Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Verisign

VeriSign, Inc. is an American multinational corporation headquartered in , that serves as the exclusive registry operator for the .com and .net generic top-level domains (gTLDs), managing registrations and providing critical internet infrastructure services including DNS resolution and security to enable global online navigation. Established in 1995 as a from amid the privatization of U.S. government domain functions, VeriSign maintains its role through renewable agreements with the and the U.S. Department of Commerce, overseeing approximately 378.5 million total domain registrations across its managed TLDs as of the third quarter of 2025, with .com alone comprising over 150 million names. The company's proprietary infrastructure ensures DNS stability and resiliency, including maintenance of the , while its government-sanctioned on .com and .net has supported consistent revenue growth but attracted antitrust scrutiny, exemplified by 2024 calls from U.S. Senator and Representative for regulatory action against perceived unchecked price increases under existing contracts.

History

Founding and Initial Focus on Security Services

VeriSign, Inc. was incorporated in April 1995 as a from RSA Data Security, Inc., initially concentrating on services to enable secure online transactions via encryption technologies. The company was founded by D. James Bidzos in , with Stratton Sclavos recruited as president in August 1995 to oversee early operations. This structure allowed VeriSign to operate independently as a certification authority, issuing digital certificates to verify identities and protect data privacy in communications. In June 1995, VeriSign launched its flagship product, Digital IDs, which functioned as digital certificates for authenticating senders and encrypting transmissions, marking an early milestone in (PKI) deployment. These certificates were integrated into protocols like Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), with VeriSign becoming the first entity to commercially issue them in the mid-1990s to support security. Strategic partnerships with , , and facilitated their embedding in browsers, servers, and payment systems, addressing authentication challenges in the nascent environment. VeriSign's founding emphasis on digital authentication laid the groundwork for trust mechanisms in online interactions, prioritizing empirical needs for verifiable security over unproven alternatives in an era of rapid commercialization. By focusing on scalable PKI solutions, the company targeted enterprises requiring robust defenses against interception and , establishing itself as a key player in cybersecurity before expanding into domain management.

Transition to Domain Registry Operations

In 2000, VeriSign expanded beyond its core digital certificate and services by acquiring , Inc., the operator of the .com, .net, and .org registries under a U.S. contract. The $21 billion stock-for-stock transaction, completed on June 7, 2000, positioned VeriSign as the authoritative registry for these s, handling maintenance, operations, and wholesale registrations while integrating them with its security portfolio. This move marked VeriSign's initial entry into domain registry operations, driven by the rapid and the need for scalable DNS infrastructure amid exponential domain growth. Following the acquisition, VeriSign divested non-core assets to sharpen its registry focus, including transferring .org registry operations to the in 2003 and exiting the retail registrar business by spinning off as an independent entity. These steps complied with policies separating registry and registrar functions to promote competition, allowing VeriSign to retain exclusive .com and .net registry roles under cooperative agreements with the U.S. Department of Commerce. By the mid-2000s, registry services generated the majority of revenue, surpassing legacy security offerings as .com registrations exceeded 50 million by 2005. A pivotal occurred in when VeriSign sold its authentication services division—including SSL certificates and managed PKI—to for $1.28 billion, with the deal announced on May 19 and closed on August 9. This divestiture eliminated overlapping security operations, transforming VeriSign into a pure-play registry provider dedicated to .com and .net stewardship, root zone maintenance, and infrastructure resiliency. Residual security services were fully transitioned to third-party providers by 2018, solidifying the company's operational emphasis on registry functions amid growing global demands.

Corporate Restructuring and Divestitures

In November 2007, VeriSign announced a strategic divestiture plan to streamline operations and concentrate on its core domain registry and infrastructure services, targeting non-core units such as communications, billing, and for sale. This initiative followed regulatory pressures and aimed to resolve antitrust concerns by shedding diversified assets acquired during earlier expansion phases. As part of this strategy, VeriSign executed several sales in 2009, including its Communication Services Group to TNS, Inc. for $230 million in cash on March 2, 2009, which handled enterprise messaging and signaling services. In August 2009, it divested its Messaging Business to Syniverse Holdings, Inc. for $175 million, further reducing exposure to telecommunications-related operations amid challenging economic conditions. These transactions supported a 2008 restructuring plan that involved workforce reductions and facility consolidations to cut costs and align with the narrower business focus. The most significant divestiture occurred in 2010 with the sale of its Authentication Services Business, encompassing SSL certificate issuance and related security products, to Corporation for $1.28 billion in cash; the deal was announced on May 19, 2010, and closed on August 9, 2010. This transaction, which also included a majority stake in , marked the exit from its legacy security services originating from the company's 1995 from , allowing VeriSign to operate solely as a domain registry provider for .com and .net. An expanded 2010 restructuring plan facilitated this shift by migrating corporate functions from Mountain View to , and incurring associated charges for severance and facility exits. Earlier, in 2001, VeriSign complied with and NTIA agreements by divesting assets of its NSI Registrar operations by May 10, 2001, to promote competition in separate from registry functions. These restructurings collectively transformed VeriSign from a broad services into a focused, high-margin registry operator, with subsequent years showing minimal acquisitions or divestitures beyond minor adjustments.

Core Operations and Services

Management of .com and .net Registries

Verisign operates the authoritative registries for the .com and .net top-level domains (TLDs), maintaining the central databases that store registration data for approximately 170 million names across these zones combined. As the exclusive registry operator, Verisign does not register directly to end users but interfaces with over 3,000 ICANN-accredited registrars through its Shared Registration System (), which facilitates real-time additions, deletions, and queries for registrations. The company provides core registry services including DNS resolution, processing over 400 billion DNS queries daily for .com and .net, lookups, and distribution of zone files for public access to support secondary services like caching resolvers. Its infrastructure features a globally distributed network spanning more than 60 countries with hundreds of technical sites, enabling 100% DNS availability for .com since at least 1996 and robust failover mechanisms to mitigate outages. Verisign invests continuously in proprietary technologies for query handling, , and security, such as monitoring for DNS abuse like and , in compliance with recent mandates. For .com, Verisign's operations are governed by a Registry Agreement with , renewed on November 27, 2024, and effective December 1, 2024, alongside a separate U.S. Department of Commerce Cooperative Agreement administered by the NTIA to ensure stability given .com's scale. The agreement imposes performance standards for uptime, response times, and data accuracy; requires implementation of the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) for enhanced functionality; and allows to adjust registry fees for while incorporating fixed fees. Pricing for .com registrations remains subject to caps, with a 2020 (amended in 2023 to extend provisions to .net) permitting up to a 7% increase above in specific years if mutually agreed, reflecting regulatory oversight to prevent monopolistic pricing. The .net Registry , last amended significantly in to align with .com's pricing framework via the extended , similarly obligates Verisign to maintain equivalent access for registrars, support 24/7 operations, and adhere to consensus policies on security and stability without the same level of NTIA oversight as .com. Verisign reports quarterly metrics through its Industry Brief, tracking registration volumes, renewal rates, and growth—such as .com's consistent dominance with over 150 million names as of mid-2024—while emphasizing infrastructure resiliency to handle peak loads and threats.

Role as DNS Root Zone Maintainer

Verisign serves as the Root Zone Maintainer for the (DNS), a role that involves editing, signing, and distributing the root zone file to ensure the stability and integrity of the global DNS hierarchy. This function encompasses receiving change requests from the (IANA), processing them through Verisign's root zone maintainer systems (RZMS), and publishing the updated, cryptographically signed root zone at least once daily. The root zone file contains the authoritative list of top-level domains (TLDs) and their corresponding name servers, making Verisign's maintenance critical for resolving domain names worldwide. Under a service agreement with the , renewed on October 20, 2024, for an eight-year term, Verisign performs these operations independently of its .com and .net registry duties following the 2016 transition of IANA stewardship from the U.S. . Prior to this, Verisign's role stemmed from a cooperative agreement with NTIA, which directed root zone changes until the IANA functions were privatized. The agreement includes provisions for ICANN to assume control in emergencies, ensuring operational continuity. A key aspect of Verisign's responsibilities is the implementation of DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) for the root zone, where it acts as the Zone Signing Key (ZSK) operator. Verisign generates ZSK key signing requests, participates in biannual key signing ceremonies to have these keys signed by the root Key Signing Key (KSK) managed by , and applies the signatures to individual resource records in the root zone before distribution to the 13 root server operators. This process authenticates DNS data, preventing spoofing and cache poisoning attacks, with Verisign adhering to documented DNSSEC Practice Statements that outline key generation, storage in hardware security modules, and algorithm rollovers, such as the planned shift to /SHA-256 (algorithm 8) standards. In addition to maintenance, Verisign operates two of the global DNS servers (designated as J and roots), hosting them at multiple geographically diverse sites to enhance and resiliency against failures or attacks. These combined functions position Verisign as a foundational operator in preserving the DNS's trustworthiness, with daily publications supporting uninterrupted name resolution for billions of queries.

Legacy and Residual Security Contributions

VeriSign's foundational contributions to originated in its 1995 from RSA Data Security, where it pioneered public-key infrastructure (PKI) services to support secure electronic commerce. Collaborating with and , VeriSign issued the first commercial Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates that year, integrating cryptographic validation into browsers and establishing visual trust indicators like the , which facilitated the growth of online transactions by verifying website identities and encrypting data in transit. Over the subsequent decade, VeriSign expanded its authentication portfolio to include enterprise PKI solutions such as OnSite software for internal certificate management and VeriSign Trust services for identity verification, processing billions of daily validations and becoming the dominant certification authority (CA) with a global infrastructure for distribution. These efforts laid the groundwork for widespread adoption of SSL/TLS protocols, reducing risks from man-in-the-middle attacks and fostering scalability, though VeriSign's market dominance drew antitrust scrutiny in the late for bundling registry and security services. In 2010, VeriSign divested its authentication business—including SSL certificates, PKI, and related services—to Symantec for $1.28 billion, marking a strategic pivot to core domain registry operations while recognizing the unit's maturity after 15 years of innovation. This transaction transferred VeriSign's legacy CA operations, which Symantec later resold to DigiCert in 2017, but the foundational standards and trust models VeriSign developed persist in modern TLS ecosystems, influencing CA/Browser Forum guidelines for certificate issuance and revocation. Despite the divestiture, VeriSign's early emphasis on scalable cryptography informed broader PKI resilience, evidenced by its handling of root certificate updates that maintained backward compatibility amid evolving threats like certificate transparency requirements introduced post-2010. Post-divestiture, VeriSign's residual security contributions center on safeguarding DNS infrastructure, where it maintains the root zone's authoritative name servers and operates .com and .net top-level domains (TLDs) with built-in defenses against volumetric attacks. Since 2010, VeriSign has implemented DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) for the root zone, cryptographically signing zone data to prevent cache poisoning and , a deployment coordinated with that enhanced validation chains for billions of daily queries. Its distributed network, comprising over 100 global sites, mitigates distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks on TLD resolvers by absorbing traffic peaks exceeding 100 gigabits per second, employing techniques like traffic scrubbing and sinkholing malicious domains to disrupt botnets and campaigns. These measures, integrated into VeriSign's registry services, bolster internet-wide resiliency without direct endpoint authentication, as demonstrated in quarterly DDoS trend reports showing multi-vector attack mitigation for registry traffic. In 2024, VeriSign advanced DNS protocol security through Ladder mode trials, preparing for post-quantum threats by experimenting with hybrid signature schemes resistant to attacks on .

Business Model and Financial Performance

Revenue Streams and Pricing Mechanisms

Verisign's revenue is derived almost exclusively from wholesale registry fees charged to accredited domain name registrars for the registration and renewal of domain names in the .com and .net top-level domains (TLDs). These fees are collected on a per-domain basis and form a single, concentrated revenue stream, accounting for over 99% of total revenue in recent years. In 2024, Verisign reported total revenue of $1.56 billion, reflecting a 4.3% increase from 2023, driven primarily by growth in domain name registrations and renewals under these TLDs. The pricing mechanism for .com domains is governed by a cooperative agreement between Verisign, the , and the U.S. Department of Commerce's , which caps maximum wholesale prices while permitting periodic increases. As of 2025, the wholesale price remains at $10.26 per .com per year, following a 7% increase implemented on , 2024, as authorized under the agreement's terms allowing such hikes in four out of every six years to offset and operational costs. For .net domains, pricing is set via a separate ICANN registry agreement, with the current wholesale fee at $9.92 per domain per year, and provisions for increases up to $19.31 over the contract term, though Verisign has exercised limited raises to maintain competitiveness. Revenue recognition occurs ratably over the period, typically one to ten years, leading to significant deferred revenue balances; as of , 2025, deferred revenues stood at $1.38 billion, up from year-end 2024, reflecting prepaid fees from registrars. Registrars, in turn, set retail prices to end-users, which are generally higher to cover their margins, distribution, and value-added services, but Verisign does not participate in retail pricing or compete directly with registrars. This model benefits from the stability of .com and .net as TLDs with high renewal rates—often exceeding 80%—and minimal capital expenditures beyond maintenance. The absence of diversified streams, such as security services divested in prior restructurings, underscores Verisign's reliance on TLD volume and contractual pricing controls for profitability.

Key Contracts with ICANN and NTIA

Verisign operates the .com and .net registries under Registry Agreements with the . The .com Registry Agreement, originally executed in 2012 and set to expire on November 30, 2024, was renewed by on November 27, 2024, for an additional six-year term through November 30, 2030. This renewal incorporates provisions aligning with ICANN's base Registry Agreement, including mechanisms for permissible wholesale fee increases tied to the , with .com pricing fixed at $10.26 per through 2026 before potential 7% annual increases in subsequent years. An amendment on June 30, 2023, extended the agreement's Binding Letter of Intent to also cover .net operations. Complementing the ICANN agreements, Verisign maintains a Cooperative Agreement with the (NTIA), part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically governing .com registry operations to promote internet stability and security. This agreement, which caps .com wholesale pricing increases at no more than 7% above the CPI every four years, was renewed on November 30, 2024, for another four-year period, ensuring continued oversight amid Verisign's exclusive management of the .com namespace. The NTIA pact originated from the 1999 privatization of functions and serves as a backstop to the ICANN Registry Agreement, addressing potential concerns by limiting price escalation while Verisign handles over 170 million .com domains as of 2024. Verisign also serves as the Maintainer under a separate agreement with , renewed on October 20, 2024, for a five-year term. This role, transitioned from NTIA oversight following the completion of the IANA stewardship transition, involves implementing authorized changes to the root zone file, signing it with DNSSEC keys, and distributing updates to root name servers to maintain global DNS integrity. Prior to , NTIA directly supervised root zone changes via its cooperative agreement with Verisign, but post-transition, assumed policy authority while Verisign executes technical maintenance. These contracts collectively ensure Verisign's operational exclusivity for .com and .net while imposing regulatory constraints on pricing and performance to safeguard the internet's core infrastructure.

Financial Metrics and Profitability

Verisign's financial performance is characterized by consistent revenue growth driven by domain name registrations and renewals, coupled with exceptionally high profit margins attributable to its near-monopoly control over .com and .net registries, low variable costs, and limited capital expenditures. In fiscal year 2024, the company reported total revenue of $1.56 billion, a 4.3% increase from $1.49 billion in 2023, primarily from registry fees. Operating income reached $1.06 billion, yielding an operating margin of approximately 68%, while net income was $786 million, reflecting a net profit margin of about 50%. These margins underscore the scalability of Verisign's operations, where incremental domain additions generate outsized returns due to fixed infrastructure costs and high renewal rates exceeding 80%.
Fiscal YearRevenue ($B)Net Income ($M)Operating Margin (%)Net Margin (%)
20201.23778~65~63
20211.36823~67~60
20221.47674~66~46
20231.49818~67~55
20241.567866850
In the third quarter of 2025, accelerated to $419.1 million, up 7.3% year-over-year from $390.6 million, driven by a 2.5% increase in the .com and .net base to 170.9 million names and higher weighted average per . rose to $213 million from the prior-year quarter, with diluted of $2.27, supporting a net margin of roughly 51%. Cash flow from operations remained robust at approximately $200 million for the quarter, bolstering a with $618 million in cash, equivalents, and marketable securities. Verisign also returned value to shareholders via and share repurchases, declaring a quarterly of $0.81 per share in Q3 2025. Profitability faces constraints from U.S. government oversight, including a price cap on .com wholesale fees set at the 2016 level through 2024 and extended via contract renewals, limiting nominal despite . Nonetheless, adjusted EBITDA margins hovered near 70% in recent periods, reflecting and minimal . For full-year 2025, Verisign raised guidance for base to 2.2-2.5%, citing AI-related demand for digital infrastructure, projecting continued mid-single-digit expansion and sustained high margins absent major disruptions. exceeds 100% annually, far outpacing peers, due to leveraged buybacks reducing share count by over 50% since 2010.

Innovations and Contributions to Internet Infrastructure

Technological Advancements in DNS and Registry Systems

Verisign developed the Shared Registration System (SRS) on April 3, 1999, establishing a standardized protocol for domain name registrations that enabled multiple ICANN-accredited registrars to interface with the .com and .net registries. This three-tiered architecture incorporated the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP), which Verisign pioneered in 1999 and which achieved Internet Engineering Task Force standard status in 2009, facilitating automated, extensible domain transactions across over 2,000 registrars. By processing over 100 million daily transactions and peaking at 400,000 per minute while supporting more than 250 million domain registrations, SRS demonstrates engineered scalability for high-volume registry operations. Complementing SRS, Verisign's ATLAS platform, a patented transitioned into production in and upgraded to Next Generation ATLAS in , underpins DNS resolution for .com and .net by distributing query loads across global networks to achieve 100% availability for over 15 years. This system resolves billions of daily DNS queries—reaching 77 billion per day as of earlier benchmarks—while enabling rapid propagation of zone updates, such as the implementation of "rapid updates" that reduced .com and .net DNS change dissemination times from hours to minutes. ATLAS's design prioritizes fault-tolerant replication and load balancing, allowing the registries to handle escalating traffic without proportional increases, as evidenced by sustained performance amid domain base growth to 171.9 million names by Q3 2025. In DNS security, Verisign advanced (DNSSEC) through inline signing capabilities for .com and .net, incrementally securing over 100 million domain names since deploying DNSSEC for .com in March 2011, which authenticates DNS responses via to mitigate cache poisoning and redirection attacks. Enhancements include a 2023 algorithm upgrade from /SHA-1 to RSA/SHA-256 for .com, .net, and .edu zones, bolstering resistance to cryptographic weaknesses. Verisign has also pioneered authenticated , which restricts DNS responses to verified requesters in alignment with zero-trust models, and adaptive , which tailors responses based on requester context like location or device to optimize navigation efficiency; both technologies, protected by patents such as U.S. No. 8990356, remain in development for integration into recursive resolvers. Preparatory work for post-quantum DNSSEC, including hash-based signatures and synthesized zone keys, addresses emerging threats from to classical . These contributions, backed by over 127 U.S. patents in registry and DNS domains as of 2013, underscore Verisign's focus on resilient, scalable infrastructure amid rising cyber threats.

Enhancements to Internet Stability and Resiliency

Verisign operates a distributed DNS infrastructure utilizing technology across its .com and .net authoritative name servers, enabling queries to route to the nearest available server instance for reduced and improved against failures or attacks. This deployment spans multiple global locations, handling over 275 billion daily DNS transactions as of recent reports, which supports even under peak loads or regional disruptions. In 2023, Verisign upgraded its DNSSEC signing algorithm from /SHA-256 to ECDSA P-256/SHA-256 for .com, .net, and .edu zones, reducing signature sizes from 160 bytes to 64 bytes and thereby mitigating DNS amplification risks in DDoS attacks, which enhances overall DNS resiliency without disrupting resolution for validating resolvers. The transition, completed by late 2023 after phased testing, aligns with broader adoption trends, as ECDSA is supported by 78 top-level domains and nearly 10 million second-level domains. Verisign's Regional Internet Service (RIRS), introduced to extend its DNS constellation, deploys localized nodes that minimize reliance on third-party transit providers, thereby isolating critical DNS paths from DDoS vectors and improving reachability during transit outages. This service supports both IPv4 and , allowing networks worldwide to install nodes for scalable performance gains and reduced latency in recursive-to-authoritative queries. As root zone maintainer, Verisign contributes to resiliency through periodic Key Signing Key (KSK) rollovers, such as the 2024-2026 process, which verifies cryptographic material distribution to root servers and ensures uninterrupted DNSSEC validation amid evolving threats. Additionally, Verisign Public DNS, a recursive launched with addresses 64.6.64.6 and 64.6.65.6, leverages this infrastructure to provide users with reliable, privacy-respecting resolution hardened against common exploits. In 2010, Verisign collaborated with and the U.S. Department of Commerce to deploy cryptographic signing for the root zone, introducing DNSSEC at the internet's to prevent zone tampering and bolster global stability. These measures, combined with Verisign's proprietary systems engineered for dependability, have sustained .com and .net uptime exceeding 99.999% in quarterly reports.

Recognitions and Broader Impacts

Verisign executives have garnered notable recognitions for technical contributions to internet infrastructure. In May 2025, Burt Kaliski received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the for his enduring advancements in cryptography, including foundational work on standards. In August 2021, Vice President Danny McPherson was honored with the ACM SIGCOMM Test of Time Award for a 2001 paper on internet-scale measurement techniques that remain influential in network diagnostics and . Earlier, in 2011, Senior Director Matt Larson earned InfoWorld's Technology Leadership Award for innovations in DNS operations and domain management practices. The company itself qualified for the Online Trust Alliance's 2017 Honor Roll, recognizing its implementation of best practices in data protection, transparency, and across online operations. Beyond direct operations, Verisign has supported broader initiatives. In March 2011, it distributed $300,000 in grants—$75,000 each to four university teams—for projects enhancing infrastructure resilience, selected by evaluators including President Rod Beckstrom and internet pioneer . These efforts targeted vulnerabilities in , naming, and protocols, fostering academic advancements applicable to global DNS stability. Verisign's remediation of name collision queries during the 2012-2014 new rollout prevented widespread disruptions, resolving billions of erroneous resolutions through targeted outreach to network operators and device manufacturers. As maintainer, it distributes authoritative data to the 13 root server clusters, underpinning the hierarchical resolution process that handles over 100 billion daily queries for .com and .net domains alone. The U.S. has affirmed Verisign's stewardship in sustaining .com reliability, with no major outages attributed to registry operations since assuming control in 2001. These activities have reinforced the DNS's role as a resilient backbone, mitigating risks from scale growth—evidenced by .com/.net registrations reaching 171.9 million by September 2025—while enabling secure navigation for a substantial share of global .

Regulatory Environment and Monopoly Debates

Government Oversight and Contractual Framework

Verisign's operations for the .com and .net top-level domains (TLDs) are governed by registry agreements with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which specify technical, operational, and pricing requirements for domain name registry services. The .com agreement, renewed by ICANN on November 27, 2024, for a term extending through September 30, 2028, incorporates provisions for DNS abuse mitigation, Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) implementation, fixed fees with inflation adjustments, and support for multilingual internet initiatives. Similarly, the .net agreement aligns with ICANN policies, including emergency support obligations for registrars. These agreements mandate Verisign's compliance with ICANN's consensus policies on issues such as data accuracy, dispute resolution, and infrastructure resilience, while capping .com wholesale pricing increases at a maximum of 7% annually under a 2012 amendment that permits such hikes only upon mutual ICANN-Verisign consent. Complementing ICANN's framework is the U.S. Department of Commerce's (NTIA) Cooperative Agreement with Verisign, exclusively for operations, which originated from the of functions previously managed by the U.S. government. This agreement, renewed automatically on November 30, 2024, for successive one-year terms unless non-renewal notice is given 120 days prior, emphasizes 's role as critical by requiring Verisign to maintain operational stability, security enhancements, and coordination with NTIA on root zone changes. Unlike standard ICANN contracts, NTIA's oversight includes reviewing Verisign's performance metrics, such as system availability exceeding 100% uptime credits annually, and enforcing to prevent excessive hikes beyond the 7% cap, reflecting the U.S. government's retained authority post-2016 IANA stewardship transition. Verisign additionally serves as the DNS Root Zone Maintainer under a separate ICANN agreement, renewed on October 20, 2024, involving the publication and signing of root zone files to ensure DNS integrity. This role imposes heightened accountability, with and, indirectly, NTIA monitoring for any disruptions that could affect TLD delegation, including .com. NTIA's framework allows for periodic evaluations, as evidenced by 2024 inquiries into pricing practices ahead of renewal, though it preserves Verisign's operational autonomy absent demonstrated non-compliance. The combined structure balances private management with public-interest safeguards, prioritizing stability over competitive deregulation.

Antitrust Allegations and Historical Lawsuits

Verisign has faced antitrust scrutiny primarily due to its exclusive control over the .com and .net registries, positions secured through contracts with the and oversight by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and . Critics argue that this government-sanctioned arrangement constitutes a enabling excessive pricing, with .com registration fees rising from $7.85 in 2018 to $10.26 by 2024 under a pricing formula allowing up to 7% annual increases. The DOJ has acknowledged Verisign's significant , warning NTIA in 2008 that the company could leverage its dominance to harm competition in related services. However, Verisign maintains that its role ensures internet stability, with contractual caps mitigating unchecked profiteering, and no formal antitrust enforcement actions have resulted in divestiture or penalties to date. A key historical lawsuit was Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. (CFIT) v. Verisign Inc., filed in 2006, alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the . CFIT claimed that Verisign conspired with to restrain trade by securing a registry that perpetuated Verisign's over .com and .net domains while extending into expiring domain markets, thereby limiting competition from alternative registries. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2006 affirmed that CFIT adequately pled a conspiracy and intent to restrain trade but ultimately dismissed parts of the suit for lack of sufficient evidence on damages. The case settled in without any payment from Verisign or admission of liability, allowing Verisign to retain its contracts. More recent allegations emerged in November 2024 when U.S. Senator urged the DOJ and NTIA to investigate Verisign's .com pricing as anticompetitive exploitation of power, citing over $1 billion in annual excess costs to consumers and businesses. Warren's letter highlighted the Trump-era contract renewal, which preserved Verisign's no-bid exclusivity despite DOJ concerns, and called for fairer pricing mechanisms in future agreements. Advocacy groups like Economic Liberties echoed these claims, labeling Verisign an "economic termite" for profiting from government-granted dominance without commensurate innovation or cost reductions. These calls have not led to active litigation but underscore ongoing debates over whether regulated structures inherently stifle competition, even with oversight.

Defenses Against Monopoly Claims and Market Efficiency Arguments

Verisign's defenders argue that its exclusive role as the .com and .net registry operator is structurally necessary to maintain a unified , avoiding the fragmentation that could arise from multiple competing registries and lead to inconsistent worldwide. This centralized model enables efficient management of approximately 170 million domains, processing 329 billion DNS queries daily with 100% transactional success rates and uptime sustained for over 27 years across more than 60 countries. Such reliability stems from inherent to a single operator, allowing Verisign to invest heavily in redundant and technologies, including over 500 DNS-related patents, some licensed royalty-free to bolster broader ecosystem stability. Pricing mechanisms under Verisign's registry agreements with incorporate regulatory caps, limiting annual wholesale increases for .com domains to no more than 7% or the U.S. , whichever is lower, until at least 2025, with recent renewals maintaining these provisions amid scrutiny. As of September 1, 2024, the .com wholesale fee stands at $10.26, below 87% of other generic top-level domains (gTLDs) such as .biz at $15.00 or .online at $25.00, positioning it competitively rather than monopolistically extractive. efficiency is further evidenced by vigorous downstream among over 2,800 ICANN-accredited registrars, which set prices often double the wholesale , alongside alternatives in nearly 1,200 gTLDs and 250+ country-code TLDs representing 362 million non-Verisign-managed domains. Critics' focus on Verisign's high operating margins—around 40%—overlooks how these fund resiliency enhancements, such as advanced abuse mitigation and Registration Data Access Protocol improvements committed to in the November 25, 2024, ICANN renewal effective December 1, 2024. Absent this monopoly-like structure, duplicative registries could elevate operational risks and costs without commensurate benefits, as no rival has matched Verisign's scale in handling TLDs twice the size of all new gTLDs combined. Periodic NTIA and ICANN oversight, including contract reviews every six years, validates this framework by prioritizing systemic stability over fragmented competition, with renewals reflecting assessed performance against efficiency and security benchmarks.

Major Controversies

Early Certificate and Domain Transfer Disputes (2001-2002)

In January 2001, VeriSign erroneously issued two Class 3 code-signing digital certificates to an individual who fraudulently impersonated a Corporation employee, claiming authority to request them for software development purposes. The certificates, issued on January 29 and 30, bore the name " Corporation" and could have enabled the creation of malicious software appearing authentically signed by , posing risks of spoofing and trust exploitation in Windows environments. VeriSign's verification process failed to detect the forgery, which involved fabricated documentation submitted via an outsourced verification service; the incident highlighted deficiencies in due diligence at the time. Upon discovery, VeriSign revoked the certificates on February 1, 2001, and issued Security Bulletin MS01-017, urging users to reject any software signed with them and offering tools for validation. The episode drew scrutiny from security experts and , which classified it as a (VU#869360) emphasizing the need for robust identity verification in . No widespread exploitation was reported, but it eroded confidence in VeriSign's role as a leading , prompting internal reviews and broader industry discussions on authentication standards; VeriSign publicly acknowledged the error stemmed from human oversight in processing. Concurrently, VeriSign faced disputes over domain name transfer practices, particularly accusations of "domain slamming"—deceptive marketing that misled consumers into unwittingly transferring registrations from competitors to its Network Solutions subsidiary. In early 2002, starting around April, VeriSign mailed "Domain Name Expiration Notices" to customers of rival registrars, formatted to resemble official renewal alerts with urgent deadlines (e.g., implying expiration by May 15, 2002), but actually promoting transfers to Network Solutions with offers like discounted renewals. These tactics exploited consumer confusion amid growing domain portability under ICANN rules, leading to lawsuits from affected registrars such as GoDaddy.com and BulkRegister, which claimed false advertising and unfair competition. By mid-2002, VeriSign settled multiple suits, including with in June—agreeing to cease the mailings and provide refunds or free registrations to misled customers—and with BulkRegister in August, without admitting liability but committing to clearer disclosures. Consumer class actions followed, alleging violations of laws, with VeriSign defending the notices as legitimate promotions but yielding to injunctions against deceptive language. These incidents reflected VeriSign's aggressive retention strategies in a competitive post-monopoly market, foreshadowing enforcement in 2003 over similar practices dating back to 2001. An audit of VeriSign's 2001 operations also uncovered material noncompliances in registry procedures, including lax enforcement of limits for registrars, which indirectly affected transfer efficiency and competitor access. In September 2003, VeriSign launched Site Finder, a service designed to redirect queries for unregistered .com and .net domains to a company-controlled search page offering sponsored links and options. The implementation, effective September 15, 2003, involved deploying DNS wildcard records—A records for *.com and *.net pointing to VeriSign's 64.94.110.11, accompanied by a CNAME alias to wildcard.comsf.com—which intercepted queries for non-existent domains and replaced standard NXDOMAIN error responses with HTTP redirects to the Site Finder landing page. This altered the expected DNS behavior without prior consultation with standards bodies or the broader technical community, aiming to monetize otherwise unresolved traffic. The service disrupted internet operations reliant on accurate DNS resolution, as applications interpreting NXDOMAIN as confirmation of non-existence—such as filters, detectors, and diagnostic tools—began malfunctioning when receiving affirmative responses instead. Specific harms included interference with delivery systems that used DNS checks to validate sender domains, breakdowns in software scanning for hosts, and widespread user confusion over failed connections resolving to advertisements rather than errors. The described it as a "brazen " of VeriSign's registry authority, exacerbating privacy risks through data tracking on queries and potential dilution via misleading redirects. Internet service providers responded by patching resolvers to restore NXDOMAIN responses, with blocking affecting approximately 9% of top websites by late September; notable implementations occurred in regions like , , and . The issued a statement on September 20, 2003, urging wildcard removal due to issues. ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee recommended voluntary suspension on September 22, 2003, citing stability threats, but VeriSign declined. On September 23, 2003, formally requested suspension, arguing the service constituted an unapproved registry addition violating the 2001 .com and .net agreements' provisions on equal access, conduct codes, and service modifications. VeriSign resisted, prompting 's October 3, 2003, demand for immediate shutdown by the following day, which VeriSign executed on October 4, 2003, while reserving rights to challenge the decision. The rollout drew three independent lawsuits from affected parties alleging technical interference and contract breaches. VeriSign countersued in 2004, claiming the shutdown breached their agreement and violated antitrust laws by restraining trade, but a U.S. District Court dismissed the antitrust allegations on March 31, 2004, ruling 's enforcement did not meet criteria under the Sherman Act.

Domain Policy Shifts and Retentions (2003-2005)

In January 2003, VeriSign implemented the Redemption Grace Period (RGP) for .com and .net domains, marking a significant policy shift to enhance domain retention after expiration. Previously, domains entering the post-grace deletion phase were irretrievable once the initiated deletion, typically after a 0-40 day following expiration. Under the new RGP, introduced on January 25, 2003, domains transitioned to a 30-day REDEMPTIONPERIOD status after deletion, during which could restore them via the Registry-Registrar Protocol, a web-based tool, or , subject to a restoration fee of US$85 for the first 2,000 requests annually and US$40 thereafter (waived for registry errors). Restoration required submission of a Restore Report within two business days, including justification for the error and contact verification. Unrestored domains then entered a five-day PENDINGDELETE phase before final deletion from the registry. This framework, proposed by VeriSign in February 2002 and preliminarily approved by in June 2002, addressed community concerns over accidental deletions while standardizing retention processes across registries. Complementing the RGP, VeriSign launched the ConsoliDate service on the same date, allowing registrars to adjust domain expiration dates for synchronization purposes, thereby influencing retention strategies. Extensions ranged from one day (minimum) to one year minus one day (maximum), with a fee structure of US$2 fixed plus US$1 per month extended, applicable once per year per domain and restricted during statuses like REDEMPTIONPERIOD or PENDINGDELETE. Additionally, output was updated to display expiration dates and status codes, improving transparency for domain holders and facilitating proactive retention. 's analysis in February 2003 endorsed these changes for their alignment with stability goals, noting broad stakeholder support and no substantive controversies, leading to recommendations for amending .com and .net registry agreements to codify them permanently. These policies were retained through 2005 amid ongoing ICANN oversight and VeriSign's monopoly on .com/.net operations, with no major reversals despite external pressures like the September 2003 SiteFinder dispute (addressed separately). The RGP framework proved durable, extending redemption protections and reducing deletion risks, as evidenced by its subsequent adoption in other registries without -mandated alterations to VeriSign's implementation by 2005. Retention of these measures supported VeriSign's operational efficiency claims, prioritizing empirical recovery data over unsubstantiated calls for shorter periods, while contractual caps limited pricing escalations tied to retention services.

Data Breaches and Domain Seizures (2010-2012)

In 2010, VeriSign's corporate network endured multiple successful cyberattacks, enabling intruders to access and exfiltrate data from a limited subset of systems, though the company did not disclose the specifics of the stolen information. The breaches were first detailed in VeriSign's October 2011 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 10-Q filing, which followed new disclosure rules for cybersecurity incidents and noted that management was informed only after the attacks had concluded. VeriSign maintained that these intrusions did not affect the operational integrity of the (DNS), including no evidence of tampering with core registry functions for .com and .net domains. Nonetheless, the incidents prompted scrutiny from security analysts, who speculated that attackers might have obtained sensitive DNS-related data, potentially enabling or traffic redirection schemes targeting high-value domains under VeriSign's stewardship. Concurrent with these security lapses, VeriSign's role as the exclusive registry operator for .com and .net domains positioned it to execute U.S. government-ordered domain seizures, typically involving the redirection of targeted domains to federal seizure notices via changes to records. Between 2010 and 2012, U.S. authorities, including and Customs Enforcement (), leveraged this mechanism in operations like "In Our Sites," resulting in the forfeiture of hundreds of domains accused of facilitating goods, , and illegal . A notable example occurred in February 2012, when VeriSign implemented seizures for 307 sports-streaming domains ahead of the , as directed by court warrants alleging unauthorized broadcasting. These seizures extended to .com domains registered through non-U.S. entities, sparking debates over jurisdictional overreach, as VeriSign's U.S. domicile compelled compliance irrespective of the registrar's location. In one publicized case from February , VeriSign seized the .com domain pugetsoundanesthesia.com—registered via firm easyDNS—on behalf of U.S. authorities pursuing civil forfeiture for alleged healthcare , despite the registrar's foreign status and lack of direct U.S. ties. Critics argued this demonstrated VeriSign's enforcement power, bypassing international and potentially enabling extraterritorial control over global addressing. Amplifying concerns, VeriSign sought to expand its seizure capabilities in October 2011 by proposing amendments to its registry agreement, which would authorize proactive scanning of hosted sites for or child exploitation material and permit rapid takedowns without full judicial warrants in exigent cases. The proposal, piloted with U.S. and cybersecurity partners, aimed to streamline responses to DNS abuse but drew opposition from domain registrars and free-speech advocates, who viewed it as an unchecked escalation of private-sector aligned with government priorities. VeriSign withdrew the request within days amid backlash, reaffirming reliance on existing legal processes. These events underscored tensions between VeriSign's on key TLDs and demands for enhanced measures, without of operational DNS disruption from the seizures themselves.

Recent Pricing Scrutiny and Political Interventions (2020s)

In the early , Verisign faced growing criticism over its annual wholesale price increases for .com domain registrations, which reached the maximum allowable 7% cap under its cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce's (NTIA). For instance, on September 1, 2023, the price rose from $8.97 to $9.59 per domain, a 6.91% hike, followed by an increase to $10.26 effective September 1, 2024. These adjustments, applied to over 150 million .com domains, generated substantial revenue for Verisign—exceeding $1 billion annually from .com alone—prompting accusations of exploiting its exclusive registry role without competitive pressures. Critics, including advocacy groups like Economic Liberties, argued that such hikes outpaced by roughly double, potentially burdening small businesses and consumers amid limited alternatives to .com's market dominance. Political scrutiny intensified ahead of the .com registry agreement's renewal deadline in late 2024, with interventions from both Democratic and Republican figures highlighting concerns over Verisign's monopoly-like position. In November 2024, Senator urged the NTIA and Department of Justice to investigate Verisign for antitrust violations, claiming the firm charged "excessive prices" and profited disproportionately from its government-granted exclusivity, while dismissing defenses that retail registrars absorb costs. Concurrently, Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans launched an inquiry into NTIA's contract oversight, faulting the agency for permitting unchecked maximum increases since the Trump-era formula restoration in 2018, which reversed Obama-administration caps. A coalition of consumer advocates echoed these calls, pressing NTIA to end automatic renewal and pursue competitive bidding to curb pricing power. Despite the backlash, the NTIA approved a six-year extension of Verisign's .com agreement in November 2024, maintaining the pricing formula with no increases scheduled for 2025–2026 but allowing up to 7% annual hikes in four subsequent years. Verisign countered allegations by emphasizing that it sets only wholesale fees, with registrars determining retail prices amid a competitive featuring alternatives like .net or new gTLDs, and noted its investments in infrastructure stability. The renewal, ratified by , preserved Verisign's presumptive right without rebidding, a provision the company defended as essential for operational continuity, though detractors viewed it as entrenching unaccountable pricing authority.

References

  1. [1]
    Verisign: A global provider of domain name registry services and ...
    Verisign enables the world to connect online with reliability and confidence, anytime, anywhere. · A Leader in Internet Infrastructure and Domain Name Registry ...About Verisign · Domain Registry · Support · Careers
  2. [2]
    VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) Company Profile & Facts - Yahoo Finance
    VeriSign, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides internet infrastructure and domain name registry services that enables internet navigation.
  3. [3]
    About - Verisign
    Verisign, a global provider of critical internet infrastructure and domain name registry services, enables internet navigation for many of the world's most ...What is the DNS · Leadership · Our Mission and Values
  4. [4]
    Is Verisign a Monopoly? Does It Matter? - CircleID
    Nov 26, 2024 · As to whether VeriSign is a monopoly, well, they sure act like one. The .com registry has about 150 million names, which is over twice as large as all of the ...
  5. [5]
    Warren, Nadler Urge Regulators To Take Action on Verisign's ...
    Nov 22, 2024 · Verisign has government-sanctioned monopoly on .com registry. Trump-era contract signed by NTIA and DOJ has allowed Verisign to raise prices ...
  6. [6]
    Warren Accuses Verisign of Web Domain Registration Monopoly
    Nov 25, 2024 · Sen. Elizabeth Warren is calling for an antitrust investigation into the web domain registration business, saying Verisign has a monopoly.
  7. [7]
    History of VeriSign, Inc. – FundingUniverse
    VeriSign, Inc. has grown and expanded into new markets through acquisitions since it was spun off from RSA Data Security Inc. in 1995. The company is known ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    About VeriSign and SSL Certificates - Blog - GeoCerts.com
    Jan 8, 2018 · VeriSign was the first company ever to issue SSL certificates back in the mid-1990s, and it continued to be the brand and market leader in the SSL space.
  10. [10]
    What is Brief History of VeriSign Company? – PortersFiveForce.com
    Oct 7, 2025 · Founded in 1995, the company initially focused on digital authentication, providing digital certificates to secure online transactions.
  11. [11]
    History and Company Timeline - Verisign
    issuance, identity verification, and ...
  12. [12]
    The Verisign Shared Registration System: A 25-Year Retrospective
    Jun 3, 2024 · Over a period of several months, Network Solutions designed and installed the system, which was officially deployed on April 3, 1999. Through a ...Missing: spin- date<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    VeriSign to Sell Authentication Services Business to Symantec for ...
    May 19, 2010 · VeriSign to Sell Authentication Services Business to Symantec for $1.28 Billion ... MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA, May 19, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX News ...
  14. [14]
    VeriSign's Sale of Authentication Services Business to Symantec ...
    Aug 9, 2010 · As part of the transaction, which was originally announced on May 19, VeriSign sold to Symantec its Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption ...
  15. [15]
    VeriSign to divest many businesses | Reuters
    Nov 14, 2007 · VeriSign Inc, which makes switchboards that direct Internet traffic, plans to divest several businesses and focus on its Web site-naming and ...Missing: spin- offs
  16. [16]
    VeriSign To Divest Multiple Units, Focus On Naming Services, Web ...
    Nov 14, 2007 · VeriSign (VRSN), which is meeting with analysts in New York today, this morning announced that it plans to divest a number of businesses, ...
  17. [17]
    VeriSign mulls divestiture of many businesses - Reuters
    Nov 14, 2007 · Businesses targeted for divestiture include VeriSign's communications, billing and commerce units, the company said. Jumpstart your morning with ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    VeriSign Sells Communication Services Group to TNS, Inc. for $230 ...
    Mar 2, 2009 · VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN) today announced the sale of its Communication Services Group to Reston, Va.-based TNS, Inc. (NYSE: TNS), in a cash transaction of ...Missing: spin- offs
  19. [19]
    VeriSign to Sell Messaging Business to Syniverse Holdings, Inc. for ...
    Aug 25, 2009 · "Even under challenging economic conditions, we have continued to execute on our divestiture strategy through aligning with buyers with ...Missing: spin- offs
  20. [20]
    [PDF] VERISIGN ANNUAL REPORT
    Feb 26, 2010 · 2008 Restructuring Plan. As part of its divestiture strategy announced in 2007, the Company initiated a restructuring plan in the first.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] VERISIGN, INC.
    In July 2010, the Company expanded the 2010. Restructuring Plan to include migration of its corporate functions from its Mountain View facility to its ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] VERISIGN, INC.
    Apr 11, 2011 · Under the 2010 Restructuring Plan, the Company expects to incur ... Authentication Services business and certain other completed divestitures.
  24. [24]
    Archives | Information on Proposed VeriSign Agreement Revisions
    Under section 23, this means that to obtain the extension VeriSign must divest all the assets and operations of NSI Registrar by 10 May 2001. Obviously, there ...
  25. [25]
    VeriSign Net Acquisitions/Divestitures 2010-2025 | VRSN
    VeriSign annual/quarterly net acquisitions/divestitures history and growth rate from 2010 to 2025. Net acquisitions/divestitures can be defined as the total ...Missing: restructuring | Show results with:restructuring
  26. [26]
    Verisign as a Domain Name Registry
    Verisign operates the authoritative registry of .com, .net, .name, and .cc domain names, and provides domain registry services for a range of additional ...
  27. [27]
    Whois - Verisign
    Verisign's Whois tool allows users to look up records in the registry database for all registered .com, .net, .name, .cc and .edu domain names. It also ...
  28. [28]
    ICANN Renews .COM Registry Agreement with Verisign
    Nov 27, 2024 · The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) today announced the renewal of its .COM Registry Agreement (RA) with Verisign.
  29. [29]
    The .com Cooperative Agreement: Ensuring Internet Stability and ...
    Nov 29, 2024 · Verisign manages the .com registry—just as other organizations manage registries like .biz or .org – and serves as a wholesaler of .com domains.Missing: shift .net
  30. [30]
    ICANN and Verisign Announce Proposed Amendment to .COM ...
    Jan 3, 2020 · Verisign enables the security, stability, and resiliency of key internet infrastructure and services, including providing root zone maintainer ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    .com Registry Agreement - icann
    Dec 1, 2024 · On 30 June 2023, ICANN and VeriSign, Inc. agreed to amend the Binding Letter of Intent for .COM to also apply to .NET. Agreement.
  32. [32]
    Domain Name Industry Brief - Verisign
    The Domain Name Industry Brief (DNIB) provides up-to-date trends in new domain name registrations, renewals, and growth.
  33. [33]
    Root Zone Maintainer | Verisign
    Verisign, as the Root Zone Maintainer, helps to ensure continuous connectivity to the Domain Name System (DNS) root zone.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Root Zone Maintainer Service Agreement | ICANN
    May 11, 2016 · “Verisign RZMS” means the Verisign root zone maintainer system(s) that receives and processes Root Zone Change Submissions from ICANN.
  35. [35]
    Verisign and ICANN Renew Root Zone Maintainer Service Agreement
    Oct 22, 2024 · On October 20th, ICANN and Verisign renewed the agreement under which Verisign will continue to act as Root Zone Maintainer for the Domain Name System (DNS) ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  36. [36]
    Verisign gets eight more years running the root - Domain Incite
    Oct 24, 2024 · Verisign said the Root Zone Maintainer Agreement was renewed on October 20 for another eight-year term. The RZMA is basically a technical ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Verisign/ICANN Proposal in Response to NTIA Request
    Until the IANA stewardship transition is completed, Verisign, at the direction of. NTIA, plans to continue its current role as Root Zone Maintainer (RZM) under ...
  38. [38]
    Verisign's Role in Securing the DNS Through Key Signing ...
    Mar 1, 2023 · Keeping the internet's DNS secure, stable, and resilient is a crucial aspect of Verisign's role as the Root Zone Maintainer. We are honored ...
  39. [39]
    The DNSSEC Root Signing Ceremony - Cloudflare
    Verisign also plays an important role, as they are the root zone maintainer responsible for generating the root zone-signing key that is signed during the ...
  40. [40]
    Verisign DNSSEC Practice Statements
    It states the practices and provisions that are used to provide Root Zone Signing and Zone distribution services. These include, but are not limited to, issuing ...
  41. [41]
    Verisign to update DNSSEC algorithm - APNIC Blog
    Sep 19, 2023 · All Verisign TLDs are currently signed with DNSSEC algorithm 8, also known as RSA/SHA-256, as documented in our DNSSEC Practice Statements.Growth Over Time · Rolling The Algorithm · The Road To Algorithm 13<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Verisign | Digital Watch Observatory
    Verisign performs the Domain Name System root zone maintainer function and acts as a root server operator, by managing 2 of the 13 root servers hostnames.
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Cloud-Based DDoS Protection and Managed DNS Services Helping ...
    Verisign helps enable the security, stability, and resiliency of the Domain Name System and the internet by providing root zone maintainer services, operating ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  45. [45]
    Combating DNS Abuse - Verisign
    We deploy a range of techniques, including sinkhole servers, cryptographic protections, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) mitigation mechanisms, and ...
  46. [46]
    Verisign Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results
    Feb 6, 2025 · On Nov. 27, 2024 , Verisign announced the renewal of the .com Registry Agreement with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ( ...Missing: becomes pure- play
  47. [47]
    Verisign Revenues: How Does VRSN Make Money? - Trefis
    Verisign's makes money from a single revenue stream · Verisign's Business Model · Verisign's Revenues have seen a increase of 9.3% from around $1.4 Bil in FY2022 ...
  48. [48]
    Verisign inks .com contract extension with ICANN
    Nov 27, 2024 · This means prices should remain $10.26 in 2025 and 2026 before being eligible for 7% increases in the next four years. Verisign has consistently ...
  49. [49]
    ICANN enters into .net contract extension with Verisign
    Jul 1, 2023 · The current wholesale price is $9.92, and the new agreement gives Verisign the right to increase prices to $19.31 at the end of the six-year ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    VeriSign renews .com registry agreement with ICANN - Investing.com
    Nov 27, 2024 · In conjunction with the registry agreement, VeriSign and ICANN also amended a separate Letter of Intent (LOI), originally dated March 27, 2020, ...
  53. [53]
    Verisign Cooperative Agreement
    The RZMA was signed by ICANN and Verisign in 2016. Subsequently, the Department of Commerce amended the Cooperative Agreement to release Verisign from root zone ...
  54. [54]
    NTIA announces renewal of cooperative agreement with VeriSign
    Dec 2, 2024 · ICANN maintains its own .com registry agreement with Verisign, which it renewed last week. “The security and stability of the Internet are ...
  55. [55]
    E&C Republicans Open Inquiry into NTIA's Online Domain Name ...
    Jul 25, 2024 · Verisign manages the .com registry under two agreements—a .com Registry Agreement between ICANN and Verisign and a Cooperative Agreement between ...
  56. [56]
    Root Zone Maintainer Service Agreement Is Now Effective - icann
    Oct 20, 2016 · As of today, the cooperative agreement between NTIA and Verisign was amended to release Verisign from its root zone maintainer obligations.Missing: contract maintenance
  57. [57]
    VeriSign Net Income 2011-2025 | VRSN - Macrotrends
    VeriSign annual net income for 2024 was $0.786B, a 3.9% decline from 2023. VeriSign annual net income for 2023 was $0.818B, a 21.34% increase from 2022.
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    VeriSign Revenue 2011-2025 | VRSN - Macrotrends
    VeriSign revenue for the twelve months ending June 30, 2025 was $1.598B, a 4.59% increase year-over-year. VeriSign annual revenue for 2024 was $1.557B, a 4.31% ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Form 10-K for Verisign Incca filed 02/13/2025
    Feb 13, 2025 · This is Verisign Inc.'s Form 10-K annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, filed on 02/13/2025. It includes information on ...
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    None
    ### Summary of Verisign's Key Innovations
  67. [67]
    VeriSign Implements 'Rapid Updates' for DNS - TechNewsWorld
    Sep 9, 2004 · VeriSign has implemented an enhancement, called “rapid updates,” to its .com and .net Domain Name System (DNS) servers.Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Verisign Achieves Critical DNSSEC Milestone by Deploying Security ...
    Mar 31, 2011 · Verisign enables the security, stability, and resiliency of key internet infrastructure and services, including providing root zone maintainer ...
  69. [69]
    Security and Navigational Enhancements to the Domain Name System
    Nov 19, 2020 · Two Verisign-developed technologies known as authenticated resolution and adaptive resolution give DNS name servers an important new role in ...
  70. [70]
    Verisign Managed DNS Offers Hybrid of Unicast and Anycast Query ...
    Feb 14, 2011 · Verisign's hybrid approach to managed DNS helps minimize transactional latency while optimizing availability by anycasting to a smaller number ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Measuring the Placement of DNS Servers in Top-Level ... - Verisign
    3.2 DNS Anycast. 3.2.1 Existing Anycast Deployment. DNS anycast is a practice of providing DNS service at multiple geographic and topological locations [16, 7] ...
  72. [72]
    Regional Internet Resolution Service (RIRS) - Verisign
    Reduce dependencies on Internet Protocol (IP) transit relationships for critical DNS reachability, thereby increasing internet resiliency to DDoS attacks.Missing: enhancements | Show results with:enhancements
  73. [73]
    Verisign Will Help Strengthen Security with DNSSEC Algorithm ...
    Aug 10, 2023 · We will upgrade the algorithm we use to sign domain names in the .com, .net, and .edu zones with Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC).
  74. [74]
    The 2024-2026 Root Zone KSK Rollover - Verisign Blog
    All in all, we are highly optimistic about a successful rollover process that helps continue to keep the DNS secure, stable, and resilient, beginning with the ...
  75. [75]
    Introducing Verisign Public DNS: A Free Recursive DNS Service
    Verisign helps enable the security, stability, and resiliency of the Domain Name System and the internet by providing root zone maintainer services, operating ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Commerce Department, ICANN and VeriSign Deploy New ...
    Jul 16, 2010 · Commerce Department, ICANN and VeriSign Deploy New Technology to Enhance the Security and Stability of the Internet ... Internet infrastructure.
  77. [77]
    Celebrating Verisign CTO Burt Kaliski's Lifetime Achievement Award
    May 14, 2025 · Verisign helps enable the security, stability, and resiliency of the Domain Name System and the internet by providing root zone maintainer ...
  78. [78]
    The Test of Time at Internet Scale: Verisign's Danny McPherson ...
    The Test of Time at Internet Scale: Verisign's Danny McPherson Recognized with ACM SIGCOMM Award. August 27, 2021 • By Burt Kaliski • Domain Names.
  79. [79]
    Verisign's Matt Larson Wins 2011 InfoWorld Technology Leadership ...
    Jun 1, 2011 · Verisign's Matt Larson Wins 2011 InfoWorld Technology Leadership Award. By Verisign (Sponsored Post) A Global Provider of Critical Internet ...<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    Verisign Named to the Online Trust Alliance's 2017 Audit and Honor ...
    Verisign is pleased to announce that we qualified for the Online Trust Alliance's (OTA) 2017 Honor Roll for showing a commitment to best practices in ...
  81. [81]
    Verisign Announces Winners of Grants Aimed at Strengthening ...
    Mar 16, 2011 · Distinguished judges for the grants included Rod Beckstrom, President and CEO of ICANN; Vint Cerf, Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist ...Missing: recognitions | Show results with:recognitions
  82. [82]
    Verisign Outreach Program Remediates Billions of Name Collision ...
    Jan 15, 2021 · While this unilateral outreach effort resulted in significant and successful name collision remediation, it is broader DNS community engagement, ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] .NET Registry-Registrar Agreement - Verisign
    Registrar shall, consistent with ICANN policy, provide to Registered Name Holders emergency contact or. 24/7 support information for critical situations such as ...
  84. [84]
    ICANN and Verisign Announce Proposed Amendment to .COM ...
    Jan 3, 2020 · Verisign and ICANN may agree to amend the .COM Registry Agreement to permit an increase to the price for .COM registry services, up to a maximum of 7 percent.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Letter to NTIA and DOJ re Verisign's .com Website Prices
    Nov 21, 2024 · 4. Commerce is set to renew its contract with Verisign that regulates Verisign's .com registration fees on November 30, 2024.5 Ahead of that ...
  86. [86]
    COALITION FOR ICANN TRANSPARENCY INC v. VERISIGN INC
    CFIT has adequately pled the existence of a conspiracy between VeriSign and ICANN, and that VeriSign had the intent to restrain trade when it entered into the .
  87. [87]
    VeriSign settles CFIT lawsuit for free - Domain Incite
    May 11, 2011 · VeriSign has settled its five-year-old antitrust lawsuit with the Coalition For ICANN Transparency. What's more, it's done so without having ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Elizabeth Warren Calls for Crackdown on Internet 'Monopoly' You've ...
    Nov 22, 2024 · “VeriSign is exploiting its monopoly power to charge millions of users excessive prices for registering a .com top-level domain,” the letter ...
  89. [89]
    The Government Created the Most Profitable Company in America
    Jun 27, 2024 · “VeriSign is a prime example of an economic termite, and has used its government-approved monopoly over domains to hike prices with no ...
  90. [90]
    NTIA and DOJ Must Break VeriSign's Monopoly Power Over Domain ...
    Jun 27, 2024 · The letter to the NTIA urges the agency not to renew its contract with Verisign—which has a monopoly over core internet domain names including “ ...
  91. [91]
    Setting the Record Straight - Myths vs. Facts about .com
    Aug 13, 2024 · Myth: Verisign sets .com domain name prices for consumers. Fact: Domain name registrars set unregulated retail prices for .com domain names ...
  92. [92]
    COM Registry Agreement - icann cdn
    Dec 1, 2024 · This REGISTRY AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of December 1, 2024 by and between Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and ...
  93. [93]
    VeriSign Addresses Monopoly Concerns by Renewing Its Registry ...
    Nov 29, 2024 · ... VeriSign's monopoly position in the .com domain registry industry due to its exclusive control over the .com and .net top-level domains.
  94. [94]
    Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-017 - Critical
    In mid-March 2001, VeriSign, Inc., advised Microsoft that on January 29 and 30, 2001, it issued two VeriSign Class 3 code-signing digital certificates to an ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  95. [95]
    Unauthentic "Microsoft Corporation" certificates issued by Verisign to ...
    Mar 27, 2001 · On January 29 and 30, 2001, VeriSign, Inc. issued two certificates to an individual fraudulently claiming to be an employee of Microsoft ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  96. [96]
    VeriSign issues false Microsoft digital certificates - Computerworld
    MICROSOFT ON THURSDAY began to warn users that VeriSign erroneously issued two digital certificates to someone masquerading as a Microsoft ...Missing: 2002 | Show results with:2002
  97. [97]
    Questions Linger After VeriSign Breach - eWeek
    Internet security company VeriSign has acknowledged issuing two Microsoft digital certificates to an imposter, raising doubts in many quarters.Missing: 2002 | Show results with:2002
  98. [98]
    VeriSign settles “domain name slamming” lawsuit - Pinsent Masons
    Aug 8, 2002 · The notices referred to a deadline for reply of 15th May 2002, the implication being that the domain name registration was about to expire.
  99. [99]
    VeriSign Faces New Aggressive Marketing Lawsuit | Internet News
    “On or about April 25, 2002, Verisign began sending a 'Domain Name Expiration Notice' to thousands of consumers of its competitors,” the lawsuit maintained. “ ...
  100. [100]
    Technology Briefing | Internet: Verisign Sued By Consumers - The ...
    In a suit filed by consumers, VeriSign, which registers Internet addresses, is accused of misleading competitors' customers by sending them letters ...
  101. [101]
    BUSINESS DIGEST / VeriSign settles lawsuit by Go Daddy - SFGATE
    Go Daddy had claimed a VeriSign mailing misled consumers into switching domain registrations. The letter, titled "Domain Name Expiration Notice," looked like a ...
  102. [102]
    VeriSign settles slamming charge with BulkRegister • The Register
    The lawsuit was over a direct mail VeriSign sent out to customers of rival registrars earlier this year. The mailshot, critics say, was misleading, as it looked ...
  103. [103]
    VeriSign to stop mailings to competitors' customers - CT Insider
    Jun 21, 2002 · Online registrar VeriSign has agreed to stop a direct mail campaign that critics say duped many Internet users into switching their domain ...
  104. [104]
    FTC settles with VeriSign over domain transfers - Computerworld
    Sep 24, 2003 · VeriSign agreed to stop marketing practices that allegedly tricked consumers into transferring domain names to its Network Solutions ...
  105. [105]
    2001 AIN Audit Report on Verisign - icann
    Jun 19, 2002 · Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with the ICANN Requirements applicable to VeriSign, Inc. during the year ended ...
  106. [106]
    The Deployment of VeriSign "Site Finder" and ISP Response
    On September 15, 2003, VeriSign introduced a service called Site Finder. ... Objections range from the way in which Site Finder's implementation confuse ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  107. [107]
    Verisign's "Sitefinder" Harms Internet - Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Sep 16, 2003 · "It interferes with the delivery of e-mail, causes security software to malfunction, and creates extreme confusion for Internet users. This is ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  108. [108]
    ICANN asks VeriSign to suspend Site Finder service - Pinsent Masons
    Sep 23, 2003 · According to CNet News.com, VeriSign implemented the change without consulting internet standards groups, which has caused other problems.Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  109. [109]
    ICANN demand sees VeriSign pull SiteFinder - The Register
    VeriSign has pulled its controversial SiteFinder application after ICANN demanded in a formal statement and letter that the company shut it ...Missing: implementation challenges
  110. [110]
    VeriSign's Antitrust Claim Against ICANN Dismissed
    VeriSign has claimed that ICANN was manipulated by the registrar's competitors who convinced the nonprofit group to curtail VeriSign's market activities, ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  111. [111]
    General Counsel's Analysis of VeriSign Global Registry Services ...
    Feb 23, 2003 · The purpose of the agenda topic is to authorize updating the .com and .net registry agreements to reflect these changes.
  112. [112]
  113. [113]
  114. [114]
    [PDF] ICANN Registry Request Service
    Mar 20, 2012 · RGP for .com and .net was approved in 2003, and ICANN approved RGP for other registries as well. Verisign is not aware of any concerns raised by ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Summary of Revisions to VeriSign Settlement Agreement/ - icann
    Jan 29, 2006 · Issue #2: VeriSign price increase (the maximum 7% peryear cap) is inappropriate, too high, and should be tied to increases in costs. Section 7.3 ...
  116. [116]
    Verisign Statement on 2010 Security Breach | VeriSign, Inc.
    Feb 2, 2012 · Verisign stated in 2011, and reaffirms, that we do not believe that the operational integrity of the Domain Name System (DNS) was compromised.
  117. [117]
    VeriSign Hit by Hackers in 2010 - WIRED
    Feb 2, 2012 · Internet giant VeriSign was hacked repeatedly in 2010 resulting in the theft of undisclosed information and raising questions about the integrity of security ...
  118. [118]
    Key Internet operator VeriSign hit by hackers - Reuters
    Feb 2, 2012 · The previously unreported breaches occurred in 2010 at the Reston, Virginia-based company, which is ultimately responsible for the integrity ...
  119. [119]
    VeriSign 2010 Hack: DNS Data Theft A Possibility - Dark Reading
    Feb 2, 2012 · SEC data breach disclosure report triggers admission from VeriSign that attackers might have accessed sensitive domain name system data.
  120. [120]
    Feds Seized 1,700 Online Domains in 3 Years - WIRED
    Jun 20, 2013 · Federal authorities said today that, since June 2010, they have seized more than 1,700 domains that allegedly breached intellectual property ...
  121. [121]
    Feds Seize 307 Sports-Related Domains Ahead of Super Sunday
    Feb 2, 2012 · The feds are able to seize the domains because Verisign, which controls the . ... TopicsCrimeDomain SeizureIntellectual PropertyThreat Level.
  122. [122]
    Verisign seizes .com domain registered via foreign Registrar on ...
    Feb 29, 2012 · Verisign seizes .com domain registered via foreign Registrar on behalf of US Authorities. February 29, 2012 by Mark E. Jeftovic 57 Comments.Missing: 2010-2012 | Show results with:2010-2012
  123. [123]
    Uncle Sam: If It Ends in .Com, It's .Seizable - WIRED
    Mar 6, 2012 · Navas said the U.S. government has seized 750 domain names, "most with foreign-based registrars." VeriSign, for its part, said it is complying ...
  124. [124]
    VeriSign demands website takedown powers - The Register
    Oct 11, 2011 · That seizure process has come under fire because, in at least one fringe case, a seized .com domain's website had already been ruled legal by a ...
  125. [125]
    Registrars not happy with VeriSign abuse plans - Domain Incite
    Oct 12, 2011 · Verisign and PIR join new DNS abuse group February 9, 2022. VeriSign yanks domain seizure power request October 13, 2011. Tagged: abuse, ICANN ...
  126. [126]
  127. [127]
    Verisign wants power to shut sites down upon law enforcement ...
    Oct 11, 2011 · Verisign said it has been piloting takedown procedures with US law enforcement agencies, cybersecurity experts, US government Computer Emergeny ...<|separator|>
  128. [128]
    Verisign under fire for increasing .com prices every year - The Register
    Aug 6, 2024 · Last week, just prior to the August 2, 2024 contract renewal deadline, the American Economic Liberties Project released a policy paper ...
  129. [129]
    Verisign Increases .COM Domain Price Effective September 1, 2024
    Sep 1, 2024 · Verisign has a contract with our mutual regulator ICANN to have .com pricing go up by about 7% in each of the last four years of its six ...
  130. [130]
    Renewing Verisign's Contract Would Hike Domain Name Prices at ...
    Jul 29, 2024 · With an August 2nd deadline looming for the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to decide whether to renew ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  131. [131]
    Coalition Urges End to VeriSign's Domain Monopoly Before August ...
    Jun 30, 2024 · The coalition's letter to the NTIA implores the agency to not renew VeriSign's contract, which grants the company monopoly control over core ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  132. [132]
    Verisign: you can't cancel our contract to run .com
    Jun 28, 2024 · Verisign (NASDAQ: VRSN) today filed a notice with the SEC stating that the .com contract cannot be put out to competitive bidding.Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  133. [133]
    Biden to Renew .Com Contract With Verisign Amid Pricing Scrutiny
    Aug 5, 2024 · Website registry contract set to renew for six-year term · NTIA, Verisign agrees to discussions on registration prices.Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy