Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

IOK

IOK, an acronym for Indian Occupied Kashmir, denotes the territories of Jammu and Kashmir administered by India, a usage primarily advanced by the Government of Pakistan to challenge the legitimacy of Indian control over the region.^[1]^[2] This encompasses the union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, covering roughly 101,387 square kilometers of varied terrain including the densely populated Kashmir Valley, the Jammu plains, and high-altitude Ladakh plateau.^[3]^[4] Home to over 12 million residents, predominantly Muslim in the Valley but diverse across Hindu-majority Jammu and Buddhist-influenced Ladakh, the area features significant geopolitical value due to its headwaters for major Indus River system tributaries vital to both India and Pakistan's agriculture and hydropower.^[5]^[6] The term's contentious framing emerged from the 1947 partition of British India, when Maharaja Hari Singh acceded the princely state to India via the Instrument of Accession on October 26 amid a Pakistani-backed tribal incursion, prompting the first Indo-Pakistani war and de facto division along the Line of Control.^[7]^[8]^[9] India asserts sovereign integration based on this accession and subsequent elections, while Pakistan disputes it as provisional pending a UN-mandated plebiscite unrealized due to unmet preconditions like troop withdrawals, fueling three additional wars (1965, 1971, 1999), nuclear tensions, cross-border militancy, and persistent claims of security force excesses and demographic engineering in the administered zones.^[10]^[11]^[12]

Terminology

Definition and Geographical Scope

IOK is an initialism for "Indian Occupied Kashmir," a designation primarily employed by Pakistani authorities and media to refer to the sections of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir under de facto administration by India following the 1947 accession and subsequent partition.^[13]^[14] This terminology frames the region as disputed territory illegitimately held, contrasting with India's official view of it as an integral part pursuant to the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh on October 26, 1947.^[4] The geographical scope of IOK corresponds to the Indian-administered portions, reorganized in 2019 into two union territories: Jammu and Kashmir, spanning approximately 42,000 square kilometers, and Ladakh, encompassing about 59,000 square kilometers, for a total area of roughly 101,000 square kilometers.^[15]^[16] These territories exclude areas under Pakistani control (Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, totaling around 85,000 square kilometers) and Chinese administration (Aksai Chin and the Shaksgam Valley, approximately 38,000 square kilometers).^[4] Situated in the northwestern Himalayas, the region features extreme topographic variation, from the densely populated Kashmir Valley at elevations of 1,500–2,000 meters to the alpine Jammu hills and the trans-Himalayan Ladakh plateau exceeding 3,000 meters, with peaks like Nun Kun reaching 7,135 meters. It is delimited by the Line of Control (LOC) with Pakistan to the west, the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China to the northeast, and integrates southward with Indian states Himachal Pradesh and Punjab.^[4]^[17] The Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers originate here, shaping its hydrology and supporting limited agriculture amid a predominantly rugged terrain.^[4]

Origins and Partisan Usage

The term "Indian Occupied Kashmir" (IOK), an acronym for the regions of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir administered by India, originated in Pakistani political rhetoric shortly after the 1947 partition of British India and the first Indo-Pakistani War over the territory. It encapsulates Pakistan's contention that the Instrument of Accession, signed by Maharaja Hari Singh on October 26, 1947, lacked legitimacy due to the absence of a promised plebiscite under United Nations resolutions, thereby framing Indian administration as an unlawful occupation rather than sovereign control. This designation contrasts with India's official terminology of "Jammu and Kashmir," which it regards as an integral part following the accession and subsequent integration measures, including the 2019 revocation of Article 370.^[18]^[14] Partisan usage of IOK is predominantly associated with Pakistan's government, media, and aligned entities, serving to underscore claims of Kashmiri self-determination and human rights abuses while rejecting India's legal and historical assertions over the territory. Pakistani state documents, such as those from the National Assembly, routinely employ IOK to describe protests and policies in the region, portraying Indian governance as suppressive and calling for international intervention. Similarly, figures like former Prime Minister Imran Khan have invoked the term in critiques of Indian actions, linking it to broader narratives of resistance against perceived annexation. This usage aligns with separatist sentiments in the Kashmir Valley but is absent from Indian official discourse, which counters with "Pakistan-occupied Kashmir" (PoK) for areas under Pakistani control, highlighting the mutual partisan framing in the bilateral dispute.^[19]^[20] Neutral international observers and media outlets, such as those adhering to balanced reporting standards, often favor "Indian-administered Kashmir" to avoid endorsing either side's sovereignty claims, recognizing IOK's inherent bias toward delegitimizing Indian rule without resolving the underlying legal ambiguities of the accession. The term's partisan nature is evident in its amplification during escalations, like Pakistan's observance of "Youm-e-Istehsal" on August 5 to mark India's 2019 constitutional changes, which reframed the region as occupied to rally domestic and global support for Kashmiri independence or unification with Pakistan. Despite its prevalence in Pakistani sources, IOK lacks endorsement in multilateral forums like the UN, where terminology emphasizes the disputed status without partisan qualifiers.^[14]^[21]

Historical Context

Pre-Partition Jammu and Kashmir

The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was established on March 16, 1846, through the Treaty of Amritsar, by which the British East India Company transferred sovereignty over the Kashmir Valley, along with associated hill territories, to Gulab Singh, the Dogra Raja of Jammu, in exchange for 7.5 million rupees (75 lakh Nanakshahi).^[22] This transaction followed the British victory in the First Anglo-Sikh War and the Treaty of Lahore, which ceded Kashmir from the Sikh Empire; Gulab Singh, a Hindu Dogra Rajput who had previously served as a vassal under Sikh rule and expanded his control over Jammu and Ladakh (conquered between 1834 and 1842), capitalized on British support to consolidate the disparate regions into a single state under Dogra dynastic rule.^[23] The treaty formalized British paramountcy, requiring the Maharaja to pay an annual tribute and provide troops for British campaigns, while granting internal autonomy subject to British oversight.^[24] Gulab Singh ruled until his death in 1857, followed by his son Ranbir Singh (1857–1885), who centralized administration, reformed land revenue systems, and expanded infrastructure, including roads and irrigation works, though these efforts disproportionately benefited Dogra elites and Hindu communities.^[25] Pratap Singh (1885–1925) faced British intervention in 1889–1891 due to administrative mismanagement, leading to a regency council that implemented modernizing reforms like a state council and judicial codes, but his reign saw continued fiscal extraction to fund military obligations. Hari Singh ascended in 1925 and governed until the 1947 partition, introducing limited electoral reforms in 1934, such as the Glancy Commission to address grievances, yet retaining absolute monarchical authority amid growing princely state-wide tensions.^[26] Demographically, the state encompassed diverse regions: the Kashmir Valley with a Muslim majority exceeding 93% in 1941, Jammu province with a Hindu plurality (around 60% Hindus versus 30–40% Muslims), and Ladakh with Buddhists comprising over 50% alongside Muslims and Hindus.^[27] The 1941 census recorded a total population of approximately 4.02 million, with Muslims at 72.4%, Hindus at 24.5%, and smaller groups including Sikhs (1.8%) and Buddhists (1.3%), reflecting ethnic and religious fragmentation that strained Dogra governance.^[28] Dogra policies emphasized Hindu cultural and administrative dominance, with Muslims—forming the rural agrarian base—subject to heavy land taxes (up to 75% of produce in some areas), begar (forced unpaid labor), and restrictions on religious practices, such as limits on cow slaughter and mosque construction, fostering resentment among the Muslim peasantry.^[29] Kashmiri Pandits, a Hindu minority in the Valley, held disproportionate civil service positions (over 90% in senior roles by the early 20th century), exacerbating perceptions of bias, though some reforms under Hari Singh, including the 1932 establishment of the Reading Room Party (precursor to the Muslim Conference), aimed to mitigate unrest by advocating for representation and land rights.^[30] Economic conditions remained agrarian and underdeveloped, with silk and shawl industries declining post-19th century due to market shifts, while military expenditures consumed up to 50% of revenue, limiting investments in education and health for the Muslim majority.^[31] By the 1930s and 1940s, socio-political ferment intensified, highlighted by the 1931 Srinagar uprising—triggered by a court case involving a Muslim laborer—that resulted in 21 deaths and prompted the Glancy Commission's recommendations for Muslim quotas in services and schools, though implementation was partial and uneven.^[32] These events underscored causal tensions from dynastic favoritism and economic extraction, rather than exogenous factors, setting the stage for partition-era decisions without resolving underlying communal divides.^[33]

Accession to India and Initial Conflicts

On October 22, 1947, armed tribal militias, primarily Pashtun lashkars from Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province, launched an invasion into the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, advancing towards Srinagar with support from elements of the Pakistani military.^[34] ^[35] The invaders captured Muzaffarabad and Baramulla, committing widespread atrocities including mass killings, looting, and arson against civilians, with estimates of 35,000 to 40,000 residents killed across the state during the initial phase.^[36] ^[37] Facing the collapse of state forces and an existential threat, Maharaja Hari Singh, the Hindu ruler of the Muslim-majority state, initially sought to maintain independence amid partition uncertainties but acceded to India on October 26, 1947, by signing the Instrument of Accession, which ceded control over defense, external affairs, and communications while retaining internal autonomy.^[38] ^[7] The decision was prompted by the invasion's urgency, as Hari Singh appealed for Indian military aid to repel the aggressors, with the accession accepted by Governor-General Lord Mountbatten on October 27, 1947.^[38] ^[39] Indian forces were airlifted to Srinagar airport on October 27, 1947, halting the tribal advance just 20 miles from the capital and initiating defensive operations that secured the valley.^[40] This triggered full-scale hostilities, escalating into the First Indo-Pakistani War as Pakistani regular troops joined the fray by November 1947, with fighting spreading to Jammu, Ladakh, and the western frontier.^[35] ^[41] The war concluded with a United Nations-mediated ceasefire on January 1, 1949, establishing the Ceasefire Line (later the Line of Control) that divided the state, with India controlling about two-thirds—including the Kashmir Valley, Jammu, and Ladakh—and Pakistan administering the remainder.^[41] ^[35] Pakistan's initial denial of involvement gave way to open admission, while the accession's legality under the Indian Independence Act—allowing rulers unconditional choice—remains affirmed by Indian courts and international legal precedents, though contested by Pakistan as coerced despite the preceding invasion.^[7] ^[37]

Subsequent Indo-Pakistani Wars

The second major Indo-Pakistani conflict erupted in 1965, primarily over the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir, following border skirmishes that escalated into full-scale war after Pakistan's infiltration of forces into the region in an operation codenamed Gibraltar aimed at inciting a local uprising against Indian control.^[42] The war began with clashes in the Rann of Kutch in April but intensified in August along the Kashmir cease-fire line established after the 1947-48 war, leading to Pakistani tank advances toward Akhnoor and Indian counteroffensives, including the capture of the Haji Pir Pass.^[42] Fighting lasted from early August until a United Nations-mandated cease-fire on September 22, 1965, with India gaining control of more territory and incurring relatively fewer losses in manpower and equipment compared to Pakistan, according to declassified assessments.^[43] The Tashkent Agreement, mediated by the Soviet Union in January 1966, restored pre-war boundaries but failed to resolve underlying Kashmir claims.^[42] The 1971 war, while centered on the secession of East Pakistan (leading to Bangladesh's independence), featured significant action on the western front including Kashmir, where Pakistan initiated preemptive air strikes on Indian airfields on December 3, prompting India to open a multi-front offensive.^[44] In Kashmir, Indian forces successfully repelled Pakistani incursions along the cease-fire line, with limited but intense engagements preventing major territorial shifts in the region amid the broader conflict.^[45] The war concluded swiftly after India's decisive victory in the east on December 16, 1971, with Pakistan's surrender of over 90,000 troops; the western front, including Kashmir, saw no net territorial changes formalized in the 1972 Simla Agreement, which reaffirmed the Line of Control (LOC) as the de facto boundary.^[44] Tensions culminated in the 1999 Kargil conflict, a limited war sparked by Pakistani Northern Light Infantry troops and militants infiltrating across the LOC to occupy strategic heights in the Kargil-Dras sector of Ladakh during winter, aiming to cut off India's supply lines to Siachen and revive Kashmir's international profile.^[46] India responded with "Operation Vijay," deploying air strikes from May 26 and ground assaults that recaptured most positions by July 26 after 74 days of combat, restoring the status quo ante.^[47] The incursion resulted in over 1,000 casualties per side, with India regaining full control of the peaks; Pakistan initially denied regular army involvement but later acknowledged it under international pressure, leading to the ouster of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.^[48]^[47] This episode underscored nuclear-era restraint, as both nuclear-armed states avoided escalation beyond the LOC despite vows of retaliation.^[49]

Indian Administration and Integration

Governance and Legal Framework

The Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir operates as a Union Territory under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which was passed by the Indian Parliament on August 9, 2019, and took effect on October 31, 2019, reorganizing the former state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislature) and Ladakh (without).^[50]^[51] This framework vests executive authority in the Lieutenant Governor (LG), appointed by the President of India under Article 239 of the Constitution, who exercises powers akin to a state governor but with enhanced administrative control, including the ability to rule by ordinance for up to six months and to oversee police, public order, and land matters reserved for the Union government.^[52] The LG is supported by a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister, drawn from the legislative assembly, though the council's role is advisory and subordinate to the LG on concurrent subjects.^[51] The Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir is unicameral, comprising 90 directly elected members following the 2022 delimitation exercise that increased seats from 83 to account for population changes, with 47 in the Kashmir Valley, 43 in Jammu, and reserved quotas for Scheduled Castes and Tribes.^[51] Elections to the assembly were held in three phases from September 18 to October 1, 2024, marking the first since the reorganization, resulting in a coalition government led by the National Conference with Chief Minister Omar Abdullah sworn in on October 16, 2024.^[52] The assembly's legislative competence is restricted under the Seventh Schedule's Union and Concurrent Lists, excluding full autonomy over subjects like defense, foreign affairs, and fiscal policy; bills require LG assent, and the LG can reserve them for presidential approval or direct the assembly to reconsider, limiting its effective sovereignty compared to full states.^[51] Judicially, the region falls under the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, established post-reorganization with principal seats in Srinagar and Jammu, exercising original and appellate jurisdiction over civil, criminal, and constitutional matters for both Union Territories, subject to the Supreme Court of India's oversight.^[53] The abrogation of Article 370 on August 5, 2019, via presidential order, extended the full Indian Constitution, including fundamental rights under Part III and central laws like the Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, and Representation of the People Act, supplanting prior state-specific codes and enabling uniform application of property, domicile, and residency laws.^[53] Security-related legal provisions include the continued enforcement of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, in designated "disturbed areas" across parts of the Kashmir Valley as of 2024, granting armed forces powers for search, arrest, and lethal force without prior warrant in response to militancy, alongside the Public Safety Act, 1978, for preventive detention up to two years.^[54] Administrative bodies such as the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission handle civil service recruitment, while local governance occurs through district development councils and panchayats empowered under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, extended to the territory in 2020.^[51] This structure emphasizes central oversight amid ongoing security concerns, with the Union government retaining final authority over budgets and policies via the Ministry of Home Affairs.^[52]

Economic and Infrastructural Development

The economy of Jammu and Kashmir, under Indian administration, is predominantly agrarian and service-oriented, with horticulture, tourism, and handicrafts as key contributors. In 2023, the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) stood at Rs. 2.30 trillion (approximately US$27.70 billion) at current prices.^[55] The region is India's largest producer of apples, walnuts, and cherries, with horticulture accounting for a significant share of agricultural output and exports.^[56] Agricultural reforms have emphasized high-value crops and organic farming, supported by government initiatives to diversify from traditional paddy and maize cultivation.^[57] Real GSDP growth has averaged 5-7% annually over recent decades, despite disruptions from security challenges, with projections for 7.06% growth in 2024-25 and nominal GSDP reaching Rs. 2.65 lakh crore by that year.^[58]^[59]^[60] Post-2019 abrogation of special status, investments have risen, particularly in services and trade, though the tertiary sector's growth slowed to 5.8% in 2023-24 from 11% the prior year amid fluctuating tourism recovery.^[61] Unemployment declined to 6.1% in 2023-24, reflecting improved labor participation, though youth employment remains constrained by limited industrial diversification.^[60] Infrastructural development has accelerated since the 2010s, focusing on connectivity to counter geographic isolation and security-related barriers. The Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link (USBRL), a 272 km all-weather line including the world's highest rail bridge over the Chenab River, enhances freight and passenger access to the Kashmir Valley, with full operationalization targeted for 2025.^[62] Road networks have expanded via National Highway 44 upgrades and the 9.2 km Chenani-Nashri tunnel, operational since 2017, reducing Jammu-Srinagar travel time by hours and enabling year-round access.^[63]^[64] Ongoing projects include the Rs. 12 billion Baramulla-Uri rail line (40.2 km) and doubling of the Qazigund-Budgam stretch (73.5 km) to boost capacity.^[65] Tunnels like Zojila and Z-Morh are under construction to link Ladakh and Srinagar, improving strategic and economic corridors while mitigating avalanche risks.^[66] By 2024, over 2,200 projects valued at more than Rs. 25,000 crore—spanning roads, power, and urban amenities—have been completed or advanced, primarily under central schemes, though critics argue some prioritize military logistics over civilian benefits.^[67] Hydropower capacity, leveraging the region's rivers, contributes significantly to energy self-sufficiency, with projects like those on the Chenab supporting both local grids and national exports, despite environmental and displacement concerns raised in regional analyses.^[68] These efforts have facilitated trade growth but face ongoing hurdles from militancy, which has historically inflated project costs and delayed timelines.^[69] The Indian administration of Jammu and Kashmir has pursued demographic policies primarily focused on rehabilitating conflict-displaced communities and, following the 2019 abrogation of Article 370, revising residency criteria to integrate the region more fully with national frameworks. These measures address historical shifts, including the 1990 exodus of an estimated 100,000 to 500,000 Kashmiri Pandits—Hindu residents of the Kashmir Valley—driven by targeted violence from Islamist militants, which reduced their share of the Valley's population from around 5% in 1981 to near negligible levels by the mid-1990s.^[70] The 2011 census, the most recent comprehensive data available, recorded a total population of 12,541,302 across the former state, with Muslims at 68.3%, Hindus at 28.4%, Sikhs at 1.9%, Buddhists at 0.9%, and Christians at 0.3%; the overall sex ratio stood at 889 females per 1,000 males, with rural residents comprising 75.2%.^[71] Projections estimate the population at approximately 16 million by 2025, reflecting modest growth amid delayed censuses post-2011.^[72] Key rehabilitation efforts for Kashmiri Pandits and other migrants include monthly cash relief, enhanced from ₹6,600 to ₹10,000 per family in 2015 and further to ₹13,000 by 2020, alongside transit housing and job reservations under the Prime Minister's 2008 package allocating 6,000 government positions.^[73] However, implementation has yielded limited returns, with only about 3,800 Pandits resettling in the Valley by 2021, often in fortified transit camps amid ongoing security concerns rather than full reintegration into original villages.^[74] In 2022, the Kashmiri Pandits (Recourse, Restitution, Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Bill was introduced to mandate property restitution, secure return, and dedicated townships, receiving presidential approval in July 2025 for parliamentary debate, though critics argue it prioritizes economic incentives over addressing root security failures.^[75]^[76] Social policies emphasize welfare extension and affirmative action, with national schemes like Ayushman Bharat health coverage and Ujjwala gas connections applied uniformly since 2019, alongside local enhancements such as increased birth registrations from 76.3% in 2015 to 78.5% in 2018.^[77] Post-reorganization into union territories, reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes were extended at 10% each, benefiting Jammu's Hindu and Sikh communities, while the 2020 domicile rules—requiring 15 years' residence, central government service, or educational ties—issued over 60,000 certificates by 2021, enabling broader access to land ownership, jobs, and education previously barred to non-permanent residents under Article 35A.^[78] This shift, intended to spur investment and reverse isolation, has sparked debate: proponents cite economic integration and minority rehabilitation potential, while opponents, including regional parties, contend it risks diluting the Muslim-majority Valley's demographic profile through influxes from Hindu-majority states, though no large-scale settlement has materialized as of 2025, with domicile grants largely to long-term Jammu residents.^[79]^[80] The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act also adjusted electoral constituencies in 2022, increasing Jammu's assembly seats to better reflect its 43% population share versus the Valley's 47%, per 2011 data.^[81] Broader social initiatives include empowering local governance via 2018 panchayat elections with 33% women's quotas, yielding over 35,000 elected bodies, and vocational training under the 2010 Prime Minister's Reconstruction Plan, though insurgency disruptions have constrained outcomes in the Valley.^[82] Literacy rates rose to 67.2% by 2011, with targeted programs for girls and minorities, but persistent conflict has elevated youth unemployment and migration, underscoring the interplay between security stabilization and social equity.

Security and Insurgency

Rise of Militancy

The perceived rigging of the 1987 Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly elections marked a pivotal catalyst for the escalation of militancy, as widespread fraud alienated Muslim United Front (MUF) supporters and eroded faith in electoral processes.^[11] The National Conference-Congress alliance secured victory amid allegations of ballot stuffing, intimidation of polling agents, and the declaration of winners despite trailing vote counts in key constituencies, leading to the arrest of hundreds of MUF leaders and activists.^[11] This disillusionment prompted many young MUF affiliates, including figures like Yasin Malik and Hamid Sheikh, to cross into Pakistan for arms training, transitioning from political advocacy to armed resistance under groups such as the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF).^[83] Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) played a central role in amplifying local grievances into a sustained insurgency, providing training, funding, and logistical support to militants from the mid-1980s onward, including veterans of the Soviet-Afghan War who introduced sophisticated tactics and ideological fervor.^[84] By 1988, ISI-backed operations facilitated the infiltration of over 300 trained fighters annually, with annual expenditures estimated in the millions for arming groups advocating both independence and accession to Pakistan.^[84] The JKLF, initially focused on secular independence, conducted early high-profile actions such as the 1988 bombing of the Srinagar electricity grid and targeted killings of officials, while the more Islamist Hizbul Mujahideen emerged in 1989 with explicit pro-Pakistan aims, drawing recruits through mosques and madrasas.^[11] The insurgency intensified dramatically in late 1989, exemplified by the JKLF's kidnapping of Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of Union Home Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, which forced the release of five militants and exposed perceived Indian administrative vulnerabilities, encouraging further recruitment.^[83] By early 1990, militant attacks had proliferated, including assassinations of Kashmiri Pandits and security personnel, culminating in the mass exodus of approximately 100,000-300,000 Hindus from the Valley amid targeted killings and threats, as documented in contemporaneous reports.^[85] This phase saw militant numbers swell to thousands, sustained by cross-border sanctuaries in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, though internal divisions between independence-seeking and Pakistan-oriented factions foreshadowed later fragmentation.^[11]

Indian Counter-Terrorism Efforts

India's counter-terrorism strategy in Jammu and Kashmir emphasizes a zero-tolerance policy, involving sustained military operations, intelligence-driven actions, and dismantling of terror support networks through a whole-of-government approach.^[86] The Indian Army, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), and Jammu and Kashmir Police collaborate to neutralize militants, with over 97 alleged terrorists killed in 222 incidents in 2022 alone, contributing to a reported decline in overall violence post-2019.^[87] These efforts include cordon-and-search operations, targeted killings, and arrests of overground workers aiding infiltration from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.^[88] The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), extended in Jammu and Kashmir since 1990, grants security forces authority to conduct operations in "disturbed areas," enabling rapid response to militancy without prior warrants, which Indian officials credit with facilitating the neutralization of thousands of militants since 2000.^[89] Critics, including human rights organizations, argue it enables excesses, but empirical data from government reports show its correlation with reduced infiltration attempts, from peaks of over 2,000 annually in the early 2000s to under 100 by 2022.^[87] The strategy integrates human intelligence with technology, such as drones and signals intelligence, to preempt cross-border incursions supported by Pakistan-based groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM).^[90] Cross-border actions mark escalations in this framework. Following the September 18, 2016, Uri attack by Pakistan-backed militants that killed 19 Indian soldiers, Indian Para Special Forces conducted surgical strikes on September 29, 2016, targeting nine terror launch pads across the Line of Control, destroying infrastructure used for infiltration into Jammu and Kashmir.^[91] Similarly, after the February 14, 2019, Pulwama suicide bombing by JeM that killed 40 CRPF personnel, India executed airstrikes on a JeM training camp in Balakot, Pakistan, on February 26, 2019, claiming to have eliminated a significant number of terrorists and disrupted operational capabilities aimed at Kashmir.^[92] These preemptive measures, justified by Indian authorities as responses to state-sponsored terrorism, have deterred large-scale attacks, though Pakistan denies involvement and claims minimal impact.^[93] In 2025, following the April 22 Pahalgam attack killing 26 civilians, India launched Operation Sindoor, involving airstrikes on May 7 targeting nine sites in Pakistan, including militant camps, as part of intensified counter-terrorism to address persistent proxy threats in Jammu and Kashmir.^[94] Government data indicate over 100 militants neutralized in Jammu and Kashmir in early 2025, reflecting ongoing success in containing militancy through combined kinetic and non-kinetic measures, such as deradicalization programs and economic incentives to erode local support.^[95] Despite these gains, challenges persist from foreign mercenaries and residual networks, necessitating continued vigilance.^[86]

Human Rights Allegations and Responses

Human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented allegations of extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, torture, and excessive use of force by Indian security forces in Jammu and Kashmir, particularly during counter-insurgency operations enabled by the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) of 1990, which grants broad powers including arrest without warrant and use of lethal force.^[96]^[97] For instance, between 1990 and 2011, Amnesty International reported over 8,000 cases of alleged disappearances attributed to security forces, often involving civilians detained on suspicion of militancy links.^[98] The use of pellet-firing shotguns against protesters has led to thousands of injuries, including permanent blindness in over 1,000 cases since 2016, according to data compiled by local medical facilities and cited in UN reports.^[99] These groups have criticized the low prosecution rates, with fewer than 50 convictions of security personnel for abuses over decades, attributing this to AFSPA's requirement for central government sanction for trials, which is rarely granted.^[97] Critics of these reports, including Indian analysts and organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, argue that Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch exhibit systemic bias against India, often relying on unverified testimonies from separatist sympathizers while underreporting abuses by militants, such as targeted killings of civilians and security personnel.^[100]^[101] U.S. State Department assessments acknowledge violations by Indian forces but also highlight serious abuses by insurgents, including torture and executions of suspected informants, with over 40,000 deaths from militancy-related violence since 1989, the majority involving civilian and security force victims of terrorist attacks.^[102] The Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission, established in 1997, has registered thousands of complaints and recommended compensation in verified cases, but its effectiveness is limited by jurisdictional constraints over armed forces and a focus on custodial deaths rather than battlefield encounters.^[103] In response, the Indian government maintains that security operations are proportionate responses to Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, with measures like AFSPA necessary in "disturbed areas" to prevent ambushes and improvised explosive attacks that killed 229 security personnel and 38 civilians in 2018 alone.^[102] Official data from the Ministry of Home Affairs indicate a sharp decline in terror incidents post-2019 abrogation of Article 370, from 417 in 2018 to 125 in 2023, alongside reduced stone-pelting by 99% and fewer civilian deaths, attributed to enhanced intelligence and community policing that dismantle militant networks.^[104] The government has conducted judicial inquiries into high-profile cases, such as the 2010 Machil fake encounter where five civilians were killed and staged as militants, leading to convictions and life sentences for involved army personnel in 2014.^[102] Efforts to address grievances include the 2019 repeal of certain emergency laws and increased local recruitment into security forces, though NGOs report persistent detentions under public safety acts without trial.^[96] India has rejected UN calls for international probes, asserting domestic mechanisms suffice and accusing reports of ignoring cross-border infiltration, which supplied over 70% of militants per security estimates.^[99]^[90]

Political Changes and Controversies

Special Status under Article 370

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 17 October 1949, created temporary provisions that conferred special autonomy on Jammu and Kashmir, limiting the Union Parliament's legislative powers to defense, external affairs, and communications as specified in the state's Instrument of Accession.^[105]^[106] The accession instrument was signed by Maharaja Hari Singh on 26 October 1947 in response to a tribal invasion backed by Pakistan, acceding the princely state to India while preserving internal sovereignty.^[106] Clause (1) of Article 370 stipulated that other constitutional provisions could apply to the state only through presidential orders, incorporating modifications and requiring the concurrence of the state government for matters beyond the accession terms.^[105] This structure enabled Jammu and Kashmir to maintain its own constitution, adopted by its Constituent Assembly on 17 November 1956 and effective from 26 January 1957, which affirmed the state's integral status within India while vesting residuary legislative powers in the state assembly for non-Union subjects.^[107]^[108] The state also retained a separate flag, its own penal code, and procedural laws distinct from the rest of India, with central laws applicable only after state endorsement via presidential notification.^[109] Initially, fundamental rights under Part III of the Constitution did not fully extend to the state, allowing tailored application that prioritized local governance over uniform national standards.^[105] Article 370's framework supported Article 35A, introduced via presidential order in 1954, which empowered the state to define "permanent residents" and restrict their privileges to locals, barring non-residents from acquiring immovable property, settling permanently, or accessing state government jobs and scholarships.^[110]^[109] These restrictions aimed to safeguard land ownership and demographic composition, preventing external demographic shifts in a region of approximately 222,000 square kilometers at the time of accession.^[110] The Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly, elected in 1951 and dissolved in 1957 without invoking clause (3) to recommend Article 370's cessation, effectively entrenched the provision despite its "temporary" designation.^[108]^[105] Over subsequent decades, more than 40 presidential orders extended select central laws, such as those on preventive detention and elections, but the core autonomy persisted, reflecting the conditional nature of integration negotiated amid partition violence and unresolved territorial claims.^[106] This special status distinguished Jammu and Kashmir from other states, fostering parallel legal systems that prioritized state-level control over residency, resources, and administration until modifications in 2019.^[109]

Abrogation in 2019 and Aftermath

On August 5, 2019, President Ram Nath Kovind issued a proclamation under Article 356, recommending the application of all provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir, effectively superseding Article 370's temporary provisions that had limited such applicability.^[111] The Rajya Sabha passed a resolution endorsing this on the same day, followed by the Lok Sabha's approval on August 6, 2019, amid a communications blackout and deployment of additional security forces that had begun in early August to preempt unrest.^[112] Concurrently, the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, was enacted, bifurcating the state into two union territories—Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislature) and Ladakh (without)—effective October 31, 2019, thereby revoking the region's separate flag, constitution, and land ownership restrictions under Article 35A.^[113] Immediate aftermath involved a prolonged security lockdown, with mobile internet suspended until January 2021 in phases, landline restrictions, and preventive detentions of over 4,000 individuals, including mainstream politicians like Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti under the Public Safety Act.^[112] These measures correlated with a sharp drop in stone-pelting incidents from 1,328 in 2018 to 41 by 2021, and terrorist-related fatalities declined by approximately 66% in the initial years post-abrogation, per government data, attributed to intensified counter-insurgency operations and reduced infiltration attempts.^[114] Encounters with militants persisted but shifted toward targeted eliminations, with official figures reporting 157 terrorists neutralized in 2023 compared to higher pre-2019 annual averages.^[115] Economically, the changes facilitated central government schemes' direct implementation, boosting investments in infrastructure such as the Delhi-Srinagar highway upgrades and power projects, with foreign direct investment inflows rising to over ₹1.5 lakh crore by 2024 in sectors like horticulture and handicrafts.^[116] Tourism rebounded, recording 2.11 crore visitors in 2023—exceeding pre-2019 peaks—driven by improved security perceptions and marketing campaigns, though seasonal disruptions from cross-border tensions occurred.^[117] Critics, including local business associations, noted initial GDP contraction to 3.97% growth in 2020-21 due to lockdowns, but recovery accelerated to 7-8% annually by 2024, with unemployment easing from 23% in 2018 to around 18% via skill programs.^[118] Politically, a delimitation commission redrew constituencies in 2022, increasing assembly seats from 83 to 90, paving the way for Jammu and Kashmir's first legislative assembly elections since 2014, held in three phases from September 18 to October 1, 2024, with a 63.88% voter turnout—the highest in decades.^[119] The National Conference-led alliance secured 49 seats, forming a government under Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on October 16, 2024, which pledged to pursue statehood restoration while implementing development agendas.^[120] Separatist groups boycotted the polls, and while integration advanced, demands for autonomy persisted, alongside Supreme Court validation of the abrogation on December 11, 2023, mandating elections by September 2024.^[111] Cross-border skirmishes continued sporadically, but overall stability enabled Rajya Sabha elections in October 2025, where the National Conference won three seats.^[121]

Claims of Occupation and Self-Determination

Pakistan and various Kashmiri separatist groups maintain that India's administration of Jammu and Kashmir amounts to an illegal occupation, arguing that it violates the principle of self-determination enshrined in United Nations resolutions from the late 1940s. These claims posit that the region's accession to India in 1947 was provisional or coerced, and that a promised plebiscite to ascertain the will of the populace has been systematically denied. Pakistani officials, including Foreign Minister Muhammad Ishaq Dar, have repeatedly characterized the territory as "Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir" (IIOJK), asserting that India's control relies on military force rather than popular consent, and linking it to broader allegations of demographic engineering and rights suppression post-2019.^[122] The historical foundation for these claims traces to the 1947 partition of British India, when Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir initially sought independence amid indecision over accession to India or Pakistan. On October 22, 1947, Pashtun tribesmen, backed by Pakistani regulars, invaded the region, prompting the Maharaja to sign the Instrument of Accession to India on October 26, 1947, which ceded defense, external affairs, and communications to the Indian Dominion while preserving internal autonomy. Proponents of the occupation narrative, including Pakistani state sources, contend that this document was signed under duress from the invasion and did not reflect the Muslim-majority population's aspirations, particularly in the Kashmir Valley, where pro-Pakistan sentiments were strong. However, the accession aligned with the legal framework of lapsed paramountcy under the Indian Independence Act 1947, granting princely rulers sovereign choice, and Indian forces entered only after the request on October 27.^[123]^[124]^[40] Central to self-determination arguments are United Nations Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 47 adopted on April 21, 1948, which called for an immediate ceasefire—achieved on January 1, 1949—followed by phased demilitarization and a plebiscite under UN auspices to determine accession. The resolution stipulated that Pakistan withdraw its tribesmen and nationals first, with India then reducing its forces to a minimum, after which a UN-nominated plebiscite administrator would oversee a vote allowing residents to choose India or Pakistan. Pakistan's failure to fully withdraw, as verified by UN observers, stalled implementation, with subsequent resolutions like 91 (1951) maintaining the framework but noting non-compliance. Indian officials, including in Ministry of External Affairs statements, counter that the accession remains irrevocable, rendering plebiscite conditions obsolete, and that repeated elections since 1951—participated in by millions—serve as ongoing expressions of self-determination, though turnout has varied amid insurgency. Pakistani and separatist sources, often state-aligned, dismiss these elections as manipulated under duress, prioritizing the unimplemented UN plebiscite as the sole legitimate mechanism.^[125]^[126] Post-2019 claims have intensified following the abrogation of Article 370, with Pakistan alleging that domicile reforms enabling non-Kashmiris to settle and acquire property constitute settler colonialism aimed at altering the Muslim-majority demographics to entrench control. Indian responses reject this as internal administrative reform, emphasizing that the territory's integration was finalized legally and that security operations target Pakistan-sponsored militancy, not occupation. Empirical data on population shifts show limited non-local settlement as of 2023, with over 90% of new domiciles granted to long-term residents displaced by conflict, though critics cite opacity in records. These narratives reflect entrenched positions: Pakistan's framing aligns with its strategic interests in claiming the region as a "jugular vein," while India's prioritizes the accession's finality and democratic integration, amid mutual accusations of bias in international reporting that often amplifies occupation claims without equal scrutiny of Pakistan-administered areas' governance deficits.^[127]^[128]

International Dimensions

United Nations Resolutions and Plebiscite Debates

The United Nations Security Council addressed the Jammu and Kashmir dispute following India's complaint of Pakistani aggression on 1 January 1948, adopting Resolution 38 on 17 January 1948, which called for an immediate ceasefire and cessation of hostilities.^[129] Resolution 39, passed on 20 January 1948, established the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) to investigate and mediate the dispute.^[130] UNCIP's efforts culminated in supplementary resolutions on 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949, which detailed a phased demilitarization process as a prerequisite for a plebiscite to ascertain the state's accession to India or Pakistan under UN supervision.^[131] Central to these measures was Security Council Resolution 47, adopted unanimously on 21 April 1948, which outlined a truce framework followed by demilitarization and a free, impartial plebiscite.^[132] It mandated Pakistan to withdraw tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not resident in Jammu and Kashmir, while requiring India to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level needed to maintain law and order after the truce.^[132] A UN-appointed Plebiscite Administrator would then oversee the vote, ensuring freedoms of expression, assembly, and travel, the release of political prisoners, and protection of minorities from coercion.^[132] The Commission was tasked with certifying the plebiscite's fairness to the Council.^[132] Subsequent resolutions, such as 91 on 30 March 1951 and 122 on 24 January 1957, reaffirmed the demilitarization and plebiscite requirements while urging compliance and invalidating unilateral actions altering the status quo.^[131] Implementation faltered after the ceasefire took effect on 1 January 1949, as India and Pakistan diverged on demilitarization sequencing. India accepted the resolutions conditionally, insisting Pakistan fully withdraw irregular forces and nationals first, as stipulated, before any Indian troop reductions, and arguing that partial Pakistani withdrawals were insufficient to proceed.^[133] Pakistan advocated for mutual or simultaneous withdrawals to achieve parity, claiming India's troop presence would bias the plebiscite, and accused India of demographic manipulations and non-compliance with force reductions.^[122] UNCIP's mediation, including proposals by representatives like Owen Dixon in 1950, collapsed over these impasse points, including disputes on refugee repatriation, minority protections, and the exclusion of Pakistani personnel from plebiscite administration.^[131] The plebiscite never occurred, with both sides attributing failure to the other's non-fulfillment of preconditions; India viewed Pakistani non-withdrawal as the primary obstruction, rendering the process inoperable, while Pakistan highlighted India's refusal to demilitarize proportionally and later electoral integrations as violations.^[133]^[122] India subsequently regarded the resolutions as obsolete following the 1972 Simla Agreement, which bilateralized the dispute and emphasized direct negotiations, asserting that repeated state elections since 1951 reflected popular endorsement of accession over a UN-supervised vote.^[134] Pakistan maintains the resolutions' validity, framing the plebiscite as an unfulfilled commitment to self-determination and periodically raising the issue in UN forums, as in Security Council discussions in 2019 and 2025.^[135]^[136] The Council has not enforced implementation since the 1950s, deferring to bilateral mechanisms amid evolving geopolitical contexts.^[131]

Positions of Major Powers

The United States has long held that the Kashmir dispute is a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan, to be resolved through direct negotiations without third-party mediation or reference to United Nations resolutions on plebiscites. This position was reaffirmed in official assessments following India's 2019 revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status under Article 370, with U.S. policy emphasizing India's sovereignty over its administered territories while expressing concerns over human rights and democratic processes. In 2025, amid heightened tensions from a militant attack in Pahalgam, President Trump reiterated offers for U.S. assistance in finding a "solution," though such proposals have historically been rejected by India as attempts to internationalize the issue.^[137]^[138]^[139] China, which administers portions of the broader Kashmir region including Aksai Chin, has opposed India's 2019 administrative changes, declaring the creation of the Union Territory of Ladakh—adjacent to Chinese-claimed territory—as illegal and invalid under international law. Beijing's stance frames the Jammu and Kashmir dispute as a historical legacy requiring peaceful resolution through India-Pakistan dialogue and consultations, often articulated in joint statements with Pakistan that reject unilateral alterations to the status quo. This position aligns with China's strategic interests in maintaining influence over the region and supporting Pakistan, as evidenced by repeated calls post-India's Supreme Court validation of Article 370's abrogation in December 2023.^[140]^[141]^[142] Russia, a longstanding strategic partner of India, views the Kashmir issue primarily as an internal affair for bilateral settlement between the disputants, consistent with its abstention from UN votes historically favoring India's position and its supply of over 50% of India's military imports. In response to 2025 escalations, including cross-border strikes, Moscow urged restraint and offered assistance in de-escalation only if requested by both parties, emphasizing political dialogue over external imposition. This balanced yet India-leaning approach reflects Russia's deepening defense ties with New Delhi while pragmatically engaging Pakistan to counterbalance Western influence in South Asia.^[143]^[144] European powers, including the United Kingdom and France, align with the bilateral resolution framework, rejecting calls for Kashmiri self-determination via plebiscite and recognizing India's administrative control over its territories. The UK government, under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, shifted Labour Party policy in 2024 to affirm that resolution lies solely between India and Pakistan, diverging from prior emphases on UN-mediated rights. The European Union has echoed calls for restraint and dialogue during flare-ups, such as in 2025, while treating human rights monitoring as secondary to sovereign matters, though France in 2019 privately urged India to uphold rights amid communications blackouts. This consensus among G7 states prioritizes stability and counter-terrorism cooperation with India over revisiting colonial-era partitions.^[145]^[146]^[147]^[148]

Bilateral India-Pakistan Relations

Bilateral relations between India and Pakistan originated from the 1947 partition of British India, which divided the subcontinent along religious lines and left the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir disputed after its Hindu ruler acceded to India amid a tribal invasion from Pakistan in October 1947, sparking the first Indo-Pakistani War that ended with a UN-mediated ceasefire in January 1949 and the establishment of the Line of Control (LoC).^[149]^[150] The conflict resulted in India administering approximately two-thirds of the territory, including the Kashmir Valley, while Pakistan controlled the remainder, setting a pattern of recurring military confrontations over the region, with three of the four wars between the nations—1947–1948, 1965, and 1999—directly centered on Kashmir claims.^[149]^[49] The 1972 Simla Agreement, signed on July 2 following India's victory in the 1971 war that led to Bangladesh's independence, marked a pivotal bilateral framework by committing both nations to resolve disputes, including Kashmir, peacefully through direct negotiations without third-party involvement and recognizing the LoC as the de facto boundary pending final settlement.^[151]^[152] This accord emphasized mutual respect for sovereignty and non-interference, aiming to prevent future conflicts, though subsequent Pakistani support for militancy in Indian-administered Kashmir from the late 1980s undermined trust, as evidenced by cross-border infiltration and attacks attributed to Pakistan-based groups.^[49] The 1999 Lahore Declaration, signed February 21 by Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, reaffirmed bilateral dialogue on Kashmir, nuclear risk reduction, and confidence-building measures like trade and people-to-people contacts, but was swiftly violated by Pakistan's initiation of the Kargil intrusion weeks later, leading to war and exposing asymmetries in commitment to peaceful resolution.^[153]^[154] Efforts at normalization in the early 2000s, including the 2003 ceasefire along the LoC that reduced violations from thousands annually to hundreds, faltered amid major terrorist incidents like the 2001 Indian Parliament attack and 2008 Mumbai assaults, which India linked to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and militant proxies, prompting military standoffs and suspension of composite dialogue.^[49]^[155] A renewed understanding on February 25, 2021, restored adherence to the 2003 truce, correlating with over 90% fewer ceasefire violations in the following year through hotline communications and DGMO-level talks, though sporadic breaches persisted.^[155]^[156] Relations deteriorated sharply after India's August 2019 revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status, leading Pakistan to downgrade diplomatic ties, suspend trade, and close borders, with no formal bilateral talks resuming amid accusations of Indian demographic changes and Pakistani sponsorship of terrorism.^[49] In April 2025, Pakistan suspended the Simla Agreement in response to an Indian terror attack probe, heightening LoC tensions and prompting threats to abrogate other pacts like the Indus Waters Treaty.^[157]^[158] A militant attack in Pahalgam on May 7, 2025, escalated to Indian missile strikes, Pakistani retaliation, and cross-border shelling, culminating in a fragile ceasefire on May 10 after intense fighting—the most severe since 1999—but with ongoing violations eroding the 2021 accord by late 2025.^[49]^[159]^[160] As of October 2025, bilateral channels remain frozen, with India insisting on terrorism cessation as a precondition for dialogue and Pakistan conditioning talks on Kashmir's status, perpetuating a cycle of distrust despite shared economic incentives like resumed limited trade in essentials.^[49]^[161]

Recent Developments

Post-2019 Stability and Elections

Following the abrogation of Article 370 on August 5, 2019, Jammu and Kashmir experienced a period of heightened security measures, including internet shutdowns and detentions of political leaders, which were gradually eased by early 2020 as normalcy was restored. Official data from the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs indicated a significant decline in terrorist incidents, with a reported reduction of over 70 percent in Kashmir compared to pre-abrogation levels, attributed to intensified counter-terrorism operations and the dismantling of terror financing networks. Stone-pelting incidents, a marker of unrest, dropped by approximately 80 percent from 2018 peaks, while civilian fatalities from terrorism fell from 55 in 2018 to 38 in 2020. However, militancy persisted, with over 100 terrorist encounters annually in the initial years, including targeted killings of migrants and minorities, though overall violence metrics showed a downward trend per government assessments.^[162]^[90] Local governance elections resumed post-reorganization into union territories, beginning with District Development Council (DDC) polls in November-December 2020, the first such tier introduced under the Jammu and Kashmir Panchayati Raj Act amendments. These elections, held across 20 districts with 2,638 wards, saw a voter turnout of 51.6 percent despite boycott calls from some separatist groups and initial COVID-19 disruptions; the National Conference-Congress alliance secured 58 seats in the Kashmir Valley, while the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won 125 seats predominantly in Jammu, reflecting regional divides. Independents and People's Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) affiliates also gained traction, with the polls enabling grassroots development funding of over ₹1,000 crore annually. Panchayat elections, held earlier in 2018 but with bypolls and extensions post-2019, further decentralized power, though implementation faced challenges from low attendance in some Valley areas due to security concerns.^[163] The Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly elections, delayed since 2014 amid the constitutional changes, occurred in three phases from September 18 to October 1, 2024, marking the first such polls post-abrogation and covering 90 constituencies across the union territory (excluding Ladakh). Voter turnout reached 63.87 percent, the highest since 1996, with peaceful conduct overseen by over 80,000 security personnel and minimal disruptions. The Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (JKNC) emerged as the largest party with 42 seats, primarily in the Valley, followed by the BJP with 29 seats concentrated in Jammu; the Indian National Congress secured 6, and the People's Democratic Party (PDP) 3, while independents won 7. The JKNC-Congress alliance formed the government on October 16, 2024, with Omar Abdullah sworn in as Chief Minister, fulfilling a Supreme Court mandate for elections by September 30, 2024. These results underscored voter preference for regional parties in Kashmir while BJP maintained dominance in Hindu-majority Jammu, with the party's vote share at 25.5 percent—the highest overall—despite fewer seats.^[164]^[165]^[166] By mid-2025, stability metrics included sustained tourism recovery, with over 2 crore visitors in 2023-24 versus pre-2019 averages, alongside infrastructure projects under the Prime Minister's Development Programme, though sporadic terror attacks, such as the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam incident killing civilians, highlighted residual threats from cross-border infiltration. The elected assembly's resumption of legislative functions, including debates on statehood restoration, signaled political normalization, but analysts noted persistent alienation in parts of the Valley, with security forces conducting over 6,000 operations annually to neutralize militants. Government sources credited integration measures for reduced radicalization, evidenced by fewer recruitment into terror groups, while international observers like Freedom House upgraded J&K's status to "Partly Free" in 2025 citing competitive elections.^[167]^[82]

Cross-Border Tensions and PoK Protests

Cross-border tensions along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir have persisted despite a 2021 ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan, which initially reduced firing incidents from thousands annually to fewer than 100 by 2022.^[168] However, sporadic violations continued, often linked to infiltration attempts by militants from Pakistan-administered areas.^[169] Tensions escalated dramatically in April 2025 following a terrorist attack on April 22 in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, where gunmen killed at least 12 tourists, an incident India attributed to Pakistan-based groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba.^[170] ^[169] Armed skirmishes along the LoC began on April 24, 2025, involving artillery exchanges that displaced thousands of civilians on both sides.^[168] On May 7, India conducted missile strikes, dubbed Operation Sindoor, targeting alleged terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, prompting Pakistan to retaliate with attacks on Indian positions in Poonch, Jammu, killing 16 civilians.^[171] ^[169] The four-day escalation included air and ground clashes, with both nations accusing each other of ceasefire breaches, before an immediate truce was agreed on May 10, mediated indirectly through military hotlines.^[160] By May 11, the ceasefire appeared to hold amid mutual allegations of violations, though reports of explosions persisted briefly.^[172] Later incidents, such as disputed firing claims in Poonch on August 5, 2025, were denied by the Indian Army as unprovoked violations.^[173] Concurrently, protests in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), also known as Azad Jammu and Kashmir, have highlighted local grievances against Pakistani administration, often erupting over economic issues amid broader Indo-Pakistani tensions. In May 2024, the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) organized six days of sit-ins, shutter-downs, and wheel-jam strikes starting May 8, demanding subsidized wheat flour, reduced electricity tariffs reflecting hydel power generation costs, and lower taxes on essentials.^[174] Violent clashes with security forces resulted in at least three protester deaths, prompting Pakistan to concede demands including price rollbacks and a judicial inquiry.^[174] Protests reignited in late September 2025, with JKJAAC calling for region-wide strikes from September 29 to October 4, focusing on unresolved issues like electricity shortages, high costs, and alleged repression.^[175] Demonstrations in Muzaffarabad and other areas turned violent, leading to a government deal on October 4 that included compensation for families of those killed in prior unrest, subsidies, and probes into deaths.^[175] These events, occurring against the backdrop of the May 2025 LoC crisis, underscored systemic economic discontent in PoK, with protesters rejecting Islamabad's narrative of benevolent oversight and demanding greater autonomy or resource equity from local hydropower revenues.^[174] Indian officials cited the unrest as evidence of governance failures under Pakistani control, contrasting it with post-2019 developments in Indian-administered areas.^[176]

Natural Disasters and Humanitarian Issues

The Himalayan terrain of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir exposes the region to frequent natural disasters, including earthquakes, flash floods from cloudbursts, landslides, and avalanches, with seismic activity along the India-Eurasia plate boundary amplifying risks.^[177] Monsoon-driven heavy rainfall and glacial melt further intensify flooding in river valleys like the Chenab and Jhelum, while winter snow accumulation leads to avalanches in high-altitude areas such as the Pir Panjal range.^[178] Post-2019, climate variability has correlated with increased intensity of these events, though long-term data attribution remains debated among meteorologists.^[179] In 2025, the region experienced its most severe flooding since the 2014 deluge, triggered by record-breaking monsoon rains and cloudbursts. On August 14, a massive cloudburst struck Chisoti village in Kishtwar district, unleashing flash floods that killed at least 65 people, injured over 100, and left more than 200 missing, primarily pilgrims along the Machail Mata route.^[180] ^[177] By late August, cumulative tolls across Jammu division districts including Kishtwar, Doda, and Kathua reached 150 deaths, 178 injuries, and 33 missing, with landslides blocking highways and destroying bridges, homes, and agricultural lands.^[181] Earlier in July 2025, heavy rains caused flash floods in Rajouri, Poonch, and Reasi districts, displacing thousands and prompting evacuations.^[182] No major earthquakes have struck since 2019, but minor tremors persist, and avalanches claimed lives in border areas during the 2020-2021 winters, underscoring ongoing seasonal hazards.^[183] Humanitarian responses have relied heavily on coordinated efforts by the Indian Army, State Disaster Response Force, and local administration, including aerial rescues, relief camps, and distribution of food, water, and medical supplies.^[184] In the 2025 floods, over 80% of electricity was restored within weeks in affected zones, alongside provision of potable water and health services, though remote access challenges delayed some operations.^[185] Compensation packages were announced for families of the deceased and damaged property, totaling millions in rupees, while NGOs and community groups aided reconstruction.^[186] Persistent issues include infrastructure vulnerabilities—such as inadequate early warning systems and deforested slopes exacerbating landslides—and temporary displacement of 200,000-plus residents, straining resources in a post-abrogation security context where military presence facilitates rapid deployment but raises occasional access critiques from local observers.^[187] Cross-border flooding warnings to Pakistan in August 2025 highlighted regional cooperation gaps, with aid focusing domestically amid geopolitical tensions.^[188] Overall, disaster mortality rates have declined due to improved preparedness, yet population density in hazard-prone valleys sustains high human costs.^[189]

References

[1]
Situation in IOK - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Situation in IOK. Pakistan is deeply concerned at the increase in systematic human rights violations in the Indian Occupied Kashmir We condemn the brutal use ...
[2]
Indian-occupied Kashmir elects first regional government in a decade
Oct 8, 2024 · Indian-occupied Kashmir (IoK) elected on Tuesday its first government since the territory was brought under New Delhi's direct control.
[3]
States Uts - Jammu And Kashmir - Know India
... area of 101387 sq km on this side of actual line of control. Out of this, area under reserved forest is 2551 sq km which accounts for 12.61 per cent of ...
[4]
Kashmir | History, People, Conflict, Map, & Facts - Britannica
Administered by India are the southern and southeastern portions, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, which were reorganized as union territories in 2019. The Indian- ...
[5]
Realities of Life in Kashmir - Amnesty UK
Jul 12, 2023 · Of the total population of around 15 million, the majority, about 12.5 million, lives in the Jammu and Kashmir Valley plus Ladakh, administered ...
[6]
Kashmir profile - BBC News
Mar 10, 2025 · The population of historic Kashmir is divided into about 10 million people in Indian-administrated Jammu and Kashmir and 4.5 million in Pakistani-administered ...
[7]
Instrument of Accession of Jammu and Kashmir State
The complete text of the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh, the then ruler of the State of Jammu & Kashmir and its acceptance by the ...
[8]
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
For text of Instrument of Accession signed by Hari Singh on October 26 and for statement by Lord Mountbatten on its acceptance dated October 27, see P. L. ...
[9]
Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it - BBC
May 7, 2025 · The maharaja (local ruler), Hari Singh, initially wanted Kashmir to become independent - but in October 1947 chose to join India, in return for ...
[10]
UN report on Indian Occupied Kashmir - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
... Indian Occupied Kashmir: A documentary on Kashmir was played which was ... IoK was stressed. The participants were asked to use their influence for ...
[11]
Behind the Kashmir Conflict - Background (Human Rights Watch ...
Kashmir has been at the heart of a territorial dispute between India and Pakistan since the two nations gained their independence in 1947. Both claim Kashmir.
[12]
Jammu and Kashmir | History, Princely State, Capital ... - Britannica
Oct 5, 2025 · The administrative capitals are Srinagar in summer and Jammu in winter. Area 16,309 square miles (42,240 square km). Pop. (2011) 12,367,013.
[13]
Explainer: What India's change to occupied Kashmir's status means
Aug 5, 2019 · India's government has revoked the special constitutional status of Indian-occupied Kashmir (IoK), amid a heavy security crackdown in the disputed region.<|separator|>
[14]
Indian-occupied Kashmir? - E-International Relations
May 20, 2014 · ... occupied Kashmir” (PoK). It has been used to collectively denote the area comprising Gilgit–Baltistan and Azad Kashmir since the ceasefire ...
[15]
Indian-administered Kashmir broken up: All you need to know | News
Oct 30, 2019 · The union territory of Jammu and Kashmir will have two divisions; Kashmir Valley and Jammu, an area of over 42,000 square kilometres (16,216 ...
[16]
https://www.britannica.com/place/Ladakh-union-territory
[17]
Map of Kashmir, India / Pakistan - Nations Online
To the northeast of Ladakh lies the disputed region of Aksai Chin, once part of Ladakh but now administered by China. To the east, Kashmir borders the Tibetan ...
[18]
Seventy-two years of Kashmiri suffering - The Express Tribune
... history of IOK. First, October 27 is significant because on that day the Maharaja of Kashmir signed the so-called instrument of accession with India which ...
[19]
THE KASHMIR ISSUE At a Glance - National Assembly of Pakistan
... Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) on the streets, agitating for their right of self-determination. Since India endeavoured to kill their spirit for freedom by ...
[20]
Kashmir: When Words Collide – TRT World Research Centre
Ever since, Khan's tweets have constantly been criticising the tactics of the Modi-led government, referring to the region as Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK).
[21]
5th August has now been termed as Youm-e-Istehsal (English ... - PID
Jul 27, 2020 · The term Kashmir Siege Day may be used wherever and whenever deemed appropriate. ... Indian Occupied Kashmir Illegal Action Illegal Annexation or ...
[22]
[PDF] 1846-Treaty-of-Amritsar.pdf - Claude Arpi
Article 1. The British Government transfers and makes over for ever in independent possession to Maharajah Gulab Singh and the heirs male of his body all the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[23]
Gulab Singh and the Creation of Jammu & Kashmir
Sep 24, 2023 · The state of Jammu and Kashmir was created in 1846 through two treaties - the Treaty of Lahore between the British East India Company and ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[24]
[PDF] Treaties of Amritsar - Apna.org
Then as part of the Treaty of Amritsar (1846) Maharaja Gulab Singh Jamwal agreed to serve the British Empire under Article 6: "Maharajah Gulab Singh engages ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
[25]
DOGRAS: THE LAST RULING DYNASTY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Jun 13, 2025 · Gulab Singh, the first ruler of the Dogra dynasty, rose after achieving different military and political ranks during the Sikh Rule, eventually ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-<|separator|>
[26]
[PDF] Political Consciousness of the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir State ...
The Dogra rule was an oligarchic and tyrannical for the Muslims of Kashmir. It was one man rule and all powers were vested to man (Mahraja). In spite of.
[27]
[PDF] jammu and kashmir - Census of India
Hindus thus form over 57 % of the population, Muslims over 39% and Sikhs just over 2 %. The Hindus are mostly Dogra. Rajputs 'and a large number of the Muslims ...
[28]
Muslim-Hindu demography of Jammu and Kashmir: What Census ...
Oct 28, 2020 · The pre-Independence Census of 1941 recorded Muslims as constituting 72.41% of the population, and Hindus 25.01%. Thereafter, the proportion ...
[29]
Kashmir before 1947 | Politics and Society in Modern South Asia
Sep 24, 2023 · Dogra policies targeted both the communal ethnic identity and the faith practices of Kashmiri Muslims, who faced restrictions on practices like ...
[30]
GENESIS OF THE CONFLICT - Legal Forum for Kashmir
The 1931 resistance galvanized the momentum of Muslim leadership against the anti-Muslim policies, practices and oppressive measures of the Hindu-Dogra rulers.
[31]
Colonizing Kashmir: Introduction | Stanford University Press
The Muslims of Jammu would later be ethnically cleansed in 1947, making Hindus the majority. The Kashmir Valley was majority Muslim (over 90 percent) and also ...
[32]
Dogra raj in Kashmir - Frontline - The Hindu
Nov 8, 2017 · Muslim women have been dishonoured” ( ibid , page 298). In 1947, Muslims were in a 61 per cent majority in the Jammu province. Horace ...
[33]
[PDF] A Historical Perspective on Jammu and Kashmir - BPAS Journals
12 After the Treaty of Amritsar in 1846, the Muslim-majority population of Kashmir came under the rule of the Hindu Dogra dynasty. The Dogra kings ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
[34]
Partition 70 years on: When tribal warriors invaded Kashmir - BBC
Oct 21, 2017 · The invasion not only traumatised a previously well-settled and peaceful Kashmiri society, it also set a disastrous pattern for India-Pakistan ...
[35]
India‑Pakistan War (1947‑48): Full History, Causes, Timeline ...
Aug 20, 2025 · 22 Oct 1947: Tribal invasion begins; 26 Oct 1947: Maharaja signs Instrument of Accession; 1 Jan 1948: India refers the issue to the United ...<|separator|>
[36]
22 October 1947: The darkest day in the history of Jammu & Kashmir
Oct 16, 2020 · Estimates of the total number of residents of J&K killed in the tribal invasion range between 35,000 to 40,000. The march of the tribal Lashkars ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[37]
https://brighterkashmir.com/remembering-1947-the-truth-behind-pakistans-invasion-of-kashmir
[38]
https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/history-today-when-maharaja-hari-singh-of-jammu-and-kashmir-sent-instrument-of-accession-to-india-13944201.html
[39]
J&K Accesion Day: Myths, falsehoods regarding accession need to ...
Oct 26, 2024 · Jammu & Kashmir became an integral part of India after Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession on October 26, 1947.<|separator|>
[40]
54. India/Jammu and Kashmir (1947-present)
Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession with the Indian government on October 26, 1947, and Indian troops entered Jammu and Kashmir on October ...
[41]
History of Conflict in India and Pakistan
Nov 26, 2019 · A ceasefire was arranged on Jan. 1, 1949 and a ceasefire line was established – now called the Line of Control. August 1965: The second Indo- ...<|separator|>
[42]
The India-Pakistan War of 1965 - Office of the Historian
The 1965 war was over Jammu and Kashmir, starting with border clashes and a Pakistani attempt to seize Kashmir, ending with a UN ceasefire and UN mediation.The 1967 Arab-Israeli War · Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
[43]
OUTCOME OF INDIA-PAKISTAN WARFARE | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
India won the September war with Pakistan. India seized the most territory and suffered less relative loss in manpower and materiel.Missing: key facts
[44]
[PDF] THE SOUTH ASIAN MILITARY HANDBOOK - CIA
On 3 December, Pakistan launched air strikes at air bases in western. India, and full-scale war on two fronts began. In the East, on 4 December,. India invaded ...
[45]
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
In the West, the Indians seem to be successfully repulsing Pak attacks in Kashmir, but show no signs yet of initiating a major offensive of their own. Repeated ...Missing: Indo- | Show results with:Indo-
[46]
[PDF] Indian and Pakistani Lessons from the Kargil Crisis - RAND
defeat in the 1971 war with India; India's occupation of the Siachen glacier; a desire to punish India for its periodic shelling of the. Neelum Valley road ...
[47]
[PDF] THESIS - DTIC
A campaign that lasted seventy-four days and cost each side more than a thousand casualties concluded with India in control of the peaks around Kargil.
[48]
Why India and Pakistan Are Fighting Over Kashmir Again
Mar 1, 2019 · The ensuing skirmish, known as the Kargil War, lasted two months and claimed more than a thousand casualties on each side. The episode was ...
[49]
Conflict Between India and Pakistan | Global Conflict Tracker
May 12, 2025 · The Karachi Agreement of 1949 temporarily ended violence in the Jammu-Kashmir region by establishing a cease-fire line (CFL) overseen by ...
[50]
Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 - India Code
Act Number: 34 ; Enactment Date: 2019-08-09 ; Act Year: 2019 ; Short Title: The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 ; Hindi Title: जम्मू-कश्मीर पुनर्गठन अधिनियम, ...
[51]
The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019 - PRS India
Aug 5, 2019 · The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019 was introduced in Rajya Sabha on August 5, 2019 by the Minister of Home Affairs, Mr. Amit Shah. ...
[52]
Jammu Kashmir Election Results 2024: What powers will the new ...
Sep 18, 2024 · Article 239, which deals with the administration of Union Territories, states that “every union territory shall be administered by the President ...Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
[53]
Understanding the Abrogation of Article 370: Origin and Impact
Following the abrogation of Article 370, on August 9, 2019, Parliament passed the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. This Act bifurcated the State into ...Missing: framework | Show results with:framework
[54]
Indian Kashmir: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report
Under the arrangements announced in 2019, the new union territory of Jammu and Kashmir would have a unicameral legislature with limited powers and at least 83 ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure<|separator|>
[55]
Jammu and Kashmir Presentation and Economic Growth Report | IBEF
The economy is primarily services based and agri-oriented at current prices, the GSDP of J&K has been estimated at Rs. 2.30 trillion (US$ 27.70 billion) in 2023 ...
[56]
Industrial Development & Economic Growth In Jammu And Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmir is the largest producer of apples, walnuts, and cherries in India. ... Key Industries: Horticulture. Floriculture. Handlooms and ...
[57]
[PDF] ECONOMIC SURVEY 2024-25
The agricultural sector in Jammu and Kashmir is undergoing a transformative shift towards high-value crops and organic farming. The Holistic Agriculture ...
[58]
[PDF] Contribution Of Major Economic Sectors In Gsdp Of Jammu And ...
Despite bottlenecks and uncertainties, the economy of Jammu and Kashmir has consistently grown at an average annual pace of 5-7 percent over a secular period.<|separator|>
[59]
Jammu & Kashmir to clock nearly 10 pc growth, economy on path to ...
Oct 2, 2025 · Between 2021–22 and 2024–25, Jammu and Kashmir recorded steady annual growth of more than 7 percent, supported by rising investments, booming ...
[60]
Jammu & Kashmir annual growth fractionally up; unemployment rate ...
Mar 6, 2025 · Jammu and Kashmir's economy is projected to grow at 7.06%, with unemployment declining to 6.1% in 2023-24.
[61]
J&K Economy: A Report Card - greaterkashmir
Aug 14, 2025 · The rate of growth of the tertiary sector of which trade is a large part, halved to 5.8 percent in 2023-24 from 11 per cent in 2022-23.
[62]
A new Kashmir rail bridge that could be a game-changer for India
Aug 14, 2024 · The bridge is part of a 272km (169 miles) all-weather railway line that will pass through Jammu, ultimately going all the way to the Kashmir ...
[63]
Infrastructure Development in Jammu & Kashmir - PMF IAS
Targeted infrastructure projects like NH-44 and the USBRL rail link are connecting remote areas to urban centres, boosting trade, mobility, and strategic access ...
[64]
Transforming India's Transport Infrastructure (2014- 2025) - PIB
Jun 11, 2025 · Anchored on seven key sectors—railways, roads, ports ... Chenani-Nashri tunnel: The tunnel in Jammu and Kashmir was opened in 2017.
[65]
Rs 12 Billion Rail Projects to Boost Connectivity in Jammu & Kashmir
Sep 10, 2025 · The projects include the construction of a new 40.2 km Baramulla–Uri railway line and the doubling of the 73.5 km Qazigund–Budgam stretch, both ...
[66]
India's Infrastructure Investments in Jammu and Kashmir
Jan 23, 2025 · The notable projects for rapid military deployment are the Zojila Tunnel, Z-Morh Tunnel, Chenab Railway Bridge, and Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramula ...
[67]
Post-Article 370 infrastructure is rebuilding Jammu & Kashmir
Jul 6, 2025 · As of 2024, more than 2,200 infrastructure projects worth over Rs 25,000 crore have been completed or are in progress in Jammu and Kashmir under ...
[68]
The High Costs of India's Local Projects in Kashmir
Apr 3, 2025 · From roads to bridges, to hydropower projects, Kashmir has been having a continuous infrastructure fever that Union officials say will bring development and ...Missing: power | Show results with:power<|separator|>
[69]
India's Kashmir railway is an engineering feat - and an occupation ...
Jun 21, 2025 · India's new railway in Kashmir is less about connectivity and more about consolidating control through spectacle, displacement and militarisation.
[70]
Frozen displacement: Kashmiri Pandits in India
The government relief and rehabilitation package fails to differentiate categories of beneficiaries, nor have relief and rehabilitation been dealt with ...
[71]
state profile - Planning Development & Monitoring Department
Population consists of 68.32% Muslims, 28.44% Hindus, 1.87% Sikhs, 0.90% Buddhist, 0.28% Christians and 0.01% others. 75.19% of the population resides in rural ...
[72]
Jammu and Kashmir population 2025 - StatisticsTimes.com
Oct 14, 2025 · There are 7,226,000, or 7.23 million, or 72.26 lakh, males and 6,605,000, or 6.61 million, or 66.05 lakh, females in Jammu and Kashmir. Jammu ...
[73]
https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1578947
[74]
[PDF] Property Rights of Kashmiri Pandits: A Critical Evaluation of Legal ...
planning to resettle all the displaced Kashmiri Pandits in the state of J&K by 2022 as a part of discussion on the J&K. (Reorganisation) Amendment Bill, 2021 ...
[75]
Kashmiri Pandits urge parties to back bill on return and rehabilitation
Jul 24, 2025 · Kashmiri Pandits welcomed the recommendation made by President Droupadi Murmu to a bill on the return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri Hindus ...
[76]
President paves way for Parliament to consider Kashmiri Pandit ...
Jul 23, 2025 · The Kashmiri Pandits (Recourse, Restitution, Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Bill, 2022, has now been approved by President Droupadu Murmu to be taken up by ...
[77]
UT Profile - Planning Development & Monitoring Department
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir lies to the north of the Indian States Himachal Pradesh and Punjab and west of Union Territory of Ladakh. Jammu and Kashmir ...
[78]
5 august – indian nefarious designs - MoIB Pakistan
Through the so-called Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act (2019), the Indian government also divided the occupied territory into two Union Territories – Jammu ...
[79]
India's Kashmir clampdown continues four years after Article 370 ...
Aug 5, 2023 · The abrogation of Article 370 of India's constitution that granted the region partial autonomy in 2019 heralded a slew of policies by the ruling ...Missing: framework | Show results with:framework
[80]
Five Years After Abrogation, the Hinduisation of Kashmir ... - The Wire
Aug 7, 2024 · This series looks at where J&K was and where it is now, five years after the move. Another year of humiliation, injustice and oppression has passed.
[81]
Kashmir's Unseen Battle: The Aftermath of Article 370 Abrogation
Consequently, the representation of Jammu increased to 43% while the representation of Kashmir remained at 47%. According to the 2011 census, the Kashmir ...
[82]
Indian Kashmir: Freedom in the World 2025 Country Report
Indian Kashmir's status improved from Not Free to Partly Free because peaceful and competitive legislative elections were conducted after a long delay.
[83]
When guns got to Kashmir Valley after rigged polls of 1987
Apr 19, 2024 · Against this backdrop, Valley-based leader Sajad Lone spoke about the rigged elections of 1987. The rigging of the polls, which the Congress- ...
[84]
Pakistan's Role in the Kashmir Insurgency - RAND
Sep 1, 2001 · Pakistan's Role in the Kashmir Insurgency ... According to India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), annual ISI expenditure to the main militant ...
[85]
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4799506
[86]
terrorism in jammu and kashmir - PIB
Jul 30, 2024 · Effective, continuous and sustained actions against terrorists and support structures. Dismantling of terror ecosystem using whole of government ...
[87]
Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: India - State Department
2022 Terrorist Incidents: J&K experienced 222 incidents of terrorism resulting in 152 deaths, including 97 alleged terrorists, according to the Global Terrorism ...
[88]
Jammu & Kashmir: Timeline (Terrorist Activities)-2025
On January 1, Police arrested four associates of Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), identified as Mudasir Ahmad Naik, Umar Nazir Sheikh, Inayat Firdoos, ...
[89]
[PDF] government of india - Ministry of Home Affairs
May 27, 2015 · (i) Proactively take suitable measures by all the Security. Forces to safeguard the borders from cross-border terrorism and to contain militancy.
[90]
Militant Violence in Jammu and Kashmir Post-Abrogation of Article 370
Sep 1, 2025 · The Pahalgam massacre has not only reignited national outrage in India against Islamist terrorism but also underscored the enduring threat of ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[91]
[PDF] India's Surgical Strikes: Response to Strategic Imperatives
On September 19, 2016, militants allegedly backed by Pakistan, attacked an Indian Army camp in. Uri. The government in New Delhi, which was facing important ...
[92]
conducted - Welcome to Permanent Mission of India in Geneva
Statement by Foreign Secretary on 26 February 2019 on the Strike on JeM training camp at Balakot. On 14 February 2019, a suicide terror attack was conducted ...Missing: counter- | Show results with:counter-
[93]
Three Years After Balakot: Reckoning with Two Claims of Victory
Feb 28, 2022 · This was the first time since the 1971 War that Indian aircraft had carried out an airstrike on Pakistani soil. The next day, the Pakistani ...
[94]
Indian Airstrikes in Pakistan: May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025 · On May 7, 2025, between 1:05 and 1:30 a.m. (IST), airstrikes carried out by the Indian Air Force hit nine locations inside Pakistan and ...
[95]
Operation Sindoor: a turning point for India in addressing terrorism ...
May 21, 2025 · Operation Sindoor: a turning point for India in addressing terrorism in Kashmir? ... On 22 April, India was shocked by a deadly terrorist attack ...
[96]
India: Repression Persists in Jammu and Kashmir
Jul 31, 2024 · The Indian security forces continue to carry out repressive policies including arbitrary detention, extrajudicial killings, and other serious ...
[97]
[PDF] Failures in accountability for human rights violations by security ...
This report documents obstacles to justice existing in both law and practice for victims of human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir, and shows how the ...
[98]
[PDF] £INDIA @Summary of human rights concerns in Jammu and Kashmir
Such killings and hundreds of deaths in custody -- by far the highest in any Indian state -- are facilitated by laws that provide the security forces with ...
[99]
First-ever UN human rights report on Kashmir calls for international ...
Jun 14, 2018 · GENEVA (14 June 2018) – There is an urgent need to address past and ongoing human rights violations and abuses and deliver justice for all ...
[100]
Don't Take Them Seriously! Anti-India Bias Runs Deep in Human ...
Jul 11, 2024 · Human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, their smaller cousins, and the foundations who support them consider ...
[101]
RSS slams Amnesty International report on human rights in J&K ...
Jul 11, 2015 · Slamming a US-based NGO's report on alleged human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir, RSS mouthpiece 'Organiser' has said such ...<|separator|>
[102]
2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: India
Separatist insurgents and terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir, the Northeast, and Maoist-affected areas committed serious abuses, including killings and torture of ...
[103]
2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: India
There were few investigations and prosecutions of human rights violations or abuses arising from these situations. Killings: Terrorists used violence against ...<|separator|>
[104]
Decline in Terror Incidents in Jammu and Kashmir
Dec 19, 2023 · The approach of the Government is to dismantle the terror eco-system. Security measures are being strengthened to sustain peace and stability in J&K.
[105]
Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir
Article 370 provides for temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir. On 6 August 2019, Article 370 of the Constitution was ...
[106]
Article 370 of the Constitution: A Timeline - Supreme Court Observer
Jul 31, 2023 · Broadly, Article 370 stipulated India would not make laws in Jammu & Kashmir outside the scope set out by the Instrument of Accession, without ...
[107]
https://jkrajbhawan.nic.in/aboutjk/
[108]
The Jammu & Kashmir Constituent Assembly: A Brief History
The Assembly sat for 56 days over a 5-year period and adopted the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution on 17 November 1956. The Constitution, to the relief of Indian ...
[109]
Article 370: What happened with Kashmir and why it matters - BBC
Aug 5, 2019 · The article allowed the state a certain amount of autonomy - its own constitution, a separate flag and freedom to make laws. Foreign affairs, ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
[110]
Kashmir special status explained: What are Articles 370 and 35A?
Aug 5, 2019 · Article 370 was the basis of Jammu and Kashmir's accession to the Indian union at a time when erstwhile princely states had the choice to join ...<|separator|>
[111]
Abrogation of Article 370 | Judgement Summary
Dec 11, 2023 · On August 5, 2019, the Union government diluted Article 370, revoking Jammu and Kashmir's special status. First, President Ram Nath Kovind ...
[112]
https://www.ifri.org/en/papers/jammu-and-kashmir-aftermath-august-2019
[113]
https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1984951
[114]
https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1776816
[115]
Effects after the Abrogation of Article 370 on Militancy in Jammu and ...
Apr 24, 2025 · The Union Home Minister Amit Shah's statement is “ 66 percent decline in terrorist incidents in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of ...Missing: aftermath | Show results with:aftermath
[116]
Six years after Article 370 abrogation, where J&K stands on ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Political activity has resumed in Jammu & Kashmir. The security situation and economy have improved. But the Pahalgam terror attack dealt a blow ...Missing: aftermath | Show results with:aftermath
[117]
(PDF) Impact of Abrogation of Article 370 on Tourism and ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Result: The results indicate that, overall, the removal of Article 370 has improved Kashmir's tourism industry, with gains seen in a number of ...Missing: aftermath | Show results with:aftermath
[118]
Six Years After Article 370: Promise vs Reality
Aug 5, 2025 · Macroeconomic Performance Post-Abrogation · GDP Slowdown: Real GSDP growth fell from 6.91% to 3.97% post-2019, while India's national average is ...Missing: aftermath | Show results with:aftermath<|separator|>
[119]
Restoring Democracy: Jammu and Kashmir's Historic 2024 ...
Oct 4, 2024 · The Union Territory of J&K now has 90 Assembly seats—47 in Kashmir and 43 in Jammu—up from the previous 83 seats within the two regions, with ...
[120]
Omar Abdullah completes one year as J-K CM, statehood ...
Oct 16, 2025 · NC government cites limited powers but critics say little progress on political front; relief schemes, transport and education initiatives ...<|separator|>
[121]
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jammu-and-kashmir/nc-wins-three-rajya-sabha-seats-in-jk-bjp-victorious-in-one/article70198254.ece
[122]
Jammu and Kashmir Dispute - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Counter-Terrorism & Anti Money Laundering; 3 Open submenu (Arms Control And ... Take concrete and meaningful steps for the full implementation of UNSC resolutions ...
[123]
1947: Maharaja Hari Singh signs Instrument of Accession - Frontline
Aug 10, 2022 · On October 26, 1947, Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir signed the Instrument of Accession with India, thereby ending the intense angling for that ...
[124]
Jammu and Kashmir – Instrument of Accession [October 26, 1947]
On 26 October 1947, the Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu & Kashmir signed the Instrument of Accession, the legal document that ceded J&K to the Dominion of India ...
[125]
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/111955
[126]
https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/security-council-resolutions/?ctype=Jammu%20and%20Kashmir&cbtype=jammu-and-kashmir
[127]
From Domicile to Dominion: India's Settler Colonial Agenda in Kashmir
May 10, 2021 · On August 5, 2019, the Indian government revoked the autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir 1 by abrogating Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian ...<|separator|>
[128]
https://www.eurasiareview.com/28102025-pakistans-false-kashmir-narrative-collapses-amid-crackdown-in-occupied-territories-oped/
[129]
1948 (S/RES/38-66) - UN Security Council Meetings & Outcomes
Security Council Meetings in 1948. Resolutions and decisions of the Security ... The Jammu and Kashmir question, S/RES/38 (1948) 9-0-2. S/PV.228, 16 January, The ...<|separator|>
[130]
Resolution 39 (1948) / - UN Digital Library
Establishes a Commission on the India-Pakistan question. In: Resolutions and decisions of the Security Council, 1948.
[131]
UN Documents for Jammu and Kashmir: Security Council Resolutions
... Kashmir should be determined by a free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices. 30 March 1951 S/RES/91, This resolution decided that UNMOGIP would ...
[132]
Security Council resolution 47 (1948) [The India-Pakistan Question]
Resolution 47 called for peace, a plebiscite for Jammu and Kashmir, and a commission to facilitate these measures, with a focus on a free and impartial vote.
[133]
Distinguished Lectures Details - Ministry of External Affairs
Aug 31, 2022 · As regards Pakistan, India agreed to a UN Resolution calling for a plebiscite. That plebiscite was to be organized after Pakistan had withdrawn ...
[134]
[PDF] THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR ISSUE - Ministry of External Affairs
The Government of India requested the. Security Council “to put an end immediately to the giving of such assistance which was an act of aggression against India ...
[135]
https://mofa.gov.pk/press-releases/message-from-the-deputy-prime-ministerforeign-minister-of-the-islamic-republic-of-pakistan-senator-mohammad-ishaq-dar-on-kashmir-black-day-on-27th-october-2025
[136]
[PDF] S/2025/84 Security Council - the United Nations
Feb 5, 2025 · plebiscite, remain unimplemented. 3. India has resorted to brutal suppression to stifle the quest of the Kashmiri people for self-determination.
[137]
Kashmir: Background, Recent Developments, and U.S. Policy
Jan 13, 2020 · The Indian government says the conflict has killed at least 42,000 civilians, militants, and security personnel since 1989; independent analyses ...
[138]
Trump offers to work with India, Pakistan on Kashmir 'solution'
May 11, 2025 · United States President Donald Trump has offered to work with India and Pakistan to achieve a “solution” for the long-disputed Kashmir region.Missing: position | Show results with:position
[139]
Trump's mediation offer on Kashmir puts India in a tight spot - BBC
May 12, 2025 · President Trump's recent comments have irked many Indians, who see this as an attempt to "internationalise" the Kashmir dispute. The main ...
[140]
China, Pakistan refer to Kashmir in joint statement, oppose ...
Oct 16, 2024 · The Chinese side reiterated that the “Jammu and Kashmir dispute is left over from history, and should be properly and peacefully resolved in ...
[141]
In China's first reaction to SC verdict on Article 370, focus on dialogue
Dec 12, 2023 · China on Tuesday called for the Kashmir issue to be resolved through dialogue and consultations between India and Pakistan.
[142]
Ladakh UT illegally set up by India: China - Mint
Dec 14, 2023 · China has dismissed the Indian Supreme Court's decision on the abrogation of Article 370. The apex court earlier upheld the Centre's ...
[143]
Russia says willing to help resolve India-Pakistan differences over ...
May 4, 2025 · "It was stressed that Russia is ready to act for a political settlement of the situation resulting from the act of terrorism of April 22 in the ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[144]
Russia's Ties With India and Pakistan, Explained - The Moscow Times
May 7, 2025 · Russia and India are also deeply involved when it comes to defense. Chatham House notes that Russia accounts for over 50% of India's military ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[145]
Kashmir: Self-determination of States
Jun 18, 2025 · The UK Government's longstanding position on Kashmir that it is for India and Pakistan to find a lasting political resolution on Kashmir ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
[146]
New UK PM Keir Starmer Changed Labour Party's Stance On Kashmir
Jul 5, 2024 · Their stance has been in stark contrast with the British government's view that Kashmir is a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan.
[147]
What is the EU's stand on the Kashmir conflict? – DW – 02/19/2021
Feb 19, 2021 · The European Union has shown solidarity with Kashmiris regarding human rights, it regards India-administered Kashmir as India's sovereign matter.
[148]
France calls for restraint between India, Pakistan following ...
May 7, 2025 · France on Wednesday called on both India and Pakistan to avoid escalation and protect civilians after India launched midnight strikes on cities in Pakistan.
[149]
https://www.britannica.com/topic/India-Pakistan-conflict
[150]
India-Pakistan tensions: A brief history of conflict - Al Jazeera
May 9, 2025 · In October 1947, the first war over Kashmir broke out when armed Pakistani tribesmen invaded the territory. The monarch of Kashmir asked India ...
[151]
[PDF] Simla Agreement
The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan are resolved that the two countries put an end to the conflict and confrontation that have hitherto ...
[152]
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Simla-Agreement
[153]
[PDF] The Lahore Declaration
Signed at Lahore on the 21st day of February 1999. Atal Behari Vajpayee - Prime Minister of the Republic of India. Muhammad Nawaz Sharif - Prime Minister of ...
[154]
All about 1999 Lahore Declaration and how Pakistan 'violated' it - Mint
May 29, 2024 · The declaration outlined key steps both countries should take to improve bilateral relations and resolve outstanding issues, particularly the Kashmir conflict.
[155]
The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons ...
Feb 6, 2024 · On February 25, 2021, India and Pakistan announced a ceasefire along the Line of Control (LOC) that divides the Indian- and Pakistani- ...
[156]
Bordering on Peace: Evaluating the Impact of the India-Pakistan ...
Feb 24, 2022 · These incidents represent violations of the ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control (LoC) and International Border (IB).
[157]
Pakistan suspends 1972 Simla Agreement: What is it and what will ...
Apr 26, 2025 · Pakistan on Thursday suspended the 1972 Simla Agreement as a reaction against stringent measures taken by India amid nationwide grief over the terrorist attack.
[158]
Kashmir attack: Why Pakistan's threat to suspend Simla Agreement ...
Apr 28, 2025 · Signed in 1972, the Simla Agreement forms the bedrock of India-Pakistan relations, governing the Line of Control (LoC) and outlining ...
[159]
India-Pakistan Relations After the Ceasefire - The Diplomat
Jun 7, 2025 · The military clashes between the two nuclear-armed countries, which have a history of volatile relations, ended with a ceasefire on May 10.
[160]
Explosions, violations reported after India and Pakistan agree ...
May 10, 2025 · India and Pakistan have agreed to an immediate ceasefire after days of military escalation, deadly cross-border attacks, accusations and counter accusations.
[161]
[PDF] India-Pakistan relations in 2025: Continuity, challenges, and ...
Jun 19, 2025 · Recent developments such as the revocation of Article 370, domestic political shifts, regional alignments, and global pressures have further ...
[162]
Jammu Kashmir - PIB
Jan 2, 2025 · ... reduction of over 70 per cent in terrorist incidents in Kashmir, which proves that Article 370 was a facilitator of terrorism. He mentioned ...
[163]
Jammu & Kashmir DDC election results: Key takeaways | India News
Dec 23, 2020 · India News: The first-ever District Development Council (DDC) elections in the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir have sprung several ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[164]
Jammu & Kashmir - ECI Result
Oct 8, 2024 · General Election to Assembly Constituencies: Trends & Results October -2024 ... Jammu & Kashmir ... JKN ... 42 ... BJP ... 29 ... INC ... 6 ... JKPDP ... 3 ... JPC.Jammu & Kashmir · 29 · 42 · Aam Aadmi Party (Jammu...
[165]
Jammu and Kashmir Election Results 2024 Highlights - The Hindu
Oct 8, 2024 · The results for all 90 seats of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly Elections results have been declared. The J&K National Conference won 42 seats.
[166]
Jammu Kashmir election results 2024: BJP's vote share highest ...
Oct 8, 2024 · Jammu Kashmir election results 2024: The Congress-NC alliance won the elections and will form the government. Independent candidates won ...
[167]
Alert: U. S. Embassy New Delhi, India (April 23, 2025)
Apr 23, 2025 · On April 22, 2025, a terrorist attack occurred in Pahalgam, Kashmir, India, with media reporting multiple casualties. Several cities in India remain on high ...
[168]
What Led to the Recent Crisis Between India and Pakistan? - CSIS
May 20, 2025 · On May 7, 2025, India launched missile strikes in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir. India stated that the strikes ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025<|separator|>
[169]
[PDF] Kashmir: Renewed India- Pakistan tensions - UK Parliament
May 16, 2025 · After a major war between Pakistan and India in 1971, which included fighting in Kashmir, the parties signed a peace accord called the Simla ...
[170]
India and Pakistan: On the Brink of Conflict Over Kashmir
Apr 30, 2025 · Following a terrorist attack in Kashmir, India and Pakistan are heading toward a conflict, with few signs of de-escalation.
[171]
India's Response to the 2025 Kashmir Crisis: Strategic Escalation ...
May 27, 2025 · India responded with Operation Sindoor, suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, downgraded ties, and declared attacks from Pakistan as acts of war, ...
[172]
India-Pakistan truce appears to hold despite accusations of violations
May 11, 2025 · Ceasefire holds: A ceasefire between India and Pakistan appears to be holding on Sunday despite accusations of violations by both sides.Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
[173]
Indian army says no violation of ceasefire after reports of Pakistani ...
Aug 5, 2025 · The Indian army on Tuesday said there had been no violation of ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC) that separates Indian-controlled ...
[174]
Why has Pakistan-administered Kashmir erupted in protest again?
Oct 3, 2025 · The movement reached its first major flashpoint in May 2024, when protesters launched a long march towards Muzaffarabad. Violent clashes ensued, ...
[175]
Pakistan, Protesters Strike Deal to End Violent Kashmir Unrest
Oct 4, 2025 · Pak Govt Holds 2nd Round of Talks with PoK Protest Leaders · Judicial probe into protester deaths, with compensation for families of those killed ...
[176]
PoK protests reveal systematic repression by Pakistani elite - Firstpost
Oct 7, 2025 · The recent violent protests that have rocked Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) have torn apart the illusion of autonomy granted to the region ...
[177]
Floods and landslides in Indian Kashmir kill 60, over 200 missing
Aug 17, 2025 · Floods and landslides in Indian Kashmir kill 60, over 200 missing · Pilgrims caught in floods during popular pilgrimage · Cloudbursts cause sudden ...
[178]
Kashmir's Environmental Crisis: Cloudbursts, Climate Change, and ...
Aug 29, 2025 · On August 14th, 2025, a massive cloudburst hit Kishtwar in the Chenab valley. More than 67 people have been declared dead, with around 200 ...Missing: avalanches 2020-2025
[179]
When Himalayas Roared: Kashmir's Summer of Floods and Fury-I
Aug 26, 2025 · On 14 August 2025, a cloudburst devastated Chishoti village in Kishtwar, along the Machail Mata pilgrimage route. Pilgrim camps were torn apart.Missing: avalanches 2020-2025
[180]
Record-breaking rain fuels deadly floods in India's Jammu region
Aug 27, 2025 · Powerful torrents driven by intense rain smashed into Chisoti village in Indian-administered Kashmir on August 14, killing at least 65 people ...
[181]
Kashmir: 2025 Floods Data
Oct 2, 2025 · Since August 14, 2025, the Jammu region has witnessed a grim toll of 150 deaths, 178 injuries, and 33 missing persons across nine districts. The ...
[182]
Situation Report 1 - Flash Floods in Jammu & Kashmir, Date
Jul 23, 2025 · Heavy monsoon rains have been lashing the Jammu region since July 21, severely impacting districts such as Rajouri, Poonch, Reasi, and parts of ...<|separator|>
[183]
2025 floods Drown Jammu & Kashmir - Daily Excelsior
Sep 21, 2025 · In Kishtwar, Kathua and Doda, sudden cloudbursts unleashed torrents of water that swept away houses, roads, and even small bridges in minutes.
[184]
India Army Role during Natural Calamities - Brighter Kashmir
May 13, 2025 · Troops were immediately deployed to the hit areas, establishing relief camps and distributing necessary provisions like food packets, potable ...
[185]
In Jammu, the Home Minister met flood-affected people of Chak ...
Sep 1, 2025 · More than 80 percent electricity supply has been restored in affected areas, people have started receiving pure drinking water and health ...
[186]
'Everything has been lost': Kashmir floods, landslides kill dozens
Aug 29, 2025 · At least 40 people have died and scores have been injured as torrential rains in Indian-administered Kashmir triggered major landslides this ...
[187]
Dozens killed, hundreds missing as cloudburst hits Indian Kashmir
Aug 15, 2025 · At least 60 people have been killed and more than 200 remain missing after a massive cloudburst struck a remote mountain village in ...Missing: avalanches 2020-2025
[188]
After rains, India warns Pakistan of possible cross-border flooding
Aug 25, 2025 · Members of the State Disaster Response Force navigate a boat to rescue students stranded in a hostel after floodwaters submerged the ground ...
[189]
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/valley-faces-hardships/article70209565.ece

IOK