Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Thromboelastometry

Thromboelastometry, also known as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), is a point-of-care viscoelastic testing that assesses the dynamics of clot formation, strength, and lysis in samples under low conditions. It provides a graphical trace and numerical parameters representing key phases of , including reaction time, clot formation time, alpha angle, maximum clot firmness, and lysis indices, using specific assays such as EXTEM (extrinsic pathway), INTEM (intrinsic pathway), and FIBTEM (fibrinogen contribution). Developed in the as an advancement over traditional (TEG), ROTEM employs a rotating pin within a stationary cup of citrated activated by reagents, differing from TEG's stationary pin and oscillating cup mechanism, which allows for more standardized and automated analysis. This technology enables rapid, real-time evaluation of factors, platelets, fibrinogen, and , making it particularly valuable in high-bleeding-risk scenarios. Clinically, thromboelastometry guides targeted transfusion therapy in , , , and postpartum hemorrhage by identifying specific coagulopathies—such as hyperfibrinolysis or fibrinogen deficiency—and reducing unnecessary administration compared to conventional tests like or activated . Studies have demonstrated its utility in decreasing transfusion volumes and improving outcomes in settings, with results available within 5–10 minutes versus 30–60 minutes for standard laboratory assays. Additionally, it supports monitoring of effects and prediction of bleeding risks in critical care.

Introduction

Definition and Principles

Thromboelastometry, commonly referred to as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), is a point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assay designed to measure the kinetics of clot formation, strength, and fibrinolysis in whole blood. This method provides a graphical and numerical representation of the dynamic changes in blood's viscoelastic properties during coagulation, capturing the interplay of plasma factors, platelets, and fibrin. Developed as a variant of thromboelastography, which was invented by Helmut Hartert in 1948, ROTEM employs rotational mechanics to assess hemostasis under low shear stress conditions. At its core, thromboelastometry evaluates the viscoelastic alterations in blood as it transitions from a liquid to a gel-like state, primarily driven by polymerization and platelet-fibrin interactions that enhance clot elasticity. The test utilizes small volumes of citrated , approximately 300 μL, maintained at a physiological of 37°C to mimic conditions and ensure reproducible results. Unlike conventional static tests, such as prothrombin time (PT/INR) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), which analyze isolated factors in platelet-poor plasma and offer snapshots of specific pathways, thromboelastometry delivers a holistic, profile of the entire hemostatic process, including cellular contributions. In the basic setup, a sample of is placed in a cylindrical , with a pin suspended above it; the cup remains stationary while the pin oscillates, and as strands form between them, the increasing torque on the pin is optically detected and plotted over time to produce a TEMogram trace. This trace visually represents the progression from initial clot initiation through maximum firmness to potential , enabling point-of-care analysis within minutes. The primary purpose of thromboelastometry is to rapidly detect abnormalities such as hypercoagulability, hypocoagulability, or excessive , thereby informing precise transfusion strategies and hemostatic therapies in clinical settings.

Historical Development

Thromboelastography (TEG), the foundational technology for , was invented in 1948 by German physician Helmut Hartert at the University of Heidelberg as a manual viscoelastic method to assess blood dynamics in real time, particularly during surgical procedures where rapid monitoring of was needed. Hartert's used a rotating cup containing a blood sample with a suspended pin connected to a torsion wire, recording the mechanical resistance as the clot formed, providing a graphical trace of clot initiation, formation, and lysis. Initially limited to research settings due to its manual nature and sensitivity to vibrations, TEG saw early clinical exploration in but faced challenges in reproducibility from inconsistent pin . In the early 1990s, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was developed in , , by TEM International (now part of ) to address TEG's limitations by introducing a rotating pin and stationary cup, enhancing stability and automation for better reproducibility in point-of-care settings. This innovation shifted the focus toward automated, computerized systems, driven by the demand for rapid assessment in high-bleeding-risk surgeries like cardiac and , where traditional lab tests delayed transfusion decisions. ROTEM was first commercialized in around 1995, enabling broader adoption in monitoring. Key milestones included U.S. FDA clearance for the ROTEM delta system in 2010 as a substantially equivalent device to TEG, facilitating its integration into American clinical practice. By the early 2000s, clinical trials demonstrated ROTEM's utility in guiding transfusions, notably in hepatic surgery where TEG had gained traction since the 1980s through studies like Kang et al.'s 1985 work showing reduced blood product use via real-time monitoring during liver transplants. Standardization efforts in the 2000s established reference ranges and assays such as EXTEM (extrinsically activated) and INTEM (intrinsically activated), supported by multicenter investigations that improved inter-laboratory consistency. ROTEM's incorporation into guidelines, such as the European Society of Anaesthesiology's 2013 recommendations for severe perioperative bleeding management, further solidified its role in algorithm-based transfusion strategies.

Methodology

Instrumentation

Thromboelastometry devices, such as the ROTEM analyzer, feature a stationary disposable cup that holds the blood sample, with an oscillating pin suspended within it to detect clot formation dynamics. The pin rotates through a limited arc of 4°45' every 6 seconds. The oscillation of the pin is monitored by an optical detector system that measures the impedance to motion as strands form and link the pin to the cup. This setup is connected to a computer that processes the signal to generate a real-time graphical trace of coagulation parameters. The standard ROTEM sigma represents a modern multi-channel variant, supporting up to four simultaneous tests with fully automated cartridge-based sampling that eliminates manual pipetting and incorporates embedded reagents for standardized . Technical specifications include a typical sample volume of 300 μL of citrated , precise temperature control at 37°C to mimic physiological conditions, run times of 30-60 minutes depending on the , and disposable cartridges combining cups and pins to prevent cross-contamination. Earlier models like the ROTEM use pipetting for semi-automated , while the 's compact design facilitates point-of-care deployment in various clinical settings. Calibration involves daily internal electronic checks to verify torque sensitivity and system integrity, ensuring consistent optical detection and mechanical oscillation. Quality assurance is further supported by periodic runs using control plasmas, such as ROTROL, to validate assay performance against reference ranges. Safety features include a closed cartridge system that minimizes aerosol generation and biohazard exposure, along with integration capabilities via ROTEM Integrated Solutions for secure data transfer to laboratory information systems, adhering to standards like HIPAA/HITECH.

Procedure and Assays

The procedure for thromboelastometry begins with pre-analytical sample collection and preparation to ensure accurate assessment of dynamics. Blood is collected into citrated tubes at a 9:1 , typically 1.8 per , to prevent spontaneous clotting while maintaining physiological calcium levels for later recalcification. Samples remain stable for analysis up to 120 minutes at (approximately 23°C), after which progressive deterioration in clot formation parameters may occur; is avoided as it alters results, and hemodilution from improper mixing or delays should be minimized to preserve native hemostatic components. The sample is pre-warmed to 37°C for 5-10 minutes prior to testing to simulate physiological conditions. The core testing process involves recalcification and in a disposable cylindrical . Approximately 300 μL of citrated is pipetted into the , followed by the addition of 20 μL of Star-TEM recalcifying agent (0.2 mol/L CaCl₂) to reverse citrate anticoagulation and initiate calcium-dependent factors. Next, 20 μL of a specific (activator or ) is added, and the contents are gently mixed by and dispensation once to ensure homogeneity without introducing bubbles. The measuring cell, consisting of the and an attached pin connected via a ball-bearing shaft, is inserted into the channel. The system then automatically oscillates the pin at 4.75° every 6 seconds within the stationary , with motion detected optically as strands form between the and pin; this generates a continuous thromboelastometric trace recorded for up to 60 minutes or until predefined endpoints like maximum are reached. Multiple channels allow simultaneous running of 2-4 s per sample. Standard assays in thromboelastometry target specific coagulation pathways using tailored reagents for comprehensive profiling. The INTEM assay activates the intrinsic pathway with ellagic acid and phospholipids, providing a contact activation-based evaluation similar to activated partial thromboplastin time but in whole blood. The EXTEM assay employs low concentrations of recombinant tissue factor and phospholipids to rapidly initiate the extrinsic pathway, mimicking tissue injury and enabling quick assessment of overall clot formation. FIBTEM isolates fibrinogen and fibrin polymerization by adding cytochalasin D, which inhibits platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors to eliminate platelet contribution, thus highlighting fibrin-specific defects. HEPTEM neutralizes heparin effects using heparinase I alongside contact activator, allowing differentiation of heparin-induced anticoagulation from intrinsic pathway deficiencies by comparing traces to INTEM. APTEM assesses hyperfibrinolysis by incorporating aprotinin (a plasmin inhibitor) into the EXTEM setup; a stable trace here versus EXTEM indicates plasmin-mediated lysis. Specialized assays extend thromboelastometry's utility for targeted evaluations. Platelet mapping assays, adapted for rotational thromboelastometry, quantify effects by measuring aggregation inhibition using activators like (for aspirin) or (for inhibitors like clopidogrel) in combination with standard reagents; percent inhibition is calculated from amplitude differences, with the method showing good correlation to light transmission aggregometry but longer run times.

Parameters and Interpretation

Key Measurement Parameters

Thromboelastometry, also known as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), generates a viscoelastic from which several key quantitative parameters are derived to assess the of clot formation, strength, and . These parameters provide insights into the , , , and of the clot, enabling evaluation of factor activity, fibrinogen and platelet function, and fibrinolytic processes. The Clotting Time (CT) measures the latency from the start of the test until the clot amplitude reaches 2 mm, corresponding to the initial detection of strands and reflecting the efficiency of factor activation and enzymatic pathways. Prolonged CT values indicate deficiencies in clotting factors or the presence of anticoagulants, while shortened values may signal hypercoagulability. In assays such as INTEM, which evaluates intrinsic pathway function, representative normal CT ranges from 100 to 240 seconds. For EXTEM (extrinsic pathway), the range is 38 to 79 seconds. This parameter is analogous to the reaction time (R-time) in (TEG). The Clot Formation Time (CFT) quantifies the time elapsed from the end of CT until the amplitude reaches 20 mm, assessing the speed of clot development primarily influenced by fibrinogen concentration and platelet contribution to . Extended CFT suggests impaired clot , often due to low fibrinogen levels or platelet dysfunction. For INTEM assays, a typical normal range is 30 to 110 seconds. For EXTEM, it is 34 to 159 seconds. It corresponds to the K-time in TEG. The alpha represents the angle formed by the to the at the 20 mm amplitude point relative to the horizontal baseline, serving as an indicator of the rate of cross-linking and overall clot-building kinetics. A reduced alpha points to slower , commonly associated with fibrinogen deficiencies. Normal values are 70 to 83 degrees for INTEM and 63 to 83 degrees for EXTEM. This metric is directly comparable to the alpha in TEG. Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF) denotes the peak of the , equivalent to the maximum rotational exerted by the formed clot in millimeters, which integrates the contributions of platelets, fibrinogen, and factor XIII to overall clot mechanical strength. Diminished MCF reflects hypofibrinogenemia or , guiding targeted interventions like fibrinogen replacement. In EXTEM assays, which assess extrinsic pathway activation, normal MCF typically falls between 50 and 72 mm. It is equivalent to the maximum () in TEG. Lysis parameters evaluate clot stability post-formation. The Lysis Index at 30 minutes (LI30) is calculated as the amplitude at 30 minutes after CT as a percentage of MCF, indicating the degree of clot degradation over time. Reduced LI30 values signify ongoing , potentially requiring antifibrinolytic therapy. The Maximum Lysis (ML) measures the maximum percentage decrease in amplitude from MCF, capturing the extent of hyperfibrinolysis. Elevated ML, such as greater than 15%, highlights significant clot breakdown and bleeding risk. These indices are similar to the LY30 in TEG. Parameter values can vary across assays like EXTEM or INTEM due to differences in activators, influencing for specific hemostatic pathways.

Trace Analysis and Reference Values

The , or TEMogram, provides a visual representation of the viscoelastic changes in during and . It initiates with a flat baseline denoting the reaction or (), the latency period before detectable clot formation begins. This transitions into a rapid upward curve signifying the clot formation phase, followed by a plateau at maximum clot firmness (MCF), which reflects peak clot stability. The trace may subsequently decline due to enzymatic , with the extent quantified by maximum lysis (ML). A persistently flat , lacking significant rise or , indicates severe hypocoagulability, such as profound or fibrinogen deficiency. Abnormal TEMogram patterns highlight specific hemostatic derangements. Prolonged manifests as an extended flat baseline, often due to coagulation factor deficiencies or effects. Reduced MCF appears as a lowered plateau, suggestive of hypofibrinogenemia or impaired platelet contribution to clot strength. Hyperfibrinolysis is characterized by a steep post-plateau decline with elevated , indicating excessive clot breakdown. Reference ranges for TEMogram parameters are derived from multi-center studies in healthy adults and vary slightly by and population. The following summarizes standard ranges for commonly used assays (ROTEM delta device, adults):
ParameterReference Range (Adults)
EXTEM38–79 s
EXTEMCFT34–159 s
EXTEMAlpha angle63–83°
EXTEMMCF50–72 mm
INTEM100–240 s
INTEMCFT30–110 s
INTEMAlpha angle70–83°
INTEMMCF50–72 mm
FIBTEMMCF9–25 mm
EXTEMML<15%
INTEMML<15%
These values assume standardized pre-analytical conditions, such as citrated blood analyzed within 4 hours. Reference ranges exhibit demographic variations that influence trace interpretation. Females and older adults often show mildly shortened CT and increased MCF, reflecting a hypercoagulable tendency. In , particularly peripartum, traces demonstrate enhanced firmness, with FIBTEM MCF typically ranging from 13–45 mm due to elevated fibrinogen levels. Trace analysis employs algorithmic thresholds to standardize and inform interventions. For example, an EXTEM MCF below 50 mm signals potential clot weakness, while a FIBTEM MCF under 10 mm prompts fibrinogen supplementation to restore firmness to at least 10–12 mm. ROTEM software automates measurement, classification, and abnormality flagging, reducing subjective variability. quality is assessed through visual and automated checks for artifacts that compromise reliability. Irregular oscillations, sudden spikes, or uneven baselines may result from air bubbles, inadequate sample mixing, or issues, requiring repeat testing to ensure accurate analysis.

Clinical Applications

Perioperative and Surgical Use

Thromboelastometry plays a pivotal role in and surgical settings by providing real-time assessment of dynamics to guide transfusion decisions and manage . In , it is particularly valuable for monitoring heparin reversal using the HEPTEM assay, which detects residual heparin effects by comparing clotting times with and without heparinase. This approach allows for targeted administration, reducing unnecessary anticoagulation reversal. Trials have demonstrated that thromboelastometry-guided protocols in decrease fresh frozen plasma (FFP) usage by up to 50% and platelet transfusions by 30-40%, leading to lower overall consumption without increasing adverse events. In , thromboelastometry such as EXTEM and FIBTEM are employed to target fibrinogen replacement, addressing the high risk of hypofibrinogenemia due to massive blood loss and dilution. The FIBTEM , which isolates by inhibiting platelets, helps quantify fibrinogen contribution to clot strength, with maximum clot firmness (MCF) serving as a key parameter for intervention thresholds. The A5 amplitude in FIBTEM has been validated as an early indicator of hypofibrinogenemia, enabling prompt administration of fibrinogen concentrate to maintain clot stability and reduce bleeding volume. For obstetric hemorrhage, thromboelastometry offers rapid evaluation of dilutional following significant blood loss during , facilitating goal-directed . ROTEM-guided protocols have been shown to decrease the need for invasive interventions, including hysterectomy rates, by optimizing transfusion of fibrinogen and other factors based on dynamic clot formation parameters like EXTEM (CT) and FIBTEM MCF. This approach minimizes over-transfusion and supports maternal stabilization in time-sensitive scenarios. Studies highlight the cost-effectiveness of thromboelastometry in surgical contexts, with early implementations showing 20-40% reductions in transfusion-related costs through decreased utilization. For instance, in , monthly management expenses dropped by 32% after adopting bedside thromboelastometry. Updated meta-analyses through 2020 confirm these savings across applications, attributing benefits to reduced allogeneic blood exposure and shorter hospital stays. Practical algorithms integrate these parameters for decision-making; for example, an EXTEM CT exceeding 80 seconds may prompt () administration to correct prolonged initiation, while a FIBTEM MCF below 10 mm indicates the need for fibrinogen concentrate to bolster clot firmness. These evidence-based thresholds, derived from high-impact trials, enhance hemostatic management without relying on slower conventional tests.

Trauma, Critical Care, and Other Indications

Thromboelastometry plays a critical role in managing -induced , where rapid assessment is essential for guiding transfusion strategies. In severe cases, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) assays such as EXTEM and FIBTEM enable early prediction of massive transfusion needs, often within 5-10 minutes of sample processing, by identifying hypofibrinogenemia and clot weakness through parameters like A5 (amplitude at 5 minutes). A 2023 of ROTEM-guided transfusion in patients demonstrated improved targeted use of fibrinogen concentrates, reducing unnecessary administration compared to conventional testing, although overall mortality benefits require further validation in larger trials. Updated evidence from 2023 reviews indicates that viscoelastic hemostatic assays like ROTEM are associated with lower transfusion volumes and potentially decreased mortality in high-risk cohorts when integrated into massive transfusion protocols. In critical care settings, particularly for sepsis-induced (), thromboelastometry facilitates real-time monitoring of dynamics. INTEM and EXTEM assays detect early hyper- or hypocoagulable states in septic patients, with prolonged clotting times () and reduced maximum clot firmness (MCF) signaling DIC progression and guiding interventions like or antifibrinolytic therapy. A 2024 study highlighted ROTEM's utility in identifying sepsis-related hemostatic imbalances within the first 24 hours, correlating altered EXTEM profiles with higher scores. Additionally, thromboelastometry supports anticoagulation reversal in critically ill patients on direct oral anticoagulants or , where specific assays like HEPTEM help confirm adequate dosing by normalizing CT values, thereby minimizing bleeding risks during procedures. During the from 2020 to 2025, thromboelastometry emerged as a valuable tool for detecting hypercoagulability in affected patients, particularly those with severe respiratory distress. Studies from 2021-2023 showed that ROTEM profiles in cases often revealed increased MCF and shortened CT in EXTEM assays, indicative of enhanced generation and resistance, which correlated with thrombotic events like . For instance, a 2022 found hypercoagulable ROTEM patterns in over 60% of hospitalized patients, predicting in-hospital and supporting escalated anticoagulation strategies. When combined with complementary viscoelastic tests like Sonoclot, thromboelastometry aided therapy optimization by assessing platelet function and clot elasticity, enabling personalized adjustments to dosing in intensive care units. Beyond acute settings, thromboelastometry has shown promise in other indications such as and (CKD). In perioperative , a 2020 study published in Annals of Oncology explored rotational thromboelastometry's prognostic value in patients, revealing that preoperative hypercoagulable profiles (e.g., elevated EXTEM MCF) were associated with higher recurrence risk and poorer survival outcomes, advocating for its use in risk stratification. For CKD, a 2025 of (closely analogous to thromboelastometry) demonstrated superior detection of subclinical prothrombotic abnormalities compared to standard tests, with pooled data from over 500 patients showing consistently elevated maximum amplitude across CKD stages, highlighting its potential for bleeding risk assessment in populations. Recent advancements from 2020-2025 include refined algorithms incorporating modified ROTEM assays, such as APTEM for evaluation in , which integrate to predict lysis onset and guide administration, improving hemostatic efficiency. Furthermore, the introduction of portable ROTEM devices, like the ROTEM Sigma system, has enabled prehospital use in scenarios, allowing helicopter to perform en route, facilitating earlier activation of transfusion protocols and potentially reducing time to intervention.

Quality Control, Limitations, and Comparisons

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance in thromboelastometry encompasses protocols to ensure the accuracy, reliability, and of test results, primarily through internal and external controls, operator proficiency, and compliance with international standards. Daily controls are essential for verifying performance and integrity. Laboratories routinely use manufacturer-provided plasmas, such as ROTROL N () and ROTROL P (pathological), to assess key parameters like (CT) and clot firmness in ROTEM systems. These plasma-based controls are reconstituted and tested daily when the system is in use, with stability limited to 8 hours for ROTROL N and 4 hours for ROTROL P at 2-8°C post-reconstitution. Additionally, electronic simulators or cartridge-based system checks monitor internal components like , centering, variance, and to detect issues without consumption. If controls fail, repeats are performed on alternate channels, and persistent issues trigger cleaning or technical support. Internal (QC) is conducted at regular intervals to maintain ongoing reliability, typically daily upon system activation or every 8-24 hours during operational use, aligning with manufacturer guidelines for viscoelastic testing devices. Acceptance criteria are lot-specific and include parameters such as CT falling within ±10% of the assigned mean value, ensuring results remain within manufacturer-defined ranges before samples are processed. Logs of these checks are maintained and reviewed monthly to identify trends in performance. External proficiency testing enhances inter-laboratory comparability through programs like the UK National External Quality Assessment Service (NEQAS) for blood coagulation, where participating centers analyze lyophilized plasma samples. Up to 10 ROTEM users per study have demonstrated coefficients of variation ranging from 7% to 83.6% across parameters, underscoring the need for routine participation to minimize discrepancies that could affect clinical decisions. Studies on multi-center report inter-laboratory variability below 15% for reproducible parameters like maximum clot firmness (0% outside tolerance), though higher for reaction times (up to 22-60%), emphasizing the value of citrated samples and consistent protocols. Operator training is critical to mitigate sources, with programs recommended for competency in sample handling and instrument operation. Manufacturers provide structured educational modules, including online courses on and point-of-care diagnostics, leading to for ROTEM users. Common errors, such as improper pipetting of (target 340 μL) or calcium chloride (20 μL, 0.2 M), can produce artifactual hypocoagulable traces, while incorrect cup placement alters shear forces and yields beak-like curves; preventive measures include regular training and adherence to standardized techniques. Standardization efforts align with requirements for medical laboratories, ensuring quality management systems cover equipment validation, reagent verification, and risk-based processes for like thromboelastometry. Laboratories must update protocols for new reagents, such as those introduced with the ROTEM sigma system (FDA-cleared in 2022), which features automated cartridges to reduce variability and includes integrated QC for lot transitions. These updates involve verifying performance against prior lots per ICSH guidelines, maintaining compliance without disrupting workflow.

Limitations and Comparison to Other Tests

Thromboelastometry, while providing dynamic insights into clot formation, exhibits several inherent limitations. It is operator-dependent, as manual pipetting of reagents can introduce variability in results, such as differences in clotting times between operators. The test is insensitive to mild deficiencies in individual factors, particularly those above 30% activity levels, and fails to detect disorders like due to its inability to incorporate endothelial or components of . Additionally, thromboelastometry lacks detailed assessment of platelet function without specific add-on assays, rendering it insensitive to antiplatelet therapies like aspirin. High costs represent another constraint, including substantial initial acquisition, ongoing maintenance, and per-test consumables. Error sources in thromboelastometry primarily stem from pre-analytical variables, including improper sample collection in citrate tubes, which can lead to under-filling and falsely prolonged clotting times, or delays in transport that degrade clotting factors and mimic hypocoagulability. Inappropriate handling, such as excessive shaking or temperature fluctuations, may cause or failure to form clots. Post-2020, disruptions during the exacerbated issues like availability for viscoelastic assays, though specific impacts on thromboelastometry were part of broader challenges. Compared to (TEG), thromboelastometry offers greater reproducibility owing to its cup-rotation mechanism versus TEG's pin oscillation, reducing motion artifacts, though parameter values differ and are not interchangeable— (CT) corresponds to time (R), clot formation time (CFT) to K-time, and maximum clot firmness (MCF) to maximum (MA). ROTEM demonstrates higher for low fibrinogen (100% vs. 0% for TEG) and abnormal /activated (40% vs. 0%), while providing faster results (mean 24 minutes vs. 31 minutes). Relative to standard tests like PT and aPTT, which are static and assess only early clot initiation, thromboelastometry is dynamic, yielding quicker whole-blood evaluations but with poorer to PT/aPTT (r = -0.460 for PT-ExTEM CT) and less specificity for isolated factor deficiencies. Newer viscoelastic systems, such as Quantra, emphasize operator-independence via cartridge-based methods but differ in detection capabilities compared to ROTEM's mechanical approach. Advancements from 2020 to 2025 include cartridge-based, automated thromboelastometry systems like the ROTEM sigma for enhanced portability and reduced operator error. Emerging research explores AI-assisted interpretation of traces and predictive modeling using large language models. Ongoing trials aim to validate these in broader settings, addressing evidence gaps such as outdated pre-2010 references and the lack of reference intervals for diverse populations, including and non-Caucasian groups.

References

  1. [1]
    Basic Principles of Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and ...
    Oct 16, 2023 · Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic method, which provides a graphical and numerical representation of induced hemostasis in whole blood ...
  2. [2]
    Basic Principles of Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and ...
    Oct 16, 2023 · Introduction. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care testing devices, which means that tests can be performed at the bedside.
  3. [3]
    Thromboelastography - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Apr 10, 2023 · Maintaining blood in a liquid state is essential for homeostasis, as it ensures the delivery of sufficient oxygen and nutrients to tissues ...
  4. [4]
    Thrombelastography and Tromboelastometry in ... - PubMed
    Sep 23, 2009 · This article reviews the basic principles of VHA, the correlation between the VHA whole blood clot formation in accordance with the cell-based ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    TEG and ROTEM: Technology and clinical applications
    Oct 3, 2013 · In the ROTEM system, a cylindrical cup containing a 340 µl whole blood sample remains fixed while a pin suspended on a ball bearing ...Abstract · Introduction · Technology · Clinical Applications
  7. [7]
    “TEG talk”: expanding clinical roles for thromboelastography and ...
    Dec 4, 2020 · TEG and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are VEAs that assess clot formation, strength, and dissolution by measuring the effect of a continuously applied ...Missing: overview | Show results with:overview
  8. [8]
    Thromboelastography: Measuring Blood Coagulation in Real Time
    Aug 30, 2022 · The development of thromboelastography (TEG) in 1948 is credited to Dr. Helmut Hartert, who was working at the University of Heidelberg in ...
  9. [9]
    Review of Thromboelastography (TEG): Medical and Surgical ...
    Dec 14, 2023 · Although it has only recently gained broader acceptance, TEG has been in use for over 60 years since it was developed in 1948 by Helmut Hartert ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  10. [10]
    Meeting thromboelastometry clinical needs and new quality standards
    Sep 22, 2016 · In the early 1990s a modified thromboelastography system was developed in Munich, Germany. Later termed “rotational thromboelastometry” or “ ...
  11. [11]
    Thromboelastography Utilization in Vascular Surgery
    Its clinical application was subsequently investigated in liver transplantation in the 1980s and cardiac surgery in the 1990s. Since then, TEG utilization has ...Missing: early hepatic 1970s
  12. [12]
    Redefining haemostasis: Role of rotational thromboelastometry in ...
    ROTEM provides real-time insights into the clotting process, enabling clinicians to customize interventions more precisely. This capability is crucial for ...
  13. [13]
    K083842 - 510(k) Premarket Notification - FDA
    ROTEM DELTA THROMBOELASTOMETRY SYSTEM. Applicant. PENTAPHARM GMBH ... Date Received, 12/24/2008. Decision Date, 03/23/2010. Decision, Substantially Equivalent ...
  14. [14]
    Intraoperative changes in blood coagulation and ... - PubMed
    Intraoperative changes in blood coagulation and thrombelastographic monitoring in liver transplantation. Anesth Analg. 1985 Sep;64(9):888-96. Authors. Y G Kang ...Missing: thromboelastography | Show results with:thromboelastography
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · We investigated the reference ranges of two activated tests (INTEM and EXTEM) and a test analysing specifically the fibrin component of ...
  16. [16]
    Glossary: ROTEM - Blood Bank Guy
    In both ROTEM and TEG, a pin attached to a detection device is inserted into a cup of fresh blood collected from the patient being tested. The main difference ...Missing: instrumentation components
  17. [17]
    ROTEM sigma Coagulation Testing | Werfen North America
    ### Summary of ROTEM sigma Instrumentation and Features
  18. [18]
    [PDF] A 510(k) Number K201440 B Applicant Tem - accessdata.fda.gov
    B Principle of Operation:​​ The ROTEM sigma Thromboelastometry System technology uses rotational thromboelastometry that is based on a fixed cylindrical cup and ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] ROTEM sigma | ANTISEL
    ROTEM sigma is an easy-to-use thromboelastometry system ... • Fully automated cartridge system eliminates sample pipetting with closed tube direct sampling.
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ROTEMdelta system
    • Meets HIPAA/HITECH security standards. • Uses secure, closed, Linux-based systems. ROTEM Integrated Solutions (RIS). ROTEM live. ENQ Concentrator Interface ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) stability and reproducibility ...
    We think that this point is of limited importance since the ROTEM® devices work at a temperature of 37 °C and the 300 μl of blood drawn are at this same ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Role of rotational thromboelastometry in critical care settings
    ROTEM functions with distinct operational principles. The pin traverses an arc measuring 4.75°, with the cup remaining stationary. As coagulation initiates and ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] ROTEM Analysis
    "TEM" thereby stands for. "thromboelastometry" (analogous to the term "thromboelastography"), thus the plotting of the clot firmness. Page 5. 5 Guide ROTEM.Missing: overview | Show results with:overview
  28. [28]
    Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM ... - PubMed
    EXTEM: CT equals; 42-74 s, CFT equals; 46-148 s, MCF equals; 49-71 mm. FIBTEM: MCF equals; 9-25 mm. ROTEM whole blood coagulation correlated weakly with a trend ...
  29. [29]
    Peri-partum reference ranges for ROTEM® thromboelastometry
    These were comparable from centre to centre, and between T1 and T2. Reference ranges T1: EXTEM: CT 31–63 s, CFT 41–120 s, and MCF 42–78 mm. INTEM: CT 109– ...
  30. [30]
    Cost reduction of perioperative coagulation management in cardiac ...
    Cumulative costs for treatment of perioperative coagulation disorders can be reduced by 'bedside' ROTEM analysis to achieve a selective substitution management.
  31. [31]
    Thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry for bleeding ...
    Conclusions. TEG or ROTEM-guided transfusion strategies may reduce blood loss volume and the transfusion rates in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
  32. [32]
    Management of bleeding and transfusion during liver transplantation ...
    Oct 12, 2014 · Correlations between EXTEM and FIBTEM A10 values and platelet counts and fibrinogen concentrations. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Vol. 21, No. 2 ...
  33. [33]
    Thromboelastometry-guided treatment algorithm in postpartum ...
    Dec 7, 2022 · ROTEM-guided treatment of postpartum haemorrhage could have a plasma-sparing effect but possibly only a small reduction in total blood loss.Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  34. [34]
    [Bedside thrombelastography. Cost reduction in cardiac surgery]
    Cumulative average monthly costs of all blood products decreased from 66,000 EUR to 45,000 EUR (-32%). Coagulation factor average monthly costs decreased from ...Missing: thromboelastometry | Show results with:thromboelastometry
  35. [35]
    Thromboelastography (TEG) or Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to ...
    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether transfusion strategies guided by viscoelastic testing (TEG or ROTEM) reduce the use of ...
  36. [36]
    The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational ...
    Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care viscoelastic method and enables to assess viscoelastic profiles of whole blood in various clinical ...
  37. [37]
    A systematic review on the rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM ...
    Oct 3, 2016 · It utilizes a small volume of whole blood to assess hemostatic function from initiation of clot formation, clot propagation and clot lysis [20].
  38. [38]
    Guided blood transfusion of trauma patients with rotational ...
    Jul 1, 2023 · A systematic review on the rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) values for the diagnosis of coagulopathy, prediction and guidance of blood ...
  39. [39]
    Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays are Associated With Mortality and ...
    2023. TLDR. Specific TEG-PM abnormalities are associated with worse outcomes in trauma ... Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015. TLDR. The objective ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Rotational Thromboelastometric Profile in Early Sepsis
    Aug 17, 2024 · This study aimed to assess the hemostatic profile of sepsis patients using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and to find the ROTEM parameters best ...
  41. [41]
    Hypercoagulable Rotational Thromboelastometry During Hospital ...
    Dec 14, 2024 · Hypercoagulable rotational thromboelastometry during hospital stay is associated with post-discharge DLco impairment in patients with COVID-19-related ...Missing: portable | Show results with:portable
  42. [42]
    Thromboelastometry Predicts Thromboembolic Events in COVID-19 ...
    Jul 6, 2022 · Thromboelastometry Predicts Thromboembolic Events in COVID-19 Patients. By LabMedica International staff writers. Posted on 06 Jul 2022. In ...Missing: sonoclot | Show results with:sonoclot
  43. [43]
    Sonoclot Signature Analysis: A New Point-of-Care Testing Method ...
    Oct 20, 2021 · Sonoclot signature analysis has greater sensitivity in monitoring coagulation factors and platelet function in patients with coronavirus disease ...
  44. [44]
    128P Exploratory analysis of the prognostic value of rotational ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · 128P Exploratory analysis of the prognostic value of rotational thromboelastometry in colorectal cancer ... October 2025 · Frontiers in Oncology.<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Haemostatic changes detected by thromboelastography in chronic ...
    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether Thromboelastography (TEG) offers a better ability to assess coagulation abnormalities in CKD ...
  46. [46]
    Prognostic value of admission ROTEM in trauma: enhancing 30-day ...
    Oct 21, 2025 · This study assessed whether a single admission rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) test could independently predict 30-day all-cause mortality ...Missing: Cochrane | Show results with:Cochrane
  47. [47]
    The UK NEQAS for Blood Coagulation Experience | Request PDF
    Aug 6, 2025 · Second, VEM tests can demonstrate variability, particularly when performed by clinical team members at the bedside (rather than laboratory ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    Dec 5, 2019 · PRINCIPLE. 1.1. The ROTEM delta system measures the qualitative and quantitative coagulation status of a blood sample in order to assist in ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] The use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the management of ...
    ROTEM recommends weekly quality control checks and Sonoclot recommends a viscosity check ... Standard ROTEM tests (EXTEM/. INTEM CT) can detect DOACs ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    the UK NEQAS for blood coagulation experience - PubMed
    Oct 26, 2010 · The UK NEQAS evaluated quality control for TEG and ROTEM devices, finding high test precision variations and the need for regular EQA/ ...
  51. [51]
    Intra‐ and inter‐centre standardisation of thromboelastography (TEG ...
    May 20, 2014 · Thromboelastography is used for assessment of coagulation and to guide administration of blood products peri-operatively.
  52. [52]
    An overview of the potential sources of diagnostic errors in (classic ...
    1.3.1. Operator related factors · 1.3.1.1. Incorrect placement of the cup · 1.3.1.2. Preventive measure · 1.3.1.3. Incorrect pipetting technique · 1.3.1.4.
  53. [53]
    ISO 15189:2012 - Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality ...
    ISO 15189:2012 specifies requirements for quality and competence in medical labs, used for developing quality systems and assessing competence.Missing: thromboelastometry | Show results with:thromboelastometry
  54. [54]
    International Council for Standardization in Haematology Guidance ...
    However, these regulatory agencies provide little details or recommendations about how to perform new lot verification of reagents. ISO 15189 (section 5.3.2.3 ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    An overview of the potential sources of diagnostic errors in (classic ...
    The present paper describes the possible errors leading to wrong thromboelastogram interpretation, and the respective preventive measure.
  57. [57]
    Coagulation tests and COVID: inside labs, industry - CAP TODAY
    January 2021— COVID-19 and coagulation testing were up for discussion on Nov. 20 when six people joined CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle to talk about ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Comparison Of Thromboelastography (TEG) With Rotational ...
    Nov 15, 2013 · TEG and ROTEM are comparable devices. TEG and ROTEM appear to prevent unnecessary blood component transfusions.Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  59. [59]
    Comparative Assessment of Thromboelastography and Rotational ...
    Jul 14, 2025 · ROTEM measured results faster, with a mean time of 24 minutes, compared to TEG with a mean time of 31 minutes (p<0.001). It was found that ROTEM ...
  60. [60]
    Comparison of thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) with standard ...
    Another meaningful limitation of the Clauss assay is that fibrinogen levels can be considerably altered after massive fluid resuscitation and that colloids can ...
  61. [61]
    TEG and ROTEM: Technology and Clinical Applications, 2026 Update
    Oct 4, 2025 · Sonoclot employs viscoelastic impedance analysis, measuring changes in viscosity and elasticity as a probe vibrates within a blood sample. This ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    A multicenter reference interval study of thromboelastography in the ...
    In reality, due to the paucity of studies on TEG RIs, there may be insufficient medical evidence for decision-making by means of the TEG results for the ...