Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

YORP effect

The Yarkovsky–O'Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack (YORP) effect is a radiative torque acting on small asteroids and other irregularly shaped bodies in the solar system, arising from the absorption of sunlight and the subsequent anisotropic re-emission of thermal radiation, which alters the body's spin rate and obliquity over timescales of millions of years.^[1] This effect, significant primarily for asteroids smaller than about 40 kilometers in diameter due to their lower thermal inertia and higher surface-area-to-mass ratios, complements the related Yarkovsky effect by influencing rotational dynamics rather than orbital paths.^[2] The phenomenon derives its name from four key contributors: Ivan Osipovich Yarkovsky, who first proposed aspects of thermal radiation forces on small bodies in the early 1900s; John A. O'Keefe, who explored orbital implications in the mid-20th century; Vladimir V. Radzievskii, who described rotational torques in 1954; and Stephen J. Paddack, who in 1969 detailed how scattered and re-emitted photons could accelerate spin.^[3] The modern formulation of the YORP effect was solidified in the late 1990s and early 2000s through theoretical modeling by researchers like David P. Rubincam, who applied it to asteroid spin evolution, leading to the acronym's adoption around 2000.^[4] Mechanistically, the YORP torque emerges from the body's asymmetric shape and surface properties, which cause uneven heating during the day and delayed, directional re-radiation at night, producing a net angular momentum transfer that can either accelerate or decelerate rotation depending on the asteroid's geometry, obliquity, and thermal parameters such as surface roughness and albedo.^[5] For prograde rotators near the ecliptic, the effect often increases spin rates, potentially leading to mass shedding and the formation of binary systems, while retrograde rotators may experience deceleration toward tumbling states.^[2] Direct observational confirmation of the YORP effect first occurred in 2007 through radar and optical studies of the near-Earth asteroid (54509) YORP (formerly 2000 PH5), revealing a spin-up rate of (2.0 ± 0.2) × 10^{-4} degrees per day per day, consistent with theoretical predictions based on its shape model.^[1] Subsequent detections include spin acceleration on asteroids like (1620) Geographos, (1862) Apollo, and (10115) 1992 SK, and more recent measurements of both acceleration and deceleration on additional bodies such as (433) Eros, with rates up to several milliseconds per year, supporting the effect's role in shaping the observed distribution of small-asteroid rotation periods.^[6]^[7]^[8] The YORP effect has profound implications for asteroid populations, explaining the excess of both fast- and slow-rotating bodies among kilometer-sized objects, driving the evolution of young asteroid families by altering spin vectors and promoting fragmentation or binary formation, and influencing long-term dynamical stability in the main belt and near-Earth regions.^[2] NASA's OSIRIS-REx mission to Bennu measured YORP-induced spin acceleration, confirming predictions of measurable changes and highlighting its relevance to planetary defense and solar system formation models.^[3]^[9]

History and Terminology

Etymology

The term "YORP effect" derives from the acronym Yarkovsky–O'Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack, coined by geophysicist David P. Rubincam in a 2000 paper published in Icarus to honor four early contributors to the theoretical foundations of radiation-induced rotational changes in small celestial bodies during the 20th century.^[10] As Rubincam noted, the name recognizes "those scientists who worked on or inspired the idea that radiation-driven accelerations could modify the rotation rates of small planetary bodies." The acronym breaks down as follows: "Y" for Ivan Osipovich Yarkovsky, who in 1901 introduced the concept of thermal radiation forces arising from diurnal heating on rotating bodies in space; "O" for John A. O'Keefe, whose 1960s work explored radiative influences on asteroid dynamics, including potential rotational impacts; "R" for Vladimir V. Radzievskii, a Soviet physicist who in the 1950s investigated torques from re-emitted radiation and radiation pressure on spinning objects; and "P" for Stephen J. Paddack, who in the late 1960s and early 1970s demonstrated how asymmetric thermal re-emission from irregularly shaped bodies could generate net rotational torques.^[10]^[12] This nomenclature specifically denotes the rotational variant of thermal radiation effects, in contrast to the Yarkovsky effect, which Rubincam and others distinguish as the non-rotational precursor primarily causing orbital semimajor axis drift through translational thrust.^[10]^[12]

Historical Development

The theoretical foundations of the YORP effect trace back to early speculations on how thermal radiation from sunlight could influence the motion of small celestial bodies. In 1901, Russian civil engineer Ivan Osipovich Yarkovsky proposed in a self-published pamphlet that the absorption and anisotropic re-emission of solar radiation by rotating asteroids would generate a net thrust, subtly altering their orbital paths—a phenomenon now recognized as the translational Yarkovsky effect, which laid the groundwork for understanding related rotational torques.^[13] This idea remained largely overlooked in Western literature until revived by Ernst Öpik in 1951, but it was independently explored in the Soviet Union by V.V. Radzievskii in 1954, who analyzed the momentum transfer from re-emitted photons, emphasizing its potential to cause orbital perturbations and even contribute to asteroid disintegration.^[12]^[14] Attention shifted toward rotational implications in the mid-20th century as researchers considered how radiation pressure might affect spin states. In 1969, Stephen J. Paddack proposed that rotational radiation pressure could accelerate the spin of small, asymmetric bodies, potentially leading to structural disruption, demonstrating through laboratory experiments how incident sunlight on non-spherical particles induces torque via reflected and re-emitted photons. John A. O'Keefe's work in the 1960s on radiative influences on asteroid dynamics contributed to exploring these effects.^[3]^[15] Paddack expanded this in 1973, quantifying the torque from photon momentum on irregularly shaped objects and linking it to the origins of cosmic dust and meteoroids. Further refinement came in the late 1970s and 1980s, with studies highlighting seasonal variations in thermal torques. David P. Rubincam synthesized these concepts in 1987, introducing the term "thermal drag" to describe the radiative forces causing orbital decay and initial spin perturbations in small bodies, drawing analogies from satellite observations like LAGEOS.^[16] By 2000, Rubincam unified the disparate contributions into a comprehensive framework for the YORP effect, explicitly naming it after Yarkovsky, O'Keefe, Radzievskii, and Paddack to honor their pioneering roles, while deriving the torque's dependence on body shape, rotation, and thermal properties.^[17] Despite these theoretical advances, the YORP effect lacked direct observational confirmation before 2000, primarily due to limitations in observational precision and computational modeling; telescopes of the era could not resolve the subtle spin changes over short timescales, and numerical simulations required significant advances in thermal modeling to predict measurable effects on real asteroids.^[13]

Physical Mechanism

Underlying Principles

The YORP effect arises from the interaction of solar radiation with an asteroid's surface, where incoming sunlight is absorbed and subsequently re-emitted as thermal radiation, transferring momentum to the body. This process involves both the reflection of visible light and the infrared re-emission of absorbed heat, creating subtle forces due to the recoil from photon emission. For irregularly shaped asteroids, these interactions do not cancel out symmetrically, leading to a net momentum transfer that influences the body's rotational state.^[12] Asymmetry in an asteroid's shape, such as irregular facets, craters, or boulders, and variations in surface properties like albedo or roughness, are essential prerequisites for the YORP effect, as they cause uneven absorption, reflection, and re-emission patterns across the surface. Without such irregularities, the radiation forces would balance out, producing no net rotational influence.^[12] These asymmetries ensure that the momentum imparted by outgoing radiation is not uniformly distributed, setting the stage for changes in spin. Unlike the Yarkovsky effect, which generates a net translational force that perturbs an asteroid's orbital motion, the YORP effect specifically produces a torque that alters the rotation rate and obliquity of the spin axis.^[12] The foundational ideas trace back to early 20th-century concepts by Yarkovsky and others on radiation forces, later extended to rotational dynamics. Thermal inertia, which measures a surface's resistance to temperature changes, plays a key role by determining how quickly absorbed heat is conducted and re-emitted, leading to phase lags in the thermal radiation relative to the incident sunlight.^[12] Diurnal cycles, driven by the asteroid's rotation period, cause day-night heating variations that shift the center of thermal emission, while seasonal cycles, tied to the orbital period around the Sun, introduce longer-term asymmetries in illumination. These cycles amplify the effect of surface asymmetries in momentum transfer. The YORP effect is particularly prominent for small asteroids with diameters less than about 30 km, where low self-gravity allows for highly irregular shapes that enhance radiation asymmetries, and where rotational changes can accumulate significantly over time without being overwhelmed by gravitational stabilization. For larger bodies, the effect diminishes relative to other dynamical influences due to smoother shapes and stronger gravity.^[12]

Torque Generation

The YORP effect generates rotational torque on asteroids through the asymmetric interaction of solar radiation with their irregular surfaces, primarily via two mechanisms: the reflection of sunlight and the delayed re-emission of absorbed thermal energy. When sunlight strikes an asteroid's uneven, wedge-shaped features, it produces a tangential thrust from the scattered or reflected photons, imparting a net rotational force akin to the recoil from a sail catching wind on a spinning top.^[18] This reflection component arises because the momentum transfer from outgoing photons does not cancel symmetrically on prolate or irregular shapes, leading to a preferential torque direction.^[19] A more dominant contributor to the torque is the thermal re-emission process, where absorbed solar radiation heats the surface and is reradiated as infrared photons with a slight delay due to the asteroid's thermal inertia. This lag causes the re-emitted radiation to be asymmetrically directed relative to the incident sunlight, resulting in a net torque that can either accelerate or decelerate the spin, depending on the body's geometry.^[18] For instance, on an asteroid with "windmill"-like protrusions, the delayed emission from sunlit areas pushes in a way that reinforces rotation, while shadowed regions contribute oppositely but with less intensity, yielding an overall imbalance.^[19] The direction and magnitude of the torque—whether causing spin-up or spin-down—hinge on the asteroid's shape, spin axis obliquity, and surface albedo variations, which modulate the absorption and emission patterns. Prograde rotators with low obliquity often experience spin-up, but the effect diminishes or reverses near obliquities of approximately 55° and 125°, where torques balance out.^[18] Albedo contrasts across the surface further amplify asymmetries, as brighter areas reflect more sunlight tangentially while darker regions re-emit more thermal energy in delayed bursts.^[19] Additionally, a seasonal variation in the YORP torque arises from the asteroid's orbital motion, which periodically alters the illumination geometry and thus the obliquity evolution. This component drives the spin axis toward extreme orientations over long timescales, potentially destabilizing low-obliquity states and initiating cycles of acceleration followed by deceleration.^[18] Overall, these processes transform the otherwise symmetric radiation pressure into a rotational driver, analogous to a windmill harnessing uneven gusts to turn.^[19]

Theoretical Formulation

Key Equations

The YORP torque arises from the net recoil due to absorbed and re-emitted solar radiation on an irregularly shaped asteroid surface, expressed through the following surface integral:

\vec{\tau}_{\mathrm{YORP}} = \frac{1}{c} \int_A \left( \vec{r} \times \vec{F}_{\mathrm{rad}} \right) \, dA

where c is the speed of light, \vec{r} is the position vector relative to the asteroid's center of mass, and \vec{F}_{\mathrm{rad}} is the radiation force (including both direct solar pressure and thermal thrust) acting on the differential surface element dA.^[20] This torque induces a secular change in the asteroid's spin rate via the rotational analog of Newton's second law:

\dot{\omega} = \frac{\tau_{\mathrm{YORP}}}{I}

where \dot{\omega} is the time derivative of the angular velocity \omega, \tau_{\mathrm{YORP}} is the component of the torque along the principal spin axis, and I is the corresponding principal moment of inertia. The spin rate derivative scales as \dot{\omega} \propto R^{-2}, where R is the effective radius, due to the torque's dependence on surface area and the moment of inertia's volume scaling.^[21]^[18] The YORP torque also drives changes in the spin obliquity \theta (the angle between the spin axis and the orbital normal), with a simplified form for the seasonal-averaged evolution given by:

\dot{\theta} \propto \sin(2\theta) \cos(\phi)

where \phi represents the asteroid's rotational phase relative to the subsolar point; this expression approximates the obliquity torque's dependence on double-angle symmetry and phase asymmetry in thermal emission. These equations derive from the conservation of photon momentum: incident solar radiation imparts a flux of momentum proportional to the energy flux divided by c, while anisotropic re-emission due to the asteroid's rotation and shape produces a net torque via surface integration of the local temperature distribution and emission directions, often solved using spherical harmonics for the shape and heat conduction models for the temperature.^[21]

Influencing Factors

The strength and direction of the YORP effect depend on a variety of asteroid-intrinsic and orbital parameters that modulate the asymmetric thermal photon emission and resulting torque. These factors determine not only the magnitude of spin rate and obliquity changes but also whether the effect leads to acceleration, deceleration, or reorientation of the rotation axis. Understanding these influences is crucial for modeling long-term rotational evolution in small solar system bodies.^[12] Asteroid size plays a dominant role, with the YORP-induced spin rate derivative scaling inversely with the square of the radius for bodies larger than tens of meters, rendering the effect far more pronounced in smaller asteroids. For instance, objects under 1 km in diameter experience torques that can alter rotation periods on timescales of millions of years, whereas the effect becomes negligible for radii exceeding several kilometers due to the increased moment of inertia overpowering the torque. This inverse-square dependence arises from the balance between radiated momentum flux, which scales with surface area, and the body's rotational inertia.^[2] Shape irregularity is essential for generating net torque, as the YORP effect vanishes for highly symmetric forms like spheres or uniform ellipsoids but is amplified in asymmetric, rubble-pile structures common among small asteroids. Protrusions, boulders, and uneven topography create localized hot spots and delayed re-radiation, leading to tangential and normal force asymmetries that enhance spin-up or spin-down. Rubble-pile configurations, characterized by loose aggregates, further boost this by allowing greater thermal lag and irregular emission patterns compared to monolithic bodies.^[2]^[22] Surface properties significantly alter the absorption, conduction, and re-emission of solar radiation. Albedo variations determine the fraction of incident flux absorbed, with lower albedo (darker surfaces) increasing the effect by raising the thermal output asymmetry. Thermal conductivity governs heat propagation depth; low-conductivity regoliths delay photon emission to the nightside, shifting the torque direction, while higher values promote more symmetric radiation. Surface roughness, including craters and micrometer-scale features, introduces shadowing, multiple scattering, and enhanced beaming, which can increase torque magnitude by tens of percent through modified emission angles.^[2]^[12] The orbital distance from the Sun, parameterized by the semi-major axis a, inversely affects the effect's strength proportional to (1 AU / a)², as the incident solar flux diminishes quadratically with heliocentric distance. Consequently, YORP torques are robust near 1 AU but weaken substantially beyond 2 AU, limiting significant rotational changes to inner solar system populations like near-Earth asteroids.^[2] Obliquity—the angle between the rotation axis and the orbital normal—and the overall rotation state critically influence torque components. The effect reaches maximum intensity at obliquities of 0° or 180°, aligning the equator perpendicular to sunlight for optimal asymmetry, while it nullifies at intermediate values around 55° and 125° due to balanced seasonal heating. Principal-axis rotation maximizes predictability, but non-principal (tumbling) states, prevalent in elongated bodies, reduce the net torque by averaging out phase-dependent emissions over complex wobbling.^[12]^[2]^[23] Material density and composition indirectly modulate the response by affecting rotational inertia and thermal behavior. Higher density elevates the moment of inertia, damping spin changes for a given torque, as seen in estimates for asteroids like Bennu with bulk densities around 1.3 g/cm³. Compositional variations, such as silicate-rich versus carbonaceous materials, influence thermal inertia and conductivity, thereby altering emission timing and patterns; for example, volatile-poor compositions promote sharper thermal contrasts that can reverse torque signs.^[2]

Observational Confirmation

Early Detections

The first direct observational confirmation of the YORP effect came in 2007 through combined radar and optical lightcurve observations of the near-Earth asteroid (54509) YORP (formerly designated 2000 PH5). These measurements revealed a spin-up, with the sidereal rotation period decreasing at a fractional rate of -1.7 × 10^{-6} (±9%) per year, corresponding to an angular acceleration of (2.0 ± 0.2) × 10^{-4} degrees per day squared. The observations utilized radar imaging from the Arecibo and Goldstone observatories to determine the asteroid's peanut-shaped model and size (approximately 120 meters in length), while optical lightcurves from telescopes including the Nordic Optical Telescope captured period changes over four years (2001–2005). This detection established the YORP effect's role in accelerating the spin of small asteroids, matching theoretical predictions from models that incorporated the asteroid's irregular shape and thermal properties to compute the asymmetric photon recoil torque.^[24]^[25] In 2008, the YORP effect was detected on asteroid (1620) Geographos through photometric observations spanning multiple apparitions, revealing spin acceleration at a rate of (2.0 ± 0.3) × 10^{-4} deg day^{-2}, consistent with theoretical models based on its elongated shape.^[6] In the same year, independent observations confirmed the YORP effect on the near-Earth asteroid (1862) Apollo, marking the second empirical validation. Analysis of photometric lightcurves spanning over two decades (from 1980 to 2005) showed the rotation period decreasing such that the asteroid completes one extra rotation every 40 years, equivalent to an angular acceleration of (5.3 ± 1.3) × 10^{-8} radians per day squared or a period change of approximately -0.31 milliseconds per year. The shape model was derived from adaptive optics imaging at the Keck Observatory, revealing an elongated form about 1.4 kilometers long, which, when input into YORP simulations assuming a bulk density of 2.2 g/cm³, produced torque estimates consistent with the observed spin-up. These findings aligned with pre-2007 theoretical formulations that predicted net positive torque for Apollo's near-retrograde obliquity, driving gradual spin acceleration without requiring alternative explanations like internal structural changes.^[26]^[27] Detecting the YORP effect posed significant challenges due to its subtle nature, necessitating long observational baselines—often decades—to distinguish the tiny rotational changes from noise, aliasing, or non-thermal influences. For (54509) YORP, the four-year dataset was sufficient given its rapid baseline rotation (about 12 minutes), but for slower rotators like Apollo (period of 2.22 hours), multi-decade lightcurve archives were essential to accumulate measurable phase shifts. Both studies emphasized the importance of precise shape modeling via radar or adaptive optics to validate YORP as the cause, as alternative mechanisms like outgassing were ruled out by the lack of cometary activity. These early detections in the 2000s provided proof-of-concept for the effect's reality, bridging theoretical models developed in the late 1990s and early 2000s with empirical evidence.^[24]^[26]

Recent Measurements

The OSIRIS-REx mission provided direct confirmation of the YORP effect on asteroid (101955) Bennu from 2018 to 2023, measuring a continuous rotational acceleration of 3.63 ± 0.52 × 10^{-6} degrees per day squared, equivalent to the rotation period shortening by approximately 1 second every century.^[28] This spin-up is attributed to thermal recoil torques acting on Bennu's irregular surface, as modeled from spacecraft imaging and laser altimetry data. However, observed particle ejections from Bennu's surface, detected during the mission, impart a counteracting torque that slows the rotation, such that the net acceleration is reduced to approximately 1/50th of the pure YORP value induced by solar photons.^[29] In 2022, analysis of lightcurves confirmed YORP-induced spin acceleration on near-Earth asteroid (10115) 1992 SK, with a measured torque strength consistent with theoretical predictions for its shape and thermal properties.^[7] The Hayabusa2 mission at asteroid (162173) Ryugu, operational since 2019, offered indirect evidence of YORP through detailed shape models derived from optical navigation imagery and laser ranging. These models predict a spin-down rate dominated by YORP thermal torques, with the asteroid's current 7.6-hour rotation period resulting from a historical slowdown from an initial ~3.5 hours over millions of years, consistent with the mission's topographic data.^[23] In 2025, NASA's Goldstone radar observations of near-Earth asteroid 2025 OW revealed an exceptionally fast rotation period of 1.5 to 3 minutes, among the quickest recorded for asteroids of its ~60-meter size, indicating recent YORP-induced spin acceleration that has pushed it toward rotational instability.^[30] A 2025 study analyzing lightcurve data from multiple apparitions provided evidence of YORP-induced spin deceleration on asteroid (433) Eros, with a torque strength of -5.0 \pm 4.6 \times 10^{-10} rad day^{-2}, marking one of the first confirmed cases of negative YORP on a larger near-Earth object and highlighting the effect's dependence on surface obliquity and shape.^[8] Simulations published in 2025 for asteroid (3200) Phaethon, the parent body of the Geminid meteor stream, incorporated YORP effects into thermal models, predicting gradual changes in obliquity due to asymmetric re-radiation from its retrograde spin axis, with the torque influencing orbital and rotational evolution over orbital timescales.^[31] Recent advances in YORP measurements from 2010 to 2025 include enhanced spacecraft thermography, as utilized by OSIRIS-REx and Hayabusa2 to map surface temperatures and validate torque models, alongside improved lightcurve photometry from ground-based surveys enabling detection of subtle rotational changes in dozens of small bodies. Additionally, numerical models for meter-sized asteroids demonstrate rapid YORP-driven spin evolution, with rotation periods potentially halving in under 10^5 years, and reveal a strong dependence on surface conductivity that refines predictions for thermal inertia variations.^[32]

Notable Examples

Near-Earth Asteroids

Near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) are particularly amenable to YORP effect studies due to their proximity to Earth, which enables frequent and high-resolution observations using radar and optical telescopes, enhancing detectability of subtle spin changes.^[33] These small bodies, often under 1 km in diameter, experience pronounced YORP torques because their irregular shapes and low thermal inertia amplify the asymmetric re-radiation of sunlight, leading to measurable spin-up or obliquity variations over decades.^[5] Such effects are relevant for hazard assessment, as spin evolution can alter an asteroid's trajectory during close approaches, complicating prediction models.^[2] The namesake asteroid (54509) YORP, approximately 120 meters in diameter, provided the first direct detection of YORP-induced spin-up, with its rotation period decreasing by about 1.3 milliseconds per year, sufficient to double its spin rate in roughly 600,000 years.^[34] Radar observations from Arecibo and Goldstone revealed its peanut-shaped form with prominent wedge-like protrusions that enhance the torque asymmetry.^[35] This spin acceleration, measured through lightcurve analysis over multiple apparitions, confirmed theoretical predictions and highlighted how surface features drive the effect. Asteroid (1620) Geographos, a 5.1-km elongated NEA, shows evidence of YORP-induced spin-up, with photometric observations indicating a rotation period decrease consistent with theoretical models for its shape.^[6] Another early example is (1862) Apollo, a 1.7-km elongated NEA whose orbital closeness to Earth facilitated repeated photometry from 1972 to 2007, revealing a spin-up rate of approximately 4 milliseconds per year.^[27] This acceleration, attributed to YORP, implies the rotation period could double in about 2.6 million years, with the asteroid's irregular shape modeled to produce a net torque from thermal re-emission.^[36] Such observations underscore how NEA accessibility allows for long-term monitoring of YORP signatures. Asteroid (10115) 1992 SK, a small NEA, exhibits YORP spin acceleration, with lightcurve data supporting a positive torque that increases its rotation rate over time.^[7] The fast-rotating 60-meter NEA 2025 OW exemplifies YORP's role in small bodies, with Goldstone radar imaging in July 2025 capturing its elongated, tumbling shape and period of under 3 minutes, enabling estimates of ongoing YORP torque that could further accelerate its spin.^[37] This torque arises from the asteroid's rough surface scattering sunlight unevenly, a process inferred from shape models without direct spin change measurement yet.^[38] Common traits among YORP-affected NEAs include diameters below 1 km, which ensure thermal wavelengths comparable to body size for efficient torque, and high initial obliquities (often >60°), where YORP preferentially alters spin axis orientation, potentially influencing close-approach geometries through coupled Yarkovsky drifts.^[39] These characteristics, combined with irregular morphologies, make NEAs prime candidates for YORP detection via photometric campaigns, as seen in recent Goldstone radar data.^[23]

Main-Belt Asteroids

The YORP effect influences the spin states of main-belt asteroids, often leading to observable changes in rotation rates over timescales of millions of years, particularly for bodies smaller than 10 km in diameter where thermal torques dominate over collisional effects.^[40] Population-level studies of main-belt asteroids reveal an excess of small, fast-rotating bodies, with rotation periods shorter than 2.2 hours, attributed to YORP-induced spin-up that accelerates rotation until disrupted by mass shedding or collisions.^[41] Surveys such as the Palomar Transient Factory have identified this non-Maxwellian distribution, showing a bimodal spin-rate profile with a pronounced peak at high frequencies for asteroids under 5 km, consistent with YORP acting on irregular shapes to preferentially increase spin rates.^[41]^[40] Individual main-belt asteroids provide direct evidence of YORP variability. For (433) Eros, recent analysis of light curve data indicates spin deceleration at a rate corresponding to a YORP strength of υ = (−5.0 ± 4.6) × 10^{-10} rad day^{-2}, marking the first confirmed case of YORP-induced slowing in a main-belt body and challenging the prior observation that all detected YORP effects resulted in spin-up.^[8] This deceleration suggests that Eros's elongated shape and surface properties produce a net torque opposing rotation, potentially influenced by its low obliquity and thermal inertia.^[8] Asteroid (101955) Bennu, a main-belt origin body, exhibits YORP-driven spin-up at approximately 3.63 × 10^{-6} degrees day^{-2}, as measured by OSIRIS-REx spacecraft observations of its rotation period shortening from 4.297 hours in 1999 to 4.202 hours by 2018.^[28] However, particle ejection events observed by OSIRIS-REx, occurring at rates of up to several dozen per month, introduce directional torques that can mask or alter the apparent YORP effect; systematic westward ejections from the equator could contribute up to 0.04% of the observed acceleration, implying the underlying YORP torque may be stronger than directly inferred.^[42] These ejections, primarily millimeter- to centimeter-sized particles, redistribute mass and generate secondary torques, complicating precise YORP quantification without accounting for their asymmetry.^[42] In contrast, (162173) Ryugu displays YORP-induced spin-down, with Hayabusa2-derived shape models predicting a deceleration rate of -0.421 to -6.26 × 10^{-6} degrees day^{-2}, extending its current 7.6-hour period from an estimated prior 3.5-hour rotation over 0.58–8.7 million years.^[23] The asteroid's prominent equatorial ridge, a feature of its "spinning-top" morphology observed by Hayabusa2, contributes to this low YORP torque by stabilizing the spin axis at high obliquity (~171.6°) and reducing net thermal re-emission asymmetry, resulting in type II or IV YORP behavior that favors deceleration over acceleration.^[23] This ridge likely formed from earlier mass wasting during faster rotation, further modulating current YORP efficiency.^[23] In the case of P/2013 R3, a 150-meter rubble-pile main-belt asteroid, YORP spin-up reached disruptive levels, causing rotational fission around 2013 and ejecting debris to form a comet-like tail observed by Hubble.^[43] The asteroid's low density and fractured structure amplified the effect, with models indicating the rotation period shortened to near the disruption limit over millions of years.^[44] This event illustrates YORP's potential to destabilize weakly bound main-belt asteroids. Recent models for meter-sized main-belt asteroids highlight YORP's role in driving rapid evolution toward tumbling states for bodies under 10 m, where tumbling-averaged torques promote sun-tracking orientations that amplify rotational instability on timescales of decades to centuries.^[32] These 2025 simulations, applied to pseudo-asteroid shapes, demonstrate that small-scale irregularities enhance torque variability, leading to non-principal axis rotation and potential disruption for the smallest fragments.^[32] Such dynamics explain the prevalence of tumblers in meteorite parent bodies and small main-belt populations observed in photometric surveys.^[32]

Implications and Applications

Spin Evolution

The YORP effect drives long-term changes in asteroid spin rates and orientations through asymmetric thermal radiation torques, leading to gradual acceleration or deceleration of rotation for small bodies. For asteroids ranging from 100 meters to 1 kilometer in diameter at 1 AU from the Sun, the characteristic timescale for significant spin evolution, such as doubling the rotation rate, is on the order of 10^5 to 10^6 years, with smaller objects evolving more rapidly due to their higher surface-area-to-volume ratios.^[45] This torque can push rubble-pile asteroids toward critical spin limits, where rotational fission occurs; simulations show mass shedding or binary formation typically at spin rates of 5 to 6 revolutions per day, well below the theoretical rigid-body limit of 8 to 9 revolutions per day for spherical or prolate shapes, demonstrating the self-limiting nature of YORP as shape changes reduce the torque efficiency. In addition to spin-rate changes, YORP induces shifts in obliquity, the angle between the spin axis and the orbital plane, often driving it toward asymptotic states near 0° or 180° with comparable probability to 90°, depending on initial conditions and thermal properties.^[46] These obliquity variations directly influence the Yarkovsky effect, as the seasonal and diurnal components of thermal thrust are maximized at low obliquities (0° or 180°), enhancing semimajor axis drift, while equatorial orientations (90°) minimize it, thereby modulating orbital evolution over similar 10^5–10^6-year timescales.^[45] Counteracting processes temper YORP-driven spin-up, including collisions that disrupt rotation through cratering or grazing impacts, inducing random-walk changes in spin rate and potentially reversing torque direction, as well as internal friction within rubble-pile structures that dissipates collision-induced energy and stabilizes or slows rotation.^[47] Recent analyses using Gaia observatory data reveal that internal friction plays a key role in locking slow rotators (>24-hour periods) into tumbling states, where it opposes collisional excitation while limiting YORP's effectiveness.^[48] Insights from 2025 modeling further explain the observed overabundance of slow rotators among small asteroids: tumbling bodies experience a weakened YORP torque (reduced by a factor of ~0.1 due to chaotic motion), leading to prolonged evolution in long-period regimes and accumulation in a distinct population separated from fast spinners by a period-diameter gap. This weakened effect in tumblers, often triggered by collisional resets, aligns with the prevalence of porous rubble piles inferred from their low tensile strengths (~10–100 Pa).^[49]

Asteroid Dynamics

The YORP effect plays a pivotal role in the formation of binary asteroid systems, particularly among near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), by inducing spin-up that leads to rotational fission and subsequent mass shedding. For rubble-pile asteroids, prolonged YORP torques accelerate rotation until centrifugal forces exceed gravitational binding, ejecting material from the equator to form a debris disk; particles within this disk can then circularize into a satellite orbit through dissipative processes or gravitational capture by the primary. This mechanism is thought to account for a significant fraction of observed NEA binaries, with estimates suggesting up to 30% of small NEAs (diameters under 10 km) originate this way, as supported by photometric surveys and dynamical simulations.^[50] Notable examples include the Didymos-Dimorphos system, where YORP-driven spin-up on the primary is inferred to have initiated mass shedding and satellite formation.^[51] In asteroid families, the coupled YORP and Yarkovsky effects drive long-term dispersal in semimajor axis, reshaping cluster dynamics over gigayears. YORP modulates spin obliquity and rate, which in turn influences the seasonal and diurnal components of the Yarkovsky drift—a radiative force causing orbital migration. This coupling introduces variability in drift rates among family members, leading to increased spreading in semimajor axis beyond what Yarkovsky alone would produce; collisions further amplify this by resetting spin states and enhancing tangential YORP contributions.^[52] Simulations of families like Karin demonstrate that such effects can expand the semimajor axis width by factors of 2–3 over 10–100 Myr, contributing to the observed broadening of young collisional clusters into mature, diffuse populations.^[53] YORP-induced disruptions also generate interplanetary dust, with events like the disintegration of main-belt asteroid P/2013 R3 exemplifying rotational breakup that feeds the zodiacal light. Observations by the Hubble Space Telescope revealed P/2013 R3 fragmenting into over ten components between 2013 and 2014, with inferred rotation periods under 2 hours prior to failure, consistent with YORP spin-up eroding cohesion in a weakly bound rubble pile.^[43] The ejected dust grains, ranging from meters to sub-millimeters, follow hyperbolic trajectories initially but contribute to the steady-state zodiacal cloud through collisions and Poynting-Robertson drag, sustaining the faint glow observed across the ecliptic plane.^[44] Such sporadic disruptions are estimated to supply a non-negligible portion of the zodiacal dust budget, linking small-body evolution to visible solar system phenomena.^[13] Recent models, including those from 2025, explore YORP's role in post-main-sequence debris disks around white dwarfs, offering insights into analogs of asteroid belts and exoplanetary systems. Simulations indicate that YORP-driven spin-up during the giant branch phases can shatter exo-asteroids into fragments that later tidally disrupt near the white dwarf, forming observable polluted atmospheres and infrared disks; for instance, rotation-induced breakup times for kilometer-scale bodies are on the order of 1–10 Gyr, aligning with the ages of polluted white dwarfs.^[54] These disks serve as proxies for disrupted planetary systems, revealing compositional gradients and dynamical instabilities akin to those in active main-sequence analogs like β Pictoris, with implications for understanding exoplanet formation and migration in evolved stellar environments.^[55] For planetary defense, YORP's alteration of NEA spin states necessitates its inclusion in orbital propagation models to assess impact hazards accurately. By changing rotation rates and obliquities, YORP modulates the Yarkovsky effect's orbital drift, potentially shifting semimajor axes by a few kilometers over decades for objects like Bennu, which influences close-approach geometries and long-term ephemerides.^[56] Modern hazard assessments, such as those by NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies, integrate YORP-Yarkovsky coupling via Monte Carlo simulations, improving probability estimates for potential impactors by accounting for spin evolution uncertainties.^[57] This is critical for small NEAs, where YORP can accelerate trajectories toward Earth-crossing orbits, enhancing the need for spin-state observations in mission planning.^[58]

References

[1]
Direct Detection of the Asteroidal YORP Effect - Science
Apr 13, 2007 · The Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect is believed to alter the spin states of small bodies in the solar system.
[2]
[PDF] The Yarkovsky and YORP Effects - SwRI Boulder
The YORP effect, the rota- tional counterpart of the Yarkovsky effect, broadly denotes the torque arising from interaction with the impinging solar radiation.<|separator|>
[3]
The YORP Effect and Bennu | The Planetary Society
Dec 11, 2014 · YORP is an acronym that combines four scientist's names: Yarkovsky, O'Keefe, Radzievskii, and Paddack. Building on the work of Yarkovsky, V. V.Missing: naming | Show results with:naming
[4]
YORP: Its origin - NASA ADS
In 2000 Rubincam applied Paddack's idea to small asteroids and called it the YORP effect (YORP = Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack), to give it a catchy ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[5]
strength and detectability of the YORP effect in near-Earth asteroids
Direct detection of YORP rotational acceleration has been achieved on NEAs (54509) YORP (Lowry et al. 2007; Taylor et al. 2007), (1862) Apollo (Kaasalainen et ...
[6]
Detection of the YORP effect in asteroid (1620) Geographos
Geographos is only the third asteroid (after (1862) Apollo and (54509) YORP) for which the YORP effect has been detected. It is also the largest object for ...
[7]
Rotation acceleration of asteroids (10115) 1992 SK, (1685) Toro ...
Oct 13, 2021 · The YORP effect is a net torque from solar radiation that causes asteroid rotation to slowly change. This study found rotation acceleration in ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[8]
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/addd23
[9]
Yarkovsky and YORP effects - Scholarpedia
Oct 26, 2013 · In basic terms, the Yarkovsky effect is defined as a thermal radiation force that causes objects to undergo semimajor axis drift as a function ...
[10]
[PDF] THE YARKOVSKY AND YORP EFFECTS - SwRI Boulder Office
Jan 16, 2006 · An important feature of YORP-driven evolution is that the spin axis gradually tilts toward a specific (asymptotic) obliquity value (Rubincam ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[11]
[PDF] The Yarkovsky and YORP Effects - arXiv
Feb 4, 2015 · Studies of the Yarkovsky effect were soon followed by those of the YORP effect (Rubincam,. 2000). Today, both effects belong to a core culture ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Rotational bursting of small celestial bodies: Effects of radiation ...
Solar radiation pressure can cause rotational bursting and eventual elimination from the solar system of small nonmagnetic bodies in space by a sort of ...
[13]
LAGEOS orbit decay due to infrared radiation from Earth - Rubincam
Feb 10, 1987 · Infrared radiation from the earth may be the principal reason for the decay of LAGEOS' orbit. The radiation heats up the laser ...
[14]
Radiative Spin-up and Spin-down of Small Asteroids - ScienceDirect
The Yarkovsky–O'Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack (YORP) effect may spin up or spin down 5-km-radius asteroids on a 10 8 -year timescale.
[15]
[PDF] The Yarkovsky and YORP Effects - Southwest Research Institute
Thence, the Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-. Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect was born as an alter ego of the Yarkovsky effect little more than half a century after ...Missing: naming | Show results with:naming
[16]
[PDF] THE YORP EFFECT AND THE SPIN OF SMALL ASTEROIDS. D. P. ...
YORP stands for. Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack [1]-[4]. The. YORP effect is due to sunlight shining on a body freely floating in space. A dark ...
[17]
[PDF] YORP torque as the function of shape harmonics - arXiv
May 14, 2009 · Notably, the YORP effect in the Rubincam's approximation is a second order effect in terms of the shape coefficients. Which of the harmonics ...
[18]
https://www2.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Vokrouhlicky_2015_Asteroids_IV_509_Yarkovsky_YORP_Effects.pdf
[19]
Boulder-induced spin variability in the YORP effect - ScienceDirect
May 1, 2025 · ... 1 km in diameter. ... The global normalized YORP spin coefficient is C ̄ 0 , z , which is normalized by asteroid radius and therefore ...
[20]
YORP Effect on Asteroid 162173 Ryugu: Implications for the ...
Nov 11, 2021 · We found that the radiation pressure is a reasonable mechanism for the spin-down of the asteroid and thus provides a clue to Ryugu's history.
[21]
Spin Rate of Asteroid (54509) 2000 PH5 Increasing Due to the YORP Effect
### Key Findings on YORP Effect Detection for Asteroid (54509) 2000 PH5
[22]
None
### Summary of YORP Effect Detection for (54509) 2000 PH5
[23]
Acceleration of the rotation of asteroid 1862 Apollo by ... - Nature
Mar 7, 2007 · Here we report a change in the rotation rate of the asteroid 1862 Apollo, which is best explained by the YORP mechanism.
[24]
[PDF] Direct detection of acceleration in asteroid (1862) Apollo's rotation ...
This depends on the physical properties and especially on the shape; energy re-radiated from an irregularly shaped body allows YORP effect to change the spin ...
[25]
The operational environment and rotational acceleration of asteroid ...
Mar 19, 2019 · Bennu's rotation rate has accelerated since 1999, but previous work could not distinguish between continuous spin-up due to YORP and a step ...
[26]
Episodes of particle ejection from the surface of the active asteroid ...
We analyzed the properties and behavior of particles ejected from Bennu to determine the possible mechanisms of ejection and provide understanding of the ...
[27]
NASA's Goldstone Planetary Radar Observes Fast-Spinning Asteroid
Aug 4, 2025 · These Goldstone observations suggest that 2025 OW is about 200 feet (60 meters) wide and has an irregular shape.
[28]
Evidence for YORP-induced Spin Deceleration in Asteroid (433) Eros
Jun 20, 2025 · However, in the past decade or so, 12 asteroids confirmed to exhibit ... The highest-resolution shape model of Eros, with over 3 million ...
[29]
Yarkovsky and YORP effects simulation on 3200 Phaethon - PMC
Feb 27, 2025 · The YORP effect depends on the shape of the asteroid. Specifically, the YORP effect caused by small-scale morphology is known as the tangential ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
The YORP effect for meter-sized asteroids - ResearchGate
Oct 24, 2025 · The new thermal model implies the dependence of the YORP effect in rotation rate on asteroids conductivity.Missing: advances | Show results with:advances
[31]
The Strength and Detectability of the YORP Effect in Near-Earth ...
Dec 31, 2012 · The Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect causes changes in the rotation rate and pole direction of an irregularly shaped asteroid ...
[32]
Spin rate of asteroid (54509) 2000 PH5 increasing due to the YORP ...
Apr 13, 2007 · The detection of asteroid spin-up supports the YORP effect as an explanation for the anomalous distribution of spin rates for asteroids under 10 ...Missing: first | Show results with:first
[33]
Radar observations of 2000 PH5 (YORP) - Jean-Luc Margot | UCLA
Radar and optical observations of asteroid (54509) YORP provided the first direct observational evidence that sunlight modifies the spin of asteroids.
[34]
Sunshine puts asteroids in a spin | New Scientist
Mar 7, 2007 · The effect is tiny. It would take about 2.6 million years for YORP to double the rotation rate of 1862 Apollo, for instance.Missing: degrees | Show results with:degrees
[35]
NASA's Goldstone Planetary Radar Observes Fast-Spinning Asteroid
Aug 4, 2025 · ... asteroid, a tiny amount of torque is applied and, over time, the asteroid's spin can increase – a phenomenon known as the YORP effect. For ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[36]
Friends - Fast-Spinning Near-Earth Asteroid 2025 OW - Facebook
Aug 30, 2025 · Discovered on July 1, 2025, by a survey telescope in Chile, 3I/ATLAS is the third known interstellar object to visit the solar system and marks ...
[37]
Hubble Witnesses an Asteroid Mysteriously Disintegrating
This leaves a scenario in which the asteroid is disintegrating due to a subtle effect of sunlight, which causes the rotation rate to slowly increase. Eventually ...
[38]
Anatomy of an Asteroid Breakup: The Case of P/2013 R3 - IOPscience
Figure 13. e-folding timescales for spin-up by the YORP effect (thick red line) and sublimation torques (steeper colored lines, each labeled with the mass ...
[39]
Size matters: The rotation rates of small near-Earth asteroids
YORP affects both spin rate and obliquity, in an obliquity-dependent way; obliquity and spin thus evolve together over time.Missing: Common traits
[40]
Combined effect of YORP and collisions on the rotation rate of small ...
The rotation rate distribution of small Main Belt asteroids is dominated by YORP and collisions. These mechanism act differently depending on the size of ...Missing: Palomar Transient Factory
[41]
313 NEW ASTEROID ROTATION PERIODS FROM PALOMAR ...
The decrease at D ∼ 10 km was considered to be a consequence of the transition from the “small” asteroids, which showed a non-Maxwellian spin-rate distribution ...
[42]
Particle Ejection Contributions to the Rotational Acceleration and ...
Mar 11, 2020 · This paper explores the implications of the observed Bennu particle ejection events for that asteroid's spin rate and orbit evolution.
[43]
https://science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/hubble-witnesses-an-asteroid-mysteriously-disintegrating/
[44]
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/aa6a57
[45]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125120
[46]
https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2002.6918
[47]
[1504.00034] Asteroid Systems: Binaries, Triples, and Pairs - arXiv
Mar 31, 2015 · Small asteroid binaries form by rotational fission, while large binaries form from large collisions. The YORP effect powers the spin-up process.<|separator|>
[48]
Evidence for multi-fragmentation and mass shedding of boulders on ...
Jul 30, 2024 · One formation hypothesis of such binary bodies is that due to the Yarkovsky–O'Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack (YORP) effect, a larger primary might ...Results · Dimorphos · Didymos
[49]
Evolution of an Asteroid Family under YORP, Yarkovsky, and ...
Aug 21, 2020 · We find that both collisions and TYORP increase the dispersion of a family in semimajor axis by making the spin axis evolution less smooth and regular.<|separator|>
[50]
Evolution of an Asteroid Family under YORP, Yarkovsky, and ...
We find that both collisions and TYORP increase the dispersion of a family in semimajor axis by making the spin axis evolution less smooth and regular.
[51]
Bounding destruction time-scales of minor planets orbiting white ...
Jul 9, 2025 · Dynamical activity attributed to the destruction of minor planets orbiting white dwarfs has now been photometrically monitored in individual ...
[52]
Post-main-sequence debris from rotation-induced YORP break-up of ...
Jan 3, 2020 · Over one quarter of white dwarfs contain observable metallic debris from the breakup of exo-asteroids. Understanding the physical and ...
[53]
Ephemeris and hazard assessment for near-Earth asteroid (101955 ...
Nov 15, 2021 · Using OSIRIS-REx spacecraft tracking data, we derive meter-level constraints on the distance between Earth and Bennu from January 2019 to October 2020.Missing: 2018-2023 | Show results with:2018-2023
[54]
[PDF] Near Earth Asteroids with measurable Yarkovsky effect
Feb 16, 2013 · The successful detection of the Yarkovsky effect as a result of the orbital fit strongly depends on the quality of the observations in- volved.
[55]
YORP and Yarkovsky effects in asteroids (1685) Toro, (2100) Ra ...
This so-called YORP effect can change the directions of the rotation axis and the rotation rates (Bottke et al. 2006; Vokrouhlický et al. 2015) and has direct ...