Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Siege of Skardu

The Siege of Skardu was a prolonged military blockade during the 1947–1948 Indo-Pakistani War, in which a small garrison of Jammu and Kashmir State Forces defended the town of Skardu in Baltistan against Pakistani-supported irregular forces, including Gilgit Scouts and Chitral Scouts, from 12 February to 14 August 1948. Commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Sher Jung Thapa with approximately 250 troops, the defenders withstood harsh winter conditions, high-altitude terrain, and intermittent assaults while isolated from relief due to logistical challenges and enemy control of surrounding passes following the earlier fall of Gilgit. The siege highlighted the strategic importance of Skardu as a gateway to and , with the garrison's resistance delaying Pakistani consolidation in the region despite limited supplies and failed Indian relief attempts over treacherous routes like the Pass. Besieging forces, coordinated under Pakistani officers such as Major Abdul Ehsan of the , employed encirclement tactics, cutting off reinforcements and subjecting the fort to artillery fire and raids, yet faced determined counteractions that repelled multiple attacks. The defenders' endurance, marked by rationing ammunition and food amid sub-zero temperatures, exemplified resilience but ended in surrender on 14 August 1948 after ammunition depletion, with and survivors taken prisoner until a subsequent exchange. This engagement underscored logistical disparities in , contributing to the broader war's and the eventual UN-mediated , while Thapa's leadership earned posthumous recognition for sustaining the defense against superior numbers. The fall of facilitated Pakistani advances toward , prompting Indian countermeasures including airlifts to isolated posts, though it remained one of the war's most grueling attritional battles with few parallels in sustained isolation.

Background

Geopolitical Context of the Kashmir Conflict

The partition of British India on August 15, 1947, into the independent dominions of and was governed by the Act, which allowed over 560 s—covering about 40% of the subcontinent's territory—to accede to either dominion or, in theory, remain independent based on the decision of their ruling princes. , a spanning 222,236 square kilometers with a Muslim-majority population of approximately 77% but ruled by the Hindu , presented a unique challenge due to its contiguous borders with both new dominions, as well as and . The state's strategic location controlled the headwaters of major rivers including the Indus, , and Chenab, which were critical for and hydropower in the region, making control over Kashmir economically vital for Pakistan's agrarian economy while also offering India defensive depth against potential threats from the northwest. Maharaja initially pursued independence, signing standstill agreements on August 12, 1947, with both and to maintain existing administrative and trade arrangements without committing to accession. These agreements preserved the amid internal unrest, including demands for democratic reforms from the Muslim Conference and National Conference parties, but Hari Singh's indecision was influenced by during —estimated at over 200,000 deaths across the subcontinent—and fears of losing sovereignty. , viewing Kashmir's Muslim demographics as aligning with its justification for , pressed for accession, while emphasized the ruler's prerogative under the framework; however, Hari Singh's delay heightened tensions as Pakistani authorities allegedly encouraged cross-border agitation. The geopolitical flashpoint erupted on October 22, 1947, when irregular Pashtun tribal militias, armed and logistically supported by Pakistani military officers, invaded from the northwest, capturing and advancing toward amid reports of looting and atrocities that exacerbated communal divides. Facing collapse of state forces, appealed to for aid, signing the on October 26, 1947, which transferred defense, external affairs, and communications to while retaining internal autonomy. airlifted troops to on October 27, formalizing intervention under the accession terms, but Pakistan rejected the document's validity, claiming it was coerced and initiating direct military involvement, thus escalating the conflict into the first Indo-Pakistani war over territorial control, , and irredentist claims. This war, fought primarily in , reflected deeper causal drivers: Pakistan's strategic imperative to secure riverine lifelines against India's upstream dominance and ideological commitment to Muslim-majority unification, contrasted with India's legalistic defense of princely accession rights and concerns over fragmented borders vulnerable to infiltration.

Composition of Defending and Attacking Forces

The defending forces at Skardu consisted primarily of personnel from the 6th Jammu and Kashmir Infantry Battalion of the State Forces, commanded by . The initial garrison included about 71 troops, comprising 40 and 31 , with reinforcements arriving in 1948 that increased the military strength to approximately 285 all ranks, predominantly non-Muslims following desertions by some Muslim soldiers and operators. Additionally, around 200 local Balti civilians were armed and organized into a supporting , bringing the total effective defending personnel to roughly 485, including refugees under protection. The attacking forces were a coalition of irregular units coordinated under Pakistani auspices, including the , Chitral Scouts, and local militias, rather than regular troops at the outset. The formed the core, numbering approximately 600 personnel, supplemented by about 200 deserters from the 6th Jammu and Kashmir Infantry and up to 2,000 tribal and local militiamen, with Chitral Scouts providing further support; total strength exceeded 2,000. Key commanders included Major Ahsan Ali (also known as Ehsan Khan), Captain Muhammad Khan, and Lieutenant Babar Khan, operating under designations like Ibex Force. These forces were equipped with modern rifles and mortars, enabling sustained encirclement and assaults despite their irregular nature.

Strategic Importance of Skardu

Skardu, as the administrative headquarters of , commanded critical terrain overlooking the valley and served as the primary hub for controlling northern access routes within the princely state of . Its location facilitated dominance over the Shyok and systems, which were essential for sustaining military movements and local populations in the high-altitude desert regions. During the conflict, Pakistani irregulars and scouts targeted Skardu to consolidate gains from the Gilgit rebellion, recognizing that its capture would secure the flank of their northern holdings and prevent Indian counteroffensives toward . The town's airfield, operational with a rudimentary airstrip since the pre-partition era, amplified its logistical value by enabling air resupply operations in an area where overland routes like the pass were seasonally impassable due to heavy snowfall from November to May. Indian forces had reinforced the garrison via aircraft landings as late as November 1947, underscoring the site's role in sustaining isolated outposts amid harsh winter conditions that restricted ground transport to mule trains and limited vehicular access. Control of this airfield was pivotal for projecting power into , as it offered the only viable aerial link bypassing the vulnerable Srinagar-Leh axis. From a broader operational standpoint, anchored the western gateway to , with roads linking it southward to and eastward across the Deosai Plateau toward , positions that, if held by Indian state forces, could threaten Pakistani supply lines from and isolate . Failure to defend Skardu risked severing Ladakh's northern defenses, potentially allowing invaders to envelop Indian positions from multiple directions and complicating relief efforts reliant on the single, precarious Srinagar-Kargil-Leh route. Pakistani command, led by figures like Major Aslam Khan, prioritized the siege to neutralize this threat, viewing Skardu as the linchpin for denying India territorial depth in the trans-Himalayan sector.

Prelude

Tribal Invasion and Gilgit Rebellion

The tribal invasion of Jammu and Kashmir commenced on 22 October 1947, when roughly 5,000 to 20,000 Pashtun tribesmen from Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province and adjoining tribal agencies, including Mahsuds, Afridis, and Yusufzais, crossed the border at Muzaffarabad under the banner of jihad against Dogra rule. These irregular lashkars, armed with rifles and supported logistically by Pakistani military officers such as Colonel Akbar Khan (operating under the pseudonym "General Tariq"), advanced swiftly, capturing Muzaffarabad by 23 October and Baramulla by 25 October after overcoming minimal resistance from Jammu and Kashmir state forces. The invaders looted settlements, massacred non-combatants—particularly Hindus and Sikhs—and engaged in widespread rape, acts documented in contemporaneous reports that accelerated the Maharaja's decision to accede to India on 26 October. Indian paratroopers airlifted into Srinagar on 27 October halted the lashkars' push toward the capital, but detachments of tribesmen, numbering several thousand, diverted eastward and northward into the Ladakh region, exploiting the state's elongated terrain and poor communications. In parallel, the Gilgit Rebellion erupted in the remote on 1 November 1947, where the predominantly Muslim population (over 85 percent) chafed under nominal suzerainty following the agency's lease from India in 1935. The , a unit of approximately 900 local levies commanded by Major William , mutinied against the newly appointed Hindu governor, Brigadier Ghansara Singh, arresting him without bloodshed and seizing the agency's administrative centers including town. , motivated by fears of Hindu domination post-partition and local resentment toward policies, formed a provisional "Revolutionary Council" and sought affiliation with , raising its flag on 16 November after dispatching a to for approval. This swift coup, unopposed due to the scouts' control over strategic passes and the absence of reinforcing state troops, secured for Pakistani control and severed overland links from to via the Indus Valley and . The combined effects of the tribal incursions and Gilgit uprising isolated Skardu, the administrative hub of Baltistan, by early November 1947. Tribal lashkars, numbering around 1,000-2,000 in the eastern sectors, linked up with advancing Gilgit Scouts detachments (initially 400-600 strong under subalterns like Captain Nasir Khan), who traversed the high-altitude Deosai Plateau despite harsh weather, encircling the town and its fort-held garrison of roughly 250-300 Jammu and Kashmir state troops plus local Muslim militia under Colonel Sher Jung Thapa. Pakistani sources portray the Gilgit action as a grassroots pro-Pakistan uprising against oppressive rule, while Indian accounts emphasize its coordination with the broader invasion strategy; primary records, including Brown's own memoir, confirm local agency but acknowledge covert Pakistani encouragement via radio links and supplies. These events precluded any timely reinforcement to Skardu, forcing its defenders into a prolonged siege amid winter's onset.

Isolation of Skardu Garrison

The Gilgit rebellion on 1 November 1947, led by the under Major William Brown, resulted in the arrest of the Maharaja's governor, Brigadier Ghansara Singh, and the establishment of a provisional pro-Pakistan government in the region. This event severed administrative control over the northern areas of , including where was located, and cut off the critical supply route linking to , , and . The loss of effectively isolated the Skardu garrison from reinforcements and logistics from the north, as the Scouts rapidly advanced southward, capturing the strategic Bunji fort on the Indus by mid-November, further blocking any potential relief from that direction. In response to the deteriorating situation, Lieutenant Colonel , second-in-command of the 6th Infantry, was ordered to reinforce . Departing on 23 November 1947 with two officers, two junior commissioned officers, and 72 other ranks amid heavy snowfall, arrived to bolster the existing garrison of approximately 71 troops at the Kharpocho Fort and barracks. However, the advancing , augmented by local Baltistani levies and defectors from the state forces, encircled by late November, initiating the siege with coordinated assaults from the north and east. Early defections, including those led by Captain of the 6th Infantry who urged mutiny via intercepted communications, compounded the isolation by eroding internal cohesion and providing intelligence to the besiegers. Local hostility in further entrenched the garrison's predicament, as villagers withheld alerts about enemy movements and the Raja of Rondhu detained state postal runners while inciting raiders. The primary southern supply route from via the Zojila Pass and became untenable due to harsh winter conditions and tribal threats elsewhere in , leaving Skardu without viable resupply options. By early December 1947, the garrison was fully besieged, reliant on limited stockpiles amid dwindling ammunition and food, with no external communication or possible.

Course of the Siege

Initial Encirclement and Early Assaults (November 1947–February 1948)

Following the successful rebellion in Gilgit on 1 November 1947, pro-Pakistani forces comprising Gilgit Scouts, Chitral Scouts, tribal lashkars, and approximately 80 deserters from the Jammu and Kashmir state forces advanced southward, encircling the Skardu garrison by mid-November. The initial defending force numbered about 71 troops, including 40 Sikhs and 31 Muslims from the 6th Jammu and Kashmir Infantry, holding the Skardu fort amid surrounding high-altitude terrain that limited resupply and favored the attackers' numerical superiority of roughly 600 men equipped with rifles and mortars. Lieutenant Colonel Sher Jung Thapa assumed command on 3 December 1947, arriving with reinforcements of 2 officers, 2 junior commissioned officers, and 72 other ranks, bolstering the loyal non-Muslim contingent while contending with desertions among Muslim operators and troops. The encirclement isolated from external aid as winter snowfall intensified, restricting Indian relief efforts and forcing defenders to rely on limited stockpiles while facing intermittent sniping and probing attacks from positions across the . positioned detachments at key outposts like Tsari to block the Indus route, conducting aggressive patrols to maintain perimeter control and disrupt enemy buildup under commanders such as Major Ahsan Ali and Captain Mohammad Khan. By early February 1948, the garrison's effective strength had reached around 130 non-Muslims and 31 Muslims, though morale was strained by ammunition shortages and the defection of wireless operators, compelling to personally manage communications. Early assaults escalated in February, beginning with an attack on the Tsari outpost on 9 February 1948, where a Sikh platoon was overwhelmed and survivors executed, while an attached Muslim platoon defected to the attackers. This was followed by a major coordinated assault on the fort on 11 February, involving heavy fire and infantry advances that lasted six hours; defenders repelled the push through counterattacks, inflicting 10 enemy fatalities while suffering 7 killed, 1 officer and 15 other ranks wounded. Further reinforcements of 140 men arrived between 13 and 15 February, expanding the garrison to 285, which temporarily stabilized the defenses amid ongoing attrition from cold, hunger, and sporadic fire. These actions demonstrated the garrison's resilience against superior numbers, though the harsh environmental conditions and logistical isolation foreshadowed prolonged attrition.

Sustained Defense and Attrition (March–July 1948)

Following the repulsion of major assaults in February, the Skardu garrison, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel of the 6th Infantry, shifted to a strategy of sustained defense centered on the fort's fortified positions, including trenches and bunkers, supplemented by aggressive patrolling and s to disrupt enemy movements. Troops numbering around 285 at the start of March maintained vigilance against probes by approximately 600 pro-Pakistani forces, comprising , Chitral Scouts, tribal lashkars, and local deserters, who employed sniping and mortar fire but failed to breach defenses in clashes on March 4–6. A notable defensive action occurred on April 10, when a led by Chatru repelled an enemy attempt to overrun the School picket, preserving key outposts. Relief efforts from forces proved futile, exacerbating the garrison's isolation. In mid-March, the "Biscuit Column"—a relief force of one company with mortars under Faqir Singh—advanced toward but was ambushed near Gol (also referenced as Thorgo), suffering 26 killed and 18 wounded, with surviving elements withdrawing after heavy losses in arms and ammunition, including 27 rifles and two Vickers machine guns. The attempted to mitigate shortages via Tempest aircraft sorties from , navigating high-altitude Himalayan challenges to deliver limited supply drops and conduct , though operations remained constrained by oxygen deprivation, armaments, and terrain hazards, providing only marginal sustenance amid the 400-mile round-trip demands. Attrition intensified through spring and summer due to chronic shortages and environmental factors. Food was rationed to 250 grams of and 30 grams of per soldier daily, with stocks depleted by July 8, forcing reliance on barley; ammunition dwindled to critical levels, while non-combat losses mounted from , , and , affecting nearly all remaining troops and straining resources further with 229 non-Muslim refugees and wounded under protection. Enemy reinforcements and the capture of nearby in May enabled sustained pressure, including an assault repelled on April 7, but cumulative combat casualties—building on prior losses—reduced effective fighting strength progressively, leaving the garrison vulnerable despite Thapa's leadership in maintaining .

Internal Dynamics and Local Support

The Skardu garrison, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel of the 6th Jammu and Kashmir Infantry, initially comprised a mixed force of approximately 71 troops on December 3, 1947, including 40 and 31 , which grew to 285 by mid-February 1948 with reinforcements from outposts. Internal cohesion was undermined by significant desertions among Muslim personnel, such as Nek Alam's platoon surrendering without resistance on February 9, 1948, and three Muslim wireless operators fleeing, forcing Thapa to personally operate communications. Hassan Khan defected and attempted to incite further revolt through intercepted correspondence, exacerbating morale challenges amid severe shortages of food, ammunition, and medical supplies by July 1948, when rations sustained only 70-80 individuals despite 600 total personnel including refugees. Thapa's leadership maintained discipline among the remaining loyal troops, primarily non-Muslims, through personal example and motivational efforts, holding the fort against starting February 11, 1948, for over six months until on August 14, 1948. However, internal vulnerabilities were compounded by intelligence failures, including enemy awareness of the " Column" relief force's movements, leading to its on March 15, 1948, near Gol, where 26 were killed and 18 wounded. The local Balti population in Skardu and surrounding areas provided no support to the garrison and actively aided besieging forces, reflecting resentment toward rule under the of . Muslim civil officers, schoolboys, shopkeepers' servants, and villagers withheld warnings of raider advances despite knowledge of their approach, instead relaying to the ; as Thapa later stated, "Every Muslim civil officer, schoolboys, servants of local shopkeepers and all who were employed to secure information about the did not do so. They knew that the was coming… They wanted the flag to fly." The of Rondhu further incited raiders and detained postal runners, ensuring the garrison remained isolated without local logistical or informational aid. This hostility facilitated surprise attacks and contributed to the eventual attrition of the defenders.

Relief Attempts

Indian Military Operations Toward Skardu

Following the encirclement of Skardu in early February 1948, Indian forces initiated ground relief efforts from Srinagar southward via the difficult terrain toward Kargil, aiming to reinforce the besieged garrison of the Jammu and Kashmir State Forces. On 17 February 1948, a company equipped with two 2-inch and two 3-inch mortars was dispatched from Srinagar, later augmented by a platoon at Kargil known as the "Biscuit Column" under Brigadier Faqir Singh and Major Coutts; this force advanced toward Skardu but was ambushed by Pakistani-aligned Ibex Force elements near Gol on 15 March 1948, resulting in 26 killed, 7 missing, and 18 wounded, forcing a retreat without reaching the garrison. A subsequent larger-scale effort, termed the "Sugar Column," involved approximately battalion-strength reinforcements departing from positions between , , and starting around 10 May 1948, intended to break through to and recapture key points like . However, the column faced repeated ambushes and outflanking maneuvers by Ibex Force, leading to its rout by late May; Pakistani forces captured on 10-11 May and on 6 June, severing the primary overland route and rendering further ground advances infeasible. Parallel to ground operations, the Royal Indian Air Force (RIAF) provided aerial support from June onward, conducting supply drops and strikes with fighter-bombers based in to sustain the garrison and disrupt besiegers. Drops occurred on 28 June, 1 July, 8 July (recovering 4 of 6 canisters), 16-17 July, and 7 August 1948, alongside repeated bombing runs targeting enemy positions around ; while some and rations reached defenders, many containers landed outside the fort under enemy fire, proving insufficient to avert attrition or lift the siege. These combined efforts failed to relieve , contributing to the garrison's surrender on 14 August 1948 after over six months of isolation.

Logistical and Environmental Obstacles

The rugged terrain of , encompassing steep Himalayan and slopes, deep gorges, and high passes such as at 3,528 meters, severely impeded Indian relief columns advancing from toward . Narrow, winding tracks with hairpin bends and weak bridges limited vehicular movement, forcing reliance on foot marches, mules, and porters over distances exceeding 300 kilometers from to via . These features, combined with enemy ambushes exploiting elevated cliffs and ravines, rendered supply convoys highly vulnerable, as seen in the "Biscuit Column" operation on 17 February 1948, where a relief force carrying mortars was intercepted near Gol on 15 March, suffering 26 killed, 18 wounded, and 7 missing. Environmental conditions exacerbated these difficulties, with extreme winter cold, , and heavy snowfall—often 30 to 75 centimeters deep—blocking passes for extended periods and restricting viable routes primarily to the Indus valley floor. High-altitude operations above 3,000 meters induced among troops lacking adequate greatcoats and , while freezing winds and temperature swings slowed advances and increased attrition; for instance, a on 26-27 June 1948 killed 45 mules in a supply effort. Air resupply attempts by the , including Dakota drops totaling thousands of kilograms, proved insufficient due to aircraft limitations at elevations up to 4,670 meters and imprecise delivery in gusty conditions, with sorties on 28 June, 1 July, and 8 July 1948 failing to alleviate the garrison's shortages. Logistical strains were compounded by stretched resources, communication failures such as wireless set breakdowns, and enemy maneuvers that captured on 10 May 1948, severing the 136-kilometer Kargil-Skardu link and outflanking relief pushes. Earlier winter crossings of on 30 January 1948 by small companies—reaching Skardu by 10 February with only about 285 total defenders—highlighted the perils of manhandling equipment through snow, but subsequent mobilizations of two battalions in April 1948 faltered amid these cumulative barriers, contributing to the siege's prolongation until the garrison's capitulation on 14 August 1948.

Fall and Surrender

Final Offensive (August 1948)

As the siege progressed into August 1948, the Skardu garrison under Lieutenant Colonel faced acute shortages, with rations limited to two barley chapattis and a cup of tea per soldier daily, exacerbating malnutrition and weakening defensive capabilities. On August 7, Indian aircraft conducted strikes on enemy positions and airdropped two supply containers, but the quantities proved insufficient to sustain the defenders amid ongoing attrition. The besieging forces, including , Scouts, and Pakistani-supported irregulars, escalated their offensive by deploying two 3.7-inch howitzers on August 9, enabling more effective shelling of garrison pickets. The pivotal assault occurred on August 12, when approximately 200 attackers, following bombardment, targeted a key picket outside . Defenders repulsed the advance after four hours of intense , expending their final reserve ammunition box and leaving numerous enemy dead around the perimeter. This engagement reduced available small-arms ammunition to roughly 10 rounds per rifleman, rendering further sustained resistance untenable. On the night of August 13–14, the enemy launched a renewed fierce assault across multiple fronts, exploiting the garrison's depleted resources and manpower, which had dwindled to about 40 combatants including Thapa and four officers. The defenders fired their remaining ammunition in desperate counterfire, but the onslaught induced panic amid the chaos of close-quarters fighting, marking the culmination of the final offensive after six months of encirclement. These attacks, coordinated under Pakistani officers such as Major Ahsan Ali, overwhelmed the isolated Jammu and Kashmir State Forces troops, who had previously held off larger numbers through fortified positions and limited resupply.

Terms of Surrender and Capture of Defenders

On the night of 12–13 August 1948, amid intensifying assaults and with ammunition nearly depleted, Lieutenant Colonel , commander of the garrison, requested terms of surrender from the besieging forces led by Colonel Shahzada Muhammad Mata-ul-Mulk. The garrison had exhausted its reserve ammunition, leaving approximately 10 rounds per rifleman, and faced orders from Thimayya to capitulate due to the impossibility of relief or resupply. The occurred on 14 August 1948, after six months and three days of , with Thapa's force comprising roughly 250 men at the time of capitulation according to Pakistani accounts, though Indian estimates indicate fewer survivors: four officers, one , and 35 other ranks. Specific terms were not formally documented in available records beyond an earlier June 1948 offer by Mata-ul-Mulk promising protection upon laying down arms, which Thapa had rejected; the final capitulation appears to have been unconditional, driven by total depletion of resources. Following surrender, accounts diverge sharply on the treatment of the defenders. histories report a post-surrender , with most non-Muslim troops and male refugees executed in cold blood, including Captain Ganga Singh who was tied and shot; women reportedly faced abduction or suicide to avoid capture, leaving only and his orderly, Kalyan Singh, as survivors among the , possibly spared through intervention by Pakistani General . himself anticipated severe reprisals, stating he knew "the fate my troops will meet after surrendering to the enemy." In contrast, Pakistani narratives describe the captured officers and men, including , as prisoners of war who were repatriated to post-ceasefire, with no acknowledgment of executions. was later awarded the by for his leadership during the .

Aftermath and Consequences

Immediate Territorial Control

Following the of the Indian garrison on 14 August 1948, Pakistani forces commanded by Colonel Muhammad Mata-ul-Mulk of the immediately assumed control of and the town itself. The besieging troops, comprising , , and local Baltistani militias supportive of accession to , secured the perimeter defenses and key positions without further resistance, as the defenders' ammunition and supplies were depleted. This transfer of authority ended nearly seven months of encirclement and positioned as a forward base for Pakistani operations in . In the days immediately after the fall, Pakistani military elements conducted sweeps of the surrounding valleys to neutralize any residual pockets of Indian-aligned locals or stragglers, consolidating territorial hold over southern up to the line. No Indian relief column reached in time to contest this, due to ongoing commitments elsewhere in and logistical constraints from high-altitude terrain; the area thus integrated into Pakistan-administered Kashmir's northern sector, later formalized as part of under direct Pakistani oversight. Local pro-Pakistan elements, including Baltistani levies, assisted in establishing administrative outposts, ensuring stable control amid the ceasefire negotiations that concluded the broader conflict in January 1949.

Fate of Prisoners and Casualties

Following the capitulation of the Skardu garrison on August 14, 1948, approximately 250 surviving Indian defenders, primarily from the Jammu and Kashmir State Forces under Lt. Col. Sher Jung Thapa, were taken prisoner by pro-Pakistani forces led by Col. Shahzada M. Mata ul Mulk. Post-surrender, many non-Muslim prisoners, especially Sikhs, were subjected to summary executions; Captain Ganga Singh, the garrison's adjutant, was reportedly tied to the ground and shot, while other Sikhs were killed en masse. Women among the captives were spared execution but faced implied abuses, as per accounts from the period. Lt. Col. and his Sikh , —the sole Sikh survivor—were among the exceptions, detained as prisoners of war in but ultimately released, attributed to Thapa's personal intervention via his acquaintance with Pakistani Commander-in-Chief General . Thapa remained in captivity until repatriation, later receiving the for his defense. Pakistani narratives, such as those emphasizing without detailing subsequent events, contrast with these reports, highlighting interpretive differences in post-conflict accounts. Casualties during the February–August 1948 siege stemmed more from prolonged , , and supply shortages—than decisive engagements. Indian losses included one officer and seven enlisted men in the initial February 11 assault, with cumulative combat deaths likely in the dozens amid intermittent enemy probes; total defender fatalities, including non-combat, reduced the garrison from over 500 to the 250 who surrendered. Pro-Pakistani attackers, comprising , forces, and irregulars, suffered higher exposure in assaults, with at least 10 killed on February 11 and additional losses in subsequent failed advances, though exact aggregates remain unquantified in available records.

Strategic Analysis

Role in Broader Kashmir War

The Siege of Skardu formed a critical component of the northern theater in the 1947–1948 Indo-Pakistani War, where pro-Pakistan forces, including the Gilgit Scouts and Chitral Scouts, sought to isolate Jammu and Kashmir state forces from reinforcements originating in Srinagar and to sever land connections to Ladakh. Following the Gilgit rebellion on November 1, 1947, which placed the Gilgit Agency under de facto Pakistani control, these irregular units advanced southward, besieging Skardu by late November and effectively cutting off the western approach to Leh via the Indus Valley. This maneuver complemented the broader Pakistani strategy of exploiting ethnic and religious divisions within the princely state's Muslim-majority northern regions, where local levies largely defected, contrasting with Indian efforts to secure the Kashmir Valley through airlifted regular troops starting October 27, 1947. The prolonged blockade, lasting approximately seven months until the garrison's surrender on August 14, 1948, diverted limited Indian resources northward amid ongoing battles in and at , where Indian forces recaptured key positions by November 1947 but struggled with overextended supply lines across the . Skardu's strategic position as a hub for routes threatened Indian control of , prompting urgent air supply operations to that town from December 1947 and a subsequent armored over the Pass in early November 1948 to relieve it, which succeeded despite severe weather and terrain challenges. Pakistani consolidation in Skardu following its fall prevented any Indian counteroffensive in , securing for an area encompassing roughly 28,000 square miles of mountainous territory with sparse population but vital passes linking to and . In the war's denouement, the loss of contributed to the delineation of the under the January 1, 1949, ceasefire, leaving Pakistan in possession of and enabling subsequent infrastructure developments like the . This outcome underscored the war's fragmented nature, with Pakistan gaining territorial depth in the north despite India's retention of the Valley and , and highlighted how local agency rebellions amplified the conflict's asymmetry beyond conventional state-to-state engagements. Indian military analyses later attributed the northern setbacks to underestimation of logistical imperatives and reliance on potentially disloyal state troops, while Pakistani accounts framed the siege as a assertion of in Muslim-majority enclaves.

Tactical Lessons from the Siege

The Siege of Skardu exemplified the defensive advantages conferred by mountainous terrain on a numerically inferior force, where fortified positions and control of enabled Lt Col Sher Jung Thapa's —peaking at approximately 285 troops—to repel initial assaults by around 600 , forces, and tribal irregulars on February 11, 1948. Aggressive patrolling and bunker-based defenses mitigated the attackers' early surprise tactics and occupation of Point 8853, demonstrating that proactive small-unit actions can offset disparities in manpower during high-altitude engagements. Logistical sustainability emerged as the decisive factor in prolonged sieges, with the defenders food to 250 grams of flour and 30 grams of per daily by July 1948 amid isolation after enemy captures of and . Inadequate aerial resupply—via imprecise drops and unsuitable aircraft lacking precision in thin air—highlighted the necessity of specialized assets and forward bases to sustain encircled positions, as ground convoys like the "Biscuit Column" suffered ambushes inflicting 26 killed and 18 wounded. Attacker tactics of sustained sniping, fire, and , culminating in 3.7-inch barrages by August 9, 1948, underscored the value of mobility and local knowledge in eroding defender resilience without risking decisive frontal assaults, leading to on August 14 due to exhaustion rather than overrun. Failed operations exposed coordination shortfalls, as terrain-familiar foes exploited chokepoints, emphasizing the need for integrated air-ground to preempt such vulnerabilities in . Individual leadership sustained morale amid desertions and refugee strains (248 non-Muslims), with personally operating wireless sets, yet the garrison's collapse illustrated how even resolute command cannot indefinitely compensate for systemic supply and reinforcement deficits in remote theaters. Initial attacker errors, such as understrength probes, were rectified through , reinforcing that sieges reward patient resource allocation over hasty offensives in unforgiving environments.

Perspectives and Debates

Indian Narrative of Heroic Resistance

The Indian military perspective portrays the Siege of Skardu as an exemplar of resolute defense against overwhelming adversity, led by Lieutenant Colonel of the 6th Infantry. From early February 1948, Thapa commanded a garrison of approximately 217-250 troops, comprising and soldiers loyal to the Maharaja's forces, entrenched in the amid the harsh winter. Besieged by an estimated 1,000-2,000 fighters from the , Scouts, and pro-Pakistani militias under Ibex Force, the defenders repelled multiple assaults despite being outnumbered roughly 5-10 to 1, enduring extreme cold, food shortages, and limited medical supplies. Thapa's leadership is credited with sustaining morale and tactical ingenuity, including improvised fortifications and counterattacks that inflicted significant casualties on the attackers, such as during clashes in March 1948 where defenders held key positions against probing attacks. Indian accounts highlight instances of individual bravery, like soldiers fighting hand-to-hand when ammunition dwindled, and Thapa's refusal to abandon the post despite appeals for evacuation, arguing it would shield the Leh-Ladakh sector from immediate threat. Air resupply attempts by the , though hampered by weather and enemy fire, symbolized national commitment, with pilots risking high-altitude drops to bolster the garrison until late July 1948. This prolonged resistance, spanning over 160 days, is said to have delayed Pakistani advances southward, allowing reinforcements to secure Zojila Pass and airlift troops to by August 1948. The narrative underscores themes of loyalty amid betrayal, as some local Muslim troops defected early in the siege, yet the core force—predominantly non-Muslims—remained steadfast, viewing their stand as a of Jammu and Kashmir's accession to . By mid-August 1948, with rations exhausted and no left following a final enemy , Thapa negotiated surrender terms on August 14 to spare his wounded, resulting in the capture of 120 survivors, including himself. sources frame this not as defeat but as a moral victory, buying critical time that preserved Ladakh's integration into , with later awarded the for "conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty." Post-war reflections in Indian military historiography emphasize the siege's role in highlighting the valor of state forces integrated into the , contrasting it with logistical failures elsewhere, such as delayed reinforcements from . Accounts from veterans and official records stress that the defenders' endurance prevented a quicker enemy consolidation in , influencing the ceasefire lines under UN mediation. While acknowledging the eventual territorial loss, the Indian view elevates as a symbol of sacrificial resistance that aligned with broader operational successes in recapturing key passes.

Pakistani View of Local Liberation

In Pakistani accounts, the Siege of Skardu is depicted as an extension of the indigenous uprising in against rule under the of , reflecting the predominant Muslim population's desire to integrate with following the of . The Gilgit rebellion on November 1, 1947, led by local , set the stage for operations in , where Skardu—administratively part of the region—was viewed as a of oppressive Sikh and Hindu imposed despite local demographic realities. Forces comprising , Chitral Scouts, and supporting levies initiated the blockade in late 1947, framing their efforts as a rightful liberation rather than external aggression, with emphasis on the volunteers' resilience amid winter hardships and logistical isolation. The narrative highlights the strategic encirclement and incremental pressure on the Skardu garrison, which surrendered on August 14, 1948, to Colonel Muhammad Mata-ul-Mulk of the Scouts, coinciding symbolically with Pakistan's Independence Day. Pakistani sources portray this as a triumph of local determination, involving approximately 1,000-2,000 fighters who withstood counter-relief attempts and supply shortages, ultimately securing without substantial regular army involvement until later stabilization. Accounts attribute success to the cohesion of units drawn from regional ethnic groups like Baltis and , who reportedly provided intelligence and manpower, underscoring a grassroots momentum for "" (freedom) from what was seen as alien rule. Post-surrender, the area was handed to local committees for administration, reinforcing the view of Skardu’s fall as a people-led emancipation that preserved Gilgit-Baltistan's alignment with amid the broader . This perspective critiques Indian intervention as an imposition on self-determining northern agencies, with the siege's outcome credited for preventing reconquest and enabling subsequent defenses like those at the [Indus River](/page/Indus River) line. Commemorations, such as Baltistan's "freedom war" remembrance, stress the event's role in regional , though some analyses note coordination with Pakistani frontier authorities as facilitative rather than directive.

Critiques of Strategic Decisions

The Indian military's strategic prioritization in the early phases of the 1947-48 has been critiqued for failing to extend airlift and resupply operations to isolated garrisons like immediately after the successful defense of in late October 1947, allowing the siege—initiated by pro-Pakistani forces in early November—to persist without timely external support. This oversight stemmed from a focus on securing the core, underestimating the cascading effects of losing northern outposts on overall territorial control, as Skardu's fall enabled Pakistani consolidation in and threatened . Reinforcement efforts exemplified coordination lapses: on 15 March 1948, Faqir Singh's "Biscuit Column"—comprising approximately 140 men—advanced toward but was ambushed near Gol, suffering 26 killed, 7 missing, and 18 wounded, primarily due to a failed set preventing calls for air support despite requests from the besieged Lt. Col. Thapa's garrison of about 285 troops. A subsequent push in April 1948 with two battalions (around 2,000 men) from faltered as pro-Pakistani raiders outflanked via and by early July, capturing key passes and severing routes amid low state forces' morale and decentralized command structures. In June 1948, General K.S. Thimayya proposed Operation Snipe—a brigade-sized offensive from Gurais across the and Deosai Plateau to relieve and sever enemy supply lines to and —but Delhi's higher command rejected it owing to administrative hurdles and strategic indecision, forgoing a potential game-changing maneuver despite India's growing troop superiority. Air resupply attempts by the , using Tempest aircraft, proved insufficient at Skardu's 4,670-meter elevation; for instance, only 4 of 6 dropped containers were recovered on 8 July 1948, highlighting equipment limitations unfit for high-altitude precision drops. On the pro-Pakistani side, an early tactical error occurred on 11 February 1948 when Capt. Ahsan Ali committed only half of his 600 available troops in an assault, retreating prematurely after initial setbacks and permitting reinforcements to bolster the fort, thus prolonging from six months of irregular to a resource-draining . Reliance on Scouts and Ibex Force—totaling around 500 by mid-February—without fuller regular army integration exposed vulnerabilities to the defenders' resolute holdout, as noted in post-war analyses emphasizing underutilized numerical advantages.

Legacy

Military Honors and Recognition

Lieutenant Colonel , commanding officer of the 6th Infantry Regiment garrison at Skardu, received the , India's second-highest wartime gallantry award, for his leadership during the six-month siege from 11 February to 14 August 1948. Under his command, approximately 250 Indian and state forces troops withstood repeated assaults by numerically superior Pakistani-backed forces, including and Chitral Bodyguards, despite severe shortages of ammunition, rations, and medical supplies. Thapa's citation highlighted his inspirational resolve in maintaining morale, organizing defenses, and repelling attacks that inflicted significant casualties on the besiegers, thereby delaying their advance and contributing to the broader Indian strategy in . The award was gazetted post-war following Thapa's from Pakistani captivity, recognizing the garrison's heroic stand that prevented an earlier fall of and potential threats to . No other individual gallantry awards specifically tied to the Skardu defense are prominently documented in official records from the 1947-1948 conflict, though unit-level battle honors were later conferred on the 6th Infantry for its role in the operation. Pakistani sources have acknowledged Thapa's tenacity, with some accounts noting the respect earned by the defenders amid the eventual due to exhaustion rather than defeat in .

Long-Term Impact on Gilgit-Baltistan

The fall of Skardu on August 14, 1948, cemented Pakistani military dominance over Baltistan, integrating it administratively with the earlier-captured Gilgit region into what became known as the Northern Areas, later formalized as Gilgit-Baltistan under direct federal control via the 1949 Karachi Agreement, which separated it from Azad Jammu and Kashmir governance. This arrangement excluded Gilgit-Baltistan from Pakistan's constitutional frameworks of 1956, 1962, and 1973, subjecting it to Frontier Crimes Regulations that curtailed judicial and political rights, with administration handled by a centrally appointed Political Agent under the Ministry of Kashmir Affairs. Local hereditary rulers were abolished by 1972, transitioning the area to Federally Administered Northern Areas status, perpetuating a colonial-style governance that limited legislative autonomy and national electoral representation until partial reforms in the 2000s and 2020 Gilgit-Baltistan Order, which introduced a local assembly but stopped short of provincial status amid resident demands for fuller integration. Strategically, the siege's outcome fortified Pakistan's hold on high-altitude passes and routes linking to and , enabling infrastructure like the (completed 1979) and facilitating the 1963 cession of Shaksgam Valley to , while enhancing defenses against Indian advances in and Siachen. This control positioned as a corridor for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor since 2015, boosting connectivity but prioritizing external strategic interests over local development, with the region's disputed status tied to the broader preventing full sovereignty resolution. Socioeconomically, the events disrupted 's demographic balance through reported massacres of non-Muslim populations during the siege, fostering long-term sectarian divides, particularly between Shia majorities in and Sunni influences from mainland , intensified by post-1977 Islamization policies under . Economic exploitation persisted, with resource extraction in gems and yielding limited local benefits amid underdeveloped until recent CPEC investments, though grievances over rights denial and cultural marginalization continue, as evidenced by annual "independence day" commemorations reflecting unresolved aspirations for constitutional parity.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] 1947-48 Indo-Pak War Fall of Gilgit and Siege and Fall of Skardu
    of time, has few parallels in the annals of military history. Though his exploits of bravery are confined to the siege and fall of Skardu, the battle itself ...Missing: historical facts
  2. [2]
    [PDF] THE 1947-48 Kashmir War The war of lost opportunities
    January 1948 and besieged the Dogras at Skardu from 12 February. ... quality of intellect and efficiency as far as producing military history works was higher in ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] 1947-48 INDO-PAK WAR: THE FIRST WAR OF KASHMIR ...
    Oct 18, 2022 · Of particular importance was the siege of Skardu. It was at Skardu that the true spirit of a typical Indian soldier was first demonstrated.
  4. [4]
    Surrender at Skardu—1948 - The Nation
    Sep 28, 2020 · As a result of this, the siege of Skardu was lifted and handed over to local volunteers as the remaining forces were sent to Parkuta. Major ...
  5. [5]
    Conflict Between India and Pakistan | Global Conflict Tracker
    May 12, 2025 · The conflict between India and Pakistan arose out of the 1947 Partition of British India. The Partition established a Muslim-majority Pakistan ...
  6. [6]
    Kashmir profile - BBC News
    Mar 10, 2025 · In October 1947 tribesmen from Pakistan invaded Kashmir, spurred by reports of attacks on Muslims and frustrated by Hari Singh's delaying ...Missing: context | Show results with:context
  7. [7]
    India and Pakistan Clash over Kashmir | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Kashmir was valuable to India not only for its strategic importance, its control of the headwaters of the Punjab rivers, and its fame as the Switzerland of ...
  8. [8]
    Diplomatic History of Kashmir - Stanford University
    Kashmir's importance to India and Pakistan lies mainly for its strategic geographic location and water resources. Kashmir provides direct access to China on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Standstill Agreement with India and Pakistan, August 12 1947
    The Government of Pakistan agree to have a Standstill Agreement with the Government of Jammu and Kashmir for the continuance of the existing arrangements.
  10. [10]
    Jammu & Kashmir in legal perspective :: EFSAS
    The Instrument of Accession is a legal document executed by Maharaja Hari Singh on 26 October 1947, thereby agreeing to accede to the Union of India.
  11. [11]
    1947: Maharaja Hari Singh signs Instrument of Accession - Frontline
    Aug 10, 2022 · On October 26, 1947, Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir signed the Instrument of Accession with India, thereby ending the intense angling for that ...
  12. [12]
    Brigadier Sher Jung Thapa, MVC – The Hero of Skardu Part 2
    Aug 15, 2017 · The siege begins. By mid-November 1947, the Gilgit Scouts assisted by the Muslim troops of 6 Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) Infantry, originally based ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  13. [13]
    Spare a thought for those defenders of Skardu - The Tribune
    Aug 19, 2015 · Two more groups, of about 70 each, arrived soon after making the strength of the garrison about 285. In addition, there were about 200 ...
  14. [14]
    BATTLE OF SKARDU- a story of determination, courage and hope
    Feb 14, 2020 · One such event was Skardu battle in J&K. By mid-November 1947, the Gilgit Scouts of Pakistan had secured the entire Gilgit Agency. Sardar ...
  15. [15]
    Tempests over Skardu – Indian Air Force - Bharat-Rakshak.com
    Apr 9, 2010 · We were warned the aircraft and ammunition was not meant to be used at these heights. And the rockets, bombs and cannons did freeze, initially.
  16. [16]
    Defending Kashmir – Indian Army - Bharat-Rakshak.com
    During the long campaign, the Indian Army lost 76 officers, 31 JCOs and 996 men of other ranks. The wounded totalled 3152, including 81 officers and 107 JCOs.Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Pakistani Options for Resolution of the Kashmir Dispute. - DTIC
    Pakistan on 12 August 1947. 8. The Maharaja unleashes a reign of terror on his populace triggering a tribal invasion from Pakistan on 22 October 1947. There ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Kashmir Imbroglio - Air University
    Jun 3, 2019 · tribal invasion on 22 October 1947 to perpetrate militancy in J&K and acquire it by force.11 However, the major objective of the invaders ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Kashmir - Hanover College History Department
    Foremost is the actual signing of the Instrument of Accession by Maharaja Hari Singh, on or about October 26th, 1947. ... tribal invasion has done much to tarnish ...Missing: geopolitical | Show results with:geopolitical
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The conflict in Jammu/Kashmir between its Hindu and Muslim ...
    From October 23 through October 26, 1947, India refused to save Kashmir from the tribesmen. Before the tribal invasion, Maharaja Hari Singh did not want to join ...
  22. [22]
    The Foundations of Pakistan's Strategic Culture:
    The invasion of Kashmir by tribal invaders that India alleged was orchestrated by the Pakistan Army was eventually repulsed in early November 1947 with ...
  23. [23]
    Gilgit Rebellion: The Major who Mutinied over Partition of India
    Major Brown mutinied because Gilgit, despite being 99% Muslim, was to be ceded to Hindu rule, which he knew would lead to insurrection.
  24. [24]
    HISTORY: THE GILGIT-BALTISTAN CONUNDRUM - Dawn
    Nov 1, 2020 · The Gilgit Scouts, who had already formed a Revolutionary Council, initiated a revolt against Dogra rule on October 31, 1947. The Kashmiri ...
  25. [25]
    REVOLUTION OF GILGIT- BALTISTAN....1ST NOVEMBER 1947
    Nov 1, 2016 · On November 1, 1947 Gilgit-Baltistan became a republic for 15 days through a jointly formed armed struggle of the local people, the Gilgit ...
  26. [26]
    The Gilgit Rebellion 1947 - Google Docs
    Arrival of Avro Anson transport plane from Peshawar at the 600 yard long Gilgit landing strip, 1947. · Major Brown leaves Gilgit for Peshawar to report in recent ...
  27. [27]
    (PDF) THE FIRST INDO-PAKISTANI WAR, 1947-48 - ResearchGate
    It was the first modern war in which one of the belligerents (Pakistan) relied on an artificially created and nurtured insurgency in the target area to realize ...Missing: composition defending
  28. [28]
    [PDF] the gilgit rebellion - Pahar – Mountains of Central Asia Digital Dataset
    1947,. Major Brown leaves Gilgit for Peshawar to report in recent events, November 1947. From left: S.-Leader Ahmed, Captain Mathieson, Brown. Pipe and Drum ...
  29. [29]
    BATTLE OF SKARDU- a story of determination, courage and hope
    Feb 14, 2020 · By mid-November 1947, the Gilgit Scouts of Pakistan had secured the entire Gilgit Agency. Sardar Mohammad Alam flew into Gilgit from Peshawar ...Missing: prelude | Show results with:prelude
  30. [30]
    Fall of Gilgit - Daily Excelsior
    Aug 14, 2015 · Due to its strategic importance, it was administered by British Political Agent. ... Epic Siege of Skardu. Maj Sher Jung Thapa, 2IC, 6 JAK, ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Operations In Jammu Amp Kashmir 1947-48
    ... SKARDU. THE SIEGE BEGINS. BRIGADIER FAQIR SINGH AMBUSHED. DISASTER AT KARGIL. DRAS FALLS TO THE RAIDERS. THE FALL OF SKARDU. CONCLUSION. 279. 280. 282. 285. 287.
  32. [32]
    The Hero of Skardu – Indian Army - Bharat-Rakshak.com
    One such heroic tale is of late Brigadier Sher Jung Thapa, MVC. But for his siege of Skardu in the Ladakh region of Kashmir for over six months, Ladakh might ...Missing: phase | Show results with:phase
  33. [33]
    Independent India's first war: The Gilgit-Skardu saga of 1947-48
    Nov 7, 2023 · Defence of Skardu: The aviators pitch in Skardu, the second largest town in Baltistan, was defended by a small force of the Gilgit Scouts and ...
  34. [34]
    The Historical Shaping of Gilgit-Baltistan - Daily Excelsior
    Dec 23, 2024 · On August 14, 1948, after an intense final assault, Skardu fell. Colonel Thapa and his men were captured. This decisive victory allowed Pakistan ...
  35. [35]
    A Historical Analysis of India's Miscalculations on Gilgit Baltistan
    Oct 20, 2021 · ... Scouts attack. Irrespective of what could have been done, the fact remains that legally, Gilgit and Baltistan was returned by the British to ...
  36. [36]
    The politics, military tactics & geography behind how Pakistan won ...
    Aug 30, 2019 · The original Himalayan blunder was committed as much by the Kashmir forces as by the Indian Army and India's political leadership.
  37. [37]
    Facts that Led to the Creation of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (West ...
    Fall of Skardu threatened Kargil and Leh, for which Indian Army had to mount attacks, including to securing Zoji La, with more loss of lives. During the ...
  38. [38]
    Remembering the defenders of Skardu! - Daily Excelsior
    Aug 13, 2015 · Thus, the Skardu garrison found itself in dire straits with more than 800 people to be fed from a ration for 80 and little hope of rescue.Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Chitral's Role In The Liberation Of Gilgit-Baltistan - The Friday Times
    Nov 24, 2021 · The bulk of the Chitral State Forces (the Mehtar's Bodyguard and the Chitral Scouts) had crossed over the Shandur and based themselves at Yasin.Missing: strength | Show results with:strength
  40. [40]
    Ghazi Rakin Gul, a Mujahid from Chitral hoisted National Flag on ...
    Nov 3, 2019 · Mr. Liaquat Ali elder son writes his memoires with all that he said about holy war for liberation of Skardu in August 1948. Our group of 400 ...
  41. [41]
    GB's struggle - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
    Nov 1, 2022 · On Nov 1, 1947, the Gilgit Scouts overthrew the government of Kashmir's Dogra ruler. The Gilgit Scouts, a local paramilitary force, were ...Missing: perspective | Show results with:perspective
  42. [42]
    The Original Himalayan Blunder: How India Lost Gilgit-Baltistan
    Oct 10, 2015 · Go and check world' military history, Siege of Skardu is second longest siege, comes only after siege of Stalingrad. After more than 275 ...Missing: primary sources
  43. [43]
    Decision Making in War: Recalling India's Military History
    Dec 5, 2021 · Even the best of militaries require clear strategic guidance and this is a vital task for the political leadership of the time. Military history ...
  44. [44]
    Brig Sher Jung Thapa MVC - Honourpoint
    Sher Jung Thapa was ordered to take charge of the remaining 6th Infantry at Skardu, and was promoted to lieutenant colonel. He left Leh on 23 November and ...Missing: isolated | Show results with:isolated
  45. [45]
    War Heroes | District Kangra, Government of Himachal Pradesh | India
    ... Indian Army's second highest gallantary award, the Mahavir Chakra (MVC).On 11 February 1948, Skardu was attacked and surrounded by the enemy of ...