Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Student orientation

Student orientation refers to a transitional program conducted by universities and colleges to familiarize incoming students, particularly first-year undergraduates, with institutional policies, academic resources, facilities, and social expectations before the formal start of classes. These programs typically span one to several days and encompass activities such as guided tours, sessions for course registration, presentations on student conduct codes, and interactive sessions to foster peer connections and a of belonging. Originating in the late through initiatives like those of campus Young Men's Christian Associations , which aimed to support welfare amid rapid enrollment growth, orientation evolved from informal receptions to structured events by the early , with formalized courses appearing as early as at institutions like . Empirical studies indicate that well-designed orientations enhance retention and academic persistence by addressing adjustment challenges, such as building social networks and clarifying expectations, though effectiveness varies with program depth and delivery mode, including online formats. While primarily informational, some orientations have drawn criticism for incorporating mandatory sessions on ideological topics—such as or political viewpoints—potentially resembling coercive thought reform rather than neutral acclimation, raising concerns about free expression and institutional bias in settings where left-leaning perspectives predominate. Formats differ globally, from rigorous physical challenges in programs like Indonesia's OSPEK to conversational seminars in liberal arts colleges, reflecting cultural adaptations but consistently prioritizing practical over abstract .

Definition and Terminology

Core Concepts and Variations

Student orientation constitutes a foundational transitional program in , designed to acquaint incoming students with institutional policies, academic expectations, resources, and peer networks, thereby mitigating initial adjustment challenges. These initiatives, often mandatory for first-year undergraduates, emphasize practical acclimation through guided activities that foster familiarity with daily operations and reduce early risks, as evidenced by participation rates exceeding 90% at many U.S. institutions where orientations precede fall semesters. At its core, the program integrates administrative functions such as course registration and ID issuance with educational components like sessions and policy briefings on conduct codes, health services, and financial aid processes. Social elements, including icebreakers and group outings, complement these to build , with empirical indicating that structured peer interactions during correlate with higher first-semester retention by up to 10-15% compared to non-participants. Variations emerge in program scope and delivery: short-format sessions (1-2 days) focus on logistics at commuter colleges, while extended models (3-7 days) at residential universities incorporate overnight stays and team-building exercises to deepen immersion. Delivery modalities further diversify orientations, with in-person formats yielding superior student satisfaction scores (averaging 4.2/5) over alternatives (3.5/5), per surveys of over 1,000 participants, due to enhanced relational opportunities absent in remote setups. approaches, accelerated post-2020, blend online modules for flexibility with on-site events, particularly benefiting or non-traditional students who comprise 20-30% of enrollees at select public universities. Internationally, programs adapt to cultural contexts; for example, European orientations prioritize academic seminars over social rites, contrasting U.S. emphases on extracurricular integration, while some Asian institutions integrate familial involvement in multi-day events. Tailored variants for subpopulations—such as graduate-specific sessions emphasizing research protocols or modules on compliance—address unique needs, with data from 65 U.S. four-year colleges showing 60% offering differentiated tracks to boost inclusivity. Student orientation programs primarily serve as short-term introductions to institutional policies, navigation, and basic academic procedures, typically spanning one to seven days before the academic term begins, in contrast to broader student initiatives that extend over weeks or months to support ongoing retention, skill development, and personalized integration into life. For instance, orientation sessions often focus on immediate tasks like course registration and resource overviews, while incorporates follow-up mentoring and progress monitoring to address barriers to persistence. Unlike first-year experience (FYE) courses or programs, which are structured academic interventions—frequently offered for credit and spanning the entire freshman year to build competencies in areas such as , college-level study habits, and career —student remains non-credit-bearing and preparatory, emphasizing one-off exposure to university expectations rather than sustained curricular support. Orientation thus functions as an entry point within larger FYE frameworks but lacks the longitudinal evaluation and skill-assessment components typical of FYE, which have been linked to improved GPA and retention rates in empirical studies. Student orientation also diverges from welcome weeks or frosh weeks, which extend beyond administrative into predominantly and extracurricular , often commencing after students have settled into and featuring peer-led , performances, and informal networking to foster community ties rather than formal policy dissemination. While some institutions blend these—such as designating frosh week as student-union organized with a heavier emphasis on festivities—traditional orientation prioritizes mandatory informational modules on topics like and health services, distinguishing it from the optional, celebratory nature of welcome programming.

Historical Development

Origins in Early Higher Education

In medieval European universities, such as the in the 15th century, incoming students—often as young as 14—underwent informal initiations that served as precursors to modern orientation by enforcing hierarchy and familiarizing novices with institutional norms, though these frequently involved rituals like donning monstrous costumes, enduring verbal insults, hair-pulling, and mock executions before purchasing wine for seniors. Similar practices at the prohibited violence against freshmen in communal spaces, indicating widespread peer-led acclimation efforts amid strict daily schedules of lectures, prayers, and prohibitions on or excessive . These rituals, documented in texts like the Manuale scholarium, emphasized subservience to upperclassmen and integration into faculty nations, reflecting causal pressures from small, homogeneous student bodies where survival in a rough demanded quick . In early American , —established in 1636—pioneered rudimentary orientation by assigning experienced upperclassmen to guide new entrants through campus transitions and rites of passage, which included elements later viewed as to build resilience and camaraderie among predominantly local, religiously homogeneous students. By the late , as enrollments expanded and student diversity increased, Harvard formalized faculty involvement in addressing freshman-specific administrative and adjustment needs, a model adopted by other institutions to mitigate attrition from unfamiliar academic rigor. Parallel student-initiated efforts emerged through campus Young Men's Christian Associations (YMCAs) starting in the late , where members organized events to support incoming freshmen, prioritizing organizational welfare, peer fellowship, and moral guidance amid growing secular influences on campuses. These voluntary programs, driven by undergraduates rather than administrators, focused on practical acclimation—such as navigating dormitories and classes—laying empirical foundations for later structured orientations by demonstrating that proactive reduced and improved retention in expanding colleges.

Expansion in the 20th Century

The expansion of student orientation programs in the 20th century was driven by rising college enrollments, the need for structured socialization amid growing institutional scale, and contributions from student organizations like the YMCA and YWCA. Following the first formal program at Boston University in 1888, adoption accelerated in the early decades; by 1912, YMCA associations operated on approximately 80% of U.S. campuses, providing handbooks, receptions, and settlement assistance to incoming freshmen. These efforts evolved from evangelical student-led initiatives—such as the YMCA's Fall Campaign formalized around 1889, which greeted arrivals at train stations and oriented them to campus life—into more comprehensive activities, including freshman camps introduced in 1926 at the University of Illinois and soon adopted elsewhere. By 1925, over 25 colleges offered dedicated orientation courses, with roles like Directors of Orientation emerging to coordinate them. The saw further formalization, as programs shifted from ad hoc faculty or peer efforts to administratively managed events like Freshman Week, first implemented at the in 1923 and at in 1927. Over 100 institutions had established such programs by the 1940s, reflecting broader administrative specialization amid steady enrollment growth from the late onward. This era emphasized acclimating students to academic routines, housing, and social norms, often through handbooks expanding from brief guides in the 1880s to over 100-page volumes by the . The first national conference of orientation directors, held December 6-7, 1948, in , with 24 delegates from six states, addressed aims and objectives, signaling a push for shared techniques as became integral to admissions and retention. Post-World War II expansion was particularly pronounced, fueled by the of 1944, which spurred a surge in enrollments—from about 1.5 million students in 1940 to 2.7 million by 1950—necessitating scaled programs to facilitate transitions for diverse, often older veterans. The 1950s brought greater structure, with first-year courses supplanting some freshman weeks, while the 1960s introduced pre-college elements like peer mentoring in small groups. By the 1970s, amid further diversity increases and legislative shifts like the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (), which curtailed parental data access, orientations emphasized student autonomy and retention, culminating in the National Orientation Directors Association's incorporation in 1977. The 1980s and 1990s standardized practices through bodies like the Council for the Advancement of Standards (1979 onward), incorporating retention metrics, parent sessions, and early technology such as VHS-based virtual orientations at the , as programs addressed nontraditional and transfer students comprising up to 60% of four-year graduates.

Contemporary Evolution and Standardization

In the decades following the mid-20th century expansion, student orientation programs underwent significant evolution, incorporating , psychological support, and retention-focused elements alongside traditional academic and administrative guidance. By the , orientations had transformed into multifaceted experiences blending rigorous academic with social and cultural acclimation, often resembling intensive boot camps that addressed students' shifting life circumstances, such as increased and demands. This shift responded to empirical observations of higher 's role in mitigating early , with programs extending durations—such as from two days to two weeks at some institutions—and emphasizing community building to foster long-term engagement. Into the , orientations increasingly integrated and data-driven approaches, prioritizing measurable outcomes like enrollment persistence and sense of belonging, particularly as first-year retention rates became key institutional metrics. The accelerated hybrid and virtual formats, prompting reevaluations to enhance peer connections and combat , with satisfaction rates rebounding to pre-pandemic levels by 2023 among in-person participants (around 80% at four-year institutions). However, some evolutions, including mandatory diversity or sessions introduced in the (e.g., probing personal attitudes on sensitive topics), have faced scrutiny for veering into ideological conditioning rather than neutral transition support, potentially alienating students without proven causal benefits for academic success. Standardization emerged as a counterbalance to these variations, driven by professional bodies establishing benchmarks for program quality and assessment. The Council for the Advancement of Standards in () published dedicated guidelines for new student orientation programs, outlining criteria for mission alignment, diversity responsiveness, and ethical practices, which institutions adopted for self-evaluation starting in the early 2000s. The National Orientation Directors Association (NODA), formalized in but influential in contemporary frameworks, disseminated these standards and promoted evidence-based techniques, such as longitudinal evaluations of program impacts on transition metrics. By the 2010s, over 1,000 institutions referenced protocols in program audits, fostering uniformity in components like and family involvement while allowing flexibility for institutional contexts, though adherence varies and lacks universal enforcement. This standardization has correlated with improved program efficacy in targeted areas, such as reducing first-semester dropout rates by facilitating structured peer networks, per institution-specific longitudinal data.

Core Purposes and Objectives

Academic and Administrative Integration

Student orientation programs facilitate administrative integration by guiding participants through essential processes, such as obtaining student identification cards, setting up campus email accounts, and completing financial aid paperwork, which collectively ensure compliance with institutional policies and timely to services. These sessions, often conducted in the first 1-3 days of arrival, address bureaucratic hurdles that could otherwise delay academic starts; for instance, a 2021 study of first-year students found that orientation-assisted registration reduced scheduling errors by providing hands-on support from , minimizing conflicts in prerequisites and credit loads. Administrative components also cover , health services registration, and parking permits, with programs at two-year colleges emphasizing these to accommodate commuter populations who face heightened logistical challenges. Academic integration within orientation emphasizes familiarization with requirements, selection, and learning resources, typically through workshops led by advisors who outline general credits, elective options, and progression timelines. Participants engage in mock advising sessions or group consultations, where advisors review transcripts and recommend initial course loads—evidence from programs indicates that such proactive guidance during orientation correlates with higher first-semester enrollment rates in foundational courses, as students avoid under- or over-loading credits that could lead to . For example, orientations at public two-year institutions often integrate academic planning with registration, enabling 80-90% of attendees to finalize schedules on-site, thereby bridging the gap between high school advising and university-level . This phase counters common pitfalls like misunderstanding credit transfer equivalencies, particularly for transfer students, by providing direct interaction with or department representatives. While administrative and academic elements of orientation yield immediate practical benefits, empirical assessments reveal mixed long-term impacts on integration, with retention gains more attributable to follow-up advising than one-off sessions; a review of orientation data notes that technical tasks like registration achieve high completion rates (over 95% in structured programs) but require reinforcement to sustain academic momentum. Institutions prioritizing these components, such as those aligning orientation with intrusive advising models, report reduced dropout in the first term due to fewer procedural dropouts, though causal links weaken without ongoing support structures. Overall, these integrations serve as foundational , empirically easing the causal pathway from admission to productive enrollment by mitigating information asymmetries inherent in large-scale systems.

Social and Psychological Adjustment

Student orientation programs aim to mitigate the psychological stressors of the college transition, including heightened anxiety, risk, and adjustment disorders, by introducing mechanisms, resources, and resilience-building exercises. Incoming students often experience elevated stress from academic demands and separation from familiar support systems, with first-year anxiety prevalence reaching up to 55% in some cohorts. Orientation activities, such as workshops on time management and emotional regulation, target these issues by normalizing transitional challenges and connecting students to counseling services early. Socially, orientations facilitate through peer-led group events, club fairs, and collaborative tasks that encourage bonding and reduce , countering the interpersonal deficits linked to poor outcomes. These elements promote a sense of belonging, which empirical data associate with lower dropout intentions and sustained engagement; for example, overnight programs have demonstrated enhanced persistence via early social ties. Blended or in-person modalities further amplify connectedness, as participants report stronger perceived post-orientation compared to non-participants. Research on specialized formats, like outdoor orientations, reveals causal links to improved psychological and reduction, with participants showing gains in and interpersonal resilience that persist into the semester. However, efficacy varies by program design; sessions explicitly addressing , such as those on substance resistance and life balance, yield measurable declines in anxiety metrics. Overall, these components align with causal pathways where proactive social exposure buffers against the 32% median anxiety rate among undergraduates, fostering adaptive behaviors over time.

Long-Term Retention and Success Goals

Student orientation programs aim to enhance long-term retention by equipping participants with foundational skills and connections that promote persistence through completion. Retention in this context refers to the proportion of first-year students returning for subsequent terms, with national U.S. averages hovering around 70-80% from first to second year, though varying by institution type. Programs target this by addressing early attrition risks, such as academic underpreparedness and , which empirical analyses link to dropout rates exceeding 30% in the first year at many four-year institutions. A quantitative of orientation completers found they achieved higher cumulative GPAs and rates compared to non-participants, suggesting an associative boost in academic trajectory. Success goals extend beyond retention to encompass measurable outcomes like timely and post-graduation . Orientations often incorporate modules on time management, study strategies, and career , posited to cultivate habits that correlate with higher six-year rates, which stand at approximately 63% nationally for public four-year colleges. Research on orientations indicates positive effects on term-to-term persistence, with one analysis attributing a 7% retention increase to mandatory sessions that improved . Similarly, evaluations of first-year seminars integrated into orientations report correlations with elevated GPAs and reduced , though causal links require controlling for self-selection biases in attendance. Mechanistically, these programs foster enduring networks and institutional commitment, which longitudinal data tie to sustained engagement. Peer mentoring during orientation, for instance, builds that buffers against later stressors, with studies showing participants 10-15% more likely to utilize resources over time. However, effectiveness hinges on program design; short, informational sessions yield weaker long-term impacts than those emphasizing skill-building and follow-up, as evidenced by persistence rate disparities across delivery methods. While not panaceas—external factors like financial aid exert stronger influences—orientations contribute incrementally to success by aligning early experiences with institutional expectations.

Typical Components and Formats

Pre-Arrival and In-Person Activities

Pre-arrival activities in student orientation programs typically involve preparatory steps to facilitate smooth transition to life, such as completing checklists for registration, financial verification, and housing assignments. Students are often required to submit required documents like immunizations and set up security measures, such as two-factor authentication systems, before arrival. These measures aim to reduce administrative burdens during in-person sessions and allow students to focus on acclimation. Many universities offer optional pre-arrival programs, including workshops on resources, projects, and peer presentations to build early connections and confidence. For instance, programs may feature small-group sessions for outdoor adventures or acclimation activities to foster relationships among incoming students prior to physical arrival. International students frequently participate in targeted pre-arrival sessions addressing visa compliance, cultural adjustment, and academic expectations through question-and-answer formats with current students. In-person activities commence upon students' arrival, often spanning one to two days immediately before the academic term, and include guided tours to familiarize participants with facilities, libraries, and administrative buildings. These sessions typically incorporate meetings where students select courses, review degree requirements, and register for classes under faculty or advisor guidance. Orientation leaders, often upper-class peers, lead group icebreakers such as photo scavenger hunts or team-building exercises to encourage and reduce isolation. Additional in-person components involve presentations on policies, protocols, and available services like counseling and centers, enabling students to identify support networks early. Many programs include opportunities to join clubs, attend meet-and-greets, and participate in hall activities, with some providing overnight stays in dormitories to simulate daily routines. Practical tasks, such as obtaining IDs and completing remaining paperwork, are handled on-site to streamline . Variations exist by institution, with larger universities emphasizing logistical efficiency while smaller ones prioritize personalized interactions.

Virtual and Hybrid Elements

Virtual elements in student orientation programs encompass asynchronous online modules, interactive webinars, virtual campus tours, and self-paced videos covering academic policies, registration processes, and campus resources. These components emerged prominently in following the , which necessitated remote for incoming students in 2020, with many institutions retaining them for and cost efficiency. models integrate these digital features with limited in-person sessions, such as optional meetups or peer-led events, to accommodate diverse student needs including commuters, students, and those in fully online degree programs. Empirical data indicate mixed outcomes for virtual orientations. A study of online students at a U.S. institution reported a 7% retention increase from fall to spring after mandatory online orientation implementation, attributed to improved familiarity with course navigation and support systems. Similarly, completion of self-paced online modules has been linked to students' self-reported better preparation for online coursework, with participants demonstrating higher confidence in time management and technical skills post-orientation. However, satisfaction rates lag behind in-person formats; only 55% of four-year college students rated virtual orientations as good or excellent, compared to 80% for in-person, potentially due to reduced opportunities for real-time social interaction. Hybrid approaches seek to mitigate these gaps by blending modalities, fostering social connectedness through combined online forums and brief in-person activities. One of first-year students found blended orientations positively influenced perceived social ties, though quantitative persistence rates varied by institution. In terms of wellness, a hybrid program for counseling students showed no overall self-efficacy gains but increases in 89% of participants' scores or stability, alongside modest rises in social and emotional domains. Despite these benefits, highlights causal challenges: virtual elements excel in scalability for large cohorts—serving thousands without venue constraints—but may underperform in building causal pathways to long-term absent follow-up in-person reinforcement. Ongoing trends as of 2025 emphasize data-driven in designs, such as AI-tailored content, to enhance for underrepresented groups facing access barriers.

Peer-Led and Faculty Involvement

Peer-led elements in student orientation programs typically involve upper-year students serving as mentors, guides, or facilitators who conduct tours, lead activities, and provide informal advice on academic and adjustment. These roles leverage the relatability of peers, as shows students often peer leaders more than for fostering during the to . Empirical studies demonstrate that such increases first-year students' sense of belonging and inclusion, with trained peer-mentors contributing to a more supportive atmosphere that reduces early dropout risks. For instance, peer interactions in orientation have been linked to improved cognitive and , as peers model successful of life. Faculty involvement complements peer efforts by emphasizing academic expectations and direct engagement, such as through welcome addresses, course previews, or question-and-answer sessions that clarify demands and study habits. Participation by in these programs delivers high-impact messaging on institutional values and learning strategies, which orientation professionals identify as essential for orienting students beyond social aspects. Studies affirm that informal faculty-student interactions during orientation build early relational ties, correlating with sustained engagement and retention by signaling academic support availability. This involvement is deemed critical, as presence humanizes the and addresses potential mismatches in student expectations versus realities, though implementation varies by size and resources. The between peer and roles enhances overall program efficacy, with peers handling relational and experiential guidance while provide authoritative academic insights, together mitigating and promoting persistence. Quantitative analyses of efficacy, including retention metrics, support this division, showing combined approaches yield better adjustment outcomes than isolated efforts. However, effectiveness depends on training quality for peers and buy-in, as untrained participants may dilute intended benefits.

Empirical Evidence on Effectiveness

Key Studies on Retention and Engagement

A study at a technology-focused college analyzed data from 1,505 first-year students across 2018 and 2019 cohorts, finding that retained students attended significantly more orientation sessions (mean 3.56–3.79) than those who departed (mean 2.66–2.97), with p < 0.001 via t-tests. Logistic regression indicated that attendance at specific sessions, such as Step 1 (odds ratio 2.22–2.79, p < 0.001) and Block 3 (odds ratio 1.55–2.13, p < 0.001–0.023), increased retention odds, alongside higher first-semester GPAs (2.49 vs. 1.99, p < 0.001) and co-curricular involvement (1.84 vs. 1.26 memberships, p < 0.001) for those attending over 50% of sessions. Overall first-to-second semester retention was 79.5%, and first-to-second year was 63%. At a rural Kentucky community college, a 2010 cohort analysis of 296 first-time, full-time students showed academic orientation program (AOP) attendees had 93% term-to-term persistence versus 84% for non-attendees (p = 0.009) and 73% retention versus 62% (p = 0.049), with linear regressions confirming positive effects (β = 0.100 for retention, β = 0.127 for persistence). No significant differences emerged in GPA, credit hours, or credentials earned. A quantitative analysis at Minnesota State University, Mankato compared on-campus and online orientations for first-year students from 2021–2023, revealing 82.6% fall-to-fall persistence for on-campus attendees (N = 2,034) versus 76.2% for online-only (N = 2,482), with logistic regression yielding an odds ratio of 1.481 (p < 0.001). Completion of more online modules correlated positively with persistence, though effect size was weak (phi = -0.074). In a pilot for online courses, face-to-face orientation yielded 91% retention (32/35 attendees) versus under 18% (6/29 non-attendees), with p = 0.9143, attributing gains to built learning communities and social support. Qualitative interpretive phenomenological analysis of first-year residential students at small private institutions identified orientation's role in fostering sense of belonging, peer connections, and transition confidence, themes linked to enhanced engagement and persistence into the sophomore year. Non-attendees showed lower retention (e.g., 60% in one cohort), while overall rates hovered around 80–82% for attendees. Related meta-analyses on first-year seminars, which often incorporate orientation elements, report small positive effects on one-year retention (δ = 0.11, k = 195, N = 169,666), though effects vary by program type and institution, suggesting modest overall influence rather than transformative impact.

Metrics of Success and Causal Factors

The primary metrics evaluating the effectiveness of student orientation programs center on retention and persistence rates, particularly first-to-second-year continuation at the institution. Studies consistently report associations between orientation attendance and elevated retention, though often correlational rather than causal due to self-selection among participants. For example, analysis of 1,505 first-year undergraduates at the (2018–2019 cohorts) found retained students attended a mean of 3.56 orientation session blocks compared to 2.80 for those who departed (t=6.673, p<0.001), with logistic regression showing attendance in initial program blocks raising fall-to-spring retention odds by 2.22 times (p<0.001) and fall-to-second-year odds by 1.63 times (p=0.004). In another case, mandating an asynchronous virtual orientation for online learners at increased fall-to-spring retention from 88% (2016–2017 cohorts, n=129 per year) to 95% (2018 cohort). Broader reviews rank orientation among high-impact retention strategies, with institutions emphasizing it achieving notable persistence gains, though pre-1980s data like lack modern controls for confounders such as demographics or pre-entry preparation. Secondary metrics include academic outcomes like grade-point average (GPA), credit accumulation, and degree completion, alongside psychosocial indicators such as sense of belonging and engagement. Orientation-linked advising has yielded statistically significant first-semester GPA improvements and higher credits earned in subsequent terms, per evaluations of proactive models involving faculty monitoring and skill workshops. Self-reported data from large surveys indicate 73% of attendees view orientations positively for transition support, correlating with reduced early withdrawals. Causal factors driving these metrics involve program elements promoting integration per , including multi-session formats covering academic advising, registration, and social events to foster institutional fit. Attendance in comprehensive blocks—encompassing peer interactions and expectation-setting—shows strongest associations with persistence, as fragmented participation yields weaker odds ratios. integration enhances retention across 17 analyzed programs by building community and reducing isolation, particularly for first-generation or underrepresented students, while also boosting completion rates in 5 cases. , with sustained faculty-student contact and nonacademic supports like time management training, causally links to better persistence via randomized trials, though single-institution studies predominate and may inflate effects due to institutional incentives. Experimental evidence remains limited, highlighting risks of overattributing outcomes to orientation amid confounding variables like socioeconomic status.

Limitations in Research Findings

Research on the effectiveness of student orientation programs in improving retention, engagement, and academic success often relies on correlational designs rather than randomized controlled trials, making it difficult to establish causality. Self-selection bias is a pervasive issue, as participants who attend orientations tend to be more motivated or academically prepared than non-attendees, inflating apparent benefits independent of the program itself. For instance, studies frequently compare voluntary enrollees to non-participants without adequately controlling for preexisting differences in student background or psychological attributes. Confounding variables further undermine findings, including uncontrolled factors such as family support, work commitments, socioeconomic status, and concurrent interventions like academic advising, which may independently influence outcomes. Many analyses struggle to statistically isolate orientation's isolated impact amid these influences, as noted in reviews highlighting the complexity of social connections and individual differences. Additionally, external disruptions, such as the shift to online formats during the in 2020, introduce variability that retrospective studies cannot fully disentangle from program effects. Sample sizes and scopes are often limited, with much evidence drawn from single institutions or small cohorts—such as one rural community college study involving 296 students over two years—restricting generalizability across diverse higher education contexts. Longitudinal data tracking long-term retention (beyond the first year) remains scarce, with many evaluations relying on short-term or cross-sectional measures like immediate satisfaction surveys rather than sustained academic performance. Measurement challenges persist, including reliance on self-reported data prone to social desirability bias and imprecise attendance tracking (e.g., via card swipes without verifying engagement). These limitations collectively suggest that while orientation programs correlate with positive metrics, rigorous evidence of causal efficacy is inconclusive, warranting caution in attributing retention gains solely to such initiatives. Future research requires quasi-experimental approaches, larger multi-institutional samples, and controls for selection effects to better isolate true impacts.

Criticisms and Controversies

Ideological Content and Indoctrination Risks

Critics contend that student orientations frequently embed ideological content through mandatory sessions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), presenting progressive viewpoints on topics such as systemic racism, microaggressions, and gender identity as unquestioned truths, potentially fostering indoctrination rather than open inquiry. A 2022 analysis of 55 U.S. college orientations found that approximately 70% of materials focused on DEI-related themes, including bias training and anti-racism workshops, with limited emphasis on academic skills or neutral integration topics. Specific examples include 's required DEI orientation module covering privilege and intersectionality, and 's mandatory viewing of the "Blue Eyed" film on racism awareness during freshman events, which employs confrontational exercises to challenge participants' beliefs. These sessions often occur in group settings with peer facilitators, amplifying social pressure to conform without opportunities for dissent or exposure to counterarguments. The risks of indoctrination arise from the one-sided presentation of contested social theories, which may precondition students to view disagreement as moral failing or bias, thereby chilling free expression early in their college experience. Reports indicate that such trainings correlate with heightened perceptions of ubiquitous discrimination among participants, potentially exacerbating division rather than promoting empirical understanding of campus dynamics. For instance, a Speech First study of 248 institutions revealed widespread DEI requirements integrated into orientations and general education, framing ideological conformity as a graduation prerequisite and limiting viewpoint diversity. Critics, including free speech advocates, argue this mirrors thought reform techniques by leveraging authority figures and group dynamics to shift beliefs, particularly vulnerable among impressionable freshmen separated from prior support networks. Empirical concerns are compounded by academia's documented left-leaning bias, which influences orientation content toward uncritical endorsement of progressive frameworks without balancing evidence from alternative perspectives, such as evolutionary psychology or classical liberal critiques of identity politics. While proponents claim these sessions build inclusivity, surveys post-orientation show subsets of students reporting discomfort or self-censorship on political topics, suggesting unintended conformity effects. Absent rigorous, peer-reviewed evaluations isolating causal impacts, the prevalence of mandatory ideological elements raises questions about whether orientations prioritize institutional agendas over individual critical thinking development.

Practical Shortcomings and Subgroup Disparities

Practical shortcomings of student orientation programs include information overload from condensed sessions that attempt to cover administrative logistics, academic policies, and campus resources in limited timeframes, often leading to diminished retention of key details among participants. For instance, multi-day in-person orientations can exhaust attendees with repetitive presentations and mandatory activities, reducing engagement as students prioritize social bonding over substantive learning. Online formats exacerbate these issues by struggling to foster genuine peer connections, with studies noting lower interaction levels compared to hybrid or in-person models due to technical barriers like inadequate device compatibility or absence of real-time feedback mechanisms. Additionally, failure to update content regularly results in outdated information on policies or technology, undermining program utility; one analysis of community college orientations found that unrefreshed materials correlated with student confusion on enrollment processes. Subgroup disparities manifest in uneven program effectiveness, particularly for first-generation students who often enter with less familiarity of higher education norms, leading to lower perceived value from generic orientations that emphasize procedural details over navigational guidance. A study of first-generation community college students revealed that standard orientations inadequately addressed their unique barriers, such as decoding implicit academic expectations, resulting in heightened anxiety and reduced initial GPA compared to continuing-generation peers. International students face additional hurdles, including cultural mismatches in program design; for example, sessions on U.S. classroom etiquette are frequently superficial, leaving participants overwhelmed by unaddressed differences in communication styles and individualism, which contribute to isolation during the critical first weeks. Separate orientations for racial minorities, intended to build support networks, have been critiqued for inadvertently promoting segregation by limiting cross-group interactions, with enrollment data from community colleges showing Black and Hispanic students participating at rates 10-15% lower than White students in general programs, potentially exacerbating feelings of exclusion. Empirical retention analyses indicate these groups experience smaller gains from orientation—e.g., first-generation and underrepresented minority students show only marginal improvements in persistence rates (around 2-5%) versus 7-10% for others—attributable to insufficient tailoring for socioeconomic or cultural capital deficits.

Economic and Resource Critiques

Orientation programs impose direct financial burdens on students through mandatory fees, often ranging from $50 to $200 or more per participant, covering activities, meals, materials, and staffing. These fees, assessed as one-time charges upon enrollment, exclude additional expenses such as travel and lodging for multi-day events, which can exacerbate access barriers for low-income or rural students. At institutions like , the two-day program costs $155, including meals but requiring separate transportation arrangements. Institutions face substantial operational costs, including personnel for facilitation, venue usage, and event logistics, though comprehensive aggregate data remains sparse. In response to fiscal pressures, including post-pandemic budget constraints and enrollment declines, many universities have scaled back programs to mitigate resource strain. For instance, the University of Maryland Baltimore County shortened daily sessions and shifted advising to virtual formats, while Reed College reduced required in-person time to 2-3 sessions per day over five days, relocating non-essential content online. These adjustments reflect critiques of inefficiency, where extended on-campus events demand disproportionate staff hours and facilities without proportional gains in student outcomes. Critics argue that orientation spending represents an opportunity cost, diverting funds from high-impact areas like academic advising or financial aid amid broader higher education fiscal scrutiny. Student feedback often highlights perceived low value relative to fees, with complaints of redundant information and minimal long-term utility, such as at where $400+ programs were deemed underwhelming. Broader analyses question non-academic expenditures, including orientations, as contributors to rising tuition and fees without rigorous cost-benefit validation. While some studies claim favorable returns through retention, the absence of standardized economic evaluations limits claims of efficiency, prompting shifts toward hybrid models to lower per-student costs.

Global and Institutional Variations

North American Practices

In the United States, student orientation programs for incoming undergraduates generally occur in late summer, lasting from one to seven days, and focus on practical acclimation to campus environments. These sessions typically include guided campus tours to familiarize students with facilities such as libraries, dining halls, and residence areas; academic advising meetings to assist with course selection and registration; and mandatory information sessions covering institutional policies on conduct, sexual assault prevention, and access to support services like counseling and financial aid. Participation is often required for full-time freshmen, with larger public universities like those in the University of California system hosting multi-day events that integrate peer mentors to lead small-group discussions and icebreaker activities aimed at building early social networks. Community colleges may offer shorter, half-day formats emphasizing transfer pathways and vocational resources, while some institutions have shifted to hybrid models post-2020, combining online modules on academic integrity with in-person social events. Canadian practices, frequently termed "Frosh Week" or "O-Week," mirror U.S. structures but place greater emphasis on peer-driven social integration, particularly at universities like the University of Toronto and McGill, where upper-year student leaders organize events such as barbecues, games, and faculty meet-and-greets to foster a sense of belonging among first-year cohorts. These programs, held in early September, incorporate academic components like workshops on study skills and library use, alongside sessions for international students on immigration regulations and cultural adjustment, with institutions such as the University of Waterloo providing regional transportation for off-campus explorations. Attendance is encouraged but not always mandatory, and recent evolutions have reduced alcohol-centric traditions in favor of inclusive activities, reflecting institutional responses to safety concerns and demographic shifts toward diverse student bodies. Across both countries, orientations increasingly feature digital tools, such as mobile apps for navigation and event scheduling, with surveys from 2023 indicating that 80% of U.S. four-year college students rated in-person orientations positively compared to 55% for virtual alternatives, underscoring preferences for direct interpersonal engagement in building retention-supporting connections. Variations exist by institution type, with private liberal arts colleges prioritizing intellectual discussions and public research universities emphasizing scale through mass convocations, though equity-focused reviews highlight gaps in accessibility for underrepresented groups, prompting recommendations for tailored pre-orientation surveys and feedback mechanisms.

European and Other Western Approaches

In the United Kingdom, student orientation is commonly known as , typically occurring in the week before the academic term begins, with activities centered on campus tours, society fairs, and social events to facilitate integration. Universities such as those in and emphasize practical sessions on academic procedures, student services, and settling into UK life, often including nightlife and club sign-ups that can involve significant alcohol consumption. Continental European universities conduct orientation weeks focused on academic and administrative guidance, such as program briefings, stress management workshops, and departmental meet-and-greets, as seen at institutions like in Germany and the University of Tübingen. In Germany, some high schools offer preliminary orientation semesters for undecided students transitioning to higher education, bridging secondary and tertiary levels. Central European University in Hungary structures its week with initial "Meet and Greet" sessions starting September 1, prioritizing peer and faculty connections. Scandinavian approaches feature structured welcome programs with mentor-led activities, cultural integration events like Swedish fika, sports, and fairs connecting students to unions and services, exemplified by Lund University's orientation weeks and Uppsala's receptions in historic buildings. In Norway, Bergen’s Fadder Week pairs newcomers with mentors for peer support during introductory events. These programs aim to ease transition through social and practical support, often spanning the first semester's start in early September. In Australia, Orientation Week, or O-Week, precedes classes with celebratory events, information sessions, and support services to acquaint students with campus life, as implemented at and the University of Queensland. Universities like and host workshops and activities tailored to faculties, with events running for one to two weeks per semester, emphasizing transition aid for both domestic and international students. Compared to North American models, European and Australian orientations tend toward greater student autonomy and less institutionalized hand-holding, though they similarly prioritize retention through early socialization.

Developing Regions and Adaptations

In developing regions, student orientations often adapt to resource scarcity, large enrollment surges, and entrenched cultural hierarchies, prioritizing peer-led integration over resource-intensive programming common in wealthier nations. Universities in sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, face challenges like overcrowded campuses and limited administrative support, leading to orientations that emphasize basic acclimation to institutional routines and survival skills amid infrastructural deficits. A study on South African higher education highlights seven strategies for enhancement, including structured pre-arrival information and peer mentoring to boost retention rates, which hover around 70-80% for first-year students in such contexts due to socioeconomic barriers. In Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia, orientations known as ospek (orientasi studi dan pengenalan kampus) exemplify cultural adaptations rooted in seniority systems, where senior students guide newcomers through campus navigation, extracurricular recruitment, and social norms, typically spanning one to two weeks at the start of the academic year. However, these programs frequently devolve into hazing rituals involving verbal abuse, physical tasks, and humiliation, reflecting hierarchical traditions dating to the 1950s but resulting in documented harms, including six student deaths from exhaustion or violence between 2010 and 2015. Reforms have been proposed, such as shifting to formalized, faculty-supervised sessions to mitigate risks while preserving adaptive elements like rapid socialization in high-density environments. African adaptations vary by country; in Nigeria, institutions like the University of Lagos conduct multi-day orientations for thousands of freshmen, focusing on academic expectations, registration processes, and anti-corruption sensitization starting April 9, 2025, to address high dropout rates exceeding 30% linked to unpreparedness. Similarly, the integrates orientation from August 27, 2025, with emphasis on campus mapping and support networks to counter regional instability and economic pressures. In India, orientations at public universities like 's involve introductory sessions on July 15, 2006, adapted to massive intakes by leveraging alumni volunteers for logistical efficiency amid funding constraints. These practices underscore causal trade-offs: while cost-effective and culturally resonant, they risk exacerbating subgroup disparities, such as for rural or low-income students, without robust oversight.

Technological and Post-Pandemic Innovations

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual and hybrid formats in student orientation programs, with many institutions shifting from in-person events to online platforms in 2020 to comply with health restrictions and maintain accessibility. By 2021, as campuses reopened, hybrid models persisted, combining live sessions with digital resources to accommodate diverse student needs, such as remote participation for transfer students or those with health concerns, leading to reported improvements in retention rates at community colleges, where first-year persistence rose to around 67% post-2020. These adaptations emphasized data-driven personalization, with online hubs providing timely information via preferred channels like mobile apps and email, fostering virtual communities before physical arrival. Technological tools have enhanced orientation efficiency through dedicated software and mobile applications, enabling interactive schedules, checklists, and navigation aids tailored to individual student profiles. For instance, platforms offering filtered programming and geolocation-based campus mapping allow incoming students to simulate their paths and access resources asynchronously, reducing logistical confusion during move-in. Post-pandemic trends, as of 2023-2024, prioritize inclusivity and engagement via these digital experiences, with institutions using analytics to track participation and refine content, though satisfaction rates for orientations dipped initially during remote phases before rebounding. Emerging innovations include virtual reality (VR) for immersive previews and artificial intelligence (AI) for guided support. A 2020 study on distance education found that VR orientations improved students' knowledge of campus facilities, reduced anxiety, and boosted post-session scores compared to traditional methods, with participants expressing more positive views of the technology. AI agents, deployed in tools like chatbots since around 2019, assist with personalized queries during orientation, streamlining tasks such as course selection and policy navigation without requiring staff intervention, thereby scaling support for large cohorts. These technologies, while promising for engagement, rely on empirical validation from controlled implementations rather than widespread adoption, with VR particularly effective in reducing orientation-related stress in virtual settings.

Emphasis on Mental Health and Resilience

In response to escalating mental health challenges among college students, with over 60% meeting criteria for at least one mental health condition during the 2020–2021 academic year, many universities have integrated dedicated sessions on mental health awareness and resilience-building into orientation programs. These initiatives, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic's exacerbation of anxiety and depression, aim to equip incoming students with coping strategies early in their academic transition. For instance, 's 2025 orientation program featured introductions to campus mental health resources alongside activities fostering gratitude and emotional regulation to promote long-term well-being. Resilience training components, often delivered through workshops or peer-led discussions, emphasize adaptive coping mechanisms such as stress management and problem-solving skills. A 2021 pilot study of training for college student-athletes found it enhanced the use of effective strategies against academic and athletic stressors, with participants reporting sustained benefits in emotional regulation. Similarly, a pragmatic clinical trial of a brief intervention demonstrated reductions in depression and stress levels among undergraduates, particularly those self-reporting high baseline symptoms, with effect sizes indicating clinical relevance (e.g., Cohen's d > 0.5 for stress reduction). Programs like Resilience 101, a five-week tailored for freshmen, have increased participants' knowledge of resilience factors, correlating with lower anxiety scores post-intervention. Outdoor and experiential elements in orientations have also shown promise for bolstering ; a 2018 evaluation of university outdoor programs reported significant pre-post improvements in participants' scores (measured via the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) and overall , attributed to in controlled challenge environments. A 2024 randomized trial of training further confirmed its efficacy in mitigating depressive (F=11.542, p<0.01) and anxiety symptoms (F=13.67, p<0.01) among students, though long-term follow-up data remains limited, suggesting benefits may wane without ongoing support. formats, blending in-person and sessions, yielded mixed outcomes in a 2022 study, with gains in emotional and social domains offsetting minor declines in physical . Despite these findings, causal evidence linking orientation-specific interventions to reduced dropout rates or improved academic persistence is preliminary, as most studies rely on self-reported measures prone to short-term reactivity. Institutions prioritizing these elements, such as through mandatory modules, report higher initial help-seeking behaviors, aligning with broader trends where 70% of students have faced struggles since enrollment. This emphasis reflects a shift toward proactive, evidence-informed programming, though and integration with existing counseling services remain key challenges for efficacy.

Policy Shifts and Backlash Responses

In response to growing criticism of mandatory (DEI) sessions in student orientations, several U.S. states enacted legislation between 2023 and 2025 restricting such programs at public institutions. Florida's Senate Bill 266, signed in May 2023, prohibited the use of state funds for DEI initiatives, leading to the elimination of mandatory orientation components focused on topics like systemic and at universities such as the and . Similarly, Texas's Senate Bill 17, effective January 2024, banned DEI offices and required the removal of ideological training from new student programs, prompting institutions like the to revise orientation agendas to emphasize academic resources over themes. These shifts were driven by concerns that orientations served as vehicles for ideological conformity, as documented in a 2022 Speech First analysis of over 50 programs, which found that 80% included content pressuring students to affirm progressive views on race and sexuality, often at the expense of viewpoint . Federally, the administration's 2025 actions accelerated these changes, with a DOJ memo declaring certain DEI practices, including compulsory orientation workshops on and , unlawful under civil laws, threatening for non-compliant schools. , facing potential loss of billions in , responded by dismantling DEI elements; for instance, in August 2025, multiple institutions in and scaled back orientation requirements, replacing them with optional sessions or neutral informational modules on campus policies. Backlash from advocacy groups like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression () highlighted empirical evidence of , with surveys showing over 60% of freshmen avoiding political discussions post-orientation due to perceived enforcement of orthodoxy. Even private institutions adapted amid legal and reputational pressures; the system eliminated diversity statements in hiring in March 2025, extending scrutiny to practices that mirrored such ideological vetting. Critics, including congressional Republicans, argued these reforms restored orientations to their core purpose of practical acclimation, citing data from pre-DEI eras where dropout rates were comparable without ideological mandates. However, proponents of retained DEI elements claimed the backlash disproportionately affected minority retention, though studies post-reform, such as those tracking in affected states, showed no significant declines in underrepresented student participation. This tension reflects broader causal dynamics, where initial expansions of orientation content correlated with rising campus , prompting evidence-based recalibrations toward neutrality.

References

  1. [1]
    What is College Orientation for First-Year Students?
    Sep 18, 2023 · The purpose of the orientation is to get students acclimated to the campus and to give them a feel for what their first year in college will be ...
  2. [2]
    What Actually Happens During College Orientation? - College Raptor
    Feb 9, 2024 · It typically occurs before the start of the academic year. The purpose is to familiarize incoming students with campus resources, academic ...
  3. [3]
    What is college orientation and how to prepare for it
    May 17, 2023 · College orientation is your introduction to life at university. You'll schedule your classes, meet new classmates, get familiar with campus and visit support ...
  4. [4]
    What Is College Orientation, and How Can Students Prepare?
    Mar 31, 2025 · College orientation is an introductory program designed to help new students transition into college life. It typically takes place before the academic year ...
  5. [5]
    (PDF) The YMCA and the Origins of American Freshman Orientation ...
    ... The history of first-year orientation programs began as early as the late 1870s (Finnegan & Alleman, 2013) . Originating in the campus- ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The YMCA and the Origins of American Freshman Orientation ...
    As early as the late 1870s and motivated to ensure the welfare of their own student organization, members of campus-based Young Men's Christian Associations ...
  7. [7]
    A Student Orientation Program to Build a Community of Learners - NIH
    The entire structure of the new student orientation program was successful, based on our observations and the student evaluations and reflective portfolios of ...
  8. [8]
    ED627726 - The Impact of Orientation Programs on First-Generation ...
    This study examines the impact of online orientation and in-person orientation on first-generation college students' sense of belonging.
  9. [9]
    The Effect of New Student Orientations on the Retention of Online ...
    Research suggests that having an in-depth orientation and onboarding process increases the academic preparedness of online students and, consequently, improves ...
  10. [10]
    How Universities Weaponize Freshman Orientation - National Review
    Jul 15, 2022 · Instead of simply informing students about the resources on campus, orientation can amount to an ideological hazing.
  11. [11]
    FIRE's Guide to First-Year Orientation and Thought Reform on ...
    This guide explains the immoral implications of these orientation sessions for liberty and dignity on college and university campuses.
  12. [12]
    Orientation: Past, present and future | First Things First - U.OSU
    May 17, 2015 · The history of orientation programs dates back to the early days of higher education in the United States. Harvard College, founded in 1636, was ...
  13. [13]
    Student Orientation in Higher Education Institutions - EBSCO
    Student orientation in higher education institutions encompasses a range of activities aimed at helping students transition to college life.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  14. [14]
    Orientation vs Student Onboarding in Higher Education - OptimumHQ
    May 22, 2024 · Student orientation is a short-term, intensive program designed to introduce new students to campus facilities, resources, and basic academic ...Key Takeaways · Defining The Landscape · The Orientation Process
  15. [15]
    Student Orientation Best Practices - Deans Roundtable
    Aug 15, 2024 · Student orientation is a crucial milestone that shapes a student's journey in higher education. For deans and student life professionals, ...8. Foster Community Building · 9. Provide Ongoing Support · 10. Gather Feedback And...
  16. [16]
    The Ultimate Student Orientation Guide for Planning ... - Concept3D
    Aug 27, 2024 · Create a comprehensive student orientation plan. Start with our helpful student orientation guide to logistics, events management, and more.
  17. [17]
    Best Freshman Orientation Programs - College Confidential Forums
    Aug 26, 2019 · Larger schools like UCLA often have multiple orientations spaced out over the summer, which is a very different experience from the entire ...
  18. [18]
    Survey: What college students want from orientation - Inside Higher Ed
    Aug 31, 2023 · Students tend to rate their orientation experiences highly, according to a new Student Voice survey. Yet data suggest modality matters in student satisfaction.Modality Matters · Share Of Students Who... · To Include In New Student...
  19. [19]
    Orientation Is the First Step to Finding Belonging in College. It Is ...
    Jul 18, 2024 · Many colleges and universities are rethinking their freshman orientation programs, adding new options and doing more to help students forge relationships.
  20. [20]
    An Analysis of New Student Orientation Programs at U.S. Four-Year ...
    This study examines new student orientation (NSO) programs of 65 four-year US colleges, with a focus on a subset of 39 colleges offering NSOs with available ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  21. [21]
    Orientation vs. Student Onboarding: Four Questions for ... - Encoura
    Jan 21, 2020 · Orientation is “old school;” onboarding is “new school.” Orientation is a one-time, cohort-level program where students are treated the same.
  22. [22]
    Student onboarding versus student orientation: Lessons from post ...
    Feb 3, 2025 · In sum, the orientation process focuses on how the school can get the student enrolled and in classes. The onboarding process widens that focus ...Missing: distinctions freshman welcome week
  23. [23]
    [PDF] First Year Experience Courses - Institute of Education Sciences
    First year experience courses, also called college success courses, are for first-year students to support academic performance, social development, and degree ...
  24. [24]
    The First Year Experience is about more than first-year student ...
    Sep 24, 2019 · A for-credit first-year experience (FYE) is more than orientation, offering a full curriculum, personal skill-building, and can increase ...
  25. [25]
    Why colleges are paring down new-student orientation
    Sep 7, 2023 · New student orientation satisfaction rates fell early in the pandemic but they're back up, according to Student Voice survey data.
  26. [26]
    Orientation and Welcome Week - Randolph-Macon College
    Welcome Week. Welcome Week starts as New Student Orientation winds down and runs from Saturday, August 30 – Saturday, September 6, 2025. The Student ...Thursday, August 28 · Thursday -- Sunday · Welcome WeekMissing: frosh | Show results with:frosh
  27. [27]
    Welcome Week : Orientation and New Student Programs
    A unique set of in-person events and activities to welcome you and your family to campus, connect with fellow incoming students and their families.
  28. [28]
    Medieval University Life Was Rough—Just Ask the Freshmen
    Feb 19, 2025 · Medieval university life was anything but dull—freshmen endured brutal hazing rituals, public humiliations, and even bizarre traditions ...
  29. [29]
    The YMCA and the Origins of Freshman Orientation Programs
    Apr 1, 2013 · Most insightful historical work pinpoints the rise of freshman orientation programs in the mid 1920s as one instance of administrative ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  30. [30]
    History - NODA
    The first official orientation program for new students in higher education was held at Boston University. By 1925, over twenty-five colleges throughout the ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Designing Successful Transitions: - ERIC
    Orientation programs have made important gains in the last century. Orientation research and best practices have made an impact in higher education by ...
  32. [32]
    As Life Changes, So Does Freshman Orientation
    Aug 28, 1991 · Orientation has evolved into an intense social and intellectual initiation that combines aspects of academic boot camp and cultural finishing school.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The impact of orientation programs on new student engagement and ...
    Apr 7, 2021 · Orientations can focus on community building in addition to helping new students with the shift from high school to college, taking ...
  34. [34]
    Thought Reform 101: The Orwellian implications of today's college ...
    In the early 1990s, Bryn Mawr College shared its mandatory "Building Pluralism" program with any school that requested it. Bryn Mawr probed the most private ...
  35. [35]
    New Student Orientation Programs Standards - CAS
    In stockThis document conveys the set of specific standards and guidelines that apply to this aspect of higher education.
  36. [36]
    CAS Standards - NODA
    NODA provides the latest CAS standards for New Student Orientation Programs and Parent & Family Programs free of charge to our members.Missing: universities | Show results with:universities
  37. [37]
    A Longitudinal Analysis of Standards Used to Evaluate New Student ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · PDF | On Jan 1, 2019, Daniel P. Nadler and others published A Longitudinal Analysis of Standards Used to Evaluate New Student Orientation at ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Student Satisfaction with Orientation: Toward a Framework for ...
    The Council for the Advancement of Standards (CAS) Standards for New Student. Orientation provide a meaningful guide for program development and assessment.
  39. [39]
    Orientation in Two-Year Colleges - NACADA
    Nov 5, 2012 · This outline is provided as a starting point for those charged with developing or revising an orientation program.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Impact Of Orientation Programming On Student Success ...
    There is a need to study programs that increase student success, and new student orientation programs have demonstrated their promise in reducing student ...
  41. [41]
    The First-Year Experience in Two-Year Public Postsecondary ...
    Sep 26, 2018 · ... academic advising and course registration. They often also include ... college orientation course taught by dedicated counselors, small ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The Literature and Data on New Student Orientation
    “Orientation programs are designed to accomplish a wide variety of goals, ranging from the purely social to the technical aspects of registering for classes ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Effectiveness of intrusive advising of engineering first-year students ...
    Mar 13, 2022 · 11* What could we do to improve your knowledge and skills in planning for course registration towards timely ... Academic Advising. Today, 30(3), ...
  44. [44]
    Empirical analysis based on the related factors of college students ...
    Sep 26, 2022 · Interpersonal relationship is one of the important factors affecting college students' mental health. The relationship between interpersonal ...
  45. [45]
    Prevalence of anxiety in college and university students
    The overall prevalence of anxiety among college and university students had a median of 32.00 % and ranged from 7.40 to 55.00%.Review Article · 3. Results · 3.4. Subgroup Analysis
  46. [46]
    [PDF] The Impact of Psychological Adjustment on Private University ... - ERIC
    Oct 16, 2019 · Abstract. The present study examined the impact of psychological adjustment on private university students' academic achievement.
  47. [47]
    The Impact of Social Relationships on College Student Learning ...
    Jun 14, 2023 · Disruptions in social relationships can play a role in mental health distress for college students. Reyes-Portillo and colleagues (2022) find ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Student Orientation Modality on Social Connectedness
    Apr 8, 2025 · This case study looks specifically at how a university's new-student orientation blended modality affects social connectedness as perceived by ...
  49. [49]
    Examining the Impact of a University Outdoor Orientation Program
    Orientation programs are often cited in research as having a significant impact on participants' transition and adjustment to college (Posey et al., 2015; ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Examining the Impact of a University Outdoor Orientation Program
    This study examined the impact of a university outdoor orientation program on participants' transition to higher education.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The Impact of the New Student Orientation Program on the ...
    Apr 5, 2024 · This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the new student orientation program in facilitating their adaptation process and its ...
  52. [52]
    Effects of the positive Interpersonal and life orientation training ...
    Students exposed to a high-level intervention demonstrated an increase in resilience, psychological flourishing, substance resistance self-efficacy, cognitive ...
  53. [53]
    Beyond the first week: sustaining the feeling of social inclusion and ...
    Oct 27, 2024 · Promoting inclusive student communities and a sense of belonging is essential for university students' well-being and mental health.
  54. [54]
    The Impact of New Student Orientation on Student Academic ...
    The study found that students who completed orientation had higher GPA and graduation rates than those who did not, but no difference in withdrawal rates.
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The impact of a freshman orientation program on academic ...
    Dec 13, 2019 · This study provided new information to supplement existing and past literature that indicated support programs were necessary to address.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Grades, Graduation, and Orientation: A Longitudinal Study of How ...
    One of the most popular methods toward increasing retention is to help facilitate student success through freshmen orientation programs (Forrest, 1982).Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  58. [58]
    [PDF] A Quantitative Analysis of University Orientation Persistence Rates
    CAS (2021) explained that orientation programs were around virtually as long as colleges and universities, dating back to the 1640s when Harvard expected ...
  59. [59]
    Tips for Preparing for College Orientation - Office of Admissions
    What to Do Before College Orientation · Register Early · Finish Your Pre-Arrival Checklist · Prepare a List of Preferred Courses · Pack Necessities for Your Trip.
  60. [60]
    What You Need to Know - Orientation & Transition Experiences
    Orientation Overview. Orientation has two major components: Completing your three-part New Student Checklist and attending a two-day, overnight Orientation ...Set Up and Use Duo Security · Required Immunizations... · Summer 2025 Road...
  61. [61]
    New Student To-Do List - New Coug Orientation
    The Pre-Campus Arrival To-Do List should be completed before arriving on campus for your first semester of classes.
  62. [62]
    Pre-arrival Programs | New Student & Family Programs
    It helps ease the first-week nerves by fostering connections and boosting confidence through service projects, campus partner presentations, and workshops.
  63. [63]
    Pre-Welcome Programs - Student Experience – Syracuse University
    Programs offer students the opportunity to meet and connect to fellow new students in small groups. From outdoor adventure to on-campus acclimation,
  64. [64]
    Pre-Arrival Activities - Maryland Global
    You can ask questions such as what it is like to study at UMD, get advice on making the most of your time, and meet current and new students before you arrive ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    College Orientation: 5 Things You Need to Know - Bestcolleges.com
    Jul 22, 2022 · College orientation is a chance for incoming students to explore the campus, meet faculty, and talk to an academic advisor before registering for classes.
  66. [66]
    College orientation ideas, activities and icebreakers - Marq
    Jan 4, 2024 · 5 in-person college orientation ideas · 1. Photo scavenger hunt · 2. Beach ball icebreakers for college students · 3. Insider guide to campus life.
  67. [67]
    8 Tips to Prepare for Freshman Orientation - CollegeData
    Get to know their way around campus; Learn about services and resources provided by the college; Sign up for clubs and activities; Register for fall classes ...
  68. [68]
    Orientation -First Year Students
    On campus housing and meals are provided in the First Year New Student Session. Students will stay in the residence halls and will eat in residential dining ...
  69. [69]
    Freshman Orientation Ideas: Dos & Don'ts + New Student Giveaways
    Aug 20, 2025 · 3. Nail the welcome. Use the word “welcome” on custom printed university signage and make sure the first stop of registration is friendly and ...
  70. [70]
    Orienting Students to Online Learning: A Must for Student Success
    May 12, 2020 · For instance, if students never have to meet synchronously for their online courses, a blended or hybrid orientation may not be effective.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    2025's Top 10 Trends in Student Orientation | GR Tech
    Jan 1, 2025 · During student orientation, students meet faculty, staff, and peers. They learn about campus resources, class schedules, and academic ...1. Community Building And... · 9. Focus On Mental Health... · Frequently Asked Questions
  72. [72]
    [PDF] DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A MANDATORY ONLINE ...
    Results from the implementation indicate that after completing the orientation, students feel they are better prepared for their online courses. This result is ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Assessing Impacts of a Hybrid Orientation on Counseling Students ...
    The study found no significant change in self-efficacy scores after the hybrid orientation, but 89% of participants' scores increased or stayed the same.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] The Effects of a Hybrid Orientation on the Perceived Wellness of ...
    Aug 3, 2022 · Overall wellness decreased slightly, but social, spiritual, and emotional wellness increased after the hybrid orientation.
  75. [75]
    2023's Top 10 Trends In Online Student Orientation
    Jan 10, 2024 · Looking ahead, the trends for 2024 highlight the importance of community building, inclusivity, personalization, data-driven strategies, and ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
  76. [76]
    [PDF] The benefits of peer leader programs: An overview from the literature
    For example, peer mentors who serve first-year students report increased confidence in their ability to manage group dynamics, facilitate learning, and ...Missing: led | Show results with:led
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Promoting Student Success Through Outdoor Orientation Programs
    Apr 20, 2025 · OOPs have been shown to be more effective than traditional orientation programs in fostering student retention, academic success, and social ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Peer-mentorship and first-year inclusion: building belonging in ...
    Nov 7, 2023 · We conclude that training peer-mentors is an effective way to increase awareness and to ensure an inclusive atmosphere during the start of higher education.Missing: led | Show results with:led
  79. [79]
    The benefits of peer leader programs: An overview from the literature
    Aug 9, 2025 · Research has established that peer interactions have a positive impact on learners' cognitive and social experiences as they develop and ...
  80. [80]
    Importance of Faculty Involvement in Orientation
    Jun 1, 2007 · The authors conclude that faculty participation in Orientation is beneficial, possible, and critical. Orientation professionals should seek out ...Missing: freshman studies
  81. [81]
    SIP 10.1 The Faculty Role in New Student Orientation
    Aug 22, 2019 · Faculty can provide students with quality, high-impact messaging that enhances the orientation experience and keeps students learning about how to be ...Missing: freshman | Show results with:freshman
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Retention Principles for New Student Orientation Programs
    The program should allow students and peers to interact and get to know one another and should provide informal interactions between faculty and students. In ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] The freshman year experience: Orientation as a key to retention
    New students see faculty involvement and understand ... Effect of parental participation in freshman orientation programs on perceptions of the university.<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Peer Mentoring for Student Success - APLU
    Research shows that feeling at home on campus and having strong social ties—both fostered by peer mentoring—play an important role in student success. This ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] The efficacy of orientation programming on college student retention ...
    May 1, 2021 · Orientation programming can help students more easily transition to college, make friends, develop a sense of belonging, and be introduced to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  86. [86]
    A systematic review of peer support interventions for student mental ...
    Peer learning and peer mentoring had more positive, significant results reported for the outcomes of anxiety and stress.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] The Impact of Face-to-Face Orientation on Online Retention
    While retention rates vary across programs and courses, many suggest that drop-rates for online courses are 15 – 20% higher than traditional face-to-face ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Do First-Year Seminars Improve College Grades and Retention? A ...
    Meta-analytic results indicate that first-year seminars have a small average effect on both first-year grades (k = 89, N = 52,406, δ = 0.02) and the 1-year ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Advising for College Success: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
    Dec 22, 2022 · The College Completion Network conducted a systematic review of the research on advising strategies that support college completion.
  90. [90]
    Student College Experience Survey: The Top 10 Takeaways
    Nov 10, 2023 · The vast majority (2,802) of the survey's 3,000 two- and four-year respondents attended their new-student orientations, and 73 percent rate ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Impact of an Orientation on Online Students' Course Outcomes - ERIC
    An important limitation persistent among prior studies of online orientation courses is the lack of experimental or quasi-experimental research design. Each ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Outcomes Assessment of an Outdoor Orientation Program Through ...
    evidence that orientation programs increase retention is scarce and often ... Self-selection bias remains a limitation of many outdoor orientation studies ...
  93. [93]
    REPORT: Freshman orientation materials dominated by DEI agenda
    Aug 19, 2022 · Topics included microaggressions, anti-racism, trigger warnings, bias, racial equity, DEI training, and discrimination. Only about 30% of ...
  94. [94]
    Top 10 Woke College Orientation Programs - Dean's List
    Carnegie Mellon University requires all students to complete a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion orientation training module. The module addresses topics ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  95. [95]
    [PDF] NO GRADUATION WITHOUT INDOCTRINATION: - Speech First
    Americans have long sensed that university campuses, once considered to be bastions of free inquiry, have become increasingly enthralled with an ideological.
  96. [96]
    America's DEI colleges get an 'F' on free expression - The Hill
    Jun 4, 2025 · The irony is that the supposed push for “diversity” has reduced diversity of ideas, thus suppressing free expression in classrooms. Students ...
  97. [97]
    New Study Confirms What Common Sense Tells Us About DEI
    Dec 2, 2024 · People subjected to DEI indoctrination become more likely to imagine the presence of bigotry where none exists, more willing to punish those who ...
  98. [98]
    Rescue College Classrooms with the Freedom from Indoctrination Act
    Sep 13, 2023 · This should hedge against the kinds of ideological indoctrination even college administrators might feel shy about letting see the light of day.
  99. [99]
    The Dangerous DEI Bloat at Virginia's Public Universities
    Sep 21, 2023 · Ideological indoctrination is utterly unacceptable at taxpayer-funded universities, and Virginia lawmakers must abolish the DEI bureaucracy ...
  100. [100]
    Reversing the Woke Takeover of Higher Education
    Aug 25, 2023 · DEI indoctrinates students and punishes dissent from a far-left viewpoint orthodoxy. Because critical theorists believe that ongoing prejudice ...
  101. [101]
    11 Student Orientation Mistakes You Must Avoid During Freshman ...
    Feb 9, 2025 · 1. Relying on Outdated Student Orientation Management Methods · 2. Cramming Too Much Information into Marathon Sessions · 3. Neglecting Pre- ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Postsecondary Orientation Practices and Equity Considerations
    This review covers postsecondary orientation value, online/hybrid program considerations, equity, and implementation strategies, including key takeaways and ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] new student orientation programs: understanding the perceptions ...
    Sep 6, 2025 · Orientation programs have been widely used at institutions across the nation and have taken on different shapes and forms to support the mission ...<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    [PDF] First-Generation College Students: - First-Year Challenges - NACADA
    This chapter will examine the student characteristics and issues first-generation students face as they attempt to navigate our institutional cultures and offer ...
  105. [105]
    Rethinking International Student Orientation - Inside Higher Ed
    Nov 25, 2012 · Orientation may include a session on classroom culture but this is not necessarily sufficient or useful when students are overwhelmed and (often) ...Missing: shortcomings | Show results with:shortcomings
  106. [106]
    International Student "Dis"orientation
    Sep 30, 2014 · International student orientation ... The list goes on indefinitely and includes identity issues like individualism as opposed to collectivism.Missing: shortcomings | Show results with:shortcomings
  107. [107]
    Do Minority Orientations Encourage Segregation?
    Sep 4, 1998 · Separate orientation programs for minority students have become fairly common, although they differ widely in scope. At many public institutions ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Differences in Orientation Program Enrollment as a Function of ...
    Examined in this study was the orientation program participation of Black, White, and Hispanic community college students using archival data from the CCSSE.
  109. [109]
    [PDF] A Comparison of Specialized and General Orientation Courses for ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · differences in terms of retention rates and GPA between the two groups ... An ex post facto study of first-year student orientation as an ...
  110. [110]
    First Time In College Student Orientation
    Cost of Orientation. Spring 2026: Students are charged a $35.00 orientation fee which covers materials, staffing, and associated program costs. Summer/Fall ...Missing: average | Show results with:average
  111. [111]
    Registration - ECU Orientation - East Carolina University
    The student fee to attend a two-day orientation is $155. This price includes your ECU 1Card, all activities and program materials, three meals, evening ...
  112. [112]
    New Student Orientation & Transition Programs - Chico State
    How much does Orientation cost? Students can choose to attend Orientation in-person or virtually. In-person Orientation will cost $95 and virtual costs $60.
  113. [113]
    Now why did nobody tell me I have to pay almost $200 for a ... - Reddit
    Nov 22, 2022 · A mandatory orientation that costs hundreds of dollars AND requires me to figure out a transportation plan because the university is 260 miles away (8hr drive!)Why the hell does orientation cost money??? : r/utdallas - Redditwhy is the orientation fee so expensive? : r/UCDavis - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: average | Show results with:average
  114. [114]
    Did anyone feel like orientation was a waste if money ... - Reddit
    Mar 22, 2016 · Orientation is over 400 dollars and I thought the resources weren't very important. Yes it could be argued it gives you a glimpse of the freshman experience, ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  115. [115]
    2024: 5 times wasteful spending drove student fees and tuition higher
    Dec 23, 2024 · Here are five examples of questionable spending by institutions of higher learning. · 1. Report shows UMich spent $100k on DEI Summit, including ...
  116. [116]
    Critics say public universities are spending too much outside the ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · Critics say public universities are spending too much outside the classroom. Some schools say the administrative functions are good for students and faculty.
  117. [117]
    What to Expect at Your US University Orientation - Shorelight
    What does orientation in college mean? This type of program is offered to freshmen and transfer students to make you feel more comfortable at your university.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  118. [118]
    5 Online & Offline Orientation Programs at Prominent U.S. Colleges
    Sep 10, 2024 · US colleges use different orientation methods, ranging from in-person events to online orientation, to help new students get a feel for their new home.
  119. [119]
    University welcome week around the world: Canada - Edvoy
    Dec 4, 2024 · O-Week or Frosh is the Canadian orientation week, aimed to bring students together, provide academic guidance and break the ice.Move-in day · University-wide orientation · Orientation/Frosh leadersMissing: practices | Show results with:practices
  120. [120]
    Belonging over beer: How frosh week is evolving on Canadian ...
    Sep 4, 2025 · This year, the university's two-day central orientation will also include faculty sessions, barbecues, carnival games and a football game. Abby ...
  121. [121]
    First Year Orientation | Welcome Warriors - University of Waterloo
    Learn about the services supporting you at Waterloo; Travel around the region to pick up essentials; Access immigration support; Learn about Canadian culture.
  122. [122]
    Orientation activities and resources for new students - York University
    York University Orientation is for all new incoming students, including transfer, mature, international, and exchange.Orientation Guide · College Finder · Priority Communities · Parents and FamilyMissing: practices | Show results with:practices
  123. [123]
    College Applications and Process, Student Orientation Practices ...
    Sep 28, 2023 · 80% of four-year college students described their in-person orientation as good or excellent, but only 55% rated virtual orientation as good or ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
  124. [124]
    Orientation, Transition and Retention - NASPA
    A conduit for student affairs professionals with a vested interest in orientation, transition and retention programming, research, and services.
  125. [125]
    International and European student orientation - Events | UWE Bristol
    Our orientation programme offers you the chance to meet other students and helps you settle into your university life at UWE Bristol and life in the UK.
  126. [126]
    International orientation programme - University of Brighton
    The University of Brighton's international orientation programme helps students adapt to life in the UK as easily as possible and meet other students.
  127. [127]
    A guide to freshers' week 2025 | Prospects.ac.uk
    Jun 25, 2025 · Find out what to expect from freshers' week 2025 and how to make the most of your first few weeks as a university student.Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
  128. [128]
    Orientation Week Program - Europa-Universität Flensburg (EUF)
    Sep 15, 2025 · Welcome to Europa-Universität Flensburg! In most cases, your studies will begin with the orientation week starting from 9th of September ...
  129. [129]
    Orientation | University of Tübingen
    This page will provide information about the Orientation Week for new students and valuable hints for getting a good start into your studies.
  130. [130]
    What is an orientation semester for? - Hochschule Darmstadt
    Orientation semesters are one to two-semester programmes between the (technical) Abitur and studies/training. They are aimed at school leavers.
  131. [131]
    Orientation Week - Central European University
    The one-week programs start with a “Meet and Greet” session on CEU's campus on September 1. Students will have the opportunity to meet their department ...
  132. [132]
    Orientation Weeks - Lund University
    Sep 5, 2025 · The Orientation Weeks for international students include social, cultural and practical activities that aim to help you settle in smoothly at the University.
  133. [133]
    Welcome reception – new students autumn 2025 - Uppsala University
    Aug 29, 2025 · As is tradition, we welcome all new students autumn 2025 to our beautiful University Main Building with a programme in the auditorium and a ...
  134. [134]
    Welcome week | Mentor week | Freshers Week - Study Bergen
    Welcome week is also known as Freshers week, Mentor Week, Into Campus, Fadder Week and Fadderullan. The goal of the week is to help you get to know your fellow ...
  135. [135]
    Introduction and welcome activities | Student Portal
    Oct 1, 2025 · At the Welcome Fair, you will meet student associations, student unions, university services, support functions, sport clubs, and more. Joining ...
  136. [136]
    Orientation Week | Current Students - UNSW Sydney
    O-Week, or Orientation Week, is the best opportunity for you to experience university life and access available support services to help you transition to UNSW.UNSW Online orientation · Law & Justice Orientation · New student checklist
  137. [137]
    Orientation and settling in overview - my.UQ
    Orientation is 2 weeks of events and activities held every semester for undergraduate and postgraduate students, and HDR candidates.
  138. [138]
    Our Welcome Program - The University of Sydney
    Our Welcome Program includes orientation events, activities and workshops for new students to introduce them to life at the University of Sydney, ...
  139. [139]
    Orientation - Monash University
    This October and November, Monash Business School and the Faculty of Information Technology are hosting your orientation programs, offering essential ...Orientation week · Orientation by campus · Monash IT Orientation · Orientation Hub
  140. [140]
    North-american universities vs European universities
    Apr 3, 2016 · American universities provide much more extensive “orientation” programs and devote many resources to looking after their students. If you were ...
  141. [141]
    [PDF] How to Improve University Orientation: Seven Good Practice ... - ERIC
    Research shows that orientation activities are linked to a variety of positive outcomes for first‑year students, such as improving preparedness, empowering ...<|separator|>
  142. [142]
    Jakarta, bullying on rise in colleges: six die in orientation programs
    Aug 14, 2015 · The Ospek and Mos have been practiced in Indonesia since the 1950s. ... Here too the “orientation” progams are drawn up by the student ...Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  143. [143]
    Your letters: The culture of seniority - Community - The Jakarta Post
    Aug 4, 2015 · The main aspect of Ospek and MOS today is hazing (bullying). It may consist of verbal harassment or initiation activities that involve humiliation.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  144. [144]
    Orientation Programme for Fresh UTME/Direct Entry Students ...
    Mar 13, 2025 · The Orientation Programme and Fair for fresh students (UTME and Direct Entry) of the University of Lagos (UNILAG) will commence on Wednesday, April 9, 2025.
  145. [145]
    New Student Orientation - American University of Nigeria
    The AUN orientation helps new students learn university life, navigate campus, make connections, and get support, starting August 27, 2025.
  146. [146]
    Freshers coming out after attending the orientation programme at ...
    Freshers coming out after attending the orientation programme at Delhi University's Hindu College in New Delhi on July 15, 2006. Photo: Sandeep Saxena.
  147. [147]
    Supporting COVID-19 Transitions For College Students | The Whole U
    Jun 30, 2021 · Classes and programs were suddenly socially distanced – or in many cases, became fully remote. With most campuses preparing to fully reopen this ...
  148. [148]
    College Orientation Is Changing Post-Pandemic - RealClearEducation
    Jul 18, 2024 · Many colleges and universities are rethinking their freshman orientation programs, adding new options and doing more to help students forge
  149. [149]
    How Technology Can Shape College Orientation for Gen Z
    Jul 27, 2023 · College orientation for Gen Z likely has a heavy social media tilt. It might start in virtual communities long before the actual campus event.Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
  150. [150]
    Affordable, Beautiful Orientation Apps - Eventus.io
    Interactive Schedule. Personalized, filtered schedules to help students quickly find the programming they need. · Interactive Navigation · Orientation Checklists.<|control11|><|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Virtual Reality as a Tool for Student Orientation in Distance ...
    Jun 11, 2020 · The results indicate that students who received a VR orientation expressed more optimistic views about the technology, saw greater improvement in scores.
  152. [152]
    Using AI to Help Students Learn "How to College"
    May 20, 2019 · Artificial intelligence can help students learn "how to college." This sets them on the path to graduation and to success far beyond the college or university.Missing: apps | Show results with:apps
  153. [153]
    5 ways to use an AI agent for student orientation | Gravyty
    AI agents like Ivy & Ocelot from Gravyty are helping student affairs teams modernize orientation without overhauling existing systems. They streamline ...
  154. [154]
    Enhancing distance learning with virtual reality
    This study examines the impact of the learner attribute, behavioral engagement, on learning outcomes in a 3D desktop VR new student online orientation.
  155. [155]
    Student mental health is in crisis. Campuses are rethinking their ...
    Oct 1, 2022 · During the 2020–2021 school year, more than 60% of college students met the criteria for at least one mental health problem, according to the ...
  156. [156]
    Orientation Program Highlights Miami's Commitment to Student ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Miami University's orientation introduced first-year students to mental health resources and activities that promote gratitude, ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  157. [157]
    Post-pandemic Campus Life and Student Mental Health Needs in ...
    As schools prepare for post-pandemic campus life, many students will return to campus in a state of depression or with feelings of stress or anxiety.
  158. [158]
    Evaluation of a resilience training program for college student-athletes
    Resilience training may increase college student-athletes' likelihood of using adaptive coping strategies to manage academic and sport-related stressors.
  159. [159]
    A Pragmatic Clinical Trial Examining the Impact of a Resilience ...
    Overall, the resilience program was feasible and acceptable to students and was effective at reducing levels of depression and stress, particularly as reported ...
  160. [160]
    [PDF] A Resilience Education Intervention for College Freshmen
    May 13, 2021 · Resilience 101 is a five-week education intervention for college freshmen to increase their knowledge of resilience, stress, and anxiety.
  161. [161]
    Examining the Impact of a University Outdoor Orientation Program
    May 8, 2018 · Findings indicated significant improvement of resilience and well-being in participants through outdoor orientation program involvement.Missing: training | Show results with:training
  162. [162]
    The Effects of Resilience Training on Mental Health Among Students
    Feb 28, 2024 · The findings revealed that the resilience training intervention significantly reduced symptoms of depression (F = 11.542), anxiety (F = 13.67), ...
  163. [163]
    Mental Health at College: What to Know - U.S. News & World Report
    Jun 3, 2025 · About 70% of students have struggled with mental health since starting college, according to data from a U.S. News survey.
  164. [164]
    Integrating Mental Health Initiatives into Student Orientation
    Jun 2, 2025 · Strategic partners Mantra Health and EAB join together to discuss the many ways in which higher ed leaders can improve their student support systems.Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  165. [165]
    College Uncovered: DEI Backlash - The Hechinger Report
    Oct 10, 2024 · College campuses have become battlegrounds in America's culture wars, with diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the center of the debate.
  166. [166]
    Anti-DEI Laws Have Passed at a Furious Pace This Year. Here's ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · State legislatures have passed an unprecedented number of laws this year that severely restrict colleges' efforts to recruit and retain ...
  167. [167]
    [PDF] FRESHMAN DISORIENTATION: - Speech First
    Our findings show that new student orientation programs exclusively steep students in all things diversity, equity, and inclusion while leaving out ...
  168. [168]
    DOJ Declares Slew of DEI Practices Unlawful in Memo
    Jul 30, 2025 · The nine-page memo builds on the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
  169. [169]
    Universities alter DEI policies as students return to campus
    Aug 28, 2025 · Colleges are welcoming students back to campus under increased pressures from the Trump administration to remove all DEI offices and ...
  170. [170]
    Ohio colleges began scaling back DEI programs even before state ...
    Feb 10, 2025 · Many Ohio colleges began distancing themselves from diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) work long before state lawmakers renewed calls to ban those efforts.Missing: mandatory | Show results with:mandatory
  171. [171]
    Shifting Winds: Students Under Fire, 2020-2024
    This report examines the efforts to investigate, censor, or otherwise discipline students at US colleges and universities for expressive activity.
  172. [172]
    As Trump attacks DEI, UC bans 'diversity statements' in faculty hiring
    Mar 20, 2025 · The decision ends a UC practice requiring job applicants to submit written testimonials about how they have worked to enhance diversity.<|separator|>
  173. [173]
    'None of these goals are illegal': Universities struggle to respond to ...
    Apr 16, 2025 · Public universities are quickly backtracking on decades of diversity initiatives to avoid the ire of the Trump administration and protect billions in federal ...
  174. [174]
    Anti-DEI Policies Are Ramping Up—With Big Implications for ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · A new study sheds light on what students of color face when DEI practices and policies are banned in schools.
  175. [175]
    Tracking Higher Ed's Dismantling of DEI
    Oct 17, 2025 · As colleges make changes in response to anti-DEI legislation and mounting political pressure, an inconsistent and confusing landscape has ...