Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Voiced alveolar fricative

The voiced alveolar fricative is a consonantal sound used in many spoken languages, characterized by the vibration of the vocal cords during the production of turbulent airflow through a narrow channel formed between the tongue and the alveolar ridge, the bony ridge just behind the upper front teeth. In the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), it is represented by the symbol ⟨z⟩, and it serves as the voiced counterpart to the voiceless alveolar fricative , often exhibiting a sibilant quality due to its high-frequency hissing noise. This sound is articulatorily classified as a fricative based on its manner of production, involving incomplete closure of the vocal tract to create friction, and alveolar in place of articulation, with the tongue tip or blade approximating the alveolar ridge.^[1] As one of the more common fricatives cross-linguistically, the voiced alveolar fricative has a specific occurrence estimated at around 28% of the world's languages when considering voiced dental or alveolar sibilants broadly.^[2] It is particularly prevalent in Indo-European languages such as English (e.g., in "zoo" or "buzz"), where it contrasts phonemically with , and in many Romance, Germanic, and Slavic languages, but is rarer in some African and Austronesian languages. Acoustically, features periodic voicing superimposed on aperiodic fricative noise, with formant transitions into adjacent vowels aiding its perceptual identification, and it often undergoes allophonic variations like devoicing in word-final positions in certain languages. In phonological systems, it frequently patterns with other sibilants in rules involving assimilation or spirantization, and its presence correlates strongly with that of , appearing in about 85% of cases in Eurasian, Australian, and American languages.^[2]

Overview

Definition

The voiced alveolar fricative is a consonantal sound produced with voicing, meaning the vocal cords vibrate during its articulation, and with a manner of articulation involving turbulent airflow through a narrow constriction formed at the alveolar ridge—the bony ridge just behind the upper front teeth—by the tip or blade of the tongue.^[3] This results in a characteristic hissing or buzzing quality, distinguishing it from stops or approximants. It is classified as an oral, pulmonic egressive consonant, where air from the lungs escapes through the mouth without nasal involvement.^[4] In the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), the voiced alveolar fricative—specifically the sibilant variant—is represented by the symbol , placed in the fricatives row under the alveolar place of articulation.^[5] A non-sibilant variant, less common and producing a softer frication, uses the symbol [ð̠] or similar diacritics, though predominantly denotes the sibilant form across linguistic descriptions.^[4] The sound's features include central airflow (not lateral) and a stricture narrow enough to generate audible noise, but not complete closure.^[3]

Variants

The voiced alveolar fricative exhibits distinct variants based on articulatory configuration, particularly in terms of sibilance (presence of a tongue groove producing intense high-frequency noise) and airflow direction. The most prevalent is the sibilant form , articulated with the tongue blade raised to the alveolar ridge, creating a channeled airstream for turbulent noise concentrated around 4–8 kHz. This variant appears in roughly 30% of documented languages, predominantly in Europe and among Indo-European families, where it often contrasts phonemically with its voiceless counterpart , as in English "zoo" versus "sue."^[6] In contrast, the non-sibilant variant, denoted [ð̠] (retracted [ð]) or [ɹ̝] (raised [ɹ]), features a broader, flatter constriction without grooving, yielding lower-amplitude frication akin to a weak, voiced interdental sound but positioned alveolars. This form lacks the perceptual salience of sibilants due to its diffuse spectral energy below 4 kHz and is exceptionally rare as a distinct phoneme, occurring primarily as an allophone of dental [ð] in languages like Spanish or Greek, where variable tongue contact shifts it posteriorly. Cross-linguistically, non-sibilant dental or alveolar fricatives (including voiced realizations) are attested in only 7.6% of 567 surveyed languages, with a scattered global distribution suggesting independent emergence and frequent loss.^[7] A further variant is the lateral form [ɮ], produced with central blockage and lateral airflow escape, generating frication along the tongue sides rather than centrally. This non-sibilant sound, with noise peaking around 2–4 kHz, is uncommon and documented in select languages such as Adyghe (Northwest Caucasian), often in environments favoring lateral articulation for phonological contrast.

Phonetic Features

Articulation

The voiced alveolar fricative, represented by the symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), is a consonant produced with vibration of the vocal folds, distinguishing it from its voiceless counterpart . The primary articulators are the blade (or sometimes the tip) of the tongue and the alveolar ridge, the bony ridge located just behind the upper front teeth. To produce the sound, the tongue is raised toward the alveolar ridge, forming a narrow constriction without complete closure, which allows pulmonic egressive airflow to pass through a small, grooved channel along the midline of the tongue. This configuration generates turbulent airflow, or frication, as the air escapes and strikes the upper teeth or the alveolar ridge itself, creating the characteristic sibilant buzzing quality.^[4] In many languages, including English, the articulation is laminal, meaning the broad blade of the tongue approaches the alveolar ridge, with the sides of the tongue often contacting the upper molars to direct the airflow centrally through the groove. The degree of constriction is finer than in non-sibilant fricatives, enhancing the high-intensity noise typical of sibilants. Voicing is achieved through synchronous vibration of the vocal folds in the larynx, adding a periodic low-frequency component to the turbulent frication noise. The velum is raised to block nasal airflow, ensuring the sound remains oral. Variations in exact tongue positioning can occur; for instance, some speakers may use a more apical (tip-focused) articulation, slightly altering the spectral qualities, but the core mechanism remains consistent across standard realizations.^[4]^[8] While the sibilant is the most common variant, non-sibilant and lateral forms of the voiced alveolar fricative exist in certain languages, involving less grooved or laterally directed airflow, respectively. However, these are addressed in specific variant sections; the standard articulation described here pertains to the prototypical sibilant type, as codified in the IPA consonant chart.

Acoustics

The acoustics of the voiced alveolar fricative feature a dual sound source: aperiodic turbulent noise from the constriction at the alveolar ridge and periodic voicing from vocal fold vibration. This results in a spectrogram displaying high-frequency frication noise, typically concentrated above 3,500 Hz and extending up to 10,000 Hz, superimposed with low-frequency energy indicative of voicing.^[9] Spectral analysis reveals a primary peak for in the 4–5 kHz range, with the spectral center of gravity (a measure of overall energy distribution) falling between 5–6 kHz, though individual productions can vary, such as a mean of 7,510 Hz in some idiolects.^[10]^[11] This high-frequency emphasis distinguishes from postalveolar fricatives like [ʒ], which have lower peaks around 2.5–3 kHz.^[12] Voicing manifests as a prominent voicing bar or striations in the lower frequencies (below 400–500 Hz), adding low-frequency energy that increases overall amplitude compared to non-sibilant fricatives.^[9]^[13] Compared to its voiceless counterpart , exhibits shorter noise duration—averaging 107 ms versus 136 ms—due to aerodynamic constraints on sustaining voicing during frication, though this can lead to partial devoicing, especially in word-final positions where voicing may drop to as low as 10% of the segment.^[11] Formant transitions, particularly rising F2 onsets, further cue the alveolar place of articulation when frication noise alone is ambiguous.^[10] These properties make perceptually robust, with spectral center of gravity and duration serving as key discriminators from , despite occasional intensity overlaps.^[11]

Sibilant Variant

Specific Features

The sibilant variant of the voiced alveolar fricative, denoted as in the International Phonetic Alphabet, is classified by its voicing, place of articulation, and manner of articulation. It is voiced, with the vocal folds vibrating to produce a periodic component superimposed on the frication noise. The place of articulation is alveolar, involving the blade or tip of the tongue approaching the alveolar ridge behind the upper teeth. The manner is fricative, specifically sibilant, where airflow passes through a narrow groove-like constriction in the tongue, directed against the upper teeth or incisors to generate intense turbulent noise.^[3] Articulatorily, the tongue forms a tight seal at the sides against the upper molars, channeling the pulmonic egressive airstream through the central groove, which is narrower and more anterior than for postalveolar sibilants like [ʒ]. This configuration results in a high-pitched hissing quality, distinguishing it from non-sibilant fricatives. In many languages, including English and Dutch, the exact tongue positioning can vary slightly, with the constriction sometimes retracted or less tense, affecting the spectral profile.^[8] Acoustically, exhibits prominent aperiodic energy in the high-frequency range of 5,000–10,000 Hz, characteristic of sibilants, due to the resonant cavity formed anterior to the constriction. The center of gravity of the noise spectrum typically falls around 7,000–8,500 Hz, lower than for its voiceless counterpart owing to the added voicing energy. Voicing manifests as a low-frequency voice bar (around 100–200 Hz) on spectrograms, with partial periodicity during the frication, though devoicing can occur in word-final positions, reducing modal voicing to about 10% in some idiolects. Duration averages 100–140 ms, shorter than in intervocalic contexts, and intensity is comparable but slightly lower due to transglottal airflow constraints.^[14]^[11]

Occurrence

The sibilant voiced alveolar fricative is a relatively common consonant cross-linguistically, appearing as a phoneme in the inventories of 893 languages documented in the PHOIBLE database, which equates to approximately 30% of its 3,020 language entries.^[6] This frequency underscores its role as a standard sibilant in many phonological systems, often patterning with its voiceless counterpart to form voiced-voiceless pairs that distinguish meaning. Unlike rarer fricatives, tends to occur in languages with moderately sized consonant inventories, where sibilants contribute to high-frequency noise-based contrasts.^[15] In Indo-European languages, is a core phoneme, as seen in English where it contrasts with in pairs like sip [sɪp] and zip [zɪp].^[4] Similarly, in German, it appears as an allophone of /s/ in intervocalic positions, as in lesen [ˈleːzən] 'to read', maintaining a clear alveolar sibilant quality.^[1] Afro-Asiatic languages also frequently feature , such as in Arabic, where the letter ز represents /z/ in forms like zarā [za.raː] 'he visited' and zawiya [za.wi.ja] 'angle'.^[16] Niger-Congo languages like Swahili include as a phoneme, exemplified in lazima [la.zi.ma] 'must', highlighting its integration into Bantu phonologies.^[17] Beyond these families, surfaces in Na-Dené languages, including Navajo, where it occurs in terms like bizid [bɪ.zɪd] 'its liver'.^[18] In some languages, such as Spanish, functions primarily as an allophone of /s/ before voiced consonants, as in mismo [ˈmiz.mo] 'same', rather than a distinct phoneme.^[4] Overall, while is absent from many East Asian and Austronesian languages—where sibilants may devoice or simplify—its presence correlates with regions favoring robust fricative systems for lexical differentiation.^[19]

Non-sibilant Variant

Specific Features

The non-sibilant variant of the voiced alveolar fricative is a consonantal sound produced with voicing, alveolar place of articulation, and fricative manner without the intense high-frequency noise typical of sibilants. In the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), it is represented by diacritic-modified symbols such as ⟨ð̠⟩ (retracted [ð]) or ⟨ɹ̝⟩ (raised [ɹ]), indicating a position between a dental fricative [ð] and an alveolar approximant [ɹ].^[20] Articulatorily, the tongue tip or blade approximates the alveolar ridge with a broader constriction than in sibilants, lacking the narrow central groove that directs airflow against the teeth for hissing. This results in weaker turbulence and a sound closer to a continuant or weak fricative, often realized as a brief tap or approximant-like frication. The airstream is pulmonic egressive, and the sound is central and oral. Variations may include apical or laminal contact, with the tongue position sometimes centralized.^[2] Acoustically, unlike sibilants, it features lower-intensity frication noise concentrated in mid-frequencies (around 1,000–4,000 Hz), with prominent voicing showing a clear voice bar on spectrograms. The noise spectrum has a lower center of gravity, and the sound may exhibit partial devoicing in certain contexts, but it generally maintains modal voicing throughout. Duration is similar to other fricatives, around 80–120 ms, but with less spectral prominence.^[21]

Occurrence

The voiced alveolar non-sibilant fricative is rare cross-linguistically, occurring in only about 7.6% of surveyed languages as either voiceless or voiced dental/alveolar non-sibilants, and almost always as an allophone rather than a distinct phoneme.^[7] It typically arises as a variant of other sounds, such as /r/, /d/, or dental fricatives [ð], in languages with alveolar or coronal realizations. In Czech, it appears as a realization of /r/, particularly in fricative form [ɹ̝] or [r̝], as in "čtyři" [ˈt͡ʃtɪɹ̝ɪ] 'four'.^[22] In some English dialects, such as Scouse (Liverpool) and South African English, the interdental [ð] is alveolarized to [ð̠], e.g., "this" [ð̠ɪs]. Icelandic uses [ð] which can have alveolar variants in casual speech. In Aragonese and Sicilian Spanish, similar non-sibilant realizations occur for /ð/ or /d/. Overall, it is absent from most language families, appearing sporadically in Indo-European and isolates where coronal sounds vary.^[2]

Lateral Variant

Specific Features

The lateral variant of the voiced alveolar fricative, denoted as [ɮ] in the International Phonetic Alphabet, is classified by its voicing, place of articulation, and manner of articulation. It is voiced, with the vocal folds vibrating to produce a periodic component during frication. The place of articulation is alveolar, involving the blade or tip of the tongue against the alveolar ridge behind the upper teeth. The manner is fricative but lateral, where the sides of the tongue form a seal against the upper molars, allowing pulmonic egressive airstream to escape laterally through narrow channels, generating turbulent noise without a central groove. Articulatorily, the tongue central portion contacts the alveolar ridge to create frication, while the sides are lowered to permit lateral airflow, distinguishing it from central fricatives like . This results in a buzzing or rasping quality, often less intense than sibilants. In languages featuring [ɮ], such as Adyghe, the constriction may vary slightly in tension or height, influencing the noise profile. Acoustically, [ɮ] shows aperiodic frication energy primarily in the mid-to-high frequency range of approximately 2,000–4,000 Hz, lower and broader than sibilants due to the lateral release. Voicing appears as a low-frequency voice bar (around 100–200 Hz) on spectrograms, with partial periodicity, though devoicing may occur in certain contexts. Duration typically ranges from 80–120 ms, and intensity is moderate, constrained by the lateral airflow path.^[23]

Occurrence

The voiced alveolar lateral fricative [ɮ] is a rare consonant cross-linguistically, appearing as a phoneme in the inventories of approximately 43 languages documented in the PHOIBLE database (out of 2,155 inventories, or about 2%).^[24] This low frequency highlights its limited role in phonological systems, often occurring in languages with expanded fricative or lateral inventories, and it may pattern with approximants like or voiceless [ɬ] in assimilation rules. In Northwest Caucasian languages, [ɮ] is phonemic, as in Adyghe (e.g., "къалэ" [qaːɮa] 'town'). Bantu languages like Zulu feature it, exemplified in "ukudla" [úkuɮa] 'to eat'. It also appears in Mongolic languages such as Mongolian ("монгол" [ˈmɔŋɡɔɮ] 'Mongol'). Other occurrences include Tera (Afro-Asiatic), Kabardian, and Ket (Yeniseian), where it may alternate with in morphological contexts. In some varieties, such as South African English influenced by Zulu loans, [ɮ] arises allophonically. Overall, [ɮ] is absent from most Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan, and Austronesian languages, correlating with regions favoring lateral approximants over fricatives.^[25]

Comparisons

With Voiceless Alveolar Fricatives

The voiced alveolar fricative and the voiceless alveolar fricative are produced with the same primary articulatory configuration, involving a narrow constriction between the tongue blade or tip and the alveolar ridge, creating turbulent airflow. The fundamental distinction lies in phonation: is produced with vocal fold vibration, generating periodic low-frequency energy, whereas lacks this vibration, resulting in purely aperiodic noise. This voicing contrast is universal across languages where both sounds occur, such as English (e.g., zip vs. sip) and Spanish.^[3] Articulatorily, subtle differences emerge beyond voicing. Production of involves higher intraoral pressure due to the absence of voicing, leading to a more retracted tongue root and constricted pharyngeal cavity (mean volume 23.0 cm³). In contrast, accommodates voicing through pharyngeal expansion (mean volume 34.3 cm³, a 49% increase), primarily via forward displacement of the tongue dorsum (contributing 31% to volume change) and lateral pharyngeal wall expansion, with minimal rear wall movement (6%). Additionally, the larynx lowers more during (mean 5.1 mm displacement) than , facilitating vocal fold adduction. These adjustments reflect the aerodynamic challenge of sustaining voicing amid frication, as lower pressure in prevents vocal fold closure disruption.^[26] Aerodynamically, exhibits greater airflow velocity and subglottal pressure buildup at the constriction, enhancing frication intensity without the need to balance voicing demands. For , airflow is moderated to maintain transglottal pressure drops for vibration, resulting in weaker overall turbulence. This lenis (relaxed) articulation for versus fortis (tense) for aligns with cross-linguistic patterns where voiceless fricatives show stronger constriction force.^[26] Acoustically, both exhibit sibilant characteristics with high-frequency energy concentrated in a spectral peak at 4–5 kHz, reflecting the short anterior oral cavity. Spectral moments are largely shared: mean ~6133 Hz, low variance (2.92 MHz²), negative skewness (-0.229 indicating high-frequency tilt), and moderate kurtosis (2.36 for peaked spectrum). However, typically has longer frication duration (mean 178 ms) than (118 ms), aiding perceptual separation. Amplitude differences vary by context, but often shows higher relative frication-to-vowel intensity ratios, while incorporates visible low-frequency formants from voicing. In clear speech, these cues are enhanced, with displaying more defined spectral peaks and less variance. Perceptually, the voicing contrast dominates identification, but secondary cues like duration and intensity become critical in adverse conditions (e.g., noise), where listeners rely on longer, higher-amplitude noise for . In English, this pair forms a robust phonemic opposition, with minimal pairs highlighting the distinction's role in meaning.

With Adjacent Sounds

The voiced alveolar fricative /z/ frequently undergoes assimilation in connected speech, particularly in English, where it adapts to the features of adjacent sounds to facilitate smoother articulation. This process is most evident in regressive assimilation, influenced by the following segment, and occurs more prominently in casual or rapid speech. For instance, voice assimilation causes /z/ to devoice to when preceding a voiceless consonant, as in "is possible" pronounced as /ɪs ˈpɒsəbl/ rather than /ɪz ˈpɒsəbl/, reflecting the devoicing effect of the following /p/ (Roach, 2009).^[27] Similarly, in "this shop," the /z/ may devoice to under the influence of the voiceless /ʃ/, resulting in /ðɪs ʃɒp/ (Roach, 2009).^[27] Place assimilation also affects /z/, often shifting it toward a palato-alveolar articulation when followed by the palatal approximant /j/. A classic example is "those years," where /ðəʊz jɪəz/ may surface as /ðəʊʒ jɪəz/, with /z/ becoming [ʒ] due to the anticipatory influence of /j/ (Roach, 2009).^[27] This change is partial and context-dependent, varying by speaking style, but it illustrates how /z/ can adjust its alveolar place to align with palatal features in phrases like "is your" (/ɪz jə/ → [ɪʒ jə]). Such assimilations enhance fluency but are optional and less obligatory than in some other languages.^[28] In addition to assimilation, coarticulation with adjacent vowels modifies the spectral characteristics of /z/, allowing the fricative noise to carry cues about the vowel context. Perceptual studies show that listeners can identify high vowels like or from the fricative segment alone with 60–80% accuracy, due to anticipatory and carryover effects that alter the fricative's higher formants (Soli, 1981).^[29] For low vowels like , identification drops near chance levels, indicating weaker coarticulatory influence. Voiced fricatives such as /z/ exhibit greater resistance to these vowel-induced changes compared to voiceless counterparts like /s/, preserving their core articulatory properties more robustly during overlap (Jesus & Shadle, 2002).^[30] This resistance stems from the need for sustained voicing, which limits extensive spectral shifts in rapid speech.

References

[1]
Phonetic symbols
z, voiced alveolar fricative, fizz, his, rose ; ẓ, voiced retroflex fricative; IPA [ʐ], Indic, Mandarin ("r") ; or emphatic, i.e. pharyngealized [zˁ] or [ðˁ] ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[2]
Voiced alveolar fricative - Translation Directory
Its manner of articulation is simple fricative, which means it is produced by constricting air flow through a narrow channel at the place of articulation, ...Missing: definition articulatory
[3]
2.6 Classifying Consonants – Essentials of Linguistics
Consonants are classified according to how they are produced. The articulatory description for each consonant includes three pieces of information.
[4]
Describing Consonants: Manner of articulation
For example, the sound [p] is described as a voiceless bilabial stop, the sound [b] is a voiced bilabial stop, [z] is a voiced alveolar fricative, [ʒ] is a ...
[5]
[PDF] THE INTERNATIONAL PHONETIC ALPHABET (revised to 2015)
Fricative. Lateral fricative. Approximant. Lateral approximant. Symbols to the right in a cell are voiced, to the left are voiceless.
[6]
Segments - PHOIBLE 2.0
PHOIBLE 2.0 segments include consonants like 'm', 'k', 'j', 'p', and vowels like 'i', 'u', 'a', 'e', and 'o'.Missing: frequency voiced alveolar sibilant<|control11|><|separator|>
[7]
Chapter Presence of Uncommon Consonants - WALS Online
Dental or alveolar non-sibilant fricatives are just as rare as labial-velar plosives, occurring in just 43 (or 7.6%) of the languages surveyed, but the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
11.2.2 Alveolar and Palato-Alveolar Fricatives: /s,z,ʃ,ʒ
GA /s,z/ are grooved fricatives: the blade of the tongue articulates with the teeth ridge, allowing the air to escape through a narrow tube-like groove ...
[9]
s/ & /z - Taalportaal
Dutch /s/ is a voiceless and /z/ a voicedalveolarsibilantfricative. The approximation is between the tongue blade and the alveolar ridge, somewhat further back ...
[10]
3.2. Acoustic Aspects of Consonants – Phonetics and Phonology
Different from their voiceless counterparts, the voiced fricatives have a substantial voicing bar occupying approximately the lower 400 Hz as shown in Figure ...
[11]
https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1085&context=stcloud_ling
[12]
https://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~jkirby/hanoi/slides/lecture14-hanoi-4up.pdf
[13]
http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~jkirby/hanoi/slides/lecture14-hanoi-4up.pdf
[14]
[PDF] Spectral features of fricatives and stops
Voiced fricatives. • [v D z Z] are spectrally similar to [f T s S], but with striations/voicing bar and weaker frication. From Ladefoged (2006), A Course in ...
[15]
[PDF] The Acoustic Correlates of Alveolar Fricatives in the Idiolect of a ...
Those produced with vocal fold vibrations are referred to as. [+voiced], those without are labeled [-voice]. Accordingly, [s] is voiceless, while [z] is voiced.
[16]
Speech Acoustics
### Acoustic Description of Alveolar Sibilants [s z]
[17]
Phonetics of Fricatives
### Summary of Voiced Alveolar Fricative [z]
[18]
[PDF] Arabic Fricative Consonants
So the Arabic / z / is a voiced alveolar fricative consonant. Examples. 1. zar / zara / visited. 2. zawya / zawya / angle. 3. zarafa / zarafa / giraffe. 4 ...
[19]
Native Phonetic Inventory: kiswahili - speech accent archive: browse
Kiswahili includes sounds like labio-velar central approximant [w], 3 aspirated voiceless stops, 3 ejective voiced stops, 3 prenasalized voiced stops, and more.
[20]
z - Navajo Sound Profile
z [z]: voiced alveolar fricative. Word: bizid [pɪzɪt] “its liver". Description ... This example demonstrates the voiced version of the s [s] sound in ...
[21]
[PDF] Mandarin adaptations of voiced alveolar fricative [z] in English ...
Take. Mandarin adaptations of English voiced alveolar fricative [z]E as an example, it is mainly adapted into. Mandarin as [s]M or [ts]M, and occasionally ...Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
[22]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0095447015000030
[23]
None
Below is a merged summary of the assimilation of /z/ from Peter Roach's *English Phonetics and Phonology*, consolidating all information from the provided segments into a single, comprehensive response. To maximize detail and clarity, I will use a table in CSV format to organize key aspects (e.g., definitions, types of assimilation, examples, and context), followed by a narrative summary that integrates additional details and URLs. This approach ensures all information is retained efficiently.
[24]
[PDF] Assimilation of Consonants in English and Assimilation of the ...
Alveolar Fricatives Assimilation. The alveolar stop /s/ may become post alveolar fricative / ʃ/ as in this shoe (ðɪs ʃuː‎ ðɪʃ ʃuː)‎and /z/ may become /ʒ/ if ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation
Four studies investigated the perceptual effects of spectral variations in fricatives produced in different vowel contexts. The alveolar and palatal ...
[26]
[PDF] Anticipatory vowel-to-consonant coarticula - DiVA portal
Further, voiced fricatives are more resistant to coarticulation compared to voiceless fricatives. (Jesus and Shadle 2002). A more detailed explanation of the ...