Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

System for Award Management

The System for Award Management () is the U.S. and that enables entities to for eligibility to receive contracts, grants, loans, and other assistance awards while providing agencies with validated supplier data for and oversight. Launched in 2012 under the General Services Administration (GSA) as part of the Integrated Award Environment, SAM consolidated legacy systems such as the Central Contractor Registration (CCR), Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA), and Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) to reduce redundancy, enhance data accuracy, and streamline award processes without charging users fees. Registration in SAM is mandatory for prime recipients of funding exceeding certain thresholds, requiring annual renewals with detailed entity information including tax identification, banking details, disclosures, and certifications on matters like debarment status and compliance with laws such as the (FAR). SAM supports transparency by publicly disseminating non-sensitive data on over 1.5 million registered entities as of recent reports, facilitating agency searches for capable vendors and enabling public access to contract opportunities, histories, and exclusion records for . Key features include the assignment of a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) upon registration—replacing the DUNS number since —to uniquely track entities across federal systems, integration with tools for forecasting subcontracting opportunities, and automated validations to mitigate risks like duplicate registrations or ineligible participants. While praised for centralizing disparate processes and improving efficiency in federal spending exceeding $700 billion annually in s alone, SAM has encountered operational challenges, including registration delays during high-volume periods, technical glitches from system updates, and instances of fraudulent entries prompting GSA interventions such as enhanced verification protocols in 2018. These issues underscore ongoing efforts to balance accessibility with security in a system critical to federal acquisition integrity.

Overview

Purpose and Core Functions

The System for Award Management (SAM) serves as the official U.S. government portal for entities seeking to engage in federal contracting, grants, loans, and other assistance programs, functioning as a centralized repository that consolidates entity registration, , and related processes to streamline federal award management and reduce administrative redundancies across agencies. By integrating previously disparate systems, SAM enables efficient oversight of the federal award lifecycle, from pre-award eligibility verification to post-award compliance monitoring, thereby enhancing and accountability in the distribution of taxpayer funds. This consolidation supports the government's objective of standardizing interactions with vendors, nonprofits, and other organizations, eliminating the need for multiple registrations and minimizing errors in entity data handling. Core functions of SAM include the collection, validation, and storage of entity-supplied data, such as business details, banking information, and certifications, which agencies access to verify eligibility before issuing . It performs exclusion checks against a database of debarred or suspended parties to prevent to ineligible entities, ensuring with standards. Additionally, SAM facilitates opportunity searches by posting all contracting opportunities valued over $25,000, allowing registered entities to identify and pursue relevant solicitations. Award tracking capabilities extend across the lifecycle, including reporting on , subcontracts, and subawards to support transparency requirements under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA), which mandates public disclosure of spending data. Registration in SAM is required for entities to receive federal awards exceeding $25,000 annually, as stipulated by FFATA and implementing regulations, which aim to track and report on federal expenditures for greater fiscal oversight without imposing fees on users. This mandate applies to prime recipients of grants, contracts, and assistance, ensuring that only validated entities participate and that award data is accurately captured for public access and audit purposes.

Key Components and Data Elements

The System for Award Management (SAM) features integrated backend components that store and process entity data to support federal contracting and grant administration. Central to its structure is the entity registration database, which assigns and manages the (UEI), a 12-character alphanumeric generated by the to uniquely track organizations without reliance on commercial vendors. This replaced the (DUNS) number on April 4, 2022, enabling standardized identification across federal systems for validation and reporting. Another key component is the exclusions database, which compiles records of entities debarred, suspended, or proposed for exclusion due to violations of federal laws, regulations, or contracts, sourced from agencies like the General Services Administration and Department of Justice. These records include exclusion types such as administrative agreements, convictions, or tax delinquencies, facilitating real-time checks to prevent awards to ineligible parties and mitigate risks. The representations and certifications component, evolved from the legacy Online Representations and Certifications Application (), requires entities to affirm compliance with federal acquisition regulations, including clauses on , labor standards, and anti-discrimination policies, with data electronically linked to entity profiles for streamlined verification. Core data elements across these components include financial details such as banking information for (EFT) and Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs); industry classifications via (NAICS) codes, which denote primary and secondary business activities for set-aside eligibility; small business designations like 8(a) program participation, HUBZone certification, or service-disabled veteran-owned status, verified against standards; and performance-related metrics, such as references to past award data and integrity information from the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), used for risk assessments in award decisions.

Users and Registration

Eligible Entities and Requirements

Eligible entities for registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) encompass U.S. businesses of varying sizes, including small businesses and veteran-owned firms, nonprofit organizations, state and local governments, tribal entities, institutions of , and select foreign organizations or governments eligible for specific federal assistance or procurement programs. These stakeholders must maintain an active SAM registration to bid on federal contracts, apply for grants or loans, or receive other federal awards, as federal regulations prohibit awards to unregistered entities. Core requirements include possession of a valid (TIN), which SAM validates against (IRS) records to confirm the taxpayer name and control details, and proof of legal organizational status, such as incorporation date, entity structure (e.g., , LLC, ), and profit/nonprofit designation. Foreign entities additionally require a Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) code prior to registration. Registrations must be renewed annually—every 365 days—to sustain active status, with failure to renew resulting in expiration and ineligibility for new awards. Individuals unaffiliated with an organizational entity are ineligible for standard registration, though sole proprietors operating as businesses with a TIN may register under business classifications. SAM performs automated verifications against federal databases, including IRS TIN validation and (SBA) socioeconomic category confirmations for applicable entities, to ensure compliance and prevent fraudulent claims. This process underscores mandatory compliance for all prime recipients of federal funding, extending indirectly to subcontractors via flow-down clauses in awards.

Step-by-Step Registration Process

The registration process for the System for Award Management () begins with establishing a user account on SAM.gov, which requires authentication through Login.gov to ensure secure access. Entities must then initiate entity registration by providing core identification details, including the legal business name, physical address, (TIN), and date of incorporation or establishment. This step triggers the assignment of a Unique Entity ID (UEI), a 12-character alphanumeric identifier replacing the former DUNS number, which is issued after initial validation of entity details. Subsequent stages involve submitting additional data elements, such as points of contact (e.g., electronic business point of contact and government business point of contact), banking information for , and organizational structure details. TIN validation occurs automatically through integration with the (IRS), confirming the entity's tax status and eligibility; discrepancies here, such as mismatched names or inactive TINs, represent a common pitfall leading to rejection or delays. Entities asserting small business status must link to the (SBA) for size standard verification, requiring accurate (NAICS) codes and supporting documentation to avoid invalid assertions. The process concludes with completing Representations and Certifications (Reps & Certs), where entities affirm compliance with federal requirements like debarment status, labor standards, and clauses, followed by an from an authorized representative. Upon submission, the full registration undergoes backend validations, typically taking 7-10 business days to activate, though IRS and other agency checks can extend this to 12 business days if issues arise. Common execution pitfalls include incomplete address verification (e.g., using P.O. boxes where physical addresses are mandated) or failure to designate administrative properly, which may necessitate resubmission. Post-initial registration, entities must perform annual renewals every 365 days from the last date, involving revalidation of and Reps & Certs to maintain active ; failure to renew results in expiration, barring eligibility for federal awards until reinstated. Renewals mirror the initial process but focus on updates, with validations processing in 3-5 business days under normal conditions, though peak periods or errors can prolong this. Lapses beyond 30 days typically require full re-registration rather than simple reactivation, emphasizing the need for proactive monitoring via SAM.gov's entity checker to mitigate disruptions in bidding or award receipt.

Historical Development

Predecessor Systems

Prior to the consolidation into the System for Award Management, federal contractor registration and compliance relied on several disparate databases managed primarily by the General Services Administration (GSA). The Central Contractor Registration (CCR) served as the core repository for basic vendor information, including entity details such as taxpayer identification numbers, banking data, and commercial and government entity () codes, enabling agencies to verify eligibility for payments and awards. Established through Department of Defense policies in 2000 and expanded governmentwide by 2003, CCR required annual renewals and updates but focused solely on foundational registration without integrating broader compliance functions. Complementing CCR, the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) handled contractors' electronic submissions of representations and certifications, such as affirmations of size standards, labor compliance, and adherence, which agencies referenced during solicitations. Launched in 2004 as a centralized platform under Federal Acquisition Regulation updates, ORCA operated independently, necessitating separate logins and data maintenance from CCR despite overlapping user bases. The Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained records of debarred, suspended, or otherwise ineligible entities, drawing from agency reports to prevent awards to prohibited parties under federal regulations. Disseminated by GSA as a web-accessible since at least the early 2000s, EPLS required manual cross-checks by officials against other systems for comprehensive vetting. These siloed platforms, active throughout the , compelled contractors to perform redundant data entries and updates across multiple interfaces, fostering administrative inefficiencies through disjointed workflows and reliance on manual reconciliations for accuracy. GSA's 2008 initiative to integrate such systems stemmed from recognized redundancies in the Integrated Acquisition Environment portfolio, though full unification awaited later reforms.

Establishment and Initial Integration (2012)

The System for Award Management (SAM) was established in 2012 by the General Services Administration (GSA) to consolidate disparate federal procurement and grant systems into a unified platform, primarily integrating the Central Contractor Registration (CCR), , and Excluded Parties List System (EPLS). This initiative addressed longstanding redundancies in entity validation and data management, enabling a single point of entry for vendors, contractors, and grantees seeking federal awards. The consolidation supported broader federal mandates for transparency, including those under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006, which required detailed public reporting of awards exceeding $25,000 to curb waste and enhance accountability. Phase I of SAM's rollout, focusing on entity management, became operational on July 29, 2012, marking the initial migration of legacy data from , , and EPLS. The transition commenced on July 25, 2012, with full enforcement for new registrations by July 30, requiring existing users to transfer records to the new architecture to avoid disruptions in eligibility for federal opportunities. This shift eliminated parallel across systems, fostering and validation for over 100 federal agencies involved in and assistance programs. GSA's interim rule, effective February 2, 2012, had laid the groundwork by mandating the use of SAM for contract representations and certifications. Core objectives at inception emphasized operational efficiency, such as minimizing duplicate submissions and centralizing exclusion checks to bolster prevention, while aligning with FFATA's subaward requirements through integrated feeds to USAspending.gov. By May 29, 2012, preliminary integrations had begun testing these capabilities, with the July rollout ensuring seamless access for entity validation prior to award issuance. This foundational integration reduced administrative silos, though initial migrations faced technical hurdles for some users adapting to the unified interface.

Major Transitions and Updates (2010s–2020s)

In November 2019, the federal government decommissioned FedBizOpps (FBO.gov), migrating its contract opportunities functionalities to beta.SAM.gov to enable unified searching across federal procurement data. This transition, initiated in phases starting October 2018, consolidated disparate systems into a single platform, improving accessibility for vendors seeking federal awards. Beta.SAM.gov underwent further testing and refinement through 2021–2022, culminating in the April 4, 2022, replacement of the (DUNS) number with the SAM-generated Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). This change eliminated reliance on the third-party DUNS system, which had imposed fees on entities, thereby promoting competition among data providers and reducing administrative costs for registrants. On August 7, 2025, the (FAR) Council issued a final rule amending FAR 52.204-7 to clarify that offerors must maintain active registration only at the time of offer submission and contract award, not continuously throughout the interim period. This adjustment addressed contractor feedback regarding penalties for temporary lapses due to prior rigid enforcement, streamlining compliance without compromising verification at critical stages.

Operational and Technical Features

System Architecture and Integrations

The System for Award Management (SAM) utilizes a cloud-based architecture as part of the General Services Administration's (GSA) (IAE), enabling scalable data processing and real-time accessibility for federal contracting entities. This infrastructure supports the ingestion and validation of entity data, facilitating automated workflows for over 674,000 registered entities and handling monthly volumes exceeding 56,000 new or renewed registrations. SAM integrates with the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) to supply validated entity information for federal award reporting, ensuring accurate linkage of contractor details to procurement actions via standardized data exchanges. It connects to USAspending.gov through data feeds and , promoting by disseminating entity and award to public spending dashboards. Additional interoperability occurs with agency-specific systems via RESTful , such as the SAM Entity for retrieving public business information and the Opportunity Management for submitting procurement notices. The platform adheres to XML-based standards for data submission and exchange, compatible with FPDS web services to automate entity validation and award documentation across federal systems. Specialized features include Workspace for managing and collaborating on contract opportunity notices, allowing multiple users to draft, review, and finalize submissions prior to posting. Complementing this, the Service Contract Reporting (SCR) module enables contractors to fulfill (FAR) 52.204-14 requirements by submitting annual data on invoiced amounts, labor hours, and subcontractors directly within SAM, streamlining compliance for indefinite-delivery and fixed-price service contracts. These integrations ensure efficient data flow, reducing manual reconciliation while supporting the platform's capacity for millions of annual records processed through linked systems.

Security Measures and Compliance Tools

The System for Award Management (SAM) incorporates (MFA) via integration with Login.gov, requiring users to combine passwords with secondary verification methods such as authenticator apps, security keys, or backup codes to access accounts and perform actions like entity registrations. This measure enhances protection against unauthorized access by verifying user identity beyond static credentials. Role-based access controls further restrict permissions, allowing entity administrators to delegate tasks while limiting sensitive operations, such as core data edits, to authorized principals. SAM integrates Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code validation during entity registration, a process managed by the that confirms physical addresses and organizational details against external records to mitigate risks of fraudulent submissions. Failure in CAGE validation triggers notifications with specific reasons, such as mismatched location data, ensuring only verified entities proceed. Continuous monitoring aligns with Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) standards, with systems handling (FOUO) data meeting moderate security baselines to detect and respond to anomalies. Compliance tools include automated exclusions screening against SAM's debarment and suspension database, which federal agencies query to verify eligibility before issuing awards or subawards, prohibiting dealings with listed parties under Subpart 9.4. Comprehensive audit trails log all registration modifications, entity validations, and access events, providing traceable records for oversight and FISMA-mandated reporting on system integrity. These features support risk mitigation during updates, such as phased implementations to minimize disruptions, though documented response issues have occasionally delayed programmatic submissions.

Controversies and Criticisms

Third-Party Paid Services Exploitation

Third-party firms have capitalized on the System for Award Management (SAM) registration process by offering paid assistance for tasks that are officially free, charging between $300 and $1,500 per service despite the U.S. government's explicit policy of no fees for registration or renewal. These services emerged shortly after SAM's launch in 2012, preying on small businesses unfamiliar with federal contracting requirements and unaware that the process can be completed independently via SAM.gov or with free support from the Federal Service Desk. The General Services Administration (GSA) has repeatedly emphasized since SAM's establishment that entities never need to pay third parties to register, renew, or correct errors, as confirmed in official scam warnings distributed to vendors. Critics argue these practices distort the market for government contracting entry by creating artificial barriers, particularly for small, veteran-owned, and minority-owned businesses that may lack resources or expertise to navigate the system solo. Such firms often use aggressive marketing, including unsolicited emails and calls mimicking official communications, leading to complaints reported to bodies like the , with alerts noting a pattern of hefty fees for unnecessary "expedited" or "guaranteed" registrations. This exploitation underscores a perceived shortfall in federal outreach, as persistent scams suggest inadequate education on options despite available free guides and helplines, contrasting with more proactive private-sector customer education models. While GSA and SAM.gov have achieved partial deterrence through public alerts, vendor notifications, and reinforced messaging on the site's help resources—such as repeated affirmations of zero cost—scams remain prevalent, with reports of fraudulent third-party solicitations continuing into 2025. These efforts highlight ongoing inefficiencies in broad-scale communication to potential registrants, allowing bad actors to thrive amid the complexity of federal procurement rules.

Disruptions from System Transitions

The transition to the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) in SAM.gov, effective April 4, 2022, following the phaseout of Dun & Bradstreet's DUNS numbers, resulted in significant operational disruptions, including prolonged delays in entity validation and registration processing. These issues stemmed from the government's inability to reuse previously validated D&B due to contractual limitations, necessitating manual submission and review of new such as legal names, addresses, and incorporation papers for affected entities. Entities undergoing name or address changes, mergers, foreign registrants, or those with multiple locations faced heightened scrutiny, leading to backlogs in verification that extended beyond initial expectations. Processing delays persisted for months, with high demand overwhelming the system and requiring extensive manual interventions, as automated tools proved insufficient for complex cases. By September 2022, the Department of Defense issued a deviation to accommodate ongoing UEI transition problems, allowing flexibility for contractors unable to complete timely registrations. Agencies across government issued guidance to manage these delays, including extensions for expiration dates and recommendations to initiate renewals early, while congressional inquiries highlighted concerns over the disruptions' scope. Impacts included expired entity statuses, rendering thousands of businesses temporarily ineligible for federal s and grants, thereby forfeiting bidding opportunities and contributing to inefficiencies in federal award distribution. Root causes included inadequate pre-transition testing of validation workflows, overreliance on external without for phaseout constraints, and fragmented inter-agency coordination, which prioritized the fixed deadline over robust user support mechanisms. These factors exacerbated empirical shortfalls in federal spending efficiency, as delayed registrations disrupted pipelines and increased administrative burdens on entities. While proponents argued the UEI shift would yield long-term improvements in standardization and reduced dependencies, early post-transition performance revealed persistent validation bottlenecks, with the General Services Administration reporting that only 85% of manual reviews were completing within one month by November 2022, underscoring a misalignment between bureaucratic timelines and practical user needs.

Impact and Effectiveness

Achievements in Streamlining Federal Awards

The consolidation of multiple legacy federal systems into SAM has streamlined administrative processes by eliminating redundant registrations and data submissions, enabling agencies to manage awards more efficiently without the need for separate platforms like the Central Contractor Registration and Excluded Parties List System. This unified approach supports the annual processing of federal contracts and grants exceeding $500 billion in value. Public accessibility to entity registrations and award data on SAM.gov, including over 2.8 million user accounts as of June 2023—a 42 percent increase from the prior year—promotes and facilitates oversight of expenditures. Integrating exclusion directly into the registration prevents awards to debarred or suspended entities at the outset, thereby mitigating risks of and ensuring before funds are disbursed. Registration processing times average 10 business days for most entities, a reduction from the extended periods associated with navigating predecessor systems, which often required parallel submissions across platforms. This expedited onboarding lowers barriers for prospective award recipients, including small businesses required to register for eligibility, thereby expanding competitive access to federal contracting opportunities.

Persistent Challenges and Empirical Shortcomings

Despite updates in the , the System for Award Management (SAM) continues to face challenges, including a complex registration process that results in errors in approximately one in five submissions, according to an analysis by researchers. These errors often stem from mismatches in business data across federal records, leading to delays or rejections that hinder timely entity validation and participation in federal awards. User reports and surveys highlight difficulties in providing acceptable documentation for entity validation, exacerbating abandonment during the multi-step renewal process required annually. SAM's exclusions database exhibits persistent data integrity shortcomings, with significant underreporting of responsibility information that undermines risk mitigation. For instance, from fiscal years 2019 to 2023, 335 contract terminations recorded in the Federal Procurement Data System were not reflected in SAM's /qualification records, and 52 administrative agreements tracked by the failed to appear in the system. Agencies such as the Department of Defense reported 166 unreported terminations over this period, while others like the General Services Administration cited gaps in guidance and awareness as contributing factors, allowing potentially ineligible entities to secure awards despite debarment indicators. These propagation delays and omissions reflect ongoing inadequacies in across systems. The centralized architecture of , which consolidated ten prior systems, creates single points of failure that amplify disruptions, in contrast to more resilient decentralized alternatives in private sectors. Notable outages, such as the unexpected downtime on March 8, 2023, which generated erroneous emails and impeded access for users nationwide, illustrate how system-wide issues halt registrations, validations, and award processes simultaneously. Intermittent outages reported in 2023 and 2024 further underscore this vulnerability, compounded by historical security lapses like weak identity verification enabling fraudulent diversions as far back as 2016–2018, with effects persisting through inadequate safeguards against third-party exploitation of public data. Such centralization also fosters redundant verifications at the agency level, as incomplete SAM data prompts repeated manual checks rather than streamlined reliance.

References

  1. [1]
    About This Site - SAM.gov
    The System for Award Management (SAM.gov) is an official website of the US Government. There is no cost to use SAM.gov.
  2. [2]
    About SAM.gov - GSA
    Feb 21, 2025 · The System for Award Management (SAM.gov) is an official website of the US Government. There is no cost to use SAM.gov.
  3. [3]
    Get Started with Registration and the Unique Entity ID - SAM.gov
    A registration allows you to bid on government contracts and apply for federal assistance. As part of registration, we will assign you a Unique Entity ID. To ...
  4. [4]
    Check Entity Status - SAM.gov
    This tool allows you to check the status of your entity. Non-federal users: You may only check the status of entities linked to your SAM.gov account.
  5. [5]
    SAM.gov
    This is a U.S. General Services Administration Federal Government computer system that is "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY." This system is subject to monitoring.
  6. [6]
    GSA Identifies Fraudulent Activity in SAM.gov and Imposes New ...
    Apr 30, 2018 · GSA has updated its notice to inform the contracting community that it is implementing additional steps to verify SAM registrants and their authorized users.
  7. [7]
    Capabilities - System for Award Management (SAM) - OUSD A&S
    In 2012, GSA consolidated several federal procurement and award systems into 1 new system—the System for Award Management (SAM). SAM streamlined processes ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  8. [8]
    Exclusion Types - SAM.gov | Entity Information
    Exclusion records created in SAM.gov will only have an Exclusion Type, not a CT Code. This page provides a description of each Exclusion Type as well as links ...
  9. [9]
    Databank | Contract Data | Standard - SAM.gov
    SAM.gov reports support analysis of the federal award lifecycle. The DataBank allows you to download or run reports on various domains.
  10. [10]
    FFATA Act (2006) - Grants.gov
    The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), signed into law in 2006, required information about Federal awards to be posted on a single, ...
  11. [11]
    part 25—unique entity identifier and system for award management
    In these instances, Federal agencies must require the recipient to obtain a UEI and complete registration in SAM.gov within 30 days of the Federal award date.
  12. [12]
    Unique Entity Identifier update - GSA
    Apr 4, 2022 · About the Unique Entity Identifier. On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS number to uniquely identify entities.
  13. [13]
    52.204-7 System for Award Management. - Acquisition.GOV
    (1) An Offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer or quotation and at time of award (see FAR clause 52.204-13, System for Award ...
  14. [14]
    Entity Information - SAM.gov
    SAM.gov provides entity registrations, exclusions, disaster response registry, responsibility/qualification data, and tools to manage exclusions.Advanced Search · Exclusion Types · Go to Exclusions Data Files · Exclusion POC<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] SAM Entity Management Public Extract Layout
    The letter next to the NAICS code is the. Small Business indicator (Y/N/E). Please note: The following NAICS codes are not used for Federal procurement purposes ...Missing: performance ratings
  16. [16]
    SAM.gov Registrations - US Federal Contractor Registration (USFCR)
    A SAM registration is required to work as a federal contractor or subcontractor, and for nonprofits to receive grants.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] How to register your entity to be eligible for GRANTS in SAM
    NATO Commercial and Government. Entity (NCAGE) Code: Foreign entities must obtain a NCAGE code for each. DUNS number they plan to register in. SAM before you ...
  18. [18]
    Resources for Using the System for Award Management (SAM.gov)
    JustGrants uses the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) as the primary source of agency information when applying for and managing DOJ grant funding.Missing: checks | Show results with:checks
  19. [19]
    Basic requirements | U.S. Small Business Administration
    Aug 1, 2025 · NAICS codes classify businesses based on the particular product or service they supply. A business will generally have a primary NAICS code ...Missing: ratings | Show results with:ratings
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Entity Registration Checklist | SAM.gov
    SAM.gov is FREE to use. There is no charge to get a Unique Entity ID, register your entity, and maintain your entity registration at SAM.gov.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] System for Award Management (SAM) - GSA
    Jul 16, 2020 · Entity records are created by the person or entity wishing to do business with the government. Exclusion records are created by Federal agency ...
  22. [22]
    Register with SAM - Grants.gov
    It takes 24 hours for SAM Registration to activate after SAM has received all required information from registrants. SAM registration must be renewed annually.
  23. [23]
    Subpart 4.11 - System for Award Management - Acquisition.GOV
    Oct 10, 2024 · This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for requiring contractor registration in the System for Award Management (SAM)<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] SAM.gov Quick Start Guide for New Grantee Registration
    On the My SAM page, select Entity Registrations from the sub- navigation menu and select Register New Entity. 4. Select your type of Entity. 5. If you are ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 1 SAM.gov Registration Process Updated May 31, 2023 ... - DFC
    May 31, 2023 · Before you start, please have the following information available regarding the company/entity you are registering: • Date of Incorporation.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] SAM Registration Process – Challenges & Tips Feb 29, 2024 - COGR
    Feb 29, 2024 · The current average processing time for validation is 3-5 business days. Page 35. System for Award Management | For People Who Make, Receive, ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  27. [27]
    How Long Does it Take to Complete the SAM Registration Process?
    The SAM registration process averages 2 to 8 weeks, but can vary based on business complexity, information accuracy, and other factors.Missing: validation | Show results with:validation
  28. [28]
    Central Contractor Registration (CCR) - Federal Register
    Aug 17, 2000 · This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for requiring contractor registration in the DoD Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database.
  29. [29]
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Central Contractor Registration
    Oct 1, 2003 · This rule amends the FAR to require contractor registration in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database prior to award of any contract.
  30. [30]
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Electronic Representations and ...
    Dec 20, 2004 · Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) means the primary Government repository for contractor submitted representations ...Background · Regulatory Flexibility Act · Paperwork Reduction Act · ANNUAL...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  31. [31]
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Transition to the System for Award ...
    Jan 3, 2012 · The transition of the IAE to the new System for Award Management (SAM) architecture has begun. ... Databases include the CCR, EPLS, ORCA, and ...Missing: predecessor history
  32. [32]
    31 CFR § 19.950 - Excluded Parties List System. - Law.Cornell.Edu
    Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) means the list maintained and disseminated by the General Services Administration (GSA) containing the names and other ...
  33. [33]
    31 CFR Part 19 Subpart E -- Excluded Parties List System - eCFR
    The EPLS is a widely available source of the most current information about persons who are excluded or disqualified from covered transactions.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] FEDERAL CONTRACTING Effort to Consolidate Governmentwide ...
    Mar 15, 2012 · In 2008, GSA began consolidating its portfolio of systems into one integrated system called the System for Award. Management (SAM). In ...
  35. [35]
    Consolidation of the System for Award Management | FAMR
    The Creation of the System for Award Management (SAM)​​ SAM was launched in 2012 to consolidate multiple government programs involving federal contract work.Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  36. [36]
    SAM Registration - Federal Schedules
    Central Contractor Registration (CCR); Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA); Excluded Parties List System (EPLS). Do You Need to ...
  37. [37]
    Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act | US EPA
    FFATA requires disclosure of all entities receiving Federal funds over $25,000 on USASpending.gov, including award details and entity information.
  38. [38]
    Requirements for Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · FFATA requires reporting of subawards over $30,000, executive compensation for top 5, and subrecipient executive compensation if certain ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Class Deviation - System for Award Management (SAM) - Osd.mil
    Aug 21, 2012 · The General Services Administration (GSA) implemented Phase I of SAM on July 29, 2012.<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    CCR Migration to SAM Beginning July 25, 2012 - Police1
    Jul 23, 2012 · On July 30th, SAM will begin to update Grants.gov of any registrations that were in process when the migration began. You will also be able to ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  41. [41]
    [PDF] REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE BENEFITS OF THE ...
    May 9, 2013 · (CCR/FedReg, EPLS, and the ORCA). SAM moved the legacy applications to ... In 2012, the System for Award Management (SAM), used by the ...
  42. [42]
    Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · If you do not make subawards, you do not have to file a report via SAM; however, you would need to address the executive compensation for your ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] information on the system for award management (sam)
    Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)) beginning May 29, 2012. After ... If you have any questions about SAM please cone them via email at: askSAM@gsa.gov.
  44. [44]
    Effort to Consolidate Governmentwide Acquisition Data Systems ...
    Mar 15, 2012 · GSA has made progress in developing SAM and phase 1, consisting of three systems, is scheduled to be completed in May 2012. GSA also has ...
  45. [45]
    Information About FBO transition - GSA
    Essential Information About the FBO transition into SAM.gov · November 6, 2019: FBO Retirement Webinar for Contracting Officers · October 22, 2019: FBO Transition ...
  46. [46]
    Transition from Unique Entity (DUNS) to Unique Entity ID (SAM)
    Change is coming. Starting Monday, April 4, 2022, the new Unique Entity ID from SAM.gov will be the official governmentwide identifier used for federal awards.
  47. [47]
    DUNS to be Replaced in SAM as Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) April ...
    DUNS, a 9-character number from D&B, will be replaced by a 12-character SAM-issued UEI on April 4, 2022, to eliminate the third-party website.
  48. [48]
    Federal Acquisition Regulation: Clarification of System for Award ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... (FAR) to clarify System for Award Management (SAM) preaward registration requirements. The interim rule changed the provision at FAR 52.204-7 ...
  49. [49]
    GSA Modernizes One of The Government's Largest Digital Initiatives
    We worked to modernize GSA's cloud-based Integrated Award Environment (IAE), one of the largest and most complex of the government's digital initiatives.
  50. [50]
    SAM.gov by the Numbers - GSA
    Formerly known as FBO.gov, all contracting opportunities valued over $25,000 are posted at sam.gov. tax exempt. When you use a government purchase card, such ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Version 1.5 OCTOBER 2025 - Federal Procurement Data System
    Jun 24, 2023 · SAM – System for Award Management database. The primary government repository for entity information required for the conduct of business ...
  52. [52]
    USAspending API
    The USAspending API (Application Programming Interface) allows the public to access comprehensive US government spending data.
  53. [53]
    APIs - GSA Open Technology
    Federal Procurement Data System - FPDS API. SOAP and XML web services are used in FPDS-NG to provide interoperability with various federal procurement systems.
  54. [54]
    General Services Administration - Organizations - Dataset - Catalog
    System for Award Management (SAM) API. The SAM API is a RESTful method of retrieving public information about the businesses, organizations, or individuals ( ...Missing: architecture integrations USAspending
  55. [55]
    SAM.gov: Home
    The Official U.S. Government System for: Contracting Contract data including Opportunities, Awards and Subcontractor reports; Wage Determinations · Federal ...About This Site · Check Entity Status · Entity Registration · Search
  56. [56]
    Service Contract Reporting for FY25 Starts Oct 3 - SAM.gov
    Oct 3, 2025 · The SCR feature in SAM.gov allows contractors to submit annual reports on service contract activity, as required under FAR 52.204-14 and FAR ...
  57. [57]
    52.204-14 Service Contract Reporting Requirements.
    Contractors must report annually by Oct 31, including contract number, total invoiced amount, labor hours, and subcontractor data, submitted via www.sam.gov.
  58. [58]
    V1.3 FPDS-NG Web Service Integration Specifications
    This document introduces the web services system architecture that exposes one point of entry to FPDS-NG.
  59. [59]
    Authentication methods | Login.gov
    In addition to your password, Login.gov requires that you use at least one multi-factor authentication method (MFA) as an added layer of protection to secure ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Appendix 7: SAM Registration User Guide
    These measures include masking specific data elements in the entity registration; requiring “parent” approval of new registrations for their specific “child” ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Terms of Use - SAM.gov
    SAM.gov is a federal government website. When you use this site, you must follow these terms. If you do not, you may lose access to SAM.gov and we may take ...
  62. [62]
    Subpart 9.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility
    This subpart- (1) Prescribes policies and procedures governing the debarment and suspension of contractors by agencies for the causes given in 9.406-2 and 9. ...
  63. [63]
    SAM.gov Entity Management API | GSA Open Technology
    When submitting help desk tickets for API or system connection issues, provide the following: The exact API requests that you were trying to send; The exact ...Getting Started · API Description · HTTP Response Codes · Examples
  64. [64]
    Typical Costs SAM Registration Assistance Pricing
    While SAM registration itself is free through the government website, third-party assistance services typically charge between $300-$600 for basic packages.Missing: $500 | Show results with:$500
  65. [65]
    How SAM.gov Scams Target Small Businesses
    Aug 21, 2025 · Scammers are targeting small businesses using fake SAM.gov communications to steal sensitive information and money.<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    CAUTION: Beware of Predatory SAM Updates or Registration Charges
    Apr 5, 2013 · SAM registration and SAM updates are FREE. Some third-party firms promise to help for a price but leave you wondering what it is you are ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] SAM Scams Warning from GSA
    From time to time, GSA and IAE share information about common fraud schemes that target vendors registered in the System for Award Management (SAM). These scams ...
  68. [68]
    Veteran entrepreneurs: Spot the scams | Consumer Advice
    Nov 2, 2022 · I reported on a business that looked legitimate offering certifications to designate Veteran's, Women, or Minority owned businesses. We paid ...
  69. [69]
    BBB Scam Alert: Watch out for third parties claiming to help with your ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · Third-party companies claim to offer vendors help with their SAM.gov registrations and renewals for a hefty fee. SAM.gov is a free US ...
  70. [70]
    SAM Scams: Protect Your Company | Crowell & Moring LLP
    Oct 23, 2024 · Recent phishing scams and efforts to gain access to registrations indicate sophisticated actors are attempting to manipulate SAM registrations.
  71. [71]
    SAM Scams: Protect Your Company | Government Contracts Legal ...
    Oct 29, 2024 · Recently, there has been a significant increase in scams targeting users of the System for Award Management (SAM.gov). Active SAM registrations
  72. [72]
    SAM Transition to UEI Plagued with Registration Processing Delays
    Jul 21, 2022 · Begin updating your SAM registration early enough to address potential processing delays. Collect entity validation documentation before ...
  73. [73]
    SAM Transition to UEI Plagued with Registration Processing Delays
    Jul 21, 2022 · Substantial verification and validation delays continue, agencies have had to issue guidance for the management of SAM delays, and even Congress ...Missing: impacts | Show results with:impacts
  74. [74]
    DoD issues deviation after continued UEI transition delays
    Sep 13, 2022 · Companies continue to face delays in completing the transition because of problems with GSA's new system. Industry associations and companies ...
  75. [75]
    GSA says it is completing 85% of manual reviews for Unique Entity ...
    Nov 2, 2022 · The General Services Administration is completing 85% of manual reviews required to assign Unique Entity Identifiers within one month, according ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    GSA Systems Switch to Unique Entity ID (SAM) on April 4, 2022
    Mar 16, 2022 · On Monday, April 4, 2022, SAM.gov and all other General Services Administration (GSA) systems will switch to the new Unique Entity ID (SAM) as the ...Missing: validation | Show results with:validation
  77. [77]
    What is the System for Award Management (SAM) - Price Reporter
    Aug 8, 2024 · The System for Award Management (SAM) was designed with the overarching goal of simplifying the federal procurement and grants management ...
  78. [78]
    Provider and Entity Transparency with the SAM Database - Verisys
    Feb 20, 2020 · The exclusion list protects the federal government and taxpayers from fraud and abuse with a centralized system for agencies and departments ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] SAM.gov Entity Validation - GSA
    Sep 14, 2022 · Note that after submitting your renewal, validations by CAGE and the IRS can take 7-12 business days. IAE Stakeholder Forum. Answer. How much ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  80. [80]
    [PDF] New to SAM.gov A Quick Overview for Financial Assistance - Treasury
    Registrations must be updated every 12 months to remain active. ○ There is no fee to register or renew at SAM.gov. ○ Businesses and grant or loan recipients ...
  81. [81]
    7 Common SAM Registration Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
    May 10, 2021 · Top SAM Registration Issues to Avoid. Mistake #1: Thinking user account creation amounts to registration. Registration is not on an individual ...
  82. [82]
    7 Deadly SAM Registration Mistakes to Avoid - Federal Filing
    Jun 13, 2024 · Master the SAM.gov registration process with patience and preparation. Learn what documents are necessary for success.
  83. [83]
    [PDF] GAO-24-106911, Federal Contractors: Actions Needed to Improve ...
    Sep 25, 2024 · We conducted this performance audit from June 2023 to September 2024 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
  84. [84]
    SAM.gov Experiencing Unexpected Outage and Generating ...
    Mar 8, 2023 · As of the morning of March 8, 2023, SAM.gov is experiencing an unexpected outage and the system also appears to be generating false emails.
  85. [85]
    System Alerts | SAM.gov
    SAM.gov will undergo planned maintenance on Saturday, November 15, 2025 from 8:00 AM to 1:00 PM EST. Users in SAM.gov will be unable to complete Entity ...SAM.gov Scheduled... · Scheduled SAM Maintenance · Entity ValidationMissing: beta. implementation
  86. [86]
    None
    ### Summary of Challenges Related to SAM.gov or Integrated Award Environment