Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Self-checkout


Self-checkout refers to that allow customers to item , verify weights, consolidate purchases, and process payments independently, thereby reducing dependence on staffed lanes. These systems typically feature interfaces, scanners, bagging areas, and integrated payment terminals supporting cash, card, or digital methods.
Introduced commercially in during the late , self-checkout proliferated in the as retailers sought to cut labor expenses and accelerate transaction throughput, with global reaching $3.87 billion by 2022 and projected annual growth of 13.4% through the decade. Empirical analyses indicate average transaction times of about two minutes per customer versus over ten minutes at traditional checkouts, alongside higher average basket values due to expedited processing. However, adoption has encountered substantial hurdles, including technical glitches prompting assistance calls and elevated error rates from user mishandling. A primary controversy surrounds shrinkage, or , where studies document self-checkout lanes incurring up to 16 times the rate of manned ones, equating to 3.5% of in affected transactions and comprising 39% of certain grocery . This has prompted reversals by major chains, limiting or removing units amid unchecked external and intentional misscans, despite initial promises of efficiency gains. While proponents cite consumer preference—43% overall, rising among younger demographics—causal evidence underscores that unmonitored amplifies opportunistic losses without commensurate productivity boosts in many implementations.

History

Early Innovations (1980s–1990s)

The development of self-checkout systems in the 1980s addressed fundamental inefficiencies in manual grocery checkouts, such as prolonged customer wait times and escalating labor expenses driven by wage inflation and structured workforce demands in unionized retail environments. In 1984, electronics executive David R. Humble observed a customer struggling with a checkout process while waiting in a South Florida supermarket line, inspiring him to prototype an automated system that empowered customers to handle scanning and bagging independently. This initiative, backed by a $5 million research effort over three years, resulted in the first functional self-checkout unit, produced by Humble's CheckRobot, Inc., and deployed at a Kroger supermarket near Atlanta, Georgia, in July 1986. These pioneering machines streamlined transactions by integrating barcode scanners to capture item data directly from products, eliminating cashier intermediation, and pairing them with platform scales for weight-based verification to confirm scanned items matched bagged contents, thereby reducing errors from manual entry. Early engineering emphasized sensor redundancy and basic mechanical safeguards to foster reliability in unsupervised operations, reflecting a causal approach to offsetting labor-intensive processes amid 1980s economic pressures like stagnant productivity in service sectors. Initial deployments promised substantial reductions in frontline staffing needs, with reports from the era citing up to 66% savings in cashier labor costs through partial automation. During the 1990s, adoption remained confined to experimental pilots in forward-leaning chains, including select locations where self-checkout terminals tested viability in high-volume settings, yielding preliminary operational efficiencies but exposing vulnerabilities like frequent hardware glitches requiring specialized upkeep. These systems, still rudimentary in and durability, demanded disproportionate relative to throughput gains, as sensors and early components proved prone to misalignment from daily use, tempering enthusiasm despite demonstrated potential for labor in controlled trials. Limited scaling reflected retailers' caution, prioritizing refinements in error detection over widespread rollout amid unresolved integration hurdles with legacy store infrastructure.

Expansion and Maturation (2000s–2010s)

During the , self-checkout systems expanded significantly in major chains seeking operational efficiencies. initiated pilots in the early 2000s to reduce labor costs and accelerate checkout processes. Similarly, launched self-checkout trials in the in 2003, marking a key step in integration. By 2008, global installations exceeded 90,000 units, primarily in the United States, reflecting rapid scaling driven by maturing scanner and scale technologies. Technological refinements, such as interfaces and integrated payment processing, enhanced user interaction and transaction speed during this decade. In the , self-checkout matured through hybrid configurations that blended automated scanning with optional staff assistance, improving adaptability for varied transaction volumes. NCR Corporation's 2012 acquisition of Retalix for $650 million facilitated standardized point-of-sale software, enabling seamless inventory synchronization across systems and supporting broader retail deployment. These developments correlated with documented efficiency improvements; for instance, U.S. productivity increased by approximately 2 percent annually from 2000 to 2010, attributable in part to self-service adoption for low-basket transactions. Empirical analyses highlighted reduced wait times in self-checkout lanes compared to traditional ones, particularly for small purchases, underscoring causal benefits in throughput for select use cases. The from 2020 onward propelled self-checkout adoption by emphasizing contactless interactions, with retailers rapidly expanding installations to reduce employee-customer proximity and meet heightened hygiene demands. This shift was particularly evident in grocery and sectors, where kiosks saw accelerated deployment as part of broader trends, contributing to a of approximately 8.6% in the self-service kiosk market through 2027. By , self-checkout had achieved near-universal presence in U.S. grocery retailing, with 96% of stores offering the , alongside early estimates of over 10,000 new global installations since that year amid ongoing post-pandemic normalization. Retailers began re-evaluating implementations in 2024-2025 to balance efficiency gains against emerging issues like , exemplified by Target's nationwide rollout of express self-checkout lanes in March 2024, which limited transactions to 10 items or fewer and resulted in faster processing times and higher by May 2025. Consumer surveys underscored sustained preference among younger demographics, with a 2025 NCR Voyix study revealing that 77% of shoppers select self-checkout primarily for speed, and 63% of respondents favoring it over traditional lanes for that reason. Market analyses project the global self-checkout systems value at $3.93 billion in 2025, fueled by a CAGR of 13.6% through 2030 via integrations of for error reduction and for real-time monitoring, even as select chains restore some manned lanes for theft mitigation without derailing overall expansion.

Technical Systems

Conventional Scanning Systems

Conventional self-checkout scanning systems feature a fixed with core hardware including a scanner for item , a display for user interaction, and integrated typically located in the bagging area to verify item against expected values from scanned data. These components enable users to scan —either via or 2D imager technology—to retrieve product details such as and , then place items on the for automated discrepancy checks, ensuring basic verification through matching physical attributes to database entries. For produce or unscanned items, a separate flatbed allows entry of price look-up (PLU) codes, with the prompting to maintain accuracy. Operational flow emphasizes sequential scanning and placement: users handle one item at a time, with the capturing the to log it, followed by scale-based validation that flags mismatches due to incorrect scanning or substitution attempts, relying on predefined item parameters for between scanned identity and measured properties. This setup supports typical user-driven processing rates, where efficient scanning achieves throughputs comparable to manual speeds under low-error conditions, though actual performance varies with user proficiency and item types. Variants extend functionality to scanning-while-shopping, employing store-provided handheld barcode scanners that allow customers to log items directly into a virtual basket during aisle navigation, with data later synced to a central kiosk for final review, payment, and scale verification of bulk items. Systems like those implemented by integrate these devices to reduce end-of-aisle queuing, transferring scanned tallies via docking or wireless sync for attendant oversight where needed. Such approaches maintain core scanning principles while decentralizing initial capture, with empirical deployments showing feasibility in controlled retail environments since the early .

Advanced Detection Technologies

Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology facilitates automatic item detection through embedded tags that enable bulk reading without sequential scans, thereby reducing manual errors in self-checkout processes. Deployments in the 2010s and onward have focused on inventory accuracy, with initiating broader RFID pilots for categories like apparel and electronics by 2022, achieving improved store-level tracking that indirectly bolsters self-checkout reliability by minimizing discrepancies between scanned and actual items. Empirical analyses indicate RFID mitigates misplacement errors in settings, where execution issues like improper shelving contribute to inaccuracies; one study quantified potential reductions in such errors via automated tracking, though specific self-checkout metrics vary by implementation. Computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) integrate cameras for real-time item recognition, particularly advancing in 2020s pilots to handle non-barcoded goods like produce by automating identification and weighing. These systems analyze visual data to detect anomalies such as mislabeled items or irregular hand movements, causally decreasing and scanning errors compared to methods; for example, AI-driven validation has enabled faster processing for or unpackaged items, with reported accelerations through reduced employee interventions. By 2025, integrations with (IoT) sensors extend this to predictive restocking, where self-checkout data feeds real-time inventory analytics for automated replenishment, reducing stockouts via in demand and usage. Open-source software experiments support customization of detection algorithms, allowing developers to adapt vision or RFID interfaces for specific retail needs, though commercial uptake remains constrained by scalability issues and reliance on vendor-locked proprietary stacks. Projects like open-source point-of-sale (POS) frameworks provide modular tools for self-checkout enhancements, enabling community tweaks for accuracy in niche applications, but lack the robust validation and integration support of enterprise solutions, limiting widespread adoption.

Hybrid and Specialized Variants

Hybrid self-checkout systems integrate customer-operated scanning with employee supervision to address vulnerabilities in unattended setups, such as error-prone transactions or risks. In these models, often called assisted or attended self-checkout, a single staff member monitors several kiosks simultaneously, approving high-value item scans, assisting with identification, or overriding system alerts for age verification. This configuration enables one attendant to handle oversight for 4-6 units, optimizing labor while minimizing intervention delays. Retailers report that such oversight reduces non-scanned item losses, which can account for over 60% of self-checkout shrinkage, by enabling proactive monitoring without full involvement. Adoption of systems has accelerated in the 2020s amid rising theft concerns, with about 16% of retailers deploying or convertible checkouts by 2025 and 26% conducting trials. Examples include associate-assisted models at chains like , where staff guide customers to kiosks and intervene as needed, covering over 60% of stores by 2021 expansions. These variants balance efficiency and security, with employee presence deterring intentional errors and facilitating quicker resolutions for issues like failures, leading to fewer abandoned transactions than pure . Specialized self-checkout variants adapt to particular merchandise categories, such as foods or loose , incorporating tailored interfaces like integrated scales, item image databases, or voice guidance to streamline handling. Voice-assisted systems, piloted by since around 2025, use for step-by-step audio instructions, aiding users with variable-weight items by prompting weight confirmation or selection from produce libraries. Surveys of self-checkout users highlight audio prompts as effective for reducing produce-related confusion, with 14% recommending them to enhance scanning accuracy and prevent under- or over-charging errors. These adaptations yield measurable improvements in completion rates for challenging baskets; for instance, guided prompts correlate with fewer help requests and lower frustration-induced exits, supporting overall reduction in specialized scenarios without relying solely on visual interfaces. Bulk-focused kiosks often feature larger weighing platforms and prompt-based tare adjustments, minimizing discrepancies in unscanned quantities.

Operational Benefits

Efficiency and Cost Reductions

Self-checkout systems have enabled retailers to achieve substantial labor cost reductions by minimizing the need for dedicated personnel. In early pilots during the late 1980s, such as those implemented by grocery chains using automated checkout prototypes, costs were reduced by up to 66% compared to traditional manned lanes, primarily through the elimination of per-lane staffing requirements. This efficiency stems from a single attendant overseeing multiple self-checkout units, displacing routine scanning and bagging labor and allowing reallocation of staff to higher-value tasks like or assistance. In the 2020s, these dynamics persist, with retailers reporting sustained reductions in frontline checkout staffing; for instance, modern deployments often require one supervisor for 4-6 lanes versus one per lane in conventional setups, yielding ongoing per-transaction labor efficiencies despite supervisory overhead. The labor displacement facilitated by self-checkout supports broader operational reinvestment, as saved costs—estimated in some analyses at up to 40% of checkout-related expenses—can be redirected toward inventory management, store maintenance, or technology upgrades that enhance overall productivity. Empirical observations from grocery and sectors indicate that this shift causalizes a net gain in resource flexibility, with reduced fixed labor commitments during peak hours enabling dynamic staffing adjustments based on foot traffic. Additionally, self-checkout promotes scalability for extended operations, particularly in low-volume periods, by supporting near-unattended checkouts that lower the of maintaining store hours. This capability has allowed some retailers to extend to 24/7 access without proportional staffing increases, capturing off-peak sales that would otherwise require full closures or minimal manned alternatives. Such flexibility causalizes cost efficiencies in capital utilization, as fixed store overheads are amortized over longer operating windows with minimal incremental labor.

Consumer Time Savings and Preferences

Self-checkout systems enable measurable reductions in consumer wait times, with surveys indicating that 77% of shoppers select them primarily for faster service compared to staffed lanes. This preference stems from empirical observations of shorter queues, particularly in high-volume retail settings where traditional checkouts face bottlenecks during peak periods. Adoption varies by demographics, countering notions of uniform dissatisfaction; 63% of Gen Z consumers (ages 18-29) express a clear preference for self-checkout, rising to over half (53%) when including . Overall, nearly two-thirds of U.S. consumers opt for self-checkout when available, reflecting sustained for its in streamlining transactions. Retail-specific data underscores these gains: Target's 2024-2025 implementation of express self-checkout limits improved total transaction times by nearly 8% across and manned lanes, yielding faster throughput without expanding hardware. Independent analyses report average checkout durations shortened by up to 30% in self-service configurations, amplifying convenience for time-sensitive shoppers in crowded stores.

Challenges and Risks

Theft Vulnerabilities and Mitigation

Self-checkout systems are susceptible to skip-scanning, where customers intentionally fail to scan high-value items, and (ORC) involving coordinated theft rings exploiting unattended kiosks. A 2023 LendingTree survey of over 1,000 U.S. consumers found that 15% of self-checkout users admitted to purposely stealing items, with 44% of those indicating they would likely repeat the behavior. Empirical studies indicate that self-checkout contributes significantly to grocery , with 39% of all incidents in grocery stores occurring at these stations according to data from retail crime intelligence firm Auror. Shrink rates at self-checkout have been estimated at 3.5% to 4%, compared to under 1% for traditional lanes, representing a potential increase in by up to 65% relative to manned checkouts. To counter these vulnerabilities, retailers have deployed integrated weight s that verify scanned items against expected product weights in the bagging area, flagging discrepancies in . AI-powered systems, introduced widely in the , analyze video feeds to detect unscanned items or suspicious behaviors like rapid scanning patterns associated with ORC, with implementations reporting enhanced detection accuracy in high-risk zones. Combinations of weight verification and AI have demonstrably reduced theft incidents; for instance, advanced tech cross-referenced with product databases minimizes bypass attempts, while AI have improved overall loss prevention efficacy in self-checkout environments. Vendor updates in 2024 and 2025, such as those from major providers like , incorporate these features alongside software enhancements for , enabling continued expansion despite shrinkage concerns. Retailers generally favor technological mitigations over outright removal of self-checkout, citing that labor cost savings—often exceeding losses—justify adaptation. Analyses suggest that while shrinkage rises, the economic benefit persists as staff reductions offset increased inventory discrepancies, prompting ongoing investments in hybrid security rather than reversals. Critics advocating bans overlook these causal trade-offs, as empirical losses remain below operational gains in most deployments.

Operational Frustrations and Errors

Self-checkout systems are prone to technical glitches such as scanning s, weight sensor discrepancies, and software prompts that disrupt user flow, often requiring intervention from store attendants. A 2022 consumer survey found that 67% of shoppers experienced at least one during self-checkout transactions, with common issues including items not registering properly or false alerts halting the process. These errors arise from limitations in recognition, especially for damaged or , and overly sensitive bagging-area scales calibrated to detect discrepancies as small as a few grams. Mis-scans, where items fail to register or are incorrectly processed, affect roughly 2% of transactions according to operational analyses, though partial-audit data from loss studies indicate undetected errors can inflate discrepancies to 0.5-3% of in self-checkout channels. The "unexpected item in the bagging area" exemplifies these frustrations, triggered by procedural mismatches like placing scanned produce before full registration; enhanced anti-theft sensitivities in 2023-2024 deployments amplified such false positives, prompting widespread user backlash and media critiques of machines "gaslighting" customers through repetitive interruptions. Auditory cues, including error beeps and confirmation tones from multiple adjacent kiosks, generate in crowded setups, exacerbating irritation during peak hours; while consumer logs highlight this as a frequent , metrics rank it below scanning reliability, viewing it as a tunable rather than a core defect. Such operational hiccups contribute to user abandonment, particularly for carts exceeding 10-15 items, where complexity elevates error likelihood and prompts switches to staffed lanes—though empirical deployment data shows variants with attendant oversight reduce abandonment by integrating automated scanning with corrections. These issues, largely attributable to and , demonstrate solvability via iterative software refinements and advancements, as evidenced by declining error incidences in post-2020 system upgrades.

Accessibility and User Demographics

Self-checkout systems exhibit demographic disparities in usage and preference, with younger consumers demonstrating higher adoption rates. A 2024 survey by found that 53% of shoppers aged 18 to 44 prefer self-checkout to traditional cashier-operated lanes, compared to lower rates among older groups. Similarly, a Forrester report indicated that over 70% of U.S. online adults aged 44 and younger favor self-checkout when available. Usage statistics reflect this skew: approximately 58% of shoppers and 41% of report regular use, while 21% of almost never utilize it. Older and low-technology-familiar users encounter elevated operational challenges, including higher deterrence from participation. A 2017 study revealed that 24% of individuals over 65 avoid shopping due to automated checkouts, with 60% expressing concern over insufficient staff assistance for errors or queries. Visually impaired and motor-impaired individuals face additional barriers, such as small touchscreens, complex scanning interfaces, and lack of tactile or , limiting independent use without adaptation. Recent retailer initiatives, like Target's 2025 rollout of accessible self-checkout kiosks featuring voice guidance and simplified controls developed with disability advocates, underscore these persistent issues while illustrating market-driven responses. Despite these hurdles, overall exclusion remains limited, as widespread —evidenced by self-checkout comprising up to 80% of in some U.S. grocery stores—coexists with retained manned options, enabling without halting gains. Debates center on types: proponents of mandated assistance argue it addresses gaps for vulnerable demographics, yet empirical patterns suggest solutions, including on-site and lanes, better balance with systemic , avoiding sacrifices for marginal cases where voluntary adaptations suffice.

Economic Impacts

Employment Shifts and Market Efficiency

The adoption of self-checkout systems has substantially diminished the demand for traditional roles, with early implementations demonstrating reductions in checkout labor costs by as much as 66%. This shift reallocates human resources away from routine scanning and transaction processing toward higher-value tasks such as inventory management, customer assistance, and store maintenance, enhancing overall operational flexibility. Empirical data from the indicate that while employment grew modestly from 3.4 million in 2010 to about 3.5 million by 2019, total retail trade employment expanded by over 700,000 jobs during the same period amid widespread self-checkout rollout, underscoring no net loss in sector-wide positions. Economists frame this transformation through the lens of Joseph Schumpeter's concept of , wherein technological innovation displaces specific low-skill jobs but fosters broader economic adaptation, productivity gains, and job creation in complementary areas like fulfillment and personalized service roles. These efficiency improvements free up capital previously tied to labor-intensive checkouts, enabling retailers to invest in expansion or competitive pricing strategies that ultimately benefit consumers via sustained market discipline. In contrast, labor unions have vociferously opposed self-checkout proliferation, attributing direct displacements—estimated at tens of thousands in localized markets—to and advocating regulatory caps to preserve existing positions. Market efficiency metrics further reveal that self-checkout correlates with accelerated transaction throughput, reducing per-store staffing needs at front-end operations without contracting overall output or consumer access. This reallocation counters zero-sum narratives of inevitable , as evidenced by retail sector resilience: U.S. retail sales volume rose 3.1% from 2019 to 2020 despite disruptions and ongoing , with employment projections anticipating continued 12% growth through 2020 baselines adjusted for integration.

Broader Productivity and Retail Adaptation

Self-checkout systems have contributed to systemic productivity gains in retail by accelerating transaction speeds, with implementations yielding 8% improvements in overall checkout times as reported by major chains in 2025. These efficiencies stem from reduced queue dependencies and automated scanning, allowing for higher throughput during peak hours without proportional labor increases. In turn, faster checkouts facilitate capture, supporting just-in-time inventory practices by enabling retailers to replenish based on immediate signals rather than lagged reporting. Such operational enhancements have spillover effects on broader innovation, including with AI-driven and automated replenishment systems that extend beyond checkout to . While cost savings from self-checkout—estimated at 25-30% reductions in checkout labor—primarily bolster retailer margins amid rising shrinkage concerns, competitive pressures have led to selective price adjustments in efficiency-focused chains. Retail adaptation has seen partial reversals in 2024-2025, with chains like and limiting self-checkout access in select stores to curb theft, yet these are offset by upgrades such as for item verification, sustaining overall adoption at 96% among grocery retailers. These technological refinements, including for error detection, have reinforced self-checkout's role in hybrid models, where it complements manned lanes rather than replacing them outright. Market projections indicate continued terminal growth, driven by these adaptations that mitigate drawbacks while amplifying productivity benefits.

Regulatory and Policy Debates

Legislative Interventions

In August 2025, the Long Beach City Council approved Ordinance No. ORD-25-0010, establishing staffing requirements for self-service checkout stations in grocery and drug retail establishments with over 2,500 square feet of sales floor area. Effective September 21, 2025, the ordinance mandates a of one employee per three self-checkout stations to enable direct and , alongside a requirement for at least one traditional manned checkout lane to remain open whenever self-checkout is operational. It also imposes a 15-item purchase limit per transaction at self-checkout kiosks and prohibits their use for high-theft or age-restricted items such as , , or those typically secured in locked cases. Proponents cited underreported theft at self-checkout as a primary driver, with the measure positioning Long Beach as the first U.S. city to enforce such staffing ratios amid national concerns. At the state level in , Senate Bill 442, introduced in 2025 by Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, proposes broader restrictions including mandatory signage for a 15-item limit at self-checkout lanes and a requirement for at least one staffed traditional lane during operating hours. The bill further obligates retailers to notify employees and unions 60 days in advance of installing new self-checkout stations, incorporating the technology into workplace safety plans to address alleged increases in theft and violence toward staff. Labor unions, including sponsors of similar prior measures like SB 1446, have advocated these rules to mitigate job displacement and safety risks, asserting that self-checkout correlates with higher and understaffing burdens. Empirical data on the of these interventions remains limited due to their recency, with Long Beach's ordinance yielding immediate operational disruptions such as self-checkout closures at some supermarkets, resulting in customer complaints over extended wait times at manned lanes. Retailers have reported potential compliance costs from added staffing and reconfiguration, potentially elevating operational expenses without verifiable reductions in rates, as pre-implementation studies indicate self-checkout losses stem more from intentional non-scanning than solely inadequate oversight. Union-backed claims of spikes lack independent quantification beyond anecdotal store reports, raising questions about whether mandates address root causes like prosecutorial leniency or instead amplify oversight burdens that could indirectly heighten net retail losses through reduced throughput efficiency.

Industry Responses to Oversight

Retailers have responded to increased regulatory scrutiny on self-checkout systems—such as staffing mandates in locales like , effective September 2025, requiring one employee per three stations—by implementing hybrid models that combine kiosks with staffed lanes, thereby balancing efficiency gains with compliance demands. , for instance, announced in 2025 a strategic reduction in self-checkout kiosks across stores, prioritizing cashier-staffed options to address theft and customer dissatisfaction, though it maintains selective deployment of automated systems in high-volume areas. This partial reversal contrasts with broader industry trends, as evidenced by Target's affirmation that it has no plans to eliminate self-checkout from the majority of its locations despite similar pressures. To mitigate theft vulnerabilities highlighted in oversight debates, major chains have piloted -enhanced detection technologies at self-checkout points, achieving notable shrink reductions without fully capitulating to restrictions. , a subsidiary, launched portal pilots in 2025 that scan shoppers upon exit, yielding faster processing times and diminished losses from or errors, with industry analogs reporting 20-35% shrink decreases in comparable trials. These efforts leverage and to flag anomalies like unscanned items, positioning as a proactive alternative to regulatory caps on numbers. Despite localized reversions, surveys and market analyses indicate sustained investment in self-checkout infrastructure, driven by operational data favoring automation's resilience. A 2025 industry report noted retailers deploying over 205,000 terminals amid shrinkage concerns, with hybrid expansions incorporating for real-time monitoring as a hedge against further rules. Projections forecast the global self-checkout market reaching USD 9.74 billion by 2029 at a 13.4% CAGR, underscoring tech adaptations like integration over wholesale abandonment. This data-centric approach prioritizes empirical loss prevention metrics, enabling chains to expand selectively while navigating oversight.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Adoption of Self-Checkout Systems in Retail and Their Impact on ...
    Self-checkout systems allow consumers to scan, bag, and pay, reducing transaction times, improving convenience, and enhancing customer happiness and loyalty.
  2. [2]
    Adoption of Self-Checkout Systems in Retail and Their Impact on ...
    Jan 10, 2025 · Self-checkout systems are become more and more common as consumers depend more on technology. The study is to assess the difficulties of these ...
  3. [3]
    Understanding the influence of self- versus regular checkout on ...
    The market size of global self-checkout systems was valued at US$3,865.8 million in 2022 and is expected to register a compound annual growth rate of 13.4% from ...
  4. [4]
    Easy-Mart: Self checkout System for Supermarkets - Academia.edu
    Self-checkout systems reduce transaction times significantly, with customers averaging 2 minutes per transaction compared to over 10 minutes in traditional ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] An Empirical Analysis of Self-Service Technologies in the Retail Stores
    Dec 26, 2024 · SST adoption reduces traditional POS transactions but increases basket value, decreases cashiers, and reduces unregistered customers. SSTs ...
  6. [6]
    'It hasn't delivered': The spectacular failure of self-checkout technology
    Jan 15, 2024 · Some data shows retailers utilising self-checkout technology have loss rates more than twice the industry average. In addition to shrink ...
  7. [7]
    Study finds self-check has 16x more shrink than cashier lanes
    Nov 28, 2023 · Research from Grabango reveals self-checkout machines are a significant driver of shrink, with losses amounting to 3.5% of sales – or more than 16 times more ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  8. [8]
    Self-Checkout in Retail: Measuring the Impact on Loss
    This report, published in 2018, focusses upon quantifying the risks associated with three forms of self-scan and checkout technology (SCO).
  9. [9]
    Retail self-checkouts: From convenience to controversy?
    Aug 16, 2024 · One study found that 39% of grocery shrink comes from self-checkout. ... AI can help combat self-checkout theft by utilising advanced machine ...
  10. [10]
    The Impact and Control of Losses at the Self Checkout
    They went on to say that 'external theft activity' in self-scan stores was between 20 per cent and 65 per cent higher and 'inventory shrink in theft-related ...Retail Shrinkage · Abusing Self-scan Checkouts · Self-scan Checkouts and...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  11. [11]
    Making the Case for Better Self-Checkout Systems - NMI
    Recent research from NCR Voyix shows that 43% of consumers prefer to use self-checkout when buying groceries. When narrowed down to Millennials and Gen Z, that ...
  12. [12]
    'It hasn't delivered': The spectacular failure of self-checkout technology
    Jan 15, 2024 · For shoppers, self-checkout was supposed to provide convenience and speed. Retailers hoped it would usher in a new age of cost savings. Their ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  13. [13]
    Employee Suggestion Origin Story: Self-Checkout Machines - LinkedIn
    Nov 20, 2023 · In South Florida in 1984, a man named David R. Humble found inspiration for a groundbreaking idea while waiting in a long grocery store checkout line.Missing: Delco | Show results with:Delco
  14. [14]
    the Last-Ditch Effort Before the No-Checkout Stores of the Future?
    The first self-service checkout machines then called automated checkout machines or ACM, were set up in a Kroger store in Atlanta in July 1986. One of the ...
  15. [15]
    The Tipping Point of The Great Self-Checkout Experiment
    Sep 26, 2024 · The first self-checkout kiosk was installed in a Kroger store in Atlanta in July 1986, after David R. Humble, president of electronics ...
  16. [16]
    A Self-Checkout That Customers Love? This Company Created It.
    Dec 21, 2023 · When they were first rolled out in 1986 at Atlanta-area Kroger grocery stores, self-checkout machines were hailed as a “revolution in the ...
  17. [17]
    How Self-Checkout Reflects Cultural and National Differences
    The concept of self-checkout first emerged in the U.S. back in the 1980s, when retailers faced rising labor costs and growing pressure to streamline operations.
  18. [18]
    Nobody likes self-checkout. Here's why it's everywhere - CNN
    Jul 10, 2022 · The system reduced cashier costs by as much as 66%, according to a 1988 article in the Miami Herald. The first modern self-checkout system, ...
  19. [19]
    It's the End of the Food World as We Know It (and Publix Feels Fine)
    Sep 1, 2024 · Throughout this store, you'll see Publix's 1990's tile ... Publix #356 may have been the first Florida Publix to install self-checkout ...
  20. [20]
    MEET GROCERY OF THE `90S: DO-IT-YOURSELF CHECKOUT
    May 9, 1990 · The self-service machines are simply the latest development shaping the supermarket of the 1990s, where automation will speed checkouts, offer ...
  21. [21]
    The Evolution of Self-Checkout - Cloudpick's Blog
    Apr 16, 2025 · By 1986, Kroger, a major grocery chain, introduced the first self-checkout machine in Atlanta. This innovation marked the beginning of a new era ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    The unpopular rise of self-checkouts (and how to fix them) - BBC
    May 9, 2017 · It's a machine that many people love to hate. What will it take to improve the experience of the self-checkout?Missing: savings maintenance
  23. [23]
    Walmart and the Evolution of Self-Checkout: A Revolution Under ...
    Jan 11, 2025 · Walmart began experimenting with self-checkout in the early 2000s as part of a broader strategy to increase efficiency and reduce labour costs.
  24. [24]
    Tesco begins self checkout trial - Food Navigator
    Mar 6, 2003 · After a 12-week trial of a self checkout system at Marks & Spencer last year, Tesco has become the latest British food retailer to ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Scanning Barcodes: Self-Checkouts' Effect on Labor Markets and
    Through IBM, the self-checkout counter blossomed, and by 2008 there were over 90,000 self-checkouts worldwide, mostly concentrated in the United States (Castro ...
  26. [26]
    NCR Acquires Retail Point Of Sale Software Company Retalix For ...
    Nov 28, 2012 · NCR Corporation announced this afternoon that it will acquire Retalix, a provider of point-of-sale software and services, for $30 per share in cash.
  27. [27]
    Checking out productivity in grocery stores - Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Dec 18, 2019 · Productivity improved by about 2.0 percent annually in grocery stores in the 2000 to 2010 period, compared with the previous period, 1987 to ...
  28. [28]
    Understanding the implementation of retail self-service check-out ...
    Sep 14, 2022 · To understand the opportunities to improve the self-checkout experience Statista Research Department surveyed 2,803 consumers, and only 17% ...
  29. [29]
    How COVID-19 is Accelerating the Adoption of Self-Checkout - Nedap
    This trend is mainly driven by customer experience, cost savings and most recently the COVID-19 pandemic has been credited for accelerating the push for ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  30. [30]
    COVID-19 and the Impact on Customer Self-Service - Heretto
    May 26, 2022 · According to ReportLinker, the self-service kiosk market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 8.6% from 2020 to 2027. The ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  31. [31]
    Self-Checkout Adoption & Theft Statistics - Capital One Shopping
    Feb 17, 2025 · 96% of grocery stores offer self-checkout. Early estimates indicate that 10,000 global retailers have installed self-checkout systems as of 2024 ...
  32. [32]
    Target Express Self-Checkout
    May 5, 2025 · In March 2024, we debuted Express Self-Checkout with limits of 10 items or fewer at most of our nearly 2,000 stores nationwide to give ...
  33. [33]
    One year later, Target calls express self-checkout a success | CX Dive
    May 7, 2025 · Target says its express self-checkout lanes, which limit customers to 10 or fewer items, have increased satisfaction and sped up the ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Self-checkout popularity expands among shoppers
    Jan 21, 2025 · Notably, younger generations, particularly Gen Z and millennials, demonstrated a higher propensity for self-checkout usage, with 63% of Gen Z ...
  36. [36]
    Self-checkout Systems Market Size & Demand 2025 to 2035
    The global self-checkout systems market is expected to reach USD 3,926.1 million in 2025. Demand for self-checkout systems is projected to rise at a CAGR of ...
  37. [37]
    Self-checkout Systems Market Size | Industry Report, 2030
    Self-Checkout Systems Market Report Scope ; Market size value in 2025. USD 5.55 billion ; Revenue forecast in 2030. USD 10.49 billion ; Growth rate. CAGR of 13.6% ...
  38. [38]
    The Evolution of Supermarket Shopping: Self-Checkout Machines
    Jun 4, 2024 · Interactive Screen: The self-checkout kiosk machines always have interactive touch screens. · Barcode Scanner: · Digital Weighing Scale: · RFID ...
  39. [39]
    How Do Self Service Checkout Machines Work in Supermarkets?
    Mar 13, 2025 · These machines are equipped with a touchscreen display, a barcode scanner, a scale for weighing items, and a payment terminal.Missing: conventional | Show results with:conventional
  40. [40]
    Self-Checkout: Kiosks vs Mobile: A Comprehensive Comparison
    Dec 2, 2024 · Self-checkout kiosks require a proper hardware setup. Each unit has its own components like touchscreens, barcode scanners, card readers, and ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    What is Self-Checkout Hardware System? Uses, How It Works & Top ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · These systems typically include barcode scanners, touchscreens, payment modules (credit/debit card readers, mobile payment options), and ...Missing: conventional | Show results with:conventional
  43. [43]
    Wish Your Grocery Store Checkout Lane Could Move Faster? Read ...
    Apr 23, 2019 · Digimarc Barcode and Zebra's multi-plane scanners, like the MP7000, enable faster scanning, increasing throughput from 48 to 74 IPM.
  44. [44]
    What is Scan and Go? A Guide for Retailers - Netguru
    Sep 9, 2025 · Walmart introduced its "Scan & Go" in select stores, empowering customers to use handheld devices to scan items while shopping.
  45. [45]
    Scan & Go on Handheld Scanners - Shopreme
    In short, shopreme Scan & Go on Handheld Scanners enables shoppers to scan products, pay on the device or at checkout, and leave the store without downloading ...
  46. [46]
    Smart Self Checkout System | Scan, Pay, & Go Solution | Scan 'N' Thru
    With Scan and Go, your customers can scan items and pay directly through their smartphones and enjoy a fast and hassle-free shopping process.
  47. [47]
    Analysis of the Impact of the RFID Technology on Reducing ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper considers the situation of a retail store subject to inventory inaccuracies stemming from execution problems.
  48. [48]
    Walmart To Use RFID To Improve 'Store Level' Inventory Accuracy In ...
    Feb 10, 2022 · Walmart To Use RFID To Improve 'Store Level' Inventory Accuracy In Home Goods, Consumer Electronics · Expanding Beyond Apparel & Footwear.
  49. [49]
    leveraging AI and computer vision for effective self-checkout fraud ...
    May 9, 2025 · AI and computer vision use visual deep learning to detect hand movements, barcode issues, and mislabeled produce, preventing self-checkout ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] AI and Computer Vision Accelerate Self-Checkout
    AI and computer vision enhance image recognition, automate weighing, and integrate weighing into payment, improving self-checkout and reducing manual input and ...Missing: pilots 2020s<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    IoT in Retail: Smart Technologies Reshaping Shopping in 2025
    Aug 29, 2025 · Combining IoT sensors with AI enables predictive restocking, innovative promotions, and adaptive store layouts. Hyper-personalization. The ...
  52. [52]
    7 best open source POS software, free & paid options in 2025
    Jun 10, 2025 · In this post, we compile the list of the top 7 open source point of sale software based on our experts' research, POS features, and customer reviews.
  53. [53]
    8 open source point of sale systems | Opensource.com
    Jul 14, 2016 · Open source POS options include Odoo, OSPOS, SambaPOS, WallacePOS, Unicenta, Floreant, Chromis, and Apache OFBiz.Missing: checkout uptake
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Mitigating self-checkout theft: A comprehensive guide for retailers
    Jul 29, 2025 · Employee oversight stations: Visible employee presence directly addresses a main weakness of self-checkout systems: reduced supervision. This ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Hybrid / Convertible Tills - The Good, Bad and Ugly - Retailer Insights
    Sep 26, 2025 · Still relatively early stage: only ~16% of retailers surveyed have deployed hybrids; ~26% are trialling. Click here for benchmark study results ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Five Below Adding Associate-Assisted Self-Checkout to 250 Stores
    Jun 8, 2021 · Discount Retail Chain Five Below (publicly listed NYSE: FIVE) said it will add Associate Assisted Self-Checkout (ACO) to be in over 60% of the ...
  58. [58]
    How Retail Leverages Self-service for Increased Sales
    Dec 7, 2022 · Most retailers have found that attended self-checkout is the best model, allowing shoppers to ask for help when needed and keeping a ...
  59. [59]
    Walmart Self Checkout - Current Challenges - Retail Systems
    Mar 22, 2025 · Voice-Assisted Self-Checkout: Walmart is piloting voice-assisted self-checkout kiosks in select stores, using natural language processing to ...
  60. [60]
    Self-Checkout Survey Highlights Key Opportunities to Increase ...
    Oct 3, 2024 · Respondents suggested that more explicit on-screen instructions and audio prompts would help alleviate confusion, with 14% specifically ...
  61. [61]
    Self-checkout survey highlights opportunities for fresh produce sales
    Oct 3, 2024 · Respondents suggested that more explicit on-screen instructions and audio prompts would help alleviate confusion, with 14% specifically ...Missing: specialized | Show results with:specialized<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Walmart Self Checkout - 2025 Edition - Kiosk Industry
    Feb 16, 2025 · Members can now enjoy expedited self-checkout processes and exclusive lanes in some locations. Voice-Assisted Self-Checkout. Walmart has been ...
  63. [63]
    Self-Checkout Pros and Cons - Wavetec
    Mar 28, 2024 · Self-checkout systems offer businesses significant advantages, such as efficiency, reduced labor costs, and increased checkout throughput. Self ...
  64. [64]
    The Impact of Self-Checkouts on Price Image and Customer Trust
    Jan 22, 2025 · Studies indicate that self-checkouts can reduce staffing expenses by up to 40% (Forbes). However, this operational efficiency can backfire if ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The Future of Retail Grocery Store Labor - Wharton Faculty Platform
    Jun 17, 2024 · We report here the results of a study to learn about the evolving store labor practices of leading (mostly grocery) retailers, including the ...
  66. [66]
    The Business Acumen Impact of Self-Checkouts - Advantexe
    Jun 27, 2024 · The adoption of self-checkout systems can lead to substantial benefits for retailers, including cost savings, enhanced customer experience, and ...
  67. [67]
    Embracing Self-Serve Retail: The Evolution of Unattended Shopping
    Self-serve checkouts also benefit merchants in other ways, from limiting in-store congestion to reducing labor costs. As a result, self-serve retail not only ...Missing: savings | Show results with:savings
  68. [68]
    77% of Shoppers Choose Self-Checkout for Faster Service ...
    Jan 10, 2025 · Seventy-seven percent of shoppers prefer self-checkout because it's faster than staffed checkout. Over one-third of shoppers (36%) prefer self-checkout because ...
  69. [69]
    Self-checkout soars: Speed, convenience drive customer demand
    Jan 17, 2025 · A recent survey reveals 77% of shoppers now prefer self-checkout due to speed, despite concerns about theft and job displacement.
  70. [70]
    Self-checkout leads in retail tech adoption - eMarketer
    Jan 8, 2025 · Key stat: 86% of US adults have used self-checkout, and 70% have used mobile apps for shopping, per a September 2024 study from Morning ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
  71. [71]
    Most US Consumers Prefer To Use Self-Checkout When It's Available
    Sep 14, 2025 · Nearly two-thirds of US online adults prefer to use self-checkout when it's available, according to Forrester's Retail Topic Insights 1 ...
  72. [72]
    Celebrating Express Self-Checkout - Target Corporation
    May 5, 2025 · So, in March 2024, we rolled out our Express Self-Checkout lanes with limits of 10 items or fewer at most of our nearly 2,000 stores nationwide.
  73. [73]
    The Benefits of Self-Checkout: Efficient Customer Journeys, Shorter ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · Self-checkouts are game-changers. They speed up the purchasing process, reduce queues, and simplify payment. For customers, it's a smoother and faster ...Missing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
  74. [74]
    Self-Checkout Users Think It Makes Stealing Easier | LendingTree
    Nov 13, 2023 · 15% of self-checkout users confess to purposely stealing. While 60% of those who have stolen felt remorseful and 33% say they've been caught, 44 ...
  75. [75]
    Self-checkout at the grocery store: Reality bites
    Oct 16, 2023 · In response, many stores have employees watching shoppers scan their items, which undercuts self-checkout's presumed labor savings and is a ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  76. [76]
    Is Self-checkout a Failed Experiment? - Knowledge at Wharton
    Jan 30, 2024 · November 9, 2023 ... A survey last year by LendingTree found that 15% of self-checkout users admitted to stealing, and 44% planned to do it again.January 30, 2024 5 Min Read · Written By · Shrink: Why Some Are Calling...
  77. [77]
    How To Harness AI And Automation For Smarter Self-Checkout ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · Smart weight sensors validate that the scanned product matches its expected weight to combat common mis-scanning fraud.
  78. [78]
    Preventing POS Theft in Self-Checkout: A Strategic Approach
    Apr 1, 2025 · Install AI-driven cameras to detect non-scanned items moving past the scanner. · Use weight verification systems that compare scanned items with ...
  79. [79]
    Retailers Invest in Self-checkout Solutions Despite Shrinkage ...
    Jul 17, 2025 · Adoption continues to rise, with retailers deploying a variety of loss prevention measures including AI-powered solutions.
  80. [80]
    More on retail theft - Blue Book
    Oct 6, 2023 · Self-checkout leads to higher rates of theft. But it cuts back on the number of employees needed. What if the net savings in staff costs offset— ...
  81. [81]
    Shrinkage at the Self-Checkout - Checklens
    Shrinkage at self-checkouts includes non-scanning, mis-scanning, and walk-aways. Scan errors occur in 2% of transactions, and losses can be 31% higher.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  82. [82]
    Self Checkout - ECR Retail Loss
    Of those, 2.87% were found to contain at least one error, generating an overall inventory error rate of 0.52% of Scan and Go sales. When over-scans were ...
  83. [83]
    Walmart, Costco and other companies rethink self-checkout - CNN
    Nov 13, 2023 · Self-checkout woes. Self-service machines were first introduced during the 1980s to lower labor expenses. They shifted the work of paid ...Missing: union pressures
  84. [84]
    Monster of 2024: Self-Checkout Machines Taking Over Grocery Stores
    Jan 2, 2025 · Please report to the nearest grocery store, scan your weekly essentials, move them to the doll-sized bagging area, and prepare to be gaslit by ...
  85. [85]
    Self Checkout Statistics That You Should Know | ConnectPOS
    Sep 5, 2023 · Around 58% of Gen X shoppers and 41% of baby boomers now use self-checkout regularly. This trend indicates a broader shift in behavior, where ...
  86. [86]
    Automated checkouts 'miserable' for elderly shoppers - BBC
    Nov 21, 2017 · The study suggests 24% of older people are deterred from shopping by automated checkouts and 60% are worried that there will be a lack of ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Challenges Faced by Persons with Disabilities Using Self-Service ...
    motor disabilities. Most individuals who are visually impaired, and even some who have motor disabilities, have limited access to a car or even someone to ...
  88. [88]
    Target's First-of-its-Kind Accessible Self-Checkout Built with the ...
    Sep 26, 2025 · Rolling out to self-checkout stations nationwide beginning this holiday season and continuing through early 2026, it's part of Target's ongoing ...<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Self-checkout at grocery stores gaining in popularity: report
    Jan 16, 2024 · traditional checkout, and 53% of consumers aged 18 to 44 choose self-checkout. “Self-checkout is evolving to offer a quicker and more user- ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  90. [90]
    All Employees, Retail Trade (USTRADE) | FRED | St. Louis Fed
    In Aug 2025, there were 15,588.4 thousand seasonally adjusted retail trade employees, as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  91. [91]
    The War on Self-Checkouts Is Economically Backward - FEE.org
    Feb 26, 2020 · More effective strategies displace less effective strategies. Economist Joseph Schumpeter coined the term “creative destruction” to describe ...
  92. [92]
    Unions wage war on self-checkout - Orange County Register
    Aug 19, 2025 · Lola Smallwood-Cuevas introduced Senate Bill 1446 to micromanage how stores utilize self-checkout machines. The bill was sponsored by the ...
  93. [93]
    Union-Backed Ballot Initiative Would Limit Grocery Stores to 2 Self ...
    Sep 6, 2019 · The Oregon AFL-CIO argues that self-checkout machines are costing jobs and increasing social isolation.
  94. [94]
    U.S. Retail Sales Top $5,570 Billion - U.S. Census Bureau
    Jan 13, 2022 · Retail sales (NAICS 44-45) for the nation increased 3.1% from $5402.3 billion in 2019 to $5570.4 billion in 2020.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] The Retail Trade Workforce in the United States - Aspen Institute
    ... Labor's Bureau of Statistics 2010-2020 projections, employment in the retail industry overall will grow by about 12 percent and add 1.8 million jobs.18 ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    What's in store for the future of self checkouts? How retailers are ...
    May 9, 2025 · According to a November 2023 LendingTree survey of 2,000 U.S. consumers, 15% of self-checkout users have purposely stolen an item − and 44% of ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    77% of Shoppers Choose Self-Checkout for Faster Service ...
    Jan 10, 2025 · Press Release · 77% of Shoppers Choose Self-Checkout for Faster Service, According to New Consumer Survey from NCR Voyix¹.<|control11|><|separator|>
  98. [98]
  99. [99]
  100. [100]
    Self Checkout Trends 2025: AI Innovations & Global Adoption Insights
    May 30, 2025 · Grocery Dominance: 96% of grocery stores now offer self-checkout, with projections indicating 24,000 global retailers adopting the technology by ...
  101. [101]
    Walmart Removing Self-Checkout - What Are The Numbers?
    Oct 16, 2025 · Walmart's multifaceted approach in 2025 merges cutting-edge technology, increased physical security, and legal consequences to combat theft at ...
  102. [102]
    Top Statistics on Self-Serve Systems to Know in 2025 - Deliverect
    Aug 26, 2025 · A recent study by RBR predicts a 90% per year global increase in self-checkout terminals to address this growing demand for self-service ...
  103. [103]
    Self-Service Checkout Staffing Requirements Ordinance
    On August 12, 2025, the Long Beach City Council approved an ordinance establishing certain staffing requirements for self-service checkout ...
  104. [104]
    Long Beach regulates self-checkout amid growing shopper frustration
    Oct 11, 2025 · Theft is common and underreported at self-checkout, according to the ordinance. Rampant shoplifting has been a growing issue across the country, ...
  105. [105]
    City of Long Beach to Require Staffing for Self-Check Out
    Aug 7, 2025 · The proposed ordinance also prohibits the use of self-checkout for items requiring ID (like alcohol or tobacco) or items with special theft- ...Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
  106. [106]
    Long Beach restricts self-checkouts in attempt to stop shoplifters
    Oct 15, 2025 · The new rule requires stores to post one staff member monitoring every three self-checkout kiosks.Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
  107. [107]
    Hate self-checkout? California lawmakers could set new rules
    Aug 13, 2025 · Under the measure, stores would have to display signs that limit customers to 15 items or fewer in the self-checkout lanes and also designate ...<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Bill Text: CA SB442 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session | Amended
    (2) (A) The employer has established a workplace policy that limits self-service checkouts to purchases of no more than 15 items. (B) (i) The establishment ...
  109. [109]
    Self-checkout kiosks in Long Beach may be closing over new city ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · The new ordinance establishes a 3:1 staffing ratio and limits self-checkout lanes to purchases of 15 or fewer items. It also bans certain locked ...Missing: driven | Show results with:driven
  110. [110]
    Self-Checkout Machines Cause Retail Theft and Put Workers in ...
    Aug 14, 2024 · The proliferation of self-checkout has caused an increase in theft and violence and presented new data on how self-checkout has negative consequences.Missing: bans | Show results with:bans
  111. [111]
    Walmart's Self-Checkout Strategy Shift and What It Means for ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Walmart's self-checkout strategy in 2025 means fewer kiosks, more staff, and exclusive lanes for Walmart+ members—see how these changes ...
  112. [112]
    Sam's Club Pilots AI Portals for Faster Checkouts and Less Theft
    Sep 26, 2025 · Data from the pilot suggests not just faster exits but also reduced shrinkage—retail speak for losses from theft or errors. Walmart ...
  113. [113]
    Retail Loss Prevention in 2025: Standards, Terminology, Brands ...
    Aug 15, 2025 · Here's how industry standards, AI tech, and key players shape the battle against retail shrink in 2025. ... 20–35% shrink reduction in pilots, Low ...Missing: self- | Show results with:self-<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    Can Artificial Intelligence Stop Loss at the Checkout?
    May 27, 2025 · AI technology is helping retailers reduce checkout losses by detecting fraud, predicting theft, and improving overall efficiency without ...
  115. [115]
    Self-Checkout Systems Market Report 2025
    The Self-Checkout Systems Market, valued at USD 5.9B in 2025, is projected to reach USD 9.74B by 2029, growing at a 13.4% CAGR.
  116. [116]
    Self-checkout System Market Size, Share & Growth Report 2033
    The Self-checkout System Market Size was valued at USD 5.85 Billion in 2025E and is expected to reach USD 17.47 Billion by 2033 and grow at a CAGR of 14.68% ...