Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Devadatta

![Borobudur relief depicting Devadatta and the elephant]float-right Devadatta was a first of Siddhartha Gautama, known as , and an ordained in the early Buddhist community who later emerged as his chief antagonist, seeking to supplant his leadership through schismatic efforts and multiple assassination attempts. Born to Suppabuddha, a Sakyan noble and brother of the Buddha's mother , Devadatta initially renounced worldly life alongside other Sakyan relatives and attained psychic powers () and meditative absorptions shortly after , earning early praise within the . His rivalry intensified due to envy of the Buddha's preeminence, leading him to propose five stricter disciplinary rules—mandatory lifelong forest dwelling, perpetual alms begging without invitations, exclusive use of rag robes, avoidance of high beds, and refusal of certain foods—which the Buddha rejected as optional rather than compulsory, prompting Devadatta to lead 500 monks in an attempted at Gayasisa. When this failed after the Buddha dispatched Sariputta and Moggallana to retrieve the monks, Devadatta resorted to violence, including rolling a boulder that grazed the Buddha's foot, releasing the drunken Nalagiri (tamed by the Buddha's metta), and other plots detailed in the Pitaka's Cullavagga. Accounts in the texts culminate in his death by being swallowed into the earth at or vomiting blood, with prophecies of rebirth in Avici hell for an eon before eventual enlightenment as a pratyekabuddha, though these narratives, compiled post-Buddha, likely amplify his villainy to underscore monastic unity amid ascetic versus moderate tensions. In traditions, such as the , he receives a more ambivalent portrayal as a past-life to , reflecting doctrinal .

Biography

Family and Early Life

Devadatta was born into the aristocratic clan as the son of Suppabuddha, a Sakyan noble and maternal uncle of Gautama, and Suppabuddha's wife Amitā. His sister, Bhaddakaccānā (also called Yasodharā), married Siddhartha, establishing Devadatta as both cousin and brother-in-law to the man who later became known as . The clan, of origin, controlled territories around Kapilavastu, their primary settlement in the region of ancient (present-day Nepal-India border), where Devadatta grew up amid the clan's oligarchic governance and emphasis on martial and administrative roles. texts reference these kinship ties within the extended Sakya family, underscoring shared elite status without implying doctrinal significance. Some Pali commentaries, drawing from Vinaya accounts, describe early rivalries between Devadatta and Siddhartha during their youth in Kapilavastu, attributed to competitive dynamics within the clan's princely circles, though these narratives postdate the core suttas and reflect interpretive traditions rather than verbatim historical records.

Ordination and Attainments

Devadatta, as a Sakyan prince and cousin of the Buddha, joined the monastic order early in the Buddha's ministry, undergoing pabbajja ordination directly from the Buddha alongside other Sakyan nobles such as Anuruddha, Bhaddiya, Bhagu, and Kimbila. This event, recorded in the Cullavagga (Vin. Cv VII.1.4), marked his formal entry into the sangha, positioning him among the early converts from the Buddha's clan who renounced lay life for ascetic practice. Traditional Pali sources portray this phase as one of initial conformity to monastic discipline, though without specific dates, as the Vinaya timelines align broadly with the Buddha's post-enlightenment wanderings in the 5th century BCE. Through intensive during a subsequent rainy season retreat, Devadatta attained mundane powers—supernormal abilities including , flight between realms, and mind-reading—accessible to non-noble practitioners via jhanic concentration but lacking insight into the noble path. narratives in the Cullavagga (Khandaka 7) detail how he demonstrated these feats publicly, such as levitating to attract and followers, thereby gaining repute and drawing approximately 500 monks to his side initially. Commentarial texts like the Dhammapada-atthakatha specify he achieved the eight jhanic attainments and putthujjanika , yet explicitly deny arhatship or any ariya status, framing his powers as "lower grade" phenomena tied to worldly concentration rather than liberating wisdom. These attainments, while evidencing disciplined practice, did not culminate in ethical transformation; accounts causally link Devadatta's prowess to inflated self-regard, as public displays prioritized gaining prestige over internal , setting the stage for rivalry without evidence of disputed claims in core strata. The texts' portrayal underscores a doctrinal emphasis on discerning mundane from supramundane realizations, with Devadatta's case illustrating how psychic facility, absent insight, fosters attachment to acclaim among impressionable disciples.

Initial Relationship with the Buddha

Devadatta, a of through his father Suppabuddha, 's maternal , entered the monastic order early in the Buddha's ministry following the Buddha's . As a Sakyan prince, he was ordained alongside other relatives, including groups of lay followers who joined the , establishing him as part of the core early community dedicated to practicing and propagating the . In this phase, Devadatta demonstrated discipline and capability, attaining mundane psychic powers (puthujjana-iddhi), such as and , which marked him as a skilled practitioner among the monks. These attainments initially positioned Devadatta as a prominent , contributing to the Sangha's growth through displays of abilities that inspired among lay supporters in regions like Rajagaha. He collaborated with in monastic activities, benefiting from the shared structure of the order where senior monks, including relatives like Ananda, supported the Buddha's teachings. Accounts in the texts describe his early conduct as impeccable, aligning with the communal efforts to establish rules and spread the path, without overt discord. However, by approximately the ninth year of 's , signs of emerged as Devadatta's attachment to personal fostered toward 's preeminent status. Pali sources indicate this stemmed from causal factors like unequal distribution of lay offerings—despite Devadatta's powers drawing admiration, donors preferentially honored , redirecting gains such as robes and away from him. This disparity, rooted in ' comparative perceptions of and reverence, ignited as a self-perpetuating motive, where Devadatta's ambition for clashed with 's enduring vitality and central role. Such , described in suttas as arising from unchecked desire for honor, marked the transition from alliance to usurpation attempts, without evidence of doctrinal disagreement at this stage.

Monastic Reforms and Schism

Proposed Stricter Rules

Devadatta advocated for the mandatory imposition of five stricter ascetic practices on the monastic community (Saṅgha), as detailed in the Cullavagga of the Pāli (VII.3.9-14). These proposals included: dwelling exclusively in the forest; relying solely on alms begging without accepting invitations to meals; wearing only robes made from discarded rags gathered from charnel grounds; sleeping only at the foot of trees rather than in constructed shelters; and abstaining entirely from fish and meat. The rejected making these rules compulsory, reasoning that such austerity was not suitable for all at that of the Saṅgha's , as it could overburden those not yet prepared and lead to unnecessary hardship without commensurate spiritual benefit. He specified that dwelling at was permissible for eight months outside the rainy season () but prohibited during to avoid exposure to inclement weather, emphasizing practical causality in monastic welfare over rigid . The other four proposals were neither mandated nor forbidden outright; instead, the allowed voluntary observance for those inclined toward them, reflecting a principle of gradual training tailored to individual capacities rather than uniform imposition. Three of Devadatta's proposals—forest dwelling, rag-robes, and lifelong begging—were later formalized as optional dhutaṅga (ascetic) practices in the , permitting advanced monks to adopt them for enhanced detachment from worldly comforts while maintaining Saṅgha cohesion. The rules against -eating and tree-root dwelling year-round, however, were not incorporated, as upheld the permissibility of alms-derived if not killed specifically for the monk (tihoṇadāna criterion) and prioritized shelter during for health and sustainability. This selective response underscores a causal approach: while fosters and , premature enforcement risks alienating practitioners and disrupting communal harmony, potentially undermining the Saṅgha's long-term viability over short-term rigor.

Formation of the Schism

Devadatta, after his proposals for stricter monastic rules were rejected by , gathered supporters to form a breakaway group, marking the initial fracture in the early Buddhist Saṅgha. He persuaded around 500 newly ordained monks—impressed by displays of his (supernatural abilities) and appeals to a more rigorous lifestyle—to accompany him from Rājagaha to Gayāsīsa, where they established a separate residence and observed practices apart from the main community. This constituted the first recorded saṅghabheda, or , in the Saṅgha, fracturing its unity along factional lines based on adherence to Devadatta's leadership. The Buddha responded by instructing his chief disciples, Sāriputta and Moggallāna, to lead a delegation to Gayāsīsa and reclaim the dissenting monks. Upon arrival, Sāriputta delivered a discourse on the , emphasizing its core principles, while Moggallāna demonstrated further to underscore the superiority of the Buddha's path; these efforts swayed the 500 monks, who acknowledged their misjudgment and returned en masse to the original Saṅgha, leaving Devadatta with only a handful of loyal followers, including Kokālika. The incident highlighted the Saṅgha's vulnerability to charismatic appeals and supernatural displays in resolving internal disputes. Vinaya accounts frame the schism's mechanics as driven less by doctrinal purity than by Devadatta's ambition to seize authority, with his recruitment tactics exploiting the inexperience of recent ordinands and his prior attainments to challenge the Buddha's primacy, resulting in immediate fragmentation but swift reintegration through authoritative intervention.

Motivations and Causal Factors

Devadatta's pursuit of monastic reforms and the ensuing were principally motivated by a desire to supplant as leader of the , fueled by envy of the Buddha's preeminence and the adulation he received. Pali canonical accounts in the Cullavagga of the Pitaka depict Devadatta directly requesting the Buddha to cede leadership to him upon the Buddha's attainment of old age, a proposal rejected on the grounds that the Buddha's authority derived from his unparalleled rather than mere . This rebuff, rather than prompting reflection, escalated Devadatta's efforts to garner personal influence, revealing an underlying egoistic drive incompatible with the Buddha's emphasis on from gain and status. Textual narratives consistently attribute Devadatta's advocacy for stricter rules—such as lifelong forest dwelling and refusal of invitations—not to altruistic but to a strategic bid for followers disillusioned with the existing community's perceived laxity. These proposals attracted around five hundred monks initially, yet Devadatta's refusal to heed the Buddha's counsel that such measures were premature exposed the initiatives as vehicles for factionalism rather than doctrinal purity. , as a causal root, aligns with broader canonical descriptions of Devadatta's character, where his supernormal attainments bred arrogance and a craving for supremacy, overriding any veneer of . (section on kamma and character) The schism's consequences underscore the ego-driven causality over any claim of principled dissent: it fractured the Sangha's cohesion at a vulnerable stage, when unity was essential for doctrinal preservation and lay support, leading to immediate and long-term vulnerabilities to external . Early texts emphasize that schismatics act from malice toward the Dhamma or its proponent, not constructive disagreement, as Devadatta's actions demonstrably sowed without advancing ethical rigor in the broader . This harm refutes sympathetic reinterpretations that romanticize his motives, privileging instead the canonical evidence of personal ambition's corrosive effects on communal harmony.

Conflicts with the Buddha

Assassination Attempts

According to accounts in the Pali Canon's Vinaya Pitaka (Cullavagga), Devadatta orchestrated three distinct attempts on the Buddha's life following disputes over monastic leadership. These narratives, preserved in multiple recensions including the Theravada tradition, depict the efforts as motivated by rivalry and ambition, though their precise historicity remains debated among scholars due to the texts' compilation centuries after the events. In the first attempt, Devadatta hired a group of archers—sometimes specified as sixteen—to slay the Buddha during his alms round or meditation. Approaching the Buddha, the assassins were instead persuaded by his teachings and ordained as monks, abandoning their mission. This episode is framed in the Dhammapada commentary as occurring amid escalating tensions, with the conversion highlighting the Buddha's doctrinal influence over coercion. The second involved Devadatta dislodging a massive boulder from the slopes of (Gijjhakuta) near Rajagaha, intending it to crush below. The rock split upon descent, propelling only a sharp fragment that pierced 's right foot, causing bleeding and temporary pain but no fatal injury. The describes enduring the wound stoically, attributing it to karmic residue from past lives rather than immediate peril. For the third, Devadatta instigated the release of (or Dhanapala in some variants), a notoriously aggressive in Rajagaha's stables, after intoxicating it with to heighten its rage. As the beast charged on a public path, he reportedly radiated metta (benevolent intention), calming the animal into docility and prompting it to bow submissively. This account, echoed across traditions, underscores themes of non-violence prevailing over aggression. ![Relief depicting Devadatta and the elephant at Borobudur][float-right]

Immediate Repercussions and Expulsion

In response to Devadatta's attempts and efforts to the , the Buddha pronounced the brahmadanda, a formal act of suspension that barred Devadatta from associating with the monastic community. This measure, enacted for grave offenses including harm to an enlightened being and disruption of the order, is detailed in the Cullavagga of the Pitaka as an immediate consequence of his actions. The ukkhepaniya-kamma, a for persistent refusal to acknowledge faults, further underscored the sangha's rejection, effectively expelling Devadatta and his followers who persisted in the . Canonical accounts emphasize this as a causal outcome rooted in Devadatta's deliberate , without from institutional leniency. Theravada texts portray Devadatta's subsequent fate as swift karmic retribution: afflicted by illness from drawing the Buddha's blood, he was swallowed by the earth en route to seek reconciliation, descending directly to the Avici hell—the realm of unrelenting torment—for offenses against an awakened one. While some commentaries note a momentary regret, the dominant narrative stresses unremedied intent yielding irreversible consequence, independent of later interpretive softening.

Portrayals in Theravada Tradition

Accounts in the Vinaya and Pali Canon

The of the Pitaka, specifically 7, chronicles Devadatta's efforts to challenge 's leadership and fracture the monastic community. After developing supranormal powers, Devadatta approached with proposals for five mandatory ascetic practices: perpetual forest dwelling, reliance solely on almsfood, use only of rag-robes, dwelling at the foot of trees without shelter, and constant standing without sitting. The rejected making these obligatory, permitting them as voluntary dhutaṅga observances instead. Dissatisfied, Devadatta canvassed monks for support in enforcing the rules and, failing that, allied with King Ajātasattu to orchestrate assassination attempts on , including rolling a from a cliff, unleashing the drunken Nālagiri, and offering a poisoned meal. Devadatta further endeavored to incite a by leading away 500 newly ordained monks from Vesāli, but Sāriputta and Moggallāna persuaded them to return, thwarting the division. He also dispatched monks to demand the Buddha's death through collective by , an act the Buddha preempted by warning them of its futility. The responded with a formal act of (brahmadanda) against Devadatta for inciting , after which his followers deserted him. Afflicted by illness, he vomited hot blood and lingered in agony for nine months before dying. Suttas in the reinforce this portrayal of Devadatta as a peril to the Dhamma. In the Devadattasutta (SN 6.12), the Buddha declares that just as fruit destroys the banana, bamboo, and reed, so honor destroys a reprobate like Devadatta, underscoring his self-inflicted ruin through ambition. The Devadattavipattisutta (AN 8.7) attributes Devadatta's downfall to being overwhelmed by eight dhammas contrary to the true teaching—gain, loss, fame, disrepute, honor, dishonor, wicked ambition, and evil friendship—rendering his mind possessed and consigning him to a state of woe, hell-bound for an eon, beyond redemption. Across these texts, Devadatta embodies atic villainy and moral corruption, with and issuing unequivocal condemnation, portraying his deeds as ānantariya offenses meriting interminable torment and existential threat to the nascent order, devoid of any salvific resolution.

Depictions in Later Texts

In the , a text composed between the 1st century BCE and 2nd century CE, Devadatta exemplifies the Buddha's foreknowledge of karmic outcomes and compassionate allowance for fruition. When questioned why the Buddha ordained Devadatta despite anticipating the , Nāgasena responds that Devadatta's enmity spanned innumerable as the Bodhisatta's adversary, accumulating demerit that inevitably manifested as betrayal in this existence; the Buddha's admission permitted this karma to exhaust without further deferral. This analogy portrays Devadatta not as a redeemable reformer but as a divisive force whose actions align with predetermined moral failure, serving didactic purposes on karma's inexorability. Theravada commentaries, including the Vinaya-aṭṭhakathā (Sāratthappakāsinī and Samantapāsādikā) from the 5th century , attribute Devadatta's schismatic efforts to unchecked ambition exacerbated by royal patronage from Ajātasattu, framing his stricter rule proposals as bids for personal dominance rather than genuine . These texts detail his downfall—marked by expulsion, the earth's swallowing, and rebirth in —as causally linked to the three roots of unwholesomeness (, , ), with no mitigating factors like provisional teaching devices. In contrast to reinterpretations, such post-canonical elaborations reject any justification of Devadatta's deeds as expedient means, instead solidifying his archetype as a cautionary of betrayal's self-inflicted ruin.

Portrayals in Mahayana Tradition

Redemption in the Lotus Sutra

In Chapter 12 of the Lotus Sutra, titled "Devadatta," Shakyamuni Buddha recounts that in a distant past life on Mount Grdhrakūṭa, Devadatta served as his benevolent teacher, instructing him in the Dharma and enabling his attainment of anuttarā-samyak-saṃbodhi (unexcelled complete enlightenment). The Buddha further prophesies Devadatta's future attainment of Buddhahood under the name Devacandra ("Moon-Deva" or "Heavenly King"), after enduring kalpas of suffering in the Avīci hell due to his misdeeds, emphasizing the universal potential for enlightenment even among those deemed irredeemable (icchantika). This portrayal diverges sharply from earlier Buddhist accounts in the Pāli Canon and Vinaya, which depict Devadatta as an unrelenting antagonist expelled for schismatic and violent acts, marking a Mahāyāna theological innovation that reframes enmity as provisional karma conducive to ultimate awakening. Mahāyāna interpreters, drawing on the sutra's upāya (skillful means) doctrine, posit Devadatta's historical antagonism—including his —as a bodhisattva-like expedient to safeguard the Dharma's integrity by compelling stricter monastic discipline or testing the saṅgha's resolve, thereby ensuring the transmission of profound teachings like the itself. Such views, prominent in and traditions, transform Devadatta from villain to instrumental figure in the cosmic drama of , underscoring the sutra's message that all beings, regardless of apparent evil, possess and will realize it. However, this redemption narrative lacks corroboration in pre-Mahāyāna texts, which uniformly condemn Devadatta without prophetic salvation, suggesting a doctrinal evolution in later strata of the composed centuries after the historical (circa 5th century BCE), possibly to extend soteriological inclusivity amid sectarian rivalries. Scholarly assessments highlight the chapter's ahistorical character, noting no archaeological or epigraphic evidence ties the prophesied Devacandra to the 5th-century BCE monk known from Aśokan edicts and early pilgrim accounts as a schismatic figure; instead, the prophecy aligns with Mahāyāna's expansive karmic reinterpretations, potentially interpolated to counter Theravāda exclusivity on paths. This reframing prioritizes doctrinal universality over empirical causality, as Devadatta's documented attempts on the Buddha's life—such as the Nālagiri incident—yield no textual basis for viewing them as intentional preservation tactics, rendering the redemption motif a theological construct rather than a factual .

Views in Other Mahayana Sutras

In the Amitāyurdhyāna Sūtra, a foundational text dated to around the CE, Devadatta is depicted as a malevolent advisor who incites Ajātasattu to imprison and starve his father, King Bimbisāra, within a fortified cell measuring seven layers thick, leading to the monarch's death by attrition after 28 days of deprivation. This portrayal frames Devadatta as an "evil friend" whose counsel precipitates profound karmic downfall, serving as narrative foil to Queen Vaidehi's subsequent visualization practices and attainment of rebirth in Amitābha's through repentance; no redemptive arc or future is prophesied for Devadatta himself, maintaining his role as unmitigated antagonist akin to early Buddhist accounts. Other , such as the Mahāmegha Sūtra, occasionally reference Devadatta with neutral or elevated terminology like mahāpuruṣa (great man), acknowledging his historical prominence without delving into rehabilitative narratives or doctrinal endorsement. In texts, which emerged later from the 7th century onward, Devadatta appears sporadically in discussions of monastic schisms or karmic exemplars, but positive reinterpretations—such as viewing his rigorist proposals through esoteric lenses of antinomian skill-in-means—are rare, non-canonical, and confined to interpretive fringes rather than sutra-core portrayals. These inconsistencies across literature, where antagonistic depictions predominate outside the Lotus Sutra's outlier motif, contrast with the uniform tradition's primacy in pre-Mahayana sources, underscoring potential doctrinal adaptations over historical continuity.

Scholarly Perspectives

Historical Evidence from Early Texts and Pilgrims

The accounts of Devadatta's appear consistently across early texts of multiple schools, including the and parallels in the Mahasanghika tradition, where he proposes five stricter monastic rules—such as lifelong residence in forests, begging for alms, perpetual robes from rags, and abstaining from fish and flesh—only to lead a group of 500 monks away from the main upon their rejection by . These shared narrative elements, predating sectarian divergences around the 4th century BCE, indicate a core historical event of communal split over disciplinary rigor rather than doctrinal . The Mahasanghika Vinaya variant emphasizes Devadatta's efforts to establish separate scriptures and rules, omitting some assassination motifs present in accounts, suggesting the schism's procedural aspects—requiring at least nine dissenting monks and formal separation—form the earliest stratum, while violent plots like the elephant release or boulder drop likely accrued later as cautionary elaborations. Scholarly analysis of these texts prioritizes this schismatic kernel as verifiable, given its alignment with Vinaya's legal focus on unity, over hagiographic expansions in sutta collections that amplify Devadatta's villainy for moral instruction. Chinese pilgrims provide corroborative evidence of Devadatta's enduring legacy. (ca. 399–412 CE) records observing followers of Devadatta cohabiting with non-Buddhists in monasteries near in Sravasti, attesting to sects adhering to his ascetic prescriptions persisting into the . (ca. 629–645 CE) similarly notes sites of Devadatta's failed attempts, such as the rock-throwing incident at a mountain pass, and describes communities following Devadatta's rules () in monastic settings, confirming the schism's historical footprint through tangible locations and rival groups into the . These on-site observations, drawn from direct travel records, bolster the Vinaya's depiction of a real schismatic movement over embellished personal animus.

Modern Reassessments and Their Critiques

In Buddhist Saints in India (1994), Reginald proposed that Devadatta embodied early ascetic "forest saint" ideals, positing his vilification as a product of later urban monastic dominance that suppressed such traditions through biased textual transmission. argued for minimal overlap in sectarian accounts to support this, framing Devadatta's as a clash between rigorous practices and settled . This thesis has faced substantial critique for lacking evidential foundation and disregarding causal sequences in primary sources. Bhikkhu Sujato, in a examination, contended that Ray's interpretation selectively omits unanimous early condemnations across and Mahasanghika vinayas, where Devadatta instigates the first schism through ambition-fueled proposals for stricter rules, culminating in plots—including inciting an attack and hiring archers—that inflicted direct harm and precipitated his expulsion. No canonical or archaeological data affiliates Devadatta with forest lineages; texts instead portray him in urban-adjacent settings, with escalating lurid details reflecting standard mythologization rather than targeted anti-ascetic bias. Post-2000 studies yield scant new empirical material, such as inscriptions or non-canonical artifacts, to bolster efforts, which predominantly advance interpretive lenses favoring Devadatta's reforms as proto-dissent against . These often underweight the texts' depiction of ambition as the originating cause of communal rupture and violence, prioritizing narrative sympathy for challengers over fidelity to documented outcomes like the schism's destabilizing effects on the early .

Legacy and Controversies

Doctrinal Impact on Vinaya Development

Devadatta's advocacy for stricter ascetic practices prompted the Buddha to address monastic discipline more systematically, though the proposals were initially rejected as mandatory for the entire saṅgha. In the Pāli Vinaya's Cullavagga, Devadatta urged five rules: lifelong forest dwelling away from human habitations, exclusive reliance on alms rounds without accepting invitations, use only of rag-robes sewn from discarded cloth, consumption of a single daily meal before noon with no further eating, and observance of uposatha (fortnightly confession) in every available locality. The Buddha declined to impose these universally, deeming them optional practices suitable for ascetics of lesser faculties but not binding on all monks, as they could deter potential entrants to the order and undermine its adaptability. Following the Buddha's parinirvāṇa, elements of Devadatta's proposals gained traction and influenced evolution across traditions. himself later endorsed three—forest dwelling, alms begging, and rag-robes—as practices conducive to the non-decline of the Dhamma and Saṅgha, recommending them for dedicated monks while allowing flexibility for others; these became idealized norms in Theravāda texts like the , shaping ascetic ideals in later monastic codes. In Mahāyāna recensions, such as the , similar allowances persisted, with partial integration reflecting a balance between rigor and accessibility, though (variously attributed as a sixth or variant proposal) remained optional and regionally adopted rather than codified universally. The attempted by Devadatta, involving the of approximately 500 to recite the Pātimokkha separately, established a precedent that directly spurred rules on handling dissent and division (saṅghabheda). This event, detailed in multiple Piṭakas, led to formal procedures requiring senior to admonish schismatics three times before expulsion, emphasizing reconciliation to preserve communal unity; such mechanisms formalized in the Cullavagga served as a template for subsequent monastic governance, preventing fragmentation in early Buddhist communities. The crisis underscored causal vulnerabilities in unstructured assemblies, accelerating the compilation and expansion of disciplinary texts post-Buddha to institutionalize stability, as evidenced by the 's growth from ad hoc rulings to comprehensive codes recited at councils like Rājagṛha around 483 BCE.

Debates on Villainy vs. Reformist Intent

In traditional Buddhist accounts, Devadatta emerges as a figure driven by personal ambition and enmity toward , evidenced by his orchestration of attempts—including inciting the Nalagiri to charge and rolling a —and his effort to incite a by attracting 500 monks to his faction with promises of stricter rules. These actions, as analyzed in early texts, demonstrate a pattern of aimed at supplanting the Buddha's leadership rather than advancing doctrinal purity. Some modern interpreters, notably Reginald Ray, have reframed Devadatta as a misunderstood advocate for ascetic reform, portraying his proposals—such as mandating dwelling, rag robes, and lifetime —as a pushback against the softening of monastic discipline in settled communities, potentially representing an authentic tradition later suppressed by urban-oriented orthodoxy. This view attributes the villainous depictions to later biases favoring institutional stability over rigorous practice. Critiques of this reformist narrative argue that it speculatively infers benevolent intent while downplaying the empirical reality of Devadatta's violent methods, which would have eliminated and destabilized the nascent if successful; the temporary , moreover, inflicted immediate harm by dividing monks and requiring the Buddha's personal appeals to reunite them, underscoring over principled disagreement. Such reassessments risk romanticizing actions whose consequences—disruption and endangerment—align more closely with power-seeking than with constructive , as the proposals could have been advanced through rather than .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] A Condemned Saint: Devadatta
    Devadatta30 appears prominently in the Nikāya texts as the Buddha's cousin and archrival, who consistently competes with the Blessed One and tries to ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] 61.5a Devadatta, a study from the Pali texts piya - The Minding Centre
    1.1 CHILDHOOD RIVALRIES. Deva,datta was the son of the Sakya Suppabuddha (maternal uncle of the Buddha). Sāriputta refer- red to Devadatta as Godhi,putta, ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  3. [3]
    Devadatta
    Devadatta: Son of the Sakyan SuppaBuddha (maternal uncle of the Buddha) and his wife Amita. He had a sister Baddakaccana, who married Prince Siddhattha.
  4. [4]
    PIC AND HISTORY - Mahidol University
    King Suppabuddha had one son and one daughter to Queen Amita. The son was Prince Devadatta, the daughter was Princess Bimbayasodhara. The Pathamasambodhi states ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  5. [5]
    Cullavagga, Khandaka 7, Chapter 1
    Feb 12, 2020 · ... Devadatta attained to that kind of Iddhi which is attainable even by those who have not entered upon the Excellent Way. 5. Now at ...
  6. [6]
    Cross-cousin Relation Between Buddha and Devadatta.
    It is related in Cullavagga (VII. 1.4) that when he was ordained by the Buddha (pabbajja) along with Bhaddiya, Anuruddha, Bhagu and Kimbila--the Sakyas, ...
  7. [7]
    Buddhist Legends, I. 12. Devadatta's Career
    Thus Devadatta with his five hundred monks sought to persuade all manner of people, both hardened and believing, to accept the Five Points.
  8. [8]
    Great Chronicles, 37a: Devadatta - Ancient Buddhist Texts
    Devadatta gained mundane psychic powers, remaining a worldling. He never became a noble one (ariya). At another time while the Buddha was sojourning in ...
  9. [9]
    Devadatta - Palikanon
    Son of the Sākiyan Suppabuddha (maternal uncle of the Buddha) and his wife Amitā. He had a sister Bhaddakaccānā, who married Prince Siddhattha.
  10. [10]
    Buddha, His Life and Teachings: Devadatta - BuddhaNet
    Devadatta was a cousin of the Buddha who entered the Order and gained supernormal powers of the mundane plane (puthujjana-iddhi). Later, however, he began to ...
  11. [11]
    Devadatta - Association for Insight Meditation
    ² During the rainy season that followed, Devadatta acquired the psychic-power possible for worldlings (puthujjanika-iddhi). ... Devadatta, out of envy, killed it.Missing: Pali | Show results with:Pali
  12. [12]
    Devadatta | Dictionary of Buddhism
    Devadatta ［提婆達多］ ( , Pali; Daibadatta): A cousin of Shakyamuni who, after Shakyamuni's enlightenment, first followed him as a disciple but later ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  13. [13]
    https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/devadatta
  14. [14]
    In-laws of the Buddha as Depicted in Pāli Sources
    But at this point his psychic powers diminished. According to the Cullavagga account, almost immediately afer Devadatta joined the Saṃgha, the Buddha was warned ...
  15. [15]
    1.12 The Story about Devadatta - Ancient Buddhist Texts
    Devadatta grew jealous and plotted to kill the Buddha, when that failed he tried to cause a schism; eventually he wished to seek for forgiveness.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  16. [16]
    Cullavagga, Khandaka 7, Chapter 3
    Feb 12, 2020 · And the one man returned to Devadatta, and said to him: 'I cannot, Lord, deprive the Blessed One of life. Great is the power (Iddhi) and might ...Missing: attained | Show results with:attained
  17. [17]
    The Story of Devadatta [Verse 17]
    Nov 26, 2021 · He envied the Buddha and aspired to head the Order of the monks. One day, while the Buddha was preaching at the Veluvana Monastery in Rājagaha, ...
  18. [18]
    Devadatta's Five Rules - 500 Yojanas
    Jul 24, 2021 · Devadatta then decided to provoke a schism in the Saṃgha, and went to the Buddha proposing five rules to be made compulsory for monks (bhikṣus).Missing: stricter Vinaya
  19. [19]
    The Promulgation of the Vinaya Rules and the purpose they served ...
    Dec 3, 2014 · The Buddha did not accept it. He said if any monks like to practice they can practise and if any monk does not like to practice he can reject ...
  20. [20]
    Extraordinary Compassion | Great Middle Way - WordPress.com
    Jun 7, 2015 · For, your reverence, people esteem austerity.” There are three reasons why the Buddha rejected Devadatta's 'five rules ... Vinaya (Rules for ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The Buddhist Monastic Code II - Access to Insight
    The Buddhist Monastic Code II details the Khandhaka rules, which are training rules for bhikkhus, and are the second major part of the Vinaya Pi˛aka.
  22. [22]
    Devadatta vs. the Buddha - Dharma Records
    Mar 25, 2012 · Devadatta then tried to kill the Buddha himself by throwing a rock at him from on high, while the Buddha was walking on the slopes of a mountain.
  23. [23]
    Bu Ss 10: Saṅghabheda—Bhikkhu Brahmali - SuttaCentral
    The origin story to this rule gives an account of how Devadatta, the Buddha's notorious cousin, tried to cause a schism in the Order.
  24. [24]
    Why Devadatta Was No Saint | Sujato's Blog - WordPress.com
    Oct 26, 2012 · Reginald Ray has argued for a radical reassessment of Devadatta as a forest saint who was unfairly maligned in later monastic Buddhism.
  25. [25]
    Dhammapada, Verse 163 - The Story of Schism in the Sangha
    Jul 13, 2015 · Devadatta claimed that the rules proposed by him were much better than the existing rules of discipline, and some new monks agreed with him. One ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Buddhist Studies
    Envy also arose between different Buddhist communities as the religion ... Devadatta suggests to the Buddha that he take over the leader- ship of the ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Why Devadatta Was No Saint - Santi Forest Monastery
    The story of Devadatta is primarily the account of the earliest threat of schism to the Buddhist monastic community, and is therefore told at length in the ...
  28. [28]
    What Is One Misconception About the Buddha? - Tricycle
    Oct 15, 2022 · The Pali canon ... Or the grace with which he handled several assassination attempts by his jealous cousin Devadatta (Cullavagga 7).
  29. [29]
    The Buddha's Bad Karma - jstor
    this text, Devadatta attained certain supernatura once he had become a monk ... miraculous powers (iddhi), could have been murdered so brutally as.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Verse 17 - The Story of Devadatta - VivekaVani
    Jan 17, 2015 · Devadatta felt aggrieved and vowed vengeance against the Buddha. Three times, he attempted to kill the Buddha: first, by employing some archers.Missing: conversion | Show results with:conversion
  31. [31]
    Dhammapada Verse 17 - Devadatta Vatthu | Wikipitaka - Fandom
    The hired assassins, instead of attacking the Buddha, became his disciples. The big piece of rock rolled down by Devadatta hurt the big toe of the Buddha just a ...Missing: conversion | Show results with:conversion
  32. [32]
    Why the Buddha Suffered 5. Pierced by a Rock
    Through that deed and its result Devadatta threw a rock at me, Which crushed the big toe on my foot with a shard which was made of stone. Prev Index Next.Missing: boulder | Show results with:boulder
  33. [33]
    Devadatta in Hell | History Today
    Nov 11, 2021 · Devadatta plotted to assassinate the Buddha. First, he hired 31 archers to kill him, but the Buddha converted them all.Missing: commentaries | Show results with:commentaries
  34. [34]
    Why the Buddha Suffered 7. The Elephant Nalagiri
    In the seventh enquiry, called Nāḷāgiri, we hear about how the elephant Dhanapālaka was sent in order to kill the Buddha.
  35. [35]
    Devadatta's Third Attempt to Kill the Buddha
    That Devadatta had tried to kill the Buddha was now common knowledge among the Sangha. ... In the Pali Canon, several short discourses have been designated as ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Horner-The-Book-of-the-Discipline-06.pdf - Ancient Buddhist Texts
    The Cullavagga, the Less or Lesser Division of the Vinaya, consists of twelve Sections. The first three of these have been translated by H. Oldenberg and ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Studies in Vinaya technical terms I-III - The Open Buddhist University
    Vinaya expert), and of suspension (ukkhepaniya-kamma) for refusing both to see and to redress his offences (see above, SVTT IV, § 2, § 8a— d). Last but not ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Story of Devadatta [Part 4]
    Sep 14, 2019 · The following story of Devadatta, from the time of his ordination to his being swallowed by earth, is condensed as far as possible.
  39. [39]
    Devadattasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato - SN 6.12 - SuttaCentral
    Early Buddhist texts, translations, and parallels ... Primary source was the digital Mahāsaṅgīti edition of the Pali Tipiṭaka.<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    AN 8.7: Devadattavipattisutta—Bhikkhu Sujato - SuttaCentral
    Overcome and overwhelmed by eight things that oppose the true teaching, Devadatta is going to a place of loss, to hell, there to remain for an eon, irredeemable ...
  41. [41]
    Devadatta Sutta: About Devadatta - Access to Insight
    "Conquered by eight untrue dhammas, his mind overcome, Devadatta is headed for a state of deprivation, headed for hell, there to stay for an eon, incurable.
  42. [42]
    Chapter 1d: Why Devadatta was admitted to the order
    Oct 10, 2024 · It was when the Blessed One in his mercy and wisdom considered the life history of Devadatta that he perceived how, having heaped up Karma on ...
  43. [43]
    Chapter 4g: Devadatta
    Oct 10, 2024 · 'And when, O king, Devadatta as the god, had been himself Unrighteous, and had led others into unrighteousness of life, he was burnt in ...
  44. [44]
    Devadatta's downfall: Significance and symbolism
    Sep 21, 2024 · Devadatta's downfall in Buddhism signifies a narrative of moral failures and ambitions, revealing how his harmful actions led to a decline in status and ...Missing: commentaries | Show results with:commentaries
  45. [45]
    Chapter XII - Devadatta
    Feb 16, 2018 · Wherever they may be, they will always hear this sutra. If they are born among humans or devas, they will enjoy a supreme and delightful ...Missing: 12 summary
  46. [46]
    “Devadatta” chapter | Dictionary of Buddhism
    The twelfth chapter of the Lotus Sutra. It teaches that both women and evil persons are capable of attaining Buddhahood in their present forms.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Lotus Sutra - Bucknell Digital Commons
    Each chapter contains a mix of straight narrative and verse, with the poetry generally repeating and reinforcing the prose (though most scholars believe that.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Karma of Bodhisattva Devadatta The Story within the Story, the ...
    Feb 3, 2012 · Historically, Buddhism has been a religion of liberation, but of course, “liberation” is an English word with its own history and connotations.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  49. [49]
    “Devadatta” chapter: eight important points | OTT
    The Record of the Orally Transmitted Teachings says: Age eight is symbolic of the eight volumes of the Lotus Sutra. Devadatta stands for the world of hell ...p.101 · p.103 · p.104 · p.106Missing: scholarly redemption
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Lotus-Sutra-12-Devadatta.pdf - Tohoku University
    Devadatta will become a buddha whose name will be Heavenly King ... And if they are reborn in the presence of a buddha, they will be born by transformation from ...Missing: Devacandra | Show results with:Devacandra<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The Three Pure Land Sutras
    Aug 7, 1991 · Devadatta (“God-given”): A cousin of the Buddha who became his ... Amitāyurdhyāna-sūtra. Eng. The Sutra on Contemplation of Amitāyus. (in ...
  52. [52]
    The Visualisation of the Buddha of Infinite Life Sutra 观无量寿佛经
    Apr 8, 2025 · Following the counsel of Devadatta, an evil friend, he arrested his father, King Bimbisara, and confined him in a cell surrounded by walls seven ...Missing: Amitayurdhyana | Show results with:Amitayurdhyana
  53. [53]
    How closely does Devadatta relate with Mahayana Buddhism?
    May 5, 2023 · Mahayana honoured Devadatta by calling him a “mahapurusa” (great man) in the Mahamegha Sutra. The first schism in Buddhist Sangha was caused by ...
  54. [54]
    A Paradigm for Schism in the Vinayas: The Devadatta Narrative ...
    ... Buddhist scholars have taken note of the accounts of Devadatta's prosperous early life found in Buddhist texts from various traditions. Especially in the ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Why Devadatta Was No Saint - Santi Forest Monastery
    Oct 29, 2012 · In any case, the early sources are unanimous in condemning Devadatta as the instigator of the first schism in the Buddhist community.Missing: consensus | Show results with:consensus
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Fiction and History of a Heresy in the Buddhist Tradition - DigitalOcean
    The reconstructed context of the historical sangha of Devadatta would fit quite well in this historical setting and into the theroretical framework of the ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis