Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Llama (language model)

Llama is a family of large language models developed by , ' artificial intelligence research division, initially released in February 2023 as efficient, research-oriented foundational models with up to 65 billion parameters trained to achieve high performance on language understanding and generation benchmarks. Subsequent iterations, including Llama 2 in 2023, Llama 3 in April 2024 with 8 billion and 70 billion parameter variants, Llama 3.1 in July 2024 featuring a 405 billion parameter model claimed as the largest and most capable openly available at the time, Llama 3.2 in September 2024 adding vision capabilities and lightweight variants for edge devices, and Llama 4 in April 2025 introducing natively multimodal models like and with extended context lengths, have progressively enhanced capabilities in multilingual processing, coding, reasoning, and vision-language tasks. These models are distributed as open weights under Meta's custom , which permits non-commercial , , and limited commercial deployment while imposing restrictions such as prohibitions on use by entities exceeding certain user thresholds (e.g., 700 million monthly active users) without prior approval, requirements for attribution, and bans on training competing models with outputs—terms that enable broad accessibility but have fueled debates over whether they qualify as fully under standards like those of the . 's releases have demonstrated competitive or superior performance against models on metrics like reasoning and benchmarks, with Llama 3.1 405B rivaling closed systems in evaluations and the series achieving over 10-fold usage growth since 2023 through integrations in applications ranging from chatbots to enterprise tools. The emphasis on efficiency—such as through architectural innovations enabling smaller models to punch above their parameter counts—has positioned as a for advancing accessible development, though its limitations highlight tensions between corporate control and community-driven innovation in the ecosystem.

Development History

Inception and Llama 1 (2023)


Meta's Fundamental AI Research (FAIR) lab initiated the LLaMA project to create efficient large language models capable of state-of-the-art performance using fewer parameters and less computational resources than prevailing models like GPT-3. The effort emphasized foundational models for research, trained exclusively on publicly available data to prioritize accessibility and reproducibility. This approach contrasted with closed proprietary systems, aiming to advance scientific understanding of language model scaling laws and robustness.
On February 24, 2023, Meta publicly announced LLaMA (Large Language Model Meta AI), releasing model weights in four sizes: 7 billion, 13 billion, 33 billion, and 65 billion parameters. The models employed a standard autoregressive transformer architecture, predicting subsequent tokens in sequences, and were trained on approximately 1 trillion tokens for the 7B variant and 1.4 trillion tokens for the larger models, drawn from text in the 20 most spoken languages using Latin and Cyrillic scripts. Custom data curation filtered out low-quality content, focusing on high-quality subsets to enhance efficiency. LLaMA 1 demonstrated competitive or superior results on benchmarks such as MMLU and GSM8K compared to larger models, underscoring the viability of optimized over sheer . However, like contemporaries, it exhibited limitations including factual inaccuracies, biases from data, and potential for generating toxic outputs. Access was restricted under a non-commercial , requiring researchers from , , or to apply for approval, reflecting Meta's intent to support targeted scientific inquiry rather than broad deployment. This controlled release facilitated rapid community experimentation while mitigating misuse risks.

Leak of Model Weights

In February 2023, released , a family of large language models ranging from 7 billion to 65 billion parameters, exclusively to approved academic ers, organizations, and government entities under a restrictive prohibiting use. On March 3, 2023, an on posted a link containing the model's checkpoint weights, making them publicly downloadable without authorization. The leak originated from an individual with approved access, as had distributed the weights to approximately 4,000 recipients prior to the incident, though the company implemented download limits and monitoring to prevent unauthorized sharing. The unauthorized distribution rapidly proliferated across platforms like and torrent sites, enabling hobbyists and developers to deploy on consumer hardware using optimized inference tools such as ggml, developed by Georgi Gerganov shortly after the leak. confirmed the breach but did not pursue aggressive legal enforcement against downloaders, citing challenges in tracking widespread dissemination and a strategic pivot toward greater openness in subsequent releases. In response to the event, U.S. Senators and others sent a letter to CEO on June 6, 2023, questioning the company's risk assessment processes, safeguards against misuse for generating or harmful content, and failure to notify authorities promptly. The leak accelerated community-driven fine-tuning efforts, including Stanford's model, which achieved competitive performance with minimal additional training data, and Koila Alpaca variants, demonstrating LLaMA's efficiency for resource-constrained environments. While proponents argued it fostered by democratizing access to high-performing models, critics highlighted risks of deploying unmitigated systems capable of producing biased or unsafe outputs without Meta's intended controls. This incident influenced Meta's decision to release LLaMA 2 under a more permissive license later in , incorporating safety improvements absent in the leaked version.

Llama 2 (2023)

Llama 2 is a collection of large models developed by , released on July 18, 2023, as a successor to the earlier models. The family includes base pretrained models and instruction-tuned variants (Llama 2-Chat) in three sizes: 7 billion, 13 billion, and 70 billion parameters. These models were pretrained on approximately 2 trillion tokens of publicly available data, representing a 40% increase in training data volume compared to Llama 1, with a doubled context length of 4,096 tokens. Key architectural enhancements in Llama 2 over Llama 1 include the adoption of grouped-query attention, which reduces memory usage and improves inference efficiency by sharing key and value heads across query heads, and optimizations for faster dialogue performance in the chat variants. The instruction-tuning process for Llama 2-Chat incorporated over 1 million human-generated samples, emphasizing and to enhance response quality and safety alignment. These changes resulted in superior performance on benchmarks such as reasoning, , and tasks relative to Llama 1 equivalents, though the 70B model still trailed models like GPT-3.5 in some evaluations. Meta released the model weights and inference code under the Llama 2 Community License, a custom agreement permitting and use for entities with fewer than 700 million monthly , beyond which a separate from Meta is required. This , while enabling broad access including applications, does not meet the Open Source Initiative's Definition due to its user-scale discrimination and failure to allow unrestricted redistribution or modification without attribution clauses. Critics, including the OSI, have argued that labeling it "open source" misrepresents its restrictive nature, as the training dataset remains and cannot be independently reproduced. Despite these limitations, the release facilitated widespread adoption, with integrations on platforms like and optimizations for hardware from , , , and others.

Llama 3 and Variants (2024)

Meta released Llama 3 on April 18, 2024, introducing pretrained and instruction-tuned language models in 8 billion (8B) and 70 billion (70B) parameter sizes. These models were designed to support a wide array of applications, including multilingual tasks, coding, and reasoning, with pretraining on approximately 15 trillion tokens. Meta positioned Llama 3 as achieving state-of-the-art performance among openly available large language models at the time, emphasizing improvements in logical reasoning and reduced hallucination rates compared to prior versions. In July 2024, Meta extended the Llama 3 family with Llama 3.1, released on , featuring models in 8B, 70B, and a 405B variant. The 405B model was described by as the largest and most capable openly released , rivaling closed-source competitors in , , and tool-use benchmarks, while incorporating a 128,000-token context window and native multilingual support for eight languages. Llama 3.1 introduced built-in tool-calling capabilities, trained on three specific tools for tasks like execution and browsing, alongside enhanced safety mitigations to address risks such as jailbreaking and harmful outputs. Further variants arrived with Llama 3.2 on September 25, 2024, focusing on efficiency for edge devices and inputs. This release included lightweight text-only models at 1B and 3B parameters, optimized for deployment with reduced , and vision-enabled models at 11B and 90B parameters capable of processing inputs alongside text for tasks like visual . All Llama 3 variants were distributed under a community license permitting commercial use with restrictions on training derivative models exceeding 700 million users or high-risk applications without additional safeguards.

Llama 4 (2025)

Llama 4 represents Meta's initial release of natively large models on April 5, 2025, marking a shift toward integrated text and vision processing via early fusion techniques that unify input in a shared space. The family comprises two open-weight mixture-of-experts () models: Llama 4 Scout, with 109 billion total parameters (17 billion active across 16 experts), and Llama 4 Maverick, featuring 17 billion active parameters across 128 experts. Both support a 10 million context window, enabling extended reasoning over vast inputs, and are optimized for efficiency in deployment on standard . Meta positioned these as foundational for agents capable of advanced reasoning and action, with Scout emphasizing speed and Maverick targeting superior multimodal performance. Performance evaluations indicate Llama 4 Maverick outperforms models like OpenAI's GPT-4o and Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash in multimodal benchmarks, particularly in vision-language tasks, due to its sparse architecture that activates only a subset of parameters per inference. Independent assessments confirm efficiency gains, with lower inference costs compared to dense counterparts of similar capability, though real-world scaling depends on expert routing quality. Meta's announcements, including those from CEO , highlighted these models' role in advancing open-source , with over 650 million prior Llama downloads underscoring ecosystem adoption. Subsequent developments include delays to larger variants, such as the anticipated , originally slated for summer but postponed to fall 2025 or beyond amid training challenges. A planned iteration targets year-end 2025 release, focusing on enhanced reasoning capabilities. These models retain Meta's permissive licensing for research and commercial use, excluding military applications, while incorporating safeguards like for . As of 2025, 4's open weights have facilitated rapid community , though Meta's internal benchmarks—potentially optimistic—require external validation for claims of frontier-level parity.

Technical Specifications

Core Architecture

The Llama family of language models employs a -only architecture optimized for autoregressive generation, processing input sequences to predict subsequent tokens without an encoder component. This design facilitates efficient next-token prediction, stacking multiple identical decoder layers, each comprising a self-attention mechanism followed by a feed-forward network. Linear projections within these layers omit terms to reduce parameters and enhance training stability, while embeddings for input tokens and output logits are often tied to share learned representations. Layer normalization uses RMSNorm applied before both the and feed-forward sublayers, promoting stable gradients during training compared to alternatives like LayerNorm. Feed-forward networks adopt the SwiGLU activation, which applies a gated linear unit mechanism—splitting the projection into two parts, one passed through Swish and the other through a —to improve expressivity over standard ReLU or GELU while maintaining computational efficiency. Positional information is encoded via Rotary Positional Embeddings (), rotating query and key vectors in the mechanism to inject relative positional dependencies without absolute encodings, enabling extrapolation to longer contexts beyond training lengths.
![RoPE with \theta = 500{,}000][center]
RoPE configurations vary by version, with Llama 3 extending the base frequency to support up to 128,000 tokens.
Self- evolves across versions for scalability: early Llama 1 and smaller Llama 2 models (7B and 13B) use multi-head , whereas larger Llama 2 variants (30B and 70B) introduce grouped-query (GQA), partitioning query heads into groups that share fewer key-value heads to balance expressivity and speed by minimizing memory for key-value caches. Llama 3 standardizes GQA across all sizes, including 8B, further optimizing for deployment on resource-constrained hardware. Llama 4 introduces interleaved layers that dispense with positional embeddings entirely, relying on alternative mechanisms for sequence ordering to accommodate native and extended contexts. These choices prioritize efficiency and long-context handling, with model dimensions scaling from 7 billion to 405 billion parameters in pretrained variants.

Training Processes

The pre-training phase for models employs a self-supervised next-token prediction objective on massive text corpora, utilizing a decoder-only architecture with optimizations such as grouped-query attention and rotary positional embeddings to enhance efficiency and long-context handling. conducts this distributed training on proprietary GPU clusters, leveraging frameworks like with custom optimizations for mixed-precision arithmetic (e.g., FP16 or BF16) and techniques like sharding to maximize utilization, often exceeding 50% model utilization in later iterations. schedules typically follow a cosine decay or linear warmup followed by annealing, with peak rates around 3-6 × 10^{-4} scaled inversely with model size. For the initial Llama 1 models (2023), pre-training occurred on approximately 1.4 trillion tokens sourced primarily from public web crawls, with compute estimated at around 5 × 10^{23} FLOPs for the 65B variant, though exact figures were not publicly detailed by Meta. Llama 2 (2023) scaled to 2 trillion tokens across its 7B, 13B, and 70B variants, utilizing ~8.26 × 10^{23} FLOPs for the largest model—1.5 times the compute of Llama 1 equivalents—while incorporating longer context training up to 4,096 tokens and rejection sampling for improved stability. Llama 3 models (2024) expanded pre-training to over 15 for the 8B and 70B sizes, a sevenfold increase over Llama 2, with rigorous pipelines including filtering for quality, deduplication, and to prioritize diverse, high-value sources like academic texts and . This phase emphasized extended lengths up to 8,192 during , followed by progressive extension techniques. The 405B Llama 3.1 variant maintained similar token scale but incorporated 128,000-token , with final-stage linear annealing of the over the last 40 million to stabilize . Compute for Llama 3 70B reached approximately 6.3 × 10^{24} , derived from standard scaling laws (6 × parameters × ). Llama 4 (2025) introduced multimodal pre-training with early fusion of text, , and video tokens into a unified token stream, trained on over 30 trillion using a mixture-of-experts () architecture for computational efficiency during sparse activation. A custom MetaP technique automated hyperparameter tuning, such as layer norms and expert routing, to mitigate instability in large-scale runs on clusters exceeding 100,000 H100-equivalent GPUs. Post-fusion alignment training integrated separate vision encoders with the backbone, emphasizing across modalities.

Datasets and Data Curation

The Llama family of models relies on massive pretraining datasets drawn exclusively from publicly available sources to ensure ethical data usage and , avoiding any proprietary Meta user data such as private or posts. This curation strategy prioritizes high-quality, diverse text to enhance model generalization while mitigating risks like or amplification from unfiltered web scrapes. The original LLaMA models (2023) were pretrained on around 1.4 trillion tokens, processed through filtering pipelines that included deduplication and quality scoring to remove low-value content, drawing from web crawls like , academic repositories, and open code sources. Llama 2 (2023) expanded this to 2 trillion tokens of public data, incorporating longer context handling and refined filtering to improve efficiency over its predecessor, though specific composition details remain proprietary to protect against scraping incentives. These steps involved heuristic-based removal of duplicates and heuristics for , emphasizing without compromising openness. Llama 3 (2024) and its variants scaled dramatically to over 15 trillion tokens—seven times larger than Llama 2—sourced from public data with enhanced multilingual coverage (over 5% non-English across 30+ languages) and four times more code data for technical proficiency. Curation employed advanced pipelines: and NSFW filters to excise harmful content, semantic deduplication to eliminate redundancies, and classifiers trained on prior Llama outputs to score text quality, with data mix optimized via experiments for domains like , , , and . This multi-stage process, informed by scaling laws, aimed to balance volume with precision, reducing noise that could degrade or factual recall in downstream tasks. Subsequent iterations, including Llama 3.1 (2024), maintained the ~15 trillion token scale while refining post-training filters for safety and alignment, underscoring a commitment to iterative quality over sheer quantity. Overall, Meta's approach contrasts with closed models by forgoing internal data hoards, potentially introducing web-scale biases from sources like uncurated crawls, but enabling verifiable reproducibility through public sourcing.

Fine-Tuning Methods

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) forms the initial stage of adapting base Llama models for instruction-following, involving training on datasets comprising prompt-response pairs generated from public sources, , and human annotations. For Llama 2, this included filtering and ranking outputs from the base model using a quality model, followed by training on approximately 27,000 high-quality, human-annotated conversations, supplemented by to promote output diversity. Llama 3 extended this with over 10 million human preference annotations, incorporating techniques like for efficient long-context handling during post-training. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) refines SFT outputs by aligning them with human preferences, using a reward model trained on ranked response pairs to optimize the policy via (). In Llama 2, the reward model drew from 1 million human preference labels across categories like helpfulness and safety, enabling iterative improvements in coherence and reduced hallucinations. Llama 3's RLHF incorporated iterative human feedback loops and direct preference optimization variants to enhance robustness, with safety-specific RLHF targeting jailbreak vulnerabilities through adversarial red-teaming datasets exceeding 1 million examples. Additional alignment techniques include (RFT), where multiple base model completions are generated per prompt, ranked by a reward model, and the highest-scoring retained to expand the SFT dataset without further sampling during training. This method, applied in Llama 2, yielded gains in benchmarks like Helpful and Harmless evaluations, with the 70B chat variant outperforming comparably sized closed models. For safety, Meta integrates system-level mitigations alongside , such as content filters, though critiques note that RLHF's reliance on crowd-sourced preferences can embed subjective biases from annotator demographics, potentially limiting generalizability. Community adaptations of Llama models frequently employ parameter-efficient (PEFT) methods like low-rank adaptation (), which updates only a small of parameters via low-rank matrices, reducing needs by up to 90% compared to full . Tools such as Hugging Face's PEFT library facilitate on Llama variants for domain-specific tasks, with quantized variants (QLoRA) enabling single-GPU training on consumer hardware. While effective for resource-constrained settings, PEFT may underperform full on complex alignments, as evidenced by drops in adherence when is insufficiently high.

Performance Evaluation

Benchmark Results Across Versions

Successive iterations of the Llama family have demonstrated progressive gains in benchmark performance, particularly on evaluations of , reasoning, , and , driven by increases in model parameters, refined training objectives, and expanded datasets. Early versions like Llama 2 established competitive baselines against closed-source models of similar scale, while later releases such as Llama 3.1 and Llama 4 approached or exceeded frontier capabilities in select domains. These results are primarily self-reported by in accompanying technical reports and blog announcements, with independent verifications available via open weights on platforms like , though benchmark saturation and potential to evaluation sets remain concerns in the field. Key quantitative improvements are evident in standard academic benchmarks. For instance, on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) test, which assesses zero- or few-shot performance across 57 subjects, Llama 2's 70B parameter model achieved 68.9% accuracy, trailing 's 70.0% but surpassing it in efficiency per parameter. Llama 3's 70B variant advanced to 82.0% on MMLU (5-shot), outperforming Mistral 7B and approaching levels at lower inference costs. The Llama 3.1 405B model further improved to 88.6% on MMLU, rivaling 's 88.7% while leading in multilingual subsets.
Model VersionParametersMMLU (%)HumanEval (%)GSM8K (%)
Llama 270B68.929.956.8
Llama 370B82.062.379.6
Llama 3.1405B88.689.096.8
Note: Scores reflect instruction-tuned variants where applicable; MMLU is 5-shot, HumanEval pass@1, GSM8K 8-shot. Data from evaluations. Llama 4 variants continued this trajectory, with the Behemoth model (288B active parameters) reporting approximately 95% on MMLU and superior results on harder variants like MMLU-Pro (around 81% for mid-sized siblings), alongside outperformance on STEM-focused tests such as GPQA Diamond and MATH-500 compared to GPT-4.5 and Claude 3.5 . Smaller Llama 4 models like (17B active, 128 experts) exceeded GPT-4o on HumanEval and MATH, achieving Elo scores above 1400 on LMSYS Arena, a crowd-sourced preference benchmark. These gains highlight scaling benefits but also underscore limitations, as Llama models historically lag in areas like long-context retrieval and multimodal reasoning relative to proprietary counterparts, per third-party analyses.

Comparative Analysis with Competitors

Llama models, particularly the Llama 3.1 405B variant released in July 2024, demonstrated competitive performance against closed-source counterparts on standardized benchmarks such as MMLU (87.3% accuracy, surpassing GPT-4 Turbo's 86.5% and Claude 3 Opus's 86.8%) and GPQA (diamond subset, 51.1% vs. GPT-4o's 48.0%). However, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, launched in June 2024, frequently outperformed Llama 3.1 across coding tasks (e.g., HumanEval: 92% vs. Llama's 89%) and reasoning benchmarks like GPQA (59.4% vs. Llama's 51.1%), attributed to Anthropic's emphasis on safety-aligned post-training optimizations. Gemini 1.5 Pro excelled in long-context retrieval (e.g., 71.9% on vision benchmarks vs. Llama's lower scores), leveraging Google's vast multimodal data, while GPT-4o maintained edges in speed and latency for real-time applications (2x faster inference than predecessors).
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BGPT-4oClaude 3.5 SonnetGemini 1.5 Pro
MMLU87.3%88.7%88.7%85.9%
HumanEval89%90.2%92%84.1%
GPQA51.1%48.0%59.4%53.9%
Data compiled from independent evaluations; discrepancies arise from evaluation methodologies, with closed models benefiting from proprietary fine-tuning not replicable in open-weight releases. The April 2025 of 4 introduced like (outperforming GPT-4.5 and Claude 3.7 on tasks such as MATH: 92% accuracy) and , which claimed superiority in document understanding (94.4% on DocVQA). Yet, independent tests revealed underperformance in coding-centric benchmarks compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet (e.g., LiveCodeBench: Llama 4 at 78% vs. Claude's 85%), alongside allegations of benchmark manipulation inflating Meta's reported scores on arenas like LM Arena. 4's open-weight architecture enabled broader for specialized tasks, contrasting with closed models' dependencies, but incurred higher costs for large-scale deployments (e.g., 405B+ parameters requiring 800+ VRAM). Against open-source rivals, 4 Maverick surpassed Large 2 in efficiency (lower for equivalent reasoning) and multilingual capabilities (e.g., 85% on XGLUE vs. Mistral's 82%), while trailing xAI's Grok-3 in real-time social data integration due to Grok's training on X platform content. 's permissive licensing facilitated adaptations, yielding derivatives outperforming base Mistral in niche domains like , though Grok's causal focus on truth-seeking reduced rates in empirical queries (e.g., 15% lower error in vs. Llama 3.1). Overall, 's empirical edge lies in scalable openness, enabling via custom alignments, but closed competitors retain advantages in polished, resource-intensive evaluations where data curation minimizes biases inherent in public datasets.

Empirical Strengths and Weaknesses

Llama models demonstrate empirical strengths in reasoning and instruction-following tasks, with Llama 3 achieving scores of 68.4% on MMLU and 86.0% on HumanEval, surpassing prior open-source counterparts like Llama 2 in multilingual and benchmarks. Llama 3.1 further extends this with a 128,000-token context window, enabling superior handling of long-form synthesis, where it outperforms GPT-3.5 and approaches in generation for chain-of-thought prompting. In domain-specific evaluations, such as report generation using the ACR 2022 , Llama 3 matches proprietary models like in accuracy while offering open accessibility. Multimodal capabilities in Llama 4 variants, including and , yield competitive results in image reasoning, with scoring an Elo of 1417 on LMSYS Arena for chat performance and excelling in efficiency metrics like tokens per second per dollar. These models leverage native training to integrate vision-language tasks effectively, outperforming and 3.1 in benchmarks. Quantized versions of Llama 3 maintain robustness, retaining over 90% of full-precision performance in low-bit settings for inference efficiency on resource-constrained hardware. Despite these advances, Llama models exhibit weaknesses in specialized coding tasks; Llama 4 ranks last in accuracy (69.5%) on coding-centric benchmarks, trailing DeepSeek v3.1 by 6% and Claude 3.5 by 18%, due to insufficient emphasis on programming paradigms. Long-context retrieval remains inconsistent, with Llama 4 struggling on complex needle-in-haystack tests beyond 100,000 tokens, despite advertised windows exceeding 1 million, as independent evaluations reveal degradation in factual recall. Ethical reasoning benchmarks highlight persistent gaps, where Llama 3.1 scores lower than proprietary models in moral dilemma resolution, reflecting training data imbalances toward neutral rather than causally grounded ethical frameworks. Early Llama 4 benchmarks have faced scrutiny for potential overstatement, with discrepancies between reported and verified scores on enterprise-relevant tasks like multi-hop reasoning.

Licensing Framework

Core License Terms

The Meta Llama models are distributed under the Meta Llama Community License Agreement, a proprietary that grants recipients a non-exclusive, worldwide, non-transferable, and right to use, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works of, and modify the "Llama Materials," which encompass the model's weights, and inference-enabling , , and associated . This framework applies across versions from 2 onward, with minor adjustments such as user threshold refinements, but maintains core permissive elements for non-commercial and most commercial applications while imposing safeguards against misuse. A key restriction integrates the by reference, barring applications that violate laws or rights, promote harm (e.g., weapons development, child exploitation, or incitement to violence), engage in (e.g., , , or impersonation), or undermine ; users must also disclose AI-generated outputs where risks exist and report violations. Additional prohibitions include leveraging outputs to enhance non-derivative large models belonging to third parties, alongside requirements to preserve and attribution notices in all distributions. Commercial deployment is authorized without upfront fees, yet triggers a mandatory request for a separate from if the powered product or service surpasses 700 million monthly active users in any calendar month—a calibrated to exempt smaller entities while enabling oversight for hyperscale operations. The agreement disclaims all warranties, limits 's to the fullest extent permitted , and allows unilateral termination for breaches, after which licensees must destroy all Llama Materials; sections on disclaimers, , and governing law (typically or jurisdiction) persist post-termination. This structure, while facilitating widespread adoption for research and innovation, deviates from standard open-source definitions due to the commercial scale limitations, use-field constraints, and absence of unconditional sublicensing freedoms, as critiqued by bodies like the .

Restrictions and Evolving Policies

The initial release of Llama 1 in February 2023 imposed strict restrictions, limiting access to approved and explicitly prohibiting commercial use, with model weights available only upon request to for non-commercial, purposes. This controlled-access approach aimed to mitigate risks from misuse while enabling , but it drew for not aligning with open-source principles due to the absence of broad redistribution and usage limits. With 2 in July 2023, relaxed these constraints under a custom community permitting commercial applications, provided monthly active users did not exceed 700 million without prior written approval from ; exceeding this threshold required negotiating a separate . An accompanying (AUP), effective from the 2 launch, banned uses violating laws, promoting or , child exploitation, , based on protected attributes, or generating malicious code, with reserving rights to enforce compliance through reporting mechanisms. The policy emphasized safety but was critiqued for its subjective enforcement potential and failure to meet the Initiative's definition, as it imposed field-of-use restrictions. Llama 3, released in April 2024, retained the commercial user cap and AUP while adding a on using model outputs or derivatives to train competing large language models, aiming to protect Meta's investments amid competitive pressures. This clause sparked debates on stifling, as it limited downstream for rival systems. In July 2024, Llama 3.1 revised this by permitting output usage for training other models, broadening accessibility while maintaining core commercial and safety guardrails. The AUP evolved minimally across versions, consistently prohibiting high-risk activities, though enforcement relied on user self-reporting and Meta's discretion. Subsequent policies reflected geopolitical adaptations; by November 2024, Meta amended terms to explicitly allow U.S. government and defense entities to deploy models for national security applications, reversing earlier implicit restrictions on military uses to align with strategic priorities. For 4 in April 2025, Meta introduced region-specific hardcoded bans, prohibiting deployment by -based entities to navigate anticipated regulatory hurdles under the AI Act, though this was framed as precautionary rather than a blanket prohibition on European research. These evolutions underscore a shift from research-centric gating to conditional openness, balancing dissemination with risk controls, commercial safeguards, and jurisdictional compliance, while the licenses continue to require derivative works to adhere to similar terms, limiting full permissiveness.

Debates on Openness

The release of model weights by has sparked ongoing debates about the nature of openness in large language models, centering on whether these releases qualify as genuine open-source contributions or merely "open weights" with strategic encumbrances. positions as advancing open AI by publicly sharing trained parameters, code, and inference tools, enabling widespread experimentation and fine-tuning by researchers and developers. However, the custom licenses attached to these releases—such as those for 2, 3, and 4—include clauses that limit redistribution, prohibit using outputs to train rival models, and restrict commercial serving to entities with fewer than 700 million monthly active users, thereby excluding major competitors like or hyperscalers from unrestricted deployment. The (OSI) has explicitly rejected Meta's licenses as , citing violations of the Open Source Definition's requirements for non-discriminatory use and distribution freedoms, including field-of-endeavor restrictions that bar certain commercial or military applications. Proponents of Meta's approach, including Chief Scientist Yann , argue that absolute openness would cede competitive advantages to closed-model developers like , potentially hindering broader progress; instead, Llama's model balances accessibility for non-commercial and small-scale use with safeguards against free-riding on Meta's substantial compute investments, which exceeded billions in training costs per version. LeCun has emphasized that this "open-ish" framework accelerates collective innovation, as evidenced by community-derived fine-tunes outperforming proprietary baselines in niche tasks, while mitigating risks like unchecked proliferation of harmful derivatives. Critics from the community counter that these restrictions erode trust and mislead users by co-opting the "open source" label, fostering dependency on Meta's rather than enabling forkable, permissionless evolution as seen in software like . Empirical analyses show open-weight models like lag closed frontiers by 5-22 months in capability but drive growth through derivatives, yet opacity—omitting full details or datasets—limits and scrutiny, potentially concealing biases or inefficiencies. In 2025, 4's multimodal extensions reignited contention, with some hailing expanded context lengths as democratizing advanced , while others decry persistent controls as prioritizing Meta's market position over unfettered access, influencing policy discussions on . This tension underscores a causal divide: partial empirically boosts short-term adoption but may constrain long-term compared to permissive alternatives like those from Mistral .

Deployments and Uses

Open-Source Implementations

llama.cpp, an open-source C/C++ library developed by Georgi Gerganov, enables efficient of Llama models on diverse hardware, including CPUs and GPUs, through techniques like quantization and the GGUF model format. Released on March 10, 2023, it supports Llama versions up to Llama 4, prioritizing minimal setup and state-of-the-art performance for local deployment without requiring high-end resources. The project has facilitated widespread experimentation by allowing on consumer devices, such as running quantized 7B-parameter Llama models at speeds exceeding 50 tokens per second on modern CPUs. Ollama provides a user-friendly platform for downloading, quantizing, and running models locally via simple command-line interfaces, supporting models like 3.1 (up to 405B parameters), 3.2 with capabilities, and 4 variants including multimodal and . As of April 2025, Ollama integrated 4 support, enabling seamless tool calling and multilingual inference across languages such as English, , , , and . It emphasizes privacy-preserving execution on personal hardware, with optimizations for over 100 models, making it a preferred choice for developers avoiding dependencies. Meta's official inference codebase, hosted on , offers Python-based tools for running Llama models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters, including scripts for and evaluation under the Llama terms. Community adaptations, such as integrations with Transformers, extend these to broader ecosystems for tasks like distributed serving via libraries including vLLM, though Meta's releases impose restrictions on commercial redistribution of modified weights. These implementations have democratized access to Llama's capabilities, with llama.cpp and Ollama amassing millions of downloads and forks by 2025, fostering innovations in edge AI while navigating license constraints that limit full model redistribution.

Enterprise and Commercial Applications

Llama models have seen extensive adoption in enterprise environments due to their permissive licensing allowing commercial use, enabling organizations to fine-tune and deploy them for proprietary applications. By December 2024, Llama and its derivatives had exceeded 650 million downloads, reflecting rapid integration into business workflows across sectors including finance, telecommunications, and technology services. Companies such as , , DoorDash, Niantic, , , , and have incorporated Llama for functions like customer support, sales assistance, and internal productivity tools, leveraging its open-source nature to customize models without . In finance, institutions like and Nomura have deployed Llama-based systems for and , capitalizing on the models' efficiency in processing large datasets compared to closed alternatives. Telecommunications firms such as utilize Llama for network optimization and customer query resolution, where fine-tuned variants handle interactions at scale. Food delivery platforms like apply Llama in and recommendation engines, enhancing operational efficiency through generation for training. These deployments often involve on-premises or setups to address data privacy concerns, with Llama 3.1's 405B parameter variant proving suitable for high-stakes tasks due to its capabilities. Infrastructure providers facilitate broader enterprise access, with Llama available via platforms like Amazon Bedrock, , , and Nvidia's ecosystem, where usage doubled between May and July 2024. Meta's partnerships, including with Scale AI for evaluation and deployment tools, support customization of Llama 3.1 for specific use cases like knowledge search and . The Llama Stack framework, introduced in 2024, streamlines integration across hardware from to , promoting cross-platform compatibility for enterprises seeking to build AI agents for sales and support. By January 2025, organizations like and Nanome reported cost-effective innovations in content generation and molecular design using fine-tuned Llama models. Commercial applications extend to sectors like and healthcare, where powers research assistants and diagnostic aids, though deployments emphasize compliance with Meta's to mitigate risks such as in critical decisions. Over 25 hosting partners, including Groq and , enable scalable inference, positioning as a cost-competitive alternative for businesses avoiding proprietary dependencies. This ecosystem has spurred economic activity, with Meta attributing innovation in tools like WriteSea's writing aids to Llama's accessibility.

Government and Military Adaptations

In September 2025, the U.S. (GSA) approved Meta's models for deployment across federal agencies via the OneGov platform, facilitating streamlined access while ensuring compliance with government data security and legal requirements. This initiative emphasizes the models' open-source architecture, which permits agencies to maintain over and storage, thereby mitigating risks associated with systems. Adoption has focused on applications such as to reduce operational costs and enhance delivery. In November 2024, expanded access by explicitly permitting U.S. agencies and contractors to utilize Llama for applications involving and , marking a shift from earlier terms that prohibited use. This policy aligns with broader efforts to leverage open-source for U.S. strategic advantages in global competition. Military adaptations include Scale AI's release of Defense Llama on November 5, 2024, a fine-tuned derivative of 3 optimized for tasks such as analysis and data synthesis, developed in collaboration with defense experts. Concurrently, Lockheed partnered with to integrate Llama-based large language models into workflows, targeting enhanced in defense scenarios. Internationally, Chinese researchers adapted derivatives for purposes, including and decision support, as detailed in a November 2024 Reuters report on unauthorized for applications like "intelligence policing." Such modifications highlight the dual-use potential of open-source models, though they occur outside Meta's endorsed frameworks.

Reception and Controversies

Technical and Industry Praise

Llama models have been lauded for achieving competitive or superior performance on standardized benchmarks compared to counterparts. The 3.1 405B variant, released in July 2024, demonstrated state-of-the-art results across evaluations including reasoning, multilingual capabilities, long-context handling, and mathematics, often surpassing and establishing a new benchmark for open models. Independent assessments confirmed improvements such as 15% higher accuracy in math tasks and 12% better reasoning over prior iterations for the 70B model. Similarly, 3.1 scored 86 on the MMLU benchmark, reflecting broad knowledge gains. Subsequent releases like 4, announced in 2025, extended this trajectory with model outperforming GPT-4.5, Claude 3.7, and 2.0 Pro on multiple benchmarks, while the variant excelled as the top model in its 17 billion active parameter class, surpassing GPT-4o and 2.0 Flash. These advancements from architectural innovations, including longer context windows up to 128,000 tokens and enhanced efficiency in mixture-of-experts designs. Industry figures, including Meta CEO , have highlighted 's role in democratizing advanced AI, positioning it as a contender for the most capable open model and emphasizing its potential to accelerate innovation through accessibility. Experts note the models' cost advantages for deployment, with 4 variants being significantly cheaper to operate than closed-source options like GPT-4o, facilitating adoption in customized applications. This efficiency, combined with high parameter counts—such as 405 billion in 3.1—has drawn enthusiasm from developers and researchers for enabling scalable, modifiable AI without .

Criticisms of Capabilities and Hype

Critics have argued that Meta's promotional claims for Llama models, particularly Llama 4 released in April 2025, overstated their practical capabilities relative to proprietary competitors like those from and . Independent developer testing revealed underwhelming performance in real-world tasks such as and reasoning, despite Meta's assertions of "best-in-class" benchmarks, leading to perceptions of hype exceeding delivery. A key point of contention was Meta's practices, with developers noting that the versions used for public evaluations—such as those scoring high on LMSYS —differed from the released models, prompting accusations of manipulation to inflate perceived superiority. For instance, 4 Maverick, touted for its performance-to-cost ratio, underperformed in individual assessments on coding benchmarks like HumanEval, where it lagged behind models like GPT-4o by significant margins. This discrepancy fueled skepticism about the models' ability to close the gap with closed-source systems in agentic or production environments. Earlier iterations faced similar critiques; Llama 3, launched in April 2024, exhibited limitations in mathematical reasoning and tasks compared to contemporaries, with error rates in benchmarks exceeding 20% higher than in some evaluations, undermining claims of frontier-level competence. Even Llama 3.1's expanded 405 billion parameter variant, while improving multilingual support, struggled with long-context retention and advanced inference, requiring substantial for reliability—efforts that diminished the "out-of-the-box" accessibility Meta emphasized. These shortcomings highlight a broader pattern where scaling parameters and context windows (e.g., up to 128,000 tokens) did not yield proportional gains in emergent abilities, echoing concerns that open-weight models prioritize accessibility over raw capability depth. The hype surrounding Llama's open-source ethos has also drawn scrutiny for masking inherent trade-offs, as resource constraints in and compute efficiency—Meta's reliance on augmentation—resulted in brittleness under adversarial prompting or edge cases, per analyses from evaluation firms. Investors and analysts noted that Llama 4's shortfalls, including subpar scores on MMLU-Pro (around 5-10% below leaders), eroded in Meta's roadmap, suggesting that announcements serve more as competitive signaling than indicators of transformative progress.

Broader Implications and Debates

The release of models has significantly accelerated innovation by enabling widespread customization and deployment, with over 650 million downloads of and its derivatives reported by 2024, fostering a vibrant of fine-tuned variants and applications across industries. This accessibility has reduced dependency on proprietary systems from companies like and , narrowing performance gaps between open and closed models, as evidenced by Llama 3.1's competitive benchmarks against leading proprietary LLMs in tasks like reasoning and coding. By providing high-capability base models under permissive licenses, has empowered smaller developers, startups, and researchers to iterate rapidly, contributing to efficiency gains and novel applications without the barriers of closed APIs. Debates center on the extent of Llama's "openness," with Meta positioning it as a driver of industry-standard open-source AI, yet critics contend that licensing restrictions—such as prohibitions on using outputs to train rival models and earlier commercial use limits—deviate from the Initiative's definition, effectively creating a "open-weight" rather than fully open paradigm. Proponents, including Meta's , argue this controlled openness catalyzes progress and counters closed systems' monopolistic tendencies, while detractors view it as strategic benefiting Meta's dominance. These tensions highlight causal trade-offs: partial openness spurs short-term but may hinder long-term and if restrictions evolve toward , as speculated for 2025 with potential paid tiers. Safety and alignment pose another flashpoint, as Llama's release of frontier-level capabilities without exhaustive safeguards risks enabling harmful fine-tunes; studies show that low-resource adaptations, such as LoRA fine-tuning on Llama 2, can efficiently erode built-in safety mechanisms, increasing vulnerability to jailbreaks and misuse for generating toxic content. Meta's emphasis on community-driven improvements via openness contrasts with concerns that unaligned derivatives amplify existential risks, though empirical evidence suggests open models facilitate collective scrutiny and iterative hardening absent in black-box alternatives. Geopolitically, Llama bolsters U.S. leadership by extending access to allied governments and contractors, countering closed authoritarian models, yet this raises questions about dual-use proliferation in contested domains.

References

  1. [1]
    Introducing LLaMA: A foundational, 65-billion-parameter language ...
    Feb 24, 2023 · We are publicly releasing LLaMA (Large Language Model Meta AI), a state-of-the-art foundational large language model designed to help researchers advance their ...
  2. [2]
    Introducing Meta Llama 3: The most capable openly available LLM ...
    Apr 18, 2024 · This release features pretrained and instruction-fine-tuned language models with 8B and 70B parameters that can support a broad range of use cases.
  3. [3]
    Introducing Llama 3.1: Our most capable models to date - AI at Meta
    Jul 23, 2024 · We're publicly releasing Meta Llama 3.1 405B, which we believe is the world's largest and most capable openly available foundation model.
  4. [4]
    Llama 3.2: Revolutionizing edge AI and vision with open ... - AI at Meta
    Sep 25, 2024 · We're releasing Llama 3.2, which includes small and medium-sized vision LLMs (11B and 90B) and lightweight, text-only models (1B and 3B) that fit onto select ...
  5. [5]
    The Llama 4 herd: The beginning of a new era of natively ...
    Apr 5, 2025 · We're introducing Llama 4 Scout and Llama 4 Maverick, the first open-weight natively multimodal models with unprecedented context length support.
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Meta's new Llama 4 AI models aren't open source - forkable
    Apr 11, 2025 · Meta likely knows that its Llama models can't really be called open source, which it tacitly acknowledges by calling Llama 4 “open weight” in its official ...
  8. [8]
    The Llama 3 Herd of Models | Research - AI at Meta
    Jul 23, 2024 · This paper presents a new set of foundation models, called Llama 3. It is a herd of language models that natively support multilinguality, coding, reasoning, ...The Llama 3 Herd Of Models · Abstract · Related Publications
  9. [9]
    With 10x growth since 2023, Llama is the leading engine ... - AI at Meta
    Aug 29, 2024 · It's been just over a month since we released Llama 3.1, expanding context length to 128K, adding support across eight languages, and ...With 10x Growth Since 2023... · The Leading Open Source... · A Snapshot Of Llama Case...
  10. [10]
    The Hidden Traps in Meta's Llama License - Open Source Guy
    Jan 27, 2025 · I have often stated, in various forums, that “Llama is not Open Source; in fact, it's a hazardous license,” but many people—apparently seeing me ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  11. [11]
    Mark Zuckerberg announces Meta LLaMA large language model
    Feb 24, 2023 · Mark Zuckerberg announces Meta's new large language model as A.I. race heats up. Published Fri, Feb 24 2023 ... Meta's release of its new model ...
  12. [12]
    How Meta's LLaMA NLP Model Leaked - DeepLearning.AI
    Mar 15, 2023 · Meta offered LLaMA to researchers, but a 4chan user posted a BitTorrent link a week later, leaking the model.Missing: 1 | Show results with:1
  13. [13]
    Powerful Meta large language model widely available online
    Mar 6, 2023 · On Friday, a link to download LLaMA was posted to 4chan and quickly proliferated across the internet. By Elias Groll. March 6, 2023.
  14. [14]
    Meta's LLaMA Leaked to the Public, Thanks To 4chan | AIM
    Mar 6, 2023 · LLaMA, Meta's latest family of large language models, has been leaked along with its weights and is now available to download through torrents.<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Meta's powerful AI language model has leaked online - The Verge
    Mar 8, 2023 · Meta's LLaMA model was created to help researchers but leaked on 4chan a week after it was announced. Some worry the technology will be used for harm.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 06.06.2023.Meta.LLaMA Model Leak Letter
    Jun 6, 2023 · The letter expresses concern over the LLaMA leak, potential misuse, and Meta's failure to assess risks, and the unrestrained release of the  ...
  17. [17]
    Llama 2: an incredible open LLM - by Nathan Lambert - Interconnects
    Jul 18, 2023 · What is the model: Meta is releasing multiple models (Llama base from 7, 13, 34, 70 billion and a Llama chat variant with the same sizes.) Meta ...
  18. [18]
    Llama 2 - Hugging Face
    Jul 18, 2023 · Llama 2 is a family of large language models, including Llama 2 and Llama 2-Chat, available in 7B, 13B, and 70B parameters.LlamaConfig · LlamaTokenizer · LlamaTokenizerFast · LlamaModel
  19. [19]
    meta-llama/Llama-2-7b - Hugging Face
    Llama 2 is a collection of pretrained and fine-tuned generative text models ranging in scale from 7 billion to 70 billion parameters.
  20. [20]
    meta-llama/Llama-2-70b - Hugging Face
    Llama 2 family of models. Token counts refer to pretraining data only. All models are trained with a global batch-size of 4M tokens. Bigger models - 70B -- use ...
  21. [21]
    Meta Llama 2
    Llama 1 released 7, 13, 33 and 65 billion parameters while Llama 2 has7, 13 and 70 billion parameters · Llama 2 was trained on 40% more data · Llama2 has double ...
  22. [22]
    What Is Llama 2? | IBM
    Llama 2 is a family of pre-trained and fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) released by Meta AI in 2023. Released free of charge for research and commercial ...
  23. [23]
    LLaMA-2 from the Ground Up - by Cameron R. Wolfe, Ph.D.
    Aug 14, 2023 · LLaMA-2 models differentiate themselves by pre-training over more data, using a longer context length, and adopting an architecture that is optimized for ...
  24. [24]
    Llama vs Llama 2. Comparison, Differences, Features | Apps4Rent
    Jul 27, 2023 · Performance on External Benchmarks: Llama 2 has outperformed Llama on reasoning, coding, proficiency, and knowledge tests, demonstrating its ...
  25. [25]
    Meta's LLaMa license is not Open Source
    Jul 20, 2023 · The license for the Llama LLM is very plainly not an “Open Source” license. Meta is making some aspect of its large language model available to ...
  26. [26]
    Llama and ChatGPT Are Not Open-Source - IEEE Spectrum
    Jul 27, 2023 · However, compared to other open-source LLMs and open-source software packages more generally, Llama 2 is considerably closed off. Though Meta ...
  27. [27]
    Meta announces Llama 2; "open sources" it for commercial use
    Jul 18, 2023 · Llama 2 is not open source.​​ While their custom licence permits some commercial uses, it is not an OSI approved license, and because it violates ...
  28. [28]
    The Llama Ecosystem: Past, Present, and Future - AI at Meta
    Sep 27, 2023 · It's been roughly seven months since we released Llama 1 and only a few months since Llama 2 was introduced, followed by the release of Code ...
  29. [29]
    [2407.21783] The Llama 3 Herd of Models - arXiv
    This paper presents a new set of foundation models, called Llama 3. It is a herd of language models that natively support multilinguality, coding, reasoning, ...
  30. [30]
    Expanding our open source large language models responsibly
    Jul 23, 2024 · We're bringing open intelligence to all by introducing the Llama 3.1 collection of models, which expand context length to 128K, add support ...Expanding Our Open Source... · Takeaways · System Safety: New Resources...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B - Hugging Face
    Apr 18, 2024 · Meta Llama 3 Version Release Date: April 18, 2024 "Agreement" means ... "Documentation" means the specifications, manuals and documentation ...
  32. [32]
    Meta's Llama 4 is now available on Workers AI - The Cloudflare Blog
    Apr 6, 2025 · The Llama 4 “herd” is made up of two models: Llama 4 Scout (109B total parameters, 17B active parameters) with 16 experts, and Llama 4 Maverick ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Llama 4 is here | Mark Zuckerberg - Facebook
    Apr 5, 2025 · The first model is Llama four scout. It is extremely fast natively multi model. It has an industry leading nearly infinite 10 million token ...
  34. [34]
    Meta debuts new Llama 4 models, but most powerful AI model is still ...
    Apr 5, 2025 · Meta has not yet released the biggest and most powerful Llama 4 model, which outperforms other AI models in its class.
  35. [35]
    Unmatched Performance and Efficiency | Llama 4
    Meet Llama 4, the latest multimodal AI model offering cost efficiency, 10M context window and easy deployment. Start building advanced personalized ...
  36. [36]
    The future of AI: Built with Llama - AI at Meta
    Dec 19, 2024 · We started the year by introducing Llama 3, the next generation of our state-of-the-art open large language model. We followed that in July with ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    Meta is racing the clock to launch its newest Llama AI model this year
    Aug 28, 2025 · Meta plans to launch its latest AI model, called Llama 4.X, by year-end, two people familiar with the matter told Business Insider.
  39. [39]
    Everything we announced at our first-ever LlamaCon - AI at Meta
    Apr 29, 2025 · Today, we're releasing new Llama protection tools for the open source community, including Llama Guard 4, LlamaFirewall, and Llama Prompt Guard ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Llama: Industry Leading, Open-Source AI
    Discover Llama 4's class-leading AI models, Scout and Maverick. Experience top performance, multimodality, low costs, and unparalleled efficiency.Download Llama · Llama Impact Grants are Meta's · Llama API · Llama 4
  41. [41]
    Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models - arXiv
    Jul 18, 2023 · We develop and release Llama 2, a collection of pretrained and fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) ranging in scale from 7 billion to 70 billion parameters.
  42. [42]
    High-Performance Llama 2 Training and Inference with ... - PyTorch
    Nov 6, 2023 · We discuss the computation techniques and optimizations used to improve inference throughput and training model FLOPs utilization (MFU). For ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Llama 2 at KDD LLM - AMiner
    Llama 2 70B model uses total compute of. ~8.26e23 FLOPs, 1.5x more than Llama 1. • Models have not yet converged, showing more room for training further into “ ...
  44. [44]
    meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct - Hugging Face
    Llama 4 Version Effective Date: April 5, 2025 "Agreement" means the ... Training Factors: We used custom training libraries, Meta's custom built GPU clusters, and production infrastructure for pretraining.Files Files and versions xet · 30 models · 32 models · 6 modelsMissing: process | Show results with:process
  45. [45]
    LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
    ### Summary of Datasets and Data Processing from LLaMA Paper (arXiv:2302.13971)
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models - arXiv
    Jul 19, 2023 · We provide a detailed description of our approach to fine-tuning and safety improvements of Llama 2-Chat in order to enable the community to ...
  47. [47]
    meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct - Hugging Face
    Apr 18, 2024 · Meta Llama 3 means the foundational large language models and software and algorithms, including machine-learning model code, trained model weights, inference- ...
  48. [48]
    Meta AI - Error
    No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Meta Llama - Hugging Face
    We are launching two efficient models in the Llama 4 series, Llama 4 Scout, a 17 billion parameter model with 16 experts, and Llama 4 Maverick, a 17 billion ...
  50. [50]
    Llama 3.1 405B better than GPT-4, Cluade 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · On the MMLU benchmark testing undergraduate-level knowledge, Llama 3.1 405B scored 87.3%, outperforming GPT-4-Turbo (86.5%), Claude 3 Opus (86.8 ...
  51. [51]
    Which LLM is right for you? The answer is clear: it depends. - Proxet
    Jul 18, 2024 · Claude 3.5 Sonnet outscored GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Meta's Llama 3 400B in seven of nine overall benchmarks and four out of five vision benchmarks.
  52. [52]
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro & Llama3 - LinkedIn
    Jun 22, 2024 · Top-tier Performance: Outperforms competitor models and its predecessor, Claude 3 Opus, across various benchmarks. • ⚡ 2x Faster: Operates at ...
  53. [53]
    Claude vs. GPT-4.5 vs. Gemini: A Comprehensive Comparison
    Aug 5, 2024 · Claude 3.5 Sonnet emerged as the winner with 93.7%, followed by GPT-4o at 90.2% and Gemini 1.5 Pro weighing in at 71.9%.<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Best AI Models 2024: GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 vs Gemini - Arsturn
    Aug 10, 2025 · Which AI is truly the best? We compare GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, & Llama 3 to find the top LLM for coding, writing, ...
  55. [55]
    Evaluation: Llama 3.1 70B vs. Comparable Closed-Source Models
    Jul 24, 2024 · Our findings show that the Llama 3.1 70b model improves over the previous version with 15% better accuracy in math tasks, 12% regression for reasoning tasks.
  56. [56]
    ChatGPT 4O, Claude Sonnet 3.5, Gemini 1.5 Pro and LLama 3.1
    Aug 3, 2024 · Performance and Benchmarks. In terms of performance, Claude Sonnet 3.5 often surpasses both ChatGPT 4O and Gemini 1.5 Pro in benchmarks ...
  57. [57]
    Meta's Llama 4 Family: The Complete Guide to Scout, Maverick, and ...
    Apr 6, 2025 · Achieves 88.8% on ChartQA and 94.4% on DocVQA, demonstrating superior document understanding. Benchmark Comparison: Llama 4 Scout vs Competitors
  58. [58]
    Llama 4 underperforms: a benchmark against coding-centric models
    Jul 2, 2025 · Rootly AI Labs analyzes the performance of Meta's Llama 4 models and finds they underperform compared to competitors like Claude 3.5 Sonnet ...
  59. [59]
    Meta gets caught gaming AI benchmarks with Llama 4 - The Verge
    Apr 7, 2025 · With Llama 4, Meta fudged benchmarks to appear as though its new AI model is better than the competition.
  60. [60]
    Meta's vanilla Maverick AI model ranks below rivals on a popular ...
    Apr 11, 2025 · One of Meta's newest AI models, Llama 4 Maverick, ranks below rivals on a popular chat benchmark. Meta didn't originally reveal the score.
  61. [61]
    Top 9 Large Language Models as of October 2025 | Shakudo
    In terms of performance, Llama 4 Maverick and Scout have been reported to outperform competitors like GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash across various benchmarks, ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Top 10 LLMs Summer 2025 Edition - Azumo
    Sep 16, 2025 · Comprehensive comparison of the best LLMs in 2025. Compare Claude 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok 3, and Llama 4 performance benchmarks, pricing, ...
  63. [63]
    Best Open Source LLMs in 2025: Top Models for AI Innovation
    For companies with the infrastructure to support it, LLaMA 3.1 offers depth, performance, and compatibility with common open source tooling.
  64. [64]
    Grok AI vs. Competitors: Comprehensive Comparison with GPT-4 ...
    Commercial closed-source models generally offer stronger performance than open-source alternatives but with less deployment flexibility. Grok demonstrates ...
  65. [65]
    Meta Model Analysis: Llama 3 vs 3.1 - PromptLayer Blog
    Dec 5, 2024 · Strengths: While Llama 3 emphasizes accessibility and efficiency, Llama 3.1's standout feature is its enhanced reasoning and expanded context ...
  66. [66]
    Llama 3 Challenges Proprietary State-of-the-Art Large Language ...
    Aug 13, 2024 · This study compares the performance of Llama 3, other open-source LLMs, and leading proprietary models by using the American College of Radiology (ACR) 2022 in ...
  67. [67]
    How Good Are Low-bit Quantized LLaMA3 Models? An Empirical ...
    Apr 22, 2024 · In this empirical study, our aim is to analyze the capability of LLaMA3 to handle the challenges associated with degradation due to quantization.Missing: weaknesses | Show results with:weaknesses
  68. [68]
    Meta's Llama 4 models show promise on standard tests, but struggle ...
    Apr 12, 2025 · New independent evaluations reveal that Meta's latest Llama 4 models - Maverick and Scout - perform well in standard tests but struggle with complex long- ...
  69. [69]
    LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for ...
    Oct 5, 2025 · This study establishes a novel framework for systematically evaluating the moral reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) as ...Ai Evaluation Techniques... · Experimental Setup · Experimental Results And...
  70. [70]
    What misleading Meta Llama 4 benchmark scores show enterprise ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · The revelation that Meta misled users about the performance of its new Llama 4 model has raised red flags about the accuracy and relevancy of benchmarking.
  71. [71]
    Meta Llama 3 License
    Apr 18, 2024 · Meta Llama 3 Version Release Date: April 18, 2024. “Agreement” means the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, distribution and ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  72. [72]
    Llama 2 - Acceptable Use Policy - AI at Meta
    We want everyone to use Llama 2 safely and responsibly. You agree you will not use, or allow others to use, Llama 2 to: 1. Violate the law or others' rights.<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Meta's LLaMa license is still not Open Source
    Feb 18, 2025 · Meta has released new versions of Llama with new licensing terms that continue to fail the Open Source Definition. Llama 3.x is still not Open Source.
  74. [74]
    Llama 3.1 Community License is not a free software license
    Jan 24, 2025 · The FSF has published its evaluation of the Llama 3.1 Community License Agreement. This is not a free software license and you should not use it.
  75. [75]
    Llama FAQs
    Llama models are licensed under a bespoke commercial license that balances open access to the models with responsibility and protections in place to help ...
  76. [76]
    How Llama 3.1 changes licensing rules | Yaoshiang Ho posted on ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · One of the most important changes in Llama 3.1 is a licensing term. You can now use outputs of Llama 3.1 to train your own LLM / deep ...
  77. [77]
    Llama 3.3 Acceptable Use Policy
    If you access or use Llama 3.3, you agree to this Acceptable Use Policy (“Policy”). The most recent copy of this policy can be found at https://www.llama.com/ ...
  78. [78]
    Meta changes its tune on defense use of its Llama AI - The Register
    Nov 6, 2024 · The Facebook giant has announced it will allow the US government to use its Llama model family for, among other things, defense and national security ...Missing: evolving | Show results with:evolving<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    Llama 4 Is Banned in the EU: Open AI, Region-Locked - LinkedIn
    Apr 6, 2025 · Meta's Llama 4 model is banned for use by any EU-based entity, with the restriction hardcoded into its license.
  80. [80]
    How Llama's Licenses Have Evolved Over Time - Notes
    Mar 26, 2025 · Here's a list of all current licenses/use policies in effect according to Meta: Llama 2 License / Use Policy; Llama 3 License / Use Policy ...
  81. [81]
    Meta's Llama LLMs Spark Debate Over Open Source AI - ITPro Today
    Jun 18, 2025 · As Meta positions its Llama large language models as "open source AI," critics challenge whether restrictive usage terms and undisclosed ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] A Comparative Analysis of Meta's Llama Licensing Approach
    Oct 31, 2024 · This paper investigates the core distinctions between Meta's Llama ... Meta, which outline the Llama licensing terms and Acceptable Use Policy.
  83. [83]
    How Not to Be Stupid About AI, With Yann LeCun - WIRED
    Dec 22, 2023 · Why did Meta decide that Llama code would be shared with others, open source style? When you have an open platform that a lot of people can ...Missing: truly | Show results with:truly
  84. [84]
    To people who see the performance of DeepSeek and think: | Yann ...
    Jan 24, 2025 · The correct reading is: "Open source models are surpassing proprietary ones." DeepSeek has profited from open research and open source (eg PyTorch and Llama ...
  85. [85]
  86. [86]
    Open weights != Open source - LessWrong
    Aug 6, 2025 · Open weight generative models typically restrict usage based on company size and use case (e.g. Llama's license disallows use for military ...
  87. [87]
    How far behind are open models? - Epoch AI
    Nov 4, 2024 · Supposing that Llama 4 has open weights and is released in July 2025,, Llama 4 would be exactly on-trend for closed models, eliminating the lag ...
  88. [88]
    Beyond the binary : A nuanced path for open-weight advanced AI
    Jul 30, 2025 · A 2024 report by Epoch AI found that open-weight models lag behind the most advanced closed models by approximately 5 to 22 months depending on ...
  89. [89]
    Llama 4's Open License Sparks Debate - AI Prompt Theory
    Sep 7, 2025 · The debate surrounding Llama 4's open license highlights the inherent tension between access and control in the development and deployment of ...
  90. [90]
    Open vs. Closed: The Battle for the Future of Language Models | ACLU
    Sep 9, 2025 · A permissive intellectual property license that allows anyone to copy, modify, build upon, and use the model as they wish. Meta's Llama model ...
  91. [91]
    Mapping the Open-Source AI Debate: Cybersecurity Implications ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · This study examines the ongoing debate between open- and closed-source AI, assessing the trade-offs between openness, security, and innovation.
  92. [92]
    ggml-org/llama.cpp: LLM inference in C/C++ - GitHub
    The main goal of llama.cpp is to enable LLM inference with minimal setup and state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of hardware - locally and in the cloud ...Releases · Llama.vscode · Changelog : `llama-server... · Issues
  93. [93]
    Llama.cpp Tutorial: A Complete Guide to Efficient LLM Inference and ...
    Llama.cpp was developed by Georgi Gerganov. It implements the Meta's LLaMa architecture in efficient C/C++, and it is one of the most dynamic open- ...What is Llama.cpp? · Understand Llama.cpp Basics · Your First Llama.cpp Project
  94. [94]
    llama3 - Ollama
    Llama 3 instruction-tuned models are fine-tuned and optimized for dialogue/chat use cases and outperform many of the available open-source chat models on common ...Meta's Llama 3.2 · Ollama's LLaMA 3.1 · Llama 3.3 70B · Llama3:8b
  95. [95]
    llama3.2 - Ollama
    Supported Languages: English, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Hindi, Spanish, and Thai are officially supported. Llama 3.2 has been trained on a broader ...Meta's Llama 3.2 goes small... · Tags · 3b · Llama3.2:1b
  96. [96]
    Llama 4 support · Issue #10143 · ollama/ollama - GitHub
    Apr 5, 2025 · @rsmirnov90 there is a new version of Ollama that support Llama4, it still can evolve, but it's there and you can try it. https:// ...
  97. [97]
    Top 5 Local LLM Tools and Models in 2025 - Pinggy
    Oct 13, 2025 · 1. Ollama · One-line commands to pull and run models · Support for 100+ optimized models including GPT-OSS, DeepSeek V3.2-Exp, Qwen3-Next/Omni/ ...
  98. [98]
  99. [99]
    llama.cpp: Writing A Simple C++ Inference Program for GGUF LLM ...
    Jan 13, 2025 · llama.cpp is a C/C++ framework to infer machine learning models defined in the GGUF format on multiple execution backends. It started as a pure ...
  100. [100]
    I Switched From Ollama And LM Studio To llama.cpp And ... - It's FOSS
    Oct 11, 2025 · Like Ollama, I can use a feature-rich CLI, plus Vulkan support in llama.cpp and it takes a lot less disk space, too.<|separator|>
  101. [101]
    Meta says its Llama AI models being used by banks, tech companies
    Aug 29, 2024 · Meta's Llama artificial intelligence models are being used by companies including Goldman Sachs and AT&T for business functions like ...
  102. [102]
  103. [103]
    Meta's Llama AI wins big with Goldman Sachs, AT&T, Nomura
    Aug 30, 2024 · Companies such as Goldman Sachs, Nomura Holdings, AT&T, DoorDash, and Accenture have adopted Llama models for a range of business functions, ...<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    Meta's Llama AI Models Gain Traction Among Major Corporations
    Aug 30, 2024 · The use of Llama models through cloud platforms such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure has more than doubled between May and July 2024, ...
  105. [105]
    Llama Models Soar: Meta's AI Drives Innovation - netEffx
    Sep 9, 2024 · From giants like AT&T and Goldman Sachs to small startups, companies are using Llama language models to boost productivity and enhance customer ...
  106. [106]
    Customize Generative AI Models for Enterprise Applications with ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · The Llama 3.1 405B model is ideal for synthetic data generation due to its enhanced ability to recognize complex patterns, generate high-quality ...
  107. [107]
    Building Enterprise GenAI Apps with Meta Llama 3 on Databricks
    Apr 18, 2024 · With Llama 3 on Databricks, enterprises of all sizes can deploy this new model via a fully managed API. Meta Llama 3 sets a new standard for ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  108. [108]
    Meta and Scale Partner on Enterprise Adoption of Llama 3.1
    Jul 23, 2024 · Meta and Scale also partnered to help businesses customize, evaluate, and deploy Llama 3.1 405B for enterprise use cases using Scale GenAI Platform.Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  109. [109]
  110. [110]
    How Organizations Are Using Llama to Solve Industry Challenges
    Jan 13, 2025 · WriteSea, The Washington Post and Nanome are just a few examples of businesses that are using open source AI to innovate in a cost effective and ...
  111. [111]
    Llama AI for Commercial Use: License & Enterprise Impact
    Deploying Llama commercially requires a robust governance framework to manage risk. Meta provides tools and policies to support this. The Acceptable Use Policy: ...
  112. [112]
    Meta Llama: Everything you need to know about the open ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · Meta's Llama models are open generative AI models designed to run on a range of hardware and perform a range of different tasks.
  113. [113]
    Our open source Llama models are helping to spur economic ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · Meta's Llama open source AI models help to unlock innovation and competition, letting people build exciting new tools that positively impact the US economy.
  114. [114]
    GSA, Meta Collaborate to Accelerate AI Adoption Across the ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · GSA's OneGov initiative now includes Meta's open source AI models, facilitating and supporting AI adoption across the government.
  115. [115]
    Trump administration allowing government agencies to use Meta AI ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · U.S. government agencies approved to use Meta's AI system Llama for processing multimedia data, driving down costs and improving public ...
  116. [116]
    Open Source AI Can Help America Lead in AI and Strengthen ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · We're making Llama available to U.S. government agencies and contractors working on national security applications.
  117. [117]
    Meta to let US national security agencies and defense contractors ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · Meta announced Monday that it would allow US national security agencies and defense contractors to use its open-source artificial intelligence model, Llama.
  118. [118]
    Introducing Defense Llama - Scale AI
    Nov 5, 2024 · The Large Language Model (LLM) built on Meta's Llama 3 that is specifically customized and fine-tuned to support American national security missions.
  119. [119]
    Scale AI unveils 'Defense Llama' large language model for national ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · DefenseScoop got a live demo of Defense Llama, a powerful new large language model that Scale AI configured and fine-tuned over the last ...
  120. [120]
    Lockheed Martin, Meta Collaborate on Large Language Models for ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · Lockheed Martin and Meta are collaborating to apply the power of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLM) for national security applications.
  121. [121]
    Chinese researchers develop AI model for military use on ... - Reuters
    Nov 1, 2024 · A June paper described how Llama had been used for "intelligence policing" to process large amounts of data and enhance police decision-making.
  122. [122]
    A comparative study of ChatGPT-4o and Meta AI's Llama 3.1 - NIH
    Llama 3.1 is considered a new standard, outperforming ChatGPT and other LLMs in reasoning, multilingual capabilities, long-context handling, math, and ...Missing: positive | Show results with:positive
  123. [123]
    The Ultimate AI Showdown Between Llama 3 vs. 3.1 - AI-PRO.org
    Oct 30, 2024 · In July 2024, Meta introduced Llama 3.1, a model that builds on the strengths of its predecessor while addressing its limitations. Llama 3.1 ...
  124. [124]
    Inside Llama 4: How Meta's New Open-Source AI Crushes GPT-4o ...
    Apr 6, 2025 · Llama 4 Maverick, a 17 billion active parameter model with 128 experts, is the best multimodal model in its class, beating GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash.
  125. [125]
    Mark Zuckerberg Just Intensified the Battle For AI's Future | TIME
    Jul 24, 2024 · Alongside the release of its latest generation of Llama, the Meta CEO published a manifesto arguing for open-source AI.
  126. [126]
    Meta's Llama 4 Models Are Good for Enterprises, Experts Say
    Apr 9, 2025 · Meta's latest open-source Llama 4 models are much cheaper to run than closed models like OpenAI's GPT-4o, making enterprise AI deployment more feasible.
  127. [127]
    Meta open-source AI model Llama 3.1 405B excites X influencers
    Jul 29, 2024 · Influencers are highly enthusiastic about the Llama 3.1 model, which, with its unprecedented 405 billion parameters, stands as the largest openly available AI ...<|separator|>
  128. [128]
    Meta's LLaMa 4 May Disappoint the Hype, but Impresses Where It ...
    Apr 23, 2025 · Overall, many felt disappointed in LLaMa 4 when they tested its performance individually. Additionally, Artificial Analysis ranks Maverick and ...<|separator|>
  129. [129]
    Meta's Llama 4: Hype vs Reality | Unwind AI posted on the topic
    Apr 6, 2025 · Many report disappointing performance in reasoning, coding, and context handling. There's also whispers of controversy around Meta's ...
  130. [130]
    Meta's Llama Has Reached a Turning Point - Business Insider
    May 16, 2025 · Llama 4's debut quickly met criticism when developers noticed that the version Meta used for public benchmarking was not the same version ...
  131. [131]
    Meta's Llama 4.X Rush: The Dangerous Stupidity of AI's Sprint to ...
    Sep 1, 2025 · Developers accused Meta of engaging in "benchmark manipulation" by using internally tuned experimental versions that bore little resemblance to ...
  132. [132]
    Llama 4 Reality Check: Why Meta's Latest Models Fall Short of ...
    The model's coding performance is poor, making it hard to suggest it for most uses, despite having a large context window.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  133. [133]
    Evaluating Llama 3: A Comprehensive Analysis of its Performance
    May 15, 2024 · Performance Analysis: Strengths and Limitations · Creative Writing and Problem Solving · Math, Coding and Reasoning Proficiency · User Interaction: ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation<|separator|>
  134. [134]
    Llama 4's Failure Confirmed - What Does It Mean for Investors?
    Apr 13, 2025 · Meta's Llama 4 underperforms in key AI benchmarks, raising concerns about its capabilities and shaking investor confidence in 2025.
  135. [135]
    Meta Llama 4 Ranking Controversy and Executive Departures ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · Meta Llama 4 faces ranking manipulation allegations while dealing with executive departures, putting its AI strategy to the test.
  136. [136]
    Meta's Llama 3.1 Shakes Up the AI Landscape: What You Need to ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · Meta claims it rivals top AI models in capabilities like ... broader ecosystem of people and developers working on open source models.
  137. [137]
    Generative AI Digest: The debate over open-source vs. closed ...
    Aug 22, 2024 · The debate between open-source and closed-source large language models has been influenced by the dominance of leading frontier models, which ...
  138. [138]
    Open Source AI is the Path Forward - About Meta
    Jul 23, 2024 · We're taking the next steps towards open source AI becoming the industry standard. We're releasing Llama 3.1 405B, the first frontier-level open source AI ...
  139. [139]
    The debate over open vs closed AI models is 'ridiculous,' Meta AI ...
    Dec 10, 2024 · Technically, Meta's Llama large language model does not meet the definition of open source as defined by the Open Source Initiative in a ...
  140. [140]
    ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta's LeCun Says Open-Source ...
    Jan 28, 2025 · LeCun advocates for the catalytic, transformative potential of open-source AI models, in full alignment with Meta's decision to make Llama open.
  141. [141]
    Meta's Llama, The Challenge of Openness, and the Future of AI
    Oct 26, 2024 · While Meta has positioned Llama as a cornerstone of open-source AI, critics argue that the company is misrepresenting what “open-source” truly ...
  142. [142]
    Predictions 2025: Meta Will Monetize Llama AI Models
    In 2025, Meta will monetize its Llama AI models, introducing paid access tiers for enterprises while maintaining free options.
  143. [143]
    Meta's New Llama 3.1 AI Model Is Free, Powerful, and Risky | WIRED
    Jul 23, 2024 · The newest version of Llama will make AI more accessible and customizable, but it will also stir up debate over the dangers of releasing AI ...<|separator|>
  144. [144]
    LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training from Llama 2 ...
    Oct 12, 2023 · LoRA fine-tuning undoes the safety training of Llama 2-Chat 70B with one GPU and a budget of less than $200.
  145. [145]
    How Meta's Open Source AI is Giving US the Edge in AI Race
    Nov 10, 2024 · Meta's Llama is an open-source family of large language models, with the latest version Llama 3.1 featuring up to 405 billion parameters.