Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open-end fund

An open-end fund is a type of pooled investment vehicle that continuously issues new shares to investors and redeems existing shares upon demand, allowing shareholders to buy or sell at the fund's net asset value (NAV) calculated typically at the end of each trading day.^[1] These funds aggregate capital from multiple investors to create a diversified portfolio of securities, including stocks, bonds, short-term money-market instruments, or other assets, which is professionally managed.^[2] In the United States, open-end funds are also known as mutual funds or open-end investment companies and are managed by SEC-registered investment advisers. Unlike closed-end funds, which issue a fixed number of shares through an initial public offering and trade on exchanges like stocks without mandatory redemptions, open-end funds must repurchase shares from investors at NAV, providing high liquidity but requiring robust liquidity risk management to meet redemption demands.^[3] The structure and regulation of open-end funds vary by country; in the United States, they operate under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which mandates registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), full disclosure of fees, risks, and portfolio holdings in prospectuses, and adherence to limits on leverage and diversification to protect investors.^[2] Shares are typically purchased directly from the fund or through financial intermediaries like brokers, with prices determined by the NAV—calculated as the total value of the fund's assets minus liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares.^[4] Investors may incur front-end sales loads, deferred sales charges, or ongoing management fees, but the structure enables low minimum investments and professional oversight, making these funds accessible for retail investors seeking broad market exposure.^[2] Common types of open-end funds include equity funds focused on stocks for growth, bond funds emphasizing fixed-income securities for income generation, balanced funds combining both, target-date funds that adjust allocations based on retirement timelines, and money market funds offering stability through short-term debt instruments.^[2] While they provide advantages such as diversification to mitigate individual security risks, liquidity for quick access to capital, and economies of scale reducing costs per investor, open-end funds carry market, credit, and interest rate risks, with no guarantee against loss of principal and generally no government insurance like that for bank deposits.^[2] Exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are often structured as open-end funds, blend mutual fund diversification with intraday trading flexibility on stock exchanges.^[5]

Overview

Definition

An open-end fund is a type of collective investment scheme, defined as an arrangement in which capital is raised from multiple investors through the issuance of shares or units, with the proceeds pooled for investment in securities or other assets on a collective basis.^[2] Unlike closed-end funds, an open-end fund continuously issues new shares and redeems existing ones directly from or to investors based on demand, resulting in no fixed number of outstanding shares.^[2] The pricing mechanism for open-end fund shares relies on the fund's net asset value (NAV), which represents the per-share value of the fund's total assets minus liabilities; shares are purchased or redeemed at this NAV, typically calculated once daily at the close of trading.^[2] This structure allows the fund's size to expand or contract in response to investor activity, providing liquidity through daily redemption rights.^[6] Primary implementations of open-end funds include U.S. mutual funds, which are registered open-end investment companies that pool investor money for diversified portfolios in stocks, bonds, or other securities.^[4] In the United Kingdom, unit trusts serve as open-ended collective investment schemes where property is held on trust for participants, enabling ongoing issuance and redemption of units.^[7] In Europe, particularly Luxembourg, SICAVs (sociétés d'investissement à capital variable) function as open-ended investment companies with variable capital that adjusts to match the NAV through share creations and cancellations.^[8]

History

The origins of open-end funds trace back to the early 20th century in the United States, where the Massachusetts Investors Trust was established on March 21, 1924, as the first modern mutual fund offering redeemable shares to investors.^[9] This innovation allowed investors to buy and sell shares directly from the fund at net asset value, distinguishing it from earlier closed-end structures and setting the foundation for retail participation in pooled investments.^[10] By the late 1920s, the number of such open-end funds had grown to 19, amid a speculative boom, but the 1929 stock market crash exposed vulnerabilities in the nascent industry.^[11] The Great Depression prompted significant regulatory reforms to restore investor confidence and prevent abuses. In response to widespread fraud and mismanagement revealed during the crash, Congress passed the Investment Company Act of 1940, which imposed strict disclosure requirements, governance standards, and limits on leverage for investment companies, including open-end funds.^[12] This legislation formalized the structure of mutual funds, mandating registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission and protecting shareholders through oversight of fund advisers and custodians.^[11] The Act's protections helped stabilize the sector, with open-end funds numbering over 100 by the early 1950s as markets recovered.^[11] Post-World War II economic prosperity fueled the expansion of open-end funds, driven by rising household incomes and a surge in retail investing among the growing middle class.^[9] The industry saw exponential growth, with assets under management increasing from about $0.5 billion in 1940 to over $100 billion by 1980, and surpassing $1 trillion by 1990, reflecting broader access to stock market participation.^[13] A pivotal milestone occurred in 1976 when The Vanguard Group launched the first index mutual fund, tracking the S&P 500 and emphasizing low-cost passive strategies, which gradually shifted industry focus from active stock-picking to broad market replication.^[14] Globalization accelerated in the late 20th century, with open-end funds adapting to international markets. In Europe, the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive, adopted in 1985, harmonized regulations for cross-border retail funds, enabling their passporting across European Union member states and spurring adoption.^[15] Subsequent revisions in the 1990s and 2000s enhanced liquidity and diversification rules, solidifying UCITS as a global standard for open-end structures.^[16] In Asia, mutual fund industries emerged rapidly during the 1990s amid economic liberalization, with assets growing significantly by the 2000s as governments introduced regulatory frameworks modeled on U.S. and European systems.^[17]

Characteristics

Key Features

Open-end funds are characterized by their ability to issue and redeem shares without a fixed limit, allowing the fund's total assets to expand or contract in response to investor demand. This structure enables continuous issuance of new shares to accommodate purchases and mandatory redemption of shares from investors seeking to exit, directly aligning the fund's size with net capital flows. Unlike structures with predetermined share counts, this flexibility supports scalability but requires ongoing liquidity management to meet redemption obligations.^[2] A core attribute is the provision of daily liquidity to shareholders, where shares can be redeemed at the fund's net asset value (NAV) calculated at the end of each trading day. Investors submitting redemption requests by a specified cutoff time typically receive proceeds based on that day's closing NAV, ensuring prompt access to funds within regulatory timelines, such as seven days under U.S. law. This feature distinguishes open-end funds by prioritizing investor accessibility over fixed capital commitments.^[18]^[19] To mitigate risk, open-end funds generally adhere to diversification standards, often holding portfolios comprising 50 or more securities across various issuers and sectors. Under frameworks like the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, diversified open-end funds limit investments to no more than 5% of assets in any single issuer for at least 75% of their portfolio, promoting broad exposure and reducing concentration risks.^[20] This requirement fosters stability by pooling assets into a spread-out investment vehicle. These funds are professionally managed by registered investment advisers employed by fund companies, who make investment decisions on behalf of a collective pool of capital from numerous investors. This pooled approach allows individual participants to benefit from expert oversight and economies of scale without needing to select securities independently, with the manager responsible for aligning the portfolio with the fund's objectives.^[21] In the United States, open-end funds often qualify as regulated investment companies (RICs) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, benefiting from pass-through taxation. This means the fund itself generally avoids entity-level taxes, with income, gains, and losses instead distributed directly to shareholders, who report them on their personal tax returns. This treatment enhances tax efficiency for investors compared to taxable corporate structures.^[22]

Comparison to Closed-end Funds

Open-end funds and closed-end funds differ fundamentally in their share structure. Open-end funds continuously issue new shares to meet investor demand and redeem shares upon request, allowing the number of outstanding shares to vary based on net inflows or outflows.^[23] In contrast, closed-end funds issue a fixed number of shares through an initial public offering (IPO) and do not create or retire additional shares thereafter, resulting in a static share count.^[24] This structural difference means open-end shares are transacted directly with the fund company, while closed-end shares trade on secondary markets, such as stock exchanges, similar to individual stocks.^[25] Pricing mechanisms further highlight these distinctions. Shares in open-end funds are bought and sold at the fund's net asset value (NAV), calculated once daily at the end of the trading day, ensuring transactions occur at this intrinsic value without market-driven deviations.^[26] Closed-end funds, however, are priced by supply and demand on exchanges, leading to market prices that may trade at a premium or discount to NAV, influenced by investor sentiment and trading activity.^[23] This market-based pricing for closed-end funds introduces potential volatility in share value relative to underlying assets, unlike the NAV adherence in open-end structures. Liquidity provisions also vary significantly. Open-end funds provide daily redemption options directly from the fund, offering investors reliable access to their capital at NAV, though limited to end-of-day processing.^[24] Closed-end funds depend on secondary market trading for liquidity, where shares can be bought or sold throughout the trading day but at prevailing market prices, potentially affected by bid-ask spreads or low trading volume.^[25] In terms of management flexibility, open-end funds must actively adjust portfolios to accommodate capital flows, often holding cash reserves to meet redemptions and maintaining liquidity in holdings.^[23] Closed-end funds, with their fixed capital base, enjoy greater portfolio stability, enabling managers to pursue long-term strategies without disruption from redemptions and allowing for the use of leverage to amplify returns.^[26] Investor access reflects these mechanics as well. Open-end funds are generally available to retail investors through brokers or directly via the fund sponsor, facilitating broad participation.^[24] Closed-end funds, traded on exchanges, often attract institutional or more experienced investors who monitor market dynamics for entry points.^[25]

Operations

Net Asset Value Calculation

The net asset value (NAV) of an open-end fund represents the per-share value of its underlying assets after deducting liabilities, serving as the basis for pricing shares during issuance and redemption. It is calculated using the formula:

\text{NAV} = \frac{\text{Total Assets} - \text{Total Liabilities}}{\text{Number of Outstanding Shares}}

This computation ensures that investors receive or pay a fair price reflective of the fund's current portfolio value.^[27]^[18] Total assets encompass the market value of the fund's securities portfolio, including stocks, bonds, and other investments, along with cash holdings and receivables such as dividends or interest due. Valuation occurs daily at the close of trading on major U.S. exchanges, using the most recent closing prices for listed securities to capture end-of-day market conditions. For open-end mutual funds, this end-of-day pricing is standard, though some exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are also open-end structures, may provide intraday indicative values while still computing official NAV at market close. Open-end funds are required to determine NAV at least once daily, typically Monday through Friday, unless no material changes or orders warrant recalculation.^[27]^[18]^[21] Total liabilities include accrued expenses such as management fees, administrative costs, and other operational charges, as well as payables for securities purchased or other short-term obligations. These are subtracted from total assets to arrive at net assets before dividing by outstanding shares. Funds must accurately accrue these liabilities daily to maintain precise NAV figures.^[27] For illiquid assets lacking readily available market quotations, such as certain restricted or foreign securities, funds apply fair value pricing determined in good faith by the board of directors or designated personnel. This method uses established valuation techniques, like matrix pricing or third-party appraisals, to estimate fair market value and prevent dilution of shareholder interests. Open-end funds may hold up to 15% of net assets in such illiquid securities, with fair value adjustments ensuring compliance with daily NAV requirements.^[18] Open-end funds issue new shares directly to investors upon purchase requests, allowing the fund to expand its assets under management in response to investor demand. This process involves creating additional shares at the fund's net asset value (NAV), with the proceeds from sales typically invested in the fund's portfolio to maintain its investment strategy. As a result, the fund's total assets grow proportionally with inflows, enabling scalability without fixed share limits.^[1] When investors redeem shares, the fund repurchases them at the current NAV, removing the shares from circulation and distributing cash or equivalent value to the shareholder. If the fund lacks sufficient cash on hand, it may need to sell portfolio assets to fulfill the redemption, which can occur pro rata across holdings or as a vertical slice to approximate the fund's composition. Payments for redemptions are generally made within seven days, though prospectuses often specify next-business-day settlement.^[28]^[29] Purchase and redemption orders are processed at the end-of-day NAV, with a typical cutoff time of 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time for same-day execution; orders received after this are handled at the next day's NAV. This forward-pricing mechanism ensures fair valuation based on the NAV calculated after market close.^[28] Many open-end funds impose minimum initial investment requirements, ranging from $500 to $50,000 depending on the fund's structure and share class, to ensure administrative efficiency. In periods of market stress, funds may impose temporary redemption limits or suspend redemptions with regulatory approval if liquidity pressures threaten the fund's stability, though such measures are exceptional and not routine for most open-end funds.^[1]^[30] Large redemptions can introduce dilution risk to remaining shareholders, as the costs of selling assets—such as transaction fees, bid-ask spreads, and market impact—may reduce the fund's overall value without being fully borne by redeeming investors. This risk is heightened during volatile periods when asset sales occur at unfavorable prices, potentially eroding the NAV for non-redeeming shareholders.^[31]

Forward Pricing

Forward pricing is the standard mechanism employed by open-end funds to execute purchase and redemption orders at the net asset value (NAV) computed after the order is received, ensuring equitable treatment among investors by preventing the use of outdated or manipulable pricing information.^[32] Under this approach, orders placed during the trading day are typically valued using the NAV calculated at the close of that day or the subsequent business day, depending on the timing of receipt.^[33] This method directly addresses potential abuses such as market timing, where traders could otherwise submit late orders after gaining insight into intraday market movements that influence the NAV.^[34] The regulatory foundation for forward pricing in the United States stems from Rule 22c-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on October 16, 1968. This rule explicitly prohibits "backward pricing"—the practice of using a future NAV for orders received earlier—and mandates that redeemable securities be offered, sold, redeemed, or repurchased at a price based on the current NAV next computed after receipt of the order, with all transactions on a given day using a uniform NAV determined at a consistent time at least once daily.^[35] The SEC's adoption of the rule was driven by concerns over dilution risks to existing shareholders from opportunistic trading practices prevalent in the 1960s.^[32] In practice, open-end funds establish cutoff times for order submission to implement forward pricing, most commonly 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time on business days, after which orders receive the next available NAV.^[34] Orders received before the cutoff are priced at that day's NAV, while those after the cutoff, or on non-business days such as weekends or federal holidays, are priced using the NAV of the following business day.^[33] Funds must disclose these cutoff times in their prospectuses, and exceptions may apply for certain order types or intermediaries, but the core principle remains uniform application to avoid discrepancies.^[34] The primary purpose of forward pricing is to safeguard against shareholder dilution arising from late trades that exploit known or anticipated NAV changes, thereby promoting market integrity and investor confidence in open-end fund operations.^[31] By decoupling order receipt from immediate pricing, the mechanism reduces opportunities for short-term traders to arbitrage intraday information, a vulnerability highlighted in SEC investigations during the rule's development.^[32] Internationally, analogous forward pricing standards apply to UCITS funds under the European Union's UCITS Directive (2009/65/EC), which requires that units be issued, sold, repurchased, or redeemed at a price based on the next-determined NAV in accordance with fund rules and national laws, similarly aiming to mitigate market timing risks and ensure fair valuation.^[36] This harmonized approach in the UCITS framework, implemented across EU member states, mirrors the U.S. model by mandating timely and transparent NAV computations to protect investors from dilution.^[37]

Management

Active Management

In active management of open-end funds, portfolio managers actively select and trade securities based on fundamental research, economic forecasts, and market analysis to achieve returns that exceed a specified benchmark index, such as the S&P 500. This approach contrasts with passive management by emphasizing discretionary decision-making to capitalize on perceived market inefficiencies. A key goal is generating alpha, which measures the excess return of the fund relative to the benchmark after adjusting for systematic risk, reflecting the value added by the manager's skill.^[38] Active managers employ various strategies to pursue outperformance, including stock picking, where they identify undervalued or high-potential individual securities through detailed company analysis; sector rotation, which involves shifting allocations among industry sectors in response to economic cycles or trends; and tactical asset allocation, a dynamic rebalancing of asset classes like equities, bonds, and cash to exploit short-term opportunities.^[39] These methods allow flexibility in portfolio construction but introduce higher levels of tracking error, defined as the standard deviation of the fund's excess returns over the benchmark, indicating the degree of deviation from benchmark performance and the risk of active decisions.^[40] Performance evaluation for active open-end funds focuses on metrics like alpha and tracking error, alongside comparisons to benchmarks. Historical analyses, such as those in S&P Dow Jones Indices' SPIVA U.S. Scorecard reports, consistently show that most active funds underperform their benchmarks over extended periods; for example, 87% of large-cap U.S. equity funds underperformed the S&P 500 over 10 years ending in 2023, with underperformance rates at approximately 88% over 15 years. As of mid-2025, these figures were 86% over 10 years and 88% over 15 years.^[41]^[42] This pattern persists due to challenges in consistently generating positive alpha amid efficient markets and costs. Active strategies also incur higher expense ratios to cover research, analyst teams, and frequent trading, averaging 0.64% for actively managed domestic equity mutual funds as of 2024, compared to lower fees in less intensive approaches.^[43] Illustrative examples of actively managed open-end funds include growth-oriented funds, which target companies with strong earnings potential and innovation, such as the Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX), and value funds, which seek undervalued stocks trading below intrinsic worth, like the Dodge & Cox Stock Fund (DODGX).^[44] These styles exemplify how active management tailors portfolios to specific investment philosophies while aiming to outperform broad market indices.^[45]

Passive Management

Passive management in open-end funds involves constructing a portfolio that closely mirrors the performance of a specified market index, such as the S&P 500, without attempting to outperform it through individual security selection or market timing.^[46] This approach relies on systematic replication to achieve returns that approximate the index's performance, net of minimal fees, thereby providing investors with broad market exposure at low cost.^[46] Two primary methods are employed to replicate the index: full replication, where the fund purchases all securities in the index in exact proportions to their weighting, and sampling, which involves selecting a representative subset of securities that collectively mimic the index's characteristics, such as sector allocation and market capitalization.^[46] Funds periodically rebalance their holdings to align with changes in the index composition, such as additions, deletions, or weight adjustments, ensuring ongoing fidelity to the benchmark.^[47] The modern era of passive open-end funds began with the launch of the First Index Investment Trust by Vanguard in 1976, the world's first retail index mutual fund tracking the S&P 500.^[48] By 2024, assets under management (AUM) in U.S. passive mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including open-end structures, surpassed those in active funds for the first time, reaching approximately 53% of total fund market share.^[49] In theory, passive management offers advantages through lower portfolio turnover, which minimizes transaction costs and capital gains distributions, and reduced expense ratios compared to active strategies, often by a factor of several times.^[50] Empirical studies confirm that passive funds typically match or exceed the net returns of active funds over long periods, primarily due to these cost efficiencies, with index funds outperforming actively managed peers after fees in most asset classes.^[51] A variant of passive management includes smart beta funds, which introduce systematic factor tilts—such as low volatility, value, or quality—into index-based portfolios while maintaining a rules-driven, non-discretionary approach to implementation.^[52] For instance, a low-volatility smart beta fund might overweight stocks with historically stable returns relative to the broader market, aiming to enhance risk-adjusted performance without active stock picking.^[53]

Fees and Expenses

Types of Fees

Open-end funds incur several types of fees that cover distribution, management, and operational costs, with these expenses deducted from fund assets or investor contributions. These fees are structured to compensate intermediaries, advisers, and service providers while impacting investor returns through direct charges or ongoing deductions. Disclosure of all fees is mandated in the fund's prospectus via a standardized fee table, enabling investors to assess costs and their compounding effects on net performance over time.^[54]^[55] Sales loads represent commissions paid to brokers or financial professionals for distributing fund shares. Front-end sales loads are deducted from the initial investment amount at the time of purchase, effectively reducing the amount invested in the fund; for example, a 5% front-end load on a $10,000 investment results in $500 paid as a fee, with $9,500 allocated to shares. Back-end sales loads, often termed contingent deferred sales loads (CDSL), are imposed upon redemption if shares are sold within a specified holding period, typically 5 to 8 years, and decrease over time as an incentive for longer-term holding; these are not included in the expense ratio but are listed under shareholder fees in the prospectus.^[56]^[55] Rule 12b-1 fees, named after the SEC rule authorizing them, are ongoing annual charges levied on fund assets to finance marketing, distribution, and shareholder servicing activities, such as compensating brokers for ongoing sales efforts. These fees are capped at 1% of the fund's average annual net assets, with up to 0.75% allocated to distribution costs and the remainder to service fees, and they are included in the fund's total operating expenses. Unlike sales loads, 12b-1 fees provide a steady revenue stream for promotion without upfront investor payments.^[57]^[58] Management fees compensate the fund's investment adviser for portfolio selection, oversight, and administrative duties, calculated as a percentage of assets under management (AUM). These fees typically range from 0.5% to 1.5% of AUM annually, varying by fund complexity, size, and investment style, with larger funds often benefiting from economies of scale that lower the effective rate. They form a core component of the fund's operating expenses and are accrued daily but paid periodically from fund assets.^[55]^[56] Other expenses encompass a range of operational costs, including custodial services for asset safekeeping, legal and auditing fees, transfer agent services, and regulatory compliance. These miscellaneous charges, which can vary widely but often constitute 0.1% to 0.3% of AUM, are not itemized separately in prospectuses but are aggregated with management and 12b-1 fees into the total expense ratio (TER). The TER, expressed as a percentage of average net assets, provides a comprehensive measure of annual costs borne by the fund, and is prominently displayed in the prospectus to facilitate cost comparisons.^[54]^[55]

No-Load Funds and Cost Structures

No-load open-end funds, commonly known as no-load mutual funds, are investment vehicles that permit investors to purchase or redeem shares without incurring sales commissions, also referred to as loads. These funds enable direct investment through the fund company or a brokerage platform, ensuring that the entire principal amount is allocated to the fund's assets rather than being diminished by upfront or deferred sales charges.^[59] This structure contrasts with load funds, which impose such commissions to compensate intermediaries like brokers or financial advisors.^[60] No-load funds have gained significant prevalence, particularly among passively managed index funds, where cost efficiency is paramount. Pioneered by firms like Vanguard, which popularized direct, low-cost access to open-end funds, no-load options now dominate market flows; in 2024, they accounted for 92 percent of gross sales of long-term mutual funds, excluding those with 12b-1 distribution fees, up markedly from 46 percent in 2000.^[61]^[43] This shift reflects investor preference for transparency and reduced entry barriers in open-end structures. The cost framework of no-load funds centers on the expense ratio, an annual fee expressed as a percentage of assets under management that covers portfolio management, administrative services, and other operational expenses. Passive no-load funds, such as those tracking broad market indices, typically feature expense ratios below 0.1 percent, exemplified by Vanguard's average of 0.08 percent across its mutual funds.^[61] In contrast, actively managed no-load funds generally carry higher ratios exceeding 0.5 percent, with the industry-wide asset-weighted average for mutual funds at 0.34 percent as of 2024.^[62] Unlike load funds, where breakpoints scale down sales charges for investments above certain thresholds (e.g., reducing front-end loads for purchases over $50,000), no-load funds apply uniform expense ratios irrespective of investment size, emphasizing ongoing costs over transactional ones.^[43] Even with the absence of sales loads, no-load funds purchased via brokerage platforms may involve additional transaction fees, typically ranging from $0 to $50 per trade, unless the fund participates in the broker's no-transaction-fee (NTF) program, which waives such charges in exchange for fund reimbursements to the broker.^[63] These fees can vary by platform and fund, potentially impacting smaller or frequent investments. Recent trends underscore a broader movement toward no-load structures, driven by the proliferation of fee-only financial advisors who prioritize asset-based compensation over commissions, thereby diminishing the market share of load funds.^[64] This advisor shift, with over 72 percent now operating on fee-based models as of 2025, has accelerated the adoption of no-load open-end funds.^[65] Concurrently, the popularity of no-load funds has fueled a multi-decade decline in average expense ratios, from 0.83 percent in 2005 to 0.34 percent in 2024, enhancing overall cost efficiency in the sector.^[66]^[67]

Regulations

United States Regulations

Open-end funds in the United States are primarily regulated under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which defines them as investment companies that continuously offer and redeem their shares at net asset value (NAV).^[2] The Act requires all open-end funds to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) before operating and imposes strict limits on leverage, such as prohibiting senior securities unless they meet a 300% asset coverage requirement to protect investors from excessive risk.^[68] These provisions aim to ensure transparency and investor protection by mandating detailed disclosures about the fund's operations, fees, and risks.^[69] A key component of this framework is Rule 22c-1 under the Act, known as the forward pricing rule, which requires open-end funds to sell and redeem shares based on the NAV computed after the receipt of an investor's order, typically at the close of the trading day.^[34] This rule prevents dilution of shareholder value by prohibiting funds from using stale prices that could disadvantage existing investors during periods of market volatility.^[31] In 2016, the SEC adopted Rule 22e-4, the Liquidity Risk Management Rule, which became effective in 2018 and mandates that open-end funds (excluding money market funds) establish a liquidity risk management program.^[70] The rule requires funds to classify their portfolio investments monthly into four liquidity buckets—highly liquid, moderately liquid, less liquid, and illiquid—based on the time and likelihood of settlement under stressed conditions, limiting illiquid investments to 15% of net assets (effectively requiring at least 85% to be convertible within seven days).^[71] This classification helps funds assess and mitigate the risks of meeting redemption demands without significant NAV impacts.^[72] Disclosure requirements for open-end funds are governed by the Act and related SEC rules, including the provision of a prospectus detailing investment objectives, risks, and fees, as well as annual and semi-annual shareholder reports.^[73] In 2022, the SEC modernized these rules through amendments to Form N-1A and related forms, requiring streamlined, concise shareholder reports that focus on key information like performance, expenses, and top holdings, while shifting more detailed portfolio data to online availability to reduce costs and improve readability for investors.^[74] Recent 2024 updates emphasize enhanced reporting without mandating swing pricing, a proposed mechanism to adjust NAV for transaction costs.^[75] Instead, amendments to Forms N-PORT and N-CEN, adopted on August 28, 2024, require monthly portfolio holdings reports to be filed more frequently and publicly disclosed 60 days after month-end, including liquidity classifications, and mandate open-end funds using liquidity classification service providers to report details about those providers on Form N-CEN.^[76] The SEC also issued guidance clarifying liquidity risk management program requirements, such as board oversight and stress testing, to promote effective implementation without new prescriptive tools like mandatory swing pricing.^[77] These amendments became effective on November 17, 2025.

International Regulations

The Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive, originally enacted in 1985, provides a harmonized regulatory framework for open-end investment funds in the European Union, enabling cross-border marketing via the UCITS passport that allows funds authorized in one member state to be sold throughout the EU without additional approvals. Revisions such as UCITS IV in 2009, and UCITS VI proposals as of 2025 which aim to strengthen rules on liquidity management by providing access to up to eight liquidity management tools (LMTs) like redemption gates and anti-dilution levies to protect investors during market stress.^[78] As of late 2025, member states such as Luxembourg have submitted draft transpositions, with full implementation anticipated in 2026. Complementing this, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) II, which entered into force in 2024 and requires transposition by member states by April 2026, requires managers of open-ended alternative investment funds to select and implement at least two LMTs tailored to the fund's strategy and redemption policy, including side pockets to segregate illiquid assets for orderly realization separate from liquid holdings.^[79]^[80] Globally, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued revised recommendations in 2023, with accompanying 2025 guidance, to address structural vulnerabilities from liquidity mismatches in open-ended funds by requiring redemption terms—such as frequency, notice periods, and settlement delays—to closely match the underlying asset liquidity.^[81] Funds are categorized by asset liquidity levels (e.g., daily redeemable for highly liquid assets, longer notice for illiquid ones), with stress testing mandated at least annually to simulate redemption pressures, margin calls, and market disruptions, integrating results into ongoing risk assessments.^[81] Quantity-based LMTs like redemption gates, which cap outflows in stressed conditions to prevent fire sales, and side pockets for isolating illiquid positions must be pre-defined in fund documents and activated judiciously to balance investor rights with fund stability.^[81] In the United Kingdom, following Brexit, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulates open-end unit trusts as authorized collective investment schemes under the Collective Investment Schemes Sourcebook (COLL), authorizing funds within two months for UK UCITS equivalents and emphasizing liquidity risk management akin to EU standards.^[82] These rules require robust stress testing and LMTs, including gates for illiquid exposures, to ensure daily dealing aligns with asset liquidity without U.S.-style parallels. Regulatory approaches in Asia vary, with India's Securities and Exchange Board (SEBI) governing open-end mutual funds under the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 (as amended in 2024), permitting unlimited issuance and redemption at net asset value on business days while imposing total expense ratio caps and mandating liquidity safeguards like side pockets for unlisted debt.^[83] In the Cayman Islands, a key domicile for alternative open-end structures, the Mutual Funds Act (as revised in 2021) requires registration or licensing by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority for funds offering redeemable interests, focusing on disclosure of liquidity risks, stress testing protocols, and use of gates or suspensions for illiquid alternative assets to facilitate global distribution.^[84]

Advantages and Disadvantages

Benefits

Open-end funds offer investors a high degree of liquidity, as shares can be redeemed daily at the fund's net asset value (NAV), providing an easier exit strategy compared to closed-end funds that trade on exchanges like stocks.^[85]^[27] This daily redemption feature allows investors to access their money promptly, typically within seven days, often sooner, making these funds suitable for those needing flexibility in their investment timeline.^[27] A key advantage is diversification, where open-end funds pool investor capital to create broad portfolios across numerous securities, industries, or asset classes, thereby reducing the risk associated with holding individual stocks or bonds.^[85]^[27] This instant access to a diversified portfolio enables retail investors to achieve exposure to markets or strategies that would be challenging or costly to replicate independently, mitigating the impact of any single security's underperformance.^[58] Professional management represents another benefit, as open-end funds are overseen by SEC-registered investment advisers who apply expertise in security selection, portfolio construction, and market analysis without requiring investors to engage in direct stock picking.^[85]^[27] This structure leverages economies of scale, spreading research and trading costs across a large pool of assets, which lowers the per-investor expense compared to managing a personal portfolio.^[58] Accessibility is enhanced by low minimum investment thresholds, with many open-end funds requiring only a relatively modest initial outlay, such as $1,000 or less, and allowing subsequent purchases in smaller increments, thereby opening these vehicles to a wide range of retail investors.^[85]^[27] Finally, open-end funds provide transparency through daily NAV calculations, which reflect the current value of the fund's assets after market close, and monthly disclosures of portfolio holdings publicly available 60 days after month-end, enabling investors to monitor performance and composition effectively.^[85]^[27]^[75] These disclosures, available via the SEC's EDGAR database and fund websites, promote informed decision-making without additional cost.^[27]

Drawbacks

Open-end funds are subject to several drawbacks that can diminish investor returns and introduce risks. One primary limitation is the erosion of net returns due to fees and expenses. Expense ratios, which cover management, administrative, and distribution costs, directly reduce the fund's performance by deducting a percentage of assets annually, acting as a persistent drag on investor gains.^[86] Similarly, sales loads—front-end or deferred charges imposed at purchase or redemption—further erode returns by limiting the initial or final amount invested in the portfolio.^[87] Another significant risk is dilution, where large-scale redemptions compel fund managers to sell assets at depressed prices during market downturns, imposing transaction costs on remaining shareholders. This occurs because redeeming investors receive the net asset value without bearing the full impact of forced sales, such as widened bid-ask spreads or market impact costs, which then lower the value for non-redeeming participants.^[88] Open-end funds also face vulnerability to market timing abuses, where sophisticated investors exploit short-term pricing discrepancies through frequent trading, despite regulatory safeguards like redemption fees and frequent-trading policies. These practices, uncovered in early 2000s scandals, increase portfolio turnover and transaction costs, harming long-term holders by diluting returns, even as post-2003 SEC rules mandate enhanced disclosures and compliance programs to mitigate such exploitation.^[89]^[90] Active open-end funds often exhibit performance drag, underperforming their benchmark indices after accounting for fees over extended periods. For instance, over 10 years ending December 2023, approximately 87% of large-cap U.S. equity funds failed to match the S&P 500's returns net of expenses, highlighting how costs compound to widen the gap with passive alternatives.^[41] Finally, liquidity mismatches between daily redemption promises and underlying asset illiquidity can exacerbate stresses during crises, potentially delaying investor access. In the 2020 COVID-19 turmoil, open-end funds experienced outflows equivalent to 5% of assets, forcing rapid sales that amplified bond price declines and market volatility, with regulatory tools like gates or swing pricing sometimes invoked to manage redemptions and protect the portfolio.^[91]

Variations and Examples

Mutual Funds

In the United States, mutual funds represent a primary form of open-end funds, registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as investment companies that pool capital from numerous investors to acquire diversified portfolios of stocks, bonds, or other securities.^[2] These funds issue shares continuously to meet investor demand and redeem them at the net asset value calculated daily, without a fixed share count, enabling flexible entry and exit for participants.^[29] This structure democratizes access to professional asset management, allowing retail and institutional investors to benefit from economies of scale in portfolio construction and oversight. Mutual funds are classified by their core investment focus, including equity funds that allocate primarily to stocks for growth potential, bond funds emphasizing fixed-income securities for income generation and stability, balanced funds blending equities and bonds to mitigate risk while pursuing moderate returns, and money market funds targeting short-term, high-quality debt instruments for liquidity and capital preservation.^[92] A well-known example is the Vanguard 500 Index Fund, an equity mutual fund that passively replicates the performance of the S&P 500 stock index, exemplifying low-cost, broad-market exposure.^[93] These categories cater to diverse risk tolerances and objectives, from aggressive growth to conservative preservation. As of year-end 2024, U.S. household mutual fund assets under management totaled $25.0 trillion, reflecting robust expansion fueled by substantial inflows into bond funds amid shifting interest rate dynamics and economic uncertainty.^[94]^[95] Investors typically access these funds through brokerage platforms for direct purchases, employer-sponsored 401(k plans for retirement savings, and individual retirement accounts (IRAs) for tax-deferred accumulation.^[96] A distinctive element of U.S. mutual funds is their tax efficiency as regulated investment companies, which mandates annual distributions of at least 90% of net investment income and realized capital gains to shareholders, thereby avoiding entity-level taxation and shifting the liability directly to investors for potential deferral in qualified accounts.^[97]

Unit Trusts and SICAVs

Unit trusts in the United Kingdom represent a key form of open-end investment vehicle, functioning as pooled investment schemes where multiple investors contribute capital to acquire a diversified portfolio of assets, managed by a professional fund manager.^[98] These funds must be authorized by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the UK's primary financial regulator, ensuring compliance with standards for investor protection, transparency, and fair valuation.^[99] Like U.S. mutual funds, unit trusts offer daily pricing based on the net asset value (NAV) of the underlying holdings, allowing investors to buy or redeem units at the end of each trading day.^[100] In Europe, particularly in jurisdictions like Luxembourg and Ireland, Société d'Investissement à Capital Variable (SICAV) structures provide another prominent open-end fund format, characterized by variable share capital that adjusts automatically with investor subscriptions and redemptions.^[101] As an investment company organized under the UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) Directive, a SICAV invests primarily in liquid assets such as equities, bonds, and money market instruments, enabling it to be marketed and sold cross-border throughout the European Union and beyond without additional local approvals in eligible markets.^[101] This framework promotes retail investor access to diversified, regulated products with standardized risk management and disclosure requirements.^[102] A primary distinction between these structures lies in their legal form: unit trusts operate as contractual trusts governed by trust law, where investors hold beneficial interests in the assets without direct ownership, managed by a trustee and fund manager.^[103] In contrast, SICAVs are incorporated as corporate entities, typically sociétés anonymes, granting investors shareholder status with shares that can vary in number and value based on the fund's NAV.^[104] This corporate setup facilitates greater flexibility in share classes and aligns with EU company law, while unit trusts emphasize separation of legal and beneficial ownership.^[103] The UCITS framework underpinning many SICAVs has driven widespread adoption, enabling seamless global distribution to professional and retail investors in over 70 countries outside the EU.^[105] By the end of 2024, UCITS funds, including SICAVs, managed net assets exceeding €15.2 trillion, reflecting robust growth of 15.9% from the prior year amid favorable market conditions and inflows.^[105] This scale underscores their role as a cornerstone of European asset management, with Luxembourg and Ireland dominating as domiciles due to favorable tax and regulatory environments.^[106] Prominent examples of SICAVs include HSBC Global Investment Funds, an umbrella structure established in Luxembourg that offers multiple sub-funds focusing on equities, fixed income, and multi-asset strategies, all compliant with UCITS standards for international distribution.^[107]

Evergreen and Open-end Hedge Funds

Evergreen funds represent a specialized open-end structure in private markets, characterized by their perpetual lifespan and the ability to accept continuous subscriptions and redemptions without a fixed termination date.^[108] These funds pool investor capital indefinitely, allowing ongoing access to illiquid assets such as real estate and private equity, while providing periodic liquidity to participants.^[109] Their popularity stems from enhanced flexibility for investors, including reduced exposure to the J-curve effect through immediate portfolio access and lower entry barriers compared to traditional closed-end vehicles.^[108] In private markets like real estate, evergreen funds have faced challenges such as growing redemption queues, particularly noted in 2024 amid market pressures, where investor outflows exceeded available liquidity, leading to deferred redemptions.^[110] To manage this, structures often incorporate gates, lock-ups, or exit queues at the fund and investor levels, balancing liquidity demands with underlying asset illiquidity.^[111] Unlike traditional mutual funds, evergreen funds offer less frequent liquidity—typically quarterly or annually—along with higher minimum investments targeted at accredited or institutional investors.^[112] Open-end hedge funds, though rare, provide another variation with periodic liquidity options, often quarterly, to accommodate alternative strategies while maintaining some investor access.^[113] These funds, frequently domiciled in the Cayman Islands, may include lock-up periods of one to three years and notice requirements of 1-3 months to align with portfolio liquidity.^[114] Redemption gates and deferred payments serve as common mechanisms to control outflows during volatility.^[115] Recent trends highlight a shift in structuring preferences for alternative open-end funds in the Cayman Islands, with over 75% offering monthly or quarterly redemptions and a rise in single- or double-legged evergreen models among Asian and European managers.^[113] The 2025 Cayman Islands Trends & Insights report notes increasing integration of ESG, AI, and digital assets in these vehicles, alongside exempted company domiciles for efficiency.^[113] In the UK, evolving non-dom tax rules effective from April 2025, which abolish the remittance basis and impose worldwide taxation on long-term residents, have encouraged the use of offshore open-end structures like Cayman-domiciled funds to optimize tax efficiency for alternative investments.^[116]^[117] Prominent examples include Hamilton Lane's evergreen private equity offerings, such as the Global Private Assets Fund, which provides diversified exposure through a multi-manager approach with periodic subscriptions and redemptions.^[118] Similarly, the firm's Private Assets Fund targets U.S. investors with access to private markets via quarterly liquidity windows and higher minimum commitments for qualified clients.^[119]

References

[1]
Mutual Funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) - SEC.gov
Dec 18, 2016 · Open-end investment companies or open-end funds—which sell shares on a continuous basis, purchased from, and redeemed by, the fund (or through a ...
[2]
Mutual Funds | Investor.gov
A mutual fund is an SEC-registered open-end investment company that pools money from many investors. It invests the money in stocks, bonds, short-term money- ...
[3]
Closed-end Funds | Investor.gov
A closed-end fund generally is not required to buy its shares back from investors upon request. That is, closed-end fund shares generally are not redeemable. ...
[4]
Unit Investment Trusts (UITs) - Investor.gov
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are generally structured as open-end funds, but can also be structured as UITs. A UIT invests the money raised from many investors ...
[5]
Statement on Open-End Funds - SEC.gov
Nov 2, 2022 · ... open-end funds. A defining feature of open-end funds is the ability for shareholders to redeem their shares daily, in both normal times and ...
[6]
https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-statement-open-end-funds-110222
[7]
[PDF] Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective ...
Dec 17, 2010 · (2) If the capital of the SICAV falls below one quarter of the minimum capital, as defined in Article. 94, the directors or managers shall ...
[8]
100 Years of Mutual Funds - FundGuard
Mar 21, 2024 · On March 21, 1924 – 100 years ago today – MFS created the first open-end mutual fund with redeemable shares, marking the inception of a revolutionary approach ...
[9]
Look Back and Learn: A History of Mutual Funds - Jason Zweig
May 4, 2017 · All that changed on March 21, 1924, when Edward G. Leffler launched Massachusetts Investors Trust, the world's first open-end mutual fund. For ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[10]
The Evolution of Mutual Funds: From Dutch Origins to Modern ...
At the beginning of the 1950s, the number of open-end funds topped 100. In 1954, the financial markets finally overcame their pre-1929 crash peak, and the ...
[11]
A Historical Analysis of the Investment Company Act of 1940
Prior to the Act, the unique structural aspects of funds, coupled with a lack of regulation, enabled rogue advisers to put their own interests ahead of those of ...Missing: UCITS Vanguard index
[12]
Mutual Funds Top $1 Trillion - The New York Times
Jan 16, 1990 · The move over $1 trillion comes less than 10 years after mutual fund assets first topped $100 billion, in 1980. The total first hit $1 billion ...
[13]
Vanguard's history
A timeline highlights Vanguard milestones as well as innovations on our journey to give investors the best chance for investment success.
[14]
[PDF] B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 20 December 1985 on the ... - EUR-Lex
Mar 20, 2008 · 3. The competent authorities may not authorise a UCITS if the management company or the investment company do not comply with the preconditions ...
[15]
Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities
Undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) is a regulatory framework for mutual funds in the European Union (EU). It governs how ...
[16]
[PDF] International Mutual Funds, Capital Flow Volatility, and Contagion–A ...
Patru (2006), examining flows into U.S.-based international mutual funds, finds evidence for return chasing among individual investors.
[17]
Valuation of Portfolio Securities and other Assets Held by ... - SEC.gov
An open-end fund generally must sell and redeem its shares at a price based on the fund's current net asset value as next computed after the receipt of a ...
[18]
Statement at Open Meeting on Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk ...
Sep 22, 2015 · Funds must make payment to redeeming shareholders within seven days of the shares being tendered.
[19]
DIVERSIFICATION NON DIVERSIFICATION DEF 14A - SEC.gov
“Diversified” under the 1940 Act means that, with respect to 75% of its total assets, a Fund will not invest more than 5% of its total assets in the securities ...
[20]
Where do I put my money? Mutual funds versus exchange-traded ...
Most statistical analysts suggest that for risk mitigation to be effective through diversification, a portfolio should hold between 25 and 50 securities broadly ...
[21]
Characteristics of Mutual Funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
Apr 29, 2025 · Professional management. Both types of funds are typically managed by SEC-registered investment advisers. Diversification. Both types of funds ...
[22]
Publication 550 (2024), Investment Income and Expenses - IRS
It includes information on the tax treatment of investment income and expenses for individual shareholders of mutual funds or other regulated investment ...
[23]
How a Closed-End Fund Works and Differs From an Open-End Fund
While closed-end funds might offer higher yields, they are less liquid than open-end funds and largely available only through brokers.Navigating the Dynamics of... · Comparing Closed-End and... · Net Asset Value
[24]
Open-End Vs. Closed-End Funds: Key Differences Explained
Mar 13, 2025 · Open-end and closed-end funds differ mostly in how they're bought and sold. Closed-end funds trade more like stocks, driven by supply and demand.What is an open-end fund? · What is a closed-end fund?
[25]
Open-End vs. Closed-End Funds: What's the Difference? | Thrivent
Dec 17, 2024 · The core difference between the two is closed-end funds do not create additional shares after the fund is formed, but open-end funds do.
[26]
Closed-End Funds Knowledge Center - Cohen & Steers
Open-end funds continuously sell and redeem shares for investors. Closed-end funds sell a fixed number of shares once, in an initial public offering. Closed-end ...
[27]
[PDF] Mutual Funds and ETFs - SEC.gov
This price—the per-share value of the mutual fund's assets minus its liabilities—is called the NAV or net asset value. Mutual funds must sell and redeem their ...
[28]
Open-End Fund: Definition, Example, Pros and Cons - Investopedia
The fund sponsor sells shares directly to investors and redeems them as well. These shares are priced daily based on their net asset value (NAV). Most mutual ...What Is an Open-End Fund? · How It Works · Closed-End Funds · Pros and Cons
[29]
Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk Management Programs and Swing ...
Dec 16, 2022 · Open-end funds typically calculate their NAVs once a day. Purchase and redemption requests submitted throughout the day receive the NAV ...
[30]
Open-End Management Company: Meaning, Types, FAQs
Shares are issued as long as investors are willing to buy and are bought and sold at their net asset value (NAV). Open-end funds are an easy way to gain ...
[31]
Statement at Open Meeting: Modernizing and Enhancing Investment ...
Oct 13, 2016 · ... and – in extreme cases – result in late or suspended redemptions. Last December, for example, an open-end fund suspended redemptions and ...
[32]
[PDF] Final Rule: Investment Company Swing Pricing - SEC.gov
Oct 13, 2016 · dilution risk—for example, it is possible the swung adjusted NAV on a given day under or overestimates the costs incurred by the fund, or ...
[33]
[PDF] Final Rule: Pricing of Redeemable Securities for ... - SEC.gov
On June 25, 1968, the Securi ties and Exchange Commiss ion published noti.ce. (Investment Company Act Release No. 5413; Securities Exchai1ge Release No. 8340) ( ...
[34]
Mutual Fund Share Pricing: FAQs - Investment Company Institute
Rule 22c-1 requires "forward pricing," which means that shareholders purchasing or redeeming shares receive the next computed share price following the fund's ...
[35]
Amendments to Rules Governing Pricing of Mutual Fund Shares
May 25, 2023 · The amendments would provide that an order to purchase or redeem fund shares would receive the current day's price only if the fund, its designated transfer ...
[36]
17 CFR § 270.22c-1 - Pricing of redeemable securities for ...
Generally, redeemable securities must be priced at current net asset value. Some funds can use swing pricing to adjust this value.Missing: forward | Show results with:forward
[37]
Directive - 2009/65 - EN - UCITS - EUR-Lex
Summary of each segment:
[38]
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/alpha.asp
[39]
Understanding Alpha in Investing: Definition and Examples
Alpha is a measure of an investment's performance that indicates its ability to generate returns in excess of its benchmark.
[40]
Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA): Definition and Example Portfolio
Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) is an active management portfolio strategy which re-balances holdings to take advantage of market prices and strengths.Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
[41]
Understanding Tracking Error: Meaning, Influencing Factors, and ...
Tracking error is the divergence between the price behavior of a position or a portfolio and the price behavior of a benchmark.What Is a Tracking Error? · Impact on Investment... · Key Influences
[42]
SPIVA | S&P Dow Jones Indices
For over 20 years, our renowned SPIVA research has measured actively managed funds against their index benchmarks worldwide.About SPIVA · Performance Reports · SPIVA Library · U.S. Persistence Scorecard
[43]
Active Versus Passive Investing Performance In Stocks And bonds
Overall, 77.97% of large-cap mutual fund managers and 73.21% of institutional accounts underperformed the S&P 500® on a gross-of-fees basis over the 10-year ...
[44]
7 of the Best Growth Funds to Buy and Hold | Investing | U.S. News
Jul 21, 2025 · 7 of the Best Growth Funds to Buy and Hold · Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) · Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) · Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX).
[45]
Growth versus Value Investing - Fidelity
Growth investing focuses on companies with faster growth and higher risk, while value investing seeks undervalued companies with lower risk and potential ...
[46]
[PDF] Mutual Funds and ETFs | A Guide for Investors
The strategy can be implemented by replication—purchasing 100% of the securities in the same proportion as in the index or benchmark—or by a representative ...Missing: definition methods
[47]
[PDF] On the Changes to the Index Inclusion Effect with Increasing Passive ...
The Fund uses the replication method of indexing, meaning that it generally holds the same stocks as its target index and in approximately the same proportions.
[48]
What is an index fund? - Vanguard
Vanguard pioneered the index fund with the launch of the first retail index fund in 1976, revolutionizing the way investors build their portfolios. Today ...<|separator|>
[49]
Active vs. Passive Funds: Performance, Fund Flows, Fees
Jul 9, 2025 · In 2024, total assets in US passive mutual funds and ETFs narrowly surpassed those in active ones for the first time. Recent data reflects a ...Missing: open- | Show results with:open-
[50]
[PDF] research-note-does-growth-passive-investing-affect-equity-market ...
The growth of passive investing has undoubtedly created substantial benefits for investors by lowering the cost of investing (directly by providing low cost ...<|separator|>
[51]
[PDF] Active and Passive Investing — The Long-Run Evidence
The market share of passive investing is somewhere between 20% and 40%, depending on the asset class, region, and manager universe, as well as on definitional.
[52]
Explore Smart Beta - Research Affiliates
Smart beta strategies can also be described as portfolios that tilt toward various, or combinations of, equity factors. Smart beta viewed as a factor framework.
[53]
Active vs. Smart Beta vs. Passive | Man Group
Smart beta strategies are active in that they deviate from market capitalization weighted indices by design. But many are implemented in a passive fashion, ...
[54]
Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses | Investor.gov
A purchase fee is another type of fee that some funds charge their shareholders when the shareholders purchase their shares.Missing: open- | Show results with:open-
[55]
Investment Management: Report on Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses
The fee table reflects both (i) charges paid directly by a shareholder out of his or her investment, such as front- and back-end sales loads, and (ii) recurring ...
[56]
Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses | Investor.gov
### Summary of Mutual Fund Fees
[57]
[PDF] IM Guidance Update - SEC.gov
1 Rule 12b-1 permits an open-end fund to bear its own distribution expenses under certain conditions, including that distribution expenses be paid pursuant ...
[58]
Mutual Funds | FINRA.org
Mutual funds are a popular way to invest in securities. Because mutual funds can offer built-in diversification and professional management, they offer certain ...
[59]
What Are No-Load Funds? Definition, Advantages & Top Examples
A no-load fund is an investment fund that doesn't charge a sales commission when buying or selling shares, allowing your full investment to be put to work.Missing: prevalence trends
[60]
Understanding Load vs. No-Load Mutual Funds: Key Differences ...
Load and no-load mutual funds differ mainly in fees: no-load funds don't charge upfront sales fees, while load funds do, which can reduce the amount ...Overview · Load Mutual Fund · No-Load Mutual Fund
[61]
No-load mutual funds - Vanguard
*Vanguard average mutual fund expense ratio: 0.08%. Industry average mutual fund expense ratio: 0.51%. All averages are asset-weighted. Industry average ...Low-Cost, No-Load Funds Are... · All The Investment... · Open Your Account OnlineMissing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[62]
[PDF] Trends in the Expenses and Fees of Funds, 2024
At year-end 2024, the average expense ratio of actively managed domestic equity mutual funds at small fund complexes was 0.99 percent, higher than the industry ...
[63]
Brokerage Fees and Investment Commissions Explained - NerdWallet
Jun 6, 2025 · As mentioned above, mutual fund companies can pay a broker to offer their funds with no transaction fee. ... To do that, choose no-load funds.What is a brokerage fee? · Common types of investment... · How investment and...
[64]
Vanguard to Advisors: Let's Snuggle - Wealth Management
Fee-based advisors are more inclined to use no-load funds because they are getting paid for their ongoing advice. Some 43 percent of advisors were fee-based ...
[65]
More Than 72% of Financial Advisors Are… | Cerulli Associates
Mar 18, 2025 · This shift toward fee-based services is driven primarily by a transition from commissions to asset-based fees among the wirehouse and broker ...
[66]
Popularity of No-Load Mutual Funds Whittles Down Fees - planadviser
Apr 2, 2025 · The average expense ratio for mutual funds has been steadily declining over the past three decades, per a report from the Investment Company Institute.Missing: prevalence structures
[67]
Fund Fees Are Still Declining, But Not as Quickly as They Once Were
May 23, 2025 · Between 2005 and 2024, the asset-weighted average fee fell to 0.34% from 0.83%. As a result, investors have saved billions in fund fees.
[68]
Registered Investment Company Use of Senior Securities - SEC.gov
Oct 11, 2017 · Section 18 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 circumscribes the ability of registered closed-end investment companies and registered ...
[69]
The Exciting World of Investment Company Regulation - SEC.gov
Jun 14, 2001 · The '40 Act is, in effect, a comprehensive corporate statute. It places substantive restrictions on virtually every aspect of the operation of investment ...
[70]
Investment Company Liquidity Risk Management Programs - SEC.gov
May 27, 2025 · The Commission is adopting new rule 22e-4, which requires each registered open-end management investment company, including open-end exchange- ...
[71]
[PDF] Investment Company Liquidity Risk Management Programs - SEC.gov
Oct 14, 2016 · Open-end funds that redeem in cash and In-Kind ETFs operate differently, and therefore evaluate liquidity risk differently. We believe, for ...
[72]
Investment Company Liquidity Risk Management Program Rules
Oct 11, 2017 · A fundamental feature of open-end funds is that they allow investors to redeem their shares daily. Funds need to maintain sufficiently ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[73]
[PDF] Final rule: Tailored Shareholder Reports for Mutual Funds ... - SEC.gov
Oct 26, 2022 · The SEC rule requires concise, visually engaging annual and semi-annual reports for retail investors, and promotes transparent statements about ...
[74]
SEC Adopts Amendments to Modernize Fund Shareholder Reports ...
Oct 26, 2022 · The rule amendments will require funds to provide concise, tailored shareholder reports that highlight key information, such as fund expenses, performance, and ...
[75]
SEC Adopts Reporting Enhancements for Registered Investment ...
Aug 28, 2024 · The Form N-PORT amendments will require funds that are required to report on the form—generally registered open-end funds, registered closed-end ...
[76]
[PDF] Final Rule, guidance: Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN Reporting
Aug 28, 2024 · In addition to the Form N-PORT amendments, we are adopting proposed amendments to. Form N-CEN to modify certain items related to entity ...
[77]
Guidance on Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk Management Programs
Aug 28, 2024 · Statement on Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN Reporting Amendments; Guidance on Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk Management Programs
[78]
A Big Deal: UCITS 6 & 7
Aug 2, 2023 · The UCITS revisions accordingly prescribe eight Liquidity Management Tools (LMT) and a harmonized set of rules around access to and use of ...
[79]
AIFMD 2.0 impact on open-ended funds: Liquidity Management Tools
Jan 14, 2025 · The EU is now seeking to regulate the approach to liquidity management in open-ended alternative investment funds (as well as UCITS)
[80]
[PDF] Final Report - | European Securities and Markets Authority
Oct 21, 2025 · ... open-ended loan-originating AIFs liquidity lies in its structuration. Liquidity management tools are no different from other open-ended funds,.
[81]
[PDF] Revised Recommendations for Liquidity Risk Management ... - IOSCO
In December 2023, the FSB published its Revised Policy Recommendations to Address. Structural Vulnerabilities from Liquidity Mismatch in Open-ended Funds6 ( ...
[82]
Public Investment Funds Laws and Regulations United Kingdom 2025
Apr 4, 2025 · The FCA must determine applications for authorisation of new UK UCITS schemes within two months and has six months to process applications for ...
[83]
SEBI |
**Summary of SEBI Mutual Funds Amendment Regulations 2024 for Open-End Mutual Funds in India:**
[84]
Alternative Investment Funds Laws and Regulations Cayman ...
Aug 19, 2025 · The Mutual Funds Act (As Revised) (the “MF Act”) provides for the regulation of open-ended investment funds and mutual fund administrators.
[85]
Mutual Funds | Investor.gov
Low Minimum Investment. Many mutual funds set a relatively low dollar amount for initial investment and subsequent purchases. Liquidity. Mutual fund investors ...
[86]
[PDF] The Behavior of Mutual Fund Investors
Expense ratios are a drain on investors' returns; in addition to accelerating capital gains taxes, high turnover increases trading costs. In aggregate, fees, ...
[87]
[PDF] How Fees and Expenses Affect Your Investment Portfolio - SEC.gov
Fees typically come in two types—transaction fees and ongoing fees. Transaction fees are charged each time you enter into a transaction, for example, when you ...
[88]
Setting the Record Straight on Dilution, First-Mover Advantage, and ...
Jun 5, 2023 · Dilution occurs when fund shareholders redeem, and costs are borne by non-redeeming shareholders. The first-mover advantage is a theory that ...
[89]
GAO-05-313, Mutual Fund Trading Abuses: Lessons Can Be ...
The compliance staff reviewed trading data in funds considered vulnerable to market timing--such as international funds--and notified customers who exceeded ...
[90]
Disclosure Regarding Market Timing and Selective ... - SEC.gov
Market timing arbitrage strategies often involve such frequent purchases and redemptions of mutual fund shares or frequent transfers among sub-accounts of ...
[91]
None
### Summary of Underperformance Rates of Active U.S. Equity Funds vs. Benchmarks (Net of Fees)
[92]
How Illiquid Open-End Funds Can Amplify Shocks and Destabilize ...
Oct 4, 2022 · Mutual funds holding hard-to-sell assets but offering daily redemptions can spark volatility and magnify the impact of shocks, especially in periods of market ...
[93]
4 Types of Mutual Funds - NerdWallet
Mar 7, 2023 · There are four broad types of mutual funds: Equity (stocks), fixed-income (bonds), money market funds (short-term debt), or both stocks and bonds (balanced or ...
[94]
10 Largest Mutual Funds by AUM | Investing - US News Money
Oct 15, 2024 · 10 Largest Mutual Funds by AUM ; Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFIAX), $1.3 trillion, 1.3% ; Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX), $599.4 ...
[95]
[PDF] What US Households Consider When They Select Mutual Funds, 2024
Percentage of total household mutual fund assets, year-end 2024. Total household mutual fund assets: $25.0 trillion. 45%. Domestic equity. 11%. World equity. 6 ...
[96]
Fund Flows: Bonds and Passives Real Winners in 2024
Jan 23, 2025 · Long-term index funds raked in flows of EUR 307.6 billion in 2024, compared to just EUR 150.5 billion posted by actively managed funds.
[97]
Investing in Mutual Funds: What They Are and How They Work
A mutual fund is a financial vehicle in which shareholders put their money together to invest in securities (eg, stocks, bonds, money market instruments).
[98]
End-of-year tax considerations for capital gains: Understanding ...
Sep 22, 2025 · In tax-advantaged accounts like IRAs or 401(k)s, reinvested dividends and capital gain distributions are not taxed in the year received. Taxes ...
[99]
[PDF] UK FCA Authorised Funds: A Guide - Farrer & Co
The authorised fund manager is always an FCA authorised entity and will either have regulatory permission to manage a UCITS and/or manage an authorised AIF.
[100]
[PDF] Fund Management 2021 - Morgan Lewis
Jun 26, 2021 · Any entity established as an open-ended retail fund in the UK must be authorised by the FCA. ... thorised unit trusts that are open only to UK tax ...Missing: authorization | Show results with:authorization
[101]
Liquidity management in UK open-ended funds | Bank of England
Mar 26, 2021 · One of the liquidity management tools at funds' disposal is pricing adjustments. Under FCA rules, single-priced authorised funds can protect ...Missing: Trusts authorization
[102]
UCITS - ALFI
UCITS is an investment fund that invests in liquid assets and can be distributed publicly to retail investors across the EU.
[103]
Fund Management - | European Securities and Markets Authority
UCITS are a very successful product: there are more than 37,000 UCITS funds in the EU which represent over €14.6 trillion of assets under management. ▸ To ...Missing: 15 | Show results with:15
[104]
OEICs Vs Unit Trusts I Investments - HSBC UK
Both OEICs and unit trusts are types of funds that combine money from multiple investors and invest it for them.
[105]
What are the different types of funds? - Artemis Fund Managers
Those investing in a SICAV fund own 'shares' of it. Similar to open-ended funds in the UK such as unit trusts and OEICs, they are 'open-ended' because they can ...
[106]
Strong net asset growth for funds in 2024, significantly ... - | EFAMA
Mar 5, 2025 · Net assets of UCITS increased by 15.9%, ending the year at EUR 15.2 trillion. Net sales of UCITS reached EUR 617 billion, more than three times ...
[107]
Our industry in numbers - | EFAMA
Net assets of investment funds domiciled in Europe, UCITS and AIFs, totalled EUR 23.4 trillion at the end of Q4 2024. Luxembourg and Ireland are the two ...
[108]
[PDF] HSBC Global Investment Funds Prospectus
The Company is a recognised collective investment scheme in the United Kingdom under the Financial Services and Markets. Act 2000 (the “Act”). The distribution ...
[109]
[PDF] Private Markets Mythbusters Series - Navigating the evergreen fund ...
Apr 4, 2024 · Evergreen funds are perpetual capital funds where investors can subscribe and redeem over time, without waiting for termination. They are open- ...
[110]
Evergreen funds rising popularity - RBS International
Mar 24, 2025 · Evergreen funds are popular due to their flexibility, liquidity, resilience, access to illiquid assets, and the ability to operate indefinitely.
[111]
Redemption Queues in Open-End Commingled Funds
This article focuses on the growing redemption queues in real estate open-end commingled funds.
[112]
Evergreen private markets funds — the benefits and costs of liquidity
Jul 11, 2025 · Institutional-focused evergreen structures will often feature a lock-up, fund and investor-level gates, or an exit queue concept to ensure that ...
[113]
Evergreen funds: The next frontier in private markets? - SEI
Open-end funds have no terminal date and can accept investors' contributions on a periodic basis with preset intervals for investors to withdraw capital. Closed ...Missing: queues | Show results with:queues
[114]
Cayman Islands Trends & Insights: Open-Ended Funds Report 2025
Jun 30, 2025 · This report delivers unparalleled analysis of the market's most significant developments, structuring preferences, and fund terms.Missing: alternative | Show results with:alternative
[115]
[PDF] A Guide to Cayman Funds - Dillon Eustace
Where a Cayman fund is open ended, the following liquidity control mechanisms can be facilitated: • redemption gates;. • deferred redemption payments ...Missing: periodic lock-
[116]
[PDF] Cayman Islands Trends & Insights: Open-Ended Funds
Liquidity terms have not seen drastic changes, with monthly or quarterly redemption cycles and notice periods of 1-3 months being standard. Lock-up periods are ...Missing: periodic | Show results with:periodic
[117]
Technical note: Changes to the taxation of non-UK domiciled ...
Apr 23, 2024 · From 6 April 2025, the current remittance basis of taxation will be abolished for UK resident non-domiciled individuals. This will be replaced ...
[118]
Alternative investment destinations for UK non-doms - Bolder Group
Jul 23, 2024 · Effective April 2025, non-doms will no longer be able to permanently protect foreign assets held in an offshore trust from inheritance tax. They ...
[119]
Evergreen Strategies - Hamilton Lane
Global Private Assets Fund (GPA). Offers investors a core diversified private equity exposure through a single commitment. · Global Private Infrastructure Fund ( ...Private Assets Fund · Choose your country · Private Secondary Fund
[120]
Private Assets Fund - Hamilton Lane
Private Assets Fund (“PAF”) provides qualified clients with access to a diversified private markets portfolio, leveraging Hamilton Lane's private market ...