Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tickled

Tickled is a 2016 New Zealand co-directed by and Dylan Reeve, which investigates the production and distribution of online videos depicting young men enduring competitive sessions while restrained. The film begins with Farrier, a , encountering invitations to participate in such "endurance " events offering free flights and accommodations, but encounters immediate and homophobic threats from organizers upon inquiring further. As the investigation deepens, it exposes an operation allegedly orchestrated by an individual using the Jane O'Brien, later identified as David D'Amato, involving payments to participants followed by , , and public shaming of those seeking to withdraw, particularly targeting vulnerabilities like . The garnered critical acclaim for transforming a seemingly frivolous into a probing of and power imbalances, earning a 94% approval rating on and praise for its blend of humor and unease. It highlights interviews with former participants who describe and doxxing tactics employed to silence dissent, illustrating broader risks of anonymous digital influence. Notable for its real-time confrontations, including legal threats against the filmmakers, Tickled underscores the challenges of exposing hidden abuses in niche communities. Controversies surrounding include lawsuits filed by D'Amato against in U.S. courts, alleging , though these actions amplified and the directors maintained the veracity of their from victim testimonies and archival materials. The work prompted discussions on ethical boundaries in content production and the enforcement of in semi-professional settings, without resolving all disputes over the operators' identities and motives.

Background

The Tickling Fetish Phenomenon

Knismolagnia, commonly referred to as , constitutes a wherein individuals experience from others, being , or observing acts, often integrating elements of restraint and vulnerability that evoke dominance-submission dynamics. Psychological literature classifies it alongside other tactile paraphilias, distinguishing light, feather-like knismesis (which may not elicit ) from more intense gargalesis, with stemming from the interplay of , discomfort, and of control. Within subcultures, frequently serves as a low-risk entry into power exchange, where the tickler's control amplifies the ticklee's helplessness, though it remains a niche interest relative to more prevalent es like or . Pre-internet expressions of were predominantly clandestine, manifesting in personal fantasies, anecdotal , or isolated references in , with scant empirical documentation due to societal and lack of infrastructure. The digital era catalyzed its visibility starting in the late 1990s, as online forums and early video-sharing platforms enabled aggregation; by July 2000, Yahoo's category hosted 62 clubs, the largest exceeding 1,000 members, fostering discussions and content exchange. This proliferation accelerated in the early with dedicated sites like the Tickling Media Forum (established around 2001), where users shared stories, media, and preferences, transitioning the fetish from solitary pursuits to organized virtual subcultures. Fetish communities emphasize voluntary participation, with self-reported surveys underscoring adherence to protocols modeled on standards, including pre-scene negotiations, safewords, and aftercare to mitigate risks of overstimulation or psychological distress. A 2024 online survey of enthusiasts (n=approximately 200, primarily self-identified practitioners) revealed that 88% achieved sexual satisfaction via without additional stimuli, and 25% reported orgasms solely from it, attributing appeal to exposures like playful that conditioned associations—all framed within consensual frameworks. Broader research corroborates these norms, finding stringent communication prevalent among practitioners, though flexibility increases in established relationships, with violations reported at rates comparable to contexts but addressed through community accountability.

Emergence of Competitive Endurance Tickling Videos

Competitive endurance tickling videos first appeared online in the early 2010s, primarily through channels associated with Jane O'Brien Media, a Los Angeles-based production entity established around 2002 that shifted toward this format to appeal to niche audiences on platforms like and specialized websites. These videos depicted fit, athletic young men—often athletes or models—restrained in and subjected to prolonged sessions framed as timed endurance competitions, with participants competing to withstand the stimulation longest for purported prizes or rankings. The content was marketed as a quirky, non-sexual "" testing physical and mental resilience, akin to extreme challenge videos popular in online entertainment at the time. Recruitment targeted athletic individuals via unsolicited emails to their social media profiles, such as or , offering compensation—typically $1,000 or more—and promises of fame or portfolio-building opportunities without initially disclosing the element's intensity or the videos' potential appeal. Emails emphasized the athletic, comedic nature of the "challenges," positioning them as lighthearted tests of endurance similar to stunt videos, which attracted participants seeking quick or in a pre-social media influencer era. Early responders, including athletes, reported the process as straightforward and consensual, with sessions conducted in rented spaces equipped for and basic restraints. Prior to broader scrutiny, these videos circulated in limited online circles, amassing views in the tens of thousands on under pseudonymous channels, where they were perceived as eccentric but harmless oddities blending humor, , and mild . Participants often shared positive initial feedback, describing the experiences as surprisingly enjoyable group activities that fostered camaraderie, with laughter and banter dominating the footage. This niche virality helped sustain production, as the format differentiated itself from overt content by emphasizing competition scores and leaderboards, drawing curiosity from broader users intrigued by unconventional challenges.

Discovery and Investigation

David Farrier's Initial Contact

In 2014, New Zealand television journalist , while researching eccentric sports for a segment at 3 News, encountered online videos produced by Jane O'Brien Media (JOM) that purported to show "competitive endurance tickling" events, featuring fit young men restrained and tickled by others in a contest format. Seeking material for a lighthearted story, emailed JOM expressing interest in participating as a potential contestant and inquiring about the production process. JOM's initial replies expressed keen interest in enlisting "straight, fit" male recruits for their Angeles-based shoots, providing logistical details and emphasizing a preference for heterosexual participants to maintain the videos' intended appeal. However, upon Farrier disclosing his homosexuality in follow-up correspondence, JOM's tone shifted abruptly, with emails rejecting collaboration due to his and invoking derogatory stereotypes about in coverage of such content. These responses, marked by selective enthusiasm for males and overt discomfort with a gay journalist's involvement, revealed early discrepancies in JOM's professional facade, spurring Farrier to scrutinize the operation further rather than abandon the topic. By late 2014, enlisted producer Reeve to co-lead a formal , transforming the inquiry from a brief news item into a full project.

Uncovering Coercion and Blackmail Practices

As investigative journalist delved deeper into the operations of Jane O'Brien Media (JOM), the New York-based entity producing the "competitive endurance " videos, former participants provided testimonies revealing systematic . Recruits, often young athletic men enticed with free flights and payments ranging from $1,000 to $5,000, reported being pressured to sign nondisclosure agreements and continue filming despite discomfort, with sessions involving restraints and multiple ticklers that exceeded initial expectations of light-hearted competition. Non-consensual elements emerged prominently through accounts of threats to distribute footage if participants withdrew. One former tickler described receiving demands for additional videos under duress, with warnings that refusal would lead to videos being sent to family members, employers, or colleagues, exploiting the associated with male vulnerability in such scenarios. Similar patterns appeared in cases involving U.S. , including at least three , who were lured under and later faced implicit to maintain participation or silence. Farrier's inquiries uncovered JOM's use of pseudonyms and proxies to obscure the operation's leadership, ultimately tracing it to David D'Amato, a resident operating under aliases including "Richard Loper." D'Amato, whose involvement was linked through email correspondences and records, had a prior history in content distribution dating back to the early , predating JOM's formalized "competitions." Empirical evidence from leaked s highlighted targeted recruitment of vulnerable individuals, such as college athletes and service members, via and modeling sites, with inducements playing on curiosity or financial need while leveraging societal taboos around male ticklishness—often framed with homoerotic undertones to amplify . One exchange cited in the investigation demanded compliance with threats of "" participants' involvement, reinforcing control through fear of reputational harm rather than mutual . These practices deviated from consensual activities, as corroborated by multiple ex-participants who emphasized initial about the videos' intensity and permanence.

Production

Filmmaking Challenges and Methods

The production of Tickled commenced as a self-funded endeavor by in late 2014, after his initial outreach to organizers of online tickling videos, with co-director Dylan Reeve joining to handle on a shoestring . The duo initially covered expenses out-of-pocket, relying on personal resources for early investigations, before turning to ; a campaign launched subsequently raised nearly NZ$30,000 in three weeks to finance travel, equipment, and . Spanning roughly two years from 2014 to 2016, the timeline reflected adaptive amid resource limitations, as initial plans for a lighthearted pivoted to intensive scrutiny following hostile responses that amplified personal and logistical risks. Faced with evasion and intimidation, and Reeve adopted covert filming techniques, including disguised in objects like cups to document unscripted encounters without alerting subjects. They integrated to dissect online trails, tracing IP addresses and debunking pseudonymous accounts through collaboration with specialists, which demanded real-time technical adaptations beyond standard journalistic tools. This methodological evolution—from casual inquiries to forensic-driven sleuthing—addressed the absence of institutional backing, compelling the filmmakers to bootstrap investigations across and the while managing sporadic associate producer input from figures like . Editing emphasized empirical rigor, with editors like Simon Coldrick prioritizing footage corroborated by , such as dated threads displayed with timestamps to anchor narrative claims in traceable rather than . Ethical restraints shaped selections, excluding speculative elements in favor of authenticated sequences verified through multiple cross-checks, ensuring the 92-minute cut maintained causal without amplifying unproven assertions. These choices mitigated the perils of a low-budget, threat-laden process, culminating in a completed within approximately 18 months of core filming.

Key Figures and Testimonies

David D'Amato, the individual identified as orchestrating the Jane O'Brien Media operation behind the competitive endurance videos, operated under multiple female aliases including Jane O'Brien, Terri Tickle, Terri DiSisto, and Debbie Kuhn. A gay man from , D'Amato had been convicted in 2001 on federal misdemeanor charges of and abuse for launching attacks and unauthorized computer access against university students who had participated in his earlier solicitations, resulting in a $5,000 fine and six months in a . Testimonies from former participants portrayed D'Amato as employing tactics, such as threatening to disclose videos to participants' families, employers, or commands to enforce or silence , with some accounts linking these actions to personal grudges against those who sought to exit the videos or refused additional involvement. One coerced recruit, a former , recounted being lured with promises of paid "training" sessions that escalated into non-consensual filming, followed by doxxing and shaming when he attempted to withdraw. While organizers maintained the activity was a legitimate non-erotic sport attracting willing entrants for modest compensation, participant statements often highlighted an underlying dynamic that shifted from voluntary to coercive, with initial undermined by subsequent threats. David Farrier, an openly gay New Zealand investigative journalist, initiated the probe after receiving an unsolicited email inviting him to cover the tickling videos, only to encounter immediate homophobic vitriol in replies from the production entity upon his inquiry. Co-director Dylan Reeve, a filmmaker specializing in unconventional subjects, collaborated with Farrier in on-camera pursuits that exposed operational patterns but drew escalating online harassment, including homophobic slurs directed at Farrier's sexuality to discredit the investigation. Their accounts emphasized the psychological strain of persistent antagonism, with Farrier noting the barrage of derogatory messages as a deliberate tactic to intimidate rather than engage substantively.

Release

Premiere and Theatrical Distribution

Tickled world premiered at the in the World Cinema Documentary Competition. Following its festival debut, acquired North American theatrical distribution rights in late January 2016, with securing U.S. television rights. The film received a in the United States on June 17, 2016. In , it opened in cinemas on May 26, 2016, after an earlier local premiere event on April 13. The theatrical rollout remained limited, reflecting the documentary's niche subject matter, with screenings primarily in select arthouse theaters. It grossed $613,956 in the U.S. and , contributing to a worldwide total of $790,519. Distribution efforts highlighted the film's investigative elements, focusing on themes of online and to broaden appeal beyond the initial videos that sparked the inquiry. This approach addressed challenges posed by the unconventional premise, positioning Tickled as an exposé on power dynamics in subcultures rather than content.

Streaming and International Availability

Following its limited theatrical release, Tickled secured U.S. television rights with HBO in January 2016, shortly after its Sundance premiere, enabling broader accessibility via cable and later streaming platforms. The film debuted on HBO on February 27, 2017, marking a key expansion beyond cinemas and contributing to increased viewership through on-demand options. Subsequent platform deals further democratized access, with adding the documentary to its catalog, alongside availability on services like for rental or purchase. By 2024, Tickled remained streamable on (now Max), , and in the U.S., reflecting sustained without major platform churn. Internationally, handled distribution rights outside and , facilitating releases in select markets, though streaming options vary by region due to licensing—commonly accessible via and globally. No evidence of widespread or required edits emerged in conservative regions, despite the film's sensitive themes; availability persists on major platforms without noted restrictions as of late 2024. The absence of remasters or significant re-releases underscores reliance on original formats, with occasional screenings linked to director follow-ups maintaining niche visibility rather than driving mass re-accessibility.

Reception

Critical Acclaim and Reviews

Tickled received widespread critical acclaim upon its release, earning a 94% approval rating on based on 119 reviews, with critics praising its shift from whimsical curiosity to exposing darker undercurrents of and . On , the film holds a 7.4 out of 10 rating from over 22,000 user votes, reflecting strong audience and professional endorsement for its investigative depth. of awarded it three out of four stars, commending the documentary for balancing disquieting revelations with entertainment value, particularly in its unforced unveiling of dynamics without overt moralizing. The film premiered at the in the Documentary Competition, where it was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize, highlighting its appeal as a probing journalistic work. Reviewers frequently lauded its investigative rigor, with Richard Crouse describing it as "hard core with a human touch" for methodically tracing the origins of online tickling videos to patterns of and power imbalances. called it "terrifically entertaining," noting how David Farrier's pursuit transforms a niche inquiry into a compelling examination of online harassment. Critics appreciated the film's adept blending of humor and unease, starting with lighthearted footage of endurance before escalating to revelations of tactics, as observed in The Guardian's review of its progression from "giggly to grim." Consequence similarly highlighted the descent from "giggles" into "surreal ," crediting the directors' restraint in letting evidence drive the narrative. Some noted minor pacing issues in the context explanations or a rushed conclusion, as in Little White Lies' assessment that it "peters out somewhat in its rushed, indelicate final stages," though this did not detract from overall praise for its structural tension. gave it 2.5 out of 4 stars, deeming it "sloppy" in parts but ultimately "compelling" for unearthing a amid the .

Responses from Fetish and Affected Communities

Some members of the community contended that overemphasized coercive practices linked to Jane O'Brien Media (JOM), thereby stigmatizing consensual adult activities that typically involve mutual agreement and do not feature or . These critics argued that JOM's methods, including deceptive recruitment of financially vulnerable participants such as fighters, constituted aberrant outliers rather than reflective of broader fetish production, where ethical operators prioritize explicit and participant . Affected individuals who had been recruited or coerced into JOM videos expressed support for the film's revelations, crediting it with validating their experiences of and providing a platform for previously silenced testimonies; one former underage participant, involved at age 15, contributed investigative files to the filmmakers and described the exposure as instrumental in highlighting unreported abuses, though they noted lingering unresolved details. emerged for specific victims, such as athlete Jordan Sewell, whose exploitation for content amid economic hardship was seen as emblematic of predatory tactics, fostering community discussions on the psychological toll of non-consensual involvement. In online forums including Reddit's r/tickling, participants debated protocols in content creation, underscoring the distinction between voluntary —often involving safewords and aftercare—and the involuntary restraint and depicted in JOM footage; users advocated for stricter norms against , with some expressing personal discomfort or shame induced by the film's mainstream scrutiny of the . These exchanges highlighted a post-release push for ethical self-regulation, though some ists felt alienated by portrayals framing enthusiasts as inherently deviant.

Controversies

Legal Threats and Harassment Against Filmmakers

Prior to the film's release, filmmakers and Dylan Reeve received a cease-and-desist letter in early from a New York-based attorney representing David D'Amato, the operator of Jane O'Brien Media, alleging and demanding that production halt. This initial legal threat followed Farrier's public inquiries into the company's competitive endurance videos, which had prompted aggressive responses including homophobic emails directed at Farrier, who is openly gay. These emails combined legal warnings with slurs and personal attacks, establishing a pattern of that the filmmakers archived and later incorporated into the documentary as evidence of coercive tactics rather than factual rebuttals. Escalating harassment included attempts to dox through smear campaigns, phone calls, and investigations into his , often laced with homophobic aimed at deterring his . D'Amato's representatives also pursued doxxing-like efforts against potential interviewees, such as former participants who had spoken out, by threatening of details to them. These actions, documented via saved correspondence and call logs featured in the film, underscored a reliance on fear over substantive defense, as no empirical counter-evidence to the filmmakers' findings was provided in the threats. Legal efforts culminated in defamation lawsuits filed by D'Amato against and Reeve in the United States in March 2016, claiming the film portrayed him falsely in connection with the tickling operations. Separate claims invoking privacy laws, alleging invasion of through the documentary's disclosures, were also advanced but voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs prior to any rulings on merits. These failed U.S. and actions highlighted tensions between reputational protections and free speech in , with courts not substantiating the claims amid the filmmakers' persistence. The pattern of preemptive litigation and , rather than engaging with the evidence presented, amplified the story's visibility and reinforced the film's narrative of systemic within the video production.

Debates on Ethics and Sensationalism

Scholars have critiqued Tickled for engaging in and extra-juridical , where the filmmakers' counter-surveillance tactics—such as persistent inquiries and public exposure—effectively punish David D'Amato outside formal legal channels, mirroring his own methods of and invasion against video participants. Ethan Stoneman and Joseph Packer argue that this participatory approach invites viewers to derive pleasure from the subject's humiliation, raising ethical questions about whether the documentary's revelations of systemic justify inflicting as a core product rather than an unintended byproduct. Such methods, including emails feigning interest in tickling videos to elicit defensive responses, have been seen by some as bordering on , potentially provoking revelations of while infringing on subjects' . Counterarguments emphasize the overriding public interest in exposing empirically documented harms, such as non-consensual extensions of filming sessions and threats of reputational damage, as detailed in unedited participant testimonies that demonstrate genuine distress beyond initial consent. These tactics align with journalistic standards permitting limited deception when no viable alternatives exist and the evidence uncovers causal patterns of manipulation, prioritizing accountability over unfettered privacy for those engaging in potentially harmful practices. Claims of center on the film's tonal shift from quirky exploration to dark exposé, which and Packer describe as sensationalizing retribution to appeal to voyeuristic impulses, potentially manipulating audience perception through edited contrasts rather than pure . Yet, the structure is substantiated by capturing real-time and emotional toll, arguing against dismissal as mere drama by grounding the narrative in verifiable instances of power imbalance and psychological harm. Within fetish communities, some responses highlight a lack of nuance in distinguishing consensual adult —where participants exercise —from the film's focus on non-consensual elements, cautioning that broad exposure risks conflating benign with and eroding recognition of voluntary boundaries in private practices. This perspective underscores causal distinctions between isolated predatory behaviors and ethical, negotiated engagement, urging investigative works to avoid overgeneralization that could stigmatize unrelated subcultures.

Aftermath and Impact

David D'Amato's Death and Conspiracy Theories

David P. D'Amato, identified in the documentary Tickled as the principal figure behind Jane O'Brien Media and its competitive endurance tickling operations, died on March 13, 2017, at the age of 55 in . The official cause was a heart attack, compounded by underlying conditions including , as confirmed by the filmmakers through access to his and medical records. This occurred approximately one year after the film's at the in January 2016, though medical reports attribute the death to natural health factors rather than any direct psychological or external pressures from the documentary's release or investigations. Following D'Amato's death, online speculation emerged suggesting he had faked his demise, fueled by the continued operation of Jane O'Brien Media's websites and the release of new videos under the same branding in the months afterward. Proponents of these theories pointed to the persistence of the enterprise—allegedly managed by D'Amato—as evidence of his survival, with some claiming he had orchestrated a disappearance to evade scrutiny from the Tickled filmmakers and legal challenges. Such claims gained traction in niche online forums and , but lacked supporting documentation and relied on circumstantial observations of the websites' activity. Documentary directors and Dylan Reeve refuted the faked-death theories in a June 2017 article published on The Spinoff, providing verifiable evidence including the , records, and estate proceedings that confirmed D'Amato's passing. They explained the post-death website continuity as resulting from automated systems, lingering domain registrations, and potential exploitation by third parties accessing D'Amato's unmanaged digital assets, rather than his ongoing involvement. While some observers speculated on indirect psychological strain from the film's exposure contributing to health deterioration, findings and indicate no causal connection to the documentary, emphasizing pre-existing cardiac vulnerabilities instead.

Follow-up Works and Ongoing Investigations

In 2017, filmmakers and Dylan Reeve released The Tickle King, a 21-minute short documentary serving as a direct follow-up to Tickled. The film captures David D'Amato's uninvited appearance at a screening of Tickled in 2016, where he confronted the directors and presented his perspective on the events depicted in the original documentary. It also documents D'Amato initiating lawsuits against Farrier, Reeve, and his stepmother Dorothy D'Amato, who had appeared in Tickled discussing his background. The short premiered alongside HBO's broadcast of Tickled on February 27, 2017, highlighting the immediate legal and personal repercussions of the exposure. Following D'Amato's death in early 2015—which was publicly confirmed in 2017— continued investigating remnants of the network through independent reporting. In April 2020, he disclosed evidence that at least three had been deceived into participating in videos under of modeling or sports-related shoots in , and hotel rooms, expanding on the coercion patterns uncovered in Tickled. No criminal prosecutions have resulted from these revelations, as D'Amato, identified as the central figure behind aliases like Jane O'Brien Media, was deceased prior to the film's release, limiting against the operation. More recently, Farrier's Webworm detailed the of a seven-year probate battle over D'Amato's estate, estimated in the millions and derived from the video enterprise, which concluded without further distribution of coerced content. As of 2025, online discussions of endurance persist sporadically on forums and , but organized coercive recruitment appears to have diminished significantly due to the heightened scrutiny from Tickled and its extensions, with no evidence of large-scale networks reactivating.

Broader Effects on Online Fetish Content

Following the 2016 release of Tickled, which detailed coercive recruitment tactics and by producers of "competitive endurance " videos under the Jane O'Brien Media banner, fetish communities engaged in discussions distinguishing ethical, consent-based practices from exploitative ones. Co-director Reeve stated that the film intentionally featured ethical producer Ivey to illustrate sessions, contrasting them with non-consensual operations to avoid stigmatizing the broader . Post-release analyses of underscored the importance of explicit in sessions, particularly for restrained "" scenarios, with practitioners advised to establish boundaries to prevent unintended distress or power imbalances. Reeve reported that harassing behaviors tied to specific abusive producers largely ceased after 2016, though commercial exploitation of tickling archives continued via other operators without the prior elements. Platform policies contributed to reduced visibility of endurance-style videos; YouTube's guidelines, prohibiting violent, graphic, or humiliating fetishes, often result in removal or age-restriction of such content. The 2017 "Adpocalypse"—a advertiser prompting stricter algorithmic —further demonetized and limited reach for controversial videos, including those bordering on fetish territory, as platforms prioritized advertiser safety over niche adult expression. These shifts enhanced protections against non-consensual recruitment by deterring covert operations through public scrutiny, yet no data indicates suppression of content overall, with ongoing production by independent creators. Some community members expressed alienation from the film's portrayal, arguing it amplified external judgment on private fetishes without proportionally addressing ethical variants.

References

  1. [1]
    Tickled (2016) - IMDb
    Rating 7.4/10 (22,511) Journalist David Farrier stumbles upon a mysterious tickling competition online. As he delves deeper he comes up against fierce resistance.Plot · Parents guide · Full cast & crew · User reviews
  2. [2]
    Tickled movie review & film summary (2016) - Roger Ebert
    Rating 3/4 · Review by Glenn KennyJun 17, 2016 · A documentary about a tickling empire that manages to be disquieting and entertaining simultaneously.
  3. [3]
    Tickled review: fetish documentary goes from giggly to grim
    Mar 8, 2016 · What begins as a lighthearted glimpse into the inner workings of a niche porn empire soon morphs into a disturbing study of cyberbullying.
  4. [4]
    This controversial documentary says competitive tickling is a tale of ...
    Jun 29, 2016 · When some of the men decided they no longer wanted to participate in the tickling videos, the film alleges that they were threatened with public ...
  5. [5]
    Tickled - Rotten Tomatoes
    Rating 94% (119) Tickled uses an investigation into a silly-seeming subculture as the launching point for thought-provoking insights into online bullying.
  6. [6]
    Review: 'Tickled' Is Fun and Giggles Until It Isn't Anymore
    Jun 16, 2016 · A terrifically entertaining documentary about a strange, murky corner of the adult tickling world. A New Zealand journalist named David Farrier discovered this ...
  7. [7]
    The Bizarre Controversy Surrounding 'Tickled,' a Documentary ...
    Jul 1, 2016 · The filmmakers allege that it's owned by D'Amato, who served time for computer fraud in connection with tickling videos. In the documentary, ...
  8. [8]
    'Tickled' documentary draws controversy - Newsday
    Feb 27, 2017 · When “Tickled” began playing at festivals last year, D'Amato took legal action, filing two defamation lawsuits against Farrier, one in Missouri ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Catching Up With 'Tickled' Filmmaker David Farrier - IndieWire
    Feb 24, 2017 · The strange saga of David Farrier and Dylan Reeve's fascinating and controversial documentary “Tickled” didn't end once the filmmakers stopped ...
  10. [10]
    HBO's Tickled special lets a documentary villain react to his on ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · After its release, the doc was accused of either being entirely fictional or exaggerated for entertainment. But even if it was all true, the ...
  11. [11]
    Tickling Fetishism Explored - Psychology Today
    Mar 2, 2017 · knismophilia is a paraphilia in which individuals derive sexual pleasure and arousal from tickling or being tickled (and is also known as titillagnia).
  12. [12]
    Tickle fetishism: pleasure beyond playfulness - PMC - NIH
    Apr 3, 2024 · Furthermore, vigorous tickling can incorporate elements of sadomasochism, as it often straddles the line between pleasure and discomfort. This ...
  13. [13]
    Tickled pink: A brief look at knismolagnia - drmarkgriffiths
    Feb 10, 2013 · “Knismesis refers to the light, feather-like type of tickling. This type of tickling generally does not induce laughter and is often ...
  14. [14]
    Tickle fetishism: pleasure beyond playfulness - Frontiers
    Apr 2, 2024 · Our online survey, primarily distributed among individuals interested in tickle fetishism, explored tickling and its association with sexual ...
  15. [15]
    Tickling Fetishism Explored | Psychology Today United Kingdom
    Mar 2, 2017 · Arguably one of the most obscure paraphilias is knismophilia (sexual arousal from tickling). This post explores tickling fetishes by ...
  16. [16]
    Turned on with a tickle - Salon.com
    Jul 12, 2000 · Tickling may be an underground fetish, but it's surprisingly common. Yahoo's adult tickling area has 62 clubs, the largest of which has more ...
  17. [17]
    The Tickling Media Forum
    Tickling Stories. Here you can read and share all your favorite tickling fiction with the community. Threads: 22.2K. Messages ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  18. [18]
    Consent Norms in the BDSM Community: Strong But Not Inflexible
    Nov 22, 2024 · The BDSM community is generally regarded as having strict consent practices, such as safewords and explicit negotiations.
  19. [19]
    (PDF) Tickle fetishism: pleasure beyond playfulness - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · A quarter of respondents reported experiencing orgasms exclusively from tickling, while around 88% expressed sexual satisfaction through ...
  20. [20]
    Sexual Consent Norms in a Sexually Diverse Sample - PMC
    Nov 28, 2023 · This study examined sexual consent norms among a sexually diverse sample, including people who practice BDSM (n = 116), people who identify with another sexual ...
  21. [21]
    Is Jane O'Brien Media Still Active? Is Debbie Kuhn a Real Person?
    Jul 10, 2024 · According to the aforementioned production plus its follow-up short, 'Tickle is King,' ever since Jane O'Brien Media was established around 2002 ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
  22. [22]
    Tickled: Film lifts lid on secret world of 'endurance tickling' - BBC News
    Aug 23, 2016 · A documentary called Tickled shines a spotlight on those who take part in "competitive endurance tickling".Missing: 2010-2014 | Show results with:2010-2014
  23. [23]
    Tickled: how David Farrier poked the underbelly of 'competitive tickling'
    Aug 18, 2016 · 'The scale of it blew our minds', says the New Zealand journalist, whose hyped documentary falls squarely in the truth is stranger than fiction category.
  24. [24]
    The bizarre story behind a 'tickling' documentary that led to online ...
    which, ...
  25. [25]
    Welcome To The World Of Competitive Tickling | by K. Thor Jensen
    Nov 22, 2016 · Welcome to the world of “competitive endurance tickling.” Despite its presentation as a “sport,” there don't seem to be winners and losers.Missing: 2010-2014 | Show results with:2010-2014<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Tickled Is a Cyberbullying Exposé You Won't See Coming | Vogue
    Jun 17, 2016 · Smelling a story, Farrier decided to apply. The response from the organizer, Jane O'Brien Media, was swift: “To be brutally frank, association ...
  27. [27]
    David Farrier: Not Exactly Tickled Pink - FilmInk
    When New Zealand TV news reporter, David Farrier, stumbled across Jane O'Brien Media and its competitive tickling videos, what started as an innocent request ...
  28. [28]
    Exhibit A: "Jane O'Brien Media" briefing email - Tumblr
    This is an example of a "Jane O'Brien Media" briefing email, sent to those that have agreed to take part in a "competitive tickling" shoot in Los Angeles.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  29. [29]
    <i>Tickled</i>: The wacky documentary with a sinister twist
    Aug 21, 2016 · When his initial email contact with Jane O'Brien Media sparked a flurry of furiously homophobic responses (Farrier is gay) and the threat of ...
  30. [30]
    https://purenonfiction.net/episodes/pn-12-talking-tickled-with-david-farrier-dylan-reeve
  31. [31]
    'Tickled' Review: An Engrossing Investigative Doc - Variety
    Jan 24, 2016 · David Farrier and Dylan Reeve's documentary traces the New Zealand duo's investigation of an online tickling-video empire.
  32. [32]
    Men Tricked into Participating in Bizarre Tickling Videos Have No ...
    Jun 24, 2016 · In other cases, the tickling videos were leaked without the performer's consent: Farrier details an instance in which a performer believed his ...
  33. [33]
    'Tickled' Director David Farrier Claims At Least Three U.S. Marines ...
    Apr 30, 2020 · Whenever a young man would try to stop participating in filming new videos, DiSisto and O'Brien would threaten to share their videos and ...
  34. [34]
    No laughing matter: documentary on endurance tickling runs into ...
    May 21, 2016 · Tickled, an investigative documentary into the strange, litigious world of “competitive endurance tickling”, has proved no laughing matter for its subject and ...
  35. [35]
    Tickled - The Austin Chronicle
    Jul 8, 2016 · David Farrier is a journalist out of New Zealand whose beat is the ... coercion, exploitation of the working class, blackmail, and most ...
  36. [36]
    Tickled and Everything That Really Happened to David D'Amato
    Jul 20, 2024 · This investigative saga turned into a full-blown and surprisingly hard-hitting documentary titled Tickled that was released two years later in 2016.
  37. [37]
    The Sinister Side of Tickling - Interview Magazine
    Jun 17, 2016 · When New Zealand journalist David Farrier first heard about the sport of “competitive endurance tickling,” he was intrigued.
  38. [38]
    TICKLED – Review - We Are Movie Geeks
    Jul 14, 2016 · Internet forensics finally reveal a mastermind, a person living in the NYC area that David and Dylan decide to confront on camera.
  39. [39]
    Man Says Tickling-Contest Film Defamed Him
    Mar 7, 2016 · The son of late legal giant George D'Amato claims in court that the indie film "Tickled" defamed him in its tale of "competitive endurance tickling."Missing: victim | Show results with:victim
  40. [40]
    Tickled Documentary: Exposing the Shocking Truth Behind ...
    Dec 19, 2024 · These encounters reveal a pattern of harassment and coercion. Former participants in the tickling videos share stories of being threatened ...
  41. [41]
    Tickled Documentary Uncovers Dangerous World of Competitive ...
    Aug 31, 2025 · Explore the shocking journey of David Farrier's 'Tickled' documentary, exposing the dark side of competitive endurance tickling.
  42. [42]
    'Tickled': Sundance Review - The Hollywood Reporter
    Jan 24, 2016 · The film, premiering at Sundance, is a chilling account of cyberbullying, perpetrated on a disturbingly wide scale over many years.Missing: testimonies coerced
  43. [43]
    Sundance: Documentary 'Tickled' Bought by HBO, Magnolia - Variety
    Jan 30, 2016 · HBO has acquired the U.S. television rights to the documentary "Tickled" and Magnolia has picked up North American theatrical rights.
  44. [44]
    The trailer for David Farrier's documentary Tickled is finally here and ...
    Mar 22, 2016 · Director David Farrier and director Dylan Reeve at the Tickled premiere at Sundance. ... A US release date has also been set for June 24th.
  45. [45]
    David Farrier's Tickled documentary set for NZ debut next month | Stuff
    Mar 10, 2016 · David Farrier's controversial documentary on competitive, endurance tickling will have its New Zealand Premiere at Auckland's Civic Theatre on April 13.
  46. [46]
    Magnolia's 'Tickled' Top Debut in Slow Weekend: Specialty Box Office
    Jun 19, 2016 · In a total of 80 theaters, Weiner crossed a million dollars, grossing $144K, averaging $1,800. Last weekend the title grossed nearly $167K ...
  47. [47]
    “Tickled” Is The Must-See Doc That Is Just As Creepy As It Is Hard ...
    Jul 15, 2016 · Co-director and star David Farrier talks about the challenges of spreading the word about the film, and odd happenings since it wrapped.
  48. [48]
    Watch Tickled | Netflix
    While looking into the sport of competitive tickling, reporter David Farrier uncovers a dark empire that ensnares and exploits vulnerable young men.
  49. [49]
    Tickled streaming: where to watch movie online? - JustWatch
    Rating 86% (1,026) Currently you are able to watch "Tickled" streaming on fuboTV, HBO Max. It is also possible to buy "Tickled" on Amazon Video, Apple TV, Fandango At Home, ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  50. [50]
    Defamation case over film 'Tickled' moves to federal court | AP News
    Mar 18, 2016 · A Missouri defamation lawsuit over a documentary on “competitive endurance tickling” has moved to federal court, where a similar case from Utah is pending.
  51. [51]
    Tickled - Prime Video
    Rating 7.4/10 (22,508) In a story stranger than fiction, journalist David Farrier uncovers a tickle-fetish subculture online. As he delves deeper into the dark world of a tickling ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  52. [52]
    Sundance: HBO, Magnolia Nab Documentary 'Tickled'
    Jan 31, 2016 · HBO has picked up the U.S. TV rights to Tickled, a documentary that premiered in the World Documentary section at the Sundance Film Festival ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  53. [53]
    Awards - Tickled (2016) - IMDb
    Sundance Film Festival · Dylan Reeve. 2016 Nominee Grand Jury Prize. World Cinema ... 2016 Nominee Critics' Choice Documentary Award. Best First Documentary ...
  54. [54]
    TICKLED: 4 STARS. “despite the movie's name, it's no laughing ...
    Despite the light 'n fluffy name “Tickled” is hard core investigative journalism with a human touch. A personality driven doc with pop culturist David ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Film Review: Tickled - Consequence.net
    Jun 14, 2016 · There are a few metrics by which we should judge all documentary films, or at least questions we should ask ourselves when viewing them.
  56. [56]
    Tickled | Little White Lies
    Rating 3.3 · Review by David JenkinsAug 18, 2016 · It's a supremely compelling story, even if it peters out somewhat in its rushed, indelicate final stages. Farrier, too, does the film no favours ...
  57. [57]
    'Tickled' Movie Review - Rolling Stone
    Rating 2.5/4 · Review by David FearJun 17, 2016 · A reporter looks into a fetish contest and stumbles across a conspiracy in this sloppy, compelling doc
  58. [58]
    The truth about Tickled: how a harmless fetish documentary turned ...
    Aug 18, 2016 · It all started with a video of a young man in a bright tracksuit strapped to a bed writhing and laughing uncontrollably as four other young men straddle him.<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    I'm Dylan Reeve, Co-Director of TICKLED, a documentary ... - Reddit
    May 14, 2019 · After stumbling upon a bizarre “competitive endurance tickling” video online, wherein young men are paid to be tied up and tickled, reporter ...
  60. [60]
    2016 Tickled Documentary : r/tickling - Reddit
    Jan 6, 2025 · 2016 Tickled Documentary. Discussion. A documentary by David Farrier in 2016 about tickling. Have you seen the film if so what are your ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
  61. [61]
    Is 'Tickled' Poised to Be the Next 'Catfish'? - The Hollywood Reporter
    May 11, 2016 · Just as swiftly came the legal threats, the first in the form of a cease-and-desist letter from a New York-based lawyer. After a Kickstarter ...
  62. [62]
    Review: Tickled - Slant Magazine
    Jun 12, 2016 · The response he receives is startling, combining threats of legal action with homophobic slurs, and the disproportionate nature of these attacks ...
  63. [63]
    'Tickled': Why The Online Fetish Doc Was Hit With A Defamation ...
    Mar 9, 2016 · David Farrier, the New Zealand co-director of “Tickled,” was served with papers for a defamation lawsuit filed by David D'Amato, one of the subjects of his ...Missing: dismissed | Show results with:dismissed
  64. [64]
    Reel cruelty: Voyeurism and extra-juridical punishment in true-crime documentaries - Ethan Stoneman, Joseph Packer, 2021
    ### Extracted Information
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Tickled Discussion Guide | Influence Film Club
    When David Farrier first contacts Jane O'Brien Media about its tickling productions, he received a rather hostile homophobic response. What was your ...
  66. [66]
    'Ultimately we'll never know all the things that made David D'Amato ...
    Mar 19, 2017 · News broke overnight that David D'Amato, the antagonist of David Farrier and Dylan Reeve's Tickled documentary, has died.
  67. [67]
    "Bad guy" from Tickled documentary David D'amato dead. : r/movies
    Mar 18, 2017 · He is dead from a heart attack and diabetes, and his death certificate and other proof can be seen at this link which the filmmakers wrote and posted below.The Tickle King (2017) Follow up to Tickled, about an investigation ...Tickled (2016) - A journalist intends to document an ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: non- | Show results with:non-
  68. [68]
    Tickled: What Happened to David D'Amato's Millions?
    Jul 13, 2024 · David D'Amato (the “big bad” in Tickled) died from a heart attack back on March 13, 2017. He left behind a legacy of tickling videos and online ...
  69. [69]
    Tickled Directors On David D'Amato's Death: It 'Hit Us Pretty Hard'
    Mar 18, 2017 · David D'Amato, the subject of the documentary “Tickled,” “died suddenly” on March 13. On March 18, the “Tickled” filmmakers, David Farrier and Dylan Reeve, ...Missing: cause | Show results with:cause
  70. [70]
    'Tickled': A New, Bizarre Conspiracy Theory Has Emerged - IndieWire
    Jun 18, 2017 · David D'Amato has died, but Competitive Endurance Tickling has not.
  71. [71]
    Life after the Tickle King's death | The Spinoff
    Jun 19, 2017 · Despite Peluso's public denial, it was clear to us that D'Amato was behind Jane O'Brien Media. Beyond that, we really didn't have much more to ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
  72. [72]
    As If 'Tickled' Weren't Already Strange Enough, a New Conspiracy ...
    With that cleared up, however, they're left to question how his company Jane O'Brien Media persists now that its founder has departed this mortal coil.
  73. [73]
    The Tickle King (Short 2017) - IMDb
    Rating 7.1/10 (1,304) The follow-up documentary "The Tickle King" is all about David D'amato and his reaction to the original "Tickled" movie. It's actually funnier than the previous ...
  74. [74]
    https://www.webworm.co/what-happened-to-david-damatos-millions
  75. [75]
    https://www.%5Breddit
  76. [76]
    YouTube's Adpocalypse and the gatekeeping of cultural content on ...
    The March 2017 advertiser revolt on YouTube, popularly known as the adpocalypse, introduced widespread and radical changes on the platform's policies.