Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Venography

Venography, also known as a venogram, is a diagnostic imaging procedure that employs X-ray fluoroscopy and an injected iodinated contrast agent to visualize the structure and blood flow within veins, particularly in the extremities (such as the legs and arms) and pelvis.^[1] This technique allows healthcare providers to identify abnormalities like blockages, narrowing, or malformations in the venous system.^[2] Commonly used to diagnose deep vein thrombosis (DVT), venography provides detailed images when other noninvasive methods, such as ultrasound, yield inconclusive results.^[3] The procedure is invasive and typically performed in a radiology suite, lasting 30 to 90 minutes. Preparation may involve fasting, disclosing allergies or kidney issues, and holding medications such as metformin. Following the exam, patients are encouraged to drink fluids to flush the contrast.^[1]^[2]^[3] Venography serves multiple clinical purposes beyond DVT detection, including evaluating varicose veins, assessing veins for surgical bypass or dialysis access, and guiding interventions like stent placement or thrombolysis.^[1] Ongoing advancements, such as deep learning reconstruction and 3D rotational techniques, continue to improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy as of 2025.^[4]^[5] Variants include conventional catheter-directed venography; computed tomography (CT) venography, which can provide broader anatomical coverage either indirectly (without direct venous catheterization) or directly (with catheterization); and magnetic resonance (MR) venography, which avoids ionizing radiation and contrast in some cases.^[6] Although generally safe, potential risks include allergic reactions to the contrast dye, temporary kidney impairment (particularly in patients with pre-existing renal conditions), minor bleeding or infection at the puncture site, and a small risk of dislodging a clot.^[2] Radiation exposure is minimal but considered in benefit-risk assessments, especially for pregnant individuals.^[3] Results are interpreted by a radiologist, informing treatment decisions such as anticoagulation therapy or surgical options.^[1]

Definition and Principles

Definition

Venography is a diagnostic imaging procedure that involves the radiographic visualization of veins following the intravenous injection of an iodinated contrast medium, enabling the assessment of venous anatomy, patency, and pathology such as blockages or abnormalities.^[1] This technique utilizes X-rays, often in conjunction with fluoroscopy to produce real-time or static images of blood flow within the venous system.^[2] Unlike arteriography, which specifically examines arterial structures, venography targets the veins to evaluate conditions like deep vein thrombosis (DVT).^[2] The term is synonymous with phlebography, though the latter is less commonly used in modern medical literature.^[7] The core components of venography include the iodinated contrast agent, which opacifies the veins for visibility on imaging; fluoroscopy or conventional X-ray equipment for capturing the images; and selected venous access sites, typically in the extremities or central veins depending on the region of interest.^[1] Etymologically, "venography" derives from the Latin vena (vein) and the Greek graphia (writing or recording), reflecting its role in "recording" venous structures.^[8]

Underlying Principles

Venography relies on the radiopacity of iodinated contrast agents, which contain iodine atoms that effectively absorb X-rays, thereby outlining the venous lumen against the lower radiopacity of surrounding soft tissues and blood. This mechanism enhances the visibility of venous structures by creating a stark contrast in radiographic images, allowing for the detection of abnormalities such as thrombosis or obstructions.^[9] The physics underlying this visualization stems from X-ray attenuation, where the iodinated contrast medium exhibits higher absorption of X-ray photons compared to blood or soft tissue, primarily through the photoelectric effect. This differential attenuation—governed by the Beer-Lambert law, where transmitted intensity decreases exponentially with material thickness and attenuation coefficient—results in density differences that produce clear silhouettes of the veins on fluoroscopic or radiographic images. Iodine's K-edge absorption at approximately 33 keV aligns well with typical diagnostic X-ray energies (around 30-40 keV at 80 kVp), optimizing contrast while minimizing dose.^[10] Optimal contrast filling in venography depends on venous hemodynamics, including the unidirectional flow enforced by competent bicuspid valves that prevent reflux and segment the venous system into compartments. These valves, present in nearly all superficial femoral and popliteal veins, ensure proximal-directed flow under normal pressure gradients, which range from 12-18 mm Hg at the capillary-venous junction to 4-7 mm Hg near the atria in the supine position. During the procedure, injection pressures and patient positioning exploit these gradients—augmented by hydrostatic effects or muscle pump simulation—to achieve complete opacification without stagnation, though valve incompetence can lead to reflux and incomplete filling.^[11] The pharmacokinetics of contrast agents further influence venous imaging, with ionic agents (high-osmolality, 1500-2000 mOsm/L) dissociating into charged particles that increase chemotoxicity and osmolality, potentially causing venous vasodilation, endothelial damage, and fluid shifts due to hypertonicity relative to plasma (290 mOsm/L). In contrast, non-ionic agents (low- or iso-osmolality, 290-860 mOsm/L) exhibit lower dissociation, reducing these effects and improving vascular tolerance by minimizing erythrocyte deformation and capillary permeability changes. Both types distribute rapidly to perfused tissues with a half-life of 2-5 minutes before renal glomerular filtration and excretion (half-life 90-120 minutes in normal function), ensuring transient enhancement without prolonged venous irritation.^[12]^[13]

Historical Development

Early Innovations

The origins of venography trace back to 1923, when German physicians Joseph Berberich and Samson Hirsch conducted the first successful radiographic visualization of the venous system in a living human. They injected an aqueous solution of strontium bromide directly into the arm vein of a patient with venous obstruction, capturing images of the peripheral veins shortly after injection. This pioneering work established the feasibility of phlebography but was constrained to superficial and peripheral vessels due to the rudimentary nature of the technique and the limitations of available imaging equipment.^[14] Advancements in the 1930s were led by Portuguese surgeon Reynaldo dos Santos, who developed ascending venography specifically for evaluating the lower extremities. In 1938, dos Santos described a method involving injection of contrast medium into a dorsal foot vein, with leg positioning to facilitate flow, allowing visualization of both superficial and deep venous structures. This approach proved particularly valuable for diagnosing varicose veins and assessing venous incompetence, marking a significant step toward more systematic clinical application.^[15] In the 1940s, Swedish surgeon Gunnar Bauer further advanced the field by refining venographic techniques and developing descending (retrograde) venography to assess valvular incompetence. Bauer advocated the routine use of venography for early diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), combining it with anticoagulant therapy like heparin, which helped establish its clinical importance.^[16] The exigencies of World War II further propelled the adoption of venography, as military surgeons increasingly employed it to diagnose and manage venous injuries in wounded soldiers, including deep vein thrombosis and trauma-related obstructions. This wartime experience highlighted the procedure's utility in peripheral vessels and contributed to the early standardization of techniques, such as ascending venography protocols. However, initial contrast agents like strontium bromide and early iodides were highly toxic, frequently inducing phlebitis, pain, and systemic reactions that limited broader use until safer media emerged in subsequent decades.^[14]

Modern Evolution

The evolution of venography in the post-World War II era began with significant improvements in contrast agents during the 1950s, when monomeric ionic compounds like diatrizoate were introduced, offering safer profiles compared to earlier high-osmolar ionic media that had caused notable adverse reactions.^[17] These advancements reduced the incidence of severe reactions, such as anaphylactoid events, by approximately 4-5 times relative to prior agents, enabling broader clinical adoption for venous imaging.^[18] Building on this, the 1970s marked the advent of non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media, pioneered by Torsten Almén, which further minimized osmotic stress and chemotoxicity, dropping major adverse reaction rates to under 0.04% in large-scale studies.^[19] Unlike the early toxic contrasts that limited procedure feasibility due to high risks, these innovations facilitated more routine use in diagnostic venography.^[20] The 1970s and 1980s saw a pivotal shift with the integration of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which enhanced real-time imaging by digitally subtracting pre-contrast "mask" images from subsequent frames, improving vessel visualization with lower contrast volumes—often 50-70% less than conventional methods.^[21] Commercialized around 1980, DSA allowed for intravenous approaches in venography, reducing the need for invasive arterial access and enabling dynamic assessment of venous flow with resolutions approaching 1 mm. This technology's impact was profound in peripheral and central venography, where it improved detection of subtle filling defects by up to 20% in comparative trials against film-based techniques.^[21] From the 1990s onward, venography increasingly incorporated cross-sectional imaging hybrids, with computed tomography venography (CTV) and magnetic resonance venography (MRV) emerging as less invasive alternatives to conventional catheter-based methods. CTV, leveraging helical CT scanners introduced in the early 1990s, provided multiplanar views of venous structures with sensitivities exceeding 95% for deep vein thrombosis detection, significantly decreasing reliance on traditional venography by offering combined arterial and venous evaluation in single sessions.^[14] Similarly, MRV advanced through time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced techniques, achieving non-invasive depictions of pelvic and cerebral veins without ionizing radiation, and by the late 1990s, it had become a standard for complex cases like suspected central thrombosis.^[14] These modalities reduced procedural risks and contrast exposure, shifting venography toward hybrid diagnostic-therapeutic paradigms. In the 21st century, refinements such as iso-osmolar non-ionic contrasts like iodixanol have further optimized safety, with meta-analyses showing 20-30% lower rates of contrast-induced nephropathy in high-risk patients compared to earlier low-osmolar agents.^[22] Concurrently, catheter-based interventions during venography have evolved, incorporating pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and stenting directly under fluoroscopic guidance, which has improved outcomes in acute deep vein thrombosis by restoring patency in over 80% of cases while minimizing post-thrombotic syndrome incidence.^[23] These developments underscore venography's transition to a more integrated, minimally invasive field.^[24]

Clinical Applications

Diagnostic Indications

Venography serves as a key diagnostic tool for confirming deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the extremities, particularly when ultrasound imaging is inconclusive or provides inadequate visualization due to factors like swelling or obesity. By injecting contrast dye into the venous system and using X-ray fluoroscopy, it precisely delineates the location, extent, and degree of venous occlusion caused by thrombi, often considered the historical gold standard for this purpose despite its invasive nature. This indication is especially relevant in cases of suspected lower extremity DVT, where accurate diagnosis guides anticoagulation therapy and prevents complications like pulmonary embolism.^[25]^[2] In the evaluation of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), venography provides detailed assessment of valvular incompetence and reflux patterns, helping to identify the underlying anatomy of venous dysfunction. Ascending venography maps deep vein patency and perforator vein abnormalities, while descending venography, performed with the patient in a semierect position and Valsalva maneuver, classifies the severity of retrograde flow and localizes incompetent valves. It is particularly useful in diagnosing post-thrombotic syndrome, where imaging reveals distorted venous architecture, collateral vessel formation, and residual intraluminal defects from prior thrombosis, informing decisions on interventions like valve repair or stenting.^[26] Venography is indicated for assessing congenital venous anomalies, such as May-Thurner syndrome, where it confirms extrinsic compression of the left common iliac vein by the overlying right common iliac artery, often in conjunction with intravascular ultrasound for precise measurement of stenosis and collateral development. Similarly, in Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome, modified techniques like diversion venography—using tourniquets and selective cannulation—visualize the deep venous system obscured by superficial malformations, aiding in the detection of hypoplasia or atresia that contributes to venous hypertension. These applications are crucial for differentiating structural anomalies from acquired disorders in patients presenting with unilateral limb swelling or pain.^[27]^[28]^[29] For preoperative planning in venous surgeries, venography facilitates detailed mapping of varicosities and superficial venous networks, such as the great saphenous vein, to predict insufficiency and identify perforator connections that may influence surgical approaches like ligation or ablation. Three-dimensional computed tomography venography, in particular, offers high-resolution roadmaps with sensitivity exceeding 98% for great saphenous vein reflux, reducing the risk of incomplete treatment and recurrence by highlighting anatomical variations missed on ultrasound. This preoperative utility extends to procedures addressing CVI or anomalous veins, ensuring targeted interventions.^[30]

Contraindications and Precautions

Venography, while valuable for diagnosing conditions such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), carries specific relative contraindications and precautions to ensure patient safety, particularly due to the use of iodinated contrast media and invasive access. There are no absolute contraindications, but the procedure requires careful risk-benefit assessment.^[1]^[31]^[32] Relative contraindications include a history of severe hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media, which can lead to life-threatening anaphylaxis but may be managed with premedication; active sepsis or infection at the venous access site, increasing the risk of systemic spread or procedural complications; and renal impairment, defined by a serum creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m² in non-dialysis patients, to avoid contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI).^[33]^[31] Other relative contraindications encompass pregnancy, owing to potential fetal exposure to ionizing radiation; dehydration, which exacerbates renal risks; and recent anticoagulation therapy, which heightens bleeding potential at the access site.^[31]^[1] In such cases, the procedure may proceed if benefits outweigh risks, with close monitoring. Precautions involve premedication for patients at risk of allergic reactions, such as those with a history of prior contrast reactions, using regimens like oral prednisone 50 mg at 13, 7, and 1 hours before injection combined with diphenhydramine 50 mg 1 hour prior.^[31] Hydration protocols, including intravenous normal saline at 1-1.5 mL/kg/hour for 3-12 hours pre- and post-procedure, are essential to mitigate nephropathy in patients with borderline renal function.^[31] For special populations, pediatric patients require weight-based contrast dosing (typically 1.5-2 mL/kg of low-osmolar contrast) and adjusted premedication (e.g., prednisone 0.5-0.7 mg/kg) to account for lower osmotic tolerance and reaction rates of 0.18-0.9%.^[31] In geriatric patients, comprehensive screening for comorbidities like cardiovascular disease or reduced renal reserve is critical, with heightened vigilance for hemodynamic changes and extravasation risks.^[31]

Procedural Techniques

Patient Preparation

Patient preparation for venography begins with obtaining informed consent, during which the healthcare provider explains the procedure, its purpose in visualizing venous structures, potential risks such as allergic reactions to contrast agents or kidney injury, benefits for diagnosing venous disorders, and available alternatives like ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging.^[1] Patients are asked to disclose any history of allergies, particularly to iodinated contrast materials, pregnancy, recent illnesses, current medications including blood thinners, and renal or coagulation disorders to tailor the approach and mitigate complications.^[2] A signed consent form is required prior to proceeding.^[34] Laboratory assessments are essential to evaluate patient safety, particularly focusing on renal function through tests such as blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels to identify risks of contrast-induced nephropathy, especially in patients with pre-existing kidney impairment.^[2] Coagulation profiles, including prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR), are reviewed or obtained for individuals on anticoagulant therapy to assess bleeding risk at the access site.^[35] Allergy history is thoroughly documented, with premedication considered for those with known sensitivities to contrast agents.^[36] Fasting is typically required for 4 to 6 hours prior to the procedure to minimize aspiration risk during sedation, allowing only sips of water if necessary.^[34] Hydration strategies include encouraging oral fluid intake where possible pre-procedure and administering intravenous fluids for renal protection in at-risk patients to facilitate contrast clearance.^[1] Site-specific preparation involves removing clothing and jewelry from the access area, such as the groin, neck, or extremity, and positioning the patient supine on the imaging table with immobilization aids like safety straps to ensure stability during the procedure.^[2] The skin at the venous access site is shaved if hair is present, cleansed with an antiseptic solution to prevent infection, and draped sterilely.^[36] Local anesthetic is applied to numb the site before catheterization.^[37]

Contrast Administration and Imaging

Venous access for venography is established by inserting an 18- to 20-gauge needle or catheter into a peripheral vein, typically the antecubital vein for upper extremity studies or the dorsal foot or ankle veins for lower extremity evaluations.^[38]^[2] Local anesthesia is applied at the puncture site to minimize discomfort prior to insertion.^[39] Contrast administration involves injecting an iodinated contrast agent through the established intravenous line, either manually or via power injector, with volumes ranging from 20 to 100 mL depending on the anatomical region being imaged.^[38]^[40] The injection rate is typically 2 to 5 mL per second to ensure adequate opacification of the venous structures without excessive pressure.^[38] For peripheral venography, a tourniquet may be applied proximal to the injection site to direct the contrast into deeper veins and enhance visualization.^[39] Patients may experience a transient burning sensation during injection due to the hyperosmolar nature of the agent.^[39] Imaging is performed using fluoroscopy for real-time monitoring of contrast flow, supplemented by serial X-ray acquisitions to capture the venous filling phases.^[1]^[40] The sequence begins with initial scout images, followed by dynamic imaging during contrast infusion to document progression through the venous system, often requiring patient repositioning or maneuvers like the Valsalva to optimize venous distension.^[2]^[40] This approach highlights filling defects or occlusions indicative of pathology, with multiple projections obtained to provide comprehensive anatomical detail. Following contrast injection, a saline flush of approximately 30 mL is administered through the line to clear residual agent and reduce the risk of thrombosis.^[38] The catheter is then removed, and the puncture site is bandaged while monitoring for signs of extravasation, such as swelling or pain at the injection site.^[1] Patients are encouraged to hydrate orally to facilitate contrast excretion and minimize potential renal effects.^[1]

Types of Venography

Conventional Contrast Venography

Conventional contrast venography, also known as diagnostic infusion venography, is an invasive radiographic procedure that provides direct opacification of the venous system through the injection of iodinated contrast material. The technique begins with direct venipuncture to access a peripheral vein distal to the region of interest, such as a dorsal foot vein for lower extremity evaluation, using a catheter or needle. Contrast is then hand-injected or delivered via a pressure injector to facilitate dynamic studies of venous filling and emptying, allowing real-time assessment under fluoroscopy. Imaging is captured using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or traditional film-screen radiography, which subtracts pre-injection images to highlight contrast-filled vessels and enhance visualization of flow patterns. Recent advances include direct 3D rotational venography as an adjunct to standard DSA, improving visualization of complex venous anatomy.^[1]^[40]^[32]^[5] This method excels in delivering high spatial resolution, capable of resolving fine details in small vessels and branches that may be obscured in non-invasive alternatives, while enabling immediate detection of thrombi through observation of filling defects during live imaging. Its ability to provide real-time hemodynamic information supports precise diagnosis of venous obstructions and has historically positioned it as the gold standard for confirming deep vein thrombosis (DVT).^[40]^[41]^[42] Despite these strengths, conventional contrast venography is limited by its invasive nature, which carries a risk of procedure-related complications including catheter-induced DVT in approximately 2% of cases, as well as potential adverse reactions to iodinated contrast such as allergic responses or contrast-induced nephropathy, especially in patients with renal impairment. The procedure requires a specialized catheterization laboratory and exposes patients to ionizing radiation, with effective doses typically ranging from 1 to 5 mSv for extremity studies, comparable to several months of natural background radiation.^[40]^[1]^[43] In current clinical practice during the 2020s, conventional contrast venography is primarily reserved for cases where non-invasive methods like duplex ultrasound yield equivocal results or when immediate therapeutic interventions, such as venous thrombolysis, are anticipated, consistent with position statements from the Society of Interventional Radiology emphasizing its role in complex venous interventions. Building on modern evolutions from early radiographic techniques, digital enhancements have refined its efficiency while reducing film usage.^[44]^[45]^[40]

Computed Tomography Venography

Computed tomography (CT) venography is a hybrid imaging modality that integrates intravenous contrast administration with cross-sectional CT scanning to provide detailed volumetric assessment of the venous system. Unlike conventional contrast venography, which relies on two-dimensional fluoroscopic projections, CT venography offers multiplanar visualization of venous structures, enabling the detection of thrombi, stenoses, and anatomical variants across larger anatomical regions. This technique is particularly valuable in evaluating deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in challenging areas such as the pelvis and abdomen, where direct access may be difficult. As of 2025, deep learning reconstruction techniques have been integrated to enhance lesion visibility and reduce image noise.^[46]^[4] The standard protocol for CT venography involves peripheral intravenous injection of 100-150 mL of undiluted iodinated contrast medium at a rate of 4 mL/sec, typically followed by a saline chaser to optimize bolus timing. Scanning is performed in both arterial and venous phases, with the venous phase acquired 3-4 minutes after the start of injection to allow adequate contrast opacification of the veins while minimizing overlap with arterial enhancement. This timing ensures clear delineation of venous filling, often covering the region from the lower extremities to the abdomen or chest, depending on the clinical indication.^[46]^[6] Post-acquisition image reconstruction enhances diagnostic utility through techniques such as multiplanar reformats (MPR), which generate sagittal, coronal, and oblique views from the isotropic volumetric data, and maximum intensity projections (MIP), which produce 3D venous maps by projecting the highest attenuation voxels. These reconstructions facilitate comprehensive venous mapping, allowing radiologists to assess vessel patency and collateral pathways without additional invasive procedures. MPR is especially useful for evaluating vessel cross-sections, while MIP aids in overviewing venous anatomy in thrombotic disease.^[47]^[48] Key strengths of CT venography include its high sensitivity (71-100%) for detecting pelvic and abdominal thrombi, such as those in the inferior vena cava or iliac veins, where it provides extensive evaluation beyond superficial veins. Additionally, it reduces the need for direct venipuncture required in conventional methods, minimizing procedural risks like vessel injury. This non-invasive approach is particularly advantageous in patients with suspected multi-level DVT, offering combined assessment of arterial and venous systems in a single examination.^[49]^[50]^[6] Common artifacts in CT venography arise from beam-hardening effects caused by dense iodinated contrast, which preferentially attenuates low-energy X-rays and produces streaking or cupping distortions, potentially obscuring venous segments near high-attenuation structures like metallic implants. The effective radiation dose typically ranges from 3-10 mSv, comparable to standard abdominal-pelvic CT, necessitating careful justification in radiation-sensitive populations such as pregnant patients or children. Dose optimization strategies, including low-kV protocols, can mitigate exposure while preserving image quality.^[51]^[52]^[53]

Magnetic Resonance Venography

Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) serves as a non-ionizing imaging modality that utilizes magnetic fields and radiofrequency pulses to visualize venous structures, offering a valuable alternative to radiation-based techniques for evaluating venous pathology.^[54] This method excels in providing detailed anatomical and flow information without exposing patients to ionizing radiation, making it particularly suitable for repeated assessments or populations sensitive to radiation exposure.^[55] The primary techniques in MRV include time-of-flight (TOF) imaging, a non-contrast approach that relies on flow-related enhancement to depict venous blood as high-signal structures against suppressed stationary tissue background.^[54] TOF is effective for assessing vessel patency and structural anatomy, particularly in regions with moderate flow velocities, though it can be susceptible to artifacts from turbulent or slow flow.^[55] In contrast, contrast-enhanced MRV (CE-MRV) involves the intravenous administration of gadolinium-based agents to produce high-resolution images of the venous lumen, enabling better delineation of filling defects such as thrombi and improving visualization in areas of complex anatomy.^[54] CE-MRV often employs three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences timed to capture venous enhancement, providing isotropic voxels for multiplanar reformatting.^[56] Standard protocols for MRV are performed on 1.5T or 3T scanners, with higher field strengths offering improved signal-to-noise ratios for enhanced detail.^[54] For abdominal venous imaging, breath-hold sequences are commonly used to minimize motion artifacts, typically involving short acquisition times of 20-30 seconds per station to capture the inferior vena cava and iliac veins.^[54] Spatial resolution achieves 1-2 mm, allowing detection of small thrombi, supported by parallel imaging techniques to reduce scan duration while maintaining image quality.^[56] MRV is particularly advantageous in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents, such as those with renal impairment, where non-contrast TOF or phase-contrast methods avoid the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.^[56] It demonstrates high sensitivity for detecting slow-flow thrombi, which may be challenging on other modalities, by leveraging techniques like balanced steady-state free precession sequences that provide excellent contrast between flowing blood and thrombus even in low-velocity conditions.^[56] Despite its benefits, MRV has notable limitations, including longer overall scan times of 20-40 minutes compared to computed tomography venography, which can limit its use in unstable patients.^[54] Contraindications include ferromagnetic implants, such as certain pacemakers or cochlear devices, which can cause significant artifacts or pose safety risks during the magnetic field exposure.^[55] Additionally, MRV incurs higher costs than CT due to equipment demands and operational expenses, though it remains a preferred option when radiation avoidance is prioritized.^[56]

Anatomical Variations

Upper Extremity Venography

Upper extremity venography is a specialized imaging procedure that evaluates the venous system of the arms and shoulders, particularly the superficial and deep veins such as the cephalic, basilic, axillary, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins. This technique addresses unique anatomical challenges, including the relatively low-flow nature of upper limb veins compared to lower extremities and the potential for extrinsic compression at the thoracic outlet. Access is typically achieved via cannulation of the basilic or cephalic veins at the elbow or a superficial dorsal hand vein, with the arm positioned in elevation to counteract gravity and enhance contrast flow toward the central veins.^[57]^[7]^[58] Common indications include the diagnosis of subclavian vein thrombosis, which often arises from indwelling central venous catheters or repetitive overhead arm efforts leading to Paget-Schroetter syndrome, a form of effort-induced thrombosis affecting young, active individuals. In Paget-Schroetter syndrome, venography reveals filling defects or stenosis at the costoclavicular junction, with imaging performed in both neutral and arm-elevated positions to demonstrate dynamic compression. This modality is particularly valuable for confirming thrombosis extent and planning interventions like thrombolysis.^[59]^[60] To visualize critical junctions, multiple projections are employed during fluoroscopic imaging, including anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral views of the axillary and brachiocephalic regions to account for overlapping structures and ensure comprehensive assessment of patency or occlusion. Due to the smaller venous capacitance in the upper extremities, contrast dosage is adjusted to a lower volume of 30-50 mL of iodinated agent, injected manually or via power injector, often diluted to optimize opacification while minimizing risks.^[61]^[62]

Lower Extremity Venography

Lower extremity venography is a radiographic procedure primarily used to evaluate the deep and superficial veins of the legs, particularly for detecting deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and other venous abnormalities. The technique involves injecting iodinated contrast medium into peripheral veins to opacify the venous system, allowing visualization of filling defects, obstructions, or reflux under fluoroscopy. This method is especially valuable for assessing common sites of pathology in the lower limbs, where gravity influences venous flow, contrasting with upper extremity venography that focuses on subclavian and axillary veins accessed via the basilic vein.^[63] Access for lower extremity venography is typically achieved through a dorsal foot vein or the great saphenous vein at the ankle, using a 20- to 22-gauge needle or catheter. Tourniquets are applied sequentially at the ankle and knee to direct contrast flow preferentially into the deep venous system by occluding superficial veins, ensuring sequential filling from the calf upward. The patient is positioned in a semi-upright or reverse Trendelenburg tilt (head elevated 15-30 degrees) to facilitate retrograde flow against gravity and enhance opacification of the deep veins. Nonionic iodinated contrast (50-100 mL, concentration 300-370 mg I/mL) is injected at a rate of 2-3 mL/second, with serial radiographs or fluoroscopic images acquired during injection and for 10-15 seconds afterward to capture dynamic filling.^[63]^[64]^[65] The procedure targets key deep veins, including the deep femoral (profunda femoris), popliteal, femoral, and iliac veins, which are prone to thrombosis due to their role in lower limb venous return. For comprehensive iliofemoral assessment, a retrograde (descending) approach may be employed, involving femoral vein puncture at the groin and retrograde contrast injection under fluoroscopy to evaluate valvular competence and proximal obstructions. This selective catheterization helps identify reflux or stenosis not well visualized in standard ascending venography.^[66]^[67] Common pathologies detected include calf vein thrombi, which appear as nonopacified defects in the peroneal, posterior tibial, or soleal veins; superficial thrombophlebitis, manifesting as irregular filling in the saphenous system; and compression syndromes such as May-Thurner syndrome, where extrinsic narrowing of the left common iliac vein by the right iliac artery is evident as a focal stenosis with collateral formation. These findings guide therapeutic decisions, such as anticoagulation or endovascular intervention, by delineating the extent and location of venous compromise.^[63]^[68]^[69]

Central and Abdominal Venography

Central and abdominal venography encompasses imaging procedures targeted at the thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal venous systems, including the inferior vena cava (IVC), portal vein, and visceral tributaries such as the renal and ovarian veins. These techniques are essential for evaluating venous patency, thrombosis, and anatomy in complex central and intra-abdominal pathologies. Access is typically achieved through catheter-directed approaches via the femoral or jugular veins, allowing navigation to the IVC for detailed assessment.^[70] Indications for central and abdominal venography include preoperative evaluation for IVC filter placement, where imaging confirms IVC diameter, patency, and absence of thrombus to guide device deployment and prevent pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients. In liver disease, venography is indicated for diagnosing portal vein thrombosis (PVT), a complication affecting up to 25% of cirrhotic patients, by visualizing occlusions or cavernous transformations that influence management decisions like anticoagulation or shunting. Selective catheterization techniques enable targeted imaging of specific branches; for instance, renal vein venography assesses nutcracker syndrome or varices, while ovarian vein venography identifies reflux in pelvic congestion syndrome, often performed with Valsalva maneuver to provoke venous distension.^[71]^[72]^[73] Intraoperative venography during laparoscopic procedures, such as portosystemic shunt ligation, provides real-time visualization of portal vein flow and pressure gradients to confirm shunt occlusion without additional incisions. Challenges in abdominal venography arise from overlying bowel gas, which can obscure fluoroscopic views and necessitate angled projections or alternative imaging adjuncts like ultrasound. Larger venous volumes in the central and abdominal regions require higher contrast doses, typically 80-120 mL of iodinated agent, to achieve adequate opacification compared to extremity studies, though this increases risks in patients with renal impairment. Femoral or jugular access often leverages lower extremity entry points for retrograde advancement to abdominal veins.^[74]^[75]^[76]

Risks and Complications

Immediate Risks

Immediate risks of venography primarily involve acute reactions to the iodinated contrast medium, local vascular complications from catheter insertion or injection, and potential effects from ionizing radiation used in imaging. These events typically occur during or shortly after the procedure and require prompt recognition and management to prevent escalation. Contrast reactions represent one of the most common immediate concerns, manifesting as allergic-like or anaphylactoid responses due to histamine release rather than true IgE-mediated allergy. Mild reactions, such as urticaria or itching, occur in 0.2–3% of patients receiving low-osmolality non-ionic contrast agents commonly used in venography.^[31] Moderate reactions, such as significant urticaria or bronchospasm, occur in 0.02–0.5%, while severe anaphylactic-type reactions, including laryngeal edema, bronchospasm, or hypotension, are rarer, with an incidence of 0.004–0.02% overall and 0.001–0.01% for life-threatening cases.^[31]^[77] Management involves immediate administration of intramuscular epinephrine (0.3 mg for adults, 0.01 mg/kg for children) for severe cases, supplemented by antihistamines like diphenhydramine (25-50 mg IV for adults) for urticaria or milder symptoms, along with supportive measures such as oxygen and fluid resuscitation.^[31] Prevention strategies include premedication with corticosteroids and antihistamines in patients with a history of prior reactions, as well as screening for risk factors like asthma or prior contrast sensitivity during patient preparation.^[31] Extravasation of contrast medium into surrounding tissues occurs when the injection leaks outside the vein, leading to potential local tissue damage, swelling, or pain, with an incidence of 0.1-1.2% in procedures involving intravenous contrast like venography.^[31] In venography specifically, such events are uncommon but can result in more severe outcomes like skin sloughing if large volumes extravasate, though major complications remain rare with proper technique.^[78] Treatment focuses on conservative measures, including elevation of the affected limb to reduce swelling, application of warm or cold compresses, and close monitoring for signs of compartment syndrome or necrosis; surgical intervention is needed in only 11-21% of cases.^[31]^[79] Prevention entails careful venous access confirmation via test injection and use of low-pressure delivery to minimize leakage risk. Venous injury, including phlebitis (inflammation of the vein wall) or rare perforation, arises from mechanical trauma during catheter placement or contrast injection. These can manifest as localized pain, redness, or swelling immediately post-procedure. Additionally, venography carries a small risk of inducing thrombosis, particularly in dehydrated patients where hemoconcentration exacerbates clot formation, though overall rates remain low with hydration protocols.^[80] Management includes anti-inflammatory agents for phlebitis and anticoagulation if thrombosis develops, while prevention involves adequate patient hydration prior to the procedure and gentle catheter manipulation.^[31] Radiation exposure in conventional venography, which relies on fluoroscopy, poses minimal immediate risk in standard protocols, as effective doses are typically low (under 10 mSv) and unlikely to cause deterministic effects like skin erythema, which requires skin doses exceeding 2 Gy.^[81]^[82] Such skin reactions are rare in venography due to brief fluoroscopy times, but can occur at high cumulative doses in prolonged cases. Prevention centers on minimizing fluoroscopy duration through collimation and pulsed imaging techniques.^[81]

Long-Term Complications

One of the primary long-term complications associated with venography is contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), an acute kidney injury characterized by a serum creatinine increase of greater than 0.5 mg/dL or a 25% rise from baseline within 48-72 hours after contrast administration.^[83] This condition affects up to 20–30% of high-risk patients, particularly those with preexisting chronic kidney disease, diabetes, or dehydration, and typically resolves within 7-14 days but can lead to prolonged renal impairment in vulnerable individuals.^[83] Post-procedure deep vein thrombosis (DVT) represents another delayed adverse outcome, manifesting as iatrogenic thrombosis at the venous access sites with an incidence of 2-5%.^[84] These thrombi often necessitate therapeutic anticoagulation to mitigate extension and embolization risks, with management guided by clinical severity and patient factors. Chronic venous changes, such as valvular scarring and insufficiency, may develop following repeated venography sessions, especially if iatrogenic DVT occurs, contributing to post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in up to 20-50% of affected cases over 1-2 years.^[85] PTS presents with persistent limb edema, pain, and dermatologic alterations due to venous hypertension and inflammation, and is routinely monitored using duplex ultrasonography to assess flow dynamics and valve function.^[86] Allergic sequelae from iodinated contrast are uncommon but can include persistent hypersensitivity, elevating the risk of recurrent reactions during subsequent exposures; in such instances, desensitization protocols employing premedication with glucocorticoids and antihistamines are employed to safely enable future procedures.^[87] Immediate reactions during venography may occasionally foreshadow this long-term sensitization.^[88]

Alternatives and Comparisons

Non-Invasive Imaging Modalities

Duplex ultrasound serves as the primary non-invasive imaging modality for evaluating venous disorders, particularly deep vein thrombosis (DVT), by combining real-time B-mode imaging to visualize vein compressibility and structure with Doppler ultrasound to assess blood flow velocity and direction.^[89] This approach allows direct detection of non-compressible veins indicative of thrombus and abnormal flow patterns such as absent or reduced flow signals.^[89] As the first-line diagnostic tool for suspected DVT, duplex ultrasound demonstrates high accuracy, with pooled sensitivity of 96.5% (95% CI: 95.1-97.6%) and specificity of 94.0% (95% CI: 92.8-95.1%) for proximal DVT.^[90] Venous Doppler ultrasound, often integrated within duplex protocols, employs spectral waveform analysis to evaluate venous valve function and overall flow dynamics without the need for ionizing radiation or contrast agents.^[91] This technique displays blood flow velocity over time as a graphical waveform, enabling assessment of phasicity—normal venous waveforms exhibit respiratory variation and cardiac pulsatility—while deviations, such as continuous flow or reversed signals, indicate valvular incompetence or obstruction.^[92] Its non-invasive nature makes it suitable for serial monitoring of chronic venous insufficiency. Impedance plethysmography (IPG) indirectly detects venous obstruction by measuring changes in electrical impedance across the limb, which reflect alterations in blood volume during controlled venous occlusion and release via a pneumatic cuff.^[93] The device records the rate of impedance change, with reduced venous outflow indicating proximal obstruction, and its portable design facilitates bedside use in outpatient or emergency settings.^[93] However, IPG is less specific than direct imaging methods, showing sensitivity of 12-64% for asymptomatic distal DVT due to its reliance on global volume shifts rather than localized visualization.^[94] Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) represents an emerging non-radiative technique for mapping superficial veins by exploiting the differential absorption of near-infrared light (700-900 nm) by hemoglobin, which highlights venous structures against surrounding tissue on projected images.^[95] This optical method enables real-time visualization of vein patterns for procedures like venipuncture or varicose vein assessment, with devices projecting enhanced vein maps directly onto the skin surface.^[96] Although primarily used for superficial applications, NIRS shows promise in quantifying tissue oxygenation and venous compliance, supporting its role in non-invasive peripheral vascular evaluation.^[97]

Advantages Over Alternatives

Venography provides superior spatial resolution for visualizing small collateral vessels and chronic venous changes, such as recanalized thrombi or synechiae, which can be challenging to assess with duplex ultrasound due to the latter's operator dependency and limitations in obese patients or those with overlying structures.^[98]^[99]^[100] This direct contrast opacification allows for precise delineation of subtle abnormalities that may contribute to post-thrombotic syndrome, offering a more reliable assessment in complex cases compared to non-invasive modalities like ultrasound, which serves as an initial screening tool.^[101] In equivocal diagnostic scenarios, venography excels by providing definitive confirmation through real-time contrast filling, particularly for conditions like iliac vein compression (May-Thurner syndrome), which may be overlooked by Doppler ultrasound due to its challenges in evaluating pelvic veins.^[102]^[103] For instance, venography can reveal extrinsic compression or spurs not apparent on initial non-invasive imaging, guiding targeted interventions and reducing diagnostic uncertainty.^[104] A key advantage of venography lies in its seamless integration with therapeutic procedures, enabling simultaneous thrombolysis or stent placement during the same catheterization, unlike static imaging techniques that require separate sessions.^[105]^[106] This approach facilitates immediate thrombus removal and venous recanalization in acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), improving patency rates and minimizing the risk of post-thrombotic complications.^[107] As the historical gold standard for DVT diagnosis, venography demonstrates near-perfect sensitivity and specificity (95-100%) for detecting thrombi, supported by meta-analyses affirming its reference status even in recent evaluations up to 2023.^[108]^[109] This high diagnostic accuracy underpins its continued use in confirmatory roles where non-invasive alternatives fall short.^[110]

References

[1]
Venography - Blood Flow Examination of Veins | Venogram
A venogram is an x-ray test that involves injecting contrast material into a vein to shows how blood flows through your veins.
[2]
Venogram: Procedure Details & Recovery - Cleveland Clinic
Apr 26, 2023 · A venogram (venography) is a test that uses X-rays to create moving pictures of blood flow in your veins, particularly those in your legs and pelvis.
[3]
Venogram - leg: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia
May 10, 2024 · Venography for legs is a test used to see the veins in the leg. X-rays are a form of electromagnetic radiation, like visible light is.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
CT Venography: Technique and Indications - Endovascular Today
A brief summary of how to perform indirect and direct CT venography and when this imaging modality can be helpful in diagnosing venous disease.
[5]
Venography | Venous and Lymphatic Diseases - AccessCardiology
INTRODUCTION. Conventional venography, also known as phlebography, refers to radiographic imaging of the veins after direct injection of the contrast material.Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[6]
VENOGRAPHY definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
Word origin. [1925–30; veno- + -graphy]This word is first recorded in the period 1925–30. Other words that entered English at around the same time include ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[7]
Radiocontrast Media: Applications and Concerns - PMC - NIH
Oct 11, 2019 · Radiocontrast media are the agents used to increase the contrast of an image, to enhance the visibility of internal structures in imaging technology.
[8]
X-Ray Interaction with Matter | Attenuation and Dose | Tissue Contrast
X-ray beam attenuation. As the x-ray beam passes through tissue, photons get absorbed so there is less energy; this is known as attenuation. It turns out that ...
[9]
The hemodynamics and diagnosis of venous disease - ScienceDirect
Under normal circumstances, the pressure is 12 to 18 mm Hg at the venous end of the capillary and falls steadily toward atrial pressures of 4 to 7 mm Hg. When ...
[10]
Clinical Pharmacology, Uses, and Adverse Reactions of Iodinated ...
This modality requires higher rates of contrast administration to opacify the target vessels (up to 30 mL/s) as opposed to intravenous injections used for ...
[11]
Ionic Contrast Medium - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The osmolality of the ionic dimeric contrast media is almost the same as that of the non-ionic monomeric agents and is about twice that of blood at iodine ...
[12]
The History of Diagnosing Venous Thromboembolism - PMC - NIH
Its first reported use in human patients was in 1923 by Berberich and Hirsch ... After a brief period, contrast venography lost its popularity for a while ...Missing: 1920s | Show results with:1920s
[13]
[PDF] History of Contrast Media - Journal of Clinical Practice and Research
Jun 1, 2021 · The increasingly rapid IV injection of iodinated products using automatic injectors would lead to the widespread use of nonionic products by the ...
[14]
[PDF] The History of Contrast Media Development in X-Ray Diagnostic ...
Direct puncture and/or cut down arteriography was achieved in the early 1920s by Brooks using sodium iodide and bromide solutions [43] , and by Berberich and ...
[15]
30 years of Katayama's article on ionic and non-ionic contrast media
In 1990, non-ionic ICMs were approved for clinical use, but most radiologists still preferred ionic ICMs. Today, we can no longer imagine that. 30 years ago, ...
[16]
[PDF] contrast-agents-tutorial.pdf - Department of Radiology
These compounds are designated iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM). The toxicity of contrast agents decreases as osmolality approaches that of serum.Missing: veins venography
[17]
Digital subtraction angiography: overview of technical principles | AJR
DSA depends on the mating of high-resolution image-intensifier and television technology with computerized information manipulation and storage.Missing: venography | Show results with:venography
[18]
The Adoption of Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents in the United States
OBJECTIVE. In this historical analysis of low- and high-osmolar contrast agents, we outline the reasons for the price depreciation, speculate on motivation ...
[19]
Venous Interventions | Circulation
Apr 1, 2014 · Catheter-based treatment of ASVT begins with basilic vein access, followed by CDT therapy. Adjunctive mechanical thrombectomy may be combined ...
[20]
Advanced venous imaging and image-guided venous interventions
Dec 7, 2016 · CT venography can also serve as guide for catheter based interventions, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis. Contrast enhanced MR venography ...
[21]
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) - Diagnosis & treatment - Mayo Clinic
Jun 11, 2022 · Venography. This test uses X-rays and dye to create a picture of the veins in the legs and feet. The dye is injected into a large vein in ...
[22]
Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Clinical Assessment and Patient ... - NIH
Descending venography is used to document the presence and extent of reflux, to define valvular anatomy, and to identify specific incompetent valves. It is also ...
[23]
May-Thurner Syndrome - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Mar 11, 2024 · May-Thurner syndrome is characterized by venous insufficiency, obstruction, or thrombosis from impaired venous return secondary to venous compression.
[24]
May-Thurner syndrome - UpToDate
Jul 31, 2025 · - CT/MR venography · Invasive venous imaging (venography, intravascular ultrasound) · - Catheter-based venography · - Intravascular ultrasound.<|separator|>
[25]
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/deep-vein-thrombosis/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20352563
[26]
Three-Dimensional CT Venography of Varicose Veins of the Lower ...
In particular, GSV insufficiency, which is the main cause of varicose veins, can be predicted with high accuracy on the basis of CT venographic findings alone.Subjects And Methods · Mdct Venography Technique · Image Analysis
[27]
Venography - Thoracic Key
Jan 1, 2019 · Relative contraindications include a history of anaphylaxis with iodinated contrast materials and renal dysfunction. In patients with allergy to ...
[28]
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/may-thurner-syndrome
[29]
Renal venogram: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia
Jan 29, 2024 · You will be told to avoid food and drinks for about 6 hours before the test. Your provider may tell you to stop taking aspirin or other blood ...
[30]
Renal venogram - UCSF Health
Jan 29, 2024 · How to Prepare for the Test. You will be told to avoid food and drinks for about 6 hours before the test. Your provider may tell you to stop ...Missing: informed coagulation
[31]
Renal Venogram | Johns Hopkins Medicine
A renal venogram is an imaging test to look at the veins in and around your kidneys. Your doctor may also use the test to find out what is causing your high ...Missing: preparation informed
[32]
Venogram Patient Education - Cheyenne Regional Medical Center
Pre-Procedure Patient Information · Infection · Bleeding · Blood cots · Allergic reaction to medicines or contrast · Damage to other structures or organs · Kidney ...Missing: contraindications precautions
[33]
https://thoracickey.com/venography-2/
[34]
Venogram - leg Information | Mount Sinai - New York
How to Prepare for the Test · If you are pregnant · If you have allergies to any medicines · Which medicines you are taking (including any herbal preparations) · If ...How The Test Is Performed · How To Prepare For The Test · RisksMissing: contraindications precautions
[35]
Conventional and Cross-Sectional Venography - Thoracic Key
Mar 27, 2017 · (a) Immediately before contrast injection, an X-ray “mask” image is obtained. (b) Imaging is performed during injection of contrast into a ...
[36]
acr–sir practice parameter for the performance of diagnostic infusion ...
Diagnostic infusion venography is a radiographic study of venous anatomy using contrast media injection via a peripheral intravenous access.
[37]
Deep vein thrombosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and medical ...
Contrast venography is the gold standard for lower extremity DVT, but it is limited by a number of factors including availability, patient discomfort, user- ...
[38]
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights ... - NIH
Jul 30, 2024 · Contrast venography is usually considered the “gold standard” for DVT diagnosis; however, point-of-care compression ultrasound is currently ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
Radiation Dose from X-Ray and CT Exams - Radiologyinfo.org
To put it simply, the amount of radiation from one adult chest x-ray (0.1 mSv) is about the same as 10 days of natural background radiation that we are all ...Missing: conventional | Show results with:conventional
[40]
Guidelines and statements | Society of Interventional Radiology
A framework of evidence-based clinical practice documents to ensure patient safety and enhance the delivery of patient care.
[41]
Society of Interventional Radiology publishes IVC filter guidelines
Sep 9, 2020 · The guidelines advise against the routine placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in most VTE cases where patients are being successfully treated with ...
[42]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11289207/
[43]
https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/safety-xray
[44]
Basic Three-Dimensional Postprocessing in Computed ...
Dec 26, 2015 · The most popular and widely available postprocessing tools for CTA and MRA data are multiplanar reformation (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and ...<|separator|>
[45]
Usefulness of the Computed Tomography Venography for ...
Dec 24, 2014 · In conclusion, CTV can evaluate venous problems in pelvis and abdomen more extensively and can be performed more easily and for shorter duration ...
[46]
Abdominopelvic and Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
CT venography has been reported to have a pooled sensitivity of 71–100% for detection of DVT in the pelvis and lower extremities, and, in some centers, it is ...Missing: Strengths | Show results with:Strengths
[47]
Pitfalls in CT Venography of Lower Limbs and Abdominal Veins | AJR
Axial CT venogram of left common femoral vein shows strong beam-hardening artifacts from left dynamic hip screw preventing interpretation of patency of vein ( ...
[48]
Beam hardening | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org
Jun 3, 2025 · CT beam hardening artifacts have two distinct manifestations: streaking (dark bands) and cupping artifacts. Streaking artifact. The streaking ...Question 1194 · Question 742 · Question 840
[49]
What are the Radiation Risks from CT? - FDA
Dec 5, 2017 · The effective doses from diagnostic CT procedures are typically estimated to be in the range of 1 to 10 mSv. This range is not much less than ...
[50]
Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography ... - AJR Online
Basics of Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced MR Venography. Several different MRV techniques have been tested since the 1990s [58–63]. PC and time-of-flight ...Missing: impairment | Show results with:impairment
[51]
Intra- and Extracranial MR Venography: Technical Notes, Clinical ...
May 31, 2016 · Our proposed protocol encompasses the main widely available MRV techniques ... magnetic resonance venography techniques for the evaluation of the ...2. Venous Drainage... · 3.1. Intracranial 3d Phase... · 3.2. Extracranial 2d Tof Mrv<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
Advanced imaging in acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis
Initial studies used contrast venography as gold standard and found sensitivity and/or specificity values for MRV as high as 100% in diagnosing femoro-popliteal ...
[53]
Current techniques for assessment of upper extremity vasculature ...
May 8, 2007 · Venography by cannulation of an ipsilateral dorsal hand vein allows imaging of the entire cephalic or basilic veins from the hand up to the ...Missing: pathologies | Show results with:pathologies
[54]
Paget-Schroetter: A Thrombosis Syndrome in the Young and Healthy
To help with diagnosis, vein imaging should be taken both with the patient's arms down and with them raised because it's easier to see the vein compression or ...
[55]
Upper extremity veins and superior vena cava - Radiology Key
Jan 8, 2016 · Venography is used to confirm the diagnosis or plan endovascular or surgical treatment of venous thrombosis of the upper extremity. In the acute ...Missing: pathologies | Show results with:pathologies
[56]
Paget-Schroetter Syndrome: Review of Pathogenesis and Treatment ...
Doppler ultrasonography is the preferred initial test, while contrast venography remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Computed tomographic venography ...
[57]
Computed tomography venography of the upper extremities - PMC
Jan 15, 2020 · The computed tomography venography revealed an elongated contrast medium embraced thrombus in the right subclavian and axillary vein.
[58]
[PDF] Venogram of the Upper Extremity Using the Tourniquet Technique ...
Therefore, in this study, the tourniquet technique was designed as a new venogram method for central vein evaluation to solve the problems associated with ...Missing: pathologies | Show results with:pathologies
[59]
Imaging in Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity
Aug 15, 2022 · Diagnostic venography is performed to identify the extent of DVT; fluoroscopic guidance provides the most accurate and straightforward means of ...<|separator|>
[60]
Venography | Thoracic Key
Jul 30, 2016 · The two primary techniques of venography that we employ today are ascending and descending venography. Ascending venography is more common and ...
[61]
Low incidence of adverse events after venography in orthopedic ...
Feb 9, 2009 · With the patient tilted on the radiographic table to between 25° and 30°, 50–100 mL ... Lower extremity venography with iohexol: results and ...
[62]
a method of evaluating lower extremity venous valvular function.
Oct 1, 1980 · Descending venography: a method of evaluating lower extremity venous valvular function. ... ascending venography in the examination of 32 patients ...
[63]
[PDF] Chapter 1 - Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
First described in 1923 by Berberich and Hirsch,56 ascending venography remained the gold standard diag- nostic test for DVT for over 60 years. Unfortunately,.
[64]
Venous compression syndromes: clinical features, imaging findings ...
Aug 23, 2013 · Aside from clinical findings and physical examination, diagnosis can be made with ultrasound, CT, or MR conventional venography. Symptoms and ...
[65]
Diagnosis and endovascular treatment of iliocaval compression ...
Ascending venography almost always provides the information needed to make the diagnosis of ICS. In difficult or confusing cases, direct puncture of the common ...
[66]
Inferior Vena Cava Filtration in the Management of Venous ...
The ideal location for a filter is the infrarenal IVC; the apex of the filter should be at or immediately caudal to the level of the lowest renal vein. This ...
[67]
Anatomic and Technical Considerations: Inferior Vena Cava Filter ...
A relative indication for placement of an IVC filter in pregnant patients is when the DVT is upstream from the uterus, due to concern for a thrombotic event in ...Missing: central | Show results with:central
[68]
Portal Vein Thrombosis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Intra-abdominal inflammatory conditions leading to vascular endothelial injury can cause PVT. These include pancreatitis, cholangitis, appendicitis, and liver ...Continuing Education Activity · Introduction · Etiology · Treatment / ManagementMissing: venography | Show results with:venography
[69]
Female Pelvic Vein Embolization: Indications, Techniques, and ...
Mar 25, 2015 · Selective venography has been considered the gold standard for demonstrating pelvic incompetence as it can potentially show communication ...
[70]
Laparoscopic treatment of congenital portosystemic shunts ... - NIH
Feb 28, 2024 · Generally, when using CB or ARC, post-surgery portal pressure measurement and intraoperative portal venography are forgone, as occlusion occurs ...
[71]
Combined Direct and Indirect CT Venography (Combined CTV ... - NIH
Mar 18, 2016 · US can have difficulty in detecting proximal DVT in the pelvis because of excess bowel gas, a large body habitus, an in situ inferior vena cava ...Missing: laparoscopy | Show results with:laparoscopy
[72]
Abdominal Computed Tomography Angiography and Venography in ...
Apr 14, 2021 · CT angiography/venography helps for adequate evaluation of thrombus ... thromboembolism in the abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities. AJR ...
[73]
Contrast media adverse reactions | Radiology Reference Article
Oct 13, 2025 · Epidemiology. Anaphylactic-type reactions to iodinated contrast agents are rare, accounting for 0.6% of cases, with only 0.04% considered ...Missing: immediate | Show results with:immediate
[74]
Skin Necrosis following Extravasation during Peripheral Phlebography
Capek, M.D.. Skin necrosis is an unusual complication following venography of the legs. The authors have found only four cases in the English literature.Missing: incidence | Show results with:incidence
[75]
Peripheral venous extravasation injury - PMC - NIH
Because only 11–21% of all extravasation events require any surgical intervention, low-risk cases may be managed conservatively by the usual care team. Low-risk ...Missing: venography | Show results with:venography
[76]
V - THERAPY - Servier - Phlebolymphology
Most frequent complications are ecchymosis (75%), paresthesia (3%), superficial phlebitis (1.87%), burns (0.46%), inflammatory pain during the first week, and ...
[77]
The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism
Disadvantages of CV include invasiveness, which may result in phlebitis or hypersensitivity reactions; however, it is generally safe and accurate.
[78]
Radiation Doses from Venous Access Procedures - RSNA Journals
Mar 1, 2006 · Conclusion: Radiation doses from venous access procedures are low. Even extreme outlier cases are unlikely to produce doses high enough to ...
[79]
Radiation damage (skin injury) | Radiology Reference Article
Nov 6, 2024 · It is a type of deterministic effect. Acute radiation doses above 2 Gy are known to result in erythema, permanent epilation will occur at 7 Gy ...
[80]
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Precipitating factors include acute coronary syndrome, hypotension, volume depletion, concomitant nephrotoxic medications, and anemia. Contrast media (CM) ...
[81]
Lower extremity venography with iohexol: results and complications.
MR Venography ... August 1996. Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: efficacy of spiral CT venography compared with conventional venography in diagnosis.<|separator|>
[82]
The Postthrombotic Syndrome: Evidence-Based Prevention ...
However, some studies have reported that the cumulative incidence of PTS continues to increase, even 10 to 20 years after DVT diagnosis. About 5% to 10% of ...
[83]
Venous Insufficiency - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Feb 14, 2024 · Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a condition in which the flow of superficial or deep venous blood is impaired, causing venous ...
[84]
Successful desensitization to radiocontrast media in two high-risk ...
In conclusion, desensitization to radiocontrast media may be considered in patients with previously unsuccessful premedication and/or severe acute comorbidities ...
[85]
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media - PMC
Apr 30, 2022 · In patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity reactions, such as anaphylaxis, use of the same ICM should not be attempted, even with ...5. Phenotype Of... · 6. Diagnosis · Table 3
[86]
The clinical application of venous ultrasound in diagnosis and follow ...
Oct 26, 2023 · Complete duplex ultrasound (CDUS) is the preferred venous ultrasound protocol for diagnosis of acute DVT, with pooled sensitivity and ...
[87]
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ...
Duplex US had pooled sensitivity of 96.5% (95.1 to 97.6) for proximal DVT, 71.2% (64.6 to 77.2) for distal DVT and specificity of 94.0% (92.8 to 95.1). Triplex ...
[88]
Doppler Peripheral Venous Duplex Assessment, Protocols ... - NCBI
Aug 9, 2025 · The procedure evaluates vein compressibility, any intraluminal thrombus, valvular function, and venous flow direction. Peripheral venous duplex ...<|separator|>
[89]
[PDF] Interpretation of peripheral arterial and venous Doppler waveforms
Noninvasive spectral Doppler waveform assessment is a principal diagnostic tool used in the diagnosis of arterial and venous disease states. With 200 million ...
[90]
Deep vein thrombosis: a clinical review - PMC - PubMed Central
Apr 29, 2011 · Impedance plethysmography. The technique is based on measurement of the rate of change in impedance between two electrodes on the calf when a ...
[91]
Peripheral vascular disease assessment in the lower limb - NIH
May 11, 2018 · However, impedance plethysmography has shown to have low sensitivity (12 to 64%) for detecting asymptomatic DVTs [62] and air plethysmography ...
[92]
Preliminary evaluation of near-infrared vein visualization technology ...
Vein imaging: a new method of near infrared imaging, where a processed image is projected onto the skin for the enhancement of vein treatment. Dermatol Surg ...
[93]
Infrared imaging of subcutaneous veins - Zharov - Wiley Online Library
Jan 15, 2004 · Here we revisited and explored the capability of near-IR imaging to visualize subcutaneous structures, with a focus on diagnostics of ...Background And Objectives · Study Design/materials And... · Conclusion
[94]
The value of near-infrared spectroscopy for the assessment of calf ...
Objective: Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a noninva- sive technique with the potential to determine the degree of tissue oxygenation.
[95]
Advanced imaging in acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis - PMC
Dec 6, 2016 · In this technique, contrast material is injected into a peripheral vein and serial image volume measurements are acquired.
[96]
Imaging findings and interventional management of deep venous ...
May 12, 2022 · (c) Venography reveals chronic thrombus with collateral formation (arrows) extending from the external iliac to the superficial femoral vein.
[97]
Ultrasonography and Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism
The purpose of this review is to discuss the utility of venous ultrasonography as the foundation for diagnosis of acute lower extremity DVT.Limitations Of Current... · Clinical Assessment In... · The Problem Of Acceptance Of...
[98]
Noninvasive and invasive imaging of lower-extremity acute and ...
Oct 4, 2023 · However, venography can offer a more 'global' view of the diseased segment, including visualization of collateral flow and its 'road-mapping' ...<|separator|>
[99]
Iliac vein compression syndrome: Clinical, imaging and pathologic ...
Contrast venography has widely been considered the gold standard diagnostic modality for MTS and has been utilized to confirm a diagnosis of MTS in several ...
[100]
Sonography's Role in the Diagnosis of May–Thurner Syndrome
Jul 26, 2017 · Most publications state that sonography is useful in detecting a DVT but may be limited in detecting iliac vein compression or spurs.Missing: missed | Show results with:missed
[101]
Iliac vein compression: undervalued or overestimated? - Servier
In addition to the symptomatology, the diagnosis can be confirmed using duplex ultrasound, computed tomographic (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance (MR) venography ...
[102]
Venous Stenting - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
In patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) who have undergone thrombolysis, iliac stenting improves vessel patency and lowers PTO rates.[13] In ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
[103]
Stent Placement After DVT Thrombolysis/Mechanical Thrombectomy
Early clot removal results in relief of venous outflow obstruction in patients with acute DVT and prevention of PTS.
[104]
Venous stenting after deep venous thrombosis and antithrombotic ...
Nowadays, stenting is predominantly used in patients with venous outflow obstructions of the iliac and femoral veins after thrombus removal with catheter ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration<|separator|>
[105]
Diagnostic value of CT for deep vein thrombosis - Clinical Radiology
Contrast venography has traditionally been considered the reference standard test for DVT, with near-perfect sensitivity and specificity, but, due to the ...<|separator|>
[106]
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights from ...
Jul 30, 2024 · Contrast venography is usually considered the “gold standard” for DVT diagnosis; however, point-of-care compression ultrasound is currently ...
[107]
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights from ...
Jul 30, 2024 · The "gold standard test" for DVT diagnosis is venography; however, various point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocols have been suggested for DVT evaluation in ...