Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Polarizer

A polarizer is an that transmits waves with oscillations aligned in a specific direction while absorbing, reflecting, or deflecting those that are not, thereby producing linearly polarized from unpolarized or partially polarized sources. This restriction of the 's to a single plane—perpendicular to the direction of propagation—distinguishes polarized from natural unpolarized , where oscillations occur randomly in all planes. Polarizers are essential components in , exploiting phenomena such as dichroism, , or to achieve this selective transmission. Polarizers can be broadly classified into several types based on their operating principles and materials. Absorptive or dichroic polarizers, often made from films like (PVA) dyed with iodine, preferentially absorb light polarized perpendicular to their transmission axis, commonly used in low-cost applications due to their simplicity and performance. Reflective polarizers, such as wire-grid or multilayer designs, reflect unwanted components instead of absorbing them, offering higher efficiency and damage resistance for high-power systems. Birefringent polarizers, including calcite-based Glan-Taylor or Nicol prisms, utilize the double in anisotropic crystals to separate states spatially, providing high ratios for precise scientific instrumentation. Each type balances factors like wavelength range, angular acceptance, and transmission efficiency, with ideal polarizers achieving near-perfect linear but real devices limited by factors such as ratio and . The applications of polarizers span numerous fields, enhancing optical performance by controlling light's polarization state. In consumer products, they are integral to liquid crystal displays (LCDs), where crossed polarizers modulate light transmission through electrically controlled birefringence to produce images. Polarizing sunglasses reduce glare from reflective surfaces like water or roads by blocking horizontally polarized light, improving visual comfort and contrast. In scientific contexts, polarizers enable polarized light microscopy for analyzing birefringent materials in biology and materials science, and they are crucial in laser systems for beam quality control and isolation. Additionally, in photography and imaging, polarizers suppress unwanted reflections and enhance color saturation, while in spectroscopy, they facilitate the study of molecular orientations and thin films. These versatile devices underscore polarization's role in modern optics, from everyday technology to advanced research.

Basic Concepts

Definition and Principles of Polarization

A polarizer is an optical filter that transmits light waves having electric field oscillations aligned with a specific polarization direction while attenuating those with orthogonal or differing orientations. Light exhibits the properties of a transverse electromagnetic wave, in which mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields oscillate in a plane normal to the direction of propagation. The polarization of such a wave is defined by the orientation of the electric field vector within this transverse plane; for instance, in linearly polarized light, the vector oscillates along a fixed line, while in circularly polarized light, it rotates at a constant rate. Unpolarized light, typical of sources like incandescent bulbs or sunlight, features electric field vectors that fluctuate randomly in all directions within the transverse plane, representing an incoherent superposition of all possible polarizations. In contrast, polarized light maintains a coherent, restricted orientation or rotational pattern for the electric field. Vector diagrams commonly depict this by portraying the electric field as time-varying arrows confined to a single line for linear cases or tracing a helix along the propagation axis for circular cases, emphasizing the wave's transverse nature. The principles of light polarization emerged in the early through observations by key physicists. In 1811, Dominique François Jean Arago demonstrated that certain crystals, such as , alter the polarization state of transmitted light. , building on this in 1815–1816, conducted interference experiments with Arago that confirmed light's character and explained polarization effects through vectorial superposition. Concurrently, established in 1815 that light reflected from a surface at a particular angle becomes fully polarized parallel to the surface, a relation now known as Brewster's law. In , light comprises , massless spin-1 particles that propagate at the and possess two intrinsic states: positive for right-circular and negative for left-circular, reflecting the projection of their spin angular momentum along the direction of travel. These states provide a fundamental basis for the classical descriptions of , where superpositions of photon states yield linear or elliptical forms.

Types of Light Polarization

Light polarization refers to the orientation of the oscillations of the in an electromagnetic wave propagating through space. The primary types of polarization are linear, circular, and elliptical, with serving as a where the oscillates randomly in all directions without a preferred orientation. occurs when the oscillates along a fixed plane, such as horizontal or vertical relative to the direction of propagation. arises when two orthogonal linear components of equal amplitude are -shifted by 90 degrees, causing the to trace a circular path. is the general case, where the orthogonal components have unequal amplitudes or a phase difference other than 90 degrees, resulting in an elliptical trace. These polarization states can be mathematically represented using Jones vectors, a introduced for describing fully polarized light in coherent systems. For linear polarization, horizontal polarization is denoted by the Jones vector \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} and vertical by \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}, assuming normalized amplitudes and no phase difference. Right-handed circular polarization is represented as \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -i \end{pmatrix}, and left-handed as \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ i \end{pmatrix}, where i indicates a 90-degree shift. Elliptical states are linear combinations of these basis vectors with arbitrary amplitudes and s. The handedness of is physically interpreted through the rotation direction of the vector as viewed facing the source: right-handed rotates clockwise, corresponding to a positive or helical with a right-handed screw sense advancing along propagation. This arises from a \pi/2 difference between orthogonal components, where the vector's tip follows a in space-time. Left-handed exhibits the opposite rotation and . Natural light, such as , is unpolarized because its directions are randomly distributed over all possible orientations due to emissions from numerous incoherent sources. Partially polarized light occurs when there is a statistical preference for certain orientations, as seen in light scattered by the atmosphere or reflected from surfaces, blending unpolarized and polarized components. In contrast, light is often fully polarized, either linearly or circularly, owing to the coherent nature of that aligns oscillations. Polarizers operate effectively on both coherent and incoherent light sources, as polarization selection depends on the field's transverse orientation rather than temporal , though coherent sources like lasers enable precise state manipulation without depolarization effects from incoherence. Incoherent sources, such as or LEDs, produce that polarizers can still filter to yield a polarized output, albeit with reduced efficiency due to random initial states.

Linear Polarizers

Absorptive Polarizers

Absorptive polarizers operate through dichroic materials that exhibit differential absorption of based on the polarization direction, arising from the anisotropic alignment of molecules within the material. In these devices, with an component parallel to the aligned molecular chains is strongly absorbed, while the component is transmitted with minimal loss. This selective absorption stems from the molecular structure, where extended conjugated systems, such as polyene chains, facilitate transitions that couple more effectively to polarized along the chain axis. A seminal example of an absorptive polarizer is the Polaroid H-sheet, developed by in the late as an improvement over his initial 1929 patent for crystal-based polarizers. This sheet utilizes (PVA) doped with iodine, where the iodine forms polyiodide complexes that act as the dichroic agent, enhancing absorption for one state. The material's marked a practical advancement in producing thin, flexible polarizers suitable for widespread applications, building on Land's earlier work with suspensions of polarizing herapathite crystals. The fabrication process for such polarizers begins with a PVA film, which is swollen in to increase chain mobility, then uniaxially stretched at elevated temperatures—typically 50–80°C—to several times its original length, aligning the polymer chains parallel to the stretch direction. This alignment creates the necessary for dichroism; subsequently, the stretched film is immersed in an iodine-potassium iodide solution to incorporate the dichroic iodine complexes, which preferentially bind along the aligned chains. The film is then dried and stabilized, resulting in a material with strong anisotropic , where the transmission axis is perpendicular to the stretch direction. This stretching-induced molecular is crucial, as it orients the transition dipoles responsible for the polarization-dependent . In terms of performance, absorptive polarizers like iodine-doped PVA sheets achieve high extinction ratios in the , often reaching 10^4:1 to 10^5:1, meaning the transmitted intensity for the blocked is 10^{-4} to 10^{-5} times that of the pass . However, their efficiency is wavelength-dependent, with optimal operation around 400–700 nm due to the peak of the iodine complexes, and transmission dropping outside this range. These devices typically transmit 30–50% of the incident in the pass direction for unpolarized input, reflecting their absorptive nature. Despite their effectiveness, absorptive polarizers have notable limitations, primarily the conversion of absorbed into , which can lead to , warping, or degradation of the matrix under prolonged exposure. This results in a low optical damage threshold, typically around 1 W/cm² for polymer-based sheets, restricting their use in high-intensity applications like lasers. Additionally, exposure to , UV , or elevated temperatures can cause fading of the dichroic or misalignment of chains, reducing polarization efficiency over time.

Reflective Polarizers

Reflective polarizers operate by exploiting the differential reflection of light based on its polarization state at dielectric interfaces, primarily through the , which describe how s- and p-polarized components of light reflect and transmit differently depending on the angle of incidence. At , defined as \theta_B = \arctan(n_2 / n_1), where n_1 and n_2 are the refractive indices of the incident and transmitting media, respectively, the reflectance for p-polarized light (parallel to the ) drops to zero, resulting in complete transmission of that component while the reflected beam becomes fully s-polarized (perpendicular to the ). For a typical glass-air interface with n_1 = 1 (air) and n_2 = 1.5 (glass), \theta_B \approx 56^\circ, making this configuration effective for generating linearly polarized light from unpolarized sources via a single reflection. The reflectance for s-polarized light, which governs the polarization separation in reflective polarizers, is given by the Fresnel equation: R_s = \left( \frac{n_1 \cos \theta_i - n_2 \cos \theta_t}{n_1 \cos \theta_i + n_2 \cos \theta_t} \right)^2 where \theta_i is the angle of incidence, \theta_t is the angle of transmission (determined by : n_1 \sin \theta_i = n_2 \sin \theta_t), and R_s represents the intensity reflectance. This equation highlights how R_s increases with angle, peaking near grazing incidence, while p-polarized reflectance remains low until beyond , enabling efficient polarization splitting without material absorption. Thin-film reflective polarizers extend this using multilayer stacks, typically consisting of alternating layers of high- and low-refractive-index materials (e.g., SiO₂ and TiO₂), deposited on a to create effects that enhance -dependent and across broader wavelength ranges and angles. These stacks are designed such that one polarization state experiences constructive for (high reflectivity, often >99%), while the orthogonal state sees destructive (high transmission, >90%), functioning as polarizers or beam splitters. For instance, a stack with 20–50 periods can achieve extinction ratios exceeding 1000:1 in the , far surpassing single-interface Fresnel polarizers. In applications, reflective polarizers serve as polarizing beam splitters in interferometers, where they divide an input into orthogonally polarized components for path separation and recombination, as seen in Michelson and Mach-Zehnder setups for precision measurements in and detection. These devices leverage the non-absorptive nature of reflection to maintain beam integrity, avoiding distortions that plague absorptive alternatives. A key advantage of reflective polarizers is their lack of losses, as energy is conserved between reflected and transmitted beams, leading to higher overall and minimal generation compared to absorptive types. Additionally, their construction provides high laser damage thresholds, often exceeding 10 J/cm² for nanosecond pulses in the visible and near-infrared, making them suitable for high-power systems in research and industrial processing.

Birefringent Polarizers

Birefringent polarizers operate on the principle of double refraction, or , exhibited by certain anisotropic crystals where the varies with the direction of light. In uniaxial crystals, an incident beam splits into two orthogonal components: the ordinary ray (o-ray), which follows with a constant refractive index n_o, and the extraordinary ray (e-ray), which experiences a refractive index n_e that depends on the angle relative to the optic axis. This difference, \Delta n = |n_e - n_o|, causes spatial separation of the rays, enabling polarization selection. Key devices include the , constructed from two prisms cemented with , a medium with between n_o and n_e of , allowing the o-ray to undergo while the e-ray transmits as the polarized output. The Glan-Taylor prism improves on this by using air-spaced prisms, where the o-ray is deflected via at the air interface, achieving higher damage thresholds and broader acceptance angles without cement degradation. These prisms separate orthogonal polarizations spatially, with the transmitted beam being linearly polarized. Waveplates, thin birefringent crystal sections, integrate with these polarizers for polarization manipulation; a half-wave plate rotates linear polarization by twice the angle between the incident polarization and its fast axis, while a quarter-wave plate converts linear to circular polarization when oriented at 45 degrees. The retardance \delta, or phase difference introduced, is given by \delta = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \Delta n \, d where \lambda is the wavelength and d is the plate thickness, allowing precise control in polarization conversion setups. Common materials include calcite (\mathrm{CaCO_3}), with strong birefringence (\Delta n \approx 0.17) suitable for visible wavelengths, and quartz (\mathrm{SiO_2}), offering milder birefringence (\Delta n \approx 0.009) but higher mechanical stability. Dispersion in \Delta n affects performance across wavelengths; calcite operates from UV (~200 nm) to mid-IR (~5 μm), while quartz extends to near-IR (~3.5 μm), with birefringence decreasing at longer wavelengths due to reduced electronic contributions. High-quality birefringent polarizers achieve extinction ratios exceeding $10^6:1, essential for precision optics such as polarimeters used to measure material birefringence or optical rotation.

Wire-Grid and Thin-Film Polarizers

Wire-grid polarizers consist of arrays of parallel metallic wires with sub-wavelength spacing a < \lambda, where \lambda is the wavelength of incident light; these structures transmit electromagnetic waves polarized parallel to the plane of incidence (electric field perpendicular to the wires) while reflecting those polarized perpendicular to the plane (electric field parallel to the wires). This behavior arises from the boundary conditions imposed by the conducting wires, which effectively short-circuit the electric field component parallel to them, preventing transmission, whereas the perpendicular component passes through the gaps with minimal interaction when a \ll \lambda. The foundational theory for this polarization selection was developed by in 1888, describing the diffraction and reflection of waves incident on periodic wire arrays or equivalent slit gratings in conducting sheets. Under the low-frequency approximation (a \ll \lambda) and assuming perfect conductivity and normal incidence, the transmission for the parallel polarization approaches unity, T_\parallel \approx 1, while for the perpendicular polarization, it is significantly attenuated as T_\perp \approx \left( \frac{\pi a}{\lambda} \right)^2, reflecting the small fraction of power that evades reflection due to induced currents in the wires. Modern implementations employ grids fabricated on substrates such as silicon or flexible polymers, enabling compact devices for and terahertz (THz) applications; for instance, aluminum nanowire grids on silicon achieve high contrast ratios (>1000:1) in the mid-wave (3-5 μm) for thermal imaging. In the THz regime, dense nanowire arrays with 200 nm periodicity on substrates demonstrate over 95% for the parallel polarization and extinction ratios exceeding 40 dB across 0.2-1.5 THz, leveraging for scalability. These nanowire variants are particularly suited for integration in micro-opto-electro-mechanical systems (MOEMS), where they serve as tunable polarizers in MEMS-based spectrometers or , benefiting from their thin profile (typically <1 μm) and compatibility with semiconductor processing. Thin-film polarizers, in contrast, utilize layers of liquid crystal or polymer materials with aligned molecular domains to achieve anisotropic absorption or phase retardation for polarization selection, often incorporating dichroic absorbers to enhance contrast. Alignment is typically induced via photo-polymerization or rubbing techniques, orienting nematic liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs) into uniform domains that transmit one linear polarization while attenuating the orthogonal one, with thicknesses on the order of 1-5 μm for visible to near-IR operation. Multilayer photo-aligned LCP structures, for example, combine polarizing and waveplate functionalities in a single thin film, enabling broadband performance from 400-700 nm with extinction ratios up to 1000:1 when doped with absorbers. Both wire-grid and thin-film polarizers offer advantages such as broadband operation spanning visible to THz wavelengths and seamless integration into semiconductor devices or displays, where their sub-millimeter profiles facilitate on-chip fabrication via lithography or deposition. Wire-grid designs, in particular, exhibit high thermal stability (>200°C) and large acceptance angles (>30°), making them ideal for high-power systems. However, their fabrication involves complex nanoscale patterning—such as for nanowires or precise photo-alignment for LCPs—leading to higher costs and yield challenges compared to bulk alternatives like birefringent crystals, which are better suited for visible light but less integrable.

Properties of Polarizers

Malus's Law

Malus's law describes the intensity of polarized light transmitted through a polarizer, stating that the transmitted intensity I is given by I = I_0 \cos^2 \theta, where I_0 is the incident intensity and \theta is the angle between the polarization direction of the incident light and the transmission axis of the polarizer. This law was derived by French physicist Étienne-Louis Malus in 1808 during an observation of sunlight reflected from the windows of the in , viewed through a calcite crystal (). Malus noticed that the brightness of the reflected light varied with the orientation of the crystal, leading him to quantify the relationship as proportional to the square of the cosine of the angle between the incident and transmission directions; he published his findings in 1809, coining the term "." The law can be understood through the of the in electromagnetic waves. For linearly polarized with E_0 along a certain direction, only the component to the polarizer's transmission passes through, given by E_\parallel = E_0 \cos \theta. Since the of is proportional to the square of the , I \propto E^2, the transmitted follows I = I_0 \cos^2 \theta. In practical applications, Malus's law explains key behaviors of polarizers: when two polarizers are crossed (\theta = 90^\circ), \cos^2 90^\circ = 0, so no is transmitted, resulting in complete . At \theta = 45^\circ, \cos^2 45^\circ = 0.5, transmitting half the incident intensity. For unpolarized incident , which has no preferred direction, the first polarizer transmits half the intensity (I_0 / 2) by selecting one polarization component on average. A subsequent polarizer then applies Malus's law to this partially polarized output, yielding I = (I_0 / 2) \cos^2 \theta.

Performance Characteristics

The performance of polarizers is quantified by several key metrics that assess their ability to selectively transmit or reject specific polarization states, with variations depending on the design and material. The extinction ratio () measures the effectiveness of a polarizer in suppressing the undesired polarization component relative to the desired one. It is defined as ER = 10 \log_{10} (I_\parallel / I_\perp), where I_\parallel is the intensity of the parallel (transmitted) polarization and I_\perp is the intensity of the perpendicular (rejected) polarization. Ideal polarizers achieve ER values exceeding 40 , corresponding to ratios greater than 10,000:1, though practical values range from 100:1 for economical sheet polarizers to over 10^6:1 for high-quality birefringent designs. Closely related is the degree of polarization (DoP), which evaluates the overall polarization purity of the output light, particularly for partially polarized inputs. The DoP is given by \DoP = \frac{I_{\max} - I_{\min}}{I_{\max} + I_{\min}}, where I_{\max} and I_{\min} represent the maximum and minimum intensities observed when rotating an analyzer after the polarizer. For ideal linear polarizers, DoP approaches 1 (fully polarized), but real devices may yield values between 0.99 and 0.999, depending on material imperfections and alignment. This metric is derived from and is essential for applications requiring high contrast. Wavelength dependence, or , significantly impacts polarizer performance across ranges. Absorptive polarizers, often based on dichroic polymers, exhibit strong due to wavelength-sensitive coefficients, limiting effective operation to narrow bands such as 400-700 with transmission dropping sharply outside this range. In contrast, birefringent polarizers using like can be engineered as achromatic designs, maintaining consistent phase differences and extinction over broader spectra, from 130 to 4 \mu m, by compensating for material through multi-element configurations. Temperature stability and power handling are critical for operational reliability, with notable differences between polymer-based and crystal-based polarizers. Polymer absorptive polarizers have limited temperature stability, with typical operating ranges up to 40°C, beyond which performance may degrade; they typically handle about 1 W/cm² power before damage. Crystal birefringent polarizers, such as Glan-Thompson types, offer better thermal stability than polymers due to their rigid structures, with power handling typically up to several J/cm² for pulsed operation (e.g., 2-7.5 J/cm² depending on model, , and pulse conditions). Testing polarizer performance involves precise measurement setups to evaluate these metrics under controlled conditions. Alignment sensitivity is assessed using a collimated source (e.g., HeNe at 632.8 nm) to provide linearly polarized input, followed by the device under test (DUT), a high-extinction reference analyzer polarizer, and a to record transmitted intensities at various rotation angles. Maxima and minima are fitted to derive and , with errors minimized through automated rotation stages and lock-in amplification for signals below 10^{-6} of the input. This method ensures traceability to standards like ISO 12005 for polarization.

Circular Polarizers

Generating Circular Polarization

Circularly polarized light can be generated by passing linearly polarized light through a quarter-wave plate (QWP) whose fast or slow axis is oriented at 45° to the polarization direction of the incident light. This configuration ensures that the input has equal projections onto the fast and slow axes of the QWP, allowing the device to impart the necessary phase difference. The linear polarizer preceding the QWP can be used to create the initial from sources, such as natural sunlight or incandescent lamps. The QWP introduces a phase shift of π/2 (90°) between the orthogonal components of the along its fast and slow axes, converting the into . This transformation is rigorously described using Jones matrix calculus, where the QWP's Jones matrix, when aligned appropriately, multiplies the input Jones vector to yield the circular state. For horizontally linearly polarized input (Jones vector \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}) passing through a QWP with its fast axis at 45° to the horizontal, the output is right-circularly polarized with Jones vector \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ i \end{pmatrix}, assuming the convention where positive i corresponds to right-handed rotation. Quarter-wave plates are available in zero-order and achromatic designs to suit different applications. Zero-order QWPs, typically constructed from a single thin birefringent plate (such as or ) with retardance exactly λ/4 at the design , are compact and cost-effective but exhibit strong dependence, limiting their use to sources like lasers. Achromatic QWPs, often multi-layer assemblies of birefringent materials with opposing (e.g., and ), provide nearly constant π/2 retardance over a broad range (e.g., 400–700 nm), making them suitable for white-light or polychromatic applications. While the linear polarizer plus QWP combination is the most common method for generating , it can also arise inherently in chiral media, where molecular leads to differential interactions with left- and right-handed circularly polarized , enabling selective or of circular states from unpolarized inputs in systems like chiral nanostructures or biomolecules.

Chiral and Quarter-Wave Polarizers

Chiral polarizers exploit helical structures to selectively interact with circularly polarized light based on its , distinguishing them from linear polarizers that operate on orientation axes. In cholesteric liquid crystals (ChLCs), molecules self-assemble into a periodic helical , where the p determines the central of via \lambda = n_{\text{avg}} p, with n_{\text{avg}} as the average refractive index. This helical arrangement functions as a one-dimensional , enabling Bragg of circularly polarized light matching the helix's —right-handed ChLCs reflect right-circularly polarized light, while transmitting left-circularly polarized light, and vice versa—due to the phase-matching condition in the periodic dielectric modulation. The arises from the of multiple scattered within the helix, limited to approximately 50% of incident owing to the selective nature of . The bandwidth of this selective reflection, \Delta \lambda, is given by \Delta \lambda = \Delta n \, p, where \Delta n = n_e - n_o is the birefringence between extraordinary and ordinary refractive indices, typically yielding narrow bands under 200 nm for uniform-pitch ChLCs. To broaden this for practical use, techniques such as pitch gradients or polymer stabilization introduce variations in p, expanding \Delta \lambda while preserving helicity selectivity. Examples include ChLC films doped with chiral agents for tunable reflection in sensors or displays, where the transmitted light remains circularly polarized with opposite handedness. Quarter-wave polarizers, often implemented as retarders, introduce a \pi/2 shift between orthogonal linear polarizations to handle , but in integrated forms like thin films, they enable direct absorption or filtering of specific circular handedness when combined with absorptive elements. These standalone retarders, typically made from birefringent such as or stretched films, convert linear to at the design where the difference is \lambda/4. -based quarter-wave sheets, such as those in homogeneous , absorb one circular component by laminating with a linear polarizer, effectively blocking of matching for applications like stereoscopic viewing. In organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), quarter-wave polarizers integrated with chiral emitters facilitate circularly polarized luminescence (CPL), where the retarder enhances dissymmetry factors by filtering output to one handedness, achieving up to 24% in supramolecular assemblies. Homogeneous sheets incorporating quarter-wave retarders are used in 3D , providing uniform for each eye to separate left- and right-handed images without head-tilt sensitivity. Unlike linear polarizers, both chiral and quarter-wave types select based on light's —clockwise or counterclockwise rotation—enabling manipulation of circular states intrinsic to many natural and engineered systems.

Applications in Imaging and Displays

Circular polarizers, which combine a linear polarizer with a quarter-wave plate, serve a glare-reduction purpose in photography and are preferred in modern digital cameras because their output circularly polarized light minimizes interference with through-the-lens (TTL) exposure metering and autofocus systems that rely on linear polarization-sensitive beam splitters. In stereoscopic 3D imaging systems, circular polarizers enable passive viewing glasses to separate left- and right-eye images by encoding them with opposite-handed circular polarizations on the display, such as in alternating-frame LCD projectors where a quarter-wave retarder converts linear polarizations to circular ones. This approach provides viewer head movement tolerance without crosstalk, as the circular polarization maintains separation regardless of viewing angle, unlike linear systems. In organic light-emitting diode () panels, circular polarizers suppress ambient reflections from metallic electrodes, boosting contrast ratios beyond 100,000:1. As of 2025, emerging intrinsically circularly polarized OLED emitters reduce the need for external polarizers, potentially avoiding absorption losses and improving efficiency.

Historical Development

Early Discoveries

The discovery of light polarization began in 1808 when French physicist Étienne-Louis Malus observed that reflected from water at a particular angle exhibited properties, using a crystal to detect the effect. This serendipitous observation, made while viewing the River through a crystal during a , marked the first recognition of by and shifted attention from earlier corpuscular theories of toward vibrational models. Between 1811 and 1815, French scientists , , and conducted key experiments on , demonstrating and dichroism in crystals such as and . first noted the rotation of polarized light passing through in 1811, while identified 's strong dichroism—its selective absorption of polarized light components—in 1815, and contributed theoretical insights linking these phenomena to . These findings expanded understanding of how anisotropic materials alter light's state, building on Malus's work. In 1815, Scottish physicist formulated Brewster's law, which describes the polarizing angle of incidence for maximum upon reflection from transparent surfaces, relating it directly to the material's . This law provided a quantitative framework for predicting in reflections, influencing subsequent optical studies. Early detection devices emerged in this period, including Wilhelm Karl Haidinger's 1844 observation of "Haidinger's brushes"—an allowing naked-eye visualization of direction through macular pigments. Around 1828, Scottish geologist William Nicol invented the first practical polarizing prism by cleaving and recementing crystals with to separate ordinary and extraordinary rays, a design later refined and widely described by 1852. These 19th-century advances were enabled by the rising acceptance of the wave theory of , pioneered by Fresnel, which explained as transverse vibrations perpendicular to propagation—contrasting with Newton's earlier corpuscular view that struggled to account for such directional properties.

Modern Innovations

In 1929, invented the first practical absorptive polarizer sheets, known as , by embedding microscopic crystals of iodoquinine sulfate (herapathite) in a matrix and aligning them to selectively absorb polarized in one direction. This innovation enabled mass production of thin, flexible polarizing films, revolutionizing applications from to filters. Land patented the method that year and founded the in 1937 to commercialize these sheets, marking the transition from laboratory curiosities to widespread commercial use. During the 1950s and 1960s, research on liquid crystals advanced their integration into display technologies, culminating in the development of twisted nematic (TN) liquid crystal displays (LCDs) in the 1970s. Pioneering work at RCA in the early 1960s, including the discovery of the Williams domain effect in 1962 and the first dynamic scattering mode LCD prototype in 1968, laid the groundwork for electro-optic modulation using aligned liquid crystals between polarizers. These efforts focused on improving response times and contrast, leading to the 1971 invention of the TN field effect by Martin Schadt and Wolfgang Helfrich at Hoffmann-La Roche, which relied on crossed polarizers to achieve high-efficiency light switching and enabled the first commercial TN-LCD watches and calculators by the mid-1970s. The 1980s saw significant progress in specialized polarizer types, including wire-grid designs optimized for () wavelengths and cholesteric films for . Wire-grid polarizers, featuring sub-wavelength metallic gratings, were refined for IR , with copper grids on mylar substrates achieving high efficiency below 700 cm⁻¹ when integrated into Martin-Puplett interferometers. Concurrently, cholesteric films emerged as broadband circular polarizers, leveraging their helical structure to reflect one circular polarization while transmitting the other, with early polymeric versions developed for LCD backlights to enhance brightness without absorption losses. Post-2000 innovations have introduced advanced materials like metamaterials and for polarizers targeting (THz) frequencies and , alongside broadband achromatic designs. Metamaterial polarizers, using subwavelength resonators to manipulate THz waves, enable compact polarimetric devices such as quarter-wave plates. -based polarizers, exploiting the material's tunable conductivity and mechanical flexibility, have been integrated into wearable devices, achieving polarization extinction ratios up to 27 dB in and formats for visible-to-near-IR ranges. Improvements in broadband achromatic polarizers, often via metasurface arrays, minimize chromatic dispersion in compact . These modern polarizers have profoundly impacted fields like , augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR), and . In digital cameras, absorptive and circular polarizers reduce glare and enhance color fidelity by filtering unwanted reflections, improving in sensors. For AR/VR headsets, they enable precise light control to minimize ghosting and boost immersion, with reflective types recycling light for energy-efficient displays. In quantum optics, polarizers are essential for generating and analyzing polarization-entangled photon pairs, enabling high-resolution imaging protocols that surpass classical limits through coincidence detection of entangled states.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Polarizers - RP Photonics
    Types of Optical Polarizers · Absorptive Polarizers (= Dichroic Polarizers) · Reflective Polarizing Films · Polarizing Beam Splitters Based on Birefringence · Thin- ...Ideal versus Real Polarizers · Absorptive Polarizers... · Thin-Film Polarizers
  3. [3]
    Introduction to Polarized Light | Nikon's MicroscopyU
    Polarized light has electric field vectors restricted to a single plane, unlike non-polarized light with vibrations in all directions.
  4. [4]
    Polarizer Selection Guide
    ### Summary of Polarizer Performance Characteristics
  5. [5]
    Polarizers - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    There are two main types: Glan types with rectangular shapes and Nicol types with rhombohedral shapes. The polarizers are made of two pieces of calcite cemented ...Polarizers · Birefringent Materials... · Reflection And Transmission
  6. [6]
    Polarization of Light - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    May 29, 2023 · Polarization of light is when the electric field vector oscillations are restricted to a single plane. Unpolarized light has randomized ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Crossed Polarizers - HyperPhysics
    An ideal polarizer produces linearly polarized light from unpolarized light. Two ideal polarizers would eliminate all light if their transmission directions ...
  9. [9]
    The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. I Ch. 33: Polarization
    Polarization relates to the direction of light's electric field oscillation, which is perpendicular to the propagation direction. Scattering can produce ...
  10. [10]
    Classification of Polarization - HyperPhysics
    Light polarization is classified as linearly polarized (plane wave), circularly polarized (two waves with 90° phase difference), and elliptically polarized ( ...Missing: polarizers | Show results with:polarizers
  11. [11]
    [PDF] A Brief History of The Development of Classical Electrodynamics
    1811: Francois Arago shows that some crystals alter the polarization of light passing through them. 1812: Jean-Baptiste Biot shows that Arago's crystals ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field: Photons and Operators
    The numbers operators in this expression count the number of photons in each helicity or circular polarization state. The creation operators generate quanta ...
  13. [13]
    States of Polarization - Linear, Circular and Elliptical Polarization
    Nov 4, 2007 · Elliptically polarized light consists of two light waves that are linearly polarized, but unlike circularly polarized light, they have unequal ...
  14. [14]
    A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical SystemsI. Description ...
    The present paper is devoted to a description of the new calculus. When light passes through any of the three fundamental types of optical elements, the state ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Introduction to Jones Vectors
    Since Jones Vectors represents the state of polarization then the optical element that changes the light from one state to another is represented by a ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Jones calculus 1 Rotation of coordinate systems
    3 Jones vectors for various polarization states. The simplest type of polarization is plane polarized light, or 乡, characterized by the x and y components ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Linear Algebra for Describing Polarization and Polarizing Elements
    First formulated in 1941, Jones calculus utilizes a 2x1 vector to describe the polarization of light, and 2x2 matrices to describe the action of an element upon ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Polarization Handedness Convention - Thorlabs
    Jul 10, 2017 · The sign of the phase difference determines the handedness of the rotation. A clockwise rotation corresponds to a right-hand circular ...Missing: helical | Show results with:helical
  19. [19]
    Polarized Light Waveforms | Nikon's MicroscopyU
    This interactive tutorial explores the generation of linear, elliptical, and circularly polarized light by a pair of orthogonal light waves.
  20. [20]
    Unpolarized Light - RP Photonics
    Jul 30, 2025 · Fully polarized light is represented by points on the surface. Unpolarized light corresponds to the origin. Partially polarized light leads to a ...
  21. [21]
    Polarization Control with Optics - Newport
    Incoherent light sources such as lamps, LEDs, or the sun typically emit unpolarized light, which is a random superposition of all possible polarization states.
  22. [22]
    Polarization - Newport
    Elliptical polarization is the most common description of polarized light, while circular and linear polarized light can be looked at versions of elliptically ...
  23. [23]
    Polarization by Absorption: Dichroism - HyperPhysics Concepts
    Dichroism is when materials absorb more light in one plane than another, polarizing light. Tourmaline and Polaroid are examples of dichroic materials.
  24. [24]
    Polarizing refracting bodies - US1918848A - Google Patents
    This invention relates to polarizing refracting bodies, and particularly to polarizing bodies made from suspensions containing polarizing crystals. The ...
  25. [25]
    Some Aspects of the Development of Sheet Polarizers*
    The H polarizer is made by absorbing iodine in a stretched sheet of polyvinyl alcohol. The various dye polarizers are made by absorbing dyes in stretched ...
  26. [26]
    Linear Polarizer - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Polarizers of this type can achieve extinction ratios as small as 10−5 in the visible region of the spectrum. Often the performance of a pair of sheet ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Derivation of Fresnel Equations for s-polarization
    The two boxed equations for r and t are the “Fresnel equations” for s-polarized light (with 𝛼 and 𝛽 defined above).Missing: reflectance | Show results with:reflectance
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Multilayer thin film design for far ultraviolet polarizers using an ...
    If a double reflection polarizer is made with this design, it will have a degree of polarization of 99.99% and s-polarization throughput of 77.35%. Key words • ...
  30. [30]
    Birefringence – double refraction, uniaxial, biaxial crystals, induced ...
    Birefringence is the property of some transparent optical materials that the refractive index depends on the polarization direction.Definition of Birefringence · Intrinsic and Induced... · Uniaxial Crystals
  31. [31]
    Principles of Birefringence | Nikon's MicroscopyU
    2. Birefringence (B) = |n e - no|. where n(e) and n(o) are the refractive indices experienced by the extraordinary and ordinary rays, respectively. This ...
  32. [32]
    Polarizing Prisms - HyperPhysics Concepts
    Such materials are said to be birefringent or doubly refracting. The Nicol prism is made up from two prisms of calcite cemented with Canada balsam .
  33. [33]
    Glan-Taylor Calcite Polarizers - Thorlabs
    Our Glan-Taylor Polarizers produce extremely pure linear polarization with an extinction ratio of 100 000:1 and are meant for use with laser beams in the ...
  34. [34]
    Waveplates - RP Photonics
    The most common types of waveplates are quarter-wave plates ( λ / 4 plates) and half-wave plates ( λ / 2 plates), where the difference of phase delays between ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  35. [35]
    Introduction to Waveplates - Newport
    The difference between these two-phase shifts is termed the retardation, Γ= 2πf(nslow - nfast)L/c. The value of Γ in this formula is in radians, but is more ...
  36. [36]
    Optical Crystals - RP Photonics
    Often used birefringent crystal materials are quartz, calcite and sapphire. ... application wavelength band: UV 0.2–7.0 μm; IR 4–7.0 μm; excimer grade: 193 ...
  37. [37]
    Polarimeter for measuring the properties of birefringent media in ...
    Dec 24, 2019 · This work presents a description of a polarimetric system for measuring the properties of birefringent media. In our reflection system the ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Wire Polarizers 1 Problem 2 Solution - Kirk T. McDonald
    This solution follows methods perhaps first given by Lord Rayleigh [3, 4] for “wires” being formed by cutting slits in a plane conducting sheet.
  39. [39]
    Waveguide sub‐wavelength structures: a review of principles and ...
    Sep 30, 2014 · To study the polarization of the waves he employed a grid of wires with a pitch much smaller than the wavelength. Such a device blocks ...
  40. [40]
    Nanowire Grid Polarizers for Mid- and Long-Wavelength Infrared ...
    Moxtek has developed several high contrast IR polarizers on silicon suitable for mid-wavelength and long-wavelength thermal IR applications using ...Missing: THz MOEMS
  41. [41]
    Broadband high-performance terahertz polarizer based on a dense ...
    Aug 2, 2022 · The terahertz polarizer uses a 5 nm gap slit array with 200 nm periodicity, achieving over 95% transmittance and 40 dB extinction ratio from 0. ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Wire-grid polarizer sheet in the terahertz region fabricated by ... - arXiv
    Wire-grid polarizer sheets in the terahertz region have been fabricated on flexible substrates by nanoimprint technology. They show ideal polarization property ...
  43. [43]
    Multilayer photo-aligned thin-film structure for polarizing photonics
    In this Letter, an advanced multilayer photo-aligned liquid crystal polymer (LCP) thin-film structure with multiple optical functions is introduced.
  44. [44]
    Liquid Crystal Displays and Novel Optical Thin Films Enabled by ...
    Photo-alignment and photo-patterning of monomeric- and polymeric liquid crystals by the linear photo-polymerisation (LPP) technology enables novel molecular ...
  45. [45]
    Understanding Polarization & Wire Grid Polarizers - Omega Optical
    Sep 13, 2019 · Finally, wire grid polarizers have greater thermal stability and can operate under high temperature or high flux conditions. These features make ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Use of Wire Grid Polarizers with Liquid Crystal Display for Large ...
    Jan 27, 2022 · Second, wire grid polarizers are more difficult to manufacture as the wavelength of light decreases because the wire pitch must be smaller ...
  47. [47]
    Fabrication and characterization of bilayer metal wire-grid polarizer ...
    ... wire-grid polarizer is simpler, less costly and defect tolerant. The drawback with the interference lithography is a need for precise process control [12].Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    Malus's rays | Opinion - Chemistry World
    Feb 9, 2023 · Etienne-Louis Malus' discovery of the polarisation of light is a good example. Malus was born in Paris, France, into a well-connected family.Missing: law | Show results with:law
  50. [50]
    Polarimeter - Physics - Kenyon College
    Malus, who had been doing experimental work on double refraction while working on a theory of the effect, observed the light of the setting sun, reflected from ...
  51. [51]
    Malus's Law - SPIE
    In 1808, using a calcite crystal, Malus discovered that natural incident light became polarized when it wasreflected by a glass surface.Missing: sunlight | Show results with:sunlight
  52. [52]
    Malus' Law - Physics
    If unpolarized light passes through a polarizer, the intensity of the transmitted light will be 1/2 of what it was coming in. If linearly polarized light ...
  53. [53]
    Polarization of Light - RP Photonics
    Further, one can define a degree of polarization which can be calculated from the Stokes vector and can vary between 0 (unpolarized) and 1 (fully polarized).Linear Polarization · TE, TM and TEM Polarization · Polarization of Light in Non...
  54. [54]
    Economy Film Polarizers with Windows - Thorlabs
    The transmission is going to be roughly 90% and the extinction ratio will be less than 10:1. The LPVIS series of polarizers will have much better ...
  55. [55]
    Glan-Thompson Polarizers - Thorlabs
    For high-power applications, Thorlabs offers Glan Laser polarizers, which can handle energy densities up to 20 J/cm 2 (CW). Click to Enlarge Click Here for ...
  56. [56]
    Polarization Extinction Ratio Measured Using Laser Light - Thorlabs
    The extinction ratio of an optical component under test (DUT) can be measured using light from a laser or other linearly polarized source.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  57. [57]
    Circular Polarization | Harvard Natural Sciences Lecture ...
    Circular polarization is created by placing a linear polarizer followed by a quarter-wave plate at 45 degrees, causing a 90° phase shift.
  58. [58]
    Quarter-wave plate - HyperPhysics
    A quarter-wave plate is a birefringent material that retards light by 90 degrees, used to convert linear to circular polarization and vice versa.
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    Chiral materials and mechanisms for circularly polarized light ...
    Mar 25, 2024 · Chiral materials enable the generation of CP electroluminescence in LEDs through several different mechanisms, depending on the choice of material and device ...
  61. [61]
    Research Progress of Cholesteric Liquid Crystals with Broadband ...
    Jul 11, 2022 · This critical review systematically summarizes the optical background of the ChLCs with broadband reflection characteristics, methods to obtain broadband ...
  62. [62]
    Augmenting Bragg Reflection with Polymer-sustained Conical Helix
    Apr 2, 2019 · Cholesteric liquid crystals (CLC) possess a periodic helical structure, and are known for their selective reflection of light which occurs when ...
  63. [63]
    Cholesteric Liquid Crystals - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Thus, the reflection bandwidth Δλ is given by Δλ = ΔnP, where the birefringence Δn = ne − no. Within the bandwidth, right-circularly polarized light is ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  64. [64]
    Hyperfluorescence circularly polarized OLEDs consisting of chiral ...
    Feb 15, 2025 · This work prepares two pairs of efficient circularly polarized thermally activated delayed fluorescence (CP-TADF) materials, featuring high photoluminescence ...
  65. [65]
    Advanced liquid crystal devices for augmented reality and virtual ...
    May 30, 2022 · In this paper, we focus on advanced LC-based light engines and optical components for AR/VR applications.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Polarization and Color Filtering Applied to Enhance ...
    Linear and circular polarizing filters are commonly used in outdoor photography to reduce sunlight glare. Linear polarization filters selectively transmit one ...
  67. [67]
    Analog image contouring using a twisted-nematic liquid-crystal display
    Twisted-nematic LCDs are currently manufactured to work between crossed polarizers, with the incident light polarization (P) having a prefixed direction ...
  68. [68]
    OSA | Light propagation and color variations in liquid-crystal displays
    For an STN with a 180-deg twist, this means that the polarizers are crossed. Figure 15 clarifies the above statement. The variation of the color points on ...
  69. [69]
    3D Television | - The University of Arizona
    Because of the properties of circular polarization you can sit anywhere in the theater as well as move and tilt your head and get the same viewing experience.Missing: displays | Show results with:displays
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Modeling, Prediction and Reduction of 3D crosstalk in Circular ...
    Circularly polarized (CP) liquid crystal display. (LCD) is one of the main-stream consumer 3D displays with the prospering of 3D movies and gamings. The ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Advances in Coherent Population Trapping for Atomic Clocks
    This can be thought of as an optical pumping effect: atoms in the. "bright" (or "coupled") state |C> will be excited to level |3> and will eventually fall into ...
  72. [72]
    Wideband antireflective circular polarizer exhibiting a perfect dark ...
    In this paper, we proposed a novel circular polarizer which exhibits a perfect dark state in all viewing directions for OLEDs, in which the polarizer is ...
  73. [73]
    Real-color displays realized by randomized polarization
    Consequently, LCDs and OLED displays emit linearly polarized light that vibrates in one direction along the transmission axis of the polarizer. This light ...
  74. [74]
    The Lives of Malus and His Bicentennial Law - Chemistry Europe
    Jan 4, 2008 · Étienne-Louis Malus (see picture) serendipitously discovered the polarization of light by reflection nearly 200 years ago.
  75. [75]
    The discovery of polarization (polarization.com)
    Iceland Spar was involved in the official discovery of polarization. This naturally occurring transparent crystal (optical quality Calcite, CaCO3) separates an ...Missing: sunlight | Show results with:sunlight
  76. [76]
    Arago, Biot, and Fresnel Elucidate Circular Polarization | Cairn.info
    With the discovery of circular birefringence, Fresnel extended the concept of polarization, gave the interference principle an unequivocal generality, and ...
  77. [77]
    Polarizer - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    All Glan polarizers are based on a total internal reflection principle, where one polarization component (the O-ray) is transmitted by the polarizer and the ...
  78. [78]
    IX. On the laws which regulate the polarisation of light by reflexion ...
    IX. On the laws which regulate the polarisation of light by reflexion from transparent bodies. By David Brewster, LL. D. F. R. S. Edin. and F. S. A. Edin.
  79. [79]
    [PDF] haidinger's (1844) naked-eye polarizaton translated 1 - arXiv
    It is now commonly called Haidinger's brushes. Haidinger first noticed the phenomenon in various minerals that produce polarized light. He learned to see the ...
  80. [80]
    July 1816: Fresnel's Evidence for the Wave Theory of Light
    But by the early 19th century, the wave theory was making a comeback, thanks in part to the work of a French civil engineer named Augustin-Jean Fresnel.
  81. [81]
    Edwin Land and Instant Photography - American Chemical Society
    In 1929, Land applied for his first patent, a method for producing his polarizing sheets. He returned to Harvard in the same year but left again before ...Missing: dichroic | Show results with:dichroic
  82. [82]
    The History of Liquid Crystal Display - ThoughtCo
    Mar 2, 2019 · In 1962, RCA researcher Richard Williams generated stripe patterns in a thin layer of liquid crystal material by the application of a voltage.
  83. [83]
    The History of LCD Technology - Orient Display
    Charles Mauguin was the first to begin placing thin layers of liquid crystals between plates, an idea that would later found the structural concept of LCDs.
  84. [84]
    Grid polarizers for infrared fourier spectrometers - ScienceDirect
    The polarizers have been used to extend the useful frequency range of a Martin-Puplett polarizing interferometer designed for Fourier transform spectroscopy.
  85. [85]
    Reflective cholesteric liquid crystal polarizers and their applications
    Various single layer reflective polarizers are introduced based on cholesteric liquid crystal materials containing one polymeric liquid crystal component ...Missing: 3M 1980s
  86. [86]
    Metamaterials for THz polarimetric devices - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · We highlight some potential applications for polarimetric devices and present simulations of a terahertz quarter-wave plate and a polarizing ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Advanced optical polarizers based on 2D materials - Nature
    Jul 17, 2024 · This paper reviews recent progress in 2D-material-based optical polarizers. First, an overview of key properties of various 2D materials for realizing optical ...
  88. [88]
    Mid-infrared polarization-controlled broadband achromatic metadevice
    This study presents a platform to realize polarization-controlled broadband achromatic metadevice in mid-wavelength infrared.
  89. [89]
    Applications of Optical Polarization - Band Optics
    May 19, 2025 · AR and VR rely on light behaving perfectly. Polarization can help make that happen. In AR glasses, polarization improves image clarity by ...
  90. [90]
    Using Polarization to Improve Quantum Imaging - www.caltech.edu
    Mar 19, 2024 · However, filters called polarizers can be used to create light beams with one specific polarization. A vertical polarizer, for example, only ...