Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

PROM-1

The PROM-1 is a bounding fragmentation anti-personnel landmine manufactured in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, featuring a cylindrical steel body approximately 75 mm in diameter and 260 mm in height, filled with a 425 g TNT/RDX main charge and a smaller propelling charge. Upon activation via pressure or tripwire on its pronged UPROM-1 fuze, the mine propels itself upward to about 0.5 meters before detonating, dispersing fragments with a lethal radius of 50 meters and a hazard radius extending to 100 meters. Introduced during the , the PROM-1 was produced for defensive military use and deployed extensively in the Yugoslav People's Army's minefields, later proliferating through conflicts in the during the 1990s , where it contaminated vast areas in , , and . Instances of the mine have also been documented in and , highlighting its export or capture beyond original production lines. The device's design, akin to earlier bounding mines like the German , emphasizes area denial through unpredictable fragmentation patterns, rendering affected terrains hazardous long after active hostilities cease. Particularly notorious among demining experts, the PROM-1 has inflicted disproportionate casualties on clearance teams due to its partial burial deployment, sensitivity to ground vibrations, and propensity for incomplete neutralization attempts, as evidenced in post-conflict operations in where it accounted for multiple fatalities among personnel. Despite international efforts under the to eradicate such weapons—ratified by successor states to —the PROM-1's enduring presence underscores challenges in verifying stockpile destruction and locating legacy munitions in rugged or overgrown environments.

History and Development

Origins and Design Influences

The PROM-1 is a bounding anti-personnel fragmentation mine developed in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for use by the Yugoslav People's Army. Its design incorporates a cylindrical steel body filled with TNT and pre-formed fragments, propelled upward by a black powder charge upon activation to detonate at waist height, enhancing lethal radius through aerial fragmentation dispersal. This operational principle mirrors that of earlier bounding mines, prioritizing area denial against infantry advances. The PROM-1 draws direct design influences from the German Schrapnellmine 44 (), a notorious deployed extensively on the Eastern and Western Fronts. Like the , the PROM-1 employs a pressure- or tripwire-activated that initiates a launching charge, elevating the mine 0.7 to 1 meter before main charge detonation to optimize fragment projection over a 20- to 60-meter radius. Yugoslav engineers adapted this concept to local manufacturing capabilities, producing a simpler, bottle-shaped variant suited for in non-aligned communist industry. Key similarities extend to the fuze system, where the PROM-1's UPROM-1 employs a pronged mechanism akin to the S.Mi.Z. 35 fuze of the , facilitating burial with minimal exposure while enabling reliable tilt-rod or initiation. This inheritance reflects post-war reverse-engineering trends in Eastern European militaries, which often emulated captured ordnance absent comprehensive Soviet bounding mine equivalents. Unlike blast-only mines, the PROM-1's emphasis on vertical projection underscores causal emphasis on psychological terror and casualty infliction, a hallmark of field reports from WWII.

Production in Yugoslavia

The PROM-1 bounding anti-personnel mine was manufactured within the state-controlled military-industrial complex of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), which emphasized self-sufficiency in arms production during the Cold War. Antipersonnel landmine fabrication, including the PROM-1, was centralized in facilities located in the Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the primary factory operated to supply the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) with defensive ordnance. Yugoslav production of antipersonnel mines, encompassing models like the PROM-1, contributed to an estimated dozens of millions of units manufactured across the federation since the end of , supporting both domestic defense needs and limited exports to non-aligned nations. Specific output figures for the PROM-1 remain undocumented in available records, but its integration into JNA inventories indicates substantial scale to meet territorial defense doctrines emphasizing minefields along potential invasion routes. Manufacturing involved domestic sourcing of steel casings, or similar explosives, and mechanical fuzes, with assembly leveraging Yugoslavia's metallurgical and chemical industries; the process prioritized reliability in varied terrains, reflecting the federation's geopolitical strategy of armed neutrality. Production halted amid the SFRY's in the early , though residual capabilities influenced successor states' outputs.

Technical Design

Components and Construction

The PROM-1 is constructed with a cylindrical body that houses the main charge and a central charge responsible for the bounding mechanism. The body features upper and lower sections joined by a central rubber cover, providing suitable for deployment in up to 0.5 meters of . A base plug secured by shearable screws anchors the , with a short tether wire—approximately 1 meter long—connecting the body to this base to control the height of projection during activation. The assembly, designated UPROM-1, screws into the top of the body and includes prongs for or activation, a spring-loaded , and a to initiate the . This is typically , complemented by aluminum components such as the prongs and safety collar. The overall mine body is painted olive drab, with yellow markings on the body and black on the for identification. Deployment includes two rolls of 16-meter plastic-coated attached to the prongs, enabling multi-directional coverage. Upon initiation, the ejects the body upward, shearing the base screws, until the halts ascent and triggers the main charge , fragmenting the casing in a 360-degree pattern.

Fuzing and Activation Mechanisms

The PROM-1 employs the UPROM-1 mechanical , also designated as UPMR-3, which screws into the top of the mine's cylindrical body. This fuze features prongs that serve as the primary initiation point, incorporating both and pull capabilities. Activation occurs through direct pressure on the prongs or tension applied via attached tripwires, typically supplied in two 16-meter rolls of plastic-coated wire. Tilting the prongs releases a spring-loaded striker that impacts a , igniting an initial pyrotechnic charge after a delay of 1 to 2 seconds. This charge then expels the mine body upward, shearing brass screws at the base and leaving the base plug embedded in the ground. The ascending body remains tethered to the stationary base by a approximately 1-meter wire that unwinds during launch. Upon reaching a of 70 to 80 cm, wire or the integrated delay mechanism triggers the main explosive charge, fragmenting the steel body in a 360-degree pattern. This sequence enhances lethality by elevating the fragmentation dispersal above ground level, complicating evasion.

Specifications

Physical and Explosive Parameters

The PROM-1 bounding features a cylindrical, bottle-shaped body constructed from wrought to maximize fragmentation upon . Its external measures 75 mm, with an overall height of 260 mm when equipped with the standard UPROM-1 pronged . The design includes a central tube surrounded by the main charge, enabling the mine to launch upward before the primary occurs. The explosive filling consists of 425 grams of high explosive, either cast or (a mixture of and ). A smaller black powder or similar charge, integral to the mechanism, ejects the upper portion of the mine body to a height of 0.5 to 1 meter above ground level prior to main charge initiation. This configuration produces steel fragments with a lethal radius of approximately 50 meters and a broader hazard radius of up to 100 meters, depending on and environmental factors.
ParameterSpecification
Body materialWrought steel
Diameter75 mm
Height (with fuze)260 mm
Main explosive weight425 g ( or )
Propellant typeBlack powder
Lethal fragment radius50 m
Casualty radius100 m

Performance Characteristics

The PROM-1 bounding , upon triggering via pressure (minimum 9-15 kg) or (minimum 3-5 kg), employs a charge to eject its body approximately 70-80 cm into the air after a brief delay of about 0.5-1 second, optimizing fragmentation dispersion by allowing potential targets to advance beyond the vertical launch path. At this elevation, the main charge—typically 425 g of /—detonates, fragmenting the body into hundreds of pre-formed and irregular shards projected omnidirectionally in a 360-degree pattern. This elevated burst enhances effectiveness against exposed by producing a conical fragmentation rather than a ground-level , with a lethal radius (50% casualty probability) of approximately 20-25 meters and a radius (potential from fragments) extending to 100 meters or more, though maximum fragment projection can reach 200 meters under ideal conditions. The mine's performance is optimized for open terrain area denial, where its ability to defeat cover like low or shallow ditches increases vulnerability for advancing forces, but effectiveness diminishes in dense foliage or against armored vehicles due to limited penetration. Field reports from operations indicate high reliability in activation (over 95% in controlled tests) but sensitivity to environmental factors, such as affecting ejection consistency or reducing fragment velocity over time in humid climates. Compared to static fragmentation mines, the PROM-1's bounding mechanism provides superior psychological deterrence and casualty infliction rates in tactical maneuvers, though it poses greater risks to friendly forces in close-quarters scenarios due to the unpredictable delay and wide scatter.

Operational Deployment

Use in Yugoslav Wars

The PROM-1 bounding was a standard munition in Yugoslav military inventories and saw widespread deployment by the (JNA) during the initial phases of the in 1991, as well as by successor Serb forces in both and Bosnia-Herzegovina. These forces laid PROM-1 in defensive minefields to secure borders, block Croatian advances, and protect static positions, often in combination with antitank mines along confrontation lines established by mid-1992. The mine's ability to be emplaced on the surface or partially buried with its pronged UPM-1 exposed facilitated rapid deployment in forested and hilly terrain characteristic of the conflicts. In the (1992–1995), PROM-1 employment expanded as the JNA withdrew and equipment was inherited by the (VRS), while (HVO) and Army of the (ARBiH) units also incorporated captured or pre-existing Yugoslav stocks into their mine-laying operations. All three primary belligerents used the mine to deny terrain, with fields concentrated around , the corridor, and , where it complemented scatterable and directional fragmentation devices in layered defenses. A retrospective analysis of injuries in southern from 1991 to 1995 highlighted the PROM-1's role in inflicting fragmentation wounds, as its propulsion charge elevated the warhead to detonate at 70–80 cm, maximizing lethal radius against advancing . During the (1998–1999), Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) army units deployed PROM-1 extensively against (KLA) incursions and to impede ground operations, particularly along the and borders where minefields were hastily emplaced in 1999. U.S. military assessments prior to IFOR entry into Bosnia in December 1995 identified the PROM-1 as among the most ubiquitous threats, underscoring its tactical prevalence in JNA doctrine for area denial.

Applications in Other Conflicts

The PROM-1 bounding , exported by to client states and non-aligned nations during the , appeared in several conflicts beyond the . These exports, often part of broader arms packages to third-world countries, included millions of antipersonnel mines supplied to regimes engaged in regional wars. In , PROM-1 mines of Yugoslav manufacture were deployed, likely during the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), when provided military support to Saddam Hussein's regime. These mines were subsequently identified and cleared during demining operations in northern following the 1991 and intensified efforts after the 2003 invasion, with reports documenting their presence alongside other foreign-sourced . 's 2008 submission to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention listed PROM-1 among remaining stockpiles and cleared items, confirming their operational use and persistence as hazards. PROM-1 mines have also been documented in conflicts, including Angola's (1975–2002), where Yugoslav arms shipments to the government facilitated their deployment for area denial. Small numbers were reported in , likely from cross-border incursions or spillover. In , the mines were encountered, possibly from Ethiopian stockpiles or direct imports during the Eritrean-Ethiopian border war (1998–2000). Reports indicate limited but verified presence in these zones, underscoring the mine's role in prolonged insurgencies supported by Yugoslav non-aligned diplomacy. More recently, PROM-1 has been noted in , particularly amid the ongoing since 2014, drawn from regional stockpiles or captured equipment in the and eastern fronts. While specific incident data remains sparse, assessments highlight its use for defensive fortifications, contributing to clearance challenges in contaminated areas.

Military Effectiveness

Tactical Advantages

The PROM-1's bounding mechanism propels the mine approximately 0.5 to 1 meter into the air upon activation before , enabling an airburst that disperses fragments in a 360-degree with a lethal radius of up to 50 meters in diameter and a hazard radius extending to 100 meters. This design enhances coverage against advancing squads compared to ground-burst mines, as the elevated maximizes spread and velocity, increasing the probability of multiple casualties per . Its steel casing fragments into high-velocity projectiles capable of penetrating and helmets, contributing to a reported 60% fatality rate within the primary . The mine's simplicity, low production cost, and versatility—employing the UPROM-1 for , tilt, or initiation—allow rapid deployment in defensive positions, environments, or clustered patterns to channel enemy movements and deny access to key areas. Tactically, the PROM-1 imposes a psychological deterrent on , forcing deliberate advances or diversions that expose forces to , while its sensitivity to minimal disturbance complicates breaching efforts, thereby prolonging area denial without requiring constant monitoring. Multiple tripwires per mine further amplify its effectiveness in covering approaches, making it suitable for protecting fixed positions during conflicts like the .

Strategic Role in Area Denial

The PROM-1 bounding serves a strategic function in area denial operations by integration into layered defensive minefields, where it targets dismounted attempting to or exploit gaps in anti-vehicle obstacles. Upon activation via pressure or , the mine propels itself approximately 0.7 to 1 meter into the air before detonating, dispersing steel fragments over a 360-degree lethal radius of up to 22 meters, which disrupts enemy follow-on forces and engineering efforts. This mechanism extends the effective denial beyond point-specific threats, compelling attackers to divert assets for specialized breaching—such as manual probing or explosive line charges—thus delaying advances and preserving defender positions. In assessments of former Yugoslav and Pact-influenced doctrines, the PROM-1 is typically emplaced in mixed protective-obstacle minefields during hasty defenses, alongside anti-tank mines like the TMA-4 or TMRP-1, to counter desant ( or rapid ) units and protect flanks or avenues of approach. U.S. Army field manuals on threat mine operations note that such configurations aim to maximize casualties among breaching parties, exploiting the PROM-1's to indirect or tilt (via its UPROM-1 ) to cover inter-mine gaps that might otherwise allow passage. This tactical layering elevates area denial from mere physical blockage to a casualty-inflicting barrier, historically employed to canalize enemy movements into kill zones or force prolonged engagements under fire. On a broader strategic scale, the PROM-1's deployment enables resource-constrained defenders to hold terrain against numerically superior forces by amplifying the psychological and logistical costs of assault. For instance, in open or semi-open environments common to Balkan conflicts, its wide fragmentation pattern hinders rapid advances, buying time for counterattacks or repositioning without requiring constant manned presence. Empirical analyses of roles indicate that bounding variants like the PROM-1 significantly prolong enemy clearance times—often by factors of hours per kilometer—compared to static mines, thereby supporting operational pauses critical to defensive strategies. However, its reliance on manual laying limits scalability in fluid warfare, confining strategic utility to prepared positions rather than dynamic denial.

Risks and Impacts

Hazards to Combatants and Deminers

The PROM-1 poses significant hazards to combatants due to its bounding fragmentation mechanism, which propels the mine approximately 0.5 to 1 meter into the air before detonating and dispersing over 600 steel balls in a 360-degree pattern. This design inflicts severe fragmentation injuries across a lethal of up to 50 meters, with fragments capable of penetrating and helmets, resulting in high fatality rates estimated at around 60% for those within the primary . Advancing face elevated risks from the mine's pressure-sensitive UPROM-1 , which activates under as little as 10-15 kg of on its prongs or via tripwires extending up to 16 meters, often camouflaged in or clustered for area denial. In conflicts such as the , this has led to multiple casualties per detonation, particularly in forested or urban environments where detection is impeded by foliage, exacerbating tactical vulnerabilities during assaults. Deminers encounter amplified dangers from the PROM-1's low metallic signature and the need for precise detection techniques, as standard sweeps may miss the prongs if not conducted at a height of about 20 cm above the ground to account for reduced sensitivity in certain sectors of differential coil devices. Probing or disturbing the prongs during clearance or safety device manipulation has caused numerous fatal accidents, with the responsible for more deminer deaths in the than all other Yugoslav types combined and globally more than any other recorded . Specific incidents underscore these risks, including the deaths of two Croatian deminers in 2023 during clearance operations triggered by PROM-1 activation and two Bosnian deminers in 2008 from a similar , highlighting ongoing perils despite post-conflict efforts. The fuze's extreme sensitivity to any contact further complicates safe neutralization, often resulting in instantaneous detonation upon minimal disturbance.

Civilian Casualties and Long-term Effects

The PROM-1 bounding fragmentation has inflicted substantial civilian casualties in the post-conflict , primarily through its mechanism of propelling upward upon triggering to detonate at waist height, dispersing steel fragments over a 50-meter killing radius and up to 100 meters of hazardous . In , where the was extensively deployed during the 1992–1995 war, PROM-1 antipersonnel devices have caused the majority of incidents, with at least 1,750 injured and 614 killed since 1996 as of 2017 reporting. Approximately 15% of these victims were children, often encountering mines in formerly rural or forested areas during activities like or herding . Incidents persisted into the , including nine fatalities and twelve injuries in the two years prior to December 2017, underscoring the mine's role in ongoing civilian risks. In , PROM-1 mines contributed to civilian injuries amid broader trauma from the 1991–1995 conflicts, with documented cases including unexpected detonations in residential settings or near infrastructure, leading to fatalities among non-combatants. Survivors frequently suffer severe lower-body mutilations from , compounded by the mine's design favoring fragmentation over contained blast, which amplifies tissue damage and rates. Long-term effects extend beyond immediate blasts, as unexploded PROM-1 ordnance contaminates over 2% of Bosnia and Herzegovina's land, endangering approximately 500,000 residents and hindering agricultural use, reconstruction, and migration patterns. The mine's durability—featuring a steel body and ground-level fuze prone to erosion but resistant to decay—positions it as the predominant persistent threat in the region, with geological factors like soil migration exacerbating unpredictable relocation and detection challenges decades after deployment. Civilian survivors endure chronic physical sequelae, including repeated surgeries for fragment removal, mobility impairments, and heightened vulnerability to infection, alongside psychological burdens such as post-traumatic stress and anxiety from residual contamination fears. Economic repercussions include disability-related unemployment and restricted access to resources, perpetuating poverty cycles in affected communities, as evidenced by cases where families receive inadequate support relative to injury severity. Clearance efforts face compounded risks, delaying safe reintegration and full land utilization projected beyond initial post-war targets like Bosnia's 2019 deadline, extended to 2025.

Controversies and Debates

Indiscriminate Nature vs. Defensive Utility

The PROM-1 bounding anti-personnel mine's design inherently contributes to its indiscriminate effects, as it launches approximately 1 meter into the air upon triggering before detonating to disperse 500 steel balls over a 360-degree radius, lethal up to 50 meters and injurious to 100 meters. This mechanism, similar to the World War II-era German , maximizes fragmentation against personnel but lacks selectivity between combatants and non-combatants, particularly when deployed along civilian routes or in populated areas during conflicts. Multiple tripwires and camouflaged placement further heighten unintended activation risks, with capable of penetrating and helmets, resulting in a 60% fatality rate for those within 50 yards. In post-conflict settings like , the PROM-1 has inflicted significant civilian harm, accounting for most mine accidents despite its prohibition under the 1997 Ottawa Convention. Over 80,000 mines and remain, endangering more than 500,000 residents; since the war's end, 1,750 people have been injured and 614 killed, with recent years seeing 9 fatalities and 12 injuries, 15% involving children engaged in routine activities like wood collection or play. In , the mine has claimed more personnel lives than other Yugoslav types combined, underscoring its persistence and detectability challenges that prolong hazards to returning civilians and efforts. Despite these risks, the PROM-1 offers defensive utility in , particularly for Yugoslav forces, by enabling area denial against advances, securing perimeters, and disrupting enemy squads in urban or rural environments through its bounding fragmentation effect. Integrated into Yugoslav military planning, such mines slow attackers, allowing defenders to engage with , as evidenced by their tactical preference for holding defensive lines during . Proponents, including non-signatories to the like and historically the , argue anti-personnel mines provide cost-effective —manufactured for about $30 each versus $300–$1,000 removal costs—against numerically superior foes, historically aiding perimeter security without constant troop commitment. The debate pits these tactical benefits against long-term indiscriminateness, with organizations like the International Committee of the Red Cross asserting that the human toll—disproportionate maiming and deaths post-hostilities—outweighs fleeting gains, as mines rarely deploy as intended and evade control after placement. analyses counter that proper and short-duration variants mitigate risks, preserving utility for weaker defenders facing , though empirical from Balkan conflicts reveal frequent haphazard laying that amplifies postwar . Non-signatory states maintain reservations, viewing blanket bans as overlooking context-specific defensive necessities, while ban advocates highlight verifiable casualty patterns as causal evidence of inherent unreliability.

International Ban Efforts and Non-Compliance

The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction (), adopted on 18 September 1997 and entering into force on 1 March 1999, represents the principal international effort to eliminate anti-personnel mines, including bounding fragmentation types like the PROM-1. The treaty obligates states parties to cease all use, development, production, acquisition, and transfer of such mines immediately upon ratification, destroy stockpiled mines within four years, and clear contaminated areas within ten years, with the definition encompassing devices like the PROM-1 that are designed to explode through detection, proximity, or contact and intended to injure, kill, or damage personnel. By 2025, 165 states had ratified the treaty, leading to the destruction of over 55 million stockpiled anti-personnel mines globally, though 31 states, including major military powers like , , and the , remain non-parties. Yugoslavia's successor states demonstrated compliance with the treaty's stockpile destruction requirements. ratified on 20 June 2003 (effective 1 March 2004), declaring 1,320,621 anti-personnel mines in stockpile, including 540 PROM-1 units among other types. With international support, including from , Serbia completed destruction of its remaining stockpiles by August 2008, eliminating the full 1.3 million declared anti-personnel mines. and similarly ratified and destroyed their PROM-1-inclusive stockpiles, retaining limited quantities only for training and development as permitted under Article 3. Non-compliance with the has undermined its universality, particularly regarding proliferated mines like the PROM-1, which Yugoslavia exported in large quantities to third-world countries prior to the treaty's adoption. Non-signatories such as , which signed but did not ratify, have employed PROM-1 mines in conflicts, exploiting legacy stocks without treaty constraints. Among states parties, documented violations include 's use of anti-personnel mines in 2022 near , contravening the prohibition on use; given confirmed PROM-1 presence in Ukrainian territories from earlier , such actions likely involved comparable bounding mines from Soviet or Yugoslav-era inventories. , a non-party, has similarly deployed anti-personnel mines extensively in since 2022, further eroding the treaty's norm against indiscriminate weapons. Persistent challenges highlight partial treaty enforcement. Uncleared PROM-1 minefields from the 1990s continue to inflict casualties in states parties like , where in 2017, PROM-1 units caused most recorded accidents despite the ban, reflecting delays in fulfilling clearance deadlines extended multiple times. In 2025, security-driven withdrawals from the treaty by states including , , , , and signaled potential reversals, with these parties citing threats from non-compliant actors like as justification for resuming mine deployment. Such developments risk normalizing PROM-1-like mines in defensive strategies, as proliferated stocks persist in non-party arsenals and conflict zones.

Current Status

Stockpiles and Proliferation

The PROM-1 bounding anti-personnel mine was produced in the former Yugoslavia primarily for military use within the region, with no documented large-scale exports by the Yugoslav government. Stockpiles were inherited by successor states following the dissolution of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, including Croatia, Serbia (including as part of Serbia and Montenegro until 2006), and Bosnia and Herzegovina. These states, as parties to the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty (Ottawa Convention), committed to destroying their anti-personnel mine holdings under Article 4, with deadlines extended in some cases due to the volume of inherited ordnance from the Yugoslav wars (1991–1999). In , a 2005 stockpile reported 52,547 PROM-1 mines among a total of over 1.3 million s, including incomplete or damaged units. Destruction efforts commenced shortly thereafter, with completing the elimination of all declared anti-personnel mine s by its 2008 deadline, verified through international monitoring. enacted a national law prohibiting anti-personnel mines in 2004 and destroyed its entire declared , encompassing PROM-1 and other types, by October 2005, exceeding the treaty's four-year requirement. , which acceded to the treaty in 1998, similarly destroyed declared s by 2003, though specific PROM-1 quantities were not publicly detailed in annual reports; remnants from wartime deployment persist primarily as contamination rather than held reserves. Proliferation of the PROM-1 occurred mainly through wartime capture, transfer among conflict parties, and post-war dispersal in the , rather than formal state-to-state exports. Yugoslav production ceased with the country's , limiting systematic spread, but the mine has been documented in use beyond the region, including in and , likely via illicit channels, battlefield recovery, or limited transfers to non-state actors. No verified ongoing production exists, and non-signatories to the Mine Ban Treaty, such as , maintain stockpiles of their own indigenous mine types (e.g., POM-2 bounding mines) rather than PROM-1. Reports of PROM-1 encounters in since 2014 suggest possible undeclared retention, capture from Balkan sources, or survival of pre-ban stocks, though Ukraine's status as a treaty party mandates destruction, with compliance lapses noted in broader use during conflicts. As of , no state parties report active PROM-1 stockpiles, with destruction verified in Balkan successors through treaty transparency measures; any residual holdings would constitute non-compliance, potentially subject to scrutiny. Non-signatory states show no evidence of adopting or stockpiling the PROM-1, reflecting its obsolescence relative to modern alternatives and the 's normative pressure, which has reduced global inventories by tens of millions since 1999.

Demining and Clearance Challenges

The PROM-1 mine presents significant obstacles in operations due to its bounding fragmentation design, which propels the device 0.7 to 1 meter into the air upon , dispersing lethal fragments over a 20- to 40-meter radius. This mechanism, combined with sensitive or activation via minimal 3- to 5-gram s or pronged fuzes partially exposed above shallow burials (typically 3-5 cm deep), heightens risks during manual probing or mechanical clearance. In regions like the , where PROM-1 mines were extensively deployed during the conflicts, they have inflicted more casualties on clearance personnel than all other Yugoslav-era anti-personnel mines combined, often due to accidental triggering during vegetation clearance or improper handling. Detection is complicated by the mine's metallic cylindrical body and fuze components, which can produce variable electromagnetic signatures depending on orientation—such as lying partially on its side after shifting in soil—and burial depth. Metal detectors require specific sweep techniques, including preliminary passes at approximately 20 cm height on medium sensitivity to avoid false negatives from atypical patterns that miss the prongs or body. Environmental factors exacerbate this, as overgrown vegetation, rocky terrain, or peat soils in affected areas like obscure signals and increase false positives from , slowing progress and elevating operator fatigue. Mechanical systems, such as mine-protected vehicles with flails or plows, face heightened vulnerability, as the bounding action can damage mounted detectors or trigger premature explosions, rendering automated clearance less reliable for PROM-1 concentrations. Neutralization poses further hazards, as prolonged exposure to and destabilizes the UPM-1 or similar fuzes, making defusing highly perilous and often leading to in-situ destruction via controlled charges or explosives to minimize manipulation risks. Deminers in and Bosnia report approaching PROM-1 with exceptional caution, prioritizing visual identification of prongs over probing to avoid detonation, yet accidents persist, accounting for nearly 15% of recent incidents in Bosnia despite reduced overall mine threats. These challenges contribute to protracted clearance timelines, with Bosnia estimating over 100 km² of contaminated land remaining as of 2023, underscoring the need for specialized training and adaptive technologies like units or controlled methods, though the latter show limited efficacy against PROM-1's robust construction.

References

  1. [1]
    PROM-1 Anti-personnel bounding fragmentation mine
    The mine is usually a dull olive green. Diameter: 75mm. Height : 260mm. Main charge: 425g TNT/RDX. The mine uses an UPROM- ...Missing: specifications history
  2. [2]
    [PDF] PROM - 1 Anti-personnel bounding fragmentation mine, designed
    While its activation, the steel body breaks and fragments have a killing radius in 50 m diameter, while the hazard radius is up to 100 m. Due to its ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The PROM-1: Waiting in the Ground for the Deminers in Kosovo
    The PROM-I is a deadly and menacing anti-personnel mine, even as it lies partly on its side. This mine has killed or injured more clearance personnel in the.Missing: specifications history<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Prom 1 landmine - CAT-UXO
    This is the Yugoslavian PROM-1, a High-Explosive Fragmentation (HE-Frag), pressure or tripwire (TPW) actuated, bounding, Anti-Personnel (AP), landmine.Missing: specifications history
  5. [5]
    The Road Ahead: Clearance Toward Sustainability in Bosnia and ...
    Feb 28, 2023 · The PROM-1 landmine is a very dangerous mine. I always approach them with great care. This is the most dangerous mine in Bosnia, and they ...
  6. [6]
    CISR: Munitions Reference Guide - JMU
    anti-personnel mine, Diameter: 85mm Length: 200mm Weight: 1.3kg Explosive: 350g Range: 200m. PROM-1, PROM-1 is a bounding, fragmentation, antipersonnel landmine ...
  7. [7]
    German S-mine was Shrouded in Secrecy - - Military Historia
    Jan 17, 2024 · Yugoslavia developed the PROM-1, a bounding anti-personnel mine similar to the S-mine, used extensively in the Croatian War of Independence.
  8. [8]
    yugoslavia[1] - Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor
    Almost all questions regarding the production, stockpiling, transfer and use ... - PROM-1 (3) bouncing mine;. - PROM-2 (4) bouncing mine;. - MRUD-1 (5) ...
  9. [9]
    Landmines in the Yugoslav Wars - YuAntiques
    The PROM-1 was a particularly unique and deadly mine, famous for quite literally “jumping” out of the ground when triggered (thus nicknamed “the frog”). It was ...
  10. [10]
    Landmine, APERS, PROM-1 - Bulletpicker
    This is a bounding, fragmentation, antipersonnel landmine. The mine may be planted in water up to 500mms (19.69 inches) of depth.
  11. [11]
    Uprom 1 fuze - CAT-UXO
    Once the firing-mechanism is triggered, a pyrotechnic charge is ignited 1 to 2-seconds later. Normally associated with the PROM-1 AP bounding landmine, it ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] IDENTIFICATION GUIDE - Bulletpicker
    Jul 30, 2025 · The Yugoslav antipersonnel bounding mine PROM-i uses the. UPROM-1 fuze which incorporates both pressure and pull features. The pressure piece ...
  13. [13]
    PROM-1 anti-personnel mine - Weapons - Military Periscope
    A bounding fragmentation mine, the PROM-1 has a 360-degree kill radius covering 72 ft (22 m). UPROM-1 and UPMR-3 fuses generally come equipped with this mine.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  14. [14]
    [PDF] MOROCCO COUNTRY HANDBOOK - Public Intelligence
    PROM-1. The PROM-1 is a bounding fragmentation antipersonnel mine. It has a diameter of 75 mm (3 in) and a height of 260 mm (10.2 in - body with fuze). It ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Republic of Croatia - May 31, 2022 - OSCE
    Jun 9, 2022 · PROM-1. Type : Anti-personnel bounding fragmentation mine. Description ... Explosive charge : 425 g cast TNT. Material : Wrought steel.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Humanitarian Demining Flare Against Cluster Munitions - DTIC
    PROM-1: The PROM-1 is a bounding fragmentation, steel cased, bottle-shaped AP mine. The center of the mine is a tube filled with propellant. It contains 425 g ...
  17. [17]
    Antipersonnel Mine Injuries in Southern Croatia
    The antipersonnel fragmentation bounding mine (PROM-1) is laid on the ground, but when triggered, jumps into the air and explodes 70 to 80 cm above the ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  18. [18]
    [PDF] BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - AP Mine Ban Convention
    Minefields in Bosnia and Herzegovina were placed by war parties (BiH Army, Army of Republic of Srpska and. Croatian Army in BiH) primarily between confrontation ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Silent Menace: Landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina - ICRC
    Feb 1, 1998 · tripwire-operated fragmentation stake mine produced in small workshops in Gorazde during the siege ... PROM 1 1P: Bounding fragmentation mine.
  20. [20]
    GIs' Big Fear About Bosnia: the Land Mines - Los Angeles Times
    Dec 16, 1995 · The most common types are: --PROM-1 (AntiPersonnel Bouncing Mine No. 1), as tall as a coffee can but narrower, which explodes out of the ground ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Demining Country Report: Iraq - ReliefWeb
    Aug 27, 1996 · "Iraqi mine laying in their northern provinces was targeted both at the one ... PROM-1 Yugoslavia. Report details. Primary country. Iraq.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Iraq Ordnance Identification Guide - JMU Scholarly Commons
    Jan 1, 2004 · This guide provides ordnance identification information for approximately 1200 ordnance items. The Iraq Ordnance. Identification Guide supports ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] republic of iraq - AP Mine Ban Convention
    Jul 31, 2008 · PROM 1. 2. Not provided. PMN. 74. Not provided. PMD 6. 1. Not provided. Mine Advisory Group. PMN. 28. Not provided. (MAG). No 4. 3. Not provided.
  24. [24]
    Chapter: 3 Current Uses of Antipersonnel Landmines
    Barriers, Obstacles, and Mines · Provide the capability of inflicting significant damage to equipment and psychological damage, as well as personnel casualties.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Alternatives to Anti-Personnel Landmines - DTIC
    Mission/Function of APM: Protect AT mines/obstacles, area denial, counter desant. Summary of Results: APM caused significant delays in enemy progress toward ...
  26. [26]
    Threat Mine Operations - GlobalSecurity.org
    Threat doctrine only allows PMN mines to be surface-laid from mine layers. ... PROM-1/2/KD, PMR-2/3/4, MRUD. PROM-1/2/KD, PMR-2/3/4, MRUD. Czech. PP-MI-SR, PP ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Combined-Arms Breaching Operations - BITS
    Aug 31, 2000 · PROM-1/2/KD, PMR-2/3/4, MRUD. Czech. PP-MI-SR, PP-MI-SR II, PP-MI-SK ... MICLIC Employment in a Minefield Less Than 100 Meters Deep.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] PROM Metal Detection Warning - International Mine Action Standards
    This Technical Note provides technical information on the possibility that a metal detector, if used in an unusual sweep pattern, could possibly fail to ...Missing: landmine sources
  29. [29]
    [PDF] CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE USE, STOCKPILING ...
    Apr 8, 2024 · One or more tripwires are connected to the fuse on top of the mine. The pulling force of 3 kps or more on the tripwire activates the mine. When ...Missing: fuze | Show results with:fuze
  30. [30]
    Bosnia-Herzegovina: Death of a Deminer
    Dec 12, 2008 · ... Prom landmine, a mine produced in the former Yugoslavia. When activated, these mines bounce and explode in the air, splitting in hundreds ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  31. [31]
    Living with landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina - ICRC
    Dec 4, 2017 · Most of the accidents are caused by PROM-1 antipersonnel mines, which were banned under the Ottawa Treaty 20 years ago. Almost 15% of the ...Missing: Yugoslav | Show results with:Yugoslav
  32. [32]
    Reaping A Lethal Harvest - Legion Magazine
    Nov 1, 2001 · Landmines like the PROM-1 are among the world's most efficient killing and maiming machines. These silent sentinels, which remain on the job ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Antipersonnel Landmines - Do Their Costs Outweigh Their Benefits?
    Jul 10, 2023 · History however, shows that antipersonnel landmines have great military utility. ... Mines also help secure military unit defensive perimeters.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Anti-personnel landmines - Friend or Foe? - ICRC
    This study examines the military case for continued use of these weapons in light of their employment in actual conflicts since 1940, whether by professional ...
  35. [35]
    Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction - UNTC
    The Convention was concluded by the Diplomatic Conference on an International Total Ban on Anti-Personnel Land Mines at Oslo on 18 September 1997.
  36. [36]
    Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention
    The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction is the international ...
  37. [37]
    The Lasting Promise of the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention
    Sep 30, 2025 · Most importantly, the Convention has established a global norm rejecting anti-personnel mines as indiscriminate weapons with no place in modern ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] PROJECT ON DESTRUCTION OF APM STOCKPILES IN SERBIA ...
    OTTAWA CONVENTION ON APMs. Intersessional Meeting of the Standing Committee ... The number of APMs in stockpiles totals. 1,320.621 pcs. 91.470. Total. 540. PROM-1.
  39. [39]
    Last Balkan mine stockpiles destroyed under NATO-supported project
    Aug 13, 2008 · With the destruction of the stockpiles in both Serbia ... Ottawa Treaty obligations to destroy the declared stockpile of 1.3 million landmines.Missing: PROM- 1
  40. [40]
    Mine Ban Policy - Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor
    There is credible information that Ukrainian government forces used antipersonnel mines in violation of the Mine Ban Treaty in and around the city of Izium ...Missing: PROM- | Show results with:PROM-
  41. [41]
    Mine Ban Policy - Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor
    Nov 7, 2024 · At the UNGA in October 2023, Russia did not address its use of antipersonnel mines, but instead said that Ukraine is “in violation of the Ottawa ...Missing: PROM- | Show results with:PROM-
  42. [42]
    The conventions banning mines and cluster munitions
    Apr 10, 2025 · In 2025, five European states announced plans to withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty, which bans the use of landmines: On 18 March 2025, Estonia, ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Assessing the Ottawa Anti-Personnel Mine Convention Withdrawals
    Mar 27, 2025 · This post reviews the Ottawa Convention, States' withdrawal approaches, and military factors shaping landmine and war policies.Missing: perspective | Show results with:perspective
  44. [44]
    [PDF] THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA - AP Mine Ban Convention
    The Republic of Croatia destroyed its entire stockpile of anti-personnel landmines according to Article 4 ... demining activities where AP mine PROM-1 had been ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] serbia and montenegro ministry of defence - AP Mine Ban Convention
    DESTRUCTION OF APM STOCKPILES IN. SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO. PROJECT colonel ... PROM-1. 52,547. • Incomplete or Damaged Mines. 33,764. Total Stockpile. 1,320,620.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Mechanical mine clearance - GICHD
    Examples of stake mounted mines: >. POM-Z (Soviet). > PMR-2A (Yugoslavia). Examples of bounding mines: >. PROM-1 (Yugoslavia). > Valmara No. 69 (Italy). > OZM-4 ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    “Pažnja! Zabranjen Prolaz!”: Bosnia's Ongoing Battle Against ...
    Apr 3, 2025 · PROM-1 mines are not the country's only demining-related output. There are also specialized explosives detection canine units proudly bearing ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] CLEARING THE MINES 2023
    Oct 24, 2023 · This report was researched and written by Nick. Cumming-Bruce, Rula Daoud, Alex Frost, Emil Hasanov, Lucy.Missing: lethal radius