Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Suresh Tendulkar

Suresh Dhondopant Tendulkar (15 February 1939 – 21 June 2011) was an renowned for his empirical work on measurement, , and economic policy. A Harvard Ph.D. holder, he served as Professor of Economics at the from 1978 to 2004 and as Executive Director of its Centre for . Tendulkar also held key advisory roles, including Chairman of the Prime Minister's from 2008 to 2009 and Chief Statistician of as head of the . Tendulkar's most notable contribution was chairing the Expert Group on for Estimation of (2005–2009), which revised India's poverty measurement framework by adopting an basket and mixed reference period, shifting away from calorie-based norms. This increased the estimated headcount to 37.2% for 2004–05, from previous figures around 27%, reflecting broader inclusion of non-food expenditures but sparking debates on the adequacy of the resulting poverty line, often critiqued for implying subsistence levels too low for essential needs beyond calories. His data-driven approach emphasized empirical rigor over ideological priors, influencing subsequent policy discussions on living standards despite methodological controversies.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Suresh Dhondopant Tendulkar was born on 15 February 1939 in , , as the youngest of five siblings in a traditional family. The family resided in modest circumstances with limited financial resources, reflecting the socioeconomic challenges common to many middle-class households in pre-independence . Tendulkar's early years were marked by the premature death of his father, which imposed additional hardships on the family and likely fostered his and determination. Despite these adversities, the emphasis on education within the cultural milieu provided a foundation for his intellectual development, steering him toward academic pursuits amid constrained opportunities. This upbringing in a resource-scarce yet value-driven environment contributed to his later analytical rigor in , grounded in an appreciation for empirical constraints on human potential. The family's relocation to during his formative years further immersed Tendulkar in an urban setting conducive to scholastic advancement, though specific details on parental professions remain undocumented in available records.

Academic Formation and Influences

Suresh Tendulkar was born on 15 February 1939 in , , and received his early education in after his family relocated there. He completed a B.Com. degree from Pune University, achieving the top rank in his batch. Tendulkar pursued advanced studies at the (DSE), University of Delhi, earning a in in 1962 with first-class honours and again topping his cohort. This program exposed him to the empirical and analytical traditions prevalent at DSE, emphasizing quantitative methods in Indian economic contexts. He then obtained a in from , where his dissertation focused on economic theory and measurement, honing his commitment to data-led scholarship over ideological priors. The combined influences of DSE's focus on applied econometrics for development issues and Harvard's rigorous neoclassical framework shaped Tendulkar's lifelong approach, prioritizing verifiable evidence in assessing , , and impacts. His underscored a preference for grounded in household surveys and data, distinguishing his work from more theoretical or politically motivated analyses.

Academic and Research Career

Key Positions and Institutions

Suresh Tendulkar commenced his professional research career in 1968 after completing his Ph.D. at , joining the Planning Unit of the () in as a researcher focused on planning models and issues. He remained at ISI until 1978, contributing to empirical analyses of India's during the era of centralized strategies. In 1978, Tendulkar transitioned to academia as a of at the (DSE), University of , a position he held until his retirement in 2004, though he continued affiliations thereafter until his death in 2011. At DSE, he taught core courses such as and Planning (later renamed ), Indian Economy, and Industrial Economics, influencing generations of students through rigorous data-driven instruction. Tendulkar also assumed administrative leadership at DSE, serving as Head of the and later as from 1995 to 1998. In these roles, he oversaw curriculum development and research initiatives, including the establishment of the Centre for , where he later acted as Executive Director. His tenure emphasized empirical rigor and integration of global economic perspectives into Indian policy analysis. Additionally, Tendulkar held a brief consultancy at the in , around 1978, bridging his ISI experience with international development economics before fully committing to DSE. Throughout his career, he prioritized institutions fostering quantitative research, avoiding overt ideological alignments in favor of evidence-based inquiry.

Major Research Areas and Publications

Tendulkar's scholarly work centered on , with a strong emphasis on estimation, , and the of India's economic reforms. He pioneered empirical analyses of how growth affects inequality and , critiquing planning frameworks like the for inefficiencies in and equity outcomes. His research integrated econometric techniques to assess productivity, industrial performance, and regional disparities, often drawing on household survey data to challenge prevailing narratives on welfare improvements. In poverty and , Tendulkar co-authored seminal papers with K. Sundaram, including studies on decline linked to distributional shifts between 1983 and 1987-88, highlighting accelerated under post-1980 reforms compared to earlier dirigiste periods. He examined through an lens, arguing for context-specific metrics that account for socio-economic structures beyond simple Gini coefficients. On reforms, Tendulkar advocated market-oriented , analyzing coalition-era challenges in sustaining post-1991 changes like and fiscal consolidation. Key publications include the book Reintegrating with the (2003), co-authored with T.N. Srinivasan, which evaluated openness and its poverty-alleviating effects via empirical modeling of export-led growth. Another major work, Understanding Reforms: Post-1991 (2010), detailed the sequencing of liberalization measures and their macroeconomic stabilization impacts. He produced over 100 papers and reports, covering topics from consumer expenditure patterns in Sankhya (1973) to equity-growth -offs in the 1960-1992 period.

Policy Advisory Roles

Involvement in Planning and Reforms

![The Chairman, Economic Advisory Council to PM, Dr. Suresh D. Tendulkar releasing the “Review of Economy 2008-09”, at a Press Conference, in New Delhi on January 23, 2009][float-right]
Tendulkar joined the Planning Unit of the Indian Statistical Institute in New Delhi in 1968, where he contributed to the development of econometric models for national economic planning, including analyses of consumption patterns and growth projections published in 1969 and 1971. During this period from 1968 to 1978, he critiqued the Fifth Five-Year Plan (1974–1979) for insufficient financing mechanisms and inadequate emphasis on poverty alleviation, as detailed in his 1974 publications in the Economic and Political Weekly. These works highlighted structural deficiencies in plan implementation, advocating for better integration of growth, redistribution, and self-reliance objectives.
In his advisory capacity, Tendulkar served as a member of the Prime Minister's (PMEAC) from 2004 to 2008 and as its Chairman from 2008 to 2009, providing recommendations on macroeconomic policies amid ongoing efforts post-1991. Through the PMEAC, he influenced assessments of reform impacts, including trade integration and domestic policy constraints, as reflected in co-authored works like Reintegrating with the (2003) and Understanding Reforms: Post-1991 (2012). His analyses emphasized the of reforms, underscoring the need for sustained liberalization while addressing distributional challenges. Tendulkar's involvement extended to broader policy reforms via participation in government panels, contributing empirical insights to India's transition from toward market-oriented structures, though specific committee tenures beyond poverty estimation are noted in tribute assessments of his policy scholarship.

Chairmanship of Expert Committees

Suresh Tendulkar chaired the Steering Committee on National Sample Surveys, which oversees the planning, methodology, and implementation of nationwide household surveys conducted by the to generate empirical data for formulation. These surveys cover critical areas such as consumer expenditure, , and household assets, providing the empirical backbone for assessing socioeconomic trends and informing government interventions in areas like and welfare programs. His chairmanship emphasized enhancing survey robustness through refined sampling techniques and data quality controls, addressing challenges like non-response biases and urban-rural coverage disparities to ensure reliable inputs for national exercises. This role complemented Tendulkar's broader involvement in statistical reforms, underscoring the causal link between accurate survey data and evidence-based policymaking amid India's evolving economic landscape.

Poverty Measurement Contributions

Tendulkar Committee Report (2009)

The Expert Group to Review the for Estimation of , chaired by Suresh Tendulkar, was established by India's in 2005 to address shortcomings in the 1993 Lakdawala Committee's calorie-centric approach, which had relied on uniform nutritional norms across regions and emphasized food expenditure over non-food items. The group analyzed data from the National Sample Survey Organisation's () 61st round (2004-05), proposing a shift toward a basket that incorporated patterns for both rural and poverty lines, adjusted via spatial price indices. Submitted in November 2009, the report calculated poverty lines at ₹446.68 monthly expenditure (MPCE) for rural areas and ₹578.80 for areas in 2004-05 prices, reflecting inclusion of , health, and conveyance costs alongside food. Key findings revealed elevated poverty incidence relative to prior estimates: the all-India headcount ratio (HCR) stood at 37.2 percent for 2004-05, with at 41.8 percent (up from 28.3 percent under Lakdawala) and urban at 25.7 percent. This implied approximately 407 million people below the poverty line in 2004-05, highlighting disparities in non-food spending and the limitations of calorie-only benchmarks in capturing multidimensional deprivation. The report advocated applying the new framework retrospectively to data from 1973-74 onward for trend analysis, enabling consistent comparisons of rates. The Planning Commission formally accepted the Tendulkar recommendations in January 2011, integrating them into official estimates starting with 2004-05 data. Subsequent applications, such as the 2009-10 estimates released in March 2012, showed a decline to 29.8 percent all-India HCR (rural 25.7 percent, urban 13.7 percent), attributing an 8 rural drop to and targeted interventions, though the higher baseline underscored ongoing challenges in data comparability and undercounting of informal vulnerabilities. The methodology's adoption marked a departure from nutrition-anchored lines, prioritizing empirical consumption patterns from surveys for targeting under programs like the Public Distribution System.

Methodological Framework and Innovations

The Tendulkar Committee's methodological framework for poverty estimation relied on household consumption expenditure data from the , specifically the 61st round (2004–05) for base-year calibration and subsequent rounds like the 66th (2009–10) for updates. It shifted from the calorie-norm-focused approach of prior methodologies, such as the Lakdawala Committee, to a broader basket anchored on consumption patterns. The poverty line from 2004–05 served as the reference, encompassing food and non-food items including private expenditures on , , and durable goods, calibrated to cover approximately 22–25% of the population below the line. lines were derived by extending this basket, adjusting non-food components via elasticities (estimated at 1.0 for rural areas) and splicing urban non-food prices onto rural food prices using Fisher Ideal price indices to account for spatial differentials. A central innovation was the adoption of the Mixed Reference Period (MRP) for computing Monthly Per Capita Expenditure (MPCE), replacing the Uniform Reference Period (URP). Under MRP, reference periods varied by item: 365 days for low-frequency purchases like durables (e.g., ), 30 days for semi-durables (e.g., ), and 7 days for perishables (e.g., ). This reduced recall bias and underreporting compared to URP's fixed 30-day period, yielding 11–20% higher expenditure estimates depending on item categories and thus elevating poverty thresholds. For 2004–05, the MRP-adjusted rural poverty line equated to roughly ₹356 monthly in rural areas and ₹538 in urban areas (at 2004–05 prices), updated via state-specific for Agricultural Labourers (CPI-AL) for rural and CPI for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) for urban areas. The framework's econometric splicing and elasticity-based adjustments represented further advancements, ensuring basket consistency across rural-urban divides without relying solely on calorie adequacy, which had ignored rising non-food needs amid economic structural shifts. State-level disaggregation incorporated regional price variations, and the approach facilitated comparable headcount ratios, with MRP implementation alone raising the 2004–05 rate from 28.3% (URP) to 41.8%. This prioritized empirical alignment of consumption patterns over normative nutritional floors, though it presupposed urban baskets as normative for rural extensions due to better NSSO coverage of non-food items in urban surveys.

Controversies and Debates

Criticisms of Poverty Line Estimates

The Tendulkar Committee's for estimating the poverty line, which anchored the national standard to the urban poverty line from the 2004–05 National Sample Survey, drew criticism for lacking a robust nutritional foundation and relying on outdated from 1973–74. Critics, including economist Madhura Swaminathan, argued that this anchoring implied a uniform intake norm of approximately 1,800 kcal per day , a reduction from prior rural (2,400 kcal) and urban (2,100 kcal) benchmarks, based on the Food and Agriculture Organization's minimum for light rather than the moderate-to-heavy labor typical among India's poor. This shift away from explicit adequacy norms toward expenditure-based thresholds was faulted for underestimating nutritional requirements, especially given India's persistent high rates of undernutrition, and for not aligning with higher standards (over 2,800 kcal) observed in countries with low prevalence. Further critiques highlighted inadequacies in accounting for non-food essentials. The incorporated median household expenditures on and from survey data but was accused of assuming these levels ensured reasonable without verifying , , or the potential for financing among the poor, thereby failing to reflect true destitution thresholds. The adoption of a mixed period—combining uniform recall for food with a 365-day period for durable goods and a 30-day period for other non-food items—was seen by some as potentially inflating non-food expenditure estimates due to recall biases, though this was secondary to concerns over the anchor's normative weakness. Opposing viewpoints contended that the estimates overstated poverty. Economist criticized the application of Tendulkar-derived lines to consumption survey data, arguing that National Sample Survey consumption aggregates systematically underreport actual spending—evidenced by discrepancies with and asset data from National Family Health Surveys—leading to inflated headcount ratios, such as the official 23% for 2011–12, when alternative adjustments suggest near-elimination of . These debates underscored broader issues, including the absence of state-specific price adjustments and reliance on uniform deflators, which critics like G. Raveendran argued distorted rural-urban comparability. Despite raising the 2004–05 poverty rate to 37.2% from 27.5% under prior methods, the framework's deviations from calorie-centric approaches fueled ongoing contention over whether it captured multidimensional deprivation or merely recalibrated subsistence inadequately.

Empirical Defenses and Broader Implications

The Tendulkar Committee's methodology has been empirically defended through validations against international data from the International Comparison Program (), which aligned the proposed poverty line of Rs. 902 per capita per month for 2011-12 with global benchmarks, confirming its reasonableness relative to patterns adjusted for rural contexts. Additionally, the framework checked the adequacy of private expenditures among the identified , demonstrating that households below the line still met minimum nutritional norms—such as 2,400 in rural areas and 2,100 in —despite shifting away from a strict calorie anchor, thus addressing concerns over undernutrition by incorporating a broader basket including , , and durable . These checks revealed consistent trends in decline across National Sample Survey Office () rounds, with headcount ratios falling from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 21.9% in 2011-12 under mixed reference period (MRP) data, which captured infrequent expenditures more accurately than prior uniform reference period (URP) methods. Critics' claims of systematic underestimation due to survey underreporting were countered by noting that such biases affect both mean expenditures and ratios proportionally, preserving the relative ordering of households and the observed decline's validity when benchmarked against independent household surveys. The approach's empirical robustness is further supported by its alignment with price deflators derived from price indices applied to rural areas, ensuring spatial without arbitrary adjustments, and by cross-verification with state-level showing uniform deceleration in post-2004-05 economic reforms. The broader implications of the Tendulkar framework extended to reshaping India's official metrics, serving as the basis for government-endorsed estimates until and influencing targeting for programs like the Public Distribution System and below--line (BPL) cards, which prioritized efficient over expansive coverage. By emphasizing consumption-based lines over multidimensional indices, it highlighted causal links between —averaging 8.5% GDP annually from 2004-2012—and , informing policy shifts toward skill and rather than universal subsidies. Internationally, the methodology underpinned extrapolations for India's trends, projecting further declines to under 10% by 2022-23 when extended with MRP , though this sparked ongoing debates on integrating non-monetary deprivations for holistic assessments. Ultimately, it underscored the trade-offs in measurement: while enabling precise fiscal targeting, it faced resistance from advocates favoring higher lines to expand welfare nets, reflecting tensions between empirical precision and normative goals.

Later Contributions and Legacy

National Statistical Commission Leadership

Suresh Tendulkar was appointed as the first part-time Chairman of India's (NSC) on July 12, 2006, succeeding an earlier advisory body and marking the operationalization of the NSC as an autonomous apex advisory body for statistical matters. The commission, under his leadership, comprised four other part-time members—Dr. Surjit S. Bhalla, Prof. Amitabh Kundu, Prof. Bikas Sinha, and Dr. Padam Singh—along with the Secretary (Statistics) as ex-officio member, focusing on coordinating core data collection, dissemination, and quality improvement across government statistical agencies. Tendulkar's tenure, from July 12, 2006, to February 15, 2009, emphasized enhancing the credibility and efficiency of India's statistical system amid growing demands for reliable economic indicators. As a Delhi School of Economics professor emeritus with expertise in econometrics and poverty measurement, he brought rigorous analytical oversight to the NSC's mandate of advising on survey methodologies, data standards, and inter-agency coordination, including oversight of the National Sample Survey Office. His chairmanship coincided with efforts to address gaps in official statistics, though specific reforms initiated under him were aligned with broader governmental pushes for evidence-based policymaking rather than standalone overhauls. The NSC under Tendulkar functioned independently to recommend improvements in statistical practices, such as refining consumer expenditure surveys and ensuring uniformity in data reporting, contributing to the foundational strengthening of India's statistical before subsequent commissions built upon this framework. His leadership role underscored a commitment to empirical rigor in official data, drawing from his prior involvement in sample survey , though it predated major crises in statistical reliability that emerged later. Tendulkar's departure in early 2009 aligned with the end of his term, after which the NSC continued with subsequent chairs amid ongoing debates on .

Posthumous Recognition and Enduring Impact

Following Tendulkar's death on June 21, 2011, from in , Indian economic institutions and scholars established annual memorial lectures in his honor, with the 11th Prof Suresh Tendulkar Memorial Lecture delivered on March 24, 2025, by economist Selim Raihan, underscoring ongoing academic commemoration of his analytical rigor. Tributes emphasized his data-led integrity, as noted in contemporaneous analyses portraying him as a principled "judge amongst economists" who prioritized over ideological pressures. His methodological innovations endured in official poverty estimation, with the Tendulkar Committee's framework adopted for India's 2011-12 national survey, yielding a incidence of 21.9% (or 269.8 million persons below the line), down from 37.2% in 2004-05, and informing resource allocation under schemes like the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. This mixed-reference-period approach to consumption surveys, integrating urban and rural baskets with imputed non-food expenditures, provided a benchmark for subsequent analyses, including projections and domestic studies tracking trends into the 2020s despite calls for updates amid inflation and structural shifts. Scholarly volumes reflect his lasting influence on welfare economics and policy, such as the 2017 compilation Perspectives on Economic Development and Policy in India: In Honour of Suresh D. Tendulkar, which credits his reforms-era contributions to trade liberalization and fiscal federalism, and a 2025 publication, The Legacy of Suresh Tendulkar, detailing how his poverty metrics reshaped development frameworks by incorporating health and education outlays into caloric sufficiency models. These works highlight Tendulkar's causal emphasis on consumption-inclusive poverty lines as a tool for evidence-based targeting, sustaining debates on inequality measurement even as newer committees like Rangarajan (2014) built upon or critiqued his elasticities and price adjustments.

References

  1. [1]
    Suresh Tendulkar: An Economist's Life - jstor
    Suresh D Tendulkar (1939-2011) was also a warm friend, an excellent colleague, and, above all, a great human being. A record of his life and work, and.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  2. [2]
    Suresh Tendulkar, eminent economist, passes away - The Hindu
    Jun 21, 2011 · A Ph.D in economics from Harvard University and Professor of Economics at the Delhi School of Economics (University of Delhi) from 1978 to 2004, ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  3. [3]
    Suresh Tendulkar: The Judge Amongst Economists - Forbes India
    Jun 27, 2011 · The economist Suresh Tendulkar will be remembered for his integrity as a scholar and his belief in letting the data lead him, even to the point of ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Tendulkar Poverty Line - World Bank Documents & Reports
    The corresponding Tendulkar line turned out to be Rs659. 18. This change led the urban poverty estimate in 2004–2005 to jump from 13.3% based on the Lakdawala ...
  5. [5]
    A methodology deeply flawed - The Hindu
    Feb 5, 2010 · The poverty line that the Tendulkar Committee proposes depends on reduced calorie consumption, and fails to provide for reasonable household expenditures on ...
  6. [6]
    Journey towards Inclusive Growth in India - Reserve Bank of India
    Jan 7, 2020 · 2. Prof. Suresh D. Tendulkar was a great teacher, economist and policy analyst. His seminal work on the measurement and analysis of living ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Suresh Tendulkar, delineator of poverty, dead - Archive News | The ...
    Born in Kolhapur, Tendulkar studied at Bhave School in Pune and Brihan Maharashtra Commerce College. He did his Masters from the Delhi School of Economics.
  8. [8]
    Meet the men who advise India's PM - Rediff.com Business
    Oct 15, 2009 · Tendulkar, an Economics professor in Delhi University, has a master's degree from the DSE and a PhD from the Harvard University. He has written ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  9. [9]
    Specials | Economic and Political Weekly
    An outstanding academician with an enviable publication record and a public servant of enormous personal integrity, Suresh D Tendulkar (1939-2011) was also a ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Working Paper No. 477 Planning, Poverty and Political Economy of ...
    This paper pays tribute to Professor Suresh Tendulkar's contribution and scholarship to economics, economic-policy making, and economic reforms in India.
  11. [11]
    The right economist - India Today
    Apr 15, 1997 · Suresh Tendulkar, 58, is now at the epicentre of a tremor in public policy. As the economist member of the three-man Pay Commission for Central ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Economist Suresh Tendulkar dies - Rediff.com
    Jun 22, 2011 · Renowned economist Suresh Tendulkar, 72, has died of a cardiac failure in a Pune hospital. A former director of the Delhi School of Economics.
  13. [13]
    Introduction - jstor
    Centre for Development Economics,. Delhi School of Economics. Professor Suresh Dhondopant Tendulkar, was an outstanding economist. He was amongst the very few ...
  14. [14]
    Perspectives on Economic Development and Policy in India
    The book pays tribute to the celebrated economist Professor Suresh Tendulkar's contribution and scholarship to economics, economic-policy making, and economic ...Missing: career early
  15. [15]
    Books By Suresh D. Tendulkar - Author - LoveReading UK
    He did his Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Chicago and is an expert on econometrics, industrial economics, economics of productivity, regional ...
  16. [16]
    Suresh D. Tendulkar's research works | University of Delhi and other ...
    Suresh D. Tendulkar's 6 research works with 173 citations, including: Growth, distributional change and reduction in rural poverty between 1983 and 1987-88: ...Missing: mentors influences
  17. [17]
    Suresh D. Tendulkar's research works | delhi school of economics ...
    Suresh D. Tendulkar's 31 research works with 720 citations, including: Continuing Reforms in the Era of Coalition Politics.Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  18. [18]
    Reintegrating India with the World Economy | PIIE
    $$18.95In this study, Professors T.N. Srinivasan and Suresh D. Tendulkar analyze the economics and politics of India's recent and growing integration with the world ...Missing: list | Show results with:list<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Tribute to Suresh D. Tendulkar - Oxford Academic
    He was a committed teacher and a dedicated researcher and ever willing to learn. He was more of a 'Guru' in a traditional sense and inspiring in every way— ...
  20. [20]
    Draft Fifth Plan and Removal of Poverty - jstor
    This article seeks to examine the credibility of the Draft Fifth Five-Year Plan in the context of the basic objective of removal of poverty. This has been done ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Poverty Estimates for 2011-12 - English Releases
    Jul 23, 2013 · 7. For 2011-12, for rural areas the national poverty line using the Tendulkar methodology is estimated at Rs. 816 per capita per month and Rs. ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] government of india
    The erstwhile Planning Commission had been using. Tendulkar Committee methodology to estimate the poverty line and the poverty ratio at national and state level ...Missing: key findings
  23. [23]
    Poverty Estimates for 2009-10 - PIB
    Mar 19, 2012 · The all-India HCR has declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10, with rural poverty declining by 8.0 percentage points from ...
  24. [24]
    [Solved] According to Tendulkar Committee, the total percentage of th
    According to the commission, in 2011-12 for rural areas, the national poverty line by using the Tendulkar methodology is estimated at Rs 816 per capita per ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Press Note on Poverty Estimates, 2011-12 Government of India ...
    Jul 22, 2013 · The Tendulkar. Committee submitted its report in December 2009 and computed poverty lines and poverty ratios for 2004-05. For comparison they ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Government of India Planning Commission June, 2014
    Tendulkar in 2005. The Expert Group. (Tendulkar) submitted its report in November 2009 and the Planning Commission accepted its recommendations in January 2011.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] New method of estimating poverty
    The new methodology proposed by Tendulkar Committee recommends to move away from calorie norm, adopting the Mixed Reference Period (MRP) equivalent of urban ...
  28. [28]
    Poverty Estimation in India - BYJU'S
    Mixed Reference Period (MRP): From 2000 onwards, the NSSO relied on an MRP method which measured consumption of five-low frequency items over a period of 30 ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    (PDF) The New Poverty Line: A Methodology Deeply Flawed
    Aug 7, 2025 · This note discusses the Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Estimation of Poverty. ... Tendulkar Committee Report does, but ...Missing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
  30. [30]
    New methods needed to answer old controversy in poverty ...
    Apr 9, 2012 · A committee is being set up to devise yet another methodology to estimate poverty in India. The step has led to some unhappiness among economists and experts.
  31. [31]
    Hungry for publicity | Surjit S. Bhalla
    That appeal became weak when absolute poverty in India in 2011/12 came out to be around 12 per cent, not 23 per cent as officially reported (Tendulkar poverty ...
  32. [32]
    India eliminates extreme poverty - Brookings Institution
    Mar 1, 2024 · Official data now confirms that India has eliminated extreme poverty, as commonly defined in international comparisons.
  33. [33]
    A Critique of the Tendulkar Committee Report - G. Raveendran, 2010
    May 31, 2017 · 'New Estimates of Poverty in India: A Critique of the Tendulkar Committee Report'—A Response ... Yoginder K. Alagh. Indian Journal of Human ...
  34. [34]
    ICP data validate Tendulkar poverty line - The Hindu
    Jun 10, 2014 · ... Suresh Tendulkar committee, which is being reviewed by the C. ... Rangarajan, who chaired the Economic Advisory Council of the then Prime ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] India: Trends in Poverty, 2011-12 to 2022-23 - Methodology Note
    May 6, 2025 · The Tendulkar Committee's 2011-12 estimates, accepted by the Planning Commission, set the poverty ratio at 21.9 percent based on MRP consumption.Missing: Innovations | Show results with:Innovations
  36. [36]
    National Statistical Commission operationalised - English Releases
    Jul 12, 2006 · Suresh Tendulkar as the first Chairman of the National Statistical Commission and Dr. Surjit S Bhalla, Prof. Amitabh Kundu, Prof. Bikas ...
  37. [37]
    National Statistical Commission(NSC) - SCHOOL OF STATISTICS
    Suresh D.Tendulkar as part-time Chairman, Prof. Surjit Bhalla, Prof. Bikas Sinha, Prof. Amitabh Kundu and Dr. Padam Singh as part-time Members and Secretary ...
  38. [38]
    Past Members of NSC | Ministry of Statistics and Program ... - MoSPI
    Past Members of NSC ; 1, Prof. Suresh D. Tendulkar, Former Professor of Economics, Delhi University, Chairperson ; 2, Dr. Surjit Bhalla, Managing Director, Oxus ...
  39. [39]
    India's Statistical System: Past, Present, Future
    Jun 28, 2023 · The committee qualified its criticisms by noting that in the matter of sample surveys, “those from outside India must expect to have more to ...
  40. [40]
    English Releases - PIB
    In the Technical Session following the Inaugural Session, Professor Suresh Tendulkar, Chairman, National Statistical Commission, will deliver a memorial address ...
  41. [41]
    SSE | 11th Prof Suresh Tendulkar Memorial Lecture - YouTube
    Mar 24, 2025 · SSE | 11th Prof Suresh Tendulkar Memorial Lecture by Professor Selim Raihan. He is a Professor at the Department of Economics, University of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Noted economist Suresh Tendulkar passes away - The Indian Express
    Jun 21, 2011 · Professor Suresh D Tendulkar died in Pune of cardiac arrest this morning. He was 72. He is survived by his wife and two daughters.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Imputation-based Poverty Monitoring in India Post-2011
    Apr 10, 2024 · Based on official poverty lines drawn up by the Tendulkar Commission, the headcount rate in India fell from 37 percent of the population in 2004 ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  44. [44]
    How poor is India? Outdated poverty line creates data dilemma
    Jun 21, 2024 · The Tendulkar Committee's 2009 recommendations pegged India's poverty line at an expenditure level of Rs 33 a day in urban areas and Rs 27 a ...
  45. [45]
    Perspectives on Economic Development and Policy in India
    The book pays tribute to the celebrated economist Professor Suresh Tendulkar's contribution and scholarship to economics, economic-policy making, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    The Legacy of Suresh Tendulkar: Reflections on his Contributions to ...
    Dr. Suresh Tendulkar, one of India's most distinguished economists, transformed the nation's understanding of poverty, welfare, and development with his ...Missing: posthumous impact<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Do We Know What has Happened to Poverty since 2011-12?
    Jun 16, 2022 · Bhalla has long argued that the consumption aggregates from the CES are gross underestimates of actual consumption, and are therefore not the ...