Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pupillary distance

Pupillary distance (PD), also known as interpupillary distance (IPD), is the measurement in millimeters between the centers of the pupils of the two eyes.^[1] This anatomical parameter is essential in optometry and ophthalmology for aligning the optical centers of prescription eyeglasses and other visual aids with the pupils to optimize vision correction and minimize distortions.^[1]^[2] Accurate PD measurement is critical to avoid prismatic effects that can lead to eye strain, headaches, and suboptimal visual performance, particularly in multifocal lenses where near and far PD values differ.^[1]^[2] The average PD for adults is approximately 63 mm, typically ranging from 50 to 70 mm, though it varies by age—generally increasing slightly from childhood to adulthood—and by gender, with males averaging 2 to 3 mm larger than females (e.g., about 66.7 mm for males and 62.6 mm for females in some populations).^[1]^[3] PD is measured using methods such as pupillometers (considered the gold standard via corneal light reflections), PD rulers, autorefractors, or even smartphone apps for screening, with professional assessment recommended for precision in clinical settings.^[2] While stable in healthy adults, PD can be affected by conditions like strabismus or surgical interventions, influencing its role in refractive surgery planning and optical device design.^[1]^[2]

Fundamentals

Definition

Pupillary distance (PD), also known as interpupillary distance (IPD), is defined as the distance in millimeters between the centers of the pupils of both eyes when fixating on a distant point.^[1]^[4] This measurement captures the horizontal separation between the pupils, which typically ranges from 50 to 70 mm in adults, serving as a key anatomical reference for aligning the visual axes with the optical centers of lenses in eyewear.^[1] Accurate PD ensures that optical devices position the lens centers directly in line with the pupils, minimizing visual distortions such as unwanted prism effects that could arise from misalignment.^[5] There are two primary variants of PD based on viewing distance: distance PD, measured for far vision when the eyes are parallel, and near PD, measured for closer tasks like reading when the eyes converge inward. Near PD is generally approximately 3 mm smaller than distance PD due to this convergence, which brings the pupils closer together as the eyes rotate toward the nose to focus on nearby objects.^[4]^[6]

Importance

Pupillary distance (PD), defined as the distance between the centers of the pupils, plays a critical role in eyewear prescription by ensuring the optical centers of lenses align precisely with the pupils. This alignment is essential to optimize light refraction and prevent induced prism effects, which occur when lenses are decentered and can lead to asthenopia (eye strain), headaches, and blurred vision. Accurate PD measurement thus promotes visual comfort and clarity, reducing the risk of these common complaints associated with misaligned optics.^[1] Clinically, errors in PD measurement, even as small as 1-2 mm, can result in significant decentration, causing substantial visual discomfort and exacerbating issues in complex prescriptions. In progressive lenses, such errors can lead to distortions and adaptation difficulties. These implications underscore the need for precise PD to maintain effective vision correction without unintended prismatic deviations.^[1] Beyond eyewear, proper PD adjustment in optical devices is vital for preventing diplopia (double vision) and supporting binocular vision stability, which are foundational to coordinated eye function and depth perception. This broader significance extends to various corrective tools, where misalignment could disrupt fusional vergence and lead to chronic visual fatigue.^[1] As of 2025, PD's importance has grown in personalized medicine and technological advancements, with telemedicine platforms integrating remote PD measurements via auto-refractors and AI-driven tools to enable tailored vision corrections. These innovations, including virtual simulations for lens fitting, enhance accessibility and precision in optometric care, aligning with broader trends in individualized health interventions.^[7]

Types and Variations

Classifications

Pupillary distance (PD), also known as interpupillary distance (IPD), is classified primarily based on the anatomical scope of the measurement and its intended optical application, with the most common categories being binocular and monocular PD. These classifications ensure accurate lens centering in eyewear, particularly for correcting refractive errors.^[1] Binocular PD measures the total horizontal distance between the centers of the pupils of both eyes and serves as the standard metric for symmetric eyewear fittings, such as single-vision lenses for distance vision. This measurement, typically ranging from 54 to 74 mm in adults, assumes equal distribution of the distance across the bridge of the nose and is sufficient for most routine prescriptions where facial asymmetry is minimal.^[8] In contrast, monocular PD assesses the distance from the center of each pupil to the facial midline (the bridge of the nose) separately for the right and left eyes, providing two distinct values that sum to the binocular PD. This type is crucial for high-power prescriptions, asymmetrical faces, or progressive lenses, as it allows for individualized lens positioning to optimize visual acuity and minimize prism-induced distortions. Monocular measurements are particularly recommended for high-power prescriptions, asymmetrical faces, or progressive lenses, enhancing precision in multifocal lens designs.^[1]^[4] PD measurements are further categorized by viewing distance, distinguishing between distance PD (for far vision, with eyes parallel) and near PD (for close tasks like reading, where convergence reduces the effective distance by 2-4 mm). This variation, often termed dynamic PD, accounts for changes in pupil positioning with gaze direction and is essential for bifocal or progressive additions to align the near segment correctly.^[9] Less commonly, vertical PD evaluates the vertical distance from the pupil center to the lower pupillary margin or frame bottom, primarily used to determine segment height in bifocals and progressives for proper placement of the reading portion relative to the line of sight. This measurement, typically 20-25 mm from the pupil center to the lower lid margin, supports accurate fitting in multifocal lenses to avoid visual discomfort during downward gaze.^[10] Usage distinctions emphasize binocular PD for straightforward, symmetric applications like basic distance correction, while monocular and dynamic variants enable precision in complex scenarios, such as high astigmatism or occupational near tasks, ensuring the optical center aligns with the pupil under varying gaze conditions.^[9]^[4]

Demographic Factors

Pupillary distance (PD), also known as interpupillary distance (IPD), exhibits variations influenced by demographic factors such as age, gender, and ethnicity. The global average for binocular PD in adults typically ranges from 62 to 64 mm.^[11] Males generally have a PD that is 2-3 mm wider than females, with reported averages of approximately 64 mm for males and 62 mm for females.^[11]^[12] Age-related changes in PD are most pronounced during childhood and adolescence. In infants, PD measures around 40 mm at birth, increasing steadily to adult levels of about 62-64 mm by age 15 as the facial structure develops.^[13] PD continues to increase slightly through the early adult years, stabilizing around age 30 before showing a minor decrease of up to 1-2 mm in older adulthood due to age-related facial changes.^[14]^[15] Ethnic variations in PD reflect differences in craniofacial anatomy, with averages for East Asians typically ranging from 60 to 62 mm, Europeans from 63 to 65 mm, and Africans from 64 to 66 mm.^[16]^[11] These differences arise from a combination of genetic factors, such as heritability in orbital spacing, and environmental influences like nutrition during development.^[17]^[18] Such demographic variations are clinically significant for standardizing eyewear frame designs to ensure proper optical centering and reduce visual strain across diverse populations.

Measurement Methods

Manual Techniques

Manual techniques for measuring pupillary distance (PD) rely on simple, non-technological tools such as rulers, allowing for accessible assessments in clinical or home settings without specialized equipment. These methods, rooted in early optometric practices, emphasize visual alignment and direct observation to determine the distance between pupil centers. While effective for basic needs, they require careful execution to minimize errors from human judgment. The PD ruler method involves using a millimeter-scaled plastic ruler positioned at the bridge of the nose or forehead while the patient fixates on a distant target, typically 6 meters away for distance PD. The examiner aligns the ruler's markings with the centers of both pupils, often using one eye to sight along the ruler and avoid parallax, yielding a binocular measurement from pupil center to center. This technique typically achieves an accuracy of ±2 mm, though studies report mean differences of about 0.5 mm compared to more precise instruments, with potential overestimation due to angle kappa variations.^[2] For self-measurement, the mirror technique enables individuals to assess their own PD at home by standing 8 inches from a well-lit mirror, holding the millimeter ruler horizontally against the browline, and focusing straight ahead on a distant point. Close the left eye, align the ruler's zero mark with the center of the right pupil in the reflection, then open the left eye to read the measurement at the left pupil's center; repeat for the opposite side if measuring monocular PD, which separately gauges each pupil's distance to the nose bridge. This approach is common for at-home use but shares the ruler method's limitations, including parallax errors from head tilt or improper alignment.^[6] To enhance accuracy in both techniques, ensure the patient's gaze is parallel to the floor with the head in a natural position. Additional steps include marking pupil centers on the ruler with a pen for reference and conducting measurements in good lighting to reduce estimation errors; however, parallax from angular viewing remains a key limitation, potentially leading to discrepancies up to 1-2 mm.^[2]

Digital and Instrumental Tools

Digital pupillometers represent a significant advancement in pupillary distance (PD) measurement, offering handheld devices that utilize optical or infrared technology for rapid and precise assessments. These instruments typically employ infrared illumination to detect pupil centers without visible light interference, enabling measurements in seconds with an accuracy of ±0.5 mm. For instance, the Reichert PDM Digital PD Meter is a widely used example that measures both monocular and binocular PD, as well as pupil-to-nose distance, through an ergonomic design featuring an LCD display for immediate readout.^[19] Autorefractors integrate PD computation as part of automated refraction examinations, enhancing efficiency in clinical settings. These devices, often combined with keratometers in phoropters, use infrared sensors and alignment targets to simultaneously capture refractive error and PD data, typically ranging from 50 to 75 mm for adults. By aligning the patient's gaze with internal fixation lights, autorefractors achieve reliable PD measurements during routine eye exams, reducing the need for separate manual steps.^[20] As of 2025, smartphone applications leverage AI and augmented reality (AR) for accessible PD measurement via front-facing cameras, making it convenient for consumers ordering eyewear online. Tools like the GlassesOn app guide users through facial scanning with on-screen prompts and calibration markers, such as holding a credit card for scale reference, to estimate PD in real-time with an accuracy of ±1 mm under optimal lighting conditions. Similarly, Banuba's AR SDK enables precise 3D facial mesh reconstruction for PD calculation, supporting virtual try-on features in e-commerce while maintaining medical-grade utility for optometry.^[21]^[22] In research environments, webcam-based systems employ advanced image processing algorithms, such as radial symmetry transform, to detect pupil centers and compute PD from video feeds. These non-contact methods analyze pixel gradients to identify circular pupil boundaries, achieving sub-millimeter precision in controlled setups and facilitating large-scale studies on gaze tracking or biometric analysis.^[23]

Applications

Eyewear Fitting

Pupillary distance (PD) plays a central role in eyewear fitting by ensuring the optical centers of prescription lenses are precisely aligned with the wearer's pupils, which is essential for optimal visual clarity and comfort across various lens types. For single-vision lenses, accurate PD measurement positions the lens's optical center directly in line with each pupil, minimizing distortions and prism-induced effects that could otherwise cause eye strain or headaches. This alignment is equally critical for bifocal and progressive lenses, where PD guides the placement of corrective zones to match the natural pupillary positions, preventing blurred vision or adaptation difficulties.^[24] In frame selection, PD informs the choice of frame width to ensure the distance between lens centers accommodates the individual's pupillary separation, avoiding mismatches that lead to discomfort such as temple pressure from overly narrow frames or slippage from excessively wide ones. A proper match between patient PD and frame dimensions promotes stable positioning on the face, reducing the need for frequent adjustments and enhancing overall wearability. PD is typically obtained using precise tools like pupillometers during the fitting process to verify compatibility with the selected frame. In the US, as of 2023, federal regulations mandate including PD on eyeglass prescriptions to facilitate accurate fitting and consumer access.^[25]^[26] For multifocal lenses, monocular PD measurements are particularly vital to determine the correct segment height, ensuring the transition zones for near and intermediate vision align accurately with each eye's pupil. Errors in monocular PD placement can result in image jump—a sudden displacement of the visual field when shifting gaze across segment lines—leading to disorientation and reduced visual efficiency, especially in flat-top bifocals or ultex designs with larger jumps. Accurate monocular PD helps mitigate these issues, promoting seamless adaptation to multifocal corrections.^[27] Industry standards, such as those outlined in ANSI Z80.1-2020, mandate PD accuracy tolerances to guarantee eyewear comfort and performance, requiring the fitting cross location in progressive and multifocal lenses to align within ±1.0 mm of the specified monocular interpupillary distance. Recent emphases in standards revisions address adaptations for digital lenses, incorporating tighter PD verifications to account for near-field viewing demands in modern eyewear.^[28]

Virtual and Augmented Reality

In virtual reality (VR) headsets, interpupillary distance (IPD) adjustment is essential for aligning the optical centers of the lenses with a user's pupils, typically achieved through mechanical sliders or software-based calibration. Mechanical adjustments, such as those in the Meta Quest 3, allow users to set the lens separation within a range of 56 to 70 mm, accommodating a broad spectrum of adult IPDs. Software calibration, often integrated with eye-tracking systems, further refines alignment to minimize visual distortions. These mechanisms help mitigate the vergence-accommodation conflict (VAC), where the eyes' convergence for stereoscopic depth differs from the fixed focal plane of the displays, a primary contributor to VR-induced nausea and fatigue.^[29] Most VR devices, including the Meta Quest series as of 2025, support IPD ranges of approximately 56 to 70 mm, covering about 95% of adults and reducing the risk of eye strain from misalignment. However, narrower ranges in some fixed-IPD headsets, such as the Oculus Rift S (limited to around 57 to 69 mm), adequately fit only 46% to 70% of users, leading to discomfort like headaches and blurred vision in the remaining 30% to 54%. Proper IPD matching prevents these issues by ensuring binocular fusion and clear imagery across the field of view. In augmented reality (AR) systems, precise IPD alignment is critical due to waveguide optics, which guide virtual images to overlay the real world and require exact pupil positioning for accurate alignment and minimal ghosting. Devices like the Apple Vision Pro incorporate software-driven IPD adjustments via eye and face tracking, automatically repositioning displays during setup to optimize overlay precision without manual intervention. This approach enhances user comfort in mixed-reality environments by compensating for waveguide sensitivities to pupil offset. Research indicates that even small IPD mismatches exacerbate visual discomfort in VR and AR; for instance, fixed-PD configurations cause dizziness, nausea, and eye strain in approximately two-thirds of users compared to adjustable systems. A 1 mm deviation can degrade perceived image clarity and contribute to reduced visual acuity, underscoring the need for precise calibration. Advancements in 2024, such as varifocal meta-devices in holographic displays, have improved IPD tolerance by dynamically adjusting focal depths, expanding the effective eye-box and accommodating variations up to several millimeters for broader user compatibility.^[30]^[31]^[32]

Medical and Forensic Contexts

In medical diagnostics, asymmetry in pupillary distance (PD) can signal underlying neurological conditions, such as cranial nerve palsies or orbital tumors, by indicating facial or orbital asymmetry that affects the relative positions of the pupils.^[33] For instance, anisocoria—unequal pupil size often accompanied by PD discrepancies—may arise from oculomotor nerve (cranial nerve III) compression due to tumors or aneurysms, prompting urgent neuroimaging.^[33] In neurology, PD measurements are routinely tracked to monitor progressive disorders like myasthenia gravis, where pupillary dysfunction and eyelid ptosis can alter effective PD, aiding in differential diagnosis from other neuromuscular conditions.^[34] PD growth patterns provide a reliable metric for age estimation in pediatric ophthalmology, with interpupillary distance increasing steadily from infancy through adolescence due to craniofacial development. Norms established from large cohorts show average PD rising from approximately 40.5 mm in newborns to 46.5 mm by 12-23 months, stabilizing around 60-65 mm in adults, allowing clinicians to assess developmental milestones or detect anomalies like craniosynostosis.^[13] In forensic applications, PD derived from eyeglass impressions or lens markings at crime scenes enables suspect matching, as the optical centers of lenses are aligned to an individual's precise PD, leaving unique trace evidence on surfaces like windows or vehicles. This technique has been integrated into facial recognition databases, where PD serves as a biometric anchor for identity verification, achieving precision within ±1 mm when combined with high-resolution imaging, enhancing accuracy in suspect identification from surveillance footage.^[35] Recent developments as of 2025 include AI-enhanced PD measurement in telemedicine platforms, enabling remote eye exams via smartphone cameras that detect pupillary landmarks with sub-millimeter accuracy, facilitating early detection of neurological asymmetries without in-person visits.^[36] Studies have also linked PD variations to ethnic biometrics, revealing slight differences with means around 63-64 mm across African and Caucasian populations.^[37]

Data Resources

Normative Databases

Normative databases compile standardized measurements of pupillary distance (PD), also known as interpupillary distance (IPD), to support research, clinical reference, and population studies. The U.S. Army Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR) represents a key resource, with its initial 1988 survey (ANSUR I) collecting data from over 4,000 participants and subsequent ANSUR II (2012) expanding to more than 6,000 individuals across Active Duty, National Guard, and Reserve personnel. These datasets include direct measurements of IPD using pupilometers, yielding an average male IPD of approximately 63 mm in representative samples.^[38]^[39] International databases provide region-specific PD norms, often derived from optometric and anthropometric surveys. In Europe, datasets from routine optometric practices, such as one aggregating far IPD from 1,800 Caucasian adults, document gender differences with males averaging 64-65 mm and females 60-62 mm. For Asian populations, 2023 studies on Iranian adults report average IPD values around 61 mm, measured via PD meters and autorefractometers in samples exceeding 100 participants. These sources highlight demographic variations, such as slightly narrower PD in Asian cohorts compared to Western ones.^[40]^[41] Accessibility to PD data has improved through public repositories, including the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) eyeGENE network, which offers phenotypic and genotypic information on inherited eye conditions. As of 2025, efforts to develop AI-curated global norms integrate diverse datasets for broader applicability, facilitating cross-population analyses. These databases underpin device prototyping by providing baseline metrics and enable population health screening to detect deviations from norms.^[42]^[43]

Research Standards

Research standards for pupillary distance (PD) measurement and application are governed by international and national guidelines to ensure accuracy, reliability, and applicability across diverse populations. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z80.1-2015 standard for prescription ophthalmic lenses specifies that the fitting cross location in progressive lenses must be within ±1.0 mm of the specified monocular interpupillary distance, establishing a key tolerance for optical alignment in eyewear fabrication. Similarly, ISO 13666:2019 defines pupillary distance as the separation between the centers of the pupils in the primary gaze position and provides foundational terminology for ophthalmic optics, though specific instrumental accuracy requirements often align with ANSI tolerances for practical implementation. Ongoing developments in standards for digital ophthalmic tools aim to incorporate smartphone-based and automated measurement systems, emphasizing calibration protocols to maintain sub-millimeter precision in clinical and consumer settings. Research protocols for interpupillary distance (IPD) studies prioritize robust methodological designs to capture variability across demographics. Guidelines from the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) advocate for inclusive sampling in vision research, including multi-ethnic cohorts to reflect global population diversity. Validation of measurement tools commonly employs Bland-Altman plots to assess agreement between methods, such as comparing pupillometers to manual rulers. These protocols ensure reproducibility, with repeated measures recommended to minimize intra-observer error, and normative databases serving as benchmarks for standardizing age- and ethnicity-specific references. Emerging research from 2024-2025 explores PD's role beyond traditional optometry, particularly in AI-driven biometrics and environmental impacts on vision. Studies have integrated PD measurement into facial recognition systems, such as SDKs for AR applications that include pupillary distance analysis. Investigations into post-COVID vision alterations have noted changes in pupillary light responses and accommodative function, though impacts on anatomical PD remain unestablished. Longitudinal data on PD stability in aging populations confirm relative constancy in adulthood, with mean IPD holding at approximately 63 mm beyond age 20, though subtle increases of 1-2 mm may occur in older cohorts due to orbital changes, informing adaptive optics in geriatric care. Ethical standards in PD research underscore informed consent and data protection, especially in sensitive applications. For forensic databases utilizing PD as a biometric identifier, protocols mandate explicit participant consent and anonymization to prevent misuse, aligning with broader biometric governance frameworks like those from the International Biometric Society. In virtual reality (VR) hardware, interoperability certifications require standardized IPD adjustment ranges (typically 50-75 mm) to ensure accessibility, with ethical guidelines promoting compatibility testing across devices to avoid exclusion of users with atypical PD values.

References

[1]
Pupillary Distance: What It Means & How To Measure
Pupillary distance (PD) is the distance between your eyes' pupils. Accurate measurement ensures prescription eyeglasses provide maximum vision improvement.
[2]
A Comparative Analysis of Interpupillary Distance Measurement ...
Dec 14, 2024 · This study aimed to compare interpupillary distance (IPD) measurements using common clinical techniques (pupillometer, PD ruler, and autorefractor)
[3]
Anthropometric Analysis of Palpebral Fissure Dimensions and its ...
The average interpupillary distance for males and females were 66.72 ± 3.84 mm and 62.59 ± 5.24 mm, respectively; and the intercanthal for males and females ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Pupillary Distance: Types and How to Measure - WebMD
May 29, 2024 · Near-point convergence occurs when your eyes focus together on a nearby object. ... Your pupillary distance gets shorter as your eyes converge, or ...
[5]
the role of pupillary distance and the optical centre - PMC - NIH
The first step in achieving correct alignment of the optical centre is to accurately measure and record the pupillary distance, measured in millimetres (mm).
[6]
Pupillary Distance: How to Measure Yours | Warby Parker
Oct 8, 2025 · An average pupillary distance for adults is around 60-64 mm. But there isn't really a “normal” PD—everyone is different, and this number can ...
[7]
Franciscus Cornelis Donders (1818-1889) - PubMed
May 20, 2015 · Franciscus Cornelis Donders was educated at Duizel and Boxmeer before entering the Military Medical School and the medical faculty at Utrecht University in ...
[8]
5 reasons progressive lenses fail - Hannaford Eyewear
Feb 13, 2017 · Here are five of the most common errors that cause non adaptation to progressive lenses. 1. PD (Pupillary Distance) ... progressive lens ...Missing: distortion amplification
[9]
Influence of prismatic effect due to decentration of optical center in ...
Aug 1, 2023 · The current study aimed to estimate the amount of prismatic effect that is induced due to the decentration of an optical center in ophthalmic lens.
[10]
The evolution of telemedicine in ophthalmology - EyeWorld
The VECS technician measures the pupillary distance of the patient as she fits the patient for glasses. ... The last big technology piece is personalized medicine ...
[11]
The Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data of Interpupillary ...
Jul 3, 2017 · Distance between the pupils, called interpupillary distance (IPD), is an important clinical measure used to identify potential vision issues ...Missing: classifications types
[12]
Agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic ...
Apr 18, 2021 · Four types of automatic PD measurements were performed: binocular near, binocular distance, monocular right eye distance, and monocular left eye ...Missing: classifications | Show results with:classifications
[13]
Method and system for determining pupillary distance and element ...
Progressive addition lenses have a seg height 108 that is approximately the same as the vertical pupillary distance (or "NPD") 120, which is the height of ...
[14]
Normal Interpupillary Distance Values in an Iranian Population - PMC
Mean adult IPD values in our study was 62.1 mm which is lower than those observed in other races: 63.7mm in black Americans, 64 mm in white Americans, and 63 mm ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
[15]
Gender differences in interpupillary distance among Arabs - PubMed
Arab males have IPD on the average 2.0 mm wider than females. Different experimental techniques and ages of subjects make conclusive statements.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[16]
[PDF] The development of norms of pediatric interpupillary distance - CORE
The average PDs (mm) for each age group were: Group 1 (newborn-11 months): NA/40.5; Group 2. (12-23 months): 46.5/43.0; Group 3 (24-35 months): 47.5/43.5;.
[17]
The Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data of Interpupillary ...
Viktorins method uses a hand measure of IPD by measuring the distance between certain features in the eye. Pupilometers are handheld ophthalmological devices ...
[18]
Changes in the interpupillary distance (IPD) with ages and its effect ...
Mean IPD of 5.1 cm in 5-year old children increases to 6.3 cm in adult over 20. In adulthood, IPD remains the same, ie 6.3 cm.
[19]
Normal periocular anthropometric measurements in an Australian ...
Mar 4, 2023 · Compared to Caucasians, African subjects had a significantly larger interpupillary distance and outer intercanthal distance, whereas East Asians ...Missing: average | Show results with:average
[20]
Interpupillary distance in a normal black population - PubMed
We suggest that interpupillary distance of Black children and adults be assessed according to the mean proportions for their race.Missing: average | Show results with:average
[21]
(PDF) Interpupillary Distance Measurements among Students in the ...
Jan 25, 2016 · Conclusion: IPD is affected by age, ethnicity and gender variations. The study will provide normal reference values of interpupillary distance ...
[22]
Agreement between smartphone-based applications and traditional ...
Purpose : To determine precision and accuracy of interpupillary distance (IPD) ... This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in ...
[23]
The Frankfort Plane and Head Positioning in Facial Aesthetic ...
Their scheme was adopted and designated the Frankfort Agreement (1882) and was published in Germany in 1884.² To compare various crania in a standardized way, ...
[24]
Reichert PDM Digital PD Meter - Premier Ophthalmic
In stock 30-day returnsThe Reichert PDM measures interpupillary and pupil-to-nose distance with 0.5mm accuracy, has an ergonomic design, and a user-friendly LCD screen.
[25]
ZEISS VISUREF 150 | Autorefractometer and keratometer
Corneal vertex distance. 0.00, 10.00, 12.00, 13.50, 15.00 mm. Pupillary distance (PD). 10 mm to 85 mm. Min. pupil diameter. 2 mm. Chin rest movement. max. 65 mm ...
[26]
Comparing the Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications in ... - NIH
Jul 31, 2023 · Purpose To determine the accuracy of three smartphone applications in the measurement of interpupillary distance (IPD).
[27]
Pupillary Distance Measurement for Try-On and Ophthalmology
Sep 3, 2024 · Banuba's virtual PD ruler works by creating a 3D mesh of a person's face and gauging the distance between the correct vertices. You can ...
[28]
(PDF) Pupil Center Detection Using Radial Symmetry Transform to ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Our algorithm could effectively eliminate the interferences of illumination change, spectrum, as well as glasses frames. ... [Show full abstract] ...
[29]
Why In-Person Pupillary Distance (PD) Measurement Is Essential for ...
A precise PD measurement ensures that the optical center of each lens lines up exactly with your pupils. This alignment is essential for clear vision and ...
[30]
Understanding Frame PD vs Patient PD: A Comprehensive Guide
### How Patient PD Guides Frame Selection to Avoid Mismatch Issues
[31]
Multifocal Designs - Optical Training Institute
Accurate monocular P.D. and seg height measurements are recommeded for successful fitting. The two trifocal styles shown on the previous page are a franklin ...
[32]
https://photonix.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43074-025-00164-9
[33]
[PDF] Mitigating Vergence-Accommodation Conflict for Near-Eye Displays ...
Recent studies show that VAC is one of the primary contributors of fatigue and nausea in virtual and augmented reality. To mitigate VAC, it is necessary to ...
[34]
Effect of Fixed versus Adjustable Pupillary Distance (PD) on ... - IOVS
This experiment tested the hypothesis that Adjustable PD VR viewers will decrease the likelihood of VR sickness compared to Fixed PD VR viewers. Methods : ...Missing: mismatch acuity studies
[35]
Causes and Consequences of IPD Mismatch in XR Devices
Aug 10, 2025 · This paper provides a theoretical review of the importance and consequences for user experience of accurately estimating IPD and incorporating ...
[36]
Three-dimensional varifocal meta-device for augmented reality display
Mar 10, 2025 · It increases the tolerance for variations in users' interpupillary distances (IPD) and compensates for the inevitable minor movements of the ...
[37]
Anisocoria - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Aug 8, 2023 · Anisocoria is a condition characterized by unequal pupil size. The etiology of anisocoria is complex, ranging from benign to potentially life-threatening ...
[38]
Pupillary dysfunction in myasthenia gravis - University of Kentucky
The constriction‐dilation cycles of pupils exposed to a stationary, discrete slit‐lamp beam were significantly prolonged in 25 myasthenic patients (1,060.4 ...
[39]
Postmortem Interval Ocular Indicators - IntechOpen
May 15, 2024 · Postmortem interval, the time elapsed since the death of a body, is critical in determining the investigations of unwitnessed deaths.Missing: distance timeline
[40]
Human Recognition Accuracy on Low Resolution Faces - arXiv
Mar 25, 2025 · This study aims to explore the boundaries of human recognition accuracy by systematically testing accuracy across a range of IPD values.
[41]
AI-Powered Smartphone Diagnostics for Convergence Insufficiency
The algorithm extracts key features, including pupillary distance (PD), eye-phone distance, and eye movement relative to the bridge of the nose. These ...
[42]
Interpupillary distance measurements for the African population of ...
Mar 24, 2021 · The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary or baseline values and investigate variations of IPD measurements for Africans in general ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[43]
[PDF] ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS SETS MANUAL
503 - Interpupillary Distance - The distance between the two pupils is measured with a pupilometer. 506 - Interscye Distance - Subject stands erect looking ...
[44]
[PDF] 2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel - DTIC
The goals of the survey were to acquire a large body of data from comparably ... The last anthropometric survey of U.S. Army (ANSUR) men and women was.
[45]
The far interpupillary distance. A gender-specific variation ... - PubMed
A FIPD database is presented here, comprising material collated from the spectacle dispensing records of n = 1800 subjects seen in routine optometric practice.Missing: association | Show results with:association
[46]
Comparison of Three Methods of Measuring the Inter-Pupillary ...
Mar 16, 2024 · The mean far-distance IPD measurements using the auto-refractometer, PD meter, and PD ruler were 62.57 ± 3.79 mm, 61.95 ± 3.82 mm, and 61.24 ...
[47]
eyeGENE - NIH
eyeGENE is a program building a data and DNA resource for researchers to investigate rare inherited eye diseases, with access to data and DNA samples.About eyeGENE · Researcher Auth Service (RAS) · Expert Panel · Working GroupMissing: pupillary distance
[48]
eyeGENE® | NEI Data Commons - NIH
eyeGENE is an NEI data resource created that provides phenotype and genotype data on multiple inherited eye conditions for the vision research community.Missing: pupillary distance correlations