Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Incoterms

Incoterms®, short for International Commercial Terms, are a set of standardized rules published by the (ICC) that define the responsibilities of buyers and sellers in contracts for the sale of . These rules specify who bears the costs, risks, and obligations related to the delivery, transportation, , and clearance of , helping to minimize disputes and facilitate smooth global commerce. First introduced by the in 1936, Incoterms have been revised periodically to reflect evolving trade practices, with major updates in 1953, 1967, 1974, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and most recently in 2020. The 2020 edition, the current version, includes 11 distinct three-letter trade terms divided into two categories: seven applicable to any (EXW, FCA, CPT, , DAP, DPU, DDP) and four specific to sea and inland waterway transport (, , CFR, ). Key updates in the 2020 rules address modern realities, such as enhanced security requirements for transporting goods, greater flexibility for own-means transport under certain terms like FCA and DAP, and clarified coverage levels— with requiring more comprehensive coverage than . Incoterms are not embedded in law but must be explicitly incorporated into contracts by referencing the specific version (e.g., "FOB Incoterms® 2020") to take effect, and they apply only to the rights and obligations related to the movement of goods, not to the sale of services or . Widely adopted by businesses worldwide, these rules promote clarity in cross-border transactions, support efficient logistics, and complement international frameworks such as the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG).

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Incoterms, short for International Commercial Terms, are a set of standardized rules published by the (ICC) that define the responsibilities of buyers and sellers in the delivery of under international sales contracts. These rules specify the point at which the risk of loss or damage to the transfers from the seller to the buyer, as well as who bears the costs associated with transportation, , and customs clearance. By providing clear interpretations of common trade terms, Incoterms aim to minimize disputes and misunderstandings in global transactions, ensuring that parties from different legal and cultural backgrounds can agree on obligations without ambiguity. The primary purpose of Incoterms is to facilitate smoother international trade by allocating tasks, costs, and risks involved in the movement of from seller to buyer across various modes of . They focus exclusively on the delivery aspects of sales contracts, clarifying, for example, when the seller must hand over the goods and under what conditions the buyer assumes responsibility for further . However, Incoterms do not address the transfer of property title or ownership of the goods, which remains governed by separate contractual provisions or applicable national laws. Similarly, they do not cover remedies for , , or payment terms, leaving those to the underlying agreement or domestic legislation. Incoterms are non-mandatory and only apply if explicitly incorporated into a by reference, such as by stating "Incoterms 2020" alongside the chosen term; without this, default rules under national laws govern the transaction. This voluntary nature allows flexibility while promoting uniformity when adopted. Globally, Incoterms are recognized as the standard for interpreting terms in international commerce, used in contracts across more than 120 countries and translated into multiple languages to support diverse markets. The ICC updates these rules periodically—most recently in 2020—to align with evolving practices, such as changes in transport and security requirements.

History and Development

Incoterms, or International Commercial Terms, were first introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in 1936 to standardize interpretations of trade terms in international sales contracts, addressing ambiguities that arose in post-World War I global commerce. The initiative stemmed from earlier ICC efforts in the 1920s, including a 1923 survey across 13 countries that highlighted inconsistencies in commercial practices, leading to the formal codification of six initial terms: FAS (Free Alongside Ship), FOB (Free on Board), C&F (Cost and Freight), CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight), Ex Ship, and Ex Quay. Subsequent revisions have occurred periodically to adapt to evolving trade dynamics, with key milestones including the 1953 edition, which added terms for rail transport such as DCP (Delivered at and Placed on Board), FOR (Free on Rail), and FOT (Free on Truck); the 1967 update, introducing DAF (Delivered at Frontier) and DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) to clarify border-related responsibilities; and the 1976 revision, which incorporated FOB Airport to accommodate growing air freight usage. Further editions followed in 1980, adding FRC for containerized shipments to reflect the rise of containerization; 1990, simplifying FCA (Free Carrier) and integrating provisions for electronic communications; 2000, adjusting FAS and DEQ (Delivered Ex Quay) for better alignment with customs procedures; 2010, consolidating delivery terms into DAT (Delivered at Terminal) and DAP (Delivered at Place); and 2020, the latest version effective from January 1, 2020. The development process is overseen by the through a Drafting Group comprising international trade experts who review and revise the rules approximately every decade based on from global business practitioners, national committees, and emerging needs. These updates have been influenced by major shifts, such as the expansion of in the late , which prompted terms like CPT (Carriage Paid To) and (Carriage and Insurance Paid To), and post-9/11 security regulations that enhanced requirements for transport security in rules like starting from the 2010 edition. The ensures the rules remain relevant by incorporating changes in , technology, and regulatory environments while maintaining their core purpose of allocating risks and costs between buyers and sellers. Incoterms are published exclusively by the in official booklets, with the edition available through their platform, ICC Knowledge 2Go, alongside digital apps and explanatory guides. These resources are translated into more than 30 languages to facilitate worldwide adoption, supported by the ICC's network of over 100 national committees that provide localized training and implementation guidance.

Current Version: Incoterms 2020

Key Features and Changes

Incoterms 2020 consists of 11 rules, categorized into seven applicable to any —EXW, FCA, CPT, , DAP, DPU, and DDP—and four specific to sea and inland waterway transport—FAS, , CFR, and . This division maintains the framework from prior editions while enhancing usability through consolidated cost listings in articles A9 and B9 for each rule. A primary update replaces the Delivered at Terminal (DAT) rule from Incoterms 2010 with Delivered at Place Unloaded (DPU), broadening the delivery point to any location and requiring the seller to unload the , thereby increasing flexibility beyond terminal restrictions. Under FCA, parties may now agree for the buyer to instruct the to issue an on-board to the seller, facilitating smoother container shipments and letter-of-credit transactions. Additionally, CIP mandates higher insurance coverage under Institute Cargo Clauses (A) for all risks, diverging from the lower Institute Cargo Clauses (C) default in to better suit shipments of manufactured . All rules now incorporate provisions for allocating security-related costs and obligations, such as screening and checks, reflecting post-2010 geopolitical shifts; these are detailed in articles /A7 (obligations) and A9/B9 (costs). The rules also accommodate the use of a party's own means under FCA, DAP, DPU, and DDP, clarifying that this does not classify the party as a professional carrier and updating language to "contract or arrange at its own cost for the carriage." No entirely new rules were introduced, with revisions emphasizing clarity through explanatory notes, graphics, and applicability to emerging practices like and non-containerized shipments.

Defined Terms and Abbreviations

Incoterms 2020 establishes a set of standardized terms and abbreviations to promote uniform understanding and application in sales contracts, facilitating clear allocation of responsibilities between parties. These definitions are integral to the rules published by the (ICC), ensuring that terms like delivery points and risk transfer are interpreted consistently across global trade.

Core Definitions

  • Delivery: The point at which the seller completes its delivery obligation under the chosen , simultaneously transferring the of or to the buyer; this varies by , such as at the seller's premises under EXW or at the destination under DAP.
  • Notice of readiness: A communication from the seller to the buyer (or ) indicating that the are available for collection or handover, as required under articles A10/B10 of the rules to enable timely transport arrangements.

Abbreviations and Placeholders

The Incoterms rules employ three-letter abbreviations to denote specific trade terms, each encapsulating defined responsibilities for delivery, costs, and risks. For instance:
  • EXW: Ex Works, where the seller makes goods available at its premises.
  • FCA: Free Carrier, where the seller hands over goods to the carrier at a named place.
  • CPT: Carriage Paid To, where the seller pays for carriage to a named destination.
  • CIP: Carriage and Insurance Paid To, including insurance to the destination.
  • DPU: Delivered at Place Unloaded, where the seller unloads at the destination.
  • DAP: Delivered at Place, where goods are made available ready for unloading.
  • DDP: Delivered Duty Paid, including import clearance and duties.
These codes are typically followed by placeholders such as named place (any agreed location for delivery) or named port of destination (specific port for sea rules), allowing customization while maintaining the rule's structure.

Insurance Terms

Incoterms 2020 differentiates between the , the agreement under which goods are transported by a , and the contract of insurance, a separate arrangement for coverage against loss or damage during transit. Under CIP, the seller procures providing minimum coverage equivalent to Institute Cargo Clauses (A), offering all-risk protection; under CIF, coverage aligns with Institute Cargo Clauses (C), which is more limited.

Party Roles

  • Seller: The party obligated to deliver the in accordance with the rule, handling formalities, (in C rules), and unloading (in DPU).
  • Buyer: The party that receives the post-delivery, assumes thereafter, and manages formalities unless specified otherwise.
  • Carrier: A third-party transporter engaged by the seller or buyer, responsible for the during the contracted leg of the journey but not a primary contracting party in the sales agreement.
In DPU, the seller bears the responsibility for unloading the goods at the named place, distinguishing it from rules like DAP where the buyer unloads.

Exclusions

Incoterms rules explicitly exclude provisions on payment terms, such as letters of credit or pricing, as well as rights, product specifications, or remedies for , focusing solely on delivery-related obligations.

Multimodal Transport Rules

EXW – Ex Works

Under the EXW (Ex Works) rule in Incoterms 2020, the seller fulfills its delivery by making the goods available to the buyer at the seller's premises, such as a , , or other specified , without loading them onto any . This represents the minimum level of for the seller among all Incoterms rules, placing the primary for formalities, transportation, and associated risks on the buyer from the outset. The seller's obligations under EXW are limited to preparing the goods in conformity with the sales contract, including appropriate packaging and marking, and providing the buyer with a commercial invoice as proof of delivery. The seller must also supply any necessary evidence of conformity if stipulated in the contract but has no duty to handle loading, export clearance, or any transportation arrangements unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. All costs related to production, preparation, and making the goods available at the premises are borne by the seller. In contrast, the buyer's obligations commence immediately upon the goods being made available and include arranging and paying for loading at the seller's premises, all and formalities (such as obtaining licenses and paying duties), transportation to the final destination, unloading, and any . The buyer assumes full responsibility for all costs and risks after this point, including export duties and security-related measures for transport. Risk transfers from the seller to the buyer at the moment the goods are placed at the disposal of the buyer at the named premises, ready for collection. Costs similarly shift to the buyer for everything beyond the seller's premises, encompassing loading, , , and terminal handling. EXW is particularly suitable for scenarios where the buyer has strong control over the chain and prefers to manage processes themselves, as it minimizes the seller's involvement and allows the buyer to optimize transport and arrangements. For instance, it may be less ideal for buyers unfamiliar with the seller's country requirements, in which case a rule like FCA could provide slightly more seller assistance with handover to a .

FCA – Free Carrier

The Free Carrier (FCA) rule under Incoterms 2020 stipulates that the seller delivers the , cleared for export, to the or another person nominated by the buyer at the seller's premises or another named place. This multimodal rule applies to any , providing flexibility for both containerized and non-containerized shipments by shifting responsibility for main carriage to the buyer early in the process. Delivery under FCA can occur at the seller's premises, where the seller loads the goods onto the buyer's , or at a specified location such as a terminal or freight forwarder's facility, where the buyer assumes loading responsibility. A key feature introduced in Incoterms 2020 allows the parties to agree that, for or inland using the seller's vehicle, the buyer will instruct the carrier to issue an on-board to the seller after loading, facilitating smoother documentation for container shipments. The seller's obligations include handling all export clearance formalities, such as obtaining necessary licenses and paying associated duties, and providing the buyer with commercial invoices and any required export documents. If delivery is at the seller's premises, the seller must also package the goods appropriately and load them onto the arriving transport at their own expense. These responsibilities ensure the goods are ready for onward movement without delays attributable to the seller. In contrast, the buyer is responsible for contracting and paying for the main carriage from the named place of delivery, as well as arranging clearance, including any duties, taxes, and documentation upon arrival. The buyer also bears the risk of loss or damage once the goods are handed over to the carrier, and must reimburse the seller for any agreed costs related to the on-board if applicable. Risk transfers from the seller to the buyer at the point when the goods are placed under the control of the or other nominated at the named place, whether loaded or not, depending on the location. Costs are allocated such that the seller covers all expenses up to , including export formalities and loading at their premises, while the buyer assumes freight, (if desired, as an enhanced option under the related rule), and subsequent handling charges. FCA's versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of international transactions, particularly where the buyer prefers control over transport arrangements, and it contrasts with rules like EXW by placing export clearance duties on the seller rather than the buyer.

CPT – Carriage Paid To

CPT (Carriage Paid To) is an Incoterms rule applicable to any mode of transport, where the seller assumes responsibility for arranging and paying for the main carriage of goods to a named place of destination, while the risk of loss or damage transfers to the buyer at an earlier point upon handover to the first carrier. This rule facilitates international sales where the seller prefers to control the initial transport logistics but seeks to limit ongoing risk exposure. Under CPT, the seller must ensure the goods are delivered to the carrier or another party designated by the seller at the agreed point, marking the point of risk transfer, regardless of whether the transport involves multiple modes such as road, rail, air, or sea. The seller's primary obligations include contracting for the carriage of to the named destination and covering the associated freight costs, as well as handling all clearance procedures, including obtaining any necessary licenses and complying with security-related requirements for . Additionally, the seller must provide the buyer with the and any documents, such as the , to enable the buyer to claim the at destination. The seller bears the costs and risks until the are handed over to the first carrier, including pre-shipment inspections if required by the . In contrast, the buyer's obligations commence upon the transfer of risk, requiring them to arrange and pay for unloading at the destination, as well as all formalities, duties, taxes, and any onward transportation beyond the named place. The buyer assumes responsibility for obtaining licenses and handling customs clearance in the destination country and any countries, while also bearing the costs of for the during if desired, since the seller has no such under CPT. Risk under CPT transfers from the seller to the buyer at the moment the are delivered to the first carrier at the agreed place, which could be a , , or other specified point, rather than upon arrival at the destination. This early transfer protects the seller from liability for issues arising during the main carriage, even though they pay for it. Cost allocation in CPT divides expenses clearly: the seller covers all costs related to delivery to the first , export formalities, and the freight charges to the named destination, while the buyer handles premiums, duties, and any additional costs from the point of risk transfer onward. This structure ensures the seller's financial responsibility ends with payment for carriage, shifting subsequent expenses to the buyer. CPT is particularly suitable for scenarios involving where the seller has established relationships with carriers and wishes to manage , but the buyer is better positioned to handle processes and assumes early to align with their over arrangements. Unlike CIP, which requires the seller to procure coverage to the destination, CPT leaves entirely to the buyer, making it preferable when the parties agree the buyer should manage protection.

CIP – Carriage and Insurance Paid To

Under the CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To) rule in Incoterms 2020, the seller assumes responsibility for arranging and paying for the main carriage of the goods to a named destination and procuring minimum coverage for the buyer during , while risk transfers to the buyer upon of the goods to the first . This term is applicable to any or combination thereof, making it suitable for shipments such as containerized goods transported by , , air, or . It is particularly preferred for high-value goods where the seller wants to provide basic protection against risks without bearing the full obligations at the destination. The seller's key obligations include completing all export clearance formalities, contracting with the for to the named place of destination, and obtaining insurance coverage that complies with Institute Cargo Clauses (A) for all-risks protection, covering at least 110% of the goods' invoice value plus any additional costs incurred. The seller must also hand over the or to the buyer, enabling the buyer to claim under it if necessary, though the buyer may procure additional coverage if desired. In the 2020 edition, the insurance requirement for was enhanced to require more comprehensive coverage under Institute Cargo Clauses (A), providing all-risks protection unlike the minimum coverage under for sea . The buyer's primary responsibilities encompass handling all import formalities, including customs clearance and payment of duties at the destination, as well as unloading the goods unless otherwise agreed. Risk of or transfers to the buyer at the same point as under CPT—when the goods are handed over to the first at the named place—regardless of whether the covers the full journey. Regarding cost allocation, the seller bears the expenses for to the destination, minimum , and export-related costs, while the buyer covers duties, onward beyond the named place if needed, and any risks after the transfer point. This division ensures the seller manages initial and protection, shifting subsequent burdens to the buyer upon carrier handover.

DPU – Delivered at Place Unloaded

The DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded) rule under Incoterms® 2020 stipulates that the seller delivers the goods by placing them at the buyer's disposal, unloaded, at the named place of destination, which can be any location agreed upon by the parties. This term applies to any or combination thereof and replaces the previous Delivered at Terminal () rule from Incoterms® 2010, expanding the scope beyond just terminals to encompass broader delivery points such as warehouses or construction sites. Under DPU, the seller bears responsibility for handling all clearance formalities, arranging and paying for the main to the named destination, and performing the unloading of the goods at that location. The seller assumes all risks and costs associated with these obligations up to the point of unloading, but does not handle import clearance or pay any import duties, taxes, or other charges. For example, in a transaction involving perishable goods like flowers shipped from to a refrigerated terminal in , , the seller would manage formalities, , and unloading at the terminal. The buyer, in turn, is obligated to handle import clearance, including payment of any duties and taxes, and to arrange and bear the costs of any onward transport beyond the named place if required. Risk of loss or damage to the transfers from the seller to the buyer immediately upon completion of unloading at the destination. Costs are allocated such that the seller covers all expenses incurred until the are unloaded at the named place, including , if applicable, and unloading charges, while the buyer assumes responsibility for subsequent costs, including import-related fees. This allocation ensures clarity in financial responsibilities during international transactions. DPU is particularly suitable for scenarios where the seller has the capability and agreement to safely unload the goods at the destination, such as deliveries directly to a buyer's or job site, offering flexibility for non-terminal locations. A key change in Incoterms® 2020 was broadening the rule from the terminal-specific focus of to any named place, emphasizing the seller's unloading obligation as the primary distinction from DAP, where unloading remains the buyer's duty.

DAP – Delivered at Place

Delivered at Place (DAP) is an Incoterms rule applicable to any , where the seller assumes responsibility for delivering the to a named place of destination in the buyer's country, making them available to the buyer ready for unloading on the arriving . Under this rule, the seller bears all risks and costs associated with transporting the until they reach the specified destination, but the buyer takes over from the point of unloading. This term facilitates clear division of responsibilities in international sales contracts, particularly for multimodal shipments. The seller's obligations under DAP include arranging and paying for the main to the named place, handling all clearance formalities and associated costs, and ensuring the goods are delivered on the arriving without unloading them. The seller must also provide the buyer with necessary documentation for import formalities and bear any transit customs requirements. Unlike rules requiring , such as , the seller has no obligation to insure the goods under DAP. The buyer's obligations commence upon the goods' arrival at the destination, including unloading the goods from the arriving transport at their own risk and expense, completing customs formalities, and covering all subsequent costs such as duties, taxes, and onward transportation. The buyer must also reimburse the seller for any security-related costs incurred during or if applicable under Incoterms 2020 provisions. Risk of loss or damage transfers from the seller to the buyer at the moment the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal at the named place, ready for unloading, which occurs after arrival but before any unloading takes place. This transfer point ensures the seller is not liable for issues during the buyer's unloading . Costs are allocated such that the seller covers all expenses up to delivery at the named place, including , formalities, and any pre-shipment inspections, while the buyer assumes costs from unloading onward, encompassing import duties, taxes, and post-delivery handling. This structure helps in budgeting, as the seller's maximum exposure is defined by the destination point. DAP is particularly suitable for door-to-door deliveries in scenarios where the buyer prefers to manage import processes themselves, offering flexibility across transport modes without the seller assuming unloading or duty responsibilities, unlike the more comprehensive DDP rule which extends to paid import duties.

DDP – Delivered Duty Paid

Delivered Duty Paid (DDP) is an Incoterms 2020 rule applicable to any mode or modes of transport, under which the seller assumes maximum responsibility by delivering the goods to the named place of destination, cleared for import, and with all applicable duties, taxes, and other charges paid. This rule requires the seller to handle all transportation, risks, and formalities up to the point where the goods are made available to the buyer, ready for unloading at the specified destination. Unlike DAP, where the seller delivers goods to the named place without handling import clearance or duties, DDP extends the seller's obligations to include these import-related responsibilities. The seller's obligations under DDP encompass providing the goods and commercial invoice as per the contract, arranging and paying for the main carriage to the destination, obtaining necessary export and import licenses, performing all customs formalities, and paying any associated duties, taxes, and fees. Additionally, the seller must bear all risks of loss or damage until the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal at the named place, provide transport documents if required, and notify the buyer once delivery is ready, though the seller has no obligation to insure the goods unless agreed otherwise. Unloading at the destination is the buyer's responsibility unless otherwise specified in the contract. In contrast, the buyer's obligations are minimal: paying the agreed , taking of the at the named destination, and assuming all risks and costs from that point onward, including any post-delivery handling or further transport. Risk transfers from seller to buyer precisely when the are made available, ready for unloading, at the named place of destination. Cost allocation under DDP places the full burden on the seller for all expenses incurred up to and including at the destination, such as , and clearance, duties, taxes, and any security-related costs, while the buyer incurs only costs related to unloading and subsequent handling. This rule is rarely used in practice due to the significant challenges it imposes on the seller, particularly in navigating unfamiliar import regulations and procedures in the buyer's country; it is most suitable when the seller has a local presence or established import expertise to manage these complexities effectively.

Sea and Inland Waterway Rules

FAS – Free Alongside Ship

Free Alongside Ship () is an Incoterm rule specifically designed for sea and inland waterway transport, under which the seller fulfills its delivery obligation by placing the alongside the nominated by the buyer at the named of shipment. This point of delivery marks the transfer of risk from the seller to the buyer, making FAS suitable for scenarios where the buyer assumes control over loading and subsequent carriage. The rule emphasizes the seller's responsibility up to the quayside or , without involving the vessel's deck. Under FAS, the seller's primary obligations include transporting the to the named of shipment and placing them alongside the vessel within the agreed period, ensuring they are free from defects and ready for loading. The seller must also handle all clearance formalities, including obtaining necessary licenses and providing the and any required to the buyer. Additionally, the seller is required to give the buyer sufficient notice of the delivery so that the buyer can arrange for the vessel's arrival. The buyer's obligations commence once the goods are placed alongside the ship, including contracting and paying for the main , loading the goods onto the , and covering all associated costs such as stevedoring and handling at the . The buyer is also responsible for arranging and paying for from that point onward, as well as handling clearance and any duties or taxes upon arrival at the destination. Prior to , the buyer must notify the seller of the 's name, loading point, and required delivery time to enable proper placement of the . Risk transfers from the seller to the buyer at the moment the goods are placed alongside the on the quay or in a at the named of shipment, provided this occurs during and within the agreed timeframe. Any or occurring after this point falls under the buyer's responsibility. Costs under FAS are allocated such that the seller bears all expenses related to delivering the goods to the and placing them alongside the , including inland , formalities, and any port handling up to that point. The buyer assumes responsibility for loading costs, freight, , unloading at destination, and import-related expenses. is traditionally used for break-bulk or , such as minerals, , or heavy machinery, where goods can be directly placed alongside the ship for loading without . It is less common in modern containerized shipments, where a shift to is often preferred for on-board to better align with terminal practices.

FOB – Free on Board

FOB, or Free on Board, is an Incoterm rule applicable exclusively to and inland , where the seller fulfills its delivery obligation by loading the on board the nominated by the buyer at the named port of shipment. At this point, the risk of loss or damage to the transfers from the seller to the buyer, marking a clear division in responsibilities that favors scenarios where the buyer arranges the main carriage. This rule, introduced in the Incoterms 1936 edition by the (ICC), has evolved to accommodate modern shipping practices, shifting the risk transfer point from the traditional "ship's rail" to when the are fully loaded on board the . The seller's primary obligations under FOB include preparing and packaging the for , handling all clearance formalities, and transporting the to the named of shipment at its own . Upon receiving notice from the buyer regarding the vessel's details, the seller must load the onto the vessel, bearing all associated costs and s until that moment, and provide the buyer with an on-board or equivalent transport document as . If requested by the buyer, the seller may also assist in obtaining information for contracts, though at the buyer's and . In contrast, the buyer's responsibilities commence with nominating the and providing timely notice to the seller, followed by contracting and paying for the main freight, unloading at the destination , and managing all formalities, duties, and onward transportation. The buyer assumes all risks and costs from the moment the goods are on board, including if desired, and must reimburse the seller for any loading costs incurred if the is not ready on time. Cost allocation under divides expenses at the point of loading: the seller covers all costs up to and including placement on board, such as inland , handling, and loading fees, while the buyer pays for freight, , unloading, and destination charges. This structure ensures the seller's involvement ends at the of , with the buyer gaining over the voyage. FOB is particularly suitable for bulk or non-containerized shipments where the buyer nominates the vessel and seeks to minimize seller exposure to international risks.

CFR – Cost and Freight

CFR, or Cost and Freight, is an Incoterm rule applicable exclusively to and inland , where the seller assumes responsibility for the costs and freight necessary to deliver the to the named port of destination. Under this rule, the seller arranges and pays for the main carriage to the destination port, but the risk of loss or damage to the transfers to the buyer at the point when the are loaded on board the at the port of shipment. This structure balances the seller's control over export logistics with the buyer's assumption of risks during ocean transit, making it distinct from rules like CPT, which apply to non-maritime modes. The seller's primary obligations under CFR include providing the in accordance with the , along with necessary commercial invoices and documents such as the bill of lading. The seller must handle all export clearance formalities, including obtaining any required export licenses or permits, and bear the associated costs and risks until the are placed on board the at the shipment . Additionally, the seller contracts for and pays the freight charges to the to the named destination , ensures the are loaded on board, and provides timely notice to the buyer once loading is completed. In contrast, the buyer's obligations commence with assuming all risks of loss or damage to the goods from the moment they are on board the at the origin . The buyer is responsible for arranging and paying for any coverage desired during , as well as handling unloading costs at the destination , clearance procedures, and of any duties, taxes, or other charges. The buyer must also accept of the goods upon arrival at the named and provide any necessary instructions to the seller regarding the destination details. Risk under CFR transfers definitively when the goods are loaded on board the ship at the port of shipment, marking the point where the seller's delivery obligation is fulfilled. From this moment, any subsequent perils during the voyage, such as damage from storms or handling errors, fall on the buyer, even though the seller continues to cover the freight costs to the destination. Cost allocation in CFR emphasizes the seller's payment for all expenses up to loading at the origin , including formalities and the full freight to the destination , while the buyer covers premiums, unloading fees, and all onward transportation or import-related expenses beyond the arrival . This division ensures the seller manages the primary shipping contract without extending to post-arrival liabilities. CFR is particularly suitable for scenarios where the seller prefers to arrange and control sea freight arrangements, such as for bulk commodities, but the buyer wishes to manage insurance independently, often due to better access to coverage or specific policy needs. It is commonly used in bulk cargo shipments where direct vessel access simplifies loading, avoiding the need for seller-provided insurance as in CIF.

CIF – Cost, Insurance and Freight

CIF, or Cost, Insurance and Freight, is an Incoterms® 2020 rule specifically designed for and inland waterway transport, where the seller assumes responsibility for the cost of the , of , and of freight charges to deliver the to the named port of destination. Under this term, delivery occurs when the are loaded on board the vessel nominated by the seller at the port of shipment, at which point the risk of loss or damage transfers to the buyer. This rule is particularly suited for transactions involving containerized or shipped via maritime routes, providing a clear division of responsibilities that balances the seller's control over with the buyer's assumption of subsequent risks. The seller's primary obligations under CIF include preparing the goods for export, handling all export clearance formalities, and contracting for the carriage of the goods to the named destination port, covering the associated freight costs. Additionally, the seller must obtain insurance coverage for the goods during transit, providing the minimum level specified under Clause C of the Institute Cargo Clauses (or an equivalent policy), which typically covers major perils such as fire, explosion, and vessel stranding but excludes war risks and strikes unless separately arranged. The seller is also required to provide the buyer with a transport document, such as a negotiable bill of lading, that proves delivery and enables the buyer to claim the goods at the destination. These duties ensure the seller manages the initial logistics chain, but the buyer receives the necessary documentation to pursue insurance claims directly if needed. In contrast, the buyer's responsibilities commence upon the transfer of risk at the point of loading on board the , including bearing all costs and risks from that moment onward, such as unloading at the destination and any further inland transport. The buyer must handle customs formalities, pay any applicable duties, taxes, and fees, and arrange for the receipt of the upon arrival. If the require or through additional ports, the buyer assumes responsibility for any -related procedures in those locations. This allocation emphasizes the buyer's role in post-shipment management, particularly in jurisdictions with complex regulations. The transfer of risk under CIF is a critical feature, occurring when the goods are loaded on board the at the of shipment, regardless of whether the destination is reached without incident. Costs are similarly delineated: the seller covers the price of the , , freight to the destination , and the aforementioned minimum premium, while the buyer pays for charges at destination, clearance, and any additional if desiring broader coverage beyond Clause C. This structure helps mitigate disputes by fixing the point of risk transition early in the voyage, though it places the onus on the buyer to monitor the carrier's performance during the sea leg. Insurance under CIF is arranged and paid for by the seller but benefits the buyer, who becomes the insured party and can claim directly from the insurer using the provided policy. The minimum coverage required—Institute Cargo Clauses (C)—protects against a limited set of risks, such as generalized damage from washing overboard or collision, but excludes all risks coverage available under Clause A (as used in ). Parties may negotiate for enhanced insurance, but the default is the lower threshold to keep costs manageable for the seller. This provision is especially relevant for commodities like agricultural products or electronics, where partial coverage suffices for standard perils. In practice, CIF is commonly used in bulk shipments, such as or , where sellers in exporting countries like those in the or deliver to major import hubs in or . Compared to CFR (Cost and Freight), which omits seller-provided insurance, CIF offers added protection for the buyer during ocean transit, making it preferable when the buyer lacks established arrangements. However, it is not suitable for air or beyond waterways, and users must specify the exact port of destination to avoid ambiguity. Overall, CIF promotes efficiency in by clarifying liabilities, though parties should consult legal experts to adapt it to specific contracts.
AspectSeller's ResponsibilityBuyer's Responsibility
Delivery PointLoading on board vessel at port of shipmentReceipt at destination port after unloading
Transport ContractArrange and pay carriage to named destination portInland transport from destination port
InsuranceMinimum coverage (Institute Cargo Clauses C)Additional coverage if needed; claims handling
Customs ClearanceExport formalitiesImport formalities and duties
Risk TransferUntil goods on board at shipment portFrom loading on board onward
Costs CoveredGoods cost, freight, insurance premium, export chargesUnloading, import taxes, onward transport

Cost and Risk Responsibilities

Allocation of Costs

The allocation of under Incoterms 2020 delineates the financial responsibilities of the buyer and seller for various aspects of transactions, including formalities, transportation, and ancillary expenses. These rules, published by the (ICC), standardize the division to facilitate smoother negotiations and reduce misunderstandings in contracts. Each Incoterm specifies costs in articles A9 (seller's costs) and B9 (buyer's costs), covering everything from export procedures to final delivery. The 11 rules are divided into seven for any (EXW, FCA, CPT, , DAP, DPU, DDP) and four for or inland transport (FAS, , CFR, ), with cost divisions reflecting the point of delivery.
Cost CategoryEXWFCACPTDAPDPUDDPFASCFR
Export FormalitiesBSSSSSSSSSS
Loading at OriginBSSSSSSSSSS
Main CarriageBBSSSSSBBSS
BBBSBBBBBBS
Unloading at DestinationBBBBBSBBBBB
Import Duties/FormalitiesBBBBBBSBBBB
(S = Seller; B = Buyer. Data based on ICC Incoterms 2020 guidelines, with sea rules adapted for port-specific operations.) Seller responsibilities for costs generally escalate across the rules, starting minimally under EXW—where the buyer handles nearly all expenses from the seller's premises—and reaching maximum under DDP, encompassing import duties and formalities at the destination. For instance, under , the seller covers loading costs at the origin , while the buyer assumes subsequent expenses. Similarly, under , the seller pays for minimum coverage during ocean transit to the destination . Sea and inland waterway rules parallel their any-mode counterparts but emphasize port-related costs, such as alongside-ship placement under . Influencing factors include whether carriage is managed by the party's own or a third-party provider, which can affect ancillary fees like terminal handling. Security expenses, including those for cargo screening or services, follow the party arranging the relevant segment, as clarified in Incoterms 2020 updates. Costs accrue to each party up to the delivery point defined by the rule, aligning financial burdens with logistical handover timelines.

Allocation of Risks

In Incoterms 2020, the allocation of risks refers to the precise point at which responsibility for loss of or damage to the goods transfers from the seller to the buyer, distinct from the division of costs. This transfer occurs at the moment of as defined by each rule, ensuring clarity in contracts to prevent disputes over liability during transit. The (ICC) emphasizes that these points are critical for managing potential perils like theft, damage, or loss, with the seller bearing risk until delivery and the buyer thereafter, unless is specified. The rules exhibit distinct patterns in risk allocation based on the groups: E and F terms (EXW, FCA, , ) shift early, typically at the seller's or to the first or , placing most transit risks on the buyer. C terms (CPT, , CFR, ) at the point of shipment or to the , despite the seller covering costs to the destination. D terms (DAP, DPU, DDP) delay the shift until arrival at the named destination, with the seller retaining through much of the journey. and inland rules (, , CFR, ) generally at the of shipment, aligning with practices where voyage risks fall to the buyer. To illustrate these transfer points across the transport lifecycle, the following table summarizes risk responsibility by key stages for each Incoterms 2020 rule. Stages include pre-carriage (from origin to initial handover), main carriage (primary international transport), on arrival (at destination port or place), and post-delivery (final unloading or receipt). Cells indicate the party bearing risk (Seller or Buyer) during that stage, with the transfer occurring at the boundary. This structure highlights how risks align with delivery obligations, based on ICC guidelines.
StageEXWFCACPT/CIPDAPDPUDDPFASFOBCFR/CIF
Pre-carriage (origin to handover/carrier)SellerSellerSellerSellerSellerSellerSellerSellerSeller
Main carriage (international transport)BuyerBuyerBuyerSellerSellerSellerBuyerBuyerBuyer
On arrival (destination port/place, ready for unloading)BuyerBuyerBuyerSeller/Buyer*SellerSeller/Buyer*BuyerBuyerBuyer
Post-delivery (unloading/receipt at final place)BuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyer
*Transfer at readiness for unloading in DAP/DDP; Seller risks until then. For example, under CPT, risk transfers to the buyer when the goods are handed over to the first , meaning the buyer assumes for any during the entire main and beyond, even though the seller pays for transport to the destination. In contrast, under DPU, risk remains with the seller until the goods are unloaded at the named place, shifting to the buyer only post-unloading for any subsequent handling. Liability nuances further refine this allocation: the seller remains accountable for fulfilling delivery obligations up to the transfer point, including any risks arising from non-compliance, while the buyer bears for damage or loss after transfer, such as during import clearance if applicable. In CIP and , the seller's provision of minimum coverage mitigates the buyer's exposure during the main carriage, though the buyer may opt for additional protection. These rules do not cover post-transfer events like buyer's storage, emphasizing the need for separate agreements. Incoterms 2020 introduced clarifications on allocation when the seller uses their own means, applicable across all rules but particularly in FCA, DAP, DPU, and DDP; the transfers upon loading onto the seller's vehicle or , aligning delivery with actual to reduce ambiguity in non-third-party scenarios.

Variations and Applications

Customizing Incoterms

Incoterms serve as standardized default rules for contracts, but parties are free to customize them by incorporating additional specifics that align with their agreement, such as allocating certain duties, taxes, or using the parties' own vehicles rather than third-party carriers. This flexibility allows sellers and buyers to tailor responsibilities for costs and beyond the core definitions provided by the (ICC), ensuring the terms better reflect the unique aspects of their transaction. For instance, a might specify that the seller handles customs clearance under an EXW term, which typically leaves such duties to the buyer, or clarify that the buyer assumes responsibility for inland after delivery at a named place. Common variations include explicitly stating the Incoterms version and a precise location, such as ", Incoterms 2020," to eliminate ambiguity about the applicable rules and point of transfer. Sea-specific terms like are intended only for and should not be applied to other modes such as air freight, where terms like FCA are recommended; any adaptation requires clear mutual agreement to avoid disputes over risk transfer. These modifications maintain the foundational framework while accommodating non-maritime transport, such as using FCA for shipments where goods are delivered to a at an or warehouse. However, customizations have limitations; alterations must not undermine the essential intent of the Incoterm, such as shifting the core delivery obligation in a way that conflicts with its defined risk and cost allocations, and parties should always specify the exact version to prevent disputes over outdated interpretations. The emphasizes that Incoterms do not address all elements, like payment terms or , so modifications cannot substitute for comprehensive contractual provisions in those areas. Best practices for customizing Incoterms involve using precise, unambiguous language to detail any deviations, such as who bears specific handling charges or beyond the standard requirements. Parties should consult official resources, including the Incoterms 2020 publication and checklists, particularly for adaptations in where sellers often use their own transport vehicles for direct delivery to buyers. This approach ensures clarity in digital trade scenarios, where traditional carrier-based rules may need adjustment for last-mile logistics. Risks associated with variations include potential disputes arising from unclear language, such as disagreements over when risk transfers or who pays unforeseen fees, which can lead to delays or legal challenges in transactions. To mitigate these, it is recommended to seek legal review of customized terms by experts familiar with guidelines, ensuring modifications enhance rather than complicate the agreement.

Role in Government Regulations

Incoterms, while not legally binding in themselves, play a significant role in by providing standardized interpretations for delivery and risk transfer points. Under the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), Article 67 specifically addresses the passing of risk in contracts involving carriage of goods, stating that risk passes to the buyer when the goods are handed over to the first carrier for transmission to the buyer if no specific delivery place is named; Incoterms rules, such as or FCA, are commonly incorporated into contracts to clarify this handover point and align with CISG provisions without superseding them entirely. In the , Incoterms are recognized as global standards in trade glossaries and guidance for assigning costs and responsibilities, facilitating compliance with EU customs and export regulations. Although the (WTO) frameworks do not mandate Incoterms, they support their use in harmonizing trade practices under agreements like the Agreement on Customs Valuation, where Incoterms help determine the transaction value for duties. In , Incoterms are referenced to standardize delivery terms, though not always mandated explicitly. In the United States, the (FAR) Part 47 employs delivery terms like FOB origin, FOB destination, and CFR (Cost and Freight) that mirror Incoterms definitions, requiring contractors to specify transportation responsibilities in solicitations for supplies and services; for instance, the explicitly requires Incoterms alignment in production line items for international commerce. Similarly, in the , while the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not directly mandate Incoterms, government guidance on public procurement encourages their use to clarify in cross-border contracts, ensuring in cost allocation. Incoterms significantly influence customs procedures by aiding in the valuation of for assessment. For example, under U.S. Customs and Border Protection rules, imports on CIF terms require declaring the cost including freight and , but the dutiable value excludes certain post-importation costs to align with WTO valuation methods; this helps importers calculate tariffs accurately. In agreements like the USMCA, Incoterms indirectly support and valuation by defining when costs like transportation are included or excluded from the value, ensuring preferential tariff treatment for qualifying . Challenges arise when Incoterms conflict with local regulations, particularly for terms like DDP (Delivered Duty Paid), where the seller assumes clearance and duty payment responsibilities. In many jurisdictions, duties and clearances must be handled by a local entity or licensed importer, creating barriers to full DDP implementation and potential non-compliance risks; for instance, the identifies such national restrictions in 13 jurisdictions as of December 2024. Post-Brexit, EU-UK trade alignments have heightened the need for precise Incoterms selection to delineate responsibilities, as the end of free movement introduced new declarations and duties, with terms like EXW shifting more burden to UK importers to avoid disputes. Globally, governments integrate Incoterms into and frameworks to streamline . In , customs regulations reference Incoterms for determining delivery points and cost inclusions in export declarations, with commonly used to clarify seller obligations under the General Administration of Customs guidelines. In , the (GST) regime ties delivery terms to place of supply determinations; for example, under DAP or DDP, the importer handles GST at the border, while EXW may trigger reverse charge mechanisms, ensuring accurate tax liability based on transfer.

Historical Versions

Incoterms 2010 and Earlier Editions

The Incoterms 2010 edition, published by the (), consists of 11 rules designed to clarify responsibilities in contracts. This version reduced the number of rules from 13 in the prior edition by introducing two new terms— () and Delivered at Place (DAP)—applicable to all modes of transport, while merging others for simplicity. It became effective on January 1, 2011, and for the first time explicitly addressed the allocation of security-related costs between buyers and sellers in articles A6/B6 of the relevant rules, reflecting global trade concerns. Earlier editions trace back to the original 1936 publication by the ICC, which established six foundational terms primarily focused on sea and waterway transport: Free Alongside Ship (FAS), Free on Board (FOB), Cost and Freight (CFR, then C&F), Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF), Ex Ship, and Ex Quay. Subsequent revisions adapted to evolving trade practices: the 1980 edition responded to the rise of containerization by introducing multimodal terms like Free Carrier (FCA) and emphasizing container-friendly delivery points; the 1990 edition updated the "Licenses, Authorizations and Formalities" sections for FAS and Delivered Ex Quay (DEQ) to align with modern customs procedures; and the 2000 edition incorporated provisions for electronic communication and e-commerce in trade documentation. Over time, Incoterms evolved from a sea-centric framework—where terms like and added insurance obligations for sellers ( since 1936 for , introduced in 1980 for with )—to a broader system accommodating air, road, rail, and combined transport, reducing mode-specific ambiguities. Some terms from these editions, such as and DEQ, were later deprecated in favor of more versatile options. Contracts specifying Incoterms 2010 or earlier remain legally valid until their natural expiry, as parties can choose any version, though the recommends transitioning to the 2020 edition for alignment with current practices. As of 2025, Incoterms 2010 continues to appear frequently in legacy contracts, particularly in ongoing long-term agreements predating the 2020 update.

Deprecated Terms

Over time, the () has deprecated several Incoterms rules to streamline the set, reduce overlap, and better align with evolving global trade practices, including the rise of multimodal transportation and . These changes occurred primarily in the 1990, 2010, and 2020 editions, consolidating similar terms into more versatile ones like DAP (Delivered at Place) and DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded). DAF (Delivered at Frontier) specified delivery at a named point, with the seller handling transport to that but transferring risk upon arrival. It was removed in Incoterms 2010 due to its limited relevance in scenarios, where border-specific deliveries became less practical amid integrated supply chains. DES (Delivered Ex Ship) required the seller to deliver goods by placing them alongside the buyer's vessel at the destination port, with risk transferring at that point. This term was eliminated in Incoterms 2010 to consolidate overlapping D-family rules, as it caused confusion in selection and was replaced by the broader DAP for any . DEQ (Delivered Ex Quay) involved delivery of on the quay at the destination , including of import duties by the seller, with risk passing upon unloading. Its complexity, particularly around duty handling and port-specific logistics, led to its removal in Incoterms 2010, favoring simpler alternatives like (Delivered at Terminal) for multimodal applicability. DDU (Delivered Duty Unpaid) meant the seller delivered goods to the buyer's premises without paying import duties, transferring risk at the destination. It was deprecated in Incoterms 2010 because of its similarity to other D terms, which created selection ambiguity, and was integrated into DAP to reflect modern point-to-point delivery needs. DAT (Delivered at Terminal), introduced in 2010 as a replacement for some prior D terms, required unloading at a named terminal with risk transfer after placement on the terminal. It was replaced in Incoterms 2020 by DPU to remove the "terminal" restriction, allowing delivery and unloading at any suitable place and enhancing flexibility across transport modes. FOR (Free on Rail) and FOT (Free on Truck) defined seller obligations for loading goods onto or at the origin point, with transferring thereafter. These mode-specific terms were rendered obsolete in Incoterms 1990 as the shifted focus to rules, eliminating , , and airport variants to accommodate containerized and integrated global . The primary reasons for these deprecations include significant overlap among rules, which complicated usage, and the need to adapt to contemporary supply chains emphasizing efficiency and versatility over mode-specific distinctions. Although deprecated, some legacy terms may still appear in older contracts, but parties are advised to update to current editions for clarity.

References

  1. [1]
    Incoterms® rules - ICC - International Chamber of Commerce
    Incoterms are eleven trade terms used in contracts for the sale and purchase of goods, clarifying tasks, costs, and risks in delivery.
  2. [2]
    Incoterms® 2020 - ICC - International Chamber of Commerce
    The Incoterms® 2020 app features essential information and insights regarding the commercial trade terms from a trusted source, in one, easy-to-access location.
  3. [3]
    Incoterms® Rules history - ICC - International Chamber of Commerce
    First published by ICC in 1936, Incoterms® rules provide internationally accepted definitions and rules of interpretation for most common commercial terms.
  4. [4]
    Know Your Incoterms - International Trade Administration
    Although the ICC recommends using Incoterms® 2020 beginning January 1, 2020, parties to a sales contract can agree to use any version of Incoterms after 2020.
  5. [5]
    Incoterms® 2020: New Rules, Old Problems - ICC Academy
    Mar 10, 2020 · Most commonly misunderstood is that Incoterms do not deal with the passing of title in the goods. Title of the goods is a separate concept ...Missing: scope remedies<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Incoterms 101: The Basics of International Trade - BuildSmart
    Jul 8, 2025 · The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) defines 11 Incoterms ... Incoterms, which are used in 31 languages across more than 120 countries.
  7. [7]
    ICC releases Incoterms® 2020 - International Chamber of Commerce
    Sep 10, 2019 · Incoterms® 2020 aligns different levels of insurance coverage in Cost Insurance and Freight (CIF) and Carriage and Insurance Paid To (CIP).
  8. [8]
    ICC Incoterms 2020 - Commentary | HFW
    Oct 1, 2019 · One of the key changes in the Incoterms 2020 is the adoption of language in the FCA term to allow the seller to require the buyer to procure ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] incoterms® 2020 - ICC Switzerland
    The eleven Incoterms® 2020 rules—“sea and inland waterway” and “any mode(s) of transport”: getting it right. VIII. Order within the Incoterms® 2020 rules. IX ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Incoterms® 2020: CPT or CIP? - ICC Academy
    Jun 20, 2025 · Under CPT (Carriage Paid To), the seller delivers the goods and transfers the risk of loss or damage to the buyer when the goods are handed over ...
  12. [12]
    Incoterms® 2020: CIP or CIF? - ICC Academy
    Oct 7, 2024 · In this article we will focus on just two of the Rules; CIP and CIF including when each of them should be used and their key differences and similarities.
  13. [13]
    Incoterms® 2020: DPU or DAP? - ICC Academy
    Mar 17, 2025 · Both DAP and DPU are delivery terms, meaning the seller is obligated to deliver the goods to the agreed place and point of destination. In both ...
  14. [14]
    Incoterms® 2020: DAP or DDP? - ICC Academy
    Feb 25, 2025 · In this article we will focus on just two of the rules: DAP and DDP, including when each of them should be used and their key differences and similarities.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Incoterms® 2020 Rules - Trade Finance Global
    EXW – Ex Works. 67. FCA – Free Carrier. 69. CPT – Carriage Paid To. 73. CIP – Carriage and Insurance Paid To. 75. DAP – Delivered at Place.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] BASIC OVERVIEW OF THE INCOTERMS® 2020 RULES - DHL
    This guide is designed to provide a quick overview of the Incoterms® rules frequently used worldwide in international and domestic contracts.
  17. [17]
    Incoterms® 2020: FAS or FOB? - ICC Academy
    May 13, 2025 · FAS (Free Alongside Ship) means the seller delivers the goods alongside the vessel nominated by the buyer at the port of shipment.
  18. [18]
    FAS Free Alongside Ship - Incoterms® 2020 Rule [UPDATED 2025]
    This means that it is most commonly used for the sale of bulk commodity cargo such as oil, grain, and ore or for heavy-lift cargo.
  19. [19]
    FAS Incoterms: Free Alongside Ship - Freightos
    Free Alongside Ship Incoterms - FAS incoterms 2023. What Does The ICC Say? Not recommended for containerized freight. Designed for bulk and break bulk cargo.
  20. [20]
    FOB Incoterms® meaning | Free on Board shipping - Maersk
    Oct 5, 2023 · Under Free on Board, the seller is responsible for delivering the goods to the port of departure, clearing it for export, and loading the goods on the vessel.What Does Free On Board... · Fob Shipping: Who Is... · Fob Destination Or Fob...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    FOB (Free on Board) - Incoterms® 2020 Rule [UPDATED 2025]
    Under FOB, the seller has no obligation to contract for carriage. If the buyer requests it, the seller (at the buyer's risk and cost) must provide the buyer ...
  22. [22]
    Incoterms® 2020: CFR or CIF? - ICC Academy
    Aug 21, 2024 · In this article, we will focus on two maritime shipping terms CFR (Cost and Freight) and CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight), which are widely used in ...
  23. [23]
    Incoterms® 2020 | PDF Download Printable Chart
    Jun 2, 2024 · Download Incoterms® 2020 PDF chart file. The newest 2020 Incoterms® chart from the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) definitions and ...
  24. [24]
    Incoterms Guide [Updated 2025] With Free PDF Download - IncoDocs
    Sep 1, 2025 · Incoterms®, short for International Commercial Terms, are rules published by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). They define ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Incoterms 2020 - Marsh
    Incoterms® are ICC's standard defnitions of trade terms and are internationally recognized as indispensable evidence of the buyer's and seller's.
  26. [26]
    Incoterms® 2020 vs 2010: What's changed? - ICC Academy
    Mar 5, 2020 · For example, CPT (carriage paid to) includes a specific requirement that the seller must comply with any security-related requirements for ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Incoterms® 2020 Checklist and Flowcharts
    The FCA Incoterms®. 2020 rule provides a possible solution to bridge the difference between delivery and on-board transport documents frequently required by ...
  28. [28]
    Best Incoterms for Air & Ocean Freight Explained 2025 - Sky2C
    Oct 27, 2025 · Discover key differences between air freight Incoterms vs ocean freight terms. Learn FCA, FOB, CFR, CIF & best practices for international ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN INCOTERMS® AND THE CISG
    51 As for the passing of risk, the second sentence of article 67(1) CISG is rendered applicable where the contract indicates the place of shipment. The problem, ...
  30. [30]
    Incoterms | Access2Markets - European Commission's trade
    Incoterms are international commercial terms used to assign costs and responsibilities between buyer and seller, serving as global standards. Examples include ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Standards Toolkit - World Trade Organization
    It provides the framework for any cross-border transport- related business and government domains to specify their own specific information exchange.
  32. [32]
    Part 47 - Transportation | Acquisition.GOV
    (a) Contracting officers shall prepare solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services as prescribed elsewhere in the FAR ...
  33. [33]
    Choosing the right incoterms for your goods - Business.gov.uk
    There are 11 incoterms in total. 7 cover all forms of transport and 4 are for ocean freight. So let's look at some commonly used ones.Missing: Public | Show results with:Public
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    [PDF] 7-1 CHAPTER 7 CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION AND TRADE ...
    Each Party shall issue advance rulings with regard to: (a) tariff classification;. (b) the application of customs valuation criteria for a particular case in ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] National regulatory barriers to the Incoterms® 2020 rules
    Jan 2, 2025 · Foreign transport insurance is allowed for CIF and CIP until the point of entry but not allowed for subsequent transport into the country.
  37. [37]
    Brexit and Incoterms: how three letters can make a big difference
    Feb 21, 2019 · Incoterms are standard provisions drawn up by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) for use in contracts relating to international trade in goods.
  38. [38]
    The 5 most important Incoterms® when shipping to or from China
    Oct 3, 2023 · Here are the five most important Incoterms® rules when exporting or importing goods to or from China, what they mean, and their advantages and disadvantages.
  39. [39]
    DDP and DAP simplified for the Indian businesses - Avalara
    Oct 8, 2021 · DAP means the buyer pays duties/taxes at destination, while DDP means the seller collects and reports tax, with prices including taxes at ...
  40. [40]
    The Incoterms® rules 2010 - ICC
    The Incoterms® rules have become an essential part of the daily language of trade. They have been incorporated in contracts for the sale of goods worldwide.
  41. [41]
    New Incoterms 2010 To Become Effective January 1, 2011 | JD Supra
    Dec 8, 2010 · On January 1, 2011, the new Incoterms 2010 published by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) will go into effect, ...
  42. [42]
    Incoterms® rules history - ICC Belgium
    Apr 1, 2017 · The first revision of the Incoterms® rules was then issued in 1953. It debuted three new trade terms for non-maritime transport. The new rules ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Incoterms 2010 - What Has Changed?
    Mar 1, 2011 · The eighth edition of Incoterms was published on 27th September 2010 and came into force on 1st January 2011. The International Chamber of ...Introduction · Incoterms 2010 May Encourage... · Changes To The Existing...Missing: details 11
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Incoterms 1990 - ICC Digital Library
    Jul 1, 1990 · Under DAF, DES and DDU the seller does not have to deliver the goods cleared for import, while under DEQ and DDP he would have to do so. Since ...