Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Photometric system

A photometric system in astronomy is a standardized comprising a set of discrete passbands or optical filters, each characterized by a known to incident across specific ranges, enabling the precise of from objects such as , galaxies, and nebulae. These systems define apparent magnitudes and color indices by calibrating observations against primary standard , allowing astronomers to quantify brightness variations and spectral properties in a consistent manner. The core purpose of photometric systems is to facilitate comparative analysis of astronomical objects' , , and composition by isolating light in targeted bands, typically using detectors like photomultiplier tubes or charge-coupled devices (CCDs). Passbands are categorized by width—wide-band (≥300 for broad coverage), intermediate-band (100–300 for refined detail), and narrow-band (≤ a few tens of for lines)—to suit various observational needs, from broad classification to detailed . Calibration ensures reproducibility across telescopes, correcting for atmospheric effects and instrumental differences through techniques like photometry, which compares target objects to nearby reference stars. Prominent examples include the Johnson-Morgan UBV system, which employs ultraviolet (U, ~3650 Å), blue (B, ~4400 Å), and visual (V, ~5500 Å) filters for optical photometry of stellar temperatures and classifications; the Strömgren uvby system for intermediate-band analysis of and ; and systems like JHK (J at 1.25 µm, H at 1.65 µm, K at 2.2 µm) for penetrating dust-obscured regions. Modern extensions, such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey's ugriz system, incorporate broader multispectral coverage for large-scale surveys, while specialized applications like those in the use custom filters at wavelengths including 300 nm, 450 nm, 606 nm, and 814 nm to map distant galaxies. These systems underpin key astronomical research, from monitoring to detection, by providing a foundational metric for .

Definition and Principles

Definition

A photometric system in astronomy is a standardized comprising a set of optical filters and their associated passbands, used to measure the magnitudes of objects across specific ranges. These systems define discrete wavebands with known sensitivities to incident , enabling consistent quantification of for comparison across observations. Photometry measures the —or density—from a object through these designated bands, capturing the total or integrated in narrow or broad intervals. This differs from , which resolves the into its components to study spectral lines and distributions, whereas photometry provides broadband or targeted intensity assessments. Central to photometric systems is the scale, a logarithmic measure of apparent in a given band, such as the V-band visual . The apparent m is calculated as
m = -2.5 \log_{10} (f) + ZP,
where f is the measured and ZP is the zero-point constant calibrated against standard stars. This scale ensures that a difference of 5 magnitudes corresponds to a of 100, facilitating precise comparisons.
Photometric systems are categorized by passband width: narrow-band photometry uses restricted filters (≤ a few tens of Å) to target specific or lines, intermediate-band photometry employs filters of 100–300 Å for refined detail, and broad-band photometry uses wide filters (typically ≥300 Å) to assess overall .

Fundamental Principles

Photometric measurements quantify the flux of light from astronomical sources by integrating the source's spectral energy distribution (SED), S(\lambda), weighted by the transmission function T(\lambda) of the observing filter across the relevant wavelength range. This process isolates specific spectral regions, yielding a band-specific flux F = \int S(\lambda) T(\lambda) \, d\lambda, which forms the basis for deriving magnitudes on a logarithmic scale. A in interpreting these measurements is the effective \lambda_{\rm eff}, which represents the at which a monochromatic source would produce the same as the actual broadband source through the . It is calculated as the first of the flux-weighted : \lambda_{\rm eff} = \frac{\int \lambda \, T(\lambda) S(\lambda) \, d\lambda}{\int T(\lambda) S(\lambda) \, d\lambda}. This value depends on both the properties and the source , providing a precise of the band's central response for that object. In ground-based photometry, atmospheric diminishes the observed , with greater at shorter wavelengths due to molecular and by gases like and ; the effect scales with airmass, the atmospheric path length. Corrections involve site-specific extinction coefficients to adjust observed magnitudes to standard conditions outside the atmosphere, ensuring consistency across observations. Color indices, defined as the difference in magnitudes between two bands (e.g., B - V), capture the relative distribution across the , serving as proxies for source properties like temperature without resolving the full .

Historical Development

Early Foundations

The development of visual photometry in the late marked a significant advancement in quantitative stellar brightness measurements, primarily driven by Edward C. Pickering at the Observatory. Pickering employed meridian photometers to systematically estimate star magnitudes through visual comparisons, compiling extensive catalogs such as the Harvard Photometry, which included over 46,000 stars observed between 1885 and 1900. This approach relied on the human eye's to green-yellow light, providing a foundation for the magnitude scale but limited by subjective variations among observers. In the early , photographic photometry emerged as a means to overcome some visual limitations, with introducing precise methods in 1897–1899 during his time at the Kuffner Observatory in . Schwarzschild's technique utilized out-of-focus images on photographic plates to measure stellar densities more accurately, enabling the determination of magnitudes for fainter stars. However, early photographic plates were primarily sensitive to and blue wavelengths rather than the full , leading to discrepancies when compared to visual observations and complicating color assessments. Parallel to these efforts, the Harvard group developed early color-index systems in the 1900s, integrating photographic magnitudes with visual estimates to support . Under Pickering's direction, Annie J. Cannon and others used these photometric data alongside spectral features to refine the Harvard spectral classification scheme (OBAFGKM), published in the Henry Draper Catalogue starting in 1918, which correlated brightness and color with temperature-based types. This focus on color differences aided in distinguishing stellar populations but remained constrained by the non-uniform sensitivity of photographic emulsions. The transition from visual and photographic methods to photoelectric photometry occurred in the 1920s and 1930s, pioneered by Joel Stebbins at the University of Illinois Observatory. Stebbins adapted selenium cells as detectors attached to telescopes, achieving objective measurements of with precision surpassing earlier techniques; his 1922 move to further expanded applications to variable stars and eclipsing binaries. These photoelectric cells provided linear responses to light intensity, reducing human error and enabling reliable light curves, though initial selenium versions suffered from fatigue and temperature sensitivity.

Modern Standardization

The was created in 1953 by Harold L. Johnson and William W. Morgan at , marking a pivotal step in standardizing broadband photometry for and color measurements. This system utilized photoelectric techniques to define three filters—ultraviolet (U), blue (B), and visual (V)—calibrated against the North Polar Sequence, enabling consistent determinations of stellar temperatures and interstellar reddening across observatories. Johnson and Morgan's framework addressed inconsistencies in earlier photographic methods by emphasizing precise filter transmissions and zero-point definitions, quickly gaining adoption among astronomers for its simplicity and reliability. Building on this foundation, Arlo U. Landolt advanced standardization in the 1970s and 1980s through comprehensive surveys of standard stars, extending the UBV system to include red and bands for broader coverage. In 1973, Landolt established photoelectric UBV sequences near the , providing a dense network of calibrators to minimize atmospheric and instrumental variations. His 1983 observations further refined UBVRI standards by integrating Cousins' R and I definitions, observing hundreds of stars with high precision to ensure homogeneity in the Johnson-Kron-Cousins framework. These efforts, spanning multiple decades, resulted in catalogs of over 500 standard stars, facilitating accurate transformations between systems and supporting global photometric consistency. The Johnson-Cousins system solidified in the 1970s under A. W. J. Cousins, who introduced standardized R and I bands to extend the UBV framework for redder stellar populations and deeper surveys. Cousins' 1976 publication defined VRI standards in the E regions of the sky, using S25-response photocathodes to calibrate filters that aligned closely with Johnson's original setup while correcting for discrepancies. This integration created a cohesive UBVRI , adopted widely for its improved sensitivity to late-type stars and reduced color-term dependencies in observations. Space-based observations from the mission in the 1990s further refined these standards by delivering high-precision photometry for 118,218 stars, enabling rigorous cross-calibrations with ground-based systems. Launched by the in 1989, Hipparcos provided measurements in the Hp (broad V-like), B_T (blue), and V_T (visual) bands, which, despite their unique passbands, allowed transformations to UBVRI via synthetic photometry and standard star matches. The resulting Tycho-2 catalogue, incorporating over a million stars, enhanced zero-point accuracies and interstellar extinction models, influencing subsequent standards like those for .

Key Components

Photometric Bands

Photometric bands in astronomy are standardized intervals designated by single letters, forming the basis for measuring stellar fluxes across the optical . These bands, such as U, B, V, R, and I in the Johnson-Cousins system, enable consistent comparisons of celestial objects' brightness by isolating specific portions of the . The designations reflect approximate color perceptions or spectral regions, with each band defined by its effective central and shape to account for instrumental responses. The standard bands and their characteristics are summarized in the following table, based on refined definitions for modern detectors:
BandDesignationCentral Wavelength (nm)FWHM (nm)
U36164
B44195
VVisual55185
R647157
I806154
These central wavelengths represent the effective means of the transmission functions, while the (FWHM) quantifies the band's width, indicating the spectral range over which approximately half the peak transmission occurs. Broader bands like and I allow measurement of redder sources but introduce more overlap with adjacent wavelengths compared to narrower ones like U. The assignment of letters to these ranges draws from both and detector technologies. The V band aligns closely with the peak photopic sensitivity of the at 555 nm, facilitating visual estimates that mimic naked-eye observations. In contrast, U and B target shorter wavelengths detectable by early tubes with S-type photocathodes, while and I extend into regions suited to the sensitivity of charge-coupled devices (CCDs), peaking around 800 nm. The definitions evolved from initial photoelectric observations to accommodate advancing instrumentation. Johnson and Morgan introduced the UBV bands in 1953, calibrated against the North Polar Sequence for northern sky standards using vacuum-tube detectors. Cousins extended the system with R and I bands in 1976, providing standards to cover redder stellar types. Bessell further standardized the full UBVRI set in 1990 by deriving synthetic passbands from spectral libraries, ensuring compatibility with CCDs and minimizing systematic errors in color measurements.

Filters and Instruments

Photometric filters are essential hardware components that isolate specific ranges for accurate measurement of stellar fluxes. They primarily fall into two categories: filters and (dichroic) filters. filters, constructed from colored or dyed glass that selectively absorbs unwanted wavelengths while transmitting the desired band, have been widely used in classical systems. For instance, in the Johnson UBV system, combinations of Schott optical filter glasses form the basis of these filters, such as 3 mm GG495 combined with 3 mm BG39 for the or 1 mm UG1 with 1 mm BG39 for the U band, providing broad passbands through material-specific properties. filters, in contrast, employ thin-film coatings on substrates to achieve selection via constructive and destructive of , enabling sharper band edges and higher out-of-band rejection compared to types, though they are more sensitive to the angle of incoming . The optical performance of these filters is defined by their transmission curves, which illustrate (typically 0-100%) as a function of and guide design choices for minimal spectral contamination. Ideal curves feature high peak within the (often exceeding 85-95%), steep cutoffs at the 50% points to delineate the effective , and strong out-of-band rejection (>99% ) to block light from neighboring spectral regions. For example, the Johnson V filter achieves approximately 90% peak at 550 , with 50% cutoffs near 480 and 620 , ensuring isolation of the visual band while rejecting and leakage. Detection instruments in photometric systems convert filtered light into measurable electrical signals, evolving from single-point to imaging technologies. Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), introduced in the 1940s and adopted for astronomical photometry by the 1950s, served as the primary detectors in early setups due to their exceptional sensitivity, capable of registering single photons through photoelectron multiplication across multiple dynodes, which was crucial for precise point-source measurements on small telescopes. Since the early , charge-coupled devices (CCDs) have revolutionized the field by enabling two-dimensional imaging photometry, with silicon-based pixel arrays offering quantum efficiencies up to 90% across visible wavelengths, superior linearity, and the ability to capture extended sources or fields of view, rapidly supplanting PMTs for most applications except high-time-resolution needs. To facilitate multi-band observations, filters are mounted in motorized assemblies integrated into focal planes, allowing sequential insertion of multiple filters (typically 4-12 positions) without mechanical disturbance to the , thus enabling efficient acquisition of simultaneous or rapid-series photometry in bands like U, B, and .

Major Photometric Systems

Johnson UBV System

The Johnson UBV photometric system, introduced in 1953 by Harold L. Johnson and William W. Morgan, established a standardized framework for broad-band photometry using three filters to classify hot stars based on their energy distributions. This system was developed using photoelectric detectors, specifically the 1P21 , to measure in the ultraviolet (U), blue (B), and visual (V) bands, with serving as the zero-point reference (V = 0 mag). The design emphasized empirical calibration against spectral types from the Yerkes Atlas, enabling quantitative color measurements for stars brighter than about 10th in the . The filters are defined by their effective wavelengths and bandwidths: the U band at 365 nm with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 66 nm, the B band at 436 nm with 88 nm FWHM, and the V band at 545 nm with 89 nm FWHM. These passbands approximate the sensitivities of early photographic and visual observations while extending into the near-ultraviolet, allowing for the computation of color indices such as (B - V) and (U - B). The system's transmission curves were tailored to minimize overlap and align with the peak responses of available detectors, ensuring reliable differential photometry. A primary application of the UBV system lies in deriving stellar temperatures through these color indices, which serve as proxies for effective temperatures in hot stars (spectral types through F). For instance, the (B - V) index correlates inversely with , spanning from negative values for hot stars (T_eff > 20,000 K) to positive values for cooler F stars (T_eff ≈ 6,000 K), facilitating rapid classification without . Similarly, (U - B) provides sensitivity to luminosity class and abundance effects in main-sequence stars. Despite its foundational role, the UBV system has notable limitations, including poor coverage beyond the visual band into the , which restricts its effectiveness for cooler, redder stars where flux peaks at longer wavelengths. Additionally, the shorter-wavelength bands (particularly U and B) are highly sensitive to reddening, as increases toward the end of the , often requiring corrections based on assumed reddening laws to recover intrinsic colors.

Cousins Extensions and Alternatives

The Cousins R and I bands represent a key extension to the original Johnson UBV photometric system, introducing standardized redder passbands to better capture near-infrared stellar fluxes. Defined in 1976 by A.W.J. Cousins through extensive observations of southern standards, these bands feature effective wavelengths of approximately 641 nm for and 788 nm for I, with (FWHM) of about 162 nm and 149 nm, respectively. The filters were designed for compatibility with tubes like the S-25 response type, ensuring precise measurements of and stars, and have since become integral to the Johnson-Kron-Cousins UBVRI framework. Standardized sets, such as those using RG610 glass for R and RG695 for I combined with appropriate Wratten barriers, minimize inter-observer discrepancies and support transformations to other systems. An influential alternative to the Johnson-Cousins system is the (SDSS) ugriz framework, optimized for () detectors and large-scale sky surveys. Established in 1996 and operational from 2000 onward, it comprises five broad bands spanning from the near-ultraviolet u (central 355 ) to the near-infrared z (893 ), with g at 469 , r at 617 , and i at 748 . This system emphasizes uniform flux calibration on the scale, enabling efficient photometry of millions of objects for studies of galaxy evolution and stellar populations. Unlike the Johnson-Cousins emphasis on visual optical bands, SDSS ugriz provides extended coverage, facilitating detection of low-redshift quasars and faint extended sources. Other notable alternatives include the Strömgren uvbyβ system, developed in the late 1950s and refined through the 1960s, which uses intermediate-width filters to derive astrophysical parameters like , , and from color indices. Pioneered by Bengt Strömgren in 1956 and extended by David L. Crawford with the β (Hβ) index for Balmer absorption strength, it targets hot stars and open clusters, offering reddening-independent estimates via the m1 index. Similarly, the system, introduced by Canterna in 1976 and standardized by Geisler in 1990, employs four broad bands (C, M, T1, T2) tailored for cool, metal-poor stars, with the C filter enhancing sensitivity to (CN) variations for abundance diagnostics in red giants and globular clusters. This system's ultraviolet-sensitive (centered near 420 nm) excels in distinguishing chemical peculiarities in low-temperature atmospheres. In comparison, the SDSS ugriz offers broader spectral coverage (300–1100 nm) than the optical-centric Johnson-Cousins extensions (320–900 nm), making it ideal for multi-wavelength synergies in modern surveys, while niche systems like Strömgren and prioritize parameter precision over wide-field efficiency for specific stellar types.

Calibration and Transformations

Zero-Point Calibration

In photometric s, the zero-point establishes the scale by defining the level that corresponds to a of zero in a given band. For the Vega-based , which serves as the reference for many optical photometric standards, the zero-point in the V band is set such that a flux of $3.631 \times 10^{-20} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2} Hz^{-1} yields V = 0, based on the monochromatic flux density of at its effective . This definition ensures consistency across observations by tying the magnitude to the intrinsic properties of , the adopted zero-point star, whose is used to calibrate filter responses and instrumental sensitivities. Calibration of the zero-point relies on observations of carefully selected standard stars with well-determined magnitudes and fluxes. The Landolt catalog, comprising photoelectric UBVRI observations of 526 stars near the in the magnitude range 11.5 to 16.0, provides a foundational set of standards on the Johnson-Kron-Cousins system, enabling precise zero-point determinations for ground-based telescopes. This catalog was updated in 2013 with UBVRI photometry of 335 additional stars centered at +50° , extending coverage and improving homogeneity for northern observations. These standards are observed under diverse atmospheric conditions to account for and color effects, ensuring the zero-point remains robust across sites and instruments. Absolute flux values for zero-point calibration are derived through methods such as spectrophotometry, which measures the continuous spectrum of standard stars to compute integrated fluxes over bandpasses. This approach, often using electrographic or CCD spectrophotometers, ties ground-based photometry to fundamental physical units by comparing stellar spectra against model atmospheres or laboratory calibrations. More recently, satellite missions provide independent absolute calibrations; for instance, Gaia DR3 employs low-resolution spectrophotometry of over 220 million sources to refine zero-points via external validation against ground standards, achieving sub-percent accuracy in the G, G_BP, and G_RP bands through iterative flux normalization. The relationship between observed flux and magnitude is formalized by the equation m = -2.5 \log_{10} \left( \frac{F}{F_0} \right), where m is the magnitude, F is the measured density, and F_0 is the zero-point reference flux for the band. This logarithmic relation, rooted in the historical Pogson scale, allows instrumental counts to be converted to calibrated magnitudes once F_0 is established from standards, with F_0 typically expressed in the same units as F to maintain dimensional consistency.

Inter-System Transformations

Inter-system transformations enable the conversion of photometric measurements from one standard system to another, ensuring across datasets obtained with different filters or instruments. These transformations are essential for combining observations from legacy surveys in the UBV system with modern data in the Cousins extensions, particularly for broadband colors like (B-V) and (V-I). They account for differences in filter passbands, which can introduce systematic offsets or color-dependent shifts due to varying sensitivities. Empirical grids derived from observations of standard stars provide the foundation for these conversions, mapping magnitudes and colors between systems based on real stellar spectra. For instance, Bessell (1979) established transformations between the UBV and the new Cousins VRI system using photometry of equatorial standards, revealing linear relations for redder colors such as (R-I)_Cousins ≈ (r-i) + constant and (V-I)_Cousins ≈ 0.973(V-i) + constant, where the constants are determined from zero-point alignments. These grids highlight small but significant discrepancies, especially in the B band, where Johnson filters transmit more flux, leading to brighter B magnitudes by up to 0.02 mag for blue stars. Simple linear transformation equations are often sufficient for specific stellar types, such as main-sequence . A representative example is (B-V)_Cousins = (B-V)_Johnson + 0.023, which corrects for the narrower Cousins B and applies primarily to with (B-V) near 0.6. More generally, for VRI bands, transformations like V_Cousins = V_Johnson - 0.015 and I_Cousins = I_Johnson + 0.002 have been derived from standard star comparisons, though these assume low . For broader applicability, color-dependent corrections use fits to capture nonlinear effects from passband mismatches. These take the form Δm = a + b[(B-V)] + c[(B-V)]^2, where Δm is the magnitude offset between systems, and coefficients a, b, c are fitted to observational data. Landolt (1983) provides such polynomials for UBV transformations, with Δ(B-V) ≈ 0.01 + 0.014(B-V) - 0.087(B-V)^2 + 0.0486(B-V)^3, based on over 200 standard , emphasizing the need for higher-order terms for red giants where color terms exceed 0.05 mag. These fits improve accuracy to better than 0.01 mag for most spectral types. Software tools facilitate the application of these transformations to large datasets. The IRAF PHOTCAL package, for example, computes and applies inter-system conversions by fitting transformation coefficients to standard star observations, supporting and linear models for bands like UBVRI. It integrates empirical grids and allows users to derive corrections, making it a standard tool for astronomers processing multi-system photometry.

Applications and Limitations

Astronomical Measurements

Photometric systems enable the derivation of key stellar parameters, such as , through color indices like (U-B) and (B-V), which correlate with the across , blue, and visual bands. These indices, derived from multi-band observations, allow astronomers to estimate temperatures for main-sequence ranging from approximately 3000 to 30,000 by comparing observed colors to theoretical models or empirical calibrations. For variable stars like Cepheids, the further provides distance measurements, where longer pulsation periods correspond to higher luminosities in specific bands, enabling precise extragalactic distance ladders with uncertainties as low as 1-2%. This relation has been refined through photometry of Cepheids in galaxies like M33, confirming its reliability for cosmological applications. In , photometric systems facilitate estimation for via (SED) fitting, where multi-band fluxes are matched to template libraries of spectra to various distances. This template-based approach, applied to surveys with broad wavelength coverage, achieves photometric accuracies of σ_z ≈ 0.05 (1+z) for bright , allowing statistical mapping of large-scale structure without spectroscopic follow-up. For instance, fitting observed photometry in ugriz bands to evolutionary models helps resolve degeneracies in type and , particularly for high-z objects where emission lines influence the SED shape. Photometric monitoring produces light curves that reveal variability patterns in specific bands, essential for characterizing eclipsing binaries and supernovae. In eclipsing binaries, time-series photometry in or bands captures orbital eclipses, yielding inclinations near 90° and enabling mass and radius determinations with precisions better than 5% when combined with radial velocities. For supernovae, multi-band light curves track peak brightness and decline rates, distinguishing Type Ia from core-collapse events based on color evolution and duration, which supports their use as standard candles for distance measurements. Large-scale surveys exemplify these applications, with the Pan-STARRS1 survey (2009-2014) utilizing grizy filters to detect transients across 3π steradians of the sky. This system identified millions of variable sources, including thousands of supernovae, by differencing nightly images to isolate changes brighter than 22nd , contributing to and follow-up campaigns for counterparts.

Challenges and Advances

One major challenge in photometric systems is the effect of interstellar reddening, which causes wavelength-dependent and of light by , altering observed colors and magnitudes. This requires based on the color excess E(B-V), a standard measure of reddening, to derive intrinsic stellar properties; for instance, in the Johnson UBV system, the extinction A_V is often estimated as approximately 3.1 × E(B-V). Accurate E(B-V) maps, such as those from Schlegel et al. (1998), are essential but can introduce uncertainties in regions with variable distributions. Another limitation arises from non-linear detector responses, particularly in near-infrared (NIR) devices like HgCdTe arrays, where classical non-linearity stems from voltage-dependent diode capacitance and readout electronics, leading to flux underestimation at high signal levels. The "brighter-fatter" effect further complicates measurements by causing charge to spread laterally in the detector, affecting point spread function (PSF) shapes and precision in bright sources. These issues demand careful characterization and correction algorithms to maintain photometric accuracy across dynamic ranges. Advances in synthetic photometry address these challenges by generating filter convolved fluxes from theoretical spectra, enabling calibration without direct observations; for example, Kurucz atmosphere models have been used to compute synthetic magnitudes for B stars, achieving agreement within 0.02 mag with empirical data in the system. Space-based systems like the Space Telescope's (JWST) NIRCam, operational since 2022, provide 29 filters from 0.6 to 5.0 μm with improved stability over ground-based setups, minimizing atmospheric interference and enabling precise photometry for distant galaxies. In crowded fields, such as galactic clusters, traditional aperture photometry suffers from source blending, whereas PSF fitting techniques model individual stellar profiles to deconvolve overlaps, yielding superior precision for faint objects—up to 0.01 mag better than apertures in dense regions. Looking ahead, the mission (launched 2013, ongoing) utilizes its blue (BP) and (RP) photometric bands to deliver low-resolution spectra for nearly 2 billion stars, facilitating a comprehensive catalog with mean G-band magnitudes and colors for unprecedented 3D mapping of the .

References

  1. [1]
    Photometric Systems - Starlink
    A photometric system comprises a set of discrete wave-bands, each with a known sensitivity to incident radiation.
  2. [2]
    Glossary term: Photometry - IAU Office of Astronomy for Education
    Photometry allows different physical characteristics of astronomical objects to be measured, for example, temperature, color, and change in brightness.<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    What is photometry and how are optical filters involved? - Envin
    Jan 31, 2022 · A photometric system defines a set of optical bandpass filters for use in observations, which can be calibrated against a number of primary ...
  4. [4]
    Introduction to Photometry - Las Cumbres Observatory
    Photometry is a technique that measures the brightness of a star in an image. Each pixel on a CCD will have had a certain number of photons fall on it during an ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Photometric Systems
    Apr 8, 2008 · When we refer to a photometric system what we mean is a set of system responses (bands) and a definition of the zero point for each band. As ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] An Introduction to Astronomical Photometry Using CCDs
    For apparent magnitudes (which as related to the flux of a star), we essentially define the zero point of the system by saying that a set of stars has a given ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Revised Harvard Photometry: a catalogue of the positions ...
    ... in the line of sight. The variable star, $ Persei, was the first object of this class to be discovered, The classes, periods, and ranges in the motion are ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Illinois—Where Astronomical Photometry Grew Up - aavso
    Joel Stebbins joined the University of Illinois faculty as an astronomy instructor and Director of the University of Illinois Observatory. In 1905 he and F. C. ...
  9. [9]
    Karl Schwarzschild's investigations of out-of-focus photometry
    Nov 26, 2000 · This paper concentrates on Schwarzschild's early work in this field and gives an overview of his important Viennese years. Bibliographical ...Missing: 1907 | Show results with:1907<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Photographic photometry | astronomy - Britannica
    Schwarzschild introduced precise methods in photographic photometry. The results of his studies clearly demonstrated the relationship between the spectral type ...Missing: 1907 | Show results with:1907
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Joel Stebbins - Biographical Memoirs
    Upon his return to Urbana, Stebbins' major effort went into the assembly of a photometer incorporating a photoelectric cell ... Selenium photometry of stars.
  12. [12]
    Joel Stebbins: Pioneer of Astronomical Photoelectric Photometry
    C~ Brown, was working on selenium cells. Once Stebbins saw a demonstration of Brown's selenium cell, it wasn't long before he enticed Brown to put it on the ...Missing: 1920s- | Show results with:1920s-
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    The VRI Cousins photometric system - GCPD
    The VRI Cousins photometric system. Basic Reference. Cousins A.W.J. 1976, Mem. R. Astr. Soc. 81, 25. Abstract. Mean values of V-R(KC) and V-I(KC), measured with ...Missing: Robert paper
  18. [18]
    [PDF] AST 443/ PHY 517
    The name of the filter often gives the 50% transmission wavelength in nm. E.g, the. GG495 filter transmits 50% of the incident light at 495 nm, and has higher.
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Absorption vs Interference Filters: Key Differences - AZoOptics
    Jul 3, 2024 · An absorption filter blocks or absorbs unwanted wavelengths while simultaneously selectively transmitting light of a desired color range or wavelengths.
  21. [21]
    Absorption vs. Interference Optical Filters: Materials and Functionality
    Jul 8, 2024 · Optical filters work by either reflecting or absorbing undesirable light, they are classified into absorption and interference filters.
  22. [22]
    UBVRI passbands - Astrophysics Data System
    BESSELL devise a variety ofpassbands and then compute synthetic magnitudes by convolving the passbands and the spectra, and compare these synthetic and standard ...Missing: FWHM | Show results with:FWHM
  23. [23]
    A light history of photometry: from Hipparchus to the Hubble Space ...
    9 Early visual magnitude estimates cannot properly be classed as an attempt at visual photometry, but rather they were principally made as an aid to stellar ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES - Hamamatsu Photonics
    Light detection technolgy is a powerful tool that provides deeper understanding of more sophisticated phe- nomena. Measurement using light offers unique ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Signal-to-Noise in Optical Astronomy 1 CCDs - Lick Observatory
    By the end of the 1980s, CCDs had won the battle of the various electronic devices and had replaced photographic plates for all applications except for very ...
  26. [26]
    Progress in CCD photometry - Astrophysics Data System
    ... astronomy in the early 1980s: CCDs. With these remarkable little Charge Coupled Devices, astronomers are now routinely carrying out research projects which ...
  27. [27]
    NIRISS Pupil and Filter Wheels - JWST User Documentation
    Jul 11, 2017 · The pupil wheel and filter wheel house the filters, low- and high-resolution grisms, and aperture mask that enable the 4 observing modes of JWST NIRISS.
  28. [28]
    Filter Wheel - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Filter wheels are used on microscopes, cameras, and video systems to position a selected filter in the imaging path quickly and accurately.
  29. [29]
    Fundamental stellar photometry for standards of spectral type on the ...
    THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPECTROSCOPY AND ASTRONOMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME 117 MAY 1953 ... 313 314 H. L. JOHNSON AND W. W. MORGAN 4. Color ...Missing: ApJ PDF
  30. [30]
    [PDF] STANDARD PHOTOMETRIC SYSTEMS - Physics & Astronomy
    The Hipparcos-Tycho HpBT VT System. The European Space Agency's (ESA) Hipparcos mission provided parallaxes of unprecedented precision and accuracy for ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    AN EMPIRICAL UBV RI JHK COLOR–TEMPERATURE ...
    A collection of Johnson/Cousins photometry for stars with known [Fe/H] is used to generate color–color relations that include the abundance dependence.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    VRI standards in the E regions - Astrophysics Data System
    (1976) 8i, 25—36. VRI STANDARDS IN THE E REGIONS A. W. J. Cousins South African Astronomical Observatory, P0 Box 9, Observatory, Cape Province 7935, South ...Missing: Robert | Show results with:Robert
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Standardization in the Classical UBV RI Photometric System
    A series of papers (recounted in Hearnshaw 1996, chapter 9.3) lead to the imple- mentation of the UBV photometric system as described by Johnson & Morgan. (1953) ...
  35. [35]
    Photographic and CCD R and I bands and the Kron-Cousins RI
    ... passbands on photometric systems. 2. 4-mm RG715 + IV-N is a good match to KronCousins I for all stars. 'CCD defined by an interference filter is an ...
  36. [36]
    Flux Calibration - SDSS
    The objective of the photometric calibration process is to tie the SDSS imaging data to an AB magnitude system, and specifically to the “natural system” of the ...
  37. [37]
    PHOTOMETRIC RESPONSE FUNCTIONS OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL ...
    The system is outlined and the results of the measurements, mostly during the first six years of the SDSS, are described. We present the reference response ...
  38. [38]
    Empirical color transformations between SDSS photometry and ...
    Here we present empirical color transformations between the SDSS ugriz photometric system using point-source photom- etry obtained with the SDSS 2.5-m telescope ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Magnitude Systems (or “what's the zeropoint?”) m! = −2.5 log f + C!
    For Vega, the monochromatic flux density at 5492Ε is fλ = 3.63 x 10−9 erg/s/cm2/Ε which can also be written in terms of frequency: fν = (λ2/c)fλ = 3.65 x 10−20 ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    Absolute flux calibration of optical spectrophotometric standard stars
    1. INTRODUCTION The calibration of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) instrumentation in the optical wavelength region of 3200-9200 A ~s based largely on the ...
  43. [43]
    [1406.1707] Techniques and Review of Absolute Flux Calibration ...
    Jun 6, 2014 · The basic equations for quantitative spectrophotometry and photometry are explained in detail. Several historical lab based flux calibrations ...
  44. [44]
    Gaia DR3 passbands - ESA Cosmos - European Space Agency
    Oct 29, 2020 · The result of the photometric external calibration is the definition of a set of passbands (one per band or instrument G, G_BP and G_RP) that ...
  45. [45]
    Light, magnitudes, and the signal equation - NMSU Astronomy
    m = - 2.5 log $\displaystyle {F\over F_0}$. or. m = - 2.5 log F + 2.5 log F0. where the coefficient of proportionality, F0, depends on the definition of ...
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    photcal: Photometric Calibration Package — IRAF 2.18 documentation
    photcal: Photometric Calibration Package · mkapfile: Prepare aperture corrections file from apphot/daophot output · mkcatalog: Type in a standard star catalog or ...
  48. [48]
    [astro-ph/0503086] The uBVI Photometric System. I. Motivation ...
    Mar 3, 2005 · Model stellar atmospheres are used to calibrate color-color diagrams for the uBVI system in terms of the fundamental stellar parameters of ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] MULTI-COLOR PHOTOMETRY OF SUPERGIANTS AND CEPHEIDS
    in the UBV system the color (B-V) is the one chosen, as all observa tional data indicate this to be better than (U-B) as an index of temperature. A second ...
  50. [50]
    [2304.00037] A 1.3% distance to M33 from HST Cepheid photometry
    Mar 31, 2023 · We present a low-dispersion period-luminosity relation (PL) based on 154 Cepheids in Messier 33 (M33) with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry from the ...
  51. [51]
    [2205.06280] An Improved Calibration of the Wavelength ... - arXiv
    May 12, 2022 · The Cepheid period-luminosity (PL) relation (or Leavitt law) has served as the first rung of the most widely used extragalactic distance ladder ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    BayeSED-GALAXIES I. Performance test for simultaneous ... - arXiv
    Sep 25, 2023 · The forthcoming CSST wide-field multiband imaging survey will produce seven-band photometric spectral energy distributions (SEDs) for billions ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    [1807.02116] ASAS-SN Identification of a Detached Eclipsing Binary ...
    Jul 5, 2018 · We report the identification of a new, long period detached eclipsing binary by the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN). Combining ...
  54. [54]
    Determining the Physical Properties of the B Stars II. Calibration of ...
    Dec 20, 2004 · These models are then used to calibrate the synthetic photometry. We compare our results with previous, well accepted results and provide a ...
  55. [55]
    NIRCam Filters - JWST User Documentation
    Nov 29, 2017 · JWST NIRCam offers 29 bandpass filters in the short wavelength (0.6–2.3 μm) and long wavelength (2.4–5.0 μm) channels.
  56. [56]
    Gaia Data Release 3 (Gaia DR3) - ESA Cosmos
    A tentative correction formula for the parallax zero point is provided. Photometry (G, GBP, and GRP published as part of Gaia EDR3, OTHER DATA ARE NEW IN GAIA ...Gaia DR3 software tools · Gaia DR3 events · Gaia DR3 stories · Gaia DR3 previews