Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Main Ground Combat System

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) is a bilateral defense program launched in 2017 by the governments of and to develop an advanced, networked ground combat capability, primarily featuring a next-generation manned as its core, designed to succeed the German and French tanks with initial operational capability targeted for the 2040s. The initiative emphasizes a "system of systems" architecture, integrating crewed platforms with unmanned vehicles, sensors, and effectors for enhanced lethality, survivability, and connectivity in future warfare environments dominated by anti-access/area-denial threats and multi-domain operations. Historically plagued by delays stemming from divergent national requirements, industrial rivalries, and procurement disputes—such as disagreements over armament architecture and lead contractor roles—the program gained renewed momentum in 2025 through the establishment of the MGCS Project Company GmbH in Cologne, Germany, a joint venture equally shared among KNDS, Rheinmetall, and Thales with balanced Franco-German work allocation. This entity oversees the demonstrator phase, focusing on key technologies like high-energy weapons, advanced protection systems, and AI-driven decision aids, amid broader European efforts to bolster armored capabilities in response to geopolitical pressures. While promising interoperability gains and technological superiority over legacy platforms, the MGCS faces scrutiny over escalating costs, timeline realism, and the challenge of reconciling French emphasis on autonomy with German preferences for modular, export-oriented designs.

History

Inception and Early Agreements

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) project originated from a 2012 decision by and to pursue a collaborative effort toward developing a next-generation ground combat system, prompted by the anticipated obsolescence of their respective main battle tanks—the French and German [Leopard 2](/page/Leopard 2)—by the mid-2030s. This initiative was framed within the broader Franco-German defense cooperation framework, dividing the program into five phases starting with operational needs analysis and concept studies. Formal launch occurred in July 2017, when French President and German Chancellor endorsed the MGCS as a bilateral program to integrate advanced technologies for future , emphasizing and shared technological development. The agreement built on preliminary discussions from the early , reflecting strategic imperatives to pool resources amid rising defense budgets and evolving threats, with an initial timeline targeting prototypes by the late 2020s and operational capability around 2035-2040. In June 2018, the two nations formalized their commitment to joint development, assigning political leadership to while ensuring balanced industrial participation between and firms. This pact outlined even work distribution and initiated detailed concept phases, focusing on a system-of-systems rather than a singular platform. Early industrial groundwork advanced in late 2019, when defense ministers reconfirmed the program's priority during an October ministerial council, followed by the December formation of a (ARGE) between (a Nexter-Krauss-Maffei Wegmann merger) and to serve as the primary contractor interface with procurement agencies. These steps marked the transition from conceptual alignment to preparatory contracts, setting the stage for Phase 1A studies on , , and innovations.

Development Phases and Milestones

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) program originated from conceptual discussions in the early 2010s, evolving into a formal Franco-German initiative to develop a next-generation ground combat platform replacing the Leopard 2 and Leclerc main battle tanks. The project was officially launched on July 13, 2017, during a Franco-German Defense and Security Council meeting between Presidents Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Angela Merkel, alongside related programs like FCAS. Initial agreements emphasized joint development, with letters of intent signed at the Meseberg Summit on June 19, 2018. Early milestones included 's entry in June 2019 and the formation of a (ARGE) by and in December 2019 to advance preparatory work. The System Architecture Definition Study (SADS) Part 1, awarded in May 2020 to and at a cost of approximately €150 million, concluded between March 2022 and late 2023, focusing on operational needs analysis and concept studies. This fed into the Technology Demonstrator Phase (TDP), spanning 2020–2024, which researched core technologies including propulsion, protection, weapons, sensors, and vetronics. Progress accelerated in 2023 with the agreement on a High-Level Common Operational Requirements Document (HLCORD) in July and validation of military system requirements by defense ministers and in September, shifting the initial operational capability target from the 2030s to 2040–2045 due to technical complexities and industrial alignments. The Phase 1A agreement, signed on April 26, 2024, formalized equitable work-sharing between and across eight technological pillars—such as platform architecture, firepower, and connectivity—and set the stage for first contracts by late 2024, managed by Germany's BAAINBw with co-funding. Subsequent phases include the Full System Demonstrator Phase (FSDP) from 2024–2028 for integrating and testing demonstrators, followed by an implementation and pre-production phase through 2035 leading to prototypes and low-rate production. A key industrial milestone occurred on April 10, 2025, with the incorporation of the MGCS Project Company GmbH (MPC) in , , involving , , Rheinmetall Landsysteme, and Thales as the prime contractor for Phase 1A execution and SADS Part 2/technology demonstrators estimated at €1.5 billion. Negotiations with BAAINBw were slated for late 2025, reflecting ongoing efforts to consolidate technologies amid delays from differing national priorities. Full operational capability remains targeted for 2040–2045.

Key Delays and Adjustments

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) program, initiated in 2017, encountered significant delays primarily stemming from bilateral disagreements between and on industrial architecture, workshare allocation, and leadership roles, compounded by the . Early phases, including the System Architecture and Demonstration Study (SADS), faced an estimated 22-month postponement due to contractor disputes over responsibilities. These frictions, rooted in competing national defense industries—such as 's and Krauss-Maffei Wegmann versus 's Nexter—led to protracted negotiations, delaying consensus on core requirements until mid-2023. Originally targeting initial operational capability between 2035 and 2040, the timeline was extended to 2040–2045 by September 2023, reflecting unresolved debates on development packages and management structure. Serial production, once projected for the early 2040s, slipped to at least 2045, exacerbating concerns over capability gaps amid evolving threats like those observed in . This lag prompted interim measures, including Germany's exploration of modernizations and Rheinmetall's promotion of nearer-term alternatives like the Concept Unmanned Turret for the tank. Adjustments accelerated in 2024–2025 following high-level political interventions. A breakthrough agreement in March 2024 resolved key disputes on development modalities, leading to formal approval of operational requirements in April. In July 2023, both nations endorsed a High-Level Common Operational Requirements Document (HLCORD), providing a unified framework. Phase 1A commenced in January 2025, spanning four years to deliver a prototype by 2030, with emphasis on eight priority technologies including active protection systems and AI integration. The establishment of the MGCS Project Company GmbH in Cologne on April 10, 2025, centralized oversight, addressing prior fragmentation. By July 2025, industry leaders noted renewed momentum driven by political commitment, though full alignment on budget shares and work division persisted as challenges.

Strategic Rationale

Need for Replacement of Legacy Systems

The French , which entered service in 1992, has reached an age of over three decades, with production concluding in 2008 after 862 units were built, rendering many components susceptible to and escalating maintenance costs. Unaddressed issues in and subsystems have already driven up the expenses of interim upgrades like the program, which aims to modernize approximately 200 units by 2029 but is viewed by defense analysts as inadequate for extending viability against evolving threats beyond the mid-2030s. Similarly, Germany's , operational since 1979 with subsequent upgrades to variants like the 2A8, faces structural limitations in scalability for future integrations, necessitating a full generational replacement rather than perpetual retrofits to bridge to the 2040s. These legacy systems, designed in an era predating widespread unmanned aerial systems and precision-guided munitions, exhibit heightened vulnerabilities in contemporary conflicts, as evidenced by high attrition rates of comparable platforms in where first-person-view (FPV) drones have penetrated top-attack defenses and exploited gaps in sensor coverage. The core deficiencies include insufficient active protection against loitering munitions and swarming drones, limited network-centric warfare capabilities for real-time data fusion, and inadequate modularity for incorporating artificial intelligence-driven autonomy, all of which undermine their effectiveness against peer adversaries employing hybrid tactics combining electronic warfare and hypersonic threats. Sustained reliance on these platforms risks operational irrelevance, as the temporal gap from predecessors like the T-34 to the Leopard 2/equivalent Leclerc spans less than the projected interval to successors like the MGCS, amplifying the urgency for systemic overhaul to restore armored maneuver dominance.

Geopolitical and Threat Environment

The 2022 demonstrated the vulnerabilities of legacy main battle tanks to asymmetric threats, including swarms of commercial drones, loitering munitions, and top-attack anti-tank guided missiles, which inflicted heavy losses on armored formations despite numerical superiority. These battlefield realities, where inexpensive unmanned systems neutralized high-value platforms like Russia's and tanks, underscored the obsolescence of Cold War-era designs reliant on reactive armor and line-of-sight engagements, prompting and to prioritize the MGCS for enhanced lethality in contested environments. Russia remains Europe's primary conventional military threat, maintaining over 12,000 tanks (including modernized variants) and conducting large-scale exercises simulating assaults on NATO's eastern flank, as evidenced by Zapad-2021 drills involving 200,000 troops and hybrid maneuvers blending conventional forces with and . The Kremlin's doctrinal emphasis on deep battle and massed armor, combined with its post-2014 military reforms yielding hypersonic missiles and integrated air defenses, necessitates a next-generation system capable of overmatching peer adversaries in high-intensity conflicts while integrating into NATO's multi-domain operations. Hybrid threats from , such as sabotage of and intrusions targeting defense , further amplify the urgency for resilient systems that can operate amid degraded communications and contested electromagnetic spectra. Emerging non-state and proxy actors, empowered by proliferated drone technologies observed in Ukraine (e.g., over 10,000 Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian armor by mid-2023), pose persistent low-cost attrition risks, driving MGCS requirements for modular effectors against aerial and ground-based unmanned threats. This threat evolution, validated by assessments of hybrid campaigns including GPS jamming and undersea cable disruptions, demands a platform with AI-enabled and autonomous subsystems to maintain decision superiority in urban and dispersed operations.

Alignment with European Defense Autonomy

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) embodies Europe's pursuit of in defense by prioritizing the indigenous development of a next-generation system through Franco-German collaboration, launched formally in June 2017 during a bilateral summit in . This initiative aims to replace Germany's and France's tanks by the mid-2030s, ensuring that core ground combat capabilities remain under European control rather than dependent on transatlantic suppliers like the . By integrating advanced technologies such as optionally manned platforms and system-of-systems architectures, MGCS seeks to build sovereign capacities in high-end , aligning with the European Commission's vision of "open strategic autonomy" that emphasizes self-reliance in critical defense technologies while maintaining with allies. The program's structure supports autonomy through joint industrial efforts led by (a Nexter-Krauss-Maffei Wegmann merger) and involvement from , focusing on -sourced components and R&D to safeguard the continent's defense technological and industrial base (DTIB). Official statements from project partners highlight MGCS as a means to preserve strategic independence, particularly in response to supply chain vulnerabilities exposed by the Russia-Ukraine , where reliance on non-EU munitions and systems strained capacities. This aligns with EU-level frameworks like the European Defence Fund, which has allocated resources to collaborative projects, and (PESCO), positioning MGCS as a for pooled that avoids duplicative national efforts while advancing collective capabilities. Despite these objectives, MGCS's contribution to is tempered by persistent bilateral frictions, including disputes over and workshare that delayed the operational analysis phase until 2022 and the formation of a until April 2025. Critics note that while the project reduces external dependencies in platform design, it does not fully insulate from global or rare earth supplies, underscoring limits to complete self-sufficiency. Nonetheless, advancements like the 2024-2026 demonstrator contracts reinforce its role in bolstering Europe's ability to independently address peer threats, as evidenced by commitments from France's Military Programming Law 2024-2030 to fund such initiatives for industrial resilience.

Design and Technical Features

Core Platform Architecture

The core platform architecture of the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) is structured around Pillar 1, which focuses on the development of a modular and automated systems, with primary leadership from industry partners. This pillar emphasizes a heavy tracked base capable of supporting manned and unmanned variants, designed for enhanced mobility, survivability, and integration into networked operations. The incorporates and techniques to achieve a balance between protection, payload capacity, and agility, drawing from lessons in existing platforms like the Leopard 2 while incorporating next-generation automation for reduced crew workload. Propulsion and mobility elements within the core architecture prioritize high power-to-weight ratios and hybrid or electric drive options to enable modes and rapid acceleration, though specific engine details remain under evaluation in ongoing demonstrator phases. Early prototypes, such as those exhibited by in 2018, utilized modified 2A7 hulls and chassis components—adapted to handle up to 68 tons—to test integration feasibility, highlighting a front-engine with centralized crew compartments for optimal weight distribution and placement. Automated features include AI-assisted and avoidance, integrated via a common data architecture to enable semi-autonomous operations across the MGCS family. The platform's design supports , allowing interchangeable mission modules atop the common for roles ranging from to support vehicles, thereby maximizing commonality and reducing lifecycle costs. This approach aligns with the program's evolution toward a multi-platform , where the core serves as the foundational element for system-of-systems , including linkage to unmanned ground vehicles. As of 1A initiation in 2024, technical maturation efforts continue to refine these elements, with teams like and advancing simulations and subscale tests to validate performance under modern threat scenarios.

Armament and Protection Systems

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) incorporates advanced armament designed for superior lethality against peer adversaries, including a high-caliber main gun to surpass the capabilities of existing 120 mm systems on the Leopard 2 and tanks. Proposed options include Nexter's 140 mm gun, which employs to achieve scalable effects, beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) firing, and reduced ammunition volume for increased onboard capacity, with maturation targeted by 2025. Alternatively, Rheinmetall's 130 mm Rh-130 L/52 gun offers enhanced range and penetration, reflecting ongoing Franco-German debates on caliber selection to balance firepower, logistics, and platform weight. Secondary armament may include automatic cannons or machine guns for counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (C-UAV) roles, alongside modular integration of directed energy weapons (DEW), high-energy lasers (HEL), hypersonic guided effectors for anti-tank missions, and loitering munitions to extend engagement envelopes. Protection systems prioritize a multi-layered "protective bubble" emphasizing active defenses over traditional passive armor to optimize mobility and weight. (APS), such as Nexter's PROMETHEUS (developed with ), provide hard-kill interception of incoming threats like anti-tank guided missiles and rocket-propelled grenades, potentially complemented by soft-kill electronic countermeasures; alternatives like Rafael's APS have been evaluated in demonstrators such as the Europe (EMBT). Passive elements feature lighter composite armors and reduced crew configurations (potentially two-person or unmanned turrets) to minimize signatures, augmented by for visual and thermal concealment against detection. Reinforced modular armor and integrated neutralization systems further counter aerial and ground threats, with the overall design shifting weight savings from passive toward enhanced sensors and effectors for networked .

Mobility and Sensor Integration

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) employs a diesel-electric system designed to provide enhanced operational flexibility, including reduced acoustic and thermal signatures for operations and a "silent watch" mode that minimizes detectability during stationary . This approach supports extended range and simplified by optimizing , while the overall platform targets a weight under 50 tonnes to improve tactical , deployability, and maneuverability across diverse terrains including environments. Sensor capabilities in the MGCS encompass a networked suite of optronics, radars, electro-optical systems, infrared cameras, and integrations, enabling surveillance, detection, recognition, identification, and targeting (SDRI+T) across the . These sensors, distributed across the manned , missile carriers, and unmanned platforms, feed into AI-driven processing for real-time data fusion, hemispheric coverage, and threat prioritization even in degraded conditions such as fog or smoke. Integration of mobility and sensors occurs through a system-of-systems architecture, where fused sensor data informs autonomous navigation, path planning, and threat evasion, allowing the hybrid propulsion to adapt dynamically—such as switching to electric mode for low-signature maneuvers based on real-time environmental inputs. Networked datalinks connect the core vehicle with unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and UAVs, creating a shared data cloud that enhances crew situational awareness and enables sensor-to-shooter loops, thereby coupling high-speed mobility with precise, AI-augmented targeting during on-the-move operations. This synergy prioritizes survivability against precision threats and dense intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) environments observed in contemporary conflicts.

Unmanned and System-of-Systems Elements

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) incorporates a system-of-systems approach, envisioning the primary manned as the core of a networked that includes manned support platforms, unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and assets to enable collaborative operations in contested environments. This architecture emphasizes cloud-based connectivity for real-time data sharing, artificial intelligence-driven decision-making, and modular integration to adapt to evolving threats, with initial operational capability targeted for the late 2030s. Unmanned elements form a critical component, with UGVs designed to accompany the main vehicle for roles such as forward reconnaissance, sensor augmentation, and flank protection, reducing crew exposure to direct threats. These platforms, potentially including sensor-equipped variants and missile-armed support units, leverage autonomy and remote operation capabilities demonstrated by KNDS in prototypes, allowing the manned vehicle to offload high-risk tasks while maintaining human oversight. Integration with drone swarms provides persistent aerial surveillance and loitering munitions, enhancing the system's battlespace dominance through layered, multi-domain effects. The onboard UAV capability further extends the system's sensor horizon, enabling launch and recovery from the primary vehicle for tactical , , and electronic countermeasures without compromising mobility. algorithms facilitate semi-autonomous behaviors across these elements, such as swarm coordination and threat prioritization, though full remains constrained by ethical and technical considerations in frameworks. This networked structure aims to counter peer adversaries by distributing lethality and resilience, drawing from lessons in where isolated platforms prove vulnerable. As of April 2025, the MGCS Project Company, led by , , and Thales, continues to refine these integrations through demonstrator programs, prioritizing standards for future force structures.

Development Partners and Industry Structure

Primary Franco-German Consortium

The Primary Franco-German Consortium for the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) is anchored by , a European defense holding company formed on June 19, 2015, through the equal partnership of Germany's Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (KMW) and France's , with each holding 50% ownership to jointly develop land combat systems. serves as the lead industrial entity, leveraging KMW's expertise in tank production and maintenance alongside Nexter's capabilities in systems and modular armored vehicles, ensuring a balanced Franco-German industrial base for the MGCS program's core platform development. This structure was formalized following the 2017 governmental launch of MGCS to replace aging and main battle tanks by around 2040, with tasked with integrating advanced lethality, protection, and mobility features into a system-of-systems architecture. To enhance technical depth, the consortium expanded in June 2019 when Germany's Rheinmetall Landsysteme joined KNDS as a key partner, contributing sensor fusion, ammunition, and protection technologies derived from its prior work on Leopard upgrades and Boxer vehicles. France's Thales was incorporated for electronics and optronics, providing battle management systems and unmanned integration aligned with its Rafale avionics heritage, maintaining national parity in contributions. This collaboration culminated in the establishment of MGCS Project Company GmbH on April 17, 2025, in Cologne, Germany, with equal 25% shares among KNDS Deutschland, KNDS France, Rheinmetall Landsysteme, and Thales, enforcing a 50% German and 50% French workshare to mitigate industrial disputes and align with European defense autonomy goals. The consortium's governance emphasizes joint decision-making, with KNDS overseeing overall system integration while subcontractors handle specialized subsystems, as evidenced by a June 18, , Letter of Intent signed by industry leads to advance demonstrator phases. reports over 10,000 employees and a turnover of €3.8 billion, underscoring its capacity to drive the €100 billion-plus program despite historical delays from competing national priorities. This setup prioritizes verifiable over unilateral dominance, though critics note persistent tensions in capability allocation, such as armament leads, resolved through phased contracts rather than full .

Supporting Contractors and Technologies

, a , supports the MGCS through its expertise in systems, survivability enhancements, and modular architectures, contributing to demonstrations and subsystem as part of the industrial team formed in 2019. Thales, a electronics specialist, provides critical contributions in optronics, command-and-control systems, and sensor integration to enable networked operations and adaptations. These contractors, alongside entities, established the MGCS Project Company GmbH in on April 10, 2025, to coordinate the program's next phase as the industrial prime. Hensoldt, another German firm, supplies advanced sensor technologies for the MGCS, including hemispheric surveillance systems that fuse data from multiple sources to deliver AI-assisted real-time , reducing crew workload and improving threat detection. This includes automated analysis for overview, integrating electro-optical, , and infrared inputs to counter modern threats like drones and precision-guided munitions. Key supporting technologies emphasize modularity and system-of-systems integration, such as AI-driven decision aids for target identification and engagement, sensor fusion for 360-degree environmental mapping, and active protection systems to neutralize incoming projectiles via kinetic or directed-energy interceptors. Unmanned companion platforms, including ground robots and loitering munitions, are incorporated for and , leveraging networked to operate semi-autonomously within the MGCS . Cybersecurity measures and energy management for hybrid propulsion further enhance resilience against and sustainment challenges. These elements, developed collaboratively, aim for operational entry by 2040, prioritizing empirical validation through phased demonstrations starting in 2027.

Potential International Collaborators

, , the , , and have expressed varying degrees of interest in collaborating on the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) to leverage shared development costs, standardize future armored capabilities across , and improve interoperability within frameworks. These nations possess existing tank fleets or complementary industrial capacities that align with MGCS objectives, potentially allowing them to contribute to subsystems like sensors, electronics, or unmanned elements while procuring upgraded platforms. Spain has articulated concrete plans to join the program, aiming to modernize its armored forces amid evolving threats; a June 2025 announcement highlighted Madrid's intent to integrate as a full partner, building on bilateral ties with Germany for vehicle upgrades. Italy's interest stems from its defense industry's push for involvement, with Leonardo exploring joint ventures that could feed into MGCS architecture, though domestic priorities for a national main battle tank successor complicate full commitment. Belgium and the Netherlands have signaled exploratory participation, viewing MGCS as a pathway to replace aging fleets without independent development burdens; Belgian interest gained traction by early 2025 as a potential cost-sharing third partner, while Dutch overtures emphasize modular integration with existing systems. Sweden's engagement began as an in October 2021, focusing on technology transfer for its variant, though subsequent alternative initiatives have tested alignment. Poland and Norway have voiced preliminary support in earlier discussions, driven by regional security needs, but face hurdles from national procurement preferences and export restrictions on core technologies. Despite this interest, expanding the consortium beyond the Franco-German core remains fraught; 2023 rumors of a rival tank project involving , , , and underscored tensions over workshare and leadership, ultimately leading to recommit to while keeping doors open for observers. Such dynamics reflect broader European defense autonomy goals, yet progress hinges on resolving industrial disputes and aligning national timelines for operational entry in the 2035-2040 window.

Challenges and Controversies

Industrial and Political Disputes

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) project, initiated in 2017 under the leadership of French President and then-German Chancellor , has encountered persistent industrial and political friction between and , primarily stemming from divergent national priorities and competing defense industry interests. These tensions delayed progress for several years, with the program stalling after initial concept studies and only advancing to Phase 1A in April 2024 following high-level negotiations. By September 2023, industry sources expressed skepticism about the project's viability, citing unresolved disagreements over work distribution and strategic commitments, which risked derailing the planned replacement for 's and 's tanks by the mid-2030s. Politically, the disputes reflect broader asymmetries in Franco-German defense postures, with France advocating for greater European and joint industrial capacity, while Germany has prioritized interoperability and upgrades to existing platforms amid slower political consensus on new programs. German Defense Minister emphasized commitment to the joint effort in July 2023, allocating €83.5 million from the €100 billion special fund, yet French counterparts highlighted Berlin's hesitancy, exacerbated by Germany's parallel modernization of the Leopard 2 A8 in collaboration with , which diminished urgency for MGCS. These differences have led to repeated renegotiations, including concerns over project leadership—Germany designated as overall lead for MGCS, contrasting with France's role in the parallel (FCAS)—and fears in Berlin of disproportionate French influence over contracts. Industrially, rivalries center on workshare allocation within the KNDS consortium (comprising Germany's Krauss-Maffei Wegmann and France's Nexter) and the integration of competitors like , whose exclusion from early phases fueled tensions over technology selection, such as the 130 mm gun. KNDS proposed interim upgrades like the Leopard 2 A-RC 3.0 and Evolution to bridge delays pushing MGCS entry to 2040–2045, while advanced alternatives including the with an unmanned turret concept unveiled at 2024, highlighting fragmented industrial incentives. A company incorporating , , and Thales was established in April 2025 to enforce a 50/50 Franco-German split, but prior disputes over proprietary technologies and export controls underscored the challenge of aligning without compromising competitiveness. By July 2025, 's CEO noted accelerating momentum with renewed political backing, yet analogous frictions in FCAS—such as claims for subsystem leadership—signal ongoing risks of bifurcation if unresolved.

Technical and Engineering Hurdles

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) faces significant engineering challenges in integrating a networked "" architecture, encompassing a manned (MBT), unmanned sensor and missile carrier vehicles, and associated effectors, which demands seamless across diverse platforms. This requires advanced from optronics, radars, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), but generates vast data volumes that risk overwhelming crew decision-making without robust AI-driven filtering and prioritization. A core hurdle lies in achieving real-time integration for autonomous targeting, , and effector management, including hypersonic guided munitions, directed-energy weapons, loitering munitions, and counter-UAV systems, while ensuring reliability in contested electromagnetic environments. Divergent national requirements exacerbate this: prioritizes agility and lighter designs, while favors heavier configurations for enhanced protection, complicating modular architectures that must accommodate future upgrades without compromising baseline performance. Power management poses another critical engineering constraint, as the hybrid-electric or fully electric powerpack must sustain high-energy demands for propulsion, sensors, and weapons while maintaining mobility comparable to legacy systems like the Leopard 2 and . Target weights under 50 tonnes for the manned MBT aim to balance survivability—via active protection systems resilient to advanced threats—with operational agility, but trade-offs in armor and subsystem density remain unresolved. Weapon system maturation represents a protracted technical bottleneck, with no consensus on the primary gun: France's 140 mm ASCALON (using caseless telescoped ammunition for higher velocity and reduced logistics) versus Germany's 130 mm Rh-130 L/52 (emphasizing NATO interoperability and proven scalability). Static firing trials for ASCALON concluded in 2024, with full technical maturity and turret integration tests projected by late 2025, but integration risks persist due to ammunition standardization and recoil management in unmanned turrets. These hurdles echo risks observed in analogous high-tech platforms, such as the T-14 Armata, which has encountered persistent integration failures in , sensors, and networked systems a decade post-fielding, underscoring the causal difficulties of scaling unproven technologies under real-world combat stresses like those revealed in . Progress hinges on the eight technology pillars formalized in the April 2024 memorandum of understanding, but empirical validation through prototypes remains pending, with full operational capability delayed beyond initial 2040 targets.

Cost Overruns and Funding Debates

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) program has faced persistent funding debates rooted in Franco-German divergences over workshare allocation, industrial leadership, and national budget priorities, though no confirmed cost overruns have materialized as of mid-2025 given the project's stage. Initial agreements outlined shared costs up to the implementation phase at approximately €1.5 billion as of 2021, with subsequent phases involving joint funding mechanisms led by . Delays in advancing beyond conceptual studies—originally targeted post-2017 —have heightened risks of future overruns, potentially straining resources and widening replacement gaps for aging and tanks. In 2023, France's omission of MGCS allocations from its military budget sparked tensions, interpreted by observers as reluctance to commit amid domestic fiscal pressures and preferences for upgrading existing variants, before reversed course by reinstating funding commitments for 2024. By mid-2025, phase-specific budgets included €150 million for the initial System Architecture and Demonstration Studies (SADS) segment, with projections for expanded studies underscoring incremental cost escalations tied to protracted negotiations. Disagreements over equitable budget shares and technology distribution persisted as hurdles, exemplified by French advocacy for balanced contributions versus German emphasis on leveraging firms like alongside the consortium. Mitigating steps include the April 2024 Phase 1A agreement between defense ministers and , formalizing early demonstrator work, and a January 2025 shareholder accord for the company representing industry interests. These pacts reflect renewed political momentum, as noted by CEO Armin Papperger in July 2025, who highlighted accelerating progress driven by bilateral resolve despite historical stalls. Critics, including defense analysts, argue that unresolved industrial turf battles could inflate total program costs—potentially exceeding €30-50 billion including production—without stricter oversight, drawing parallels to overruns in prior European collaborative projects like the Tiger helicopter.

Criticisms of Concept and Viability

Critics contend that the MGCS concept, envisioned as a networked "" integrating manned platforms with unmanned ground vehicles, drones, , and AI-driven decision-making via a combat cloud, overreaches in technological ambition, potentially mirroring the T-14 Armata's protracted failures despite a decade of development. This complexity demands breakthroughs in , resilience, and hybrid propulsion, yet unresolved disputes over core components—such as France's preference for a 140mm cannon versus Germany's 130mm option—highlight risks that could undermine operational coherence. Viability concerns intensify with the program's susceptibility to obsolescence in drone-saturated battlefields, as evidenced by where hundreds of tanks have been neutralized by low-cost UAVs, exposing vulnerabilities in even advanced armor and 120mm armaments that MGCS must radically address through unproven modular designs and larger-caliber kinetics. Skeptics project that serial production, now slated for no earlier than 2045—a decade beyond the initial 2035 target—will yield platforms outdated amid accelerating threats like hypersonic munitions and autonomous swarms, exacerbated by eight years of Franco-German negotiations merely to formalize requirements. Proponents of interim upgrades argue that evolving existing Leopard 2 and fleets—via configurations like the or with enhanced optics, active protection, and 120mm upgrades—offers superior near-term viability at lower risk and cost, bridging to 2040 without the MGCS's exposure to capability gaps from delays. defense analysts have voiced uncertainty over MGCS's market relevance by 2040, citing competition from non-cooperative designs like the KF51 , which could erode prospects and strain national budgets estimated at €3.5-4.5 billion annually for independent development.

Current Status and Future Outlook

Recent Milestones and Progress

In April 2024, the French and German defense ministers signed a memorandum of understanding to advance the MGCS program into Phase 1B, focusing on demonstrator development for critical technologies including active protection systems and artificial intelligence integration. On January 23, 2025, key industry partners—KNDS Deutschland, KNDS France, Rheinmetall Landsysteme, and Thales—signed a shareholder agreement establishing the MGCS Project Company GmbH as the prime contractor for this phase. The company was formally incorporated in Cologne on April 17, 2025, tasked with coordinating Phase 1B activities, which emphasize system architecture studies and subsystem prototypes over a multi-year period leading toward operational capability by 2040. By mid-2025, industry leaders reported accelerated momentum, with Rheinmetall's CEO noting strengthened political commitment from both nations to overcome prior delays, enabling progress on high-level operational requirements finalized in 2023. This phase prioritizes eight technology domains identified in 2024, such as enhanced lethality, , and networked warfare capabilities, with initial contracts allocated to the consortium for risk reduction demonstrations. Despite ongoing technical integrations, these steps mark a shift from conceptual disputes to concrete industrial execution, though full-scale prototyping remains contingent on sustained bilateral funding.

Testing and Demonstration Plans

The MGCS program's testing and demonstration efforts are organized into phased milestones to validate subsystems, integrate technologies, and reduce risks prior to full-scale development. The initial Technology Demonstrator Phase (TDP), initiated in 2020, encompasses the System Architecture Definition Study (SADS), with Part 1 awarded for €150 million and completed after a 22-month delay due to contractor negotiations and external factors like the . This phase focuses on conceptual architecture and early technology maturation, including evaluations of modular components such as advanced sensors, effectors, and networked systems derived from operational lessons, including those from the conflict emphasizing resilience and robustness. Phase 1B, slated for 2025, advances SADS Part 2 and incorporates main technology demonstrators (MTDs) under a €1.5 billion allocation, enabling subsystem prototyping and integration testing. Specific demonstrations include the 140 mm gun, which underwent static stand firing tests in 2024 and is targeted for completion of turret-integrated testing by the end of 2025, alongside parallel efforts like Rheinmetall's 130 mm gun demonstrator. These activities, coordinated through the MGCS Project Company established in April 2025, involve negotiations with Germany's BAAINBw for contract awards later that year to support demonstrator manufacturing and validation. Subsequent plans transition to the Full System Demonstrator Phase (FSDP), originally envisioned for 2024-2028 but adjusted to align with 2025-2028 of integrated system demonstrators estimated at €1.5 billion, preceding the implementation phase around 2029. This phase prioritizes end-to-end testing of the multi-platform architecture, including and cloud-networked capabilities, with demonstrator delivery projected for 2030-2035 to inform production decisions amid timeline extensions to initial fielding by 2035 and full operational capability by 2040-2045. A government progress report on these demonstrations is required by in 2025, serving as a checkpoint for Phase 2 approval.

Projected Timeline and Operational Entry

The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) is projected to enter initial operational capability around 2040, following the commencement of deliveries in 2035, as a replacement for existing and main battle s in German and French service. This timeline encompasses a multi- "" architecture, integrating crewed and uncrewed elements for enhanced lethality, survivability, and connectivity, rather than a singular . Development phases include the ongoing Technology Demonstrator Phase (2020–2024), which focused on validating core technologies, succeeded by the planned Full System Demonstrator Phase to refine and prototypes. Recent advancements in 2025, such as the establishment of the MGCS Project Company in and a prioritizing eight key technologies—including AI-driven decision aids and advanced protection systems—have supported adherence to this schedule, with industry leaders noting accelerated progress. Full operational entry by 2040–2045 anticipates widespread fielding across participating nations, contingent on successful demonstration milestones and funding continuity, though potential delays from technical integration or budgetary constraints remain risks given historical Franco-German program frictions. Operational deployment will emphasize modular upgrades for legacy fleets as interim measures until MGCS achieves maturity.

References

  1. [1]
    MGCS status update - European Security & Defence - Euro-sd
    Aug 27, 2025 · Launched in 2017, the Franco-German Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) programme aims to deliver a next-generation heavy tracked platform ...
  2. [2]
    Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) – Status and Path Forward
    May 18, 2021 · The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) will develop a future land warfare system to replace the German Army's Leopard 2 and the French Army's Leclerc.
  3. [3]
    New Franco-German Tank Project Takes Shape With Industry Team ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · The Main Ground Combat System will be centered upon a tank, but aims to provide a wider 'system of systems,' with crewed and uncrewed platforms.
  4. [4]
    Main Ground Combat System (MGCS): A Status Report - Euro-sd
    Jan 23, 2023 · MGCS will not be a single vehicle, rather, it is conceived as a system of systems built around a manned heavy combat vehicle. This core MBT ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  5. [5]
    Franco-German MGCS tank project speeding up, Rheinmetall CEO ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · The Franco-German MGCS main battle tank project, which has stalled for years, is speeding up and has political will on both sides, ...
  6. [6]
    Signature of MGCS Project Company shareholder agreement - KNDS
    The company will be equally owned by the parties, 25% each, with a national workshare of 50% Germany and 50% France, and will be based in Cologne, Germany. The ...
  7. [7]
    MGCS Project Company GmbH established in Cologne - Rheinmetall
    Thursday, 17 April 2025 – The next step has now been taken in the Franco-German armaments project Main Ground Combat System (MGCS).
  8. [8]
    Franco-German MGCS Battle Tank Program Moves Ahead with New ...
    Joint firm to oversee next phase of future tank system aimed at replacing Leopard 2 and Leclerc by 2040.
  9. [9]
    Franco-German Next-Gen Tank Project Reaches Key Milestone
    Jan 29, 2025 · The Franco-German Main Combat System of the Future is a replacement for the German Leopard 2 and the French Leclerc main battle tanks, with ...
  10. [10]
    Joint company formed to take Main Ground Combat System ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · MGCS Project Company GmbH was formed on 10 April 2025 to take forward the Franco-German Main Ground Combat System programme.
  11. [11]
    Franco-German agreement on the new Main Ground Combat ...
    Apr 28, 2020 · Germany and France launched the joint MGCS project in 2012 with the project divided into five major phases: operational needs analysis ...Missing: defense council
  12. [12]
    Decoding MGCS Franco-German Tank of the Future Finally Realized
    Apr 29, 2024 · The partnership, which began with formal discussions in 2012 and was officially sealed in 2017, represents a significant step in consolidating ...
  13. [13]
    German-French agreement on the new MGCS main battle tank signed
    Apr 28, 2020 · Since these battle tanks are to be replaced by 2035, Germany and France launched the joint MGCS project in 2012. The project is divided into ...
  14. [14]
    France and Germany Formalize Agreement to Develop Future Main ...
    Apr 29, 2024 · The latest step between France and Germany essentially revitalizes a longstanding project referred to as the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS).
  15. [15]
    MGCS: the first agreements are signed between France and ...
    Apr 29, 2020 · This contract should take place over a period of two years, at the end of which it will be possible to move on to the next phase of the program, ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The FCAS and MGCS Weapon Systems and Franco-German ... - Ifri
    The Future Combat Air System (FCAS) and the Main Ground Combat. System (MGCS) represent the latest chapter in a more than seven decades- long history of Franco- ...
  17. [17]
    France, Germany sign MGCS phase 1A agreement - Army Technology
    Apr 29, 2024 · Defence ministers of France and Germany have formalised their commitment towards the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) programme.Missing: inception history early
  18. [18]
    MGCS: There is a crisis in Franco-German tank construction - ESUT
    Sep 5, 2023 · The background is the constant quarrels between the two partner nations about the development packages, the industrial setup and the management.<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    MGCS: Timetable for future main battle tank system significantly ...
    Sep 26, 2023 · The schedule for the German-French battle tank system of the future (Main Ground Combat System, MGCS) to be ready for series production has been pushed back by ...
  20. [20]
    France and Germany give new push to joint next-generation battle ...
    Sep 22, 2023 · While the initial timetable was somewhere between 2035 and 2040, Lecornu told reporters on Thursday the project "will take us to 2040, 2045.".Missing: adjustments | Show results with:adjustments
  21. [21]
    MGCS Tank Project, a Case Study in How Europe Is Stuck in ...
    Feb 18, 2025 · When MGCS was first introduced, the timeline seemed clear: a prototype by 2028, with serial production by 2035. That would still leave a 60 ...
  22. [22]
    If MGCS drags out, Rheinmetall pitches Concept Unmanned Turret ...
    Jun 17, 2024 · Germany's Rheinmetall is pitching a nearer-term option dubbed the “Concept Unmanned Turret” (CUT) for its Panther KF51 main battle tank.Missing: adjustments | Show results with:adjustments
  23. [23]
    The Leopard 2A-RC 3.0 – a modernization program for the old ...
    This development marks a turning point in the Franco-German MGCS program, even though the latter has been delayed since June 2024. ... Main Ground Combat System ( ...
  24. [24]
    Germany, France reach 'breakthrough' deal on MGCS tank ... - Reuters
    Mar 22, 2024 · Berlin and Paris have reached a "breakthrough" on how to develop a planned next-generation tank known as the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    France and Germany sign off on future battle tank system
    Apr 26, 2024 · Germany is counting on the future combat system to replace its Leopard tanks sometime in the 2040s, while France is looking for the MGCS to ...
  26. [26]
    Key Milestone Reached for Franco-German Future Main Battle Tank ...
    Jan 24, 2025 · This phase will focus on eight key technological areas identified in 2024, such as advanced active protection systems, artificial intelligence- ...
  27. [27]
    MGCS Project Company GmbH established in Cologne to advance ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · Initiated by the French and German governments, the MGCS project aims to replace the current Leopard 2 and Leclerc main battle tanks. The ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    France's Leclerc Tank - The Armory Life
    Oct 4, 2025 · When it entered service in 1992, the MBT was named the Leclerc, in honor of Marshal Philippe Leclerc de Hauteclocque, commander of the Free ...
  29. [29]
    AMX Leclerc MBT (1990) - Tank-AFV
    Leclerc MBT (1990). Main Battle Tank - France. 862 built 1990-2008. The lightest & fastest western MBT. The Leclerc is recognised by numerous world's defence ...
  30. [30]
    Obsolescence issues could increase cost of Leclerc XL upgrade
    Oct 28, 2020 · The cost of the Leclerc XL main battle tank upgrade programme could increase significantly due to years of unaddressed obsolescence issues, ...
  31. [31]
    France's Leclerc tank gets a facelift - Le Monde
    Jul 7, 2023 · 200 units will need to be modernized between now and 2029. But some experts believe the planned 'retrofit' is insufficient in view of the ...
  32. [32]
    Leopard 2 – the bridge to MGCS - Euro-sd
    Jun 25, 2024 · System change with MGCS. In 2012, Germany and France launched the bilateral MGCS project to replace the Leopard 2 and Leclerc MBT families.
  33. [33]
    MBTs vs drones: are tanks obsolete? - Army Technology
    Apr 30, 2025 · Almost all MBTs be they Western or Russian remain greatly vulnerable to FPV drones and are now more or less obsolete in current form.
  34. [34]
    Tanks Were Just Tanks, Until Drones Made Them Change
    Sep 8, 2025 · But the tanks were thrust into battle lacking the appropriate armor to defend against drones. ... drones and legacy threats, such as landmines.
  35. [35]
    Main Ground Combat System: The Powerhouse Tank Germany and ...
    Dec 28, 2024 · MGCS strives to address the limitations of the Leopard 2 and the Leclerc by prioritizing situational awareness via integrating artificial ...
  36. [36]
    Why Develop the MGCS When the Era of Tanks Is Over
    Jan 27, 2025 · The time gap between the T-34 and the Leopard 2 is shorter than the gap between the Leopard 2 and the MGCS. This striking fact is crucial ...
  37. [37]
    Reassessment of Soviet-era Weapons in the Ukraine War - Euro-sd
    Nov 28, 2023 · ... threat. During its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has deployed huge military formations, with large numbers of armoured vehicles and artillery ...
  38. [38]
    Analysis: Germany's MGCS program developing the next-gen tank ...
    Nov 29, 2024 · ... threat detection in high-risk environments. In combat situations ... Moreover, the system's ability to detect threats like drones, anti ...
  39. [39]
    The war in Ukraine: consequences for the Bundeswehr and ... - OSW
    Mar 30, 2022 · After 2014, Russia began to be perceived in Germany as a challenge – but not a threat – to the European security order. At the same time, ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  40. [40]
    The governance and funding of European rearmament - Bruegel
    Europe faces a grave security threat, created by Russia's aggression in Ukraine and exacerbated by changes in US policy on Ukraine and European defence ...
  41. [41]
    Russian hybrid warfare could leave Europe's energy consumers in ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · Russia intensifies 'hybrid warfare' tactics in Europe; Attacks pose severe threat to European energy infrastructure; Diversification and ...
  42. [42]
    https://epthinktank.eu/2025/10/23/eastern-flank-watch-and-european-drone-wall/
  43. [43]
    EU Nations to 'Revolutionize' Main Battle Tanks for Hybrid Warfare
    Apr 24, 2025 · Europe's New Laser-Driven Drone Shield Takes Aim at Rising UAV Threats ... New Hybrid Underwater Drone Poised to Join Italy's Next-Gen Mine ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Open strategic autonomy in European defence: what countries must ...
    Dec 31, 2022 · Main Ground Combat Systems (MGCS) ... programmes will step up Europe's defence output and contribute to the realisation of open strategic autonomy ...
  45. [45]
    KMW and Nexter join forces on Main Ground Combat System - KNDS
    MGCS will develop a new generation of Main ... European armies' main combat capabilities and contribute to Europe's sovereignty and strategic autonomy.
  46. [46]
    https://www.ifri.org/en/studies/troubled-twins-fcas-and-mgcs-weapon-systems-and-franco-german-co-operation
  47. [47]
    Germany approves formation of joint venture for Franco-German ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · The MGCS initiative reflects a broader trend in European defence collaboration, aiming to enhance military capabilities through joint ...Missing: alignment | Show results with:alignment
  48. [48]
    Military Programming Act 2024-2030: European aspects
    Feb 19, 2024 · The MPL forms part of the bedrock fuelled by developments in the European Union aimed at reinforcing EU strategic autonomy, the European DITB in ...
  49. [49]
    Main Ground Combat System - Wikipedia
    The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) is a project launched in 2017 by Germany and France, aiming to replace their current Leopard 2 and Leclerc main battle ...Future Combat Air System · Future Ready Combat Vehicle · Leopard 3 · EMBTMissing: details | Show results with:details
  50. [50]
    MGCS next phase agreement imminent between France and Germany
    Apr 2, 2024 · The French Ministry of Defence announced on 25 March 2024, that the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) is ready to enter the next step of the ...
  51. [51]
    Franco-German company formed to develop and build new Main ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · Franco-German company formed to develop and build new Main Ground Combat System. 27th January 2025 - 09:18 GMT | by Shephard News Team in London.
  52. [52]
    Towards MGCS: KNDS details the future of main battle tanks
    Jun 17, 2024 · Both systems are under development, and they both integrate a modular turret which gun can be switched from 120 mm to 140mm ASCALON® gun. The ...
  53. [53]
    What is MGCS Main Ground Combat System, nicknamed future ...
    Oct 10, 2023 · More than just a traditional heavy armored vehicle, the MGCS is conceived as a multi-platform system: a main battle tank equipped with a large- ...
  54. [54]
    Flash News: Franco-German MGCS Company Formed to ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · On April 17, 2025, a pivotal milestone was reached in the evolution of European defense cooperation with the formal announcement of the MGCS ( ...Missing: setbacks | Show results with:setbacks
  55. [55]
    MGCS Project Company GmbH Officially Launched by KNDS ...
    Apr 18, 2025 · The new entity, headquartered in Germany, will serve as the industrial engine of the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) program, a Franco-German ...
  56. [56]
    KNDS Aims to Establish Itself as Leading European Supplier of ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · KNDS has demonstrated the remote operation capabilities of vehicles, highlighting its technological expertise in the field of military robots.
  57. [57]
    History | KNDS Group
    MGCS will develop a new generation of Main Battle Tanks, providing their users enhanced, innovative, and best-in-class systems with the most advanced ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  58. [58]
    Signature of MGCS Project Company shareholder agreement
    Jan 24, 2025 · Friday, January 24, 2025 – Thales, KNDS Deutschland, KNDS France and Rheinmetall Landsysteme signed the articles of association for MGCS ...Missing: timeline inception
  59. [59]
    Signature of MGCS Project Company shareholder agreement - KNDS
    Jan 24, 2025 · The company will be equally owned by the parties, 25% each, with a national workshare of 50% Germany and 50% France, and will be based in ...Missing: consortium | Show results with:consortium<|control11|><|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Industry signs Letter of Intent on MGCS | KNDS Group
    Jun 18, 2024 · This agreed German/French cooperation on the future land combat system for the armed forces. Download media folder.
  61. [61]
    Shareholder agreement signed for MGCS project company
    Jan 24, 2025 · KNDS, Rheinmetall and Thales are collaborating in a German-French partnership to develop a new battle tank system by 2040.Missing: beyond Safran
  62. [62]
    Adapting European tanks to the war of tomorrow | Thales Group
    Jul 22, 2025 · Its main mission will be to develop new technological bricks designed to adapt battle tanks to the conditions of modern hybrid warfare, by ...
  63. [63]
    MGCS – Main Ground Combat System - Hensoldt
    A state-of-the-art tank system given the unassuming title of Main Ground Combat System (MGCS). It is set to replace the current Leopard 2 and Leclerc main ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  64. [64]
    France, Germany divvy up workload for next-generation tank
    Mar 22, 2024 · Italy, the Netherlands and others have expressed interest in joining the MGCS program, Pistorius said in September after a meeting with Lecornu ...
  65. [65]
    Spain plans to join European battle tank program to secure future ...
    Jun 20, 2025 · While France and Germany remain the principal stakeholders, additional European countries have shown increasing interest in joining or ...
  66. [66]
    Spain and Germany Partner to develop collaboration of Spanish ...
    May 26, 2025 · Spain and Germany Partner to develop collaboration of Spanish army armored vehicles modernization.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Italy's Leonardo and Germany's Rheinmetall forge new defence ...
    Jul 4, 2024 · Leonardo and Rheinmetall have announced today a 50/50 joint venture to develop next-generation land defence systems.
  68. [68]
    Europe's Sixth-Gen Fighter Program Could Learn from Its Tank ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · Germany and France are seeking to share the costs, and could soon have a third partner, as Belgium has also expressed interest in joining the ...
  69. [69]
    Germany Back with France on MGCS after Rumours of a Separate ...
    Sep 25, 2023 · The collaboration is led by Nexter on the French side and by Krauss-Maffei-Wegmann (KMW) and Rheinmetall on the German end. MGCS was launched in ...
  70. [70]
    Italy and Germany join forces on tanks. Are jets next? - Decode39
    Sep 7, 2023 · Berlin, Madrid, Rome and Stockholm have reportedly agreed on jointly developing the next-gen battle tank. This could spell the end of the Franco-German ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    France, Germany ink deal on way ahead for 'completely new' future ...
    Apr 26, 2024 · France and Germany today signed “phase 1A” of the agreement to jointly develop the next-generation Main Ground Combat System (MGCS).Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  72. [72]
    Germany-France: the MGCS tank project risks failing - Agenzia Nova
    Sep 4, 2023 · The German-French project for the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS), known as the "European tank", is in danger of failing.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  73. [73]
    The Persistent Lack of Strategic Convergence between France and ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · France and Germany have not developed a shared strategic outlook or even a joint vision for European security.
  74. [74]
    https://eualive.net/german-lawmaker-warns-berlin-may-exit-franco-german-fcas-fighter-jet-project/
  75. [75]
    German lawmaker warns Berlin may exit Franco-German FCAS ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · Berlin has accused French industry, particularly Dassault Aviation, of obstructing the next phase of FCAS by demanding sole leadership, ...
  76. [76]
    Overcoming challenges: advancing the MGCS future Main Battle Tank
    Aug 20, 2023 · The new generation tank developed unde the MGCS program would completely overhaul the features of today's European Main Battle Tanks (MBT).Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
  77. [77]
    Germany back with France on MGCS after rumours of a separate ...
    Oct 5, 2023 · Crucially, France pledged to re-insert MGCS in its military budget for 2024, as it was interestingly omitted in its 2023 military budget ...
  78. [78]
    France and Germany finalise shareholder agreement for MGCS ...
    Jan 24, 2025 · The Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) project aims to replace the Leopard 2 and Leclerc tanks with an advanced cross-platform combat system by 2040.Missing: funding debates
  79. [79]
    Leopard 2A-RC 3.0, EMBT...: Will the interim tanks have the skin of ...
    Jun 14, 2024 · Will the intermediate generation tank supplant an overly ambitious MGCS program? Conclusion. Key lessons from the war in Ukraine, and the ...
  80. [80]
    Eurosatory 2024 - From Leopard 2A8 and Leclerc XLR to MGCS
    Jun 17, 2024 · The Leclerc Evolution wants to be an intermediate solution between current tanks and the MGCS, therefore it is designed exploiting state-of-the- ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    France's Uncertainty Amid Challenges for Future Main Ground ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · This joint Franco-German initiative represents an ambitious but complex program designed to replace the French Leclerc and German Leopard 2 ...
  82. [82]
    With MGCS, is France repeating the same mistake for 2040 as with ...
    Oct 30, 2024 · The Main Ground Combat System, or MGCS, program was intended to allow France and Germany to pool their skills, resources and needs to replace the Leclerc tanks ...
  83. [83]
    Franco-German MGCS project hits milestone with new agreement
    Jan 27, 2025 · Franco-German MGCS project has new agreement. MGCS will replace the Leopard 2 and Leclerc main battle tanks by 2040. January 27, 2025. Share.Missing: timeline inception initial