Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sexual identity

Sexual identity is an individual's persistent self-conception as male or female, which for over 99.9% of the human population corresponds directly to their biological sex, defined by the dimorphic capacity to produce either small gametes (sperm) in males or large gametes (ova) in females.^[1] Biological sex is a binary trait rooted in reproductive roles, with rare disorders of sex development—such as true intersex conditions involving ambiguous genitalia—affecting approximately 0.018% of births and not constituting intermediate sexes or undermining the underlying dimorphism.^[2]^[1] In typical development, sexual identity emerges early, reinforced by prenatal hormonal influences on brain organization that align with gonadal sex, leading to lifelong congruence without conscious effort or social conditioning.^[3] Empirical data indicate that incongruence, termed gender dysphoria, affects less than 1% of adults historically—0.6% of natal males and 0.2% of natal females in rigorous Dutch studies—with high rates of natural resolution (desistance) in childhood cases exceeding 80% when not medically intervened upon prematurely.^[4] Recent decades have seen explosive increases in reported dysphoria, particularly among adolescents, with incidence rising over 50-fold in England from 2011 to 2021 and adolescent females showing 12-fold surges, suggesting potential roles for social contagion, online influences, and diagnostic expansion beyond biological markers.^[5]^[6] These trends contrast with stable biological underpinnings, fueling debates over causal mechanisms, including critiques of over-reliance on self-report in youth amid evidence of fluidity and regret post-intervention.^[7] Defining characteristics include its innateness for most, resilience to cultural shifts, and distinction from sexual orientation, which concerns patterns of attraction rather than self-sex classification.^[3]

Definitions and Conceptual Foundations

Core Definitions and Distinctions

Sexual identity refers to an individual's self-concept regarding their pattern of sexual attractions, typically categorized as heterosexual (attraction primarily to the opposite sex), homosexual (attraction primarily to the same sex), or bisexual (attraction to both sexes). This self-identification integrates emotional, romantic, and physical dimensions of attraction and is considered a stable aspect of personal psychology for most people, emerging from innate predispositions rather than conscious choice.^[8]^[3] Biological sex, by contrast, is an objective binary classification based on an organism's reproductive organization: males are structured to produce small gametes (sperm), while females produce large gametes (ova). This definition derives from evolutionary principles of anisogamy and holds across sexually reproducing species, including humans, where rare disorders of sex development (affecting 0.02-1.7% of births depending on criteria) represent developmental variations within the binary rather than additional categories.^[1]^[9] Sexual identity, as orientation-based self-labeling, operates independently of biological sex; for instance, homosexual attraction occurs within both male and female sexes. Gender identity differs from sexual identity in focusing on one's internal sense of being male, female, or otherwise, which typically aligns with biological sex but can diverge in cases of gender dysphoria (prevalence ~0.005-0.014% for persistent adult cases). Sexual identity concerns relational attractions (who one desires), whereas gender identity pertains to self-categorization (who one is). These are orthogonal: a biologically male individual with male gender identity may identify sexually as homosexual or heterosexual. Empirical studies, including twin research, indicate partial biological influences on sexual identity formation, distinct from gender identity processes.^[3]^[10]^[11] Sexual identity refers to an individual's internal recognition of belonging to the male or female sex category, typically congruent with biological indicators such as chromosomal composition (XX for females, XY for males) and reproductive anatomy.^[3] This differs from biological sex itself, which constitutes the objective, dimorphic classification based on the type of gametes produced—small gametes (sperm) defining males and large gametes (ova) defining females—with intersex variations arising from developmental disorders of sex development rather than constituting a spectrum or third category, affecting fewer than 0.02% of births in reproductively ambiguous forms.^[3] In empirical data, sexual identity aligns with biological sex in the overwhelming majority of cases, with discordance manifesting as gender dysphoria at clinical prevalence rates of approximately 0.0067% in general populations based on diagnostic records.^[12] Recent self-reported identifications have increased, potentially reflecting social influences or diagnostic expansions rather than underlying biological shifts, with rates rising from 0.14 to 4.4 per 10,000 person-years in some cohorts between 2011 and 2021.^[5] Sexual identity is independent of sexual orientation, which denotes the predominant pattern of erotic attraction to the opposite sex (heterosexual), same sex (homosexual), or both (bisexual), irrespective of one's own sex.^[3] For instance, a person with male sexual identity may experience heterosexual attraction to females or homosexual attraction to males, as these axes operate orthogonally; twin studies indicate partial genetic overlap between gender identity development and orientation but distinct neurobiological pathways, with sexual orientation showing stronger prenatal hormonal influences.^[3] This separation underscores that one's sense of sex membership does not dictate attraction patterns, as evidenced by consistent sex-attracted preferences across cultures and historical periods where biological sex dimorphism remains the attractor base.^[3] In contrast to gender roles—culturally prescribed behaviors, expectations, and expressions deemed appropriate for each sex, such as masculinity or femininity—sexual identity concerns the foundational categorization as male or female, not performative or social adaptations.^[13] Gender roles vary across societies and eras, influenced by economic and environmental factors, whereas sexual identity exhibits high stability rooted in early developmental biology, with deviations rare and often comorbid with conditions like autism spectrum disorder at elevated rates.^[14] Although sometimes conflated in contemporary discourse, sexual identity emphasizes alignment with biological sex dimorphism, while gender identity more broadly captures a subjective, potentially non-binary self-conception that may diverge from physical reality due to psychological or social factors.^[15] Peer-reviewed neurobiological research reveals that while typical individuals show brain structures sexually dimorphic in line with biological sex, those with discordant gender identity display mosaic patterns intermediate between sexes, though findings are limited by small samples, postmortem biases, and inability to disentangle causation from correlation or plasticity effects.^[3] Institutional sources in psychology and medicine, including those from the American Psychological Association, frequently frame gender identity as primary and fluid, potentially reflecting ideological preferences over empirical weighting of biological determinism, as critiqued in reviews highlighting overreliance on self-report amid rising youth identifications without corresponding genetic or prenatal evidence shifts.^[3]^[15]

Biological Underpinnings

Genetic and Prenatal Factors

Biological sex is determined at conception by the chromosomal complement, with the presence of a Y chromosome typically leading to male development via the action of the SRY gene, which encodes a transcription factor that initiates testis formation around week 6-7 of gestation.^[16] In the absence of SRY (as in XX individuals), ovarian development proceeds, establishing the binary framework of male or female gonadal differentiation that underpins typical sexual identity alignment. Mutations or deletions in SRY can result in XY individuals developing as females, highlighting the gene's causal role in male sex determination, though such disorders of sex development (DSDs) often involve additional prenatal factors and do not inherently disrupt gender identity congruence.^[17] Twin studies provide evidence for a heritable component in gender incongruence, with concordance rates higher in monozygotic than dizygotic pairs. A 2002 analysis of child and adolescent twins estimated heritability of gender identity disorder (GID) symptomatology at approximately 62%, based on univariate model-fitting to data from 314 twin pairs, though environmental influences accounted for the remainder.^[18] More recent register-based population studies, including a 2022 Danish analysis of over 500,000 individuals, reported pairwise concordance for gender dysphoria diagnoses at 28% for monozygotic twins versus 0.6% for dizygotic, suggesting moderate genetic influence amid shared and non-shared environmental effects.^[19] A 2022 case of monozygotic triplets where two of three female-identifying individuals exhibited gender dysphoria further supports heritability, as the shared genome correlated with partial concordance in identity formation.^[20] Across eight twin studies reviewed up to 2025, seven indicated genetic contributions ranging 25-47% to gender identity variance, comparable to complex traits like personality, though no single locus explains the phenotype.^[21] Genome-wide association efforts have identified candidate variants in genes regulating sex hormone signaling. A 2019 study of 380 transgender women found significant associations between gender dysphoria and polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor beta (ESR2) and androgen receptor (AR) genes, which modulate steroid hormone responses critical for sexual differentiation.^[22] Whole-exome sequencing in transgender cohorts has revealed rare variants in genes linked to sexually dimorphic brain development, such as those involved in neuronal migration and synaptic plasticity, though these findings require replication in larger samples and do not account for population-level prevalence.^[23] A 2020 review of genetic influences emphasized that while such variants may predispose to incongruence, they interact with prenatal and postnatal environments, and the absence of high-penetrance mutations underscores multifactorial etiology over deterministic genetics.^[24] Prenatal hormone exposure, particularly androgens, organizes brain regions associated with sex-typed behaviors and identity. In typical development, testosterone surges in male fetuses (weeks 8-24) masculinize neural circuits, fostering alignment between biological sex and later identity; disruptions can lead to atypical outcomes.^[25] Evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), where XX fetuses experience excess prenatal androgens due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, shows affected females exhibiting masculinized toy preferences and rough-and-tumble play from infancy, with elevated rates of bisexual or homosexual orientation in adulthood (up to 30-40% versus 5-10% in controls).^[26] However, gender identity remains predominantly female in CAH cohorts, with systematic reviews reporting gender dysphoria in only 1-5% of cases, indicating that while prenatal androgens increase risks for behavioral atypicality, they rarely cause full identity reversal.^[27]^[28] Indirect markers like the 2D:4D digit ratio, a proxy for prenatal androgen exposure, correlate with gender incongruence in some transgender subgroups, but prospective human data remain limited, and most individuals with elevated exposure do not develop dysphoria, pointing to thresholds or interactions beyond hormones alone.^[29] Overall, prenatal factors contribute to variance in sexual identity but do not deterministically override genetic sex in the majority of cases.

Neurobiological and Hormonal Evidence

Human brains display sexually dimorphic structures and connectivity patterns, with males exhibiting larger overall volumes of gray and white matter even after adjusting for body size, while females show greater cortical thickness across regions.^[30] These differences emerge early in development and encompass specific nuclei, such as the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH-3), which is larger in males, correlating with sex-typical behaviors.^[31] Functional connectivity analyses further reveal sex-specific network organization, with males showing stronger within-hemisphere connections and females more inter-hemispheric integration, influencing cognitive and emotional processing.^[32] Such dimorphisms underpin biological sexual identity, as they align with reproductive roles and are consistent across populations, though individual variability exceeds average group differences in many traits.^[33] Prenatal hormones drive this sexual differentiation through organizational effects during critical fetal windows. In males, a mid-gestational testosterone surge acts directly on the developing brain to promote male-typical morphology and function, whereas its absence results in default female organization.^[34] Human studies, including those on disorders of sex development, demonstrate that atypical prenatal androgen exposure alters brain responses; for instance, genetic females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), exposed to elevated androgens in utero, exhibit masculinized neural activation in auditory cortex during language processing and male-typical preferences in spatial tasks.^[35] Conversely, genetic males with androgen insensitivity syndrome develop female-typical brain features and gender identity, underscoring hormones' causal role over chromosomal sex alone.^[36] Regarding gender identity—self-perception as male or female—neurobiological evidence supports its primary alignment with biological sex, as prenatal hormonal effects produce concordant brain-body dimorphism in over 99% of individuals.^[3] Claims of innate mismatches in transgender cases, based on small-scale imaging studies showing partial shifts (e.g., in cortical thickness or hypothalamic volumes toward identified gender), face critiques for methodological limitations including tiny samples (often n<20), confounds from cross-sex hormones or puberty suppression, and failure to account for sexual orientation effects.^[37] Meta-analyses reveal substantial overlap between sexes in brain metrics, precluding reliable "brain sex" categorization, and no replicated biomarkers distinguish transgender brains categorically from cisgender ones post-adjustment for confounds.^[38] Thus, while hormones contribute to identity formation, evidence favors environmental, psychological, or post-natal factors in rare incongruences rather than deterministic neurobiological reversals.^[39]

Developmental Dynamics

Early Formation and Influences

Gender identity, understood as an individual's internal sense of being male or female, begins to manifest in infancy through categorical distinctions, with children as young as 3-4 months able to differentiate male and female faces.^[40] By 18-24 months, approximately 50% of children can label gender groups, such as "boy" or "girl," with girls acquiring this ability slightly earlier than boys on average.^[40] This early labeling capacity correlates with increased engagement in gender-typed play, suggesting an interplay between cognitive recognition and behavioral expression from toddlerhood.^[40] A stable sense of one's own gender typically solidifies between ages 2 and 3, when most children consistently identify with their biological sex and exhibit preferences aligned with it, such as toy choices or activity segregation.^[41] Longitudinal data indicate high stability in these patterns, with gender-typed interests maintaining moderate to strong consistency (correlation coefficients of 0.5-0.7) from age 2.5 to 8 years in general population samples.^[40] By age 4, children grasp basic biological markers of sex, and by age 7, they understand its invariance despite superficial changes.^[41] Biological factors predominate in this formative phase, including prenatal androgen exposure that organizes sexually dimorphic brain structures and behaviors observable prenatally or in early infancy, independent of postnatal socialization.^[3] Twin studies and neurobiological evidence support heritability estimates for gender-typical traits exceeding 50%, underscoring innate drivers over learned ones.^[39] Social influences, such as parental reinforcement of labels or peer interactions, modulate expression—e.g., accelerating sex-segregated play—but do not override core biological alignment in the majority of cases.^[40] ^[42] Among the small subset experiencing gender dysphoria in early childhood (prevalence ~0.5-1% in clinic-referred samples), longitudinal follow-ups reveal desistance in 70-90% by adolescence or adulthood, often coinciding with the emergence of a homosexual orientation relative to birth sex.^[43] ^[41] Persistence is rarer and typically intensifies peripubertally, with lower desistance among those showing intense, pervasive cross-sex identification from onset.^[41] These outcomes challenge purely social constructivist views, as desistance occurs despite affirmative environments in some cohorts, pointing to biological maturation as a key resolver.^[43] Recent upticks in adolescent-onset cases, absent in childhood data, implicate peer networks and online exposure as amplifiers rather than originators of early identity formation.^[42]

Stability Across the Lifespan

Gender identity, which refers to an individual's internal sense of their own gender, typically aligns with biological sex and demonstrates high stability from early childhood through adulthood in the general population. Longitudinal research indicates that core gender identity forms by ages 3 to 4 and persists without significant change for the vast majority, with deviations rare outside clinical contexts.^[44] Among children diagnosed with gender dysphoria in specialized clinics, multiple follow-up studies report desistance rates of 61% to 98%, meaning the incongruence resolves by adolescence or adulthood, with individuals identifying as cisgender and often exhibiting homosexual attractions. For instance, a study of boys referred for gender identity disorder found high desistance accompanied by predominant biphilic or androphilic orientations in adulthood.^[43] ^[45] These findings, drawn from pre-2010s clinic data emphasizing pre-pubertal onset and rigorous diagnostic criteria, contrast with critiques alleging methodological flaws, such as inclusion of non-dysphoric children; however, replicated across Dutch, Canadian, and Swedish cohorts, they underscore that childhood dysphoria frequently attenuates without intervention.^[46]^[47] In cohorts of youth who undergo early social transition—living as the identified gender before puberty—a 2022 longitudinal analysis of 317 participants aged 3 to 12 at baseline reported that 7.3% retransitioned at least once after an average 5-year follow-up, indicating persistence in over 92% of cases.^[48] This subgroup, characterized by parental support for transition and early affirmation, differs from historical clinic samples (more male, intense dysphoria), potentially inflating perceived stability due to selection bias toward persistent cases; post-2015 referral surges, disproportionately adolescent females, may further reflect social influences rather than innate stability.^[49]^[50] Sexual orientation, a component of sexual identity involving patterns of attraction, exhibits substantial stability after adolescence, with longitudinal data showing persistence as the dominant trajectory across the lifespan. A 10-year panel study found most individuals maintained their reported orientation, though a minority—higher among women—experienced shifts, challenging strict essentialism while affirming relative fixity post-20s.^[51] Meta-analyses confirm changes are less common than stability, with genital arousal patterns aligning enduringly with self-reported identity in men, and greater but still limited fluidity in women.^[52]^[53] Recent surveys of sexual minority youth report 13.5% orientation changes over time, often during identity exploration, but overall cohesion increases with age.^[54] Academic emphasis on fluidity may overstate variability, given earlier studies' focus on biological markers yielding higher consistency.^[49]

Historical Evolution

Pre-20th Century Perspectives

In ancient Greek society, particularly from the Archaic to Classical periods (c. 800–323 BCE), male same-sex relations were commonly structured as pederasty, involving an older male mentor (erastes) and a younger male youth (eromenos), emphasizing pedagogical, civic, and hierarchical roles rather than a categorical sexual identity. The erastes assumed the penetrative, active position symbolizing dominance and maturity, while the eromenos' temporary passivity was tied to his adolescent status and expected to cease upon adulthood; enduring adult passivity was stigmatized as effeminacy and loss of citizenship virtues.^[55]^[56] This framework prioritized social function and power dynamics over innate orientation, with Plato's Symposium (c. 385–370 BCE) portraying eros as a spectrum of desires ascending toward philosophical ideals, not fixed homosexual or heterosexual essences. Roman perspectives from the Republic to Empire (c. 509 BCE–476 CE) similarly evaluated male-male sexual acts through status and penetration roles, tolerating them among elites provided the freeborn citizen remained dominant and active to preserve virtus (manly excellence); passivity for adult males risked infamia (legal disgrace) and emasculation. The Lex Scantinia (c. 149 BCE) fined freeborn males for submitting to penetration, reflecting concerns over social hierarchy and imperial masculinity rather than prohibiting same-sex attraction per se.^[57] Emperors like Nero and Elagabalus faced criticism not for acts themselves but for inverting norms, such as passive roles or public excess, underscoring act-based regulation over identity formation.^[58] Judeo-Christian traditions, influencing Western views from antiquity onward, framed male same-sex intercourse as a moral transgression against divine order and procreation, with Leviticus 18:22 (c. 6th–5th century BCE) deeming it an "abomination" and Romans 1:26–27 (c. 57 CE) linking it to idolatry and unnatural exchange of roles. In medieval theology, Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) in Summa Theologica (II-II, Q. 154, A. 11) classified sodomy—encompassing male-male copulation—as a "vice against nature" among the gravest sexual sins, exceeding even rape in intrinsic disorder by thwarting semen’s generative purpose, though less severe than murder due to lack of direct harm to others.^[59]^[60] Ecclesiastical and secular laws, such as those under Justinian I (Novella 77, 538 CE), prescribed castration or death for sodomites, treating it as heresy or pollution rather than an ontological identity.^[57]^[61] Through the Renaissance and Enlightenment (14th–18th centuries), classical revivals occasionally invoked Greek tolerance, as in Winckelmann's aestheticized male beauty (1764), yet dominant Christian moralism persisted, viewing non-procreative acts—including same-sex—as sinful deviations policed by confessional and legal mechanisms without conceptualizing enduring orientations.^[62] Premodern discourses thus regulated behaviors via status, theology, and utility, absent the 19th-century emergence of identity categories like "inversion" or "urning."^[63]

Modern Categorization and Shifts

In the early 20th century, German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld advanced a theory of sexual intermediaries, positing that human sexuality exists on a continuum rather than a strict binary, with individuals exhibiting varying mixtures of masculine and feminine traits.^[64] He categorized homosexuals as a "third sex" intermediate between male and female, influencing subsequent views on non-normative identities through empirical observations at his Institute for Sexual Science, founded in 1919.^[65] This marked an initial shift from purely binary categorizations rooted in religious or legal norms toward biologically informed spectra, though Hirschfeld's work emphasized innate variations observable in anatomy and behavior.^[66] Mid-century developments formalized "gender identity" as a distinct concept, coined by psychiatrist Robert J. Stoller in 1964 to describe an individual's internal sense of maleness or femaleness, separate from biological sex.^[67] Psychologist John Money popularized the term in the 1950s through studies on intersex conditions, arguing for the primacy of postnatal socialization in shaping identity over chromosomal or gonadal determinants, a view later critiqued for lacking robust empirical support in cases like the David Reimer experiment.^[68] These categorizations distinguished gender role, orientation, and identity, enabling clinical interventions like hormone therapy for "transsexualism," as outlined in Harry Benjamin's 1966 standards.^[69] Diagnostic classifications evolved significantly from the late 20th century, with the DSM-III (1980) introducing "gender identity disorder" to encompass persistent mismatches between assigned sex and identified gender, including transsexualism and childhood variants.^[70] The DSM-IV (1994) refined this into adult, adolescent, and child subtypes to mitigate stigma associated with earlier terms like "transsexualism."^[71] By DSM-5 (2013), the diagnosis shifted to "gender dysphoria," prioritizing clinically significant distress or impairment over the identity mismatch itself, reflecting advocacy-driven revisions to depathologize nonconformity while retaining medical gatekeeping for treatments.^[71] Paralleling this, the ICD-10 (1990) grouped related conditions into four categories, including transsexualism and dual-role transvestism.^[67] Into the 21st century, categorizations expanded beyond binary male/female to incorporate non-binary, genderqueer, and fluid identities, driven by cultural visibility and self-identification models that grant individuals authority over their labels.^[72] The ICD-11 (effective 2022) reclassified "gender incongruence" under sexual health rather than mental disorders, removing requirements for distress or dysfunction, a change proponents attribute to reduced stigma but critics argue risks over-medicalization without addressing underlying comorbidities like autism or trauma often observed in clinical samples.^[73]^[68] Surveys reflect these shifts, with U.S. youth self-reporting non-cisgender identities rising from 0.5% in 2012 to over 1.8% by 2017, potentially indicating greater acceptance or social influences on reporting.^[49] Despite proliferation, biological sex remains dimorphic in over 99.98% of humans, with modern categories largely self-reported and varying cross-culturally.^[39]

Theoretical Frameworks

Essentialist Models

Essentialist models of sexual identity conceptualize sexual orientation as an innate, biologically determined characteristic that reflects underlying essences of human nature, manifesting early in life and exhibiting high stability across the lifespan. These frameworks posit that orientations such as heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality arise primarily from fixed biological mechanisms, including genetics, prenatal hormonal exposures, and neurostructural differences, rather than being predominantly shaped by cultural or social forces. Proponents argue that such traits function as natural kinds, with variations occurring as inherent outcomes of developmental biology, akin to other species-typical behaviors observed in evolutionary contexts.^[74]^[75]^[3] Genetic research provides key empirical support for essentialism through heritability estimates derived from twin and family studies. A landmark 1991 study by J. Michael Bailey and Richard C. Pillard analyzed 56 monozygotic twin pairs and 54 dizygotic twin pairs where at least one male twin was homosexual, finding concordance rates of 52% for monozygotic twins versus 22% for dizygotic twins, alongside 11% concordance among adoptive brothers, yielding substantial heritability estimates (approximately 30-50% across similar studies). These patterns suggest a genetic component influencing orientation, as monozygotic twins share nearly 100% of their DNA compared to 50% for dizygotic twins, controlling for shared rearing environments. Subsequent genome-wide association studies have identified specific genetic loci correlated with same-sex behavior, reinforcing the role of polygenic influences without implying strict determinism.^[76]^[77] Neurobiological evidence further bolsters essentialist claims by demonstrating structural brain differences aligned with orientation. In Simon LeVay's 1991 postmortem analysis of 41 human brains, the third interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH-3) measured approximately 1.8 cubic millimeters in heterosexual men but only 0.6 cubic millimeters in homosexual men—volumes comparable to those in women—indicating dimorphism tied to sexual orientation rather than solely to sex. Functional imaging studies, such as PET scans, have similarly shown distinct hypothalamic activation patterns in response to pheromones, with homosexual men exhibiting responses akin to heterosexual women. These findings point to prenatal organization of brain circuits governing attraction, independent of postnatal experiences.^[78]^[79] Prenatal hormonal factors represent another pillar, where atypical exposure to androgens or estrogens during critical fetal windows is hypothesized to masculinize or feminize neural pathways underlying orientation. Reviews of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) cases, for instance, reveal elevated rates of non-heterosexual orientation among genetically female individuals exposed to excess prenatal androgens, with bisexuality or lesbianism reported in up to 30-40% of affected adults versus 5-10% in controls. Animal models and human proxy measures, such as digit ratios (2D:4D) as markers of prenatal testosterone, correlate with orientation strength, supporting organizational effects that fix orientation before birth. Essentialist models thus integrate these lines of evidence to argue for causal primacy of biology, predicting low malleability and alignment with observed persistence rates exceeding 90% in longitudinal cohorts tracking individuals from adolescence to adulthood.^[26]^[80]

Constructivist and Fluidity Perspectives

The constructivist perspective posits that categories of sexual identity, such as "heterosexual" or "homosexual," emerge from historical, cultural, and linguistic processes rather than innate biological essences.^[81] Proponents argue that same-sex attractions and behaviors have existed across societies, but fixed identity labels are modern Western inventions, particularly post-19th century, shaped by medical, legal, and social discourses that categorized individuals based on enduring orientations.^[82] For instance, in ancient Greece, same-sex relations often occurred without implying a distinct "gay" identity, functioning instead within age, status, or ritual contexts rather than as core personal attributes.^[83] This view emphasizes variability: anthropological evidence shows non-binary systems, like the Sambia tribe's ritualized homosexuality without adult identity implications, suggesting identities are negotiated socially rather than fixed.^[84] Critics contend that constructivism underplays cross-cultural universals in erotic preferences, such as consistent male preferences for youth and beauty, and biological markers like genetic correlations in twin studies, which indicate constraints beyond pure social invention.^[85] Sexual fluidity perspectives extend constructivism by proposing that attractions, behaviors, and self-identifications can shift over time or context, challenging rigid essentialist models.^[86] Empirical support derives primarily from longitudinal studies tracking non-heterosexual women, where changes occur more frequently than in men. In Lisa Diamond's 10-year study of 89 women (mostly non-heterosexual), 67% altered their identity labels at least once, with shifts often tied to relational contexts rather than random volatility; attractions showed greater stability but still exhibited non-linear patterns, such as increased same-sex focus post-heterosexual relationships.^[87] A 2023 analysis of U.S. national panel data (N=2,232) found 10-15% of adults reported identity changes into their 30s and 40s, predominantly among bisexual-identifying individuals, though 80-90% maintained stability.^[53] Gender differences persist: meta-analyses indicate women report higher fluidity in attractions (effect size d=0.68), potentially linked to adaptive social bonding mechanisms, while male orientations correlate more strongly with early prenatal hormones and show lower change rates (under 5% in some cohorts).^[88]^[89] These views integrate with broader critiques of essentialism, arguing that societal norms amplify or suppress expressions, as seen in rising non-heterosexual identifications among youth (e.g., 20% of U.S. Gen Z in 2023 surveys), potentially reflecting reduced stigma or exploratory fluidity rather than fixed innateness.^[90] However, evidence for widespread fluidity remains limited to subsets—primarily women and bisexuals—with population-level data showing net stability over decades; for example, a 2025 review of twin and cohort studies found 70-95% retention of baseline orientations after age 18, questioning constructivist claims of high malleability.^[88] Academic emphasis on fluidity may stem from selection biases in samples favoring self-selected non-conformists, overlooking representative stability in essentialist-leaning biological research.^[85] Synthesizing approaches, some scholars advocate hybrid models where biological predispositions interact with cultural contexts, avoiding constructivism's potential dismissal of heritable variance (estimated at 30-50% for orientation).^[85]

Empirical Assessment

Measurement Techniques

Self-reported identification remains the predominant technique for measuring sexual identity in large-scale surveys and epidemiological studies, typically involving categorical options such as heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or other, or continuous scales assessing dimensions like attraction, behavior, and fantasy.^[91] Instruments like the Kinsey scale, introduced in 1948, rate individuals on a 0-6 continuum from exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual, but it has been critiqued for conflating distinct constructs such as opposite-sex and same-sex attractions into a single dimension, potentially misrepresenting non-binary orientations.^[92] Multidimensional tools, such as the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (1985), extend this by evaluating seven variables—attractions, fantasies, behaviors, emotional preferences, social preferences, lifestyle, and self-identification—across past, present, and ideal time frames, offering a more nuanced profile though with increased respondent burden.^[93] Test-retest reliability of self-reports varies, with higher stability for exclusive heterosexual or homosexual identities (around 90-98% over short intervals) compared to bisexual or non-exclusive categories, which show greater fluidity or inconsistency potentially due to social desirability bias or genuine shifts.^[94] Discordance often arises between self-reported identity and actual behaviors, as evidenced by studies finding up to 10-20% of self-identified heterosexuals reporting same-sex partners, highlighting limitations in capturing underlying attractions influenced by stigma or privacy concerns.^[95] To mitigate underreporting, anonymous formats like audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) improve validity by reducing social desirability effects, yielding 5-10% higher disclosure rates for sensitive behaviors.^[94] Physiological measures provide objective validation, particularly in laboratory settings, by assessing genital arousal responses to stimuli. For men, penile plethysmography (PPG) records tumescence via strain gauges during exposure to erotic materials, demonstrating strong category-specific arousal—heterosexual men respond preferentially to female stimuli, with minimal overlap—correlating moderately (r ≈ 0.6) with self-reports but revealing non-concordance in 20-30% of cases, such as bisexual self-identifiers showing biased rather than balanced responses.^[96] In women, vaginal photoplethysmography measures vasocongestion, though patterns are less category-specific, with greater overlap in responses across orientations, possibly due to higher contextual influences on female arousal.^[97] Non-genital indirect measures, like pupil dilation to stimuli, offer less invasive alternatives, with heterosexual individuals showing dilated pupils to opposite-sex images, supporting convergent validity but limited by small effect sizes and cultural confounds.^[98] Behavioral histories, derived from self-reports of partner counts and types over time, serve as proxies but suffer from recall inaccuracies, with longitudinal data indicating retrospective reports underestimate early experiences by 15-25%.^[99] Emerging indirect methods, such as implicit association tests or viewing time paradigms, aim to bypass conscious biases by measuring reaction latencies to gendered stimuli, though their predictive validity for orientation remains modest (r < 0.4) compared to direct physiological assessments.^[96] Overall, no single technique fully captures sexual identity's multifaceted nature—attractions, behaviors, and self-concept—necessitating multi-method approaches for robust empirical assessment, particularly in populations where self-reports may underrepresent non-heteronormative identities due to measurement inconsistencies rather than inherent prevalence.^[93]

Key Longitudinal Findings

Longitudinal research on sexual identity reveals predominant stability among adults, with change rates typically below 5%. In a 10-year follow-up of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study involving 2,560 midlife adults, 97.85% reported no change in sexual orientation identity, with heterosexuals showing 98.64% stability, homosexuals 68.75%, and bisexuals only 35.29%.^[51] Similarly, analysis of a nationally representative U.S. sample assessed up to eight times between 2014 and 2022 found that 4.1% of adults over age 18 reported shifts in sexual orientation.^[54] These patterns hold across self-reported identity components, including attractions and behaviors, with exclusive homosexuality demonstrating near-complete persistence, particularly in men.^[100] Gender differences emerge consistently, with women displaying higher fluidity than men, especially among those initially identifying as bisexual or homosexual. The MIDUS data indicated that 64.71% of bisexual women and 63.63% of homosexual women changed identities, compared to 47.06% and 9.52% of men in those groups, respectively; heterosexual women changed at 1.36%, versus 0.78% for men.^[51] A longitudinal study of youth sexual identity corroborated this, reporting average mobility scores of 0.114–0.125 for females aged 12–21, exceeding males' 0.068–0.081, though overall mobility remained low (≈0.1) outside sexual minority subgroups.^[101] Among adolescents and young adults, change rates are elevated, reflecting developmental exploration. The 2014–2022 national sample showed 13.5% of teens altering sexual orientation identity, compared to the adult rate.^[54] In a youth cohort, 66% of those initially "unsure" later identified as exclusively heterosexual, while sexual minority youth exhibited higher multidirectional shifts (mobility ≈0.5–0.8).^[101] A 10-year prospective study of 79 non-heterosexual women by Lisa Diamond found 67% changed labels (primarily between lesbian, bisexual, and unlabeled), but attractions shifted modestly (average 1 point on the Kinsey scale), with changes often non-linear and context-dependent rather than progressive toward heterosexuality.^[102] Bisexual identities prove least stable across cohorts, prone to flux toward either heterosexual or homosexual labels, though outright desistance from exclusive homosexuality remains rare post-adolescence.^[51]^[100] No longitudinal data supports widespread malleability driven by external interventions in stable adults; observed changes align more with endogenous factors like age and initial ambiguity.^[54]^[101]

Controversies and Critiques

Debates on Innateness vs. Malleability

Twin studies have consistently demonstrated moderate heritability for same-sex sexual orientation, with monozygotic twins showing concordance rates of 30-65% compared to lower rates in dizygotic twins, indicating genetic influences but not determinism, as full concordance is absent even in identical twins sharing nearly all DNA.^[103]^[104]^[105] These findings suggest that while biology contributes—potentially through prenatal hormone exposure or brain structure differences, as in Simon LeVay's 1991 study identifying smaller hypothalamic nuclei in gay men—environmental factors, including non-shared experiences, play a substantial role in discordant outcomes among identical twins.^[106]^[107] Critics note limitations in such biological evidence, including small sample sizes and inability to establish causality, arguing that no single "gay gene" exists and that heritability estimates (around 30-50%) leave room for developmental plasticity.^[105]^[108] Longitudinal research reveals variability in sexual orientation over time, challenging strict innateness claims; for instance, in a large U.S. panel study spanning seven years, 5.7% of adults shifted sexual identities, with bidirectional changes (toward and away from non-heterosexual labels) observed across age groups, particularly among women.^[53] Lisa Diamond's decade-long tracking of non-heterosexual women found substantial fluidity, with over two-thirds reporting shifts in attractions or labels, attributing this to emotional and relational contexts rather than fixed biology.^[86] In youth, sexual orientation identity shows even greater instability, with one study of adolescents noting over a third changing orientations by young adulthood, linked to factors like gender nonconformity in childhood.^[50] For gender identity—a related aspect of sexual identity debates—desistance from dysphoria is common in pre-pubertal children, with rates of 60-80% resolving without intervention by adolescence, as evidenced in Dutch and other cohorts, prompting questions about early medical transitions' assumptions of innateness.^[109]^[110] Proponents of innateness often cite these biological markers to argue against malleability, influencing policy views on immutability, yet empirical data indicate that while core attractions may have biological roots, expressed identity and behavior can evolve through life experiences, therapy, or social influences, with some individuals reporting orientation changes without psychological harm.^[111]^[112] Critiques of the innateness paradigm highlight potential institutional biases, where academic consensus favoring biological determinism aligns with advocacy against conversion efforts, potentially underemphasizing evidence of natural or induced shifts; for example, despite APA positions deeming orientation unchangeable, longitudinal fluidity data suggest greater malleability than acknowledged, especially in females and youth.^[113]^[108] This debate underscores causal realism: sexual identity emerges from gene-environment interactions, not pure innateness, with plasticity evident in population-level changes and individual trajectories.^[114]^[86]

Sociopolitical Influences and Biases

Sociopolitical pressures, particularly from progressive ideologies dominant in Western academia and media, have profoundly influenced research on sexual identity, often prioritizing affirmation of fluidity or social construction over empirical scrutiny of biological or environmental factors. Surveys of faculty political leanings reveal stark imbalances, with ratios exceeding 12:1 favoring Democrats over Republicans in social science and humanities fields as of the early 2020s, correlating with systemic underrepresentation of conservative viewpoints that might emphasize innate or fixed elements of identity.^[115] This skew manifests in funding allocations, where grants from bodies like the National Institutes of Health increasingly align with narratives supporting expansive identity categories, while proposals exploring potential social contagion or malleability encounter barriers.^[116] Such dynamics foster an environment where dissenting scholarship risks professional repercussions, including denied tenure or publication rejections, thereby constraining the diversity of hypotheses tested. Controversy surrounding human sexuality exacerbates methodological biases, as researchers selectively interpret data to align with ideologically favored outcomes, a form of confirmation bias documented in social science literature. For example, studies on transgender youth outcomes, such as Durwood et al. (2017), have been critiqued for omitting statistically significant negative findings—like effect sizes of 0.31 for lower self-worth (p < 0.02)—to highlight purported benefits of affirmation, skewing perceptions of intervention efficacy.^[117] Similarly, in sexual orientation research, pro-same-sex parenting studies receive disproportionately higher citations (up to fourfold), inflating meta-analyses toward optimistic conclusions despite methodological inconsistencies in comparison groups or sample representativeness. These patterns reflect not neutral scientific progress but sociopolitically driven incentives, where challenging narratives of inherent stability invites accusations of bias, even as longitudinal data on identity persistence remains limited and contested. A prominent case illustrating suppression of alternative perspectives is Lisa Littman's 2018 study on "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" (ROGD), which surveyed parents reporting sudden identity shifts in adolescents amid peer and online influences, hypothesizing social contagion. Published in PLOS One, the paper triggered immediate backlash from advocacy organizations, prompting Brown University to disavow its press release and the journal to append an "expression of concern" over recruitment methods, though the study was later republished with revisions in 2021.^[118] ^[119] Littman faced personal and professional attacks, highlighting how sociopolitical norms enforce an affirmative paradigm, marginalizing inquiries into environmental triggers despite rising adolescent referrals—e.g., a 4,000% increase in gender clinic cases in the UK from 2009 to 2018—potentially driven by cultural factors rather than solely innate traits. This episode underscores broader biases, where media amplification of activist critiques outpaces peer-reviewed rebuttals, distorting public discourse and policy toward irreversible interventions without proportionate evidence.^[120]

References

[1]
Biological sex is binary, even though there is a rainbow of sex roles
Dec 21, 2022 · Biomedical and social scientists are increasingly calling the biological sex into question, arguing that sex is a graded spectrum rather than a binary trait.Biological Sex As A Binary... · Biological Sex Is An... · Sex And Gender In Humans
[2]
How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling
Aug 5, 2025 · Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling ...
[3]
Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation - PMC
The present review discusses the relationship of sexual identity and sexual orientation to prenatal factors that act to shape the development of the brain.
[4]
The phenomenology of gender dysphoria in adults: A systematic ...
In the Netherlands the prevalence of gender dysphoria was 0.6% in adult natal males, and 0.2% in adult natal females, while 3.2% of adults assigned female at ...
[5]
Likely 50-fold rise in prevalence of gender related distress from ...
Jan 24, 2025 · Analysis of the data showed that between 2011 and 2021, incidence rates of recorded gender dysphoria rose from 0.14 per 10,000 to 4.4 per 10,000 ...
[6]
The Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis in Young People Has a “Low ...
Jul 19, 2024 · Adolescent females had the highest prevalence (452.2/100,000) and have experienced the sharpest increase (12-fold, from 37.9/100,000 in 2013).
[7]
Iatrogenic Gender Dysphoria and Harm Cycle in Gender Affirming ...
Mar 27, 2025 · This study, which tracked 2,772 adolescents, found that the prevalence of gender non-contentedness was 11% in early adolescence, decreased with ...
[8]
Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality
Oct 29, 2008 · Sexual orientation is commonly discussed as if it were solely a characteristic of an individual, like biological sex, gender identity, or age.
[9]
Sex is a Biological Trait of Medical Significance
In the life sciences, sex is defined according to whether an organism is structured to donate or receive genetic material during the reproductive process.
[10]
Sexuality vs. Gender: What's the Difference? - Verywell Mind
Sep 19, 2025 · Gender identity is about who you feel you are inside, while sexuality is about who you're attracted to. People shouldn't assume a person's ...What Is Gender And Gender... · What Is Sexuality? · Effects Of Sexuality And...<|separator|>
[11]
Sexual Identity vs. Gender Identity | Definition & Types - Lesson
Sexual identity refers to a person's identity in relation to their connections/attraction to other people. Gender identity is a person's identity within ...Sexual Identity vs. Gender... · Gender Identity: Definition and...
[12]
Gender Dysphoria – Prevalence and Co-Morbidities in an ... - Frontiers
Based on the 2011 census reports (9), this indicates a prevalence of GD in 1:14,756 people (0.0067% of the population), categorized into 1:10,154 MTF (0.0098%) ...
[13]
Sex, Gender, Roles, Identities, and Orientations - Psychology Today
Dec 20, 2018 · We understand that people can vary with respect to biological sex, gender identity, gender roles, and sexual orientation – but what do those terms actually ...
[14]
Gender Dysphoria - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
GD has been found to have a higher prevalence in people with illnesses such as schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. The link seems to be neuroanatomical ...Continuing Education Activity · Introduction · Etiology · Treatment / Management
[15]
Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation - NCBI - NIH
The most common sexual orientation identity terms are based on a gender binary and include heterosexual, or straight; homosexual, gay, or lesbian; and bisexual.
[16]
SRY: Sex determination - Genes and Disease - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
SRY, or sex-determining region Y gene, is on the Y chromosome and is important for testis formation. It binds to DNA, altering its properties.
[17]
Sry: the master switch in mammalian sex determination | Development
Dec 1, 2010 · SRY, the mammalian Y-chromosomal testis-determining gene, induces male sex determination. Recent studies in mice reveal that the major role of SRY is to ...
[18]
The heritability of gender identity disorder in a child and adolescent ...
Prevalence of clinically significant GID symptomatology in the twin sample was estimated to be 2.3%. Univariate model fitting analyses were conducted using an ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[19]
Gender dysphoria in twins: a register-based population study - Nature
Aug 4, 2022 · The few twin studies that have examined outcomes related to GD have shown a possible genetic influence, but with varying heritability or ...
[20]
Concordance for Gender Dysphoria in Genetic Female Monozygotic ...
Aug 31, 2022 · This unusual case of gender dysphoria among a set of monozygotic triplets adds support for a heritable role in gender identity formation.
[21]
Using twin data to examine heritable and intrauterine hormonal ...
Jul 1, 2025 · To date, heritability estimates for gender identity have come from eight published twin studies. Seven provided evidence suggesting a genetic ...
[22]
Genetic Link Between Gender Dysphoria and Sex Hormone Signaling
In this study we identified a genetic association between gender dysphoria in transgender women and polymorphisms in genes involved in sex hormone signalin.
[23]
The Use of Whole Exome Sequencing in a Cohort of Transgender ...
Dec 27, 2019 · In this study, we expand on the topic of gender identity genomics by identifying rare variants in genes associated with sexually dimorphic brain development.
[24]
Gender Dysphoria: A Review Investigating the Relationship ...
Aug 5, 2020 · This paper reviewed the literature to explore the link between genetic influences and brain development, and their impact on gender identity.
[25]
Early androgen exposure and human gender development
Feb 26, 2015 · The strongest evidence that prenatal androgen exposure contributes to human gender development comes from studies of children's gender-typed ...
[26]
Prenatal endocrine influences on sexual orientation and on sexually ...
This article reviews the evidence regarding prenatal influences of gonadal steroids on human sexual orientation, as well as sex-typed childhood behaviors
[27]
Gender Identity in Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia - NIH
In patients with CAH, gender identity disorder is a rare finding. Hormonal control, social, familial, and religious beliefs have impacts on gender identity of ...
[28]
Effects on Gender Identity of Prenatal Androgens and Genital ...
Thus, moderate androgen excess early in development appears to produce a small increase in the risk of atypical gender identity, but this risk cannot be ...
[29]
Prenatal androgen exposure predicts sexuality disorders - Frontiers
These findings suggest that variations in 2D:4D, particularly in MtF individuals, reflect the influence of PAE on gender identity, adding evidence to the role ...Abstract · Introduction · Materials and methods · Discussion
[30]
Sex differences in brain structures throughout the lifetime
Males generally have larger brain tissue volumes, while females have higher cortical thickness. Males also have larger total grey and white matter volume.
[31]
Sex differences in the human brain: a roadmap for more careful ...
Jul 26, 2022 · We review observations that motivate research on sex differences in human neuroanatomy, including potential causes (evolutionary, genetic, and environmental) ...
[32]
Sex differences in human brain networks in normal and psychiatric ...
Previous studies have revealed that there are significant differences between the brains of males and females, which become evident in both structure and ...
[33]
Are Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure Associated With ... - NIH
Our findings suggest that behavioral sex differences are, to some extent, related to sex differences in brain structure but that this is mainly driven by ...
[34]
Sexual differentiation of the human brain in relation to gender ...
It is believed that during the intrauterine period the fetal brain develops in the male direction through a direct action of testosterone on the developing ...
[35]
How Early Hormones Shape Gender Development - PMC - NIH
We focus on the role of sex hormones in early development, particularly the differential effects of prenatal androgens on aspects of gender development.
[36]
Sexual differentiation of the human brain: Relation to gender identity ...
During the intrauterine period a testosterone surge masculinizes the fetal brain, whereas the absence of such a surge results in a feminine brain. As sexual ...
[37]
Biological studies of transgender identity: A critical review
We critically examine the biological literature which explores the etiology of transgender identity, including endocrinological, behavioral, genetic, and ...
[38]
Brain Sex in Transgender Women Is Shifted towards Gender Identity
Mar 13, 2022 · We hypothesized that the estimated brain sex in transgender women is shifted away from their biological sex (male) towards their gender identity ...
[39]
Biological origins of sexual orientation and gender identity
Multiple layers of evidence confirm that sexual orientation and gender identity are as biological, innate and immutable as the other traits conferred during ...
[40]
Patterns of Gender Development - PMC - PubMed Central
Taken together, these studies suggest that most children develop the ability to label gender groups and to use gender labels in their speech between 18 and 24 ...
[41]
Transgender children and young people: how the evidence can ...
Children first begin to develop a sense of biological gender at around the age of 2 to 3 years. At this age, they are able to label pictures of boys and girls ...Gender Dysphoria And The... · Adolescence And Gender... · Informed Consent
[42]
Gender Development in Gender Diverse Children - PubMed Central
Second, we discuss how findings about gender diverse children bear on the roles of social, cognitive, and biological determinants of gender identity. Third ...
[43]
A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder - PMC
Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The ...
[44]
Consistency of gender identity and preferences across time
Gender identity development in children and young people: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(3), 706 ...
[45]
False Assumptions Behind Youth Gender Transitions - SEGM
Dec 30, 2022 · Further, the high rate of childhood desistance from gender dysphoria before maturity, (61-98%) and growing evidence of desistance among youth ...
[46]
A critical commentary on “A critical commentary on follow-up studies ...
The authors claim in the very beginning of their paper that the 80% desistence rate of gender dysphoria (GD) is a number that is largely drawn on estimates ...
[47]
The myth of persistence: Response to “A critical commentary on ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Longitudinal research suggests that a substantial proportion of children presenting with gender dysphoria do not persist in that identification ...
[48]
Gender Identity 5 Years After Social Transition | Pediatrics
Jul 13, 2022 · We found that an average of 5 years after their initial social transition, 7.3% of youth had retransitioned at least once.
[49]
Stability and Change in Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation ...
In this monograph, we provide a detailed quantitative description of gender identity and sexual orientation across childhood and adolescence in a sample of ...
[50]
Stability and Change in Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation ...
Jul 15, 2025 · ... empirical evidence of disproportionate transgender identification ... Sexual identity conflict in children and adults. Basic Books. Google ...
[51]
[PDF] Stability and Change in Sexual Orientation Identity Over a 10-Year ...
Abstract We examined reports of sexual orientation identity stability and change over a 10-year period drawing on data from.
[52]
Stability and Change in Sexual Orientation and Genital Arousal over ...
Apr 12, 2022 · One hypothesis is that sexual orientation is a stable trait, which is possibly determined during early development and does not change later ...
[53]
Fixed or Fluid? Sexual Identity Fluidity in a Large National Panel ...
Dec 14, 2023 · Our study shows that sexual identity can be fluid into adulthood and has implications for how we understand contemporary human sexuality.
[54]
The Longitudinal Measurement of Sexual Orientation and Gender ...
Among teens, who are developmentally more apt to change identity, 13.5% reported a change in sexual orientation and 9.3% reported a change in gender identity.
[55]
Examining Greek Pederastic Relationships - Inquiries Journal
Keywords:Ancient Greece Pederasty Pederastic Relationships Homosexuality Erastes Eromenos. Pederasty is an ancient Greek form of interaction in which members ...
[56]
[PDF] Male Homosexuality in Ancient Athens - Scholar Commons
Though ancient Athens permitted limited forms of pederasty, restrictions on male prostitution reveal a deep-seated fear that if not checked, homosexuality could ...
[57]
Justinian I - Internet History Sourcebooks Project
Certainly in the late Republic/early Empire the law was not applied, and social attitudes did not condemn homosexual sex (although "passive" sexual roles for ...<|separator|>
[58]
Homosexuality in ancient Rome - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
Nov 9, 2021 · Homosexuality in ancient Rome was tolerated as long as certain rules were followed. For example, a Roman citizen had to be the dominant ...
[59]
St. Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica - Christian Classics ...
" Thirdly, by copulation with an undue sex, male with male, or female with female, as the Apostle states (Rom. 1:27): and this is called the "vice of sodomy.
[60]
Medieval Sourcebook: Aquinas on Sex
Aquinas' discussion of unnatural sex [which includes homosexuality, bestiality and masturbation], is available in a separate document, Aquinas on Unnatural Sex ...
[61]
The Experience of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages
Homosexual acts existed and even though the meaning of the word sodomy has been much discussed for the Middle Ages, and it could be applied to acts such as anal ...
[62]
Homosexuality in the 'Enlightenment'? - Doing History in Public
Aug 12, 2025 · Classical references and reason were employed for defending sodomy before the Enlightenment as well. Although there were very few works of that ...
[63]
[PDF] David M. Halperin How to Do the History of Homo sexuality
Foucault is analyzing the different modalities of power at work in pre- modern and modern codifications of sexual prohibition, which is to say in two ...
[64]
Defining the Sexes - Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft
According to this theory, all people were mixed forms of the most diverse combinations of male and female features. Hirschfeld calculated the number of possible ...Missing: identity categories
[65]
Full article: Magnus Hirschfeld's 1899 psychobiological questionnaire
Aug 24, 2022 · The first scientific questionnaire to establish gender and sexual “intermediate” identities “objectively” was published in 1899 by the ...
[66]
Beyond Binaries: Magnus Hirschfeld's Doctrine of Sexual ...
Jun 23, 2023 · Hirschfeld saw different stages of Geschlecht, including labeling homosexuality a “third sex” and recognizing both hermaphrodites (who we might ...<|separator|>
[67]
[The history of the concept of gender identity disorder] - PubMed
In contrast, gender identity disorder was categorized into four groups (including transsexualism and dual-role transvestism) in ICD-10. A draft proposal of DSM- ...
[68]
History and Epidemiology - Psychiatry.org
In the 1990s, the dichotomy of male/female was challenged, giving way to an understanding of gender spectrum. Genderqueer came into use as an identity label.
[69]
Gender incongruence/gender dysphoria and its classification history
A diagnosis of 'transsexualism' appeared first in DSM-III in 1980. This version also included a childhood diagnosis: gender identity disorder of childhood. As ...
[70]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26782319
[71]
Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis - American Psychiatric Association
With the release of DSM–IV in 1994, “transsexualism” was replaced with “gender identity disorder in adults and adolescence” in an effort to reduce stigma.
[72]
Gender Identity: The Career of a Category | Theory and Social Inquiry
Jul 31, 2025 · Organizations use the category to diagnose and treat; to instruct and train; to sort and classify; and to govern who is eligible to do what.
[73]
Validity of Categories Related to Gender Identity in ICD-11 and DSM ...
ICD-11 gender incongruence (GI), in contrast to DSM-5 gender dysphoria (GD), is explicitly not a mental disorder; neither distress nor dysfunction is a required ...
[74]
Essentialist views on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Essentialist views suggest sexual orientation and gender identity are biologically determined, with variations naturally occurring.
[75]
[PDF] Where!Does!Sexual!Orientation!Come! From?!Essentialism,!Social ...
Essentialists view sexual orientation as a biological force, while social constructivists see it as a product of culture and time.
[76]
A genetic study of male sexual orientation - PubMed - NIH
52% (29/56) of monozygotic cotwins, 22% (12/54) of dizygotic cotwins, and 11% (6/57) of adoptive brothers were homosexual. Heritabilities were substantial.
[77]
(PDF) A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation - ResearchGate
Aug 8, 2025 · ... Twin studies and segregation analyses have revealed that homosexuality is influenced by a complex interplay of biological, genetic, ...
[78]
A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and ...
Aug 30, 1991 · This finding indicates that INAH is dimorphic with sexual orientation, at least in men, and suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.
[79]
A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure Between Heterosexual and ...
The anterior hypothalamus of the brain participates in the regulation of male-typical sexual behavior. The volumes of four cell groups in this region ...
[80]
Minireview: Hormones and Human Sexual Orientation | Oxford
A large number of studies indicating that prenatal factors have an important influence on this critical feature of human sexuality.
[81]
7.1: The Social Construction of Sexuality
30 gush 2022 · Sexuality is a social representation of sexual orientation. So to argue whether one is born “gay” or “straight” is a loaded debate without the possibility of a ...
[82]
[PDF] Social Construction Theory: Problems in the History of Sexuality
Some critics contend that social construction theory implies that sexual identity, or more to the point, lesbian and gay identity is somehow fictional ...
[83]
[PDF] The sociological construction of gender and sexuality - Chris Brickell
This essay considers how we might come to understand social constructionism soci- ologically. It examines a number of related approaches to gender and ...
[84]
Social Constructionism and Sexual Desire - ResearchGate
9 gush 2025 · Social constructionism, which tends to view sexuality and sexual expression as cultural creations via language and ideas developed and promoted ...
[85]
A critique and synthesis of biological essentialism and social ...
In effect, it submerges sexual preference, a human process, into sexual orientation, a biological mechanism.
[86]
The Current State of Sexual Fluidity Research - PMC - NIH
Oct 25, 2022 · This review provides a brief narrative of historical conceptualizations of sexual orientation and fluidity and the current state of research on sexual fluidity.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[87]
[PDF] Sexual Fluidity in Male and Females - Department of Psychology
I review recent evidence for sexual fluidity and con- sider the extent of gender differences in sexual fluidity by examining the prevalence of three phenomena: ...
[88]
Stability vs. Fluidity of Sexual Orientation | Archives of Sexual Behavior
Aug 29, 2025 · This study examined the prevalence, stability, and fluidity of sexual orientation as well as the prevalence of gender discontent.Introduction · Gender Identity And Sexual... · Discussion
[89]
[PDF] Are Women Sexually Fluid? The Nature of Female Same-Sex ...
In a recent paper,. Diamond (2016) reviewed several studies and concluded that there is support for the argument of sexual fluidity. The first line of evidence ...<|separator|>
[90]
Does exposure to continuous and fluid theories of sexual orientation ...
Oct 3, 2024 · Scientific research suggests that sexual orientation is continuous in nature and can be fluid over time. Relatively little is known about ...
[91]
Measuring Sexual Orientation and Identifying Sexual Minority ... - NCBI
This chapter reviews approaches to assessing sexual orientation in large-scale population-based settings.SEXUAL ORIENTATION... · EVALUATION OF EXISTING... · RECOMMENDED...
[92]
The Kinsey scale is ill-suited to most sexuality research ... - PNAS
The main problem with the Kinsey scale is that it conflates two distinct constructs: degree of sexual attraction/behavior toward opposite-sex others.
[93]
Defining and Measuring Sexual Orientation: A Review
This paper reviews and critiques definitions and measures of sexual orientation mat have been proposed and used by researchers over the past century.
[94]
Test-Retest Reliability of Self-Reported Sexual Behavior ... - NIH
Indeed, the reliability and validity of adolescents and young adults' self-reported sexual behaviors have been questioned.
[95]
Discordance between Sexual Behavior and Self-Reported Sexual ...
Sep 19, 2006 · Context. •. Self-identification of sexual orientation may not accurately reflect actual sexual practices. Contribution.
[96]
A Comparative Investigation of Indirect Measures of Sexual Attraction
Nov 14, 2024 · Our main focus was single-gender indirect measures that assess sexual attraction to men and to women separately, as recommended by contemporary ...
[97]
Physiologic Measures of Sexual Function in Women: A Review - PMC
During sexual arousal, there is increased blood flow to the genitalia, resulting in vasocongestion. Vaginal lubrication occurs as a result of several processes ...
[98]
Eyes reveal sexual orientation, study shows – HD TODAY e-NEWS
Aug 29, 2012 · While the eyes may be the window to the soul, pupil dilation can reveal a person's sexual orientation, finds a new Cornell study.
[99]
The validity of self-reported behaviors: methods for estimating ...
When individuals underreport risk behaviors, data gathered from public health research and practice will underestimate risk.Missing: orientation | Show results with:orientation
[100]
Prevalence and stability of self-reported sexual orientation identity ...
Stability was greatest among men and those identifying as heterosexual. Individuals who identified as 100% homosexual reported nearly the same level of ...
[101]
[PDF] Stability and Change in Self-Reported Sexual Orientation Identity in ...
This study investigated stability and change in self-reported sexual orientation identity over time in youth. We describe gender- and age-related changes in ...
[102]
Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood - PubMed
The present study uses 5 waves of longitudinal data collected from 79 lesbian, bisexual, and "unlabeled" women to evaluate these models.
[103]
Sexual Orientation in Twins: Evidence That Human Sexual Identity ...
Dec 30, 2023 · If one twin has a same-sex orientation, there is a 30% chance that the second twin will have this same identity. If splitting occurs after day ...
[104]
Homosexual orientation in twins: a report on 61 pairs and three ...
Thirty-eight pairs of monozygotic twins (34 male pairs and 4 female pairs) were found to have a concordance rate of 65.8% for homosexual orientation.
[105]
Gay Is Not All in the Genes | Science | AAAS
Jun 30, 2008 · Earlier twin studies of sexual orientation have suggested varying degrees of genetic and environmental influences. But they have suffered from ...
[106]
Evidence for a Biological Influence in Male Homosexuality
Aug 6, 2025 · Researchers have pre- sented evidence for biological mechanisms un- derlying male homosexuality. Simon LeVay of the Institute of Gay and Lesbian Education and ...
[107]
[PDF] Homosexuality: Innate and Immutable? What Science Can and ...
Oct 4, 2015 · William Byne & Bruce Parsons, Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories. Reapprised, 50 ARCH. ... thoroughly peer-reviewed and was published ...
[108]
“Born That Way” No More: The New Science of Sexual Orientation
Sep 30, 2019 · Previous Research Underscores the Malleability of Sexual Identity. In actual practice, sexual orientation and behavior exemplify the diverse ...
[109]
Early Social Gender Transition in Children is Associated with High ...
May 6, 2022 · Of note, the 61%-98% (or the 85%) historic desistance statistic has been critiqued as inflated, by those who noted that some of the children ...
[110]
Desisting from gender dysphoria after 1,5 years of puberty ...
This case report illustrates that after treatment with puberty blockers desistance from gender dysphoria can occur.
[111]
[PDF] Ex-gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in ...
Change in sexual orientation did occur for some, and the process showed no deleterious psychological consequences, either for those experiencing change or not.
[112]
[PDF] Evidence Shows Sexual Orientation Can Change:
Mar 25, 2019 · McHugh goes on to debunk the idea that homosexuality is innate, and notes, “Sexual orientation can and often does change over time.”72. The ...
[113]
Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science
Apr 25, 2016 · Specifically, those who believe that sexual orientation is “innate,” “biological,” “immutable,” or “inborn” are especially likely to favor ...
[114]
Sexual Arousal Patterns of Identical Twins with Discordant ... - Nature
Oct 8, 2018 · Our study provides physiological evidence confirming twins' discordant sexual orientations, thereby supporting the importance of the non-shared environment.Missing: heritability | Show results with:heritability<|separator|>
[115]
Political Discrimination Is Fuelling a Crisis of Academic Freedom
Jan 17, 2022 · The Left-wing skew in SSH academia has gone from around 3:1 in the US in the mid-1960s to 12:1 today. A similar trend has taken place in ...
[116]
Trump's ban on funds to 'promote gender ideology' could threaten ...
Jan 24, 2025 · President Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring it “the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female.”
[117]
Difficulties With Methodology in Social Science Research With ...
The focus of this paper will be on ways in which controversy in the area of human sexuality seems to have led to bias in the use of statistics, research ...
[118]
New paper ignites storm over whether teens experience 'rapid onset ...
Aug 30, 2018 · Littman hypothesizes that "social contagion" may be a key driver of the purportedly rapid onset dysphoria. To trans activists, such a suggestion ...
[119]
Updated: Brown statements on gender dysphoria study
Mar 19, 2019 · In light of questions raised about research design and data collection related to Lisa Littman's study on “rapid-onset gender dysphoria,” Brown ...Missing: backlash | Show results with:backlash
[120]
Gender dysphoria in adolescence: examining the rapid-onset ... - NIH
Littman's study introduces the hypothesis of a rapid-onset gender dysphoria subgroup, primarily consisting of natal females without prior gender dysphoria ...