Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cisgender

Cisgender is an adjective denoting individuals whose psychological sense of gender identity corresponds to their as determined by observable physical characteristics at birth, such as chromosomes and reproductive anatomy. The term derives from the Latin prefix cis-, meaning "on this side of," contrasting with trans- ("across" or "on the other side"), and was first used in 1994 by biologist Dana Leland Defosse in an online discussion among transgender communities. Introduced to provide a counterpart to "," the concept gained traction in academic and activist discourse during the late 1990s and 2000s, particularly in fields like and , where it frames as a of identities rather than strictly tied to . Empirical surveys indicate that cisgender individuals comprise the overwhelming majority of the population, with identification estimated at 0.3% to 0.6% depending on definitional criteria, underscoring that alignment between sex and is the statistical norm rather than an exception requiring labeling. The term's adoption has sparked debate among scientists and philosophers of biology, who argue it conflates immutable sex differences—rooted in evolutionary adaptations for reproduction—with subjective gender feelings, potentially obscuring causal realities of human dimorphism without robust empirical justification beyond self-report. Critics, including some evolutionary biologists, contend that applying "cisgender" to the majority retroactively pathologizes normality and serves ideological aims over first-principles analysis of sex as a bimodal distribution determined by gamete production. Despite its prevalence in institutional guidelines, the label remains contested for implying that all individuals possess a detachable "gender identity," a notion lacking direct biological correlates akin to those for sex.

Definitions and Biological Foundations

Core Definition and Distinction from Transgender

refers to individuals whose internalized sense of corresponds to their , which is determined by reproductive anatomy and type: s produce small s () and s produce large s (ova), with rare affecting less than 0.02% of births in ways that do not alter this . This alignment reflects the typical human condition, where psychological self-conception as or matches observable physical traits rooted in chromosomal ( for s, for s) and gonadal development from embryonic stages. The distinction from lies in this congruence versus incongruence: individuals experience a persistent mismatch between their and , often formalized in diagnostic criteria as , characterized by clinically significant distress or impairment lasting at least six months. Empirical data indicate identification occurs in roughly 0.5% to 1.4% of adults, depending on , underscoring cisgender as the default outcome of in . studies attempting to identify innate brain-based differences yield inconsistent results, with no replicated evidence establishing as a fixed, sex-atypical of ; instead, such research often highlights overlaps and plasticity influenced by hormones and experience rather than causal primacy for outcomes. This conceptual framework prioritizes observable biology over subjective identity claims, as exhibits near-perfect predictive validity for traits like athletic performance and disease susceptibility across populations.

Alignment with Biological Sex

in humans is determined at fertilization through the genetic complement of , with resulting in female development and in development, primarily driven by the SRY on the that initiates testis formation and subsequent hormonal cascades leading to phenotypic sex characteristics. This binary framework manifests in dimorphic reproductive roles—production of small gametes () in s and large gametes (ova) in females—underpinning secondary traits such as genitalia, gonads, and hormone profiles. Cisgender alignment refers to the congruence between an individual's gender identity—their internal psychological sense of being male or female—and these biological sex markers, absent the persistent incongruence characteristic of gender dysphoria. In cisgender persons, this harmony typically emerges early in development, aligning with observed sex-typical behaviors, preferences, and self-perception without requiring intervention. Empirical observations confirm this as the default human condition, with direct assessments showing males overwhelmingly identifying as men and females as women from childhood onward. Population-level data reinforce the prevalence of this alignment: surveys indicate that approximately 1.6% of U.S. adults identify as or , meaning over 98% exhibit cisgender congruence with their . Similar patterns hold internationally, with gender-diverse identities comprising around 2% of adults in large-scale estimates, underscoring the rarity of misalignment. While neurobiological studies of remain limited and primarily focus on discordant cases, the overwhelming statistical norm of alignment supports a causal linkage to biological sex determinants rather than social construction alone.

Etymology and Conceptual Origins

Latin Prefix and Scientific Precedents

The Latin prefix cis- derives from the preposition cis, meaning "on this side of" or "not beyond," in contrast to trans-, which signifies "across" or "on the other side." This spatial connotation, rooted in classical Roman usage—for instance, in Cisalpine Gaul to denote regions south of the Alps relative to Rome—emphasizes proximity to a reference point without crossing a divide. In scientific nomenclature, cis- gained prominence in the late 19th century, particularly in chemistry, to describe geometric isomerism where substituents occupy positions on the same side of a molecular plane or bond. Dutch chemist Jacobus Henricus van 't Hoff introduced stereochemical concepts in 1874 that laid groundwork for such distinctions, but German chemist Otto Wallach formalized cis- and trans- terminology in 1909 for alkene derivatives, building on earlier observations of isomer behavior. This usage precisely differentiates configurations, as in cis-2-butene, where methyl groups lie on the same side of the double bond, affecting physical properties like boiling points—cis-2-butene boils at 3.7°C versus 0.9°C for the trans- isomer. The prefix extended to and in the mid-20th century, notably in the cis-trans test developed by in 1955 for mapping genes in T4, distinguishing mutations on the same (cis) versus opposite (trans) DNA strands to identify functional units. In modern , cis-regulatory elements refer to DNA sequences acting on nearby genes on the same , influencing expression without translocation, as opposed to trans-acting factors from distant loci. These applications underscore cis-'s utility in denoting non-crossing, same-side relationality, providing a , descriptive independent of subjective interpretation.

Coinage in 1994 and Initial Context

The term "cisgender" was first used in English on October 30, 1994, in a post by Dana Leland Defosse, then a graduate student at the , to the alt.transgendered. Defosse, writing under the "S. Leigh" and later identifying as a individual, proposed the term as a neutral descriptor for individuals whose internal sense of aligns with their at birth, drawing an to the chemical "cis-" denoting structures on the same side of a . She aimed to provide a linguistically parallel antonym to "" within online discussions among people, avoiding terms like "non-transgender" or "biological normal" that she viewed as implying abnormality for identities. In its initial context, "cisgender" emerged amid early forums focused on experiences, where participants sought to discuss and without pejorative contrasts. Defosse later recounted inventing the word while drafting a paper on youth, intending it to foster in rather than to label the explicitly. The recognizes this 1994 usage as the earliest attested instance in English, predating broader adoption and distinguishing it from related German neologisms like "cissexual" introduced by sexologist in 1991 to describe non-transsexual sexual orientations. Early adopters in these niche online spaces used it descriptively, though its proponents emphasized neutrality, a claim subject to debate given the term's role in framing as an internal potentially divergent from .

Historical Development and Adoption

Early Academic Usage (1990s-2000s)

The term "cisgender" received limited academic attention in the 1990s following its initial online introduction, primarily circulating within activist and online discussion groups rather than peer-reviewed literature. It was employed to describe individuals whose internal sense of corresponded to their , paralleling "" to promote descriptive neutrality and challenge implicit hierarchies in that positioned non- experiences as default or normative. This usage drew from earlier sexological concepts, such as "cissexual" introduced by German sociologist in 1991 to denote alignment between phenotypic sex and without pathologizing divergence. Into the early 2000s, adoption remained niche, confined to emerging and adjacent fields like and , where scholars used it to analyze congruence in contrast to identities. For instance, independent coinages and references appeared in by researcher Carl Buijs, reinforcing its role in activist writings critiquing binary assumptions rooted in . The term facilitated discussions on , often in unpublished or preliminary academic works, but lacked broad empirical application, reflecting its origins in ideological efforts to decenter cisgender experiences as unexamined rather than biological baseline. Peer-reviewed integration was delayed, with systematic appearances in scholarly journals not until 2009, as in Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook's analysis of authenticity debates in Gender & Society. This period's academic employment, though sparse, aligned with postmodern influences in theory, prioritizing social construction over empirical sex differences, and was critiqued even within studies for potentially reifying /trans binaries without advancing causal understanding of development. Usage emphasized avoiding terms like "non-transgender," which were seen as carrying deficit implications, but empirical studies validating "" as a distinct category with measurable traits were absent until later decades.

Expansion into Broader Discourse (2010s)

During the early 2010s, the term "cisgender" transitioned from niche academic and activist usage to wider online discourse, particularly within platforms and internet communities focused on and . Platforms such as and facilitated its dissemination among younger activists and allies, where it was employed to denote individuals whose aligned with their , often in tandem with concepts like "cis privilege" to highlight perceived societal advantages over people. This adoption reflected broader trends in visibility amplified by , though sources from activist circles, which tend to exhibit ideological alignment with postmodern frameworks, drove much of the terminology's proliferation without widespread empirical validation of its necessity. By 2014, "cisgender" began appearing in discussions, coinciding with heightened public debates on , such as Facebook's introduction of expanded options that implicitly referenced cisgender alignments. Usage in literature surged from fewer than 15 articles prior to 2016 to 104 in 2019 alone, primarily in contexts examining health disparities between cisgender and populations, though such studies often originated from institutions with documented left-leaning biases in gender-related research. The term's integration into broader discourse was further marked by its entry into the in 2015, defined as designating a person whose corresponds to their at birth, signaling institutional acceptance amid activist pressures rather than organic linguistic evolution. Critics, including some linguists and biologists, contended that the term's expansion imposed a politicized on the biological , potentially framing congruence between and as a variant rather than the empirical norm supported by and data. Nonetheless, by the late , "cisgender" permeated activist rhetoric, policy advocacy, and cultural commentary, often without acknowledgment of its roots in transgender-specific online subcultures that prioritized identity affirmation over . This period's discourse expansion underscored causal influences like algorithmic amplification on social platforms, which favored polarizing narratives, though empirical surveys indicated limited public familiarity or endorsement outside demographics.

Mainstream Institutionalization and Dictionaries (2015 onward)

The Oxford English Dictionary added "cisgender" to its entries in June 2015, defining it as "designating a person whose sense of personal identity corresponds to the sex and gender assigned to him or her at birth (in contrast with transgender)." This inclusion followed a surge in usage tracked by the dictionary's compilers, with evidence of the term appearing in print as early as 1997, though its mainstream recognition accelerated amid broader cultural discussions on gender identity. Merriam-Webster incorporated "cisgender" into its unabridged in April 2016, describing it as "of, relating to, or being a person whose corresponds with the the person was identified as having at birth." Editors cited attestations dating to 1994, attributing the term's elevation to increased frequency in contemporary sources, including academic and journalistic contexts. These updates served as linguistic milestones, signaling institutional endorsement by authoritative reference bodies and enabling wider dissemination in , , and public discourse. Post-2015, the term gained traction in institutional frameworks, such as literature and style guides, where it appeared in analyses of gender-related health disparities by 2017. For instance, organizations like the World Professional Association for Health referenced "cisgender" in updated standards of care by 2022, framing it within discussions of healthcare access, though such applications often presupposed the term's neutrality without empirical validation of its descriptive accuracy across populations. outlets, including major publications, normalized its use in reporting on , with adoption rates in academic journals rising sharply after dictionary inclusions, reflecting influence from fields despite critiques of the term's ideological framing. This period marked a shift toward routine in documents and institutional , as evidenced by its integration into resources on by the late 2010s.

Usage in Contemporary Contexts

Academic and Public Health Applications

In academic disciplines such as and , the term "cisgender" is utilized to describe individuals whose corresponds to their , enabling researchers to compare self-categorization processes and personality traits across cisgender and spectra without presupposing cisgender experiences as normative. For instance, studies integrate cisgender to examine gender development trajectories, revealing similarities in gender-typed behaviors between young cisgender and children aged 3 to 12, though cisgender children typically exhibit stronger alignment with parental expectations for sex-typical play. This application supports broader analyses of and , where cisgender individuals often report lower rates of dysphoria-related distress compared to counterparts, as evidenced in longitudinal cohort . In gender studies and related fields, "cisgender" facilitates discussions of identity positionality, with researchers urged to disclose their own cisgender status to mitigate biases in qualitative work involving transgender participants. The American Psychological Association endorses the term in bias-free language guidelines to denote alignment between assigned sex at birth and gender identity, applying it in empirical reviews of psychosocial heterogeneity across gender categories. However, its adoption has drawn critique for conflating biological sex with subjective gender constructs, potentially obscuring empirical distinctions rooted in reproductive biology and evolutionary psychology, where cisgender congruence predominates without requiring intervention. Public health research employs "cisgender" primarily as a descriptor for non-transgender participants in epidemiological studies, distinguishing them from groups to quantify disparities in outcomes like , prevalence, and access to care. Between 2013 and 2020, its usage surged in mixed-sample s, appearing more than three times in 52% of such publications, often to highlight elevated risks among transgender populations relative to the cisgender majority, which constitutes over 99% of adults based on self-reported surveys. For example, analyses of U.S. transgender adults show higher rates of healthcare avoidance and chronic conditions compared to cisgender peers, attributing differences to minority rather than inherent , though causal links remain debated due to confounding factors. In clinical and policy-oriented contexts, the term informs gender-specific interventions, such as separating cisgender and data in surveys on reporting or substance use, where cisgender respondents demonstrate greater willingness to disclose identities in anonymous formats. Critics within the field argue that routine categorization reinforces cisnormative assumptions, potentially diverting resources from universal health determinants like , which affect all groups empirically. Despite widespread institutional adoption, such as in and NIH-funded studies, the term's precision is limited by self-identification variability, with only 1.4% of surveyed adults identifying as versus over 79% as cisgender.

Social Media and Activist Employment

The term "cisgender" proliferated on platforms such as and during the 2010s, primarily through transgender activist communities seeking to articulate experiences of relative to the . Early online discussions framed "cisgender" as a neutral descriptor for individuals whose aligns with their , contrasting it with identities to challenge perceived defaults in societal norms. This usage often appeared in posts and forums, where activists argued that acknowledging "cisgender" status fosters awareness of systemic advantages, though empirical data on such advantages remains contested and largely anecdotal rather than derived from large-scale causal studies. Activists employed the term in campaigns highlighting "," compiling lists of purported benefits enjoyed by non-transgender individuals, such as unhindered access to gender-conforming without scrutiny or assumption of stability in legal documents. For instance, a online resource enumerated over 30 examples, including the ability to use public restrooms matching one's without debate, while a 2016 compilation expanded this to 130 items, encompassing everyday interactions like media representation. These checklists, disseminated via activist websites and shared on , aimed to educate "" allies on complicity in "cisnormativity," but critics contend they pathologize biological normalcy by implying inherent in sex- , lacking robust from randomized or longitudinal . On platforms like , the term featured in hashtag-driven advocacy, such as calls for cisgender individuals to defer leadership in transgender rights discussions to avoid "centering" their perspectives. Trans activists, including figures in racial justice intersections, used "cisgender" to underscore how non-transgender voices dominate narratives, as seen in 2020 online essays urging cis allies to amplify trans-led initiatives. However, this employment sparked backlash; in June 2023, owner announced that "cis" and "cisgender" would be treated as slurs if used in targeted , citing patterns of derogatory application that equate biological alignment with ideological flaw. This policy shift highlighted tensions, with pro-trans outlets decrying it as while others, including author , labeled the term itself as ideological jargon imposed without consent, reflecting broader debates over linguistic coercion in activist discourse.

Implications for Policy and Identity Politics

The incorporation of "cisgender" into policy frameworks often serves to operationalize distinctions between individuals whose gender identity aligns with their biological sex and those identifying as , particularly in and anti-discrimination contexts. In research, the term is routinely used as a category for comparing outcomes, with analyses showing adults reporting higher rates of poor health (e.g., 25.3% vs. 15.2% fair/poor health among cisgender adults) and in states lacking protective policies, influencing recommendations for targeted interventions like expanded access for populations. Such usage in federal and state guidelines, including those from agencies like the U.S. Department of Health and , frames cisgender status as the normative comparator, potentially directing toward gender-identity-based disparities while overlooking broader socioeconomic factors. In anti-discrimination and employment policies, "cisgender" appears in official definitions to delineate protected categories, as in Oregon's Bureau of Labor and Industries guidelines, which describe cisgender individuals as those not undergoing , thereby embedding the term in enforcement of nondiscrimination rules. Similarly, City's guidance explicitly defines "cisgender" to support claims involving , facilitating legal accommodations like usage or facility access that prioritize self-identified gender over . These applications extend to educational policies, where curricula in some jurisdictions contrast cisgender experiences with ones to promote inclusivity, though empirical reviews indicate limited evidence that such framing reduces disparities without introducing conflicts in sex-segregated settings like sports or prisons. Within , "cisgender" underpins narratives of "cis privilege," positing systemic advantages for those with congruent sex and , as enumerated in lists citing examples like unscrutinized access or electoral by cisgender officials. This construct informs transgender coalitions, where cisgender allies are mobilized to challenge "cisnormativity," influencing policies on issues like participation; for instance, debates over women in highlight retained male physiological advantages (e.g., 10-50% strength differentials post-puberty), prompting cisgender female-protective arguments against inclusion to preserve fair competition. Critics, including those from biologically oriented perspectives, contend that policy reliance on the term erodes sex-based rights by equating rare incongruence with majority biology, fostering zero-sum dynamics where gains correlate with cisgender women's losses in areas like scholarships or safety, as evidenced by increased litigation over single-sex spaces since 2015. The term's politicization has broader electoral implications, with analyses attributing Democratic losses in 2024 midterms partly to voter backlash against identity frameworks that categorize biological normalcy as "," alienating working-class demographics prioritizing empirical differences over ideological . In international contexts, similar dynamics appear in directives, where "cisgender" usage in reports correlates with resistance from biologically realist factions, underscoring causal tensions between identity-driven reforms and evidence-based protections grounded in immutable dimorphism. Academic sources advancing these policies often exhibit institutional biases favoring postmodern constructs, underemphasizing data on sex-gender congruence as adaptive rather than privileged.

Philosophical and Ideological Underpinnings

Relation to Postmodern Gender Theory

Postmodern gender theory, exemplified by Judith Butler's framework of gender performativity introduced in Gender Trouble (1990), conceptualizes gender not as an inherent biological attribute but as a stylized repetition of acts constituted through social discourse and power structures. In this view, gender emerges from iterative performances that stabilize norms within a "heterosexual matrix," rendering certain identities intelligible while marginalizing others. The introduction of "cisgender"—coined in 1994 by biologist Dana Defosse (posting as "Saxon") in a Usenet discussion on transgender topics—interfaces with this theory by categorizing individuals whose performed gender aligns with biological sex as occupying a privileged, normalized position within the same discursive field as transgender identities. Within queer theory extensions of postmodernism, cisgender denotes a form of unexamined performativity that upholds binary norms, subjecting it to deconstruction rather than treating it as a default or essential state. This alignment challenges essentialist views of sex as predetermining gender, positing instead that cisgender status is a cultural artifact susceptible to subversion, akin to how Butler critiques compulsory heterosexuality. Proponents argue this framing promotes fluidity and critiques power imbalances, as seen in applications where cisgender partnerships with transgender individuals are analyzed as "queering" traditional family structures. However, the theory's reliance on constructionism has drawn scrutiny for sidelining biological causation, with empirical data on sex dimorphism—such as chromosomal and gonadal determinants—indicating that typical gender congruence reflects adaptive realities rather than mere performance. Critiques of this integration highlight how postmodern deployments of invert descriptive neutrality, marking biological alignment as ideologically laden while advancing that conflates constructs with verifiable differences. Sources rooted in , often from academia influenced by postmodern paradigms, tend to prioritize discursive analysis over causal mechanisms like evolutionary pressures favoring -specific behaviors, potentially reflecting institutional biases toward de-emphasizing innate traits. Thus, while the term facilitates theoretical symmetry between and trans categories, it arguably obscures first-principles distinctions between as a reproductive and as a psychological overlay, fostering debates over whether such framing advances understanding or imposes unfalsifiable narratives.

Concepts of Cisnormativity and Privilege

Cisnormativity refers to the societal that individuals' identities align with their , positioning such congruence as the default or normative state. This concept, emerging in academic discourse around 2009, posits that such assumptions marginalize and gender-diverse people by invalidating non-conforming identities and enforcing sex- expectations in institutions like healthcare and . Proponents argue it manifests in practices such as assuming pronouns based on or requiring documents matching birth , which can exacerbate for the estimated 0.39% to 1% of adults identifying as . Closely related, cisgender privilege describes the perceived unearned societal advantages accruing to those whose matches their assigned at birth, including from scrutiny over use, reduced risk of tied to gender presentation, and seamless navigation of sex-segregated spaces without identity validation demands. Checklists of such privileges, popularized in activist literature since the early , enumerate over 30 examples, such as not fearing misgendering or based on incongruence. These ideas frame cisgender experience not as neutral but as a systemic benefit that perpetuates exclusion, drawing from intersectional frameworks that analogize it to other -based privileges. From a biological and empirical standpoint, however, cisnormativity aligns with observable dimorphism, where is —defined by production ( or ova)—and congruence supports reproductive fitness, as evidenced by evolutionary pressures favoring sex-typical behaviors and identities in over % of the . Critiques contend that labeling this majority alignment as "normative oppression" inverts causal reality, pathologizing adaptive biology rather than addressing the distress of rare ( ~0.005-0.014% in clinical samples), which lacks robust of causation over innate factors. Such concepts, rooted in queer theory's of norms, often overlook that privileges cited are consequences of statistical rarity and safety norms derived from sex-based differences in and , not arbitrary . Academic sources advancing these terms frequently exhibit ideological commitments to postmodern views denying binaries, potentially inflating perceived harms without disaggregating variables like comorbid issues in cohorts.

Scientific Perspectives

Empirical Evidence on Sex-Gender Congruence

Population-based studies consistently indicate that , defined as clinically significant distress arising from between one's experienced and , affects a small minority of individuals, implying high rates of sex-gender in the general . Estimates from clinical data place the of at 0.005% to 0.014% among those assigned male at birth and 0.002% to 0.003% among those assigned female at birth. Broader self-reported surveys, such as a analysis of U.S. adults, find that only 1.6% identify as or , with their differing from their assigned at birth, leaving approximately 98.4% exhibiting . These figures vary by age and region, with higher rates (up to 5% non-cisgender identification) among young adults, but even then, predominates. Longitudinal research on children and adolescents referred for reveals substantial desistance rates, further supporting the developmental norm of achieving sex-gender congruence. Follow-up studies of boys diagnosed with in childhood report desistance rates exceeding 80%, with most aligning their identity with their by or adulthood. A synthesis of such studies estimates that around 80% of children with do not persist in identification into adulthood. Persistence is lower among females and those without co-occurring conditions, but overall, these trajectories underscore that incongruence often resolves without intervention, yielding congruence as the typical outcome. Twin studies provide genetic insights into gender identity formation, indicating moderate for or diversity but low concordance rates that affirm as the default. A register-based population study of Danish twins found estimates for ranging from attenuated effects in to non-fixed parameters in adulthood, with environmental factors playing a role but not overriding biological alignment in most cases. Earlier analyses of child and adolescent twins estimated 62% for gender identity disorder, yet the overall prevalence remains low, suggesting that genetic predispositions toward incongruence are rare and insufficient to explain the near-universal observed empirically. These findings align with broader evidence that serves as a strong predictor of in the absence of atypical developmental influences.

Critiques from Biology and Evolutionary Psychology

Biologists maintain that human is a category defined by the production of either small gametes () or large gametes (ova), with over 99.98% of individuals fitting unambiguously into or based on this reproductive criterion, while affect approximately 0.018% and do not constitute intermediate sexes or a . This dimorphism arises from genetic and developmental processes, including or chromosomal complements that direct gonadal and subsequent hormonal cascades influencing and , leading to gender-typical identities and behaviors in the overwhelming majority of cases. The introduction of "cisgender" as a descriptor for this congruence implies an ideological separation of from , which contravenes that psychological sex-typing typically emerges from the same biological substrates as physical , rather than as a detachable . Critics from biology, such as evolutionary biologist Colin Wright, argue that framing non-dysphoric individuals as "cisgender" creates a false parity between adaptive biological norms and exceptional cases of incongruence, potentially eroding the scientific utility of sex as a predictive category in medicine, athletics, and forensics where gamete-based dimorphism yields measurable differences in traits like bone density, muscle mass, and disease susceptibility. For instance, studies of brain sexual dimorphism reveal average structural differences aligning with biological sex in 70-90% of cases, with gender identity mismatches representing statistical outliers rather than evidence of fluidity, often linked to atypical prenatal androgen exposure or neurodevelopmental variance rather than a normative spectrum of identities. This perspective holds that the term "cisgender" pathologizes normalcy by retrofitting biological reality into a postmodern paradigm that prioritizes subjective identification over observable causality, a view echoed by geneticist Jerry Coyne who contends such linguistic innovations undermine trust in empirical science by conflating descriptive biology with prescriptive ideology. From , the congruence between and is viewed as an adaptive outcome of pressures over millennia, where traits promoting role-specific behaviors—such as male risk-taking for resource acquisition or female selectivity in —enhanced reproductive and thus became sexually dimorphic in the psyche. Meta-analyses of data, encompassing over 50 societies, confirm robust sex differences in preferences and (e.g., men prioritizing in partners at effect sizes d=0.8-1.2, women emphasizing and resources at d=0.6-1.0), which align with ancestral environments favoring sex-matched psychological profiles for and propagation. Labeling this alignment "cisgender" critiques it as a form of "cisnormativity," yet evolutionary models predict discordance as maladaptive rarities, akin to mismatches in other evolved traits like (10% non-dominant), not as equivalent alternatives deserving equal framing; persistent may reflect evolutionary mismatches or developmental perturbations rather than innate diversity in essence. Proponents argue this framing risks obscuring causal mechanisms, such as how prenatal testosterone gradients shape both genital and behavioral dimorphism, evidenced by studies where XX females exposed to excess androgens exhibit masculinized play preferences and identities at rates 2-5 times higher than controls.

Major Critiques and Controversies

Ideological Objections from Gender Critics

Gender critics, including feminists who prioritize as the foundation of sex-based , object to "cisgender" as a term that presupposes the validity of theory, which they view as a postmodern detached from material reality. By classifying individuals whose self-perception aligns with their as "cis," the terminology implies that sex congruence is merely one variant among others, including identities, thereby normalizing the idea that subjective feelings can override immutable . This framing, critics argue, serves to legitimize demands for to opposite-sex spaces and services without empirical justification, ultimately subordinating women's sex-based protections to an unproven psychological construct. Proponents of this critique, such as journalist , contend that "cis" functions like the historical term "," presenting itself as descriptive while embedding an ideological commitment to over . Joyce argues that rejecting the label does not negate reality but resists a belief system that equates innate with a chosen identity category. Similarly, gender-critical writer Helen Saxby highlights women's resistance to being relegated to "cis women," a subset that diminishes the universal category of "" defined by biology, paralleling how inclusion erodes sex-specific boundaries. Professor explicitly refuses the "cisgender" designation, viewing it as tacit endorsement of a paradigm that prioritizes internal feelings above physical differences, which he sees as essential for feminist analysis of and male dominance. Jensen maintains that adopting such language concedes ground to an lacking causal evidence for gender identity's primacy, potentially harming sex-based by blurring distinctions rooted in reproductive dimorphism. Critics further assert that the term's origins in —coined in the 1990s by activists to contrast with ""—reflects a strategic linguistic shift aimed at dismantling binaries, not describing neutral variation. This imposition, often enforced in academic and activist contexts despite objections, exemplifies what gender critics call "cisnormativity" inverted: a mandate to affirm an expansive that pathologizes -typical as needing a . Empirical data on differences in athletics, prisons, and shelters, they note, underscore the practical stakes, as "cis" rhetoric facilitates policies ignoring biological advantages and vulnerabilities.

Claims of Redundancy and Normalcy Pathologization

Critics of the term "cisgender" argue that it is redundant, as and alignment constitutes the default for the vast majority of individuals, with estimates indicating that only 0.5% to 1.6% of adults identify as depending on survey methodology and population. For this population, no specialized descriptor is required, akin to how terms like "non-diabetic" are not routinely applied to the general populace absent medical necessity; proponents of this view, including commentators in public discourse, contend that labeling the normative state elevates an ideological construct over straightforward biological description. This redundancy is said to extend to pathologizing normalcy by imposing a categorical framework that parallels "" with "," thereby creating a spurious between evolutionary-expected sex-gender —a outcome rooted in and observed across species—and the rare phenomenon of , which the classifies as a diagnosable involving clinically significant distress. Detractors assert that such reframes innate dimorphism as a psychological variant requiring specification, subtly medicalizing the healthy majority and undermining causal realities of sex differentiation driven by and hormones from fetal . This approach, they claim, deviates from empirical norms where no or affirmation is needed for the congruent majority, contrasting sharply with therapeutic needs for dysphoric cases. Furthermore, the insistence on "cisgender" is criticized for enforcing an unwanted identity label on non-consenting individuals, effectively demoting biological women or men to subtypes within a gender spectrum ideology, which prioritizes subjective experience over objective sex-based categories. Such labeling, absent voluntary adoption, is viewed as an overreach that normalizes scrutiny of the majority's , inverting the pathological focus from the minority deviation to the statistical baseline.

Public Figures and Platform Policies (e.g., 's 2023 Stance)

, executive chairman and largest shareholder of X (formerly ), declared on June 21, 2023, that the terms "" and "cisgender" would be treated as slurs on the platform, with potential consequences including account suspension for repeated use. This position built on his earlier December 2022 tweet rejecting the label by stating, "I'm not , you are," in response to a query about his , framing the term as an imposition rather than a neutral descriptor. 's criticism aligns with arguments that "cisgender" pathologizes alignment by implying a deviation from a norm, a view he has linked to broader ideological pressures, including personal experiences with his child's transition. Under 's influence, X adjusted its policies in 2023 to remove explicit protections against misgendering and deadnaming individuals, which had been part of the prior rules prohibiting targeted based on . This shift de-emphasized enforcement of terms like "cisgender" in affirmative contexts while maintaining general prohibitions on , reflecting a toward reducing what described as " mind virus" influences on speech. Reports indicate that by mid-2023, algorithmic and reviews began flagging "cisgender" usage as potentially violative when deployed in contentious debates, though X's official rules page did not formally codify it as a until enforcement patterns emerged. Other public figures have voiced similar objections to the term. Author , known for critiquing gender ideology, argued in June 2023 that "cisgender" functions as a by retroactively labeling non- people in a way that advances transgender exceptionalism over biological norms. Actor publicly rejected the label in 2021, calling it unnecessary and divisive for those whose matches their , a sentiment echoed in ongoing online discourse among skeptics of postmodern frameworks. These stances highlight a recurring critique that mandating "cisgender" in public and policy discourse enforces an ideological binary, potentially marginalizing dissent on platforms like X.

Responses and Defenses

Arguments from Transgender Advocacy

Transgender advocates argue that the term "cisgender" serves as a precise, neutral counterpart to "transgender," describing individuals whose internal sense of gender aligns with their sex assigned at birth, thereby avoiding the implication that non-transgender experiences are the unmarked default or inherently superior. This linguistic parallelism, they contend, promotes symmetry in discourse, much like "heterosexual" explicitly names the majority orientation without derogating it, fostering environments where transgender identities can be discussed without being positioned as deviant or exceptional. Advocates further maintain that applying "cisgender" highlights cisnormativity—the assumption that cisgender alignment is normative—and associated privileges, such as freedom from scrutiny over access, medical gatekeeping for identity validation, or tied to gender incongruence. For instance, lists compiled by activists enumerate over 30 such privileges, including the ability to purchase clothing without sales staff questioning one's body or , or avoiding assumptions that one's family relationships are unnatural. By naming these, proponents claim, the term educates on systemic biases, encouraging cisgender individuals to recognize unearned advantages and support policies reducing marginalization, such as anti-discrimination laws. In advocacy rhetoric, "cisgender" reframes gender debates from legitimacy (e.g., whether identities are "real") to power dynamics between majorities and minorities, urging critics to address disparities rather than invalidate experiences. Organizations like the extend this by noting that gender-affirming frameworks, often associated with care, benefit cisgender people too—such as through reduced around non-conforming expressions—positioning the term as a tool for broader societal progress. However, these arguments often rely on self-identified sources, which prioritize equity over empirical measurement of privileges, such as comparative rates; for example, U.S. data from 2022 shows individuals facing at 15% versus 5% for the general population, but cisgender privileges are typically asserted qualitatively rather than quantified against other demographic axes like or .

Counterarguments on Linguistic Neutrality

Critics of the term "cisgender" argue that it fails to achieve linguistic neutrality by artificially categorizing the biologically normative alignment of sex and self-perception as a marked deviation from an implied transgender norm, rather than the default human condition. This framing, they contend, elevates rare gender incongruence to parity with the majority experience, denormalizing the latter and embedding an ideological presupposition that gender identity exists independently of biological sex. For instance, gender-critical writer Helen Pluckrose has described the term's use as perpetuating harm by normalizing transgender concepts and pathologizing cisgender alignment, thereby reinforcing a binary opposition that treats natural sex congruence as ideologically equivalent to dysphoria-based identities. Similarly, commentators in outlets like UnHerd assert that "cis" functions as a constructed label to advance transgender ideology, implying oppression or abnormality in the absence of such terminology for non-trans individuals. Etymologically, while "cis-" derives from Latin for "on the same side" as a counterpart to "trans-," opponents highlight that this technical neutrality dissolves in sociolinguistic practice, where the term often carries pejorative undertones or serves as a rhetorical tool to enforce conformity to gender theory. Analysis in An Injustice magazine characterizes "cisgender" not as a benign descriptor but as an assertion of power, compelling adoption of a framework that redefines normalcy and resists simpler, non-loaded alternatives like "non-transgender" or simply referencing biological sex without prefixes. This imposition lacks broad empirical or historical precedent, as pre-1990s discourse on sex and gender rarely required such bilateral labeling; the term's proliferation correlates with academic and activist pushes post-2010, often in environments critiqued for ideological homogeneity. Critics further note that insisting on "cisgender" dismisses objections as bigotry, mirroring tactics in biased institutional sources where dissent is marginalized, thus undermining claims of descriptive impartiality. Proponents of neutrality counter that the term merely provides precision in discussions of , akin to "heterosexual" versus "homosexual," but detractors rebut this analogy by pointing to heterosexual's basis in observable reproductive dimorphism, whereas "cisgender" abstracts from into subjective , lacking equivalent or universality. In and gender-critical communities, the term is seen as denormalizing the cis majority by equating it with experiences, fostering unnecessary othering without advancing clarity. Empirical linguistic surveys, such as those tracking term adoption, reveal resistance primarily from those prioritizing biological realism over constructivist paradigms, with usage often confined to circles where source biases toward prevail. Ultimately, these counterarguments posit that true neutrality would avoid neologisms that presuppose contested theories, favoring rooted in verifiable binaries over spectrum-based constructs.

References

  1. [1]
    The Word “Cisgender” Has Scientific Roots - McGill University
    Nov 13, 2021 · -The prefix “cis-” comes from the Latin meaning “on this side,” as opposed to “trans-” which means “on the other side of” or “beyond.” -In ...
  2. [2]
    Cisgender - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Cis-gender, from Latin cis- "on this side of" + gender, originated in psychological journals in the 1990s; meaning "not transgender," in general use by ...
  3. [3]
    Prevalence of Transgender Depends on the “Case” Definition - NIH
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate how various definitions of “transgender” may affect prevalence estimates.
  4. [4]
    Cisgender - New Discourses
    Dec 7, 2020 · Activists who recognize “cisgender” as a meaningful and important word do not recognize the relevance of “biological sex,” however, and instead ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  5. [5]
    Biological sex is binary, even though there is a rainbow of sex roles
    Dec 21, 2022 · Biological sex is defined as a binary variable in every sexually reproducing plant and animal species. With a few exceptions, all sexually ...BIOLOGICAL SEX AS A... · THE VARIOUS... · CONCLUSION: DENYING...
  6. [6]
    Sex is a Biological Trait of Medical Significance
    In the life sciences, sex is defined according to whether an organism is structured to donate or receive genetic material during the reproductive process.
  7. [7]
    Let's talk about (biological) sex - PMC - NIH
    Feb 23, 2022 · Biological sex refers to attributes distinguishing organisms as male, female, intersex, or hermaphrodite, distinct from the social construct of ...
  8. [8]
    Transgender people over four times more likely than cisgender ...
    In 2017-2018, transgender people experienced 86.2 victimizations per 1,000 people compared to 21.7 victimizations per 1,000 people for cisgender people.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  9. [9]
    Sexual orientation in transgender adults in the United States
    Sep 15, 2023 · Among transgender women, 68.4% were attracted to cisgender women, 65.7% to cisgender men, 49.7% to transgender women, 42.5% to transgender men, ...
  10. [10]
    Biological sex classification with structural MRI data shows ... - Nature
    Apr 9, 2020 · Transgender individuals (TIs) show brain-structural alterations that differ from their biological sex as well as their perceived gender.Results · Cisgender Training And First... · Discussion
  11. [11]
    Brain Sex in Transgender Women Is Shifted towards Gender Identity
    Mar 13, 2022 · The follow-up post hoc tests revealed that transgender women were significantly more female than cisgender men (Cohen's d = 0.64, t(46) = 2.20, ...1. Introduction · 3. Results · Figure 1
  12. [12]
    What science says is different between trans, cis athletes - NPR
    Feb 13, 2025 · What does scientific research show about differences between transgender and cisgender athletes? NPR asks Bradley Anawalt, endocrinologist ...
  13. [13]
    Sex Determination: Why So Many Ways of Doing It? - PMC
    Jul 1, 2014 · In humans, sex is determined by sex chromosomes (XX females, XY males). The X and Y chromosomes harbor dramatically different numbers and sets ...
  14. [14]
    The Y chromosome: beyond gender determination
    May 30, 2014 · The X and Y chromosomes, also known as the sex chromosomes, determine the biological sex of an individual: females inherit an X chromosome ...
  15. [15]
    Just the Facts: Biological Sex - ASRM
    Biological sex is a label assigned by a medical professional at birth based on physical characteristics (genitalia) and other biological determinants. · Sexual ...
  16. [16]
    Cisgender | Description, Terminology, & Modern Use - Britannica
    Oct 7, 2025 · Cisgender, term used in reference to persons whose gender identity corresponds with their sex assigned at birth.
  17. [17]
    Conclusion – Sexuality and Gender - The New Atlantis
    In one sense, the evidence that we are born with a given gender seems well supported by direct observation: males overwhelmingly identify as men and females as ...
  18. [18]
    About 5% of young adults in U.S. are transgender or nonbinary
    Jun 7, 2022 · A new Pew Research Center survey finds that 1.6% of US adults are transgender or nonbinary – that is, their gender differs from the sex they were assigned at ...
  19. [19]
    Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary ...
    Jan 26, 2021 · Our main findings draw attention that gender-diverse Brazilian individuals represent around 2% of the country's adult population (almost 3 million people).
  20. [20]
    Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation - PMC
    The biological basis of gender identity cannot be modelled in animals and is best studied in people who identify with a gender that is different from the sex of ...
  21. [21]
    Cis- - Etymology & Meaning of the Prefix
    Originating from Latin preposition cis meaning "on this side," this element denotes proximity in place, time, or life situations, contrasting with trans- or ...
  22. [22]
    cis-, prefix meanings, etymology and more - Oxford English Dictionary
    Where does the prefix cis- come from? cis- is a borrowing from Latin. Etymons: Latin cis. See etymology. Nearby entries. cirro-strative, adj.1815–; cirro ...
  23. [23]
    4.2: Cis-Trans Isomerism in Cycloalkanes - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Jun 18, 2024 · Di-substituted cycloalkane stereoisomers are designated by the nomenclature prefixes cis (Latin, meaning on this side) and trans (Latin, meaning ...Missing: biology | Show results with:biology
  24. [24]
    4.2 Cis–Trans Isomerism in Cycloalkanes - Organic Chemistry
    Sep 20, 2023 · The prefixes cis- (Latin “on the same side”) and trans- (Latin “across”) are used to distinguish between them. Cis–trans isomerism is a common ...Missing: precedents | Show results with:precedents
  25. [25]
    Tracing Terminology – AHA - American Historical Association
    May 22, 2017 · As a term, cisgender combines the Latin prefix cis-, meaning “on this side,” with gender, in contrast to transgender, where the prefix trans- ...
  26. [26]
    I Coined The Term 'Cisgender.' Here's What It Means. - HuffPost
    Feb 18, 2023 · I knew that in chemistry, molecules with atoms grouped on the same side are labeled with the Latin prefix “cis–,” while molecules with atoms ...
  27. [27]
    The history of 'cisgender' — now that Elon Musk has deemed it a ...
    Jun 21, 2023 · 'Cisgender' was first coined in 1994 by a grad student looking for a way to refer to people who aren't transgender without implying that one ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] "Cisgender and Cissexual" in - peter cava, phd
    Dana Leland. Defosse and John Hollister used it in 1994, and Carl Buijs coined it independently in. 1995. Biologist Julia Serano popularized cissexual and ...
  29. [29]
    Cisgender | TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly
    May 1, 2014 · Cisgender describes individuals whose birth-assigned sex (male or female) matches their gender (man or woman) from birth to adulthood.
  30. [30]
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124320934003
  31. [31]
    cis Meaning | Gender & Sexuality - Dictionary.com
    Aug 3, 2018 · However, it didn't enter the mainstream until the 2010s. This was due to a variety of factors, such as the rise of social-justice-oriented ...
  32. [32]
    The internet made trans people visible. It also left them more ... - Vox
    Dec 27, 2019 · The 2010s was the decade when transgender people became more visible, thanks to the internet. It was also the decade that left the trans ...
  33. [33]
    Trans, transgender, cisgender: we are what we name ourselves
    Aug 11, 2014 · As early as 1994 the term cisgender began appearing in trans circles to describe people outside of the gender non-conforming spectrum. Cisgender ...Missing: first | Show results with:first
  34. [34]
    Common Patterns of Cisgender Use in Public Health Articles and ...
    Feb 9, 2024 · Scholars have also warned that individualizing cisgender creates a false mutual exclusiveness and a division between normal and other that ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  35. [35]
    'Cisgender' has been added to the Oxford English Dictionary
    Jun 25, 2015 · According to the OED's compilers, the word cisgender first arose in the late 1990s. The prefix “cis-” derives from Latin, meaning “on this side ...
  36. [36]
    cisgender, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the word cisgender is in the 1990s. OED's earliest evidence for cisgender is from 1997, in Seeking TS Woman. cisgender is formed ...
  37. [37]
    Why Merriam-Webster added 'cisgender,' 'genderqueer' and 'Mx.' to ...
    Apr 26, 2016 · Merriam-Webster argues that cisgender is older than that: The oldest evidence of its use that editors there could find dates back to 1994.
  38. [38]
    CISGENDER Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    The meaning of CISGENDER is of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex the person was identified as having at birth.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  39. [39]
    Merriam-Webster just added “cisgender” and “genderqueer” to its ...
    Apr 20, 2016 · Merriam-Webster just added “cisgender” and “genderqueer” to its dictionary. by German Lopez. Apr 20, 2016, 11:00 AM ...Missing: entry date
  40. [40]
    https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307441
  41. [41]
    Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender ...
    Sep 15, 2022 · Background: Transgender healthcare is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] TRANSGENDER STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    These terms (cisgender, trans, binary, nonbinary) are conceptual tools—not rigid and absolute categories. People who identify with so-called binary gender ...
  43. [43]
    Integrating the Study of Transgender Spectrum and Cisgender ...
    Dec 1, 2014 · We advocate for the integration of transgender spectrum experiences alongside cisgender experiences (i.e., having the same current gender ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Similarity in transgender and cisgender children's gender ...
    Nov 18, 2019 · We present a comprehensive study of gender development (eg, gender identity and gender expression) in a cohort of 3- to 12-y-old transgender children.
  45. [45]
    Conceptualizing transgender experiences in psychology: Do we ...
    Jul 17, 2024 · Here, the term 'transgender experiences' describes the bodily and psychosocial experiences associated with divergence away from cisgender ...
  46. [46]
    Full article: Researching while cisgender: Identity considerations for ...
    Jun 22, 2017 · True representation and better science demands that, as cisgender researchers, we actively acknowledge our “cis-ness” and intentionally engage ...
  47. [47]
    Gender - APA Style - American Psychological Association
    Cisgender refers to individuals whose sex assigned at birth aligns with their gender identity (APA, 2015). Cisgenderism or cissexism refers to the belief that ...
  48. [48]
    Social and psychological heterogeneity among binary transgender ...
    ABSTRACT Researchers have identified important psychosocial distinctions between three emergent gender categories: cisgender, binary transgender and ...
  49. [49]
    Do people think that cisgender is an unnecessary term? (Why? And ...
    Sep 6, 2021 · YES, the term cis-gender is both unnecessary and offensive. · It also confuses gender (a social construct) with sex, which is a biological fact.Why are some cisgender people offended by the term 'cis'? - QuoraCan you explain the meaning of the term 'cisgender' and ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  50. [50]
    Common Patterns of Cisgender Use in Public Health Articles and ...
    Oct 26, 2023 · Cisgender is primarily used to categorize individual research participants as not transgender rather than to reflect participants' actual ...
  51. [51]
    Adults' willingness to report sexual orientation and gender identity ...
    Nov 20, 2023 · Over 79% of members' gender identity was cisgender, 1.2% of members' gender was not listed, and 1.4% identified as transgender, agender ...
  52. [52]
    Health and Health Care Among Transgender Adults in the United ...
    ... health care, relative to cisgender (nontrans) persons. We draw on theory and data to situate these disparities in their social contexts, explicating the roles ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    State Policies and Health Disparities between Transgender and ...
    Oct 1, 2022 · Numerous studies have shown that TGD populations have worse mental and physical health than cisgender populations (defined as people whose ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  54. [54]
    Comparing Two-Step Approaches to Measuring Gender Identity - NIH
    A smaller proportion of cisgender men and cisgender women reported more than one gender identity (4% and 10%, respectively), most commonly nonbinary ...
  55. [55]
    Common Patterns of Cisgender Use in Public Health Articles and ...
    Oct 26, 2023 · Objectives. To identify how “cisgender” has been used in public health articles in recent years relative to the historical origins of the ...
  56. [56]
    Gender-Inclusive and Gender-Specific Approaches in Trans Health ...
    For example, study reviewers and journal editors often recommend separating out analysis between trans women and cisgender ... School of Public Health, NIDA, ...
  57. [57]
    Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history ...
    ... Tumblr, reveal trans POC as reclaiming community, gender, and sexuality from white cisgender ideology. Similar to Lorde's (Citation1984) uses of the erotic ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  58. [58]
    30+ Examples of Cisgender Privileges - It's Pronounced Metrosexual
    You can purchase clothes that match your gender identity without being refused service, mocked by staff, or questioned about your genitals. You can purchase ...Missing: campaigns | Show results with:campaigns
  59. [59]
    130+ Examples Of Cis Privilege in All Areas of Life For You To ...
    Feb 29, 2016 · “I just don't see it,” my friend protested. “How do I have 'cisgender' privilege? I'm just normal. How is being normal a privilege?”.
  60. [60]
    Cisgender People Need to Let Trans People Lead the Way - TheBody
    Feb 18, 2020 · Very few trans people get a chance to be the face of their movement, even though transgender women started the LGBTQ+ movement of today as we know it.Missing: examples campaigns
  61. [61]
    The term 'cisgender' is more fraught than its advocates admit
    Jun 29, 2023 · Musk tweeted out some new company policy: “The words 'cis' or 'cisgender' are considered slurs on this platform.” Later that day, Harry Potter ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    BOLI : Gender/Gender Identity at Work : Civil Rights - Oregon.gov
    People who are not transgender are cisgender. Transition is used to refer to the social, legal, or physical process someone may go through to affirm their ...
  63. [63]
    Gender Identity/Gender Expression - CCHR - NYC.gov
    Cisgender. “Cisgender” is a term used to describe a person whose gender identity conforms with their sex assigned at birth. Gender. "“Gender” includes ...
  64. [64]
    Transgender Athletes, Fair Competition, and Public Policy
    The issue of transgender women competing against cisgender women in individual athletic competition is provocative and promises to become even more so in the ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Cis-Woman-Protective Arguments - Williams Institute
    ABSTRACT. It has become common to oppose the equal citizenship of transgender persons by appealing to the welfare of cisgender women and girls. Such Cis-.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] The Corrosive Impact of Transgender Ideology - Civitas
    The term transgenderism is used to refer to an ideological movement that challenges sex-based rights and actively promotes the idea that a person's gender.
  67. [67]
    Transgender Ideology Is Riddled With Contradictions. Here Are the ...
    Feb 9, 2018 · On the one hand, transgender activists want the authority of science as they make metaphysical claims, saying that science reveals gender ...
  68. [68]
    Becoming cisgender - Richardson‐Self - 2022 - Wiley Online Library
    Jun 24, 2022 · While many are familiar with 'transgender', fewer know 'cisgender', the term that captures AFAB-women (assigned 'female' at birth-women) and ...Missing: definition peer
  69. [69]
    Judith Butler: their philosophy of gender explained - The Conversation
    Oct 19, 2022 · Butler argues that we reproduce gender not only through repeated ways of speaking, but also of doing. We dress in certain ways, do certain ...
  70. [70]
    Gender Trouble in Social Psychology: How Can Butler's Work Inform ...
    Jul 27, 2018 · By arguing that gender is not something one is, but rather something one does or performs, Butler argues that gender identity is not based on ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Non-Binary Performativity: A Trans-Positive Account of Judith Butlerâ
    Oct 25, 2017 · The work of queer and feminist scholar Judith Butler has revolutionized our under- standing of gender within contemporary social theory.<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    2. Queer theory and gender norms - Align Platform
    Judith Butler's work is key to this understanding. She argues that gender is performative – meaning that the performance of gender is what makes gender exist ( ...
  73. [73]
    Gender Perspectives in Postmodernism: Questioning Norms
    Feb 25, 2024 · In the context of gender, postmodernism challenges the binary framework that has traditionally defined male and female roles. It suggests that ...Defining Postmodernism 🔗 · Postmodernism's Influence On... · Key Theorists In Postmodern...
  74. [74]
    Queering Families: The Postmodern Partnerships of Cisgender ...
    Sep 19, 2016 · Cisgender women who partner with transgender men who are socially "read" as male are often (mis)perceived as part of a heterosexual couple or ...
  75. [75]
    Gender: A Postmodern Idea Developed in Association with ... - MDPI
    This review examines the foundations of modern and postmodern thought, then focuses on sex and gender with respect to their history within these modes of ...
  76. [76]
    Cisnormativity - New Discourses
    Cisnormativity refers to the idea that it is both normal and normative for a person's gender identity and biological sex to accord with one another.
  77. [77]
    https://answersingenesis.org/family/gender/the-influence-of-postmodernism-part-7-gender-studies/
  78. [78]
    A Troublesome Occurrence: Postmodern Investments in Trans Women
    Aug 9, 2012 · Postmodernism deals with the problem of power by not dealing with it. To wit, a cisgender man's fetish for trans women has something to do with ...
  79. [79]
    Cisnormativity as a structural barrier to STI testing for trans ... - NIH
    Nov 28, 2022 · Cisnormativity is the assumption that everyone identifies as the gender they were assigned at birth, and those who do not are considered “ ...
  80. [80]
    Transgender Population Size in the United States: a Meta ... - NIH
    Estimates of the number of transgender adults significantly increased over the past decade, with a current best estimate of 390 per 100 000 adults.
  81. [81]
    What percentage of the US population is transgender? - USAFacts
    About 0.95% of the nation's adult population identifies as transgender, according to Household Pulse Survey data collected from May to September 2024.
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Cisgender Privilege - SUNY
    Cisgender Privilege. 1. Use public restrooms without fear of verbal abuse, physical intimidation, or arrest. 2. Use public facilities such as gym locker ...Missing: concept explanation
  83. [83]
    Gender Identity - The Privilege Project
    Identifying as cisgender or within the gender binary of male and female is seen as a privilege because it aligns with western societal expectations and ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  84. [84]
    The Biological Basis of Gender Roles - Aporia Magazine
    Sep 5, 2025 · Sex is binary. Gender differences, while variable, have consistent biological roots. Sexual orientation shows clear markers of genetics. A ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Gender Incongruence as Incongruence with the Social Meaning of Sex
    May 15, 2025 · Nicole Vincent makes the argument that the gender incongruence thesis is 'conceptually incoherent, insidiously regressive, and hostile to diversity'.
  86. [86]
    Gender Dysphoria Statistics, Prevalence, Influencing Factors, and ...
    Aug 30, 2024 · Gender dysphoria prevalence accounts for 0.005–0.014% of the population for biological males and 0.002–0.003% for biological females.
  87. [87]
    A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder - PMC
    Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The ...
  88. [88]
    Do children grow out of gender dysphoria? - Transgender Trend
    On average 80% of children change their minds and do not continue into adulthood as transgender. Some of these studies are very old, the first being published ...Missing: longitudinal | Show results with:longitudinal
  89. [89]
    The Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis in Young People Has a “Low ...
    Jul 19, 2024 · Adolescent females had the highest prevalence (452.2/100,000) and have experienced the sharpest increase (12-fold, from 37.9/100,000 in 2013).Missing: population | Show results with:population
  90. [90]
    Gender dysphoria in twins: a register-based population study - PMC
    Aug 4, 2022 · In particular, heritability may be a non-fixed parameter with an attenuated effect on gender identity throughout adolescence and adult life.
  91. [91]
    Gender Identity Disorder in Twins: A Review of the Case Report ...
    They found a 2.3% prevalence and 62% heritability, while 38% of the variance was explained by a nonshared environmental component. These results confirmed the ...
  92. [92]
    Genetic and Environmental Contributions To Gender Diversity
    Sep 12, 2025 · Twin studies indicate both genetic and environmental contributions to gender diversity. These results are important to inform ongoing public ...
  93. [93]
    Understanding the Sex Binary - by Colin Wright - Reality's Last Stand
    Aug 4, 2024 · The “sex binary” refers to the biological reality that there are only two sexes—male and female—and that these categories refer to individuals ...
  94. [94]
    Transgender Brain Studies are Fatally Flawed - City Journal
    Mar 14, 2025 · Research purporting to demonstrate that trans-identifying individuals' brains resemble those of the opposite sex often ignores a major confounding variable.
  95. [95]
    Biology Is Not Bigotry | Free Inquiry
    Jan 2, 2025 · We believe Coyne's essay presents a well-reasoned, scientifically based analysis of some transgender controversies.
  96. [96]
    Understanding Gender Differences Through Evolutionary Psychology
    Feb 23, 2024 · Sexual selection suggests that females evolved to be skilled at assessing male quality—looking for signs of good genes, resources, and ...
  97. [97]
    Evolutionary Basis of Gender Dynamics: Understanding Patriarchy ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · Evolutionary psychology provides a biological framework for understanding sex-based differences in human behavior and draws from a variety of ...
  98. [98]
    Sex and Care: The Evolutionary Psychological Explanations for Sex ...
    Apr 16, 2019 · The present article elucidates sex differences in terms of formal care occupational choices and care styles based on evolutionary psychological perspectives.
  99. [99]
    Neither cis nor TERF - Robert Jensen
    I am routinely described as cisgender (defined as people whose internal sense of gender identity matches their biological sex). Because I have critiqued the ...
  100. [100]
    Helen Joyce on X: "Like the term infidel, "cis" purports to be objective ...
    Nov 30, 2024 · Like the term infidel, "cis" purports to be objective but actually encodes a belief system. I'm an atheist, not an infidel, because I don't ...
  101. [101]
    Objections to 'Cis' – Not The News in Briefs - A blog by Helen Saxby
    Jul 16, 2020 · The unwanted labelling of 'cis' is enforced whether you like it or not. Many women object to being demoted to a subset of their own sex class, ...
  102. [102]
    Neither cis nor TERF - Feminist Current
    May 16, 2018 · I am routinely described as cisgender (defined as people whose internal sense of gender identity matches their biological sex). Because I have ...
  103. [103]
    How Many Adults and Youth Identify as Transgender in the United ...
    Young adults aged 18 to 24 comprise 28.9% of those who identify as transgender (aged 13 and older) compared to 10.7% of the U.S. population. Young adults aged ...
  104. [104]
    CMV: I think that "cisgendered" and "cissexual" are unnecessary.
    May 1, 2014 · My friend who is cisgender doesn't like it when I refer to them as 'cis' or 'cisgender'. They say it's offensive and that they don't believe ...CMV: I don't identify as cis. : r/changemyview - RedditWhy do people hate the word 'cisgender'? : r/asktransgender - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  105. [105]
    What's this cisgender nonsense, isn't it just 'normal' or 'the ... - Quora
    Jun 26, 2022 · As the overwhelming majority of people are “cisgender” it follows that being cisgender is the usual state of affairs, and thus “normal”.Is calling someone cisgender a form of marginalizing normal people?If “trans” people insist on calling normal people “cis”, which most ...More results from www.quora.com<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    The problem with 'cis' - UnHerd
    Jun 22, 2023 · “Cis” is a truly horrible word that IS used as a derogatory slur and it has no place in civilised discourse. It is used by antihuman bigots ( ...
  107. [107]
    Why do transgender people insist on calling normal people 'cis ...
    Nov 27, 2023 · Normal people aren't called “cis”. “Cis” is a shortened form of “cisgender” which is a concise, precise, and unambiguous desciptor.I am starting to believe that calling normal people 'cisgender ... - QuoraFor those who prefer the term 'normal' over 'cisgender' - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  108. [108]
    Elon Musk declares 'cisgender' a slur on Twitter - Fortune
    Jun 21, 2023 · Elon Musk declares 'cis' and 'cisgender' will be considered slurs on Twitter that can be punishable with suspension.
  109. [109]
    X Is Threatening Users for Using the Word “Cisgender” - Them.us
    May 21, 2024 · In a warning message, X informed users that the terms “cis” and “cisgender” could be considered “slurs” almost a year after the site's owner ...
  110. [110]
    Elon Musk Says Calling Someone Cisgender Is "Heterophobic"
    Jan 11, 2024 · World's richest man Elon Musk has said that calling someone cisgender is "heterophobic". He expressed his views on Wednesday in a post on X (formerly Twitter).
  111. [111]
    Twitter quietly removes policy against misgendering trans people
    Apr 18, 2023 · Twitter's guidelines still say that users may not attack others on the basis of their gender, gender identity or sexuality. Yet this removal of ...
  112. [112]
    Twitter quietly changes its hateful conduct policy to remove standing ...
    Apr 18, 2023 · Twitter quietly changes its hateful conduct policy to remove standing protections for its transgender users ... The advocacy group GLAAD condemned ...
  113. [113]
    The X Rules: Safety, privacy, authenticity, and more - Help Center
    X rules aim to ensure safe public conversation, prohibiting violence, harassment, hateful conduct, sharing private information, and platform manipulation.
  114. [114]
    Elon Musk's promise to treat 'cis' as a slur will provoke more extremism
    Jun 22, 2023 · Transphobes like Elon Musk and J.K. Rowling want to call 'cisgender' a slur, taking aim at language meant to promote inclusivity for trans ...
  115. [115]
    An Alternative for the Word Cisgender - Ian Thomas Malone
    Aug 19, 2021 · The word “cisgender” sparks a lot of negative emotions. Plenty of people hate the term. William Shatner, a nonagenarian, spends time on Twitter ...
  116. [116]
    Why transphobes hate the word 'cis' - ERA-LGBTI
    Oct 6, 2023 · ' Cis' is not a slur.' Cis' (short for' cisgender') is a word used to describe those whose gender matches the one they were assigned at birth, ...
  117. [117]
    Cissexism and Cis Privilege Revisited - Part 1 - Whipping Girl
    Oct 1, 2014 · Furthermore, transgender activists of the 1990's purposefully intended for “transgender” to be an open-ended label that anyone who defies gender ...
  118. [118]
    Get the Facts on Gender-Affirming Care - Human Rights Campaign
    Jan 7, 2025 · While gender-affirming care is often framed only in relation to transgender individuals, it can also have benefits for cisgender and intersex ...What Are The Laws... · Why Is It Important To... · Parents For Transgender...<|separator|>
  119. [119]
    Please Don't Get Stuck On Whether "Cis" Is a Slur or Not.
    Nov 30, 2024 · By using the term 'cis,' people further normalise the concept of 'trans' and thus perpetuate that harm. Further, gender critical feminists argue ...
  120. [120]
    Is "Cisgender" a Slur? | An Injustice!
    Jan 21, 2021 · Claims that “cisgender” is a slur aren't about “offense” or “harm” to cisgender people. Nor are they about cisgender people being “oppressed.” ...
  121. [121]
    What do people have against the word cisgender?
    Jun 13, 2016 · Intersex people are assigned genders at birth, and many of them are cisgender because they identify with the gender they were assigned at birth ...Missing: false equivalence