Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Vertical jump

The vertical jump is a standardized physical assessment that quantifies an individual's explosive lower-body power by measuring the maximum height achieved when leaping vertically from a stationary standing position, reflecting the ability to rapidly generate force to elevate the center of mass against gravity.^[1] This test evaluates neuromuscular function and lower limb explosive strength, serving as a key indicator of athletic capability in dynamic movements.^[2] Common protocols include the countermovement jump (CMJ), which incorporates a brief downward countermovement to utilize stretch-shortening cycle mechanics for enhanced propulsion, and the squat jump (SJ), executed from a static isometric squat without prior descent to isolate concentric muscle action.^[3] Jump height is calculated using methods such as flight time (the duration of airborne phase) or take-off velocity derived from force platforms, with variations in measurement potentially affecting results by up to 15 cm depending on the equation applied.^[1] Reliability is high for these assessments, particularly when using contact mats or optical systems for flight time, enabling consistent evaluation across sessions.^[4] In sports science, vertical jump performance is a critical determinant of success in disciplines requiring rapid power output, such as basketball, volleyball, and soccer, where it correlates strongly with sprint speed, agility, and overall game efficacy.^[5] Training interventions, including plyometrics and resistance exercises, are designed to improve vertical jump metrics, which in turn enhance sport-specific outcomes like rebounding or spiking.^[6] Beyond athletics, the test is applied in clinical rehabilitation to track progress in neuromuscular recovery and physical fitness in diverse populations, including older adults and those post-injury.^[1]

Fundamentals

Definition and Importance

A vertical jump is an explosive movement in which an individual propels their body upward from a grounded position, primarily utilizing the lower body muscles to achieve maximum height.^[7] This action exemplifies rapid force generation and is a fundamental assessment tool in sports science for evaluating explosive capabilities.^[2] The vertical jump serves as a key indicator of lower extremity power, reflecting the ability to produce high forces quickly during brief contact with the ground.^[8] It also correlates with neuromuscular coordination, as effective jumping requires synchronized muscle activation and technique to optimize the stretch-shortening cycle.^[9] Furthermore, vertical jump performance is linked to athletic potential, particularly in explosive sports such as basketball and volleyball, where it predicts overall success in activities demanding rapid vertical displacement.^[2] For instance, higher jump heights often align with superior acceleration and strength metrics in athletes.^[7] The vertical jump test originated in early 20th-century physical education, with the first standardized description provided by Dudley A. Sargent in 1921 as a measure of leg power.^[10] This test was developed amid growing interest in systematic fitness assessments for schools and military programs, establishing it as a benchmark for physical conditioning.^[11] At its core, the vertical jump requires an understanding of force production, where athletes apply maximal effort against the ground to generate upward propulsion through ground reaction forces.^[12] These foundational concepts highlight how the interaction between body mass and applied force determines jump height, providing insight into biomechanical efficiency without advanced equipment.^[13]

Types of Vertical Jumps

Vertical jumps are categorized primarily by the athlete's approach and preparatory movement, which influence the energy utilization and neuromuscular demands of the execution. The standing vertical jump, performed from a stationary position, emphasizes lower-body explosive power without external momentum. It can be executed as a squat jump (SJ), where the athlete starts from a static semi-squat position and explodes upward without any downward countermovement, isolating concentric muscle actions. Alternatively, it may include a countermovement jump (CMJ), involving a brief downward dip before the ascent, which engages the stretch-shortening cycle to enhance elastic energy return.^[14]^[15]^[16] In contrast, the running vertical jump incorporates a horizontal run-up to generate additional kinetic energy, converting forward momentum into vertical lift through coordinated deceleration and propulsion. This variation typically yields greater jump heights due to the added velocity but requires superior timing and coordination to redirect forces effectively.^[17] Other notable variations include the max vertical jump, which permits an arm swing to contribute to total height by increasing upward impulse, often used in performance assessments like the NBA draft combine's standing vertical test. The no-arm vertical jump restricts arm movement—typically by placing hands on hips—to isolate lower-body contributions, providing a purer measure of leg power. Depth jumps, performed by dropping from an elevated box (usually 30-60 cm) and immediately rebounding upward, prioritize plyometric reactivity and rapid force development through enhanced eccentric loading.^[14]^[18] Key differences among these types lie in their biomechanical emphases: standing jumps, whether SJ or CMJ, focus on isometric and concentric phases from a controlled start, measuring intrinsic power output. Running jumps, however, integrate eccentric deceleration from the approach, amplifying peak power but introducing variability from technique.^[17]

Applications

In Sports Performance

The vertical jump plays a pivotal role in sports performance, serving as a key indicator of lower-body explosive power essential for dynamic movements across multiple disciplines. In basketball, it facilitates critical actions such as dunking over defenders and securing rebounds above opponents, while in volleyball, it enables effective spiking and blocking at the net. Track and field events like the high jump draw on similar mechanics as precursors to vertical propulsion, emphasizing rapid force generation. Additionally, the NFL Scouting Combine incorporates the vertical jump as a standardized test to evaluate prospects' lower-body power during draft assessments, helping teams identify athletes capable of explosive plays on the field.^[19]^[20] Higher vertical jump heights are strongly correlated with success in explosive sports actions, as they reflect the neuromuscular capacity for quick, powerful movements that translate to on-field advantages like increased playing time and efficiency. For instance, in professional basketball, greater eccentric power during vertical jumps predicts longer minutes on the court and higher overall performance ratings. Elite NBA players typically achieve standing vertical jumps of 28-34 inches.^[21] Gender differences in vertical jump performance are pronounced, with males generally reaching 20-40% higher jumps than females, primarily attributable to greater relative muscle mass and lower body fat percentages that enhance force production relative to body weight. Among college athletes, standing vertical jump heights typically range from 16-30 inches for males and 9-19 inches for females, reflecting these physiological disparities while still enabling competitive execution in team sports.^[22]^[23] Vertical jump assessments are integrated into scouting processes, such as the NBA Draft Combine, where measurements have been collected since the 2000-01 season to inform team selections based on explosive potential. In training, vertical jumps are embedded within periodized programs, including plyometric exercises, to systematically build power and optimize athletic output over seasonal cycles.^[24]^[25]

In Fitness and Scientific Research

The vertical jump serves as a key component in fitness assessment protocols designed to evaluate anaerobic capacity and lower-body explosive power among non-athletes and general populations. It is integrated into standardized batteries, such as those recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) for field-based testing of muscular power, allowing trainers to monitor improvements in gym-based programs focused on health and wellness rather than competitive performance.^[26] In rehabilitation settings, repeated vertical jump assessments help track recovery progress by quantifying functional improvements in lower-limb strength without requiring specialized athletic training.^[27] In scientific research, the vertical jump is widely employed to investigate neuromuscular function, providing insights into muscle activation, fatigue, and coordination through metrics like jump height and reactive strength index.^[28] Studies utilize it to examine age-related changes, revealing that jump height typically declines by 10-15% per decade after age 30 due to sarcopenia and reduced fast-twitch fiber efficiency, which informs interventions for maintaining mobility in older adults.^[29]^[30] Additionally, vertical jump performance aids in predicting injury risk, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain, by identifying asymmetries or landing mechanics that correlate with elevated knee injury probabilities in prospective cohorts.^[31] Normative data for the general adult population establish average standing vertical jump heights at 16-20 inches (41-51 cm) for males and 12-16 inches (30-41 cm), serving as benchmarks in epidemiological studies to assess population-level physical health and track secular trends in fitness.^[32] These values highlight gender and age variations, with applications in public health metrics to evaluate overall anaerobic fitness across diverse groups.^[33] Recent advancements post-2020 have incorporated wearable technologies, such as inertial measurement units and smartphone apps, into vertical jump analysis for real-time feedback in exercise science research, enabling non-invasive monitoring of jump kinetics during routine fitness activities.^[34] These tools enhance accessibility for studying neuromuscular responses in everyday settings, bridging gaps between lab-based studies and practical applications.^[35]

Measurement Methods

Traditional Techniques

Traditional techniques for measuring vertical jump height rely on simple, manual methods that require minimal equipment, making them widely accessible for coaches, trainers, and researchers in sports settings. These approaches focus on determining the difference between an individual's standing reach and the highest point reached during a jump, typically using a countermovement jump with arm swing to maximize performance. The two primary methods are the Vertec device and the wall mark technique, both of which emphasize practical implementation over high precision. The Vertec method employs a portable pole equipped with adjustable plastic vanes spaced two inches apart, allowing for direct measurement of jump reach. The athlete first measures their standing reach by raising one arm and displacing the lowest vane at full extension while keeping feet flat on the ground. For the jump trial, the athlete performs a countermovement—bending the knees slightly before exploding upward—and swats the highest possible vane with the same hand at the peak of the jump. Jump height is calculated as the difference between the standing reach and the highest displaced vane, providing a straightforward assessment of lower-body power.^[7]^[36] The wall mark method, also known as the Sargent jump, is the most basic approach and requires only a flat wall, chalk or powder for marking, and a measuring tape. The athlete stands sideways to the wall with feet flat, extends the arm closest to the wall overhead to mark the standing reach height on the wall using chalked fingertips. After stepping away slightly, the athlete executes a vertical jump with arm swing, reaching forward to mark the peak height with the same chalked hand. The vertical jump height is the vertical distance between the two marks, measured using a tape from the floor up. This technique, originally developed by Dr. Dudley Allen Sargent in the late 19th century, remains a staple for field testing due to its simplicity.^[7]^[37] Standard protocols for both methods ensure consistency and safety. A thorough warm-up, including dynamic stretches and light jumps, is essential to prepare the muscles and reduce injury risk before testing. The arm swing is permitted and encouraged to simulate natural jumping mechanics, with the athlete facing the measurement device or wall. Typically, three to five trials are performed per session, with 1-2 minutes of rest between attempts to allow recovery; the best trial (or average of the top three for some protocols) is recorded as the final score to account for variability in effort. Proper footwear and a non-slip surface are also recommended to maintain test integrity.^[38]^[37] These traditional techniques offer significant advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and ease of use, requiring little to no specialized equipment and enabling quick assessments in various environments, from gyms to outdoor fields. They are particularly valuable for large groups or resource-limited settings, providing a reliable indicator of explosive power with high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94-0.98 for the Vertec). However, limitations include susceptibility to human error, such as imprecise marking or failure to touch at the exact jump apex, which can lead to inaccuracies of 1-2 inches (2.5-5 cm). The wall method is especially prone to under- or overestimation due to coordination challenges, while the Vertec may be affected by the athlete's shoulder flexibility or timing. For greater precision, modern alternatives like force plates can be considered, though traditional methods remain foundational for routine evaluations.^[7]^[38]^[39]

Modern Equipment and Protocols

Modern equipment for vertical jump measurement has advanced significantly, enabling precise quantification in both laboratory and field settings through integration of sensors and computational methods. Force plates represent a cornerstone technology, capturing ground reaction forces during the jump to derive performance metrics. These devices, typically embedded in a stable platform, record the vertical force-time curve as the athlete performs a countermovement jump, allowing for the calculation of jump height via the impulse-momentum theorem. The impulse, defined as the integral of force over time (\int F \, dt), equals the change in momentum, from which takeoff velocity is derived and subsequently used to compute height. Specifically, jump height h is calculated as

h = \frac{ \left( \int F \, dt \right)^2 }{ 2 m^2 g },

where m is the athlete's mass and g is gravitational acceleration (approximately 9.81 m/s²). This method provides not only height but also insights into power output, with studies confirming its reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.95) when properly calibrated.^[40] Optical systems offer a portable alternative, utilizing infrared cameras, laser sensors, or contact mats to track flight time—the duration from takeoff to landing—without direct force measurement. Devices like the Just Jump mat employ pressure-sensitive surfaces connected to timing electronics that detect when both feet leave and return to the mat, triggering a flight time recording. Jump height is then derived from the kinematic equation

h = \frac{g t^2}{8},

where t is the flight time. This approach assumes symmetric takeoff and landing velocities and has demonstrated high validity against criterion measures like 3D motion capture (correlation coefficients r > 0.98), with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97–0.99). Such systems are favored in sports science for their ease of use and minimal setup requirements compared to traditional manual techniques.^[41]^[42] Standardized protocols ensure consistency across professional and research applications, minimizing variability and enhancing comparability. In the NFL Combine, for instance, vertical jump is assessed using an electronic Vertec device featuring adjustable plastic vanes (prongs) that the athlete displaces with their hand at peak height during a standing countermovement jump, with no run-up permitted to isolate lower-body power. Athletes perform three maximal attempts after a brief warm-up, with the highest value recorded; the protocol specifies arm swing allowance but prohibits steps or preparatory movements. Reliability exceeds 95% (ICC = 0.91–0.98) when the device is calibrated regularly, making it a benchmark for talent evaluation. Force plates and optical systems can serve as backups in such protocols to verify results.^[39]^[43] Recent advancements have democratized access to accurate measurement through app-based motion capture on smartphones, leveraging built-in cameras and sensors for field testing without specialized hardware. Studies from 2023 to 2025 have validated these tools for countermovement jump assessment, showing strong agreement with force plate data (r = 0.94–0.98) and high reliability (ICC > 0.90), enabling coaches and researchers to conduct frequent, cost-effective evaluations in non-laboratory environments.^[44]^[4]^[45]^[46]^[47]

Biomechanics and Physiology

Muscle Groups and Mechanics

The vertical jump relies on the coordinated action of primary lower extremity muscle groups to generate force and propel the body upward. The quadriceps femoris, particularly the vastus lateralis, play a central role in knee extension during the propulsion phase, with their cross-sectional area strongly predicting jump height across various jump types such as countermovement and squat jumps.^[48] The gluteus maximus contributes to hip extension, providing substantial power while stabilizing the pelvis, though its relative volume is optimized lower in models of maximal jumping due to biomechanical constraints on length change.^[49] Hamstrings, including the biceps femoris, assist in hip extension and knee flexion control, delivering significant work (up to 148 J in optimized distributions) to support the overall extension sequence.^[49] The calf muscles—gastrocnemius for ankle plantarflexion and knee flexion synergy, and soleus for pure plantarflexion—enhance final propulsion, with gastrocnemius fascicle length correlating to performance in dynamic jumps.^[48] Core muscles, such as the erector spinae and abdominals, maintain postural stability throughout the movement, preventing energy loss from trunk deviation.^[50] The biomechanics of the vertical jump unfold in distinct phases that leverage the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) for efficiency. The eccentric phase involves a countermovement squat, where muscles and tendons lengthen under load, storing elastic energy—typically with knee flexion reaching 90-120° to optimize depth without compromising rebound.^[51] This is followed by the brief amortization phase, the transition between eccentric lengthening and concentric shortening, where minimizing duration (often <0.2 seconds) preserves stored energy and amplifies subsequent force output.^[52] The concentric phase then drives explosive push-off, with sequential joint extension starting from the hips and knees before ankle plantarflexion, releasing the SSC's potentiated force.^[52] Kinematically, arm swing integrates via counter-rotation, elevating the center of mass and increasing takeoff velocity to add approximately 0.086 m to jump height, equivalent to a 5-10% enhancement in typical performances.^[53] Gender and age introduce variations in these mechanics, influencing muscle recruitment and joint contributions. Females often exhibit relatively greater involvement of knee and ankle extensors during propulsion, with hip contributions averaging 30% of total work compared to 38% in males, reflecting differences in leverage and activation patterns.^[54] With maturation, mechanics evolve as vertical and leg stiffness increase post-peak height velocity, leading to shorter ground contact times and more efficient SSC utilization in adolescents and adults versus pre-pubertal children.^[55] These adaptations enhance overall jump execution but can alter joint angles and loading, with younger individuals showing less optimized hip-knee coordination.^[56]

Relationship to Power Output

The vertical jump quantifies explosive lower body power, defined as the rate of mechanical work performed, expressed as the product of force and velocity (P = F \times v). In this context, jump height serves as a proxy for peak power output by relating the impulse generated during the propulsion phase to the subsequent flight time or displacement of the center of mass, enabling indirect assessment of neuromuscular explosiveness without direct force measurements. A validated equation for estimating peak power in the countermovement jump (CMJ) is:

P = 51.9 \times h + 48.9 \times m - 2007

^[57] where P is peak power in watts, h is jump height in centimeters, and m is body mass in kilograms; this formula, derived from biomechanical data, correlates strongly with direct force platform measures (r = 0.83–0.94), supporting its use as a reliable estimator in field settings. Such estimations highlight how greater jump heights reflect enhanced force-velocity integration during the stretch-shortening cycle. Plyometric training augments power output by optimizing elastic energy storage and recoil in series elastic components, resulting in improved jump performance and corresponding power estimates. For instance, meta-analytic evidence shows plyometric interventions increase vertical jump height by 4–8% in athletes, translating to proportional gains in calculated peak power. Fatigue from repeated jumps impairs this process, reducing power output by 10–20% due to diminished neural drive and metabolic accumulation, which underscores the need for controlled protocols in power evaluations.^[58] The vertical jump is employed to evaluate anaerobic capacity, capturing the alactic contributions to high-intensity, short-duration efforts akin to sport demands. Recent meta-analyses affirm its validity as a surrogate for lower body power in athletic cohorts, with consistent correlations to direct anaerobic metrics across diverse populations.^[59] This relationship allows power gains from targeted training, such as plyometrics, to be tracked via jump-derived metrics for performance optimization.

Factors Influencing Jump Height

Genetic and Anthropometric Factors

The vertical jump height is significantly influenced by genetic factors, with heritability estimates ranging from 40% to 80% based on twin and family studies. Twin studies have demonstrated that genetic contributions account for a substantial portion of the variance in vertical jump performance, often explaining 44-80% of differences after adjusting for environmental factors. For instance, variants in the ACTN3 gene, which encodes alpha-actinin-3—a protein specific to fast-twitch muscle fibers—have been associated with enhanced explosive power and superior jumping ability, particularly in individuals with the RR genotype compared to those with XX or RX variants.^[60]^[61]^[62] Anthropometric characteristics also play a key role in vertical jump potential, including limb length, body composition, and relative strength. Longer lower limb lengths can reduce mechanical leverage during the jump due to increased moment of inertia, potentially lowering height despite greater torque potential, as evidenced in studies of recreational athletes where segmental lengths moderately correlated with jump displacement. Higher body fat percentage negatively impacts performance, with correlations showing that increases in adiposity reduce jump height by impairing power-to-weight ratios; for example, each additional percentage point of body fat is associated with a measurable decrease in explosive output. Relative strength, defined as lean body mass relative to total body weight, positively correlates with jump height, as higher lean mass percentages enhance force production without excessive non-functional mass.^[63]^[64]^[65] Gender and age further modulate these inherent factors. Males typically exhibit about 20-50% greater average vertical jump heights than females, attributable to higher testosterone levels that promote greater muscle mass and fast-twitch fiber development. Peak performance generally occurs between ages 20 and 30 years, after which jump height declines progressively due to sarcopenia—the age-related loss of muscle mass and power—resulting in approximately 1% annual reduction by age 75. Recent population norms from U.S. studies indicate an average standing vertical jump of around 18 inches for adults, varying by age and fitness level, with untrained individuals falling in the 16-20 inch range for men and 12-16 inches for women.^[66]^[67]^[32]

Training and Optimization Strategies

Strength training forms the foundational element for enhancing vertical jump height by increasing maximal force production in the lower body. Exercises such as squats and deadlifts, performed in 3-5 sets of 3-6 repetitions at high intensities (typically 80-90% of one-repetition maximum), target the development of force capacity in key muscle groups like the quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes.^[68] Over 8-12 weeks, such programs have been shown to yield improvements in countermovement jump height of approximately 5-10%, as evidenced by meta-analyses of resistance training interventions in athletes.^[9]^[69] These gains stem from neuromuscular adaptations that elevate the rate of force development, enabling greater propulsion during the jump.^[70] Plyometric training complements strength work by improving the stretch-shortening cycle efficiency, which is critical for explosive power in vertical jumps. Protocols involving depth jumps and box jumps, with progressive increases in volume (e.g., 50-100 contacts per session, 2-3 times weekly), emphasize rapid eccentric-concentric transitions to heighten reactive strength.^[71] When combined with weight training, plyometrics can produce superior outcomes, with 2023 systematic reviews indicating 15-20% enhancements in jump height over 8-12 weeks compared to isolated modalities.^[72]^[73] This synergy leverages post-activation potentiation, where heavy lifts precede plyometric drills to amplify subsequent explosive performance.^[74] Optimizing jump technique maximizes the transfer of force to height without additional physiological demands. An optimal countermovement depth of 30-60 cm allows for sufficient eccentric loading while minimizing energy loss during the transition to concentric action, as deeper squats beyond this range can reduce net impulse.^[75] Incorporating arm swing drills, where athletes practice coordinated upward arm drive synchronized with leg extension, can further boost jump height by 10-15% through increased momentum and reduced braking forces.^[76] Periodized programs, alternating high-intensity phases with deload weeks, prevent overtraining by monitoring fatigue via jump performance metrics, ensuring sustained adaptations over 12+ weeks.^[9] Post-2020 research highlights the integration of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) into vertical jump regimens, such as short bursts of repeated jumps or sprints (e.g., 20-30 seconds at maximal effort followed by recovery), which enhance anaerobic capacity and power output with moderate effect sizes (ES ≈ 0.9).^[77] Nutrition plays a supportive role, with protein intakes of 1.6 g/kg body weight daily promoting muscle repair and hypertrophy to amplify training gains, particularly when timed around sessions.^[78] Recovery strategies, including at least 7 hours of sleep per night, facilitate hormonal balance and reduce injury risk, while female-specific programs emphasize lower-volume plyometrics to account for biomechanical differences, yielding comparable 10-15% improvements in jump height.^[79]^[80]

References

[1]
The Battle of the Equations: A Systematic Review of Jump Height ...
Vertical jump height measures our ability to oppose gravity and lower body neuromuscular function in athletes and various clinical populations. Vertical jump ...
[2]
Can sport-specific training affect vertical jumping ability during ... - NIH
Vertical jumping ability (VJ) is an important component for successful performance in various team sports such as volleyball, basketball, and soccer.
[3]
A standard operating procedure for the evaluation of vertical jumps ...
Two valid, reliable, and widely adopted vertical jump tests are the Countermovement Jump (CMJ) and Squat Jump (SJ) (Markovic et al., 2004, Sargent, 1924, Bosco ...Review · 3. Results · 3.3. Protocol...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of vertical jump evaluation ...
Sep 6, 2023 · The vertical jump can be analyzed based on the flight time achieved by the individual. This measurement can be obtained using a force platform ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[5]
Effects of Physical Training Programs on Healthy Athletes' Vertical ...
The vertical jump performance, a key measure of explosive power and athletic ability, is commonly used across many sports to evaluate and improve performance ( ...
[6]
How to improve the vertical jump?
### Summary of Vertical Jump Content
[7]
The Impact of Vertical Jump Height, Hamstrings Flexibility and ...
Jun 10, 2025 · Vertical jump height was assessed as an indicator of lower extremity power. Eccentric peak torque of the hamstrings was assessed with ...
[8]
Effects of Physical Training Programs on Healthy Athletes' Vertical ...
The vertical jump relies on the power of the lower extremity muscles, among other factors such as coordination and technique, and has been widely used as a ...Abstract · Introduction · Methods · Results
[9]
Vertical Jump Test - Topend Sports
Procedure for conducting the standing vertical jump or Sargent Jump test for measurement of muscular strength and power of the lower body.
[10]
Dr. Dudley Sargent Fitness Pioneer - Topend Sports
Sargent was an early innovator in physical education. The Sargent Test bears his name, though it is more commonly known as the vertical jump test nowadays.
[11]
Analysis of the Vertical Ground Reaction Forces and Temporal ...
The vertical ground reaction forces (GRF) on the body during landing, can be determinants of injury, especially if the jumps are made very often and the GRF ...
[12]
The Physics of the Vertical Jump - Force, Speed, Height, Hangtime ...
Jun 6, 2022 · Ground reaction forces are the forces that the ground exerts on a jumper during the course of a vertical jump. You're maybe asking yourself: " ...
[13]
https://www.thehoopsgeek.com/the-physics-of-the-vertical-jump/
[14]
https://www.scienceforsport.com/countermovement-jump-cmj/
[15]
Understanding the Countermovement Jump - VALD Performance
Mar 11, 2024 · A CMJ is a vertical jump that involves a downward movement (countermovement) before an upward leap. This pre-jump dip is a key characteristic ...Missing: running | Show results with:running
[16]
[PDF] RUNNING BEFORE JUMPING - UNT Health Fort Worth
Mar 28, 2020 · RUNNING BEFORE JUMPING: HOW MUCH MORE HEIGHT FOR RUN-IN vs. STANDING VERTICAL JUMPS? Vertical jumps for maximum height rarely occur without a ...
[17]
[PDF] The relationship between vertical jump performance during different ...
Background: The purpose of the current study was to investigate: (1) differences between three types of countermovement jumps (CMJ), (2) development of lower- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Powering the Vertical Jump with OPT - NASM Blog
We now have a formula to maximize our vertical jump: Vertical Jump Enhancement = Maximal Force Production + Maximal Speed Through MAS + Maximal Neuromuscular ...
[19]
Vertical Jump Heights & Records | 2025 NFL Scouting Combine
The vertical jump (or vertical leap) evaluates an athlete's lower-body explosion and power. The athlete first has their "standing reach" measured.
[20]
Relationship between vertical jump performance and playing time ...
Jun 2, 2024 · The results of the aforementioned investigation indicated that players who had higher vertical jump values had greater playing time. Moreover, ...<|separator|>
[21]
[PDF] Cut And Dunk
NBA players' vertical jumps averaging around 28 to 34 inches, enabling them to reach well above the 10-foot rim. Furthermore, the momentum generated by the ...
[22]
Sex performance differences in vertical and horizontal jumping - PMC
Sep 24, 2025 · We postulated that the lower muscle mass/body mass fractions of females would cause sex differences in performance to increase as jump take-off ...
[23]
Vertical jump in female and male basketball players—A review of ...
It was found that vertical jump values varied greatly, from 22 to 48 cm in female players and from 40 to 75 cm in male players.Missing: norms | Show results with:norms
[24]
Draft Combine | Stats | NBA.com
Measurements and Data collected at each year's NBA Draft Combine with information dating back to the 2000-01 Season.Combine Anthro · Combine Scrimmages · Combine Strength & AgilityMissing: 2001 | Show results with:2001
[25]
Effects of 6-Week Plyometric Training on Vertical Jump Performance ...
Mar 28, 2016 · Numerous studies have shown that PLY training increases vertical jump performance in both children and young adults, regardless of their ...
[26]
Vertical Jump Test - Physiopedia
The vertical jump test is a standard test primarily used to measure athletic performances in athletes who play volleyball, basketball, and high jumps.
[27]
Vertical Jump Tests: A Safe Instrument to Improve the Accuracy of ...
Feb 8, 2022 · The study results showed that vertical jumping tests are safe and accurate for assessing physical performance and are useful for monitoring age-related loss of ...
[28]
Trends Assessing Neuromuscular Fatigue in Team Sports
Vertical jump tests are practical, well accepted by elite players, and are valid and reliable, which makes them potentially valuable for detecting and ...
[29]
Age-Related Decline in Vertical Jumping Performance in Masters ...
Apr 1, 2021 · Vertical jumping power declines with advancing age, which is theoretically explicable by loss of muscle mass and increases in body fat.
[30]
Drop jump vertical kinetics identify male youth soccer players at ...
In the current study, greater vertical stiffness during landing was associated with an increased risk of knee injury for male youth soccer players. Previous ...
[31]
Vertical Jump Height Norms - Topend Sports
What is a good vertical jump depends on your athletic goals, but generally, the average vertical jump for a man ranges from 16-20 inches (41-50 cm), while women ...
[32]
The normative values of vertical jump and sit-and-reach in a large ...
After reaching the peak, VJ values gradually declined with age. In females, VJ values remained relatively stable from childhood to early adulthood, and then ...
[33]
The validity and reliability of the jump power app for measuring ...
Nov 20, 2024 · This study revealed that the Jump Power app is a reliable but not valid tool to measure vertical jumps in soccer players.
[34]
Validity and reliability of the Output sport device for assessing drop ...
For the analysis of vertical jump performance, force plates (FP) are traditionally used and are considered the gold standard (Arampatzis et al., 2001; Busko ...
[35]
Vertec: Vertical Jump Equipment - Topend Sports
The Vertec is a steel frame device with adjustable vanes, used to measure vertical jump height, and is a popular apparatus for testing.<|separator|>
[36]
Vertical Jump Test (Sargent Jump) - PT Direct
The person puts chalk on their finger tips to mark the wall at the height of their jump. The person then stands away from the wall, and jumps vertically as ...
[37]
Vertical Jump Measurement using flight time - Topend Sports
The traditional method for assessing vertical jump ability is by measuring jump height using a wall, Vertec® device or similar (see description of this method).
[38]
The reliability of vertical jump tests between the Vertec and My ... - NIH
Apr 20, 2018 · The vertical jump is used to estimate sports performance capabilities and physical fitness in children, elderly, non-athletic and injured ...Introduction · Correlational Study · Consistency
[39]
A Systematic Review of the Different Calculation Methods for ... - NIH
The motion capture systems and the double integration method measure the jump height from the centre of mass height at the initial flat foot standing to the ...
[40]
Force-Sensitive Mat for Vertical Jump Measurement to Assess ... - NIH
This formula is defined as: Height = g∆t2/8, where g is the constant value of gravity force g=9.81 m/s2 and Δt is the flight time obtained by the system. Once ...
[41]
Validity of two alternative systems for measuring vertical jump height
The purpose of this study is to determine the concurrent validity of the jump and reach method (Vertec) and the contact mat method (Just Jump) in assessing ...
[42]
Video Analysis of Elite American Football Athletes During Vertical ...
Dec 3, 2024 · NFL athletes' combine countermovement jumps were examined to determine the movement components that best predicted their performances. Predictor ...
[43]
Validity and reliability of “My Jump app” to assess vertical ... - Nature
Nov 17, 2023 · The My Jump application appears to be a valid and reliable tool for sports scientists and strength and conditioning practitioners.
[44]
Muscle structure predictors of vertical jump performance in elite ...
Jul 30, 2024 · The objective of this investigation is to examine the contribution of key muscle groups in the lower limbs to vertical jumping performance in
[45]
Optimizing the Distribution of Leg Muscles for Vertical Jumping - NIH
Feb 26, 2016 · The optimal distribution of leg muscles for vertical jumping produces a configuration in which muscle volume is gained in the gastrocnemius, ...
[46]
The Relationship between Dynamic Balance, Jumping Ability ... - NIH
Feb 14, 2024 · In fact, jumping involves the use of several muscle groups, including the quadriceps, glutes, calves, and core muscles, which are also used ...
[47]
(PDF) Tests of Vertical Jump - Academia.edu
Variation in knee flexion angles (90-120 degrees) can optimize jump performance based on individual capabilities. ... Tests of Vertical Jump: Countermovement Jump ...
[48]
Difference of neuromuscular responses by additional loads during ...
Dec 27, 2018 · It consists of eccentric (stretch), amortization, and concentric (shortening) phase. ... Amortization is the time between the end of lengthening ...
[49]
Understanding how an arm swing enhances performance ... - PubMed
Participants jumped higher (0.086 m) in the arm swing compared to the no-arm swing condition and was due to increased height (28%) and velocity (72%) of the ...
[50]
Effect of Additional Loads on Joint Kinetics and Joint Work ... - MDPI
Jul 8, 2022 · The hip joint contribution was higher in males (38%) than in females (30%) over all load conditions on average. The relative ankle and relative ...2. Materials And Methods · 3. Results · 4. Discussion
[51]
Vertical and leg stiffness and stretch-shortening cycle changes ...
Vertical stiffness increased with maturation. Leg stiffness was higher in post-peak height velocity participants. Concentric power increased with maturation. ...
[52]
Knee biomechanics during landings: comparison of pre - PubMed
Conclusion: These findings suggest that developmental changes influence knee mechanics during landings in female athletes and highlight the need to examine ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations<|control11|><|separator|>
[53]
Effect of Ballistic and Heavy Exercise on Vertical Jump Performance
The primary finding of this study was that neither the jump squat nor back the squat protocol potentiated vertical jump performance in resistance-trained men.Missing: reduction | Show results with:reduction
[54]
Effects of Plyometric Training on Physical Performance: An Umbrella ...
Jan 10, 2023 · Most studies indicate an improvement of vertical jump height, muscle strength and to a lesser extent speed performance in non-athlete people ...
[55]
[PDF] CHAPTER 5 | VU Research Portal
Heritability estimates were 49%. (95% CI: 35% − 60%) for vertical jump, 59% (95% CI: 46% − 69%) for handgrip strength, 38%. (95% CI: 22% − 52%) for balance, and ...
[56]
[PDF] A twin study on the correlates of voluntary exercise behavior ... - Gwern
Oct 5, 2018 · vertical jump performance, balance and flexibility could be explained by genetics (44%–80%). Fig. 4 also displays the genetic correlation of.<|control11|><|separator|>
[57]
Relationship between ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and maximal ...
Our hypothesis was that the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism is associated with jumping performance and athletes with RR genotype have better scores in tests than ...
[58]
Segmental Limb Length And Vertical Jump Height
DISCUSSION: While long limb segments potentially produce greater torque, this is offset by an increase in angular inertia. Long segments may create a challenge ...
[59]
(PDF) Association Between Body Composition and Vertical Jump ...
Aug 6, 2025 · High negative relationships were present between total body fat percentage(p < 0.05), total fat mass (p < 0.01) and CMJ jump height.
[60]
Total and Lower Extremity Lean Mass Percentage Positively...
Total and lower extremity lean mass percentage positively correlates with jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 29(8): 2167–2175, 2015—Strength and power have ...
[61]
What's A Good Vertical Jump? Average Vertical Jump By Age + Sex
Feb 28, 2024 · The average vert jump test results for men was 45 cm (17.7 inches), and the average female vertical jump height was 30 cm (11.8 inches).
[62]
gender differences in age-related decline of vertical jump ... - Frontiers
Dec 11, 2024 · Additionally, female athletes showed a higher jumping capacity compared to male sedentaries (Figure 4B) and a shallower decline rate (Figure 3C) ...
[63]
A Comparison Between the Squat and the Deadlift for Lower Body ...
Results indicate that both the squat and the deadlift can result in similar improvement in lower body maximal strength and jump performance.
[64]
Percent change in vertical jump after 8 weeks of plyometric and...
In the present study, vertical jump improved 17.5% in the PLT group and was significantly different from both the SRT (5.87%) and the CNT (0.71%) groups.
[65]
The magnitude of correlation between deadlift 1RM and jumping ...
Jan 14, 2024 · Accordingly, comparable to the squat, evidence underlines the potential of using the deadlift to improve jumping performance (11, 26), however, ...Abstract · Introduction · Methods · Discussion
[66]
Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta ... - NIH
The aim of this study was to determine the precise effect of plyometric training (PT) on vertical jump height in healthy individuals.
[67]
The Effects of Strength, Plyometric and Combined Training on ...
Objective: The primary aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the specific effects of strength, plyometric and combined ...
[68]
The Effects of Strength, Plyometric and Combined Training on ...
Oct 28, 2023 · Effects of plyometric jump training in female soccer player's vertical jump height: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sports Sci ...
[69]
A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Complex Training on Vertical Jump ...
The purpose of this novel study was to conduct a meta-analysis on the effect of CT on vertical jump (VJ) performance.
[70]
Countermovement depth – A variable which clarifies the relationship ...
Feb 18, 2018 · The countermovement depth proved to be a variable strongly affecting the maximum power of jump. If the countermovement depth remains constant, ...
[71]
Effect of an Arm Swing on Countermovement Vertical Jump ... - NIH
An arm swing increases jump height by 38% and enhances the accelerating phase of the jump, while shortening the braking phase.<|separator|>
[72]
(PDF) Effects of high-intensity training on jumping performance ...
The results showed that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has a moderate effect on athlete jumping performance (ES = 0.918), while high-intensity ...
[73]
Association between changes in lean mass, muscle strength ...
A protein intake of 1.6 g.kg-1.d−1 seems adequate to maximize lean mass, muscle strength and power adaptation responses in both RT and CT groups, and aerobic ...
[74]
Effects of Strength vs. Plyometric Training Programs on Vertical ...
The main findings of this meta-analysis indicate that PT can be used instead of ST to target vertical jump, linear sprint and COD performance in female soccer ...
[75]
From a female perspective: plyometric training's impact on jump ...
This study demonstrates that plyometric training effectively improves the jumping, sprinting, and COD performance of adult female athletes. It is recommended ...