Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Matter creation

Matter creation is the physical process by which energy is converted into particles possessing rest mass, as described by Albert Einstein's mass-energy equivalence principle E = mc^2, where energy E produces mass m at the speed of light c. This phenomenon manifests primarily through pair production in quantum electrodynamics, wherein high-energy photons or colliding particles generate electron-positron (matter-antimatter) pairs, and extends to cosmological scales where the early universe's thermal energy formed quarks, leptons, and hadrons from a primordial quark-gluon plasma.^[1]^[2]^[3] In particle accelerators, matter creation is routinely achieved by accelerating charged particles, such as electrons or protons, to relativistic speeds and inducing collisions that transform kinetic and electromagnetic energy into new particle masses, often producing short-lived particles, such as resonances and heavy quarks, within the Standard Model framework. For instance, the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory demonstrated direct matter creation from light in 2021 by colliding gold ions, generating over 6,000 electron-positron pairs from virtual photons in the ions' electromagnetic fields, confirming a 1934 prediction by Gregory Breit and John Wheeler. Similarly, the 1997 SLAC E-144 experiment marked the first laboratory observation of matter solely from photon collisions, producing electron-positron pairs at energies up to 50 GeV. These experiments underscore the conservation of quantum numbers like charge and lepton number in pair production, requiring a minimum photon energy of 1.022 MeV (twice the electron rest mass) near a nucleus for momentum balance.^[1]^[2]^[4] Cosmologically, matter creation dominated the universe's first microseconds after the Big Bang, when temperatures exceeded $10^{12} K, allowing energy from the initial singularity to materialize as fundamental fermions via electroweak interactions and subsequent hadronization. Recent lattice quantum chromodynamics calculations from heavy-ion collisions suggest that up to 70% of certain observed hadrons, such as charmonium states, formed not directly from the initial quark-gluon plasma but through secondary regeneration reactions as the system cooled and expanded, providing insights into baryogenesis—the slight asymmetry that left a matter-dominated universe despite equal initial production of matter and antimatter. Theoretical extensions, including the Schwinger effect, propose that ultra-intense laser fields combined with electron beams could extract matter-antimatter pairs from quantum vacuum fluctuations, potentially enabling controlled particle cascades for applications in fusion energy. As of 2025, while matter creation is well-established within the Standard Model, searches for processes involving particles beyond it continue without confirmation.^[3]^[5]^[6]

Theoretical Foundations

Energy-Matter Equivalence

The principle of energy-matter equivalence, famously encapsulated in Albert Einstein's equation E = mc^2, establishes that mass and energy are interchangeable forms of the same underlying entity. In his 1905 paper "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?", Einstein derived this relation within the framework of special relativity by considering the momentum and energy conservation in the emission of radiation from a moving body. He demonstrated that the energy E released by a body corresponds to a loss in its inertial mass m, where c is the speed of light in vacuum, leading to the equivalence E = mc^2. This derivation showed that even small amounts of mass contain vast quantities of energy, a concept that revolutionized physics by unifying space, time, and matter.^[7]^[8] Under sufficient conditions, this equivalence allows pure energy to manifest as rest mass, creating particles from electromagnetic or kinetic energy sources. For instance, a gamma-ray photon with energy exceeding 1.022 MeV—the combined rest mass energy of an electron and positron—can convert into an electron-positron pair in the presence of a nucleus, illustrating the threshold for such transformations in high-energy environments. This process underscores how concentrated energy densities enable the emergence of matter, a foundational idea for understanding creation mechanisms in relativistic contexts.^[9] In practical units, the equation expresses energy in joules (J) when mass is in kilograms (kg) and c = 3 \times 10^8 m/s, highlighting the enormous energy scale: 1 kg of mass equates to approximately $9 \times 10^{16} J, far surpassing chemical energies. In particle physics, this equivalence is pivotal in nuclear reactions, where fission of uranium-235 releases about 200 MeV per atom—equivalent to 0.1% of the nucleus's mass converted to energy—powering reactors and explaining atomic bomb yields. Similarly, fusion in stars converts hydrogen mass into helium, liberating energy that sustains cosmic structures. These implications extend to experimental validations, confirming the formula's role in energy release from mass defects.^[10]^[11]^[12] While classical relativity provides the equivalence principle, quantum field theory offers the quantum mechanical framework for realizing matter creation from energy fluctuations.

Quantum Field Theory Basics

Quantum field theory (QFT) forms the cornerstone of the Standard Model of particle physics, unifying quantum mechanics and special relativity by treating particles as quantized excitations—or quanta—of pervasive underlying fields that extend throughout spacetime.^[13] In this framework, each type of particle corresponds to a specific field, such as the electromagnetic field for photons or the electron field for electrons, with interactions arising from the coupling of these fields.^[14] The mathematical description employs creation and annihilation operators: the creation operator a^\dagger excites the field by adding a particle quantum, increasing the particle number, while the annihilation operator a removes a quantum, reducing it.^[15] These operators satisfy commutation relations, such as [a, a^\dagger] = 1 for bosonic fields, enabling the probabilistic description of particle states in a Fock space.^[14] The vacuum state in QFT represents the ground state of all fields, defined as the configuration annihilated by all annihilation operators, with no real particles present.^[14] However, this vacuum possesses a nonzero zero-point energy, arising from the inherent quantum fluctuations of the fields even in their lowest energy configuration.^[16] Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, \Delta E \Delta t \geq \hbar/2, manifests here by permitting brief deviations from exact energy conservation, allowing virtual particle-antiparticle pairs to emerge from the vacuum and subsequently annihilate, without violating overall conservation laws on measurable timescales.^[16] These vacuum fluctuations underpin phenomena like the Casimir effect, where the zero-point energy leads to observable forces between uncharged plates.^[16] Feynman diagrams provide a perturbative tool in QFT for visualizing and calculating processes involving particle creation and interactions, where lines represent field propagators and vertices denote interactions.^[14] External lines correspond to real particles, which are on-shell (satisfying E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4) and directly observable as incoming or outgoing states.^[17] In contrast, internal lines depict virtual particles, which are off-shell intermediaries that do not obey the mass-shell condition, facilitating short-lived exchanges that mediate forces without being directly detectable.^[17] This distinction highlights how QFT enables matter creation not as a classical process but through quantum field dynamics, building on relativistic energy-matter equivalence to allow energy conversion into observable particles under sufficient conditions.^[13]

Conservation Principles

In particle physics, the creation of matter is strictly governed by fundamental conservation laws that ensure the total quantum numbers remain unchanged in interactions. Electric charge conservation mandates that the net charge before and after any process, including matter creation, must be identical, a principle upheld across all known interactions. Similarly, baryon number conservation requires that the total number of baryons minus antibaryons remains constant, preventing processes like the spontaneous creation of a single baryon without an accompanying antibaryon. Lepton number conservation follows the same logic, preserving the difference between leptons and antileptons in creation events.^[18]^[19] These conservation laws hold rigorously within the Standard Model but may be violated in grand unified theories (GUTs), where baryon and lepton numbers are not independent symmetries. In GUTs, such as SU(5) or SO(10) models, the unification of strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces at high energies allows processes like proton decay, which violate baryon number by ΔB = -1 while conserving B - L in many cases. Lepton number violations can also occur through similar mechanisms, such as neutrinoless double beta decay, though experimental limits tightly constrain these effects to scales above 10^15 GeV.^[20]^[21] The CPT theorem further constrains matter creation by imposing symmetry between particles and antiparticles under combined charge conjugation (C), parity (P), and time reversal (T) transformations. This theorem, a cornerstone of relativistic quantum field theories, implies that creation and annihilation processes for matter and antimatter must be mirror images, ensuring equal production rates in CPT-invariant interactions and explaining why isolated matter creation without corresponding antimatter is forbidden. Violations of CPT would signal new physics beyond the Standard Model, but experiments confirm its validity to high precision, such as in neutral kaon systems.^[22]^[23] Unitarity in quantum field theory (QFT) guarantees the conservation of probability during matter creation events, ensuring that transition amplitudes satisfy |S|^2 = 1, where S is the scattering matrix. This principle prevents unphysical outcomes like probability exceeding unity in multi-particle production and maintains the consistency of QFT descriptions. QFT operators, such as creation and annihilation operators, enforce these unitarity constraints in the Hilbert space formalism.^[24]

Particle Physics Processes

Pair Production from Photons

Pair production from photons is a quantum electrodynamic process in which a high-energy photon interacts with the Coulomb field of an atomic nucleus to create an electron-positron pair, converting electromagnetic energy into matter while conserving energy, momentum, and charge. This phenomenon exemplifies the energy-matter equivalence principle, as articulated by Einstein's E = mc^2, where the photon's energy is at least partially transformed into the rest masses of the particle-antiparticle pair.^[25] The process cannot occur in free space due to momentum conservation but requires the presence of a nearby nucleus to absorb recoil momentum.^[25] The minimum photon energy required, known as the kinematic threshold, is $2m_e c^2 = 1.022 MeV, where m_e is the electron rest mass; below this energy, the process is forbidden as insufficient to create the pair at rest relative to the nucleus.^[25] Experimental observation of pair production was first reported in 1933 by Carl D. Anderson, who analyzed cloud-chamber photographs of cosmic-ray showers and identified tracks of equal numbers of positive and negative electrons produced in pairs, attributing the phenomenon to the absorption of hard gamma rays in matter.^[26] This discovery built on Anderson's earlier detection of the positron in 1932 and provided direct evidence for matter creation from photon interactions in cosmic rays.^[26] The theoretical framework for pair production was developed by Hans Bethe and Walter Heitler in 1934, who calculated the differential and total cross-sections using first-order perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics, treating the nucleus as a static Coulomb potential.^[27] In the high-energy limit (E_\gamma \gg m_e c^2), the total cross-section per atom is given by

\sigma \approx Z^2 \alpha r_e^2 \left[ \frac{28}{9} \ln \frac{2 E_\gamma}{m_e c^2} - \frac{218}{27} \right],

where Z is the atomic number, \alpha \approx 1/137 is the fine-structure constant, and r_e = e^2 / (4\pi \epsilon_0 m_e c^2) \approx 2.82 \times 10^{-15} m is the classical electron radius; this formula rises logarithmically with photon energy before approaching an asymptotic value proportional to Z^2.^[25] Near threshold, the cross-section vanishes and increases rapidly, peaking around 5–10 MeV depending on Z.^[25] The Bethe-Heitler formalism also describes the angular distribution of the produced electron and positron, which is strongly forward-peaked relative to the incident photon direction due to the small transverse momentum transfer.^[28] The typical opening angle between the pair is on the order of m_e c^2 / E_\gamma, with the electron and positron sharing the photon energy asymmetrically but symmetrically in distribution (interchangeable roles); integration of the unscreened differential cross-section yields a distribution that falls off rapidly for angles exceeding a few degrees at GeV energies.^[28] Nuclear screening effects modify this at very small angles, but the forward bias persists, making the pairs highly collimated beams.^[28] In modern gamma-ray astronomy, pair production serves as the primary detection mechanism for photons above 30 MeV in space-based telescopes, where incident gamma rays convert into electron-positron pairs in thin conversion layers (e.g., tungsten foils), and the resulting tracks are reconstructed to determine direction and energy.^[29] Instruments like the EGRET detector on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory exploited this process to image cosmic sources, achieving angular resolutions of about 5–6° at 100 MeV by tracking pair trajectories in spark chambers; contemporary missions such as Fermi-LAT extend this to silicon-strip trackers for improved precision.^[29] These applications enable the study of high-energy astrophysical phenomena, including active galactic nuclei and gamma-ray bursts, by leveraging the clean signatures of pair cascades.^[29]

Matter Creation in Collisions

In high-energy particle collisions, such as those occurring in proton-proton (pp) interactions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), matter creation arises from the conversion of kinetic energy into new particles through strong interactions governed by quantum chromodynamics (QCD). When two protons collide, their constituent partons—primarily quarks and gluons—undergo hard scattering processes at scales where perturbative QCD applies, producing additional quarks and gluons with high transverse momentum. These partons then evolve through soft gluon emissions, described by the Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolution equations, before undergoing non-perturbative hadronization to form observable hadrons. The total available energy for these processes is set by the center-of-mass energy squared, s = (p_1 + p_2)^2, where p_1 and p_2 are the four-momenta of the colliding particles, enabling the creation of particles whose rest masses sum to less than \sqrt{s}.^[30]^[31] A prominent example of matter creation in such collisions is the production of the Higgs boson via gluon fusion, the dominant mechanism at the LHC, where two gluons from the protons fuse through a top-quark loop to form the Higgs. The leading-order partonic cross section for this process, gg \to H, is approximated as

\hat{\sigma} \approx \frac{G_F \alpha_s^2 m_H^2}{16 \pi^3} |A|^2 \delta(\hat{s} - m_H^2),

where G_F is the Fermi constant, \alpha_s is the strong coupling constant, m_H is the Higgs mass, \hat{s} is the partonic center-of-mass energy squared, and |A| is the loop form factor dominated by the top-quark contribution. This process exemplifies how collision energy is transformed into a new massive particle, with the full hadronic cross section obtained by convoluting the partonic result with parton distribution functions. The LHC has observed this production mode, confirming the Standard Model prediction with cross sections on the order of tens of picobarns at \sqrt{s} = 13 TeV. In more general pp collisions, the final states often involve multi-particle configurations due to the abundant production of quarks and gluons, leading to complex event topologies. These partons fragment into collimated sprays of hadrons known as jets, which serve as experimental signatures of the underlying hard scatter. Jet formation in QCD proceeds perturbatively at high energies, with infrared and collinear safe algorithms (e.g., the anti-k_t algorithm) used to cluster particles based on distance measures like d_{ij} = \min(p_{T i}^2, p_{T j}^2) \Delta R_{ij}^2 / R^2, where \Delta R is the angular separation and R is the jet radius. Multi-jet events, arising from higher-order QCD processes, allow probing of strong coupling dynamics, with cross sections factorized into hard scattering, parton evolution, and fragmentation functions; for instance, inclusive dijet production rates match next-to-leading-order predictions to within 10-20% across a wide range of transverse momenta. This hadronization of partonic matter into jets underscores the transition from perturbative to non-perturbative QCD regimes in collision environments.^[31]

Virtual Particle Creation

In quantum field theory, the vacuum is a dynamic entity characterized by quantum fluctuations that produce transient virtual particle-antiparticle pairs, which exist briefly off the mass shell and mediate fundamental interactions without direct observability.^[32] The Casimir effect serves as a key experimental manifestation of these virtual particles, demonstrating how vacuum fluctuations can exert measurable forces. Predicted by Hendrik Casimir in 1948, the effect arises from the boundary conditions imposed by two closely spaced, uncharged, parallel conducting plates, which suppress certain wavelengths of the electromagnetic vacuum modes between them compared to outside, leading to a net attractive pressure. The force F on plates of area A separated by distance d is given by

F = -\frac{\pi^2 \hbar c A}{240 d^4},

where \hbar is the reduced Planck's constant and c is the speed of light; this force has been precisely measured in laboratory settings, confirming the prediction to high accuracy.^[33] Virtual particles also play a crucial role in quantum electrodynamics (QED), influencing atomic spectra through effects like the Lamb shift and vacuum polarization, both requiring renormalization to resolve perturbative divergences. The Lamb shift, experimentally observed in 1947 as a small energy splitting between the $2S_{1/2} and $2P_{1/2} levels of the hydrogen atom (approximately 1057 MHz), results from the electron's interaction with virtual photons and pairs in the vacuum, effectively altering the electron's self-energy. Hans Bethe provided the first theoretical explanation using a semi-relativistic approach, calculating the shift as an integral over vacuum fluctuation modes, which laid the groundwork for QED's success.^[34] Vacuum polarization, meanwhile, describes how virtual electron-positron pairs screen the bare electric charge, modifying the photon propagator and introducing a momentum-dependent effective charge; Julian Schwinger's 1949 covariant formulation integrated this into QED renormalization, absorbing ultraviolet infinities into physical parameters like the observed charge and mass.^[32] Although analogous to the mechanism proposed for Hawking radiation—where virtual pairs near a black hole horizon can separate to produce real particles—in non-gravitational, flat-spacetime scenarios, these virtual fluctuations remain undetectable, rapidly annihilating to preserve energy conservation without net matter creation.^[35]

Cosmological Contexts

Early Universe Baryogenesis

In the early universe, the process of baryogenesis refers to the generation of a net baryon number, explaining the observed predominance of matter over antimatter. This asymmetry arose shortly after the Big Bang, when the universe was hot and dense, allowing for processes that violated certain symmetries and conservation laws. The theoretical framework for baryogenesis was established by Andrei Sakharov, who outlined three necessary conditions in 1967: (1) baryon number violation through interactions beyond the standard conservation laws, (2) charge conjugation (C) and charge-parity (CP) symmetry violation to distinguish matter from antimatter, and (3) departure from thermal equilibrium to prevent symmetric annihilation.^[36] These conditions are satisfied in the electroweak phase transition, occurring around 100 GeV when the Higgs field acquires a vacuum expectation value, breaking electroweak symmetry. Here, sphaleron transitions—non-perturbative topological processes in the electroweak sector—enable rapid baryon number violation at high temperatures, converting any initial lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry while preserving B - L (baryon minus lepton number). Electroweak baryogenesis requires a strong first-order phase transition to create out-of-equilibrium conditions, often involving extensions to the Standard Model such as additional Higgs sectors or supersymmetry to enhance CP violation.^[37]^[38] The observed baryon asymmetry is quantified by the parameter η, the ratio of baryon number density to photon number density, measured as η ≈ 6 × 10^{-10} through cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies and Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) abundances of light elements like deuterium and helium. This value indicates that for every billion baryons, there is roughly one excess over antibaryons, a puzzle since the Standard Model alone predicts negligible asymmetry without extensions. At grand unified theory (GUT) scales around 10^{16} GeV, alternative mechanisms like leptogenesis generate a primordial lepton asymmetry via CP-violating decays of heavy right-handed neutrinos, which sphalerons later partially convert to baryon asymmetry during the electroweak era.^[39]^[40]

Inflation and Reheating

In the inflationary paradigm, the universe undergoes a phase of rapid exponential expansion driven by a scalar field known as the inflaton, denoted \phi. The dynamics of this field are governed by its potential V(\phi), which is typically flat enough to satisfy the slow-roll conditions: the potential's first and second derivatives must be small compared to V(\phi) itself, specifically \epsilon = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{V'}{V} \right)^2 \ll 1 and \eta = \frac{V''}{V} \ll 1, where primes denote derivatives with respect to \phi. These conditions ensure that the inflaton rolls slowly down the potential, with its kinetic energy negligible compared to the potential energy, leading to quasi-de Sitter expansion where the Hubble parameter H is nearly constant. Seminal models, such as chaotic inflation with V(\phi) = \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2, demonstrate how this mechanism resolves the horizon and flatness problems of the standard Big Bang cosmology. During slow-roll inflation, quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field, \delta \phi, arise from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and are amplified as they are stretched beyond the Hubble horizon. These primordial fluctuations, with a nearly scale-invariant power spectrum \Delta^2_\phi(k) \approx \frac{H^2}{8\pi^2 \epsilon}, source classical density perturbations \delta \rho / \rho \sim H / \dot{\phi} upon horizon re-entry after inflation ends. These perturbations serve as the seeds for the large-scale structure of the universe, including galaxies and cosmic web filaments, as confirmed by observations of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies.^[41] As inflation concludes, the inflaton field begins to oscillate rapidly around the minimum of V(\phi), transitioning the universe's equation of state from vacuum-dominated to matter-like. Reheating follows, converting the coherent energy of the oscillating inflaton into relativistic particles through non-perturbative processes, primarily parametric resonance. In this mechanism, the time-varying inflaton background induces exponential growth in the occupation numbers of produced particles, described by the Mathieu equation for mode functions, with resonance parameter q = g^2 \Phi^2 / (4 m^2) where \Phi is the inflaton amplitude, g the coupling, and m the particle mass. For modes in the instability band, the occupation number grows exponentially as n_k \propto \exp(2 \mu_k m t), where the Floquet exponent \mu_k \approx 0.13 for q \gg 1 in the broad resonance regime, efficiently populating the particle spectrum and leading to non-thermal particle production. This preheating phase, distinct from perturbative decay, can complete within a few oscillations, backreacting on the inflaton and broadening the resonance bands.^[42] The reheating process culminates in the decay of the inflaton condensate into a thermal plasma, marking the onset of the hot Big Bang era. The reheating temperature, set by the energy density at the end of preheating \rho \sim ( \pi^2 / 30 ) g_* T_{rh}^4 where g_* counts relativistic degrees of freedom, typically reaches around $10^{15} GeV in grand unified theory-scale models, ensuring compatibility with nucleosynthesis constraints while avoiding excessive gravitational wave production. This transition populates the universe with standard model particles, establishing the initial conditions for subsequent cosmological evolution.

Dark Matter Formation

Dark matter, which constitutes approximately 27% of the universe's energy density, is hypothesized to have been produced in the early universe through various mechanisms that decouple it from the standard model particles. These processes occur primarily during or shortly after cosmic inflation and reheating, leading to the observed relic abundance without direct thermal equilibrium in many cases. One prominent mechanism for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) involves thermal freeze-out, where dark matter particles are in thermal equilibrium with the hot plasma of the early universe and annihilate into standard model particles until their interaction rate falls below the Hubble expansion rate, "freezing out" their number density. This occurs when the WIMP mass is around the electroweak scale, typically 10 GeV to a few TeV, allowing the annihilation cross-section to naturally yield the observed relic density. The relic abundance is given by \Omega h^2 \approx 0.1 \, \mathrm{pb} / \langle \sigma v \rangle, where \Omega is the density parameter, h is the reduced Hubble constant, \langle \sigma v \rangle is the thermally averaged annihilation cross-section times relative velocity, and the value 0.1 pb (picobarns) corresponds to weak-scale interactions that match the measured dark matter density \Omega h^2 \approx 0.12.^[43] Non-thermal production mechanisms offer alternatives for lighter or feebly interacting candidates, such as axions. In the misalignment mechanism, the axion field, arising from the spontaneous breaking of Peccei-Quinn symmetry to solve the strong CP problem, starts with a non-zero initial value in the early universe and begins coherent oscillations when the Hubble parameter drops below the axion mass, converting the field's potential energy into particles that behave as cold dark matter. This process, operative for axion decay constants f_a \sim 10^{12} GeV, can account for the full dark matter relic density without thermal production.^[44] Another non-thermal pathway is gravitational production during inflation, where quantum fluctuations of minimally coupled scalar or fermionic fields in the expanding spacetime generate particles whose abundance depends on the field's mass and the inflationary scale, potentially explaining dark matter for superheavy candidates up to $10^{13} GeV without invoking new interactions.^[45] Observational evidence for dark matter, supporting these formation scenarios, comes from galaxy rotation curves, which show flat orbital velocities out to large radii inconsistent with visible matter alone, implying a dark halo mass comparable to or exceeding the baryonic content, as first demonstrated in spiral galaxies like Andromeda. Complementary support arises from cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, where the Planck satellite measured the dark matter density parameter \Omega_c h^2 = 0.120 \pm 0.001, influencing the power spectrum through gravitational effects on photon-baryon fluid oscillations during recombination. Leading WIMP candidates include the neutralino, the lightest supersymmetric particle stable under R-parity, proposed as a thermal relic with electroweak-scale mass and couplings. For non-thermal cases, sterile neutrinos with masses around 1-50 keV, produced via oscillations with active neutrinos, serve as warm dark matter candidates that suppress small-scale structure formation.^[46]

Experimental Realization

High-Energy Accelerators

High-energy accelerators have been instrumental in experimentally realizing matter creation by converting kinetic energy from particle collisions into the mass of new particles, demonstrating E=mc² on microscopic scales. The Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at CERN, operating as a proton-antiproton collider in the early 1980s, achieved a center-of-mass energy of 540 GeV and enabled the landmark discovery of the W and Z bosons in 1983 by the UA1 and UA2 collaborations. These massive electroweak bosons, with masses around 80 and 91 GeV/c² respectively, were produced in pairs or singly from high-energy collisions, marking the first direct observation of matter creation for particles mediating the weak force and confirming the electroweak unification in the Standard Model. The Tevatron at Fermilab, which operated from 1983 to 2011 with a center-of-mass energy of up to 1.96 TeV, extended these capabilities by producing heavier particles, including the top quark discovered in 1995 by the CDF and DØ collaborations. At this energy scale, proton-antiproton collisions routinely created top quark-antiquark pairs, each top quark with a mass of approximately 173 GeV/c², decaying almost instantaneously into bottom quarks and W bosons, thereby creating cascades of new matter. The Tevatron's operations amassed over 10 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity, allowing precise measurements of top quark production rates and properties, which served as benchmarks for beyond-Standard-Model searches. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, operational since 2008 with design center-of-mass energies up to 14 TeV (achieving 13.6 TeV in recent runs), represents the pinnacle of controlled matter creation experiments, producing on the order of tens of top quarks per second at peak luminosities alongside searches for exotic particles. Proton-proton collisions at the LHC generate top quark pairs through strong and electroweak processes, with production cross-sections around 800 pb at 13 TeV, enabling studies of matter creation in dense QCD environments. The ATLAS and CMS detectors play crucial roles in identifying these events: ATLAS uses silicon pixel trackers and calorimeter systems to reconstruct jets from quark fragmentation, while both experiments measure missing transverse energy from undetected neutrinos to infer W boson decays and potential new stable particles indicative of dark matter candidates. These observations, from datasets exceeding 100 fb⁻¹, have set stringent limits on beyond-Standard-Model particles up to several TeV in mass, highlighting the accelerators' role in probing new forms of matter.

Astrophysical Observations

Astrophysical observations provide indirect evidence for matter creation through high-energy processes in cosmic environments, where telescopes and detectors capture signatures of particle production on scales inaccessible to laboratory experiments. In gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), ultra-high-energy photons interact to produce electron-positron pairs via pair production, a process inferred from spectral features in observations by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). For instance, in GRB 130427A, the LAT detected over 500 photons above 100 MeV, including a 95 GeV photon, with spectra exhibiting power-law forms that require source transparency against photon-photon pair production absorption, implying bulk Lorentz factors exceeding 100 to avoid opacity at energies above 100 GeV.^[47] These absorption features, evident in the cutoff or softening of the spectrum beyond tens of GeV, signal the creation of matter-antimatter pairs within the GRB jet, constraining models of relativistic outflows and high-energy emission mechanisms. Neutron star mergers represent another key site for matter creation, particularly through the rapid neutron capture process (r-process) that synthesizes heavy elements beyond iron. The gravitational-wave event GW170817, detected by LIGO/Virgo, was accompanied by a kilonova—a transient powered by the radioactive decay of freshly created r-process nuclei in the merger ejecta. Observations of the kilonova AT 2017gfo revealed blue and red components in the optical and infrared spectra, corresponding to lanthanide-poor and lanthanide-rich ejecta with velocities up to 0.3c and masses around 0.04 solar masses, confirming the production of elements like gold and europium via r-process nucleosynthesis.^[48] While core-collapse supernovae contribute to lighter r-process elements, neutron star mergers like GW170817 dominate the cosmic budget of heavy r-process material, as inferred from the event's ejected mass and merger rates matching galactic abundances. Cosmic ray interactions with Earth's atmosphere generate extensive air showers, where pion production in hadronic collisions creates secondary particles, offering insights into matter creation at ultra-high energies. The Pierre Auger Observatory detects these showers through fluorescence telescopes and surface detectors, measuring properties like muon content to probe the underlying particle production. In highly inclined showers, the atmospheric production depth of muons—primarily from charged pion decays—peaks at depths of about 400-600 g/cm², indicating pion creation via proton-air nucleus interactions at center-of-mass energies exceeding 400 TeV.^[49] Data from Auger constrain pion interaction models, such as the inelastic cross-section and multiplicity, by comparing observed muon densities (up to 10^4 m⁻² for 10¹⁹ eV primaries) with simulations, revealing enhanced pion production that aligns with QCD expectations for high-energy hadronic processes. These observations highlight the role of air showers in quantifying matter creation through secondary particle cascades, with implications for understanding cosmic ray origins.

Laboratory Simulations

Laboratory simulations of matter creation employ analog systems in controlled environments to replicate quantum field effects like pair production from the vacuum, without relying on high-energy particle accelerators. These tabletop experiments use condensed matter platforms to mimic phenomena such as virtual particle creation, where particle-antiparticle pairs briefly emerge from the quantum vacuum. By engineering effective horizons or strong fields, researchers observe analogs of processes like Hawking radiation and Schwinger pair production, providing insights into fundamental quantum electrodynamics (QED) effects that are otherwise inaccessible due to extreme energy requirements.^[50] In Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs), sonic black hole analogs simulate Hawking radiation through the creation of phonon pairs near engineered horizons. A key experiment created a sonic horizon in a BEC by accelerating atomic flow beyond the speed of sound using a step-like potential, forming a region where phonons (sound quasiparticles) cannot escape, analogous to light in a gravitational black hole. Simulations confirmed negative energy excitations, with an effective Hawking temperature exceeding 2 nK and a phonon lifetime of at least 20 ms, sufficient for observation. Further work observed self-amplifying Hawking radiation in a low-temperature BEC analog of a charged black hole, where negative energy phonon partners reflect between an outer and inner horizon, producing approximately three Hawking phonons per incident partner at a frequency about 0.3 times the Hawking temperature. These entangled phonon pairs demonstrate mode mixing and interference, validating the analog prediction of particle creation at horizons.^[51]^[52] Laser-induced pair production via the Schwinger mechanism represents another approach, where intense electromagnetic fields probe vacuum instability in tabletop setups. The Schwinger effect predicts spontaneous electron-positron pair creation when the electric field exceeds the critical value, with the pair production rate given by

\Gamma \approx \frac{\alpha^2 E^2}{4\pi^3} \exp\left(-\frac{\pi m^2}{e E}\right),

where \alpha is the fine-structure constant, E is the electric field strength, m is the electron mass, and e is the elementary charge; this non-perturbative process arises from tunneling through the Dirac sea. Although pure vacuum Schwinger pair production requires unattainable intensities (\sim 10^{29} W/cm²), assisted variants using high-intensity lasers (\sim 10^{22} W/cm²) on near-critical-density plasmas have generated dense GeV-scale electron-positron pairs via multi-photon processes, yielding up to $10^{11} positrons at densities of $4 \times 10^{22} cm⁻³ and 0.14% laser energy conversion efficiency. These experiments bridge to the Schwinger regime by lowering the effective threshold through plasma interactions.^[53]^[54] Tabletop simulations of vacuum decay and pair production also utilize graphene and optical lattices as quantum analogs. In graphene, the Dirac-like band structure enables mesoscopic analogs of the Schwinger effect, where strong electric fields induce pair production across the bandgap, mimicking QED vacuum decay; experiments have probed this by observing charge carrier multiplication under intense fields, providing a first-principles test of non-perturbative pair creation in a solid-state system. Optical lattices with ultra-cold atoms simulate the Schwinger mechanism by discretizing the Dirac equation in a Fermi-Hubbard model, where a tunable supercritical potential drives spontaneous particle-hole pair creation analogous to electron-positron pairs diving into the negative energy continuum. These setups, using bichromatic lattices to represent particles and antiparticles, offer controllable parameters for studying vacuum instability without extreme fields.^[55]^[50]

Implications and Challenges

CP Violation in Creation

Charge-parity (CP) violation plays a pivotal role in enabling asymmetric matter creation by providing the necessary distinction between matter and antimatter processes in the Standard Model. In the quark sector, this violation arises from the complex phase in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, which parameterizes quark mixing in weak interactions.^[56] The phase introduces irreducible differences in the amplitudes for processes involving quarks and antiquarks, leading to observable asymmetries in decay rates. A key manifestation is in neutral kaon (K^0) decays, where CP violation in mixing is quantified by the parameter \epsilon \approx (2.23 \pm 0.01) \times 10^{-3}, reflecting the small but nonzero imbalance between K^0 and \overline{K}^0 oscillation amplitudes.^[57] This CKM-induced CP violation is essential for electroweak baryogenesis, a process that could generate the observed baryon asymmetry during the universe's early evolution. In the electroweak theory, sphaleron transitions—non-perturbative configurations in the gauge fields—mediate rapid baryon number violation at high temperatures, equilibrating matter and antimatter unless suppressed. During the electroweak phase transition, around the scale of 100 GeV where the Higgs field acquires its vacuum expectation value, the Higgs potential develops barriers in extensions beyond the Standard Model, such as those with additional Higgs sectors. These barriers inhibit sphaleron processes in the symmetry-broken phase, allowing CP-violating interactions in the bubble walls of the transitioning plasma to preferentially produce baryons over antibaryons. The CKM phase provides the requisite source of CP asymmetry, though its magnitude in the Standard Model is often insufficient without new physics to account for the full observed asymmetry. However, recent theoretical work as of 2025 suggests that mechanisms within the Standard Model could suffice to produce the observed asymmetry, potentially resolving long-standing challenges.^[58] Experimental confirmation of CKM CP violation has been achieved through precision measurements at B-factories. The BaBar experiment at SLAC, operating at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy e^+ e^- collider, provided early evidence by measuring the time-dependent CP asymmetry in B^0 \to J/\psi K_S decays, yielding \sin(2\beta) \approx 0.68, where \beta is an angle in the unitarity triangle derived from the CKM matrix.^[59] This value, consistent with subsequent Belle and LHCb results, confirms the CKM phase as the dominant source of CP violation in b-quark transitions and supports its role in asymmetric matter production mechanisms like baryogenesis.^[59]

Open Questions in Quantum Gravity

One of the central open questions in quantum gravity concerns the black hole information paradox arising during the evaporation process via Hawking radiation. In this scenario, particle-antiparticle pairs are created near the event horizon, with one particle escaping as thermal radiation while the other falls in, leading to a gradual loss of the black hole's mass. However, this radiation appears to be purely thermal and independent of the black hole's initial quantum state, suggesting that the quantum information encoded in the infalling matter is irretrievably lost, violating unitarity in quantum mechanics. Recent 2025 research in loop quantum gravity has proposed mechanisms where information is preserved through quantum corrections to the evaporation process, advancing toward a resolution but still requiring full integration with quantum field theory. This paradox, first articulated in the context of gravitational collapse, challenges the compatibility of general relativity and quantum field theory, as resolving it requires a full quantum gravity theory to track information through the evaporation process. In string theory, matter creation at Planck scales is predicted to occur through mechanisms involving extra dimensions, particularly in brane-world scenarios where our universe is modeled as a lower-dimensional brane embedded in a higher-dimensional bulk spacetime. The Randall-Sundrum model, for instance, posits a warped extra dimension that confines Standard Model particles to the brane while allowing gravity to propagate into the bulk, potentially generating matter via quantum fluctuations or collisions of branes during the early universe. These extra-dimensional dynamics could resolve hierarchy problems and influence particle production rates, but they remain untested, raising questions about how string-theoretic vacua stabilize and produce observable matter distributions without fine-tuning. Such predictions link matter creation to the multiverse landscape, where different compactifications of extra dimensions yield varying particle spectra, complicating the identification of our universe's specific realization.^[60] Loop quantum gravity (LQG) presents distinct challenges in addressing singularity resolution and the emergence of matter at the Big Bang, where classical general relativity predicts infinite densities and a breakdown of spacetime. In loop quantum cosmology, a symmetry-reduced version of LQG, the Big Bang singularity is replaced by a quantum bounce due to discrete spacetime geometry effects, transitioning from a contracting pre-bounce phase to an expanding post-bounce universe with finite curvature. However, the precise mechanism by which classical matter fields and inhomogeneities emerge from this symmetric bounce remains unresolved, as holonomy corrections suppress high densities but may not fully account for realistic matter content without additional semiclassical approximations. This raises fundamental issues about the recovery of general relativistic dynamics at low curvatures and the role of quantum geometry in seeding primordial matter fluctuations.^[61]

References

[1]
33.3 Accelerators Create Matter from Energy – College Physics
The fundamental process in creating previously unknown particles is to accelerate known particles, such as protons or electrons, and direct a beam of them ...
[2]
Collisions of Light Produce Matter/Antimatter from Pure Energy
Jul 28, 2021 · This conversion of energetic light into matter is a direct consequence of Einstein's famous E=mc2 equation, which states that energy and matter ...
[3]
Discovery Sheds Light on the Origins of Matter in the Early Universe
Jul 26, 2024 · A new calculation helps scientists understand how matter formed out of the hot, dense soup of subatomic particles created by the Big Bang.
[4]
PHYSICS: Conjuring Matter From Light
The SLAC experiment marks the first time matter has been created entirely from ordinary photons. Princeton University physicist Kirk McDonald, another ...
[5]
https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2202722-hadronic-regeneration-pb+pb-collisions
[6]
Theoretical breakthrough: Generating matter and antimatter from the ...
Dec 8, 2010 · A high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse could rip apart a vacuum into its fundamental matter and antimatter components.<|control11|><|separator|>
[7]
[PDF] DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY ...
The 1923 English translation modified the notation used in Einstein's 1905 paper to conform to that in use by the 1920's; for example, c denotes the speed of ...
[8]
September, 1905: Energy and Mass are Equivalent
Apr 1, 2005 · In June of 1905 Einstein submitted the paper that contained the basic concepts of the special theory of relativity. In September, he submitted a ...
[9]
Electron-Positron Pair - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
An electron-positron pair refers to a pair of particles created when a photon with energy greater than 1.022 MeV interacts with the Coulomb field of a ...
[10]
Manhattan Project: Science > Nuclear Physics > E=MC^2 - OSTI.GOV
In a nuclear fission reaction, the nucleus is busted apart, releasing a tremendous amount of energy, equal to the binding energy that had held the nucleus ...Missing: implications mc²
[11]
DOE Explains...Fusion Reactions - Department of Energy
Einstein's equation (E=mc2), which says in part that mass and energy can be converted into each other, explains why this process occurs. If scientists ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
[12]
Energy Change for a Nuclear Rection
From this change in mass we can calculate its energy equivalent using Einstein's equation, E = mc2. To find the energy change for a nuclear reaction you must ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
[13]
Quantum Field Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 22, 2006 · QFT is the extension of quantum mechanics (QM), dealing with particles, over to fields, ie, systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom.
[14]
An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory | Michael E. Peskin | Taylor &
May 4, 2018 · ABSTRACT. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory is a textbook intended for the graduate physics course covering relativistic quantum mechanics ...
[15]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory - DAMTP
The standard model of particle physics is expected to hold up to about the T eV . This is precisely the regime that is currently being probed by the. Large ...
[16]
Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits | Rev ...
Jan 11, 2012 · The ability to generate particles from the quantum vacuum is one of the most profound consequences of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[17]
Are Virtual Particles Less Real? - MDPI
Feb 2, 2019 · These exchanged particles are called virtual particles, and are not directly observable while they are being exchanged, because their creation ...2. The Real/virtual... · 3. Qft, Particle Physics... · 6. Virtual Particles Are As...
[18]
Particle Interactions and Conservation Laws - HyperPhysics
Strong overall conservation laws are the conservation of baryon number and the conservation of lepton number. Specific quantum numbers have been assigned to ...
[19]
11.3: Particle Conservation Laws - Physics LibreTexts
Mar 2, 2025 · Use rules to determine the total baryon number, lepton number, and strangeness of particles before and after a reaction; Use baryon number ...
[20]
[PDF] 13 Baryon Number Violation - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Proton decay searches probe baryon number violation due to physics at a grand unified scale of ∼ 1015 −1016 ... unification of quarks and leptons in grand unified ...
[21]
Lepton Number Violation in Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories
Apr 10, 2000 · So, a missing VEV solution to the gauge hierarchy problem leads at the same time to a similar hierarchy of baryon vs lepton number violation.
[22]
CPT Symmetry and Its Violation - MDPI
First, the CPT theorem illustrates that CPT symmetry is based only on mild physical requirements (conventional quantum mechanics, Lorentz symmetry, energy ...
[23]
C, P, T (And Their Combinations) - Matt Strassler
Note that if CPT is a symmetry, then CP and T must have the same effect. Since it is a symmetry, doing CPT gives you back the world you started with, but we ...
[24]
[PDF] 10. Scattering Theory - DAMTP
Indeed, in quantum mechanics the word “unitarity” is often used synonymously with “conservation of probability”.<|separator|>
[25]
[PDF] 34. Passage of Particles Through Matter
Aug 11, 2022 · The theory of energy loss by ionization and excitation as given by Bethe is based on a first-order. Born approximation. It assumes free ...
[26]
Cosmic-Ray Positive and Negative Electrons | Phys. Rev.
In view of the discovery that hard gamma-rays of Th give rise to positives and negatives in pairs, similar to the effects found in cosmic-ray studies, it is ...
[27]
On the stopping of fast particles and on the creation of positive ...
It is the aim of the present paper to discuss in greater detain the rate of loss of energy by this third process and its dependence on the primary energy; in ...
[28]
The Angular Distribution of Pair-Produced Electrons and ...
The Bethe-Heitler unscreened cross sections for pair production and bremsstrahlung have been integrated to give the angular distributions.Missing: process | Show results with:process
[29]
[PDF] Gamma-Ray Telescopes - Caltech Astronomy
Oct 6, 2004 · Pair production. In the pair production interaction, the γ-ray is completely annihilated with its energy transferred to an electron– positron ...
[30]
[PDF] 49. Kinematics - Particle Data Group
May 31, 2024 · The invariant mass M can be determined from the energies and momenta using Eq. (49.2) with M = Ecm. 49.4.3 Three-body decays p. 1.
[31]
[PDF] QCD and the physics of hadronic collisions
As the left proton travels freely before coming into contact with the hadron coming in from the right, its constituent quarks are held together by the constant ...
[32]
Quantum Electrodynamics. II. Vacuum Polarization and Self-Energy
Quantum Electrodynamics. II. Vacuum Polarization and Self-Energy. Julian Schwinger. Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. PDF ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
[33]
[PDF] Casimir1948.pdf - MIT
Hendrik Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. (reprint from Proceedings 51, (1948), 793-795), in: Gems from a century of ...Missing: effect | Show results with:effect
[34]
The Electromagnetic Shift of Energy Levels | Phys. Rev.
The paper 'The Electromagnetic Shift of Energy Levels' by H.A. Bethe was published in Phys. Rev. 72, 339 on 15 August 1947.Missing: original | Show results with:original
[35]
Black hole explosions? - Nature
as if the ...
[36]
Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon ... - Inspire HEP
Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe. 1967 4 pages. Published in: DOI: links cite claim reference search.
[37]
Introduction to Electroweak Baryogenesis - MDPI
Dec 12, 2022 · We present a pedagogical introduction to the electroweak baryogenesis. The review focuses principally on the sphaleron and baryon number (non)-conservation or ...
[38]
[PDF] arXiv:hep-ph/9707419v1 22 Jul 1997
The necessary conditions for the generation of the asymmetry, as formulated by Sakharov, are the following: 1. Different interactions of particles and ...
[39]
[PDF] 24. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis - Particle Data Group
May 31, 2024 · Combining the CMB and BBN sharpens the baryon measures to η10 = 6.115 ± 0.038 and Ωbh2 = 0.02233 ± 0.00014 [75]. The 4He abundance is ...
[40]
Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the grand unification scale - arXiv
Sep 15, 2020 · Sphaleron processes are also the basis of leptogenesis, where CP-violating decays of heavy right-handed neutrinos generate a lepton ...
[41]
Large-scale Structure from Quantum Fluctuations in the Early Universe
Aug 14, 1998 · The density inhomogeneities that seeded the formation of structure in the Universe originated from quantum fluctuations arising during inflation.Missing: perturbations | Show results with:perturbations
[42]
[PDF] arXiv:0711.3881v2 [hep-ph] 3 Dec 2007
Dec 3, 2007 · It is well-known that the relic density ... (0.1 pb)/ hσvii, where hσvii is the thermally averaged product of its annihilation cross section.
[43]
[1903.08842] Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter ...
Mar 21, 2019 · We first review the simplest scenario where dark matter is produced mainly during slow roll inflation. Then we move on to consider the cases ...
[44]
[hep-ph/9303287] Sterile Neutrinos as Dark Matter - arXiv
Mar 22, 1993 · We reexamine this model and find that the sterile neutrinos can be either hot, warm, or cold dark matter.
[45]
Science | AAAS
Insufficient relevant content. The provided URL (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1242350) leads to a "Page not found" error, offering no information about Fermi-LAT observations of GRB 130427A, pair production absorption features above 100 GeV, or related findings. No key findings, energies, or implications for matter creation via pairs can be extracted.
[46]
Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event - Nature
### Summary of GW170817 and Related Phenomena
[47]
[1407.5919] Muons in air showers at the Pierre Auger Observatory
Jul 22, 2014 · Abstract page for arXiv paper 1407.5919: Muons in air showers at the Pierre Auger Observatory: Measurement of atmospheric production depth.
[48]
[PDF] Optical lattice quantum simulator for QED in strong external fields ...
Abstract. Spontaneous creation of electron-positron pairs out of the vacuum due to a strong electric field is a spectacular manifestation of the ...
[49]
[PDF] Realization of a sonic black hole analogue in a Bose-Einstein ... - arXiv
We have created an analogue of a black hole in a Bose-Einstein condensate. In this sonic black hole, sound waves, rather than light waves, cannot escape the ...
[50]
[PDF] Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black ...
In order to test this theory, we have created a narrow, low density, very low temperature atomic Bose-Einstein condensate, containing an analog black hole ...
[51]
[PDF] arXiv:1004.2509v2 [hep-th] 24 Jun 2010
Jun 24, 2010 · The Schwinger effect, the non-perturbative production of electron-positron pairs from vacuum in an external electric field, is a highly non- ...
[52]
Dense GeV electron–positron pairs generated by lasers in ... - Nature
Dec 14, 2016 · Schwinger has predicted the critical electric field Es≈1.32 × 1018 V m−1 for spontaneous creation of pairs out of vacuum by a laser beam. This ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
[53]
Mesoscopic Klein-Schwinger effect in graphene | Nature Physics
Mar 9, 2023 · The Schwinger effect (SE) states that pairs are created, out of a false vacuum with an electric field, to minimize energy. It is a simple yet ...
[54]
[PDF] 12. CKM Quark-Mixing Matrix - Particle Data Group
The CKM matrix is a 3x3 unitary matrix, parameterized by three mixing angles and a CP-violating phase, and is a fundamental parameter of the Standard Model.
[55]
[PDF] 13. CP Violation in the Quark Sector - Particle Data Group
May 31, 2024 · The first determination of sin(2β), with significance of CP violation over. 5σ, with this method has recently been reported [108]. Moreover ...
[56]
A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension - hep-ph - arXiv
May 4, 1999 · Title:A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension. Authors:Lisa Randall, Raman Sundrum. View a PDF of the paper titled A Large Mass ...
[57]
[gr-qc/0602086] Quantum Nature of the Big Bang - arXiv
Feb 22, 2006 · Specifically, the known results on the resolution of the big bang singularity in loop quantum cosmology are significantly extended as ...