Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal is a major complex of container shipping facilities situated in and , on , serving as the principal hub for containerized cargo in the Port of and . Leased and operated by private entities including Port Newark Container Terminal, Global Terminal, and under the oversight of the of New York and New Jersey, the terminal encompasses over 1,000 acres across multiple sites equipped with deep-water berths, on-dock rail facilities, and extensive intermodal connections to highways and railroads. Opened in 1962 as the world's first purpose-built , it pioneered the widespread adoption of standardized intermodal containers, fundamentally reshaping global maritime logistics by reducing handling costs and accelerating cargo throughput. As the busiest container port on the U.S. East Coast, it processed a significant share of the overall port's record 8.7 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in 2024, supporting regional economic activity through imports of consumer goods, automobiles, and industrial materials while facilitating exports. Ongoing infrastructure enhancements, such as channel deepening and berth expansions, address capacity demands from ever-larger vessels, though periodic congestion and labor disputes have highlighted operational challenges inherent to high-volume freight handling.

Geography and Infrastructure

Location and Layout

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal occupies the western shore of in the cities of and , approximately 5 miles south of and adjacent to industrial areas in and counties. This positioning provides direct access to the Newark Bay channel and , connecting to the Atlantic Ocean via . The terminal complex integrates two contiguous marine facilities: Port Newark Marine Terminal in and Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal in , forming a unified waterfront spanning over 1,000 acres dedicated primarily to container operations. Key components include the Port Newark Container Terminal at 241 Calcutta Street, covering 272 acres with 4,400 feet of berthing space and channel depths of 40 to 50 feet at mean low water; Maher Terminals at 1210 Corbin Street, , encompassing 450 acres and 10,128 feet of berth length at 50 feet depth; and Elizabeth, the largest reefer facility in the port with four super post-Panamax cranes. Layout features parallel berths along the bayfront, with Port Newark handling lower-numbered berths (e.g., 2 through 14) and higher ones (e.g., 76 through 98), supported by internal roadways such as Clipper Street, Viking Street, and Inner/Outer Port Streets for truck circulation and operator-specific gates. Rail yards and intermodal yards are positioned inland, optimizing container transfer from ships to on-dock rail and road networks. The configuration prioritizes efficient vessel turnaround, with crane rails and fenced perimeters delineating operational zones.

Access Channels and Connectivity

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal gains maritime access primarily via the Kill Van Kull, a tidal strait connecting Upper New York Bay to Newark Bay, which funnels container ships from the Atlantic Ocean through the Ambrose Channel and the Narrows. This channel, historically limited by rock and sediment, was deepened from 40 feet to 45 feet between 2005 and 2009, then to 50 feet by 2011, allowing post-Panamax vessels up to 14,000 TEU capacity to navigate without lightering. Supporting channels include the Newark Bay Channel and South Elizabeth Channel, maintained at 50 feet with ongoing dredging to remove sediment and ensure safe passage for deep-draft traffic. Current federal navigation improvements, authorized under the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, target further deepening of the Kill Van Kull, , and adjacent reaches to 55 feet mean lower low water (MLLW) over 12–15 years at a projected cost of $6.3 billion, addressing shoaling and accommodating ultra-large container vessels exceeding 18,000 TEU. These enhancements, managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in coordination with the of and , include 50 years of maintenance to sustain depths amid rising vessel sizes driven by global trade demands. Landward connectivity integrates with , the (I-95), and I-278 via dedicated port roads and the Doremus Avenue overweight corridor, enabling direct truck access to inland hubs and reducing through upgrades. Rail links feature on-dock intermodal yards, including ExpressRail with capacity for 500,000 lifts annually, connecting to CSX, Norfolk Southern, and networks for seamless container transfer to the and Midwest markets. This multimodal setup handled over 9 million TEU in 2023, underscoring the terminal's role in regional freight efficiency despite periodic bottlenecks from channel maintenance and highway volumes.

Operations and Capacity

Cargo Handling Processes

Cargo handling at the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal centers on containerized freight, utilizing ship-to-shore cranes to transfer containers between vessels and the terminal yard. Vessels berth at wharves with channel depths of 40 to 50 feet, enabling access for large container ships. Unloading occurs via super post-panamax and ultra super post-panamax cranes, such as models with 65-long-ton capacities at Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT) or models with 70-long-ton capacities at Maher Terminals, which lift containers from ship decks and holds directly onto the quay. These operations proceed around the clock, seven days a week, to maintain throughput efficiency. Once unloaded, containers are moved to the storage yard using internal transport equipment, including straddle carriers at PNCT (100 units) and Maher Terminals (220 units) or rubber-tired gantry (RTG) cranes at (40 units). Top loaders assist in stacking and repositioning containers within the yard, while refrigerated (reefer) units are connected to power outlets—PNCT provides 688 reefer plugs, Maher 1,200, and APM 1,564—to preserve perishable during . Yard configurations support dense stacking, with computer-automated systems coordinating movements to optimize space and reduce congestion. Outbound processes reverse the inbound flow: export containers are retrieved from the yard via straddle carriers or RTG cranes and loaded onto vessels using the same gantry cranes. Intermodal transfers occur directly from the yard to on-dock facilities or . At —such as PNCT's inbound at Calcutta Street—trucks undergo roadability inspections to ensure container integrity before release, with systems like terminal operating systems (TOS) tracking status and appointments. These steps minimize dwell times and support annual handling capacities exceeding 1.3 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) at PNCT alone.

Throughput and Efficiency Metrics

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal, operated through its Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT) and APM Terminals Elizabeth components, handles a substantial share of the of New York and New Jersey's volumes, reflecting its role as the East Coast's busiest facility. In 2023, the broader port processed 7.8 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a 4.4% increase from pre-pandemic levels in 2019, with APM Terminals Elizabeth contributing over 25% of this throughput, equivalent to approximately 1.95 million TEUs. PNCT, meanwhile, manages more than 1.3 million TEUs annually, supported by ongoing expansions that added up to 1 million TEUs in capacity. By 2024, the port's total throughput rose to 8.7 million TEUs, an 11% year-over-year gain, underscoring the terminal's resilience amid supply chain disruptions. Efficiency metrics at the terminal highlight areas of strength in alongside challenges in operational speed compared to global peers. The Container Port Performance Index 2023, which assesses vessel dwell times and crane productivity across 405 ports based on over 180,000 vessel calls, ranked the Port of New York and New Jersey 92nd worldwide, indicating moderate performance in handling large vessel calls efficiently despite high volumes. Crane operations, critical to throughput, benefit from recent optimizations such as redeployments enabling simultaneous servicing of 18,000+ TEU vessels, though average gross moves per crane per hour remain below top-tier Asian ports' 35–40, often constrained by labor agreements and bottlenecks. Intermodal and gate efficiency further define terminal performance, with truck turn times tracked via the Port Authority's dashboard averaging under 30 minutes for transactions in peak periods, though container dwell times averaged 4.05 days for departures in early 2025, reflecting upstream delays rather than terminal-specific bottlenecks. Expansions, including straddle carriers and crane upgrades, aim to boost by 10–20% through reduced emissions and faster yard movements, aligning with broader efforts to mitigate congestion from mega-vessel calls.
YearPort of NY/NJ Total TEUsEstimated PNE Share (TEUs)
20237.8 million~3.25 million (PNCT + APM)
20248.7 million~3.6 million (projected)

Terminal Operators and Management

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal is owned by the Port Authority of and (PANYNJ), which provides overarching management, including infrastructure investment, security coordination, and tariff structures, while leasing operations to private entities for handling and terminal efficiency. These operators manage daily activities such as berthing, crane operations, and intermodal transfers under PANYNJ leases, with recent extensions emphasizing expansions to handle growing transatlantic and transpacific trade volumes. The terminal complex comprises three primary container facilities, each operated by specialized firms:
Terminal NameOperatorKey Operational Details
Port Newark Container TerminalPorts AmericaCovers 272 acres; processes over 1.3 million TEUs annually; features 2,650 feet of berths, extensive rail connectivity, and a lease extension with PANYNJ through 2050 adding 1 million TEUs capacity.
APM Terminals ElizabethAPM TerminalsLargest east coast terminal by scale; provides the highest (reefer) capacity in the NY/NJ port; equipped with four Super Post-Panamax ship-to-shore cranes for ultra-large vessels.
Maher TerminalsMaher Terminals LLCLocated at 1210 Corbin Street, Elizabeth, NJ; focuses on efficient gate processing and vessel turnaround; integrated into PANYNJ's common tariff system with other operators.
These operators collaborate with PANYNJ on initiatives like RFID gate systems and rail enhancements to mitigate congestion, though independent management allows tailored service to shipping lines such as Maersk (for APM) and others serving over 45 international routes from PNCT alone.

Facilities and Improvements

Berths, Cranes, and Equipment

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal comprises three major container terminals—Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT), Maher Terminals, and APM Terminals—offering a combined berth length exceeding 20,500 feet to service large oceangoing vessels. PNCT provides 4,400 feet of berth space with depths supporting post-Panamax ships, while Maher Terminals extends 10,128 feet of contiguous berthing, and APM Terminals 6,001 feet with water depths of 45–50 feet at mean low water along portions of its quay. These facilities enable simultaneous handling of multiple ultra-large container vessels, limited primarily by channel access and air draft constraints from the Bayonne Bridge. Ship-to-shore () cranes form the core of vessel unloading operations, with the terminals collectively operating 52 such units designed for post-Panamax and super post-Panamax container ships. PNCT features 13 cranes, comprising 6 super post-Panamax models (including two delivered in November 2024 for next-generation vessel compatibility), 3 super post-Panamax, 2 post-Panamax, and 2 Fantuzzi post-Panamax units. Maher Terminals deploys 24 cranes, including 8 super post-Panamax, 7 Paceco post-Panamax, 5 Fantuzzi post-Panamax, and 4 post-Panamax models. operates 15 cranes, with 8 ultra super post-Panamax, 4 super post-Panamax, and 3 post-Panamax units, bolstered by a $55 million crane optimization program completed in 2025 that added capacity for 18,000+ TEU vessels.
TerminalSTS Cranes TotalKey Crane Types
PNCT136 Super Post-Panamax; 3 Super Post-Panamax; 2 Post-Panamax; 2 Fantuzzi Post-Panamax
Maher Terminals248 Super Post-Panamax; 7 Paceco Post-Panamax; 5 Fantuzzi Post-Panamax; 4 Post-Panamax
APM Terminals158 Ultra Super Post-Panamax; 4 Super Post-Panamax; 3 Post-Panamax
Yard handling relies on diverse equipment tailored to each operator's layout, favoring straddle carriers for flexibility in PNCT and Maher while APM employs rubber-tired gantry (RTG) cranes for stacked storage. PNCT utilizes 100 straddle carriers, 3 RTG cranes, 39 yard hustlers, 15 empty handlers, and 5 reach stackers. Maher operates 220 straddle carriers, 50 yard hustlers, and 25 empty handlers. APM features 40 RTG cranes, 150 yard hustlers, and 34 toploaders, supporting high-density yards. Reefer plugs number 688 at PNCT, 1,200 at Maher, and 1,564 at APM for refrigerated cargo. Recent investments, such as PNCT's addition of 15 Konecranes Noell straddle carriers in 2025, enhance fuel efficiency and throughput.

Rail and Intermodal Systems

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal features an integrated on-dock rail system as part of the of New York and New Jersey's ExpressRail network, enabling direct container transfers from vessels to rail cars to reduce reliance on trucking and enhance inland distribution efficiency. ExpressRail facilities at the terminal, including ExpressRail Newark and ExpressRail Elizabeth, support service by Class I railroads and Norfolk Southern, providing connections to major markets in the Midwest, , and beyond with daily double-stack intermodal trains. These on-dock capabilities allow for same-day rail departures of unloaded cargo, minimizing dwell times and emissions compared to highway transport. Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT), a primary operator within the complex, maintains the region's only dedicated on-dock operation, featuring four intermodal spurs each 2,500 feet long and over 10,000 feet of operational track. This facilitates direct loading of containers onto via the Corbin Street Bridge connection, serving more than 12 domestic and Canadian destinations. The ExpressRail system across the port area, including these assets, holds an annual capacity of 1.5 million lifts, representing the largest such volume on the U.S. East Coast. Historical data indicate lifts at port facilities grew from 43,000 containers in 1992 to over 500,000 by 2016, reflecting expanded intermodal adoption driven by investments. Intermodal integration at the terminal emphasizes seamless mode shifts, with on-dock yards designed for double-stack equipment to handle 53-foot domestic containers alongside 20- and 40-foot units. Recent developments include plans announced in August 2024 by the to expand capacity at a forthcoming intermodal facility serving the complex, addressing anticipated freight growth ahead of its operational start. These enhancements, including clearance improvements on connecting routes completed by 2019, support higher-volume double-stack corridors to inland hubs. Overall, the rail systems contribute to the terminal's throughput of over 1.3 million TEUs annually at PNCT alone, with rail handling a growing share of outbound to mitigate congestion.

Roadway and Gate Enhancements

The Port Street Corridor Improvement Project, initiated on November 29, 2023, upgrades the primary northern roadway network serving and the Marine Terminal, addressing infrastructure dating back decades. Valued at $220 million, the effort includes demolishing and rebuilding the antiquated Corbin Street ramp to modern standards, incorporating wider turning radii for trucks, enhanced lane configurations, and improved safety features to handle peak volumes of about 1,400 trucks per hour. These modifications reduce bottlenecks in operations, supporting anticipated 50% growth in container traffic over the next decade. Completion is projected for May 2028, aligning with the of and New Jersey's 10-year capital strategy for seaport resilience. Gate enhancements emphasize technological integration to expedite truck transactions and curb wait times, critical amid rising throughput demands. At (PNCT), operated by , gate cameras employing verify containers and chassis, streamlining entry and exit processes across operational hours. The terminal's adoption of smart-Tecs Gate Operating System (GOS) enables automated transaction handling, including pre-arrival and real-time status updates, reducing manual interventions. Similar upgrades at the Elizabeth Marine Terminal incorporate pavement reinforcements and expanded gate infrastructure as part of berth reconstructions, such as the Corbin Street Berth 3 project, which indirectly bolsters gate throughput by optimizing internal truck flows. These steps, while advancing efficiency, lag behind fully automated systems at competing ports, prompting calls for further investment to maintain cost competitiveness.

Historical Development

Pre-Containerization Era (1910s–1950s)

The development of , the core facility predating the full integration of the Elizabeth Marine Terminal, began in the early 1900s when the City of reclaimed swamp lands along to establish marine terminals for handling such as packaged goods, raw materials, and manufactured items. In the , the city excavated dedicated shipping channels in the northeastern portion of , improving navigational access for oceangoing vessels and positioning the port as a complement to Manhattan's congested facilities. The of New York and New Jersey was established in 1921 via an between and to oversee and modernize the regional port district, though Port Newark continued under direct municipal operation. operations relied on traditional breakbulk methods, where longshoremen manually loaded and unloaded ships using nets, slings, and basic cranes, often requiring multiple days per vessel and gangs of up to 108 workers for standard freighters. This labor-intensive process supported imports like , , and textiles, as well as exports amid growing industrial activity in the Northeast. In 1948, the assumed operational control of Port Newark, addressing infrastructure deterioration from , military use, and the . Modernization efforts followed, culminating by 1951 in a facility with 21 berths and a channel dredged to 35 feet deep, enabling berthing of the era's largest ships and handling record tonnage volumes in the early that spurred local employment and tenant expansions. The Elizabeth portion of the future terminal remained largely undeveloped during this period, comprising tidal meadows south of Port Newark suitable primarily for limited local shipping rather than major oceanic trade. Initial plans for expansion into this area using dredged materials from channel deepening were announced around , setting the stage for integrated facilities but still within breakbulk paradigms until containerization trials in 1956.

Invention of Containerization (1956–1960s)

The practical invention of modern originated with American trucking entrepreneur Malcolm McLean, who sought to streamline cargo transfer between trucks, ships, and rail by using standardized, reusable metal boxes that minimized manual handling and damage. Frustrated by inefficient break-bulk loading practices observed in the early , McLean converted a tanker into the SS Ideal X, capable of carrying detachable truck trailers as containers. On April 26, 1956, the Ideal X departed from Port Newark, New Jersey, bound for Houston, Texas, with 58 aluminum containers—each measuring approximately 8 feet by 8 feet by 10 feet—marking the first commercial voyage and demonstrating the feasibility of sealed, uniform cargo units that reduced loading times from days to hours. McLean's Sea-Land Service, established to commercialize this innovation, expanded operations in the late by acquiring and retrofitting additional surplus tankers with cellular holds designed to secure stacked containers, enabling coastwise shipping along the U.S. East Coast and Gulf. These early containers, often repurposed truck bodies, prioritized durability and interchangeability over initial standardization, with empirical tests showing substantial reductions in pilferage, breakage, and labor costs compared to traditional loose methods. Port Newark's deep-water berths and proximity to industrial hinterlands positioned it as the launch point for these trials, though the port's infrastructure at the time remained geared toward general , requiring ad-hoc adaptations like shore cranes for container lifts. By the early 1960s, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, recognizing containerization's potential to reverse declining competitiveness against newer ports, invested in purpose-built facilities. On August 15, 1962, the Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal opened adjacent to Port Newark as the world's first dedicated , featuring specialized berths, cranes, and container yards optimized for 20-foot boxes that became the standard. This development accelerated adoption, with throughput growing as steamship lines like formed in 1965 to serve the terminal, shifting the region from labor-intensive break-bulk dominance to mechanized, high-volume handling amid initial resistance rooted in union concerns over job displacement. Through the decade, empirical data from operations validated the system's causal efficiencies, including faster vessel turnarounds and lower per-unit transport costs, cementing Port Newark-Elizabeth's role in global trade evolution.

Post-1960s Expansions and Modernization

Following the establishment of container operations in the early , the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal experienced phased expansions to accommodate growing vessel sizes and cargo volumes. In the , the invested approximately $215 million in the Elizabeth Marine Terminal, enhancing berthing capacity and supporting infrastructure to handle increased throughput. Subsequent developments included the addition of specialized handling equipment, such as shore-based gantry cranes, which improved efficiency over manual methods. Channel deepening projects were critical to modernization, enabling access for larger post-Panamax vessels. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers led multi-phase efforts under the New York and Harbor Deepening Channel Improvements initiative, progressively increasing depths in the Elizabeth Channel, , and approaches from 40 feet to 50 feet between the late 1990s and 2021. These works, including of the Kill Van Kull and channels completed in phases through 2017, removed over 40 million cubic yards of material and cost billions, directly benefiting the terminal's ability to service mega-container ships exceeding 14,000 TEU. Structural upgrades addressed vertical constraints, notably the 2014–2019 replacement and raising project by the , which increased clearance from 151 feet to 215 feet at a cost of $1.95 billion. This allowed unobstructed passage for larger vessels to the terminal's berths. Terminal operators have since invested in wharf reinforcements, new super post-Panamax ship-to-shore cranes— with facilities like adding multiple units in the —and berth extensions to boost annual capacity beyond 6 million TEU across the complex. Recent lease agreements underscore ongoing modernization, including a 2021 extension for Port Newark Container Terminal committing over $500 million in private investments for facility upgrades through 2050. Similarly, APM Terminals secured a lease to 2047 with commitments for crane acquisitions and berth enhancements. Since 2000, the Port Authority's capital program has allocated $1.5 billion for , wharf replacements, and equipment, sustaining the terminal's competitiveness amid rising East Coast trade volumes.

Economic Significance

Contribution to Trade and GDP

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal serves as the core container-handling facility within the Port of New York and , facilitating a substantial portion of the region's volumes. In 2024, the port processed 8.7 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), reflecting an 11.7% increase from the prior year, with the terminal's operations—primarily through the Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT)—accounting for a significant share of this throughput amid expansions that added up to 1 million TEUs in capacity. This volume underscores the terminal's role in enabling the import of consumer goods, industrial machinery, and electronics, as well as exports supporting U.S. sectors, thereby sustaining supply chains for over one-third of the nation's GDP concentrated within a 250-mile radius. The terminal's contributions extend to broader dynamics, positioning the port as the East Coast's largest and the nation's third-busiest by TEU , handling approximately 10% of total U.S. containerized imports in recent years. PNCT alone manages over 1.3 million TEUs annually, with investments exceeding $500 million enhancing efficiency for mega-vessels and intermodal transfers, which minimize delays and reduce costs for importers and exporters. These efficiencies amplify flows, as evidenced by the port's first-half 2025 performance of 4.4 million TEUs, a 4.9% year-over-year gain driven by terminal optimizations. In terms of GDP impact, the terminal's facilitation generates direct and indirect through , , and related industries, with the encompassing industry supporting nearly 580,000 jobs and $18.1 billion in as per a 2025 economic impact analysis by the Shipping Association of and . This activity translates to approximately $57 billion in generated income, reflecting multiplier effects from cargo processed at facilities like the terminal, which underpin regional business output exceeding $100 billion in alone based on prior assessments adjusted for growth. Such contributions highlight causal linkages between terminal throughput and GDP expansion, as heightened volumes stimulate , , and without reliance on unsubstantiated projections from potentially biased institutional sources.

Employment and Supply Chain Role

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal supports thousands of direct jobs in terminal operations, including longshore workers, crane operators, clerks, and maintenance personnel, primarily through private terminal operators such as APM Terminals and Port Newark Container Terminal under International Longshoremen's Association contracts. As part of the broader Port of New York and New Jersey, the terminal contributes to nearly 580,000 total jobs supported across direct, indirect, and induced categories as of 2025, encompassing logistics, trucking, rail operations, and warehousing in the New York-New Jersey region. These figures reflect the terminal's role in handling over 8 million TEUs annually, driving demand for skilled labor in cargo handling and equipment maintenance. In the supply chain, the terminal serves as a primary East Coast gateway for containerized imports, particularly consumer goods, , and apparel from and , facilitating distribution to the densely populated via integrated intermodal connections. Its on-dock rail facilities, including ExpressRail with over 600,000 annual lifts, enable efficient movement of freight to inland destinations, reducing reliance on trucking and supporting just-in-time inventory practices for regional manufacturers and retailers. This connectivity underpins the port's multiplier effect, where terminal activities generate upstream jobs in ocean shipping and downstream employment in wholesale trade and fulfillment, contributing to resilient supply chains amid global disruptions.

Competitive Position Among U.S. Ports

The Port of New York and New Jersey, encompassing the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal, ranked as the third-busiest U.S. by twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) handled in 2024, trailing only the Ports of and Long Beach. The port processed 8.7 million TEUs in 2024, reflecting an 11 percent increase from 2023 levels, driven by import growth and shifts in global shipping patterns such as reduced transits favoring direct East Coast calls. As the largest container facility on the U.S. East Coast, it outperforms rivals like Savannah (approximately 5 million TEUs annually) and (, around 3.5 million TEUs), capturing a significant share of Northeast import traffic. Key competitive strengths stem from its strategic location adjacent to the , enabling rapid distribution to a dense population center of over 20 million consumers and serving eight states within a 300-mile radius via established highway and networks. The terminal benefits from channel deepening to 50 feet, completed in phases through 2021, and the 2019 raising to 215 feet , accommodating post-Panamax and larger vessels that southern competitors like Savannah must sometimes divert or partially load. On-dock via the Port Authority's ExpressRail system connects directly to CSX and Norfolk Southern lines, facilitating efficient inland movement and reducing truck dependency compared to ports with weaker intermodal links. These factors position Port Newark–Elizabeth as a preferred gateway for high-value goods destined for the Northeast, where proximity minimizes inland transport costs and time versus distant southern alternatives. Challenges include chronic congestion at truck gates and rail yards, exacerbated by urban land constraints and stringent security protocols, leading to longer dwell times and higher costs for carriers than at less densely populated southern ports like Savannah or . Labor agreements under the impose elevated wage and operational expenses, contributing to a competitive disadvantage against non-union or lower-cost facilities in the Southeast, where throughput growth has outpaced the Northeast due to natural deeper drafts and expansion investments. Regulatory hurdles, including environmental compliance in a populated area, further strain efficiency, though recent upgrades have helped maintain volume leadership on the East Coast amid rising from faster-developing rivals.

Environmental and Social Impacts

Air Quality, Emissions, and Health Risks

Operations at the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal (PNET) emit substantial quantities of criteria air pollutants, including , fine , , , and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), primarily from ocean-going vessels, heavy-duty trucks, cargo handling equipment, harbor craft, and locomotives. In 2022, PNET's emissions totaled 1,171 tons of , 31 tons of PM2.5, 34 tons of PM10, 22 tons of , 282 tons of , and 61 tons of VOCs across Essex and Union Counties. Ocean-going vessels and containerships dominate and outputs, accounting for over half of port-wide emissions, while trucks contribute significantly to PM2.5 and . Emissions inventories show reductions since 2006— down 43%, PM2.5 down 76%, down 98%—despite an 86% increase in container throughput, attributed to low-sulfur fuels, retrofits, and . In 2023, port-wide criteria pollutant emissions declined further ( -14%, PM2.5 -21%, -20%) amid an 18% drop in throughput to 7.81 million TEUs. These emissions elevate local PM2.5 and concentrations, with dispersion modeling based on 2006 data indicating port contributions of up to 0.69 µg/m³ annually for PM2.5 and 5.6 µg/m³ for , exceeding screening levels (SILs) in , , Jersey City, and nearby areas when added to background levels. Combined with regional background pollution, such increments contribute to violations of (NAAQS) for 24-hour PM2.5 in parts of and Jersey City. High-resolution monitoring near the port from 2016–2019 detected elevated PM2.5 and levels correlating with vessel activity and truck traffic, confirming port operations as a localized source amid broader urban pollution. Health risks stem mainly from particulates and associated toxics, with modeling estimating lifetime cancer risks of 10–100 per million from port-related PM2.5 and in and residences, driven by , , and other carcinogens in emissions. ranks second nationally for diesel-related cancer risk, with communities like section in the 92nd percentile for diesel PM2.5 exposure and 96th for respiratory hazards. Epidemiological links attribute higher prevalence and respiratory hospitalizations in port-adjacent areas to traffic-related PM2.5 and , though attribution isolates port contributions from other sources like highways and . Non-cancer hazards remain below thresholds (hazard index <1). In 2024, federal and state allocations of nearly $400 million target further reductions via , truck , and equipment upgrades to mitigate these risks.

Community Effects in Elizabeth and Newark

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal generates substantial regional economic activity that indirectly supports local communities in and through tax revenues and development agreements, including a 2001 pact between the and Elizabeth to fund municipal upgrades and repairs. However, proximate neighborhoods, such as Newark's district—a densely populated area with significant immigrant and low-income populations—experience disproportionate burdens from port operations, including intensified truck traffic that contributes to roadway congestion and elevated safety risks. A 2018 study in Elizabeth documented how heavy truck volumes degraded neighborhood air quality, prompting local ordinances to restrict large trucks on residential streets, reflecting broader community concerns over traffic-related disruptions. Noise levels in and rank among the highest in the United States, with port-associated sources like idling trucks, rail movements, and vessel operations amplifying disturbances for nearby residents, often hindering rest and property enjoyment. advocacy groups have highlighted these externalities, noting that while the sustains over 500,000 jobs across the region and billions in annual economic output, adjacent areas derive limited direct gains, with many positions filled by non-local workers. Recent infrastructure projects seek to mitigate some effects, such as a $160 million initiative launched in June 2025 to enhance transit connectivity to the terminal, aiming to reduce reliance on trucks and improve access for historically underserved and residents. Federal funding, including a $400 million EPA Clean Ports Program award in October 2024, targets zero-emission technologies to lessen burdens on surrounding communities, potentially yielding long-term and quality-of-life improvements. Despite these efforts, persistent complaints from locals underscore ongoing tensions between port and residential well-being.

Labor Dynamics and Workforce Challenges

The Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal, as part of the broader Port of New York and New Jersey, employs longshore workers primarily represented by the (ILA), with Local 1233 handling operations in the Elizabeth area; the NY/NJ port complex supports approximately 10,000 ILA members across its terminals, many of whom staff the high-volume container operations at Newark-Elizabeth. Labor dynamics are shaped by strong union influence, enabling workers to secure contracts with significant wage increases—such as a 62% raise over six years agreed in October 2024—but also leading to frequent disruptions through strikes and work stoppages. A primary workforce challenge involves the ILA's staunch opposition to , which union leaders argue preserves jobs and enhances by maintaining human oversight in handling , though employers contend it hampers efficiency and competitiveness against automated ports like those on the . This tension escalated in a nationwide starting October 1, 2024, involving 45,000 East and Gulf Coast workers, including those at Newark-Elizabeth, halting operations for three days over demands to ban automated cranes and gates; a tentative deal averted further action but left unresolved, prompting threats of another by January 15, 2025, which was also forestalled by a new agreement. Such stoppages expose vulnerabilities in supply chains, with the 2024 event stranding billions in goods and underscoring how labor militancy prioritizes job protection over technological upgrades that could reduce labor costs and errors. Additional challenges include regulatory hurdles like mandatory background checks enforced by the Waterfront Commission of , which impose high costs on employers—estimated to deter hiring and inflate operational expenses at unionized terminals like Newark-Elizabeth—and ongoing issues with infiltration, prompting investigations into hiring practices as recently as 2024. The workforce remains predominantly non-diverse, with limited progress in recruiting women and minorities despite commission mandates, reflecting entrenched union control over registration lists that favor legacy hires over broader outreach. These factors contribute to skills gaps in adapting to modern demands, such as tracking and semi-automated equipment, exacerbating turnover and training burdens amid an aging demographic.

Controversies and Criticisms

Regulatory and Financial Inefficiencies

The of New York and New Jersey's (PANYNJ) maritime division, which includes the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal, has historically operated at a financial loss, with annual deficits ranging from $11 million to $128 million between 2004 and 2013, averaging approximately $100 million per year, subsidized by revenues from other PANYNJ facilities such as bridges and airports. This cross-subsidization model pools all agency revenues to service debt across underperforming assets, including ports, which discourages efficiency improvements in loss-making operations by allowing them to persist without standalone accountability. In 2013, Port Commerce generated $263 million in revenue, primarily from fixed rents (69%) and variable rents (13%), but operating expenses grew at 6.2% annually over the prior decade, outpacing revenue growth and contributing to projected deficits of $107 million by 2029 absent reforms. High labor costs exacerbate financial strains, accounting for about 50% of operating expenses and including inefficiencies such as royalties totaling $354 million in and practices permitting up to 40% idle time for non-working gang members. While the Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal itself posted a $16 million net profit in , systemic underutilization of PANYNJ facilities—such as low at ancillary terminals—and gate congestion have constrained overall below 50% despite infrastructure capable of handling 6.5 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) annually against 3.2 million TEUs processed that year. These issues stem partly from the agency's monolithic financial structure, which diverts port-generated funds to cover deficits elsewhere, limiting reinvestment in competitive enhancements like or rail access. Regulatory and governance inefficiencies arise from PANYNJ's bi-state structure, requiring consensus between New York and New Jersey governors, which fosters political interference, delayed decision-making, and bloated overhead from appointee-driven management. This has manifested in protracted approvals for expansions and vulnerability to , as seen in past scandals involving conflicts of interest that undermined operational integrity. Proposed reforms, including board term limits and separation of business lines to end cross-subsidies, aim to address persistent inefficiencies but face resistance due to entrenched political control. Without such changes, the model perpetuates suboptimal , hindering the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal's ability to maintain competitiveness amid rising volumes and rival investments.

Environmental Justice Claims

Environmental justice advocates have asserted that operations at the Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal impose disproportionate air pollution burdens on nearby low-income and minority communities in Newark and Elizabeth, New Jersey, citing elevated particulate matter (PM2.5) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from maritime activities, trucking, and idling ships as primary contributors to respiratory illnesses. These claims highlight the Ironbound neighborhood in Newark, where proximity to the port correlates with asthma rates approaching 30% among children, far exceeding national averages, and attribute this disparity to cumulative industrial pollution rather than isolated factors. Empirical data from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) supports elevated emissions from the terminal, with modeling indicating exceedances of air quality standards in adjacent areas predominantly inhabited by Black and Hispanic residents. Critics, including groups like the Coalition for Healthy Ports and Clean Water Action, argue that historical siting decisions and lax enforcement perpetuate "environmental racism," as port expansion has intensified and releases without commensurate mitigation for overburdened locales, where over 70% of residents in affected tracts identify as people of color. However, a 2025 peer-reviewed analysis of replacement programs near New York-New Jersey ports found mixed outcomes: while overall decreased, some Black-majority near-port communities experienced persistent or worsening air quality disparities, suggesting that regulatory interventions like cleaner mandates do not uniformly alleviate inequities due to variables such as trucking route persistence and enforcement gaps. In response to these claims, federal and state initiatives have allocated resources explicitly for remediation, including a $400 million EPA Clean Ports Program grant in October 2024 targeting zero-emission technologies at , , and facilities to curb emissions affecting vulnerable populations. NJDEP's "Stop the Soot" campaign, launched in , enforces stricter maritime emission controls at the terminal, reducing PM2.5 and by modeling compliance with community input, though advocates contend that such measures lag behind the scale of port throughput growth, which handled over 7 million TEUs in 2023. These efforts reflect acknowledgment of causal links between port activities and localized health risks, yet ongoing litigation by groups like Community Corporation underscores skepticism toward self-reported industry compliance.

Automation Versus Job Preservation Debates

The debates surrounding at Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal center on tensions between gains and the preservation of unionized longshoremen jobs, exacerbated by contract negotiations between the (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The ILA, which represents dockworkers at the terminal, has prioritized contractual bans on automated and semi-automated equipment, viewing such technologies as direct threats to employment in crane operations, container handling, and vessel loading. During the October 2024 strike that halted operations at the port for several days, ILA President Harold J. Daggett demanded "absolute airtight language that there will be no or semi-automation," framing the issue as essential for safeguarding jobs amid rising labor costs and technological pressures. Port operators and industry stakeholders counter that selective automation, such as automated guided vehicles and remote-controlled cranes, is critical for reducing turnaround times, cutting labor-intensive errors, and maintaining competitiveness against fully automated foreign terminals like those in or , which process higher volumes per worker. A 2018 McKinsey projected that port could lower operating expenses by 25 to 55 percent through increased throughput and reduced dependency on manual processes, potentially offsetting higher wage demands without net job elimination in ancillary roles like equipment maintenance and software oversight. At Port , where manual handling contributes to congestion and elevated costs—exacerbated by the terminal's handling of over 9 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) annually—proponents argue that ILA resistance perpetuates inefficiencies, raising import prices for consumers and undermining the port's position relative to facilities with partial . These negotiations extended into 2025, with a deadline for a master contract revealing persistent divides: the ILA insists on job protections to prevent , citing examples where automated terminals reduced needs by up to 50 percent, while USMX seeks flexibility for incremental to address labor shortages and bottlenecks exposed during the era. A report noted varying levels across U.S. ports, with East Coast sites like Newark–Elizabeth lagging due to contracts, potentially costing billions in forgone efficiency gains. Critics of the ILA's stance, including supply chain analysts, contend that blanket prohibitions ignore evidence from semi-automated U.S. ports where rose without proportional job losses, as displaced workers transition to higher-skilled positions; however, the maintains that such shifts fail to replicate the wage premiums of traditional longshore roles, estimated at over $150,000 annually including royalties. The impasse reflects broader causal dynamics: automation's labor-displacing effects stem from substituting capital for routine manual tasks, yet empirical data from global ports indicate net economic benefits through lower freight costs and expanded trade volumes that indirectly sustain more jobs in logistics and trucking. At Port Newark–Elizabeth, where ILA members rallied during the 2024 action emphasizing "this is for our future," the debate underscores trade-offs between short-term employment security and long-term port viability, with ongoing talks as of May 2025 showing no resolution on semi-automation allowances.

Recent and Future Developments

2020s Upgrades and Sustainability Initiatives

In the early 2020s, (PNCT), the primary operator on the side of the marine , committed to a $500 million modernization and redevelopment program aimed at expanding capacity and improving efficiency by 2030. This initiative includes a 33-acre expansion of the yard and queuing areas, boosting overall capacity by 25 percent through enhanced handling and infrastructure upgrades. Phase 2 of the project, involving site and , further supports handling larger volumes, with berth enhancements enabling simultaneous berthing of up to three ultra-large vessels as of 2024. In March 2025, PNCT acquired 15 additional Konecranes Noell Carriers to support these expansions, reducing fuel consumption and emissions compared to diesel models while increasing operational throughput. On the Elizabeth side, APM Terminals secured a lease extension agreement with the of and in 2025, incorporating substantial capital investments for capacity enhancements at its container terminal facilities. These upgrades align with broader infrastructure improvements, such as the Port Street Corridor project completed in October 2025, which modernized the northern roadway access into the terminal to alleviate congestion and support increased cargo flows. The 's overall capital investments, including portions of its $9.4 billion 2025 budget, fund these port-specific enhancements alongside regional connectivity improvements. Sustainability efforts intensified with the completion of a 7.2-megawatt at PNCT in June 2025, one of the largest such installations at an active U.S. container terminal, spanning 320 acres and generating approximately 50 percent of the terminal's annual energy needs. This system offsets an estimated 50 percent reduction in scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity and feeds excess power into the regional grid, advancing PNCT's net-zero energy goals in coordination with the 's target of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Complementing this, the opened an charging station at in July 2025 to facilitate zero-emission operations, part of a replacement program incentivizing cleaner vehicles to curb diesel emissions from port trucking. In October 2024, the U.S. allocated $400 million in Ports Program funding to ports, including initiatives for zero-emission equipment deployment at facilities like Port Newark–Elizabeth to mitigate . These measures build on the 's reduction targets of 35 percent by 2025 and 50 percent by 2030 from 2008 baseline levels.

Long-Term Master Plan and Projections

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey unveiled the Port Master Plan 2050 in July 2019 as a comprehensive 30-year framework to guide land-use decisions, infrastructure development, and operational enhancements across its marine terminals, including Port Newark and the Elizabeth Port Authority Marine Terminal (collectively PNET). The plan emerged from a 2.5-year review of over 3,000 acres of port property, incorporating input from more than 500 stakeholders through 45 presentations and 50 workshops, with the aim of sustaining while prioritizing , resiliency, and efficient cargo handling. It emphasizes flexible, phased implementation to accommodate evolving trade patterns, larger vessels, and technological advancements, building on prior investments such as the 50-foot channel deepening and raising that enabled ultra-large calls at PNET. For PNET, the plan designates Phase I as the initial focus, targeting implementation of upgrades like alternate power sources and rail connectivity enhancements to optimize existing capacity before major expansions. Phase II envisions progressive consolidation and realignment of land uses to prioritize operations, linking specific types to dedicated zones while minimizing inter-terminal truck movements and integrating advanced technologies for and . These phases support targeted expansions, such as the Port Newark South capacity addition, to handle increased volumes without sprawling development, complemented by ongoing projects like the $500 million-plus investment by in 2025 to upgrade its 350-acre PNET facility for higher throughput and vessel berthing efficiency. The strategy also incorporates resiliency measures against sea-level rise and storms, informed by post-Superstorm Sandy assessments, to ensure uninterrupted operations through elevated and ecosystem restoration ties. Projections under the plan anticipate container volumes at the Port of and doubling or tripling by 2050, driven by global recovery, nearshoring trends, and PNET's strategic position as a first for East Coast imports with direct access to over 1 billion square feet of regional warehousing. This growth equates to potentially exceeding 10 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) annually port-wide, with PNET positioned to capture a significant share through berth expansions capable of accommodating ships over 18,000 TEUs and enhanced on-dock rail to reduce highway congestion. Economic modeling in the plan forecasts sustained job preservation and creation in , projecting billions in annual revenue from optimized leases and , though actual outcomes depend on tenant investments and dredging approvals for further channel deepening. Sustainability projections include emission reductions via shore power, low-energy equipment, and tenant-mandated green practices, aiming for alignment with regional decarbonization goals without compromising throughput velocity.

References

  1. [1]
    Container Terminals - Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    Port Newark Container Terminal Features ; Entrance Gates. Calcutta Street ; Terminal Area. 272 Acres/110 Hectares + 37 off dock acres ; Length of Ship Berth. 4,400 ...
  2. [2]
    PNCT Terminal
    Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT) is one of the only Container Ports in the World to use part of its active operational footprint (10 acres)Gate Cameras · PNCT Empty Returns · TOS Web Portal · Gate HoursMissing: key facts
  3. [3]
    History Information | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    On August 15, 1962, the Port Authority opened the world's first container port, Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal (this photo shows the site in 1958, ...
  4. [4]
    Shippers Information | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    The location of the Port of New York and New Jersey's five container terminals allows shippers to get their goods to market with speed and efficiency.
  5. [5]
    Annual North American Cargo Volume Increases by 13% | CBRE
    Feb 26, 2025 · The Port of New York and New Jersey handled 8.7 million TEU cargo containers in 2024, an 11.7% year-over-year increase. The port has five modern ...Missing: Marine | Show results with:Marine
  6. [6]
    Port Master Plan - Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    The 30-year plan takes a holistic look at the Port, including cargo container facilities, automobile terminals, dry and liquid bulk cargo operations, ...
  7. [7]
    Port Newark-Elizabeth Marine Terminal - Hongocean
    Location: Located on the west bank of Newark Bay in New Jersey, it is connected to New York Harbor and is part of the New York-New Jersey port complex. · Area: ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Port Newark Marine Terminal/ Elizabeth
    ELIZABETH-PORT AUTHORITY. MARINE TERMINAL. CL. IPPER. ST. PAPD. Port Newark Marine Terminal/. Elizabeth - Port Authority. Marine Terminal. The Port is a faciity ...
  9. [9]
    APM Terminals Elizabeth
    The terminal's four ZPMC Super Post-Panamax ship-to-shore cranes are capable of handling the largest container vessels on the water today.Missing: key facts
  10. [10]
    deeper 45-foot channels officially opened to the port of new york and ...
    By coordinating closely with our partners and contractors, we were able to deepen the Kill Van Kull, a complex channel made of rock and a variety of sediments.
  11. [11]
    KILL VAN KULL CHANNEL DEEPENING IS COMPLETED BY THE ...
    Oct 13, 2011 · In order to bring all 38 miles of NY/NJ shipping channel depths to 50 feet, further dredging is needed in the Arthur Kill, Ambrose and Bay Ridge ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    NY/NJ harbor dredging, deepening complete - WorkBoat
    Sep 2, 2016 · In all, 38 miles of federal channels were dredged to as deep as 50'. The final tally for public and private investment to prepare the New ...
  13. [13]
    FACT SHEET - New York and New Jersey Harbor Deepening and ...
    Dec 23, 2024 · The project aims to deepen channels by 5 feet to -55 feet MLLW, costing $6.3B over 12-15 years, and is now in the pre-construction phase.Missing: Marine | Show results with:Marine
  14. [14]
    PORT AUTHORITY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS OUTLINE ...
    May 29, 2024 · “Our final integrated report recommends deepening the pathways to Port Newark, the Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal and the Port Jersey- ...
  15. [15]
    Newark Bay Dredging is Team Effort: Supports Safe Navigation ...
    Dec 16, 2024 · Newark Bay dredging supports safe navigation for large ships, removes sediment, and is critical for the long-term viability of the Port of New ...Missing: Terminal | Show results with:Terminal
  16. [16]
    [PDF] PA Port Facility Map Back 3-30-20
    Mar 30, 2020 · PORT NEWARK MARINE TERMINAL/ELIZABETH-PORT AUTHORITY MARINE TERMINAL. LYLE KING ST. RED HOOK. TRUCK. ENTRANCE. VIKING ST. CRANE. W. A. Y ST.Missing: layout | Show results with:layout
  17. [17]
    [PDF] City of Newark - NJ.gov
    Port Newark and the Elizabeth Port Authority Marine Terminal operate as one fully integrated ... between Port Newark/Elizabeth and the regional roadway network.
  18. [18]
    Infrastructure – Bergen County, NJ – Official Website
    Port Newark / Elizabeth is home to three fully-equipped containership terminals. It features ExpressRail, the port's on-dock rail facility, more than one ...Missing: connectivity | Show results with:connectivity<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    How Port Newark Moves the World | New Jersey Monthly
    Jul 18, 2019 · Officially, the port consists of two adjacent locations: Port Newark and Elizabeth Port Authority Marine Terminal. Most simply call it Port ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  20. [20]
    [PDF] supporting the operation of port newark and the elizabeth marine ...
    Advanced cargo handling equip- ment, including cranes and top loaders, are being introduced at Port Newark/Elizabeth to make the process of loading and ...
  21. [21]
    Newark, NJ - Ports America
    Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT) located in Port Newark, New Jersey occupies 272 acres, currently handling more than 1.3 million TEU's.
  22. [22]
    PORT AUTHORITY REPORTS DECEMBER AND FULL-YEAR ...
    Jan 31, 2024 · The Port of New York and New Jersey handled 7.8 million TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) over 2023. This was a 4.4 percent increase from pre-pandemic 2019.Missing: PNCT throughput
  23. [23]
    Port of New York and New Jersey extends lease for APM Terminals ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · APM Terminals Elizabeth currently handles over 25% of the annual container throughput in the port complex, supported by more than 1,100 ...
  24. [24]
    East Coast's Busiest Seaport Charts Growth Following Turbulent 2024
    Apr 2, 2025 · After a year of unexpected disruptions, the Port of New York and New Jersey still kept cargo moving with double-digit growth.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The Container Port Performance Index 2023
    The Container Port Performance Index 2023 ... NEW YORk & NEW JERSEY. 92. JOHOR. 93. POINTE-A-PITRE. 94. YOkkAICHI. 95. JAWAHARLAL ...
  26. [26]
    First moves in a bigger plan - APM Terminals
    Jul 14, 2025 · A $55 million crane replacement and redeployment initiative enables the terminal to simultaneously service two 18000+ TEU vessels, ...
  27. [27]
    Port of New York and New Jersey: Weekly, Monthly, and Year-Over ...
    May 2, 2025 · The terminal departure dwell time increased to 4.05 days, up 4.38% from last week's 3.88 days. This continues the upward trend from late March, ...Missing: throughput | Show results with:throughput
  28. [28]
    PNCT Orders 15 More Hybrid Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT), a long-standing customer of Konecranes, has placed an order for 15 additional Hybrid Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Liebherr Equips Port Newark Container Terminal With Two
    Nov 18, 2024 · Liebherr has delivered two ship-to-shore container (STS) cranes to Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT), boosting its capability to handle the next generation ...
  30. [30]
    PNCT invests in 15 more Hybrid Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers ...
    Mar 5, 2025 · Long-standing customer Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT) in the US has ordered a further 15 Hybrid Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers.
  31. [31]
    ExpressRail Information | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    Efficient and reliable on-dock rail service ... These facilities include ExpressRail Elizabeth, ExpressRail Newark, ExpressRail Staten Island and ExpressRail Port ...
  32. [32]
    Rail Information | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    Vessels arriving in New York/New Jersey unloads cargo directly to our on-dock rail for same-day departure to the Midwest before the vessel departs to the next ...
  33. [33]
    Millennium Marine Rail
    ExpressRail Elizabeth provides its ocean carrier customers with daily on dock double stack container service between the Port of New York/New Jersey, Canada, ...
  34. [34]
    PNCT Rail
    4 Intermodal Rail Spurs of 2,500 feet each. 10,000 feet of operational rail track. On-Dock Rail: The Corbin St. Bridge connecting Port Newark Container Terminal ...Missing: yard | Show results with:yard
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Rail Forward - Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    Annually, the. ExpressRail System has the capacity for 1.5 million rail lifts. ... major terminals in Elizabeth, Newark, Staten Island and Bayonne (the newest ...
  36. [36]
    On-Dock Rail Lifts, Port of New York, 1991-2016
    From 43,000 containers handled in 1992, volumes grew to above 500,000 lifts in 2016. It was expected that the rail's share of intermodal movements would climb ...Missing: Marine | Show results with:Marine
  37. [37]
    Port of New York/New Jersey already anxious to expand yet-to-open ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey plans to increase freight-rail capacity at an intermodal facility that hasn't even opened yet.
  38. [38]
    National Docks Rail Clearance - NJ.gov
    Sep 25, 2019 · The National Docks project improves vertical clearances on two tunnels on the Conrail railroad route between the Port of New York and New Jersey ...
  39. [39]
    Facilities - PNCT
    Port Newark Container Terminal. 241 Calcutta Street, Newark, NJ 07114. 973.522.2200 973.465.8827. Gate Access: Tyler Street; Terminal Type: Containerized Cargo ...Missing: APM | Show results with:APM
  40. [40]
    Press Release Number - Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    The redesign will feature a more efficient roadway configuration with a wider turning radius, allowing for safer trucking operations to and from the Port Newark ...
  41. [41]
    Modernization of Roadway Network at N.J. Port Complex Set to Begin
    Sep 10, 2024 · The $220 million Port Street Corridor Improvement project will transform the antiquated road network around the East Coast's busiest port complex.
  42. [42]
    PANYNJ projects tackle sustainability | AJOT.COM
    The Port Newark ramp serves around 1,400 trucks per peak hour, as well as other vehicles. The interchange's current configuration includes challenging hairpin ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    PANYNJ kickstarts $220 million street corridor project
    Nov 30, 2023 · The redesign is set feature a more efficient roadway configuration with a wider turning radius, allowing for safer trucking operations to and ...
  44. [44]
    Port Street Corridor Improvement Project
    It will modernize the northern roadway access point to Port Newark and the Elizabeth Port Authority Marine Terminal (EPAMT) in New Jersey.<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    smart-Tecs : Gate Automation Systems for Marine Terminals
    Manage gate processes and enable automation with the smart-Tecs GOS. ... Ports Newark Container Terminal Port Newark Container Terminal.
  46. [46]
    Port Newark Corbin Street Berth 3 Reconstruction - Conti Civil
    This project will increase the Port's ship berthing capacity as well as improve upon the safety and efficiency of terminal truck traffic to and from the Ports, ...Missing: enhancements | Show results with:enhancements
  47. [47]
    NJ ports must modernize to keep down cost of goods in NJ
    Sep 17, 2024 · The Port Liberty Bayonne Terminal is one of six terminals and the only one with semi-automated cranes, which still require human intervention.
  48. [48]
    Port History
    Sep 9, 2023 · In 1900 the City of Newark opened a port on filled swamp. A compact between the states of New York and New Jersey in 1921 created the Port ...Missing: 1910-1950 | Show results with:1910-1950
  49. [49]
    Top 10 Secrets Of The Port Newark-Elizabeth Marine Terminal
    Jul 12, 2021 · From housing a hidden church to holding a ship christening ceremony, there is much to discover in the Port Newark-Elizabeth Marine Terminal.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  50. [50]
    [PDF] The Port of New York and New Jersey: Lifeline to the Region
    Prior to these technological innovations, the typical breakbulk freighter required six work gangs of eighteen men each as long as a week to unload. Such proce-.<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Righting the Ship - Citizens Budget Commission
    Jan 12, 2015 · By 1955 PANYNJ announced it would expand facilities adjacent Newark Bay, using dredged materials to create Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  52. [52]
    Who Made America? | Innovators | Malcom McLean - PBS
    In April 1956, his first container ship, the Ideal X, departed Port Newark, New Jersey, headed for Houston. McLean named his new company Sea-Land, and rushed ...
  53. [53]
    The History of the Shipping Container created in 1956 | IncoDocs
    May 13, 2024 · Before shipping containers, all goods were manually loaded into sacks, barrels and wooden crates loaded directly onto cargo vessels – known as ...
  54. [54]
    Port Newark NJ began shipping industry as we know it today
    Nov 1, 2022 · "This is the birthplace of containerization," he said. "It started in New Jersey." Stacked up. Container shipping has been much in the news ...Missing: 1910s- | Show results with:1910s-
  55. [55]
    Port Newark: How Malcom McLean Changed the World |
    Apr 27, 2016 · “Malcom started out by putting truck bodies on ships. [Then] in 1957, he bought six old World War II break bulk cargo ships, gutted them and ...
  56. [56]
    The birth of the shipping container - Eveon Containers
    On April 23, 1956, the loading of Ideal X, a tanker converted by McLean, began. Using a crane, 58 aluminum "truck bodies" – trailers – were lifted aboard the ...
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    Port Newark‐Elizabeth Complex Becoming the World's Container ...
    Jul 23, 1972 · The Elizabeth terminal, which will be used almost exclusively for container ships, is already being dubbed “the container capital of the world.”.Missing: history 1910s-
  59. [59]
    The History of Container Shipping - Brookes Bell
    Nov 22, 2024 · Early-modern containerisation. The invention of the modern container is widely attributed to the mid-1950s, but more discerning historians have ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] New York and New Jersey Harbor Deepening Channel
    Maher Terminal by way of Newark Bay and Elizabeth Channels. 4. Port Newark Container Terminal by way of Elizabeth Channel. 5. Global Container Terminal New ...
  61. [61]
    B.21 – The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    The first dedicated container terminal in the world, the Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal, opened in 1962. The 1950s and 1960s saw a commitment to ...
  62. [62]
    PANYNJ reaches landmark agreement on lease extension for APM ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · “This lease extension will be another milestone for APM Terminals, which moved record volumes for the port in 2024,” said Henrik Kristensen, ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] port-lease-pnct.pdf
    Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal do not have the capacity to ... terminal at Port Newark. P&O Ports has commenced negotiations with the Port.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Capital of Commerce - Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    The Port of NY and NJ is situated in one of the country's most populated and affluent regions, with one third of the country's GDP located within. 250 miles. A ...
  65. [65]
    ​​Port of New York and New Jersey H1 2025 Overview​ | US
    Aug 25, 2025 · Through June, the Port of NY & NJ handled 4.4 million TEUs, marking a 4.9% increase compared to the same period last year.
  66. [66]
    New Study Assesses Economic Impact of Port of NY and NJ - NJBIA
    Oct 3, 2025 · The port industry of New York and New Jersey supported 580,000 total jobs, accounted for nearly $18.1 billion in tax revenue, and generated $57 ...Missing: Newark Elizabeth
  67. [67]
    Study: Port industry responsible for $108B in 2022 NJ business activity
    Jun 23, 2023 · Locally in 2022, the port industry of New York and New Jersey accounted for nearly $15.7 billion in tax revenue, supported more than 563,700 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    [PDF] supporting the operation of port newark and the elizabeth marine ...
    Note: Employment figures represent an average of quarterly employment estimates from the second quarter of 2006 and the three previous quarters. Source ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Port of New York and New Jersey Remains the Largest Container ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · October 2, 2025 ― Edison, NJ ― The Port Industry of New York and New Jersey supported nearly 580,000 jobs, accounted for nearly $18.1 billion ...
  70. [70]
    Facts and Figures - Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    Monthly Cargo Volumes ; Import TEUs ; Loads, Empties ; 2025, 382,217, 1,716 ; 2024, 413,833, 2,054 ; % Change, -7.6%, -16.5% ...Missing: Marine | Show results with:Marine
  71. [71]
    Top 5 US ports by TEU in H1 2025 - Port Technology International
    Jul 29, 2025 · 1. Port of Los Angeles · 2. Port of Long Beach · 3. Port of New York and New Jersey · 4. · 5.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] 326_25_MKTG PORT 2024 At A Glance_R2
    Worldwide, it is the 23rd largest. Cargo Volumes. (by TEU Volume). 916. 460 830. TEUs:.
  73. [73]
    Major Ports in the United States and North America - SeaVantage
    Jul 16, 2025 · Port of New York & New Jersey. Leading the East Coast, this port moved 7.2 million TEUs in 2024, cementing its position as North America's ...
  74. [74]
    USEC vs. USWC Port Opportunities and Challenges - EFL Global
    Sep 5, 2023 · One fundamental difference between the USEC and USWC is their strategic geographical locations. East Coast ports, such as New York/New Jersey, ...
  75. [75]
    Reinventing the Port Authority - City Journal
    In all these respects, the port of New York is at a disadvantage compared to most of its major competitors in the South and West. Though a competent day-to-day ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  76. [76]
    Top 7 East Coast Container Ports: A Business Guide - Unicargo
    Apr 21, 2025 · Ports that can handle larger ships and higher volumes (e.g. NY/NJ or Savannah) are ideal for high-volume importers, but smaller shippers might ...
  77. [77]
    The U.S. Port Competition Problem - AAF
    Mar 11, 2025 · This analysis shows that U.S. ports take significantly more time to move cargo, are less technologically advanced, and have longer wait times ...
  78. [78]
    Top East Coast Ports in the USA (2025 Guide) - Tonlexing Logistics
    Jul 29, 2025 · The Port of Savannah is one of the best-connected ports in the Southeast for inland transportation. It offers direct rail service and highway ...
  79. [79]
    As Much as the Traffic Will Bear: Experts Reflect on the Challenges ...
    Oct 26, 2023 · “When you look at the future of the port, there are challenges that we're going to face here. The increased volume has been great but handling ...Missing: competitive disadvantages
  80. [80]
    [PDF] 2022 multi-facility emissions inventory
    Dec 1, 2023 · ... emissions, and the change in on-rail cargo throughputs at Port Newark, Elizabeth PA Marine Terminal, Staten Island, and Bayonne between 2021 ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] PANYNJ Clean Ports Report Card
    Oct 2, 2025 · According to the 2023 Port of New York and New Jersey Emissions Inventory, ocean-going vessel operations comprise 53% of Port NOx emissions ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] 2023 MULTI-FACILITY MARINE EI - Port Authority
    Jan 1, 2025 · ... emissions, and the change in on-rail cargo throughputs at Port Newark, Elizabeth PA Marine Terminal, Staten Island, and Bayonne between 2022 ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Estimated Air Quality Impacts on Surrounding Communities of PM2 ...
    This memo describes the modeling of the estimated actual emissions and the predicted impacts of fine particulates (PM2.5) and SO2 from operations at the roughly ...
  84. [84]
    Three Years of High Time-resolution Air Pollution Monitoring in the ...
    To better understand air quality during increasing emission controls at the Port of New York and New Jersey (“Port”), an air monitoring station was sited to ...
  85. [85]
  86. [86]
    NJ ports getting $400M to cut air pollution | Video | NJ Spotlight News
    Oct 30, 2024 · Federal, state and local leaders gathered at Port Newark on Wednesday, to celebrate nearly $400 million coming from the U.S. Environmental ...Missing: Marine | Show results with:Marine
  87. [87]
    PORT AUTHORITY AND CITY OF ELIZABETH SIGN AGREEMENT ...
    The Port Authority will provide the city with additional funds under an existing Community Development Fund agreement to upgrade and repair municipal ...
  88. [88]
    Along Newark's Chemical Corridor, Old Injustices – and New Hopes
    May 15, 2024 · The Ironbound ranks in the 92nd percentile for diesel particulate matter exposure nationally and in the 96th percentile for the respiratory ...
  89. [89]
    Rutgers Study Helps City Ban Large Trucks
    Nov 27, 2018 · Diesel exhaust is a major component of particulate matter air pollution, which has been linked to asthma, lung diseases and heart disease. It ...
  90. [90]
    NJ cities with noise pollution rivaling NYC for worst in the U.S.
    Aug 14, 2024 · New York, Jersey City and Newark are three of the top 50 cities with the worst noise pollution problems in the country, according to a report by Steel Guard ...
  91. [91]
    Governor Phil Murphy - NJ.gov
    Nov 17, 2020 · Roughly 500,000 jobs are supported by Port activities, which generate billions of dollars in economic activity each year. The Port is an ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  92. [92]
    [PDF] GUBERNATORIAL PORTS BRIEFING 2017 - Clean Water Action
    Unfortunately, port-adjacent communities like Newark, Elizabeth, Jersey City and Bayonne receive little financial benefit and very few good paying jobs while ...Missing: socioeconomic | Show results with:socioeconomic
  93. [93]
    PORT AUTHORITY BREAKS GROUND ON $160 MILLION ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · The project will dramatically expand transit and airport access for historically underserved areas of Newark and Elizabeth.
  94. [94]
    EPA Announces Historic $400M Clean Ports Investment in New Jersey
    Oct 30, 2024 · EPA's Clean Ports Program funding will transform port operations with zero-emission technology, reduce air pollution, and advance environmental justice in port ...
  95. [95]
    Trucks, noise, odors: Here's what it's really like to live next to N.J. ...
    May 7, 2023 · As warehouse sprawl moves beyond New Jersey's urban areas, more and more residents are voicing complaints.
  96. [96]
    US port strike throws spotlight on big union foe: automation - Reuters
    Oct 4, 2024 · A key issue driving labor unrest across the continent - the growing use of automation - was unresolved.
  97. [97]
    East Coast ports strike, ILA union work stop strands billions in trade
    Oct 1, 2024 · Approximately 50,000 ILA union longshoremen were walking off the job at East Coast and Gulf Coast ports from New England to Texas starting ...Missing: dynamics workforce
  98. [98]
    The ILA's Fight Against Automation: Preserving Jobs, Securing ...
    Dec 2, 2024 · The ILA opposes automation because it jeopardizes jobs, threatens national security, and is not more productive than human workers, and it is ...
  99. [99]
    Unions Are Resisting Tech Advances That Make Ports More Efficient
    May 8, 2025 · Unions are resisting tech advances that would make East Coast ports more efficient—and dramatizing a tension within the Trump coalition ...
  100. [100]
    Longshoremen reach tentative deal to avert port strikes
    Jan 9, 2025 · The International Longshoremen's Association and a group representing their employers reached a tentative agreement that is set to avert widespread strikes.
  101. [101]
    [PDF] WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR ANNUAL ...
    The report highlights a tumultuous year, ongoing efforts to combat organized crime, and the lack of progress in diversifying longshore workers, despite the ...
  102. [102]
    Port Newark & The Balance Between Labor and Automation
    Oct 15, 2024 · Many of the workers at Port Newark are part of unionized labor groups that have fought for decades for fair wages, job security, and benefits.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Reforming the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    The proposed reforms include governance reforms, such as board membership and term limits, and operational reforms.
  104. [104]
    Is It Time to Dismantle the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey?
    The answer lies in the unique, historic financial structure where the combined, single revenue pool serves to support the debt that underlies the full array of ...Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
  105. [105]
    The Port Authority Leviathan - City Journal
    Feb 7, 2016 · Almost a century into its history, the Port Authority has grown into a gargantuan apparatus of inefficiency, overreach, corruption, and waste.<|control11|><|separator|>
  106. [106]
    NJDEP| Stop the Soot | Ports - NJ.gov
    Oct 5, 2022 · NJDEP has completed its Phase 1 “Estimated Air Quality Impacts on Surrounding Communities of PM2.5 and SO2 Emissions Resulting From Maritime ...
  107. [107]
    Shore power for cleaner ports in New York and New Jersey
    Oct 14, 2025 · At the Port of New York and New Jersey, ships produce 36% of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and 53% of nitrogen oxides (NOx). Both pollutants ...
  108. [108]
    Taking a Ride to the Port of Newark | Clean Water Action
    May 11, 2023 · Toxic diesel pollution does not just stop at the port terminal gate. Drayage (container) trucks are dispatched to cities and warehouses all over ...Missing: Elizabeth | Show results with:Elizabeth
  109. [109]
    Ports Archives - New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance (NJEJA)
    TODAY, Newark – The Coalition for Healthy Ports (CHP)* issued a call for action regarding the scrap yard fire at Eastern Metal Recycling Terminal at Port Newark ...
  110. [110]
    Port Cleaner Trucks and Environmental Justice in the Greater New ...
    Jun 1, 2025 · This paper examines local air pollution levels in disadvantaged neighborhoods near ports after the adoption of cleaner diesel trucks.
  111. [111]
    Fight Against PVSC's Fossil Fuel Power Plant
    Aug 26, 2025 · Ironbound Community Corporation Joins Legal Fight Against PVSC's Fossil Fuel Power Plant. Lawsuit Challenges Violation of Environmental Justice ...<|separator|>
  112. [112]
    ILA President Harold J. Daggett Joins Picket Lines Throughout Port ...
    Oct 1, 2024 · ILA President Harold J. Daggett Joins Picket Lines Throughout Port Newark/Elizabeth at Start of Strike; Rallies Tens of Thousands of ILA Members ...
  113. [113]
    Striking dockworkers: Automation will cost jobs | Season 2024 - PBS
    Oct 3, 2024 · The union threatened to “cripple” the supply chain unless port operators not only raise wages, but also promise job protection against wholesale ...Missing: versus | Show results with:versus
  114. [114]
    Strike at U.S. Ports Brings Debate Over Automation Front and Center
    Oct 2, 2024 · According to the GAO report, the 10 largest U.S. container ports have all adopted some form of automation technology, but to varying degrees.
  115. [115]
    ILA-USMX's automation divide halts negotiations again
    Nov 14, 2024 · The parties have been unable to come to an agreement on automation used at the ports as a Jan. 15 deadline approaches.Missing: versus | Show results with:versus
  116. [116]
    ILA's outstanding issues center on automation, experts say
    Oct 9, 2024 · The International Longshoremen's Association agreed to extend its master contract until next year to address automation concerns.<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    Striking US port workers sound resolute note: 'This is for our future ...
    Oct 3, 2024 · International Longshoremen's Association members walk out on east and Gulf coasts over pay and automation dispute.
  118. [118]
    News: MAYOR BARAKA JOINS PORT AUTHORITY AND ... - Newark
    Jun 12, 2025 · The 7.2-megawatt (MW) solar installation at PNCT now generates 50 percent of the terminal's annual energy needs, greatly reducing emissions and improving air ...Missing: Elizabeth 2020s
  119. [119]
    [PDF] Port Newark Container Terminal Straddle Carrier Replacement ...
    Jul 20, 2020 · Konecranes Hybrid Electric Straddle Carriers provide a safe, efficient means for completing predictive, preventive, and reactive maintenance on ...
  120. [120]
    Port Newark Container Terminal - Jacobs
    Given the proximity of Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR), new cranes installed on Berth 53 are low-profile (sliding-boom) design. Designed new crane ...Missing: Marine | Show results with:Marine
  121. [121]
    Newark port project to give MSC's terminal more room to grow
    Jul 31, 2024 · Newark port project to give MSC's terminal more room to grow. Port Newark Container Terminal plans to handle up to three ultra-large container ...
  122. [122]
    Ports America / PNCT Phase 2 - Kyle Conti Construction | KCC
    KCC was awarded the contract for the Phase 2 Expansion Development as part of PCNT's $500M modernization and redevelopment program.
  123. [123]
    PNCT invests in 15 more Hybrid Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers ...
    Mar 5, 2025 · PNCT invests in 15 more Hybrid Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers for expansion at Port of Newark. Long-standing customer Port Newark Container ...Missing: projects | Show results with:projects
  124. [124]
    Port Authority reaches landmark agreement with APM Terminals on ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · This agreement includes major investments and capacity enhancements by APM Terminals at its container terminal, setting a new framework for ...
  125. [125]
    Port Street Corridor Improvement Project - ArcGIS StoryMaps
    Oct 17, 2025 · This project upgrades the critical northern roadway access point into Port Newark and Elizabeth Port Authority Marine Terminal.
  126. [126]
    PORT AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS APPROVES ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · Rebuilding the entire Port Street complex of access roads to Port Newark and the Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal, which are among ...
  127. [127]
    Standard Solar Delivers 7.2 MW System At Port Newark Container ...
    – July 8, 2025 – Standard Solar and Port Newark Container Terminal (PNCT) have completed a 7.2 megawatt (MW) solar project engineered to integrate with the ...Missing: early | Show results with:early<|separator|>
  128. [128]
    Port Newark Container Terminal Solar Facility - Dewberry
    The project supports PNCT's mission toward a net-zero energy microgrid and PANYNJ's commitment to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
  129. [129]
    PORT AUTHORITY OPENS ELECTRIC TRUCK CHARGING ...
    Jul 9, 2025 · Through its comprehensive net-zero roadmap, the Port Authority has committed to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and to facilitating ...Missing: Elizabeth 2020s
  130. [130]
    5 Key Facts About Port Newark-Elizabeth Marine Terminal - Ship4wd
    Jul 11, 2024 · Port Newark-Elizabeth Marine Terminal takes pride in its intermodal capabilities, offering seamless transitions between sea, rail, and road ...
  131. [131]
    Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Net Zero Sustainability ...
    As part of their commitment to reducing greenhouse gasses (GHG), PANYJ adopted climate aggressive goals to reduce emissions by 35% by 2025, 50% by 2030, and net ...
  132. [132]
    PORT AUTHORITY UNVEILS COMPREHENSIVE 30-YEAR PLAN ...
    The new 30-year plan follows an extensive 2½ year review of more than 3,000 acres of port property and included more than 45 presentations to regional ...
  133. [133]
    [PDF] PORT MASTER PLAN 2050 - A Road Map for the Next 30 Years
    Oct 21, 2019 · Phase 1: Port Newark/Elizabeth PAMT. IMPLEMENT. An ... Of ongoing Red Hook marine activity at Brooklyn Port Authority Marine Terminal.
  134. [134]
    Port Master Plan 2050 | PDF - Scribd
    PHASE II PORT NEWARK & ELIZABETH PAMT. Phase II will see progressive consolidation and realignment of the current land use within specific cargo linkages.
  135. [135]
    PANY/NJ Reaches Landmark Agreement with APM Terminals
    Mar 24, 2025 · This investment supports the Port Authority's Port Master Plan 2050, which anticipates cargo volumes doubling or tripling by mid-century. APM ...
  136. [136]
    PORT AUTHORITY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS OUTLINE ...
    May 29, 2024 · “Our final integrated report recommends deepening the pathways to Port Newark, the Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal and the Port ...
  137. [137]
    NY-NJ Port Authority's Master Plan 2050 Takes On Sustainability
    Jul 12, 2019 · The master plan said with container volumes projected to double or triple over the next 30-year time frame, it is critical for the Port ...
  138. [138]
    Port Authority Unveils 30-year Vision for the Port of New York and ...
    Aug 12, 2019 · The new Master Plan offers a dramatic vision of the Port in 30 years: “The number of containers will more than double, ships will be bigger ...Missing: upgrades | Show results with:upgrades