Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

IEEE 802.15.6

IEEE 802.15.6 is an IEEE standard that defines a communication protocol for short-range, low-power, and highly reliable wireless body area networks (WBANs), enabling data transmission between devices located on, in, or around the human body (or similar environments like vehicle bodies) at data rates up to 10 Mbps. Developed by the IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 (TG6), which was formed in November 2007 to address the need for standardized WBAN communication optimized for medical and consumer applications, the standard was published in February 2012 as IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012. It specifies the physical (PHY) and medium access control (MAC) layers, supporting multiple PHY options including narrowband (NB) in ISM and medical bands (e.g., 402–405 MHz MICS band with rates up to 485.7 kbps using PSK modulations), ultra-wideband (UWB) in 3–10 GHz ranges (rates from 0.5 to 10 Mbps), and human body communications (HBC) using electrostatic fields in lower frequencies (e.g., 16 MHz and 27 MHz bands). The layer of IEEE 802.15.6 employs a superframe structure bounded by beacons, divided into phases for exclusive access (EAP), (RAP), and contention access (), with support for scheduled, polled, CSMA/CA, and slotted mechanisms to ensure (QoS), low , and efficient in low-power environments. is addressed through three levels: unsecured (Level 0), authentication-only (Level 1), and full plus (Level 2), prioritizing protection against interference and ensuring compliance with (SAR) limits and non-interference to other devices. Key design considerations include the effects of presence on antennas, user motion, and power efficiency, making it suitable for implantable, wearable, and portable devices without relying on existing standards like or . Targeted applications span healthcare, such as real-time vital sign monitoring (e.g., ECG, EEG), automated drug delivery for , and implantable devices like deep brain stimulators or retinal prostheses, as well as non-medical uses including personal entertainment, , and social networking via body-centric wearables. Since its publication, the standard has been designated inactive-reserved as of March 2023, but ongoing work under revision project IEEE P802.15.6 aims to update it by enhancing UWB PHY and MAC features for improved dependability, , and support for emerging use cases like vehicular body area networks; Draft D06 was circulated in May 2025, and as of November 2025, the project continues toward publication with proposed support for data rates up to 50 Mbps and improved coexistence.

Overview

Definition and Scope

IEEE 802.15.6 is an international standard developed by the working group for short-range wireless communications in Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs), specifically optimized for miniaturized, low-power devices deployed on, in, or around the , though not limited exclusively to human-centric scenarios. Published in 2012, it was designated inactive-reserved in March 2023, with an amendment (P802.15.6a) under development as of May 2025. It defines the (PHY) and layer (MAC) to enable reliable, low-complexity connectivity among these devices, addressing unique challenges such as body-induced antenna effects and user mobility impacts. The standard emphasizes ultra-low consumption to support battery-operated nodes, including implantable and wearable sensors, while ensuring compliance with regulatory limits on (SAR) and non-interference with coexisting systems. The scope of IEEE 802.15.6 covers fixed and mobile point-to-point, point-to-multipoint, and ad-hoc network topologies within WBANs, facilitating communication over distances up to 3 meters. It supports data rates ranging from 75.9 kbps to 10 Mbps (with some UWB modes up to 15.6 Mbps) in the original specification, utilizing approved frequency bands such as (e.g., 2.4 GHz) and medical bands (e.g., 402–405 MHz), along with (UWB) and human body communication (HBC) options. This framework prioritizes , with maximum transmit powers constrained (e.g., -41.3 dBm/MHz in certain U.S. channels) to extend device life in resource-limited environments. A core objective of the standard is to provide (QoS) mechanisms for diverse traffic types, including real-time medical data, while minimizing interference and maintaining packet error rates below 1% under specified conditions. By focusing on both medical and non-medical applications, such as health monitoring, IEEE 802.15.6 enables secure and efficient body-centric networking without delving into higher-layer protocols.

Key Characteristics

IEEE 802.15.6 is engineered for short-range, low-power wireless communication within body area networks (BANs), emphasizing to support battery-constrained devices typically worn or implanted on or in the . The standard incorporates techniques such as hibernation modes, where nodes remain inactive across multiple superframes, and modes during specific intervals to minimize energy consumption. Additionally, it prioritizes (SAR) minimization to ensure body safety, with transmit power limits like a maximum -40 dBm EIRP at certain frequencies and encouragement for even lower power levels. The protocol addresses the challenges of dynamic environments influenced by user motion and body antenna effects by providing extremely low latency and high reliability for critical applications. It achieves this through quality-of-service (QoS) mechanisms that prioritize time-sensitive data, targeting a packet error rate (PER) below 1% for typical payloads in mobile scenarios. IEEE 802.15.6 complies with non-interference guidelines for industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) bands as well as medical frequency allocations, adhering to regulations such as , including spectral masks and limits to prevent disruption to coexisting systems. The network employs a one-hop star topology, where a central coordinates multiple nodes, enabling efficient and optional extension to two-hop relaying for broader coverage. Provisions for coexistence with other wireless standards, such as and 802.15.4, include beacon shifting, channel hopping, and active superframe interleaving to mitigate interference in shared spectrum environments. Overall system goals encompass data rates ranging from 75.9 kbps to 10 Mbps (with some UWB modes up to 15.6 Mbps), supported by various (PHY) modes, an operational range up to 3 meters, and QoS prioritization to handle time-sensitive medical and non-medical data streams effectively.

History and Development

Formation of Task Group

The Task Group 6 (TG6) was established in November 2007 under the Working Group to develop a communication optimized for low-power devices operating on, in, or around the , specifically targeting body area networks (BANs). This formation followed a call for interest during the IEEE 802 that month, which garnered support for addressing the limitations of prior (WPAN) in supporting emerging BAN applications. Operations as TG6 officially began at the group's first meeting in January 2008 in , where initial proposals were solicited and discussed. The primary motivation for TG6's creation arose from the growing demand for reliable, energy-efficient wireless technologies to enable wearable and implantable medical devices, such as sensors for continuous vital sign monitoring and therapeutic implants. These applications, building on the foundations of earlier standards like 802.15.1 () and 802.15.4 (), required specialized optimizations for ultra-low power consumption, short-range propagation through or near the body, and interference mitigation in dynamic environments. The task group aimed to serve both medical (e.g., remote patient diagnostics) and non-medical (e.g., consumer fitness tracking) use cases, emphasizing and scalability. Key contributors to TG6 included major industry entities such as Philips Research and , which submitted foundational technical proposals on designs and mechanisms, alongside contributions from academic groups and organizations like the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) and (GE). These stakeholders collaborated to merge over 30 initial proposals into unified drafts, fostering a consensus-driven approach. The group's project authorization request (PAR), which defined the standard's scope including support for data rates up to 10 Mbps and coexistence with other WPANs, received IEEE Standards Association approval on December 7, 2011. Among the early challenges addressed by TG6 were the distinct requirements for on-body communication—such as between closely spaced wearable sensors affected by shadowing and movement—and off-body communication to external gateways, necessitating differentiated allocation, channel models, and considerations to ensure robust performance.

Standardization Timeline

The development of the IEEE 802.15.6 standard began with the formation of Task Group 6 (TG6) in 2007, which issued a call for proposals on applications that closed in May 2008, receiving 34 submissions subsequently merged into a single candidate proposal. Draft development commenced in March 2009, with iterative refinements leading to the standard's approval by the Board on February 6, 2012, and its formal publication as IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012 on February 29, 2012. Between 2012 and 2023, no major amendments were issued for IEEE 802.15.6, though academic analyses identified limitations such as vulnerabilities in its protocols. In response to the need for updates to address these shortcomings and evolving use cases, the was inactivated (withdrawn) on March 30, 2023. This inactivation paved the way for a revision project. Initially proposed as an amendment under project P802.15.6a (withdrawn in 2022), the Project Authorization Request (PAR) for the full revision project P802.15.6ma was approved by NesCom in July 2023, transitioning to a full revision. The P802.15.6ma revision, managed under Task Group 6ma, aims to enhance dependability for area networks (HBANs) while adding support for vehicular body area networks (VBANs), including new data rates to achieve at least 50 Mbps throughput, improved , and better interference management for low-power operations. As of November 2025, the revision remains in active development, with Draft 8 undergoing IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot recirculation and no finalized publication date set, targeting completion around March 2026.

Physical Layer Specifications

PHY Modes

The IEEE 802.15.6 standard defines three primary (PHY) modes to support diverse operational environments in body area networks: the optional (NB) PHY for general-purpose, low-power communications; the mandatory Impulse Radio (IR-UWB) PHY for high data rates with minimal power consumption; and the mandatory Communication (HBC) PHY for on-body conduction-based transmission that reduces electromagnetic exposure. The NB PHY employs modulation schemes such as π/2-DBPSK (mandatory), π/4-DQPSK (mandatory), and π/8-D8PSK (optional), with GMSK for the 420–450 MHz band, combined with convolutional at rates of 1/2, 2/3, or 3/4, to achieve data rates from 57.5 kbps to 971.4 kbps (mandatory rates: 75.9, 121.4, 242.9, 485.7 kbps, band-dependent, e.g., up to 485.7 kbps in 402–405 MHz), making it suitable for power-efficient devices in various bands. It supports features like channel hopping and to enhance robustness against while maintaining low complexity and constant envelope signaling for energy savings. The IR-UWB PHY utilizes impulse radio techniques with burst position modulation (BPM) and binary phase shift keying (BPSK) (mandatory), alongside Reed-Solomon and convolutional coding, to deliver data rates from 0.4875 Mbps (mandatory) up to 15.6 Mbps in coherent modes through low-duty-cycle operation that minimizes usage. This mode operates across multiple channels in the 3.1–10.6 GHz range, incorporating (HARQ) in its high quality-of-service variant for reliable, high-bandwidth applications such as medical data streaming. The HBC PHY relies on capacitive or galvanic coupling through the as the , employing BPSK modulation (mandatory) with convolutional coding at a rate of 1/2 to support data rates from 164 kbps (mandatory) to 1.312 Mbps, thereby minimizing exposure compared to alternatives. It operates in two bands centered at 16 MHz and 27 MHz, each with 4 MHz bandwidth, using techniques like pulse coding and pilot insertion for , which enable low-power, touch-enabled communications ideal for wearable sensors. All PHY modes incorporate channel models that account for body shadowing effects—where the attenuates signals—and variations due to and , ensuring reliable in on-body and near-body scenarios. These models, detailed in the standard's clauses for each PHY, guide and selections to mitigate challenges specific to body-centric environments.

Frequency Bands and Data Rates

The IEEE 802.15.6 standard defines three (PHY) modes, each operating in distinct bands to support area networking applications while adhering to regulatory constraints. The PHY (NB PHY) utilizes narrowband channels in low- to mid- ISM and MICS bands, specifically 402–405 MHz (MICS band for medical implants), 420–450 MHz, 863–870 MHz, 902–928 MHz, 950–958 MHz, 2360–2400 MHz, and 2400–2483.5 MHz ( band). The Impulse Radio PHY (IR-UWB) operates across the broader 3.1–10.6 GHz UWB spectrum, divided into low-band (3.4944–4.4928 GHz with 3 channels) and high-band (6.4896–9.984 GHz with 8 channels) allocations, each with 499.2 MHz bandwidth. In contrast, the Communications PHY (HBC) employs galvanic or via the human in two bands centered at 16 MHz and 27 MHz, each with 4 MHz bandwidth. These PHY modes support scalable data rates tailored to power efficiency and application needs. For NB PHY, achievable rates range from 57.5 kbps to 971.4 kbps (mandatory: 75.9–485.7 kbps), depending on the band, (e.g., π/4-DQPSK in higher bands), and , with higher rates in the 2.4 GHz band. IR-UWB provides the highest throughput, from 0.4875 Mbps (mandatory) up to 15.6 Mbps in coherent modes, scalable via and modulation order to balance and energy use. HBC offers rates from 164 kbps (mandatory) to 1.312 Mbps, optimized for ultra-low power conduction through body tissues with BPSK . Channelization and power (PSD) limits ensure compliance with international regulations, minimizing in shared spectra. NB PHY channels are spaced at 200 kHz to 1 MHz per band (e.g., 60 channels in 902–928 MHz), with PSD capped at -41.3 dBm/MHz in MICS and regional limits like -20 dBr relative to carrier in ISM bands. IR-UWB enforces a -41.3 dBm/MHz EIRP PSD under FCC rules (or -70 dBm/MHz/100 kHz in ), with spectral masks requiring -10 dBr within the first adjacent sub-bands and -60 dBr beyond. HBC maintains 0 dBr within its bands, adhering to local emission standards for near-field body-coupled signals. Body proximity significantly influences propagation characteristics, with the standard incorporating channel models to account for tissue absorption and multipath effects. In-body channels (e.g., implant-to-surface) exhibit high path loss (up to 60–100 dB at 400 MHz) due to dielectric losses, modeled as log-distance with Rician fading (K-factor >10 dB). On-body channels (surface-to-surface) show moderate loss (40–70 dB) with Nakagami-m fading (m=2–4), affected by body movement and posture. Around-body channels extend to 2 m with lower loss (30–50 dB) but increased shadowing from limbs, using log-normal models for dynamic scenarios. These models guide PHY parameter selection to maintain reliable links across implantation depths and motion-induced variations.

Medium Access Control Layer

MAC Superframe Structure

The MAC layer in IEEE 802.15.6 employs an optional superframe structure to coordinate communications in body area networks, where the hub divides the channel time into superframes of equal length, each bounded by beacon transmissions. This structure supports both beacon and non-beacon modes, with the superframe optionally including an inactive period following active superframes, during which no transmissions occur to conserve energy. The active portion of the superframe is divided into a contention access period (CAP) for unscheduled traffic and managed access phases (MAPs) that encompass type I and II access phases, enabling prioritized and scheduled resource allocation based on node priorities and quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. Beacon frames, transmitted periodically by the in beacon mode, facilitate network and contain critical parameters such as the superframe length (up to 256 allocation slots), allocation slot boundaries and offsets (supporting up to 256 slots), and QoS-related information including user priority thresholds for . These s ensure nodes align their timing and understand the structure of upcoming access opportunities, with the able to shift or disable in certain scenarios, such as regulatory restrictions in the Medical Implant Communications Service (MICS) band or during inactive superframes. In non-beacon mode, the superframe concept persists implicitly through hub-initiated polling, but without periodic for . Within the superframe, allocation slots (AS) provide scheduled, contention-free intervals for periodic or one-time transmissions, while improvised allocation slots (IAS) allow for unscheduled via hub polling outside of designated AS periods. Type I access phases use time-based allocations in for precise duration control, type II phases allocate based on the number of for variable-length bursts, and type III phases support unscheduled posted allocations in non-beacon modes to handle aperiodic . The , positioned flexibly within the superframe, permits contention-based access using mechanisms like slotted , serving lower-priority or irregular data flows. Power saving is integrated through inactive periods and configurable superframe elements, where nodes can enter modes during non-allocated times, and the polls only active nodes in access phases to minimize unnecessary wake-ups. For instance, m-periodic allocations allow nodes to remain dormant for multiple superframes (m > 1), reducing duty cycles for low-power sensors, while the 's selective polling in type I/II phases ensures efficient resource use without constant listening. This design balances reliability and energy efficiency, critical for body-worn devices supporting medical and consumer applications.

Access Mechanisms

The IEEE 802.15.6 layer employs both contention-based and contention-free mechanisms to manage medium access in body area networks (), enabling efficient for diverse traffic types while integrating with the superframe structure for time-bounded operations. These mechanisms prioritize () through user priority (UP) levels, supporting up to 255 per network via unique node identifiers (NIDs) ranging from 0x01 to 0xFF. Contention-based access relies on a prioritized with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) protocol, implemented in phases such as the exclusive access phase 1 (EAP1), phase 1 (RAP1), EAP2, RAP2, and contention access phase (CAP). Traffic is organized into queues categorized by priority: (UP 7), high (UP 6–5), medium (UP 4–3), and low (UP 2–0). To access the medium, a performs carrier sensing followed by a backoff , where the backoff counter is randomly selected from a contention window (CW) interval scaled by priority—the CWmin and CWmax values decrease for higher priorities to reduce wait times, as shown in the table below.
UP LevelPriority CategoryCWminCWmax
7Emergency14
6High28
5High48
4Medium416
3Medium816
2Low832
1Low1632
0Low1664
If the transmission fails, retransmissions are limited by the mCSMATxLimit parameter: 2 frames for UP ≤ 5 and 4 frames for UP ≥ 6, after which the frame is discarded. Acknowledgments can be implicit (via the next incoming frame) or explicit (immediate ACK, block ACK, or delayed ACK), ensuring reliability without additional overhead in low-latency scenarios. Contention-free access occurs in the managed access phase (MAP), where the hub schedules polling to guarantee deterministic channel allocation for request-based traffic. This phase supports three types of polling: type I provides polled allocations with hub-granted durations for nodes to transmit; type II uses improvised grants based on frame numbers, allowing flexible adjustments during the phase; and type III employs posted allocations, where the hub pre-assigns specific time slots via management frames. Retransmissions in MAP are governed by the mBAckLimit of 8 frames, with block ACKs aggregating confirmations for multiple frames to enhance efficiency. QoS differentiation is achieved by mapping UP levels 0–7 to specific access phases, ensuring emergency traffic (UP 7) accesses the EAP first, followed by high-priority traffic in RAP or CAP, while low-priority traffic competes in CAP. This priority-based assignment, combined with the scalable node support, allows the protocol to handle heterogeneous BAN traffic, such as medical sensors requiring low delay and consumer devices with variable loads.

Security Features

Security Levels

IEEE 802.15.6 defines three distinct security association levels to accommodate varying requirements for data protection in wireless body area networks (WBANs), balancing security needs with resource constraints on low-power devices. These levels—0, 1, and 2—determine the extent of , , , and replay protection applied to communications, with operational implications that influence power consumption, processing overhead, and vulnerability exposure. Level 0 provides unsecured communication, offering no , checks, , or ; data is transmitted in plain unsecured frames, making it suitable for low-risk, non-sensitive applications where minimal overhead is prioritized, though it leaves transmissions fully exposed to interception and tampering. In contrast, Level 1 enforces without , utilizing message integrity codes () to ensure data authenticity, , and replay defense, but without —allowing verified but readable transmissions for scenarios requiring origin over . Level 2 delivers comprehensive through both and , employing the AES-CCM-128 mode to provide alongside and replay , ideal for sensitive medical data but at the cost of higher computational demands and . Security suite selection occurs during the process, where and negotiate the appropriate level based on their capabilities and policies, as indicated in the MAC Capability field and association requests. For Levels 1 and 2, between the hub and node is mandatory, typically via a four-way to establish trust and prevent unauthorized access, ensuring that only verified entities proceed with secured communications. Post-standardization analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the key agreement protocols supporting these levels, particularly weaknesses that enable man-in-the-middle attacks due to the use of self-generated public s without certificates, potentially compromising the even in higher levels.

Key Management

The IEEE 802.15.6 standard employs a hierarchical structure to secure communications in body area networks, beginning with the master (), which is a secret bit string either pre-shared or established during the process for initial setup. The pairwise temporal (PTK) is derived from the MK for securing individual sessions, while the group temporal (GTK) is distributed by the for communications among multiple nodes. This hierarchy ensures that higher-level keys protect lower-level ones, with all keys typically being 128-bit strings to align with AES-based operations. Security associations are established through four distinct key agreement protocols, each tailored to different authentication scenarios. The unauthenticated association protocol allows MK generation without prior credentials, relying on Diffie-Hellman key exchange over the P-256 curve to derive a . Authenticated association using pre-shared keys (PSK) activates an existing MK directly for nodes with a pre-established secret, minimizing computational overhead. Certificate-based association employs digital certificates to authenticate public keys, enabling secure MK derivation via operations while hiding identities through key transfer. Finally, numeric comparison facilitates device by generating a 5-digit decimal value for user verification, combining it with Diffie-Hellman to establish the MK and support low-resource environments. These protocols operate via secure frame exchanges, incorporating nonces—unique 128-bit random values per sender—to ensure freshness and prevent replay attacks. PTK and are derived from the MK using AES-CMAC, a cipher-based that processes inputs including nonces, node identifiers, and security parameters to produce the temporal keys. To maintain security over time, key rotation is implemented by toggling indices between 0 and 1, prompting the generation of new PTK or upon index change or when sequence numbers approach their maximum value of 2^48 - 1. Freshness is further enforced through low-order and high-order security sequence numbers embedded in frames, which increment per transmission and trigger key retirement if replay is detected. Despite these mechanisms, the key agreement protocols exhibit vulnerabilities, including susceptibility to eavesdropping where compromised long-term private keys allow derivation of past MKs from captured messages, compromising prior sessions. The protocols lack , meaning that exposure of a private key enables an adversary to decrypt all previously recorded traffic protected by derived session keys. Academic proposals, such as integrating certified keys or lightweight to mitigate impersonation and enhance , have been suggested but remain unadopted in the . As of November 2025, the inactive-reserved IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012 is being amended by P802.15.6a (draft D06 circulated in May 2025), which considers mechanisms to enhance and at the MAC layer, though specific fixes to these vulnerabilities are not yet detailed in drafts.

Applications

Medical and Health Monitoring

IEEE 802.15.6 enables continuous of such as electrocardiograms (ECG) and through wearable sensors in wireless body area networks (WBANs), facilitating transmission to healthcare providers. The standard's (MAC) layer supports low-latency communication, essential for alerts in critical conditions like arrhythmias, by prioritizing high-user with guaranteed time slots. This ensures timely intervention, reducing response times in or home-based scenarios. For implantable devices, IEEE 802.15.6 leverages the communication (HBC) (PHY), operating in frequency bands centered at 16 MHz and 27 MHz, to enable in-body sensing applications like glucose monitors and pacemakers while minimizing radiofrequency (RF) exposure. HBC uses the as a , providing lower power consumption and reduced compared to traditional RF methods, which is crucial for long-term implantation without . Studies have demonstrated HBC's efficacy in non-directional channels for reliable data transfer from implants to external hubs. Integration of IEEE 802.15.6 WBANs with systems supports telemedicine by ensuring (QoS) for high-priority medical data, such as real-time streaming to central monitors. The standard's superframe structure allocates resources for emergency and on-demand access, enabling seamless connectivity in clinical settings for remote patient management. Devices using WBAN technologies, including those based on IEEE 802.15.6, align with safety standards for implantable . Comparative studies indicate that 802.15.6 transceivers achieve significantly lower power consumption—around 5 mW peak—than counterparts, extending battery life for medical sensors by up to 50% in body area applications. In clinical environments, IEEE 802.15.6 addresses interference mitigation through channel hopping and orthogonal matched filtering in the HBC and narrowband PHYs, reducing co-channel interference from nearby medical equipment. For data privacy in health records, the standard incorporates access control and encryption primitives to protect sensitive medical information during transmission, though enhanced measures are recommended for compliance with health regulations like HIPAA. Security protocols for sensitive data are further detailed in the standard's security features.

Consumer and Other Uses

IEEE 802.15.6 enables wearable consumer devices for fitness tracking, such as smartwatches and activity monitors, by supporting on-body sensors that capture motion data and biometric signals like and steps in . These devices leverage the standard's low-power PHY to monitor during sports and exercise, optimizing intensity for both professional athletes and amateurs without compromising life. In entertainment applications, IEEE 802.15.6 facilitates wireless gaming controllers and audio streaming between wearables, utilizing the (UWB) PHY for higher data rates up to several Mbps to support low-latency gesture and in virtual experiences. This enables seamless interaction in scenarios, where body-worn sensors track movements with minimal interference from the . Industrial uses include systems for training and worker safety monitoring, such as real-time tracking for firefighters or soldiers in hazardous environments. UWB-based implementations achieve centimeter-level accuracy in 3D localization, supporting applications like and with compact, low-power sensor nodes. Adoption of IEEE 802.15.6 extends to smart clothing and ecosystems, where embedded sensors in garments collect environmental and physiological data for ambient living and consumer electronics integration. These textiles support topologies for reliable one-hop communication, enhancing connectivity in everyday wearables. techniques in IEEE 802.15.6 WBANs prolong battery life in wearables by adapting protocols to harvest ambient from body movement or heat, improving throughput by up to 238% and by 274% in cooperative setups. Compared to alternatives, IEEE 802.15.6 offers lower power consumption than for short-range body-centric communication while providing greater range than , making it ideal for on-body scenarios with ranges up to 3 meters. As of November 2025, commercial adoption of IEEE 802.15.6 remains primarily in and prototype stages, with limited widespread deployment in consumer or medical devices. Ongoing work on IEEE P802.15.6a amendments is expected to enhance its applicability for emerging use cases.

References

  1. [1]
    IEEE 802.15 Wireless Next Generation Standing Committee
    The IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 (BAN) is developing a communication standard optimized for low power devices and operation on, in or around the human body (but ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    IEEE INTRODUCES GROUNDBREAKING STANDARD FOR BODY ...
    IEEE 802.15. 6-2012 specifies a short range, low power, and reliable wireless communication protocol for use in close proximity to, or inside, a human body. ...
  4. [4]
    IEEE 802.15.6-2012 - IEEE Standards Association
    Standard for Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access Systems. This standard specifies the air interface, including the medium access control layer (MAC) and ...
  5. [5]
    P802.15.6a - IEEE Mentor
    b Scope of the project: This amendment enhances the Ultra-Wideband (UWB) physical layer (PHY) and medium access control (MAC) to support enhanced ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    802.15.6-2012 - Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks - IEEE Xplore
    Feb 29, 2012 · It uses existing industrial scientific medical (ISM) bands as well as frequency bands approved by national medical and/or regulatory authorities ...Missing: specification | Show results with:specification
  7. [7]
    [PDF] IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks
    Feb 29, 2012 · This standard considers effects on portable antennas due to the presence of a person. (varying with male, female, skinny, heavy, etc.), ...
  8. [8]
    IEEE 802.15 Wireless Next Generation Standing Committee
    IEEE 802.15 TG6 was formed in November 2007 and begun operations as TG6 in January 2008 in Taipei. It had received 34 proposals, which were merged into a single ...Missing: interest | Show results with:interest
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    View of Study and overview on WBAN under IEEE 802.15.6
    IEEE Standards Association formed the IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 in November 2007. It quotes: ''The IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 (BAN) is developing a communication ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] communications - Department of Computing
    Recently, IEEE 802.15.6 Task Group begins to define guidelines for wireless ... These include. Samsung, NICT, Philips, GE, Fujitsu, Olympus etc.. By ...Missing: contributors | Show results with:contributors
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Standardization for Body Area Networks
    Feb 2, 2009 · SUMMARY. Body Area Networks (BAN) can provide a wide range of applications including medical support, healthcare monitoring, and con-.
  14. [14]
    Security analysis of the IEEE 802.15.6 standard - Wiley Online Library
    Feb 15, 2016 · This paper scrutinizes the security structure of the IEEE 802.15.6-2012 standard, which is the latest international standard for wireless ...
  15. [15]
    Re: [802SEC] 802.15 PARs and CSDs for consideration at 802 EC ...
    Feb 8, 2022 · The PAR withdraws along with PARs and CSDs were approved by the 802.15 WG at its closing interim session meeting on 26 January 2022. P802.15.12 ...Missing: authorization | Show results with:authorization
  16. [16]
    IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks ...
    Jan 21, 2022 · Change to scope of proposed standard:This is a standard for short-range, wireless communication in the vicinity of, or inside, a human body (but ...Missing: authorization | Show results with:authorization
  17. [17]
    IEEE 802.15 WSN - Task Group 6a
    The project P802.15.6ma is a revision of the standard IEEE 802.15.6 TM –2012 Wireless Body Area Networks (BANs). It intends to update and assist new use cases.
  18. [18]
    March 2025 IEEE P802.15-24-0348-04-06ma IEEE ... - IEEE Mentor
    Mar 1, 2025 · This document addresses the coexistence of IEEE 802.15.6ma PHY system with other IEEE 802 standards operating in the same frequency bands. The ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    (PDF) An overview of IEEE 802.15.6 standard - ResearchGate
    The standard defines a Medium Access Control (MAC) layer supporting several Physical (PHY) layers. We briefly overview the PHY and MAC layers specifications ...
  21. [21]
    A Review of IEEE 802.15.6 MAC, PHY, and Security Specifications
    Apr 24, 2013 · In July 2011, the initial draft of the standard was approved to start a sponsor ballot. The final version of the standard was published in ...Missing: PAR | Show results with:PAR
  22. [22]
    Frequency bands defined by IEEE 802.15.6 Standard. - ResearchGate
    ... HBC-PHY operates with a central frequency at 21 MHz and a bandwidth of 5.25 MHz, which may support data rates ranging from 164 Kbps to 1.3 Mbps. b) NB-PHY ...
  23. [23]
    Wireless Body Sensor Communication Systems Based on UWB and ...
    The stated PSD limit of −41.3 dBm/MHz refers to the measure of equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP). The EIRP is a measure of the radiated power from ...
  24. [24]
    A review of radio channel models for body centric communications
    May 17, 2014 · The IEEE 802.15.6 standard [IEEE, 2012] appeared in February 2012 and defines the PHY and MAC layers optimized for short-range transmissions in, ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] An Overview of IEEE 802.15.6 Standard
    Feb 20, 2011 · The standard defines a. Medium Access Control (MAC) layer supporting several Physical. (PHY) layers. We briefly overview the PHY and MAC layers.
  26. [26]
    A Review of IEEE 802.15.6 MAC, PHY, and Security Specifications
    As illustrated in Figure 4(a), the superframe structure is divided into Exclusive Access Phases (EAP1 and EAP2), Random. Access Phases (RAP1 and RAP2), a ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    On Vulnerabilities of the Security Association in the IEEE 802.15.6 ...
    Jan 12, 2015 · The security association in this standard includes four elliptic curve-based key agreement protocols that are used for generating a master key.Missing: man- middle
  29. [29]
    [PDF] An Overview of IEEE 802.15.6 Standard - arXiv
    Feb 20, 2011 · The purpose of the group is to establish a communication standard optimized for low-power in- body/on-body nodes to serve a variety of medical ...Missing: contributors Philips Samsung
  30. [30]
    None
    ### Summary of Vulnerabilities in IEEE 802.15.6 Key Agreement Protocols
  31. [31]
    An overview of IEEE 802.15.6 standard
    This paper explains the most important features of the new IEEE 802.15.6 standard. The standard defines a Medium Access Control (MAC) layer supporting several ...
  32. [32]
    A MAC Protocol for Medical Monitoring Applications of Wireless ...
    Targeting the medical monitoring applications of wireless body area networks (WBANs), a hybrid medium access control protocol using an interrupt mechanism ...
  33. [33]
    Wearable Wireless Body Area Networks for Medical Applications - NIH
    Apr 24, 2021 · The current IEEE 802.15.6 standard for WBAN technologies was published in 2012, and it is “a standard for short-range wireless communication ...Missing: motivation | Show results with:motivation
  34. [34]
    Technological Requirements and Challenges in Wireless Body Area ...
    May 6, 2022 · A WBAN has more stringent technical requirements and challenges in terms of power efficiency, security and privacy, quality of service and other specifications.
  35. [35]
    Wireless Body Sensor Communication Systems Based on UWB and ...
    Although the human body communication (HBC) physical layer in the IEEE 802.15.6 standard for wireless body area networks is defined for 21 MHz ± 5.25 MHz ...
  36. [36]
    Non-Directional Property of Human–Body Communication Channel ...
    Jul 28, 2023 · The human–body communication (HBC) channel was proposed for data communication in implantable devices. The impulse response was measured using a channel- ...
  37. [37]
    IEEE 802.15.6 based node and hub architectures for healthcare ...
    IEEE 802.15.6 based node and hub architectures for healthcare applications ... healthcare monitoring services to patients. The specificities of the ...Missing: medical | Show results with:medical
  38. [38]
    Emerging Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things ...
    IEEE 802.15.6 categorizes WBAN applications into medical and non-medical, which may vary from military, sports, entertainment to healthcare. According to ...
  39. [39]
    A Survey on Wireless Wearable Body Area Networks: A Perspective ...
    In this study, we have focused on feasibility, limitations, and security concerns in wireless body area networks.
  40. [40]
    A 1V 5mA multimode IEEE 802.15.6/bluetooth low-energy WBAN ...
    This transceiver chip supports IEEE802.15.6 and Bluetooth LE, operates at 2.36GHz and 2.4GHz, and has 5mW peak power for 1V button cells.
  41. [41]
    A Fair Contention Access Scheme for Low-Priority Traffic in Wireless ...
    The complexity of bluetooth devices incurs a higher cost, and makes it unsuitable for applications demanding less power consumption and lower costs [1]. One of ...
  42. [42]
    A Survey on Interference Mitigation for Wireless Body Area Networks
    Aug 19, 2024 · Wireless body area networks (WBANs) are noteworthy, dependable, and most advantageous development in many health directed applications.
  43. [43]
    Performance analysis of IEEE 802.15.6 contention-based MAC ...
    Abstract: IEEE 802.15. 6 facilitates communication in the vicinity of or even inside a human body to serve heterogeneous medical, consumer electronics, and ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Ultra Wideband Wearable Sensors for Motion ... - QMRO Home
    • In the longer term, the IEEE 802.15.6 standard will also be relevant for implementation of this system when chips compliant to this standard will become ...
  45. [45]
    The development and trend of wireless body area networks in the ...
    With the advent of the smart clothing, wireless body area network(WBAN) has became particularly important as the information perception stage of smart ...
  46. [46]
    Research on Wireless MAC Protocols Oriented to Smart Clothing
    Demands of smart clothing networks (BAN) are low consumption, suitable topology and scalability .Standard to support BAN is IEEE 802.15.6 which is introduced.
  47. [47]
    Cooperative Energy Harvesting-Adaptive MAC Protocol for WBANs
    May 28, 2015 · In this section, we present CEH-MAC, an IEEE 802.15.6-compatible MAC protocol that aims to improve the performance of cooperative WBANs by ...