Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tecopa pupfish

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) was a of Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis) endemic to the thermal spring outflows at North and South Tecopa Hot Springs in . This small cyprinodont fish, adapted to high-temperature desert waters often exceeding 30°C, occupied spring pools and connected aquatic habitats in the . Habitat modifications for recreational development, including alterations to spring systems, combined with the introduction of non-native species such as (Gambusia affinis) and (Lepomis macrochirus), led to its , with the last individuals observed in 1970. The Tecopa pupfish was formally declared extinct in 1981 and became the first species delisted from protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act due to extinction in 1982, underscoring the vulnerabilities of isolated endemic populations to anthropogenic disturbances. No captive populations or recovery efforts succeeded in preserving it, and current pupfish at the site belong to other subspecies. The rapid loss of this heat-tolerant exemplifies causal factors in extinctions, where localized habitat degradation and invasions preclude in extreme environments. Its case informed early U.S. policy, highlighting the need for preemptive protection of spring ecosystems harboring unique .

Taxonomy and Systematics

Classification and Discovery

The Tecopa pupfish () is classified within the family Cyprinodontidae, order , class , phylum Chordata, and kingdom Animalia. It is recognized as a of the Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis), distinguished by morphological traits adapted to spring environments. The nominate species C. nevadensis was originally described by Seth Eugene Meek in 1876 from specimens in the basin, but the Tecopa was not formally differentiated until later systematic study. The calidae was first described by ichthyologist in 1948, in his monograph "The Cyprinodont Fishes of the System of and Southwestern ." based the description on specimens collected primarily from the outflows of South Tecopa Hot Spring in , noting their tolerance for water temperatures up to 42°C (108°F). These collections followed earlier surveys of pupfishes, with conducting field work over several years to delineate subspecies boundaries through comparative and data. The , a mature male, measured 32.5 mm in standard length and exhibited deepened body proportions relative to other . Prior to Miller's 1948 publication, from Tecopa springs were likely observed or collected incidentally, but lacked taxonomic distinction from broader C. nevadensis populations. Miller's work established C. n. calidae as endemic to the paired hot springs at Tecopa, highlighting genetic isolation due to the extreme habitat. Subsequent genetic analyses have supported the ' validity, though its in the wild by the early 1970s precluded further morphological confirmation. The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) is classified as a of the Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis), a member of the family Cyprinodontidae endemic to the basin in and . This taxonomic designation, established based on morphological distinctions such as body depth and scale counts, reflects adaptations to localized thermal habitats. The status remains accepted in ichthyological references, with no evidence of elevation to full species rank despite its . C. n. calidae was delisted from the U.S. Endangered Species List in 1982 due to verified extinction, marking it as the first such case; no individuals have been observed since the late 1970s, with habitat alteration from human development cited as the primary cause. Remaining pupfish at former sites are attributed to other taxa, confirming local extirpation. Closely related taxa within Cyprinodon nevadensis include C. n. amargosae, restricted to the Amargosa River, and C. n. shoshone, found in Shoshone Spring outflows; these subspecies share thermal tolerance but differ in scale patterns and distribution. The parent species C. nevadensis is itself part of the diverse Cyprinodon genus, which encompasses over 20 pupfish species adapted to desert springs and salinities, with phylogenetic analyses indicating divergence driven by isolation in Pleistocene refugia.

Physical Characteristics

Morphology and Adaptations

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) was a small cyprinodont , typically measuring less than 50 mm in total length, with standard lengths ranging from 31 to 46 mm and an average of in adults. It possessed a blunt head, deep body (particularly pronounced in reproductive males), small oblique terminal mouth with a complete row of tricuspid teeth, and a origin positioned closer to the tail than the snout. The caudal peduncle was deep and short, the body slab-sided and slender with reduced ventral contour, interorbital width narrow, and scales large; pelvic fins were small, typically with 6 rays per fin (occasionally absent), while rays numbered 8–13, anal rays averaged about 9–10, pectoral rays 15–16, and caudal rays 17–18. Nuptial males exhibited intense coloration on the sides, with yellow on the head, back, and fins; females were silvery with faint or absent dusky vertical bars. These morphological traits reflected adaptations to the 's endemic in the outflows of Tecopa Hot Springs, where temperatures ranged from 36°C to 42.2°C, with individuals observed abundantly at 36–37°C and tolerating up to 40°C—the highest reliably recorded for any species at the time of description. The thrived in clear, stable, warm saline and sulfurous spring waters, exhibiting reduced meristic counts (e.g., fewer fin rays and scales) correlated with elevated temperatures, a pattern observed across warm-spring populations compared to cooler-water relatives. Such features, including a compact body form and expansive fins in warm conditions, supported survival in quiet, high-heat environments with minimal thermal fluctuation, though the population's narrow physiological range ultimately contributed to vulnerability from alterations.

Physiological Traits

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) demonstrated exceptional tolerance suited to the constant high temperatures of its native outflows, where water often reached or exceeded 36°C, with individuals observed persisting in habitats up to approximately 42°C. Preferred temperatures approximated 30°C, reflecting an upper limit for optimal physiological function, beyond which metabolic stress increased. Unlike conspecifics in fluctuating environments, this showed no reduced thermal scope despite stable warm conditions, maintaining critical thermal maxima comparable to other Cyprinodon nevadensis populations, often exceeding 40°C in laboratory assessments of related taxa. Osmoregulatory adaptations enabled survival in the low-salinity waters (1.6–2.6 ), with efficient via uptake mechanisms typical of pupfishes, preventing osmotic imbalance in dilute, thermally extreme media. These traits supported hypo-osmotic without evident strain, as evidenced by the species' persistence in effluents lacking marked gradients. Reproductive physiology featured year-round spawning potential in stable spring habitats, with females producing small clutches of adhesive eggs fertilized externally by territorial males; however, proved highly sensitive to temperatures above 32–36°C, constraining successful in overheated conditions. Metabolic responses included facultative anaerobiosis during at elevated temperatures, allowing sustained activity via accumulation despite oxygen limitations in warm, potentially stagnant pools. Such adaptations underscored respiratory and energetic flexibility, with elevated temperatures accelerating basal but risking endocrine disruption in gonadal steroidogenesis.

Habitat and Distribution

Native Environment

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) was endemic to the outflows of the North and South Tecopa Hot Springs in , situated in the arid approximately 2 miles north of Tecopa town at an elevation of 1,411 feet (430 meters). This isolated habitat comprised small, freshwater spring brooks and shallow pools emerging from geothermal sources, forming a limited riverine system in an otherwise dry desert landscape. The springs provided a , thermally influenced , with originating from underground artesian flows typical of the region's fault-controlled . The , noted for its tolerance, inhabited these outflows where temperatures could exceed 108°F (42°C), allowing persistence in conditions inhospitable to most other fish species. Prior to human modifications, the habitat supported dense populations in these confined, warm- refugia, buffered from the surrounding extremes of low and high .

Historical Range

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) was historically endemic to the thermal spring outflows associated with the North and South Tecopa Hot Springs, located in , within the . This restricted distribution spanned shallow, marshy habitats fed by geothermal waters emerging at elevations around 1,411 feet (430 meters) near the town of Tecopa. No records indicate occurrence beyond these localized spring systems, which formed isolated refugia in an otherwise arid landscape. Prior to human-induced alterations in the mid-20th century, the occupied stream channels and pools downstream from the springs, where temperatures ranged from ambient to over 40°C (104°F), supporting a population adapted to extremes. Fossil and subfossil evidence from the basin suggests that pupfish taxa related to C. nevadensis have persisted in similar desert spring habitats for millennia, but the Tecopa remained confined to its namesake locality without evidence of natural expansion or colonization elsewhere.

Ecology and Behavior

Diet and Foraging

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae), a subspecies of the Amargosa pupfish, exhibited an omnivorous diet dominated by blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) and detritus, reflecting its adaptation to the nutrient-rich, thermal spring outflows of the Tecopa Hot Springs in California's Mojave Desert. Stomach content analyses from related Amargosa pupfish populations in thermal habitats, including Tecopa Bore, revealed that the diet comprised nearly entirely a mixture of filamentous blue-green algae and organic detritus, with individuals consuming large quantities of this algal-detrital complex scraped from the substrate. Small invertebrates supplemented the plant-based diet, including mosquito larvae, chironomid larvae, ostracods, and cladocerans, though these constituted a minor portion compared to algal material. This feeding pattern aligned with the high productivity of blue-green algae in the warm (28–42°C), mineral-laden waters, providing an abundant primary food source that supported rapid growth rates in pupfish populations. Foraging occurred primarily in shallow, benthic zones of the spring effluents, where pupfish grazed on mats and sifted from sediments using their upturned mouths, a typical of cyprinodontids in oligotrophic springs. Observations from pre-extinction surveys indicated opportunistic feeding on surficial and incidental dislodged during substrate disturbance, with no evidence of seasonal shifts in diet composition despite stable thermal conditions. This herbivore-leaning strategy maximized energy intake from the limited but consistently available resources in the isolated habitat, contributing to the ' tolerance of extreme temperatures and low oxygen levels prior to its extinction in the early .

Reproduction and Life Cycle

The Tecopa pupfish exhibited a rapid typical of pupfishes adapted to ephemeral or thermally stable habitats, with individuals rarely surviving beyond one year and most completing their lifecycle in several months. Growth was fast, enabling early as young as 4-6 weeks in the constant warm temperatures of Tecopa Hot Springs, where water hovered around 34-40°C. This short generation time facilitated multiple reproductive cycles within a single year, though environmental fluctuations could truncate lifespans further. Reproduction was oviparous, with females producing small clutches of adhesive eggs deposited on substrates such as or in shallow, warm outflows. Eggs typically hatched within 4-7 days under optimal conditions, yielding larvae that grew rapidly into juveniles capable of independently. Spawning occurred year-round in the stable environment, unlike seasonal patterns in cooler , with peak activity potentially aligning with inflows that enhanced suitability. Optimal reproductive temperatures ranged from 28-35°C, beyond which development or adult gonadal function declined sharply. Males defended small territories in shallow waters, displaying bright blue nuptial coloration to attract females, while females appeared olive-brown with faint vertical bars. involved males herding receptive females to spawning sites, often at the periphery of groups, where females released eggs sequentially and males fertilized them externally in a brief embrace. was moderate, with females spawning multiple times per season, though exact clutch sizes for the remain undocumented due to pre-extinction observational limits. This strategy maximized reproductive output in a high-mortality prone to drying or predation.

Population Dynamics Pre-Decline

Abundance Estimates

Quantitative estimates of Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) abundance prior to the mid-20th century decline are absent from historical records, reflecting the limited systematic surveys of desert spring fishes at the time. The subspecies was described in 1948 by Robert R. Miller from specimens collected in the outflow channels of North and South Tecopa Hot Springs, where it occupied warm, saline waters, implying a locally established population capable of supporting collections. No census data exist from this period, but the habitat—shallow, intermittent spring outflows—constrained populations to small scales typical of endemic pupfishes in isolated desert oases. By 1966, Miller's revisit to Tecopa Hot Springs documented the population as nearly extinct, with subsequent surveys in 1972 and 1977 confirming local extirpation at the type locality. A remnant group was observed in 1968 at an artificial reservoir near a motel, but no numerical assessments were reported, and it too vanished by 1970. These qualitative observations indicate pre-decline viability gave way rapidly to scarcity amid habitat diversion for human use, without baseline counts to quantify the loss.

Genetic Diversity

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) inhabited isolated thermal springs, restricting with other C. nevadensis and fostering subspecific divergence. Quantitative assessments of intraspecific , including metrics like heterozygosity or polymorphism levels, were not conducted before the population's extinction around 1970, as molecular techniques such as allozyme or were not yet applied to desert pupfishes. Preserved specimens from collections in and 1940s, used for taxonomic description, revealed morphological traits—such as reduced scale counts ( scales 24–27 versus 27–31 in nominate C. nevadensis) and proportionally deeper bodies—indicative of genetic adaptation to geothermal environments exceeding 40°C, though these do not directly quantify variation within the population. Subsequent genetic analyses of museum material for this remain unreported, leaving its effective population size-derived diversity unmeasured and highlighting a data limitation common to pre-1970s extinctions of small, fishes.

Causes of Decline

Habitat Modification

The Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) inhabited the shallow, warm outflows of geothermal springs at Tecopa Hot Springs in , where water temperatures ranged from approximately 35–43°C, supporting its thermophilic adaptations. These spring-fed pools and channels provided stable, mineral-rich environments isolated from broader aquatic systems, but human activities in the mid-20th century directly altered this . Development for recreational bathing involved channeling springs into concrete pools and bathhouses, which disrupted natural flow regimes, reduced outflow volumes, and eliminated shallow, vegetated margins essential for spawning and foraging. Such modifications, beginning as early as the , fragmented the contiguous thermal habitats into isolated segments unsuitable for the species' persistence. Groundwater extraction compounded these surface alterations, as pumping from aquifers for local , , and domestic use diminished spring discharge rates. By the , reduced water levels in the Tecopa springs led to drying of peripheral pools and channels, contracting available from several interconnected sites to remnant pockets. Official assessments noted that these hydrological changes, driven by anthropogenic demands in the arid , critically impaired the pupfish's refugia, with no compensatory restoration efforts implemented prior to local extirpation around 1970. Unlike non-native introductions, which exacerbated , habitat modification represented a primary causal driver by physically eliminating breeding and nursery areas, as evidenced by field surveys documenting the loss of spring outflows. The interplay of recreational infrastructure and depletion highlights a pattern of unchecked resource exploitation in isolated oases, where small-scale developments yielded outsized ecological impacts on endemic . No quantitative data on pre-modification flow rates survive, but qualitative records from ichthyological surveys confirm the progressive shrinkage as a non-reversible factor in the ' decline.

Introduction of Non-Native Species

The introduction of non-native fish species to the Tecopa Hot Springs habitats significantly contributed to the decline of Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae. Specifically, Gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish) and Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill sunfish) were introduced, likely for in the spring pools or as part of recreational enhancements in the area. These invasions occurred amid broader human modifications to the springs during the mid-20th century, with the non-natives establishing populations that persisted after the pupfish's disappearance. G. affinis, an aggressive livebearer commonly deployed for , preys on fish eggs, larvae, and small juveniles, directly targeting vulnerable life stages of the Tecopa in its confined, warm-water environment. Similarly, L. macrochirus, a larger centrarchid predator, likely consumed fry and adults, outcompeting them for limited resources in the altered spring channels. Surveys post-decline documented these non-natives dominating the remaining aquatic habitats, correlating with the absence of C. n. calidae by the late . The combined predation and competitive pressures from these species amplified the effects of habitat degradation, hastening without evidence of recovery.

Other Factors

Hybridization with the closely related Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis), likely facilitated by habitat disruptions allowing influx or survival of the latter, eroded the Tecopa 's genetic integrity and contributed to its . By the late , surveys at former sites detected only Amargosa pupfish, indicating either complete replacement or assimilation through interbreeding, with no morphologically pure Tecopa individuals remaining. The ' confinement to a single, small thermal spring system—spanning less than 0.1 hectares—amplified vulnerability to such genetic threats, as low population numbers (estimated in the hundreds by 1970) limited resilience against . No evidence supports additional pressures like overcollection or as primary drivers, though the isolated inherently predisposed the population to rapid localized events.

Extinction Timeline

Key Events Leading to Disappearance

The modification of Tecopa Hot Springs for recreational bathhouses during the and disrupted the natural outflows where the Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) resided, altering water temperatures, flows, and marsh habitats critical to its survival. These changes stemmed from commercial development to accommodate visitors seeking the springs' therapeutic waters, which redirected and channelized streams, reducing isolated thermal refugia. Channelization facilitated upstream access for the related Amargosa pupfish (C. n. amargosae), enabling that genetically swamped the Tecopa subspecies; hybrid individuals were documented in collections by the late . Concurrently, introductions of non-native (Gambusia affinis)—likely for —imposed predation and competitive pressures on the diminutive pupfish, exacerbating decline in the confined spring systems. The final documented observation occurred on February 2, 1970, when researchers collected nine , including hybrids, from a Tecopa Hot Springs well, marking the last verified presence of the subspecies. Follow-up surveys in 1972 and 1977 by ichthyologists R.R. Miller and J.A. Seldy yielded no specimens, confirming local extirpation amid ongoing habitat degradation.

Official Declarations

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) proposed delisting the Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) from the Endangered Species List in the on July 3, 1978, citing the absence of verified populations following extensive surveys of over 40 historical sites since the last confirmed specimens were collected on February 2, 1970. The proposal followed unsuccessful recovery efforts and habitat assessments indicating irreversible loss due to thermal spring alterations and non-native species incursions. On January 15, 1982, the USFWS finalized the delisting in the (47 FR 2317), formally recognizing the subspecies as extinct and terminating all protections under the Act of 1973. This action marked the first instance of a species being removed from the U.S. List explicitly due to , underscoring the limitations of pre-1973 conservation measures for endemic desert fishes. No subsequent sightings or viable populations were documented, validating the declaration based on field data from multiple agencies including the USFWS and state wildlife departments. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) independently assessed the Tecopa pupfish as Extinct under its Red List criteria, reflecting global consensus on its status absent any contradictory evidence from post-1970 surveys. This classification aligns with the USFWS determination, emphasizing the subspecies' confinement to a single, degraded habitat in the Mojave Desert's Tecopa Hot Springs.

Conservation Efforts and Legacy

Pre-Extinction Attempts

The decline of the Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) prompted initial conservation awareness in the late 1960s, as habitat alterations at Tecopa Hot Springs intensified through channelization and resort development, reducing suitable warm-water outflows essential for the subspecies. Biologists, including Robert R. Miller who described the subspecies in 1948, had documented its restriction to two springs' outflows, but systematic monitoring only ramped up as populations dwindled to near zero by 1966. No records indicate early captive breeding or relocation efforts during this period, likely due to the rapid pace of local development and limited federal mechanisms prior to formal protections. In early 1970, amid growing concerns over desert fish imperilment, the Desert Fishes Council directed California Department of Fish and Game biologist Phil Pister and University of Nevada researcher James E. Deacon to survey Tecopa-area populations of C. n. calidae, reflecting nascent organized assessment rather than active intervention. These efforts coincided with the last confirmed collections of live specimens on February 2, 1970, from remnant habitats already compromised by diverted spring flows and non-native species incursions. Pister and Deacon, instrumental in contemporaneous rescues of related pupfishes like the , focused on inventorying rather than ex situ propagation for Tecopa, as the subspecies' confinement to altered sites precluded viable salvage. Under the Preservation Act of 1966, the Tecopa pupfish received federal endangered status effective , 1970, marking one of the earliest listings of a native , driven by documented threats from habitat modification and exotic introductions. However, this designation postdated the ' effective disappearance, with no subsequent recovery actions feasible; surveys in and beyond yielded no evidence of survivors. State-level recognition followed in June , but pre-extinction measures remained confined to documentation, underscoring the limitations of reactive conservation amid unchecked anthropogenic pressures. The failure to implement proactive relocations or refugia, unlike for congeneric species, highlighted institutional delays in addressing localized extinctions in isolated aquifers.

Post-Extinction Implications

The extinction of the Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae) represented the first delisting of a species from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's endangered species protections due to verified extinction, with formal removal occurring in 1981 following its disappearance by 1970. This rapid loss, despite early listing under precursor legislation to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, exposed gaps in regulatory mechanisms for averting habitat destruction in isolated desert springs, where thermal alterations from piping and development can eradicate populations within years. The case illustrated the acute vulnerability of narrow endemics to localized anthropogenic changes, prompting federal agencies to refine protocols for assessing imminent threats in arid ecosystems prior to irreversible decline. Genetically, the ' elimination eliminated a distinct adapted to temperatures exceeding 40°C (104°F), diminishing overall diversity within the Amargosa pupfish complex (C. nevadensis) and foreclosing potential insights into thermal tolerance mechanisms for related . Ecologically, no documented cascading effects occurred in the confined Tecopa Hot Springs , given the fish's small and specialist niche, but the event underscored broader risks to biodiversity from diversion and invasive competitors, as seen in parallel declines of congeners. In conservation policy, the Tecopa serves as a benchmark for the perils of delayed intervention, influencing heightened protections for surviving pupfish refugia like , where similar spring habitats now face restricted development. Contemporary efforts in the Amargosa Basin, including 2024 state grants for habitat resilience, implicitly reference such precedents to prioritize hydrological integrity and non-native eradication, aiming to prevent repeat extinctions amid escalating desert water demands.

References

  1. [1]
    Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae - NatureServe Explorer
    This fish has distinction of being the first species removed from the USFWS list due to extinction (Ono et al. 1983). Distribution.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  2. [2]
    Fishes of the Amargosa Basin
    Aug 8, 2022 · Tecopa is sadly home to the only extinct pupfish in the Amargosa Basin, the Tecopa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae). The Tecopa pupfish ...
  3. [3]
    Tecopa pupfish, Declared Extinct in 1981 | FWS.gov
    Original caption: Tecopa pupfish. Scientific name: Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae. Declared Extinct: 1981. Specimen courtesy of University of Michigan Museum ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Species Profile for Tecopa pupfish(Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae)
    Delisted due to Extinction, 10-13-1970, Pacific Southwest Region (Region 8), Wherever found. Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries. Previous; 1; Next ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  5. [5]
    [PDF] THE CYPRINODONT FISHES OF THE DEATH VALLEY SYSTEM ...
    Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae, new subspecies. Cyprinodon nevadensis ... Colorado lZiver, has been described by Gilluly (1929: 682). An area of about ...
  6. [6]
    Cyprinodon nevadensis - NatureServe Explorer
    Miller (1948) recognized and described 6 subspecies: nevadensis, amargosae, shoshone and calidae (extinct) in California, and mionectes and pectoralis in Nevada ...Missing: first | Show results with:first
  7. [7]
    Tecopa Pupfish Facts, Habitat, Diet, Pictures - Extinct Animals
    Mar 28, 2022 · Tecopa pupfish was a subspecies of Amargosa pupfish that got extinct by the year 1970 due to habitat modification and the introduction of non-native species.
  8. [8]
    Cyprinodon nevadensis, Amargosa pupfish : fisheries, aquarium
    Life cycle and mating behavior Maturity | Reproduction | Spawning | Eggs | Fecundity | Larvae. Its reproductive strategies differ from many spring-dwelling ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] 1 AMARGOSA RIVER PUPFISH Cyprinodon nevadensis ...
    Sep 1, 2015 · Description: All Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis) subspecies are small fish that rarely exceed 50 mm TL. The body is deep, ...
  10. [10]
    Tecopa pupfish - California Fish Species - California Fish Website
    Note: The Tecopa pupfish is now extinct, but used to occupy north and south Tecopa Hot Springs, Inyo County. Amargosa pupfish inhabit several isolated springs ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  11. [11]
    [PDF] THE CYPRINODONT FISHES OF THE DEATH VALLEY SYSTEM ...
    Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae, new subspecies. Typ~s.-The holotype, a nuptial ... peduncle, and in certain other details of body proportions, coloration, and.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] 1 SARATOGA SPRINGS PUPFISH Cyprinodon nevadensis ...
    Saratoga Springs pupfish are small, rarely over 50mm, with a deep body, blunt head, and a small mouth. They have large scales and reduced pelvic fins.Missing: morphology | Show results with:morphology
  13. [13]
    death valley pupfish (cyprinodon nevadensis)1 - jstor
    chemical characteristics. spring pond water was about 42 C. temperature tolerance than most other fishes and that they also tolerate a wide range of ...Missing: calidae | Show results with:calidae
  14. [14]
    Endocrine and metabolic impacts of warming aquatic habitats ...
    Nov 3, 2016 · Pupfish from the Amargosa River were maintained at 24°C, and Tecopa Bore pupfish at 34°C. For the duration of the study, all fish were fed a 1:1 ...
  15. [15]
    An Outline of the Genus Cyprinodon, by Estella Flather
    Belonging to the genus Cyprinodon, these remarkable fishes live under many types of chemical and physical conditions in isolated pools and streams of the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Thermal Tolerances for Relict Populations of Desert Pupfish ...
    Published data for critical thermal maxima and minima indicate a range of extremes from 7°C to 44.6°C (Lowe and Heath 1969, Deacon and Minckley 1974, ...Missing: calidae adaptations
  17. [17]
    Warming waters beget smaller fish: evidence for reduced size ... - NIH
    Pupfish in Tecopa Bore in 2013–2014 were likewise smaller in mass and length than conspecifics from the Amargosa River both in 2008 and in 2013–2014 (p ...
  18. [18]
    Osmoregulatory Physiology of Pupfish (Cyprinodon spp.) in ...
    Nov 2, 2012 · Active uptake of Na+ at the gill by fish is fundamental to their osmoregulation and thus survival in freshwater environments.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] THE CYPRINODONT FISHES OF THE DEATH VALLEY SYSTEM ...
    ROBERT R. MILLER. ANN ARBOR. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS. APRIL 20, 1948. Page ... South Tecopa Hot Spring fish inhabit water of even higher temperature, but.Missing: pupfish | Show results with:pupfish
  20. [20]
    Cyprinodontidae - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Because of the precarious nature of pupfish habitats, refuge populations have been established for several of the species. The entire population of C. radiosus ...
  21. [21]
    Paradoxical anaerobism in desert pupfish
    Dec 1, 2015 · Highlighted Article: Pupfish acclimated to warm but ecologically relevant temperatures experience extended periods of anaerobism despite the ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Endocrine and metabolic impacts of warming aquatic habitats - NIH
    Nov 3, 2016 · (1981) The evolution of thermal tolerance in desert ... Tecopa pupfish, Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae, an inhabitant of a thermal spring.
  23. [23]
    Tecopa Pupfish (Subspecies Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae)
    Habitat modifications and the introduction of non-native species led to its extinction in about 1970. More Info ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  24. [24]
    Cyprinodon nevadensis, Amargosa pupfish : fisheries, aquarium
    Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae, now extinct, in outlets of North and South Tecopa Hot Springs in California; Cyprinodon nevadensis shoshone , in outlet of ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Amargosa Pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis) - Species Profile
    This species is comprised of six subspecies, of which at least one, C. n. calidae is extinct and the others are at various levels of imperilment.
  26. [26]
    Food Habits of the Amargosa Pupfish in a Thermal Stream
    The diet was almost entirely a mixture of blue-green algae and detritus. ... Pupfish from Tecopa Bore eat large quan- tities of the algae-detritus ...Missing: foraging | Show results with:foraging<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Productivity of a herbivorous pupfish population (Cyprinodon ...
    At Tecopa Bore this provides pupfish with an abundant food source. The thermal regime of Tecopa Bore is nearly optimal for pupfish growth. Kinne. (1960), in ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] preliminary food studies of cyprinodon macularius and
    Jun 20, 1970 · This brief note presents some information on the food habits of two pupfish species. Desert pupfish (Cyprinodon macularius) are found in shore ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Captive Propagation of Two Pupfishes, Cyprinodon nevadensis ...
    The original subspecies that inhabited the hot springs—the Tecopa pupfish (C. n. calidae, back cover)—was replaced by C. n. armagosae when natural barriers ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Extinctions of North American Fishes During the Past Century
    Robert R. Miller, James D. Williams ... The last known individual was collected from Big Spring (=Deep. Spring of Miller 1948) on 7 September. 1948 by W.
  31. [31]
    Variation and Divergence of Death Valley Pupfish Populations at ...
    The patterns of genetic variation suggest that most polymorphic sites derive from a common ancestor and that recent population divergence has occurred primarily ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Department of the Interior - Center for Biological Diversity
    Aug 4, 2004 · 2001), including Tecopa pupfish. (Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae), ... The authors identified diagnostic genetic markers from mtDNA and nuclear DNA ...
  33. [33]
    California Riparian Systems - UC Press E-Books Collection
    Unfortunately, mining of underground aquifers and surface alteration of habitats caused the extirpation of the Tecopa pupfish during the 1970s. The second ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 1982 / Rules ...
    Jan 15, 1982 · Available data on the Tecopa pupfish in 1970 indicated that it was Endangered by habitat alteration and introduction of exotic fishes, notably ...
  35. [35]
    Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae - The Sixth Extinction
    Endemic to the hot springs of Tecopa, California, the pupfish Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae lived in a unique desert oasis. Its survival depended on the steady ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Do Not Remove - Desert Fishes Council
    Feb 18, 1970 · The range of temperature tolerance for populations at Saratoga Springs is ... Cyprinodon nevadensis calidae. 7. Cyprinodon nevadensis pectoralis.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · The “List Date” for final federal listing is the date the listing became effective. ... Tecopa pupfish. SDE. SE. 19870609. 19710627. FDE. FE.
  38. [38]
    Ash Meadows is Too Important to Risk - Sierra Club
    Jun 20, 2023 · The Tecopa pupfish, endemic to the hot spring, was not so fortunate. Failing to adapt to its altered environment, it was the first official ...
  39. [39]
    California Wildlife Conservation Board Awards Amargosa ...
    Nov 26, 2024 · The California Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) has awarded two critical grants to support the resilience and biodiversity of this unique desert ecosystem.Missing: legacy | Show results with:legacy