Neoclassicism
Neoclassicism was a Western movement in the visual arts, architecture, music, and literature that emerged in the mid-18th century and persisted into the early 19th century, characterized by a revival of classical Greek and Roman forms emphasizing simplicity, symmetry, proportion, and restrained emotion.[1][2] This style sought to emulate the perceived rational harmony and moral clarity of antiquity, drawing directly from archaeological evidence such as the excavations at Herculaneum and Pompeii, which revealed the sophistication of ancient art and prompted a reevaluation of historical aesthetics.[1] The movement arose as a deliberate reaction against the ornate exuberance and perceived frivolity of Baroque and Rococo styles, which had dominated European art with their emphasis on dramatic curves, gilding, and emotional excess.[2][3] Proponents, influenced by Enlightenment ideals of reason and empirical observation, favored linear clarity, balanced compositions, and themes from classical mythology or history to convey virtues like stoicism and civic duty.[1][4] Key figures included the German scholar Johann Joachim Winckelmann, whose writings championed the "noble simplicity and quiet grandeur" of Greek art as an ideal for moral and aesthetic reform.[1] In painting, artists like Jacques-Louis David exemplified this through works depicting revolutionary and heroic subjects with stark, sculptural forms; in sculpture, Antonio Canova produced marble figures evoking ancient prototypes with lifelike poise and idealized anatomy.[2] Architecturally, Neoclassicism manifested in grand public edifices such as the Panthéon in Paris and the neoclassical buildings of Washington, D.C., which employed columns, pediments, and domes to symbolize republican virtues and rational governance.[5] Its influence extended to decorative arts and interiors, promoting geometric motifs and classical orders over the playful asymmetries of prior eras.[6] While celebrated for restoring discipline and universality to art amid social upheavals like the French Revolution, Neoclassicism's rigid adherence to antique models later drew criticism for stifling innovation, paving the way for Romanticism's embrace of individualism and emotion.[2]