Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nancy Jacobson

Nancy Jacobson (born November 9, 1962) is an American political activist and operative best known as the founder and CEO of , a non-partisan organization launched in 2010 to advocate for bipartisan solutions to national challenges. A veteran Democratic fundraiser, she coordinated efforts for Gary Hart's 1984 presidential campaign, supported Bill and , and chaired finance for the . Jacobson co-founded the centrist before establishing , emphasizing pragmatic governance over partisan gridlock. Under her leadership, has supported independent-minded legislators, critiqued extreme polarization, and pursued for a potential 2024 unity presidential ticket, though it abandoned the effort due to recruitment failures and fundraising gaps, drawing accusations of electoral interference from Democratic-aligned critics despite the group's denials.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Nancy Jacobson was born on November 9 in , . provide limited details on her precise birth year, though biographical accounts place it in the early 1960s. She was raised in , where she demonstrated an early interest in civic affairs by interning at the mayor's office during fifth grade. This experience introduced her to operations at a young age, fostering initial exposure to political processes. Jacobson attended high school in , further embedding her formative years in the region's environment. Information on her family background remains sparse, with no verifiable public disclosures regarding her parents, siblings, or household dynamics that might have shaped her perspectives. Jacobson has not detailed any familial emphasis on , moderate values, or political discussions in available interviews or profiles, suggesting a deliberate around personal origins. This reticence aligns with her focus on professional endeavors over autobiographical revelations in documented sources.

Academic and Initial Influences

Nancy Jacobson earned a degree in and government from , transferring there after her first year of college. Her academic focus on laid the groundwork for her lifelong engagement with and , emphasizing practical approaches over rigid ideological frameworks. At Syracuse, Jacobson participated in student leadership through service on the Student Judicial Board and membership in a sorority, experiences that honed her organizational skills and interest in institutional processes. She also pursued summer internships in Washington, D.C., gaining early exposure to national political operations. These activities reflected an emerging pragmatic orientation toward Democratic politics, prioritizing effective organizing and fundraising over partisan extremism, as evidenced by her initial political efforts conducted while still a student. Jacobson's time at Syracuse marked her first forays into political organizing on campus, where she mobilized fellow students and conducted early , signaling a preference for results-driven involvement in moderate Democratic circles rather than broader ideological . No specific academic mentors are documented as direct influences, but the university's curriculum and extracurricular environment fostered her commitment to centrist problem-solving, distinct from the era's more polarized campus movements.

Early Political Career

Involvement in Democratic Campaigns

Nancy Jacobson entered professional politics as the Syracuse, New York, district coordinator for Gary Hart's 1984 presidential campaign. In this capacity, she oversaw local campaign operations in the Syracuse area after Hart's upset victory in the New Hampshire primary on February 28, 1984, which propelled his candidacy forward. Her responsibilities included coordinating district-level activities, such as volunteer mobilization and voter outreach efforts, amid Hart's push for a reform-oriented Democratic platform emphasizing economic renewal and foreign policy competence. Following the primary season, Jacobson served as a delegate to the held in from July 16 to 19, where secured the presidential nomination. As a Hart supporter at the convention, she participated in proceedings that highlighted intraparty tensions between establishment figures and insurgents like Hart, whose campaign had garnered 26.6% of the national popular vote in primaries but ultimately yielded to Mondale's delegate majority. This early experience marked her initial engagement with Democratic organizing in , focusing on upstate voter engagement rather than national strategy.

Shift Toward Bipartisanship

Jacobson's early career in Democratic politics emphasized support for candidates advocating pragmatic reforms over ideological purity. After coordinating the Syracuse district for Gary Hart's 1984 presidential campaign—a moderate Democrat focused on technological modernization and fiscal restraint—she contributed to Al Gore's 1988 bid and Bill Clinton's successful 1992 and 1996 runs, joining the latter's fundraising team as its third hire in 1992. These efforts positioned her within the centrist wing of the party, aligned with the , which prioritized market-oriented policies and to appeal beyond traditional bases. By the mid-1990s, Jacobson had transitioned to professional fundraising, serving as finance director for the in 1993 and establishing its Women's Leadership Forum to engage high-dollar female donors. She continued raising funds for moderate figures, including Evan Bayh's 2010 re-election campaign, amid a political landscape increasingly fractured by gridlock. The 1994 Republican congressional , followed by impeachments, the 2000 dispute, and post-9/11 policy battles, exemplified how rigid party-line voting—rising from about 70% in the to over 90% by the late —impeded legislative progress on issues like solvency and reduction. This causal dynamic, where ideological sorting and media echo chambers amplified , reduced incentives for compromise, as evidenced by repeated threats and stalled bipartisan initiatives. Jacobson's focus on moderates reflected an implicit critique of polarization's inefficiencies, fostering her later emphasis on transcending party labels. Prior to formal non-partisan organizing, she participated in the White House Project, a cross-party effort launched in the early to equip women for leadership roles irrespective of affiliation, signaling openness to beyond Democratic circles. Such activities, combined with her fundraising for candidates navigating , underscored a pragmatic orientation that attributes to the tangible costs of partisanship: diminished problem-solving capacity in a system requiring supermajorities for major reforms.

Founding and Leadership of No Labels

Establishment in 2010

No Labels was founded on December 13, 2010, by Nancy Jacobson, a former Democratic fundraiser, as a 501(c)(4) dedicated to advancing and in U.S. . The launch event in drew around 1,000 attendees, including political leaders and activists, signaling an intent to build a national movement against hyper-partisanship. Jacobson's motivations stemmed from frustration with Washington's entrenched divisions, which she viewed as hindering effective governance; the organization aimed to address this "problem-solving deficit" by mobilizing citizens to demand cross-aisle collaboration from elected officials. The initial structure emphasized pressure over direct , with a focus on providing political cover for politicians willing to compromise on issues like and , rather than endorsing specific candidates or platforms. Early recruitment targeted bipartisan figures to establish credibility, including Senator , an independent who quickly engaged with the group to promote its goals of donor support for moderates. Initial funding, typical for a 501(c)(4), relied on undisclosed contributions not required to be publicly reported at inception, allowing the organization to prioritize rapid member growth toward a target of one million supporters.

Organizational Growth and Key Initiatives

Following its establishment, No Labels expanded its influence in by spearheading the formation of the in January 2017, a bipartisan House group comprising approximately 50 members equally split between Democrats and Republicans committed to advancing pragmatic legislation beyond partisan lines. This initiative marked a pivotal step in organizational growth, shifting from advocacy to direct legislative engagement by fostering cross-aisle collaboration on issues like permitting reform and budget processes. The caucus has endorsed and contributed to the passage of key bipartisan measures, including the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (H.R. 3746), which suspended the federal for two years and imposed spending caps to avert , demonstrating measurable success in fiscal restraint efforts. Members have also co-sponsored or supported infrastructure-related priorities, such as streamlined permitting frameworks to accelerate project approvals, aligning with ' push for efficient public investments without increasing deficits. Overall, Problem Solvers Caucus-backed bills have resulted in at least five becoming law and eight passing the House in select Congresses, underscoring the organization's role in facilitating over 20 consensus calendar advancements in the 116th Congress alone.

Bipartisan Achievements in Congress

No Labels advanced bipartisan legislation in through its support for the (PSC), a House group it helped establish in February 2017 with initial bipartisan membership aimed at breaking gridlock via compromise proposals. The PSC expanded to approximately 50 members evenly split between Democrats and Republicans by the late , enabling structured negotiations on fiscal and priorities that pressured leadership toward consensus. A key success was the passage of the on November 15, 2021, which authorized $550 billion in new spending over five years for roads, bridges, public transit, expansion, and water systems, totaling $1.2 trillion including reauthorized funds. facilitated this by linking the with a bipartisan group, providing a counterweight to partisan opposition and enabling negotiations that secured 215 votes alongside Democrats, after prior efforts collapsed due to ideological divides. This coalition-building reduced delays, as evidenced by the bill's advancement following PSC-backed alternatives to reconciliation-only approaches. In fiscal policy, endorsed the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, passed on June 2, 2023, which suspended the debt ceiling until January 2025 and capped non-defense growth at 1% annually, averting default amid partisan standoffs. The measure received 314 House and 63 votes, reflecting PSC influence in urging restraint and deal-making, which credited with demonstrating governance viability over default threats. These efforts illustrate how ' caucus amplification fostered measurable progress, with the infrastructure law spurring $110 billion in immediate transportation investments and the debt deal stabilizing borrowing costs projected to save $1.5 trillion over a decade per estimates.

2024 Presidential Ambitions and Aftermath

Efforts to Field a Unity Ticket

No Labels, under the leadership of founder Nancy Jacobson, initiated planning for a bipartisan "unity ticket" presidential candidacy in 2022 as an alternative to the anticipated rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. The strategy emphasized recruiting one prominent Democrat and one prominent Republican to appeal to voters disillusioned with partisan polarization, positioning the ticket as a centrist option focused on problem-solving governance rather than ideological combat. Jacobson, leveraging her fundraising expertise, spearheaded donor outreach to build financial support for the initiative, which aimed to secure ballot access nationwide and launch a competitive third-party bid. Recruitment efforts targeted high-profile figures from both parties, including overtures to Senator (D-WV) and former Governor (R-SC). No Labels co-chair publicly stated in January 2024 that Haley "would deserve serious consideration" for the ticket, reflecting the group's interest in her as a potential nominee to pair with a Democratic counterpart. Similarly, discussions with Manchin intensified in early 2024, though he ultimately declined to pursue a third-party run. The organization approached approximately 30 potential candidates overall, prioritizing individuals with national stature and cross-aisle appeal to embody the unity theme. Parallel to recruitment, pursued extensive campaigns starting in 2022, achieving qualification in 12 states by October 2023, including . These efforts involved navigating state-specific petition requirements and legal hurdles over two years to enable a nationwide presence. complemented this groundwork, with the group raising over $60 million by early 2024 from donors including six-figure contributors, directed toward operational costs, advertising, and legal battles for ballot placement. Internally, the strategy hinged on polling data indicating voter demand for non-partisan alternatives, with Jacobson emphasizing in mid-2023 that the ticket would only proceed if viable candidates emerged to avoid electoral disruption. By March 2024, delegates voted to advance the ticket selection process, setting a self-imposed early deadline to finalize nominees amid mounting pressure to field a credible duo. These combined actions represented a multi-year push to operationalize a third-party challenge grounded in bipartisan credentials.

Decision to Abandon the Bid

On April 4, 2024, announced it would cease efforts to field a presidential for the 2024 election, following months of unsuccessful recruitment attempts. The organization's CEO, Nancy Jacobson, stated that despite widespread dissatisfaction with the likely major-party nominees— and former —no unifying of sufficient stature had emerged to lead a nationally competitive campaign. The decision stemmed primarily from challenges in attracting high-profile nominees, as No Labels had approached figures such as former U.N. Ambassador , former Senator , and Maryland Governor , all of whom declined. External pressures, including opposition from Democratic-aligned groups through legal challenges and public campaigns labeling the effort a potential for Biden, further complicated the bid. No Labels had secured in 13 states by that point but lacked a ticket to advance the initiative nationwide. In the immediate aftermath, Jacobson outlined a pivot away from presidential ambitions toward supporting bipartisan congressional candidates and policy advocacy, emphasizing in a Wall Street Journal on April 11, 2024, that the group remained committed to addressing the "leadership vacuum" through non-electoral means. This shift allowed No Labels to redirect resources to down-ballot races, where it had previously achieved successes in promoting cross-party legislation.

Controversies and Criticisms

Funding Transparency and Dark Money Allegations

No Labels operates as a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, a status that legally permits it to accept unlimited donations without disclosure, as long as political activities do not constitute its primary purpose. This structure has drawn allegations of "dark money" influence, with critics contending that the lack of conceals the motives of major donors potentially steering the group's agenda toward interests rather than broad support. Reports indicate No Labels raised at least $14 million in revenue during 2022, predominantly from large undisclosed contributions, including multiple six-figure gifts, escalating to tens of millions by 2023 to fund and organizational expansion for its 2024 efforts. Progressive outlets and Democratic-aligned groups, such as End Citizens United, have amplified these concerns, filing IRS complaints on February 7, 2024, accusing of misusing its tax-exempt status for partisan political activity without adequate disclosure, potentially violating limits on non-social-welfare spending. Publications like have described the organization as a "dark-money" entity reliant on hidden billionaire funding, suggesting this opacity enables undue sway in electoral dynamics, though such characterizations often emanate from sources critical of centrist interventions. Some donor identities have surfaced through investigative reporting, including megadonors like Uihlein, but the bulk remains shielded, prompting claims that No Labels' bipartisan facade masks conservative-leaning financial backing. No Labels and founder Nancy Jacobson have countered that the group fully complies with federal disclosure laws applicable to 501(c)(4)s, arguing that mandatory safeguards donors from political retaliation—a protection afforded to similar entities across the ideological spectrum. Jacobson has portrayed the funding as aligned with the organization's centrist mission, emphasizing member engagement and policy achievements over donor directives, while dismissing demands as selective scrutiny amid broader nonprofit norms. The organization highlights its internal by elected "problem solver" representatives as a check against , though skeptics maintain that without public donor lists, verifiable independence remains unproven.

Accusations of Electoral Spoiling

Democratic strategists and media outlets aligned with the Biden campaign accused of pursuing a presidential bid that would function as a , primarily drawing moderate and independent votes away from President and thereby increasing the likelihood of a victory. For instance, the Democratic think tank described the effort as an "illusion" incapable of winning but capable of electing by splitting the anti-Trump vote. Similarly, characterized ' platform as promoting a falsehood that could inadvertently or deliberately aid Trump's return to office, reflecting broader Democratic fears of third-party interventions in a polarized rematch. These criticisms persisted even as struggled to recruit high-profile candidates and faced internal hurdles, with outlets like reporting on efforts by moderate Democrats to block the initiative as a perceived threat to Biden's reelection. Nancy Jacobson, as No Labels' CEO, rebutted these claims by emphasizing that the organization had no intention of bolstering partisan extremes, including , and pledged to abandon the bid if polling indicated it would harm democratic alternatives rather than provide one. She cited surveys showing substantial demand among independent voters—who comprised 43% of the electorate per Gallup—for non-partisan options, arguing that such a ticket represented an "insurance plan" responsive to voter dissatisfaction with the major-party nominees rather than a targeted . Jacobson maintained that empirical risks extended to both major candidates, as third-party efforts could equally erode 's base in a tight race, countering narratives of one-sided electoral damage. In April 2024, ultimately suspended its presidential ambitions after failing to secure viable candidates despite approaching over 30 prospects and raising approximately $60 million, thereby averting any realized vote-splitting in the general election. Conservative commentators, while skeptical of ' viability, viewed the initiative less as pro-Trump maneuvering and more as a potential restraint on unchecked progressive policies, aligning with broader calls for alternatives to Democratic dominance without endorsing extremism. Post-election analyses of 2024 voter behavior further underscored independents' ticket-splitting tendencies and growing influence, suggesting that dynamics in hypothetical third-party scenarios warranted scrutiny beyond assumptions.

Internal Organizational Challenges

In 2022, faced substantial internal turmoil, marked by high staff turnover as at least 11 full-time employees or contractors departed from a staff of approximately 20. Former staffers attributed exits to a demanding under founder and CEO Nancy Jacobson, citing workweeks exceeding 100 hours for salaries around $40,000 and instances of Jacobson sending over 65 emails to staff before 9 a.m. on a Saturday. Specific accounts included Katie Young, who worked from 2019 to 2020 and described a hostile environment, and Jessica Sunday, who left after three months in 2021 due to poor fit. Operational secrecy contributed to tensions, with employees required to sign nondisclosure agreements and instructions from Jacobson to change LinkedIn profiles from "No Labels" to "America" to evade journalistic inquiries. The organization allocated $135,000 to Reputation Defender in 2020 for managing negative online search results. At least three former aides pursued compensation claims, including one alleging racial discrimination tied to performance disputes. A prominent example emerged in August 2023, when former Black outreach manager Mischa Smith sued in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claiming and retaliation after reporting unequal treatment. Smith alleged being assigned menial tasks at a September 2022 conference unlike white colleagues, chastisement for missing metrics due to a family funeral, and termination following her complaints, seeking lost wages, damages over $10,000 for , and punitive awards. denied the allegations, asserting Smith's underperformance justified her dismissal, with co-executive director Liz Morrison describing the suit as meritless. Jacobson responded to criticisms in a December 2022 statement, defending the organization's rigorous standards as essential for mission-driven work to bridge partisan divides, while expressing pride in its predominantly female leadership and noting many staff advanced positively after tenure. She apologized to recently terminated employees who felt wronged, stating, "I am sorry it didn’t work out for you here," but prioritized protecting the group's integrity over addressing internal optics. Despite reported dysfunction, demonstrated operational continuity, sustaining its advocacy framework amid leadership disputes.

Political Views and Ideology

Centrism and Rejection of Partisan Extremism

Nancy Jacobson, as founder and CEO of No Labels, has championed a centered on eschewing labels to foster pragmatic problem-solving rather than ideological . This approach posits that rigid affiliations exacerbate divisions, prioritizing electoral victories and donor over effective . Jacobson argues that such label-driven dynamics normalize artificial divides, often amplified by media narratives that frame compromise as weakness, thereby stifling consensus on pressing issues. In a , 2025, op-ed published in , Jacobson explicitly rejected as a form of presented under the guise of moderation, warning that failing to denounce it undermines centrist principles and Democratic electoral viability. She contended that rebranding radical policies as pragmatic erodes public trust and invites policy distortions, drawing parallels to historical Democratic moderation under figures like . This stance reflects her broader critique of left-leaning ideological overreach, which she views as equally corrosive to as right-wing variants, though she emphasizes the need for Democrats to reclaim their moderate roots to counter it. Jacobson attributes many policy failures to partisanship's causal role in , asserting it as the primary barrier to evidence-based reforms. Supporting this, surveys indicate widespread voter exasperation: a 2023 Pew Research Center poll found 65% of Americans feel exhausted by , while 55% report anger, largely tied to perceived in both parties; similarly, 60% in a 2019 Pew survey deemed the parties "too extreme," with 87% observing scant . Jacobson leverages such data to underscore that alienates independents—who comprise about 40% of voters—and hampers legislative progress, advocating instead for outcome-focused collaboration unbound by tribal loyalties.

Stances on Key Issues

Jacobson articulated a staunch pro-Israel position in May 2023, declaring that "there is no middle ground" on Israel's right to exist and critiquing what she described as in left-leaning discourse on the issue. This stance, voiced as CEO of , emphasizes unqualified support for Israel's security amid ongoing regional conflicts. Critics from pro-Palestinian perspectives, such as , have characterized it as evidence of an underlying hawkish bias, arguing that functions as a vehicle for advancing pro-Israel advocacy under the guise of while evading scrutiny on compromise in . In economic policy, Jacobson backs aligned with ' agenda, which prioritizes entitlement reforms—such as adjustments to Social Security and —to ensure long-term solvency amid rising projected to exceed 70% of federal outlays by 2034. The organization, under her leadership, advocates balanced budgets through bipartisan mechanisms like the Simpson-Bowles framework, aiming to curb deficits without broad tax hikes or that could stifle growth. Supporters view this as pragmatic realism addressing a national debt surpassing $35 trillion as of 2024, while detractors contend it risks underfunding social safety nets in pursuit of ideological spending cuts.

Personal Life

Family and Relationships

Jacobson is married to , a political pollster and strategist who served as an advisor to the Clinton administration and chief strategist for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign. The couple, known for their complementary roles in Democratic fundraising and polling, have maintained a low public profile on family matters beyond their professional intersections. Jacobson is to at least one of Penn's daughters from his prior marriage. No further verifiable details on children or extended family involvement in public life are available from reputable sources.

Philanthropy and Private Interests

Nancy Jacobson and her husband, , have supported Hope for Henry, a that provides non-medical care, including entertainment and morale-boosting activities, to pediatric patients with serious illnesses and their families. The couple is listed as donors in multiple Hope for Henry annual reports, including those for 2016, 2017, and 2019. Public records reveal limited details on other philanthropic engagements by Jacobson outside her professional political activities. No foundations or sustained involvement in non-political civic or educational causes, such as those promoting , have been documented in verifiable sources. Jacobson's pursuits appear minimal, with her career centered on political and rather than investments or enterprises. Her financial interests are intertwined with those of her , a former corporate strategist, but no specific personal ventures, such as or commercial roles, are publicly attributed to her of familial or organizational ties.

References

  1. [1]
    BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Nancy Jacobson, founder and CEO of No ...
    Nov 9, 2018 · I worked as the Syracuse, New York district coordinator for Gary Hart's 1984 presidential campaign and then served as a delegate to the 1984 Democratic ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  2. [2]
    Nancy Jacobson - Founder at No Labels - LinkedIn
    Founder at No Labels · Experience: No Labels · Education: Syracuse University · Location: Washington · 500+ connections on LinkedIn. View Nancy Jacobson's ...
  3. [3]
    How I got here: Nancy Jacobson - The Trailblazer
    Jan 20, 2022 · Nancy Jacobson is the Founder and CEO of No Labels, a non-profit political organization in Washington D.C. that uses bi-partisan approaches ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  4. [4]
    Q & A with Nancy Jacobson
    Jul 13, 2009 · Nancy has been a fundraiser for both Bill and Hillary Clinton and served as finance chair for the Democratic National Committee.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  5. [5]
    Nancy Jacobson - SourceWatch
    Aug 17, 2008 · Nancy Jacobson was a co-founder of the Third Way organization, a Senate advocacy group.
  6. [6]
    Our Team - No Labels
    We bring together builders and fixers across America and in Congress, where we support House and Senate members with the courage to think independently and ...
  7. [7]
    No Labels CEO defends 2024 ticket against spoiler charges
    Jul 18, 2023 · No Labels leader Nancy Jacobson said her group won't help Donald Trump win again. But she declined to say how it would decide whether to stand down.
  8. [8]
    No Labels Abandons Effort to Field a Presidential Candidate
    Apr 4, 2024 · The centrist group laid out grand ambitions of running a third-party candidate in a Biden-Trump contest, but the most prominent figures it ...
  9. [9]
    The Manufacturing of No Labels | HuffPost Latest News
    Dec 13, 2010 · ... in compromise at Columbia University in New York City. 2010-12 ... Miami, Florida high school when she was 14-years-old. "I wasn't your ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  10. [10]
    No Labels: Civility in Political Discourse w/ Nancy Jacobson
    Nancy Jacobson is a former Democratic fundraiser whose first political fundraiser occurred as a student at my beloved alma mater, Syracuse University, Go ...
  11. [11]
    When Marriage and Politics Conflict - Washingtonian
    Aug 1, 2006 · Jacobson, a Miami native who worked for Gary Hart after graduating from Syracuse University, has spent her career raising money for moderate ...Missing: degree | Show results with:degree
  12. [12]
    The War On Partisanship - The Atlantic
    Oct 30, 2015 · In the age of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, of Fox News and MSNBC, of total partisan warfare at all levels of government, No Labels is, to ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  13. [13]
    New 'No Labels' Movement Seeks Bipartisanship : It's All Politics : NPR
    Dec 13, 2010 · New bipartisan movement seeks to provide political cover to politicians willing to compromise. Political leaders and activists met in New ...Missing: mission statement
  14. [14]
    No Labels - InfluenceWatch
    No Labels is an ostensibly non-partisan advocacy group which attempts to foster bipartisan legislative efforts in government.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    No Label movement aims to end hyper-partisan politics
    Dec 21, 2010 · NEW YORK -- They were 1000 strong Monday, with a national goal of 1 million members...
  16. [16]
    'No Labels'? No Thanks - Cato Institute
    Jan 15, 2013 · No Labels, the ostensibly post-partisan group founded in 2010 to promote “a new politics of problem solving,” launched a press offensive ...Missing: establishment motivations initial structure
  17. [17]
    The new political group No Labels shows why labels exist.
    Dec 13, 2010 · Instead of rewarding candidates who spew partisan talking points, No Label says it will raise money for moderate candidates who embrace what co- ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  18. [18]
    Lieberman reaches out to "No Labels" - Politico
    Jan 10, 2011 · Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman urged members of the nonpartisan No Labels group Monday to donate money to candidates they don't always agree ...Missing: early 2010
  19. [19]
    No Labels' fight against partisanship - The Hill
    Sep 24, 2019 · Political partisanship is at an all-time high, but No Labels founder and CEO Nancy Jacobson says there's still plenty of time before next ...
  20. [20]
    A Look at a New Initiative from the Problem Solvers Caucus
    In an era where intensely partisan politics is the new normal and party rhetoric takes precedent over policy proposals, a coalition of lawmakers formed a ...
  21. [21]
    Problem Solvers Caucus |
    As momentum builds for Congress to act on permitting reform, this bipartisan framework offers a commonsense, two-party roadmap to streamline the permitting ...Caucus Members · About · Problem Solvers Launch... · Website Problem
  22. [22]
    Endorsed Legislation | Problem Solvers Caucus - House.gov
    Endorsed Legislation ; 118th Congress. H.R. 3746 - Fiscal Responsibility Act · H.R. 1831 - To award a Congressional Gold Medal to Billie Jean King ; 117th Congress.Missing: Labels achievements
  23. [23]
    Problem Solvers Caucus - Ballotpedia
    The Problem Solvers Caucus (PSC) is a congressional caucus in the US House of Representatives that aims to support what the group considers to be bipartisan ...
  24. [24]
    No Labels Allowed: Can The Congressional Problem Solvers ...
    Feb 8, 2021 · In a divided U.S., No Labels' CEO Nancy Jacobson and the Problem Solvers Caucus want politicians, leaders, and citizens alike to put party ...
  25. [25]
    H.R.3684 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Infrastructure Investment ...
    This bill provides new funding for infrastructure projects, including for DIVISION A--SURFACE TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act of 2021.
  26. [26]
    Proof of Concept - No Labels
    The 2021 Infrastructure Bill · The 2021 Infrastructure Bill · Years ago, No Labels helped create the Problem Solvers Caucus in the U.S. House and later connected ...
  27. [27]
    WANTED: A Bipartisan Plan to Build America - No Labels
    Jul 25, 2025 · The right way to do this is the way Congress – led by No Labels' House and Senate allies – passed the 2021 infrastructure bill: start in the ...
  28. [28]
    No Labels Endorses Bipartisan Deal to Resolve US Debt Ceiling ...
    We thank President Biden and Speaker McCarthy for their leadership to achieve the debt ceiling deal,” the No Labels leaders continued. “We encourage ...
  29. [29]
    Moody's Ends Over a Century of U.S. Credit Perfection - No Labels
    May 21, 2025 · Moody's pointed to two main problems: First, the absence of any “credible fiscal plan” to slow debt growth. Second, the corrosive effect of ...
  30. [30]
    https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57406
  31. [31]
    Inside the turmoil roiling No Labels' unity ticket presidential campaign
    Dec 8, 2022 · For that effort, its founder and CEO, one of Washington's most successful fundraisers, Nancy Jacobson, has enlisted the help of a number of ...
  32. [32]
    'No Labels' Eyes a Third-Party Run in 2024. Democrats Are Alarmed ...
    May 19, 2023 · The bipartisan political group No Labels is stepping up a well-funded effort to field a “unity ticket” for the 2024 presidential race.
  33. [33]
    No Labels 'talking with several exceptional leaders,' national co ...
    Feb 18, 2024 · Chavis said on “The Weekend” on MSNBC. No Labels is seeking to offer a centrist unity ticket for the 2024 presidential election. Manchin (D-W.Va ...
  34. [34]
    No Labels: We'd consider Haley on our ticket. Haley: No thanks.
    Jan 18, 2024 · No Labels national co-chair Joe Lieberman said on Thursday that the nonpartisan group would consider Nikki Haley to be part of their potential unity ...
  35. [35]
    No Labels will not mount third-party 2024 bid after failing to find ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · Centrist group says it won't field 'unity ticket' in US presidential election after reaching out to 30 potential people and raising $60m.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    No Labels gains 2024 ballot access in a 12th state - NBC News
    Oct 24, 2023 · No Labels, the third-party organization attempting to assemble a presidential ticket in 2024, has officially gained ballot access in Mississippi.
  37. [37]
    An Assault on Democracy - No Labels
    No Labels spent over two years working to get ballot access for a 2024 Unity presidential ticket. We launched our effort because most Americans—and most of ...
  38. [38]
    No Labels raised millions from six-figure donors - CNBC
    Nov 17, 2023 · No Labels, the nonprofit organization actively trying to form a potential third party ticket for president to take part in the 2024 election ...Missing: fundraising bid
  39. [39]
    No Labels votes to move forward with bipartisan presidential ticket
    Mar 8, 2024 · The third-party presidential movement No Labels voted Friday to move forward with a presidential ticket, though the hunt for candidates to lead the ticket ...Missing: 2022-2023 | Show results with:2022-2023
  40. [40]
    No Labels has ended its 2024 presidential bid | AP News
    Apr 4, 2024 · Strategists for the group couldn't attract a candidate willing to seize on the dissatisfaction with Biden and Trump.
  41. [41]
    No Labels ends 2024 presidential efforts - NBC News
    Apr 4, 2024 · No Labels, which had been working toward putting a third-party presidential ticket on the ballot in all 50 states in 2024, announced it was ...Missing: unity timeline<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/no-labels-will-abandon-2024-presidential-campaign-effort-4b4e5121
  43. [43]
    No Labels group abandons US presidential third-party bid - Al Jazeera
    Apr 4, 2024 · The No Labels group announced on Thursday that it will not field a third-party candidate to challenge Democrat Joe Biden and Republican Donald Trump in ...
  44. [44]
    https://www.wsj.com/opinion/no-labels-is-down-but-not-out-lieberman-no-labels-2024-rematch-1e7b69be
  45. [45]
    Why No Labels failed - Deseret News
    Apr 5, 2024 · The No Labels group says it won't field a presidential candidate in November after strategists for the bipartisan organization were unable to attract a ...Missing: bid | Show results with:bid
  46. [46]
    No Labels declines to reveal just who is funding its third party bid
    Jun 23, 2023 · The group isn't required under law to disclose its donors even as it takes on the look of a political party.Missing: December | Show results with:December
  47. [47]
    Behind the Facade: The Dark Money Game of No Labels
    Oct 2, 2023 · By Tiffany Muller. When political operative Nancy Jacobson founded the group No Labels in 2010, it purported to speak for America's ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  48. [48]
    End Citizens United to IRS: No Labels Violates Tax Law
    Feb 7, 2024 · End Citizens United's IRS complaint challenges No Labels' alleged partisan support, raising transparency concerns and potential tax-exempt ...
  49. [49]
    What Is No Labels Trying to Do? | The New Yorker
    Jun 29, 2023 · Sue Halpern on the dark-money, “centrist” group No Labels, which may run a third-party candidate in the 2024 election.
  50. [50]
    No Labels Exposed: Here's a List of Donors Funding Its Effort To ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · No Labels, the political outfit preparing to run a “unity” ticket in 2024 that Democratic strategists and Never-Trump Republican operatives fear ...Missing: bid | Show results with:bid
  51. [51]
    Messaging Guidance on No Labels' Third-Party Threat
    Aug 1, 2023 · Main Argument: No Labels is offering an illusion, not a choice. They cannot win, but they can help re-elect Trump.
  52. [52]
    Opinion | No Labels Is Pushing a Lie That Will Elect Trump - POLITICO
    Dec 18, 2023 · With a rematch between President Joe Biden and Donald Trump almost set in stone, it's time to put a farce to rest: The notion that a ...
  53. [53]
    Inside the secret battle to stop No Labels - NBC News
    Apr 15, 2024 · How moderate Democrats joined with old enemies on the left to stop No Labels, their own friends in the center, from challenging Joe Biden.
  54. [54]
    No Labels founder vows to end third-party effort if it aids Trump
    Jul 18, 2023 · The founder of the political organization No Labels insists the group would end its third-party White House push if such an effort is ...Missing: rebuttal | Show results with:rebuttal
  55. [55]
    'We're not spoiling anything': third-party group says it won't boost ...
    Dec 30, 2023 · Third parties could hurt Donald Trump as much as Joe Biden in the 2024 presidential election, the group No Labels has claimed.
  56. [56]
    No Labels ends its 2024 presidential bid - NPR
    Apr 4, 2024 · No Labels says it won't field a presidential candidate in November after strategists for the bipartisan organization were unable to attract a candidate.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  57. [57]
    In 2024, independent voters grew their share of the vote, split their ...
    Dec 9, 2024 · Postelection analysis of 2024 voters' behavior reveals several ways self-described political independents differ from those who say they are ...
  58. [58]
    No Labels sued by ex-employee over alleged racial discrimination
    Aug 14, 2023 · As part of the lawsuit, Smith said she was explicitly asked by No Labels founder and CEO Nancy Jacobson to find Black people to support the ...Missing: life | Show results with:life<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Statement by Nancy Jacobson, Founder and CEO, No Labels
    ### Summary of Nancy Jacobson’s Statement on No Labels
  60. [60]
    Moderate Democrats must denounce socialism, not help rebrand it
    Sep 10, 2025 · Political extremism disguised as moderation poses a greater threat to America. Democrats must confront and reject socialist ideas to win and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Moderate Democrats must denounce socialism, not help rebrand it
    Sep 10, 2025 · Does Earth have 2 moons? The Hill. Opinion. Opinion - Moderate Democrats must denounce socialism, not help rebrand it. Nancy Jacobson ...
  62. [62]
    Americans' Dismal Views of the Nation's Politics
    Sep 19, 2023 · A growing share of the public dislikes both political parties. Nearly three-in-ten (28%) express unfavorable views of both parties, the highest ...
  63. [63]
    Polarization is poisoning America. Here's an antidote (Opinion) | CNN
    Nov 1, 2019 · A new Pew survey shows that over 60% of Americans believe both parties have become “too extreme.” And 87% of Americans say political ...
  64. [64]
    As Partisan Hostility Grows, Signs of Frustration With the Two-Party ...
    Aug 9, 2022 · Over the past several decades, the share of Americans who express unfavorable opinions of both major parties has grown: In 1994, just 6% of the ...
  65. [65]
    'No Labels' — another Trojan Horse for Israel support without media ...
    May 23, 2023 · The well-funded bipartisan group “No Labels” wants politicians to compromise, but its CEO says “there is no middle ground” when it comes to Israel.
  66. [66]
    The Mandatory Spending Anchor Dragging America's Finances Down
    Feb 21, 2025 · Meanwhile, President Trump is calling for a balanced budget while proposing trillions in tax cuts. ... Read No Labels' new breakdown of how Trump ...
  67. [67]
    Critics doubt bipartisan group 'No Labels' has all the answers
    Sep 18, 2014 · ... No Labels founder Nancy Jacobson. Having come up with its policy recommendations through a nationwide survey, the group now wants its agenda ...
  68. [68]
    Party labels block America's progress - CNN.com
    All three are founding leaders of No Labels, a new nonprofit advocacy group. ... All three also noted that the size of the problem is so great that entitlement ...
  69. [69]
    No Labels goes after opponents of third-party presidential bid in court
    Nov 24, 2024 · Leaders of the moderate Democratic group Third Way and of Investing in US, a political operation funded by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, are ...
  70. [70]
    The Days and Nights of Juleanna Weiss - The New York Times
    Jun 13, 2004 · ... bipartisan in a town where that word can seem as quaintly old-fashioned as a ... Weiss and a Democratic hostess, Nancy Jacobson Penn, wife of the pollster Mark ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Jacqueline Penn, Alexander Deutsch - The New York Times
    Feb 16, 2020 · Penn, and a stepdaughter of Nancy Jacobson Penn and Michael J. Balick. The bride's father is based in Washington as the managing partner in ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] 2017 Annual Report - Hope for Henry
    Nancy Jacobson and Mark Penn. Ashley Jacot. Rachel Janger. Lauren Jasilli. Prasanna Jayakumar. Sathya Jesudasson. Luz Jimenez. Kunal Johar. Ann Johnson. Eric ...Missing: Labels | Show results with:Labels
  73. [73]
    [PDF] 2016 Annual Report - Hope for Henry Foundation
    Hope for Henry Foundation . 2016 Annual Report. Page 3. Hope for Henry ... Nancy Jacobson and Mark Penn. Hande Kassim. Hamid Kazemi. Kendra Scott. Karen ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Hope for Henry - 2019Annual Report
    Nancy Jacobson and Mark Penn. Brandon Jamerson. Michelle Janis and Mark ... Hope for Henry, Hope for Henry's Super Path to Super Duper Better, Hope for ...
  75. [75]
    No Labels - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica
    Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from millions of nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their ...
  76. [76]
    Nancy Jacobson | Loeb & Loeb LLP
    Nancy Jacobson has more than 30 years of experience advising public and private companies in complex business transactions of all types.Missing: fiscal | Show results with:fiscal