Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

TND

TND is an initialism used in neo-Nazi, white supremacist, and other extremist online communities to abbreviate "Total Nigger Death," a slogan advocating the mass killing or extermination of Black people.^[1] It often appears alongside similar phrases like TKD ("Total Kike Death"), targeting Jews, and has proliferated on platforms such as 4chan, TikTok, and other anonymous forums since at least the mid-2010s, gaining wider notice during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.^[1] Originating as provocative copypasta and memes in imageboard culture, TND functions as both a direct expression of genocidal intent and a trolling mechanism to evade moderation, though organizations monitoring hate speech classify it unequivocally as a symbol of violent racism rather than mere irony.^[1] Its deployment reflects broader patterns in digital extremism, where shorthand acronyms camouflage explicit calls for ethnic cleansing amid debates over free speech and content policing.^[1]

Definition and Principles

Core Definition

Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) is an urban planning approach that emphasizes the creation of compact, pedestrian-friendly communities modeled on pre-automotive era towns and villages, featuring interconnected street networks, a mix of residential, commercial, and civic uses within walking distance, diverse housing types on smaller lots, and defined edges to promote social cohesion and reduce reliance on automobiles.^[2]^[3] This model contrasts with conventional suburban development by prioritizing human-scale design over low-density, auto-oriented sprawl, aiming to replicate the functional and aesthetic qualities of early 20th-century neighborhoods with narrow streets, front porches, and central public spaces.^[4]^[5] The concept was formalized in 1990 by architects Andrés Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk through their firm DPZ CoDesign, who developed the TND ordinance as a regulatory framework for mixed-use, neighborhood-scale projects, drawing from historical precedents like the grid plans of 19th-century American towns.^[6] Early implementations, such as the Seaside community in Florida starting in 1981, demonstrated TND's viability by integrating moderate to high residential densities—often 8-12 units per acre—with retail and services in a core area to support daily needs on foot.^[2]^[7] TND developments typically include a discernable center with civic buildings, rear-loaded alleys for utilities and parking to preserve street-facing facades, and lot sizes averaging 5,000-7,000 square feet to encourage variety in homeownership and rental options while maintaining affordability relative to sprawling subdivisions.^[8]^[9] Empirical observations from TND projects indicate higher walkability indices, with residents accessing amenities within a quarter-mile radius, though long-term data on outcomes like reduced vehicle miles traveled remains project-specific and not universally quantified across implementations.^[4]^[5]

Fundamental Principles

The fundamental principles of Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) emphasize compact, human-scaled communities that integrate diverse functions to foster walkability, social cohesion, and reduced automobile dependence. Developments are structured around a defined center—often featuring civic buildings, shops, or a town square—and tapering edges, with higher densities near the core to support efficient land use and transit viability. Neighborhoods typically encompass 100 to 500 acres, scaled to accommodate 3,000 to 10,000 residents, ensuring self-sufficiency for daily needs without excessive sprawl.^[10]^[5] Central to TND is pedestrian orientation, where streets prioritize foot traffic over vehicles through narrow rights-of-way (often 50-60 feet wide, with travel lanes of 20-28 feet) and buildings aligned close to sidewalks, creating enclosed, inviting streetscapes. Essential destinations like schools, groceries, and workplaces are sited within a 5- to 10-minute walk (roughly 1,320 to 2,640 feet), promoting physical activity and incidental social encounters while minimizing travel distances. Rear alleys handle utilities, garbage, and off-street parking to preserve front-yard openness and reduce curb cuts.^[3]^[11] Interconnected street networks replace cul-de-sacs and looping designs with a modified grid system, providing multiple routes to distribute traffic, lower speeds (typically under 20 mph), and enhance safety for non-motorized users. This connectivity contrasts with conventional suburban hierarchies that funnel vehicles onto high-speed arterials, aiming instead for dispersed, lower-volume flows that support cycling and transit.^[10]^[12] Mixed land uses and housing diversity ensure vibrant, inclusive neighborhoods by blending residential, commercial, office, and institutional buildings in compatible proximity, often at block scales. Housing includes a range of types—single-family detached homes on small lots (e.g., 3,000-5,000 square feet), rowhouses, duplexes, and limited multifamily units—to accommodate varied household sizes and incomes, with at least 20-30% typically affordable. This variety, drawn from historic precedents, counters socioeconomic segregation common in single-use zoning.^[5]^[13] Public realms feature integrated open spaces like parks (at least 10% of area), plazas, and greens, positioned as neighborhood focal points to encourage gatherings and visual orientation. Architecture adheres to context-sensitive standards, favoring durable materials, front porches, and pitched roofs over modernist uniformity, while sustainability integrates passive solar design and native landscaping without mandating high-tech interventions. These tenets, formalized in ordinances like those in Florida's growth management framework since the 1990s, originated in prototypes such as Seaside, Florida (planned 1980, built from 1981), by Andrés Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk.^[14]^[15]

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Roots

Prior to the widespread adoption of automobiles and single-use zoning in the 20th century, urban and rural settlements in the United States predominantly featured compact, walkable layouts driven by reliance on pedestrian and horse-drawn transport, with mixed residential, commercial, and civic uses integrated within short distances. These patterns emerged organically or through deliberate planning in colonial and 19th-century contexts, fostering interconnected street networks, diverse housing types from single-family homes to multi-unit dwellings, and central public spaces that served as community focal points. Such designs prioritized human-scale accessibility over vehicular efficiency, as evidenced in pre-streetcar neighborhoods where homes, shops, and industries coexisted without regulatory separation, enabling daily activities to occur within walking radii of central hubs like river landings or markets.^[16] In 19th-century American cities like St. Paul, Minnesota, development from the 1850s to 1880s exemplified these traits through high-density clustering near transportation nodes, such as the Mississippi River, where working-class and affluent residents intermixed in unplanned edge neighborhoods featuring intermingled land uses and no master-planned segregation. Street grids facilitated connectivity, with blocks accommodating a variety of building scales, from modest worker housing to larger commercial structures, reflecting speculative growth patterns that avoided the low-density sprawl of later eras. Similar dynamics appeared in Midwestern cities, where proximity to employment and services dictated compact forms, with densities supporting social mixing and economic vitality absent modern infrastructure dependencies.^[16]^[17] Southern colonial planned towns provided codified precedents, such as Savannah, Georgia, founded in 1733 under James Oglethorpe's design of wards organized around public squares, which integrated residential variety, local commerce, and green spaces within a hierarchical street system promoting pedestrian circulation and neighborhood identity. Charleston and Beaufort, South Carolina, similarly embodied pre-20th-century aesthetics with rear alleys for service access, front-oriented porches encouraging social interaction, and mixed-use blocks that blurred strict residential zoning, influencing later TND by demonstrating resilient, adaptable community structures. These examples underscore how pre-1900 development, unconstrained by automobile-centric codes, naturally aligned with TND's emphasis on connectivity, diversity, and placemaking through empirical adaptation to local needs rather than imposed ideals.^[14]

Late 20th Century Emergence

Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) emerged in the late 1980s as a deliberate counter to the automobile-dependent suburban sprawl that dominated post-World War II American land-use patterns, which prioritized low-density, single-use zoning and cul-de-sac street layouts over pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use communities.^[8] This shift drew from observations of the social isolation, inefficient infrastructure, and environmental costs associated with conventional subdivisions, prompting architects and planners to revive pre-automobile neighborhood morphologies characterized by interconnected streets, compact blocks, and integrated civic spaces.^[18] Early proponents argued that such designs fostered community cohesion and reduced reliance on cars, based on empirical patterns from historic towns where daily needs were accessible within walking distance.^[14] Pivotal to TND's inception was the work of Andrés Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, who established their firm DPZ CoDesign in 1980 to explore alternatives to modernist planning orthodoxy.^[6] Commissioned by developer Robert Davis, they produced the master plan for Seaside, Florida, in 1981 on an 80-acre coastal site, marking the first major project embodying TND principles through its emphasis on human-scaled architecture, rear-alley service access, and a central town square.^[19] Seaside's implementation demonstrated viability by integrating diverse housing types—from cottages to multi-family units—within a walkable framework, achieving higher densities without high-rises and attracting residents seeking alternatives to isolated suburbs.^[20] By the late 1980s, TND coalesced as a codified approach within the burgeoning New Urbanism movement, with Duany and Plater-Zyberk articulating its tenets in workshops and publications that critiqued Euclidean zoning's segregation of uses, which had entrenched sprawl since the 1920s.^[14] The concept gained traction amid growing public and professional disillusionment with energy-intensive commuting patterns, evidenced by rising gasoline costs and urban decay in central cities during the 1970s oil crises.^[18] Initial TND guidelines stressed neighborhood boundaries defined by natural features or arterial roads, internal connectivity via narrow streets, and a hierarchy of public realms to support local economies and social interactions, setting the stage for broader adoption in the 1990s.^[8]

Key Milestones and Ordinances (1980s-1990s)

The planning of Seaside, Florida, marked an early milestone in Traditional Neighborhood Development, with developer Robert Davis commissioning architects Andrés Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk in 1980 to create a compact, pedestrian-friendly community on 80 acres of coastal land, countering automobile-dependent suburban models.^[20] Construction began in 1981, incorporating narrow streets, rear alleys for utilities, front porches, and mixed housing types to foster social interaction and walkability, achieving over 90% pedestrian coverage within a five-minute radius.^[14] Seaside's 1981 development code pioneered form-based regulations for TND by specifying building placements, scales, and typologies rather than land uses alone, enabling legal implementation of traditional patterns previously hindered by Euclidean zoning.^[21] TND formalized as a distinct paradigm in the late 1980s, driven by critiques of sprawl's inefficiencies, such as low-density single-use zoning that increased infrastructure costs by 20-30% compared to compact layouts.^[8] Notable projects included Kentlands, Maryland, initiated in 1989 by DPZ on a 348-acre brownfield site, featuring 1,600 housing units in varied densities, central greens, and commercial nodes to replicate pre-automobile neighborhood structures.^[22] Similarly, Laguna West in Elk Grove, California, planned by Peter Calthorpe in 1988 and built out through the early 1990s, spanned 650 acres with 2,500 units, integrating light rail access, 40% open space, and mixed-income housing to reduce vehicle miles traveled by an estimated 15% relative to conventional suburbs.^[18] Into the 1990s, ordinances explicitly supporting TND proliferated, particularly in the Southeast, where several cities and counties enacted form-based codes modeled on TND to mandate interconnected street grids, block perimeters of 1,300-2,000 feet, and 20-40% mixed-use areas, bypassing restrictive single-family zoning that had dominated post-1940s development.^[23] These codes, often structured as overlay districts, required civic buildings in prominent locations and rear-loaded garages to prioritize streetscape quality, with adoption rates accelerating after demonstrations of higher property values—up to 10-15% premiums in TND versus conventional subdivisions.^[14] The 1993 founding of the Congress for the New Urbanism codified TND principles in its Charter, influencing over 50 ordinances by decade's end and establishing benchmarks like density targets of 7-20 units per acre.^[22]

Design and Technical Features

Street Networks and Connectivity

In Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), street networks prioritize high connectivity through a hierarchical yet interconnected grid-like pattern, contrasting with the dendritic, cul-de-sac-dominated layouts of conventional suburban developments. This design features short blocks typically measuring 200 to 400 feet per side, fostering frequent intersections that enable multiple route choices for pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles alike.^[15]^[2] Local streets, often narrowed to 20-26 feet with on-street parking and tree canopies, serve primarily as frontage roads for residences, while rear alleys handle utilities and service access to minimize through-traffic on residential frontages.^[24] Collectors and arterials integrate seamlessly into the network, distributing traffic loads rather than funneling them into isolated high-volume corridors.^[25] Connectivity is quantified by metrics such as intersection density, ideally exceeding 150 intersections per square mile, which empirical analyses link to enhanced walkability and reduced average trip lengths compared to low-connectivity suburban patterns.^[25] Studies of TND-inspired designs demonstrate that such networks lower per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 20-30% through dispersed traffic flows and shorter, direct paths, thereby alleviating congestion on major roads without necessitating wider arterials.^[26] Traffic simulations further indicate improved overall network capacity, as connectivity allows for balanced load distribution, reducing peak-hour delays by up to 15% relative to hierarchical suburban grids.^[27] These patterns promote multimodal transport by integrating sidewalks, bike lanes, and transit stops within the streetscape, empirically correlating with higher rates of non-motorized trips—up to 2-3 times those in disconnected suburbs—due to accessible destinations and perceived safety from lower speeds (typically 20-25 mph on local streets via calming features like curb extensions).^[28] However, realization of benefits hinges on consistent implementation; poorly enforced connectivity can lead to unintended cut-through traffic, though TND guidelines mitigate this via yield-controlled intersections and limited curb cuts.^[29]^[30]

Mixed-Use Integration and Housing Variety

Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) emphasizes mixed-use integration by blending residential, commercial, office, and civic functions within compact, pedestrian-scale blocks and neighborhoods, thereby minimizing automobile reliance and supporting daily activities on foot or by transit. This design principle distributes diverse land uses throughout the development rather than segregating them into distinct zones, enabling residents to access shops, services, and workplaces within short walking distances, typically under a quarter-mile radius from most homes.^[31] Such integration contrasts with conventional single-use zoning, which often requires vehicle travel for routine needs, and aligns with pre-automotive urban patterns where mixed uses fostered economic vitality and social cohesion.^[32] Housing variety in TND manifests through a deliberate inclusion of multiple dwelling types—such as single-family detached homes, duplexes, townhouses, rowhouses, and low-rise apartments—offered in varying lot sizes and densities to accommodate diverse household compositions, including families, singles, seniors, and varying income levels. Developments typically require a mix where single-family units comprise at least 50% of total dwellings in some ordinances, while permitting higher densities near commercial cores to balance affordability and scale.^[33] This approach provides broader consumer choices in housing styles and settings compared to uniform suburban subdivisions, promoting neighborhood diversity without mandating high-rise forms.^[12] The synergy of mixed-use and housing variety in TND is achieved through transect-based zoning, which calibrates densities and uses along a rural-to-urban gradient, ensuring compatible scales where, for instance, ground-floor retail supports upper-story residences in core areas. This integration enhances land efficiency, as evidenced by reduced infrastructure needs per capita in pedestrian-oriented layouts, and counters homogenization by encouraging smaller units alongside larger homes to broaden affordability options. Empirical observations from TND implementations indicate sustained occupancy across income strata due to this diversity, though long-term data remains limited to case studies rather than large-scale longitudinal analyses.^[5]^[34]

Public Spaces and Amenities

Public spaces in Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) are intentionally designed as central anchors to promote social interaction, pedestrian accessibility, and community identity, typically comprising 10-15% of the total development area. These spaces are positioned at key nodes within the interconnected street grid, ensuring that most residents can reach them via a 5- to 10-minute walk, thereby reducing reliance on automobiles for local recreation. Formal elements such as village squares, greens, and parks serve as hubs for daily gatherings, markets, and events, drawing from pre-automobile urban patterns where public realms facilitated civic life.^[3]^[26]^[35] Key types of public open spaces include central town greens or plazas, neighborhood parks, and playgrounds, often edged by mixed-use buildings to create active edges that enhance safety and vitality through natural surveillance. Village squares, for instance, accommodate flexible uses like seasonal festivals or informal play, while parks incorporate recreational fields and trails integrated with the surrounding landscape to preserve natural features where feasible. Substantial semi-natural open spaces, such as wooded buffers or streamsides, may supplement formal areas, providing ecological benefits alongside recreational opportunities.^[35]^[11]^[3] Amenities within TND public spaces emphasize durability, human scale, and low-maintenance functionality, including shaded seating, wide pathways compliant with accessibility standards, and subtle lighting to extend usability into evenings. Streetscapes adjacent to these areas feature tree canopies, rain gardens for stormwater management, and civic fixtures like benches or gazebos, all calibrated to the transect zones—from rural edges to urban cores—to balance aesthetics with practical utility. Community institutions, such as libraries or assembly halls, are often sited proximate to these spaces to amplify their role as destinations, fostering long-term resident engagement without excessive programmed activities.^[26]^[36]^[15]

Implementation Challenges

Zoning Reforms and Legal Adaptations

Conventional zoning regulations, rooted in Euclidean principles established in the early 20th century, typically mandate strict separation of land uses, large minimum lot sizes, extensive setbacks, and automobile-oriented street designs such as cul-de-sacs and wide rights-of-way, which directly conflict with TND's emphasis on interconnected street grids, mixed-use blocks, and compact development patterns.^[2]^[37] These codes often require minimum off-street parking ratios that exceed TND's reduced provisions, further hindering implementation by inflating development costs and land consumption.^[38] To accommodate TND, municipalities have adopted zoning reforms such as overlay districts that permit deviations from base zoning, allowing narrower streets (e.g., 20-28 feet for local roads versus conventional 30-40 feet), reduced setbacks (as low as 5-10 feet front yards), and integrated residential-commercial uses within walking distance.^[12]^[39] For instance, Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, incorporated TND provisions into its zoning ordinance to enable projects like New Daleville, which features a grid layout and housing variety on smaller lots compliant with TND standards.^[12] Similarly, Columbus, Ohio's Chapter 3320 establishes TND districts including neighborhood edge, general, center, and core zones, each with tailored density and use allowances to foster pedestrian-oriented growth.^[40] A pivotal legal adaptation has been the shift toward form-based codes (FBCs), which prioritize physical form—such as building massing, facade orientation, and public realm integration—over primary use restrictions, enabling TND's mixed-use fabric without the rigidity of conventional zoning.^[41]^[42] Developed by New Urbanism proponents, FBCs address approval barriers for TND by regulating street-facing elements and block perimeters rather than segregating uses; a 2025 analysis documented over 400 U.S. jurisdictions adopting FBCs, many explicitly for New Urbanist developments.^[43] Model TND ordinances, like those from Grow Smart Rhode Island, provide templates for such reforms, specifying procedures for large-scale projects while preserving community-scale amenities.^[44] State-level enabling legislation has further facilitated adaptations; for example, Pennsylvania's Municipalities Planning Code allows optional TND zoning elements, while Florida's 1985 Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act promoted flexible districting that supported early TND experiments.^[32] However, adoption faces resistance due to entrenched suburban standards and community concerns over density, often requiring variances or planned unit developments (PUDs) as interim measures before full code overhauls.^[32]^[14] These reforms, when implemented, have enabled TND to bypass prohibitive elements like mandatory cul-de-sacs, promoting instead hierarchical street networks that prioritize connectivity over vehicle speeds.^[2]

Barriers from Conventional Suburban Standards

Conventional suburban development standards, established primarily through post-World War II zoning and subdivision regulations, emphasize low-density, single-use zoning, wide roadways, and automobile dependency, creating direct conflicts with Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) principles of mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented layouts.^[45] These standards, such as Euclidean zoning codes that segregate residential, commercial, and retail uses, prohibit the integrated land-use mixing central to TND, thereby restricting higher densities and walkable access to amenities.^[26] For instance, many U.S. municipalities mandate minimum lot sizes that exceed TND's compact configurations, often requiring parcels larger than those in pre-automobile neighborhoods to preserve perceived residential sanctity.^[32] Building setbacks represent another entrenched barrier, with conventional codes typically enforcing front yard minimums of 15 feet (4.6 meters) or more to accommodate potential road widening, enhance privacy, and align with auto-centric aesthetics, whereas TND favors zero or minimal setbacks to foster street-facing porches and continuous urban facades.^[2] Such requirements reduce achievable densities and undermine the visual coherence of TND's human-scaled environments. Similarly, excessive minimum parking mandates—often calculated per dwelling unit without regard for shared or on-street options—increase development costs and land consumption, countering TND's promotion of reduced private parking through alleys and integrated uses.^[26] Infrastructure and engineering standards further impede TND adoption by prioritizing vehicular efficiency over connectivity and safety. Suburban subdivision rules commonly dictate hierarchical street networks with cul-de-sacs and wide arterials designed for speeds of 25–45 mph (40.2–72.4 km/h), contrasting TND's interconnected grids and narrower streets of 28–30 feet (8.5–9.1 meters) aimed at 15–20 mph (24.1–32.2 km/h) for pedestrian priority.^[2] Fire departments and traffic engineers frequently oppose these narrower designs, citing needs for emergency vehicle access and turning radii, while sanitation services resist alleys for rear-loaded utilities, enforcing front-facing garages that dominate TND's preferred rear-access model.^[45] These conflicts often necessitate variances or code amendments, prolonging approvals and elevating costs.^[32] Community and political resistance amplifies these regulatory hurdles, as residents accustomed to suburban isolation oppose TND's relative density due to fears of increased traffic, noise, and property value dilution, despite empirical evidence from early projects showing contained impacts.^[32] Local officials, shaped by decades of conventional practices, exhibit inertia against reforms, with fewer than 2,000 residents living in strictly New Urbanist/TND communities as of the mid-1990s due to such entrenched norms.^[45] Overcoming these requires targeted education and ordinance overlays, but persistent adherence to auto-oriented standards continues to favor sprawl over TND's compact form.^[26]

Notable Examples

Pioneering Projects (1990s-2000s)

Kentlands in Gaithersburg, Maryland, emerged as a flagship TND project in the early 1990s, with planning initiated in 1987 by developer Joseph Alfandre and architects Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and the first model homes opening in 1990.^[46]^[47] The 352-acre development incorporated traditional elements such as a grid-based street network, a central town square with mixed-use buildings, and diverse housing types including single-family homes, townhouses, and apartments, all oriented toward pedestrian-friendly streets rather than cul-de-sacs.^[48] By emphasizing connectivity and public spaces like parks and the preserved Kentlands Mansion, it challenged prevailing suburban auto-dependency, achieving densities of up to 1,655 residential units alongside commercial space.^[48]^[49] Laguna West in Elk Grove, California, represented another early TND implementation, with initial planning in 1988 by Peter Calthorpe and significant replanning in 1991 to prioritize town-like features over conventional suburban layouts.^[50]^[18] Spanning over 1,000 acres, the project integrated residential neighborhoods with a commercial core, light rail access, and open spaces along Laguna Creek, fostering walkability and mixed uses in a Sacramento suburb.^[50] Construction progressed through the 1990s, yielding a variety of housing options and demonstrating TND's adaptability to transit-oriented growth amid regional sprawl.^[51] These projects built on the TND ordinance formalized by Duany Plater-Zyberk in 1990, which codified principles like defined neighborhood boundaries and integrated civic buildings to counteract fragmented suburban development.^[6] Into the 2000s, similar initiatives proliferated, such as Harbor Town in Memphis, Tennessee, planned as a TND extension of the downtown with rear-alley access and waterfront mixed uses, highlighting scalable applications in urban infill contexts.^[52] Empirical outcomes from these efforts included higher walkability scores and community cohesion compared to contemporaneous auto-centric suburbs, though initial resistance from zoning authorities underscored implementation hurdles.^[14]

Modern Applications (2010s-Present)

In the 2010s and 2020s, Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) principles have been applied in both greenfield sites and brownfield redevelopments, emphasizing compact layouts, mixed housing types, and pedestrian-oriented streets to counter suburban sprawl. Projects often incorporate narrower streets, rear alleys for utilities, and integrated public spaces to foster community interaction and reduce automobile dependence. For instance, Gold Hill Mesa in Colorado Springs, Colorado, zoned explicitly as a TND—the only such designation in the city—redeveloped a former gold ore processing site vacant since 1949 into a master-planned community with single-family homes, townhomes, and commercial nodes arranged around a central green. Construction phases extended into the 2020s, with new model homes slated for spring 2025 and additional residences completing later that year, demonstrating TND's adaptability to infill and environmental remediation contexts.^[53]^[54] Ongoing expansions in established TND frameworks highlight sustained implementation amid housing demands. Spring Creek in Colorado Springs exemplifies neo-traditional extensions, featuring single-family homes by builders like Apen View and CreekStone, with planned townhome additions and a 35-unit single-family phase approved in recent zoning amendments. Launched around 2010, the community integrates sidewalks, greenways, and mixed uses, with further development like Overlook at Spring Creek set for fall 2025, prioritizing walkability and varied lot sizes.^[55]^[56]^[57] TND has influenced zoning reforms and state guidelines, promoting its use in compact, village-style planning. Florida's Department of Transportation issued a TND Handbook in 2010 to integrate context-sensitive design with land-use planning, facilitating projects that blend residential, commercial, and civic elements while minimizing infrastructure costs compared to conventional sprawl. In response to post-recession recovery, mixed-use TND variants gained traction by 2014, focusing on place-based communities with diverse housing to enhance resilience and buyer appeal. By 2022, TND applications in small towns emphasized physical activity through accessible amenities, reducing development pressure on open spaces via infill strategies.^[58]^[59]^[60] These applications align with broader sustainability efforts, such as LEED for Neighborhood Development, which endorses TND-like frameworks for greenfield and infill projects mixing uses and prioritizing transit proximity. Despite economic fluctuations, TND's emphasis on efficient land use has supported over 2,000 U.S. zoning codes incorporating form-based elements akin to TND by 2025, enabling denser, connected neighborhoods.^[61]^[43]

Reception and Impact

Empirical Benefits and Achievements

Empirical analyses of Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) indicate reduced vehicle dependency through interconnected street grids and mixed-use layouts that shorten trips and encourage walking or cycling. Developments adhering to TND principles have shown trip generation rates and parking demands up to 50% below standards from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for conventional suburban designs, leading to lower overall vehicle miles traveled (VMT).^[62] This design fosters multimodal travel, with residents in TNDs reporting higher rates of non-auto trips compared to isolated subdivisions.^[63] Health outcomes correlate positively with TND features like higher density and proximity to amenities. Studies link compact, walkable environments—hallmarks of TND—to increased physical activity, with each additional kilometer walked reducing obesity risk by approximately 4.8%, while each extra hour of car travel raises it by 6%.^[64] TND-inspired neighborhoods exhibit lower body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, attributable to greater intersection density and mixed land uses that promote routine walking.^[64] Peer-reviewed research confirms these associations persist after controlling for socioeconomic factors, though causation requires further longitudinal data.^[65] Market performance provides strong evidence of TND viability, with single-family homes in such developments commanding price premiums over comparable conventional suburban properties. Hedonic regressions across multiple TND sites reveal premiums of 14.9% in Kentlands, Maryland; 4.1% in Laguna West, California; and 10.3% in Southern Village, North Carolina, after adjusting for home size, age, and quality.^[66] Similar analyses in Kentlands and Orenco Station, Oregon, estimate premiums equivalent to $24,000–$25,000 per home, driven by walkability, street connectivity, and mixed-use access rather than structural attributes.^[67] These differentials signal consumer willingness to pay for TND attributes, enhancing developer returns despite initial design complexities.^[67] TNDs yield infrastructure efficiencies over sprawl, particularly in long-term maintenance and land use. Compact layouts reduce per-capita road lengths and utility extensions, while lower VMT and parking needs cut operational costs for municipalities.^[62] Evidence from new urbanist projects shows savings in traffic mitigation and public transit integration, though upfront street network investments can exceed those in cul-de-sac suburbs.^[68] Social cohesion metrics, such as resident perceptions of community in Kentlands, align with TND goals of front porches and shared spaces, though broader empirical validation remains limited compared to transportation and economic data.^[66]^[69] Empirical studies indicate that homes in Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) command a price premium relative to comparable conventional suburban homes, attributable to new urbanist design features such as walkability and mixed uses rather than structural differences. Analysis of over 5,000 single-family home sales from 1994 to 1997 in three TNDs—Kentlands, Laguna West, and Southern Village—found premiums ranging from 4.1% to 14.9%, confirmed via hedonic pricing models and decomposition techniques controlling for home size, age, and quality.^[66] However, results vary by context; in high-poverty urban areas like Chicago neighborhoods from 1993 to 2003, TND housing incurred a 21-27% assessed value penalty compared to infill developments, suggesting buyer preferences for integration over isolated traditional designs in distressed settings.^[70] TNDs also demonstrate economic efficiencies in development and municipal costs. Infrastructure expenses are 32-47% lower than in conventional suburban layouts due to reduced street lengths, smaller lots, and compact utilities.^[71] Municipalities experience approximately 10% savings on ongoing services like roads and utilities in smart growth patterns akin to TND, stemming from higher density and less sprawl.^[72] These advantages support developer returns over longer horizons, though initial risks may exceed those of tract suburban projects.^[73] Social analyses reveal mixed empirical support for TND's purported enhancements in community cohesion and well-being. Designs fostering front porches, sidewalks, and mixed housing types theoretically promote social interactions and sense of place, aligning with New Urbanism principles.^[69] Small-scale studies, such as a 2016 pilot with five participants, link TND features like connectivity to improved mental states via increased physical activity and environmental engagement.^[74] Yet, broader evidence on social capital remains inconclusive, with some research finding no superior outcomes in TNDs versus conventional developments, potentially due to self-selection of residents valuing such amenities.^[75] Higher home prices in TNDs, often 20-40% above local comparables, can limit socioeconomic diversity, leading to unintended homogeneity despite mixed-use intentions and reducing accessibility for lower-income households.^[30] This premium-driven exclusion contrasts with TND goals of inclusive neighborhoods, highlighting a tension between market-driven benefits and equitable social outcomes.^[73] Overall, while economic metrics favor TND in affluent or greenfield contexts, social gains depend on implementation and may not universally materialize without affordability measures.

Criticisms and Controversies

Affordability and Accessibility Issues

Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TNDs) frequently command housing price premiums attributable to their design elements, such as walkable layouts, mixed land uses, and aesthetic features that appeal to higher-income buyers. For instance, homes in TNDs like Orenco Station in Oregon carried a $24,000 premium over comparable conventional developments as of 2003.^[76] Empirical analyses confirm this trend, with a study of 234 market-rate TNDs finding only 15% of units affordable at the local median income level in 2007.^[77] Another examination of 152 TNDs indicated that 90% were unaffordable to average teachers, highlighting how market-driven premiums exacerbate housing cost burdens.^[76] These elevated costs contribute to gentrification in infill TND projects, where revitalization displaces lower-income residents and reduces the overall supply of affordable housing. The HOPE VI program, which incorporated TND principles, resulted in a net loss of approximately 60,000 affordable units nationwide by the early 2000s, as mixed-income redevelopments prioritized market-rate housing.^[76] Critics argue this outcome contradicts TND's stated goal of socioeconomic diversity, often resulting in enclaves dominated by middle- and upper-middle-class households, as observed in Florida developments like Baldwin Park and CityPlace, which lacked provisions for very low-income residents as of the early 2010s.^[78] Accessibility issues stem primarily from these affordability barriers, restricting entry for low- and moderate-income individuals despite TND's emphasis on inclusive community design. Without mandates like inclusionary zoning or subsidies, such as the 20% affordable units required in East Garrison, California, TNDs risk becoming exclusionary, limiting broader demographic participation and perpetuating income segregation.^[77] Some analyses also note secondary concerns, including potential physical accessibility challenges in compact TND layouts for individuals with disabilities, though these are less documented compared to economic critiques.^[79]

Unintended Consequences and Policy Critiques

Critics of Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) policies contend that stringent design standards, such as mandated street grids, mixed-use requirements, and aesthetic guidelines, impose significant compliance costs on developers, often exceeding those of conventional suburban projects and thereby elevating end-unit prices by 10-20% or more.^[80] These added expenses, including specialized materials and labor for neo-traditional features like front porches and alley access, frequently result in TND communities targeting affluent buyers rather than achieving broad affordability, as evidenced by developer surveys indicating limited inclusion of below-market-rate units due to economic infeasibility.^[81] In practice, this has led to TND projects functioning as upscale enclaves, with home prices in early exemplars like Seaside, Florida, averaging over $500,000 by the early 2000s despite initial affordability rhetoric.^[82] A key unintended consequence arises from TND's integration with broader smart growth strategies, which restrict peripheral land supply to curb sprawl but inadvertently inflate urban land values and housing costs. In Oregon, where urban growth boundaries implemented since 1973 align with TND principles by channeling development into compact nodes, median home prices in Portland surged from approximately $77,000 in 1979 to $170,000 by 2000 (in constant dollars), outpacing household income growth by a factor of three and contributing to a severe affordability crisis.^[83] Randal O'Toole, analyzing these outcomes for the Cato Institute, attributes the disparity to reduced housing supply rather than demand alone, noting that such policies fail to deliver promised reductions in vehicle miles traveled while exacerbating commutes through job-housing mismatches in densified cores.^[83] Empirical data from similar jurisdictions show per capita land consumption dropping but congestion rising, as interconnected street networks do not sufficiently offset car dependency without robust transit support, which TND ordinances rarely mandate at scale.^[84] Policy critiques emphasize TND's reliance on top-down regulatory reforms, such as form-based codes, which introduce bureaucratic hurdles that delay approvals and favor large-scale developers over incremental, market-driven construction. These codes, intended to override Euclidean zoning's separations, often replicate rigid prescriptions that ignore heterogeneous consumer preferences for larger lots or auto-oriented layouts, leading to underutilized projects and fiscal shortfalls for localities dependent on property tax growth.^[83] Libertarian analysts like O'Toole argue this approach embodies "creeping socialism" by subsidizing preferred urban forms through public infrastructure investments while penalizing sprawl via downzoning, ultimately distorting markets without empirical vindication of social cohesion benefits.^[85] Moreover, in suburban retrofits, TND mandates have provoked backlash over perceived erosion of property rights, as homeowners face coerced redesigns that diminish lot yields and home values, highlighting a disconnect between planners' ideals and localized economic realities.^[82]

Ideological Debates on Density vs. Sprawl

Advocates for Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) and broader New Urbanism principles often frame suburban sprawl as ideologically flawed, arguing it promotes automobile dependency, inefficient land use, and higher per capita infrastructure costs. Proponents, including planners associated with the Congress for the New Urbanism, contend that low-density sprawl exacerbates traffic congestion and environmental degradation by increasing vehicle miles traveled (VMT), with empirical studies showing suburban households generating 30-50% more transportation emissions than urban dwellers due to reliance on cars.^[73]^[86] They assert that TND's emphasis on medium-density, mixed-use neighborhoods fosters walkability and community cohesion, countering sprawl's isolation of residential from commercial zones, which some analyses link to reduced social capital and higher public service expenditures per capita.^[87]^[88] Critics of density-focused ideologies, including economists and market-oriented urban analysts, counter that sprawl reflects genuine consumer preferences for larger homes, privacy, and access to open space, rather than failed planning. Empirical data from metropolitan areas indicate that suburban expansion correlates with lower housing costs per square foot and higher household satisfaction surveys, as families prioritize yards and separation from commercial activity, with U.S. Census data showing over 50% of Americans living in suburbs by 2020 due to these amenities.^[89]^[90] They argue that anti-sprawl policies, such as those mandating TND-style density, impose top-down restrictions that inflate urban land prices and limit supply, evidenced by California's experience where strict growth controls have driven median home prices above $800,000 by 2023, disproportionately affecting working-class buyers.^[91]^[92] The debate reveals deeper ideological divides, with density advocates often aligned with environmentalist and progressive viewpoints emphasizing collective sustainability and reduced carbon footprints, while sprawl defenders invoke libertarian principles of individual choice and property rights, critiquing density mandates as coercive interventions that overlook causal factors like highway investments enabling affordable peripheral growth. Peer-reviewed research highlights mixed outcomes: while higher density lowers VMT per capita, it can elevate congestion and noise pollution in core areas, and sprawl has not demonstrably worsened overall air quality in sprawling U.S. metros like Houston compared to denser ones like New York when adjusted for total emissions.^[93]^[94] Sources favoring density, frequently from academic or advocacy institutions, may underemphasize suburban preferences documented in revealed-preference studies showing 70-80% of homebuyers selecting single-family detached homes.^[95]^[96] In TND contexts, this tension manifests as resistance to form-based codes perceived as eroding market-driven suburban norms, with some analyses estimating that sprawl's decentralization has supported economic mobility by providing cheaper entry to homeownership for middle-income groups.^[45]^[97]

Recent Developments

Post-2020 Trends

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly disrupted transit-oriented development (TOD) by causing sharp declines in public transit ridership, with U.S. systems experiencing drops of up to 90% in early 2020 and global examples like London's rail and bus services seeing 83-94% reductions.^[98] This led to reevaluations of dense, transit-reliant urban models, as remote work and heightened preferences for personal space slowed recovery in central business districts intertwined with TOD areas.^[99] By 2024, U.S. public transit ridership had rebounded to 79-85% of pre-pandemic levels, with 7.66 billion trips recorded, though full recovery remains uncertain due to persistent productivity challenges and uneven mode-specific gains—such as buses reaching 77% recovery in regions like Chicago while rail lags.^[100]^[101]^[102] Policy responses emphasized resilience and equity, with the U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) expanding its TOD Pilot Program, awarding $10.5 million in grants to 11 projects across 10 states by October 2024 to integrate housing and transit planning.^[103] Initiatives like Chicago's 2023 Connected Communities Ordinance reduced parking mandates and incentivized affordable housing near stations to counter post-pandemic inequities.^[99] In the Twin Cities, TOD corridors saw over $49.9 billion in permitted development from 2009-2023, with 2023 reports highlighting continued mixed-use growth despite ridership gaps.^[104] European efforts, while less centralized, aligned with sustainability goals, though specific post-2020 reforms focused more on adapting existing systems amid similar ridership slumps.^[105] Emerging trends include "Next-Gen TOD," which shifts emphasis from traditional station-area density to broader spatial integration, social equity, and technology like virtual planning tools adopted during lockdowns.^[106]^[107] Projects such as Bellevue, Washington's 2025 Wilburton development for 127 affordable units and Sound Transit's ongoing pipeline demonstrate sustained investment, often prioritizing active transportation for health and emission reductions.^[108]^[109]^[110] Machine learning analyses indicate TOD's role in bolstering economic vitality post-COVID, though causal links to vitality require recalibrating models to account for remote work's enduring effects.^[111] Challenges persist, including regulatory barriers in states like Washington and warnings that transit productivity crises could hinder TOD viability without service innovations.^[112]^[113] Ridership in some U.S. systems, like Washington D.C.'s buses, exceeded 2019 levels by 2025, signaling potential for TOD in high-recovery areas, but broader stagnation risks underutilized infrastructure.^[114] Overall, post-2020 TOD has adapted toward hybrid models blending density with flexibility, driven by empirical needs for housing supply amid shortages, yet constrained by causal realities of altered commuting patterns.^[115]

Case Studies from 2023-2025

In the Seattle region, Sound Transit's Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) program advanced multiple projects in 2025, emphasizing affordable housing integration with rail infrastructure. The Bridge project, initiated as the first phase of redevelopment on agency-owned land adjacent to the Operations and Maintenance Facility East, delivered initial affordable units while planning for subsequent market-rate phases to boost ridership and fiscal sustainability.^[109] By the second quarter of 2025, the program reported milestones including site preparations and partnerships for mixed-income developments, contributing to over 1,000 planned housing units across TOD sites, though actual occupancy data remained pending completion.^[116] These efforts aligned with broader goals of reducing vehicle miles traveled by concentrating density near light rail stations, with early indicators showing sustained post-pandemic transit usage. A 2025 assessment by the Urban Institute examined TOD planning in Washington State municipalities, revealing inconsistent progress toward affordable housing mandates near transit corridors. Among 20 evaluated cities, only 35% had zoning reforms enabling 20% or more affordable units in TOD zones by mid-2025, hampered by local resistance to upzoning and high construction costs averaging $400,000 per unit.^[112] The report cited successful pilots in Tacoma, where TOD incentives yielded 150 affordable apartments completed in 2024 adjacent to Sounder commuter rail, correlating with a 12% ridership increase on those lines, but warned of gentrification risks displacing lower-income residents without mandatory inclusionary policies.^[112] In New York State's Hudson Valley, the Mid-Hudson Momentum Fund allocated $60 million in June 2025 to 10 affordable housing projects explicitly tied to transit access, marking a scaled-up TOD response to regional sprawl. These initiatives, concentrated near Metro-North stations, aimed to add 800 units by 2027, prioritizing households earning below 80% of area median income, with preliminary designs incorporating pedestrian links and reduced parking ratios.^[117] Funding outcomes included accelerated permitting in Poughkeepsie, where one project broke ground in late 2025, projecting a 15% cut in local commuting emissions based on similar prior TODs, though critics noted potential property tax burdens on existing suburbs.^[117] This case underscored state-level interventions overriding local NIMBYism, yet empirical tracking of long-term affordability remained limited to baseline surveys.^[117]

References

[1]
TND and TKD - ADL
TND and TKD are abbreviations for (respectively) racist and antisemitic slogans referring to the mass death or killing of Black people and Jews.
[2]
[PDF] Traditional Neighborhood Design - Federal Highway Administration
Traditional neighborhood design (TND) (also called new urbanism or neotraditional design) is a town planning principle that is gaining acceptance in recent ...
[3]
[PDF] 6. Traditional Neighborhood Design Fact Sheet
Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) is a planning concept for neighborhoods designed like early 20th-century villages, with small lots, narrow yards, and ...
[4]
Traditional neighborhood development (TND) guidelines - ROSA P
A Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) is a human scale, walkable community with moderate to high residential densities and a mixed use core.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[5]
[PDF] Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) - Shrewsbury, MA
This design practice results in the loss of community vitality and makes neighborhoods unwelcoming to pedestrians and bicyclists. It also increases traffic.
[6]
About - DPZ CoDesign
Aug 9, 2023 · ... Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) in 1990. The TND became a model regulation for compact mixed-use neighborhood design, informing ...
[7]
Duany Palter-Zyberk's Latest Take on Traditional Neighborhood ...
May 1, 2008 · Conceived by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co. ... Traditional Neighborhood Development. People. Andres Duany. Organization. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co.
[8]
[PDF] 6. Traditional Neighborhood Design
PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGN One of the main principles of TND is that residential and commercial areas should provide safe, convenient, and enticing areas for ...
[9]
Traditional Neighborhood Development: It's All About Density
Jan 3, 2013 · Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) uses compact, mixed use development and high residential densities to achieve walkable, vibrant neighborhoods.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[10]
About Traditional Neighborhood Development - Town of Ithaca
Basic TND design principles include: Compact form, with a distinct center and edge. A mutually compatible mix of shops, offices, civic uses, and homes. More ...Missing: fundamental | Show results with:fundamental
[11]
What is a Traditional Neighborhood Development?
May 8, 2024 · One of the core elements of TND is walkability. The streets are laid out in a compact, grid-like pattern, typically with a central town square ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[12]
Traditional Neighborhood Development - eTools
The traditional neighborhood development (TND) concept is implemented through the municipal zoning and subdivision ordinances. The Pennsylvania Municipalities ...
[13]
Ever Heard of a Traditional Neighborhood Development? Here's ...
Oct 16, 2020 · A Mix of Housing Styles That Feels Organic. Another key principle of TNDs is a wide variety of housing styles for residents to choose from, ...Missing: fundamental | Show results with:fundamental
[14]
Great idea: Traditional neighborhood development | CNU
Mar 30, 2017 · Traditional neighborhoods developments (TNDs), inspired by historic neighborhoods, jump-started the New Urbanism in the 1980s and 1990s as ...
[15]
[PDF] CHAPTER 19 TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ...
TND street design principles have a different emphasis in the following manner: 12. • The basis for selecting criteria and features used in designing TND. 13.
[16]
The Earliest Roots of the Suburban Experiment
Jun 7, 2023 · The mixing of social classes was also the norm on the edges of the walking city, as the working classes sought cheap and available land to make ...
[17]
https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/2011%20Neighborhoods%20at%20the%20Edge%20of%20the%20Walking%20City.pdf
[18]
[PDF] THE NEW URBANISM | Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
New Urbanism seeks to redefine the American metropolis by reintroducing traditional neighborhood design, reacting to conventional suburban planning.
[19]
Florida: Birthplace of the New Urbanism | CNU
Scrubland on Florida's coastal Panhandle gave birth to the New Urbanism in 1980, when Robert Davis engaged two young architects to design 80 acres of his ...
[20]
Traditional Neighborhood Development: Past, Present, and Future
Jul 30, 2015 · Traditional Neighborhood Development: Past, Present, and Future ... Miami-based Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co. (DPZ), the designers of Seaside ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
[PDF] Introduction to Form-Based Codes - Housing Assistance Corporation
Feb 10, 2020 · Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). • Late 1980s/early 1990s several cities in southeast adopted form- based codes in a variety of forms ...
[22]
CNU History - Congress for the New Urbanism
TNDs like Seaside, Kentlands, Orenco Station, Addison Circle, Habersham, and Celebration served as laboratories for new urban ideas from the 1980s through early ...
[23]
[PDF] Why Form-Based Codes? - Opticos Design
Over the course of the 1980s and into the early 1990s, several cities and counties adopted Form-Based. Codes in the form of Traditional Neighborhood.
[24]
[PDF] TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ... - FDOT
TND street design principles have a different emphasis in the following manner: 12. • The basis for selecting criteria and features used in designing TND. 13.
[25]
Street Networks 101 | CNU - Congress for the New Urbanism
A high level of connectivity provides an efficient template for dispersing traffic, facilitating route choice, and creating a more comfortable condition for ...
[26]
Online TDM Encyclopedia - New Urbanism
Increased street connectivity has been showed to reduce per capita vehicle travel, and reduce traffic volumes on major roads (Handy, Paterson and Butler 2004).
[27]
[PDF] Street Network Connectivity, Traffic Congestion, and Traffic Safety
Although a few recent studies proved increased traffic capacity in more connected street networks through traffic simulation (Tasic et al., 2015; Zlatkovic et ...
[28]
Good neighborhoods have lots of intersections - Grist.org
Jun 5, 2010 · Of all the built environment measurements, intersection density has the largest effect on walking – more than population density, distance to a ...
[29]
Connected streets are needed to support mixed-use, study reports
Nov 22, 2023 · The study, authored by Hamid Iravani, concludes that the hierarchical network has more traffic, higher levels of congestion, higher vehicle ...
[30]
Unintended Consequences of the Neo-Traditional City Planning ...
Feb 20, 2012 · ... street connectivity allows for ease of access ... TND communities due to many factors (design restrictions, development cost, etc.) ...<|separator|>
[31]
New Urbanism - Traditional Neighborhood Development Partners
PRINCIPLES OF NEW URBANISM · 1. WALKABILITY. Most needs are within a 10-minute walk of home and work. · 2. CONNECTIVITY · 3. MIXED-USE & DIVERSITY · 4. MIXED ...
[32]
Traditional Neighborhood Development - WeConservePA Library
The TND ordinance provisions addressing development design can help ensure that development in the TDR receiving area is consistent with the community ...
[33]
Traditional Neighborhood Development Zone (TND) - eCode360
A mix of residential dwelling types is required within a TND; however, not less than 50% of the total dwelling units must be single-family detached dwellings.
[34]
[PDF] Traditional Neighborhood Development
Mixed housing options provide residents with many options in types of affordability, providing for a more diverse neighborhood. Community gathering places. TNDs ...
[35]
§ 153.048 TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENTS.
(b) TND's always have formal public open spaces such as greens, village squares, parks and playgrounds. They may also have substantial amounts of natural or ...<|separator|>
[36]
New Urbanism's ace in the hole - CNU.org
Mar 1, 1998 · A drive through any old town or city will reveal that where the public realm ... Moreover, TNDs include amenities like parks, community ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
[PDF] New Urbanism and Euclidian Zoning: Can They Co-Exist?
For many communities, the challenge to implementing. New Urbanism design principles is that strict Euclidian zoning regulations do not provide the mechanism for.
[38]
[PDF] Overcoming Obstacles to Smart Growth through Code Reform
It is widely acknowledged that one of the major barriers to smart growth is local regulation. Our codes and practices either discourage developers from ...
[39]
Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) Overlay District
The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) Overlay District applies to R-1 Single-Family Established Residential, R-2 Single-Family Rural Residential, and R ...
[40]
Chapter 3320 | Code of Ordinances | Columbus, OH
A traditional neighborhood development (TND) can include one or more of four zoning districts: neighborhood edge, neighborhood general, neighborhood center and ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[41]
Form-Based Codes Defined
Mar 17, 2014 · Form-based codes address the relationship between building facades and the public realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another.
[42]
Form-Based Codes: Zoning Innovation for Policy Change | CNU
Form-based codes are based on principles of integration—land uses, building forms, modes of transportation, building types. Because of these foundational ...
[43]
Study shows widespread new urbanist zoning reform | CNU
Apr 14, 2025 · FBCs were created by new urbanists to address the difficulty in getting approvals for neighborhood development that follows principles of New ...
[44]
[PDF] A Model Ordinance for a Traditional Neighborhood Development
Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) bylaws set standards and procedures for large, complex projects. This model bylaw is similar to a typical planned ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
The New Urbanism Challenges Conventional Planning
Sep 1, 1996 · The New Urbanism began as a reaction to conventional suburban planning as it has been practiced in the United States since the 1940s.Missing: barriers | Show results with:barriers
[46]
Kentlands | CNU - Congress for the New Urbanism
In 1987, local developer Joe Alfandre bought 352 acres of Otis Beale Kent's vast farm estate and decided to convert it into a neighborhood similar to those ...
[47]
KENTLANDS | SAH ARCHIPEDIA
The first models opened in 1990, encompassing detached single-family houses, town houses, condominiums, and rental apartments designed to suit the metropolitan ...
[48]
[PDF] Kentlands Gaithersburg Maryland - ULI Case Studies
Referred to by its planners as a traditional neighborhood development (TND), the community has been designed and planned to function like a small town ...
[49]
Kentlands - Michael Watkins Architect, LLC
Kentlands was among the first new traditional neighborhoods built in the United States since WWII. In 1987, Town Founder Joe Alfandre hired Andres Duany and ...
[50]
Oldfangled New Towns - Time Magazine
and subvert it. The T.N.D. ...
[51]
Laguna West, an early 1990s new urbanist development | CNU
Jun 1, 2006 · Laguna West, an early 1990s new urbanist development 12 miles south of downtown Sacramento, recently became a point of contention in the June 6 primary for ...Missing: TND Kentlands Seaside
[52]
[PDF] architectural record
Harbor Town, an example of proliferating TNDs, has been planned by RKTL as an exten- sion of Memphis's downtown (1). Houses (3) were designed by. Looney, Ricks, ...
[53]
Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) - Gold Hill Mesa
A TND seeks to remedy problems associated with sprawl and auto-dependency by creating a compact, self-contained community with smart land utilization practices.Missing: fundamental | Show results with:fundamental
[54]
Gold Hill Mesa Announces Builders to Complete Its ... - Springsmag
Sep 19, 2024 · Model homes should be available by spring or early summer of next year, and new homes should start reaching completion later in 2025. With all ...
[55]
Spring Creek – A Neo-Traditional Neighborhood in Colorado Springs
Dec 23, 2010 · The City of Colorado Springs includes three neo-traditional neighborhood developments (TND's) to date: Spring Creek; Lowell; and Gold Hill Mesa.
[56]
Spring Creek Community & Residential Information
Spring Creek is a community of new construction single-family homes build by Apen View Homes and CreekStone Homes. Future developments will include townhomes by ...<|separator|>
[57]
Challenger Homes Expands Footprint and Vision in Colorado
Jul 15, 2025 · In Colorado Springs, we're preparing to launch Overlook at Spring Creek: a centrally located community coming in Fall 2025. This new ...
[58]
[PDF] TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK
Aug 2, 2010 · • A diversity of land use should be distributed throughout ... transit-oriented, walkable, bicycle friendly land use, including mixed use.
[59]
[PDF] American Mixed-use Development after the Great Recession
Aug 28, 2014 · Traditional neighborhood development (TND) focuses more on the local scale of design and planning. Similarly to Smart Growth, TND intends to ...
[60]
Encouraging Physical Activity Through Traditional Neighborhood ...
Mar 28, 2022 · "Restoring Community through Traditional Neighborhood Design: A Case Study of Diggs Town Public Housing." Housing Policy Debate 9(1). Center ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[61]
LEED v4: Neighborhood Development Guide | U.S. Green Building ...
LEED v4 for neighborhood development applies to new or redeveloped projects with residential, nonresidential, or mixed uses, and is a framework for green ...
[62]
The research is in on New Urbanism—and it's stronger than you think
Jul 8, 2025 · New urbanist development can reduce trip generation and parking demand by over half of ITE manual standards, resulting in significant savings to ...
[63]
[PDF] Community Health as a Goal of Good Design - ChangeLab Solutions
destinations within walking or biking distance.23, 24. > Traditional grids disperse traffic, resulting in less congestion and fewer VMT. Decreased congestion.
[64]
Health benefits of New Urbanism | CNU
Feb 4, 2019 · Each neighborhood contains a range of uses and densities within a 10-minute walk. Traditional neighborhood design promotes compact housing ...
[65]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13574809.2018.1554997
[66]
[PDF] An Empirical Examination of Traditional Neighborhood Development
Oct 1, 2001 · This study analyzes the impact of the new urbanism on single-family home prices. Specifically, we explore the price differential that ...Missing: key milestones
[67]
Returns to new urbanism - UF Warrington College of Business
Aug 6, 2025 · Key principles include walkability, mixed-use development, diverse housing options and sustainable design. Streets are designed to be pedestrian ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[68]
Alternative Development Planning - Benefits of Traditional ...
Jul 14, 2024 · TNDs are proven to have lower upfront infrastructure costs than sprawling developments. This is because there are fewer linear feet of streets ...
[69]
[PDF] How urban form effects sense of community
Several studies have compared traditional urbanist developments to conventional suburban development and found a number of benefits primarily related to ...
[70]
[PDF] Does Urban Design Influence Property Values
Our study investigates the relationship between the urban design and the value of new housing in order to determine whether or not urban design is a significant ...
[71]
Key to cutting infrastructure costs: TND - CNU.org
Oct 1, 2009 · Infrastructure costs are 32 to 47 percent lower in traditional neighborhood development (TND) than in conventional suburban development, ...
[72]
[PDF] Building Better Budgets - Smart Growth America
Smart growth development saves municipalities an average of 10 percent on ongoing delivery of services as compared to conventional suburban development. The ...
[73]
Competing against suburbia | CNU - Congress for the New Urbanism
Jun 30, 2024 · TNDs can't compete with the efficiency of tract development. But with longer return horizons, the initial investment can compete and even surpass the returns ...
[74]
Journal 5 - urban form and mental wellbeing
A pilot study by Hollander and Foster (2016) investigated the impact of Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) features on mental state. Five participants ...
[75]
Residents' Perceptions of the Built Environment and Neighborhood ...
Apr 4, 2018 · A number of empirical studies have examined social capital in traditional neighborhood developments and new urbanist communities; however ...<|separator|>
[76]
[PDF] The Ironies of New Urbanism - Zilker Neighborhood Association
But the very success of traditional neighborhood design and its desirability results in the failure to meet its stated goal of providing affordable housing.
[77]
New Towns: The Affordability Paradox
Call it the affordability paradox. Diversity, including income diversity, is essential to new urbanism. To be authentic communities, and not just yuppie theme ...
[78]
[PDF] New Urbanism Need Not Compromise Its Principles
As a presenter on the panel Gentrification without Displacement, I ... But as the desirability of new urbanism or TND grew, so did the home prices. ... TND ...<|separator|>
[79]
[PDF] Increasing Home Access: Designing for Visitability
Accessibility barriers within homes often lead to the need for extensive and expensive ... Mueller is a large TND community in Austin, Texas, built on an ...
[80]
[PDF] The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals - Vranas Properties
The New Urbanism synthesizes a whole range of spatial patterns that are not only good urban design, but also fit in well with many other important planning ...
[81]
Affordable Housing in New Urbanist Communities - ResearchGate
Review of scholarly research on new urbanism in ... Smart Growth and Housing Affordability A Review of Regulatory Mechanisms and Planning Practices.
[82]
New Urbanism, Smart Growth, & Andres Duany: A Critique From ...
Apr 5, 2010 · New Urbanism, Smart Growth, & Andres Duany: A Critique From Suburbia ... Demographia International Housing Affordability – 2025 Edition Released.
[83]
[PDF] The Folly of “Smart Growth ” - Cato Institute
Oregon's experience suggests “anti-sprawl” strategies worsen the problems they are intended to solve. The Folly of. “Smart Growth”. By Randal O'Toole. Thoreau ...
[84]
[PDF] Evaluating Criticism of Smart Growth
Sep 5, 2024 · Smart Growth (also called New Urbanism) ... Evaluating Criticism of Smart Growth. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 81. Randal O'Toole.
[85]
[PDF] Is Urban Planning “Creeping Socialism”? - Independent Institute
Most road funds. Page 6. THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW. 506 ✦ RANDAL O'TOOLE come from user fees, predominantly fuel taxes. Through such user fees, roads largely pay ...
[86]
Do Americans really want urban sprawl? - Yale Climate Connections
Jan 29, 2025 · Suburban U.S. households have substantially higher emissions than their city-center counterparts, largely due to cars. Building more dense, ...Missing: TND | Show results with:TND
[87]
The Fight Against Urban Sprawl and the Principles of New Urbanism
Nov 20, 2022 · New Urbanism is a planning approach that emerged as an alternative to the urban sprawl patterns that became typical of post-World War II development.
[88]
Urban Sprawl, Smart Growth, and Deliberative Democracy - PMC
Smart growth is an important strategy for combating the adverse public health, environmental, and aesthetic effects of urban sprawl.
[89]
Why America Should Sprawl - The New York Times
Apr 10, 2025 · Chapters of the Sierra Club, he wrote, would protest exurban housing for being too sprawling, suburban housing for being insufficiently close to ...
[90]
Sprawl and Urban Growth - ScienceDirect.com
We argue that sprawl is not the result of explicit government policies or bad urban planning, but rather the inexorable product of car-based living.Missing: ideological | Show results with:ideological<|separator|>
[91]
The problem, or not, of urban sprawl - Policy Options
Feb 1, 2004 · Among critics, sprawl is the problem of cities today; among defenders, low-density suburban growth isn't a problem at all. The purpose here ...
[92]
[PDF] SPRAWL AND URBAN GROWTH
Sprawl is the dominant form of city living based on the automobile, characterized by decentralized homes and jobs, and is the result of car-based living.
[93]
A Realist Philosophical Case For Urbanism and Against Sprawl
Jul 11, 2011 · The primary arguments against sprawl are 1) that sprawl is unjust; 2) that sprawl is culturally and environmentally unsustainable; and 3) that ...
[94]
Systematic review and comparison of densification effects and ...
Apr 20, 2021 · This paper examines the effectiveness of higher density (as a means) for achieving sustainable urban development (the goal) following three lines of enquiry.
[95]
Effects of urban sprawl on regional disparity and quality of life
This study provides empirical evidence on how urban sprawl, particularly in South Korean cities, exacerbates regional disparities and impacts residents' QoL.
[96]
[PDF] Effect of Urban Sprawl on Quality of Life
Jun 18, 2020 · This paper examines the relationship between low-density areas −urban sprawl− and the quality of life in the urban area of Barcelona.
[97]
[PDF] Urban Sprawl Versus New Urbanism
May 1, 2015 · On average, suburban residents generate more per capita pollution and carbon emissions than their urban counterparts because of their increased ...
[98]
Impacts of COVID-19 on public transit ridership - PMC
In Britain, the COVID-19 outbreak has led to a 90% drop in rail travel and 94% and 83% reductions in tube and bus journeys in London respectively (Carrington, ...
[99]
Ensuring the intertwined post-pandemic recoveries of downtowns ...
Aug 8, 2023 · Chicago's Connected Communities Ordinance advances equitable transit-oriented development by reducing parking requirements, incentivizing ...
[100]
New APTA Data Shows Public Transportation Drives Economic ...
Sep 5, 2025 · APTA's new 2025 Public Transportation Fact Book shows ridership reached 7.66 billion trips in 2024—a significant rebound from pandemic lows.
[101]
Research Reports - American Public Transportation Association
Sep 4, 2025 · Public transportation ridership recovered to 85 percent of pre-pandemic levels in April 2025, according to the latest data from APTA's Ridership ...
[102]
For the third year in a row, regional transit ridership was up by ...
Jan 28, 2025 · CTA buses provided 181.7 million rides, a year-over-year increase of 12 percent and the highest recovery rate of all modes at 77 percent of pre- ...
[103]
Pilot Program for Transit-Oriented Development Planning
On October 31, 2024, FTA announced the award of approximately $10.5 million to 11 projects in 10 states in FY24 TOD planning grants to support community ...Missing: 2021-2025 | Show results with:2021-2025
[104]
TOD Studies and Projects - Metro Transit
In the 14 years between 2009 and 2023, permits have been issued for over $49.9 billion throughout the region. This includes projects that have been completed ...
[105]
Transit-driven resilience: Unraveling post-COVID-19 urban recovery ...
Transit infrastructure serves as a catalyst for gradual transformation, attracting residents and businesses, raising property values, and encouraging investment ...
[106]
Next-Gen TOD: Transforming Transit Oriented Development to ...
Apr 22, 2025 · This article calls for a paradigm shift, transforming TOD 1.0 to Next-Gen TOD in three aspects. First, Next-Gen TOD shifts the spatial focus.
[107]
Transit Oriented Development Service 2025 Trends and Forecasts ...
Rating 4.8 (1,980) May 8, 2025 · 2020: Increased adoption of virtual planning tools due to COVID-19 pandemic. 2021: Several major cities announced ambitious TOD projects ...
[108]
The Week in TOD News October 11-17, 2025
Oct 17, 2025 · Bellevue has selected Bellwether Housing to build at least 127 affordable homes on city-owned land in the Wilburton Transit-Oriented Development ...
[109]
[PDF] Transit oriented development Q1 Quarterly Report 2025
This report highlights program milestones, status updates on initiatives, and a lookahead at the pipeline of TOD projects on Agency land. BRIDGE Housing, Sound ...
[110]
[PDF] Transit-Oriented Development - Think Tennessee
TOD residents engage in more active transportation, leading to improved health outcomes and reduced air pollution. Reduced Land. Consumption: TOD promotes ...
[111]
The effects of TOD on economic vitality in the post-COVID-19 era
This study employs machine learning methods to explore the effects of TOD on economic vitality under COVID-19 and recalibrate existing TOD planning models and ...
[112]
[PDF] Generating Affordable and Abundant Transit-Oriented Development ...
Regulatory barriers remain an issue for many TOD projects, though the state legislature's recent changes may enable more development in the coming years.
[113]
Addressing the transit productivity crisis - Reason Foundation
Feb 27, 2025 · This report finds that public transit ridership is unlikely to recover to pre-pandemic levels within the next decade.<|separator|>
[114]
Looking at ridership recovery comparing 2025 to 2019, first up is the ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Looking at ridership recovery comparing 2025 to 2019, first up is the best recovery rates for the top bus 25 systems, DC has exceeded 2019 ...Have your transit system's ridership numbers recovered to pre ...Q1 2025 Transit Ridership report APTA - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
[115]
Building the Future Around Transit: MDOT's Joint Development Vision
Aug 6, 2025 · By focusing development around public transit stations, TOD helps increase access to transit, expands the housing supply (including affordable ...
[116]
[PDF] Transit-Oriented Developement Quarterly Report, Q2 2025
This report highlights program milestones, status updates on initiatives, and a lookahead at the pipeline of TOD projects on Agency land. Sound Transit released ...
[117]
The Week in TOD News May 31-June 6, 2025
Jun 6, 2025 · New York State's Mid-Hudson Momentum Fund has awarded $60 million to support 10 affordable housing projects across the Hudson Valley. The ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes

TND