Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Transite

Transite is a trade name for asbestos-cement products manufactured by Johns-Manville starting in 1929, comprising reinforced with fibers to create durable sheets, pipes, boards, and panels used extensively in for roofing, siding, linings, and industrial applications. These materials gained popularity for their resistance, resistance, and structural strength, with the Transite brand becoming synonymous with asbestos-cement composites due to widespread adoption in building and infrastructure projects throughout the mid-20th century. The defining characteristics of Transite include its composite formulation, typically containing 10-20% fibers embedded in , which provided enhanced tensile strength and compared to plain but introduced significant health hazards upon fiber release during cutting, installation, or deterioration. Empirical evidence from occupational links exposure to , , and , with risks amplified by high dust generation in Transite handling, prompting regulatory bans on new asbestos use and extensive abatement efforts for legacy installations. Controversies surrounding Transite center on manufacturer knowledge of asbestos dangers since the 1930s, leading to massive litigation, filings by producers like Johns-Manville in 1982, and ongoing remediation challenges, underscoring causal links between friable asbestos forms and respiratory diseases without evidence of safe exposure thresholds below current standards. Despite phase-out by the in most jurisdictions, intact Transite remains in many structures, requiring careful management to mitigate airborne fiber risks verified through air sampling and biopsy-confirmed pathologies.

Composition and Properties

Material Composition

Transite is a primarily consisting of as the binding matrix, reinforced with chrysotile asbestos fibers to enhance tensile strength and durability. The asbestos component, typically (), constitutes 10-20% of the total weight in most formulations, though this can vary by product type and manufacturer specifications. The cement portion, usually , forms 45-55% or more of the composition, providing and rigidity when mixed with water and cured. Additional fillers, such as silica flour or other silica-containing materials, may comprise 20-35% to improve workability and reduce shrinkage during forming. These proportions were optimized for specific applications like siding sheets (often 9-12% ) or pipes (11-14% ), with higher content (up to 20-30%) in fire-resistant variants. Production involved blending the dry ingredients—primarily , fibers, and silica—before adding water to form a , which was then sheeted or piped under and autoclaved or air-cured to achieve final hardness. was preferred over asbestos types due to its flexibility and compatibility with cement hydration, minimizing cracking. Post-1980s formulations replaced asbestos with fibers or crystalline silica to address concerns, but original Transite products retain the asbestos-cement matrix.

Key Physical and Chemical Properties

Transite asbestos-cement products demonstrate robust mechanical properties suited to structural applications, with compressive strengths typically ranging from 7,000 to 8,000 and tensile strengths around 3,000 . Modulus of rupture for siding variants averages 3,000–4,100 in dry conditions, decreasing under saturation. ranges from 1.6 to 2.0 g/cm³, reflecting the composite's and fiber reinforcement, which contributes to its elasticity and resistance to compression over extended service periods, such as 30 years without significant degradation. Water absorption averages 16% after 7-day , with values between 11% and 28% depending on and history, influencing long-term in moist environments. Thermal conductivity is low at approximately 5.5 Btu·in/(h·ft²·°F), providing while maintaining stability across temperature fluctuations.
PropertyTypical ValueNotes/Source Context
7,000–8,000 psiPipe and board variants; higher under dry conditions.
Tensile Strength~3,000 psiUltimate stress; lower than compressive by factor of ~3.
Modulus of Rupture2,200–5,600 psiSiding; reduces with wetting or weathering.
1.6–2.0 g/cm³Dry bulk; varies with manufacturing pressure.
Water Absorption11–28% (7-day immersion)Affects impact strength post-exposure.
Chemically, Transite resists corrosion from soils, waters, and common agents that degrade metals, owing to the matrix's formation of protective scales in environments. It exhibits non-combustibility and inherent fire resistance, with fibers enhancing heat tolerance without ignition or significant , enabling use in flues and . However, to strong acids can erode the binder, potentially releasing fibers, while it withstands alkalis and mild solvents effectively.

Historical Development

Invention and Early Commercialization

Transite, an asbestos-cement , traces its origins to the development of asbestos-cement sheets by Austrian inventor Ludwig Hatschek, who patented a process in 1900 for producing thin, durable laminates by felting asbestos fibers with cement slurry on a rotating , registered as Austrian Patent No. 5970. This Hatschek process, which created layered sheets resembling artificial stone, was patented in the United States in 1904 under U.S. No. 769,078 for manufacturing imitation stone plates, slabs, or tiles, enabling the formation of asbestos-cement products through wet mechanical felting and curing. Initial commercial production of these sheets occurred in Europe under the brand starting around 1901, with large-scale application demonstrated in the construction of the Taur Railway in from 1902 to 1909, where the material proved resistant to weathering and fire. In the United States, commercialization of asbestos-cement products accelerated after Hatschek introduced the process in , leading to the establishment of manufacturing facilities for sheets, , and related items valued for their fire resistance and durability. Johns-Manville Corporation, a major American building materials producer, adopted and branded the technology as Transite in , initially for flat and corrugated boards before expanding to seamless pipes to meet industrial demands for corrosion-resistant conduits in chemical plants and water systems. That year, the company announced the acquisition of manufacturing rights for asbestos-cement pipes, marking the start of dedicated Transite pipe production, which leveraged the material's high —often exceeding 7,000 psi—and low weight compared to alternatives. Early adoption of Transite focused on and sectors, with installed in municipal and lines by the early due to their resistance to acids and scalability in sizes from 3 to 48 inches in diameter. By the late 1920s, asbestos-cement sheets under brands like Transite were used in full building facades, including donated municipal structures, highlighting the material's rapid driven by post-World War I needs and its cost-effectiveness over traditional . Johns-Manville's production scaled quickly, with Transite comprising a significant portion of the company's output by 1930, supported by automated Hatschek machines that produced continuous sheets up to 10 feet wide for siding, roofing, and ductwork.

Expansion and Peak Production

Following the commercialization of Transite in 1929 by Johns-Manville Corporation, production expanded in 1930 with the initiation of manufacturing for asbestos-cement sheets and pipes at dedicated facilities, leveraging the material's strength for industrial and building applications. This growth coincided with increasing demand during the economic recovery of , as Transite boards were pressed into large sheets for roofing, siding, and structural uses, offering corrosion resistance superior to traditional materials. The post-World War II construction boom further accelerated expansion, particularly in the and , as suburban development and projects drove adoption of Transite for water mains, sewer pipes, and exterior cladding. By 1950, cumulative production of asbestos-cement products for the U.S. building industry reached approximately one billion square feet, reflecting Transite's role in this category amid rapid . Peak production for Transite and similar asbestos-cement goods occurred between the 1950s and late 1960s, when U.S. asbestos consumption hit record levels—exceeding 800,000 metric tons annually by the early 1970s—fueled by applications in residential siding, utility , and fire-resistant panels. Johns-Manville's output included millions of linear feet of Transite annually during this era, supporting municipal systems and industrial installations until concerns prompted phase-outs starting in the mid-1970s.

Decline Due to Asbestos Concerns

The production of Transite, an asbestos-cement composite, began to decline in the early 1970s as empirical evidence linked asbestos fibers to severe respiratory diseases, including asbestosis and mesothelioma, primarily affecting workers through inhalation during manufacturing and installation. Asbestos constituted 15-20% of Transite's composition, releasing respirable fibers when cut, drilled, or weathered, prompting initial regulatory scrutiny under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, which set permissible exposure limits. Johns-Manville, the primary developer and producer of Transite since its 1929 patent, faced escalating litigation from exposed individuals, with claims exceeding 16,000 by the early 1980s, forcing the company into bankruptcy in August 1982 to manage liabilities estimated in billions. Regulatory pressures intensified with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 1979 proposed ban on asbestos-containing products, including cement pipes and sheets, though partially overturned by courts in 1991, it catalyzed a voluntary phase-out by manufacturers amid public health campaigns and liability fears. Utilities largely ceased installing asbestos-cement pipes by the late 1970s, reflecting concerns over fiber release during jointing or breakage, despite no widespread pipe failures documented in service. Johns-Manville discontinued asbestos in flat sheet production by 1985, substituting crystalline silica, while overall U.S. asbestos-cement output dropped precipitously, ending commercial viability for the original formulation by the mid-1980s. This shift was driven by causal evidence from epidemiological studies, such as those by the International Agency for Research on Cancer classifying as carcinogenic in 1977, outweighing Transite's prior advantages in fire resistance and durability, though legacy installations persist without mandated removal absent damage. Existing Transite products, while stable when intact, contributed to ongoing costs, with over 600,000 miles of pipes still in U.S. water systems as of 2022, monitored for integrity rather than blanket replacement.

Manufacturing Process

Raw Materials and Mixing

Transite, an asbestos-cement composite, is produced from three primary raw materials: chrysotile asbestos fibers, , and silica (typically in the form of fine sand or ). The asbestos content generally comprises 10-20% by weight of the mixture, providing tensile strength and flexibility to the brittle cement matrix, while forms the bulk (approximately 70-80%) as the binding agent, and silica (5-15%) enhances chemical stability by reacting with free lime from the cement hydration process. The mixing process begins with mechanical refining of raw chrysotile asbestos ore to separate and fibrillate the fibers, typically using beaters or refiners to achieve uniform dispersion and prevent clumping. These fibrillated fibers are then suspended in to form a pulp , into which and silica are incrementally added while agitating in a to ensure even distribution and minimize fiber bundling. The resulting homogeneous aqueous , with a facilitating flow (often around 30-40% by weight), is de-aired under to remove entrained bubbles before proceeding to forming stages, optimizing the material's and strength. This wet mixing approach, as opposed to dry blending, promotes better fiber-cement adhesion through hydration initiation during preparation.

Forming and Curing Techniques

Transite sheets and siding were primarily formed using the Hatschek process, in which a dilute aqueous slurry of Portland cement, chrysotile asbestos fibers, and silica aggregates is mechanically deposited in successive thin layers onto a moving felt belt via rotating sieve cylinders submerged in the vat. Each cylinder transfers a web of slurry to the felt, accumulating 6–12 layers to achieve thicknesses typically ranging from 3 to 12 mm, after which the wet sheet is pressed between rollers to consolidate and dewater the material before cutting to standard sizes such as 1.2 m by 2.4 m. For Transite pipes, production involved winding the cement-asbestos onto rotating cylindrical mandrels using techniques such as the Mazza or similar processes, where the mixture is applied in multiple layers under controlled to form with internal diameters from 75 mm to 1500 mm and lengths up to 3 m, followed by surface smoothing and joint preparation. The mandrel-wound is then removed and trimmed, ensuring uniformity in wall thickness for pressure ratings up to 20 . Curing of formed Transite products occurred via autoclaving in high-pressure steam chambers, typically at 180–200°C and 8–12 for 8–12 hours, which accelerated , interlocked fibers with crystals, and imparted compressive strengths exceeding 70 while minimizing shrinkage to less than 0.1%. This hydrothermal process, distinct from ambient air curing used in lower-grade asbestos-cement, enhanced dimensional stability and resistance to sulfate attack, as verified in early 20th-century production standards by manufacturers like Johns-Manville. Post-autoclaving, products underwent air drying and quality testing for (around 1.4–1.6 g/cm³) and .

Applications and Uses

Construction and Building Applications

![Transite asbestos siding on a garage][float-right] Transite panels served as a primary material for exterior siding in residential and commercial buildings from the through the , valued for their resistance to fire, weathering, and pests. These sheets, typically composed of reinforced with asbestos fibers, provided a smooth, durable surface that required minimal maintenance and contributed to fire-rated assemblies in structures. In roofing applications, Transite sheets were commonly installed on , agricultural, and some residential buildings, offering of 50 to 70 years under normal conditions and inherent fire resistance that met early 20th-century standards endorsed by fire underwriters. Such panels were lightweight yet strong, facilitating easier installation compared to heavier alternatives like metal or tile. Additional building uses included interior wall linings, soffits, and fascias where was required, as well as bench tops in educational and facilities due to chemical inertness and tolerance. By the mid-20th century, Transite had been incorporated into countless structures, with production peaking before asbestos regulations curtailed new installations in the 1970s and 1980s.

Industrial and Utility Applications

Transite, an asbestos-cement composite, found extensive use in utility infrastructure for and conduit systems owing to its corrosion resistance, electrical non-conductivity, and mechanical strength. In and utilities, Transite pipes were deployed for potable distribution, storm drains, and lines conveying to facilities, with diameters commonly ranging from 100 mm to 300 mm and classes up to 25 for pressure handling. These pipes, introduced in the 1930s, comprised 15-20% fibers, enhancing tensile strength while maintaining chemical inertness against aggressive soils and fluids. In electrical and utilities, Transite served as protective conduits for wiring, often embedded in structures or networks to shield against moisture and mechanical damage without conducting . High-pressure Transite lines facilitated freshwater supply and process conveyance in utility-adjacent operations, such as municipal systems in cities like , where installations persisted until 1994 before phased replacements due to deterioration risks. Industrial applications leveraged Transite's thermal stability and fire resistance for high-heat environments, including and linings in facilities, as well as for boilers and equipment in chemical processing plants. Panels and partitions constructed from Transite provided durable, non-combustible barriers in factories and power generation sites, capable of withstanding temperatures up to °F in installations. Pipes and ducts in these settings routed corrosive fluids or gases, capitalizing on the material's low and resistance to chemical degradation. Usage peaked mid-20th century, with production ceasing in the 1980s amid asbestos regulations, though systems remain in service pending abatement.

Specialized and Niche Uses

Transite asbestos-cement boards were employed in laboratory environments as countertops, bench tops, and fume hood liners, valued for their resistance to corrosive chemicals, acids, and high temperatures without degrading or releasing fibers under normal use. This application persisted from the mid-20th century through the 1970s in educational and industrial labs, where the material's impermeability to reagents like hydrochloric acid and solvents provided a durable, low-maintenance surface compared to wood or early synthetics. In high-temperature industrial settings, Transite served niche roles in foundry operations as flask liners, core supports, drying plates, and components for induction furnace casings, exploiting its thermal stability up to approximately 1,000°F (538°C) and structural integrity under mechanical stress. Historical formulations, reinforced with chrysotile asbestos fibers, offered superior tensile strength and crack resistance in these intermittent high-heat exposures, distinct from continuous furnace linings. Other specialized deployments included insulating panels for supermarket refrigeration units and furnace flues in commercial heating systems, where the material's fire resistance and low thermal conductivity minimized heat loss and fire propagation risks. In electrical applications, Transite boards functioned as arc-resistant barriers and switchgear housings, withstanding electrical discharges and loads in environments demanding both insulation and mechanical robustness. These uses, peaking between the 1940s and 1960s, highlighted Transite's versatility in scenarios requiring combined chemical, thermal, and electrical performance beyond standard construction.

Performance Advantages

Durability and Fire Resistance

Transite, composed of reinforced with fibers, demonstrates high durability through resistance to impact, wear, and environmental degradation. The fibers enhance tensile strength and reduce permeability, preventing cracking and over extended periods. Field observations and manufacturer data indicate lifespans exceeding 80 years for siding applications, with resistance to , , and contributing to minimal needs. In terms of fire resistance, Transite achieves a flame spread index of 0 in ASTM E84 tests, earning a Class A rating, where cement-asbestos board serves as the for minimal propagation compared to red oak at 100. This performance arises from the non-combustible cement matrix and the thermal stability of , which inhibits ignition and spread. Assemblies using Transite sheets, such as wood-framed walls, have qualified for 1-hour fire-resistance ratings under standardized evaluations. These properties historically positioned Transite as a preferred material for -vulnerable structures like industrial firewalls and exterior cladding.

Cost-Effectiveness and Longevity Data

Transite products, composed of fibers embedded in a matrix, demonstrated exceptional longevity in service, with empirical studies estimating average lifespans of 50 to 80 years depending on environmental factors such as soil aggressiveness, water chemistry, and installation quality. For asbestos-cement pipes, the Chrysotile Institute reported a lifespan of 70 years, though actual varied with pipe condition and exposure to corrosive elements like acidic water or high-velocity flows, which could accelerate calcium and structural weakening. Siding and board applications similarly exhibited high impact resistance and resistance to weathering, often outlasting wood or early metal alternatives without or chipping, contributing to their widespread adoption in construction from the through the . Cost-effectiveness stemmed from Transite's low production costs relative to contemporaneous materials like pipes or wooden siding, combined with reduced needs over its extended . Asbestos-cement formulations allowed for , moldable products that minimized transportation and installation expenses—pipes weighed approximately one-third less than ductile iron equivalents—while their fire resistance and tensile strength lowered insurance premiums and repair frequencies in and settings. Historical economic analyses highlight that these attributes drove market dominance, with asbestos-cement accounting for significant shares of and board consumption by the mid-20th century, as the material's offset initial material costs through deferred s. However, post-ban abatement and costs have reversed this profile in legacy systems, with modern renewal strategies like linings extending viable life at fractions of full expenses.

Health and Safety Considerations

Mechanisms of Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos exposure from Transite products, which consist of fibers embedded in a matrix, primarily occurs through the release of respirable fibers into the air, leading to as the dominant route. Intact Transite is classified as non-friable asbestos-containing material (ACM), meaning it resists crumbling or pulverization by hand pressure when dry, resulting in negligible fiber release under normal conditions. This encapsulation reduces inherent risks compared to friable forms like sprayed-on asbestos, but exposure risks escalate when the material is mechanically disturbed or degrades. The principal mechanism involves physical disruption during handling, , , or removal. Activities such as cutting, , sawing, sanding, or crushing Transite pipes, sheets, or siding generate containing asbestos fibers, with airborne concentrations varying based on tool type, , and wet methods used to suppress . For instance, dry cutting of asbestos-cement pipes without controls can release fibers exceeding occupational exposure limits, as documented in regulatory assessments of repairs. or of structures with Transite siding or boards similarly produces fragments that, if pulverized, become friable and emit respirable particles. Excavation of buried Transite pipes, common in water or sewer infrastructure installed from to , risks fiber liberation if pipes are chipped, broken, or abraded by machinery. Secondary mechanisms arise from long-term environmental exposure, particularly for above-ground applications like exterior siding or roofing. , freeze-thaw cycles, and can gradually abrade the matrix, exposing and releasing s over decades, though empirical measurements indicate lower emission rates than from disturbed intact material. Studies on aged asbestos-cement products show that surface deterioration may increase surface counts, but dispersal remains limited without additional like or . Underground Transite pipes, protected from such degradation, exhibit even lower release unless excavated and damaged. Regulatory frameworks, such as those from the U.S. EPA, categorize disturbed or potentially friable Transite as regulated ACM requiring controls like , encapsulation, or professional abatement to mitigate risks during these processes. exposure is negligible, as fibers do not readily leach into from intact pipes, with no significant empirical evidence of potable contamination from Transite infrastructure.

Empirical Evidence on Health Risks

Empirical studies on exposure from Transite and similar asbestos-cement products primarily focus on occupational and environmental risks, with fiber release occurring during cutting, , , or of non-friable materials. A analyzing asbestos-cement sheet handling found airborne fiber concentrations exceeding U.S. permissible exposure limits by over 50 times, with peaks up to 3000 fibers per cubic meter during removal in controlled conditions, indicating significant respiratory hazards for workers without proper controls. Epidemiological data link cumulative exposure from such products to elevated rates of , , and , with risks scaling to dose; for instance, an estimated 1 fiber/ml-year lifetime exposure substantially increases malignant probability, as observed in cohorts near asbestos-cement facilities. In Broni, , proximity to an asbestos-cement factory correlated with persistent high incidence among workers, families, and local residents, even decades post-closure, attributing cases to chronic low-level emissions from product degradation. Similarly, neighborhood studies in areas with widespread asbestos-cement roofing reported disease risks tied to environmental fiber dispersion, though causation requires distinguishing from other sources. , predominant in Transite, demonstrates lower potency than types in human cases, but large doses still yield attributable cancers, as evidenced by small but confirmed case clusters. For Transite pipes in water systems, ingestion risks appear minimal based on available evidence; the deems asbestos in non-serious for human health, supported by epidemiological reviews finding little convincing carcinogenicity from oral , despite up to 20% content in some aging . Non-occupational from intact Transite siding or roofing poses low baseline risk absent disturbance, per assessments, though no exists below which zero harm occurs, emphasizing prevention during maintenance. Overall, while peer-reviewed cohorts affirm causal links to pulmonary diseases, factors like co-exposures and fiber type variability necessitate cautious interpretation, prioritizing high-quality longitudinal data over anecdotal reports.

Comparative Risk Assessments

Intact Transite materials, composed of asbestos fibers embedded in a matrix, exhibit low and minimal airborne fiber release under normal or residential use conditions, distinguishing them from friable asbestos forms like sprayed or pipe lagging that readily crumble and emit respirable fibers. Empirical measurements of fiber emissions from weathered asbestos-cement roofs and siding demonstrate concentrations typically below 0.01 fibers per cubic centimeter, often indistinguishable from ambient background levels of 0.001 fibers per cubic centimeter or less. This low release profile results in estimated incremental lifetime cancer risks from undisturbed residential exposure below 10^{-6}, orders of magnitude lower than the 10^{-3} to 10^{-4} risks associated with historical occupational exposures exceeding 100 fiber-years per cubic centimeter. Comparative assessments highlight that chrysotile asbestos in high-density cement products like Transite poses reduced potency for and relative to varieties (e.g., crocidolite or amosite), with dose-response models indicating chrysotile's carcinogenic efficiency is 1-2 orders lower due to its curly and faster clearance from lung tissue. In contrast, friable insulation has been linked to rates up to 5% in heavily exposed cohorts, while population studies near asbestos-cement facilities show no statistically significant excess disease attributable to low-level environmental dispersion. Removal or abatement of intact Transite, however, can elevate short-term fiber concentrations by factors of 10 to 100 above background during cutting or , underscoring that disturbance-driven risks often exceed those from passive exposure. Relative to alternative building materials, Transite's intact form presents lower inhalation hazards than some substitutes; for instance, vinyl-lined or sidings may leach or , both classified carcinogens with ingestion risks comparable to or exceeding potential asbestos fiber migration in degraded . Wood or asphalt-based sidings introduce propagation risks absent in Transite's inherently non-combustible , where empirical fire tests confirm no significant fiber release even under up to 800°C. Broader contextual comparisons reveal that the lifetime from undisturbed Transite exposure remains negligible against common hazards: general population lung cancer incidence stands at approximately 1 in 15, predominantly driven by (20-fold multiplier) or (10^{-3} risk at average home levels), far outpacing any modeled contribution from non-friable products. Regulatory evaluations, such as those advocating comparative analysis before bans, emphasize that blanket prohibitions overlook these gradients, potentially amplifying net harms through substitute material toxicities or unnecessary abatement .

Regulatory Framework

Historical Regulations and Bans

The earliest federal regulations on asbestos in the United States, which encompassed Transite asbestos-cement products, focused on occupational exposure limits rather than outright prohibitions. In December 1970, the (OSHA) established an emergency temporary standard limiting airborne asbestos fibers to 12 fibers per cubic centimeter of air, prompted by mounting evidence of health risks from industrial use. This was formalized in 1972 as a permanent (PEL) of 5 fibers per cubic centimeter, averaged over an 8-hour workday, with requirements for monitoring, medical surveillance, and protective equipment in workplaces handling materials like Transite sheets and pipes. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated product-specific restrictions in the 1970s, targeting high-risk applications but sparing non-friable asbestos-cement composites such as Transite. In 1973, the EPA prohibited the manufacture, processing, and importation of spray-applied -containing surfacing materials for or fireproofing, due to their friability and potential for airborne fiber release during application. Subsequent EPA rules in 1975 and 1978 extended bans to certain , , and products manufactured after specified dates, but these did not apply to asbestos-cement pipes or panels, which were deemed lower-risk when intact owing to fiber encapsulation in the cement matrix. A pivotal but largely unsuccessful effort toward broader prohibitions occurred in 1989 under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). On July 12, 1989, the EPA promulgated the Asbestos Ban and Phase-Out Rule, which banned the manufacture, importation, processing, and distribution of most asbestos-containing products within timelines ranging from immediate to 10-20 years, explicitly including asbestos-cement corrugated sheets, pipes, and shingles—categories encompassing Transite variants. The rule aimed to phase out remaining uses, such as in vehicle friction products, over a decade. However, in 1991, the U.S. of Appeals for the Fifth vacated most provisions in Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA, ruling that the EPA failed to demonstrate unreasonable risk for many products under TSCA standards and lacked sufficient cost-benefit analysis. Only prior bans (e.g., spray applications) and new restrictions on flooring felt, corrugated asbestos sheets, rollboard, , and specialty paper were upheld; intact asbestos-cement products like Transite siding and pipes escaped prohibition, remaining legally permissible if handled to minimize fiber release. In practice, these regulatory pressures, combined with litigation from asbestos-related disease claims, prompted manufacturers like Johns-Manville—the primary producer of Transite—to voluntarily cease production of asbestos-containing versions by the late , shifting to chrysotile-free formulations or alternatives without a formal ban. No comprehensive federal ban on Transite or similar asbestos-cement materials has been enacted in the U.S. to date, though state-level restrictions on disturbance during renovation or demolition emerged in the , mandating notification and abatement protocols under the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) of , which primarily addressed school buildings but influenced broader handling standards. Internationally, bans on asbestos-cement products predated U.S. attempts in some jurisdictions, indirectly impacting Transite exports. prohibited asbestos in and certain uses as early as 1972, while the banned (including in cement products) in 1985 and all forms by 1999, citing cumulative exposure data from epidemiological studies. These measures reflected a precautionary approach, contrasting U.S. reliance on risk-based assessments that preserved non-friable applications absent proven disproportionate hazards.

Current Handling and Abatement Standards

Transite, an asbestos-cement composite material, is classified as Category II non-friable asbestos-containing material (ACM) under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), encompassing products like siding panels, boards, and that do not readily under hand when . Intact Transite in good poses minimal fiber release risk during routine handling or maintenance, allowing it to remain in place without mandatory abatement provided it is not disturbed, abraded, or demolished in a manner that renders it friable. Under (OSHA) standards for general industry and construction (29 CFR 1910.1001 and 1926.1101), handling of non-friable Transite falls under permissible exposure limits of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter as an 8-hour time-weighted average, with requirements for initial exposure assessments, (PPE) such as respirators for potential exposures exceeding limits, and wet methods to suppress dust during any incidental contact or minor repairs. Cutting, abrading, or breaking Transite panels is prohibited unless the employer demonstrates that less disturbing alternatives (e.g., gentle removal or scoring without power tools) are infeasible, in which case Class II work controls apply, including local exhaust ventilation with filtration and prompt cleanup of debris. Abatement of Transite during or requires EPA NESHAP notification at least 10 working days in advance if regulated quantities (e.g., 260 linear feet of pipe or 160 square feet of other ACM) are involved, with thorough pre-activity inspections by certified inspectors to confirm content. For II ACM like Transite that remains non-friable throughout the process, removal is not strictly required prior to ; instead, materials must be adequately wetted, carefully lowered without dropping or throwing, and disposed of intact or in leak-tight containers labeled per (DOT) standards in approved asbestos landfills, without reprocessing or reclamation. OSHA designates Transite abatement as Class II asbestos work, mandating trained competent persons to oversee operations, use of critical barriers or glove bags for containment where feasible, decontamination of tools, and air monitoring to ensure exposures stay below permissible limits, with medical surveillance for workers exposed above 0.1 f/cc over 30 days annually. Waste from abatement must be double-bagged or wrapped in 6-mil polyethylene sheeting, kept wet until disposal, and transported under strict manifests to prevent fiber release, aligning with EPA's emphasis on emission minimization over complete pre-demolition stripping for intact non-friable forms. State and local variations may impose stricter certification or notification thresholds, but federal standards prioritize proportionality to actual friability risk.

International Variations

In the , asbestos has been comprehensively banned since January 1, 2005, pursuant to Directive 1999/77/EC, which prohibits the extraction, marketing, and use of all types in products including composites like Transite. Handling of legacy installations falls under Directive 2009/148/EC, establishing an of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter over an 8-hour period, mandating risk assessments, worker training, medical surveillance, and such as or wet methods during abatement to minimize release from non-friable materials. A 2024 update via Directive (EU) 2023/2668 reduces short-term limits to 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter and enhances electronic reporting and detection protocols for residual in soil or demolition waste. The maintains no outright ban on , the predominant fiber in Transite, but regulates legacy materials through the EPA's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M), which classifies asbestos-cement products as Category I nonfriable if intact but triggers requirements for notification, inspection, and emission controls—including wetting, prompt disposal as regulated waste, and air monitoring—if thresholds of 260 linear feet of or 160 square feet of surfacing are exceeded during or . OSHA standards (29 CFR 1910.1001) further impose permissible limits of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter, use, and decontamination for workers disturbing such materials. Canada's Prohibition of Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos Regulations (SOR-2018-196), effective December 30, 2018, bans import, manufacture, sale, and use of asbestos products, yet exempts undisturbed legacy in buildings or , deferring to provincial codes like Ontario's Regulation 278/05 or British Columbia's Occupational Health and Safety guidelines, which require inventories, labeling, and licensed removal with negative pressure enclosures if fibers could become airborne. Australia implemented a national ban on asbestos mining, import, and use in December 2003, with Safe Work Australia’s model WHS Regulations (2011) stipulating asbestos management plans, registers for sites containing Transite-like materials, and mandatory licensing for removal, emphasizing non-disturbance where feasible and compliance with exposure limits of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter. In producing nations such as and , no equivalent bans apply; authorizes chrysotile in cement products under Sanitary Norms 2.2.4/2.1.8.582-96 with exposure caps, though production persists amid export challenges, while ’s Occupational Disease Prevention enforces limits but permits ongoing asbestos-cement manufacturing, frequently resulting in workplace exposures above WHO benchmarks.

Modern Alternatives and Legacy Management

Asbestos-Free Substitutes

Fiber-cement composites, reinforced with fibers or (PVA) rather than , serve as the principal direct substitutes for Transite asbestos-cement sheets and siding in modern . These materials typically consist of , silica sand, and water mixed with the alternative fibers, offering comparable , dimensional stability, and resistance to without the associated carcinogenic risks. Commercial production of such asbestos-free fiber-cement products began scaling in the 1980s following asbestos phase-outs, with brands like WeatherSide™ Purity™ and Profile™ explicitly formulated to replicate the texture, profile, and installation characteristics of legacy Transite siding for repair or replacement projects. For applications requiring fire resistance and low maintenance, such as exterior cladding or roofing underlayment, these substitutes provide Class A ratings and exceeding 50 years under standard conditions, as demonstrated in accelerated tests. Engineered variants, including wavy or lap-style panels, allow for aesthetic matching to aged Transite installations, minimizing visual discrepancies during partial replacements. However, fiber-cement products demand careful handling to avoid silica during cutting, necessitating wet-sawing methods or on-site suppression per occupational guidelines. Beyond fiber-cement, (PVC) composites and fiberglass-reinforced polymers have emerged as viable alternatives for Transite-like panels in non-structural uses, such as ductwork or facades, prized for their and lighter weight—PVC panels weighing up to 40% less than equivalent cement-based materials. For piping applications originally served by Transite, asbestos-free options include (HDPE) or pipes, which exhibit superior tensile strength (e.g., HDPE rated for pressures up to 200 psi) and have dominated municipal installations since the EPA asbestos guidelines. These substitutes prioritize empirical performance metrics over historical precedents, with lifecycle analyses indicating reduced total ownership costs due to eliminated abatement liabilities.

Remediation Strategies for Existing Installations

For existing Transite installations, primarily asbestos-cement siding, panels, or , initial remediation begins with a professional to classify the as regulated asbestos-containing (RACM) under the EPA's Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), determining if it is friable (crumbles easily, releasing fibers >1% asbestos by weight) or non-friable Category II ACM, which constitutes most intact Transite products. Non-friable Transite in good condition poses minimal airborne fiber risk during normal use, allowing in-place management as the preferred low-disturbance strategy, involving regular visual monitoring, prompt repair of damage with compatible sealants, and avoidance of activities like drilling or sanding that could render it friable. ![Asbestos siding on garage][float-right] Encapsulation or enclosure serves as intermediate remediation for weathered or vibration-exposed installations, where a bridging encapsulant (penetrating sealant) or penetrating encapsulant is applied to bind fibers and prevent release, provided the substrate is intact; enclosure involves constructing an airtight barrier, such as new siding over existing Transite or insulated panels around pipes, ensuring no gaps for air movement. These methods comply with OSHA Class II work practices for non-thermal ACM removal or disturbance, requiring wet methods to suppress dust, local exhaust ventilation with HEPA filtration, and prompt debris containment in labeled, leak-tight containers. For pipe systems, techniques like close-tolerance pipe slipping (CTPS) enable replacement by inserting new pipe through the existing void after slurry removal, minimizing direct handling of Transite segments unless fragmentation occurs. Full removal is mandated for friable, damaged, or demolition-bound Transite, executed by licensed abatement contractors using critical barriers, enclosures, and protocols per EPA and OSHA guidelines; materials must be gently lowered (not dropped) to avoid shattering, wetted thoroughly with amended to inhibit aerosolization, and double-bagged in 6-mil before transport to approved landfills as non-hazardous waste if non-friable post-wetting. Post-remediation air clearance testing via (PCM) or (TEM) verifies levels below 0.01 fibers per cubic centimeter, with costs for siding removal averaging $10–$20 per square foot depending on accessibility and local regulations as of 2023 data. All strategies prioritize worker protection via respirators (NIOSH-approved P100 or higher), disposable suits, and glove bags for localized work, reflecting empirical evidence that intact asbestos-cement releases negligible fibers compared to friable forms under controlled conditions.

Controversies and Broader Impacts

Debate on Risk Proportionality

The debate on risk proportionality for Transite, an asbestos-cement composite primarily containing asbestos fibers, centers on whether the potential health hazards justify comprehensive bans and abatement mandates, particularly for intact, non-friable applications such as siding, , and roofing. Proponents of stringent controls emphasize the absence of a verifiable safe exposure threshold for , citing epidemiological evidence linking even intermittent fiber release during handling or weathering to elevated risks of and . A 2024 study found that airborne asbestos concentrations from working with asbestos-cement products exceeded U.S. occupational limits by over 50 times, underscoring hazards in or scenarios. Similarly, analyses of global intermittent exposures associate ongoing use of such materials with increased lifetime cancer risks, arguing that regulatory proportionality demands total phase-outs to prevent cumulative societal harm. Opponents contend that risks from intact Transite are negligible under undisturbed conditions, as the cement matrix binds fibers, minimizing airborne release absent mechanical disturbance. Empirical data indicate that non-friable asbestos-containing materials like Transite pose no significant health threat to occupants when left intact, with fiber emissions primarily occurring only upon damage or abrasion. 's lower biopersistence compared to forms further attenuates potency, with studies of cement workers showing lower incidence than in high-exposure trades like , suggesting a practical exposure threshold below which carcinogenicity is minimal. For instance, reviews of prolonged but low-level exposures conclude they do not substantially elevate or rates, challenging the proportionality of blanket prohibitions that overlook dose-response relationships and controlled-use mitigations. This contention extends to applications like asbestos-cement water pipes, comprising up to 20% of some U.S. and Canadian distribution systems, where leaching studies reveal minimal fiber migration into potable water, yielding risks far below those from historical occupational settings. Critics of overregulation highlight that while is carcinogenic at heavy doses, the debate persists due to selective emphasis on worst-case scenarios, potentially amplified by institutional incentives favoring precaution over nuanced ; peer-reviewed re-evaluations prioritize causal dose dependencies, advocating managed legacies over disruptive removals for low-release products. Empirical assessments thus weigh verified low-endpoint exposures against the feasibility of zero-risk ideals, with some analyses defending chrysotile's cost-benefit in encapsulated forms when handled by trained personnel.

Economic and Infrastructural Consequences

The widespread use of Transite, an asbestos-cement produced primarily by Johns-Manville from the through the for applications including siding, , and water pipes, has imposed substantial economic burdens through litigation, abatement, and upgrades. Johns-Manville, the leading manufacturer, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1982—the first major U.S. corporation to do so primarily due to asbestos-related liabilities—amid thousands of claims linked to and other diseases from fiber exposure during installation, maintenance, or demolition. By 2025, the company's asbestos trust had disbursed over $5 billion to resolve more than 1 million claims, reflecting cumulative payouts that strained corporate finances and contributed to broader economic ripple effects, including job losses in affected industries and increased insurance premiums for construction sectors. Abatement costs for Transite in residential and commercial buildings add further economic pressure, particularly for exterior siding and roofing where disturbance risks fiber release. Removal of asbestos siding typically ranges from $5 to $15 per square foot, with full projects on a 2,000-square-foot home averaging $14,000 to $20,000, inclusive of specialized labor, containment, and disposal fees of $10 to $50 per cubic yard. These expenses often reduce property values in older housing stock—estimated at millions of U.S. structures with intact Transite—prompting deferred maintenance or costly encapsulation alternatives, though empirical data indicate low friability risks when undisturbed. Infrastructurally, Transite's prevalence in water distribution systems exacerbates replacement challenges, with asbestos-cement pipes comprising up to 18% of networks in parts of the U.S. and Canada, many installed between 1930 and 1970 and now exceeding their 50-70-year design life. Replacement costs average $1 to $2 million per mile, with specific projects documented at $1.2 million for under one mile or $1.4 million per mile in urban settings, contributing to a projected $452 billion national need for water main overhauls amid 260,000 annual breaks costing $2.6 billion yearly in repairs. While intact pipes pose minimal ingestion risks per Health Canada assessments, regulatory requirements for special handling during failure or upgrades amplify expenses, straining municipal budgets—e.g., $411 million estimated for 137 kilometers in one Canadian city—and diverting funds from other infrastructure priorities. Despite these costs, asbestos bans have shown no adverse GDP effects, suggesting long-term economic neutrality from phase-outs.

References

  1. [1]
    Asbestos Cement Pipe | Manufacturers & Health Risks
    Johns Manville is one company that openly used asbestos for years. Its brand of asbestos boards and pipes, Transite, was created in 1929. The following ...
  2. [2]
    Cement Plant Workers - Asbestos Exposure & Lawsuits
    Johns Manville: Johns Manville's asbestos cement, known as Transite, became so popular that the brand name became synonymous with asbestos cement. It also made ...Overview · Products · Mesothelioma
  3. [3]
    Transite Asbestos: Facts & Safety Tips - Anthony's Abatement
    Feb 6, 2025 · Transite asbestos is a composite material known for its durability and fire resistance, made from Portland cement mixed with asbestos fibers.Missing: manufacturer | Show results with:manufacturer
  4. [4]
    Asbestos Cement | Mesothelioma Cancer Risk
    Popular transite products included roofing sheets, wall cladding and cement pipes. Contact with these products puts workers at risk of asbestos diseases, ...
  5. [5]
    Asbestos Exposure and Cancer Risk Fact Sheet - NCI
    May 20, 2021 · There is limited evidence that asbestos exposure is linked to increased risks of cancers of the stomach, pharynx, and colorectum (8). Asbestos ...Missing: Transite peer-
  6. [6]
    Exposure to asbestos: past, present and future - PMC - NIH
    The increased use of asbestos went hand-in-hand with the dramatic onset of a series of diseases, mainly affecting the respiratory tract, that include lung ...Missing: Transite | Show results with:Transite
  7. [7]
    Asbestos and disease – a public health success story? - PMC
    Feb 7, 2024 · Serious health effects, such as malignancies and fibrosis due to occupational asbestos exposure, were highlighted in major medical journals and ...Missing: Transite peer-
  8. [8]
    Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) and Demolition | US EPA
    Jun 13, 2025 · For demolitions that are subject to the asbestos NESHAP, the regulation requires a thorough inspection before demolition or renovation begins.
  9. [9]
    Asbestos Cement Products Asbestos cement roofing, siding ...
    Asbestos cement is made from asbestos fibers [usually white chrysotile asbestos], ordinary Portland cement, and water [and possibly silica flour].
  10. [10]
    Chrysotile asbestos (EHC 203, 1998) - INCHEM
    Asbestos-cement products contain 10-15% of asbestos, mostly chrysotile, although limited amounts of crocidolite have been used in large diameter, high ...Missing: Transite | Show results with:Transite
  11. [11]
    Asbestos Cement - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The proportion by weight of asbestos fiber is normally between 9 and 12% for flat or corrugated sheet, 11 and 14% for pressure pipes, and 20 and 30% for fire- ...Missing: Transite | Show results with:Transite
  12. [12]
    Hazards of Asbestos-containing Transite Pipe HVAC Ducts
    Those specifications varied by individual products but typically included a mixture of 15-25% chrysotile asbestos, 45-55% portland cement, and another 25-35% ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Asbestos Cement (A/C) Pipe - FACT SHEET FOR NORTH CAROLINA
    Asbestos cement (A/C) pipe is formed from a mixture of Portland cement, asbestos, and other silica- containing materials under pressure and is heat cured.
  14. [14]
    Transite and Other Non-Friable Materials High in Asbestos Content
    Apr 24, 2020 · Transite is a mixture of asbestos and concrete manufactured by John Mansville starting in the 1920s. Transite can be found in the siding on ...
  15. [15]
    Chapter 5: Rigid Pipe Products - GlobalSpec
    Asbestos-Cement Pipe ; Compressive strength. 7000 lb/in ; Thermal conductivity. K = 5.5 (Btu in)/(h F ft 2), 4 when perfectly dry ; Thermal coefficient of ...Missing: Transite density
  16. [16]
    [PDF] CAPCO JEN 0020003 - Toxic Docs
    However, in magnitude, the Ultimate Compressive. Stress is almost three times the Ultimate Tensile Stress (8,000. PSI vs 3,000 PSI). As might be expected, the ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Physical properties of some samples of asbestos-cement siding
    asbestos-cement roofing products was studied and is briefly reported in this paper. The modulus of elasticity of the siding samples increased with decrease in ...
  18. [18]
    Wetness expansion and density of asbestos cement pipes
    Dry density measurements varied from 1.77 to 2.01 g/cm3. Wet density measurements ranged from 2.06 to 2.25 g/cm3. Previous article in issue; Next article in ...
  19. [19]
    Asbestos Cement Pipe Transite - InspectApedia
    Asbestos cement pipe & transite pipe product history, production & properties: this article describes the manufacturing process used for production of ...
  20. [20]
    Asbestos Cement Sheets Used 100% Chrysotile for Sound ...
    Density (bulk density), ≥1.6 g / cm3. Impact strength, ≥ 1.50kJ / m2. Frost resistance, 25 cycles. Residual strength,%, ≥ 90%. Adhesion of the polymer coating ...
  21. [21]
    Degradation of asbestos – Reinforced water supply cement pipes ...
    AC pipes were long considered as fairly corrosion-resistant due to natural deposition of protective calcium carbonate scales, especially when conveying hard ...Missing: Transite fire<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Asbestos: Geology, Mineralogy, Mining, and Uses
    The main characteristic properties of asbestos fibers that can be exploited in industrial applications are their thermal, electrical, and sound insulation;.
  23. [23]
    Learn About Asbestos | US EPA
    Aug 1, 2025 · Because of its fiber strength and heat resistance asbestos has been used in a variety of building construction materials for insulation and as a ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] HATSCHEK MACHINE AND EQUIPMENT FOR NON-ASBESTOS ...
    The Hatschek process, invented by Ludwig Hatschek in 1900 and registered as Austrian Patent number. 5970, results in a strong and durable laminate composite ...
  25. [25]
    Process of manufacturing imitation stone plates, slabs, or tiles.
    SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 769,078, dated. August 30, 1904. Application filed May 11,1900. Serial No. 16,862. (No specimens.).
  26. [26]
    Asbestos Cement - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The process was patented in the United States in 1904 (Hatschek, 1904) and reissued in 1907 (Hatschek, 1907; Wilson and Snodgrass, 2008, p. 4). Asbestos cement ...
  27. [27]
    Asbestos Cement Shingle History & Dates - InspectApedia
    The production of asbestos-cement sheets became possible in 1907 when Austrian Ludwig Hatschek brought his patented process to the United States. Forming ...
  28. [28]
    Document MJzr5j0y7J6KbmKZZ6o5ww29y - Toxic Docs
    1929 Johns-Manville announced acquisition of rights to manufacture and sell a seamless pipe of asbestos and oement. JM Circle. April 1929* Machinery for the ...
  29. [29]
    History of Asbestos | Production, Use, and Regulations
    The mass production of asbestos-cement pipes began in 1929, enabling the widespread use of water supply and waste lines. The automobile industry began ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] The History of Asbestos Use
    By the 1920's, asbestos cement products were used to build entire buildings, including municipal buildings built and donated to towns by companies like Johns- ...Missing: commercialization | Show results with:commercialization
  31. [31]
    [PDF] JM Retirees - Progress Report 1929-1944
    Therein, 1930 was no exception; it may, indeed, be said to be the outstanding year in this respect, for it witnessed the beginning of production of transite ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Seven Ages of Johns-Manville - Burchfield Penney Art Center
    Accordingly, in 1929,. Johns-Manville bought the maker, Banner. Rock Products Co. In this way, it acquired the insulation which is used in many ice and cold ...
  33. [33]
    Asbestos Siding - Cincinnati Ohio Home Inspections
    By 1950, approximately one billion square feet of asbestos-cement products had been produced for use in the building industry. By the time the Environmental ...
  34. [34]
    Products & Materials Containing Asbestos - The Lanier Law Firm
    Production of asbestos-containing products in the United States reached its peak between the 1930s and the late 1970s until the industry became heavily ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Worldwide Asbestos Supply and Consumption Trends from 1900 ...
    Apr 14, 2004 · Asbestos products that filled this need included asbestos-cement pipes and sheets, coatings and compounds, flooring, friction materials such ...
  36. [36]
    Johns-Manville | Asbestos Exposure, Products & Trust Fund
    Jul 15, 2025 · Johns-Manville Transite Pipe, 1906, 1975. Johns-Manville Transite Roofing, 1906, 1975. Johns-Manville Transite Sheets, 1906, 1975. Johns- ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    Johns Manville & Asbestos: Products, Asbestos Trust & Lawsuits
    Sep 29, 2025 · Johns Manville used asbestos in its products and hid its dangers, leading to mesothelioma lawsuits. Founded in 1858, the company declared bankruptcy in 1982.Missing: Transite ban
  39. [39]
    Johns Manville Asbestos: Exposure, Claims & Compensation
    Aug 15, 2025 · By the early 1980s, Johns Manville faced more than 16,000 lawsuits from people harmed by asbestos exposure. In response, the company filed for ...Missing: ban | Show results with:ban
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Asbestos Cement Pipe: What If It Needs To Be Replaced?
    ... transite,” was a popular choice of ... The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a complete ban on all asbestos-containing products in 1979, but was ...
  41. [41]
    Asbestos in Water and Asbestos Cement Water Pipes
    Jan 18, 2017 · Asbestos is a general term for a variety of fibrous silicate minerals which can be separated into soft, silky fibres.<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Transite - Florida Water and Pollution Control Operators Association
    Jan 28, 2019 · Asbestos-cement pipe was developed in the early 1900's by reinforcing concrete with asbestos fibers. This gave the pipe a much greater strength, ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] XV. Asbestos-Cement Flat Sheet
    In 1985, approximately 20 percent of flat asbestos-cement sheet production was for laboratory surfaces and 80 percent for construction/utility applications1( ...Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  44. [44]
    Is America's Water Contaminated by Asbestos Pipes?
    Sep 27, 2022 · Asbestos-cement pipes (AC), also known as transite pipes, were used across the United States throughout the 1900s.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Asbestos cement water mains: history, current state, and future ...
    Sep 23, 2008 · Between 1906 and 1913, a Genoa company combined asbestos fibres with cement to produce a reinforced pipe that would take the high pressure.Missing: expansion peak
  46. [46]
    [PDF] THE STORT OF TRANSITE PIPE - Toxic Docs
    Johns-Manville began producing Transits in cylindrical or tubular form in 1929 to service this type of industrial need. As in flat or corrugated Transits, three ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  47. [47]
    asbestos cement roofing, siding & millboard composition, history ...
    In this process, the raw materials are usually blended dry, using any of several common types of mechanical mixer, and transferred in weighed batches to wet ...
  48. [48]
    US3219467A - Manufacture of asbestos-cement products
    The dry mixed materials are then dumped into the wet mixer, the wet mixer ... Raw materials: Pioneer National Type I Portland cement New Jersey Silex ...
  49. [49]
    Laboratory and industrial investigations on hybrid of acrylic and ...
    Asbestos–cement sheets are made in the Hatschek process by dewatering of dilute suspension of cement–fiber mixture. Asbestos had many applications in different ...
  50. [50]
    Asbestos Cement Pipe - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Asbestos cement (AC) pipes are made of Portland cement and asbestos fibre mixed into a slurry and deposited in layers on a cylindrical mandrel.
  51. [51]
    Transite - Satterley & Kelley PLLC
    Transite is a brand name for a range of asbestos-containing cement products, including boards and pipes, widely used in construction and industrial applications ...Missing: manufacturer | Show results with:manufacturer
  52. [52]
    Transite Asbestos - 4 Identifiable Characteristics
    Oct 6, 2022 · Transite roofing panels are a majority mixture of Portland cement and asbestos fibers. Primarily light gray in color.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Early 20th-Century Building Materials: Siding and Roofing
    Asbestos-cement coatings also were used to patch roofs and seal areas where pipes or other items pen- etrated the roof. The production of asbestos-cement sheets ...
  54. [54]
    Transite Roofing: Friend or Foe? - Retrofit Magazine
    Apr 30, 2013 · One major application of asbestos over the past 100 years has been transite roofing panels. Asbestos was essentially used as a binder in ...
  55. [55]
    Asbestos in Cement Pipes - Vogelzang Law
    Sep 20, 2024 · They were commonly called Transite pipes. Transite was once a brand name for asbestos cement patented and made by Johns Manville.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] 4.4.19 ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT - nysdot
    Apr 4, 2019 · Application locations can include abutment walls and piers on steel girder structures and possible universal application on concrete structures.
  57. [57]
    Transite Asbestos - What is it & Where is it Found?
    Transite asbestos, or asbestos-cement, is a composite material made by blending asbestos fibers with cement. It is found in residential, commercial, and  ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Transite Pipe / AC Pipe Reference Manual - The Asbestos Institute
    May 4, 2021 · Asbestos Cement pipes are conventionally remediated in one of three ways: cured-in place pipe (CIPP) lining, abandoned in place, and open ...
  59. [59]
    Asbestos in Lab Equipment | Brands, Uses & Exposure
    People may see asbestos cement referred to as “transite” on labels and in product catalogs. Examples of asbestos-containing laboratory equipment include:.
  60. [60]
    Another Asbestos Cement Laboratory Countertop - Flickr
    Another example of a vintage black laboratory countertop which contains asbestos. A broken section of the countertop demonstrates the fibrous nature of this ...
  61. [61]
    Transite HT & 1000 - BNZ Materials
    These fiber cement boards are used in the foundry industry for flask liners, core, drying and carry plates, and induction furnace casings. Electrical ...Missing: beyond | Show results with:beyond
  62. [62]
    Transite - Foundry Service & Supplies, Inc.
    Transite is a high-density, fiber-reinforced cement board made from portland cement and non-asbestos fibers, used for high-temp applications like gaskets and ...
  63. [63]
    What is the average life expectancy of asbestos cement siding?
    Dec 24, 2019 · You can expect asbestos-cement siding to last 80 years or more. It was used extensively from the 1940s through the '60s, but not produced after the ban.Missing: durability | Show results with:durability
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Fire Ratings - HUD User
    cement-asbestos board is 0 and red oak is 100 (materials with a flame spread greater than red oak have a FSR greater than. 100.) The scale is divided into.
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Fire tests of wood-framed walls and partitions with asbestos-cement ...
    asbestos-cement sheets is considered to have qualified for a fire-resist%hce rating of 1 hour, combustible for both load-bearing and nonload- bearing partitions ...Missing: class | Show results with:class
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Health Hazard Evaluation Report 80-104-101 - CDC Stacks
    Flat Transite has been used by. Roberts and Schaffer for some time as a fire wall material in several coal preparation plants, At this particular job site ...Missing: empirical longevity
  68. [68]
    Asbestos in drinking water: What does it mean for human health?
    Jan 24, 2024 · Although many water authorities have stopped installing them, existing asbestos cement piping is regarded to have a lifespan of 50-70 years and ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Condition Assessment Breakthrough for Asbestos Cement Pipes
    Several studies suggest that the average service life of AC pipe is 70-80 years. • Most municipalities with AC are at this tipping point. Where are we now? Page ...Missing: data | Show results with:data
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Asbestos-Cement (Transite) Pipe in Water Distribution Systems
    The Chrysotile Institute estimates AC pipe lifespan at 70 years, but actual service life depends largely on pipe condition and working environment.
  71. [71]
    Asbestos Cement Waterpipes: A Health Hazard?
    Age: The service life expectancy of AC is estimated to be roughly 50 years. · Aggressiveness of water supply: High water flows in the distribution system can ...Missing: data | Show results with:data
  72. [72]
    Trends and the Economic Effect of Asbestos Bans and Decline ... - NIH
    Mar 16, 2018 · Asbestos has been used for centuries because it is inexpensive and durable. Historically, asbestos has had more than 3000 different applications ...
  73. [73]
    Long Term Performance of Asbestos Cement Pipe
    Jan 2, 2013 · The research identified the performance of AC pipe, methods to assess expected remaining life expectancy, and practical approaches for repair, ...
  74. [74]
    Asbestos – I'm removing transite pipe. Does it have to be managed ...
    If transite pipe is not to be broken or crushed, and is not friable, it is not a hazardous waste. However, it still may be regulated as an asbestos containing ...
  75. [75]
    Transite and Asbestos Exposure - Mesothelioma Resource Group
    Apr 24, 2023 · As long as the transite isn't damaged by erosion, weather, or drilling there is no serious risk of asbestos exposure. But once it deteriorates ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT - Mass.gov
    Sep 2, 2025 · Asbestos cement pipe waste material that has been properly wetted, packaged in sealed, leak-tight containers, and labeled can be temporarily ...
  77. [77]
    Study: Fibers Released from Asbestos Cement Far Exceed Limits
    Jan 23, 2024 · A recent study shows that working with asbestos cement exposes people to airborne asbestos more than 50 times higher than the U.S. limit.
  78. [78]
    Pollution of the environment and building interiors during asbestos ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · For example, non-friable asbestos-cement sheets removal in those work conditions increased indoor air by contamination up to 3000 f/m3 (outside ...
  79. [79]
    Public health risks from asbestos cement roofing - ResearchGate
    Based on empirical studies, an estimated cumulative occupational exposure to asbestos of 1 fiber/mL-year substantially raises malignant mesothelioma risk. No ...
  80. [80]
    Impact of an asbestos cement factory on mesothelioma incidence in ...
    The mesothelioma burden related to the asbestos cement factory is still high on factory workers, their families, and residents in Broni and Stradella towns.
  81. [81]
    Public health risks from asbestos cement roofing - PMC - NIH
    Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a risk of disease associated with proximity to asbestos cement roofing (ACR), while ongoing environmental emissions ...
  82. [82]
    Chrysotile, Tremolite, and Malignant Mesothelioma in Man - CHEST
    Although chrysotile asbestos can produce mesothelioma in man, the total number of such cases is small and the required doses extremely large.<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    On the release of asbestos fibers from weathered and corroded ...
    The purpose of this research project was to develop a method for sampling and measuring asbestos fiber emissions from solid planar surfaces (i.e., roofs and ...
  84. [84]
    Risk Assessment of the Decay of Asbestos Cement Roofs
    Jun 2, 2009 · The aim of this work is to evaluate the differences among several methods used for the risk assessment that lead to a specific choice of abatement techniques.Abstract · INTRODUCTION · MATERIAL AND METHODS · RESULTS<|control11|><|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Health risk of chrysotile revisited - PMC - PubMed Central
    Recent scientific studies have contributed to a more complete understanding of the health risk from chrysotile asbestos as used today in high-density products.
  86. [86]
    A ban on asbestos must be based on a comparative risk assessment
    This commentary presents critical evidence omitted by the Collegium and argues that any decision to ban “asbestos” should rely on a comparative risk assessment ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Asbestos Cement (Transite) Siding and Roofing
    Feb 28, 2012 · Siding and roofing products made of cement mixed with asbestos are commonly referred to as transite and are common in the Bay Area.
  88. [88]
    Are Transite Water Pipes a Health Hazard? - Asbestos 123
    Transite pipes contain asbestos, which can release into water. Vinyl-lined pipes may release tetrachloroethylene. Both are carcinogens, increasing cancer risk.<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    The History of Asbestos Regulation in the US - Eurofins USA
    Mar 29, 2024 · The US didn't ban Chrysotile asbestos until March of 2024 after decades of failed legislation, public outcry, and partial regulation.
  90. [90]
    EPA Actions to Protect the Public from Exposure to Asbestos
    1989 Partial Ban on the manufacture, import, processing, and distribution of some asbestos-containing products. EPA also banned new uses of asbestos which ...
  91. [91]
    Asbestos Laws and Regulations | US EPA
    On July 12, 1989, the EPA issued a final rule banning most asbestos-containing products. In 1991, this regulation was overturned by the Fifth Circuit Court of ...
  92. [92]
    Asbestos Ban and Legislation: U.S. Laws and Ongoing Efforts
    Most national laws trying to fully ban asbestos in the U.S. have failed. A limited number of asbestos uses are banned under various acts, but some remain legal.
  93. [93]
    Chronology of Asbestos Bans and Restrictions
    Date. Event. 1972. Denmark bans the use of asbestos for thermal and noise insulation and waterproofing. 1973. US bans the use of spray-applied surfacing ...
  94. [94]
    40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M -- National Emission Standard for Asbestos
    Category II ACM includes all other nonfriable ACM, for example, asbestos-cement (A/C) shingles, A/C tiles, and transite boards or panels containing more than ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Rules and Regulations Regarding the Demolition of Asbestos ... - EPA
    Jun 8, 2012 · The Asbestos NESHAP does not require removal of transite and other asbestos-containing cement materials if the material is Category II non ...
  96. [96]
  97. [97]
    Overview of the Asbestos National Emission Standards for ... - EPA
    Dec 26, 2024 · The rule generally requires that asbestos-containing waste material be sealed in a leak-tight container while wet, labeled, and disposed of ...Missing: Transite cement<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry - OSHA
    The OSHA standard covers work classification, exposure limits, monitoring, initial and negative assessments, and compliance requirements for different work ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] EPA 560/5-85-024 Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing ...
    Both EPA and OSHA have published regulations to reduce asbestos exposure. EPA regulations focus on: (1) application and removal of ACM in new or remodeled ...Missing: Transite | Show results with:Transite
  100. [100]
    Directive 2009/148/EC - exposure to asbestos at work - EU-OSHA
    Dec 4, 2023 · The Directive aims to protect workers health from risk of asbestos exposure, lays down limit values and specific requirements.
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Revision of Directive 2009/148/EC on the protection of workers from ...
    In 2009, the EU adopted Directive 2009/148/EC, the Asbestos at Work Directive (AWD), in order to protect workers from and prevent their exposure to asbestos- ...
  102. [102]
    Navigate the New EU Asbestos Directive: What You Should Know - 3E
    Oct 25, 2024 · The latest directive, (EU) 2023/2668, represents a pivotal shift in how the European Union approaches asbestos exposure in the workplace.
  103. [103]
    Prohibition of Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos ...
    2 (1) These Regulations do not apply to asbestos or a product containing asbestos that is in transit through Canada, from a place outside Canada to another ...
  104. [104]
    Asbestos and your health - Canada.ca
    Feb 10, 2023 · The manufacture, import, sale and use of products containing asbestos is prohibited in Canada. However, asbestos may still be found in older ...
  105. [105]
    Countries with asbestos bans
    Most OECD countries, except Mexico and the US, have banned asbestos. Australia banned it in 2003. The EU banned it in 2005. Other countries like Algeria, ...
  106. [106]
    Current Uses of Asbestos Exceed Exposure Limits - SciTechDaily
    Jan 5, 2024 · A recent study reveals that asbestos cement product use commonly surpasses US safety limits, exposing workers to serious health risks.
  107. [107]
    Asbestos bans in countries worldwide - blog.gsa-messgeraete.de
    Feb 17, 2025 · To date, asbestos bans exist in many countries around the world. China, Russia, India, the USA and others do not have a national ban on ...Diseases Caused By Asbestos · Introduction Of Asbestos... · Working Towards A Global Ban...<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Substitutes for Asbestos-Cement Construction Products
    Substitutes for these asbestos products are not limited to products that simply replace asbestos with another material (e.g., PVA and cellulose in fiber-cement ...
  109. [109]
    The 5 Biggest Problems with Fiber Cement Siding
    Feb 23, 2023 · Fiber cement is a siding material that was introduced to the market in the 1980's as a replacement for asbestos cement siding products.
  110. [110]
    WeatherSide™ Purity™ Fiber-Cement Siding
    WeatherSide™ Fiber-Cement Siding is fantastic for replacing old non-existent asbestos siding. Get the details on WeatherSide™ Purity™ Shingles now.
  111. [111]
    GAF | WeatherSide™ Profile™ Fiber-Cement Siding
    WeatherSide™ Fiber-Cement Siding is fantastic for replacing old non-existent asbestos siding. Get the details on GAF WeatherSide™ Profile Shingles now.<|separator|>
  112. [112]
  113. [113]
    What can I use to replace old asbestos-based siding with a similar ...
    Sep 7, 2023 · Closest thing to asbestos siding you can get new is fiber cement siding. You can get textures like the one in your picture, it looks pretty good for repairs.
  114. [114]
    Safer Alternatives to Asbestos in Modern Materials
    Dec 18, 2013 · Alternatives to asbestos include polyurethane foam, thermoset plastic, fiberglass, mineral wool, cellulose, and natural materials like hemp and ...
  115. [115]
  116. [116]
    Asbestos-Free Future: Innovations in Building Materials for 2025 -
    Oct 18, 2024 · On an ecological front, employing asbestos-free options yields significant gains. Modern substitutes like fiber cement and polymer composites ...Missing: Transite | Show results with:Transite
  117. [117]
    How EPA's Asbestos Regulations Apply to Transite Siding | US EPA
    Nov 18, 2024 · Letters that provide guidance on asbestos National Emissions Standard of Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) applicability to transite sliding ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Guidelines for Replacing Asbestos Cement Pipe by Close Tolerance ...
    After completion of the CTPS process, the existing pipe is removed, the new pipe is installed through the subsequent tight-fitting void, and the slurry.Missing: remediation | Show results with:remediation
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
    Exposure hazards from continuing use and removal of asbestos ...
    Intermittent high exposures from the ongoing use of AC products in countries around the world are associated with an increased lifetime risk of asbestos- ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] THE FACTS - Asbestos
    Asbestos is hazardous when it is “friable” or easily crumbled. When left intact and undisturbed, asbestos containing materials pose no health risk to occupants.
  122. [122]
    The debate on banning asbestos - PMC - NIH
    Instead, it is being defended as having an acceptable cost/risk ratio: asbestos will be handled with exquisite care by well-trained workers in the production ...
  123. [123]
    Johns Manville Asbestos Trust & Lawsuit
    Oct 1, 2025 · As of 2025, the Johns Manville asbestos trust has paid out more than $5 Billion to resolve over 1 million claims. Currently, the Johns Manville ...Missing: economic consequences
  124. [124]
    How Much Does It Cost to Remove Asbestos Siding? [2025 Data]
    Aug 15, 2025 · Homeowners can expect to pay $5 to $15 per square foot, depending on project size, labor rates, and disposal requirements Removing asbestos ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  125. [125]
    Asbestos Siding Removal Costs 2025
    Jan 8, 2024 · Removing asbestos siding is a significant investment, with costs typically ranging from $14,000 to $20,000 for a 2,000-square-foot area. It's ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  126. [126]
    How Much Does Asbestos Abatement Cost? (2025 Guide)
    Asbestos removal costs on average $1,170 to $3,120, with interior projects ranging from $5 to $20 per square foot and exterior projects costing significantly ...
  127. [127]
    Asbestos Cement Water Pipes in Canada
    Oct 22, 2024 · It is estimated that up to 18% of water distribution pipes across Canada and the US are asbestos based.
  128. [128]
    Aging Infrastructure - WSSC Water
    These older pipes are either cast iron or asbestos cement and have reached their natural lifespan. ... cost to replace one mile of water pipe is $1.4 million.
  129. [129]
    Avoiding Misguided Pipeline Replacement Expenses
    Oct 14, 2021 · At $1 million to $2 million per mile for water pipeline replacement, it certainly makes sense to identify a more refined perspective of which ...
  130. [130]
    Asbestos in drinking water - Canada.ca
    Nov 16, 2021 · There's no consistent, convincing evidence that asbestos ingested through drinking water is harmful to your health.
  131. [131]
    Councillors surprised by asbestos cement water pipes revelation
    Apr 7, 2023 · According to the city's estimate, replacing all 137 kilometres of asbestos cement pipe would cost about $411 million. The city's entire 2023 ...
  132. [132]
    Evidence shows banning asbestos has no negative economic impact
    Apr 19, 2018 · Country-level data show no negative economic impact from asbestos bans or declines in asbestos production or use.