Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Viewing angle

The viewing angle is a parameter in optics and display technology referring to the angular range over which a device or light source can be observed or emit light with acceptable performance. In displays, it is the maximum angle from the normal to the screen surface at which the image can be viewed without significant loss in brightness, contrast, or color accuracy.^[1] In lighting systems, it describes the spread of light emission from sources like LEDs.^[2] This characteristic is crucial for applications ranging from screens in monitors, televisions, and mobile devices to illumination in various environments.^[3] Viewing angles are typically specified in degrees for horizontal and vertical directions (e.g., 178°/178°). They are assessed by the angle at which the contrast ratio drops to a threshold like 10:1 or 5:1.^[4]^[5] No universal standard exists, though contrast-based metrics are common among manufacturers.^[6] Panel types vary in performance: Twisted Nematic (TN) panels offer narrower angles, around 170° horizontal and 160° vertical, prioritizing response time over off-axis viewing.^[7] In-Plane Switching (IPS) panels provide wider angles up to 178° in both directions with better color stability from the sides.^[8] Vertical Alignment (VA) panels also rate at 178°/178° but may show gamma shifts or color changes at extremes relative to IPS.^[7] Viewing angle importance varies by use case; wide angles are vital in multi-viewer settings like home theaters or conference rooms to avoid image washout or distortion.^[9] In single-user setups like desktop work, narrower angles suffice when viewed head-on. Advancements in Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) technology have notably enhanced viewing angles through per-pixel emission, minimizing off-angle issues even at high brightness.^[10]

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

The viewing angle refers to the maximum angular range, typically measured in degrees from the normal (perpendicular) axis of a display or light source, at which the visual output—such as brightness, color accuracy, or contrast—remains perceivable without substantial degradation. For displays, this is commonly defined by maintaining a contrast ratio of at least 10:1; for lighting systems, it corresponds to the half-intensity angle where luminance falls to 50% of the maximum, as per standard photometric conventions for beam spread.^[11] This concept quantifies the effective field of view for optimal perception, ensuring that the emitted light or image maintains sufficient quality for the intended observer position. The term "viewing angle" gained prominence in the 1970s alongside the development of early flat-panel displays, particularly liquid crystal displays (LCDs), where maintaining image quality off-axis was a key challenge compared to cathode-ray tubes (CRTs). It evolved from earlier concepts in photography and optics, such as viewing cones that describe the angular extent of clear visibility in lenses or projectors, adapting these principles to quantify performance in emerging electronic visuals. This historical shift addressed limitations in early LCDs, like narrow angular response due to liquid crystal alignment, prompting standardized metrics to evaluate and improve off-normal viewing.^[12] Key parameters in viewing angle specifications include distinctions between half-angle and full-angle conventions: the half-angle measures from the optical axis to the point of threshold degradation in one direction, while the full-angle spans the total width across both sides. On-axis performance represents the reference at 0° (perpendicular), with off-axis luminance or contrast diminishing progressively due to optical effects like polarization or scattering. For instance, high-quality displays often specify viewing angles as horizontal/vertical pairs, such as 178°/178°, indicating near-isotropic performance where degradation is minimal up to 89° from the normal in each plane.^[12]^[13]

Measurement Standards

The measurement of viewing angle relies on standardized methodologies to ensure consistency and comparability across devices, primarily through angular profiling of luminance or intensity distributions. Goniophotometry serves as a core technique, employing automated goniometers to rotate the device or detector systematically while capturing luminance or intensity data at incremental angles from the normal axis, generating polar plots that visualize angular performance.^[14] These systems typically operate in controlled dark room environments to minimize ambient light interference, using monochromatic light sources for precise spectral isolation and automated rotation stages for high-resolution angular steps, often as fine as 0.1 degrees to capture steep distributions.^[15] For display technologies, viewing angle is commonly quantified using contrast ratio thresholds, where the angle is defined as the maximum off-normal direction maintaining a contrast ratio (CR) greater than 10:1 between white and black levels under specified test patterns.^[16] This threshold ensures perceptible image quality degradation remains acceptable for ergonomic use, with measurements conducted via goniophotometric setups displaying full-field white and black images. An alternative luminance-based approach defines the viewing angle θ as the polar angle where the relative luminance satisfies L(\theta) / L(0) \geq 0.5, with L(\theta) denoting luminance at angle θ and L(0) at normal incidence; this half-luminance criterion is particularly prevalent for evaluating uniformity in simpler emissive sources.^[17] Industry standards formalize these methods to define acceptable degradation levels. For displays, ISO 13406-2 specifies ergonomic requirements for flat panel visual display units, including viewing angle assessments based on luminance uniformity and contrast maintenance across angular ranges, recommending measurements in azimuth and inclination planes tailored to screen size and viewing distance. In lighting systems, the Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage (CIE) provides guidelines through publications like CIE 127:2007, which outlines procedures for measuring averaged LED intensity and angular luminous intensity distributions using goniophotometric geometries under standardized conditions, such as far-field setups at distances ensuring spherical wave approximation. Lambertian models assume ideal diffuse emission following Lambert's cosine law, where intensity varies as I(\theta) = I_0 \cos \theta, yielding a half-intensity angle of approximately 60 degrees from the normal; non-Lambertian models, common in directional sources like LEDs, exhibit narrower or asymmetric distributions, requiring empirical goniophotometric characterization to fit parameters like beam width at half-maximum.^[18] These approaches enable quantitative benchmarking, prioritizing reproducibility over exhaustive angular sampling to focus on key performance thresholds.

Viewing Angle in Display Technologies

Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs)

Liquid crystal displays (LCDs) rely on the polarization of light passing through aligned liquid crystal molecules to modulate transmittance, but this mechanism introduces inherent viewing angle dependencies. In twisted nematic (TN) configurations, the twisted alignment of liquid crystals causes varying birefringence when viewed off-axis, leading to asymmetric light scattering that results in color shifts and reduced contrast as the observer moves away from the normal axis.^[19] This scattering occurs because the effective optical path length through the liquid crystal layer changes with angle, disrupting the intended polarization rotation and allowing unintended light leakage in dark states.^[19] Early LCDs in the 1990s predominantly used TN panels, which suffered from narrow viewing angles due to these alignment limitations.^[20] Advancements in the late 1990s and 2000s introduced in-plane switching (IPS) and vertical alignment (VA) modes to address these issues; IPS, developed by Hitachi in 1996, rotates liquid crystal molecules parallel to the substrate plane, minimizing birefringence variations and enabling viewing angles up to 178° in both horizontal and vertical directions.^[21] VA panels, refined with multi-domain structures during the same period, achieved similar near-wide angles by optimizing vertical tilting under electric fields, though they retained some off-axis sensitivities compared to IPS.^[19] Despite these improvements, key challenges persist in LCD viewing angles, including gamma shift—where the luminance response curve alters off-axis, causing washed-out grays—and black level inversion, in which dark areas appear brighter or inverted at extreme angles due to increased light leakage in the liquid crystal alignment.^[22]^[19] These effects degrade image quality, particularly in VA and early IPS designs, though compensation films like positive C-plates help mitigate them.

Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Displays

Organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays exhibit superior viewing angle performance primarily due to their self-emissive nature, in which each individual pixel generates and emits light directly without relying on a separate backlight or polarizing layers. This inherent design allows light to radiate uniformly across a broad angular range, minimizing off-axis scattering and maintaining consistent image quality from various perspectives. Unlike transmissive displays, OLEDs avoid light loss from directional backlighting, resulting in near-Lambertian emission patterns that preserve brightness and contrast effectively. In contrast to liquid crystal displays (LCDs), OLEDs provide wider viewing angles owing to the lack of a backlight. However, microcavity effects within the OLED pixel structure can introduce minor angular dependencies, particularly in color reproduction. These effects arise from the interference between light waves resonating between reflective electrodes, leading to a spectral blue shift as the viewing angle increases from normal incidence. For instance, electroluminescence peaks can shift by up to 42 nm from 0° to 60° in microcavity OLEDs, though this is often mitigated through structural optimizations like diffusion layers that broaden the emission profile. Such shifts are generally subtle and do not significantly impair overall viewing experience until extreme angles. Typical viewing angles for OLED displays span 170° to 180° horizontally and vertically, defined as the range where contrast ratio remains above 10:1 or brightness drops to half of on-axis levels. Brightness degradation follows approximately Lambert's cosine law, retaining 50% at ~60° and ~34% at 70° off-axis. Color shifts off-axis are likewise limited, with coordinate variations typically below 0.1 in CIE 1931 space for optimized devices. Advancements in the 2010s introduced flexible OLEDs using plastic substrates, which preserve these wide viewing angles even under bending radii as small as 10 mm, enabling applications in foldable devices without compromising angular uniformity. Active-matrix OLED (AMOLED) variants further enhance performance through pixel structures that incorporate thin-film transistors and optimized emissive layers, reducing microcavity-induced shifts via precise control of light path lengths. The blue subpixel demonstrates heightened sensitivity to these angular effects, as its narrower emission spectrum amplifies the blue shift compared to red and green counterparts, potentially altering white balance at off-axis views. As of 2025, quantum dot-enhanced OLED (QD-OLED) panels have further reduced angular color shifts through optimized emission layers.^[23]

Viewing Angle in Lighting Systems

Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs)

In light-emitting diode (LED) lighting systems, the viewing angle describes the angular spread of light emitted from the LED die, representing the full width at which the light intensity drops to half its maximum value, known as the full width at half maximum (FWHM).^[24] This metric quantifies the beam's divergence, with standard wide-angle LEDs commonly exhibiting a 120° FWHM to provide broad coverage in general illumination applications.^[25] The primary emission originates from the semiconductor chip facets, where electron-hole recombination generates photons, but the viewing angle is primarily controlled by phosphor coating and lens encapsulation. Phosphor layers, often applied to blue LEDs to produce white light, absorb and re-emit wavelengths while scattering the output to influence angular distribution and reduce color shifts at off-axis angles.^[26] Lens encapsulation, typically using epoxy or silicone domes, refracts and collimates the light, allowing precise shaping of the beam through total internal reflection and surface curvature.^[27] LEDs in lighting are classified by beam type to suit specific uses: narrow-beam variants, with angles of 30° to 60° FWHM, concentrate light for spotlights and accent tasks, delivering higher on-axis intensity over shorter distances.^[28] In contrast, wide-beam LEDs, exceeding 100° FWHM, distribute light evenly for general illumination, such as room or area lighting, minimizing hotspots and shadows.^[29] The angular intensity distribution for many LEDs approximates a generalized Lambertian model, given by the equation

I(\theta) = I(0) \cos^m \theta,

where I(\theta) is the intensity at angle \theta from the optical axis, I(0) is the peak intensity along the axis, and m is an exponent characterizing the beam's sharpness (e.g., m = 1 for ideal Lambertian emission, yielding a cosine falloff).^[30] This model arises from the diffuse nature of the emitting surface, with higher m values producing narrower beams through optical design.^[18] Historically, LEDs emerging in the early 1960s, such as the first visible red variants using gallium arsenide phosphide, featured narrow viewing angles around 30° due to basic chip geometry and minimal optics.^[31] Modern surface-mount device (SMD) LEDs, prevalent since the 1990s, achieve broader angles typically of 120° through refined phosphor integration, lens profiling, and chip-level diffusion, enabling versatile lighting without secondary optics in many cases.^[32]

Other Illuminants

Incandescent and halogen lamps, which operate by heating a filament to incandescence, emit light omnidirectionally due to the filament's glow radiating in nearly all directions, resulting in an effective viewing angle of approximately 360 degrees without a sharp intensity cutoff.^[33]^[34] This broad distribution makes them suitable for general illumination where uniform light coverage is desired, though the base of the bulb slightly obstructs emission in one direction. Halogen variants, using a halogen gas to extend filament life, maintain a similar emission pattern to standard incandescents.^[35] Fluorescent lamps, including compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), generate light through excitation of mercury vapor and subsequent phosphor layer emission, producing a diffuse pattern with omnidirectional emission, approximately 360 degrees. The phosphor coating on the tube or coiled structure scatters light broadly, mimicking the omnidirectionality of incandescents while providing more efficient energy use, though the exact angle depends on orientation and fixture design. This diffusion ensures even illumination in applications like overhead lighting, with no abrupt boundaries in light intensity. In contrast, lasers exhibit extremely narrow viewing angles, with beam divergence often less than 1 degree, governed fundamentally by the diffraction limit.^[36] The divergence angle \theta is approximated by the formula \theta \approx \frac{\lambda}{D}, where \lambda is the laser wavelength and D is the beam aperture diameter; this relation arises from wave optics principles, setting the minimum spread for collimated output.^[37] The evolution of illuminants reflects a transition from predominantly omnidirectional sources like incandescents and fluorescents, which dominated pre-2000s lighting, to more directed and controllable options in the LED era, enhancing precision in optical applications.^[38]^[39]

Factors Influencing Viewing Angle

Optical Properties

The viewing angle in optical systems is fundamentally limited by refraction and total internal reflection at material interfaces, governed by Snell's law, which states that n_1 \sin \theta_1 = n_2 \sin \theta_2, where n_1 and n_2 are the refractive indices of the two media, and \theta_1 and \theta_2 are the incident and refracted angles, respectively.^[40] In substrates like glass with higher refractive index (n_1 \approx 1.5) interfacing air (n_2 = 1), light rays incident at angles exceeding the critical angle undergo total internal reflection, trapping emission within the material and restricting observable angles to those below this threshold.^[41] This effect confines the light escape cone, preventing wide-angle visibility in display substrates where generated light must exit to the viewer.^[40] The critical angle \theta_c = \arcsin(n_2 / n_1) quantifies this limit; for a typical glass-air interface, \theta_c \approx 42^\circ, meaning only rays within this angle from the normal can refract out, while steeper angles reflect internally.^[42] Beyond \theta_c, no refracted ray exists, leading to evanescent waves but no propagation into air, which inherently caps the effective viewing angle in layered optical structures.^[40] Birefringence in anisotropic materials further constrains off-axis performance by altering light polarization dependent on the propagation direction. In such materials, the refractive index varies with polarization, causing phase shifts that differ on- and off-axis, resulting in altered transmission and contrast degradation at oblique angles.^[19] This directional dependence disrupts uniform polarization control, leading to off-axis color shifts and reduced image fidelity in systems relying on polarized light.^[19] Scattering and absorption processes, including Rayleigh scattering from small inhomogeneities in optical materials, diminish off-axis clarity by diffusing light and introducing veiling glare, which lowers contrast and luminance uniformity. Rayleigh scattering, proportional to $1/\lambda^4, preferentially scatters shorter wavelengths, exacerbating color distortion at wider angles where path lengths through scattering media increase.^[43] Absorption in components like polarizers intensifies off-axis, as the angle-dependent effective thickness enhances energy loss, further degrading perceived brightness and sharpness.^[43] In semiconductors, quantum effects during carrier recombination influence emission directionality through dipole radiation patterns. Electron-hole recombination generates photons via electric dipole transitions, producing an angular emission distribution with maximum intensity perpendicular to the dipole axis and nodes along it, forming directional cones that limit isotropic output and affect external viewing angles after refraction.^[44] This inherent anisotropy in recombination confines light to specific emission lobes, compounded by substrate interfaces, to determine the overall angular spread in devices like LEDs.^[44]

Environmental and Design Factors

Temperature significantly influences the viewing angle in liquid crystal displays (LCDs) through thermal expansion of substrates and changes in liquid crystal material properties. Elevated temperatures cause expansion that can misalign liquid crystal layers and polarizers, reducing the efficiency of light modulation off-axis and narrowing the effective viewing angle. For instance, temperatures above 40°C can lead to a reduction in viewing angle due to these alignment shifts and decreased birefringence, as demonstrated in experimental analyses of commercial LCD panels.^[45] Humidity and long-term aging further degrade viewing angle performance by accelerating the deterioration of polarizers, which are essential for controlling light polarization in LCDs. High relative humidity promotes moisture absorption in polarizer films, leading to delamination or reduced transmission efficiency over time, thereby diminishing contrast at wider angles and effectively narrowing the usable viewing cone. Aging effects, including UV exposure combined with humidity, can reduce polarizer integrity after several years, directly impacting off-axis visibility.^[46] Design choices offer mitigations to counteract these environmental influences and enhance viewing angle robustness. Anti-reflective coatings applied to display surfaces minimize external light reflections, which otherwise exacerbate glare and perceived angle limitations under varying lighting conditions, thereby improving off-axis contrast and color fidelity. Similarly, microlens arrays integrated into the display stack redirect light beams more uniformly, widening the angular distribution and compensating for narrowing caused by temperature or aging.^[47]^[48] The perceived degradation of viewing angle also depends on viewing distance, where off-axis offset introduces angular distortion given by the relation

\tan\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) = \frac{d}{D}

with \theta as the full perceived angle, d the lateral offset from the normal, and D the distance to the viewer; this trigonometric relation highlights how greater distances mitigate perceived narrowing for a given offset. Compliance with standards such as ISO 9241-307 for display measurement requires controlled environmental conditions to ensure reproducible viewing angle assessments, as variations in temperature and humidity can alter results by affecting material stability and measurement consistency. Uncontrolled factors like these lead to variability in contrast ratio thresholds used to define viewing angles, underscoring the need for standardized testing protocols.

Applications and Limitations

Consumer and Professional Uses

In consumer applications, televisions and computer monitors often prioritize wide viewing angles to facilitate group viewing experiences, such as family entertainment or collaborative work sessions. Technologies like in-plane switching (IPS) panels in premium displays achieve viewing angles up to 178 degrees horizontally and vertically, minimizing color shifts and contrast loss even when viewed from off-axis positions by multiple users. This is particularly beneficial for living room setups where viewers may sit at angles up to 30 degrees off-center without significant degradation in image quality. Conversely, smartphones and tablets frequently incorporate or support narrow viewing angle features for enhanced privacy in public or shared environments. Privacy screen protectors, utilizing micro-louver technology, restrict the visible angle to as little as 30 degrees from the front, effectively blacking out the display for sidelong observers while maintaining full clarity for the primary user. This approach addresses concerns like visual hacking, with narrower angles (e.g., 60 degrees or less total) providing stronger protection against unauthorized viewing.^[49]^[50] In professional contexts, medical imaging displays demand viewing angles exceeding 160 degrees to support multi-user diagnostics, such as in operating rooms or radiology consultations where clinicians review scans from various positions. High-end active-matrix liquid crystal displays (AMLCDs) used in these systems maintain grayscale conformance and low contrast deviation within cones of ±35 degrees or more, ensuring accurate interpretation by teams without repositioning.^[51] Similarly, large LED displays for conference halls or auditoriums utilize panels with up to 140 degrees vertical viewing angles to deliver uniform brightness and detail across broad seating arrangements.^[52] Market trends in the 2020s have emphasized viewing angles of 170 degrees or greater in premium consumer and professional displays, driven by the rise of IPS and fringe field switching (FFS) technologies, which account for approximately 46% of desktop monitor panels as of 2024.^[53] In automotive applications, head-up displays (HUDs) aim to approximate the driver's natural binocular horizontal field of view of about 120 degrees, enhancing safety by overlaying critical information without diverting gaze from the road.^[54] The adoption of wide-angle technologies, such as IPS over twisted nematic (TN) panels, typically incurs a higher cost due to advanced liquid crystal alignment processes that improve off-axis performance.^[55] A notable case study is the implementation of high-angle LED screens in stadiums like Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, where 360-degree circular displays ensure visibility for all spectators, regardless of seating position, thereby enhancing the overall event immersion.^[56]

Mitigation Techniques

Hardware-based mitigation techniques for viewing angle limitations in liquid crystal displays (LCDs) primarily involve the use of optical compensator films, such as wide-view (WV) films, which counteract the optical anisotropy of liquid crystal layers to reduce off-axis light leakage and restore contrast uniformity.^[57] These films, often biaxial positive birefringence types, are optimized for vertical alignment (VA) modes to achieve wide viewing angles, with configurations enabling up to 160° effective angular range while maintaining high contrast ratios.^[58] In light-emitting diode (LED) systems, secondary optics like total internal reflection (TIR) lenses redistribute light to broaden beam divergence, typically extending the viewing angle to 120–160° for applications requiring uniform illumination over larger areas. Software approaches, such as dynamic gamma correction, address viewing angle dependencies by adjusting the luminance response for off-axis positions, compensating for shifts in gamma transfer functions that degrade image quality at oblique angles.^[59] This method analyzes image data distribution and applies real-time corrections to maintain perceptual consistency across viewing directions, particularly effective in LCDs where gamma varies significantly with angle.^[60] Hybrid techniques integrate quantum dot (QD) enhancers with existing display layers to improve color stability under varying angles, where QDs act as color converters that minimize angular color shifts while preserving saturation and gamut.^[61] For instance, printed QD films in twisted nematic (TN) LCDs enhance off-axis color fidelity by modulating excitation light, reducing degradation in hue and brightness.^[62] These mitigation strategies collectively extend effective viewing angles by 50–100% in many configurations, as seen in VA LCDs where compensator films elevate performance from inherent narrow ranges (e.g., ~80°) to over 160°, balancing contrast, transmittance, and color accuracy.^[58] Such improvements are quantified through metrics like contrast ratio retention and color shift delta E, demonstrating substantial enhancements without excessive light loss. Emerging in the 2020s, metasurfaces offer promising adaptive solutions for dynamic viewing angle control in displays, enabling programmable wavefront manipulation to achieve wide fields of view exceeding 60° while integrating multiple optical functions like beam steering and polarization control.^[63] These nanostructured surfaces, often combined with AR/VR optics, provide on-demand angle adjustments, potentially revolutionizing hybrid display systems for enhanced angular coverage and efficiency.^[64]

References

[1]
Definition of viewing angle - PCMag
The maximum angular distance from looking in front of a screen to looking from the side without a change of brightness or colors. A 180-degree angle means that ...
[2]
Understanding Display Viewing Angles
Feb 4, 2025 · A viewing angle is a display technology specification that defines the optimal angle for maintaining acceptable image quality.
[3]
LCD Monitor Viewing Angle - Touch Screens Inc.
Viewing angle is the angle for which contrast ratio equals or exceeds a fixed value. The value may be 5:1 or 10:1.
[4]
https://www.touchwindow.com/c/ViewingAngle.html
[5]
What Is A Monitor's Viewing Angle? A Basic Definition
Feb 3, 2022 · Viewing angle refers to a range of angles where the image displayed on a monitor remains suitable to the user.
[6]
IPS vs TN vs VA - Which Is Best? [Ultimate Guide] - Display Ninja
Dec 28, 2024 · TN panels have the highest refresh rates and fastest response times, but have inferior image quality and viewing angles. IPS panels offer the ...<|separator|>
[7]
VA vs. IPS vs. TN Which Monitor Panel is Best for Gaming? - BenQ
IPS panels offer wide 178/178 viewing angles. This means clear views from almost any angle. IPS provides the best experience for shared viewing.
[8]
Our Monitor Picture Quality Tests: Viewing Angle - RTINGS.com
A monitor's viewing angle defines the range of angles at which you can look at the screen without the image looking washed out or losing accuracy.
[9]
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/tests/picture-quality/viewing-angle
[10]
LED vs OLED: Comparing Panel Types Found In Monitors
Aug 29, 2025 · ... IPS panels aren't far behind. That said, VA and TN panels have narrow viewing angles, so the image quickly washes out when you view it off-angle ...Common Panel Types Found In... · Differences In Picture... · Brightness
[11]
https://tj2lighting.com/lighting-terms-and-definition/
[12]
Lighting Terms and Definitions-TJ2 Lighting - LED Lighting ...
The angle between the two directions for which the intensity is 50% of the maximum intensity as measured in a plane through the centerline. For example, the ...
[13]
A new characterization method to define the viewing angle range of ...
The most commonly and frequently used viewing angle definition only includes the contrast ratio, a simple division of the maximum luminance, measured on a white ...
[14]
The Viewing Angle of TFT LCD Display Screens
Apr 21, 2025 · A viewing angle is defined as the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.Why Viewing Angles Matter In... · How Tft Lcd Technology... · Ideal Viewing Angles For...
[15]
Goniophotometers for Displays - Products - Instrument Systems
The DMS series of goniometer systems are used to measure and qualify electro-optical displays in typical application scenarios, e.g. viewing angle, homogeneity, ...
[16]
https://products.iec.ch/view/glossary/01cb90a7fd12e9c254fc9203532724ac
[17]
10:1 contrast ratio viewing angle | Products & Services Portal
Definitions. viewing angle over which the contrast ratio is equal or higher than 10:1. 10 ...Missing: threshold CR >
[18]
What Is LED Screen Viewing Angle? Here's the Complete Guide
Half-brightness angle refers to the angle at which the screen's brightness drops to 50% of its maximum level. ... The horizontal viewing angle is where brightness ...
[19]
Lambertian Emitters and Scatterers - RP Photonics
Lambertian emitters and scatterers are those where the radiance towards an observer is independent of the viewing direction.
[20]
Technical evolution of liquid crystal displays | NPG Asia Materials
Oct 21, 2009 · Overall, the IPS mode is therefore less sensitive to viewing angle than the TN mode, making the IPS mode a wide-viewing-angle mode.
[21]
https://www.displaymodule.com/blogs/knowledge/introduction-to-ips-technology-history-and-principles
[22]
https://sid.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sdtp.13077
[23]
66‐2: High transmittance and fast response FFS LCD for AR and VR ...
May 29, 2019 · 66-2: High transmittance and fast response FFS LCD for AR and VR displays ... viewing angle and indistinguishable gamma shift. Promising ...
[24]
Optimizing the display performance for virtual reality systems
Nov 22, 2021 · ... cosn(θ) in the simulation model. In Sec. 3, when we optimize the OLED display and LCD, a realistic radiation pattern of the display will be ...
[25]
Your Guide To LED Beam Angles - California LightWorks
May 19, 2021 · More often, what you will see is a method called “full-width, half-max” (FWHM), which measures the angle at which the light has 50% peak ...How Do You Measure Beam... · What Beam Angle Do I Need? · Ceiling Height
[26]
Understanding LED Viewing Angle: A Comprehensive Guide
Sep 17, 2025
[27]
Phosphor Coating - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The phosphor layer will absorb some of the blue light emanating from a blue LED chip and re-emit yellow light, so that white light is produced as a mix of the ...
[28]
[PDF] Phosphor Layer Arrangement for Use with Light- Emitting Diodes
Mar 11, 2010 · The 15 lens 300 is configured to focus light emitted by the LED dies. 102 and extracted by the encapsulation 202. The lens 300 includes a domed ...Missing: mechanism coating
[29]
Beam Angles - Narrow Beam and Wide Beam Spotlights
Narrow beam angles are good for highlighting and task lighting purposes, while spotlights with a wider beam angle are more suited to general lighting.
[30]
Choosing the Right Beam Angle in LED Lighting | BeamPro Explained
Aug 4, 2025 · In simple terms, beam angle is the angle at which light spreads from the source. A narrow beam angle focuses light in a tight spot. A wide beam ...Missing: illumination | Show results with:illumination
[31]
9. Luminance Properties : Angle of View and Distance - CCS INC.
Luminance, as well as illuminance, measures brightness in the space we live in. It is an index of the brightness of the light source or a reflecting surface.Missing: half method
[32]
LED Lights - How it Works - History - Edison Tech Center
The SNX-100 was the first LED sold (summer of 1962). The LEDs were first used with IBM computers to replace tungsten bulbs that controlled punch card readers ( ...Missing: SMD | Show results with:SMD
[33]
What is LED Display Viewing Angle? Here's a Guide! - Colorlit LED
Sep 23, 2024 · SMD LED. Known for a wider viewing angle, roughly 120-140 degrees, SMD is favored for indoor applications requiring close proximity viewing.
[34]
100W A19 E26 Base Incandescent Bulb (6-Pack) - Globe Electric
In stockGlobe Electric's 100W A19 Incandescent Light Bulb shines bright with 1210 ... Beam Angle : 280-Degree Beam Angle. Color Rendering Index (CRI) : 80. Color ...
[35]
Everything You Need to Know About A19 Bulbs - Waveform Lighting
A19 bulbs emit light in a 360 degree angle, because they do not have any reflectors built in. All of the light emitted by the filament in an incandescent bulb ...
[36]
Incandescent Lamps - RP Photonics
The optical spectrum of light from incandescent lamps is very smooth and exhibits a color temperature of the order of 2500 K, which is significantly lower than ...
[37]
[PDF] A Comparative Candlepower Distribution Analysis for Compact ...
Our photometric studies indicate that horizontally oriented CFLs may produce a more desirable distribution than either A-lamps or vertically oriented CFLs by ...
[38]
https://www.simplelighting.co.uk/blog/the-evolution-of-illumination-from-incandescent-to-led-light-bulbs/
[39]
Diffraction-limited Beams - RP Photonics
Diffraction-limited beams are beams with a minimum possible beam divergence for a given waist radius. That implies the maximum possible beam quality.
[40]
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/University_Physics_(OpenStax)/University_Physics_III_-_Optics_and_Modern_Physics_(OpenStax)/01%3A_The_Nature_of_Light/1.05%3A_Total_Internal_Reflection
[41]
The Evolution of Illumination: From Incandescent to LED Light Bulbs
Dec 19, 2024 · The evolution of lighting includes incandescent, halogen, CFL, fluorescent, and then LED, which is more energy-efficient and longer-lasting.
[42]
Lighting History: What Came Before the LED Bulb?
Sep 3, 2020 · Before there were LED bulbs, less-efficient incandescent and fluorescent lights were the mainstays of both commercial and residential lighting.
[43]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10342247/
[44]
Total internal reflection for illumination and displays - SPIE
Dec 3, 2006 · Total internal reflection for illumination and displays. Lorne A ... display with a wide viewing angle. Figure 4. The scanning electron ...
[45]
Total Internal Reflection - RP Photonics
Total internal reflection is the phenomenon that light incident on the boundary between two transparent media is fully reflected under certain conditions.Missing: displays | Show results with:displays
[46]
Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices
Veiling glare and ambient light reflection can significantly degrade the quality of an image on a display device. Veiling glare is primarily associated with ...Missing: absorption off- axis
[47]
Angular distribution of polarized spontaneous emissions and its ...
Mar 4, 2014 · In fact, according to the band structure, the electron-hole recombination between conduction band and valence band produces polarized dipole ...
[48]
(PDF) Viewing angle and response time behavior of LCDs versus ...
Jan 2, 2018 · Viewing angle properties are also affected by the temperature. An increase of temperature produces a reduction of the optical index and of the ...Missing: narrowing | Show results with:narrowing
[49]
https://www.belkin.com/company/blog/privacy-screen-protectors-for-your-phone/
[50]
https://www.totaldefense.com/security-blog/when-purchasing-a-privacy-screen-filter-choose-one-with-the-most-narrow-viewing-angle/
[51]
Viewing angle controllable liquid crystal display with high ...
The colored pixels are driven by fringe-field switching and the white pixel is driven by complex field. In wide-viewing angle mode, the liquid crystal (LC) ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
[52]
IPS vs TN: Which Monitor Panel Type Is Better? - RTINGS.com
Aug 29, 2025 · For most people, IPS monitors are the better choice because they offer more versatility with wider viewing angles and superior picture quality.
[53]
[PDF] Chapter 5 - FAA Human Factors
The angle off center-line for viewing a large-screen display shall not be greater than 30° for groups. The optimum viewing angle is 0°; and the preferred limit.
[54]
Privacy Screen Protector: How to Choose The Best - Belkin
Aug 8, 2023 · How do privacy screen protectors work? Privacy screen protectors use a technology called micro louver to narrow the viewing angle of the screen.
[55]
https://www.av-display.hk/blog/is-ips-panel-display-more-expensive-than-other-displays
[56]
Viewing Angle Performance of Medical Liquid Crystal Displays
The displays showed notable variation in luminance and contrast performance as a function of the viewing angle, particularly in diagonal viewing orientations.
[57]
LED Screen Placement: Viewing Angles and Distances for Flawless ...
Apr 15, 2025 · Look for specifications like 140° horizontal / 120° vertical (often written as 140°/120°) or wider, such as 160°/140°. Wider angles are ...
[58]
Wide-viewing angle trends among desktop monitor panels in 2022
Feb 14, 2022 · IPS/FFS technologies for desktop monitor displays accounted for 63.2% in 2021. This percentage will rise to 67.5% in 2022.Missing: group | Show results with:group
[59]
What's the hold up with heads-up? - SPIE
Mar 1, 2021 · Humans have about 120 degrees of static, horizontal, binocular vision. A typical HUD found in a car today is less than 10 degrees. Solving ...Missing: angle | Show results with:angle
[60]
Is IPS Panel Display More Expensive Than Other Displays?
Aug 22, 2024 · While IPS panel displays may command a higher price than some other panel types, their superior color reproduction and viewing angles often justify the cost ...
[61]
List of Top 23 Largest LED Display Screens in the World (2025)
Apr 29, 2025 · Inside Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta stands the world-famous Halo Board, a 360-degree circular large LED display that redefines in-stadium ...Missing: study | Show results with:study
[62]
Optical Compensation Films for LCDs - Optica Publishing Group
The basic idea of the WV film is to optically compensate the optical anisotropy of the black-state liquid-crystal layer to minimize off-axis light leakage.Missing: compensator | Show results with:compensator
[63]
Optimization of an optical configuration in a vertical alignment liquid ...
also proposed an optical configuration VA LCD with a wide viewing angle by ... compensation film in the oblique incidence. The effective retardation of ...
[64]
Limitations of visual gamma corrections in LCD displays
Our results show that there are significant differences between the gamma transfer functions measured and produced by observers at different viewing angles.
[65]
(PDF) Visual gamma correction for LCD displays - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · An improved method for visual gamma correction is developed for LCD displays to increase the accuracy of digital colour reproduction.
[66]
Color-conversion displays: current status and future outlook - Nature
Nov 1, 2024 · This article provides a comprehensive review of different types of color conversion methods as well as different types of color conversion materials.Missing: equation | Show results with:equation
[67]
Wide Viewing Angle TN LCD Enhanced by Printed Quantum-Dots Film
Aug 10, 2025 · The intensity of 410 nm was applied to execite the QD film and was modulated by the TN cell. As a result, the LC retardation and response time ...
[68]
Wide field of view large aperture meta-doublet eyepiece - Nature
Jan 2, 2025 · Here, we demonstrate a wide field of view (greater than 60 ∘ ) meta-optic doublet eyepiece with an entrance aperture of 2.1 cm.
[69]
Integrated metasurfaces for re-envisioning a near-future disruptive ...
Jun 20, 2023 · Recently, metasurfaces have been integrated with receivers to increase detection efficiencies, sort input light, and widen field of view (FoV).