Martin Rees
Martin John Rees, Baron Rees of Ludlow, FRS (born 23 June 1942), is a British astrophysicist and cosmologist renowned for foundational contributions to understanding quasars, supermassive black holes, and the large-scale structure of the universe.[1][2] He served as Astronomer Royal from 1995 to 2025, providing scientific advice to the British monarch on astronomical matters, and held the position of President of the Royal Society from 2005 to 2010, guiding the UK's premier scientific academy during a period of advancing interdisciplinary research.[3][4][5] Rees earned his BA in mathematics and PhD in theoretical astronomy from Trinity College, Cambridge, in 1963 and 1967, respectively, before advancing to professorial roles at the University of Sussex and later returning to Cambridge as Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics, a position from which he retired as emeritus professor.[1] His research elucidated mechanisms powering active galactic nuclei through accretion onto black holes, predicted polarization signatures in the cosmic microwave background to trace primordial fluctuations, and advanced models of galaxy clustering and formation, influencing modern observational cosmology.[2][6][7] As Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, from 2004 to 2012, he oversaw one of the university's most prestigious institutions, fostering excellence in research and education.[3] Elevated to the peerage in 2005 as a crossbench life peer, Rees has engaged in public discourse on existential risks from emerging technologies such as biotechnology and artificial intelligence, authoring influential works like Our Final Century (2003) that emphasize humanity's precarious trajectory amid rapid scientific progress.[5][8] His accolades include the 2024 Wolf Prize in Physics for advancing comprehension of cosmic phenomena and the 2001 Gruber Cosmology Prize for broad impacts on astrophysical theory, underscoring his enduring influence despite occasional debates over his acceptance of the 2011 Templeton Prize, which some viewed as blurring lines between science and theology given his agnostic stance.[2][6][9]