Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Third Position

Third Position is a revolutionary nationalist political ideology that emphasizes its opposition to both communism and capitalism, advocating instead for a synthesis of national identity, economic corporatism, and cultural traditionalism.^[1] Emerging primarily in post-World War II Europe among neo-fascist thinkers, it draws from interwar fascist precedents, particularly Benito Mussolini's Italian Fascism, which positioned its corporatist economy as a third alternative to laissez-faire markets and Marxist collectivism.^[2] Proponents argue for decentralized, racially or ethnically homogeneous communities organized around organic social hierarchies rather than class conflict or individualistic profit motives.^[3] The ideology gained traction in the late 1960s and 1970s within groups seeking to transcend traditional left-right dichotomies, incorporating elements like anti-globalism, environmental stewardship, and critiques of usury while rejecting both international finance and state socialism.^[4] Key organizations, such as the International Third Position formed by dissidents from Britain's National Front, promoted these ideas through publications and alliances with like-minded European nationalists.^[5] Third Position has influenced strands of thought in movements emphasizing spiritual renewal and autarkic self-sufficiency, often appealing to disaffected youth from both radical left and right backgrounds.^[6] Despite its claims to ideological innovation, Third Position remains controversial, frequently characterized by analysts as a repackaged form of fascism due to shared emphases on authoritarian nationalism, anti-egalitarianism, and rejection of liberal democracy.^[7] Its marginal status in mainstream politics stems from associations with extremist violence and supremacist rhetoric, though advocates maintain it offers a causal realist path to societal cohesion amid perceived failures of materialist ideologies.^[8] Empirical data on its implementation is limited, confined largely to theoretical manifestos rather than governing practice, highlighting its role more as a critique of modernity than a proven system.^[9]

Ideology and Principles

Core Tenets

The Third Position ideology rejects both capitalism and communism as interconnected systems rooted in materialism, individualism, and internationalism, which it claims undermine national sovereignty and organic social bonds.^[1] Instead, it advocates a "third way" that synthesizes nationalist priorities with economic interventionism, subordinating private enterprise and labor organization to the collective interests of the nation-state rather than market competition or proletarian revolution. This stance emerged prominently in postwar neo-fascist circles, positioning the ideology "beyond left and right" by critiquing both Western liberal economics and Soviet-style collectivism as agents of cultural homogenization and spiritual decay.^[6]^[7] Economically, core tenets emphasize corporatism, organizing society into vocational guilds or "corporations" that mediate between workers, employers, and the state to eliminate class antagonism and direct production toward autarkic self-sufficiency. Private property is retained but regulated to prevent concentration in monopolies or finance capital, often incorporating distributist ideals of widespread ownership to foster localism and reduce dependency on global trade.^[7] Politically, it promotes hierarchical governance over liberal democracy, viewing the latter as susceptible to plutocratic or mob influence, and prioritizes decisive leadership to enforce national renewal.^[1] Socially, the ideology upholds ethno-nationalism as essential for cultural preservation, advocating homogeneous communities resistant to immigration and multiculturalism, which are seen as diluting identity and fostering division.^[6] It stresses traditional values, including familial authority, spiritual or religious foundations, and opposition to egalitarian doctrines that erode natural hierarchies. Anti-usury measures and critiques of monetary dominance underscore a broader rejection of finance-driven modernity in favor of productive, community-oriented economics.^[7] These principles, while varying by proponent, consistently frame the Third Position as a revolutionary framework for restoring pre-industrial social forms adapted to contemporary challenges.

Economic Framework

The economic framework of Third Position ideology rejects both laissez-faire capitalism, viewed as promoting individualistic materialism and international finance, and Marxist communism, criticized for its class warfare and abolition of private property. Instead, it advocates a "third way" centered on national economic autarky and corporatist organization, where production serves the collective interests of the nation-state rather than profit maximization or proletarian dictatorship.^[10]^[6] This approach subordinates economic activity to state-directed goals, retaining private ownership of the means of production but subjecting it to rigorous regulation to prevent exploitation and ensure alignment with national priorities, such as self-sufficiency and social harmony.^[10] Central to this framework is corporatism, a system of economic governance that structures society into mandatory "corporations" or syndicates representing functional groups—such as workers, employers, and professionals within specific industries—under state oversight. These bodies mediate labor disputes, set wages and prices, and coordinate production to eliminate class antagonism through enforced collaboration, as implemented in Mussolini's Italy via the Charter of Labor in 1927 and the establishment of 22 corporations by 1939.^[11] Unlike capitalist markets driven by competition or communist central planning, corporatism posits the economy as an organic extension of the national community, with the state acting as arbiter to prioritize autarky over global trade dependencies.^[12] Historical applications, such as Italy's push for autarky through protectionist tariffs and the 1925 Battle for Grain campaign—which increased domestic wheat production by 15% within three years—demonstrated this by aiming to insulate the economy from foreign influences amid the Great Depression.^[10] Autarky, or economic self-sufficiency, forms another pillar, emphasizing import substitution, resource mobilization, and technological independence to fortify national resilience against external shocks. In fascist practice, this involved state interventions like public works programs and currency controls, as seen in Italy's 1935-1936 invasion of Ethiopia partly justified by resource acquisition needs, though empirical outcomes showed mixed results with industrial output rising 50% from 1929 to 1938 but at the cost of inefficiencies from overregulation.^[10] Third Position advocates extend this to postwar contexts, critiquing globalization and multinational corporations as extensions of plutocratic capitalism, while proposing decentralized yet state-guided economies that integrate small-scale proprietorships to distribute wealth more equitably than under liberal systems.^[6] Critics from libertarian perspectives argue this devolves into cronyism, where favored cartels dominate under nominal private ownership, as evidenced by Italy's pre-WWII alliances between regime insiders and industrialists like Fiat.^[13] Third Position ideology centers nationalism as the paramount social force, positing the nation as an organic entity defined by ethnic, cultural, and historical continuity rather than abstract civic principles. Proponents argue that true sovereignty requires prioritizing national interests over internationalist or class-based divisions, often advocating decentralized, tribal structures to foster communal loyalty and self-sufficiency.^[8] This vision rejects multiculturalism, viewing it as a dilution of national vitality, and instead promotes policies to maintain racial and cultural homogeneity within borders.^[6]^[1] Socially, Third Position emphasizes hierarchical traditionalism, elevating the family as the bedrock of societal stability and moral order. It opposes liberal individualism and feminist movements, confining women's primary roles to motherhood, homemaking, and national propagation, while reserving leadership and combative functions for men in a framework of machismo.^[7] Adherents draw on pre-modern customs and spiritual values to counter perceived moral decay from capitalism and communism, promoting pronatalist measures to bolster population growth aligned with national identity.^[8] Community solidarity is pursued through corporatist arrangements that integrate social welfare with nationalist goals, subordinating personal freedoms to collective ethnic destiny.^[6] In practice, these dimensions manifest in opposition to immigration and supranational entities, framing them as existential threats to the nation's biological and spiritual essence. Groups aligned with Third Position, such as certain postwar fascist offshoots, have historically mobilized around symbols of ancient authority to evoke a return to autarkic, warrior-like social norms.^[1] This synthesis of nationalism and social conservatism aims to forge a unified volk resistant to both materialist ideologies, though critics from academic analyses note its alignment with fascist traits like elitist paternalism and rejection of egalitarian progress.^[7]

Historical Origins

Interwar Foundations

The interwar period (1918–1939) laid the ideological groundwork for Third Position thought through fascist movements in Italy and Germany, which explicitly rejected the individualism of liberal capitalism and the class warfare of Marxist communism in favor of state-mediated national corporatism. In Italy, Benito Mussolini founded the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento on March 23, 1919, in Milan, drawing from nationalist war veterans and syndicalist traditions to oppose both bourgeois liberalism and Bolshevik revolution.^[14] The group's initial manifesto demanded progressive reforms like women's suffrage, an eight-hour workday, and worker participation in industry, while insisting on national sovereignty over internationalist ideologies.^[14] By November 1921, the movement formalized as the National Fascist Party (PNF), emphasizing a "third solution" to economic conflict via corporative syndicates that integrated labor and capital under state oversight, as implemented in the 1926 Charter of Labor and expanded through the 1930s Palazzo Vidoni Pact and 1934 corporative laws.^[14] Mussolini articulated this in the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism, co-authored with Giovanni Gentile, declaring fascism's opposition to "the entire complex of democratic, individualist, and liberal ideology" and its recognition of socialist impulses only insofar as they served the organic national community rather than class antagonism.^[15] This framework subordinated private enterprise to autarkic national goals, as seen in the Battle for Grain (1925) and the Institute for Industrial Reconstruction (1933), aiming for self-sufficiency without full collectivization.^[14] In Germany, the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), reorganized in 1920 under Adolf Hitler, echoed this positioning with its February 24, 1920, 25-Point Program, which advocated abolition of unearned income, confiscation of war profits, nationalization of trusts, and communalization of large department stores—measures framed as combating "international finance capital" and "Marxist materialism" through volkisch socialism. The regime, after seizing power on January 30, 1933, pursued a mixed economy blending private ownership with state direction, as in the 1934 New Plan under Hjalmar Schacht, prioritizing rearmament and autarky over laissez-faire markets or egalitarian redistribution.^[14] These policies, including the German Labor Front's replacement of unions and profit-sharing mandates, sought to harmonize interests within the racial-national state, distinguishing National Socialism from both Weimar liberalism and Soviet communism.^[16] While both movements drew criticism for retaining capitalist hierarchies under authoritarian control, their interwar innovations influenced later Third Position variants by modeling anti-materialist, nationalist alternatives.^[17]

Postwar Evolution

Following the defeat of Axis powers in 1945, Third Position ideology adapted to the emerging Cold War bipolarity by emphasizing national sovereignty, corporatist economics, and opposition to both liberal capitalism and Soviet communism, often through successor movements to interwar fascism. In Latin America, Juan Domingo Perón's regime in Argentina explicitly formulated a "Third Position" doctrine, articulated in a July 6, 1947, speech as an ideological stance transcending the U.S.-Soviet divide, promoting social justice via state-mediated class collaboration while rejecting Marxist internationalism and Anglo-American imperialism.^[18] Perón's 1946 election victory institutionalized this approach, with policies like nationalization of key industries (e.g., railroads in 1948) and labor syndicates under state oversight embodying corporatism as a mediator between capital and workers, influencing similar non-aligned models in Bolivia and elsewhere during the late 1940s.^[19] This framework positioned Peronism as a pragmatic adaptation of fascist economic ideas to postcolonial contexts, prioritizing national development over ideological purity, though critics from both capitalist and communist camps dismissed it as veiled authoritarianism.^[20] In Europe, where fascist parties were banned, Third Position elements persisted through legal successors like Italy's Italian Social Movement (MSI), founded on December 26, 1946, by ex-fascists including Giorgio Almirante, which advocated anti-communism alongside critiques of unchecked market liberalism and maintained corporatist principles from Mussolini's era.^[21] The MSI's program, outlined in its 1947 statutes, stressed national unity against class conflict, law and order, and economic self-sufficiency, achieving 6.1% of the vote in the 1948 elections by appealing to southern agrarian interests wary of both NATO-aligned capitalism and PCI dominance.^[22] Internal factions, such as Pino Rauti's "Spiritualist" wing in the 1950s, pushed for a more explicit third-way orientation, urging alliances with anti-capitalist nationalists and opposing Italy's 1955 EEC entry as subservience to Atlanticist powers, though the party pragmatically supported NATO until the 1960s.^[22] Similar dynamics appeared in France's Ordre Nouveau groups during the 1960s, blending anti-communist vigilantism with distributist economics, reflecting a broader neo-fascist effort to reframe palingenetic nationalism as compatible with decolonization struggles. By the 1970s, amid economic stagflation and youth radicalization, Third Position evolved into more militant forms, particularly in Britain and Italy, where groups like the National Front's "Political Soldier" faction (emerging circa 1980) and Rauti's 1990 MSI splinter adopted anti-globalist rhetoric, drawing from Peronist non-alignment and Strasserite workerism to critique both Thatcherite deregulation and Soviet bureaucracy.^[6] Roberto Fiore, an Italian Ordine Nuovo militant exiled after the 1970s Years of Lead, co-founded the International Third Position in 1989 from National Front dissidents, promoting ethno-pluralism, guild socialism, and solidarity with Third World anti-imperialists like Libya's Gaddafi, peaking with publications reaching fringe audiences by the early 1990s.^[23] These developments, often labeled neo-fascist by observers due to ultranationalist cores, nonetheless gained traction in contexts of industrial decline—e.g., NF membership surging to 17,500 by 1973—by framing Third Position as a causal response to materialism's failures, evidenced by endorsements of self-reliant communities over welfare states.^[6] This era marked a shift toward transnational networking, with European groups influencing U.S. paleoconservatives, though electoral marginalization persisted amid state repression and ideological dilution.

National and Regional Variants

Italy

![Fasces lictoriae, ancient Roman symbol adopted by Italian Fascism][float-right] Italian Fascism, established by Benito Mussolini in 1919 through the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, positioned itself as a revolutionary "third way" alternative to both liberal capitalism and Marxist communism, emphasizing national syndicalism and corporatism to integrate workers and employers under state oversight for the nation's benefit.^[24] This framework rejected class conflict in favor of class collaboration within a totalitarian structure, with the 1927 Charter of Labour formalizing corporatist guilds to regulate economy and society, ostensibly transcending capitalist exploitation and communist internationalism.^[25] Despite rhetorical anti-capitalism—Mussolini having originated as a socialist before his 1914 break with the Italian Socialist Party over nationalism—fascist policies preserved private property while subordinating it to state directives, allying with industrialists to suppress strikes and maintain production for autarky and militarism.^[17] Following World War II, neo-fascist groups revived Third Position elements amid Italy's republican transition, with the Italian Social Movement (MSI) founded on December 26, 1946, by ex-fascists including Giorgio Almirante, advocating "socialization" as a nationalist corrective to capitalism without communist egalitarianism.^[1] The MSI, polling up to 8.7% in 1972 elections, framed itself as defender of Italian identity against both globalist liberalism and Soviet influence, evolving into the more moderate National Alliance by 1994 under Gianfranco Fini, which distanced from explicit Third Positionism.^[8] In the late 1970s, Terza Posizione emerged as a militant youth faction synthesizing Mussolini's doctrines with anti-globalist activism, publishing a journal until its dissolution amid Operation Gladio-era violence, influencing later networks like those of Roberto Fiore.^[1] Contemporary manifestations include CasaPound Italia, formed in 2003 via a Rome housing occupation referencing Ezra Pound, which explicitly endorses Third Position as "extreme-upper-centre" politics blending fascist heritage with social services like food banks and anti-eviction aid to cultivate grassroots loyalty.^[26] By 2013, CasaPound fielded candidates, garnering 0.7% in local votes while occupying over 30 buildings nationwide, promoting autarky, anti-immigration, and corporatist economics against EU neoliberalism and leftist multiculturalism. Critics note its fascist symbolism and violence, including assaults on opponents, yet proponents defend it as prefigurative mutualism rooted in national solidarity, distinct from both corporate oligarchy and state socialism.^[27] Other groups like Forza Nuova echo these themes, but CasaPound's cultural occupations and media presence—via its satellite TV and publishing—mark a hybrid activism sustaining Third Position rhetoric into the 2020s amid Italy's populist shifts.^[28]

Germany

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), ruling Germany from 1933 to 1945, explicitly positioned its ideology as a "third way" transcending both international capitalism and Bolshevik communism, emphasizing national self-sufficiency, racial hierarchy, and state-directed economic coordination. The party's 1920 program demanded the abolition of unearned income, breaking of interest-based debt slavery, and confiscation of war profits, alongside nationalization of trusts and expansion of welfare for citizens of "German blood," while nominally upholding private property rights subordinated to national interests.^[29] In practice, this manifested as a dirigiste system retaining private ownership—evidenced by privatization of state assets in the 1930s and collaboration with industrial cartels like IG Farben—but imposing wage/price controls, forced labor allocation via the German Labor Front, and autarkic policies under the Four-Year Plan from 1936, prioritizing rearmament over market freedom or egalitarian redistribution.^[30] Post-World War II, Third Position concepts sporadically influenced fringe German political efforts to forge paths beyond Western liberalism and Soviet-style socialism, but these largely dissolved into the social market economy framework by the 1950s, diverging from fascist precedents. Neo-fascist variants reemerged in the late 20th century through groups allying with international Third Position networks, such as the National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD), which from 1989 collaborated with entities promoting Strasserist-inflected nationalism rejecting both global finance and class warfare Marxism.^[31] In contemporary Germany, the most explicit Third Position adherent is Der III. Weg (The Third Path), a neo-Nazi party founded in 2012 as a splinter from the NPD, advocating ethno-nationalist separatism, ecological traditionalism, and economic critiques framing both capitalism and communism as tools of "internationalist" decay. The group promotes "national socialism" updated with anti-globalist rhetoric, including opposition to usury, multinational corporations, and mass immigration, while endorsing community-based production models akin to guild systems.^[32] ^[33] Active in Saxony and Thuringia, Der III. Weg has organized "border patrols" against migrants, as in October 2021 when members were detained for vigilante actions near the Polish frontier, and maintains a membership under 1,000 amid constitutional scrutiny for extremist ties.^[32] Its ideology draws from interwar Strasserism—Otto Strasser's left-leaning Nazi faction emphasizing worker cooperatives over Hitlerian statism—but aligns practically with neo-Nazi violence and Holocaust denial, as documented in German intelligence reports classifying it as a threat to democratic order.^[6]

France

In interwar France, precursors to Third Position appeared in the Parti Populaire Français (PPF), founded by former communist Jacques Doriot on June 29, 1936, which promoted corporatism as an alternative to both liberal capitalism and Soviet communism, prioritizing national economic solidarity under state coordination.^[34] The PPF, peaking at an estimated 100,000–300,000 claimed adherents by 1937 though likely fewer in practice, drew from ex-communists and fascists, advocating anti-parliamentary governance, anti-Semitism, and alliances with Axis powers while rejecting class warfare for organic national unity.^[35] Its economic vision emphasized guild-like structures to harness private initiative for collective welfare, influencing Vichy-era policies but collapsing with Doriot's death in 1945 amid collaborationist ties.^[36] Postwar Third Position coalesced in small revolutionary nationalist groupuscules, with Troisième Voie (TV) emerging in 1985 as the primary explicit proponent through the merger of Jean-Gilles Malliarakis's Mouvement Nationaliste Révolutionnaire and dissidents from the Parti des Forces Nouvelles.^[1]^[37] TV, under leaders like Malliarakis and secretary-general Christian Bouchet, rejected both global capitalism and Marxism in favor of nationalisme révolutionnaire—a framework for ethno-national self-sufficiency, pan-European solidarity against U.S. hegemony, anti-Zionism, and selective Third Worldism to counter liberal internationalism.^[37]^[38] With membership numbering a few hundred, it prioritized youth mobilization via satellite entities like Jeunesses Nationalistes-Révolutionnaires and counter-cultural outreach to skinhead networks, publishing materials advocating organic democracy and anti-system fronts over electoralism.^[37] TV autodissolved in 1992 amid tactical rifts, fragmenting into groups like Nouvelle Résistance (founded August 1991 by Bouchet), which sustained Third Position themes through Eurasianist anti-Westernism and anti-globalist manifestos until its 1997 transition to Unité Radicale.^[37] A 2010s revival under Serge Ayoub reframed TV around militant anti-immigration and anti-Islamization activism, operating as an association rather than a formal party to pursue street-level confrontation over institutional paths.^[39] This iteration, linked to violent incidents including attacks on leftists and migrants, was dissolved by decree on July 12, 2013, for inciting hatred and reconstituting banned entities, with the European Court of Human Rights upholding the measure in 2020 as proportionate to public order threats.^[40]^[39] French Third Position variants have remained marginal, influencing broader far-right identitarianism but lacking mass traction due to legal suppressions and internal factionalism, contrasting with electoral successes of parties like the National Rally.^[37]

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, Third Position ideology emerged primarily within the far-right National Front (NF) during the late 1970s and 1980s through the "Political Soldier" faction. This group, influenced by neo-fascist thinkers such as Julius Evola and Francis Parker Yockey, rejected both liberal capitalism and Marxism in favor of a radical nationalist vision emphasizing spiritual renewal, anti-materialism, and corporatist economic structures.^[41] The Political Soldier approach advocated for a "new man" forged through discipline and traditional values, positioning itself against the perceived decadence of modern democracy and globalism.^[41] Key figures in this faction included Nick Griffin, who joined the NF in the mid-1970s and contributed to its publications promoting Third Position ideas, such as opposition to usury and advocacy for self-sufficient communities. By the late 1980s, the NF's Nationalism Today periodical explicitly endorsed Third Positionism, blending racial nationalism with critiques of multinational corporations and international finance.^[42] This ideological strain sought to differentiate British nationalism from mainstream conservatism by incorporating distributist economics and anti-globalist rhetoric, drawing partial inspiration from interwar fascist corporatism but adapted to postwar conditions.^[42] The Political Soldier wing's internal dominance led to schisms, culminating in the formation of the International Third Position (ITP) in 1989 by dissidents including Derek Holland and Italian exile Roberto Fiore. The ITP, initially UK-based, propagated Third Position doctrines internationally, emphasizing pan-European nationalism, rejection of Atlanticism, and economic autarky while maintaining ties to radical traditionalist circles.^[23] Though marginal electorally, the ITP influenced subsequent far-right thought by framing Third Position as a bulwark against both neoliberalism and communism, with publications critiquing the European Union as a supranational threat to sovereignty.^[23] Under Nick Griffin's leadership of the British National Party (BNP) from 1999 to 2014, elements of Third Position economics surfaced in policy platforms, such as calls for worker protections against foreign labor, nationalization of key industries, and opposition to free trade agreements that undermined British manufacturing.^[43] However, the BNP prioritized anti-immigration nationalism over explicit Third Position framing, achieving peak electoral success with over 500,000 votes in the 2009 European Parliament elections before declining due to internal divisions and legal challenges.^[44] These manifestations remained confined to fringe groups, with limited mainstream impact, as British far-right organizations faced systemic opposition from state and media institutions often aligned against nationalist ideologies.^[23]

United States

The Third Position in the United States manifests primarily through marginal political organizations and intellectual advocates who blend economic nationalism with advocacy for European-descended Americans, rejecting both unchecked corporate globalization and state socialism. This variant emphasizes protectionist policies, immigration restriction, and a corporatist economic model prioritizing national workers over multinational interests, often framed as a "third way" beyond left-right dichotomies. Unlike European counterparts, U.S. expressions are constrained by the two-party system's dominance and First Amendment protections, limiting them to fringe electoral efforts and online discourse rather than mass movements.^[6]^[45] The American Third Position Party (A3P), founded in November 2009 by figures including attorney William Daniel Johnson, represented the most explicit organizational embodiment of these ideas. Initially established by activists from Southern California skinhead networks, the party qualified for ballot access in California by early 2010, marking its first state-level recognition. Its platform called for ending non-European immigration, repatriating undocumented migrants, and implementing trade policies to protect domestic manufacturing from foreign competition, arguing that both free-market capitalism and communism erode national sovereignty and worker welfare. A3P positioned its economics as serving "the American worker" through incentives for family formation, infrastructure investment, and opposition to usury and financial speculation, drawing on critiques of Wall Street's influence akin to those in interwar fascist thought but adapted to American racial demographics.^[45]^[46]^[47] Intellectual contributions came from figures like Kevin MacDonald, a California State University professor and A3P director, who argued in works such as The Culture of Critique (1998) that Jewish influence promotes multiculturalism detrimental to Western societies, influencing the party's view of globalism as a cultural threat. The party fielded candidates in minor races, including filmmaker Merlin Miller for president in 2012, who garnered about 1,000 votes nationwide amid efforts to secure ballot lines in multiple states. Internal disputes and external scrutiny from watchdog groups led to a 2013 rebranding as the American Freedom Party (AFP), softening overt Third Position rhetoric while retaining commitments to ethnic advocacy and economic relocalization. By 2016, AFP achieved minor ballot status in California and Virginia but failed to build sustained electoral traction, with membership remaining under 1,000.^[48]^[49]^[45] Broader Third Position influences appear in dissident right publications and forums critiquing bipartisan policies on trade deficits and labor outsourcing, such as those echoing Pat Buchanan's 1990s paleoconservatism but extending to explicit anti-capitalist nationalism. Groups like the now-defunct International Third Position maintained U.S. contacts in the 1990s, promoting distributist or guild-based alternatives to corporate hegemony, though without significant institutional impact. These ideas persist in niche online communities advocating "national socialism for Americans," focusing on tariffs, worker cooperatives under national oversight, and cultural preservation, but face marginalization due to associations with extremism and lack of mainstream resonance.^[8]^[1]

Latin America and Other Influences

In Argentina, Peronism under Juan Domingo Perón represented a prominent Latin American adaptation of third-position principles, emphasizing national sovereignty, social justice, and economic corporatism as alternatives to both liberal capitalism and Marxist socialism. Perón, who rose to power via a 1943 military coup and won the presidency in 1946, articulated Justicialism—a doctrine blending nationalism, labor mobilization, and state-directed industry—explicitly rejecting the "Yankee" model of free-market individualism and Soviet collectivism. This framework promoted worker participation in management through syndicates while maintaining private property under heavy state oversight, achieving rapid industrialization: steel production rose from negligible levels to over 300,000 tons annually by 1955, and real wages increased by approximately 30% during Perón's first term. Peronism's foreign policy embodied the "Third Position" through non-alignment, as Perón declared in 1947: "We are neither Yankees nor Marxists," fostering ties with both Western and Eastern blocs while prioritizing Latin American unity via initiatives like the 1949 Economic Conference.^[50] Perón's regime integrated fascist-inspired elements, including charismatic leadership, youth organizations like the Peronist Youth, and suppression of opposition, drawing indirect influence from interwar European models while adapting them to Catholic social teaching and anti-imperialist rhetoric. Post-1955 exile, Peronism evolved into a enduring political force, influencing subsequent governments and parties like the Justicialist Party, which governed Argentina intermittently, including under Perón's return in 1973. Critics, including economists from the Austrian school, attributed Perón's ouster in a 1955 coup to fiscal imbalances from expansive welfare and subsidies, with inflation reaching 30% annually by mid-decade, underscoring tensions between third-position corporatism and market realities.^[18]^[19] In Brazil, Integralism led by Plínio Salgado from 1932 offered another prewar variant with third-position affinities, advocating a corporatist state rooted in Catholic integralism, nationalism, and opposition to both communism and liberal democracy. The Brazilian Integralist Action (AIB) mobilized up to 200,000 members by 1937, promoting "God, Patria, Family" as a sigma against materialist ideologies, with economic policies favoring guild-based organization over class conflict. Though suppressed after the 1937 Estado Novo dictatorship, Integralism echoed third-position themes of organic national unity, influencing later nationalist thinkers despite lacking postwar continuity.^[51] Beyond Latin America, third-position ideas surfaced sporadically in non-European contexts, such as through Perón's influence on Bolivian MNR leader Víctor Paz Estenssoro's 1952 revolution, which nationalized tin mines and enacted agrarian reform under a nationalist-corporatist banner rejecting bipolar alignments. In the Middle East, figures like Gamal Abdel Nasser in Egypt drew partial inspiration from similar anti-colonial third ways, though fused with Arab socialism; Nasser's 1956 nationalization of the Suez Canal exemplified state-led development independent of superpower blocs. These manifestations often prioritized causal factors like resource sovereignty and cultural preservation over ideological purity, adapting European precedents to local anti-imperialist struggles amid Cold War pressures.^[52]

Criticisms and Intellectual Debates

Charges of Neo-Fascism

Critics from academic and media sources have frequently accused Third Position ideologies of constituting neo-fascism, contending that their advocacy for a "third way" beyond capitalism and communism merely repackages interwar fascist corporatism, ethno-nationalism, and anti-liberalism to evade postwar stigma and attract broader support.^[6] Such charges emphasize that groups promoting Third Position often retain hierarchical, authoritarian structures and racial or cultural exclusivity akin to historical fascism, as seen in post-1970s European neofascist efforts to reinterpret Mussolini's doctrines economically.^[8] In Italy, CasaPound Italia exemplifies these accusations, as the group explicitly draws from the 1970s Terza Posizione movement—rejecting both capitalism and communism—and promotes policies like bank renationalization, universal healthcare, and social housing inspired by Mussolini's regime, while displaying fascist symbols and opposing immigration on national solidarity grounds.^[53] Leader Gianluca Iannone has affirmed fascist continuity, stating in 2018, "I'll be a fascist as long as anti-fascists exist," amid reports of militant violence, including threats and affiliations with neo-Nazi elements like Ukraine's Azov Regiment.^[53]^[28] A 2017 New York Times analysis highlighted public unease over CasaPound's electoral gains, such as a municipal council seat in Rome's Ostia suburb, interpreting them as evidence of resurgent neo-fascism despite the group's claims of democratic evolution.^[54] In the United Kingdom, the British National Party (BNP) under Nick Griffin from the late 1990s onward incorporated Third Position elements, such as distributist economics favoring worker cooperatives and national self-sufficiency over global capitalism, alongside strict immigration controls—moves political scientists have described as a strategic modernization of neo-fascist ideology to gain electoral legitimacy.^[23] Griffin's associations with international Third Position figures like Roberto Fiore, a former National Front member and Italian neofascist exile, further fueled perceptions of continuity with fascist traditions, as documented in analyses of pan-European far-right networks.^[23] These charges persist despite proponents' assertions of ideological innovation, with outlets like the LSE reviewing BNP's rise as emblematic of adapted British fascism.^[55] Nordic neo-Nazi groups like the Nordic Resistance Movement (NMR) have also endorsed Third Position tenets, blending anti-capitalist critiques with supremacist nationalism, leading analysts to classify them as pursuing totalitarian neo-fascist rule across Scandinavia.^[56] While some charges emanate from institutionally left-leaning sources prone to expansive definitions of fascism, the open emulation of historical fascist leaders and symbols by these movements provides empirical grounds for the neo-fascist label in cases like CasaPound's Mussolini veneration.^[53]

Critiques from Capitalist and Communist Perspectives

Free-market economists, particularly those in the Austrian school, critique Third Position economics as a deceptive form of socialism that maintains the legal facade of private property while subjecting it to comprehensive state control, thereby inheriting the fatal flaws of central planning. Ludwig von Mises, in his 1920 article "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth," demonstrated that without genuine market prices formed through voluntary exchange, economic calculation becomes impossible, leading to resource misallocation and inefficiency—a problem he extended to fascist systems where corporatist syndicates function as state-enforced cartels rather than competitive entities. In Omnipotent Government (1944), Mises analyzed the Nazi economy as totalitarian socialism in practice, with firms retaining ownership titles but losing autonomy as the state dictated production quotas, wages, and prices, resulting in bureaucratic waste and suppressed innovation, as evidenced by Germany's reliance on plunder and forced labor during World War II rather than productivity gains. This interventionist approach, proponents argue, distorts incentives, fosters cronyism between state officials and industrial leaders, and ultimately hampers long-term growth, as private initiative is supplanted by political favoritism. Libertarian thinkers further contend that Third Position's rejection of laissez-faire capitalism ignores the causal link between free markets and prosperity, instead promoting autarkic policies that isolate economies from global trade, exacerbating shortages as seen in Mussolini's Italy where the 1930s Battle for Grain campaign prioritized national self-sufficiency over comparative advantage, yielding meager output increases at high costs. Such systems, they assert, converge toward totalitarianism by eroding property rights incrementally, contradicting claims of a "third way" and aligning instead with historical patterns of state capitalism devolving into command economies. From a communist standpoint, Third Position ideologies are dismissed as fascist stratagems to perpetuate capitalist exploitation under the guise of national unity, mobilizing reactionary forces to safeguard bourgeois interests against proletarian uprising. Leon Trotsky, in Fascism: What It Is and How to Fight It (1944 compilation of earlier writings), described fascism as the desperate recourse of monopoly capital when liberal democracy falters amid economic crisis, recruiting declassed middle elements to demolish workers' organizations and trade unions while preserving the essential features of private ownership and profit extraction. In Italy, for instance, fascist squads were financed by agrarian and industrial capitalists in 1920–1921 to suppress socialist land occupations and strikes, enabling the restoration of employer control without altering the capitalist class structure, as documented in contemporary reports of squadristi violence against labor councils.^[57] Marxists emphasize that Third Position's corporatism enforces class collaboration, subordinating labor to capital within state-supervised bodies, which illusions of transcending both systems but in reality intensifies exploitation by banning independent class struggle, as Trotsky noted in analyzing Germany's 1933 Enabling Act that dismantled unions while entrenching big business dominance. This perspective holds that fascism arises not as an alternative but as capitalism's "iron fist" phase, historically correlating with imperialist decay, where nationalist rhetoric veils the defense of profit imperatives against internationalist socialism.^[57]

Proponent Defenses and Causal Analyses

Proponents of the Third Position, including figures like Oswald Mosley, argue that it offers a viable alternative to the failings of both liberal capitalism and Marxist communism by prioritizing national economic self-sufficiency and coordinated production over profit maximization or class abolition.^[58] Mosley contended that capitalism's reliance on international finance and free markets erodes national sovereignty and fosters unemployment during downturns, as seen in the Great Depression's global impact starting in 1929, while communism eliminates private incentives, leading to stagnation, as evidenced by Soviet agricultural output declines in the 1930s collectivization era.^[58] In contrast, Third Position economics, often implemented through corporatism, organizes society into vertical syndicates representing entire production sectors—encompassing workers, managers, and owners—under state mediation to align individual efforts with collective national goals, purportedly resolving class antagonism without expropriation.^[10] Causal analyses by proponents posit that corporatist structures causally enhance economic stability by suppressing horizontal class conflicts, such as strikes, which disrupted Italian industry pre-1922, through mandatory arbitration and shared representation, as formalized in Mussolini's 1927 Charter of Labour.^[10] This vertical integration, they claim, fosters productivity gains by retaining private ownership's motivational effects—unlike communism's state monopolies—while curtailing capitalism's speculative excesses via directed investment, evidenced in Italy's reported industrial production rise from an index of 100 in 1928 to 140 by 1938, attributed to autarkic policies and public works.^[10] Proponents like Juan Perón extended this reasoning to assert that prioritizing production volume over profit margins, as in Argentina's 1940s justicialism, causally builds domestic capacity and reduces foreign dependency, countering capitalism's export-driven inequalities and communism's central planning rigidities.^[59] Such defenses emphasize causal realism in linking ideological form to outcomes: Third Position regimes causally promote demographic and cultural cohesion by subordinating economics to ethno-national imperatives, avoiding capitalism's cosmopolitanism and communism's internationalism, which proponents argue precipitated interwar instability.^[10] However, these claims rest on selective metrics; while proponents highlight reduced unemployment—from over 300,000 in Italy in 1921 to near full employment by 1939 via militarized Keynesianism—critics note reliance on deficit spending and conquest, not inherent corporatist efficiency.^[10] Mosley further argued for a pan-European Third Position to causally counter U.S. capitalist dominance and Soviet expansion post-1945, proposing tariff-protected blocs for sustained growth without ideological extremes.^[58]

Contemporary Manifestations

Persistence in Far-Right Movements

In the 21st century, Third Position ideology has maintained a niche presence within far-right movements, often manifesting in fringe political parties and activist networks that blend ethnonationalism with anti-capitalist and anti-communist economic critiques, positioning themselves as alternatives to mainstream liberalism. These groups typically advocate for corporatist or distributist economic models favoring national workers, protectionism, and community-based mutual aid, while rejecting globalism and multiculturalism.^[6]^[8] This persistence reflects an adaptation of interwar fascist ideas to contemporary grievances like immigration and economic inequality, though such organizations remain marginal electorally, with membership often numbering in the hundreds or low thousands. A prominent example is the American Freedom Party (AFP), originally founded as the American Third Position Party in 2010 by white nationalist activists including Harry Bertram and Tom Metzger associates, which sought ballot access in California and other states by 2012. The party promoted "America First" policies emphasizing racial preservation, strict immigration controls, and economic nationalism to counter "corporate globalism," explicitly drawing on Third Position rejection of both "usurious finance capitalism" and Marxism. By 2016, it had fielded candidates in presidential races but achieved minimal vote shares, under 0.1% nationally, before rebranding and declining further; the Southern Poverty Law Center classified it as a white supremacist entity promoting Third Position tenets through conferences and alliances with European identitarians.^[45]^[49]^[47] In Europe, Italian neofascist group CasaPound Italia, established via a building occupation in Rome on December 27, 2003, exemplifies Third Position persistence through its operation of over 100 social centers offering rent subsidies, food aid, and cultural events exclusively to Italian nationals, framed as resistance to "banking elites" and migrant competition. Led initially by Gianluca Iannone, the group garnered about 0.7% in local elections by 2013 but faced crackdowns, including eviction orders and investigations for fascist apologism under Italy's 1952 Scelba Law; scholars describe its hybrid model—nationalist solidarity paired with anti-usury rhetoric—as a modern Third Position variant echoing Mussolini's social provisions.^[60]^[28]^[26] Such manifestations often intersect with broader far-right networks, as seen in transatlantic contacts between AFP representatives and France's National Rally around 2010–2020, where shared anti-immigration and economic sovereigntist views facilitated ideological exchange, though mainstream parties distanced themselves to avoid neo-fascist labels. Persistence is limited by legal bans, deplatforming, and internal fractures, yet Third Position rhetoric influences adjacent movements via online forums emphasizing "national socialism without the socialism" or workerist appeals to erode left-wing labor bases.^[61]^[8]

Influences on Modern Nationalism

Third Position ideology has influenced modern nationalism by promoting a synthesis of ultranationalism with economic policies aimed at autarky and communal self-reliance, rejecting both multinational corporate dominance and egalitarian internationalism. Proponents argue this framework counters the cultural erosion attributed to globalism, emphasizing national sovereignty and folk-based economies over profit-driven markets. In Italy, CasaPound Italia, founded in 2003 as a network of far-right social centers, exemplifies this by providing housing, food aid, and youth programs as alternatives to state systems, while advocating protectionist measures and opposition to immigration to preserve ethnic homogeneity.^[28]^[62] The group's self-described "extreme-upper-centre" positioning draws from historical Third Position currents like Terza Posizione, blending militant activism with welfare-oriented nationalism to appeal to disaffected workers.^[60] Forza Nuova, established in 1997 by Roberto Fiore—a veteran of 1970s Third Position groups—further channels these ideas into contemporary Italian politics, campaigning against EU federalism, usury, and multiculturalism under a banner of traditional Catholic values and economic corporatism. Fiore's trajectory, from Terza Posizione to exile-linked International Third Position in the 1980s, underscores a continuity in framing nationalism as a bulwark against liberal individualism and communist collectivism. The party garnered 0.39% in the 2018 general election, reflecting limited but persistent appeal among voters prioritizing national identity over ideological purity.^[63]^[9] This influence manifests in rhetoric prioritizing family units, local production, and anti-globalist solidarity, influencing fringe coalitions that pressure mainstream nationalists toward harder economic stances.^[6] Beyond Italy, Third Position elements have shaped nationalist fringes in Europe through Strasserist-inspired worker-nationalism, advocating guild-like structures and land reforms to foster organic communities resistant to financial elites. In the UK, alliances with the International Third Position (formed 1989) infused groups like the British National Party with anti-capitalist critiques during the 1990s-2000s, promoting policies like nationalized banking and repatriation tied to economic self-sufficiency.^[1] These ideas persist marginally in movements decrying supranational institutions, though mainstream nationalists often dilute them to broaden electability, as seen in protectionist platforms post-2008 financial crisis. Critics from leftist perspectives, such as those in academic analyses, contend this synthesis veils authoritarian tendencies, yet empirical voting data shows resonance where economic insecurity intersects with identity concerns.^[9]^[6] Overall, Third Position's causal emphasis on national revival through decentralized economics informs a subset of modern nationalists seeking alternatives to neoliberal convergence.^[8]

References

[1]
Third Position - Connexipedia article - Connexions.org
Third Position is a revolutionary nationalist political ideology that emphasizes its opposition to both communism and capitalism.
[2]
The political economy of fascism: Myth or reality, or myth and reality?
Benito Mussolini, Fascism: Doctrine and Institutions (Ardita, 1935). ... Strasserism was later influential on the neo-fascist 'International Third Position'.
[3]
What is Fascism? - Remember.org
Third Position groups believe in a racially-homogeneous decentralized tribal form of nationalism, and claim to have evolved an ideology “beyond communism and ...<|separator|>
[4]
Other Ideologies: Third Position - Sea Lion Press
Apr 19, 2019 · This philosophy became known as the Third Position, or the Third Way. It took over the neo-fascist world like wildfire from the late 60s, from ...
[5]
The Evolution of The Term: “Third Position” - The Fascio Newsletter
Feb 12, 2024 · The terminology of "Third Position" did not emerge from the political vernacular of either Italian Fascism or German National Socialism.<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
What is the Third Position? | Political Research Associates
Dec 19, 2016 · Called the Third Position, it seeks to overthrow existing governments and replace them with monocultural nation states built around the idea of supremacist ...
[7]
[PDF] Political thought of the Third Position: Analysis in the contex of ...
The research hypothesis has been positively veri- fied. The political thought of the Third Position does indeed meet the definition criteria of fascism.
[8]
Third Position - ECPS
Called the Third Position, it seeks to overthrow existing governments and replace them with monocultural nation states built around the idea of supremacist ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[9]
(PDF) Political thought of the Third Position: Analysis in the context ...
PDF | The Third Position is one of the marginal currents in contemporary political thought. This current was represented by the International Third.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
[10]
Fascism - Corporatism, Nationalism, Autarky | Britannica
Sep 26, 2025 · In theory, the corporatist model represented a “third way” between capitalism and communism, allowing for the harmonious cooperation of workers ...Missing: Position | Show results with:Position
[11]
Corporatism | Definition, History & Examples - Britannica
Sep 26, 2025 · The most prominent 20th-century fascist regimes were those in Germany and Italy. German fascism took the form of Nazism, which rose out of the ...
[12]
Corporatism for the Twenty-First Century - American Affairs Journal
Feb 20, 2020 · On the economic front, corporatists suggested (as many progressives do today) that business activity should be organized around corporations ...
[13]
The Rise of Economic Fascism in America | Mises Institute
As stated eloquently by the American fascist economist Lawrence Dennis, fascism “does not accept the liberal dogmas as to the sovereignty of the consumer or ...
[14]
Fascism | Definition, Meaning, Characteristics, Examples, & History
Sep 26, 2025 · Fascism is a notoriously difficult ideology to define, many 20th-century fascist movements shared several characteristics.Fascism · Intellectual origins · Varieties of fascism · Benito MussoliniMissing: foundations | Show results with:foundations
[15]
[PDF] “The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932) by Benito Mussolini
The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood,. Fascism, is ...Missing: third | Show results with:third
[16]
Fascism - Holocaust Encyclopedia
May 28, 2019 · Fascism is an ultranationalist, authoritarian political philosophy. It combines elements of nationalism, militarism, economic self-sufficiency, and ...Missing: Position | Show results with:Position
[17]
https://brill.com/view/journals/fasc/11/2/article-p187_3.xml
[18]
Argentina and The Third Position (Chapter Seventeen)
Nov 15, 2023 · On July 6, 1947, Perón delivered a speech that went down in history as the birth of the Third Position. As Fermín Chávez writes: “[…] the ...
[19]
The foreign policy of Peronism: Third position, the West and ... - Cairn
Nov 10, 2023 · This article presents a comprehensive, long-term analysis of the fundamental principles of Peronism in foreign policy. The “Third Position” ...
[20]
The Ideology of Peronism: The Third Way and the Law of the ...
Mar 28, 2014 · At times Perón let the mask slip and admitted as much: 'Our third position is not a centrist position. It is an ideological position that is on ...Missing: postwar | Show results with:postwar<|separator|>
[21]
Italian Neofascism and the Years of Lead: A Closer Look at the ...
Mar 4, 2022 · The development of Italian neofascism from its original goal of carrying on the Fascist legacy towards the apolitical, explosively violent ...
[22]
The Changing Profile of the Italian Social Movement | 4 | Encounters W
According to Pino Rauti, the MSI should appeal to the Left for a common struggle against capitalist and US domination and for the affirmation of a national ...
[23]
Pan-European thought in British fascism: the International Third ...
Jan 23, 2018 · Shaffer's article explores pan-Europeanism in post-war British fascism by examining the International Third Position (ITP) and the Alliance ...<|separator|>
[24]
Italian Fascism and the Aesthetics of the 'Third Way' - jstor
istic' ethos of communist and capitalist societies.3 For European ... Mussolini thus presented fascism as a sort of modernistic brico- lage which underwent ...
[25]
Italian Fascism, Nationalism and Socialism
... third way between free market capitalism and communist state control. In ... Explain the role of corporatism within Italian Fascism. Explain the role ...
[26]
CasaPound Italy: The Sui Generis Fascists of the New Millennium
Jun 18, 2021 · CasaPound Italy is one of the most interesting and ambiguous populist right-wing extremist groups emerged in Europe.
[27]
Italy's Green Fascists - Jewish Currents
Sep 18, 2019 · And while CasaPound nominally advocates the Terza Posizione, or Third Position—that is, it claims affiliation with neither the left nor the ...
[28]
Dangerous Organizations and Bad Actors: CasaPound Italia
Nov 30, 2022 · CasaPound Italia (CPI) is an Italian neofascist accelerationist movement and militant organization founded in Rome in 2008.
[29]
Nazi Party Platform | Holocaust Encyclopedia
Jun 27, 2025 · The Nazi Party platform was a 25-point program outlining the movement's political goals. Adolf Hitler helped write the program and presented it at a meeting in ...<|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] The Nazi Economic System
No institution in the economy remained unaffected by the fundamental change that German Fascism brought about.Missing: interwar | Show results with:interwar
[31]
Der Dritte Weg in der deutschen Parteipolitik nach 1945
Jun 23, 1973 · Wie überall in Europa suchte man auch in Deutschland 1945 nach einem Dritten Weg jenseits von westlichem Kapitalismus und östlichem Kommunismus.
[32]
Who are Germany's far-right 'Third Path'? – DW – 10/25/2021
Oct 25, 2021 · Members of the neo-Nazi party the Third Path were stopped over the weekend attempting to turn themselves into an anti-migrant border patrol.
[33]
Concern over German ultra-nationalist party - InfoMigrants
May 17, 2019 · A radical right-wing party in Germany called Der Dritte Weg – 'The Third Way' – openly aligns itself with the Nazis and pushes a 'Germans only' platform.
[34]
The Nature of Fascism in France - jstor
If French fascism offered a 'third way' between communism and liberalism, as its proponents argued, it was a third. 40. Page 15. THE NATURE OF FASCISM IN ...
[35]
Doriot, le PPF et la question du fascisme français. | The American ...
May 24, 2013 · Along the way, his PPF, founded during the Popular Front era, moved rapidly toward the outer fringes of the prewar French Right. Even those ...
[36]
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780773570283-003/pdf
[37]
[PDF] 'National revolutionary' groupuscules and the resurgence of 'left ...
The five years I spent in Troisième Voie were formative. A youth in a groupuscule can learn one hundred times more than one who remains in the youth ...
[38]
[PDF] The French Connections of the Italian Far Right, from the MSI ... - HAL
which, inspired by Adinolfi's teachings, renamed itself Troisième Voie (Third Way) in 1985. ... third position” ideology. If Rauti's party still exists today, it ...
[39]
AYOUB AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - HUDOC
The Court notes at the outset that Troisième Voie was not a political party seeking election but rather an association with a political programme – the ...
[40]
Décret du 12 juillet 2013 portant dissolution d'une association et de ...
Jul 12, 2013 · L'association « Envie de Rêver » et les groupements de fait « Jeunesses Nationalistes Révolutionnaires » et « Troisième Voie » sont dissous.
[41]
Political Soldiers and the New Man - part three – Blog - CST
Apr 28, 2010 · The NF was now following a mish-mash of political ideas and influences which was far removed from the traditions of the British far right.
[42]
197 Derek Holland, The Political Soldier And National Revolution
Oct 31, 2023 · By the late 198os when it was published the NF periodical Nationalism Today also preached Third Positionism, a cause now taken up with even ...Missing: Position | Show results with:Position
[43]
Nick Griffin and the Modernisation of the British National Party
Towards the end of September 1999, the result of the British National. Party's first ever leadership election was announced. On the basis of an.
[44]
Nick Griffin | Counter Extremism Project
Nick Griffin is the British former leader of the far-right British National Party (BNP) and a self-proclaimed defender of free speech against the “liberal ...
[45]
American Freedom Party - Southern Poverty Law Center
The American Freedom Party (formerly American Third Position) is a political party initially established by racist Southern California skinheads that aims to ...
[46]
American Third Position: Academic Racists Take the Reins ... - ADL
Mar 9, 2010 · Kevin MacDonald, an anti-Semitic professor of psychology and a director of A3P, have taken the helm of a group that was spearheaded by young racists.
[47]
[PDF] The American Freedom Party: While Nationalist Politics and the ...
Jul 23, 2014 · Abstract: Using a diachronic perspective, this paper explores American white nationalist political parties from the mid-twentieth century to ...
[48]
William Daniel Johnson - Southern Poverty Law Center
A quarter century later, in 2010, he was still actively supporting white nationalist causes, serving as chairman of the racist American Third Position political ...
[49]
American Freedom Party - Ballotpedia
The American Freedom Party is a political party, formerly known as the American Third Position Party. As of September 2019, it was a ballot-qualified party in ...
[50]
Peronism | World History - Lumen Learning
Peronism is considered a third-position ideology because it rejects both capitalism and communism. Peronism advocates corporatism as a means for mediating ...Missing: postwar | Show results with:postwar
[51]
Integralism and the Brazilian Catholic Church - Duke University Press
Aug 1, 1974 · The Brazilian Catholic Church of the 1930s pursued a multi-pronged approach to political power, utilizing diversified groups and tactics to attain its ends.
[52]
The rise and fall of the third position: Bolivia, Perón and the Cold ...
The doctrine of the Third Position drawn by Peron between 1946 and 1955 was an attempt to find an alternative to the opposition between the Liberal West and the ...
[53]
The fascist movement that has brought Mussolini back to the ...
Feb 22, 2018 · Italy's CasaPound has been central to normalising fascism again in the country of its birth. Now they're trying to enter parliament.
[54]
In Italy, a Neo-Fascist Party's Small Win Creates Big Unease
Nov 17, 2017 · A candidate for a neo-fascist party, CasaPound, won a seat this month on the municipal council of the Roman suburb of Ostia, many Italians were startled.<|separator|>
[55]
[PDF] Book Review: New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party
His recent book, New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party is ... fascist and Neo-. Nazi movements in Britain. The book moves into an ...Missing: Third | Show results with:Third
[56]
NMR: A Nordic neo-Nazi organization with aims of establishing ...
Apr 28, 2021 · Some members support a “Third Position” neo-fascism and have contacts with the Italian movement Casa Pound (Strømmen, 2017). Considering ...
[57]
Fascism is a Reaction to Capitalist Crisis in the Stage of Imperialism
Mar 31, 2021 · Fascism is an 'explosive mixture of false subversion and ultra-conservatism'. Fascism, in this regard, is a moving contradiction of capitalist society.Missing: Position | Show results with:Position
[58]
Top 10 Facts – OswaldMosley.com
Oswald Mosley was opposed to both State Socialism and Capitalism and believed there was a far better system he called the Third Position. ... As Communism and ...
[59]
FJ McLynn The Ideology of Peronism : The Third Way and - jstor
so At times Perón let the mask slip and admitted as much: 'Our third position is not a centrist position. It is an ideological position that is on the centre, ...
[60]
https://brill.com/view/journals/fasc/8/1/article-p61_61.xml
[61]
The Transnationalization of the Far Right between Movements and ...
Jun 4, 2025 · A representative from the American Third Position explained that his group had recently had 'transoceanic' contacts with the French RN ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
[62]
Third Millennium Fascism | Political Research Associates
Jul 9, 2020 · CasaPound official band ZetaZeroAlfa on May 26, 2012. (Credit ... What is the Third Position? Chip Berlet. Political Research ...
[63]
Forza Nuova | Counter Extremism Project
Forza Nuova (New Force) is an Italian far-right political party. The party's ideology is ultra-nationalist, conservative, and neofascist.