Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

The Plan

The Plan is a core tenet of the QAnon movement, denoting an alleged covert operation orchestrated by former U.S. President Donald Trump, in alliance with loyal elements of the military and intelligence apparatus, to dismantle a supposed global "cabal" of elites engaged in child sex trafficking, adrenochrome harvesting, and satanic rituals while controlling governments, media, and financial systems through a "deep state." Adherents maintain that this plan, revealed through anonymous "Q drops" on imageboards since 2017, culminates in "The Storm"—a series of mass arrests exposing the cabal—and a subsequent "Great Awakening" of public consciousness to these truths, encapsulated in the mantra "Trust the Plan." The narrative posits as a messianic figure strategically positioned to counter the cabal's influence, with apparent setbacks like election losses or legal challenges framed as deliberate ruses to lure enemies into overreach. Empirical verification of the plan's existence remains absent, as predicted events such as Hillary Clinton's arrest in 2017 or widespread executions have not materialized, leading critics to classify as a baseless amplified by online echo chambers. However, its influence extended into mainstream politics, with QAnon-aligned candidates like gaining congressional seats and the movement's rhetoric intersecting with events like the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, where participants invoked "The Storm." Source evaluations reveal challenges in assessing QAnon's claims: institutional outlets like and , often exhibiting left-leaning biases, predominantly frame it as dangerous disinformation without engaging underlying allegations of elite misconduct, such as those later partially corroborated in cases like Jeffrey Epstein's network. Conversely, primary QAnon interpretations derive from unverified anonymous posts, underscoring the theory's reliance on faith over falsifiable evidence, though its persistence post-2020 election underscores cultural distrust in official narratives.

Background and Origins

Historical Context of Pandemic Preparedness

In the decade prior to 2020, substantial public funding supported research on bat coronaviruses with potential for human spillover, including experiments at the (WIV). The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) awarded a totaling $3.7 million to from 2014 to 2019, of which approximately $600,000 was subawarded to the WIV for projects involving the sampling, sequencing, and laboratory enhancement of bat coronaviruses to assess risks. These efforts included serial passaging of chimeric viruses in humanized mice and bat cells to evaluate increased transmissibility, work that some experts classified as despite a 2014-2017 U.S. funding pause on such studies for , , and viruses. On October 18, 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, partnering with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a fictional coronavirus pandemic originating from South American pig farms and spreading via international travel, projecting 65 million deaths over 18 months alongside economic disruptions and governance challenges. Participants comprised approximately 15 leaders from global business (e.g., pharmaceutical executives), government, public health organizations, and media outlets, tasked with role-playing crisis response decisions such as travel restrictions and vaccine prioritization. Preceding such simulations, philanthropic scenario planning had explored pandemic contingencies, as in the Rockefeller Foundation's 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, which outlined "Lock Step"—a hypothetical path where a novel influenza-like pandemic emerges in 2012, infects 20% of the world population, causes 8 million deaths in 7 months, and triggers prolonged national quarantines, mask mandates, and top-down governance to enforce compliance and rebuild economies. This framework emphasized technology's role in surveillance and control during crises, illustrating institutional foresight into lockdown-style measures years before their widespread adoption.

Emergence of the Theory in Early 2020

The "Plan" theory, positing that the was orchestrated by powerful entities for motives including and economic reconfiguration, first coalesced in public discourse during April 2020 amid mounting observations of inconsistencies between government directives and epidemiological patterns, such as variable case fatality rates across regions and delays in acknowledging alternative origins. A pivotal catalyst was the release of ": Indoctornation" Part 1, a 26-minute video interview with virologist produced by filmmaker Mikki Willis and posted to platforms on April 28, 2020. In it, Mikovits, citing her prior research on retroviruses, claimed that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director had suppressed treatments like for political gain and that funded by U.S. agencies contributed to engineered pathogens released intentionally. The video achieved explosive virality, garnering over 5 million views across platforms including , , and within the first 24 hours before widespread removals for alleged violations. Platforms like deleted shares en masse starting May 4, 2020, while terminated related channels, prompting accusations of coordinated that further amplified alternative channels and downloads exceeding 10 million by mid-May. This suppression, occurring as official narratives emphasized zoonotic spillover without addressing lab-leak possibilities raised in internal intelligence reports, fueled perceptions of a controlled information environment inconsistent with transparent science. By July 2020, the theory's foundational claims expanded with whistleblower accounts reinforcing premeditation. On July 10, virologist , who had researched coronaviruses at the School of and fled to the in April, publicly asserted in a that bore genetic signatures of laboratory manipulation at the , with data withheld by Chinese authorities and echoed by affiliates. Yan's allegations, detailed in preprints she co-authored later that year claiming furin cleavage site insertions unnatural to wildlife coronaviruses, aligned with "The Plan" by implicating state-sponsored bioweapon development and global cover-ups, drawing from her access to unpublished sequences in early 2020. These early articulations, disseminated via amid platform , marked the theory's shift from fringe speculation to a structured narrative challenging dominant zoonotic explanations.

Key Components of the Alleged Plan

Simulated Exercises and Predictions

Event 201, a high-level pandemic tabletop exercise, was conducted on October 18, 2019, in by the Center for Health Security, in collaboration with the and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The simulation depicted a novel zoonotic originating from pigs at a South American market, transmitted via international , resulting in over 65 million deaths within 18 months, trillions in economic losses, and widespread disruptions to global supply chains and trade. Participants, including representatives from , government, and sectors, discussed challenges such as halting international travel, enforcing shutdowns to maintain essential operations, and combating that exacerbated public non-compliance and strained communication efforts. Proponents of the theory interpret these elements—global spread of a , economic halts, and behavioral management issues—as strikingly aligned with the outbreak that emerged weeks later in , . Earlier, Clade X, another Johns Hopkins-led exercise held on May 15, 2018, in Washington, D.C., simulated a severe caused by a novel Paramyxovirus spreading from , leading to 900 million global infections and 150 million deaths over 18 months. The scenario highlighted policy gaps in coordinating national responses, including overwhelmed diagnostic capacities, shortages in medical countermeasures, and cascading effects on food supply chains due to workforce absences and border closures. Discussions emphasized the need for international behavioral interventions, such as promoting voluntary quarantines and public adherence to hygiene protocols amid rising societal unrest, with outcomes underscoring delays in deployment and economic ripple effects from disrupted . These simulated contingencies, including supply vulnerabilities and the enforcement of population-level controls, have been cited by skeptics as prescient parallels to real-world responses involving similar disruptions and compliance strategies. In a March 2015 Talk, warned of an impending highly infectious respiratory virus potentially killing tens of millions, stressing the inadequacy of military-style preparedness in favor of rapid production, germ games (simulations), and systems to isolate cases and trace contacts. Gates highlighted risks over traditional bioweapon scenarios, advocating for global coordination to avoid from unchecked spread, a view echoed in his foundation's support for subsequent exercises like Event 201. Interpretations within the frame these pre-2020 statements and drills as indicative of foreknowledge or rehearsal, given alignments with policies, pushes, and breakdowns observed from early 2020 onward, though official accounts attribute them to standard risk forecasting based on prior outbreaks like and .

Biomedical Research Ties

The (NIH) awarded a (R01AI110964) in 2014, totaling approximately $3.7 million over six years, to study the emergence of bat coronaviruses, with nearly $600,000 subawarded to the (WIV) for fieldwork and viral sequencing. This funding supported experiments involving chimeric bat coronaviruses, including serial passaging in humanized mice and cell cultures, which NIH later acknowledged enhanced pathogenicity in some cases, though officials initially classified it outside the gain-of-function (GoF) moratorium framework. In May 2024 congressional testimony, NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak confirmed that such research constituted GoF under enhanced potential pandemic pathogen criteria, highlighting failures in oversight and reporting by EcoHealth. In March 2018, submitted the DEFUSE proposal to the , seeking $14.2 million to engineer SARS-like bat coronaviruses by inserting human-specific cleavage sites (FCS)—a polybasic cleavage site absent in naturally occurring SARS-CoV precursors but present in —along with other receptor-binding optimizations, in collaboration with WIV researchers and , and virologist Ralph Baric. rejected the proposal later that year, citing risks and ethical concerns over enhancing transmissibility and pathogenicity in viruses lacking natural FCS. Despite the rejection, elements of the proposed work aligned with documented WIV activities under NIH-funded projects, including bat coronavirus sampling and manipulation, raising questions about parallel efforts funded elsewhere. Historical precedents underscore state incentives for dual-use biodefense research that could enable pathogen engineering. The U.S. biological weapons program, initiated in the 1940s, developed weaponized anthrax and other agents until President Nixon terminated offensive efforts in 1969, shifting to defensive research under programs like those at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick. The 2001 Amerithrax attacks, involving letters containing aerosolized anthrax spores that killed five and infected 17, traced the strain (Ames) to USAMRIID stocks, with FBI investigations concluding in 2010 that researcher Bruce Ivins acted alone using lab materials, though independent reviews have questioned the lone-actor narrative and highlighted vulnerabilities in secure facilities. These incidents demonstrate how national security imperatives can drive capabilities for pathogen manipulation, even absent explicit weaponization intent, paralleling modern GoF pursuits justified as preparedness against natural threats.

Policy and Economic Measures

The declared a on March 11, 2020, prompting swift adoption of policies across multiple continents. Within weeks, countries including (nationwide lockdown March 9), (March 14), (March 17), and the (state-level measures escalating from mid-March) imposed restrictions on movement, gatherings, and commerce, affecting over 3.9 billion people by early April. These interventions occurred amid emerging data on case fatality rates, with initial global estimates ranging from 2% to 5% based on reported cases in and early European outbreaks, figures that some analysts argued did not immediately warrant universal suppression strategies given uncertainties in testing and spread.30244-9/fulltext) Proponents of pre-planning theories highlight the synchronized rollout—coordinated via WHO guidance and bilateral agreements—as indicative of templated responses rather than independent assessments of local . Economic policies intertwined with health measures emphasized restructuring over mere recovery. In June 2020, the launched the initiative, describing the pandemic as a "rare but narrow to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world" toward equitable, sustainable capitalism, including shifts to stakeholder models, investments, and reduced reliance on . The framework, articulated by WEF founder in a June 3 , proposed leveraging crisis-induced disruptions for reforms like , for developing nations, and accelerated , with endorsements from figures including then-Prince . Critics of official narratives, drawing on first-principles evaluation of incentives, contend this explicit linkage of the outbreak to long-term economic redesign—predating full vaccine availability—reflects opportunistic alignment with prior globalist agendas, though WEF documents frame it as adaptive resilience-building. Pre-outbreak initiatives laid groundwork for post-pandemic verification systems. The Alliance, established in 2018 with partners including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and , announced on September 20, 2019, a pilot program in to embed digital identities within routine infant vaccinations, using biometric-linked records to create verifiable IDs for over 1 million children via , the Vaccine Alliance. This effort aimed to address identity gaps for the estimated 1 billion people without formal documentation, positioning immunization platforms as vectors for scalable, privacy-preserving digital infrastructure compatible with and . During the crisis, such systems informed proposals for vaccine credentialing, including EU Digital COVID Certificates and similar national apps, which theorists cite as evidence of forestructured pathways for mandated compliance, despite ID2020's stated focus on voluntary, inclusive access predating emergence. These elements, per causal analysis in skeptical literature, suggest policy architectures primed for enforcement mechanisms like travel restrictions and workplace requirements implemented later in 2020-2021.

Empirical Evidence and Causal Analysis

Documentary and FOIA Revelations

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests released over 3,000 pages of emails from Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in June 2021, revealing private discussions in January and February 2020 about the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 originated from a laboratory accident in Wuhan. On January 31, 2020, virologist Kristian Andersen emailed Fauci stating that some features of the virus "look engineered" and potentially inconsistent with natural evolution. Following a February 1, 2020, teleconference with Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins, Andersen and co-authors drafted the March 2020 paper "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," which publicly dismissed lab-leak scenarios as implausible despite initial private concerns. These emails highlighted discrepancies between internal assessments and subsequent public messaging that labeled lab-leak hypotheses as conspiracy theories. The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic's December 2024 final report, spanning 500 pages, documented systemic efforts to suppress inquiry into a lab origin, including NIH funding of at the via and the orchestration of the "Proximal Origin" paper to counter lab-leak discussions. The report cited emails and testimonies showing Fauci's advisor Morens using to evade FOIA and discussing strategies to shield grant details related to risky research. Classified State Department documents reviewed by the subcommittee in 2024 further indicated a lab-related incident as the likely progenitor, with calls for underscoring ongoing barriers. Operation Warp Speed, announced on May 15, 2020, involved contracts totaling billions for vaccine candidates, such as the July 2020 agreement with for up to 500 million doses, authorizing at-risk manufacturing prior to phase III completion. These arrangements relied on liability immunities under the PREP Act declaration of March 10, 2020, which shielded manufacturers from claims except for willful misconduct, facilitating rapid deployment without standard legal recourse. analyses of these contracts noted the unprecedented scale of pre-trial commitments, raising questions about risk allocation and oversight in emergency authorizations. Such documents exposed gaps in public disclosure regarding the accelerated timeline and indemnifications preceding full data.

Anomalies in Disease Patterns and Responses

The of features a polybasic cleavage site (FCS) at the S1/S2 boundary, consisting of the arginine-rich insertion PRRA, which facilitates proteolytic and enhances entry efficiency. This FCS is absent in the closest known relatives, including and bat RaTG13, and occurs rarely among natural sarbecoviruses, with no exact matches in wildlife surveys of over 1,000 sequences prior to 2020. While FCS motifs exist in some distant coronaviruses like MERS-CoV, their presence in 's specific genomic context has been argued to deviate from natural evolutionary patterns in this lineage, as natural acquisition would require improbable convergent insertions without intermediates observed in progenitors. further reveals the PRRA motif aligns more closely with human mRNA transcripts than bat-derived sequences, raising questions about potential non-natural assembly. An initial bioinformatics study in January 2020 identified four short insertions in the with partial sequence similarity to regions in HIV-1 gp120 and proteins, unique among surveyed coronaviruses and potentially enhancing receptor binding. These inserts, totaling 19 nucleotides without in-frame stop codons, were posited as unlikely to arise randomly due to codon usage biases favoring lab manipulation over natural recombination. Although critiqued and withdrawn amid broader genomic reanalyses denying HIV-specific , the observation underscored early uncertainties in the virus's receptor-binding domain evolution, distinct from sarbecovirus norms. Epidemiological data from early hotspots revealed discrepancies between reported cases and mortality patterns. In Province, , excess all-cause deaths from March to April 2020 equated to 0.57% of the population—among Europe's highest—yet official attributions captured only about two-thirds of this excess, with estimates placing true pandemic-linked fatalities at 52,000 nationally by mid-April versus 21,000 reported, attributable to overwhelmed testing and reporting amid peak incidence. Globally, some regions exhibited mortality surges preceding widespread PCR-confirmed cases, as delays in testing rollout (e.g., 's national protocol formalized March 2020) led to underascertainment, with excess deaths correlating more strongly with inferred transmission waves than contemporaneous case logs. Treatment response anomalies centered on repurposed antivirals showing early efficacy signals in mild cases but subsequent dismissal. Small outpatient studies in 2020, such as one combining low-dose (HCQ) with and , reported 84% reduced hospitalization risk and faster symptom resolution versus controls, leveraging HCQ's properties to potentiate 's antiviral effects. Similarly, preliminary data from assays and pilot clinical observations indicated dose-dependent reductions and symptom amelioration in early infection stages. However, major RCTs like WHO's trial (enrolling over 11,000 hospitalized patients by October 2020) found no in-hospital mortality benefit for HCQ, as did others, often critiqued for administering drugs late in severe disease when had subsided and inflammatory cascades dominated. This pattern—positive signals in timely, low-severity use contrasted with null results in delayed, high-acuity settings—contributed to regulatory prohibitions despite mechanistic plausibility for prophylaxis or early intervention.

First-Principles Examination of Incentives

Pharmaceutical companies developing mRNA-based vaccines possessed strong financial incentives to prioritize rapid market entry and widespread adoption, as these products generated extraordinary returns. For instance, , , , and Sinovac collectively realized approximately $90 billion in profits from vaccines and related medicines in 2021 and 2022 alone, with 's Comirnaty vaccine contributing over $75 billion in sales during that period. Such windfall gains, unprecedented in the industry's history, aligned corporate strategies with accelerated regulatory approvals under use authorizations, where the potential for liability protections and contracts outweighed extended safety scrutiny. Governments and agencies similarly faced incentives to leverage the crisis for institutional expansion, as declarations of enabled executives to implement sweeping measures without legislative oversight or . In the United States, governors invoked powers to enforce lockdowns, mandates, and closures, often extending these states of for months or years, thereby concentrating decision-making authority in administrative branches. This dynamic reflects a principal-agent problem inherent in bureaucratic systems, where officials benefit from heightened control and —such as trillions in federal spending on relief and —irrespective of long-term , fostering on centralized directives over decentralized, evidence-based alternatives. The invocation of "follow the science" as a guiding principle often masked these incentives, functioning instead as a rationale for suppressing dissenting analyses that challenged interventionist policies. Early estimates by epidemiologist suggested an infection fatality rate for ranging from 0.05% to 1% overall, far lower than initial projections implying seasonal flu-like severity for most populations, yet such views were marginalized in favor of models supporting stringent measures. Stakeholders incentivized by alignment—pharma seeking mandates for revenue stability, agencies preserving authority—prioritized narratives over probabilistic assessments, illustrating how selective interpretation of uncertain data sustains self-reinforcing cycles of control rather than adaptive responses grounded in observed risks.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Claims of Conspiracy and Misinformation

In early 2020, fact-checking organizations such as Snopes and PolitiFact dismissed hypotheses suggesting a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2 as unsubstantiated or conspiratorial, emphasizing scientific analyses that supported zoonotic spillover from bats via intermediate hosts. Snopes, for instance, highlighted genetic features of the virus inconsistent with deliberate engineering, rating claims of bioweapon creation or lab manipulation as false based on expert virologist assessments. Similarly, PolitiFact evaluated assertions of U.S.-funded gain-of-function research directly causing the outbreak as lacking evidence, pointing to natural evolutionary patterns in the virus's spike protein. Regarding pre-pandemic simulations like Event 201, held in October 2019 by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, fact-checkers such as Full Fact and Reuters rejected interpretations portraying it as predictive or evidence of orchestration, describing it as a routine tabletop exercise modeling generic pandemic scenarios rather than a blueprint for COVID-19. These outlets argued that similarities between the exercise's fictional coronavirus and the real outbreak stemmed from common public health contingencies, not foreknowledge, and labeled contrary narratives as misleading distortions of preparedness drills. Critics of the theory have associated its proponents with antisemitic tropes, claiming that narratives implicating global elites or specific ethnic groups in virus creation echo historical blood libels and undue influence stereotypes. The Anti-Defamation League documented surges in online claims portraying Jews as orchestrators of the pandemic for control or profit, linking such rhetoric to broader antisemitic conspiracism amplified during restrictions. Instances include accusations against figures like George Soros or assertions of ethnic targeting in virus engineering, which organizations like the American Jewish Committee identified as fueling real-world hate incidents tied to COVID skepticism. Ties to anti-vaccination movements were also invoked to discredit adherents, with outlets framing vaccine hesitancy within the theory as rooted in irrational distrust rather than empirical scrutiny. Psychological research attributes adherence to such theories to cognitive mechanisms like dissonance reduction, where individuals rationalize inconsistencies between official accounts and anomalous events by endorsing alternative explanations to preserve . Studies published in journals such as Nature Reviews Psychology identify drivers including threat perception, low trust in institutions, and , positing that conspiracy beliefs serve as strategies amid , though they correlate with maladaptive behaviors like reduced compliance. Longitudinal analyses further link these beliefs to traits like anger proneness and approach motivation, framing them as monological systems resistant to disconfirming evidence due to .

Fact-Checks and Scientific Rebuttals

The "Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2" paper, published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, by Kristian Andersen and coauthors, contended that the virus's spike protein features, including the furin cleavage site, aligned with natural evolutionary processes rather than laboratory engineering, based on genomic comparisons with known coronaviruses. Critics have noted that the analysis employed proxy assumptions about ancestral viral backbones, such as presuming RaTG13 as the closest relative without accounting for the Wuhan Institute of Virology's (WIV) unpublished or inaccessible sequences. Specifically, the WIV removed its public virus database offline on September 12, 2019—months before the first recognized cases—preventing scrutiny of potential SARS-CoV-2 precursors in its holdings, a data gap unaddressed in the paper's modeling of natural spillover. A corresponding statement in on May 6, 2020, endorsed by 27 scientists, characterized lab-leak discussions as lacking scientific basis and conducive to , thereby shaping institutional rejection of the hypothesis. The letter's primary organizer, of , had undisclosed ties to WIV research funded by his organization, including gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses, which were not declared in the original publication. retroactively updated disclosures in June 2021 after revelations of these conflicts, highlighting how peer-review gatekeeping marginalized alternative origin inquiries absent rigorous conflict vetting. Early pandemic protocols from the CDC and WHO prioritized rapid intubation for hypoxemic COVID-19 patients, associating with ventilator mortality rates of 80-90% in initial cohorts, such as 88% among 5,700 intubated cases in New York State from March to May 2020. Accumulating evidence of ventilator-induced lung injury and overuse prompted guideline revisions by mid-2020, favoring high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive methods, which correlated with falling intubation rates—from over 30% of hospitalized cases in April 2020 to under 10% by late 2020 in U.S. data. 30459-8/fulltext) Some jurisdictions, including New York, adjusted death attributions post hoc to distinguish primary respiratory failure from iatrogenic complications, though CDC provisional counts initially aggregated ventilator-associated fatalities under COVID-19 without granular reclassification mandates.

Motivations Behind Skepticism of Official Narratives

Skepticism toward official narratives often stems from historical instances where government and institutional authorities conducted unethical experiments on unwitting populations, undermining public trust. The , run by the U.S. Public Health Service from 1932 to 1972, involved 600 Black men in , including 399 with untreated , who were denied and effective treatment even after penicillin became available in the 1940s, leading to unnecessary suffering and deaths. Similarly, the CIA's program, active from 1953 to 1973, encompassed over 150 subprojects testing mind-control techniques, including administration on non-consenting subjects, resulting in psychological harm and at least one confirmed death, as documented in declassified agency inspections highlighting ethical violations. These precedents illustrate patterns of institutional deception and overreach, fostering a rational basis for questioning deference to authority without empirical verification. Regulatory capture exacerbates distrust, particularly when agencies tasked with oversight exhibit close ties to the industries they regulate. At the U.S. (FDA), a "" phenomenon is evident, with approximately 27% of reviewers who approved hematology-oncology drugs between 2001 and 2010 later joining pharmaceutical companies they had regulated, potentially prioritizing industry interests over . This dynamic, analyzed as a vulnerability to capture, can incentivize lenient approvals and suppress scrutiny of potential risks, as former regulators leverage insider knowledge for lucrative private-sector roles. Empirical discrepancies between official mandates and subsequent evidence further fuel skepticism. A 2023 Cochrane of 78 randomized controlled trials concluded that wearing masks in community settings probably makes little or no difference in reducing or laboratory-confirmed respiratory viruses, including , contrasting with widespread policy enforcement of universal masking. Such findings highlight how initial authoritative claims may overlook rigorous meta-analytic scrutiny, prompting demands for causal evidence over procedural compliance.

Reception and Impact

Media and Platform Responses

In and May 2020, platforms including , , and swiftly removed versions of the "" video, a 26-minute production featuring claims by virologist challenging official narratives on origins, treatments, and responses, after it amassed millions of views through organic sharing. Platforms cited violations of policies against harmful , with alone reporting efforts to delete thousands of related uploads, though variants continued circulating via direct links and alternative sites, highlighting tensions between rapid and viral dissemination prior to enforcement. Similarly, removed videos from physicians advocating against lockdowns in late 2020, diverging from emerging platform-wide prohibitions on content questioning measures. The Trusted News Initiative (TNI), launched in 2019 and expanded in 2020 by organizations including the , , and tech firms like and , coordinated efforts to identify and suppress disinformation around high-stakes events, including the and U.S. elections. By July 2020, TNI intensified focus on collaborative and content flagging to preempt "moments of jeopardy," such as vaccine rollouts, with December updates explicitly targeting harmful vaccine narratives through shared intelligence among members. This alliance facilitated preemptive narrative alignment, contrasting with decentralized, user-driven information flows on platforms, where algorithmic demotion and shadow-banning reduced visibility of non-consensus views without always transparent disclosure. Mainstream media coverage of origins exemplified narrative control, with outlets like dismissing the Wuhan lab-leak hypothesis as a through much of 2020, often equating it to amid limited early evidence. A shift emerged in , as declassified U.S. intelligence and Biden administration reviews elevated the lab-leak scenario to comparable plausibility with natural , prompting retrospective scrutiny of prior suppressions that had labeled proponents as purveyors of . This evolution underscored mechanics of coordinated dismissal, where initial institutional —bolstered by tech enforcement—stifled debate until contradictory data surfaced, deviating from empirical organic discourse.

Public and Political Reactions

Public opinion on the origins of COVID-19 became increasingly divided, with polls indicating a growing majority favoring the lab-leak hypothesis over natural zoonosis by 2023. A Quinnipiac University poll conducted in March 2023 found that 64 percent of Americans believed the virus most likely leaked from a lab, compared to 22 percent attributing it to natural causes. Similarly, a YouGov poll from the same period showed 59 percent of respondents viewing the lab-leak theory as definitely or probably true. This marked a significant shift from earlier surveys, where belief in a lab origin hovered around 30 percent in 2020, reflecting rising skepticism toward official narratives amid emerging evidence from FOIA documents and whistleblower accounts. Politically, reactions manifested in congressional scrutiny of public health officials, exemplified by U.S. Senator Rand Paul's repeated confrontations with Dr. during Senate hearings in 2021. In a July 20, 2021, hearing before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, Paul accused Fauci of misleading Congress regarding funding for at the , prompting Fauci to retort that Paul was the one lying. These exchanges highlighted partisan divides, with Republicans pressing for accountability on potential lab-related risks, while Democrats often defended Fauci and emphasized natural origin probabilities. Paul's inquiries persisted, including a November 2021 hearing where he questioned changes to definitions of . Grassroots opposition to pandemic mandates emerged prominently through movements like Canada's Freedom Convoy in early , which drew thousands of truckers and supporters protesting requirements for cross-border . Beginning in January , the convoy converged on , blocking streets and prompting Prime Minister to invoke emergency powers on February 14 to clear demonstrations, which organizers framed as resistance to overreach rather than anti-vaccination per se. Similar protests occurred globally, including in the U.S. and , underscoring widespread public fatigue with restrictions and fueling demands for transparency on policy rationales tied to disease origins and responses. These actions reflected a broadening challenge to orthodox measures, often amplified by figures questioning incentive structures in government and pharmaceutical sectors.

Long-Term Consequences and Investigations

The implementation of mandates correlated with diminished uptake of subsequent boosters and non-COVID vaccines, signaling broader hesitancy spillover effects. In U.S. states with mandates, booster coverage and adult/child vaccination rates lagged behind those in states prohibiting such requirements, according to analyses of post-mandate data. This pattern extended to routine pediatric immunizations, with measles-mumps-rubella coverage among U.S. kindergartners falling from 95.2% in 2019–2020 to 92.7% by later years amid pandemic-era disruptions and policy fatigue. Longitudinal surveys further documented a multi-year drop in intent and actual receipt of doses, attributing it partly to perceived overreach in enforcement. U.S. investigations into origins intensified post-2023, yielding reports that reinforced scrutiny of research funding practices. A December 2024 House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus final report, following a two-year probe, determined that most likely escaped from the due to gain-of-function experiments partly supported by diverted U.S. funds via subawards. This echoed a June 2023 declassified intelligence community assessment, which found low-confidence consensus on a lab-related incident while noting China's obstruction of . Such findings prompted policy repercussions, including NIH termination of grants to entities linked to the lab and heightened congressional oversight of high-risk pathogen research. Global policy responses included the , adopted on May 20, 2025, to standardize prevention, preparedness, and response frameworks across nations. Negotiations, extending from 2024 debates on equity and access, resulted in provisions for and coordinated surveillance, though without U.S. endorsement amid concerns. Critics highlighted risks of over-centralization, yet the accord institutionalized lessons from gaps in international cooperation.

Recent Developments

Post-2023 Inquiries and Admissions

In December 2024, the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released a final 500-page following a two-year involving over 30 interviews and multiple hearings, concluding that the most likely originated from a laboratory-related incident at the , citing evidence of and biosafety lapses. The highlighted suppressed discussions on lab-leak possibilities and inadequate from U.S. agencies like the (NIH). During a May 22, 2024, congressional hearing, David Morens, senior scientific advisor to former NIH Director , testified under oath regarding emails obtained via Act (FOIA) requests, admitting to using personal email to evade laws and discussing efforts to avoid disclosing NIH communications related to funding of research. Morens's emails, revealed in a May 2024 subcommittee memo, included statements about deleting records and prioritizing protection of certain researchers, prompting bipartisan criticism for undermining accountability. U.S. intelligence assessments evolved in 2025, with the (CIA) issuing a report shifting to favor a lab-leak origin as more likely than natural spillover, though with low confidence, based on reanalysis of existing data without new intelligence. Similarly, Germany's (BND) declassified findings in March 2025 estimating an 80-90% probability of a lab accident at the Institute, drawing from 2020 analysis updated with subsequent evidence. FOIA litigation advanced in 2024-2025, with securing court orders for NIH and records on high-risk research, including a March 2025 ruling in v. mandating disclosure of documents relevant to origins investigations. These suits, totaling over 25 by mid-2024, uncovered details on withheld communications but faced ongoing delays, with cases active as of September 2025.

Evolving Scientific Consensus

In the years following the initial dismissal of laboratory-related origins for , a subset of virologists and epidemiologists began publicly endorsing the as a credible explanation, citing such as the virus's emergence near the and features like the furin cleavage site absent in closely related sarbecoviruses. , a at the Broad Institute of and Harvard, co-authored analyses highlighting lapses at the and the lack of intermediate animal hosts, arguing these factors elevate lab accident risks over natural spillover; her views gained broader validation in expert discussions by early 2023. Similarly, editorials from 2021 onward examined the without preconceived rejection, noting unresolved questions about early case data and activities involving RaTG13-like viruses, reflecting a shift toward evidentiary pluralism in peer-reviewed discourse. Reassessments of foundational papers have further underscored evolving perspectives. The 2020 "Proximal Origin" correspondence in , which asserted natural emergence based on genomic analyses, came under scrutiny by 2024 as declassified emails revealed initial private suspicions among its authors—including —regarding potential engineering of the spike protein's receptor-binding domain. These revelations prompted calls for retraction or revision, with congressional reviews in December 2024 highlighting how early certainties overlooked alternative interpretations of the virus's polybasic cleavage site and receptor affinity, prompting some experts to advocate for independent audits of origin datasets. Post-2023 developments include heightened calls for pausing high-risk experiments, exemplified by U.S. House approval in November 2023 of legislation prohibiting federal funding for gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens, driven by concerns over dual-use virology practices at facilities like the Wuhan lab. This momentum, echoed in oversight hearings and scientific panels, emphasizes enhanced biosafety protocols and transparency in future coronavirus studies to prioritize causal inference over consensus maintenance.

References

  1. [1]
    QAnon: A Glossary - ADL
    Jan 21, 2021 · The Plan/Trust the plan. QAnon claims a plan is in place to defeat the Deep State and the Cabal. · Adrenochrome. Adrenochrome is a real chemical ...
  2. [2]
    The QAnon Conspiracy Theory: A Security Threat in the Making?
    Jul 4, 2020 · ... the plan” (another catchphrase QAnon supporters use). Greene also has tweeted the QAnon-connected hashtag “#GreatAwakening” to far-right ...
  3. [3]
    QAnon: What is it and where did it come from? - BBC
    Jan 6, 2021 · A protester wearing a shirt with the QAnon slogan 'Trust the plan' talks to police inside the US Capitol building on Wednesday.
  4. [4]
    Interpreting QAnon as a Pseudo-Christian Extremist Movement
    Jan 30, 2024 · In the image, the concept of the plan conveys a multi-layered meaning that connects Christian nationalism, Trumpism and QAnon. The plan is ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The Storm is Coming: Analyzing the Belief in Q-Anon
    According to. Q, Donald Trump's term in office was part of “The Plan” to expose the extent of criminal behavior (e.g., human trafficking, child abuse, etc ...
  6. [6]
    A new book explains how QAnon took hold of the GOP - NPR
    Mar 2, 2023 · Journalist Will Sommer went to road shows and spoke to believers and their families while investigating QAnon. His book, Trust the Plan, makes the case that ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    How the QAnon movement entered mainstream politics
    Jul 19, 2025 · Trump and QAnon. During Trump's first ... Others believe the delay is strategic, another example of “the plan” requiring more patience.
  8. [8]
    When belief becomes research: conspiracist communities on the ...
    ... Great Awakening.” The initial QAnon ... In-group trust is central to QAnon's mantra, encouraging those who doubt or falter to hold steady: “Trust the plan.<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement
    May 21, 2021 · EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China's Wuhan Institute ...
  10. [10]
    The COVID-19 Origins Investigation
    EHA, a National Institute of Health (NIH) grant recipient, sub-awarded $598,500 in NIH grant funds to the WIV during 2014-2019 for bat coronavirus research.
  11. [11]
    Documents Provide New Evidence U.S. Funded Gain-of-Function ...
    Sep 9, 2021 · Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance president, has worked closely with scientists in China for years, and roughly $750,000 of the grant was ...
  12. [12]
    Event 201 | Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
    Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions.
  13. [13]
    Players for Event 201, a pandemic exercise, include global business ...
    Oct 15, 2019 · Former and current global business, government, and public health leaders will play a team of high-level decision makers convened to ...
  14. [14]
    Live Simulation Exercise to Prepare Public and Private Leaders for ...
    Oct 15, 2019 · The exercise will bring together business, government, security and public health leaders to address a hypothetical global pandemic scenario.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
    The Rockefeller Foundation and GBN began the scenario process by surfacing a host of driving forces that would affect the future of technology and international.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Annual-Report-2010-1.pdf - The Rockefeller Foundation
    From food insecurity in Africa to economic insecurity in America, from cities grappling with the impact of climate change and the need for sustainable ...
  17. [17]
    Seen 'Plandemic'? We Take A Close Look At The Viral Conspiracy ...
    May 8, 2020 · A slickly produced 26-minute video called Plandemic has exploded on social media in recent days, claiming to present a view of COVID-19 that differs from the " ...
  18. [18]
    Millions view viral Plandemic video featuring discredited medical ...
    May 12, 2020 · One of the newest faces linked to COVID-19 conspiracy theories is Judy Mikovits, who is featured in the video Plandemic, which started ...
  19. [19]
    How the 'Plandemic' Movie and Its Falsehoods Spread Widely Online
    May 21, 2020 · Conspiracy theories about the pandemic have gained more traction than mainstream online events. Here's how.
  20. [20]
    As '#Plandemic' goes viral, those targeted by discredited scientist's ...
    May 7, 2020 · A video from a discredited scientist promoting a hodgepodge of conspiracy theories about the coronavirus went viral across every social media platform Thursday.<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Pandemic simulation exercise spotlights massive preparedness gap
    Nov 6, 2019 · Event 201, hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, envisions a fast-spreading coronavirus with a devastating impact.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Clade X Exercise: Improving Policy to Prepare for Severe Pandemics
    Clade X is a pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in May 2018 to identify important policy issues and preparedness ...
  23. [23]
    Clade X: A Pandemic Exercise - PubMed
    Clade X was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC.
  24. [24]
    Clade X: A Pandemic Exercise | Health Security
    Clade X was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC.
  25. [25]
    Bill Gates: The next outbreak? We're not ready | TED Talk
    Apr 3, 2015 · In 2014, the world avoided a global outbreak of Ebola, thanks to thousands of selfless health workers -- plus, frankly, some very good luck.
  26. [26]
    Transcript of Bill Gates Warning of Pandemics in a 1025 TED Talk
    In a TED Talk from 2015, Bill Gates warned that the world is not prepared for an epidemic, pandemic, or outbreak. Read the full transcript of his TED Talk ...
  27. [27]
    The Next Outbreak? We're Not Ready: Bill Gates (Transcript)
    Mar 1, 2024 · In this thought-provoking TED talk Bill Gates emphasizes the significant global threat posed by infectious diseases, surpassing the fears once associated with ...
  28. [28]
    NIH says grantee failed to report experiment in Wuhan that created a ...
    Oct 21, 2021 · ... NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan.” Virologists who have reviewed the EcoHealth grant disagree on whether the chimera ...
  29. [29]
    Hearing Wrap Up: NIH Refutes EcoHealth's Testimony, Tabak ...
    May 17, 2024 · Tabak testified that the NIH was funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China through a grant to EcoHealth. Members highlighted the dangers ...
  30. [30]
    Leaked Grant Proposal Details High-Risk Coronavirus Research
    Sep 23, 2021 · The proposal, rejected by US military research agency DARPA, describes the insertion of human-specific cleavage sites into SARS-related bat coronaviruses.
  31. [31]
    DEFUSE proposal - DocumentCloud
    Documents DEFUSE proposal · Sign In.. US English. Deutsche. Español. Français. Italiano. русский. українська.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    (PDF) DRASTIC - An Analysis of Project DEFUSE - ResearchGate
    PDF | An Analysis of the Project DEFUSE proposal submitted by EcoHealth Alliance [EHA] to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [DARPA] on.
  33. [33]
    The history of biological warfare - PMC - NIH
    The still unidentified culprits of the 2001 anthrax attacks in the USA were more successful, sending contaminated letters that eventually killed five people ...
  34. [34]
    Amerithrax or Anthrax Investigation - FBI
    ... U.S. Army's Fort Detrick bio-medical research laboratory in November 2001. Soon after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, letters laced with anthrax began ...
  35. [35]
    New Report Casts Doubt on FBI Anthrax Investigation - PBS
    Dec 19, 2014 · ... anthrax came from the Maryland bioweapons laboratory of Bruce Ivins. ... 2001 anthrax-letter attacks,” the bureau said. However, Democratic ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Amerithrax Investigative Summary - Department of Justice
    Feb 19, 2010 · This Investigative Summary sets forth much of the evidence that was developed in the. Amerithrax investigation.1 In the fall of 2001, ...
  37. [37]
    WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on ...
    Mar 11, 2020 · WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 ... COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.
  38. [38]
    COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the global lockdown and its ... - NIH
    The global lockdown initiated by various countries of the world starting from March 2020 after the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic by the WHO, is the ...
  39. [39]
    The Great Reset: A Unique Twin Summit to Begin 2021
    Jun 3, 2020 · The 51st World Economic Forum Annual Meeting will bring together global leaders from government, business and civil society, and stakeholders from around the ...
  40. [40]
    ID2020 and partners launch program to provide digital ID with ...
    Sep 20, 2019 · The ID2020 Alliance has launched a new digital identity program at its annual summit in New York, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh, vaccine ...
  41. [41]
    ID2020 Alliance launches digital ID program with Government of ...
    Sep 19, 2019 · Recognizing the opportunity for immunization to serve as a platform for digital identity, this program leverages existing vaccination and birth ...
  42. [42]
    ID2020 | GHPC | Digital Identity Alliance
    Since 2016, ID2020 has promoted ethical, privacy-protecting approaches to digital ID to support equitable social, political, and economic empowerment.
  43. [43]
    Anthony Fauci's Emails Reveal The Pressure That Fell On One Man
    Jun 1, 2021 · Thousands of pages of communications obtained by BuzzFeed News show how Fauci tried to keep Americans calm and develop an effective strategy despite conflicts ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    How Fauci and NIH Leaders Worked to Discredit COVID-19 Lab ...
    Jul 18, 2023 · Though the hypothesis of a lab leak...is no longer dismissed today as a “conspiracy theory,” the damage to democratic discourse has been done.Missing: FOIA | Show results with:FOIA
  45. [45]
    “Investigating the Proximal Origin of a Cover Up” | Congress.gov
    The crux of their theory rests on a February 2020 conference call where they say Drs. Fauci and Collins began a campaign to suppress the lab leak theory.
  46. [46]
    A Covid Origin Conspiracy? - City Journal
    Jan 23, 2022 · Newly released emails make more plausible the contention that Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins presided over the suppression of the lab-leak theory for ...Missing: FOIA | Show results with:FOIA
  47. [47]
    FINAL REPORT: COVID Select Concludes 2-Year Investigation ...
    Dec 2, 2024 · The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic concluded its two-year investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic and released a final report.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] AFTER ACTION REVIEW OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    Dec 4, 2024 · ... the plan. No sooner had we convinced the Trump administration to implement our version of a two-week shutdown than I was trying to figure ...
  49. [49]
    Classified State Department Documents Credibly Suggest COVID ...
    May 7, 2024 · The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic recently reviewed classified US Department of State (State Department) documents that credibly suggest ...Missing: planned | Show results with:planned
  50. [50]
    Operation Warp Speed: Accelerated COVID-19 Vaccine ...
    Feb 11, 2021 · Operation Warp Speed was a federal effort that supported multiple COVID-19 vaccine candidates to speed up development.Missing: liability waivers predating
  51. [51]
    [PDF] GAO-21-191, COVID-19 - Government Accountability Office
    Nov 1, 2020 · As of October 15, 2020, Operation Warp Speed, had publicly announced financial support for the development and manufacturing of six vaccine ...
  52. [52]
    The Emergence of the Spike Furin Cleavage Site in SARS-CoV-2
    Nov 12, 2021 · SARS-CoV-2 possesses a unique furin cleavage site (FCS) in its spike. This has stimulated discussion pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2.
  53. [53]
    Probable human origin of the SARS-CoV-2 polybasic furin cleavage ...
    Nov 21, 2023 · The aim of this work is to provide a detailed sequence analysis between the SARS-CoV-2 S gene insert encoding PRRA and the human mRNA transcripts.
  54. [54]
    A call for an independent inquiry into the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 ...
    The two main hypotheses are that the virus emerged from human exposure to an infected animal [“zoonosis” (2)] or that it emerged in a research-related incident ...
  55. [55]
    Probable human origin of the SARS-CoV-2 polybasic furin cleavage ...
    Nov 21, 2023 · The aim of this work is to provide a detailed sequence analysis between the SARS-CoV-2 S gene insert encoding PRRA and the human mRNA transcripts.
  56. [56]
    Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein ...
    Jan 31, 2020 · We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein ...
    Jan 31, 2020 · We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, ...
  58. [58]
    Protein Structure and Sequence Reanalysis of 2019-nCoV Genome ...
    Mar 22, 2020 · 2019-nCoV Spike Protein Does Not Include Insertions Unique to HIV-1. In a recent manuscript entitled “Uncanny Similarity of Unique Inserts in ...
  59. [59]
    Protein structure and sequence re-analysis of 2019-nCoV genome ...
    2019-nCoV Spike Protein does not Include Insertions Unique to HIV-1. In a recent manuscript entitled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  60. [60]
    Estimating COVID-19 mortality in Italy early in the COVID-19 pandemic
    May 12, 2021 · The proportion of the population that died was 0.29% in the most affected region, Lombardia, and 0.57% in the most affected province, Bergamo.Missing: uncorrelated | Show results with:uncorrelated
  61. [61]
    Excess mortality during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: a two-stage ...
    The estimate of an excess of 47 490 deaths is far higher than the number of 31 610 deaths officially recorded as related to COVID-19 in the same months.Missing: uncorrelated | Show results with:uncorrelated
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Total COVID-19 Mortality in Italy - medRxiv
    Apr 20, 2020 · We estimate that the number of COVID-19 deaths in. Italy is 52,000 ± 2000 as of April 18 2020, more than a factor of 2 higher than the official ...Missing: uncorrelated | Show results with:uncorrelated
  63. [63]
    Estimating weekly excess mortality at sub-national level in Italy ...
    In this study we present the first comprehensive analysis of the spatio-temporal differences in excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.Missing: uncorrelated | Show results with:uncorrelated
  64. [64]
    COVID-19 outpatients: early risk-stratified treatment with zinc plus ...
    Low-dose hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc and azithromycin was an effective therapeutic approach against COVID-19. Significantly reduced hospitalisation ...
  65. [65]
    Ivermectin: a systematic review from antiviral effects to COVID-19 ...
    Jun 12, 2020 · It may be concluded that ivermectin could be effective in the early stages of infection and maybe a recommended drug for the prevention or ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 — Interim WHO Solidarity ...
    Dec 2, 2020 · For hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir, the Solidarity trial showed no definite effect on mortality in any subgroup. The only other substantial ...
  67. [67]
    Effect of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
    Oct 8, 2020 · Among patients hospitalized with Covid-19, those who received hydroxychloroquine did not have a lower incidence of death at 28 days than those who received ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among ...
    This randomized trial compares the effects of ivermectin vs placebo on time to symptom resolution within 21 days among patients with mild COVID-19.
  69. [69]
    The Rise and Fall of Hydroxychloroquine with the COVID-19 ...
    May 24, 2021 · 12 clinical studies reported no mortality benefits for CQ/HCQ in COVID-19 patients. The excitement over CQ/HCQ was ultimately quenched after three large ...
  70. [70]
    Big Pharma raked in USD 90 billion in profits with COVID-19 vaccines
    Feb 27, 2023 · Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, and Sinovac made an extraordinary USD 90 billion in profits on their COVID-19 vaccines and medicines in 2021 and 2022.
  71. [71]
    As COVID vaccine sales plummet, Moderna gains ground on Pfizer
    Feb 22, 2024 · During their heyday in 2021 and 2022, Pfizer's vaccine outsold Moderna's by slightly more than 2 to 1, with Comirnaty generating $75 billion in ...Missing: total | Show results with:total<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Full article: Emergency Powers in Response to COVID-19
    May 7, 2021 · During the COVID-19 pandemic many states have resorted to proclaiming a state of emergency (SOE), expanding executive powers and curtailing ...
  73. [73]
    Modernizing Public Health Emergency Powers Laws — Again
    Mar 30, 2023 · Expand federal powers to collect information and impose necessary disease mitigation measures in areas where the federal government has ...
  74. [74]
    Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data
    Seroprevalence estimates ranged from 0.02% to 53.40%. Infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 1.63%, corrected values from 0.00% to 1.54%.
  75. [75]
    Here's Why Scientists Think the Coronavirus Wasn't Made in a Lab
    Jul 13, 2020 · The vast majority of scientists who have studied the virus agree that it evolved naturally and crossed into humans from an animal species, most likely a bat.
  76. [76]
    What we know about the source of the coronavirus pandemic
    Apr 17, 2020 · There is new reporting that suggests the virus could have come from a lab in Wuhan, China, the epicenter of the outbreak.
  77. [77]
    The Origins and Scientific Failings of the COVID-19 'Bioweapon ...
    the ...
  78. [78]
    Fact-check: Did Dr. Fauci fund research that created COVID-19?
    May 11, 2021 · Conspiracy theories continue to spread about a virology lab in Wuhan, China, which has drawn scrutiny throughout the pandemic.
  79. [79]
    Event 201 didn't predict the Covid-19 pandemic - Full Fact
    Apr 27, 2020 · “Event 201” was an exercise organised in October 2019 to simulate what might happen if there was a severe pandemic.
  80. [80]
    Fact Check: Examining claims made about the COVID-19 pandemic ...
    Mar 12, 2021 · Posts show a clip of US rapper and singer Pitbull suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned due to the Event 201 by Johns Hopkins University.
  81. [81]
    New Coronavirus Wasn't 'Predicted' In Simulation - FactCheck.org
    Jan 29, 2020 · A conspiracy theory website distorted the facts about an emergency preparedness exercise to suggest that the “GATES FOUNDATION & OTHERS PREDICTED UP TO 65 ...Missing: planned | Show results with:planned
  82. [82]
    Jews as Creators of the COVID-19 Pandemic - World Jewish Congress
    As the coronavirus surged globally, virus-related conspiracy myths proliferated online, and demonstrations were used to spread antisemitic, xenophobic, ...
  83. [83]
    Coronavirus: Antisemitism - ADL
    Apr 22, 2020 · Coronavirus: Antisemitism. coronavirus. Related Content. Article XX ... Many antisemitic conspiracy theories posit that Jews have undue ...
  84. [84]
    Global Trends in Conspiracy Theories Linking Jews with Coronavirus
    May 1, 2020 · Online antisemitism ultimately makes its way into the real world. From antisemitic signs appearing at ill-advised gatherings, such as at pro- ...
  85. [85]
    Racist, Extremist, Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories Surround ... - ADL
    Mar 5, 2022 · Antisemitism has been an ongoing theme since the pandemic began, with conspiracies alleging that Jews are behind the coronavirus and are using ...Missing: accused | Show results with:accused
  86. [86]
    Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?
    Apr 28, 2020 · As conspiracy theories about COVID-19 take root in the United States, understanding the psychological foundations of conspiracy beliefs is ...
  87. [87]
    The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance ...
    Jan 12, 2022 · Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? Harv. Kennedy ... Beliefs in conspiracy theories following ostracism. Pers. Soc ...
  88. [88]
    Trait anger and approach motivation are related to higher ...
    What has changed is a growing interest in conspiracy theories observable since the COVID-19 pandemic, which has brought them to the front of mainstream public ...
  89. [89]
    A longitudinal analysis of conspiracy beliefs and Covid-19 health ...
    ... beliefs and behaviors (Mercier, 2020). This line of reasoning is consistent with psychological theories of cognitive dissonance, stipulating that people ...
  90. [90]
    The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 - PubMed
    The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):450-452. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9. Authors. Kristian G Andersen , Andrew Rambaut , W ...Missing: critique flaws assumptions
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Critical analysis of Andersen et al. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.
    The argument is that if someone wanted to design a coronavirus that binds with high affinity to human. ACE2, they would not have designed SARS-CoV-2, since the ...Missing: flaws | Show results with:flaws
  92. [92]
    (PDF) An investigation into the WIV databases that were taken offline
    Feb 18, 2021 · Every single of the 16 virus databases managed by the WIV was taken offline. Here we show how these databases may provide essential clues at to the origins of ...
  93. [93]
    Wenstrup Releases Alarming New Report on “Proximal Origin ...
    Jul 11, 2023 · The report titled “The Proximal Origin of a Cover-Up: Did the 'Bethesda Boys' Downplay a Lab Leak?” reveals extensive influence by the NIH and the flawed ...Missing: critique proxy
  94. [94]
    Scientist with conflict of interest leading Lancet COVID-19 ...
    Nov 24, 2020 · Emails obtained by USRTK revealed that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted the letter and orchestrated it to “avoid the appearance ...Missing: leak suppression dissent
  95. [95]
    Under-fire Lancet admits conflict of interest on lab-leak letter
    Jun 22, 2021 · Criticism of The Lancet has focused on its failure to declare in the original letter that Dr Daszak had for years funded and worked with the lab ...Missing: suppression dissent
  96. [96]
    ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with COVID-19
    Overall mortality to date in this critically ill cohort is 25.8% (56/217), and 40.1% (87/217) patients have survived to hospital discharge.
  97. [97]
    Higher Mortality Rate in Ventilated COVID-19 Patients - Medscape
    Apr 13, 2020 · "Ventilated COVID-19 patients are not more likely to die if they are properly treated," Gattinoni told Medscape Medical News in an email.Missing: deaths | Show results with:deaths
  98. [98]
    COVID-19 Hospital Data - Intubation and ventilator use in the ... - CDC
    Results on this page show the percentage of confirmed COVID-19 inpatient discharges that involved intubation or ventilator use for each week, by sex and age.Missing: reclassified | Show results with:reclassified
  99. [99]
    The Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee Timeline - CDC
    Sep 4, 2024 · The study initially involved 600 Black men – 399 with syphilis, 201 who did not have the disease. Participants' informed consent was not collected.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Report of Inspection of MKULTRA - Public Intelligence
    Downgrade. 1611401. Page 4. to be professionally unethical, therefore the reputations of professional participants in the MKULTRA program are on occasion in ...
  101. [101]
    A Look At How The Revolving Door Spins From FDA To Industry - NPR
    Sep 28, 2016 · About 27 percent of Food and Drug Administration reviewers who approved hematology-oncology drugs from 2001 through 2010 left to work for ...
  102. [102]
    The Revolving Door In Health Care Regulation
    Sep 5, 2023 · A revolving door between government and industry can render government agencies more vulnerable to regulatory capture.
  103. [103]
    Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory ...
    Jan 30, 2023 · Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness ...
  104. [104]
    Facebook, YouTube, struggling to remove 'Plandemic' conspiracy ...
    May 7, 2020 · Social media networks are working to remove or stop the spread of a viral pandemic conspiracy video that contains false, misleading or unproven claims about ...
  105. [105]
    'Plandemic' conspiracy video removed by Facebook, YouTube and ...
    May 7, 2020 · Social media companies including YouTube, Vimeo and Facebook are removing a viral conspiracy theory video because of its claims regarding the coronavirus ...Missing: April | Show results with:April
  106. [106]
    Facebook and YouTube scramble to remove 'Plandemic' video
    May 8, 2020 · The "Plandemic" video was the latest breakout hit from the coronavirus conspiracy theory industry. Social media companies are scrambling to ...
  107. [107]
    YouTube, Facebook split on removal of doctors' viral coronavirus ...
    Apr 29, 2020 · YouTube removed two videos of doctors whose calls to ease lockdowns have become ammunition for conservative media and fringe activists ...
  108. [108]
    Trusted News Initiative (TNI) to combat spread of harmful vaccine ...
    Dec 10, 2020 · The Trusted News Initiative (TNI) agreed to focus on combatting the spread of harmful vaccine disinformation.
  109. [109]
    Trusted News Initiative steps up global fight against disinformation ...
    Jul 13, 2020 · The Trusted News Initiative (TNI) was set up last year to protect audiences and users from disinformation, particularly around moments of jeopardy, such as ...Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination
  110. [110]
    Taking a look at the media's role in the Covid-19 lab leak theory - CNN
    though limited — information that has come to light to take a victory lap and ...
  111. [111]
    Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as ... - CNN
    Jul 16, 2021 · The theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild.
  112. [112]
    Disinformation and the Wuhan Lab Leak Thesis | Cato Institute
    Mar 6, 2023 · The Wall Street Journal broke a story regarding a classified Department of Energy report that the Covid‐ 19 virus most likely originated with a leak from China ...
  113. [113]
    Americans overwhelmingly favor 'lab leak' theory on covid origins
    Mar 16, 2023 · The Quinnipiac University poll shows Americans side with the former view by 64 percent to 22 percent.
  114. [114]
    Two-thirds of Americans believe that the COVID-19 virus originated ...
    59% — believed the lab-leak theory was definitely or ...
  115. [115]
    Fauci, Rand Paul get in shouting match over Wuhan lab research
    Jul 20, 2021 · GOP Sen. Rand Paul stepped up his feud with Dr. Anthony Fauci at a Senate hearing Tuesday, suggesting Fauci has lied to Congress and setting ...
  116. [116]
    Senator Paul Accuses Dr. Fauci of Changing Gain of Function ...
    Nov 4, 2021 · At a Senate hearing on the Biden administration's COVID-19 pandemic response, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) accuses Dr. Anthony Fauci of changing ...
  117. [117]
    In Canada, 'Freedom Convoy' Protesting Vaccine Mandates Nears ...
    Feb 10, 2022 · The “Freedom Convoy” had driven across Canada to reach the capital. The demonstrations on Saturday were raucous but largely peaceful.
  118. [118]
    Thousands join protest in Canada against Covid vaccine mandates
    Jan 31, 2022 · Thousands held a loud but peaceful protest in Canada's capital Ottawa against prime minister Justin Trudeau's Covid-19 vaccine mandates.
  119. [119]
    US state vaccine mandates did not influence COVID-19 ... - PNAS
    Feb 15, 2024 · US state vaccine mandates did not influence COVID-19 vaccination rates but reduced uptake of COVID-19 boosters and flu vaccines compared to bans ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  120. [120]
    COVID vaccine mandates may have had unintended consequences ...
    Feb 21, 2024 · States with mandates actually had lower COVID-19 booster and voluntary adult and child flu vaccine coverage than those that banned vaccine requirements.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Pandemic paradox: How the COVID-19 crisis transformed vaccine ...
    Aug 12, 2025 · This surge coincides with a decline in MMR vaccine coverage among U.S. kindergartners, which dropped from 95.2% in 2019–2020 to 92.7% in ...
  122. [122]
    Changes in intentions, behavior, and reasons to receive COVID-19 ...
    Present comorbidities did not impact vaccines uptake. Conclusions. Findings highlighted a 3-year decline in willingness and receipt of COVID-19 vaccinations ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report outlines the IC's understanding of the WIV, its ...<|separator|>
  124. [124]
    Explainer: Why the U.S. has banned funding for Chinese lab at ...
    Jul 19, 2023 · EcoHealth promptly agreed to cut WIV from the grant, and NIH reinstated it, but suspended funding, citing a need to review compliance issues.
  125. [125]
    World Health Assembly adopts historic Pandemic Agreement to ...
    May 20, 2025 · The WHO Pandemic Agreement sets out the principles, approaches and tools for better international coordination across a range of areas.
  126. [126]
    Global pandemic treaty finalized, without U.S., in 'a victory ... - Science
    Apr 16, 2025 · Three years in the making, the accord aims to increase equity and avoid errors of the COVID-19 pandemic. 16 Apr 2025; 2:25 PM ET; ByKai ...
  127. [127]
    What is the proposed WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty?
    In May 2024, negotiations on the Pandemic Treaty had failed to reach a conclusion before the 2024 World Health Assembly. However, the proposed treaty was ...
  128. [128]
    House panel concludes that COVID-19 pandemic came from a lab ...
    Dec 3, 2024 · After a 2-year investigation, a House of Representatives committee investigating the COVID-19 pandemic has released a wide-ranging final report ...
  129. [129]
    New COVID Select Memo Details Allegations of Wrongdoing and ...
    May 22, 2024 · David Morens, Senior Advisor to National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases former-Director, Dr. Anthony Fauci.” This memo ...
  130. [130]
    House panel takes Fauci adviser to task for allegedly evading public ...
    May 23, 2024 · A congressional panel yesterday grilled a top scientific adviser to former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci.
  131. [131]
    House committee grills former NIH advisor over his conversations ...
    May 23, 2024 · David Morens, who was a senior adviser to Anthony Fauci during the pandemic, and a guy named Peter Daszak, who ran a group called EcoHealth ...
  132. [132]
    CIA shifts assessment on Covid origins, saying lab leak likely ...
    Jan 25, 2025 · The CIA said Saturday it has shifted its previous assessments and has concluded that it's likely the Covid-19 virus was leaked from a Chinese lab before it ...
  133. [133]
    C.I.A. Now Favors Lab Leak Theory to Explain Covid's Origins
    Jan 27, 2025 · But the agency issued a new assessment last week, with analysts saying they now favor the lab theory. There is no new intelligence behind the ...
  134. [134]
    German spy agency concluded COVID virus likely leaked from lab ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · Germany's foreign intelligence service in 2020 put at 80%-90% the likelihood that the coronavirus behind the COVID-19 pandemic was ...
  135. [135]
    FOI lawsuits on origins of Covid-19, gain-of-function and biolabs
    Sep 29, 2025 · U.S. Right to Know has filed these FOI lawsuits a part of our investigation into origins of Covid-19 and gain-of-function research.
  136. [136]
    US Right to Know v. DOD, No. 23-02956, 2025 WL 860503 (N.D. ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · '” “Plaintiff is presently engaged in 'an investigation into high-risk virological research and the origins of COVID-19.'” “As to the records ...
  137. [137]
    The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don't know
    Jun 8, 2021 · Nature examines arguments that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in China, and the science behind them.
  138. [138]
    MIT researcher attacked for work on COVID-19 origin feels 'validated ...
    Feb 27, 2023 · A local researcher has been pushing the United States to investigate the lab for more than a year. Her remarks have led to threats and harassment.<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    US COVID-origins hearing renews debate over lab-leak hypothesis
    Mar 9, 2023 · House Republicans kick off investigation into how the pandemic began, with witnesses who mostly favour a lab origin.
  140. [140]
    [PDF] AFTER ACTION REVIEW OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    Dec 4, 2024 · open mind, that it could be a lab leak or it could be a natural occurrence. I've mentioned in this committee that I believe the evidence ...
  141. [141]
    House approves ban on gain-of-function pathogen research - Science
    Nov 15, 2023 · The US House of Representatives last night approved a ban on federal funding for “gain-of-function” (GOF) research that modifies risky pathogens.