Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Unity in diversity

Unity in diversity denotes the principle that a polity comprising varied ethnic, cultural, religious, and ideological factions can achieve cohesion through overarching shared commitments rather than homogenization.^[1] The concept prominently manifests as Indonesia's national motto Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, an Old Javanese phrase from the 14th-century epic Kakawin Sutasoma by Mpu Tantular, which illustrates tolerance between rival sects via a narrative of metaphysical oneness.^[2]^[3] Originating in this context to foster harmony amid archipelago-wide pluralism, the motto was adopted post-independence in 1945 to unify over 17,000 islands inhabited by 300 ethnic groups and multiple faiths.^[4] Philosophically, the tension between unity and diversity preoccupied early thinkers, such as Ionian philosophers who sought to reconcile observable multiplicity with underlying permanence in the natural order. In modern applications, it informs multicultural frameworks aiming to accommodate differences without assimilation, yet empirical analyses reveal that unchecked diversity often erodes social capital, interpersonal trust, and collective action, as groups retreat into parochialism absent strong civic bonds or enforced commonalities.^[1]^[5] Critics contend this ideal overlooks causal mechanisms wherein incompatible values and identities foster fragmentation rather than synergy, with historical precedents showing sustained unity typically demands hierarchical integration or cultural dominance over perpetual pluralism.^[6]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Principles

Unity in diversity refers to the concept of achieving cohesion and harmony among groups exhibiting significant differences in ethnicity, culture, religion, language, or ideology, without necessitating conformity or erasure of those distinctions. It posits that such diversity can contribute to societal strength and innovation when integrated under a framework of shared objectives or values, rather than leading to fragmentation. This idea underscores a balance between preserving individuality and fostering collective identity, often invoked in multinational or multicultural contexts to promote stability.^[7]^[8] Central principles include the recognition of diversity as an inherent and valuable aspect of human societies, coupled with mechanisms for mutual tolerance and respect that prevent dominance by any subgroup. It emphasizes legal and institutional equality, where differences are accommodated through pluralism—such as federal structures or multicultural policies—while prioritizing overarching unity via common civic norms or national symbols. For example, Indonesia's national motto Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, derived from a 14th-century Javanese poem, encapsulates this by affirming unity amid ethnic, religious, and cultural pluralism, inscribed in the state emblem since 1945 to symbolize national integrity despite over 1,300 ethnic groups and six official religions.^[9]^[10] In practice, these principles demand active promotion of intergroup contact and shared governance to build trust, as mere diversity without integrative efforts can exacerbate divisions, as evidenced by contact theory studies showing reduced prejudice through structured interactions.^[8] From a causal perspective, unity in diversity relies on underlying incentives—such as economic interdependence, defensive alliances, or enforced rule of law—that align diverse interests toward collective outcomes, rather than relying solely on ideological appeals. Absent these, empirical patterns in diverse states reveal heightened risks of conflict, as groups pursue zero-sum competitions over resources or power. Thus, the concept functions best as an aspirational guide supported by robust institutions, rather than a self-sustaining ideal.^[11]^[12]

Relation to Multiculturalism and Assimilation

Unity in diversity, as a principle, aligns closely with multiculturalism by advocating the preservation of distinct cultural, ethnic, and religious identities within a shared societal framework, positing that such diversity can contribute to overall cohesion rather than fragmentation.^[13]^[14] This perspective, evident in policies like those in Canada and Australia since the 1970s, emphasizes recognition of minority group rights and cultural accommodations to foster inclusion without mandating cultural conformity.^[1] In contrast, assimilation prioritizes the adoption of the host society's dominant norms, language, and values by immigrants or minorities, aiming for unity through cultural convergence and reduction of visible differences over generations.^[15]^[16] Empirical studies indicate that assimilation processes yield measurable improvements in socioeconomic outcomes for immigrants, with second- and third-generation groups converging toward native-born averages in education, income, and intermarriage rates, as observed in U.S. data from 1850 to 2010.^[15] Multicultural approaches, while promoting symbolic inclusion, show mixed results on social cohesion; for instance, a review of policies in Western Europe and North America found modest positive effects on immigrant political integration but no consistent boost to intergroup trust or reduced ethnic enclaves.^[5] Critics of multiculturalism argue it can entrench parallel societies and heighten identity-based conflicts by reifying differences, potentially undermining the unity aspired to in diversity mottos, as seen in rising ethnic tensions in diverse urban areas like those in the UK post-2001 riots.^[1]^[17] Proponents of unity in diversity often frame it as a hybrid model bridging multiculturalism and selective assimilation, where core civic values provide unity while allowing cultural pluralism, as in Indonesia's Pancasila ideology since 1945, which mandates national loyalty amid over 300 ethnic groups.^[18] However, causal analyses suggest that without assimilation incentives—such as language requirements or shared civic education—multiculturalism correlates with lower generalized trust and higher segregation, per surveys in multicultural nations like Sweden, where native-immigrant cohesion scores lagged behind more assimilative models in the U.S.^[19]^[20] This tension highlights that enduring unity may necessitate balancing diversity preservation with mechanisms for cultural adaptation, rather than unchecked pluralism.^[21]

Historical Origins

Ancient Eastern Roots

The concept of unity in diversity emerged prominently in ancient Indian philosophical traditions, emphasizing a singular underlying reality amid apparent multiplicity. In the Rigveda, composed circa 1500–1200 BCE, verse 1.164.46 articulates "Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti" ("Truth is one; sages call it by various names"), underscoring the oneness of existence despite diverse interpretations and manifestations in rituals, deities, and natural phenomena. This Vedic insight reflects an early recognition of harmonious coexistence among differing cosmological views within a shared spiritual framework.^[22] The Maha Upanishad, a text associated with the Atharvaveda tradition dating to approximately 800–500 BCE, explicitly advances the principle through the maxim "Vasudhaiva kutumbakam" ("The world is one family"), advising that narrow-minded distinctions of kin and stranger dissolve for those of expansive vision, treating all humanity as interconnected.^[23] This Upanishadic teaching integrates ethical universalism with metaphysical unity, positing that diversity in forms—social, linguistic, or cultural—arises from a common cosmic origin, as elaborated in passages linking individual souls (atman) to the universal self (brahman).^[24] In parallel, ancient Chinese thought cultivated analogous ideas of harmonious integration amid variation, rooted in pre-Confucian and early Zhou dynasty (circa 1046–256 BCE) cosmology. The I Ching (Book of Changes), attributed to the Western Zhou period around 1000 BCE, models reality as dynamic patterns (yin and yang) where opposites unify in flux, promoting societal order through balanced diversity rather than uniformity.^[25] Confucian texts, such as the Analects compiled by 500 BCE, further emphasize he (harmony), envisioning the state as a cohesive whole incorporating ethnic and regional differences under ritual and moral unity, as seen in the ideal of the "Great Unity" (datong) where diverse peoples align under benevolent governance.^[26] These Eastern foundations prioritize empirical observation of natural and social interconnections over imposed sameness, influencing later imperial policies that sustained multi-ethnic empires.^[27]

Western Historical Developments

The Roman Empire exemplified early Western approaches to unifying diverse populations, spanning over 5 million square kilometers by the 2nd century AD and incorporating peoples from Gaul to Syria under centralized administration and Roman law while permitting local customs and languages. Emperors like Trajan expanded citizenship selectively, with the Edict of Caracalla in 212 AD extending it to nearly all free inhabitants, fostering imperial cohesion amid ethnic variety.^[28]^[29] In the formation of the United States, the Latin phrase E pluribus unum ("Out of many, one") captured the principle of forging national unity from thirteen disparate colonies, proposed by a congressional committee including John Adams, [Benjamin Franklin](/page/Benjamin Franklin), and Thomas Jefferson in 1776 for the Great Seal and officially adopted in 1782. This motto underscored federalism's role in balancing state sovereignty with collective governance, as evidenced in the Constitution's ratification debates from 1787 to 1788, where compromises addressed regional differences in economy, slavery, and representation.^[30]^[31] Post-World War II European integration revived unity-in-diversity ideals to prevent conflict among historically rival nations, culminating in the European Union's motto "United in diversity," selected in 2000 through a contest involving 80,000 participants and reflecting the bloc's expansion from six founding members in 1957 to 27 by 2023. The phrase, translating Latin in varietate concordia, drew from earlier pacifist usages, including by Italian Nobel laureate Ernesto Teodoro Moneta in the late 19th century, emphasizing shared values like democracy and rule of law amid linguistic and cultural pluralism.^[32]^[33]

Religious Perspectives

Eastern Religious Interpretations

In Hinduism, the maxim Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam—"the world is one family"—originates from the Maha Upanishad (circa 1st millennium CE), articulating a metaphysical unity where diverse forms of life emanate from a singular Brahman, the ultimate reality, without negating phenotypic or cultural variations.^[34] This principle, echoed in texts like the Rig Veda's emphasis on cosmic order (ṛta) integrating multiplicity, underpins practices such as acceptance of diverse castes and regional traditions as expressions of dharma, fostering social cohesion through shared ethical imperatives rather than homogenization.^[35] Buddhist doctrine of dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda), expounded by Siddhartha Gautama around 500 BCE and preserved in the Pali Canon, posits that all phenomena arise through mutual causation, revealing an underlying interdependence that transcends superficial diversity in forms, selves, and experiences.^[36] This causal framework, elaborated in Mahayana sutras like the Avatamsaka (circa 3rd century CE), illustrates phenomena as holographic manifestations of emptiness (śūnyatā), where diversity in samsaric existence supports ethical unity via the sangha's communal precepts, countering atomistic individualism with relational ethics.^[37] Taoist philosophy, as in Laozi's Tao Te Ching (compiled circa 4th–3rd century BCE), conceives unity in diversity through the Tao's spontaneous generation of opposites—yin and yang—whose dynamic interplay sustains cosmic harmony without imposing uniformity.^[38] This non-dualistic ontology, influencing practices like wu wei (effortless action), views societal and natural diversity as essential to equilibrium, as Zhuangzi (circa 4th century BCE) critiques rigid hierarchies in favor of accommodating variant perspectives to preserve the whole.^[39] Confucian thought prioritizes he (harmony) amid diversity, with Confucius (551–479 BCE) in the Analects advocating ritual (li) and virtue (ren) to integrate differing social roles into a cohesive order, recognizing that suppressing individuality erodes the relational fabric of li (propriety).^[40] Mencius (372–289 BCE) extends this to innate human goodness unifying disparate temperaments, as in his emphasis on cultivating benevolence across hierarchical yet interdependent bonds, historically enabling multi-ethnic imperial governance in China without erasing cultural distinctions.^[41]

Abrahamic and Other Traditions

In Christianity, the concept of unity in diversity is articulated in the New Testament, particularly in the Pauline epistles, where the church is described as one body with many members, each contributing distinct gifts to foster collective harmony under Christ.^[42] For instance, 1 Corinthians 12:12-27 emphasizes that diverse functions—such as prophecy, teaching, and service—unite believers despite individual differences, reflecting God's design for interdependence rather than uniformity.^[43] Ephesians 4:4-13 further calls for preserving "the unity of the Spirit" through bonds of peace amid varied roles, with maturity achieved when the body grows in love.^[44] Acts 2 depicts the Pentecost event, where diverse linguistic groups heard the gospel in their own tongues, symbolizing spiritual unity transcending ethnic divisions.^[43] In Islam, the Quran promotes unity among believers through the ummah while acknowledging divinely ordained diversity among peoples to encourage mutual recognition and righteousness. Surah Al-Hujurat 49:13 states: "O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you," framing diversity as a test of piety rather than division.^[45] This principle underpins the global Muslim community, where ethnic and cultural variations coexist under tawhid (the oneness of God), as seen in practices like Hajj that gather diverse pilgrims annually in Mecca.^[46] Scholarly interpretations, such as those from Ahmadiyya sources, extend this to uniformity in core beliefs amid natural diversity, countering sectarian fragmentation.^[45] Judaism interprets unity in diversity through the cohesion of the Jewish people despite interpretive pluralism and tribal origins, as evidenced in rabbinic traditions valuing multifaceted opinions within halakha. The Talmud's dialectical debates among sages exemplify this, where conflicting views are preserved to derive deeper truth, as articulated in Chabad teachings on harmonious disagreement.^[47] The ritual of the Four Species during Sukkot symbolizes national unity: the etrog (citrus fruit) represents those with Torah knowledge and good deeds, the lulav (palm branch) those with knowledge but no deeds, and so on, bound together to signify collective wholeness.^[48] Reconstructionist thinker Mordecai Kaplan formalized "unity in diversity" as embracing change and ethnic variance within covenantal community, influencing modern Jewish thought on pluralism.^[49] Among other traditions, the Baha'i Faith elevates "unity in diversity" as a foundational principle, viewing human variety in race, culture, and language as essential to societal progress under a single divine source. Baha'u'llah's writings, compiled in texts like Gleanings from the Writings of Baha'u'llah, assert that diversity enriches civilization when unified by justice and independent investigation of truth, rejecting uniformity as stifling.^[50] Shoghi Effendi described it as the Faith's "watchword," applied in community consultations that protect minority views to achieve collective decisions.^[51] This extends to global administration, where elected bodies from diverse backgrounds deliberate without clergy, fostering equity.^[52] Zoroastrian mythology underscores human unity originating from a primordial individual, Gayomard, whose immortality and perfection bifurcate into diverse progeny through cosmic struggle, balancing ash a (truth/order) against druj (lie/chaos).^[53] The Avesta's accounts trace ethnic and social diversity to this singular source, with ethical dualism promoting communal harmony amid variation, as analyzed in scholarly exegeses of pre-Islamic Iranian texts.^[54] Modern Zoroastrian communities, such as Parsis in India, maintain tight-knit structures that cherish diversity in practice while upholding core tenets like good thoughts, words, and deeds.^[55]

Philosophical Underpinnings

Arguments in Favor

Proponents of unity in diversity argue that it resolves the metaphysical problem of the one and the many by positing that apparent diversity in phenomena arises from a underlying unified substance or principle, as in Aristotle's hylomorphism, where matter provides unity while forms introduce multiplicity without fragmentation. This framework maintains coherence in reality, allowing diverse manifestations to cohere under a single essence, avoiding the extremes of pure monism, which erases distinctions, or radical pluralism, which denies integration.^[56] In epistemic terms, diversity of viewpoints enhances collective knowledge production by fostering mutual corrective feedback, counteracting individual biases and promoting robust argumentation toward truth.^[57] Philosophers emphasize that homogeneous groups risk echo chambers and error persistence, whereas diverse inputs—through challenge and refinement—yield higher-quality outcomes, as seen in John Stuart Mill's defense of opinion diversity as essential for verifying truths and advancing understanding. Empirical extensions in philosophy of science support this, noting that cognitive diversity facilitates information elaboration and unconventional problem-solving, provided mechanisms for integration exist.^[58]^[59] Politically, unity in diversity enables social harmony via functional differentiation and exchange, where diverse roles contribute to a shared telos without requiring uniformity. Aristotle contended that excessive unity, as in Plato's communalism, stifles natural variations, while moderated diversity—bound by friendship and justice—promotes stability and eudaimonia through interdependent contributions.^[60]^[61] This approach counters factionalism by channeling differences into cooperative ends, as diverse citizens exchanging goods and labors forge bonds of mutual benefit, elevating the polis beyond mere aggregation.^[62] Dialectical philosophers like Hegel further argue that diversity of contradictions drives progress toward higher synthesis, where oppositions unify in aufhebung, preserving differences while transcending them for enriched totality.^[63] Such processes, echoed in Dewey's pragmatism, view diversity not as threat but as dynamic growth toward unified experience, integrating novel elements into evolving wholes.^[64] These arguments collectively posit unity in diversity as causally efficacious for resilience, innovation, and coherence, grounded in observed patterns of adaptation in complex systems.

Theoretical Critiques

Critics of the unity in diversity paradigm argue that it underestimates innate human propensities for tribalism and in-group favoritism, rooted in evolutionary biology, which prioritize similarity over enforced heterogeneity for social bonding.^[65] Empirical analyses, such as Robert Putnam's 2007 study across 30 U.S. communities, reveal that higher ethnic diversity correlates with diminished social trust—both within and across groups—lower civic participation, and reduced neighborly interactions, indicating that diversity often induces social withdrawal rather than cohesion. Putnam's findings, drawn from metrics like trust surveys and volunteering rates, challenge the assumption that exposure to differences naturally builds unity, positing instead a "hunkering down" effect where individuals retreat from collective life. Philosophical objections, advanced by liberal thinkers like Brian Barry, contend that unity in diversity conflates cultural preservation with normative claims, erroneously elevating group identities to possess rights that supersede individual liberties and universal egalitarian principles.^[66] Barry's critique, articulated in his 2001 book Culture and Equality, maintains that cultures lack inherent moral authority; treating them as such fosters differential treatment based on arbitrary affiliations, undermining the impartial rule of law essential for genuine unity. This approach, critics argue, risks relativism by diffusing shared ethical standards, as diverse groups import incompatible values—evident in debates over practices like honor killings or arranged marriages—that strain liberal democracies without a overriding common framework.^[1] Further theoretical challenges highlight the paradigm's essentialist presuppositions, viewing cultures as static monoliths amenable to harmonious juxtaposition, whereas in reality, they exhibit fluid boundaries, internal fractures, and competitive dynamics that preclude stable unity.^[65] Multiculturalism's emphasis on celebrating differences, per this view, reifies divisions and impedes assimilation into a cohesive polity, as seen in critiques positing that policies promoting group autonomy foster separatism and parallel societies rather than integration.^[67] Such arguments draw on historical precedents where enforced diversity, absent strong homogenizing forces like language or civic nationalism, has precipitated fragmentation, as theorized in analyses of federalism's limits in accommodating irreconcilable worldviews.^[68] These critiques, often marginalized in academia due to prevailing ideological preferences for pluralism, underscore causal mechanisms wherein value pluralism erodes the mutual trust and reciprocity required for collective action.^[69]

Political Applications

India

India's political framework embodies unity in diversity through a quasi-federal structure designed to integrate vast ethnic, linguistic, religious, and cultural variations into a cohesive national polity. The Constitution, effective from January 26, 1950, declares India a "Union of States" under Article 1, prioritizing national integrity over rigid federal symmetry while granting states legislative autonomy in areas like education, agriculture, and local governance via the Seventh Schedule's division of powers.^[70] ^[71] This arrangement accommodates over 1.4 billion people across 28 states and 8 union territories, each with distinct identities, such as Tamil Nadu's Dravidian heritage or Punjab's Sikh-majority demographics, fostering political representation through regional parties and coalition governments at the national level.^[72] ^[73] Historically, the principle has been operationalized through adaptive policies, including the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, which redrew boundaries along linguistic lines to mitigate separatist pressures following independence in 1947, creating states like Andhra Pradesh for Telugu speakers and Kerala for Malayalis.^[74] Asymmetrical federalism further applies this by granting special provisions under Article 371 to regions like Nagaland and Assam, allowing customary laws and resource control to address tribal autonomies in the Northeast, where ethnic insurgencies posed existential threats in the 1950s-1980s.^[75] Nationally, affirmative action via Articles 15-16 reserves seats in legislatures and public services for scheduled castes (15% quota) and tribes (7.5%), integrating marginalized groups into the political fabric and reducing caste-based fragmentation, as evidenced by the election of Dalit presidents like K.R. Narayanan in 1997.^[76] In practice, unity in diversity manifests in electoral federalism, where diverse voter bases compel cross-regional alliances, as seen in the 1977 Janata Party coalition ousting Indira Gandhi's Congress amid Emergency-era centralization critiques, or the 2014-2024 BJP-led NDA incorporating parties from Manipur to Maharashtra.^[73] However, applications reveal tensions: central interventions via Article 356 dissolved state governments 115 times between 1951 and 1994, often on partisan grounds, undermining state sovereignty and sparking accusations of "unitary bias" in diverse polities.^[77] Regional agitations, such as the 1980s Punjab militancy or ongoing demands in Telangana (achieved statehood in 2014), highlight causal limits where unaddressed grievances erode unity, though empirical stability—India's territorial integrity post-1947 partition, unlike Pakistan's 1971 secession—demonstrates the model's resilience in sustaining democracy amid multiculturalism.^[78] ^[79]

European Union

The European Union's motto, "United in diversity" (Latin: In varietate concordia), adopted on May 4, 2000, encapsulates the principle of harmonizing cooperation among 27 member states with distinct languages, cultures, and histories while pursuing shared objectives like peace and prosperity.^[80] This concept traces to the EU's origins in the 1950s, when six Western European nations—Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and West Germany—formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 to integrate key industries and avert future conflicts akin to World War II.^[81] The framework evolved through the 1957 Treaty of Rome establishing the European Economic Community, emphasizing economic interdependence to foster political stability without erasing national identities.^[81] Empirical evidence underscores successes in sustaining unity amid diversity: since 1945, no interstate wars have occurred among members, attributing this to institutional mechanisms like the single market operational since 1993, which facilitates free movement of goods, services, capital, and people across borders.^[81] Economic integration has yielded measurable growth, with the EU's GDP expanding by 27% from 2004 to 2024, particularly in newer eastern members like Poland, where per capita GDP rose from 50% of the EU average in 2004 to over 80% by 2023.^[82] The euro, adopted by 20 states in 1999, has streamlined trade but required fiscal coordination to manage crises, as seen in the 2010-2012 sovereign debt episode where mechanisms like the European Stability Mechanism prevented disintegration.^[81] Persistent challenges reveal tensions in balancing unity with sovereignty and cultural variance. The 2015-2016 migration influx, peaking at over 1 million asylum seekers, exposed divisions, with eastern states like Hungary erecting fences and rejecting quotas, straining the Schengen Area's borderless ethos.^[83] Brexit, culminating in the UK's departure on January 31, 2020 after a 2016 referendum (52% in favor), stemmed from grievances over supranational overreach eroding national control, including on immigration and laws.^[84] Critiques from scholars highlight how EU institutions, such as the European Commission and Court of Justice, impose uniform policies that undermine member states' autonomy, potentially homogenizing cultures rather than preserving diversity, as evidenced by rule-of-law disputes with Poland and Hungary since 2017 involving judicial reforms conflicting with EU standards.^[85] Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine tested and partially reinforced EU cohesion, with unanimous sanctions packages by March 2022 and over €100 billion in aid to Ukraine by 2025, including military support via the European Peace Facility.^[86] Surveys indicated 63% of Europeans viewed the EU as united in response, boosting support for integration.^[87] Yet fractures persist, including Hungary's vetoes on aid and rising nationalism in France and Italy, where parties advocating reduced EU influence gained seats in 2024 elections, signaling ongoing risks to the unity-in-diversity model amid east-west economic gaps and identity-based populism.^[88]

United States

The traditional motto of the United States, E pluribus unum ("Out of many, one"), adopted by the Continental Congress on June 20, 1782, for the Great Seal, symbolizes the forging of national unity from the diverse original colonies and their populations.^[89] This phrase, proposed by Pierre Eugene du Simitiere in 1776 and retained after review by Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson, emphasized consolidation into a single sovereign entity rather than perpetual fragmentation, reflecting the federal compromise that balanced state sovereignty with centralized authority under the Constitution ratified in 1788.^[90] Historically, this unity was pursued through assimilationist policies, where immigrants from Europe in the 19th and early 20th centuries integrated via public schooling that promoted English proficiency, civic republicanism, and Anglo-Protestant cultural norms, enabling economic mobility and social cohesion across waves totaling over 30 million arrivals between 1820 and 1920.^[15] ^[91] The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 shifted policy from national-origin quotas favoring European sources to family reunification and skills-based criteria, accelerating non-European immigration and demographic diversity, with the foreign-born population rising from 4.7% in 1970 to 13.7% by 2019.^[92] This era saw a rhetorical pivot toward multiculturalism, which prioritizes preserving ethnic identities over rapid assimilation, as evidenced in federal bilingual education programs peaking in the 1970s and cultural pluralism advocacy in academic and policy circles.^[93] Empirical analysis by political scientist Robert Putnam in his 2007 study, drawing on U.S. Census and Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey data from over 30,000 respondents across 41 communities, revealed that higher ethnic diversity correlates with reduced interpersonal trust (e.g., 20-30% lower neighborhood trust in diverse areas), diminished civic engagement like volunteering and club membership, and increased social isolation, termed "hunkering down."^[94] Putnam attributed this short-term "constrict" effect to in-group preferences and coordination challenges, though he noted potential long-term benefits if followed by intergenerational mixing and shared institutions.^[95] Federalism has politically operationalized unity amid diversity by devolving powers to states—evident in varying state laws on education, marriage, and welfare—while enforcing national standards through the Supremacy Clause and civil rights legislation like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which aimed to integrate minorities without balkanizing society.^[96] However, data from the Current Population Survey (2004-2008) indicate immigration influxes negatively impact volunteering rates, a proxy for cohesion, with a 1% foreign-born increase linked to 0.5-1% drops in participation among natives.^[97] Critiques, grounded in these findings, argue that unassimilated diversity erodes the common civic culture essential for E pluribus unum, as seen in rising polarization: the Pew Research Center's 2020 American Trends Panel survey showed 80% of Americans viewing political opponents as "immoral," exacerbated by identity-based fractures rather than shared national identity. Assimilation metrics, such as third-generation English fluency nearing 100% and intermarriage rates exceeding 30% for Hispanics and Asians by 2015, suggest partial success, yet rapid changes—projected non-Hispanic white minority status by 2045—pose ongoing tests to cohesion without reinforced unifying mechanisms like mandatory civics education.^[15] ^[98]

Indonesia

Indonesia's national motto, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, translates from Old Javanese as "unity in diversity" and originates from the 14th-century epic poem Kakawin Sutasoma, which emphasizes harmony between Hinduism and Buddhism.^[99] Adopted officially after independence in 1945, it is inscribed on the Garuda Pancasila, symbolizing national cohesion amid profound ethnic, linguistic, religious, and cultural differences.^[9] The motto underpins the state ideology of Pancasila, comprising five principles: belief in one God, just and civilized humanity, the unity of Indonesia, democracy through deliberation, and social justice for all Indonesians.^[100] Indonesia exemplifies unity in diversity through its vast archipelago of over 17,000 islands, more than 600 ethnic groups (with Javanese comprising 40.2%, Sundanese 15.5%, and others like Malay, Batak, and Madurese following), and hundreds of languages. Religiously, the population of approximately 278 million is 87% Muslim—the world's largest Muslim-majority nation—11% Christian (7% Protestant, 3% Roman Catholic), 1.7% Hindu (concentrated in Bali), and smaller shares of Buddhists, Confucians, and others.^[101]^[102] Pancasila mandates recognition of six official religions while prohibiting atheism, fostering a secular framework that accommodates pluralism without establishing dominance by any single faith.^[103] Politically, the motto has guided Indonesia's unitary republic structure, balancing central authority with regional autonomy to manage diversity. Post-independence, leaders like Sukarno invoked Bhinneka Tunggal Ika to unify disparate provinces against Dutch colonial remnants and internal fragmentation.^[104] Special autonomy laws, such as the 2001 Aceh agreement following decades of separatist conflict, granted Sharia-based governance while preserving national sovereignty, averting full secession.^[105] Similarly, decentralization reforms after Suharto's 1998 fall empowered local identities, reducing ethnic tensions in areas like Papua through resource-sharing mechanisms.^[106] Successes include Indonesia's endurance as a single state despite predictions of balkanization, with Pancasila enabling economic integration via shared markets and infrastructure, as seen in the stable growth of its G20 economy.^[107] Interfaith dialogues and national rituals, like Pancasila Day celebrations, reinforce tolerance, evidenced by low interstate violence relative to population scale.^[108] However, challenges persist: ongoing low-level insurgency in Papua, driven by resource grievances and cultural marginalization, has claimed thousands of lives since the 1960s integration. Religious intolerance incidents, including attacks on minorities like Ahmadis and Christians, numbered over 100 annually in recent reports, testing the motto's limits amid rising Islamist pressures.^[102] East Timor's 1999 referendum leading to independence highlighted failures in forced assimilation, underscoring that unity requires addressing economic disparities and autonomy demands rather than mere symbolism.^[109]

Other Nations (Canada, South Africa)

In Canada, the policy of multiculturalism, formalized through the Canadian Multiculturalism Act of July 21, 1988, represents an application of unity in diversity by affirming the federal government's commitment to preserving and enhancing cultural heritage while promoting equitable participation in Canadian society.^[110] The Act requires federal institutions to ensure equitable access for individuals from all backgrounds, support the elimination of discrimination, and foster intercultural understanding as a means to national cohesion, building on the initial multiculturalism policy announced on October 8, 1971, by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau.^[111] This framework emphasizes that multiculturalism strengthens national unity by integrating immigrants' attachments to Canada alongside retention of ancestral identities, with annual reports documenting initiatives like public education programs to advance these goals.^[112] Critics, including analyses from conservative perspectives, argue that the policy has evolved toward a neoconservative interpretation prioritizing civic unity over unchecked cultural pluralism, as seen in debates within the Conservative Party.^[113] In South Africa, the concept of unity in diversity underpins post-apartheid political architecture, most prominently through the "Rainbow Nation" vision articulated by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and embraced by President Nelson Mandela following the 1994 democratic transition.^[114] The Constitution of 1996, effective February 4, 1997, embeds this in its preamble, declaring that South Africa belongs "to all who live in it, united in our diversity," as a mechanism for reconciliation after apartheid's racial segregation policies, which had legally enforced separation until their dismantling in the early 1990s.^[115] Politically, this has manifested in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1995–2002), which granted amnesty for politically motivated crimes in exchange for public confessions to promote national healing across ethnic lines, alongside policies like affirmative action under the Employment Equity Act of 1998 to redress historical imbalances while affirming diverse identities.^[116] Jurisprudential interpretations, such as in post-1994 court rulings, have invoked tolerance of diversity to balance individual rights with collective unity, though persistent socioeconomic disparities—evident in Gini coefficients remaining above 0.60 as of 2023—have strained the model's realization, fueling ethno-populist challenges to the ideal.^[117]^[118]

Empirical Assessments

Evidence of Cohesion and Success

In the United States, immigration-driven diversity has empirically boosted innovation and productivity, with immigrants comprising 16% of inventors yet generating 23% of patents issued between 1975 and 2010, according to analysis of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office data.^[119] National Bureau of Economic Research findings further indicate that the death of an immigrant co-inventor reduces subsequent patent productivity by 17%, compared to 9% for native inventors, underscoring immigrants' outsized role in knowledge creation and economic output.^[120] Immigrant-owned firms also exhibit higher innovation rates and productivity than native-owned counterparts, as evidenced by U.S. Census Bureau surveys of entrepreneurs.^[121] In the European Union, regional studies across 12 EU15 countries show that cultural and ethnic diversity correlates positively with productivity, particularly in NUT3-level data where diverse locales benefit from varied skills and perspectives enhancing firm-level output.^[122] Long-term analyses reveal that high population fractionalization exerts a strong positive effect on economic development, with diverse societies leveraging informational advantages for growth, though this holds more robustly in contexts with effective institutional integration.^[123] Indonesia's Pancasila ideology, emphasizing unity amid diversity across 1,300 ethnic groups and 700 languages, has sustained national cohesion since independence in 1945, averting the fragmentation seen in comparable multi-ethnic states like Yugoslavia.^[124] This framework underpinned successful democratization, fostering tolerance and mutual cooperation (gotong royong) that integrated disparate islands into a stable federation, as demonstrated by the absence of major secessionist successes post-1950 despite regional insurgencies.^[125] Sociological research supports that normative multiculturalism—promoting mutual respect without enforced uniformity—can enhance social cohesion when paired with shared civic values, as cross-national surveys indicate reduced intergroup tensions and higher generalized trust in diverse settings with such policies.^[126] In these cases, diversity's success stems from causal mechanisms like skill complementarity and institutional safeguards, rather than diversity alone, yielding measurable gains in stability and prosperity where implemented.

Evidence of Fragmentation and Failure

Empirical studies have documented reduced social trust and civic engagement in highly diverse communities. In a comprehensive analysis of over 30,000 individuals across 41 U.S. communities, political scientist Robert Putnam found that ethnic diversity correlates with lower levels of generalized trust, fewer friendships, reduced altruism, and diminished community participation, describing residents as "hunkering down" in response to heterogeneity.^[94]^[127] This effect persisted even after controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting a causal link between diversity and erosion of social capital, though Putnam noted potential long-term assimilation benefits absent proactive integration policies.^[95] In Europe, official admissions and data underscore integration failures exacerbating fragmentation. German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated in October 2010 that attempts to build a multicultural society had "utterly failed," citing parallel societies and inadequate assimilation.^[1] Similarly, UK Prime Minister David Cameron declared in February 2011 that state multiculturalism promoted segregation rather than integration, fostering Islamist extremism and social division.^[1] The 2015-2016 EU migration crisis, involving over 1 million irregular arrivals, intensified national divisions, with uneven burden-sharing straining solidarity and fueling populist backlash across member states.^[128] Sweden exemplifies acute challenges, where immigration-driven diversity has correlated with elevated crime rates and parallel communities. Foreign-born individuals and their descendants, comprising about 20% of the population by 2020, accounted for 73% of convictions for murder, manslaughter, and attempted murder, and 70% for robbery, per official statistics from 2000-2017.^[129] Studies confirm immigrants' conviction risk is approximately twice that of native Swedes, particularly for violent offenses, contributing to "no-go" zones and declining public trust in institutions.^[130]^[131] Nearly two-thirds of rape convictions involve first- or second-generation migrants, highlighting integration shortfalls amid rapid demographic shifts from 11% foreign-born in 2000 to 20% in 2020.^[132] In the United States, identity-based diversity policies have coincided with accelerating affective polarization. From 1978 to 2018, partisan antipathy rose sharply, with negative views of the opposing party increasing by an average of 4.8 points per decade, outpacing comparable democracies and linking to identity politics emphasizing group differences over shared civic identity.^[133] By 2024, 78% of Americans perceived extreme ideological divides, correlating with reduced cross-partisan trust and heightened social fragmentation, as evidenced by declining interpersonal cooperation across demographic lines.^[134]^[135] These patterns indicate that unchecked diversity, without strong assimilative mechanisms, undermines cohesion, as causal analyses prioritize proximate ethnic fractionalization over distant economic confounders in eroding mutual reliance.^[136]

Key Sociological Studies

Robert Putnam's 2007 study, "E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century," analyzed data from over 30,000 respondents in the 2000 Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey across 41 U.S. communities, finding that higher ethnic diversity correlates with reduced social trust, lower interpersonal confidence, and decreased civic engagement, a phenomenon termed "hunkering down."^[137] Putnam observed these effects across racial lines, with residents in diverse areas expressing less trust in neighbors regardless of their own ethnicity, attributing the pattern to cognitive dissonance from unfamiliar social norms rather than direct prejudice.^[94] While acknowledging potential long-term benefits like cultural enrichment and economic innovation if diversity fosters new shared identities, the study emphasized short-term erosion of social capital, challenging assumptions of automatic unity in diverse settings without deliberate bridging efforts.^[137] A 2011 meta-analysis by Tom van der Meer and Jochem Tolsma reviewed 83 studies on ethnic diversity and social cohesion in Western contexts, concluding a small but consistent negative association between contextual diversity and indicators like generalized trust and informal social ties, with effect sizes ranging from -0.08 to -0.15 standard deviations. The authors noted that while individual-level diversity (e.g., personal exposure to out-groups) often yields neutral or positive outcomes via contact, neighborhood-level diversity triggers threat perceptions and withdrawal, particularly in high-immigration areas, underscoring the need for institutional mechanisms to counteract fragmentation.^[138] This synthesis highlighted methodological robustness in fixed-effects models controlling for selection bias, yet cautioned against overgeneralization to non-Western or rapidly assimilating societies where unity might emerge differently. Boris Portes and Rubén G. Rumbaut's longitudinal research in the Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (1992–2003), tracking over 5,000 second-generation immigrants in San Diego and Miami, revealed segmented assimilation patterns where selective acculturation—maintaining ethnic ties alongside host-language proficiency—can preserve family cohesion and upward mobility, but exposure to diverse underclass enclaves risks downward trajectories and intergroup tensions. Their findings, drawn from panel data on educational attainment and identity formation, suggest that unmanaged diversity amplifies inequality and dilutes unifying civic norms, advocating policy interventions like concentrated poverty reduction to foster convergent paths toward societal integration. These patterns align with causal evidence from econometric models showing that co-ethnic concentration buffers against anomie in diverse urban settings, yet broad heterogeneity without strong national narratives hinders overarching unity.^[139]

Contemporary Relevance

Policy Debates

Critics of multiculturalism policies argue that they prioritize group differences over shared national identity, fostering parallel societies and eroding social trust, as evidenced by Robert Putnam's 2007 study across 30,000 U.S. respondents, which found that higher ethnic diversity correlates with lower social capital, including reduced interpersonal trust and civic engagement, with residents "hunkering down" in diverse communities.^[94] This effect persists even after controlling for socioeconomic factors, implying policy prescriptions like aggressive assimilation or selective immigration to rebuild cohesion, a view echoed in European debates where leaders such as Angela Merkel declared multiculturalism "utterly failed" in 2010 amid rising Islamist extremism and welfare dependency among non-integrated migrants.^[1] In the EU, post-2015 migration surges intensified fragmentation, with externalization policies—outsourcing asylum processing to third countries like Turkey and Libya—debated as pragmatic responses to cohesion threats, though criticized for ethical lapses and inconsistent enforcement across member states.^[140] Proponents counter that multiculturalism modestly aids immigrant sociopolitical integration, per a 2014 meta-analysis by Bloemraad and Wright reviewing policies in 21 countries, which identified positive associations with naturalization rates and political participation among first-generation immigrants, albeit with "messy" evidence confounded by selection effects and host-country variations.^[5] In Canada, official multiculturalism since 1971 is cited as enhancing economic outcomes for skilled immigrants, outperforming European models in OECD metrics for immigrant education and employment as of 2018, though detractors note it masks underlying segregation and fails to integrate less-skilled cohorts from non-Western sources.^[141] These findings fuel debates on interculturalism as a hybrid alternative, emphasizing dialogue over separatism, as proposed in UK and Dutch policy shifts post-2010 to counter ghettoization blamed on unchecked diversity accommodation.^[142] In Indonesia, the Pancasila doctrine embedding "unity in diversity" has underpinned policies suppressing regional separatism since 1945, yet recent failures in Papua—such as the 2024 Yalimo violence killing over 20 in ethnic clashes—highlight enforcement gaps, with critics attributing persistent fragmentation to uneven resource distribution and cultural impositions despite the national motto.^[143] South Africa's post-apartheid Government of National Unity (1994–1999) achieved constitutional reconciliation but faltered on economic equity, as 2023 data show a Gini coefficient of 0.63—the world's highest—exacerbating racial divides and policy distrust, prompting calls for merit-based reforms over diversity quotas.^[144] In the U.S., implicit multiculturalism via affirmative action faces scrutiny following the 2023 Supreme Court ban on race-based admissions, with empirical reviews linking such policies to mismatched outcomes and resentment, underscoring causal tensions between diversity mandates and meritocratic unity. Overall, debates pivot on causal evidence: while diversity can yield innovation in controlled settings, unchecked policies risk causal breakdowns in trust and governance, favoring empirical metrics like integration rates over ideological commitments.^[136]

Recent Global Developments (Post-2020)

The COVID-19 pandemic, emerging in late 2019 and intensifying from 2020 onward, disrupted social cohesion in multicultural societies by imposing lockdowns that heightened isolation and exposed disparities in health outcomes across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Globally, social isolation prevalence rose 13.4% from 2009 to 2024, with pandemic restrictions accelerating this trend through reduced interpersonal interactions and economic strain disproportionately affecting minority communities.^[145] In ethnically diverse areas, such as urban centers in Europe and North America, the crisis amplified tensions over resource allocation and policy responses, with some studies noting short-term surges in intergroup solidarity via mutual aid but longer-term erosion of trust due to perceived inequities in vaccine access and support measures.^[146]^[147] Post-2020 geopolitical and domestic events further challenged unity in diverse populations, as evidenced by rising affective polarization in countries like the United States, Germany, and Brazil, where partisan divides deepened emotional hostility between groups.^[148] The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2025 ranks societal polarization among the top short-term global risks, attributing it to misinformation, economic inequality, and identity-based conflicts that hinder policy consensus in heterogeneous societies.^[149] A 2025 United Nations report highlights intergenerational declines in trust—falling from older to younger cohorts—as a driver of systemic social fragmentation, exacerbated by events like the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, which strained alliances in NATO and the European Union amid diverse member-state interests.^[150]^[151] Efforts to reaffirm unity in diversity have included policy adjustments, such as enhanced integration programs for migrants post-pandemic, yet empirical assessments reveal mixed outcomes. For example, a 2021 Pew Research Center survey across 17 advanced economies found that while 60-80% of respondents viewed growing ethnic diversity as positive for society, majorities (over 50% in most countries) anticipated increased social tensions from immigration and cultural differences.^[152] In response to polarization, global forums like the UN have advocated for trust-building initiatives, but causal analyses link persistent failures to underlying factors like rapid demographic shifts without corresponding assimilation mechanisms, underscoring causal realism in cohesion challenges.^[153] By 2025, these developments indicate a global tilt toward fragmentation over harmony in diverse contexts, with no widespread reversal of trends.

References

[1]
The Debate Over Multiculturalism: Philosophy, Politics, and Policy
Sep 22, 2011 · Critics retort that excessive emphasis on diversity reifies differences, undermines a cohesive collective identity, and hinders common ...
[2]
"Embracing Unity in Diversity: A Pathway to Success in Indonesia ...
“Unity in diversity” is the meaning of Indonesia's national motto, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Origin A quotation from the Old Javanese poem Kakawin Sutasoma by ...
[3]
[PDF] BHINNEKA TUNGGAL IKA (UNITY IN DIVERSITY) - ScholarSpace
Bhinneka Tunggal Ika is the official national motto of Indonesia (Farisi, 2014). The phrase is Old Javanese and loosely translates as “Unity in Diversity.” It ...<|separator|>
[4]
Indonesia - Unity in Diversity - By Larry Kulchawik » Exhibit City News
Indonesia's national motto, “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika” (“Unity in Diversity” literally, “many, yet one”), articulates the diversity that shapes the country. One ...
[5]
[PDF] “Utter Failure” or Unity out of Diversity? Debating and Evaluating ...
Multicultural theorists critique classical liberalism from a normative concern for justice and equality rooted in outcome rather than similarity of treatment ( ...
[6]
WHAT IS WRONG WITH MULTICULTURALISM? [PART 1]
Jun 4, 2012 · My view is that both multiculturalists and their critics are wrong. And only by understanding why both sides are wrong will we be able to work our way through ...
[7]
Unity in Diversity: The Opportunities and the Challenges
Oct 9, 2015 · “Unity in Diversity.” This expression speaks about a balance between wholeness and difference, between integrity and variety.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[8]
Unity in Diversity? How Intergroup Contact Can Foster Nation Building
Oct 29, 2019 · Unity in Diversity? How Intergroup Contact Can Foster Nation ... Uniting people from diverse cultures is a founding principle of many nation ...
[9]
[PDF] An Exploration of the Indonesian Concept of 'Bhinneka Tunggal Ika ...
The fundamental meaning of this motto is “unity in diversity” (Farisi, 2014; Hartanti & Ardhana,. 2022), akin to the motto of the United States, “e Pluribus ...
[10]
[PDF] Analysis of Character Values in the Indonesian Nation's Motto ...
Jan 1, 2022 · “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika” is a principle of the Indonesian nation's unity and integrity. Its meaning is that although the. Indonesian people are ...
[11]
Unity in Diversity:The Integrative Approach to Intercultural Relations
Sep 28, 2012 · The unity of mankind can only be preserved, and peace can only be maintained through the recognition of the diversity of the human race with all ...
[12]
(PDF) Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Its Norming and Actualization in ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Bhinneka Tunggal Ika is the right motto for the Indonesian people who have diversity but want unity. Therefore, it is necessary to normalize Bhinneka Tunggal ...
[13]
[PDF] UNITY IN DIVERSITY? - Berkeley Sociology
UNITY IN DIVERSITY? Bridging Models of Multiculturalism and. Immigrant Integration. Irene Bloemraad. Department of Sociology, University of California ...
[14]
UNITY IN DIVERSITY? - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · Download Citation | UNITY IN DIVERSITY? | This article considers how well the existing sociological literature on immigrant integration and ...
[15]
What History Tells Us about Assimilation of Immigrants
The evidence is clear that assimilation is real and measurable, that over time immigrant populations come to resemble natives, and that new generations form ...
[16]
Full article: Assimilation and integration in the twenty-first century
Feb 3, 2024 · The classic accounts of assimilation treated assimilation as unidirectional, with those of immigrant origin changing to assimilate while the ...
[17]
[PDF] Accommodating diversity: why current critiques of multiculturalism ...
Abstract. Some European countries of immigration are currently experiencing a widespread 'moral panic' about immigrants and ethnic and religious diversity.
[18]
Internalization of multicultural education in improving students ... - NIH
Jul 5, 2024 · ... Unity in Diversity” has a philosophical meaning of “different but still one”; this is a way of dealing with the differences that exist both ...
[19]
Differences Between Ethnic Minority and Majority Groups of Workers
Jul 16, 2019 · In contrast with multiculturalism, assimilation emphasizes that people are basically the same so that ethnic differences should be ignored and ...
[20]
Does Assimilation Shape the Economic Value of Immigrant Diversity?
Apr 22, 2021 · A growing literature has shown that greater diversity among immigrants offers material benefits in terms of higher wages and productivity.Empirical Approach · Measuring Diversity And... · Results<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
Beyond Assimilation and Multiculturalism: A Critical Review of the ...
Jun 30, 2010 · This article is an attempt to critically review and examine the key points of the debate regarding assimilationism and multiculturalism, while ...<|separator|>
[22]
Unity and Diversity in The Hindu Thought
Feb 16, 2025 · Hinduism's foundation is unity in diversity, viewing all life as interconnected, with a focus on fellowship, not tolerance, and emphasizing non ...
[23]
[PDF] The concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The World is a Family)
Conclusion: In conclusion, the concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, originating from the Mahopanisad, represents a profound and timeless philosophical idea that ...
[24]
Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam G20- Meaning, History, Significance And ...
Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam History The concept of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” has its roots in ancient Indian philosophy and texts, particularly in the Maha Upanishad ...
[25]
Understanding the Historical Significance and Contemporary Value ...
Mar 11, 2024 · Chinese civilization enjoys remarkable unity, featuring great diversity, internal cohesion, and solidarity. The political, cultural, and ...
[26]
Unity in Diversity - 孔子研究院
Dec 31, 2024 · The concept of “unity in diversity” was born during the early development of the Chinese civilization. Over 10,000 years ago, due to differences ...
[27]
Chinese civilization is unified and inclusive
Jun 18, 2023 · The concept of “inseparable ethnic groups” emphasizes the importance of maintaining the unity of all our ethnic groups, given our history as a ...<|separator|>
[28]
https://historyguild.org/cultural-diversity-the-making-of-rome/
[29]
What a second-century Roman citizen, Lucian, can teach us about ...
Feb 15, 2023 · The result was a multilingual, multicultural and cosmopolitan empire. People were allowed to retain their ethnicity, language, culture and ...
[30]
E Pluribus Unum - Fr. Ben - Xavier University
Origin of the motto of the US: E Pluribus Unum was the Latin motto proposed in 1776 for the first Great Seal of the United States of America by John Adams ...
[31]
E Pluribus Unum. “Out of Many, One.” - Vanderbilt University
Sep 28, 2021 · It reveals that inherent in America's very foundation is the ideal that diversity – of opinion and of people – is our greatest strength.
[32]
EU motto | European Union
"United in diversity", the motto of the European Union, first came into use in 2000. It signifies how Europeans have come together, in the form of the EU, ...
[33]
European diversity: the strength of our union
May 23, 2022 · In the year 2000, 80,000 young Europeans chose “United in Diversity” as the motto for our Union. Their message is clear: The recognition of our ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
A study in the direction of earth and global unity, india and world
Dec 29, 2023 · The ancient Indian concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, meaning "the world is one family," as found in the Maha Upanishad, underscores global interconnectedness.
[35]
[PDF] VASUDHAIVA KUTUMBAKAM: INDIAN CONCEPT OF UNITY IN ...
Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam is the phrase that finds its origin in the Maha Upanishad, essentially meaning “the world is family” has seen an evolution as an ...
[36]
A Brief History of Interdependence - Oxford Academic
The idea of interdependence has assumed a central role in contemporary Buddhism, especially in the West. This chapter traces the way by which dependent ...Classical and Medieval... · Interdependence and... · Western Sources of Buddhist...
[37]
Awakening to the Interconnectedness of Life - World Tribune
Jul 1, 2020 · The fundamental Buddhist concept of dependent origination teaches that, at the most profound level, all life is interconnected, that nothing exists in ...
[38]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-679
[39]
https://www.taoismandmanifest.com/blogs/all/taoism-embrace-diversity-harmony-inclusivity-perspectives
[40]
Creating Harmony from Diversity: What Confucianism Reveals about ...
Jul 28, 2017 · Realizing that Confucius understood diversity on many levels as essential to cultivating social and universal harmony may help to reveal greater ...Missing: unity | Show results with:unity
[41]
Unity in diversity-- Beijing Review
Jun 19, 2024 · Today, Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism have not merged into a single entity. Instead, they have intermingled, creating a broader intellectual ...
[42]
Topical Bible: Promoting Unity in Diversity - Bible Hub
Practical Implications: Promoting unity in diversity requires intentional effort and humility. Philippians 2:2-4 encourages believers to be "like-minded, having ...
[43]
Unity in Diversity: The Promise and Fulfillment in Scripture
May 7, 2021 · Acts 2 shows that there can be unity in diversity. Revelation 7 shows there can be and will be unity within diversity. We live within that time ...
[44]
Ephesians: Living Out Unity in Diversity (4:7-12) | Brandon's Desk
Oct 1, 2014 · Ephesians: Living Out Unity in Diversity (4:7-12) · 1) We have no reason not to be used by God in the church. If He has given us the grace ...
[45]
Cultural Understanding and Racial Harmony - Al Islam
The diversity in nature constantly reminds us that there is not only a basic unity in diversity but also a uniformity in diversity. Without this unity and ...
[46]
Unity in Diversity: The Global Truth of Islam in Surah al-Hajj
Jun 8, 2025 · The truth of Islam is presented through the lens of the principle of unity in diversity: the unity of origin, mission, purpose, and destiny.
[47]
Unity in Diversity - Chabad.org
Unity in Diversity · One of the many puzzling things about Judaism is the diversity of opinions among our Sages, the great leaders of the Jewish people. · We ...
[48]
The Four Species: A Vision for Unity | Darcey Walters - The Blogs
Oct 6, 2025 · ... Unity in Diversity. Traditionally, the Four Species represent the unity of the Jewish people: • Etrog: Possesses both a good taste and a ...
[49]
'Covenantal Community' and Classical Reconstructionism - Evolve
'Community Across Difference' as a Formulation of Kaplan's 'Unity in Diversity'. One of the greatest challenges that the Enlightenment era presented to Jewish ...
[50]
Consultation and the Protection of Diversity - Bahai.org
The keynote of the Bahá'í approach to social organization is not uniformity, but unity in diversity. Central to the Bahá'í Faith is a system of teachings and ...
[51]
Unity in Diversity - Bahá'í Library Online
Jan 15, 2022 · The concept of unity in diversity is described as the Baha'i Faith's “watchword”, an interesting term to use, which would seem to imply that ...
[52]
Unity in Diversity—But First, Justice - BahaiTeachings.org
Jul 30, 2019 · When we engage in meaningful cross-cultural interactions, we become more intentional about promoting unity in diversity. Sometimes this will ...
[53]
Human Unity and Diversity in Zoroastrian Mythology
Human Unity and Diversity in Zoroastrian Mythology. Bruce Lincoln. Bruce Lincoln. University of Chicago. Search for more articles by this author.
[54]
https://brill.com/display/book/9789004460294/BP000010.xml
[55]
Zoroastrian Diversity - RE:ONLINE
Iranian and Indian Zoroastrians continue to live in close-knit neighbourhoods (baugs) built by Parsis for Parsis, physically enhancing the sense of community.
[56]
The Metaphysical Conundrum of Unity Within Diversity
Oct 23, 2023 · At the heart of this debate are two contrasting views: monism and pluralism. Monism is the belief that there is a single, unifying essence or ...
[57]
Argumentation, cognition, and the epistemic benefits of cognitive ...
Jul 12, 2022 · The key mechanism that produces epistemic benefits from cognitive diversity is mutual corrective feedback, which counteracts belief bias and ...
[58]
Information elaboration and epistemic effects of diversity - PMC
Feb 15, 2019 · Philosophical accounts have largely overlooked the possibility that demographic diversity may improve group performance by enhancing IE, and ...Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments
[59]
Epistemic Inclusion as the Key to Benefiting from Cognitive Diversity ...
Sep 25, 2023 · The argument that cognitive diversity can help in the crowdsourcing of information or bring up unconventional ideas in science motivates us to ...
[60]
Aristotle's Political Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 1, 1998 · Aristotle is generally regarded as one of the most influential ancient thinkers in a number of philosophical fields, including political theory.Supplement: Political Naturalism · Supplement: Presuppositions...
[61]
Political unity and inequality (Chapter 5)
Aristotle views political unity as beneficial, and believes that it is promoted when we exchange goods (which need not be material).
[62]
[PDF] Aristotle' s Three Cities and the Problem of Faction
Unity, Diversity, and Virtue. Aristotle is never more voluble in his criticism of Plato than when the subject is political unity. In the Politics Aristotle ...
[63]
Dewey's Hegel: A Search for Unity in Diversity, or ... - Project MUSE
A search for unity in diversity seems to me to emphasize the struggle of opposites, and thus a more traditional reading of Hegel. On the other hand, ...
[64]
Dewey's Hegel: A Search for Unity in Diversity, or Diversity as the ...
Dewey's Hegel: A Search for Unity in Diversity, or Diversity as the Growth of Unity? September 2008. DOI:10.1353/csp.0.0059. Authors: Larry A ...
[65]
Multiculturalism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 24, 2010 · Some critics contend that theories of multiculturalism are premised on an essentialist view of culture. Cultures are not distinct, self- ...
[66]
[PDF] Barry's Criticisms of Multiculturalism
Only individuals can have rights, and individuals should have the exact same rights independent of their group identities. Cultures do not have rights. So ...
[67]
Multiculturalism and its critics - openDemocracy
Nov 17, 2011 · Critics of multiculturalism contend that multicultural policies lead to a psychology of separatism. Such policies, they maintain, isolate ...
[68]
Multiculturalism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Some philosophers are concerned about how policies meant to protect minority cultural groups can potentially impose serious threats and harm the interests and ...The Concept of Multiculturalism · Multiculturalism as a Policy
[69]
THE TROUBLE WITH MULTICULTURALISM - jstor
Now presumably, multiculturalists embrace and seek to advance understandings between cultures, but given skepticism of trans- cultural standards, it is a ...
[70]
Special Section: Unity in Diversity - Forum of Federations
classic theory of federalism, it is not a federation at all. The Constitution of India does not use the term federation; rather, it describes India as “a union ...
[71]
Federalism in India: Balancing Diversity, Autonomy and National Unity
Sep 13, 2024 · The Constitution of India lays down the foundation of federalism through a clear division of powers between the Centre and the States. This ...
[72]
India's Federalism: The Balancing Act of Unity and Diversity - Medium
unifying 1.4 billion people while celebrating diversity. It balances autonomy and ...
[73]
Unity in diversity'? Coalition politics in India (with special reference ...
Sep 26, 2007 · 'Unity in diversity'? Coalition politics in India (with special reference to Kerala). James Chiriyankandath Lectures at the Department of ...
[74]
SubscriberWrites: Indian Federalism–Unity in Diversity - ThePrint
Mar 21, 2025 · India's federalism evolved through linguistic and ethnic struggles, with changes driven by regional demands, violence, and cultural identity.
[75]
United in Diversity? Asymmetry in Indian Federalism - jstor
Oct 1, 2025 · India's north-east and for some tribal areas, has given an asymmetrical appearance to India's federal constitution. It is because of Article ...
[76]
India: Federalism, Unity in Diversity, and the Democratic Experiment
Aug 2, 2025 · What makes India unique is not just its scale but the way it has sustained federalism, unity in diversity and democracy over seven decades.
[77]
The Dynamics of Federalism in the Constitution of India - LSE Blogs
Sep 15, 2025 · ... Constitution of India did not seek to establish a centralised–uniform nation but rather a Union grounded in diversity and pluralism. If so ...
[78]
Federalism in South Asia: a constitutional analysis of India and ...
Jan 16, 2024 · The Indian federalism model of federation succeeded in regulating ethnic conflicts. However, the Pakistani model failed to accommodate the ...
[79]
India's Unity in Diversity: Essence, Challenges & Significance
Aug 19, 2025 · Global Relevance: India's ability to maintain unity in diversity serves as an example for other nations facing challenges of multiculturalism.
[80]
Symbols - European Union
"United in diversity" was adopted as the European Union's motto in 2000. Learn more here. Share this page.European flag · European anthem · EU motto · European yearsMissing: origin | Show results with:origin
[81]
History of the EU, EU pioneers | European Union
Timeline of major events in EU history. How the EU has developed over the decades. Visionary men and women who inspired the creation of the modern-day EU.History of the European Union · 2010-19 | European Union · EU pioneers
[82]
Facts and figures about the benefits of the enlargement for the EU
Over the past 20 years, the EU's economy has grown by 27%. The countries that joined the EU in 2004 have witnessed substantial economic growth. The Polish and ...
[83]
How the Latest Great Migration Is Reshaping Europe
Refugees fleeing wars in Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq have roiled the continent's politics and tested its tolerance.
[84]
Full article: Brexit – the EU membership crisis that wasn't?
Mar 28, 2024 · We argue that Brexit was a challenge that found the EU prepared. The UK's unprecedented step ended the phase in which the EU proved that it ...
[85]
Issues of EU Member Nations' Shared Sovereignty, Institutions, and ...
Apr 21, 2023 · The EU's super governance, inappropriately shared sovereignty, national polities, and cultural differences could be factors contributing to the ...
[86]
EU response to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine
The EU has shown unity and strength and has provided Ukraine with humanitarian, political, financial and military support. The European Council reconfirms ...
[87]
EU's response to the war in Ukraine - May 2022 - - Eurobarometer ...
The majority of Europeans think that since the war started, the EU has shown solidarity (79%) and has been united (63%) and fast (58%) in its reaction.
[88]
Why Europe's Far Right Will Keeps Rising - Time Magazine
Jul 11, 2025 · The next few years could see anti-migrant, Euroskeptic parties make big inroads in France, Italy, Spain, and Poland, writes Ian Bremmer.Missing: unity | Show results with:unity
[89]
E Pluribus Unum - History of Motto Carried by Eagle on Great Seal
Thomson explained that the motto E pluribus unum alludes to the union between the states and federal government, as symbolized by the shield on the eagle's ...
[90]
“In God We Trust” or “E Pluribus Unum”? The American Founders ...
Nov 9, 2011 · Only the motto “E Pluribus Unum” (“from many, one”) survived from the committee on which Adams, Jefferson, and Franklin had served. All had ...
[91]
Making Americans: Schooling, Diversity, and Assimilation in the ...
Aug 1, 2018 · Through this process of assimilation, a social context emerges in which a “true American” includes the cultural attributes of particular ethnic ...
[92]
Immigrants in the United States: How Well Are They Integrating into ...
Immigration is a prominent part of the United States' DNA. Nevertheless, concerns still exist about immigrants' ability to integrate into broader society.
[93]
[PDF] unity through diversity? assimilation, multiculturalism and the
Chapter 2 includes a review of the scant empirical research devoted to situating U.S. attitudes on multiculturalism, cultural pluralism, and assimilation.
[94]
The Downside of Diversity
When social capital is high, says Putnam, communities arebetter places to live. Neighborhoods are safer; people are healthier;and more citizens vote. The ...
[95]
Does Diversity Create Distrust? - Scientific American
Nov 29, 2016 · In 2007 the Harvard professor Robert Putnam published a paper that appeared to challenge the benefits of living in a racially diverse ...
[96]
Social Cohesion & Identity | migrationpolicy.org
Large-scale immigration has led to unprecedented levels of diversity and rapid demographic change, transforming communities across major immigrant-receiving ...
[97]
Immigrant influx and social cohesion erosion
Mar 24, 2014 · The present analysis finds some evidence for a negative relationship between immigration and volunteering from the Current Population Survey 2004–2008 ...
[98]
Demographic change and assimilation in the early 21st-century ...
Mar 24, 2022 · In this paper, we will demonstrate an important contemporary role for assimilation through empirical evidence of its patterns. In so doing ...Demographic Change And... · Assimilation Ideas For The... · Measuring Race And EthnicityMissing: multiculturalism | Show results with:multiculturalism
[99]
The Kakawin Sutasoma: A Look at "Bhinneka Tunggal Ika" and ...
Translated as “unity in diversity” and having since become the national motto of Indonesia, these words represent the “merging of Hinduism and Buddhism into one ...
[100]
Pancasila: One God, Unity-in-Diversity - Issuu
Pancasila is important for Indonesia, as it unites all religions, races, ethnicities, and culture through its overarching principles.
[101]
Indonesia - Wikipedia
40.2% Javanese; 15.5% Sundanese; 3.7% Malay; 3.6% Batak; 3.0% Madurese; 34.0% others (600+ ethnic groups) · 87.1% Islam; 10.45% Christianity. 7.38% Protestantism ...Religion in Indonesi · List of islands of Indonesia · Names of Indonesia · Geography
[102]
5 facts about Muslims and Christians in Indonesia
Mar 28, 2024 · Indonesia is about 87% Muslim and 11% Christian. Roughly 242 million Muslims and 29 million Christians live in Indonesia.
[103]
2023 Report on International Religious Freedom: Indonesia
According to 2022 data from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA) 87 percent of the population identifies as Muslim, 7.4 percent Protestant, 3.0 percent Roman ...
[104]
Unity in diversity: the religious, political, and cultural faces of Pancasila
Aug 29, 2025 · I argue that Pancasila is central to Indonesia's “unity in diversity.” It emerged as what scholars aptly describe as an “empty signifier,” an ...
[105]
Bhineka Tunggal Ika - Bahasakita.com
Jan 29, 2011 · Bhineka Tunggal Ika means 'Unity in Diversity', from an Old Javanese stanza, and is Indonesia's national emblem, promoting unity despite ...
[106]
[PDF] Unity in Diversity or Diversity in Unity: Indonesia's Process of Political
Separatist movements, namely in Aceh, Papua. (then Irian Jaya) and East Timor, became more fierce in their protests against the centre,. 1 F. Lamou re ux, ...
[107]
One Country or Many? Prospects for the Future of Indonesia
The separatist movements in these provinces, particularly those in Aceh and Papua, present an increasingly serious security challenge and threat to the ...
[108]
Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Indonesia's Philosophy of Unity ... - Seasia.co
Jul 9, 2025 · Indonesia's national motto reminds us that peaceful coexistence is not just desirable. It is achievable. A Southeast Asian Model of Tolerance.
[109]
Pancasila Day: Celebrating Indonesia's Foundational Philosophy
Today, it stands as a reflection of Indonesia's commitment to pluralism, emphasizing the enduring relevance of unity in diversity through democratic ideals and ...
[110]
Separatism in Indonesia - Wikipedia
Separatism occurs in areas far from the center of Indonesian government, usually due to inequality, economic disparities, and uneven development as well as ...
[111]
Independence Movements in Indonesia - Young Pioneer Tours
This article looks at the main and lesser-known independence movements in Indonesia, highlighting their histories, motivations, and current status.
[112]
Canadian Multiculturalism Act
Passed in 1988, the Canadian Multiculturalism Act was the first act of its kind in the world. It enshrined into law the federal government's commitment to ...
[113]
About the Canadian Multiculturalism Act - Canada.ca
Jun 3, 2024 · The Canadian Multiculturalism Act serves as a legislative framework for promoting diversity, equality and inclusion in Canada.
[114]
[PDF] the canadian multiculturalism act
that strengthen our unity in diversity. I am also pleased to report that the. Government of Canada continued to promote numerous public education and.
[115]
[PDF] Unity in Diversity? Neoconservative Multiculturalism and the ...
Jan 1, 2021 · Unity in Diversity? Neoconservative Multiculturalism and the Conservative Party of Canada. John Carlaw. Working Paper No. 2021/1. January 2021.
[116]
'The Black and White Rainbow' reveals how hard it is to build a ...
Sep 3, 2021 · 'The Black and White Rainbow' reveals how hard it is to build a 'rainbow' nation. Unity in diversity was one of the hopes of post-apartheid ...
[117]
Gaps in the “Rainbow Nation”: A Critique of South Africa's Tolerance ...
Oct 16, 2025 · Believe that South Africa belongs to all who live in it, united in our diversity. We therefore, through our freely elected representatives ...
[118]
Post Aparteid South Africa's Democratic Transformation Process
Post Aparteid South Africa's Democratic Transformation Process: Redress of the Past, Reconciliation and 'Unity in Diversity'. Henrard, Kristin. June 4, 2015.<|separator|>
[119]
The Ethos of Tolerance of Diversity in Post-Apartheid Jurisprudence
Apr 1, 2022 · Although the democratic transition of the early 1990s marked the end of codified intolerance and ushered in a new era of unity in diversity, the ...
[120]
The Rainbow Nation: A Crisis of Ethno-Populism in South Africa
Sep 19, 2025 · Though the multiculturalism of post-apartheid South Africa once led Nelson Mandela to popularize the phrase “rainbow nation” this ideal now ...
[121]
A New Look at Immigrants' Outsize Contribution to Innovation in the ...
Mar 13, 2023 · While immigrants comprised 16% of US inventors, they were behind 23% of the patents issued over 26 years.
[122]
The Outsize Role of Immigrants in US Innovation | NBER
Mar 1, 2023 · Co-inventor productivity dropped 17 percent after the death of an immigrant, compared with 9 percent after the death of a native inventor.
[123]
Are Immigrants More Innovative? Evidence from Entrepreneurs
Nov 14, 2023 · Evidence from the Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs suggests that immigrant-owned are more innovative and productive than native-owned firms.
[124]
[PDF] Cultural diversity and economic performance: Evidence from ...
We investigate the relationship between diversity and productivity in Europe using an original dataset covering the NUT3 regions of 12 countries of the EU15 ...
[125]
Does Population Diversity Matter for Economic Development in the ...
The results of the analysis show that high levels of population fractionalization have a strong and positive influence on economic development in the short, ...
[126]
Indonesia's Democratization Underpinned by Major Islamic Groups ...
Feb 26, 2019 · One of the most important reasons for Indonesia's relative success is undoubtedly the existence of Pancasila, the pluralist State ideology.
[127]
Pancasila Unify Diversity as the Foundation of the State | INP
Apr 30, 2025 · Muzani explained that the strength of Pancasila plays a role as a unifier of the nation, proven by the unity of Indonesia which has survived ...
[128]
Does normative multiculturalism foster or threaten social cohesion?
The findings point to the conclusion that normative multiculturalism is more likely to foster than to threaten social cohesion.
[129]
The downside of diversity - The New York Times
Aug 5, 2007 · The greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects.
[130]
Europe's Responses to the Migration Crisis
Apr 25, 2019 · The ongoing European migration crisis has reinforced pre-existing centripetal forces generated by serious economic imbalances in the European Union (EU).
[131]
(PDF) Migrants and Crime in Sweden in the Twenty-First Century
Regarding murder, manslaughter and attempted murder, the figures are 73 per cent, while the proportion of robbery is 70 per cent. Non-registered migrants are ...
[132]
Criminal convictions and immigrant background 1973–2017 in ...
A number of Swedish studies have found the risk for conviction among persons of foreign background to be approximately twice that of individuals born in Sweden ...
[133]
Immigrants, Crime, and Criminal Justice in Sweden
Immigrants generally have higher crime rates than do indigenous Swedes, particularly for violence and theft, and are likelier to be victims of violence.
[134]
Nearly two thirds of convicted rapists in Sweden are migrants or ...
Jan 18, 2025 · Almost two-thirds of those convicted of rape in Sweden are first- or second-generation immigrants.
[135]
U.S. is polarizing faster than other democracies, study finds | Brown ...
Jan 21, 2020 · In other words, negative feelings toward members of the other party compared to one's own party increased by an average of 4.8 points per decade ...
[136]
U.S. Political Parties Historically Polarized Ideologically - Gallup News
Jan 16, 2025 · Americans' ideological identification was steady in 2024, with an average of 37% describing their political views as “very conservative” or “conservative,” 34% ...
[137]
Latest Vanderbilt Unity Index shows the U.S. continuing its trend ...
Feb 14, 2024 · The Vanderbilt Project on Unity and American Democracy's latest Vanderbilt Unity Index shows the country continuing its trend toward more polarization.<|separator|>
[138]
[PDF] Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion - Institute for Advanced Study
show that, according to Putnam's own data, racial diversity drives down social capital. ... The business of apocalypse: Robert Putnam and diversity. Race Class 46 ...
[139]
E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first ...
Jun 15, 2007 · In the long run immigration and diversity are likely to have important cultural, economic, fiscal, and developmental benefits.
[140]
[PDF] Ethnic diversity and its supposed detrimental effect on social cohesion
Apr 25, 2021 · The paper questions if ethnic diversity is harmful to social cohesion, noting a lack of consensus and that the mechanisms are not fully ...
[141]
Does Ethnic Diversity Have a Negative Effect on Attitudes towards ...
Aug 24, 2015 · Studies demonstrate a negative association between community ethnic diversity and indicators of social cohesion (especially attitudes towards neighbours and ...
[142]
Migration Policy: European Union Increasingly Outsources ...
Oct 15, 2024 · Externalisation is increasingly seen as a lever for solving the EU's migration issues, yet poses serious legal, ethical and practical problems.<|control11|><|separator|>
[143]
[PDF] Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future
▫ Third, it challenges the idea that multiculturalism has failed, and offers instead evidence that ... social rights or residency renewals if they fail to pass ...
[144]
Interculturalism in the post-multicultural debate: a defence - PMC
Sep 4, 2017 · Unity in diversity? Bridging Models of Multiculturalism and ... Incorporating Diversity: Rethinking Assimilation in a Multicultural Age.
[145]
Yalimo tragedy exposes Indonesia's failed pluralism in Papua
“unity in ...
[146]
The South African Government of National Unity: Successes ...
Jan 22, 2025 · Failure to do so risks exacerbating societal divisions, undermining democratic institutions, and potentially unravelling the hard-won gains of ...
[147]
Global Trends and Disparities in Social Isolation - PMC
Sep 15, 2025 · The global prevalence of social isolation increased by 13.4% from 2009 to 2024 (from 19.2% [95% CI, 17.3%-21.6%] to 21.8% [95% CI, 19.4%-24.2%]) ...
[148]
The COVID-19 pandemic and social cohesion across the globe - PMC
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about a constellation of health, social, economic, and political crises, drastically affecting the lives of people across ...Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
[149]
Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on ethnically diverse communities
Jul 11, 2023 · Ethnically diverse communities are potentially exposed to multiple and compounding impacts of COVID-19, owing to social and cultural interactions, household ...
[150]
It's time to unite against polarization - Allianz.com
Feb 19, 2025 · Adrian Blattner from Stanford University examines political polarization in Germany, the US, and Brazil, highlighting the rise of affective polarization.
[151]
[PDF] The Global Risks Report 2025 20th Edition
Polarization within societies is further hardening views and affecting policy-making. It also continues to fan the flames of misinformation and.
[152]
New UN report warns of global social crisis driven by insecurity ...
Apr 24, 2025 · Alarmingly, trust levels have been declining from one cohort to the next, indicating a systemic breakdown of social cohesion. The rapid ...
[153]
[PDF] TRUST IN A CHANGING WORLD: SOCIAL COHESION AND THE ...
Dec 2, 2024 · This paper examines the erosion of trust as a global phenomenon, highlighting its implications for social cohesion and governance.
[154]
Diversity and Division in Advanced Economies | Pew Research Center
Oct 13, 2021 · This Pew Research Center analysis focuses on attitudes toward diversity and conflict around the world. For this report, we conducted nationally ...
[155]
[PDF] A New Policy Consensus to Accelerate Social Progress
Weakening social cohesion and growing polarization are causing alarm and have risen to prominence on global agendas: the World Economic Forum has identified ...