Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pets.com

Pets.com was an company founded in 1998 that specialized in the online retail of pet supplies, including food, toys, and accessories, operating on a model with nationwide delivery. Headquartered in , , the company was established by serial entrepreneur Greg McLemore, who had registered the domain name in 1994, and launched its website in late 1998 under the leadership of CEO , who joined in February 1999. The company rapidly gained prominence during the dot-com boom through innovative marketing, most notably its mascot introduced in September 1999, which became a symbolizing the era's exuberance. This mascot starred in high-profile campaigns, including a float in the 1999 Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and a 30-second commercial in January 2000 that aired to over 88 million viewers, featuring a rendition of the song "." Backed by early investments, including $10 million from Amazon.com in March 1999—which gave Amazon nearly 30% ownership by October 2000—Pets.com went public in February 2000, raising $82.5 million in its with shares debuting at $11. Despite achieving rapid sales growth—reaching $9.4 million in revenue in its third quarter of —Pets.com struggled with fundamental operational challenges, including high shipping s for bulky items like , negative gross margins leading to losses on nearly every sale, and a acquisition of approximately $400 per user in an era when was not yet mainstream. These issues, compounded by the bursting of the , culminated in the company's announcement of on November 6, , after just 27 months of operation, resulting in the layoff of 255 of its 320 employees and the sale of its assets. Pets.com's swift rise and fall has since served as a of overreliance on branding and without a viable path to profitability, influencing discussions on sustainability.

History

Founding

Pets.com was established in August 1998 by entrepreneur Greg McLemore in , as an online retailer specializing in pet supplies. McLemore, who had registered the years earlier, launched the company amid the burgeoning dot-com era, aiming to capitalize on the rising popularity of internet shopping for everyday consumer needs. The venture began as a from McLemore's prior efforts under WebMagic, focusing initially on providing a convenient platform for pet owners to access products without physical store visits. The website officially launched in November 1998, offering a selection of , toys, and essential supplies with nationwide shipping capabilities. This timing positioned Pets.com to tap into the explosive growth of , particularly in niche markets like pet products, which were seeing increased online demand during the late internet boom. Early operations emphasized a user-friendly interface and broad inventory to attract a of enthusiasts. To scale the business, Pets.com secured its first major funding round on March 29, 1999, with investments from Amazon.com and Hummer Winblad Venture Partners, which enabled Amazon to acquire approximately a 50% stake in the company. This was followed by a significant $50 million Series B round in June 1999, led by Amazon.com alongside Bowman Capital Management and Hummer Winblad Venture Partners, providing the capital needed for operational expansion and infrastructure development. As part of professionalizing the startup, was brought on as CEO in February 1999, leveraging her experience from leading online ventures like Reel.com to guide the company's growth strategy.

Expansion and Peak

Following its founding in 1998, Pets.com experienced rapid growth in 1999 and early 2000, fueled by substantial investments that enabled operational scaling. In March 1999, the company secured $10.5 million from investors including Amazon.com, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners, and Bowman Capital Management. This was followed by a $50 million round in June 1999 from the same lead investors, and a $35 million infusion in November 1999, bringing total venture funding to approximately $95.5 million. These funds supported the construction of additional distribution facilities, including a primary warehouse in and plans for further centers to improve nationwide shipping efficiency. By early 2000, Pets.com had expanded its customer base significantly, reaching 264,000 customers in the quarter ending March 31, up from 144,000 in late , driven by aggressive online efforts that heightened brand visibility. Revenue grew accordingly, with the company generating $25.7 million in the first nine months of 2000 alone, reflecting peak operational momentum amid the dot-com boom. Strategic partnerships bolstered this phase, notably a deal making Pets.com the premier pet site on and , which provided co-branded access to millions of users and integrated pet supply promotions. Amazon's majority stake, acquired through its investments, also facilitated backend and cross-promotional opportunities. In preparation for public markets, Pets.com filed for an (IPO) in late 1999, which was completed on February 11, 2000, raising $82.5 million under the ticker IPET at a debut price of $11 per share. The IPO valued the company at around $290 million initially, positioning it as a leader in the online pet supplies sector during the 's peak in March 2000. Although the experienced and declined sharply later that year amid broader market corrections, the capital influx temporarily supported further growth initiatives, including the acquisition of rival Petstore.com for $13.6 million in in 2000. Alongside expansion, Pets.com briefly increased its charitable efforts, such as donations to causes, aligning with its pet-focused brand.

Decline and Shutdown

As the burst in the summer of 2000, Pets.com faced mounting pressures from diminishing investor funding and a sharp decline in its stock value, which had opened at $11 per share during its February IPO but fell to $0.22 by the announcement of its closure. On November 7, 2000, the company announced it would shut down operations after its board approved a plan of complete on November 4, citing insufficient to continue amid cumulative losses of $147 million through September and an accumulated deficit reaching $156.3 million by early November. The announcement triggered immediate layoffs of 255 out of 320 employees, with the remaining staff retained briefly to manage the wind-down, including $2.8 million in severance payments. All operations ceased shortly thereafter, with the website closing on November 10, 2000, halting new orders and leading to disruptions in as fulfillment ended. In the process, approved by stockholders on January 16, 2001, and finalized with on January 18, 2001, assets including inventory, fixed assets, , and receivables were sold, yielding net assets of $9.629 million as of December 31, 2000; notable sales included the and trademarks to for an undisclosed amount and the Sock Puppet mascot for $125,000. An initial cash distribution of $0.09 per share, totaling $3.128 million, was made to shareholders on September 28, 2001, while return policies were honored during the brief wind-down period before full closure.

Business Model

E-commerce Strategy

Pets.com operated as a retailer, selling a wide selection of products through its website to emphasize the convenience of online ordering without the need for physical store visits. The platform focused on supplies such as , , , vitamins, and accessories, positioning itself as a one-stop shop for owners seeking 24/7 access to inventory. To attract and retain customers in the nascent online pet retail market, Pets.com employed aggressive pricing tactics, including significant discounts on select items and promotional free shipping offers to lower barriers to purchase despite slim margins. These strategies aimed to build customer loyalty by making more affordable and hassle-free compared to traditional . The company's relied on partnerships with major wholesalers and suppliers, such as for and treats, to source inventory without maintaining extensive in-house stock. This model supported fulfillment through distribution centers, including a new facility in , targeting delivery times of around three days to distant regions like the East Coast via air shipping. Pets.com integrated early technologies to enhance , featuring website such as tailored product recommendations and specials, alongside subscription services for recurring orders to encourage repeat business. These tools drew from emerging platforms to provide customized shopping. In competitive positioning, Pets.com differentiated itself from brick-and-mortar giants like by highlighting online exclusivity, such as broader product availability and constant accessibility, while competing in a crowded field that included Petopia and Petstore.com. This approach leveraged the internet's reach to target convenience-oriented consumers, supported briefly by marketing efforts that promoted the platform's ease of use.

Operational Challenges

One of the primary operational challenges for Pets.com was the high cost of shipping bulky, heavy items such as 40-pound bags of , which undermined profitability despite promotional offers of free or discounted shipping. The company struggled to economically manage these , as the weight and volume of pet supplies like and made transportation expensive, often resulting in losses on individual orders since shipping fees were subsidized to attract customers. For instance, Pets.com frequently undercharged for shipping to compete with local stores, leading to net losses on most sales. Inventory management presented further inefficiencies, particularly with overstocking of perishable and low-margin goods, which contributed to and financial strain. The company maintained large-scale to ensure broad product availability, but this approach led to excess stock that could not be sold before expiration or , culminating in the disposal of approximately $4.8 million in inventory during its 2000 . Scalability problems compounded these hurdles, as Pets.com's warehouses and fulfillment systems were ill-equipped to handle surging during peak periods, resulting in order and customer dissatisfaction. Lacking plug-and-play solutions for warehouse management, the company had to develop custom from scratch, which proved inadequate for rapid growth and led to operational bottlenecks. These challenges arose directly from the implementation of its aggressive strategy, highlighting the difficulties of online without robust . By 2000, Pets.com's intensified these issues, with monthly operating expenses averaging around $8-10 million, driven by marketing, fulfillment, and administrative costs that outpaced . The company's gross margins were deeply negative at -28% for the period from January to November 2000, meaning the , including shipping and inventory, exceeded sales prices, resulting in quarterly net losses such as $21.7 million in Q3 on just $9.4 million in . Compliance with pet product standards and interstate shipping regulations added further overhead, requiring additional resources for and legal adherence that strained the already thin margins. These operational inefficiencies ultimately accelerated the company's decline.

Marketing

Campaigns

Pets.com launched an aggressive marketing strategy during the dot-com boom, investing heavily in brand-building efforts to capture market share in the nascent online pet supplies sector. The company's campaigns, primarily executed through , emphasized the convenience of with the "because pets can't drive," highlighting the inability of pet owners to rely on animals for shopping needs. These efforts began with regional television spots in late 1999, expanding nationally to build rapid awareness among pet owners. A of the strategy was the $20 million campaign introduced in September , which featured the in humorous TV commercials portraying pets with human-like frustrations over . This multi-channel approach included television and print advertisements in pet-focused publications, as well as online banner ads on major portals like to drive traffic. In the fourth quarter of alone, Pets.com allocated $30.7 million to , nearly six times its quarterly , underscoring the scale of its promotional push. The campaigns peaked with a high-profile advertisement on January 30, 2000, costing over $2 million for the 30-second slot and reaching an estimated 88.5 million viewers. The ad showcased the singing a rendition of "" to emphasize delivery services, positioning Pets.com as a fun, essential online retailer during the event dubbed the "Dot-Com ." Additional promotional tactics included viral elements like a 36-foot balloon in the 1999 and appearances on TV shows such as "Live with Regis and Kathie Lee," along with print features in Time magazine, which amplified brand visibility without direct sales tie-ins. Partnership-driven advertising further extended reach, with co-branded banner placements on providing prominent exposure to online audiences seeking pet-related content. Radio spots echoed the core to reinforce the message across audio platforms, targeting pet owners in key markets. Despite generating significant buzz—the became a sold separately for $20 each—the campaigns yielded negative returns, with customer acquisition costs averaging $400 per user amid low average order values around $40. This inefficiency contributed to unsustainable growth, as high visibility failed to translate into profitable volume.

Mascot and Branding

The Pets.com sock mascot was created in 1999 by the office of the TBWA\Chiat\Day, which was tasked with developing a playful, approachable to embody the company's pet-focused . from on pet ownership, the agency aimed for a low-cost, homemade aesthetic to convey friendliness and accessibility in the competitive landscape. The debuted in September 1999 and quickly became the central element of Pets.com's branding strategy. Designed as a simple resembling a , the featured a white ribbed sock body, button-like black-and-white eyes, a silver wristwatch around its "neck," and a cardboard microphone emblazoned with the Pets.com logo, evoking a sassy reporter persona. Voiced by comedian , whose improvisational style added humor and personality, the appeared in numerous commercials, animations, and promotional events, including a float in the 1999 and a high-profile ad in 2000. It was also integrated into merchandise such as plush toys and apparel, reinforcing the brand's whimsical, pet-centric identity both externally and as an internal symbol of the company's innovative spirit. The sock puppet achieved widespread recognition, appearing on major media outlets like Good Morning America and in interviews with publications such as People magazine, cementing its status as a cultural touchstone of the late-1990s dot-com boom. However, following Pets.com's shutdown in November 2000, it became emblematic of the era's speculative excess, with its high-visibility campaigns highlighting the disconnect between branding hype and business viability. A merchandise version of the puppet was acquired by The Henry Ford museum in 2017, preserving it as an artifact of internet history. Following the company's shutdown, the mascot's branding rights were sold for $125,000 and repurposed in advertisements for the auto loan company 1-800-BAR-NONE from 2002 until around 2013.

Legal Matters

Sock Puppet Dispute

In early 2000, a public dispute arose between Pets.com and comedy writer , creator of the "" character from . On March 29, 2000, during an appearance on Comedy Central's , Smigel suggested that Pets.com's mascot was a "rip-off" of , noting similarities such as both being sarcastic puppets that used microphones and interacted with animals. Smigel's representative had previously sent a letter to Pets.com threatening legal action for , unfair competition, and .

Lawsuit Details

Pets.com responded by filing a lawsuit against Smigel on April 12, 2000, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco, alleging defamation and trade libel. The company sought $20 million in damages, claiming Smigel's statements falsely implied that Pets.com had stolen the mascot idea and harmed its reputation during a critical period of its advertising campaign. The suit temporarily halted Triumph's appearances on Late Night with Conan O'Brien while NBC reviewed the matter. The lawsuit was dismissed in February 2001, shortly after Pets.com's shutdown in November 2000.

Philanthropy

Charity Programs

Pets.com engaged in limited philanthropic activities during its operation. Following its bankruptcy announcement on November 6, 2000, the defunct company made a final charitable contribution by donating more than 21 tons of remaining inventory to mushers in Alaska's Interior in 2000, aiding their sled dogs amid a of traditional salmon feed.

Legacy

Cultural Significance

Pets.com has become an enduring symbol of the dot-com bubble's excesses, frequently cited in analyses of the late-1990s internet hype and subsequent crash. The company's rapid rise and fall, marked by aggressive marketing and a high-profile IPO in February , positioned it as a quintessential example of speculative fervor in popular discourse. In John Cassidy's 2002 book Dot.con: The Greatest Story Ever Sold, Pets.com is highlighted multiple times as a prime instance of overvalued startups that prioritized visibility over sustainable profitability, contributing to the narrative of market irrationality during the era. This portrayal underscores how Pets.com exemplified the era's "hype-driven failure," where investor enthusiasm outpaced viable business models. The mascot's sock puppet dog further cemented Pets.com's place in , evolving into a collectible post-shutdown. After the company's in November 2000, replicas of the —originally a promotional item—became sought-after memorabilia on platforms like , with well-preserved examples fetching prices upwards of $50, and some rare variants exceeding $100 in recent sales. This merchandise legacy reflects broader for dot-com artifacts, turning a symbol of commercial flop into a quirky emblem of tech optimism. In academic and educational contexts, Pets.com is routinely dissected as a cautionary tale for branding strategies in unstable markets. Business schools, including Harvard Business School, have developed case studies on the company, examining its marketing tactics and the pitfalls of rapid scaling in volatile sectors; one such study traces its trajectory from 1998 launch to 2000 collapse, emphasizing lessons in investor relations and operational feasibility. Similarly, Imperial College London's analysis in a 2020 marketing case study highlights Pets.com's Super Bowl ads and puppet-driven campaigns as innovative yet ultimately unsustainable efforts to build consumer loyalty amid economic turbulence. Even in the , Pets.com resurfaces in retrospectives on tech bubbles, reinforcing its symbolic role. A episode of NPR's The Indicator from podcast devoted an installment to "The Lessons of Pets.com," portraying it as the archetypal dot-com casualty due to its massive visibility—including a $1.2 million ad—and abrupt demise, drawing parallels to contemporary market frenzies. These references keep Pets.com alive in public consciousness, serving as a shorthand for the risks of unchecked digital ambition.

Business Lessons

The failure of Pets.com serves as a seminal in , highlighting the perils of prioritizing rapid growth over sustainable operations. A core lesson lies in the flawed of offering free or low-cost shipping for low-margin, bulky goods like and supplies. Pets.com's incurred significant losses on every due to the high costs of transporting heavy items, which often exceeded the from the products themselves, rendering the free shipping promotion unsustainable despite its appeal to customers. This approach influenced later models, such as , which bundled shipping subscriptions with broader revenue streams to mitigate similar risks. Another critical takeaway is the danger of overemphasizing and at the expense of fundamental profitability, particularly in venture capital-funded startups. Pets.com allocated substantial resources to high-profile campaigns, including a $1.2 million ad during in 2000, which reached over 88 million viewers but failed to generate proportional revenue. The company's customer acquisition costs reached $400 per customer, far outpacing the lifetime value of low-margin sales, underscoring the need for balanced strategies that align promotional spending with viable unit economics rather than chasing visibility alone. Pets.com's collapse also underscores vulnerability to economic timing and market corrections, advising companies to build diversified revenue during boom periods. Launched amid the , the firm raised $82.5 million in its February 2000 IPO but filed for just nine months later as investor sentiment shifted, revealing how overreliance on speculative funding without robust exposes businesses to sudden downturns. Finally, the Pets.com saga influenced subsequent innovations in pet e-tailing, particularly through contrasts with successful ventures like .com, which prioritized superior . Unlike Pets.com's inefficient shipping that led to structural unprofitability, Chewy invested in multiple distribution centers and advanced fulfillment systems, achieving positive gross margins of around 20% by 2018 and $3.5 billion in annual revenue through efficient scaling and focused on service rather than gimmicks. This evolution demonstrates how lessons from early failures can inform resilient models, with Chewy avoiding Pets.com's pitfalls by leveraging modern infrastructure for sustainable growth.

References

  1. [1]
    Pets.com was an SF sensation. It collapsed months after going public.
    Jul 18, 2023 · Serial dot-com entrepreneur Greg McLemore registered the URL in 1994. (McLemore was an original co-founder of Pets.com but left before the ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Pets.com latest high-profile dot-com disaster - CNET
    Founded in 1998, Pets.com raised $82.5 million in an initial public offering in February. Tarnished domains. Many of the domain names that were once considered ...
  3. [3]
    Why Pets.com Failed: Lessons From the Dot-Com Bubble
    Pets.com was based on an Amazon-style internet purchasing system where users ordered pet supplies from the website and the company arranged the delivery.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  4. [4]
    The Lessons Of Pets.com : The Indicator from Planet Money - NPR
    Nov 11, 2020 · This story is all about the rise and fall of pets.com, which is the company everybody thinks of when they remember the dot-com bubble because it was humongous, ...Missing: credible sources
  5. [5]
    From IPO To Complete Liquidation In 268 Days. How Pets.com ...
    May 6, 2019 · Pets.com was founded and launched by Greg McLemore in August 1998. The site and domain were then purchased from McLemore in early 1999 by ...
  6. [6]
    Pets.com - Failure.Museum
    The online pet-products retailer brought on CEO Julie Wainwright, who had previously led Reel.com, an online video seller that was a competitor to Amazon. Pets.Missing: credible sources
  7. [7]
    Amazon.com Adds Auctions; Buys 50% Stake in Pets.com
    March 29, 1999 12:00 AM PT ... Amazon.com joined with venture capital firm Hummer Winblad Venture Partners to fund Pets.com's first round of financing.Missing: Kleiner Perkins
  8. [8]
    Pets.com Fetches More Investors - WIRED
    Jun 14, 1999 · Pets.com, an online retailer of pet products, said Monday it raised an additional US$50 million from investors, including Amazon.com.Missing: 1998 | Show results with:1998<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Julie Wainwright
    Prior to OntheFrontier, she served as Chief Executive Officer of Pets.com, an online pet supply company, from February 1999 to January 2001. Ms. Wainwright ...
  10. [10]
    https://techdiplomacy.org/globalmentornetwork/people/julie-wainwright/
  11. [11]
    https://press.aboutamazon.com/1999/6/pets-com-raises-50-million-from-amazon-com-bowman-capital-and-hummer-winblad-venture-partners
  12. [12]
    https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/1999/11/01/daily12.html
  13. [13]
    Pets.com publishes print magazine - Multichannel Merchant
    Jun 1, 2000 · In late '99, the company had 144,000 customers; for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, the number of customers had swelled to 264,000. A star is ...Missing: registered users
  14. [14]
    Lessons from the Pets.com Downfall - Begin To Invest
    On November 13th, 1998 – TheGlobe, an internet news site, saw its shares skyrocket 606% on the first day of trading,; Yahoo saw its market cap rise to nearly ...
  15. [15]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Why Did Pets.com Fail? (Setting the Record Straight)
    Jul 4, 2023 · Nearly four years later, Pets.com is launched by Greg McLemore and Eva Woodsmall under the e-commerce company WebMagic. March 29, 1999. First ...
  17. [17]
    IPET Holdings Form 10-K Period Ended 12/31/01 - SEC.gov
    In July 2000, the Company established a distribution center in Union City, California, and leased a warehouse comprised of approximately 143,000 square feet for ...
  18. [18]
    TECHNOLOGY; Pets.com, Sock Puppet's Home, Will Close
    Nov 8, 2000 · Pets.com announced yesterday that it was closing down its operations. The company, which sells pet food and other supplies over the Internet, was losing money.Missing: kiosks | Show results with:kiosks
  19. [19]
    Pets.com Put To Sleep - CBS News
    Nov 7, 2000 · Pets.com said it is laying off 255 of its 320 employees and plans to sell the majority of its assets, including inventory, its distribution ...
  20. [20]
    TECHNOLOGY BRIEFING: INTERNET; PETSMART.COM BUYS ...
    Dec 6, 2000 · Pets.com, the online pet store that announced last month it would shut down, has sold the Pets.com domain name to its old rival Petsmart.com.
  21. [21]
    Ecommerce Almanac, 2000 Edition | PDF | E Commerce - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (14) 26 Pets.com, Inc. ..............................................134. Bluefly ... Site Size: 1,500 products (approx.) plus ability to order any hardcopy ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    For Online Pet Stores, It's Dog Eat Dog - Bloomberg
    Mar 5, 2000 · For every dollar that Pets.com pays suppliers such as Ralston Purina Co. for dog food and United Parcel Service Inc. for shipping, it ...
  23. [23]
    Someone Is Trying the Pets.com Idea Again - Business Insider
    Feb 1, 2011 · Whereas Pets.com offered free shipping even on heavy bags of food, PetFlow charges a consistent $4.95 shipping fee per order. They also have ...
  24. [24]
    (PDF) What A Dog Fight! TKO: Pets.com - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · The case covers the startup of Pets.com, an online retailer of pet supplies. Pets.com made its entry into a heavily competitive but ...Missing: users | Show results with:users
  25. [25]
    ONLINE SHOPPER; Pet Stores Offer Diversion and Good Deals
    Feb 10, 2000 · ... Pets.com, Petstore.com and Petsmart.com. But a funny thing happened ... Online prices are generally competitive with prices at offline ...
  26. [26]
    Pets.com gives a blast from the dot bomb past - CNET
    Nov 7, 2013 · In its two short years, it went from tiny startup in August 1998 to a publicly traded company in February 2000 to collapsed in November 2000.
  27. [27]
    IPET Holdings, Amendment to Form 10-K 12-31-2000 - SEC.gov
    The IPO, which raised approximately $75 million of new capital, was completed on February 11, 2000. The board of directors also authorized the reincorporation ...ITEM 1. BUSINESS. · ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S... · ITEM 8. FINANCIAL...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  28. [28]
    Failure Story
    Pets.com was a San Francisco-based e-tailer existing only as a virtual firm that offered pet products, information, and resources to consumers.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  29. [29]
    Pets.com: Were They Too Early? - Tedium
    Jan 12, 2017 · Today's Tedium talks about Pets.com, the company that was left eating its own dog food after the money ran out.Missing: issues | Show results with:issues<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Case Study: How Pets.com Failed Product Development - Brainmates
    In November 2000, Pets.com folded after having burned through $300 million in less than two years. Over 300 people lost their jobs, and the site was shut down.Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  31. [31]
    DOGS CAN'T DRIVE - Ad Age
    Aug 15, 1999 · ... pets and people. Voice-over says the Internet site is needed "because pets can't drive." Commercials began regionally in spot buys and ...Missing: radio | Show results with:radio
  32. [32]
    History of advertising: No 147: Pets.com's sock puppet - Campaign
    Sep 17, 2015 · The puppet was the star of a Super Bowl ad and appeared in the 1999 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade. It was synonymous with the collective insanity.Missing: total | Show results with:total<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    New Sites Unleash Pets.com 2.0 - WSJ
    6 mar 2012 · After burning through its cash, it laid off more than 250 employees and shut down in late 2000. Julie Wainwright, the Pets.com former chief ...
  34. [34]
    1999: Pets.com sock puppet becomes dot-com celebrity - The Drum
    Mar 31, 2016 · Below, find out why the Pets.com sock puppet, which was created by TBWA/Chiat/Day, is her favorite marketing moment. The pets.com sock ...
  35. [35]
    Pets.com Sock Puppet, 1999-2000 - The Henry Ford
    Their popular mascot--a sock puppet dog--was created by TBWA Worldwide and voiced by comedian Michael Ian Black. It made appearances on talk shows, commercials, ...
  36. [36]
    Memoirs of a Market- Savvy Sock Puppet - Los Angeles Times
    Mar 9, 2003 · Created in 1999 by the San Francisco office of ad agency TBWAChiatDay, this garrulous piece of stuffed hosiery rode the Internet wave for a ...
  37. [37]
    https://adage.com/article/90-years-ad-age/remembering-ad-ages-petscom-cover-20-years-ago-fall-and-what-fall-it-was/2243761
  38. [38]
    Disaster Of The Day: Pets.com - Forbes
    Nov 7, 2000 · Last quarter, the company lost more than $21 million on sales of just $9.4 million. Pets.com had retained Merrill Lynch to find a buyer for the ...
  39. [39]
    Pets.com Sock Puppet Dog Style 09375 Vintage 1999 Fun 4 All 63-2
    In stock Rating 5.0 (2) This Vintage & Collectible Pets.com Sock Puppet Plush Dog is a unique and nostalgic toy that is perfect for collectors or those looking to add a touch of ...
  40. [40]
    Pets.com Inc.: Rise and Decline of a Pet Supply Retailer
    The case follows the rise and decline of Pets.com from its inception in 1994 until 2000. It starts with a look at the birth of Pets.com.Missing: chain | Show results with:chain
  41. [41]
    The Lessons Of Pets.com : The Indicator from Planet Money - NPR
    Nov 11, 2020 · The tech bubble of the 90s was a time when companies with weak business models and flashy advertising secured massive investments.Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  42. [42]
    This Legal Dogfight Is No Joke - Los Angeles Times
    May 4, 2000 · Some in the ad community have suggested that the Pets.com Sock Puppet takes its inspiration not from Triumph but from a fur doll named Flat Eric ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Chewy founder: We're no Pets.com - CNBC
    Jul 26, 2019 · Since crashing and burning less than two years after its formation in 1999, Pets ... The company has 7 distribution centers nationwide and can ...
  44. [44]
    Here's Why Chewy Succeeded Where Pets.Com Failed
    Nov 19, 2021 · Where Pets.com faltered, Chewy has been soaring. Cohen and Day launched Chewy.com in 2011 using their own cash and several small loans.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible<|control11|><|separator|>