Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operational data store

An operational data store (ODS) is a that aggregates or near- data from multiple operational sources, providing a consolidated, current snapshot of to support tactical and operational . It serves as an intermediary layer between transactional systems and analytical environments, enabling quick access to integrated data without the full historical depth of a . Unlike direct querying of source databases, an ODS allows decision support applications to retrieve and update data efficiently while propagating changes back to operational systems. Key characteristics of an ODS include its focus on subject-oriented data relevant to specific business processes, such as or , and its volatile nature, where older data is typically overwritten to maintain only the most recent state. occurs through processes like (ETL), but often with minimal transformation to preserve the original structure for rapid querying and analysis. This setup supports applications, including automated notifications based on time-sensitive business rules and end-to-end visibility into operational workflows. In contrast to a , which stores historical, cross-functional data for strategic analysis and complex queries, an ODS emphasizes current, detailed data for simpler, operational needs with high volatility and original schemas. Benefits include improved of issues, synchronized views across systems, and enhanced for tasks like tracking or customer process management. Modern ODS implementations have evolved to incorporate cloud-based streaming, making them essential for organizations requiring immediate insights without disrupting primary transactional environments.

Definition and Purpose

Core Definition

An operational data store (ODS) is a that integrates data from disparate operational sources in or near to support tactical and operational , rather than serving as a repository for long-term historical storage. This acts as a , enabling both transactional updates and analytical access to current data, thereby facilitating immediate insights into business operations such as customer interactions or inventory status. Core characteristics of an ODS include its subject-oriented design, which organizes data around key entities like customers or products for focused operational ; its emphasis on current-valued , capturing the most recent without extensive historical retention; and its support for both read and write operations to accommodate dynamic updates. Additionally, ODS implementations typically employ a normalized to reduce , ensure during frequent updates, and maintain efficiency in handling integrated operational feeds. These attributes make the ODS volatile and detailed, prioritizing and consistency over archival depth. In distinction from general-purpose relational databases, an ODS is specifically engineered for operational integration, consolidating and reconciling data from multiple heterogeneous systems to provide a unified, up-to-date for short-term decision support, without the broader scope of standalone transaction or query optimization. This focused role enables organizations to derive actionable intelligence from live operational streams, such as sales tracking or service monitoring, enhancing responsiveness in dynamic environments.

Key Objectives

The primary objectives of an operational data store (ODS) are to enable real-time reporting and support tactical by consolidating current operational from disparate sources into a unified, accessible repository. This facilitates immediate insights for day-to-day business operations without requiring the extensive extract, transform, and load (ETL) processes typical of data warehouses. By providing a for ongoing activities, an ODS allows organizations to respond swiftly to operational needs, such as monitoring performance metrics across functions. Key use cases for ODS include customer service dashboards that deliver up-to-date customer interaction histories for personalized support, inventory monitoring systems that track stock levels in near to prevent shortages, and fraud detection in banking where from multiple channels is analyzed to identify anomalies instantly. These applications leverage the ODS to support cross-departmental queries, enabling teams like sales, finance, and operations to access integrated views of current for coordinated actions. For instance, in , an ODS might consolidate point-of-sale and to provide a holistic of status, aiding rapid restocking decisions. Performance goals of an ODS emphasize low-latency access, typically achieving query responses in seconds to minutes to balance frequent updates with efficient retrieval for operational queries. This near-real-time capability ensures data remains current while minimizing the overhead of full data transformations, supporting high-volume transactional environments without compromising speed.

Historical Development

Origins in the 1990s

The operational data store (ODS) emerged in the early as a response to the growing need for integrated, current data in enterprise environments, where traditional (OLTP) systems focused on high-volume, real-time transactions but lacked the ability to support broader operational decision-making. , recognized as the father of , conceptualized the ODS as a complementary component to the data warehouse, filling the gap between OLTP systems—optimized for updates and isolated operations—and decision support systems, which required historical, aggregated data for analysis. This hybrid structure aimed to consolidate near-real-time data from multiple sources, enabling tactical reporting and operational monitoring without disrupting transactional performance. The rise of (ERP) systems in the 1990s significantly influenced the ODS's development, as organizations adopted integrated suites to unify business processes across finance, , and . These ERP implementations amplified the demand for a centralized operational view, allowing users to access consistent, up-to-date data for daily activities such as inventory management and , rather than relying on fragmented reports from disparate applications. For example, , launched on July 6, 1992, was a key such suite. The ODS provided this integrated perspective, supporting ad-hoc queries and short-term while maintaining data freshness through frequent updates. Early motivations for the ODS stemmed from the inherent limitations of siloed transactional databases prevalent in the , which stored in isolated, application-specific repositories optimized for speed but ill-suited for cross-functional access or timely aggregation. These often resulted in inconsistent views, delayed , and inefficiencies in operational workflows, as enterprises struggled to reconcile from systems without . Inmon's first formal descriptions of the ODS appeared in his 1992 book Building the , positioning it within a larger architectural framework to enable seamless flow from operational sources to analytical environments, thereby enhancing agility.

Evolution and Adoption

In the 2000s, operational data stores (ODS) benefited from broader trends in , including service-oriented architectures (SOA) to enhance among disparate systems, enabling more flexible and updates across enterprise applications. This shift was driven by the need for middleware solutions like (EAI), supporting ODS as a central for operational data in distributed environments. By the 2010s, the rise of technologies propelled ODS toward real-time data streaming capabilities, influenced by platforms such as , released in 2011, which supported scalable, fault-tolerant processing of high-velocity data streams. This evolution addressed the limitations of traditional batch-oriented ODS by incorporating event-driven architectures and in-memory computing, allowing for sub-millisecond response times and handling millions of transactions per second. Adoption of ODS gained widespread traction in sectors like and by the mid-2000s, where they facilitated inventory management and fraud detection, respectively, by consolidating data from multiple transactional sources. In , ODS enabled dynamic customer service enhancements, while in , they supported through integrated operational views. The 2010s marked a pivot to cloud-based ODS implementations for scalable . As of 2025, current trends emphasize hybrid ODS architectures that combine with AI-driven operations, enabling localized data processing for low-latency applications in and . These systems integrate for , with composable architectures allowing modular . According to a report citing a survey, 60% of organizations view real-time data enrichment—core to modern ODS—as crucial for business operations, reflecting broad of ODS-like systems by 2023.

Architectural Components

Data Integration Layer

The data integration layer in an operational data store (ODS) serves as the primary mechanism for ingesting and synchronizing data from multiple heterogeneous sources, ensuring a unified, current view of operational information. This layer typically employs variants of (ETL) processes adapted for near-real-time operations, such as (ELT), where raw data is first loaded into the ODS and then transformed to minimize latency. (CDC) techniques are integral to this layer, enabling the detection and propagation of incremental updates, inserts, updates, and deletes from source systems without full data rescans. Sources feeding into the ODS integration layer commonly include (OLTP) databases, application programming interfaces (APIs), and (IoT) feeds, aggregating transactional data to support operational reporting and . During ingestion, the layer addresses challenges, such as duplicates, inconsistencies, or schema mismatches, through validation rules, deduplication algorithms, and schema mapping to maintain reliability. For instance, data from disparate systems is normalized at the point of entry to resolve format variations, ensuring downstream consistency. Replication methods within the integration layer vary by approach, with log-based CDC reading transaction logs from the source database to capture changes asynchronously, offering low overhead and minimal impact on source performance. In contrast, trigger-based CDC uses database triggers to record changes in auxiliary tables, providing precise capture but potentially increasing source system load due to synchronous execution. These methods support efficient, near-real-time , with log-based preferred for high-volume environments to avoid intrusive queries. A representative workflow for integrating customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) data streams into an ODS involves CDC monitoring changes in both systems' transaction logs or triggers, extracting deltas such as customer orders or inventory updates, and loading them into the ODS via an ELT pipeline. The layer then applies lightweight transformations, like merging customer profiles with order details to resolve duplicates, before persisting the integrated data for real-time querying. This process ensures synchronized views, such as unified customer interactions across sales and operations.

Storage and Access Mechanisms

Operational data stores (ODS) typically employ hybrid relational schemas to balance with query performance. The core storage model often utilizes (3NF) for write operations, ensuring minimal redundancy and maintaining during data ingestion from multiple operational sources. This normalized structure supports efficient updates and transactions in implementations. For read operations, denormalized views are created to optimize access, reducing join complexity and enabling faster retrieval of integrated data without altering the underlying normalized schema. These views are particularly useful in ODS environments handling detailed, current-value data from disparate systems, allowing for streamlined reporting without compromising write efficiency. To facilitate rapid lookups, ODS architectures incorporate extensive indexing strategies on key columns, such as unique indexes on primary keys or timestamps in change data tables and clustered indexes for patterns. These indexes, combined with standard database optimizers and statistics on table distributions, ensure low-latency response times for frequent operational queries. Access patterns in an ODS primarily revolve around SQL-based querying, supporting both structured transactional lookups and ad-hoc reports for tactical . Caching layers—often implemented via in-memory mechanisms—further accelerate repeated reads by holding modified data or hot datasets in buffer pools. Scalability in ODS designs is achieved through partitioning strategies that distribute by time (e.g., monthly partitions) or (e.g., by or product keys), enabling and efficient archiving of historical records. For instance, tables can be segmented into multiple partitions with automated rolling processes to manage growth while retaining only active . Vertical involves enhancing single-node resources like CPUs and for higher throughput, whereas horizontal leverages massively parallel processing () architectures to add nodes and distribute workloads across clusters for handling large-scale volumes. Modern cloud-based ODS implementations often separate compute and storage for elastic , supporting workloads without on-premises hardware constraints. This dual approach ensures ODS systems can support increasing volumes and query concurrency without downtime.

Comparisons with Other Data Systems

Versus Online Transaction Processing Systems

Operational data stores (ODS) and (OLTP) systems serve distinct roles in , with OLTP systems primarily designed to handle high-volume, real-time transactional operations such as order entries or account updates, emphasizing strict compliance to ensure and concurrency through mechanisms like row-level locking. In contrast, an ODS integrates current data from multiple OLTP sources to support operational reporting and tactical decision-making, often employing a subject-oriented structure that provides a consistent, integrated to support both reads and limited writes, prioritizing and . Performance trade-offs further highlight these differences: OLTP systems are optimized for rapid inserts, updates, and deletes, achieving response times in milliseconds for individual transactions to support clerical tasks like balancing a teller's drawer. An ODS, however, excels in processing complex queries that span multiple integrated tables for collective , such as summarizing recent interactions, with minimal —often near-real-time or seconds to minutes via mechanisms like trickle feeds—to provide timely integrated data without significantly disrupting source OLTP systems. For instance, an OLTP system might record individual transactions in for immediate processing, ensuring each entry adheres to strict and concurrency controls. Meanwhile, an ODS aggregates these transactions into a current-valued profile for operational , such as generating a of daily sales trends across departments, enabling tactical insights without the overhead of full transactional rigor.

Versus Data Warehouses

Operational data stores (ODS) and data warehouses serve distinct roles in architectures, with ODS focusing on integrating and providing access to current operational data, while data warehouses are designed for storing and analyzing historical data across an enterprise. ODS typically employ normalized database schemas to maintain detailed, transactional-level data that supports updates and operational queries, contrasting with the denormalized star or snowflake schemas commonly used in data warehouses to facilitate (OLAP) on aggregated, historical datasets. This structural difference enables ODS to handle frequent, incremental data loads from source systems without the extensive preprocessing required for data warehouses, which prioritize query performance on large volumes of summarized information. In terms of temporal scope, an ODS maintains a of the most current , often retaining for only days or weeks to support immediate , whereas data warehouses archive years or decades of historical to enable and long-term reporting. According to , the originator of the ODS concept, this lack of time-variance in ODS distinguishes it from data warehouses, which are inherently time-variant to track changes over periods for strategic insights. As a result, ODS is volatile and reflects near-real-time states from operational sources, avoiding the storage overhead of historical versions that characterize data warehouses. The query focus further highlights these divergences: ODS supports operational business intelligence (BI) applications, such as querying current inventory levels or customer statuses for tactical responses, in contrast to data warehouses, which excel at strategic reporting like analyzing yearly sales trends or forecasting based on historical patterns. For instance, an ODS might integrate live data from multiple transactional systems to provide a unified view for inventory management, enabling quick adjustments, while a data warehouse aggregates past data for executive dashboards on market performance over time. This operational immediacy in ODS complements the analytical depth of data warehouses, often positioning the former as a staging layer before data flows into the latter for deeper analysis.

Implementation and Design

Key Design Principles

Operational data stores (ODS) are designed with normalized data models to ensure and minimize while supporting rapid access to integrated data from disparate sources. This approach maintains , differing from the full of transactional systems. A core principle is achieving , often targeting 99.9% uptime to support continuous business operations with minimal . This is accomplished through architectures like database snapshots, mechanisms, or cloud-based replication, ensuring data remains accessible even during updates or failures. Additionally, ODS systems must support both batch and streaming data loads to handle periodic integrations alongside real-time ingestion, often via (CDC) processes that synchronize updates without overwhelming source systems. In terms of , entity-relationship () diagrams are adapted for operational contexts, focusing on current business entities and their interactions to facilitate quick, subject-oriented views rather than historical analysis. Handling changes to dimensions in environments focuses on maintaining current state with limited historical depth, while avoiding complex joins that could degrade in streaming pipelines. Security principles emphasize to restrict operational users to relevant data subsets, preventing unauthorized exposure in a multi-source environment. Compliance with standards like GDPR is integrated through , , and security measures during ingestion, ensuring personally identifiable information is handled securely across integrated datasets.

Common Technologies and Tools

Operational data stores (ODS) commonly leverage relational database management systems (RDBMS) for handling structured transactional data with high consistency and ACID compliance. Oracle Database is widely used in enterprise ODS implementations due to its robust support for real-time data integration and scalability features like Oracle GoldenGate for change data capture (CDC). Similarly, Microsoft SQL Server supports ODS through its real-time operational analytics capabilities, enabling hybrid OLTP and light analytical workloads on the same platform. For scenarios involving semi-structured or unstructured data, databases like are employed in modern ODS to accommodate flexible schemas and distributed processing. 's document-oriented model facilitates the aggregation of diverse operational data sources, supporting real-time queries and scalability in cloud-native environments. in ODS often relies on ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) and streaming tools to ensure near-real-time synchronization from multiple sources. serves as a key streaming platform for ingesting and distributing high-velocity operational data streams, enabling event-driven architectures in ODS setups. Commercial ETL solutions such as Talend and PowerCenter are prevalent for batch and real-time data pipeline orchestration, providing connectors for legacy systems and data quality features essential for ODS reliability. In cloud environments, Google Cloud Data Fusion offers a managed service for building scalable ETL/ELT pipelines, integrating operational data from sources like SQL Server and into ODS via CDC replication. Contemporary ODS deployments emphasize and for enhanced scalability and resilience. Running ODS components on allows dynamic scaling of database pods based on workload demands, supporting microservices-based architectures in hybrid cloud setups. Open-source alternatives, such as combined with Debezium for CDC, enable cost-effective, replication from source databases to the ODS, leveraging Kafka Connect for .

Benefits and Limitations

Operational Advantages

Operational data stores (ODS) significantly reduce reporting by providing near-real-time access to integrated data, often shortening the time from hours required in batch-processed systems to mere minutes or seconds. This enables organizations to generate operational reports and insights without the delays associated with traditional data warehouses, supporting immediate tactical responses in fast-paced environments. By serving as a streamlined intermediary for tactical needs, ODS deliver substantial savings compared to building comprehensive data warehouses, with implementations typically costing about one-tenth as much due to minimal data transformation and simpler querying requirements. This approach avoids the high overhead of full-scale historical data storage and processing, allowing businesses to address short-term operational queries efficiently without over-investing in infrastructure. Centralization in an ODS enhances data accuracy by consolidating disparate sources into a , consistent , where cleansing and processes eliminate redundancies and errors that plague siloed systems. This unified view ensures higher and reliability, fostering trust in operational metrics and reducing discrepancies across business units. In , ODS have demonstrated quantifiable impacts, such as enabling a firm to achieve 25% faster adjustments through visibility into levels and supplier data, thereby minimizing stockouts and overstock. Such agile operations are particularly vital in dynamic industries like , where ODS support proactive adjustments to disruptions, improving overall responsiveness. From an ROI perspective, ODS contribute to lower storage costs owing to their focus on shorter periods—typically holding only current or recent operational data rather than years of historical records—resulting in reduced demands and ongoing maintenance expenses. This efficiency aligns with core objectives of providing timely data for decision support, yielding quicker returns on investment for operational initiatives.

Potential Challenges

One significant challenge in deploying operational stores (ODS) is delays, particularly in high-volume environments where updates from multiple sources can overwhelm traditional systems, leading to inconsistencies across integrated datasets. This issue arises because conventional ODS architectures, often reliant on relational or disk-based databases, struggle to process large influxes of transactional without introducing . challenges further complicate multi-source integration, as the absence of robust policies can result in degradation, risks, and difficulties in maintaining a unified of operational . Scalability limitations are pronounced in on-premise ODS setups, where constraints hinder the handling of growing volumes and access, often causing bottlenecks. These systems typically exhibit low concurrency thresholds, making them unsuitable for environments with high simultaneous queries or rapid ingestion rates. The increased complexity of ODS architectures contributes to higher maintenance costs, requiring dedicated expertise such as data engineers to manage ongoing updates and configurations. Additionally, there is a specific risk of data staleness if (CDC) mechanisms fail, as ODS volatility—characterized by continuous overwrites—can leave users with outdated information that undermines operational decisions. To mitigate these challenges, organizations can employ tools for early detection of issues and incorporate in pipelines to enhance reliability, though such strategies demand careful planning to avoid further complexity.

References

  1. [1]
    What Is an Operational Data Store (ODS)? Complete Guide
    An operational data store (ODS) is a central database that aggregates data from multiple systems, providing a single destination for housing a variety of data.
  2. [2]
    What is an Operational Data Store (ODS)? - TechTarget
    Feb 23, 2022 · An operational data store (ODS) is a type of database that's often used as an interim logical area for a data warehouse.
  3. [3]
    Definition of Operational Data Store - IT Glossary - Gartner
    An operational data store (ODS) is an alternative to having operational decision support system (DSS) applications access data directly from the database.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Building the Data Warehouse
    When the first edition of Building the Data Warehouse was printed, the data- base theorists scoffed at the notion of the data warehouse. One theoretician.
  5. [5]
    Operational Data Stores: Purpose, Benefits, And Use Cases - Fivetran
    Sep 10, 2025 · An operational data store (ODS) centralizes data from multiple sources into a single destination, making it available for immediate querying and ...
  6. [6]
    What is an Operational Data Store: A Complete Guide for 2024 - Atlan
    Dec 28, 2023 · An operational data store is a centralized repository that provides real-time, and integrated data for operational business processes.
  7. [7]
    A Short History of Data Warehousing - Dataversity
    Aug 23, 2012 · Inmon's work as a Data Warehousing pioneer took off in the early 1990s when he ventured out on his own, forming his first company, Prism ...
  8. [8]
    The Complete History Of ERP - Evosus
    Apr 23, 2024 · The 1990s heralded a pivotal moment in the history of business management systems with the introduction of the term "Enterprise Resource ...
  9. [9]
    A Brief History of Data Silos - Dataversity
    Oct 7, 2021 · In the late 1990s, as many businesses attempted to adjust and expand their databases, they discovered their systems were badly integrated, and ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  10. [10]
    The Evolution of Data Integration Techniques: From Manual to AI
    Dec 26, 2024 · In the 2000s, businesses began adopting middleware and Enterprise Application Integration solutions to connect disparate systems. Service- ...
  11. [11]
    Real-Time Data Streaming: What It Is and How It Works - CelerData
    Sep 26, 2024 · 2010s: Platforms like Apache Kafka revolutionized real-time streaming by enabling scalable, fault-tolerant, and high-throughput systems.Missing: big | Show results with:big
  12. [12]
    What is Operational Data Store (ODS): Guide You Can't Miss | Airbyte
    Aug 11, 2025 · Discover what an Operational Data Store (ODS) is and how it helps data engineers improve data integration and governance processes.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Building the Operational Data Store on DB2 UDB - IBM Redbooks
    This document describes building an Operational Data Store on DB2 UDB using IBM Data Replication, WebSphere MQ Family, and DB2 Warehouse Manager.
  14. [14]
    Data and AI - Azure Architecture Center | Microsoft Learn
    Oct 31, 2025 · This article compares core Azure data and AI services to corresponding Amazon Web Services (AWS) solutions. For comparison of other Azure and ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  15. [15]
    Future of Real-Time Data Enrichment: Trends, Predictions, and ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · According to a survey by Gartner, 60% of organizations consider real-time data enrichment to be crucial for their business operations, with 75% ...
  16. [16]
    What is ETL (Extract, Transform, Load)? - IBM
    ETL is a data integration process that extracts, transforms and loads data from multiple sources into a data warehouse or other unified data repository.
  17. [17]
    What is Change Data Capture? | Informatica
    Change data capture (CDC) is a set of software design patterns. It allows users to detect and manage incremental changes at the data source.Why Change Data Capture... · Change Data Capture Use... · Summary
  18. [18]
    What is Change Data Capture (CDC)? Definition, Best Practices - Qlik
    Change data capture (CDC) refers to the process of identifying and capturing changes made to data in a database and then delivering those changes in real-time.
  19. [19]
    Change Data Capture (CDC): The Complete Guide - Estuary
    Jul 30, 2025 · Change Data Capture (CDC) is a real-time data integration technique that captures and delivers changes, such as inserts, updates, and deletes, from a source ...
  20. [20]
    Data Replication With Change Data Capture and Operational Data ...
    Nov 21, 2023 · Change Data Capture (CDC) is an advanced data replication technology that enables precisely that: capturing data changes in a source system ...
  21. [21]
    Comparing Log, Trigger, and Query-Based Strategies - AutoMQ
    Jun 9, 2025 · Log-based CDC is the clear winner, as it is almost entirely non-intrusive. · Trigger-based CDC has the most severe performance impact. · Query- ...
  22. [22]
    A Guide to Change Data Capture Tools: Features, Benefits, and Use ...
    The key advantage of log-based CDC is its non-intrusive nature. It puts almost no load on the source database because it doesn't execute any queries against the ...
  23. [23]
    Two-Way Real-Time Data Sync Between CRM and ERP Systems
    Enable two-way, real-time data synchronization between CRM and ERP systems to eliminate silos, ensure data consistency, and streamline business operations.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] building an operational data store for a direct marketing
    According to Inmon, an ODS is a subject-oriented, integrated, volatile, current-valued, detailed-only collection of data in support of an organization's ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    1 Introduction to Data Warehousing Concepts - Oracle Help Center
    OLTP systems usually store data from only a few weeks or months. The OLTP system stores only historical data as needed to successfully meet the requirements ...1.1 What Is A Data Warehouse... · 1.2 Contrasting Oltp And... · 1.3 Common Data Warehouse...
  26. [26]
    Overview of data warehousing - IBM
    For example the data mart might use a single star schema comprised of one fact table and several dimension tables. ... An operational data store (ODS) is a ...
  27. [27]
    Operational Data Store - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A business intelligence system using an operational data store (ODS) that is also used by some other systems. Bill Inmon defines the ODS as follows (see [26]):.
  28. [28]
    ODS vs Data Warehouse: Unveiling the Key Differences - RisingWave
    May 11, 2024 · One of the fundamental distinctions between an Operational Data Store (ODS) and a Data Warehouse lies in their approach to data freshness. An ...
  29. [29]
    What is Operational Data Stores? - GeeksforGeeks
    Aug 6, 2024 · An Operational Data Store (ODS) is a centralized database that integrates real-time data from various sources to support operational reporting and decision- ...What is an Operational Data... · Benefits of Operational Data...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Designing an ODS with high availability and consistency
    The gathering and storage of data, on which these business analytics are done, is done by either data warehouse, data mart or ODS (Operational Data Store).
  31. [31]
    What Happened to the Operational Data Store? - Materialize
    Aug 20, 2024 · What does an Operational Data Store do? Operational data stores, like data warehouses, live downstream of other sources of data. So the first ...A Brief History Of The Cloud... · ... The Operational Data... · Path 2: Build Streaming...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  32. [32]
    Get started with columnstore for real-time operational analytics
    Apr 8, 2025 · SQL Server 2016 (13.x) introduces real-time operational analytics, the ability to run both analytics and OLTP workloads on the same database tables at the same ...
  33. [33]
    Implementing An Operational Data Layer - MongoDB
    Learn how to implement an operational data layer to unify disparate data sources, making real-time operational data accessible across systems.Modernization Without... · Why Implement An Odl? · Scalability And Performance
  34. [34]
    Event Driven Architecture (3) Operational Data Store ... - Architech
    Aug 25, 2021 · Querying streams of events can be done using Kafka streams and exposing stream state store through API ( or storing results to external DB ).
  35. [35]
    Talend vs Informatica- Key Differences to Evaluate - Integrate.io
    Jul 19, 2025 · Both Talend and Informatica are powerful data integration tools with distinct features and capabilities. The key differences are that Talend offers flexibility ...
  36. [36]
    Replication overview | Cloud Data Fusion
    Cloud Data Fusion Replication lets you create copies of your data continuously and in real time from operational datastores, such as SQL Server and MySQL, ...
  37. [37]
    What is the Best Database for Data on Kubernetes? - Portworx
    May 6, 2025 · The best database for Kubernetes depends on specific needs. PostgreSQL and MySQL work well for structured data, while MongoDB and Cassandra handle unstructured ...
  38. [38]
    Debezium connector for PostgreSQL
    Jul 9, 2019 · The Debezium PostgreSQL connector captures row-level changes in the schemas of a PostgreSQL database.
  39. [39]
    Operational Data Store vs. Data Warehouse - Trianz
    Sep 2, 2024 · Since an ODS extracts real-time operational data, it simplifies the reporting process and greatly improves efficiency by consolidating that ...
  40. [40]
    Operational Data Store | insightsoftware
    Operational data store (ODS) is widely used by organizations to support real-time decision-making and operational reporting.
  41. [41]
    What is an Operational Data Store (ODS) - Solix Technologies
    Improved Data Quality: An ODS cleanses and transforms data from various sources, ensuring consistency and accuracy for downstream applications. Faster ...
  42. [42]
    5 Common Mistakes in Managing Operational Data Stores - Cognizant
    Apr 21, 2025 · Operational data stores enable real-time decision-making by bringing together multiple sources of transactional data in one place.Missing: latency | Show results with:latency
  43. [43]
    How a Next Generation Operational Data Store (ODS) Drives Digital ...
    An ODS collects, interprets and distributes data from different information systems, and is refreshed on a daily or even an hourly basis.Missing: objectives departmental