Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hunger Plan

The Hunger Plan was a Nazi German policy devised in May 1941 under the direction of Herbert Backe, State Secretary in the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture, to systematically seize and redirect food resources from the Soviet Union toward sustaining German armed forces, occupation administration, and the home front by accepting the induced starvation of tens of millions in occupied territories. The plan, integrated into preparations for Operation Barbarossa, targeted urban populations, "non-productive" elements, and Soviet prisoners of war, with explicit projections for the elimination of 20 to 30 million people through famine as a means of racial reconfiguration and economic exploitation in pursuit of Lebensraum. Implementation began with the on June 22, 1941, involving the requisitioning of grain and livestock from and other fertile regions, while enforcing blockades that prevented to Leningrad, Kiev, and other cities, exacerbating pre-existing shortages into deliberate demographic reduction. Although military setbacks limited full execution—such as the prolonged and failure to capture —the policy's core mechanisms operated effectively in rear areas and camps, resulting in the deaths of over 3 million Soviet prisoners of war and an estimated 4.2 million civilians in occupied zones, primarily , , and , through enforced caloric deprivation below subsistence levels. These outcomes reflected not logistical failures alone but intentional prioritization of nutritional needs over survival, as documented in internal directives equating with a "biological necessity" for wartime provisioning. The plan's architects, including Backe and , viewed starvation as an efficient tool for and resource reallocation, bypassing slower extermination methods and aligning with Generalplan Ost's vision of agrarian colonization, though postwar accountability largely evaded key figures due to incomplete documentation and suicides like Backe's in 1947. Its partial success in diverting approximately 7 million tons of grain to underscored the regime's causal logic: trading "surplus" lives in the East for metropolitan stability amid blockade-induced shortages.

Origins and Context

Pre-War German Food Insecurities

Prior to the Nazi era, relied on imports for roughly one-third of its foodstuffs, fodder, and fertilizers, rendering it acutely vulnerable to disruptions like the Allied during , which caused severe malnutrition and over 500,000 deaths from hunger-related causes. This historical trauma, combined with the economic fallout from , the , and Treaty of Versailles restrictions on trade and territory, heightened pre-war anxieties about food security, as limited arable land supported only about 80% of basic caloric needs domestically by the early 1930s. Upon assuming power in 1933, the Nazi regime prioritized through the establishment of the Food Estate (Reichsnährstand) on September 13, which centralized control over production, pricing, and distribution, offering subsidies for fertilizers and machinery while imposing quotas to curb imports and boost output. Policies such as the "Battle for Production" campaigns in 1934–1935 targeted increased yields in grains, potatoes, and , achieving near self-sufficiency in these staples by 1939, with rising through state-directed incentives that raised prices by about 20% and stabilized farmer incomes. However, rearmament expenditures diverted resources from , and foreign exchange shortages curtailed imports of high-value items, leading to documented nutritional declines: in 1937 showed 14% less fats, 18% less meat, and reduced proteins compared to earlier baselines, contributing to a mortality with infant death rates rising 14% from 1933 to 1936. These shortcomings persisted in fats and oils, where pre-war consumption remained approximately 50% import-dependent, as domestic synthetic substitutes and crop shifts proved insufficient amid growing population demands and ideological rejection of reliance on overseas trade. The Four-Year Plan of 1936 under intensified efforts toward synthetic fat production and import substitution but failed to eliminate vulnerabilities, fostering a strategic consensus among Nazi planners that war-time blockades could precipitate without access to additional territory, thus framing food insecurity as a core rationale for .

Ideological Foundations in Nazi Expansionism

![Herbert Backe, key figure in Nazi food policy]float-right The Nazi Hunger Plan emerged from the ideological imperative of Lebensraum, the doctrine articulated by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf as necessitating the conquest of Eastern territories to provide agrarian resources and settlement space for the German Volk. This expansionist vision portrayed the Soviet Union as a vast reservoir of fertile land capable of resolving Germany's chronic food shortages, with the subjugation and exploitation of its populations seen as a prerequisite for autarky. The plan's architects rationalized mass starvation as a means to redirect food surpluses westward, aligning with the broader goal of transforming occupied lands into a German breadbasket. Central to this framework was the Nazi racial hierarchy, which deemed Slavic peoples and Bolshevik elites as Untermenschen inherently unfit to utilize the East's resources efficiently, justifying their sacrificial elimination to prioritize Aryan needs. Influenced by pseudo-scientific eugenics and anti-Slavic sentiments, Nazi theorists envisioned depopulating urban centers and industrial workers—deemed "useless eaters"—through deliberate famine, thereby freeing agricultural output for German civilians and the Wehrmacht. This genocidal logic extended the regime's pre-war agrarian policies, which emphasized racial purity in food production under figures like Richard Walther Darré, evolving into wartime expansionism. The Hunger Plan intertwined with , the SS-orchestrated blueprint for ethnic reconfiguration of , which projected the starvation and displacement of tens of millions to facilitate German colonization. Drafted under , this plan complemented the Hunger Plan by targeting "surplus" populations in food-deficit regions like for reduction, estimating up to 30 million deaths to achieve demographic balance for settlement. , as State Secretary and de facto food policy chief after 1933, embodied this synthesis, advocating ruthless exploitation rooted in his racialized view of Soviet agriculture as Bolshevik-corrupted and redeemable only through German overlordship. These foundations reflected a causal prioritization of over occupied lives, with not merely territorial but a racial imperative to secure caloric self-sufficiency amid blockade vulnerabilities exposed in . Backe's May 1941 guidelines explicitly framed the as an opportunity to "feed " by "starving ," institutionalizing ideological contempt for Eastern populations as expendable in the pursuit of a self-sustaining .

Wartime Pressures Leading to Planning

The declaration of war in triggered the Allied naval blockade, which drastically curtailed Germany's access to overseas imports that had comprised roughly one-third of pre-war , compelling a shift toward amid intensifying resource strains. Ration cards were distributed starting August 27, 1939, limiting civilians to allocations averaging approximately 3,000 calories daily, comparable to Allied levels but increasingly reliant on ersatz substitutes and black-market supplements as supplies dwindled. Domestic agricultural output, which covered only 80% of needs even in peacetime, faced further erosion from labor shortages and prioritization of industrial war production over farming inputs. By early 1941, as Nazi planners anticipated the invasion of the , these deficiencies loomed larger with the projected mobilization of over three million troops and integration of millions of forced laborers from occupied Europe, straining an already taut logistical network. Winter shortages of staples like potatoes afflicted major cities such as and , underscoring the regime's vulnerability and prompting calculations that required an additional 7 to 8 million tons of grain annually from Soviet territories to sustain the and civilian morale. Extraction from Western occupied areas, such as and , proved insufficient, as those regions' populations also demanded rations, leaving the fertile and breadbaskets as the critical target for offsetting home-front deficits. Herbert Backe, acting State Secretary in the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, centralized these imperatives, advocating a policy of deliberate deprivation in the East to redirect surpluses westward and avert collapse in the . This calculus, formalized in spring 1941 under Hermann Göring's economic oversight, reflected not ideological abstraction but pragmatic response to blockade-induced scarcity, failed synthetic alternatives, and the exponential demands of expansion.

Formulation and Key Elements

Primary Architects and Documents


, State Secretary in the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture from 1933 and de facto head of food policy after 1941, served as the primary architect of the Hunger Plan. Backe, who succeeded as the dominant figure in Nazi agrarian policy, developed the strategy to address Germany's food shortages by seizing Soviet agricultural output, calculating that diverting surpluses from southern regions like would require accepting the starvation of 20 to 30 million urban Soviet inhabitants.
The plan's core elements emerged from a of secretaries (Staatssekretäre) on 2 May 1941, convened by Hermann Göring's Four-Year Plan office, where Backe presented the food diversion policy alongside military and economic officials, including General of the Wehrmacht's War Economy and Armaments Office. The meeting's protocol documented agreement on prioritizing German food needs over Soviet civilian survival, framing as an inevitable outcome of reallocating "surplus" production from deficit urban centers to the invading armies and . Subsequent formalization occurred through the "Economic Policy Guidelines for the Agriculture Group" issued on 23 May 1941, which detailed mechanisms for exploiting Soviet territories by partitioning them into "deficit" zones (targeted for depopulation via ) and "surplus" zones (for extraction to ), signed under Göring's authority as Plenipotentiary for the Four-Year Plan. These guidelines integrated the into preparations, emphasizing rapid seizure of harvests to prevent local consumption.

Core Objectives and Targeted Reductions

The Hunger Plan's primary objective was to secure food supplies for and its armed forces by exploiting Soviet agricultural production, particularly from fertile regions like , while accepting mass in non-priority areas as a deliberate trade-off. Developed under the leadership of State Secretary in the Reich Ministry of Food and , the plan sought to extract an estimated 7 to 10 million tons of annually from occupied territories to offset domestic shortages exacerbated by the ongoing . Central to this strategy was the division of Soviet territory into "surplus" zones—primarily rural agricultural areas whose output would be requisitioned—and "" zones, encompassing centers and industrial regions where food allocation would be minimized to near-zero levels. In the pivotal meeting of state secretaries on 2 May 1941, participants, including representatives from the Four-Year Plan Office and the , endorsed a policy of systematic for these deficit areas, calculating that redirecting calories from urban consumers to German needs would sustain the invasion's logistical demands. The explicitly targeted a reduction of 20 to 30 million people through induced , viewing this "surplus" demographic—mainly city dwellers, workers in non-essential industries, and captured Soviet soldiers—as expendable to achieve caloric surpluses for the . Backe articulated this during plan discussions, estimating that western Russia's urban and non-agricultural inhabitants represented an excess that, if eliminated, would yield food equivalent to feeding the entire adequately. This figure aligned with broader Nazi economic directives, which prioritized civilian rations at 2,300 calories per day while allotting Soviet urban residents as few as 300-500 calories, ensuring death rates sufficient to meet extraction goals.

Economic and Logistical Mechanisms

The Hunger Plan's economic mechanisms were designed to treat occupied Soviet territories as a colonial resource base, extracting agricultural output to alleviate Germany's chronic food shortages while deliberately under-supplying non-productive populations. Under , who effectively controlled the Ministry of Food and Agriculture from 1941, the strategy emphasized compulsory grain deliveries from surplus-producing regions such as , where production was estimated to yield up to 3 million tons annually for export to the after minimal local allocations. These deliveries were enforced through fixed quotas imposed on collective farms and individual peasants, with payments in worthless occupation currency to incentivize compliance while preventing reinvestment in local agriculture. Rationing systems formalized this hierarchy, allocating as little as 400-800 calories per day to Soviet civilians in areas and prisoners of —far below subsistence levels—to free up surpluses, as outlined in the May 2, 1941, state secretaries' conference protocols. Backe's "12 Commandments for the of Germans in the East," issued on June 1, 1941, reinforced this by directing officials to view Soviet populations as expendable, prohibiting aid that could divert resources from German priorities. Integration with broader Nazi economics occurred via Hermann Göring's Four-Year Plan apparatus, which coordinated food extraction with industrial looting under the "Green Folder" directives, aiming to sustain 80 million s through imported foodstuffs comprising up to 14.8% of the Reich's supply by 1942-1943. Logistically, implementation depended on military-economic coordination, with tasked to secure Ukraine's harvest zones by late summer , enabling immediate foraging followed by structured collection. Specialized units, including the Wirtschaftsstab Ost's field commands and agricultural detachments, organized storage in requisitioned and via Soviet networks, which were repurposed despite gauge differences and risks; by autumn , trains carried westward, though bottlenecks limited full realization. involved punitive measures against non-compliant farmers, such as seizures and forced labor recruitment, ensuring quotas were met even as activity disrupted supply lines.

Implementation During Operation Barbarossa

Initial Seizure Operations in 1941

The initial seizure operations of the Hunger Plan were integrated into the launch of on 22 June 1941, with economic exploitation units advancing alongside the three German Army Groups (North, Center, and South). The Wirtschaftsstab Ost, formed in March 1941 under Hermann Göring's oversight as Plenipotentiary for the Four-Year Plan, coordinated these efforts through subordinate groups attached to each army group, directing the confiscation of foodstuffs from Soviet collective farms (kolkhozy), state depots, and rural stores. These units, comprising agricultural experts and SS personnel, were instructed to prioritize grain, livestock, and fats, dismantling Soviet agricultural infrastructure to redirect resources toward sustaining the Wehrmacht's advance and generating surpluses for Germany. Central to the operations was Göring's "Green Folder," a policy directive compiled in May 1941 that outlined the economic subjugation of Soviet territory, asserting that "the feeding of the German people stands first among the claims on the occupied territories" and mandating the army to procure its needs locally while denying food to Soviet urban populations deemed expendable. , as State Secretary in the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture, reinforced these guidelines with internal memoranda emphasizing total extraction, including the conversion of occupied lands into a "" for Germans through ruthless requisitioning that ignored local needs. In practice, advancing divisions conducted immediate foraging, seizing provisions from abandoned stocks and villages, while specialized commandos inventoried and transported harvests, particularly in Ukraine's breadbasket regions under . These seizures yielded substantial initial supplies for forces, with economic reports documenting the capture of grain silos and livestock herds in the path of the , though transportation bottlenecks limited shipments to the in the war's opening months. Directives explicitly prohibited feeding excess stocks to Soviet civilians or prisoners, aligning with pre-invasion calculations that projected the of 20 to 30 million "superfluous" urban dwellers to free up rural output. from Soviet scorched-earth tactics and early activity disrupted some confiscations, but the operations established a of systematic plunder that prioritized over occupied territories' stability.

Regional Applications and Adaptations

In the northern sector advanced by , the Hunger Plan was adapted to prioritize the isolation of Leningrad through encirclement and blockade, commencing on September 8, 1941, after the city's defenses prevented a direct assault. Supply routes across were severed, and explicit orders prohibited provisioning the population, resulting in daily rations dropping below 300 grams of bread per person by November 1941, which contributed to over 800,000 civilian deaths from starvation and related diseases by February 1942. This approach aligned with the plan's urban depopulation goals but was constrained by the failure to capture the city outright, leading to prolonged logistics rather than immediate evacuation and extermination. Army Group Center's operations in Belarus emphasized rapid exploitation amid partisan activity and logistical strains, where adaptations included the deliberate underfeeding of captured Soviet prisoners of war in open-air camps, with rations limited to approximately 2,200 calories daily—insufficient for basic sustenance—resulting in over 2 million POW deaths from , exposure, and between June 1941 and January 1942. In occupied urban centers like , food seizures targeted industrial workers deemed expendable, while rural areas faced requisition quotas that diverted grain to German forces, exacerbating without the structured agricultural colonization envisioned centrally; local commanders occasionally bartered food for to counter guerrillas, marking a pragmatic deviation from strict non-provisioning. Under in , the plan's implementation focused on maximizing grain extraction from the fertile black-earth regions, with established on August 20, 1941, under , who enforced quotas seizing over 5 million tons of grain by the end of 1941 for export to the , while urban civilians and "nomadic" elements like were systematically denied access. Adaptations included selective with nationalists to bolster harvests, contrasting with northern rigidity, yet Koch's directives explicitly prioritized needs, imposing rations as low as 1,000 calories daily in cities like Kiev, where killed tens of thousands by early 1942; this regional emphasis on surplus redirection partially succeeded initially due to Ukraine's agricultural capacity but faltered as Soviet counteroffensives disrupted transport. ![Soviet prisoners of war in Mauthausen concentration camp, exemplifying starvation policy application][float-right] These variations reflected local military priorities, terrain, and administrative structures—such as the more ideologically flexible in the north and center compared to Ukraine's exploitative model—yet all adhered to the core principle of sacrificing Slavic urban and "unproductive" populations to sustain the and economy.

Integration with Military Campaigns

The Hunger Plan was embedded in the military planning for through Hermann Göring's establishment of the Economic Staff East (Wirtschaftsstab Ost) on May 23, 1941, which coordinated the seizure of Soviet food resources to sustain advancing German forces while implementing starvation policies against civilians and non-essential populations. This organization, under Göring's authority as Plenipotentiary for the Four-Year Plan, operated in direct subordination to the Wehrmacht's (OKH), with specialized sections attached to Army Groups North, Center, and South to facilitate rapid exploitation as combat units secured territory. Its threefold mandate included provisioning German troops by requisitioning local foodstuffs, organizing systematic extraction of surpluses for shipment to the , and disrupting food flows to Soviet urban centers and partisans to induce . Military directives explicitly prioritized army needs over Soviet civilian sustenance, with units instructed to confiscate grain, livestock, and other provisions immediately following advances, as outlined in pre-invasion guidelines that emphasized "living off the land" to conserve transport capacity for ammunition and fuel. For instance, economic inspectorates trailed frontline divisions, assessing harvest potentials and directing collections—such as the seizure of over 1 million tons of grain in by late —while blocking rail and road supplies to cities like Leningrad and Kiev. The plan's architects, including State Secretary , collaborated with Quartermaster-General to integrate these operations, ensuring that captured Soviet prisoners of war, deemed "superfluous eaters," received minimal rations (often 500-1,000 calories daily) to divert food to combat troops. This coordination extended to scorched-earth tactics in retreats, where retreating units destroyed unevacuated food stocks to prevent Soviet recovery, though initial rapid advances in June-July enabled peak seizures before logistical strains emerged. Implementation hinged on the pace of military success, with economic units exploiting rear areas only after combat secured them; delays, such as those during the Battle of in July 1941, temporarily hampered collections but underscored the plan's reliance on uninterrupted offensives to isolate and starve urban populations. By August 1941, OKW directives reinforced this by mandating the Wehrmacht's active role in "food economy measures," including the registration and forced delivery of harvests under threat of execution, thereby fusing logistical support for the campaign with deliberate demographic reduction.

Outcomes and Immediate Effects

Starvation in Major Soviet Cities

The Hunger Plan's core mechanism for urban areas involved the systematic diversion of food supplies from Soviet cities to and civilian needs, with Nazi planners anticipating the of tens of millions in non-agricultural populations deemed "superfluous." In practice, this policy manifested most acutely in besieged or occupied cities, where forces enforced blockades, requisitioned existing stocks, and restricted civilian rations to levels insufficient for survival, often below 500 calories per day. Documents from the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture outlined these allocations, prioritizing consumption while condemning urban Soviets to "inevitable" demise through calculated underfeeding. Leningrad exemplified the plan's application during the siege initiated on September 8, 1941, when German Army Group North severed all land connections, explicitly aiming to annihilate the city's population via hunger as articulated in directives from Field Marshal Wilhelm von Leeb. By late 1941, civilian bread rations plummeted to 125 grams per day for non-workers and 250 grams for laborers, supplemented sporadically by the "Road of Life" over Lake Ladoga, which delivered only fractions of required supplies amid Luftwaffe interdiction. This resulted in over 1 million civilian deaths from starvation and associated diseases between September 1941 and January 1944, with peak mortality in the winter of 1941–1942 exceeding 4,000 daily. In occupied cities like Kiev and Kharkov, similar policies took effect post-invasion: Kiev fell on September 19, 1941, after which German administrators under imposed food seizures and work-based that favored collaborators and German personnel, leaving urban residents to or perish. Kharkov, captured in 1941, saw comparable exploitation, with Soviet urban dwellers allocated minimal grains while harvests were exported westward. These measures contributed to widespread , with historians estimating hundreds of thousands of excess deaths across Ukrainian cities from between 1941 and 1943, though military retreats in 1943 interrupted full implementation.

Rural Exploitation and Forced Labor

![Peasants driven by hunger wandering][float-right] The Nazi Hunger Plan's rural exploitation targeted the fertile agricultural regions of and , where policies mandated the seizure of and to supply German forces and civilians, often leaving local peasants with insufficient sustenance. In the established in August 1941, administrators under imposed delivery quotas requiring peasants to surrender up to 50 percent or more of their harvests, with actual extractions including 16,802 tons of and significant —such as one-third of regional by October 1941—within the first six months of . These requisitions, enforced through raids and threats, exceeded sustainable levels, compelling peasants to hand over entire harvests and face repeated confiscations even after compliance. Forced labor mobilization in rural areas supplemented these extractions, as able-bodied peasants, including women, were conscripted under to crops and maintain fields, while or failure to meet quotas resulted in arrests, evictions, or execution. The dissolved Soviet farms to ostensibly restore , but this served primarily to facilitate direct control and requisition, with peasants viewed as racial inferiors suited only for subjugation and . Soviet prisoners of , numbering over 100,000 deaths in areas like from 1941-1944, were sporadically deployed for agricultural tasks but largely perished from starvation and abuse, rendering them ineffective for sustained exploitation. Deportations amplified rural labor drain, with approximately 2.3 million Ukrainians—many from countryside villages—transported to the as Ostarbeiter between 1941 and 1944 for agricultural and industrial work, including farm labor to offset German shortages. In regions like , quotas aimed to deport one in ten residents by mid-1942, with 40,462 individuals removed by June, often after forced seizures of produce and livestock. This systematic removal of productive rural population, tied to the Hunger Plan's goal of depopulating surplus areas for German benefit, exacerbated local famine conditions, driving peasants to slaughter animals secretly or abandon fields.

Diversion to German Forces and Civilians

The Hunger Plan established a strict hierarchy of food allocation in occupied Soviet territories, prioritizing supplies for the advancing through the East and subsequent exports to the for civilian consumption. At a of state secretaries in May 1941, officials determined that provisioning the and homeland population took precedence, explicitly accepting that "millions of people will surely starve" as a consequence. This policy was coordinated by , State Secretary in the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture, who authored the plan's core directives. Mechanisms for diversion included the seizure of grain stores, livestock, and agricultural outputs by military quartermasters and economic exploitation groups immediately following territorial conquests in . Food was first allocated to sustain German forces in the field, reducing the logistical strain of long supply lines from the ; surplus was then directed westward via rail and barge transports. The plan projected the export of 8.7 million tons of food from , southern Russia, and the to , framing these regions as "deficit areas" whose populations would endure "the most terrible ." In practice, from occupied alone, Germans secured over 7 million tons of grain by , much of which supported military operations and civilian rations in the . This redirection exacerbated starvation among Soviet prisoners of war and urban civilians, as non-worker POWs received no allocations, leading to mass deaths in camps—nearly 46,000 in Polish facilities in October 1941 alone. While initial 1941 seizures provided immediate relief to German troops amid rapid advances, later organized harvests under Reich Commissariats like ensured sustained flows, with economic staff reporting deliveries fulfilling quotas for the army and exports despite partisan disruptions. Ultimately, these diversions helped maintain German civilian calorie intake above pre-war levels in some categories, at the direct expense of occupied populations.

Broader Impacts and Extensions

Application in Non-Soviet Territories

The principles underlying the Hunger Plan were applied in occupied , a non-Soviet territory invaded by on , through systematic food requisitioning and designed to prioritize German needs over local survival. In the General Government, established by decree on October 12, 1939, agricultural output was reoriented to foodstuffs to the , with officials estimating that Poland could supply up to 80% of Germany's fat needs by 1940 despite reduced production under occupation. This exploitation mirrored the Hunger Plan's logic of diverting resources from "inferior" populations, though formalized later for the Soviet Union, and was coordinated by the Ministry of Food and Agriculture under State Secretary , who influenced policies across occupied . Rations in the General Government were deliberately set below subsistence levels to weaken the population while extracting labor and produce; non-Jewish Poles received approximately 661 calories daily, compared to 2,613 for Germans, fostering and . Jewish rations were even more severe, such as 184 calories per day in the established in October 1940, contributing to over 83,000 deaths from starvation and related illnesses by mid-1942 before systematic deportations intensified. These measures, enforced by Governor , resulted in food exports from totaling millions of tons annually, sustaining German civilians and troops while local mortality from hunger-related causes reached hundreds of thousands by 1945. Similar starvation tactics extended to other non-Soviet areas, such as occupied after April 1941, where reprisal policies included withholding food supplies, leading to conditions amid partisan warfare. However, remained the primary pre-Barbarossa testing ground for these policies, with the Reich's food ministry viewing Slavic populations as expendable for , though military demands and local resistance limited full Hunger Plan-scale implementation outside the Soviet theater.

Demographic and Agricultural Consequences

The Hunger Plan's implementation caused approximately 4.7 million deaths from among Soviet civilians and prisoners of war between 1941 and 1944. This figure encompasses around 1 million fatalities during the Siege of Leningrad and 1 to 2 million Soviet POWs who succumbed in labor camps due to systematic food denial. Overall, more than 3 million Soviet POWs perished from and neglect, reflecting the policy's prioritization of over prisoner sustenance. Demographically, the plan accelerated population collapse in occupied northern and central Soviet regions by targeting urban dwellers and "surplus" eaters, achieving partial success toward the Nazis' goal of eliminating 30 million people through famine in the 1941–1942 winter. Urban areas experienced acute depopulation, with survivors often resorting to cannibalism or mass exodus, while rural zones faced selective exploitation that preserved some agricultural labor but eroded community structures. Agriculturally, German occupation forces extracted 8.7 million tons of grain and foodstuffs from and , diverting these to feed the and German civilians, which precipitated shortages for local planting and harvesting cycles. This plunder, combined with livestock slaughter and farm damage, disrupted Soviet agrarian output, contributing to sustained productivity deficits in reclaimed territories post-1944 and exacerbating risks amid ongoing warfare. Nazi attempts to reorganize farming under Commissars prioritized exports over , further degrading and seed stocks in affected districts.

Interruptions Due to Military Setbacks

The rapid advance envisioned under , essential for seizing Soviet agricultural surpluses before winter, faltered with the failure to capture in October–December 1941, culminating in a Soviet counteroffensive that inflicted over 500,000 German casualties and forced a 150–250 km retreat across the front. This disruption severed extended supply lines, prevented the consolidation of "surplus" zones in and the as delineated in the May 1941 Backe plan, and compelled German forces to divert locally procured food to sustain their own operations rather than exporting it to the . The prolonged occupation resulting from these setbacks increased the number of Soviet prisoners of war and urban populations under German control beyond initial projections, straining food allocations intended for ; by early 1942, the held approximately 3 million Soviet POWs, many of whom were deliberately underfed, but logistical breakdowns meant even were reduced, undermining the plan's efficiency in redirecting calories to German civilians and troops. Nazi planners had anticipated a swift victory allowing for the isolation and withering of deficit areas like Leningrad and , but the counteroffensive's success enabled Soviet retention of some fertile regions, reducing projected grain diversions by limiting access to pre-harvest stocks. Subsequent defeats, notably the encirclement and destruction of the German 6th Army at Stalingrad in November 1942–February 1943, resulted in over 250,000 casualties and the abandonment of advances into the , forfeiting control over vital grain-producing districts in the and regions that were targeted for intensified exploitation under adapted Hunger Plan directives. This reversal halved effective occupation zones by mid-1943, curtailing grain extractions from —from roughly 4 million tons in 1942 to sharply diminished yields amid Soviet reconquests and intensified partisan sabotage of harvest operations. The loss of these territories not only interrupted ongoing policies but also exacerbated German shortages, as retreating forces consumed or destroyed stores to deny them to advancing units, further eroding the plan's foundational premise of autarkic through conquest.

Assessments and Controversies

Attribution of Casualties

The attribution of casualties to the Nazi Hunger Plan primarily encompasses the deliberate of Soviet prisoners of war and, to a lesser extent, civilians in occupied territories during 1941–1942. Of the roughly 5.7 million Soviet soldiers captured by German forces following the on June 22, 1941, approximately 3.3 million perished in custody, with the overwhelming majority succumbing to , exposure, and attendant diseases by January 1942. This policy stemmed directly from the Hunger Plan's directive, formulated in May 1941, to allocate seized foodstuffs to the and German civilians while denying sustenance to those classified as racially inferior and militarily expendable. Historians such as attribute these over 3 million POW deaths explicitly to the Hunger Plan's implementation, emphasizing its role in a systematic extermination that prioritized German nutritional needs over the survival of captives. Nazi directives, including those from the Economic Staff East, explicitly foresaw mass mortality among POWs as a means to alleviate food shortages, with rations set below subsistence levels—often 2,000 calories daily initially, dropping further amid logistical failures. Civilian casualties are more challenging to isolate, as they intertwined with combat losses, Soviet scorched-earth tactics, and partisan warfare, yet the plan's requisitioning of rural surpluses to starve urban populations contributed significantly. In regions like and Belorussia, excess mortality from hunger in 1941–1942 is estimated in the hundreds of thousands, based on German administrative records and postwar demographic reconstructions. Overall, scholarly estimates place the Hunger Plan's total death toll at around 4.7 million, predominantly POWs but including civilians affected by enforced , though precise figures remain debated due to incomplete records and overlapping causal factors. This attribution underscores the plan's partial execution, curtailed by the Wehrmacht's stalled advance, which prevented the projected 30 million civilian deaths outlined in initial projections.

Genocide vs. Wartime Necessity Debate

The debate over the Hunger Plan revolves around whether it represented a deliberate act of genocide, driven by Nazi racial ideology aimed at the partial destruction of Slavic and other "inferior" populations, or a grim wartime expedient necessitated by Germany's acute resource shortages in a total war against the Soviet Union. Proponents of the genocide interpretation emphasize the plan's premeditated design, formulated in a May 19, 1941, conference led by Herbert Backe, Reich Minister for Food and Agriculture, where officials explicitly calculated that diverting Soviet foodstuffs to Germany would require allowing 20-30 million urban dwellers in the occupied territories to starve, framing this as a foundational element of the racial war of annihilation (Vernichtungskrieg). This view is supported by archival directives, such as Backe's December 2, 1941, guideline stating that "the war can only be continued if the Armed Forces in Russia are fed from Russia," while systematically excluding non-productive urban populations—predominantly ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, and Jews—from rations, aligning with Generalplan Ost's broader depopulation goals. Historians like Alex J. Kay argue that the plan's integration of economic exploitation with mass murder demonstrates genocidal intent, as it targeted groups deemed racially expendable, resulting in an estimated 4.2 million deliberate starvation deaths by mid-1942, independent of combat losses. This perspective critiques sources minimizing racial motives, noting that Nazi documentation consistently linked food policy to ideological elimination of "Asiatic" Bolshevism, rather than mere logistical triage. Conversely, interpretations framing the Hunger Plan as a wartime necessity highlight Germany's structural economic vulnerabilities, including pre-war reliance on 20% food imports disrupted by the British and failed efforts, which left the facing polycrisis by with domestic reserves projected to last only until 1942 without eastern conquests. , in analyzing Nazi economic planning, posits that the Hunger Plan emerged from pragmatic calculations to sustain 3 million invading troops and 80 million German civilians, redirecting an estimated 7-10 million tons of grain annually from Soviet surpluses, as urban Soviet consumers were deemed parasitically dependent on rural production in a manner incompatible with demands. Backe's own memos underscore this calculus, prioritizing over civilian sustenance in occupied areas, akin to warfare precedents, without primary evidence of standalone racial extermination quotas predating economic imperatives. This school contends that while implementation was brutal and ideologically inflected, the plan's core was causal realism: Soviet agricultural output, historically exporting 2-3 million tons pre-war, offered the only feasible offset to Germany's 1941 harvest shortfall of 1.5 million tons, rendering alternatives like negotiated imports illusory amid Allied encirclement. The tension persists in , with intentionalist scholars like prioritizing Nazi leaders' explicit starvation rhetoric—e.g., Göring's endorsement of "feeding first"—as proof of genocidal policy, while structuralists like Tooze integrate as a veneer over inexorable wartime economics, cautioning against retroactive moralism that overlooks comparable Allied or Soviet scorched-earth tactics. Empirical data, including post-invasion requisitions yielding 700,000 tons of grain by October 1941 but falling short due to disruption, supports necessity claims, yet the plan's targeting of Jewish ghettos and POW camps—where 3.3 million Soviet prisoners died of by 1942—blurs lines, as these exceeded pure utility. Modern analyses, drawing on declassified Bundesarchiv records, increasingly view it as a hybrid: ideologically framed but materially driven, with debates influenced by post-1990s emphasis on exceptionalism potentially overstating uniqueness against total war's aggregate 70-85 million deaths. No consensus exists, as source biases—e.g., Western academia's tendency to amplify Nazi —complicate neutral assessment, but verifiable memos confirm the plan's dual roots without resolving to non-genocidal famines like those in British .

Comparisons to Other Belligerents' Policies

The Nazi Hunger Plan's explicit blueprint for starving tens of millions of Soviet civilians to redirect foodstuffs to German forces and populace set it apart from contemporaneous policies of other and Allied powers, which induced indirectly through blockades, requisitions, or scorched-earth tactics but rarely via centralized extermination directives. Unlike the Plan's bureaucratic precision—outlined in a May 1941 by Herbert Bäcke targeting "non-German" urban populations for elimination through caloric deprivation—no equivalent Allied or strategy formalized hunger as the primary mechanism for mass civilian death on such a demographic scale. Japanese Imperial Army operations in , particularly the "Three Alls" policy (kill all, burn all, loot all) implemented from 1941 onward in , systematically plundered grain stores and razed farmland to cripple resistance, contributing to the 1942–1943 where 2–3 million civilians died amid , locusts, and military grain seizures that left rural caloric intake below subsistence levels. These tactics, while devastating, prioritized tactical denial of resources to Nationalist and Communist forces over wholesale civilian starvation for Japanese home consumption, differing from the Hunger Plan's economic calculus of "feeding " by depopulating lands. Allied naval blockades and aerial campaigns against and eroded food imports—reducing German civilian rations to 1,600–2,000 calories daily by 1944–1945 and prompting widespread undernutrition—but systems mitigated outright , with mortality from remaining in the low tens of thousands rather than millions, as economic historians attribute effective distribution policies to averting Soviet-scale collapses under occupation. The Soviet regime, conversely, enforced draconian requisitions from its peasantry to sustain the , exacerbating rural hunger during the 1941–1942 retreat (with up to 1 million excess deaths from underfeeding), yet framed these as improvised wartime measures without the Hunger Plan's preemptive ideological commitment to "hunger as a " against designated "inferior" groups. Precedents like the British blockade of , which from 1914–1919 intercepted foodstuffs and fertilizers leading to 424,000–763,000 civilian deaths from malnutrition-linked diseases, paralleled the Hunger Plan's instrumental use of deprivation but operated through maritime interdiction rather than on-the-ground sequestration and lacked the racial-extermination rationale central to Nazi planning. In WWII contexts, such blockades resumed against the but yielded fewer direct fatalities due to neutral shipping loopholes and autarky efforts, underscoring the Hunger Plan's outlier status in deliberate, land-based weaponization of .

Historiography and Legacy

Post-War Trials and Early Accounts

Captured German documents detailing the Hunger Plan were presented as evidence during the International Military Tribunal at (1945–1946), illustrating Nazi intentions to exploit Soviet resources through systematic deprivation of food supplies to urban populations and prisoners of war. Key exhibits included records of policy discussions, such as Nuremberg Document 221-L from the , 1941, conference, which outlined the redirection of foodstuffs from Soviet civilians to support German military and civilian needs, contributing to charges of planning aggressive war and . Despite this documentation, the Hunger Plan's implementation via was not charged as a distinct offense, as prevailing at the time did not explicitly criminalize famine inducement as a method of warfare, with Allied prosecutors prioritizing overt acts of violence and extermination over economic policies. Subsequent proceedings, including the Ministries Case (1947–1948), examined related economic exploitation but yielded no convictions directly tied to the plan's starvation mechanisms. , the primary architect as State Secretary for Food and , was detained by British authorities in May 1945 but died by suicide on April 6, 1947, while in Allied custody at , thereby escaping prosecution. Initial post-war accounts emerged from Allied and Soviet analyses of seized records, with Soviet reports emphasizing the plan's deliberate genocidal aim toward 30 million civilians to alleviate German food shortages. These early narratives, supported by internal Nazi memoranda like the , 1941, policy outline, portrayed the scheme as integral to racial and expansionist ideology, though Western interpretations in the immediate aftermath often framed it more as a ruthless wartime expediency than premeditated , reflecting differing geopolitical priorities and incomplete access to full archives.

Modern Scholarship on Intent and Scale

Modern historians, drawing on declassified Soviet archives and Nazi bureaucratic records since the , have established the Hunger Plan as a deliberate formulated in May 1941 under , aiming to redirect Soviet food supplies to Germany by systematically starving non-German populations deemed expendable. Scholars such as emphasize its roots in Nazi economic imperatives for , where expansion into the east was predicated on eliminating urban consumers in occupied territories to free up agricultural output for the and civilians, integrating racial ideology with resource calculus. This intent is evidenced by internal memos, including Backe's outline prioritizing German needs over lives, framing starvation not as collateral but as a core mechanism of conquest. Timothy Snyder, in analyzing the plan's alignment with Generalplan Ost, argues it targeted approximately 30 million Soviet citizens—primarily urban dwellers and "Bolshevik elements"—through enforced famine, with implementation beginning immediately after on June 22, 1941, though logistical failures limited full execution. corroborates this scale, documenting how directives from the Ministry of Food and Agriculture projected the deaths of 20-30 million to achieve food surpluses of up to 7 million tons annually for export to , based on caloric that allocated just 400-800 calories daily to targeted groups versus 2,600 for Germans. Actual outcomes included the of over 3 million Soviet prisoners of war by February 1942, alongside civilian famines in cities like Leningrad and Kiev, totaling 4-7 million excess deaths attributable to the policy by 1943, per demographic reconstructions. Debates persist on the plan's genocidal framing versus wartime expediency, with Gerlach highlighting decentralized execution amid ideological consensus rather than a singular Hitler order, yet underscoring as a premeditated tool of akin to but distinct from gassing operations. Tooze and Snyder reject minimization as economic "necessity," noting documentary evidence of explicit extermination rhetoric—e.g., Goering's directive to "ruthlessly" exploit the east—revealing a causal chain from autarkic to demographic , unmitigated by . Recent works, including Alex J. Kay's analyses, affirm the plan's scale through transport records showing grain seizures exceeding 1 million tons monthly from alone in late , prioritizing export over local sustenance. These findings counter earlier narratives that downplayed intentionality, establishing the Hunger Plan as a blueprint for engineered integral to Nazi .

Implications for Total War Doctrines

The exemplified an extreme extension of doctrines, integrating deliberate civilian starvation into to secure resources for the German . Conceived between March and May 1941 by State Secretary under Hermann Göring's oversight, the plan projected redirecting 8.7 million tons of foodstuffs from Soviet agricultural surpluses—primarily —to feed the and German civilians, explicitly accepting the deaths of 20-30 million urban Soviets and POWs classified as non-producers. This built on experiences, where Allied blockades had caused German food shortages killing over 700,000 civilians, prompting Nazi leaders to prioritize preemptive economic warfare against the USSR to avert similar vulnerabilities during launched on June 22, 1941. Unlike Erich Ludendorff's earlier formulation of —which emphasized domestic mobilization of industry, labor, and propaganda for sustained conflict without direct civilian targeting—the Nazi application weaponized enemy demographics as a resource pool, subordinating occupied populations to German sustenance under the imperative. Implementation involved requisitioning grain and livestock, enforcing urban sieges like Leningrad (September 1941-January 1944, causing ~1 million deaths), and starving 3.3 million Soviet POWs in camps by denying rations below 2,000 calories daily, yielding short-term gains of 700,000 tons of grain by late 1941 but at the cost of 4.2 million total famine-related deaths through 1944. This doctrine treated food allocation as a zero-sum , where Soviet industrial workers' elimination freed calories for forces, reflecting a causal logic of prioritizing invader over conquered . The plan's implications underscore total war's potential for escalatory feedback loops, where ideological framing—racial inferiority justifying mass culling—enabled policies empirically counterproductive long-term, as partisan resistance and overextended supply lines eroded gains, contributing to German defeats at Moscow (December 1941) and Stalingrad (February 1943). Strategically, it demonstrated starvation's efficiency as asymmetric warfare, requiring minimal troops for maximal disruption, yet its underachievement (due to black markets and Soviet resilience) highlighted doctrinal flaws in assuming compliant enemy collapse. Post-1945, the Hunger Plan informed realist critiques of total war's moral hazards, influencing Article 54 of Additional Protocol I (1977) banning starvation tactics, while Nuremberg-era acquittals of siege commanders affirmed pre-existing customs tolerating such methods under military necessity, absent explicit extermination intent.

References

  1. [1]
    The Reich's forgotten atrocity | Timothy Snyder - The Guardian
    Oct 21, 2010 · Timothy Snyder: The Nazi plan to starve 30 million people in the east went unrealised. But more than 3 million Soviet POWs were murdered.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Hitler's Hunger Plan, Native American resettlement and starvation in ...
    Nov 9, 2009 · Yale historian Timothy Snyder has described the Hunger Plan as a largely forgotten atrocity, although he estimates that 4.2 million Soviets.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Dossier: The Hunger Plan: The Holocaust, Resource Scarcity, and ...
    Jul 7, 2022 · Resource scarcity in Nazi Germany, both real and threatened, contributed to the ... Timothy Snyder, Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and ...
  4. [4]
    Hitler's Hunger Plan | Nobel Peace Center
    May 18, 2021 · Photo: Hübner, Bundesarchiv. SS and the Reichssicherheitshauptamt ... Nazi Germany saw starvation as an effective way of implementing ...
  5. [5]
    Food and the First World War in Germany
    Apr 29, 2015 · In 1914 Germany depended on imports for about a third of her foodstuffs, fodder and fertiliser, and these were affected by, among other things, ...Missing: insecurity II statistics
  6. [6]
    Food Fights | The Nation
    Mar 27, 2012 · More than half a million Germans died from malnutrition as a result of an Allied blockade of Germany's overseas food supplies.
  7. [7]
    German Responses to Food Scarcity | Hunger in War and Peace
    In addition to importing between 25 and 30 per cent of its foodstuffs, Germany was increasingly reliant on the import of foreign fertilizer to increase yields.Missing: pre- II
  8. [8]
    [PDF] CRISIS IN NAZI GERMANY, 1933-1937 - ifo Institut
    Expenditures on rearmament grew at the expense of public health measures. Food imports were curtailed, and prices of many agricultural products were controlled.
  9. [9]
    Autarky: Fantasy or Reality? | Richard J Evans
    Germany became self-sufficient in bread, potatoes, sugar and meat by 1939. But there were more jobs in towns, pay was better there, and conscription took away ...
  10. [10]
    Employment and living standards - Life in Nazi Germany, 1933-1939
    By 1937, agricultural prices had increased by 20 per cent and agricultural wages rose more quickly than those in industry. The Hereditary Farm Law of 1933 ...
  11. [11]
    The Food Problem in the German War Economy - jstor
    Import conditions during the first two years of the World War were incomparably more favorable. Total food imports during the first year were still about ...Missing: insecurity | Show results with:insecurity
  12. [12]
    CQ Researcher - European Food Resources
    Prewar consumption of fats was 50 per cent dependent on imports. Even if all ... Some food imports are received via Germany. More than 8 million pounds ...
  13. [13]
    the mortality and nutritional crisis in Nazi Germany, 1933–1937
    In addition, food imports were curtailed, and prices of many agricultural products were controlled. There is ample evidence that this set of economic policies ...
  14. [14]
    Nazi Agrarian Politics in the Occupied Territories of the Soviet Union
    Feb 1, 2009 · Im Zentrum der Analyse steht Herbert Backe, der 'zweite Mann' in der landwirtschaftlichen Verwaltung. ... hunger plan'. This, however, can ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] THE QUEST FOR RACIAL PURITY:
    ROM THE MOMENT THAT HITLER TOOk POWER IN GERMANY, HE BEGAN IMPLEMENTING his vision for a new Germany—one that elevated “Aryan” Germans to the top of the.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Nazi Plans for and Use of Famine in Eastern Europe
    May 1, 2025 · 23 Christian Streit, "The German Army and the Policies of Genocide," in The. Policies of Genocide. Jews and Soviet Prisoners of War in Nazi ...
  17. [17]
    Life In Nazi Germany: Food & Drink Used To Control The Population
    Oct 27, 2022 · The shortages in food drove more of the affluent Germans to use their money and connections to circumvent the rationing system, or at least ...
  18. [18]
    The famines of WWII - CEPR
    Sep 2, 2019 · Of WWII's warring powers only the Soviet Union suffered mass starvation, but as this column, part of a Vox debate on the economics of WWII, ...
  19. [19]
    Nazi Agrarian Politics in the Occupied Territories of the Soviet Union
    Herbert Backe, 'Grosser Bericht', BAK N 1075, no. 3, 1. A copy of the ... for the 'hunger plan' that bore his handwriting. See the notes of the ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  20. [20]
    The Meeting of the Staatssekretäre on 2 May 1941 and the Wehrmacht
    Mar 7, 2025 · ... hunger plan') against the Soviet civilian population and the ... 17 'Wirtschaftspolitische Richtlinien der Gruppe Landwirtschaft', 23 May 1941, in ...
  21. [21]
    Germany's Staatssekretäre, Mass Starvation and the Meeting of 2 ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · ... Hunger Plan." [25][26][27][28] [29] ... The Meeting of the Staatssekretäre on 2 May 1941 and the Wehrmacht: A Document up for Discussion.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Starvation Genocide and the Triumph of Raphael Lemkin - PMC - NIH
    ... Hunger Plan.”– Designed to assure food supplies for ... The meeting of the Staatssekretäre on 2 May 1941 and the Wehrmacht: A document for discussion.
  23. [23]
    German Economic Plans for the Occupied Soviet Union and their ...
    Neither in the economic guidelines of 23 May 1941 nor in the preinvasion plans of designated Reich Minister for the Occupied Eastern Territories Alfred ...
  24. [24]
    The Nazis' Nightmarish Plan to Starve the Soviet Union - JSTOR Daily
    Feb 21, 2017 · Before the infamous Wannsee conference, Nazis had another meeting during which they planned the mass starvation of millions of Eastern ...
  25. [25]
    Germany's Staatssekretäre, Mass Starvation and the Meeting of 2 ...
    On 2 May 1941, seven weeks before the launch of Operation Barbarossa, a meeting of senior German officials, including many ministers' deputies, ...Missing: Hunger | Show results with:Hunger
  26. [26]
    Hunger-Plan | Operations & Codenames of WWII
    The 'Hunger-Plan' may have been made almost as soon as Adolf Hitler in December 1940 revealed his intention to invade the USSR, and by 2 May 1941 the concept ...
  27. [27]
    Starvation Genocide in Occupied Eastern Europe 1939-1945
    The genocide effected by the Nazi regime during World War II, intended for the local population in Eastern Europe, took the form of allocation of daily food ...
  28. [28]
    Immeasurable Brutality, the Nazi–Soviet War 1941–1945
    Jun 19, 2024 · Credit: Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-212-0214-08A/Hansen/CC-BY-SA 3.0 ... Hunger Plan, or Starvation Plan. Essentially, the agricultural ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] “The Purpose of the Russian Campaign Is the Decimation of the ...
    Staff East (Wirtschaftsstab Ost, Wi Stab Ost). Three days later, on March 28 ... Soviet Union would starve during 1941.88 The acquisition of ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Occupying Ukraine: Great Expectations, Failed Opportunities, and ...
    For a full list of goods confiscated by the Wirtschaftsstab Ost and related military organizations, see “Sammelmeldung über erkundete, abtransportierte ...
  32. [32]
    Leningrad: The city that refused to starve – DW – 09/08/2016
    Sep 8, 2016 · It was Leningrad, not Stalingrad that was the Eastern Front's real World War II humanitarian disaster. Nazi Germany sent hundreds of thousands of civilians to ...
  33. [33]
    The Treatment of Soviet POWs: Starvation, Disease, and Shootings ...
    The Nazi treatment of Soviet prisoners of war (POWs) was determined by Nazi ideology. Cruel conditions included starvation, no medical care, and death.Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  34. [34]
    Famine As an Instrument of Nazi Occupation Policy in Ukraine, 1941 ...
    Apr 28, 2021 · The article examines a range of questions tied to Nazi Germany's socio-economic policies in occupied Ukraine during World War II.
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Nazi Empire-Building and the Holocaust in Ukraine - Diasporiana
    During the course of the occupation, the Nazi abuse of Ukrainian forced labor became one of the more dominant features of the commissars' rule. Hun- dreds ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] World War II, Displacement, and the Making of the Postwar ...
    ... starvation of millions of Ukrainians.13. While Backe's “Hunger Plan” promised Hitler that the occupation of Ukraine would free. Germany from every economic ...
  38. [38]
    Famine As an Instrument of Nazi Occupation Policy in Ukraine, 1941 ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The systematic seizure of food for the needs of the Wehrmacht, the Reich ... The Hunger Plan instrumentalized food for appropriation ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] HITLER'S FORGOTTEN GENOCIDES: THE FATE OF SOVIET ...
    May 1941, it was decided that providing food for the Wehrmacht and for. Germany had the highest priority; “as a result, millions of people will surely starve ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] case western reserve university school of law the nazi hunger plan ...
    Despite the fact that 4.7 million people were murdered under the Hunger Plan, neither. Herbert Backe, Hermann Göring, nor Walter Darré (Reich Minister of Food ...
  41. [41]
    Bread and Conflict in Ukraine | Essay - Zócalo Public Square
    Jun 22, 2022 · ... Hunger Plan,” to sustain the Third Reich and impose death by ... By 1942, Germans consumed more than 7 million tons of Ukrainian grain and tens of ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] THE HOLOCAUST IN UKRAINE
    Dear colleagues, survivors of the Holocaust, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen: It is a great pleasure for me to welcome you to the opening of this ...
  43. [43]
    The Nazi Invasion (Chapter 1) - The Atrocity of Hunger
    The German invasion and early occupation of Poland drained the resources of Jews and their communities even before ghettoization. On the individual and ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Warsaw | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    Feb 22, 2023 · The Germans set a food ration for Jews at just 181 calories a day. By August 1941, more than 5,000 people a month succumbed to starvation and ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Malum in se
    69 The Nazi Hunger Plan, which planned to kill thirty million people, ultimately killed around 4.7 million.70 Had it succeeded, it would have been the worst ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Personal Reflections on Bloodlands - Rice University
    Jan 1, 2012 · ” The “Hunger Plan” was for thirty million people to be starved to death in the winter of. 1941–42, diverting food to Germany. There was to ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  47. [47]
    Operation 'Barbarossa' And Germany's Failure In The Soviet Union
    World War 2: Operation Barbarossa. Tthe invasion of the Soviet Union by Nazi Germany starting on Sunday, 22 June 1941 but why did it fail?Missing: implementation | Show results with:implementation<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Operation Barbarossa | Lies, Liars, Beatniks & Hippies: War
    The Soviet counteroffensives in the winter of 1941 caused heavy casualties ... The Hunger Plan was abandoned in its original conception, and applied ...
  49. [49]
    Exploitation, Resettlement, Mass Murder: Political and Economic ...
    Alex J. Kay. 256 pages, Bibliog., Index. ISBN 978-1-84545-186-8 $135.00 ... " Holocaust and Genocide Studies. "This is an original, richly detailed, and ...Missing: Hunger | Show results with:Hunger
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Tooze, Adam - The Wages of Destruction The Making and Breaking ...
    Adam Tooze has written the first radically new account of the. Second World War in a generation. He does this by placing economics alongside race and politics ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The Wages Of Destruction Text Only By A Tooze
    The plan created a famine as an act of policy, killing millions of people. The Hunger Plan was first formulated by senior German officials during a.
  52. [52]
    Hunger as a weapon of war: Hitler's Hunger Plan, Native American ...
    This effort, known as the “Hunger Plan” (der Hungerplan) was led by Nazi Food Minister Herbert Backe, and was intended to create a vast opening in the rich ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  53. [53]
    Military Metabolism and the Henan Famine of 1942–1943 (Chapter 3)
    The Japanese occupied China's major revenue-producing regions in 1940–1941 and reduced government revenues at a time when expenditures were growing tremendously ...
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Stalin & Hitler: Mass Murder by Starvation | Timothy Snyder
    Jun 21, 2012 · Stalin & Hitler: Mass Murder by Starvation. Timothy Snyder. Anna Reid's 'Leningrad: The Epic Siege of World War II, 1941–1944'.
  56. [56]
    Naval Blockade (of Germany) - 1914-1918 Online
    Jan 22, 2020 · The Allied blockade (1914-1919), which aimed to prevent war supplies reaching Germany, ultimately also targeted the civilian population.
  57. [57]
    Blockade and economic warfare (Chapter 18)
    This chapter describes the British hunger blockade and economic warfare of Germany during the First World War.
  58. [58]
    1 - Hitler, the Nazi Leadership, and the Evolution of the “Final Solution”
    Clearly, the Hunger Plan implied the genocide of Soviet Jews, since Jews lived ... 86–94 (Nuremberg Document 221-L, conference of 16 July 1941). 38 P ...
  59. [59]
    Structures, Players, and Processes (Part I) - The Cambridge History ...
    May 21, 2025 · ... Hunger Plan” to ensure food supplies for the Wehrmacht at the ... 86–94 (Nuremberg Document 221-L, conference of 16 July 1941). 38 P ...
  60. [60]
    Operation Starvation, expanded version 2 | World Peace Foundation
    Jun 19, 2017 · The Allies were in no hurry to criminalise famine or economic warfare more generally. By the standards of recent war crimes prosecutions, which ...
  61. [61]
    07 Apr 1947 - Ex-Minister's Suicide - Trove
    London, April 6.—Herbert Backe, Nazi Minister of Pood and Agriculture during the war, committed suicide in the Nuremberg prison ...
  62. [62]
    Backe, Herbert | Sciences Po Mass Violence and Resistance
    Feb 23, 2009 · Born in Georgia, Backe was named Minister of Food in May 1942 and Minister of Agriculture in April 1944. He replaced Walther Darré who was dismissed.
  63. [63]
    Hunger policies and mass murder (Chapter 9) - The Extermination of ...
    Before the war, Hitler had already emphasized that territorial expansion was necessary for German food autarchy. In Mein Kampf he had portrayed starvation as a ...Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties
  64. [64]
    The Extermination of the European Jews. By Christian Gerlach. New ...
    The heart of Gerlach's work lies in his approach to mass killing decisions. He points out that there was no central planning or apparatus concerning Europe's ...Missing: Hunger | Show results with:Hunger
  65. [65]
    Why did the Germany's Total War against the Soviet Union cause ...
    Sep 7, 2022 · This essay will analyse the effect of German policies on the occupied civilian population by looking at six factors that caused civilian deaths.<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Starvation Crimes and International Law: A New Era - CSIS
    Dec 4, 2024 · Indiscriminate bombing of civilian infrastructure. Denial of humanitarian assistance. Medieval sieges of populations centers.