Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hypnogram

A hypnogram is a graphical plot that represents the progression of sleep stages over time during a night's , typically derived from data to illustrate the of cycles. It visually depicts transitions between and various sleep phases, providing a concise summary of patterns that occur in ultradian rhythms approximately every 90 minutes. Hypnograms are constructed from comprehensive physiological recordings obtained during polysomnography (PSG), which includes electroencephalography (EEG) for brain activity, electrooculography (EOG) for eye movements, and electromyography (EMG) for muscle tone. Sleep is divided into sequential 30-second epochs, each scored according to standardized criteria such as those from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), resulting in a timeline that highlights the sequential and cyclical nature of sleep. This format allows for the detection of sleep fragmentation, such as frequent arousals or awakenings, which may not be apparent from summary statistics alone. The primary sleep stages illustrated in a hypnogram include wake (W), non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stages N1 (light sleep), N2 (intermediate sleep), and N3 (deep slow-wave sleep), as well as eye movement (REM) sleep, where vivid dreaming often occurs. A typical night's hypnogram shows 4 to 6 cycles, with early cycles featuring longer durations of deep N3 for restoration and later cycles incorporating more REM sleep associated with cognitive processing. Variations in stage distribution, such as reduced deep or excessive awakenings, can indicate disruptions in normal sleep continuity. In clinical and research contexts, hypnograms are essential for diagnosing sleep disorders like , , or by revealing patterns of instability, such as increased transitions from NREM to . They also facilitate quantitative analysis using models like log-linear or multistate approaches to measure transition rates and assess the impact of factors such as sleep-disordered breathing, which can elevate wake-to-NREM transitions by up to 26%. Beyond diagnostics, hypnograms aid in evaluating treatment efficacy, studying sleep's role in , and exploring interactions with conditions like .

Overview

Definition

A hypnogram is a graphical plot that represents the progression of sleep stages—wakefulness (W), non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stages N1, N2, and N3, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep—over time, derived from polysomnographic recordings in a sleep laboratory. The term originates from the Greek "hypnos," meaning sleep, and "gramma," meaning a drawing or record. Its primary purpose is to visualize the cyclical macrostructure of sleep across a typical night's duration of 6 to 9 hours, highlighting the sequential transitions between stages that characterize normal sleep architecture. The plot features a horizontal axis denoting elapsed time in minutes from sleep onset and a vertical axis categorizing the discrete sleep stages according to the (AASM) standards, which define scoring rules for these stages based on electrophysiological signals.

Historical Development

The origins of the hypnogram can be traced to , when researchers Alfred L. Loomis, E. Newton Harvey, and pioneered the use of (EEG) to investigate human . In their groundbreaking 1937 study, they conducted the first continuous all-night EEG recordings, identifying distinct patterns of brain activity corresponding to varying depths of , from light drowsiness to deep slumber. These findings were visualized in graphical plots depicting progression over time, which served as the earliest precursors to the modern hypnogram by illustrating fluctuations in intensity. Their work established EEG as a reliable method for quantifying states, shifting sleep research from subjective observations to objective physiological measurements. Building on this foundation, the 1950s and 1960s saw significant formalization of sleep staging by William Dement and , who introduced the critical distinction between rapid eye movement () and non-REM sleep. Through detailed EEG analyses in their 1957 study, they documented cyclical alternations between these stages occurring approximately every 90 minutes, a pattern that became a hallmark of normal sleep architecture. Dement and Kleitman's graphical representations of these cycles refined the hypnogram's structure, emphasizing its utility in capturing the dynamic, oscillatory nature of sleep rather than mere depth. Their contributions, including the correlation of REM periods with , elevated the hypnogram from a descriptive tool to an essential framework for understanding sleep's regulatory processes. Standardization of hypnogram-based sleep staging advanced in 1968 with the publication of the Rechtschaffen and Kales manual, which provided uniform criteria for classifying sleep into stages 1 through 4 (non-REM) and , based on EEG, electrooculogram, and electromyogram data. This manual became the gold standard for scoring sleep epochs, directly shaping how hypnograms were constructed and interpreted in research and clinical settings. In 2007, the (AASM) updated these guidelines in its comprehensive manual (), consolidating stages into N1, N2, N3 (non-REM), and while incorporating refinements for greater inter-scorer reliability and applicability to diverse populations; the manual was further revised in Version 2 (2012) with updates for pediatric and event scoring, and in Version 3 (2023) to include additional rules for movements, respiratory, and cardiac events. These evolutions ensured the hypnogram's consistency as a diagnostic and analytical instrument. The adoption of hypnograms in clinical practice accelerated from the 1970s onward, coinciding with the rise of as a routine tool for diagnosing sleep disorders. Early sleep clinics, such as the one established at in the late 1960s, integrated hypnograms into evaluations of conditions like and, later, , enabling clinicians to visualize architectural disruptions quantitatively. By the mid-1970s, as formalized with the founding of organizations like the Association of Sleep Disorders Centers, hypnograms had become indispensable for identifying pathological patterns, such as fragmented cycles or excessive , in patient care. This clinical integration marked the hypnogram's transition from a research artifact to a cornerstone of evidence-based sleep diagnostics.

Generation Process

Data Acquisition via Polysomnography

Polysomnography (PSG) serves as the gold standard for acquiring the physiological data necessary to construct a hypnogram, involving comprehensive overnight monitoring of a subject in a specialized sleep laboratory. This process captures multiple synchronized signals to evaluate sleep architecture and associated events, typically conducted in a controlled to minimize external disturbances. PSG is recommended for diagnosing various sleep disorders and requires a minimum of two hours of recording for validity, though full-night studies are standard to assess complete sleep cycles. The core signals recorded during PSG include the electroencephalogram (EEG) for brain activity, electrooculogram (EOG) for eye movements, electromyogram (EMG) for , electrocardiogram (ECG) for cardiac rhythm, via nasal pressure or thermistors, and for . EEG channels are placed using central (e.g., C3-A2, C4-A1) and occipital (e.g., O1-A2, O2-A1) derivations according to the international 10-20 system, as endorsed by the (AASM), to detect characteristic brain wave patterns across stages. EOG electrodes are positioned at the outer canthi—one 1 cm below the left outer canthus and one 1 cm above the right outer canthus—to identify rapid eye movements indicative of REM , while submental chin EMG electrodes monitor reductions in . and oximetry sensors, along with ECG leads, provide respiratory and cardiovascular data to contextualize quality. Electrode impedances are maintained below 5 kΩ for EEG, EOG, and ECG channels, and below 10 kΩ for EMG, ensuring signal integrity. PSG setup adheres to AASM guidelines for montage configuration, with recommended referential derivations including frontal (F4-M1), central (C4-M1), and occipital (O2-M1) for EEG to optimize detection of sleep-specific waveforms. Signals are digitized at sampling rates of at least 200 Hz for EEG, EOG, EMG, and ECG channels, with 500 Hz preferred to preserve waveform details without aliasing. The recording duration spans approximately 8-10 hours, commencing at "lights out" when the subject is instructed to sleep and concluding upon final morning awakening, allowing capture of multiple sleep cycles in adults. These raw signals form the foundation from which sleep stages are subsequently scored.

Sleep Stage Scoring Criteria

Sleep stage scoring criteria provide the standardized framework for classifying epochs of polysomnographic (PSG) data into wakefulness and sleep stages, forming the foundation of hypnogram construction. Initially established by the Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria in 1968, these rules defined four non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stages and one rapid eye movement () stage based primarily on electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns observed in 20- or 30-second epochs. The R&K system emphasized visual identification of rhythmic EEG frequencies, such as alpha for wakefulness and delta for deep sleep, to promote consistency in sleep research and clinical practice. In 2007, the (AASM) introduced an updated manual that refined these criteria, reducing NREM stages to three (N1, N2, N3) while incorporating additional signals like (EOG) and (EMG) for more precise differentiation. Subsequent revisions in 2017 (version 2.4), 2020 (version 2.6), and 2023 (version 3) addressed ambiguities in scoring arousals and artifacts, enhanced inter-scorer reliability, and updated technical specifications without altering core stage definitions. These updates reflect ongoing efforts to adapt criteria to digital systems and diverse populations, maintaining the 30-second epoch duration as the standard unit for scoring. Epoch-based scoring involves dividing continuous PSG recordings into 30-second segments, with each assigned to a single stage based on predominant features across relevant channels, such as EEG, EOG, and submental EMG. If an epoch shows mixed characteristics, it is scored according to the stage occupying the majority of the interval, prioritizing specific markers like sleep spindles over general wave patterns. The wake stage is identified by alpha (8-13 Hz) or (>13 Hz) EEG rhythms comprising at least 50% of the , often accompanied by frequent eye blinks on EOG and elevated chin EMG tone. , the lightest NREM stage, features low-amplitude mixed-frequency EEG ( at 4-7 Hz dominating), slow rolling eye movements on EOG, and mild EMG reduction compared to . N2 is characterized by the presence of sleep spindles (11-16 Hz bursts lasting ≥0.5 seconds) or K-complexes (sharp negative-positive ) on EEG, with rhythms and further EMG atonia. , or , requires slow wave activity ( of 0.5-2 Hz with ≥75 μV) occupying 20% or more of the , indicating deep, restorative with minimal eye movements and low EMG activity. REM is scored when low-amplitude mixed-frequency EEG (similar to but with sawtooth ), rapid eye movements on EOG, and profound EMG atonia are observed, typically following at least 30 seconds of NREM without intervening . Scoring rules for transitions account for arousals—defined as abrupt EEG frequency shifts lasting 3-15 seconds accompanied by EMG increase or EOG activity—which may interrupt a stage but do not change its classification unless they dominate the . artifacts, such as those from body position changes, are ignored if they obscure less than half the , but excessive artifacts may render an unscorable or default to wake. Overall scoring reliability shows inter-scorer agreement of approximately 83%, with highest concordance for (around 90%) and lowest for (about 63%), influenced by subjective interpretation of transitional s.

Visual Representation

Structure of a Hypnogram

A hypnogram is a graphical representation of sleep stages plotted against time, typically derived from data scored according to (AASM) criteria into wakefulness (W), non-rapid eye movement stages , N2, and N3, and rapid eye movement () sleep. The x-axis represents elapsed time from the start of the recording, often spanning 0 to 480 minutes or longer to cover a full night's , divided into 30-second epochs that form the basis for stage scoring. The y-axis features discrete levels for the sleep stages, often ordered from top to bottom as wake (W) at the highest level, followed by , , N2, and N3, though the exact order can vary between software implementations and conventions, allowing visual distinction of transitions between lighter and deeper states. Sleep stages are depicted using horizontal bars or lines spanning the duration of each epoch or bout, with changes in stage marked by shifts between y-axis levels to illustrate the sequential progression. Vertical lines may delineate epoch boundaries, particularly in detailed views, while annotations such as arrows or markers indicate events like arousals (brief awakenings ≥3 seconds) or other disruptions overlaid on the primary stage plot. Common software platforms for rendering hypnograms include RemLogic from Natus Medical Incorporated, which supports epoch-based visualization and event annotation in analysis, and Profusion Sleep from Compumedics, a suite for acquisition, scoring, and graphical display of sleep data including hypnogram generation. Variations in hypnogram presentation include compressed views that condense the entire night onto a single page for overview, contrasting with expanded views that zoom into specific time segments for finer resolution of transitions. Some renditions incorporate micro-arousals—subtle EEG activations lasting 3-15 seconds within an —as small flags or interruptions on the stage bars to highlight subtle disruptions without altering the primary epoch score.

Normal Sleep Patterns

In a typical healthy adult, sleep follows an ultradian cyclic structure consisting of 4 to 6 , each lasting approximately 90 minutes, with each cycle progressing from non-rapid (NREM) stages—beginning with light sleep in , advancing to N2, and deepening into (N3)—before transitioning to rapid () sleep. These cycles repeat throughout the night, with the initial cycles emphasizing deeper NREM sleep and subsequent cycles allocating more time to as the night progresses. The distribution of sleep stages in a normal hypnogram for young to middle-aged adults reflects this architecture: N1 comprises about 5% of total sleep time, N2 accounts for 45-55%, N3 ranges from 15-25%, and REM constitutes 20-25%, while wake after sleep onset remains minimal at less than 5%. This allocation supports restorative processes, with N2 dominating the overall duration to facilitate and N3 providing essential physical recovery. Age-related variations influence these patterns, with younger individuals exhibiting deeper and more consolidated N3 sleep due to higher slow-wave activity, whereas older adults experience reduced N3 proportions—often dropping below 10%—and increased fragmentation from more frequent arousals. In the elderly, this shift results in lighter overall, with elevated interrupting cycles, though total sleep duration may remain similar if compensatory daytime napping is absent. A representative timeline in a healthy young adult's hypnogram begins with a brief entry lasting 1-5 minutes, quickly transitioning to N2 for 10-20 minutes, followed by the first N3 episode of 20-40 minutes within the initial cycle; subsequent cycles deepen initially but progressively shorten N3 while extending periods, which start at 5-10 minutes and reach 20-30 minutes or more toward morning. This progression ensures early-night emphasis on physical restoration and later-night focus on cognitive functions like dreaming.

Disrupted Sleep Patterns

Disrupted sleep patterns on a hypnogram deviate from the typical cyclical progression of sleep stages, manifesting as irregularities that interrupt the smooth transitions and durations seen in sleep. These disruptions often appear as abrupt shifts between stages, prolonged periods of , or diminished representation of deeper sleep phases, contrasting with the consolidated cycles of non-REM and REM sleep in healthy individuals. Sleep fragmentation is a common disruption characterized by frequent awakenings, arousals, and shifts, particularly evident in conditions like where hypnograms display multiple brief returns to after onset, often prolonging wake after onset (WASO) and increasing the number of transitions. In , these patterns result in shorter bouts of non-REM stability, with heightened hazard rates for shifting out of stages, leading to a jagged, interrupted visual trace rather than sustained epochs. For instance, pharmacological interventions like can mitigate this by extending non-REM segment lengths and reducing wake intrusions, smoothing the hypnogram profile. Reduced representation of REM and N3 (slow-wave) sleep is another hallmark, observed in depression where hypnograms show shortened REM latency—often with sleep-onset REM periods occurring within the first 20 minutes—and diminished N3 duration, particularly in the initial sleep cycles. This creates an asymmetrical pattern with earlier and more frequent REM intrusions and a flattened deep sleep phase, shifting slow-wave activity to later cycles. In aging, hypnograms similarly exhibit a progressive decline in N3 sleep by approximately 2% per decade until age 60, alongside reduced REM, resulting in shallower, less restorative profiles dominated by lighter N1 and N2 stages. These changes contribute to overall fragmentation, with elderly hypnograms featuring more frequent micro-arousals and a 10-minute per-decade reduction in total sleep time. Parasomnias introduce sudden stage jumps on hypnograms, such as abrupt arousals from deep N3 or sleep, often accompanied by partial awakenings that briefly elevate to wake or light N1/N2 before resuming prior stages. In sleep behavior disorder, while core stage architecture may remain intact, increased electromyographic (EMG) activity during epochs signals motor enactments, visually disrupting the atonic baseline without necessarily altering stage scoring but highlighting irregular transitions. NREM parasomnias, like confusional arousals, appear as sharp vertical spikes from N3 to wake, with episodes lasting seconds to minutes, as seen in cases of sudden screaming or agitation followed by rapid return to sleep. Obstructive sleep apnea exemplifies arousal-driven disruptions, where hypnograms reveal recurrent shifts from N2 or N3 to wake due to respiratory events, causing cyclic arousals every few minutes and severely curtailing both N3 and durations. These patterns manifest as repetitive "sawtooth" interruptions, reducing consolidation and amplifying fragmentation, with severe cases showing profound N3/REM deficits alongside hypoxemia-linked instability.

Analytical Methods

Quantitative Metrics

Quantitative metrics derived from the hypnogram provide numerical summaries of sleep architecture and quality, enabling standardized assessment in (). These metrics are calculated based on the scored sleep stages and wake periods across the recording, focusing on durations, proportions, and frequencies of sleep components. Key parameters include total sleep time, , and sleep efficiency, which collectively quantify overall sleep opportunity and consolidation. Total sleep time (TST) is defined as the total duration of sleep, comprising the sum of time spent in non-REM stages N1, N2, N3, and sleep. Sleep onset latency (SOL) measures the interval from lights out to the first epoch of any sleep stage (typically N1 or deeper). Sleep efficiency is computed as the ratio of TST to total time in bed (TIB), expressed as a percentage:
\text{Sleep efficiency} = \left( \frac{\text{TST}}{\text{TIB}} \right) \times 100
An alternative formulation uses total recording time (TRT) in the denominator, particularly when distinguishing between intended bedtime and actual monitoring duration:
\text{Sleep efficiency} = \left( \frac{\text{TST}}{\text{TRT}} \right) \times 100
Stage-specific metrics include the percentage of TST occupied by each sleep stage, which reflects the distribution of sleep architecture. For instance, N1 is typically a small fraction, while N2 dominates. REM latency is the time from sleep onset (first sleep epoch) to the onset of the first REM epoch. The number of awakenings counts discrete periods of wakefulness lasting at least 30 seconds after initial sleep onset. The arousal index, defined as the number of arousals (abrupt EEG frequency shifts ≥3 seconds without behavioral awakening) per hour of TST, quantifies sleep fragmentation:
\text{Arousal index} = \frac{\text{Number of arousals}}{\text{TST (in hours)}}
Normative values for healthy adults vary by age and sex but provide benchmarks for interpretation. Typical SOL ranges from 5-15 minutes, with values under 5 minutes indicating excessive sleepiness and over 30 minutes suggesting difficulty initiating sleep. Sleep efficiency exceeds 85% in young adults, declining slightly with age but remaining above 80% in most cases. REM latency normally falls between 70-120 minutes. Stage percentages approximate 5% for N1, 45-55% for N2, 15-25% for N3, and 20-25% for . The arousal index is under 10-25 per hour, with values above 10 signaling mild elevation.

Transition and Cycle Analysis

Cycle identification in hypnograms involves algorithmic detection of NREM-REM cycles by analyzing the sequential progression of sleep stages, typically starting with an NREM period followed by REM. These algorithms scan epoch-by-epoch annotations to delineate periods based on predefined criteria, such as minimum and maximum durations for NREM and REM segments. For instance, the SleepCycles R package implements rules adapted from earlier methods, where an NREM period begins at sleep onset (N1 or N2) with a minimum duration of 15 minutes and a maximum of 120 minutes, excluding brief wake intrusions; it splits extended periods at transitions to deeper stages like N3 after sustained lighter sleep. Similarly, the SSAVE software tool identifies NREM periods starting in N1 or N2, enforcing a 15-minute minimum and 120-minute maximum, while allowing up to 5 minutes of wake or light NREM, and defines REM periods with a 5-minute minimum (except the first). Such sequence-based approaches enable automated characterization of cycle structure from polysomnographic data, facilitating quantitative analysis of ultradian rhythms. Transition matrices quantify the probabilistic dynamics of shifting between sleep stages, representing the likelihood of moving from one state (e.g., wake, , N2, N3, ) to another in consecutive epochs. These matrices are constructed by counting observed transitions and normalizing by the total occurrences from the originating state, yielding entries that reflect directional preferences in normal . For example, the transition from N2 (light ) to N3 () exhibits a relatively high probability of approximately 0.16 in healthy adults, underscoring the typical deepening of NREM sleep. In contrast, the probability of transitioning from to wake is low, around 0.05, indicating stability during phases in normals. These matrices reveal asymmetries, such as preferential pathways from lighter NREM stages to deeper ones, and are derived from large cohorts to capture population-level patterns. Markov chains provide a foundational modeling framework for multistate analysis of hypnogram transitions, treating sleep stages as discrete states with probabilities governed by a that captures epoch-to-epoch dependencies. In this approach, the probability of entering a new state depends solely on the current state, enabling simulation of hypnogram trajectories and explanation of frequent arousals as inherent to the process. For instance, a applied to patients demonstrated that and wake durations follow modified exponential distributions, contrasting with scale-free patterns in untreated cases and highlighting treatment effects like . Extensions incorporate mixed-effects to account for inter-subject variability, modeling stages like wake, N1, N2, slow-wave, and REM as a multinomial process. Log-linear models, particularly variants, further refine transition rate analysis by treating events as recurrent and competing risks across multi-state systems. These Bayesian multilevel formulations estimate hazard rates with piecewise constant assumptions, incorporating random effects for subjects and night segments to handle hierarchical data; for example, they quantify elevated NREM-to-wake rates in sleep-disordered breathing from epidemiological cohorts like the Sleep Heart Health Study. Key findings from such analyses underscore the ultradian periodicity of sleep cycles, with a median duration of approximately 96 minutes (mean 99.5 minutes) across cycles, ranging from 60 to 150 minutes in 95% of cases, reflecting the classic ~90-minute rhythm. REM duration progressively increases across successive cycles, from shorter initial episodes (around 10 minutes) to longer later ones (up to 41 minutes), a pattern less pronounced in older adults; this escalation supports the consolidation of restorative processes over the night.

Clinical and Research Applications

Diagnostic Uses in Sleep Disorders

Hypnograms derived from polysomnography (PSG) play a crucial role in diagnosing sleep disorders by visually representing sleep architecture disruptions, such as fragmented sleep stages and abnormal transitions, which are indicative of underlying pathologies. In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the hypnogram typically reveals cyclic arousals originating from non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stage N2 or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, reflecting recurrent interruptions due to airway obstructions that prevent progression to deeper sleep. These arousals manifest as frequent shifts from sleep to wakefulness or lighter stages, often occurring in a cyclical pattern aligned with respiratory events, leading to overall sleep fragmentation. Additionally, OSA hypnograms show reduced duration of stage N3 sleep (), as repeated arousals inhibit the consolidation of , resulting in lower percentages of N3 compared to healthy individuals. This reduction in N3 is a key diagnostic marker, contributing to daytime symptoms like excessive sleepiness, and is quantified by comparing total N3 time to total time on the hypnogram. For narcolepsy, the hypnogram highlights short REM latency, typically less than 15 minutes from sleep onset, and the presence of sleep-onset REM periods (SOREMPs), where occurs within the initial sleep epochs without preceding NREM stages. These features indicate REM dysregulation, supporting the when combined with multiple SOREMPs on subsequent multiple sleep latency tests. In , hypnograms exhibit prolonged (), often exceeding 30 minutes, and elevated wake after sleep onset (WASO), with fragmented showing extended periods of interspersed throughout the night. These patterns reflect hyperarousal and difficulty maintaining , distinguishing insomnia from other disorders by the predominance of wake intrusions rather than stage-specific disruptions. Hypnograms integrate with other PSG components, such as respiratory channels, to compute the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), calculated as the number of apnea and events per hour of total time derived from the hypnogram. This integration enhances diagnostic accuracy for OSA severity, where an AHI greater than 15 events per hour, aligned with hypnogram fragmentation, confirms moderate to severe disease. Hypnograms also aid in diagnosing REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), where they show increased during REM sleep (REM without atonia) and frequent arousals or stage transitions linked to dream-enacting behaviors, often quantified by elevated REM density. For (RLS), hypnograms reveal periodic limb movements (PLMs) causing micro-arousals and fragmentation, particularly in NREM stages, with PLM index derived from integrated channels to support diagnosis when movements exceed 15 per hour.

Role in Sleep Research

Hypnograms are essential in sleep research for investigating , particularly the timing and variability of sleep cycles in disorders. Quantitative hypnogram analysis employs multi-exponential models to characterize sleep-wake bout durations and transition probabilities, revealing night-to-night variability and average REM cycles of approximately 90 minutes with N3 sleep more prominent early in the night. Longitudinal hypnogram tracking, often combined with , assesses circadian disruptions such as delayed sleep phase syndrome by quantifying increased fragmentation and multi-exponential dynamics in affected individuals. In pharmacological studies, hypnograms provide visual and quantitative insights into how hypnotics alter sleep stage transitions and architecture. Benzodiazepines, for example, suppress (N3 stage) while increasing stage 2 NREM sleep duration, resulting in fragmented transitions and reduced restorative effects despite improved . These changes, observable as shallower hypnogram profiles, highlight the trade-offs in efficacy and inform for targeted sleep modulation. Population-level research utilizes hypnograms to disentangle genetic and environmental influences on in large cohorts. Twin studies in adolescents demonstrate estimates of 62% for duration and 44-50% for sleep onset, midpoint, and restorative quality, with shared environmental factors exerting stronger effects in younger subgroups. Hypnogram-derived metrics from and in such cohorts reveal how genetic variants and environmental exposures, like school schedules, shape cycle stability and stage proportions across diverse populations. Longitudinal hypnogram analysis tracks developmental maturation and pathological changes in sleep architecture. During , hypnograms illustrate a consolidation from polyphasic to monophasic patterns, with sleep decreasing from 50% in infancy to 20% by age 10, alongside emerging sleep spindles and shorter cycles (around ) that reflect thalamocortical and support . In neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, serial hypnograms show progressive fragmentation, reduced NREM duration, fewer bouts, and declining power starting weeks before overt behavioral deficits, correlating with pathology and . As of 2025, research applications increasingly incorporate , such as hypnogram language models (e.g., HypnoGPT) for automated sleep staging and enhanced diagnosis of disorders like OSA and by analyzing patterns in large datasets with improved accuracy over manual scoring.

Limitations

Subjectivity in Manual Scoring

Manual scoring of hypnograms, which involves classifying 30-second epochs of () data into sleep stages according to standardized criteria such as those from the (AASM), is inherently subjective due to inter-rater variability among scorers. A of studies using manual scoring found substantial overall agreement with a of 0.76 (95% : 0.71–0.81), indicating reliable but imperfect consensus across stages. However, agreement is notably lower for lighter sleep stages, with values around 0.31 for and 0.60 for N2, reflecting challenges in distinguishing subtle EEG patterns at these boundaries. Several factors contribute to these discrepancies in manual scoring. Ambiguous epochs, which exhibit features of multiple stages, account for much of the inter-scorer variability, as visual interpretation of EEG, EOG, and EMG signals can lead to differing classifications. artifacts, such as those from shifts or displacements, further obscure signals and increase error rates in epoch assignment. Scorer arises from the labor-intensive nature of reviewing entire overnight recordings, potentially degrading attention and consistency over extended sessions. Differences in training and experience among scorers also play a role, with less standardized backgrounds leading to divergent applications of scoring rules. This subjectivity impacts derived sleep metrics, often resulting in over- or underestimation of stage durations; for instance, variability in N3 () scoring can lead to confidence intervals spanning 1% to 28% of total sleep time, affecting assessments of sleep quality and recovery. Such inconsistencies may misrepresent total sleep time or stage proportions, influencing clinical interpretations in evaluations. To mitigate these issues, certification programs like the AASM Inter-Scorer Reliability (ISR) assessment ensure scorers meet competency standards through regular testing and feedback. Dual scoring protocols, where two independent scorers review the same record and resolve discrepancies via consensus, have been shown to enhance reliability in and clinical settings.

Technical and Interpretive Challenges

Signal artifacts pose significant challenges to the accuracy of hypnogram generation during (PSG), as they can distort electroencephalogram (EEG) signals essential for staging. Electrode detachment, often resulting from patient movement during , introduces abrupt voltage changes or flatlines in EEG traces, leading to misclassification of stages. , such as electromagnetic interference from power lines or nearby electrical devices, further contaminates EEG data by overlaying low-frequency artifacts that mimic true brain activity patterns. These artifacts necessitate preprocessing steps like automated detection algorithms to filter distortions, yet residual noise can still compromise the reliability of hypnogram interpretations in both clinical and settings. The conventional use of 30-second epochs in hypnogram construction inherently limits the of sleep analysis, often overlooking brief events such as microsleeps lasting less than 30 seconds. This epoch length, standardized since the 1968 Rechtschaffen and Kales criteria, aggregates physiological signals into discrete windows that may average out rapid transitions, resulting in an oversimplified representation of . Consequently, ultradian rhythms—short-term oscillations within cycles, such as subtle arousals or stage shifts—are inadequately captured, potentially underestimating fragmentation in conditions like or . Shorter epochs, such as 5-second mini-epochs, have been explored to address these gaps but are not yet standard due to increased computational demands and scoring complexity. Hypnograms primarily depict sleep macrostructure, such as the sequence of stages (wake, , N2, N3, ), but fail to represent microstructure elements that provide deeper insights into sleep quality and stability. For instance, cyclic alternating patterns (CAPs)—transient EEG arousals occurring in non- sleep—are not visible in standard hypnograms, limiting their utility in assessing sleep instability associated with disorders like . Similarly, sigma power, reflecting activity in N2 stage, which correlates with and protection against arousals, remains unquantified in hypnogram analyses despite its prognostic value. These interpretive gaps highlight the need for complementary tools, like power spectral density analysis, to bridge macro- and microstructure evaluations without altering the core hypnogram framework. In non-laboratory settings, -based hypnogram approximations introduce additional precision challenges compared to full conducted in controlled environments. , relying on wrist-worn accelerometers to infer -wake states, achieves moderate agreement with PSG for total sleep time (sensitivity around 0.96, specificity 0.46) but performs poorly in distinguishing specific sleep stages, with accuracy dropping below 70% for NREM versus differentiation. Home-based is less invasive and suitable for long-term monitoring, yet it is susceptible to confounds and lacks EEG , yielding hypnograms that can overestimate efficiency by up to 18% relative to lab PSG. This disparity underscores actigraphy's role as a screening tool rather than a substitute for detailed PSG-derived hypnograms in diagnostic contexts.

Emerging Developments

Automated Hypnogram Generation

Automated hypnogram generation involves computer-assisted systems that classify sleep stages from physiological signals, reducing the labor-intensive manual scoring process. These systems typically process data or signals from wearable devices to produce hypnograms, enabling faster analysis in clinical and research settings. Early approaches relied on rule-based algorithms, but methods have become prevalent for improved accuracy. Machine learning techniques, such as random forests and support vector machines (SVMs), are widely used for epoch-by-epoch in automated hypnogram generation. Random forests aggregate decisions from multiple decision trees trained on EEG features like spectral power bands (, , ) and time-domain characteristics (e.g., ) to distinguish sleep stages, achieving robust performance on multi-channel EEG data from PSG recordings. Similarly, SVMs employ kernel functions to map EEG features into higher-dimensional spaces for separating non-linear boundaries between stages like , light sleep (N1/N2), deep sleep (N3), and REM, often using kernels for optimal separation in single- or multi-channel setups. These methods process 30-second epochs, extracting features such as transforms or entropy measures to feed into the classifiers, with ensemble variants combining SVMs to handle class imbalance in sleep data. Wearable devices generate simplified hypnograms by integrating (motion detection via accelerometers) with from photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors, bypassing full requirements for consumer use. Devices like the Charge 6 and Oura Ring 4 classify stages into wake, light, deep, and categories, using proprietary algorithms that analyze movement patterns and trends to estimate transitions, though they often overestimate light duration compared to . These wearables provide accessible, overnight tracking without electrodes, supporting basic hypnogram visualization in apps for personal monitoring. Validation studies demonstrate that automated scorers achieve 80-90% epoch-by-epoch agreement with expert manual scoring, approaching or matching among humans (typically 75-85%). For instance, meta-analyses of machine learning-based systems report values of 0.76 for overall stage agreement, with per-stage accuracies ranging from 84% for to 93% for and in deep learning-augmented models up to 2023; more recent 2025 studies show improvements exceeding 90% accuracy on benchmarks like Sleep-EDF. Such performance holds across diverse populations, though agreement dips for ambiguous transitions like to N2. FDA-cleared tools like Somnolyzer 24×7 represent standardized automated hypnogram generation for clinical use, employing neural network-based scoring on full data to produce AASM-compliant hypnograms. Validated in large cohorts, Somnolyzer shows 80-88% agreement with experts for stages, facilitating efficient scoring in sleep labs while allowing overrides for discrepancies.

Advanced AI and Modeling Techniques

techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks (s) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), have enabled end-to-end automated scoring of hypnograms by directly processing raw electrophysiological signals such as EEG into stage sequences. These models extract spatiotemporal features from time-series data, achieving accuracies around 85-87% on benchmark datasets like Sleep-EDF, surpassing traditional feature-engineered approaches in handling variability across subjects. For instance, recurrent architectures integrate local from s with sequential dependencies via RNNs or LSTMs, facilitating robust hypnogram generation without . A notable advancement is HypnoGPT, a 2024 language model that treats hypnograms as textual sequences, akin to , to capture sleep stage transitions and enhance staging accuracy. By a architecture on sequential hypnogram data, it corrects initial predictions from base models, improving overall accuracy to 84.3% on datasets and 83.9% on EEG recordings in controlled evaluations. This approach leverages the model's ability to model long-range dependencies in cycles, providing interpretable insights into disorder patterns like . Dimensionality reduction via () has been applied to map states in hypnograms, reducing high-dimensional EEG spectral features to low-dimensional representations that track continuous depth. The Hypno-PC framework, introduced in a 2024 study, combines with and Gaussian hidden Markov models to identify objective states, revealing gradual transitions into deep non-REM versus abrupt arousals. This method achieves equitable performance across demographics, with a single component explaining significant variance in dynamics from multi-lead EEG data. Predictive modeling for hypnograms focuses on disruptions, such as arousals or apnea events, from partial using signals from wearables or non-contact methods like radio waves. models trained on wearable and can predict low sleep efficiency up to 8 hours prior to onset with techniques, aiding proactive interventions. Similarly, radio wave-based systems extract breathing and motion signals to forecast hypnogram epochs, achieving 80.5% accuracy in staging wake, light, deep, and phases from partial reflections, validated against full in large cohorts. These integrations enable real-time disruption prediction without invasive sensors. Recent advances in multi-modal fusion combine EEG with auxiliary signals to boost hypnogram accuracy. For example, frameworks fusing EEG, EOG, and EMG from achieve up to 91.55% accuracy for 5-class on benchmark datasets like PB-CAPSDB, outperforming single-modality models by capturing complementary physiological cues. Such fusions enhance robustness to , establishing scale for clinical translation while prioritizing high-impact, data-efficient architectures.

References

  1. [1]
    Hypnogram - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A hypnogram is defined as a plot that represents sleep stages versus time, illustrating the pattern of sleep throughout the night, typically reflecting ...
  2. [2]
    Stages of Sleep: What Happens in a Normal Sleep Cycle?
    Jul 25, 2025 · If someone undergoes a sleep study, their sleep architecture can be represented visually in a hypnogram, or graph.
  3. [3]
    Characterizing Sleep Structure Using the Hypnogram - PMC
    A relatively underutilized, but universally available, method for assessing sleep continuity is the hypnogram. The graphic representation of sleep-stage ...
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Hypnogram - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A hypnogram is defined as a graphical representation that displays sleep stages in 30-second epochs throughout the night, providing an overview of sleep ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Characterizing Sleep Structure Using the Hypnogram
    Research on the effects of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) on sleep structure has traditionally been based on composite sleep-stage summaries.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events
    The AASM manual covers rules, terminology, and technical specifications for scoring sleep, including sleep staging, arousal, cardiac, movement, and respiratory ...
  8. [8]
    Changes in Human Brain Potentials During the Onset of Sleep
    ... , [...] , A. L. Loomis, E. N. Harvey, and G. Hobart+2 authors fewerAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 12 Nov 1937. Vol 86, Issue 2237. pp. 448-450.
  9. [9]
    The History of Polysomnography: Tool of Scientific Discovery
    Mar 18, 2017 · In 1937, Loomis, along with Harvey and Hobart, published the first report from continuous, all-night studies of human sleep [ 6 ]. They had ...
  10. [10]
    Cyclic variations in EEG during sleep and their relation to eye ...
    Dement and Kleitman, 1957. W. Dement, N. Kleitman. The relation of eye movements during sleep to dream activity: an objective method for the study of dreaming.
  11. [11]
    Who discovered REM sleep? - PMC - NIH
    Sep 4, 2023 · Dement and Kleitman used the same terminology, but not stage REM, in their detailed account of the stages of sleep published in 1957 [6]. ...Missing: hypnogram 1960s
  12. [12]
    The AASM Scoring Manual Four Years Later
    This paper reviews studies and critiques which evaluate the impact and effects of the AASM Manual Sleep Scoring Manual in the four years since its publication.
  13. [13]
    History of the Development of Sleep Medicine in the United States
    The first sleep disorders center was established as a narcolepsy clinic at Stanford University in 1964. By 1970 the Stanford group had evolved into a full- ...
  14. [14]
    Sleep Study - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Aug 14, 2023 · The patient must sleep for at least 2 hours during the PSG to be considered a valid study. Go to: Indications. Indications for a polysomnogram ( ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Practice Parameters for the Indications for Polysomnography and ...
    PSG recording for evaluating breathing disorders requires a min- imum of EEG, EOG, chin EMG, airflow, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory effort, and heart ...Missing: acquisition setup
  16. [16]
    The AASM Recommended and Acceptable EEG Montages are ...
    This study demonstrates that the two EEG montages endorsed by the AASM Manual produce similar sleep and EEG arousal statistics.
  17. [17]
    Lead Placement for Sleep Stage Scoring - Medscape Reference
    Aug 12, 2025 · Recommended placement: one electrode 1 cm below the left outer canthus, one 1 cm above the right outer canthus. Conjugate eye movements produce ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Standard Polysomnography AAST Technical Guideline
    Maximum electrode impedances should not exceed 5 kilohms for EEG, ECG, and EOG channels. Maximum electrode impedances should not exceed 10 kilohms for EMG ...
  19. [19]
    Technical notes for digital polysomnography recording in sleep ...
    Sampling Rates, Desirable, Minimal ; EEG, 500 Hz, 200 Hz ; EOG, 500 Hz, 200 Hz ; EMG, 500 Hz, 200 Hz ; ECG, 500 Hz, 200 Hz.
  20. [20]
    A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring ...
    Mar 1, 2019 · A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. by: Allan Rechtschaffen, Anthony ...
  21. [21]
    Rechtschaffen, A. and Kales, A. (1968) A Manual of ... - Scirp.org.
    Rechtschaffen, A. and Kales, A. (1968) A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects.
  22. [22]
    AASM Scoring Manual - American Academy of Sleep Medicine
    Apr 9, 2025 · This comprehensive and evolving resource provides rules for scoring sleep stages, arousals, respiratory events during sleep, movements during sleep and cardiac ...Scoring Manual Version 3... · Scoring Manual 3 Access · Summary Of Updates
  23. [23]
    AASM Scoring Manual Updates for 2017 (Version 2.4)
    All AASM-accredited sleep facilities will be required to implement the new rules in the new version by October 1, 2017.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events
    A new note has been added to address a FAQ to the 2007 Scoring Manual regarding scoring arousals in wake: Note 3. Arousals meeting all scoring criteria but ...
  25. [25]
    The Visual Scoring of Sleep in Adults
    Table 2—Rechtschaffen and Kales Sleep Staging Criteria. Sleep Stage Scoring Criteria. Waking. >50% of the page (epoch) consists of alpha (8-13 Hz) activity or ...
  26. [26]
    Interrater reliability of sleep stage scoring: a meta-analysis
    To increase the interrater reliability of sleep stage scoring, there have been consistent studies with a high degree of variance.
  27. [27]
    Hypnograms - Luna
    ### Summary of Hypnograms Display in Luna Software
  28. [28]
    Hypnogram of scored human sleep staging - ResearchGate
    The y-axis represents sleep stages (evaluated in 30-second epochs) including: REM (Rapid Eye Movement); Stage 1 (N1); Stage 2 (N2); Stage 3 (N3 or SWS).
  29. [29]
    Profusion Sleep Software - Compumedics
    Profusion Sleep software suite is designed to give you everything you need: Clarity, Power, Speed, Quality Assurance, and Great Reports.
  30. [30]
    Embla® RemLogic™ Software | Neurolite Advanced Medical Solutions
    Embla RemLogic: The world's most widely accepted sleep diagnostic. Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) and other sleep disorders.
  31. [31]
    Multicomponent Analysis of Sleep Using Electrocortical, Respiratory ...
    Dec 3, 2020 · Watson et al. described “packets” of NREM sleep alternating with “microarousals,” interspersed within NREM epochs, characterized by increased ...
  32. [32]
    Physiology, Sleep Stages - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Sleep occurs in five stages: wake, N1, N2, N3, and REM. Stages N1 to N3 are considered non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, with each stage leading to ...Missing: hypnogram axis
  33. [33]
    How to interpret the results of a sleep study - PMC - NIH
    In adults, approximately 5% of the total sleep time is Stage N1; 50% Stage N2; and 20% is Stage N3 sleep. The remaining 25% is REM stage sleep (7, 8). Non ...
  34. [34]
    Sleep in Normal Aging - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Mar 1, 2019 · During nocturnal sleep, the proportion of non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) stage 1 and stage 2 increases with age, and the proportion of slow ...
  35. [35]
    Normal polysomnography parameters in healthy adults - PubMed
    For each decade of age, total sleep time decreased by 10·1 min (95% CI 7·5 to 12·8), sleep efficiency decreased by 2·1% (1·5 to 2·6), wake after sleep onset ...
  36. [36]
    Assessing sleep-wake survival dynamics in relation to sleep quality ...
    Sep 17, 2020 · Traditional parameters used to describe sleep fragmentation as scored in the hypnogram include WASO, number of awakenings, and sleep stage ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    Depression and Sleep - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Jan 31, 2019 · The view that shortened REM latency is a specific marker of depression [2] was challenged by other studies reporting similar changes in other ...Missing: hypnogram | Show results with:hypnogram
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    Aging and Sleep: Physiology and Pathophysiology - PMC
    In healthy adults, sleep progresses through NREM stages N1 through N3 followed by a period of REM occurring ~90 minutes into sleep. This sleep state cycling ...Physiological Changes In... · Changes In Sleep Quality And... · Effects Of Aging On The...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Three cases of parasomnias similar to sleep terrors occurring during ...
    We evaluated 3 cases of a sleep terrors–like parasomnia that occurred exclusively during arousals from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.
  42. [42]
    Polysomnographic analysis of arousal responses in obstructive ...
    Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by multiple interruptions of airflow between periods of arousals. A key feature of OSAS is the 20- ...
  43. [43]
    Cyclic alternating patterns and arousals: what is relevant in ... - NIH
    To review main knowledges and gaps in the field of sleep microstructure, represented by the cyclic alternating pattern (CAP), in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
  44. [44]
    Sleep stage continuity is associated with objective daytime ...
    Oct 1, 2024 · The conventional metrics used to quantify sleep architecture were: arousal index, TST, SE, SOL, wake after sleep onset, and total duration of ...Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
  45. [45]
    Nocturnal Sleep Dynamics Identify Narcolepsy Type 1 - PMC
    NT1 and NT2 patients had lower latency to rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and NT1 patients showed the highest number of awakenings, sleep stage transitions, and ...
  46. [46]
    An Interesting Case of Late Age at Onset of Narcolepsy with Cataplexy
    The diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy was established based on EDS, frequent cataplexy, hypnopompic hallucinations, short REM latency during an overnight ...
  47. [47]
    Exploring the Effects of Total Sleep Deprivation on Chronic Insomnia ...
    May 19, 2025 · Current consensus of PSG markers of chronic insomnia includes increased sleep onset latency (SOL) and wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and ...Missing: prolonged | Show results with:prolonged
  48. [48]
    Sleep-Related Arousal Versus General Cognitive Arousal in Primary ...
    With respect to subjective data, insomnia patients had significantly lower sleep efficiency as well as significantly increased WASO and sleep onset latency in ...
  49. [49]
    Obstructive Sleep Apnea - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Mar 4, 2025 · Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder characterized by repeated episodes of complete (apnea) or partial (hypopnea) collapse of the upper airway.Missing: hypnogram slow wave
  50. [50]
    Technical advances in the characterization of the complexity of ...
    Nov 19, 2012 · Quantitative analysis of the hypnogram ... Longitudinal data such as this can be used qualitatively to assess circadian rhythm disorders ...
  51. [51]
    Benzodiazepines and Sleep Architecture: A Systematic Review
    Findings on BZDs effects on sleep architecture confirm an increase in stage 2 of NREM sleep and a decrease in time of stages 3 and 4 of NREM sleep.
  52. [52]
    The association between benzodiazepine use and sleep quality in ...
    Nov 26, 2016 · Benzodiazepines are associated with modest improvements to sleep latency and longer sleep duration; however, they suppress deep sleep which ...
  53. [53]
    Genetic and environmental influences on sleep-wake behaviors in ...
    Abstract. Study Objectives. To investigate the influence of genetic and environmental factors on sleep-wake behaviors across adolescence.
  54. [54]
    Developmental Changes in Sleep Oscillations during Early Childhood
    The sleep structure of a representative boy at each longitudinal assessment is illustrated in hypnograms (Figure 1). Oscillatory events detected in the sleep ...Missing: architecture | Show results with:architecture
  55. [55]
    Relations between sleep patterns early in life and brain development
    Jun 26, 2022 · Growing evidence suggests that, during development, there are parallel changes in sleep and the brain and that sleep may modulate brain structure and activity ...2. Sleep Changes Across... · 2.1. Sleep Architecture · 2.2. Sleep Timing And...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Longitudinal changes in EEG power, sleep cycles and behaviour in ...
    Disturbed sleep is associated with cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD).Missing: hypnogram | Show results with:hypnogram
  57. [57]
    Agreement in the Scoring of Respiratory Events and Sleep Among ...
    The scoring of Stages N1 and N2 showed only fair (κ = 0.31) and moderate (κ = 0.60) agreements respectively, although there was still substantial agreement in ...
  58. [58]
    approach for determining the reliability of manual and digital scoring ...
    Sep 15, 2023 · Inter-scorer variability in sleep staging is largely due to equivocal epochs that contain features of more than one stage.
  59. [59]
    Beyond accuracy: a framework for evaluating algorithmic bias and ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly improved sleep-scoring algorithms, bringing their performance close ...
  60. [60]
    Performance of an Automated Polysomnography Scoring System ...
    Manual scoring of polysomnograms (PSG) is labor intensive and has considerable variance between scorers. Automation of scoring could reduce cost and improve ...
  61. [61]
    Polysomnography scoring–related training and quantitative ...
    Notably, the group with the lowest agreement in the first test (< 50.0%) exhibited the most substantial improvement in agreement (from 49.0 to 82.2%; Figure 3).
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    The American Academy of Sleep Medicine Inter-scorer Reliability ...
    With the age of the patient and conditions of the study, high amplitude slow waves and prolonged bouts of stage N3 sleep were expected. The pool of scorers ...
  64. [64]
    Sleep ISR: Inter-Scorer Reliability Assessment System
    Scoring exams for sleep study records each month. Sleep centers can meet the AASM Accreditation Standard F-7 for inter-scorer reliability by participating.Missing: dual | Show results with:dual
  65. [65]
    Interrater sleep stage scoring reliability between manual scoring ...
    The aim of this study is to evaluate interrater reliability (IRR) for sleep stage scoring between human scorers from 2 European sleep centers and the automatic ...
  66. [66]
    Detection of Movement and Lead-Popping Artifacts in ...
    Oct 22, 2024 · Artifacts caused by movement or loose leads distort EEG measurements. We developed a method to automatically identify such artifacts in a PSG EEG trace.
  67. [67]
    An Unsupervised Multichannel Artifact Detection Method for Sleep ...
    Jan 31, 2019 · The aim of this study is to develop a multichannel artifact detection method for multichannel sleep EEG capable of rejecting different artifact types at once.
  68. [68]
    Rethinking Sleep Analysis: Comment on the AASM Manual for ... - NIH
    Sleep scoring is traditionally based on 30-second segments of sleep records, called epochs. The segmentation with a fixed epoch length of 30 seconds goes ...
  69. [69]
    Spotlight on Sleep Stage Classification Based on EEG - PMC
    Jun 29, 2023 · Sleep staging is based on long distance montages of scalp EEG recordings, which provide a very global picture of brain activity and are unable ...Sleep Stage Classification... · Limitations Of Sleep Stage... · Prospects In Sleep Staging
  70. [70]
    Automated Characterization of Cyclic Alternating Pattern Using ... - NIH
    Often, sleep is analyzed using macrostructure sleep stages which alone cannot provide information about the functional structure and stability of sleep. The ...Missing: hypnogram sigma
  71. [71]
    Representations of temporal sleep dynamics: Review and synthesis ...
    This review provides a structured overview of approaches to represent temporal sleep dynamics, categorized based on the way the source data is compressed.Missing: expanded | Show results with:expanded
  72. [72]
    Evaluating reliability in wearable devices for sleep staging - Nature
    Mar 18, 2024 · Measuring sleep: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of wrist actigraphy compared to polysomnography. Sleep 36, 1747 (2013). Article ...Results · Sleep Staging Epoch Lengths · Algorithms For Sleep Staging
  73. [73]
    Comparison of Actigraphy with Polysomnography and Sleep Logs in ...
    In the case of sleep latency, this suggests that actigraphy may be less accurate with longer sleep latencies than with shorter sleep latencies. With patients in ...
  74. [74]
    Accuracy of Actigraphy Compared to Concomitant Ambulatory ...
    Mar 3, 2021 · Actigraphy provides longitudinal sleep data over multiple nights. It is a less expensive and less cumbersome method for measuring sleep than polysomnography.
  75. [75]
    Expert-level sleep scoring with deep neural networks
    Nov 16, 2018 · The RCNN reproduces PSG diagnostic scoring for sleep staging, sleep apnea, and limb movements with accuracies of 87.6%, 88.2% and 84.7% on held-out test data.Methods · Training Algorithms · Results
  76. [76]
    FlexSleepTransformer: a transformer-based sleep staging model ...
    Nov 1, 2024 · EEGSNet uses CNNs and bidirectional LSTMs to process EEG spectrogram inputs, capitalizing on time-frequency representations of sleep data.<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    HypnoGPT: A Hypnogram Language Model for Sleep Staging ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · This study introduces HypnoGPT, the first GPT-based hypnogram language model. By modeling the sequential nature of sleep and capturing transition patterns ...
  78. [78]
    The Hypno-PC: Uncovering Sleep Dynamics through Principal Component Analysis and Hidden Markov Modeling of Electrophysiological Signals
    **Summary of Hypno-PC: Use of PCA for Brain State Mapping in Sleep, Key Findings on Sleep Dynamics**
  79. [79]
    Hypno-PC: uncovering sleep dynamics through principal component ...
    Jun 9, 2025 · Furthermore, Hypno-PC emphasized continuous sleep dynamics, revealing a gradual descent into deep NREM sleep contrasted with abrupt transitions ...
  80. [80]
    machine learning and wearable device data forecast sleep ...
    Aug 14, 2025 · We developed models that forecast low sleep efficiency 4 and 8 hours prior to sleep onset using gradient boosting (CatBoost) and deep learning (Convolutional ...Missing: disruptions hypnogram partial radio waves 2023-2025
  81. [81]
    None
    ### Summary of Predictive Modeling for Sleep Disruptions Using Radio Waves
  82. [82]
    Machine learning-empowered sleep staging classification using ...
    May 6, 2024 · The goal is to enhance an automated sleep staging system's performance by leveraging the diverse signals captured through multi-modal polysomnography ...Missing: generation | Show results with:generation