Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Retting

Retting is a biological, chemical, or process used to separate fibers from the non-fibrous components of stems, primarily by degrading , , and that bind the fibers to the woody core. This essential step in production targets plants such as , , , and , enabling the extraction of long, strong fibers for applications in textiles, composites, ropes, and bioproducts. Traditional retting methods rely on microbial action to achieve separation, with dew retting involving the spreading of harvested stems in fields where dew, rain, and soil facilitate over 14 to 28 days, offering a low-cost, mechanizable approach suitable for large-scale operations. In contrast, water retting submerges stems in ponds, rivers, or tanks at ambient temperatures for a similar duration, promoting microbial activity that yields uniform, high-quality fibers with enhanced whiteness and tensile strength, though it generates wastewater pollution. Modern alternatives include enzymatic retting, which employs enzymes in controlled indoor settings to accelerate breakdown, reducing processing time while preserving fiber integrity for high-value uses like apparel, albeit at higher costs. Chemical retting uses alkaline or acidic solutions to dissolve binding materials quickly, producing cleaner fibers for but often compromising tensile strength and requiring environmental management. Mechanical methods, such as , crush stems without biological agents, providing speed for industrial scales but potentially lower fiber purity. The efficacy of retting directly influences fiber properties, including fineness, strength, and degumming , determining suitability for end products from coarse ropes to fine linens.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Retting is a controlled process that facilitates the separation of bast fibers from the stems of plants through the targeted decomposition of pectins and other non-fibrous tissues, primarily using moisture, bacteria, or chemicals to isolate long, strong fiber bundles without compromising their integrity. This method is essential for bast fiber crops, with primary applications in flax (Linum usitatissimum) and hemp (Cannabis sativa), and secondary use in jute (Corchorus spp.), ramie (Boehmeria nivea), and kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus). The core purpose of retting lies in its role within production, where it breaks down the pectin-based "glue" that binds the valuable bast fibers to the woody core () and outer bark, thereby enabling the of high-quality fibers suitable for textiles, composites, and industrial materials. By selectively degrading these binding substances, retting ensures the fibers retain their desirable properties, such as length, strength, and flexibility, which are critical for downstream applications. In the overall workflow, retting follows the harvesting of plant stems and precedes mechanical separation techniques to fully isolate the fibers. This process has historical roots in production dating back to , where it was employed to process for textiles.

Historical Development

Retting, of separating fibers from plant stems, originated with water retting as the earliest known method, practiced in around 3000 BCE for production from . Archaeological evidence from , such as the analysis of a 4000-year-old yarn from the of Sennedjem (circa 1300 BCE), reveals that ancient employed water-retting to loosen fibers by immersing stems in water, allowing microbial degradation of pectins, followed by manual to yield fine fiber bundles suitable for textiles. This technique was fundamental to Egypt's economy, where cultivation and weaving supported and daily use, as evidenced by wall paintings depicting harvesting and . By the (12th-15th centuries), retting practices spread across through trade routes, with dew retting emerging in cooler, northern regions like and the due to and climatic conditions unsuitable for extensive water immersion. Dew retting involved spreading stems on fields to expose them to dew and microbial action, a method documented in late medieval archaeological sites and texts as a adaptation for local production of textiles. This shift complemented water retting in southern areas, enabling broader cultivation despite environmental constraints. In the , the brought mechanization to processing in and , where large-scale production for textiles and cordage prompted innovations like improved machines to enhance efficiency and reduce labor, while water-retting remained largely traditional. , a leading producer, saw mechanized facilities along rivers facilitate faster processing, boosting output amid growing demand. Chemical retting emerged in the , with experiments using alkaline solutions like caustic soda to accelerate separation, offering a quicker alternative to traditional methods. Enzymatic retting advanced in the as a biotechnological innovation addressing environmental drawbacks of chemical and water methods, with developing pectinase-based formulations like Flaxzyme through patents and trials starting in the late 1980s and commercialized by the mid-. Post-World War II, Western flax production declined sharply due to the rise of synthetic fibers like , which offered cheaper alternatives, leading to mill closures by the . A revival began in the 2000s, driven by demand for sustainable textiles, with initiatives in and promoting eco-friendly retting for biodegradable fabrics.

Retting Methods

Water Retting

Water retting is a traditional method for separating fibers from or stems by immersing the harvested plant material in , allowing microbial action to degrade the pectin-rich that binds the fibers to the woody core. The process typically involves submerging bundles of stems in stagnant ponds, rivers, or purpose-built tanks for 4 to 14 days at temperatures between 25°C and 35°C, during which such as species colonize the stems and produce pectinolytic enzymes like pectinases and pectate lyases to dissolve the pectins. This controlled immersion creates an oxygen-depleted environment that favors microbial activity, resulting in the gradual loosening and separation of the fibers. Variants of water retting include warm water retting, where the water is heated to 30–40°C to accelerate the process, reducing the duration to 24–48 hours or up to 100 hours while enhancing activity for more uniform degradation. Another variant is stream retting, which uses flowing natural water sources like to provide oxygenation and remove dissolved pectins, often yielding cleaner and finer fibers compared to stagnant water methods. The advantages of water retting lie in its ability to produce uniform, high-quality fibers with a fine and high tensile strength, making them ideal for premium textiles, as the controlled microbial action ensures consistent removal without excessive fiber damage. In contrast to retting's exposure to variable field conditions, water retting offers more predictable results suitable for high-end applications. However, water retting is labor-intensive, requiring frequent monitoring to prevent over-retting, which can weaken the fibers, and it demands substantial volumes—up to 100 liters per of extracted fiber—often necessitating treatment of the nutrient-rich to mitigate environmental pollution. Historically, water retting was the dominant method in , where stems were retted in the River to produce fine fibers for used in and mummification, dating back over 4,000 years. In , it prevailed from the (c. 1500–500 BCE) through medieval times for production in the subcontinent. During colonial eras in , including the , river-based water retting was widespread in regions like the for exporting high-quality fibers.

Dew Retting

Dew retting is a natural, field-based process used primarily for separating bast fibers from flax stems by exposing them to atmospheric moisture and soil microorganisms. After harvest, typically in autumn, the stems are spread evenly in thin layers on grass fields to facilitate microbial degradation of pectins and other non-fibrous components that bind the fibers to the woody core. This aerobic process relies on dew, rain, and occasional sunlight to maintain moisture levels, allowing indigenous soil bacteria such as Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., and Rhizobium soli, along with fungi like Aspergillus sp. and Fusarium sp., to colonize the stems and break down the pectin matrix through enzymatic action. The stems are periodically turned to ensure even exposure and prevent uneven retting. Optimal conditions for dew retting include cool, humid climates with temperatures between 10-25°C and relative humidity of 70-80%, which promote microbial activity without excessive drying or rotting. These conditions are most reliably found in regions like , where the process typically lasts 2-6 weeks, depending on weather patterns; excessive rain can accelerate retting but risks over-degradation, while dry spells may prolong it or lead to incomplete separation. Farmers monitor the stems visually and tactilely, harvesting when the fibers separate easily from the core with a slight tug. Unlike water retting, which involves submerging stems for faster, more controlled results, dew retting depends on passive environmental exposure. The primary advantages of dew retting include its low cost and minimal resource requirements, as it uses no or additional chemicals, making it by avoiding generation. It also preserves the natural color and strength of the , which are suitable for coarser textiles and durable applications like ropes or . However, disadvantages arise from its heavy reliance on unpredictable , which can result in under-retting (incomplete separation) or over-retting ( weakening), leading to inconsistent quality and potential that introduces dirt or unwanted microbes. The longer duration ties up land and labor compared to other methods. Dew retting has been a common practice in since the , particularly in , , and , where it produces the renowned "European flax" valued for its robustness in textile production. Regional adaptations often involve mechanized spreading and turning with to improve efficiency, especially in larger operations, while the method's suitability to local cool, moist soils enhances fiber durability for export markets.

Chemical Retting

Chemical retting is an accelerated method that employs synthetic chemicals to hydrolyze pectins and other non-cellulosic components binding fibers to stems, enabling rapid fiber separation and addressing the time and variability limitations of biological retting processes. In this process, stems are immersed in chemical solutions, typically (NaOH) at concentrations of 1-5% or acids such as , maintained at temperatures of 50-80°C for 1-4 hours, after which the fibers undergo neutralization and thorough rinsing to remove residual chemicals. Variants of chemical retting include alkaline retting, which predominates for bast fibers like and due to its effectiveness in dissolving pectins under high conditions, and retting, applied more specifically to fibers such as for targeted . The alkaline variant often incorporates chelators like EDTA to enhance pectin degradation, while methods may use oxalic or at lower levels for controlled breakdown. This offers key advantages, including significantly reduced time—from weeks in biological retting to mere hours—yielding consistent unaffected by environmental factors like , and for . However, it incurs disadvantages such as substantial chemical consumption, which generates alkaline with elevated biological oxygen demand (BOD) requiring , potential from over-treatment leading to weakened tensile properties, and higher operational costs compared to methods. Chemical retting emerged in the early as a controlled alternative to traditional retting, with foundational studies documented as early as 1923, and saw heightened adoption during in the United States and to expedite hemp processing for military needs. Unlike enzymatic retting, which uses targeted bio-catalysts for milder action, chemical retting's reliance on harsh inorganics exacerbates environmental drawbacks through persistent effluents.

Enzymatic Retting

Enzymatic retting involves treating stems with specific , primarily pectinases such as polygalacturonase and pectate lyase, along with xylanases and limited cellulases, to selectively degrade the and bonds that bind fibers to the stem. These , often derived from , are applied in buffered solutions, typically at temperatures of 40-50°C and levels around 5.0, for durations ranging from 4 to 24 hours. The process is conducted in controlled environments like immersion tanks or bioreactors to ensure uniform exposure and optimal activity, resulting in the loosening of fibers without excessive degradation of . This method offers precise control over fiber separation, yielding cleaner fibers with minimal damage to the structure, which preserves fiber strength and length compared to less targeted retting approaches. It significantly reduces water consumption—by up to 70% relative to traditional water retting—and generates less , making it more environmentally sustainable for high-value applications such as and composites. Despite these benefits, enzymatic retting faces challenges including higher upfront costs for enzyme production, estimated at $10-20 per kg for pectinase formulations, and the need for precise optimization of conditions to avoid under- or over-retting. Scalability remains an issue due to the dependence on enzyme supply and the complexity of maintaining consistent enzyme activity in large-scale operations. Innovations in the field include commercial systems developed by companies like , which introduced products such as Viscozyme in the 1990s for targeted . The use of combined enzyme cocktails, incorporating pectinases with xylanases and chelators like EDTA, has enhanced retting efficiency by improving separation rates and reducing processing time. Adoption has grown in for flax production since the early 2000s, where enzymatic methods support standards by avoiding chemical inputs. Studies indicate that enzyme-retted fibers achieve 15-25% higher yields of long, high-quality fibers compared to dew-retted counterparts, facilitating better suitability for premium markets.

Post-Retting Processing

Drying and Fiber Separation

Following retting, the stems must be dried promptly to arrest microbial activity, reduce content to 10-15%, and prevent growth or further degradation. This step is essential for preserving integrity and facilitating subsequent , with outcomes depending on the uniformity achieved during retting. Air- in the field typically takes 2-5 days under favorable weather conditions, allowing natural while the stems are spread evenly to ensure uniform removal. Alternatively, controlled in dryers at 40-60°C accelerates the process, often completing in hours to days depending on initial levels (around 60% wet basis post-retting), while minimizing damage to the fibers. Once dried, the stems undergo mechanical separation to isolate the bast fibers from woody residues, performed in a precise sequence—breaking, , and hackling—to minimize tangling and maximize fiber alignment. Breaking crushes the brittle woody core ( or hurds) using fluted rollers or traditional brakes, fracturing it into small pieces without damaging the flexible outer fibers. follows, involving beating or swinging the broken stems against blades or revolving drums to dislodge and remove the shives, separating longer line fibers suitable for fine yarns from shorter tow fibers used in coarser applications. Hackling, or combing, then aligns the fibers by drawing them through sets of increasingly fine spiked combs, further isolating long-line fibers (over 20 inches) from tow while removing any remaining impurities. This sequential approach yields clean, parallel fibers ready for spinning. Traditional processing relied on hand-held tools like wooden brakes and boards, labor-intensive methods dating back centuries. By the , mechanized brakes and improved efficiency, evolving into 20th- and 21st-century automated decorticators and integrated mill lines that combine breaking, , and hackling in continuous operations. These modern systems substantially reduce labor requirements compared to manual processes, enabling higher throughput in industrial settings. Proper and separation typically achieve 20-30% recovery from the original weight, with line fibers comprising about 15-20% and tow the remainder, optimizing material utilization for textile production.

Quality Evaluation

Quality evaluation of retted fibers focuses on assessing the degree of separation, removal of non-fibrous components, and resulting physical properties to ensure suitability for applications. Effective retting yields fibers with optimal fineness, strength, purity, and appearance, while inadequate or excessive can lead to coarse, weak, or discolored material. These evaluations guide adjustments in retting parameters and post-processing to meet industry requirements for high-performance natural fibers like . Key metrics for retted flax fiber quality include fiber fineness, measured in tex (grams per kilometer), where high-quality linen fibers typically range from 10 to 20 tex; tensile strength, often 30 to 70 cN/tex; purity, indicated by residual pectin content below 5%; and color or whiteness, with lighter tones preferred for premium textiles. For instance, well-retted fibers exhibit low impurities (e.g., 0.3% in optimally water-retted samples) and improved whiteness (L* values increasing with retting duration). These metrics establish the fiber's processability and end-use performance, such as spinnability and durability in composites. Testing methods encompass , such as scanning electron (SEM), to visualize fiber bundle separation and surface cleanliness; chemical assays, including acid detergent fiber () analysis to quantify and residual content, and enzymatic methods for precise determination; and mechanical tests like those in ISO 5079, which measure breaking load and elongation at break using instruments such as Instron testers. SEM reveals smoother, more separated fibers post-retting, while ADF helps confirm low non-cellulosic residues (e.g., reduced by 58% after 6 days of water retting). Standards for flax fiber quality are outlined in ISO 2370 for fineness via permeametric methods and ISO 5079 for tensile properties, with providing additional guidelines on terminology and testing. Over-retting indicators include fiber darkening, increased brittleness, and stabilized weight loss or degumming rates, signaling degradation beyond optimal separation. While the International Wool Textile Organisation (IWTO) primarily addresses , related protocols like OFDA for fiber diameter analysis have been adapted for bast fibers such as . Factors influencing quality primarily involve retting duration and method, with water-retted fibers achieving higher (e.g., 2.3-2.54 ) and better separation compared to dew-retted ones (typically coarser at 3-5 due to uneven fungal activity). Extended water retting (e.g., 6 days) enhances tensile strength and purity but risks over-retting if prolonged to 10 days, leading to brittleness. Modern tools like , developed since the 2000s, enable non-destructive evaluation of fiber , strength, and purity by analyzing spectral signatures of and content in stems or processed fibers. This rapid technique supports on-site monitoring during retting, improving efficiency over traditional methods.

Environmental and Economic Aspects

Environmental Impacts

Water retting, a traditional method for separating bast fibers from plants like flax and hemp, has significant environmental drawbacks primarily due to its resource intensity and pollutant generation. The process consumes substantial amounts of water, typically 50-100 liters per kilogram of fiber produced, placing pressure on local water resources in regions with intensive production. Effluent discharge from water retting exhibits high chemical oxygen demand (COD), often ranging from 500 to 2000 mg/L, which promotes eutrophication in rivers by depleting oxygen levels and fostering algal blooms that disrupt aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, the anaerobic conditions prevalent in retting tanks lead to methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas that exacerbates climate change impacts. Dew retting, conducted by spreading harvested stems on fields to allow microbial via dew and , minimizes usage compared to methods but introduces land-related concerns. The practice of field spreading can cause , particularly when heavy machinery is used for turning the swaths, reducing soil porosity and affecting long-term agricultural productivity. In fields common to this method, applications to control weeds and pests increase the risk of runoff into nearby bodies, potentially contaminating habitats and harming non-target species. Chemical retting employs alkaline or acidic solutions to accelerate fiber separation, resulting in wastewater characterized by extreme pH values (2-12) that can alter receiving chemistry and harm aquatic life. This effluent often contains traces of heavy metals from processing aids, amplifying toxicity in discharge areas. Such practices contribute to through high pollutant loads and poor treatability. The method is also energy-intensive, relying on heating solutions to optimize reaction rates, which increases dependency and associated emissions. Enzymatic retting offers a more targeted approach using biological catalysts to degrade pectins, yielding lower overall environmental impacts with approximately 70% less consumption than traditional water retting and generating biodegradable effluents that pose minimal risk to ecosystems upon discharge. However, the upstream production of these enzymes demands considerable energy, primarily from and purification processes that rely on and . Across all methods, bast fiber retting represents less than 1% of global emissions, reflecting its small relative to synthetic and fibers. Nonetheless, localized effects in major production hubs such as and include from expansive flax monocultures, which reduce diversity and promote degradation through intensive .

Sustainability and Innovations

Sustainability efforts in retting focus on reducing and environmental footprints through innovative process designs. Closed-loop water systems for retting have been developed to recycle process , minimizing discharge and promoting in fiber from . For instance, such systems enable of waste stalks into fibers while reusing in a contained cycle. retting supports certifications under standards, as it relies on natural microbial action without synthetic chemicals, aligning with regulations for sustainable . Innovations in retting emphasize eco-friendly alternatives to traditional methods, enhancing efficiency and quality. Hybrid enzymatic-mechanical approaches, including ultrasound-assisted techniques, accelerate separation by improving penetration and reducing processing time compared to conventional enzymatic retting alone. research explores modified bacterial strains to optimize retting, though applications remain primarily in settings for fibers. Economic viability is improving with sustainable practices, though costs vary by . Dew retting remains cost-effective at lower expenses due to minimal inputs, while enzymatic retting incurs higher costs from use but yields superior quality for composites. The global bast , valued at approximately $5 billion in recent years, is projected to grow at a 7% CAGR through 2030, driven by demand for sustainable textiles. Future trends point toward greater integration of bio-based solutions and circular practices. Bio-based enzymes are increasingly replacing synthetic chemicals in retting to lower environmental impacts. Retting byproducts, such as and residues, are being explored for conversion into biofuels, supporting models in bio-based industries. Policy drivers like the EU Green Deal provide subsidies through the for low-impact cultivation and processing, incentivizing sustainable retting. Challenges persist in scaling these innovations, particularly for small farmers in regions like , where limited access to , training, and financing hinders adoption of advanced retting methods.

References

  1. [1]
    Retting process of some bast plant fibers and its effect on fibre quality
    The traditional methods for separating the long bast fibres are by dew and water retting. Both methods require 14 to 28 days to degrade the pectic materials, ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Harvesting, Retting, and Fiber Separation - USDA ERS
    Retting is a microbial process that breaks the chemical bonds that hold the stem together and allows separation of the bast fibers from the woody core.
  3. [3]
    Flax Fiber Offers Cotton Cool Comfort - AgResearch Magazine - USDA
    “Retting” is the process of separating the fibers from the stalks. Traditional dew retting is a slow process that takes place in the field. But by getting ...
  4. [4]
    Characterization of flax water retting of different durations in ...
    Apr 27, 2015 · Water retting is a traditional retting method that enables the low-cost production of bast fibers. This study investigated the retting of flax ...
  5. [5]
    Water retting process with hemp pre-treatment - PubMed Central - NIH
    Sep 13, 2024 · The retting time is an important key to obtaining high fiber quality, increasing the mechanical performance of fibers by avoiding cellulose ...
  6. [6]
    Retting Method - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Retting is a process that separates the fiber bundles from the central stem, thus loosening the fibers from the woody tissue of the fiber crops. The fiber ...
  7. [7]
    Retting of Bast Fiber Crops Like Hemp and Flax—A Review ... - MDPI
    The retting process involves the controlled decomposition of those substances that bind the fiber containing tissues to the other components of the stalk as ...
  8. [8]
    Bast Fibre - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Retting is a process used to collect bast fibres from harvested stems. The purpose of retting is decomposition of pectins and other compounds cementing bast ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] bioresources.com
    Sep 5, 2011 · The homogeneity of this long fibre depends very much on the technique of producing the fibre bundles, which is known as the retting or degumming.
  10. [10]
    linen: flax seeds - University College London
    However, in ancient Egypt the retting (the breakdown by enzymes of the pectin and other substances which hold the cells of the plant together) was only allowed ...
  11. [11]
    Flax-Linen in history | ALLIANCE
    5,000 years BCE: Flax farming and linen weaving were fundamental to the economy of ancient Egypt. 3,000 years BCE: The Phoenicians exported linen to Scotland, ...
  12. [12]
    Perspectives on Structure, Chemistry, and Enzymes for Retting Flax
    Two main methods have been historically employed commercially to ret flax for textile-grade fibers, namely, water retting and dew (or field) retting [3, 37]. In ...
  13. [13]
    Flax Fibre Extraction Techniques in the Late Middle Ages - EXARC
    May 25, 2020 · Early Egyptian wall paintings show the flax plant being harvested by pulling the plant out of the ground root (Klebs, 1915, pp.54-55) and all, a ...
  14. [14]
    About FLAX: the plant, retting, scutching, hackling, drafting, spinning ...
    Dec 3, 2015 · Scutching by hand was very hard work, the first mechanized scutching mills were established in Ireland and operated by the end of the 19th ...
  15. [15]
    From Dresses to Dollar Bills: Texture Connects Past and Present of ...
    Jun 27, 2024 · In the nineteenth century, flax was retted en masse in the flowing waters of the Leie river. The retting made the flax stalks supple. © City of ...
  16. [16]
    Method for batchwise enzymatic retting of flax or other rettable plants
    The invention comprises a method for batchwise enzymatic retting of flax or other rettable plants in regard to fibre release. [0002]. For the sake of brevity, ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] influence of pectinolytic enzymes on retting ... - ncsu.edu/bioresources
    Jan 5, 2008 · Flaxzyme, a product from Novo Nordisk, was developed from this work and was reported to produce fibers with good yield and quality (Van ...
  18. [18]
    Flax: Bringing back the historic crop which could make fashion greener
    Aug 30, 2023 · But its decline was triggered by a move towards cheaper man-made fibres, which were often imported, and a shift away from sailing. Now climate ...Missing: synthetics 2000s
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    The Quantity and Quality of Flax and Hemp Fibers Obtained ... - NIH
    The retting process was carried out at a water temperature of 30 °C, a ratio of 1:10 (1 kg of straw per 10 dm3 of water), process time of 72 h for flax, and ...
  21. [21]
    (PDF) History of linen in Indian subcontinent - ResearchGate
    History of linen production and use dates back to 12000 BC (Vedic age) to 1500 CE (Medieval period) in the region. Reports establish that flax was an important ...
  22. [22]
    Retting of Bast Fiber Crops Like Hemp and Flax—A Review ... - MDPI
    Another major disadvantage is that dew retting produces fibers with highly non-uniform properties [68] partly due to its dependence on the weather at the ...
  23. [23]
    Growing Flax · Omeka S - Exhibitions - Penn State
    There are two ways to ret the flax. One, the stalks can be laid out in a field in a thin layer to be dew retted. This process can take three to six weeks ...
  24. [24]
    Retting and Chemical Treatment of Natural Fibers – A Review
    Sep 24, 2025 · The ratio of fiber straws to water maintained is 1:10 (for 1 kg fiber straws 1 liter of water). Combination of physicochemical and microbial ...
  25. [25]
    Bast Fibres Processing
    ### Chemical Retting Summary
  26. [26]
    Effect of enzymatic treatment of flax on chemical composition and ...
    Feb 25, 2019 · Besides these pectinases, xylanase activity also showed high potential for enzymatic retting. Hence, pectate lyase, polygalacturonase, and ...
  27. [27]
    Enzymatic treatment of flax for use in composites - ScienceDirect.com
    However if pectinase enzymes are dosed with at least 10 times the xylanase concentration, retting will occur more smoothly. Commercially available enzyme ...
  28. [28]
    Linen Most Useful: Perspectives on Structure, Chemistry, and ...
    Dec 30, 2012 · Two main methods have been historically employed commercially to ret flax for textile-grade fibers, namely, water retting and dew (or field) ...
  29. [29]
    Enzyme-retting of flax and characterization of processed fibers
    Aug 9, 2025 · Retting formulations produced fibers having different properties, with enzyme levels of 0.3% (v/v as supplied) giving finer but weaker fibers than 0.05% ...
  30. [30]
    Bio-enzymatic Treatment of Flax Fiber Waste: Fostering Sustainable ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · Moreover, enzyme treatments significantly reduce water usage and CO₂ emissions during treatment, making them a more eco-friendly solution ( ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    The Advantages of Enzyme-Based Flax Retting
    Oct 6, 2025 · Environmental Friendliness: Enzymes operate under mild conditions (moderate temperature and pH), eliminating the need for harsh chemicals and ...
  32. [32]
    Best Linen Fabric Cost Analysis: Wholesale vs Premium Organic ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · Enzyme or Bio-Retting: If water retting used, mills employ enzyme cultures (e.g., pectinase) costing $10–$15/kg vs. $2/kg for conventional ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Flax Research in the US: Production, Retting, Processing, and ...
    An enzyme-retting method has been developed to pilot plant level but must be improved based on cost and fiber properties. A USDA. Flax Fiber Pilot Plant, based ...
  34. [34]
    Influence of water presoak on enzyme-retting of flax - Sci-Hub
    Enzyme-retting offers an alternative to the current method of dew-retting to extract fibers from flax (Linum usitatissimum L.).
  35. [35]
    Effect on chemical fiber composition and ease of fiber extraction - PMC
    Jun 27, 2019 · Enzymatic treatment of flax offers a valuable alternative for dew retting. Polygalacturonase combined with xylanase activity leads to a ...Missing: cocktails 20-30%
  36. [36]
    Chelating Agents and Enzyme Retting of Flax | Request PDF
    Aug 10, 2025 · Chelators added to enzyme mixtures increase the efficiency of enzyme retting of flax. In 2002 Adamsen reported that EDTA is the most effective ...
  37. [37]
    A review of bast fibres and their composites: Part 4 ~ organisms and ...
    Nov 1, 2020 · Enzyme retting promises to improve fibre quality, but has not yet replaced pond/immersion or field/dew retting at large scale [19], [70], [71], ...
  38. [38]
    Spray Enzymatic Retting: A New Method for Processing Flax Fibers
    An improved retting method for flax stems using pectinase-rich mixtures is developed and evaluated on a variety of fiber and seed flax samples.
  39. [39]
    Microwave Assisted Drying of Flax Straw and Fibre at Controlled ...
    The moisture content of flax stem was 3.93 % (wet basis) which was calculated by oven dry method at 105 ° C for 72 hours. The flax straws were immersed in a ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Flax Production in the Seventeenth Century - National Park Service
    Aug 3, 2023 · The brake, a large wooden machine, is used to break down the trash material and loosen it further from the end product. Then the flax is ...
  42. [42]
    Production of Long Hemp Fibers Using the Flax Value Chain - MDPI
    Apr 28, 2023 · In order to adapt the existing flax scutching line to hemp, some settings of the processing line need to be adapted, and hemp stems, which can ...
  43. [43]
    Virginia Mallow: The Lost Fiber of the Future? - MDPI
    The fiber yield of flax fiber (the most common representative of bast fibers) is within the range 20–25% [57], while the yield of SH fiber from the current ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Ecological Footprint and Water Analysis of Cotton, Hemp and ...
    Modern intensive cotton production has been associated with unsustainable water use and therefore this study will also investigate the water requirements of.
  45. [45]
    Remediation and Reuse of Retting Flax Wastewater Using Activated ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Wastewater produced is characterized by brownish to yellow color, bad odor and high organic contents due to lignin, cellulose and hemicelluloses ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Controlled anaerobic water retting of flax as part of an innovative ...
    Jan 18, 2025 · This study investigated controlled anaerobic water retting of flax as a potential process step in a future biorefinery, allowing the simultaneous production of ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] FIBRE FROM AGRICULTURAL HEMP RESIDUE - DiVA portal
    Jun 12, 2021 · Dew retting leaves a great variation unsuitable for industrial applications and water retting has environmental issues that need to be addressed ...
  48. [48]
    Improvement of water quality of remnant from chemical retting of ...
    Feb 10, 2019 · Remnant obtained from chemical retting of coconut fibre was found to have an exorbitant COD, BOD, TDS, sulphide content having blackish brown colour.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Chemical Guidance Document - AFIRM Group
    enzymatic, microbiotic, steam or chemical retting) to dissolve away much of the cellular ... Most of the environmental impacts in textile finishing are the result ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Energy-Efficiency Improvement Opportunities for the Textile Industry
    This guidebook provides information on energy-efficiency technologies and production measures applicable to the textile industry. The guidebook also includes ...
  51. [51]
    Effect of hydrothermal pre-treatment and enzymatic retting on the ...
    Hydrothermal pre-treatment of hemp stems prior to enzymatic retting is more environmentally friendly than combining enzymes and ethylenediamine-tetra-acetic ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] National Algal Biofuels Technology Review - Department of Energy
    The goal of the BETO Advanced Algal. Systems Program is to develop cost-effective algal biofuels production and logistics systems. The program focuses on ...
  53. [53]
    Bast Fibres: Size of Production - Common Objective
    May 29, 2018 · Bast fibres refer to fabrics like flax ... Despite its long history of use, linen accounts for less than 1% of global textile consumption.Missing: retting emissions loss Belarus
  54. [54]
    Closed‐Loop Water Retting System for Sustainable Fiber Production ...
    Mar 21, 2025 · A closed‐loop water retting system is developed and fabricated in this study to process discarded canola stalks into fibers. The effects of ...Missing: piloted 2010
  55. [55]
    Masters of FLAX FIBRE™ (ex-European Flax™) certification
    The Masters of FLAX FIBRE™ certification guarantees a traceability that is verified by an independent third-party organization (certification body), Bureau ...
  56. [56]
    Organic production and products - Agriculture and rural development
    European Union organic farming rules cover agricultural products, including aquaculture and yeast. They encompass every stage of the production process.Missing: dew retting
  57. [57]
    Bast Fiber Fabric for Apparel 2025-2033 Overview
    Rating 4.8 (1,980) May 20, 2025 · The market, valued at approximately $5 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% from 2025 to 2033.
  58. [58]
    Biofuel production for circular bioeconomy: Present scenario and ...
    Jul 20, 2024 · The concept of a circular economy in biofuel production can promote the environmentally friendly and sustainable valorization of biomass waste.
  59. [59]
    Flax - European Commission - Agriculture and rural development
    May 24, 2024 · Under the common agricultural policy (CAP) farmers growing flax are eligible for direct payments. EU countries can choose to grant additional ...
  60. [60]
    Flax Fiber Market Size, Share, Trends | Industry Report, 2033
    Government support is playing a pivotal role in driving the flax fiber market through subsidies for sustainable agriculture, incentives for bio-based product ...
  61. [61]
    Why Agricultural Innovation Fails to Reach Farmers in India
    Jul 24, 2025 · But despite waves of innovation, most technologies fail to scale, falter at adoption, or bypass the farmer altogether. Why does this happen? And ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Small Farmers in India: Challenges and Opportunities S.Mahendra ...
    This paper examines the roles and challenges of small holding agriculture in India. It covers trends in agricultural growth, cultivation patterns, ...Missing: retting | Show results with:retting