Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jet blast

Jet blast refers to the powerful stream of high-velocity exhaust gases and air expelled from the rear of an aircraft's jet engines, primarily during ground operations such as engine start-up, taxiing, and takeoff.^[1] This phenomenon, essential for propulsion in flight, generates wind speeds that can approach 100 knots (approximately 115 mph) at distances of up to 200 feet behind the engines, along with elevated temperatures that dissipate rapidly but can still exceed 100°F in proximity.^[2] Originating with the advent of jet-powered aircraft in the mid-20th century, jet blast has evolved into a major safety concern at airports, where it can uproot loose objects, damage infrastructure, and endanger personnel or nearby aircraft.^[3] The hazards of jet blast are particularly acute on ramps, taxiways, and maneuvering areas, where it can cause foreign object debris (FOD) ingestion into engines, structural damage to buildings or vehicles, and loss of control for smaller aircraft caught in the airflow.^[1] For instance, incidents have included shattered windows, overturned equipment, and injuries to ground crew from propelled debris, with risks amplified during high-thrust maneuvers or when aircraft are turning with engines powered.^[2] Velocities vary by engine type, power setting, and aircraft size; business jets may produce lower blasts compared to large commercial airliners like the Boeing 747, but even at idle, exhaust can reach 25 knots at 100 feet, escalating to over 100 knots at full power.^[4] Temperatures near the nozzle can surpass 1,000°F (540°C) but typically drop to below 100°F (38°C) at distances of 200–500 feet or more, varying by aircraft type, power setting, and ambient conditions.^[5] To mitigate these risks, airport operators employ blast fences—barriers designed to deflect and dissipate the airflow—and stabilized blast pads to prevent pavement erosion.^[6] Operational procedures emphasize using minimum thrust for breakaway, maintaining safe distances (often 500 feet or more behind operating engines), and coordinating with air traffic control to avoid exposure zones.^[1] Advanced software tools now aid in visualizing jet blast plumes for better planning, ensuring compliance with standards from authorities like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).^[4] Despite these measures, ongoing research focuses on predicting blast effects for newer, more efficient engines to further enhance ground safety.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Jet blast is the rapid movement of high-velocity air produced by the exhaust of an aircraft's jet engines, primarily occurring during takeoff, taxiing, or engine testing operations.^[7] This phenomenon arises from the expulsion of hot, pressurized gases and bypass air from the engine nozzle, creating a powerful airflow directed rearward from the aircraft.^[1] While related to terms such as "jet efflux," which specifically denotes the gases flowing from the exhaust nozzle, jet blast emphasizes the ground-level aerodynamic effects of this exhaust stream on surrounding areas.^[8] It is distinct from "engine wake," which typically refers to the broader aerodynamic disturbances like wake turbulence generated by an aircraft's wings rather than its engines alone.^[9] Jet blast most commonly manifests behind aircraft on runways, taxiways, ramps, and near terminal areas, where the exhaust directly impacts ground-level environments.^[10] It can occur in various aviation sectors, including commercial airliners during departure sequences, military aircraft on operational aprons, and general aviation planes at smaller airfields.^[11] This airflow is generated by different engine types, such as turbojet engines in high-performance fighters, turbofan engines in passenger jets, and even the exhaust components of turboprop engines in regional or utility aircraft.^[7] These engines produce jet blast characterized by high velocities and temperatures that can influence nearby operations.^[2]

Physical Properties

Jet blast, the high-velocity exhaust from aircraft jet engines, exhibits significant velocity profiles that diminish with distance from the engine. At 100 feet (30 m) behind the aircraft, velocities can reach up to 200 mph (322 km/h) for aircraft like the Boeing 727 during breakaway thrust, while at approximately 100 feet (30 m) behind larger aircraft such as the Boeing 747, speeds are around 170 mph (274 km/h) during takeoff.^[12] For wide-body jets at takeoff power, velocities remain at 100 mph (161 km/h) up to 350 feet (107 m) behind the aircraft, dropping to 70 mph (113 km/h) at 650 feet (198 m) and 50 mph (80 km/h) at 1,050 feet (320 m), but still posing hazards up to 500 feet (152 m) or more depending on conditions.^[13] These profiles are derived from empirical measurements and manufacturer data, showing an inverse relationship with distance due to atmospheric mixing and entrainment.^[12] Modern high-bypass turbofan engines, such as those on the Boeing 787, produce jet blast velocities that decay more gradually due to higher mass flow, with profiles available from manufacturer data per FAA standards.^[6] The thermal properties of jet blast involve exhaust gases that are extremely hot near the engine, typically ranging from 1,000°F to 2,000°F (540°C to 1,100°C) in the core flow, though they cool rapidly through dilution with ambient air.^[14] At greater distances, such as 100 feet (30 m) behind the aircraft, temperature rises near the ground can still reach 200°F (93°C) for a Boeing 727 at breakaway thrust, sufficient to cause thermal stress on surfaces.^[12] This cooling occurs exponentially as the plume entrains cooler air, but residual heat persists in the blast zone, influenced by the engine's combustion efficiency and nozzle design. Some military jets can produce even higher near-field temperatures exceeding 2,300°F (1,260°C).^[15] Force dynamics in jet blast arise from thrust-generated pressure waves and momentum transfer, creating turbulent flows that exert significant dynamic loads. The exhaust plume acts as a high-momentum jet, imparting forces through direct impingement and induced turbulence, with peak accelerations up to 20 G (196 m/s²) in single axes and RMS vector sums of 13.8 G during exposure.^[12] Turbulence patterns vary by engine type: low-bypass turbojets produce concentrated, high-velocity core jets with intense, localized pressure waves and shear layers, leading to sharper momentum decay; in contrast, high-bypass turbofans generate broader, slower fan flows mixed with hotter core exhaust, resulting in more diffuse but extended turbulent regions due to the higher mass flow. These dynamics are quantified by relationships like RMS acceleration scaling with velocity to the power of 1.5, highlighting the nonlinear increase in force with engine output.^[12] Several factors influence these physical properties. Engine power setting is primary, with takeoff thrust yielding peak velocities and temperatures compared to idle or taxi settings, where blasts are reduced by 50-70%.^[16] Aircraft size affects scale: larger jets like the Boeing 747 produce stronger blasts than regional jets due to multiple high-thrust engines, while fighter aircraft like the F-14 generate extreme velocities from afterburning.^[12] Altitude above ground modifies the profile, as elevated engines allow greater initial expansion before ground interaction, potentially increasing effective range. Atmospheric conditions, such as crosswinds, can deflect and elongate the plume, altering velocity decay and heat distribution, while density variations impact entrainment rates.^[16]

Hazards and Effects

On Personnel

Jet blast poses significant risks to personnel on or near active runways, primarily through its high-velocity airflow and thermal output, which can exceed 100 miles per hour within close proximity. Ground crew members, such as baggage handlers and wing walkers, are particularly vulnerable during aircraft taxiing and takeoff preparations, where unexpected gusts can lead to loss of balance and subsequent falls. Additionally, aircraft marshallers and fuelers face heightened exposure while directing or servicing planes, often in positions directly behind the engines. The primary injury mechanisms include blunt trauma from being knocked over by the forceful wind, which can cause fractures, sprains, or concussions upon impact with the tarmac. Noise-induced hearing damage results from the intense acoustic levels, often surpassing 140 decibels, leading to temporary or permanent threshold shifts without adequate ear protection. Inhalation of exhaust fumes, containing carbon monoxide and particulate matter, can cause respiratory irritation. Severity of these injuries is influenced by several factors, with the greatest dangers occurring within 100 feet of the engine exhaust, where wind speeds and heat intensities peak. Prolonged exposure duration exacerbates risks, as cumulative effects from repeated operations can lead to chronic issues like hearing loss. The absence of personal protective equipment, such as high-visibility vests, helmets, hearing defenders, or heat-resistant gloves, significantly amplifies vulnerability, particularly for less experienced workers. Bystanders at airport perimeter viewing areas represent another at-risk group, where inadequate barriers may allow jet blast to propel debris or gust individuals off their feet. Aviation safety reports indicate that non-fatal incidents involving personnel far outnumber fatalities, with ground crew injuries comprising a notable portion of ramp accidents annually. For instance, in June 2025, two ground workers at Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport sustained minor injuries after being struck by jet blast from a JetBlue Airbus A321 during takeoff preparations.^[17]

On Aircraft and Equipment

Jet blast poses significant risks to other aircraft on the ground, particularly lighter models, by exerting powerful aerodynamic forces that can lead to uncontrolled movement or structural damage. One primary effect is weathercocking, where asymmetric blast forces act on rudders, vertical stabilizers, or wings, causing braked aircraft to rotate uncontrollably into the wind direction of the blast. This phenomenon is especially hazardous for light aircraft weighing 5,000 pounds or less, which are more susceptible to being lifted or pivoted by the high-velocity exhaust. For instance, in one reported incident, a commuter twin-engine aircraft had its right wing and main landing gear lifted by jet blast from a widebody jet, resulting in the plane being blown into a blast fence.^[2] Damage to parked or nearby aircraft often includes dents, scratches, or impacts to fuselages, wings, propellers, flaps, and rudders, with approximately 85% of jet blast incidents involving such structural harm to other planes according to Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) data from 51 analyzed reports as of 1993.^[2] Examples include small aircraft experiencing wing and propeller strikes when positioned 150 feet behind a powering-up airliner, or fuselages being dented by propelled objects like fueling ladders blown into engine cowlings by nearby engine exhaust. These effects are exacerbated on ramps or taxiways where aircraft spacing is tight, with nearly half of ASRS jet blast incidents occurring in such areas due to the close proximity of planes.^[2]^[18]^[19] Ground support equipment and vehicles are also vulnerable to jet blast, which can push, overturn, or scatter items, leading to operational disruptions or further collisions. Baggage carts and similar wheeled equipment have been flipped or shifted by blast forces, such as an empty LD3 container becoming airborne at 75 mph and striking a maintenance truck, or carts inadequately braked during a hard aircraft turn on a congested ramp. Ground vehicles like tugs, loaders, and ramp trucks face overturning risks, with multiple cases documented where such equipment was knocked over by exhaust velocities exceeding 100 knots at distances over 200 feet. Lift equipment and tools, including ladders, can be propelled into aircraft or other assets, causing secondary damage like nicks and dents that affect airworthiness.^[19]^[2]^[20]^[10] The interaction dynamics of jet blast with trailing aircraft during lineup or taxi operations are influenced by blast angles and distances, where exhaust from a lead aircraft can propel or destabilize following planes if separation is insufficient. Large transports like the Boeing 727 or 757 account for 45% of such incidents as of 1993, often damaging smaller trailing aircraft during engine run-ups or turns. Wheel chocks or securing devices on parked equipment may become dislodged under these forces, potentially leading to unintended movement and taxiway collisions, as seen in cases where objects like air hoses were loosened and entangled nearby assets. These vulnerabilities highlight the need for precise positioning to minimize asymmetric forces and propulsion effects from jet blast velocities.^[2]^[20]^[19]

On Airport Infrastructure

Jet blast poses significant risks to fixed airport infrastructure, primarily through high-velocity exhaust forces that can cause erosion, structural stress, and material degradation over time. On pavements, repeated exposure leads to jet-blast erosion, manifesting as darkened, carbonized areas where bituminous binders are burned, with localized damage depths varying from shallow surface scorching to deeper pitting that compromises surface integrity.^[21] This erosion is particularly acute at runway ends and aprons, where thrust reversals or high-power engine runs accelerate wear on edges and shoulders, potentially leading to cracking and spalling if not addressed.^[6] In terminal areas, the force can shatter windows in nearby buildings, as evidenced by incidents where exhaust blasts have broken restaurant glass, causing fragmentation and requiring immediate repairs.^[2] Landscaping elements, such as trees and shrubs, are also vulnerable to uprooting, disrupting aesthetic and functional green spaces around terminals.^[2] Various stationary infrastructure components are susceptible to long-term degradation from jet blast. Blast fences and barriers, designed to deflect exhaust, can experience structural stress from prolonged exposure, necessitating reinforcements to maintain their protective role.^[22] Signage and lighting arrays, including runway threshold lamps and localizer equipment, face direct impacts, with exhaust velocities damaging fixtures and reducing visibility aids through misalignment or shattering.^[23]^[24] Nearby buildings and hangars endure vibrational stress and surface abrasion, while aprons and taxiway surfaces suffer cumulative wear, leading to rutting and the need for frequent resurfacing to prevent foreign object debris (FOD) generation.^[25] Environmentally, jet blast contributes to dust storms by mobilizing loose soil and gravel across aprons and runway vicinities, creating airborne particulates that reduce air quality and visibility during operations.^[26] Debris propulsion exacerbates this by hurling small objects into adjacent sensitive areas, such as drainage systems or vegetated buffers, potentially contaminating water runoff or smothering ground cover. These effects can temporarily disrupt nearby wildlife habitats by scattering nesting materials or forcing displacement of ground-dwelling species in perimeter zones, though primary concerns remain tied to operational safety.^[2] The economic ramifications include substantial repair costs and operational disruptions from infrastructure incidents. FOD, including that propelled by jet blast, is estimated to cost the aviation industry approximately $4 billion annually in damages.^[27] Airport-specific repairs for eroded pavements or damaged lighting often exceed hundreds of thousands per event. For instance, reconstructing blast pads or replacing localizer arrays due to blast-induced deterioration can cost millions, as seen in FAA-funded projects addressing rapid infrastructure decline.^[24] Delays from such repairs halt flights, amplifying costs through lost revenue and increased maintenance scheduling, with airport authority reports highlighting the need for proactive investments to mitigate recurring expenses.^[22]

Mitigation Strategies

Engineering Solutions

Blast deflectors, also known as blast fences or barriers, are engineered structures designed to redirect or dissipate the high-velocity exhaust from aircraft engines, primarily by diverting airflow upward and away from personnel, equipment, and infrastructure. These devices typically feature a concave, single-curved, corrugated metal surface, often with optional baffles to enhance dissipation, and are constructed from durable materials such as hot-dip galvanized steel, concrete, or fiberglass to withstand extreme heat, pressure, and erosion. Fiberglass variants are preferred near navigation aids like instrument landing systems to minimize electromagnetic interference. Placement is critical for effectiveness, with deflectors generally positioned 70 to 120 feet (21 to 37 meters) aft of the jet engine nozzle—ensuring a minimum of 50 feet (15.2 meters)—and often located behind runway hold points or on taxiway shoulders to shield adjacent areas.^[28]^[16]^[29] Airport layout modifications play a key role in mitigating jet blast through strategic design elements that increase separation and containment. Extended taxiways, such as full-length parallel taxiways, allow aircraft to maneuver without directing exhaust toward active areas, while separated parking stands maintain minimum distances based on aircraft codes to prevent blast overlap— for example, ICAO Code E aircraft require at least 120 meters of separation in some configurations. Windbreaks, including blast pads at runway ends (typically 100 to 400 feet long depending on aircraft group) and stabilized shoulders (10 to 40 feet wide), use paved or chemically treated surfaces to resist erosion and contain debris. These features adhere to standards outlined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 and ICAO Aerodrome Design Manual Doc 9157, which emphasize soil stabilization and object-free zones to protect against velocities exceeding 35 mph (56 km/h).^[16]^[30] Aircraft innovations further address jet blast at the source by optimizing engine performance and exhaust management. Modern high-bypass turbofan engines, with larger fan diameters and streamlined nacelle designs, inherently reduce ground-level exhaust velocities compared to older low-bypass turbojets, as the increased bypass ratio diffuses thrust over a broader area. Thrust reversers, integral to many commercial jet engines, redirect exhaust forward during deceleration on the runway, minimizing rearward blast that could affect following traffic or ground operations; this system can provide up to 40% reverse thrust efficiency, aiding in shorter stopping distances without excessive forward-directed hazards.^[16]^[31]^[32] Engineering studies demonstrate the effectiveness of these solutions, with blast deflectors significantly reducing jet blast velocities downstream, dissipating hazardous flows to below 35 mph (56 km/h) within protected zones and preventing erosion or debris projection. Airport layout adjustments, such as blast pads and separated stands, have shown comparable reductions in incident risks by containing blast patterns, while aircraft engine advancements contribute to lower baseline velocities. These metrics underscore the combined impact of hardware and design in enhancing safety without compromising operational efficiency.^[33]^[30]^[34]

Operational Procedures

Operational procedures for mitigating jet blast hazards emphasize standardized protocols to protect ground personnel, vehicles, and equipment during aircraft operations. These include maintaining minimum separation distances behind powering engines, typically 500 feet for full-power run-ups on large aircraft to ensure jet blast velocities dissipate below hazardous levels (e.g., under 35 mph for personnel safety), as specified in airport-specific ground run-up guidelines.^[35] Visual signals, such as rotating beacons on aircraft tails indicating active engines, alert ground crews to stay clear, while engine start sequences require pilots to confirm the area behind the aircraft is free of personnel and obstacles before initiating power.^[10] Advanced simulation tools are increasingly used to model jet blast plumes and predict risks for better planning.^[36] Training requirements for ground crew focus on recognizing jet blast zones and adhering to avoidance protocols, mandated under FAA regulations for certificate holders operating at least 10 aircraft.^[37] This includes on-the-job, instructor-led sessions demonstrating zone boundaries for specific aircraft types, simulations of blast effects, and emphasis on personal protective equipment (PPE) such as helmets, high-visibility vests, and hearing protection to reduce injury risks from wind, debris, or noise.^[37] EASA guidelines similarly require ground handling providers to train staff on jet blast risks, incorporating procedures for safe positioning during engine operations.^[38] Air traffic control (ATC) plays a critical role in coordinating taxi orders to minimize blast exposure, such as sequencing departures to direct exhaust away from active ramps or taxiways and issuing advisories like "caution jet blast" during run-ups.^[2] Emergency response plans, integrated into airport operations, outline rapid evacuation from blast zones and incident reporting to prevent recurrence, with ATC facilitating clear communication during potential hazards.^[2] Regulatory frameworks, including FAA Advisory Circulars on ground safety and EASA's European Plan for Aviation Safety (EPAS 2025), establish these procedures, with updates incorporated following safety assessments to address evolving risks from aircraft operations.^[37]^[39] For instance, post-incident reviews have led to refined training mandates and zone demarcations to enhance compliance.^[37]

Historical Development and Incidents

Evolution of Awareness

The introduction of jet propulsion in aviation following World War II, particularly in the late 1940s and 1950s, brought jet blast hazards to the forefront as military operations transitioned to civilian use. Early turbojet engines, such as those powering the first commercial jets, generated high-velocity exhaust that was initially underestimated for its ground-level effects, with focus primarily on in-flight performance rather than ramp or taxiway risks. Visible cues like smoke and shimmering heat waves from these engines provided informal warnings to ground personnel, but as operations scaled up at civil airports, incidents of personnel injuries and equipment damage began to emerge without adequate protocols.^[3] In the 1960s and 1970s, growing adoption of larger commercial aircraft, including the Boeing 707, amplified jet blast concerns, prompting targeted investigations by regulatory agencies. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) documented a rise in ground incidents linked to exhaust velocities typically up to 130 knots at distances of 200 feet behind aircraft. A pivotal 1972 NTSB Special Study on Jet Blast Hazards examined over 40 accidents, attributing many to the shift toward quieter, cleaner-burning engines that obscured hazards compared to earlier turbojets; the study highlighted fatalities and severe injuries, especially from wide-body jets, urging immediate safety enhancements.^[3]^[40] Regulatory responses evolved with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) incorporating jet blast considerations into Annex 14 amendments following its 1951 initial adoption, including provisions for aerodrome design such as minimum separation distances and blast fences to protect against velocities up to 150 knots in later guidance. These developments addressed airport layouts to accommodate increasing traffic. Post-2000, ICAO emphasized regional airports and tourism-oriented facilities in documents like the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), providing tailored guidance for smaller aerodromes where jet blast risks intersect with limited infrastructure and higher pedestrian exposure.^[41]^[42]^[30] Technological advancements from turbojets to high-bypass turbofans further shaped awareness, as the latter's design—diverting a significant portion of airflow through a cooler, lower-velocity bypass stream—reduced core exhaust speeds by up to 50% relative to turbojets for similar thrust levels, thereby lessening blast intensity on the ground. Incident trends reflect this shift: NTSB data from the 1970s showed dozens of annual events tied to high-velocity turbojets, but broader aviation statistics indicate a marked decline in ground-related mishaps over subsequent decades, with turbofan-equipped fleets correlating to fewer severe cases by the 1990s and 2000s, though risks remain in high-thrust scenarios at congested ramps.^[7]^[43]^[3]

Notable Incidents

One of the earliest documented series of jet blast-related fatalities occurred during the 1960s and 1970s as commercial jet operations expanded rapidly at airports worldwide. Ramp workers faced significant risks from the high-velocity exhaust, which could flip unsecured equipment like baggage carts or service vehicles, leading to crushing injuries or being struck by airborne objects. For instance, in 1967, during U.S. Navy operations in the Tonkin Gulf, jet blast from a taxiing aircraft knocked an A-4 Skyhawk fighter into the sea, drowning the pilot—a stark example of the hazards in high-traffic areas. A 1972 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) study reviewed multiple incidents, including ramp fatalities and severe injuries such as three airline stewardesses hurt by shattered restaurant windows from a jet blast 75 to 85 feet away, underscoring the need for better spacing and barriers around operating aircraft. These early cases, often caused by inadequate awareness of jet exhaust velocities exceeding 200 mph, prompted initial regulatory reviews but highlighted persistent procedure lapses in ground handling.^[44]^[40] In July 2017, a tragic incident at Maho Beach near Princess Juliana International Airport in Sint Maarten illustrated the dangers to tourists drawn to the site's proximity to the runway. A 57-year-old woman from New Zealand was fatally injured when she was knocked backward by the jet blast from a departing Caribbean Airlines Boeing 737-800; she struck her head on a concrete barrier after clinging to the perimeter fence to experience the force. The blast, generated by the aircraft's two engines at takeoff thrust, exceeded 150 mph and propelled her approximately 10 feet, causing severe head trauma that led to her death the following day. Police and airport authorities attributed the accident to proximity violations despite prominent warning signs about severe injury or death from jet exhaust; an investigation emphasized the risks to thrill-seeking visitors and resulted in direct regulatory changes, including reinforced fences, additional multilingual warning signage, and public awareness campaigns to deter fence-climbing.^[45]^[46]^[47] Similar risks have persisted at the same location, with incidents of injuries to tourists disregarding safety zones, amplifying calls for stricter enforcement and enhancements like extended barriers and monitored access to the beach area during peak operations. More recently, on June 9, 2025, at Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport in Georgia, a JetBlue Airways Airbus A321 (flight B6650 to Boston) injured two ground workers during taxi preparations for takeoff. The workers, positioned too close to the active engine without adequate chocks or signals, were struck by debris kicked up by the jet blast, sustaining minor injuries including cuts and strains that required medical attention but no hospitalization. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) launched an investigation, citing procedural lapses such as insufficient coordination between the flight crew and ground team on blast exclusion zones; preliminary findings emphasized the need for improved training on high-thrust taxi protocols, leading to immediate reviews of ramp safety guidelines at the airport.^[17]^[48]

References

[1]
Jet Efflux Hazard | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Jet Efflux Hazard is defined as hazards associated with the blast force generated behind a jet engine.
[2]
Ground Jet Blast Hazard - NASA ASRS
Jet engine blast can up-root trees, flatten building structures, shatter windows, lift and propel heavy objects, weathercock braked airplanes, blow over lift ...
[3]
[PDF] Special Study - JET BLAST HAZARDS
Since that time, however, jet blast has become increasingly hazardous during ground operations at airport terminals, on maintenance ramps and along taxiways.
[4]
Visualizing the Invisible to Manage Jet Blast Risk - Transoft Solutions
Jul 8, 2025 · Jet blast occurs during key aircraft maneuvers such as takeoff, taxiing, and power-up. The sheer force of these concentrated air streams is ...
[5]
[PDF] Advisory Circular 150/5300-13, Airport Design (Consolidated AC ...
Sep 29, 1989 · Blast velocities of business jet airplanes ... component, depicted by a letter, is the aircraft approach category and relates to aircraft approach ...
[6]
[PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 16
Adding too much power can pull damaging debris up off the ground or cause damage well behind the aircraft. Jet blast when taxiing into parking areas may affect ...Missing: efflux | Show results with:efflux
[7]
Jet efflux - Encyclopedia - The Free Dictionary
jet efflux. The gases flowing from the exhaust nozzle. Also called jet blast and jet engine exhaust. An Illustrated Dictionary of Aviation Copyright © ...
[8]
What is the difference between Jet Wash and Jet Blast?
Jan 23, 2015 · Jet Blast is the force or wind generated behind a jet engine, particularly on or before takeoff when high/full power is set, but also when the aircraft is ...
[9]
[PDF] FAA Guide to Ground Vehicle Operations
This hazard is called jet blast or prop wash. There have been several cases where vehicles have been overturned by jet blast. Drivers should be aware of the ...
[10]
[PDF] Jet Blast Deflectors for Commercial, General Aviation & Military Aircraft
BDI deflectors are constructed of heavy-duty, hot-dip galvanized steel. All designs are modular and can easily be relocated or reconfigured as requirements ...
[11]
[PDF] Aircraft Jet Engine Exhaust Blast Effects on Par-56 Runway ... - DTIC
Sensors ware placed on and near the lamp assemblies which measured blast velocity and temperature, bulb face temperature, lanp fixture acceleration and sound ...
[12]
None
### Summary of Jet Blast Velocities, Temperatures, and Force Dynamics
[13]
Engine Temperature Variation - ETR
On this slide we show how the flow temperature varies through a typical turbojet engine. The temperature is color-coded, with blue indicating the lowest ...
[14]
Cooled jet blast deflectors for aircraft carrier flight decks
... exhaust plumes from new attack jet aircraft, such as a minimum of 2300° F. temperature and 1800 feet per second exhaust flow at the jet blast deflector. It ...
[15]
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6575113B1/en
[16]
[PDF] “Don't Get Blown Away” - A Review of ASRS Jet Blast Related Reports
I was the aircraft right, number 2 side, wing walker when this event occurred. I was holding up the stop signal before, after and during our push from [gate].
[17]
[PDF] ASRS Directline Issue 6 - Aviation Safety Reporting System
Read along as she takes a fresh look at ground jet blast hazards and passes along some time-tested and new suggestions for dealing with the problem. Emergency ...
[18]
Jet-Blast Erosion - Applied Pavement Technology
Jet-blast erosion causes darkened areas on the pavement surface where bituminous binder has been burned or carbonized. Localized burned areas may vary in depth ...
[19]
[PDF] AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design, March 31, 2022 Consolidated to ...
Mar 31, 2022 · Separate jet aircraft from smaller aircraft to minimize risk of harmful jet blast effects. 4. Optimize GSE areas to promote efficient ...Missing: dislodging | Show results with:dislodging
[20]
Schumer, Gillibrand Announce Over $1.6 Million Investment to ...
This funding will also provide for the installation of a blast fence to mitigate property damage due to jet blast. “This Federal Aviation Administration grant ...
[21]
Aircraft Jet Engine Exhaust Blast Effects on PAR-56 Runway ...
A prediction algorithm was developed by correlating the acquired data against the manufacturers' published jet exhaust blast velocity and temperature contours.
[22]
[PDF] Q3-2025 Airport Construction Impact Report
Jul 1, 2025 · is deteriorating rapidly due to jet blast and debris is damaging the RWY 36R localizer array. This project will replace the entire EMAS and ...
[23]
(PDF) Jet Blast Energy Harvester - Academia.edu
... exhaust velocity profile of a Boeing 747-400 was examined. This line of aircraft was chosen for the large amount of simulated data published by Boeing. Exhaust ...
[24]
[PDF] Advisory Circular 150/5210-24A, Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD ...
Feb 8, 2024 · Personnel injuries or even death can occur when jet blast propels FOD through the airport environment at high velocities. 2.2. 2 Sources of FOD.
[25]
Foreign Object Debris (FOD) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Injuring people afer being propelled by a jet blast or prop wash. The resulting damage is estimated to cost the aerospace industry $4 billion a year. A ...
[26]
[PDF] CC 116945 Jet Blast Deflector
Design Considerations. Two blast deflector types are commonly used. One is a concave, single curved, corrugated metal surface, with or without baffles, fastened ...
[27]
[PDF] REDUCING AIRPORT NOISE AND IMPROVING SAFETY
Jun 16, 2023 · Fiberglass jet blast deflectors are designed for use near airport NAVAIDs such as an instrument landing system (ILS) localizer. They are ...
[28]
[PDF] Aerodrome Design Manual - SKYbrary
Jul 1, 2015 · Jet Blast and Blast Fence Considerations. APP 2-3 to the direction of the blast which yields the greatest possi- ble pressure. The lower ...
[29]
[PDF] NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITIEE FOR AERONAUTICS
Lastly, the reverser should produce a minimum of 40-percent reverse thrust. It is felt that 40-percent rever- sal will be sufficient to stop future jet aircraft ...
[30]
Thrust Reversal Explained: How It Helps Aircraft Stop Safely
Jun 12, 2025 · Reverse thrust in aircraft keeps the engines rotating in their normal direction but redirects where the airflow goes as it leaves the engines.
[31]
[PDF] COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF JET BLAST DEFLECTOR - iaeme
Nov 20, 2024 · A comparative study of Jet Blast Deflectors (JBDs) highlights the diversity in design, materials, and functionality tailored to specific ...
[32]
AC 150/5325-6A: Airport Design Standards - Effects and ... - ROSA P
This circular presents criteria on the jet engine blast velocities associated with aircraft in common use in air carrier service.Missing: ICAO mitigation
[33]
[PDF] GROUND RUN-UP PROCEDURES MANUAL
Dec 2, 2021 · This document contains the. 24-hour operational procedures associated with aircraft engine ground run-up operations at Chicago ... jet blast ...
[34]
[PDF] AFS-300 NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ...
Aug 29, 2025 · (3) On-the-job, instructor-led training to physically demonstrate the engine ingestion zone boundaries and jet blast zones for each kind of ...
[35]
[PDF] EPAS 2021-2025 - EASA
... crew becoming aware. This safety issue includes the procedures, training and equipment provided to the ground handling personnel to perform their duties. It ...
[36]
Safety Board Study Cites Perils Of Jet Engine Blasts at Airports
Sep 13, 1972 · Three airline stewardesses having lunch at an airport were injured by the shattering of a restaurant window from the blast of a jet 75 to 85 ...Missing: terminals | Show results with:terminals<|separator|>
[37]
Annex 14 - Aerodromes - The Postal History of ICAO
Annex 14, Volume II, contains Standards and Recommended Practices (specifications) that prescribe the physical characteristics and obstacle limitation surfaces ...Missing: blast 1980s
[38]
[PDF] annex-14-aerodromes.pdf - sky library
— The jet blast effects caused by a moving aeroplane on other aeroplanes receiving the anti-icing treatment or taxiing behind will have to be taken into ...
[39]
8 Differences between a Turbojet and Turbofan Engine You need to ...
Feb 23, 2022 · A turbojet flow velocity at the exhaust is much higher than the flow velocity of a turbofan. The temperature and pressures changes in a turbofan ...Missing: blast | Show results with:blast
[40]
Casualties: US Navy and Marine Corps Personnel Killed and Injured ...
This document lists US Navy and Marine Corps casualties from accidents and incidents not caused by enemy action, based on incomplete sources. Examples include ...
[41]
Sint Maarten jet engine blast kills New Zealand woman - BBC
Jul 13, 2017 · A New Zealand woman has died on the Caribbean territory of Sint Maarten after the blast from a powerful jet engine knocked her to the ground ...
[42]
New Zealand woman dies after jet blast at world's 'scariest' airport
Jul 13, 2017 · A New Zealand woman has been killed by a jet engine blast while watching a plane take off on the Caribbean island of St Maarten.
[43]
Jet blast from a plane kills a tourist at a Caribbean airport - CNN
Jul 14, 2017 · A tourist from New Zealand was killed by the blast of a plane at an airport in the Dutch Caribbean island of St. Maarten.
[44]
JetBlue A321 Engine Blast Injures Ground Workers in Savannah
Jun 14, 2025 · JetBlue A321 jet blast injures two workers at Savannah (SAV); FAA launches probe into safety procedures during takeoff.
[45]
JetBlue A321 Engine Blast Injures Ground Workers at Savannah ...
Jun 14, 2025 · JetBlue flight B6650, bound for Boston, became the center of an unexpected incident when a powerful engine blast injured two ground workers ...