Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Acropora

Acropora is a genus of scleractinian corals in the family Acroporidae, encompassing approximately 180 species distinguished by their arborescent, branching colony morphologies and dimorphic corallites consisting of prominent axial and smaller radial structures.^[1]^[2] These corals predominate in shallow, tropical Indo-Pacific reefs, where their rapid skeletal growth via calcification enables them to form expansive frameworks essential for reef accretion and structural complexity.^[1]^[3] Ecologically, Acropora species serve as foundational ecosystem engineers, fostering high biodiversity by providing habitat and refuge for myriad marine organisms, including fish assemblages that rely on their three-dimensional architecture for shelter and foraging.^[4]^[5] Their dominance in reef crest and fore-reef zones supports coastal protection against erosion and wave energy, while their fragmentation-based asexual reproduction facilitates quick recovery and propagation in disturbed environments.^[6]^[1] However, Acropora exhibits vulnerability to environmental stressors, with many species susceptible to thermal bleaching from elevated sea temperatures, which disrupts their symbiotic zooxanthellae and impairs calcification.^[7] Conservation assessments underscore the precarious status of numerous Acropora taxa; for instance, Caribbean species such as A. palmata (elkhorn coral) and A. cervicornis (staghorn coral) are classified as critically endangered by the IUCN due to compounded pressures from bleaching events, diseases like white-band disease, and localized threats including sedimentation and overfishing.^[8]^[9]^[10] Globally, over 40% of reef-building coral species, including many Acropora, now face extinction risks heightened by recurrent marine heatwaves and habitat degradation, prompting targeted restoration efforts such as fragment transplantation to bolster resilience.^[11]^[12]

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Species Diversity and Classification

Acropora is classified within the phylum Cnidaria, subphylum Anthozoa, class Hexacorallia, order Scleractinia, suborder Astrocoeniina, and family Acroporidae.^[13] The genus was originally described by Lorenz Oken in 1815, based on morphological traits including axial and radial corallites, dimorphic skeletal structures, and branching growth forms characteristic of small-polyp stony corals.^[13] Historically, species were grouped into subgenera such as Acropora (Acropora) for branching forms and Isopora for encrusting or massive morphologies, though molecular and skeletal analyses have led to Isopora being elevated to full genus status in some classifications, reducing the scope of Acropora proper.^[14] ^[13] The genus exhibits high species diversity, with the World Register of Marine Species recognizing approximately 140 valid extant species as of 2025, though this figure reflects conservative lumping amid extensive synonymy from over 400 nominal names described since the 19th century.^[13] ^[15] Taxonomic challenges arise from phenotypic plasticity, where environmental factors influence colony morphology, and evidence of hybridization between species, complicating delineation based on skeletal features alone.^[16] Molecular phylogenetics, including DNA barcoding and multi-locus analyses, have revealed cryptic diversity, with some studies indicating that recognized species complexes harbor multiple genetically distinct lineages; for instance, traditional barcoding markers like COI prove insufficient for resolving Acropora species boundaries, prompting calls for integrated morphological-genetic approaches.^[17] ^[18] Recent revisions underscore dynamic classification, such as the 2023 splitting of the widespread Acropora tenuis complex into distinct species including A. bifaria (Indonesian forms) and A. kenti (Great Barrier Reef and Western Australian populations), based on consistent genetic divergence and subtle skeletal differences like branch arrangement and corallite size.^[18] Similarly, analyses of the A. hyacinthus species group in 2025 propose elevated diversity beyond prior estimates, with biogeographic patterns suggesting allopatric speciation driven by ocean currents and isolation rather than ecotypic variation.^[15] These updates, informed by extensive sampling and genomic data, indicate that true species richness may exceed 160, particularly in Indo-Pacific hotspots, though validation requires further field verification to distinguish ongoing gene flow from historical divergence.^[19] Such refinements enhance understanding of evolutionary units but highlight the genus's vulnerability, as many species remain data-deficient under IUCN criteria due to taxonomic uncertainty.^[20]

Evolutionary Origins

The genus Acropora first appears in the fossil record during the Late Paleocene, approximately 60–66 million years ago, shortly after the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, with early specimens documented from Somalia and Austria.^[21] ^[22] These Paleocene fossils indicate that Acropora emerged as part of the post-extinction recovery and diversification of scleractinian corals, which had originated in the Triassic but underwent significant turnover at the K-Pg boundary.^[23] By the Eocene epoch (ca. 56–33.9 million years ago), Acropora exhibited early diversification, with fossils from southern England, northern France, and other Tethyan regions revealing precursors to up to nine modern species groups and five newly described species.^[24] ^[25] This Eocene radiation suggests adaptive morphological innovations, such as branching growth forms, that prefigured the genus's dominance in later reef ecosystems, though Acropora had largely disappeared from European latitudes by the mid-Miocene as it established in the Indo-Pacific.^[24] Phylogenetically, Acropora belongs to the family Acroporidae within the order Scleractinia, with molecular analyses of mitochondrial genes (e.g., cytochrome b and ATPase 6) resolving it as a distinct lineage separate from sister genera like Montipora and Astreopora, consistent with fossil divergence timelines.^[26] Evolutionary processes such as ancient hybridization and reticulate evolution have been inferred from genomic data, contributing to the genus's morphological convergence and species diversity, with the common ancestor estimated to predate the Miocene.^[27] ^[28]

Morphology and Physiology

Colony Structure and Growth Forms

Acropora colonies are modular structures composed of numerous genetically identical polyps connected by living coenosarc tissue and supported by a shared skeleton of aragonite calcium carbonate.^[29] The skeleton features a porous coenosteum, which is the non-corallite tissue between corallites, exhibiting reticular, spinose, or pseudocostate textures.^[30] Corallites are dimorphic, consisting of larger axial corallites located at the tips of branches and smaller radial corallites arranged along the branch sides.^[30] Axial corallites typically measure 1–3.9 mm in outer diameter and 0.4–1.6 mm in inner diameter, with porous synapticular ring walls comprising more than one ring.^[30] Radial corallites are protuberant and vary in shape from tubular to immersed.^[30] Septa are simple, arranged in two cycles with well-developed primary septa and often incomplete secondary septa, lacking a columella or dissepiments.^[30] ^[31] Axial polyps, situated in the apical corallites, possess six tentacles and drive branch extension through apical dominance mechanisms.^[29] ^[32] Radial polyps, with twelve tentacles, occur along branch surfaces and contribute to lateral expansion.^[29] The unique axial corallite at branch tips distinguishes Acropora within scleractinian corals.^[33] Growth forms in Acropora are predominantly ramose, adapting to environmental conditions such as water flow and light availability.^[34] Common morphologies include arborescent (tree-like branching), hispidose (with spine-like projections), caespitose (clump-forming), corymbose (flat-topped branching), digitate (finger-like), tabular or plate-like, and rarely encrusting.^[30] Branching forms often result from lateral extension by dominant polyps, leading to horizontally expansive structures.^[35] In high-energy environments, colonies tend toward compact, blunt shapes, while lower flow areas favor more open, expansive growth.^[34] Genetic factors also influence form diversity, with over 150 species exhibiting high morphological variation.^[36]

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Acropora corals reproduce both sexually and asexually, with sexual reproduction primarily occurring through broadcast spawning of gametes. Most species are hermaphroditic, producing both eggs and sperm within polyps, and synchronize spawning events annually, typically 1-5 nights after the full moon during warmer months such as spring or fall in tropical regions.^[37]^[38] This synchronization maximizes fertilization success in the water column, where sperm fertilizes eggs externally to form zygotes that develop into free-swimming planula larvae.^[39] Planula larvae, ciliated and motile, exhibit gravitactic swimming and remain competent for settlement for several days to weeks, during which they disperse before metamorphosing into primary polyps upon attaching to suitable substrates like crustose coralline algae.^[40]^[41] Metamorphosis involves ectodermal and endodermal reorganization, often triggered by bacterial cues, leading to the formation of a basal disc for attachment and the development of tentacles and septa.^[42]^[43] Post-settlement, the primary polyp buds asexually to form a colony, with growth rates varying by species and conditions, often reaching reproductive maturity within 1-4 years regardless of colony size after an initial ontogenetic threshold.^[44] Asexual reproduction via fragmentation is prevalent, particularly in branching species, where storm-induced or predatory breakage produces ramets that reattach to substrates and grow into genetically identical clones.^[45] This mode enhances local persistence and rapid colony expansion, with fragments attaching through cellular processes involving skeleton dissolution and tissue regeneration, though success rates depend on fragment size and environmental stability.^[46]^[47] In degraded reefs, fragmentation supports restoration efforts but may reduce genetic diversity compared to sexual recruitment.^[48] The life cycle thus alternates between sexual generation of diverse larvae for dispersal and asexual propagation for colony maintenance, with corals retaining reproductive capacity post-puberty and exhibiting resilience through both pathways under favorable conditions.^[44]^[49]

Distribution and Ecology

Geographic Range

Acropora species are distributed across tropical and subtropical marine waters worldwide, spanning latitudes approximately from 30° N to 30° S, though with pronounced variation in species richness and density among ocean basins.^[50] The genus comprises over 120 valid species, the majority of which occur exclusively in the Indo-Pacific Ocean, where they form dominant components of shallow reef frameworks.^[24] This region, extending from the Red Sea and East African coast through the Indian Ocean to the central and western Pacific, supports the highest concentrations, with more than 100 species documented across its expanse.^[50] In contrast, the Atlantic Ocean hosts only three Acropora taxa: the staghorn coral (A. cervicornis), elkhorn coral (A. palmata), and their hybrid (A. prolifera), all restricted to the Caribbean Sea, Bahamas, southern Gulf of Mexico, and Florida reefs.^[51]^[52] No native Acropora species inhabit the eastern Pacific due to biogeographic barriers such as the Eastern Pacific Barrier and cooler upwelling waters.^[53] Species diversity peaks in the Coral Triangle—encompassing Indonesia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and adjacent waters—where up to 76 species may co-occur sympatrically, reflecting historical evolutionary hotspots and favorable connectivity via larval dispersal.^[50]^[54] Abundance gradients show declines away from this core, with fewer species toward the peripheries of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.^[53]

Habitat Requirements and Adaptations

Acropora species thrive in shallow tropical and subtropical marine habitats, predominantly at depths of 0 to 30 meters, where sufficient light penetration supports their photosynthetic symbionts.^[55] ^[56] These corals require clear, oligotrophic waters with low sedimentation to avoid polyp smothering and maintain optimal conditions for larval settlement and growth.^[57] Water temperatures typically range from 24 to 28°C, with a minimum tolerance around 20°C, as colder conditions impair metabolic processes and calcification.^[52] Salinity levels of approximately 35-36 parts per thousand and adequate water motion for nutrient exchange and waste removal are essential, while high turbidity or pollution disrupts their ecological niche.^[58] Physiological adaptations enable Acropora to exploit these high-light, high-energy environments, including mutualistic symbiosis with dinoflagellate algae (Symbiodinium spp.) that provide energy via photosynthesis in exchange for nutrients and habitat.^[59] Branching and tabular colony morphologies maximize surface area exposure to sunlight and currents, enhancing gas exchange, nutrient uptake, and competitive space occupation on reef substrates.^[60] Rapid calcification rates, among the highest in scleractinian corals, allow quick vertical growth to outcompete algae and access optimal light levels, with skeletal structures featuring axial corallites for axial extension and radial corallites for lateral branching.^[57] Acropora exhibit phenotypic plasticity and acclimation potential to varying light and temperature regimes, such as adjusting photopigmentation and energy reserves upon translocation to new depths or habitats.^[61] Following sublethal heat stress, they can produce more thermally tolerant larvae and recruits, conferring transgenerational resilience to recurrent warming events.^[62] However, these adaptations are constrained by environmental stability; deviations like prolonged high temperatures or reduced light availability exceed tolerances, leading to bleaching or reduced fitness.^[63] Hard substrates in fore-reef slopes, patch reefs, and back-reefs provide settlement cues, with larvae preferring textured surfaces mimicking natural conditions.^[64]

Role in Coral Reef Ecosystems

Acropora species serve as primary framework builders in coral reef ecosystems, forming the structural backbone through their rapid calcification and branching or tabular growth forms that create three-dimensional complexity essential for reef architecture.^[65] This structural role enhances habitat availability, sheltering diverse fish and invertebrate communities while supporting higher biodiversity levels compared to less complex substrates.^[66] ^[5] Their fast growth rates enable competitive space occupation and vertical accretion, contributing to reef elevation and lateral expansion that buffers against wave energy and sedimentation.^[3] In Caribbean reefs, for instance, Acropora cervicornis outplanting has demonstrated annual increases in coral cover of 24.69% ± 5.40% and reef functional index improvements of 0.141 ± 0.03, correlating with fish biomass gains exceeding 1,100 g/100 m².^[5] These dynamics also promote herbivory by species such as parrotfish, reducing macroalgal dominance and stabilizing community structures.^[5] As keystone taxa, Acropora corals historically dominated regions like the Great Barrier Reef's Palm Islands, where their decline since the early 20th century has diminished habitat provision and overall ecosystem resilience.^[65] Their persistence is critical for maintaining ecological functions, including nursery grounds for juvenile fish and facilitation of trophic interactions that underpin reef productivity.^[66]

Threats and Decline

Climate and Environmental Stressors

Ocean warming, driven by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, induces thermal stress in Acropora corals, leading to symbiotic zooxanthellae expulsion and widespread bleaching. Acropora species, such as A. cervicornis and A. palmata, exhibit high susceptibility, with bleaching thresholds around 0.9–1.0°C above maximum mean monthly temperatures.^[67] Empirical data from the 1998 global bleaching event documented severe mortality in Caribbean Acropora populations, while recurrent events from 2014–2017 caused up to 90% tissue loss in some Indo-Pacific Acropora colonies.^[68] In 2023, a marine heatwave in the Florida Keys resulted in 98–100% mortality across Acropora species, affecting both wild and restored colonies, underscoring the intensifying frequency and severity of these events.^[69] Ocean acidification, resulting from elevated atmospheric CO₂ dissolving into seawater and lowering pH by approximately 0.1 units since pre-industrial times, impairs calcification in Acropora by reducing aragonite saturation states essential for skeletal growth. Laboratory experiments on A. millepora exposed to pH levels projected for 2050 (7.6–7.8) showed decreased calcification rates by 15–40%, compromised symbiont densities, and reduced photosynthesis and respiration.^[70] Combined with warming, these effects synergistically lower reef resilience, increasing mortality and hindering recovery, as evidenced by meta-analyses of tropical scleractinians where Acropora growth declined under dual stressors.^[67] Sea-level rise, accelerating at 3.7 mm/year globally since 2006, poses risks to shallow-water Acropora habitats through increased light attenuation from higher water columns and enhanced sedimentation in nearshore areas. Reduced vertical reef accretion under warming-amplified stress—observed at rates below 2 mm/year in the Atlantic—fails to match projected rises of 0.3–1.0 m by 2100, potentially drowning reefs and shifting Acropora-dominated assemblages to deeper, less optimal zones.^[71] However, high-cover Acropora frameworks can elevate reef growth to offset rise, with models indicating a 30% increase in A. palmata cover could sustain accretion at sites like Buck Island Reef.^[72] Intensified tropical cyclones, linked to warmer seas, further exacerbate physical breakage of fragile Acropora branches, as seen in post-hurricane surveys showing 50–80% colony fragmentation.

Biological and Pathogenic Factors

Acropora species face significant threats from coral diseases, many of which exhibit rapid tissue loss and are linked to bacterial pathogens. White band disease (WBD), first observed in the 1970s, primarily affects Caribbean elkhorn (Acropora palmata) and staghorn (A. cervicornis) corals, causing a advancing band of necrotic tissue that progresses at rates up to 1 cm per day, leading to colony mortality rates exceeding 90% in affected populations.^[73] Transmission experiments confirm direct contact and waterborne spread, with genotypic variation in resistance observed among clones.^[74] Similarly, white pox disease (WPD), identified in the Florida Keys, results in discrete white lesions covering up to 50% of colony surface area within weeks, driven by the bacterium Serratia marcescens strain PDR60, an opportunistic human pathogen introduced via wastewater runoff.^[75] ^[76] These diseases have contributed to over 90% declines in A. palmata and A. cervicornis abundances since the 1980s, though some studies question whether pathogens alone suffice as causal agents without environmental stressors exacerbating virulence.^[77] ^[78] Predation by the crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci) represents a primary biological threat, particularly to branching Acropora species that comprise up to 70% of its diet during outbreaks. A single adult starfish consumes 5-10 square meters of live coral annually, preferentially targeting fast-growing Acropora, which accelerates local declines of 50-90% in coral cover on affected reefs like the Great Barrier Reef.^[79] ^[80] Outbreaks, recurring every 13-17 years, correlate with reduced populations of natural predators such as Charonia gastropods due to overfishing, amplifying impacts on Acropora-dominated assemblages.^[81] Additional corallivores, including muricid snails like Drupella spp., exacerbate tissue loss, though their effects are secondary to starfish predation.^[82] Synergistic interactions between pathogens and biological stressors compound Acropora vulnerability; thermal bleaching events diminish disease resistance by compromising host immunity and symbiont health, increasing susceptibility to secondary infections by up to threefold in A. cervicornis.^[83] Bacterial dysbiosis in diseased tissues, characterized by shifts toward opportunistic pathogens like Vibrio and Serratia spp., further disrupts holobiont stability, though genotypic resistance varies, with some Acropora clones exhibiting lower lesion progression rates.^[84] ^[85] While infectious agents are empirically verified, their prevalence may reflect underlying eutrophication or warming rather than novel emergences, underscoring multifactorial decline dynamics.^[86]

Human-Induced Pressures

Human activities exert significant pressure on Acropora species through mechanisms such as sedimentation, nutrient pollution, overfishing, and destructive harvesting practices. Sedimentation, primarily from coastal development and land clearing, physically smothers branching Acropora colonies, which possess delicate, upright growth forms susceptible to burial and reduced light penetration for photosynthesis. Studies indicate that even thin sediment layers impair larval settlement and survival in Acropora species, with exposure doses as low as 10-50 mg/cm² leading to decreased metamorphosis rates and increased mortality.^[87] Nutrient enrichment from agricultural runoff and sewage discharge promotes macroalgal overgrowth, outcompeting Acropora for space and exacerbating susceptibility to other stressors; excess nitrogen inputs have been linked to phase shifts from coral to algal dominance in reefs dominated by Acropora cervicornis and A. palmata.^[88]^[89] Overfishing depletes herbivorous fish populations, such as parrotfish, which normally control algal biomass and maintain substrates suitable for Acropora recruitment. In regions with intense fishing pressure, reductions in grazer abundance exceeding 50% have correlated with stalled Acropora recovery and persistent algal cover, altering reef trophic dynamics.^[90]^[91] Destructive fishing methods, including blast fishing and cyanide use prevalent in parts of the Indo-Pacific, cause direct fragmentation of Acropora skeletons, with breakage rates up to 80% in affected areas hindering colony regeneration due to the corals' reliance on intact branches for propagation.^[92]^[93] Coastal urbanization and tourism amplify these effects by increasing wastewater discharge and physical disturbances, such as anchoring and trampling, which fragment Acropora branches and elevate disease transmission. Quantitative assessments reveal that human population density within 10 km of reefs correlates with up to 30% higher sediment and pollutant loads, contributing to Acropora declines observed since the 1980s in the Caribbean and Indo-Pacific.^[94]^[95] These localized pressures often interact synergistically with global stressors, accelerating Acropora loss beyond isolated impacts, though empirical data emphasize their dominance in non-climate-driven reef degradation.^[96]

Controversies in Decline Narratives

Bleaching and Recovery Dynamics

Acropora corals are highly susceptible to bleaching, a stress response triggered by elevated sea temperatures that disrupts the symbiosis with dinoflagellate algae (Symbiodinium spp.), leading to the expulsion of symbionts and tissue paling. Their branching morphology, characterized by high surface-area-to-volume ratios, exacerbates vulnerability by increasing metabolic demands and heat exposure, resulting in rapid onset of bleaching during marine heatwaves exceeding 1–2°C above seasonal norms.^[97] For example, during the 2016 global bleaching event, 99.2% of 123 monitored Acropora colonies at Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan, exhibited bleaching by early September, with 92.7% completely white.^[97] Post-bleaching mortality in Acropora typically peaks within months, influenced by duration of heat stress, species morphology, and pre-existing health. In the Sesoko event, whole-colony mortality reached 41.5% by February 2017, with branching species like A. gemmifera incurring 72.5% mortality versus 17.9% for A. digitifera. Partial mortality affected 11.4% overall, yet surviving colonies repigmented fully by the same period, indicating short-term recovery potential via symbiont reacquisition.^[97] Similarly, after the 2023 bleaching in the Turks and Caicos Islands, in-situ nursery fragments of A. cervicornis and A. palmata showed variable mortality, with recovery observed in non-lethal cases through tissue regeneration.^[98] Recovery processes encompass physiological resilience, such as upregulated heat-shock proteins and antioxidant defenses enabling symbiont retention or uptake of tolerant strains, alongside ecological mechanisms like fragmentation and larval recruitment. In Acropora-dominated reefs of the Keppel Islands, Great Barrier Reef, severe bleaching yielded high post-event survival, with rapid community stabilization underscoring inherent resilience in frequently disturbed habitats.^[99] Repeat events can enhance systemic tolerance; in the Seychelles, coral cover (driven partly by Acropora fluctuations) recovered twice as fast after the 2016 bleaching (reaching 15% in 6 years) compared to post-1998, suggesting selection for adaptive traits amid ongoing declines in branching forms.^[100] Debates in decline narratives center on the extent to which bleaching equates to irreversible loss versus demonstrable rebound capacity, with empirical data revealing site-specific recoveries that contrast generalized catastrophic forecasts. While cumulative heat stress erodes Acropora dominance—e.g., through reduced reproduction and heightened disease susceptibility post-bleaching—emergent thermal tolerance in some populations has mitigated mortality in subsequent events, implying evolutionary adaptation potential despite projected long-term declines under intensifying heatwaves.^[101] ^[63] Such variability challenges uniform attribution of reef degradation solely to bleaching, emphasizing the role of local factors like water flow and genotype diversity in modulating outcomes.^[100]

Attribution of Causal Factors

The decline of Acropora corals has been attributed to a combination of biological, environmental, and anthropogenic factors, with white-band disease (WBD) emerging as a primary driver in the Caribbean since the 1970s, causing rapid tissue necrosis and mortality rates exceeding 90% in affected populations of species like A. cervicornis and A. palmata.^[102] Historical analyses using uranium-thorium dating indicate that branching Acropora abundance began declining regionally in the Indo-Pacific as early as the mid-19th century, well before significant anthropogenic climate warming, suggesting that factors such as episodic storms, predation by crown-of-thorns starfish, and pre-existing disease pressures contributed substantially to early losses.^[65] In the Caribbean, acroporid cover dropped from dominance (over 50% in some areas pre-1950) to less than 5% by the late 20th century, with sediment core and historical records showing this trajectory initiated prior to widespread coral bleaching events linked to elevated sea surface temperatures.^[77] Debates persist over the relative roles of local versus global stressors, with some studies emphasizing local human activities—such as coastal pollution, overfishing of herbivorous fish leading to algal overgrowth, and eutrophication—as amplifying vulnerability and predating modern climate signals.^[77] For instance, relating Acropora declines since 1950 to disturbances like hurricanes and nutrient runoff implicates localized impacts more strongly than diffuse global warming in initiating phase shifts away from acroporid dominance.^[77] Conversely, analyses of reef degradation patterns find no strong correlation with proximate human population density, attributing broader Acropora losses to synergistic global effects including ocean acidification and recurrent marine heatwaves that impair calcification and recovery.^[103] In isolated reefs like Okinotorishima, repeated moderate disturbances (e.g., typhoons and minor bleaching) have driven Acropora declines without evident local anthropogenic inputs, fueling arguments that global-scale thermal stress overrides site-specific factors in long-term attrition.^[104] Coral bleaching, often framed as a hallmark of climate-driven stress, interacts complexly with these factors; while heat-induced expulsion of symbiotic zooxanthellae causes acute mortality (e.g., up to 95% in Acropora during the 2014-2017 global events), post-bleaching recovery can be hindered more by opportunistic diseases than by the bleaching itself, as compromised tissues become susceptible to pathogens.^[83] Empirical modeling projects that even with partial adaptation via natural selection, Acropora populations face projected cover reductions of 70-90% by 2050 under moderate emissions scenarios due to intensifying heatwaves, though local interventions like disease mitigation have enabled localized persistence.^[63] This multi-causal framework challenges singular attributions, as pre-20th-century baselines reveal Acropora ecosystems were already dynamic and prone to boom-bust cycles influenced by non-anthropogenic forcings, underscoring the need for disentangling exacerbated synergies from root initiators in decline narratives.^[65]

Conservation Strategies

Legal Protections and Status

Numerous species within the genus Acropora are assessed as threatened on the IUCN Red List, with classifications ranging from Vulnerable to Critically Endangered based on population declines driven by bleaching, disease, and habitat loss; for instance, Acropora cervicornis (staghorn coral) and Acropora palmata (elkhorn coral) are rated Critically Endangered due to over 90% reductions in Caribbean populations since the 1970s.^[11]^[10] Overall, more than 40% of assessed coral species, including many Acropora, face extinction risk as of November 2024 assessments.^[11] Internationally, Acropora species fall under CITES Appendix II, which has regulated trade in scleractinian corals since 1990 to ensure it does not threaten wild populations; this requires export permits and non-detriment findings, as implemented in major exporters like Indonesia where Acropora fragments are harvested for the aquarium trade.^[105]^[106] In the United States, Atlantic Acropora species A. cervicornis and A. palmata have been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since 2005, prohibiting unauthorized take, possession, or interstate commerce and mandating recovery plans.^[107] Several Indo-Pacific Acropora species, including A. pharaonis, A. speciosa, A. globiceps, and A. retusa, were listed as threatened under the ESA in 2015, with critical habitat designated on July 15, 2025, encompassing specific reef areas in U.S. Pacific territories to support recovery.^[108]^[109]^[110] These listings trigger federal consultation requirements for activities impacting habitat, though enforcement challenges persist in remote areas.^[111] Regionally, Acropora habitats in areas like the Great Barrier Reef are protected under national laws such as Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, which restricts destructive fishing and pollution, though compliance varies.^[3] Despite these measures, illegal trade and inadequate monitoring undermine protections for many unlisted Acropora species, which comprise the majority of the genus's over 140 taxa.^[106]

Restoration and Management Techniques

Restoration of Acropora corals predominantly relies on asexual propagation techniques, particularly fragmentation, due to the genus's rapid growth rates among branching species, which facilitate scalable nursery production and outplanting.^[112] In fragmentation, healthy donor colonies are divided into pieces typically 5-10 cm in length, attached to artificial or natural substrates using methods such as plastic cable ties, epoxy, or cement, and allowed to heal and grow in nurseries before transplantation to degraded reefs.^[113] Studies report initial survival rates of 60-70% for outplanted fragments of branching corals like Acropora, though long-term persistence varies with environmental conditions and predator pressure.^[112] ^[114] Micro-fragmentation refines this approach by subdividing corals into fragments as small as 1 cm², promoting accelerated tissue regeneration and skeletal growth—up to orders of magnitude faster than intact colonies or larger fragments—through increased edge-to-volume ratios that enhance nutrient uptake and budding.^[115] ^[116] Efficacy data from field trials indicate micro-fragments of Acropora species achieve 2-5 times higher linear extension rates in the first year post-fragmentation compared to traditional methods, though potential tradeoffs include temporary immune suppression and higher susceptibility to disease during the healing phase.^[116] Optimal outcomes depend on donor genet selection, with genets exhibiting high calcification rates yielding faster recovery, and substrate type, where textured or aragonite-based materials outperform smooth plastics by improving attachment stability.^[117] Coral gardening integrates these techniques by rearing fragments in protected in situ nurseries—often on elevated structures to minimize sedimentation—for 6-12 months to reach sizes of 10-20 cm before outplanting, reducing field mortality from acute stressors like wave action.^[118] Sexual propagation complements asexual methods by rearing larvae from synchronized spawning events, a technique demonstrated for species like Acropora millepora where up to thousands of propagules can be cultured in land-based systems through settlement induction on conditioned substrates.^[119] This approach enhances genetic diversity over clonal fragmentation, with settlement success rates reaching 20-50% under optimized conditions of larval density (10-100 larvae/cm²) and water flow, though scalability remains limited by unpredictable spawning timing and lower initial survival (often <30% to metamorphosis).^[119] Hybrid strategies, such as direct larval enhancement on reefs, have shown promise in boosting Acropora recruitment by 10-100 fold in targeted areas.^[120] Management techniques emphasize site-specific deployment, with outplanting favored in shallow, high-flow habitats that mimic Acropora's natural preferences for enhanced survivorship, as evidenced by 20-40% higher two-year retention in such sites versus sheltered lows.^[114] Pest mitigation, including biological controls for Acropora-eating flatworms via targeted predators or chemical dips, is integrated to protect nursery stock, achieving up to 90% efficacy in controlled trials.^[121] Ongoing monitoring via metrics like calcification rates (0.5-2 g/cm²/year for healthy fragments) and genomic screening for heat-resilient genotypes informs adaptive management, prioritizing donors from thermally variable populations to counter bleaching risks.^[122] Despite these advances, restoration efficacy is constrained by unaddressed basin-scale drivers like ocean warming, with field studies reporting 30-50% cumulative mortality within three years post-outplanting due to recurrent stress events.^[123]^[5]

Aquaculture and Propagation

Aquaculture of Acropora species primarily relies on asexual propagation through fragmentation, where branches or portions are excised from healthy donor colonies and affixed to artificial substrates such as PVC frames, ropes, or ceramic plugs using epoxy or cement, allowing regrowth in ex situ nurseries before outplanting. This method has been widely applied in the Caribbean for threatened species like Acropora cervicornis and A. palmata, with nurseries achieving fragment survival rates exceeding 90% over periods of 6-12 months under controlled conditions. Micro-fragmentation, involving the division of tissue into small pieces (typically 0.5-1 cm²), accelerates linear extension and branching by promoting faster encrustation and skeletal deposition; studies report Acropora micro-fragments doubling in size within 45 days and attaining 545% growth over several months, with survival rates around 89.8% after one year in nursery settings. These techniques support both reef restoration efforts, where thousands of fragments have been outplanted to bolster reef structure, and the ornamental trade, though commercial aquaculture remains limited due to slow initial growth and high labor demands.^[113]^[115]^[117] Sexual propagation, leveraging natural spawning events, involves collecting gametes from mature colonies, inducing fertilization in controlled tanks, and rearing larvae to settlement on conditioned substrates like crushed coral or bioerodible tiles. For Acropora species, larval rearing success has improved with optimized protocols, such as continuous aeration and drip feeding, yielding settlement rates that enable production of genetically diverse recruits; ex situ culture with supplemental feeding has enhanced juvenile growth and outplant survival to 50-80% after 4-11 months. This approach addresses genetic bottlenecks in fragmented populations but faces scalability issues, as spawning is seasonal (typically August full moons for Caribbean Acropora) and larval competency windows are narrow, often 3-5 days. Hybrid methods combining sexual and asexual propagation are emerging to maximize diversity and vigor in restored reefs.^[124]^[125]^[126] Challenges in Acropora aquaculture include high post-outplant mortality from diseases like stony coral tissue loss, bleaching during thermal stress, and predation, with overall transplant survival ranging from 16% to 83% over 11 months depending on site conditions and fragment size. Nursery-reared colonies often exhibit reduced resilience to environmental stressors compared to wild ones, necessitating selection of robust genets and preconditioning through gradual acclimation. Cost-effectiveness varies, with micro-fragmentation proving efficient for rapid scaling but requiring precise cutting tools and sterile techniques to minimize infection; restoration programs emphasize sourcing from disease-resistant donors to mitigate ongoing declines. Despite these hurdles, propagation has contributed to localized recovery, such as increased cover in Florida Keys nurseries, underscoring its role in proactive conservation amid persistent reef threats.^[127]^[128]^[129]

Human Interactions

Economic and Cultural Value

Acropora species, as dominant reef-building corals, underpin the economic value of coral reef ecosystems by forming complex structures that sustain fisheries, tourism, and coastal protection services. In the Caribbean, elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) and staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) contribute substantially to reef accretion, providing habitat for fish stocks that support commercial and artisanal fisheries valued at billions globally, with U.S. coral reefs alone generating over $3.4 billion annually in total ecosystem services including fisheries yields.^[8]^[130]^[131] These corals enhance tourism economies by creating visually striking reef formations that attract divers and snorkelers; for instance, coral reef tourism contributes approximately $36 billion annually to the global industry, with Acropora-dominated reefs in regions like the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean drawing significant visitor revenue through dive operations and related infrastructure.^[132]^[133] Additionally, Acropora frameworks offer coastal protection by dissipating wave energy, reducing erosion and storm damage costs estimated in the hundreds of millions for affected jurisdictions.^[134] In the marine aquarium trade, Acropora corals command high market value due to their branching growth and coloration, forming a notable segment of the $2.15 billion annual global retail market for aquarium organisms, though sourcing from wild populations—particularly threatened species—has drawn criticism for exacerbating declines.^[135]^[136] Cultivated fragments of species like Acropora pulchra can retail for $10–$100 or more per piece, reflecting demand among hobbyists for their aesthetic and growth characteristics, while aquaculture efforts aim to shift toward sustainable propagation to mitigate wild harvest pressures.^[137] Cultural value specific to Acropora remains limited in documented records, with their significance primarily ecological rather than symbolic or utilitarian in traditional societies; unlike massive corals used historically for tools or lime in some Pacific cultures, branching Acropora species have not been prominently featured in artifacts or rituals, though their role in reef biodiversity indirectly supports indigenous knowledge systems tied to marine resource management.^[82] Overall, their value derives more from ecosystem services than direct cultural artifacts, with restoration initiatives highlighting their importance for preserving reef-dependent livelihoods.^[138]

Aquaria and Reef-Keeping Practices

Acropora corals, classified as small polyp stony (SPS) species, demand precise environmental conditions in marine aquaria to replicate their shallow, high-energy reef habitats. Optimal lighting ranges from 250 to 600 PAR, depending on the species, to support photosynthesis via their symbiotic zooxanthellae.^[139] Strong, turbulent water flow is essential to prevent detritus accumulation on polyps and promote nutrient exchange, mimicking natural wave action.^[140] Water parameters must remain stable, with salinity at 1.025-1.026, temperature held within 0.5°F variation around 76-82°F (24-28°C), pH above 8.0, and phosphates at 0.1-0.2 ppm to minimize stress and tissue recession.^[141] ^[142] Propagation in home reef tanks primarily occurs through fragging, where healthy branches are cut using sterile bone cutters or clippers to avoid infection.^[143] Frags, typically 1-2 inches long, are secured to rubble or plugs with epoxy or super glue and placed in moderate light and flow initially for acclimation, achieving growth rates of several inches per year under ideal conditions.^[144] Captive spawning has been observed in aquaria, enabling larval rearing, though success requires precise timing with lunar cycles and temperature cues around 27-29°C.^[145] Scientific studies confirm that supplemental heterotrophic feeding, such as with Artemia nauplii, enhances growth and resilience in species like Acropora microclados compared to autotrophy alone.^[146] Common challenges include rapid decline from parameter fluctuations, leading to bleaching or recession, and pests like Acropora-eating flatworms (AEFW), whose life cycle shortens in warmer water (11-day egg hatch at 27°C).^[147] Low-nutrient systems with consistent maintenance—regular water changes and dosing for calcium (400-450 ppm), alkalinity (7-9 dKH), and magnesium (1250-1350 ppm)—are critical for long-term success, as instability exacerbates sensitivity beyond that of less demanding corals.^[148] ^[149] Hobbyist reports and empirical data indicate that while once deemed impossible for home systems, advancements in LED lighting and automated dosing have enabled thriving colonies, though mortality remains high for novices due to overlooked basics like flow and stability.^[150]

References

[1]
Acropora - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
1 Introduction. With approximately 180 species (Veron, 2000), Acropora is one of the most common Scleractinian genera to inhabit tropical coral reefs.
[2]
Microstructural characteristics of the stony coral genus Acropora ...
Mar 9, 2021 · Acropora is distinctive for its dimorphic corallites: axial and radial. Isopora is similar to Acropora but possess more than a single axial ...
[3]
Important ecosystem function, low redundancy and high vulnerability
Jun 1, 2021 · Tabular Acropora provide multiple ecosystem services in coral reefs (Kerry & Bellwood, 2015). Their fast growth rate facilitates a competitive ...2.1 As Ecosystem Engineers · 5.1 Coral Bleaching · 5.5 Coral Diseases
[4]
Rarity and genetic diversity in Indo–Pacific Acropora corals - PMC
Furthermore, because Acropora spp. are particularly important for reef formation, ecosystem function, and biodiversity, and 50% of species in the genus are ...Results · Patterns Of Genetic... · Acknowledgments
[5]
Approach to the Functional Importance of Acropora cervicornis in ...
Jun 24, 2021 · Here, we present and identify positive ecological processes and ecological functions (such as increased fish biomass, coral cover, and increased ...
[6]
Acropora cervicornis (Staghorn coral) - Animal Diversity Web
Staghorn corals are also of vital importance to the stabilization of coastlines, as fish habitats, and for the protection of our biodiversity (Nemoto 1992).Scientific Classification · Reproduction · Conservation Status
[7]
Threats to Coral - NOAA/AOML
Elkhorn Coral (Acropora palmata) is an essential reef-building coral throughout the Caribbean, and it is currently critically endangered (IUCN Status) due to ...
[8]
Elkhorn Coral | NOAA Fisheries
Scleractinia. Family, Acroporidae. Genus, Acropora. Species, palmata. Last updated by NOAA Fisheries on 09/12/2025. What We Do. Conservation & Management. We ...
[9]
Acropora palmata - Elkhorn Coral - NatureServe Explorer
... endangered by the IUCN (Aronson et al. 2008) and threatened under the ESA (NOAA 2014). It is considered extremely susceptible to sedimentation, bleaching ...
[10]
Acropora cervicornis (Staghorn Coral): Endangered Species Spotlight
Aug 27, 2024 · IUCN Status, Critically Endangered. 1. Appearance. Acropora cervicornis ... As a result, the species has been classified as Critically Endangered ...
[11]
Over 40% of coral species face extinction – IUCN Red List
Nov 13, 2024 · Atlantic coral species are particularly highly threatened due to annual severe bleaching events, pollution and the impacts of disease. Today's ...
[12]
Ecological value enhancement through Acropora coral ...
The findings confirm that coral transplantation in healthy reef systems can be effective not only for biodiversity enhancement but also for supporting ...
[13]
World Register of Marine Species - Acropora Oken, 1815 - WoRMS
Valid extant species number between about 120 and 140 (Wallace 1999; Veron 2000); valid fossil species approx. 20-30 (Michellotti 1838, Duncan 1866 ...
[14]
Taxonomy and ecology of the genus Isopora (Acroporidae ... - J-Stage
Recently, Wallace et al. (2007) has elevated the subgenus Isopora, which was one of two subgenera in the genus Acropora, to genus, based on the morphological, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
The tables have turned: taxonomy, systematics and biogeography of ...
(2016) recognised 163, and WoRMS currently lists 140 Acropora species as valid (Hoeksema and Cairns 2025). ... Many species delineated here share these ...
[16]
Integrative taxonomic analyses reveal that rapid genetic divergence ...
The reef-building coral Acropora is the most diverse scleractinian coral genus (Bridge et al., 2023, Cowman et al., 2020, Mao, 2019, Richards and Hobbs, 2015, ...
[17]
DNA barcodes are ineffective for species identification of Acropora ...
Jul 17, 2024 · The molecular revolution has transformed our understanding of coral systematics and resulted in extensive taxonomic revisions ( Kitahara et al.
[18]
tenuis relationship: traditional taxonomy obscures systematics and ...
Jul 27, 2023 · Acropora tenuis is described in recent revisions as having a neat, regular arrangement of branches with few sub-branches and evenly sized ...
[19]
A clear distinction and presence of Acropora aff. divaricata within ...
Mar 21, 2025 · Nevertheless, only 122 of approximately 400 nominal species are considered valid in the latest revision of the genus26, and the phylogenetic ...
[20]
[PDF] Recovery Status Review for 15 Species of Indo-Pacific Reef-building ...
This Recovery Status Review (RSR) is intended to inform the development of a recovery plan for the 15 Indo-Pacific reef-building coral species listed as ...Missing: count | Show results with:count
[21]
Molecular phylogenetics of geographically restricted Acropora species
The genus Acropora is at least 66 million years old (based upon Paleocene fossils collected from Somalia and Austria (Carbone et al., 1993, Baron-Szabo, 2006).
[22]
Eighteen Coral Genomes Reveal the Evolutionary Origin of ...
Sep 2, 2020 · Despite its bleaching susceptibility, the first appearances of Acropora in the fossil record are from Somalia (Carbone et al. 1993) and Austria ...Abstract · Introduction · Results and Discussion · Materials and Methods
[23]
Diverse staghorn corals (Acropora) in high-latitude Eocene ...
Jan 6, 2006 · The earliest known record of the genus occurs in the Late Paleocene (65–54 Myr) from Somalia (Carbone et al. 1994). The first record of Acropora ...
[24]
implications for the evolution of modern diversity patterns of reef corals
We examined Eocene fossils from southern England and northern France and found evidence that precursors of up to nine of 20 currently recognized Acropora ...
[25]
New species and records from the Eocene of England and France ...
May 20, 2016 · Five new species of the highly successful reef-building coral genus Acropora are described from Eocene locations in England and France ...
[26]
Phylogenetic Relationships in the Coral Family Acroporidae ...
Evolutionary history of the Acroporidae. The molecular phylogeny of the mt genes corresponds well to the divergence times deduced from the fossil record (Fig. 3 ...<|separator|>
[27]
The Evolutionary History of the Coral Genus Acropora (Scleractinia ...
Here, we present molecular phylogenies of a wide range of species in the subgenus A. Acropora using DNA sequence analyses of two molecular markers, one nuclear ...Abstract · Introduction · Materials and Methods · Results
[28]
Ancient Hybridisation Fuelled Diversification in Acropora Corals
Dec 13, 2024 · The common ancestor of the Acropora genus was estimated to have existed between 131.26 and 19.91 Ma, with diversification inferred to have ...
[29]
The genetics of colony form and function in Caribbean Acropora corals
Acropora corals have axial polyps with six tentacles located at the apical tip of their branches and radial polyps with twelve tentacles located along the sides ...
[30]
Microstructural characteristics of the stony coral genus Acropora ...
Mar 9, 2021 · 3.1.1 Acropora. Living Acropora colonies usually grow into various ramose shapes, including arborescent, hispidose, caespitose, corymbose, ...
[31]
An Annotated and Illustrated Checklist of Species of the Coral ...
Dec 31, 2015 · We collected and identified 32 species of corals from the genus Acropora (Anthozoa: Scleractinia: Acroporidae) of Vamizi Island, northern ...<|separator|>
[32]
Emerging evidence for apical dominance in colonial branching ...
Mar 4, 2025 · In our experiment, Acropora pharaonis showed hints of apical dominance mechanisms, exhibiting enhanced growth of the apical portion in treated ...
[33]
Shape & Structure | 3D Digitization
These radial corallites around the branches vary in size and shape. Some ... The axial corallite at the tip of the branch is unique to the genus Acropora.
[34]
[PDF] Corals (Acropora) Status Review - the NOAA Institutional Repository
various morphological adaptations in both coral species; for example, colonies in areas with strong wave action or currents are often compact with blunt and ...
[35]
A generalized numerical model for clonal growth in scleractinian ...
Sep 13, 2024 · In Acropora, dominant polyps extend laterally to form new branches, resulting in horizontally expansive structures. By contrast, cauliflower ...
[36]
Maternal inheritance of F1 hybrid morphology and colony shape in ...
Feb 19, 2019 · Background The coral genus Acropora contains more than 150 species with very high morphological diversity. This high diversity may have been ...
[37]
Synchronous spawning of nursery-raised elkhorn coral (Acropora ...
Jul 5, 2023 · This species reproduces asexually through fragmentation and sexually by broadcasting eggs and sperm synchronously allowing fertilization between ...<|separator|>
[38]
Gametogenesis and Inter-annual Variability in the Spawning Pattern ...
Acropora hyacinthus in northwestern Philippines is a hermaphroditic broadcast spawner, as demonstrated by the presence of both oocytes and spermaries in the ...
[39]
Sexual reproduction - Corals of the World
Many of the broadcast-spawning coral species time their reproductive cycles to coincide with the period following the full moon. This occurs in Spring on ...
[40]
Gravitactic Swimming of the Planula Larva of the Coral Acropora
Oct 12, 2022 · We report in this paper unique vertical swimming behavior of planulae of the reef-building coral Acropora tenuis.
[41]
Molecular characterization of larval development from fertilization to ...
Jan 4, 2018 · In this study, we explore developmental gene expression and relate it to competence in Acropora millepora, a reef-building coral that produces ...
[42]
Bacterial regulation of coral larval metamorphosis and settlement in ...
Aug 23, 2025 · Bacteria play a significant role in triggering coral larval metamorphosis and settlement in many coral species.
[43]
Metamorphosis and acquisition of symbiotic algae in planula larvae ...
This study examined the morphological process of metamorphosis from planulae into primary polyps in the scleractinian corals Acropora nobilis and Acropora ...
[44]
Annual onset of coral reproduction is determined by age rather than ...
Mar 31, 2023 · Our findings suggest that once the ontogenetic milestone of puberty is reached, corals retain reproductive capacity irrespective of colony size.
[45]
Coral Reproduction - Coral Disease & Health Consortium - NOAA
Corals are able to reproduce asexually or sexually. Asexual reproduction occurs when one colony produces an additional colony that is genetically identical to ...
[46]
Cellular adaptations leading to coral fragment attachment on ...
Nov 1, 2022 · Colony fragmentation through physical disturbances is a common part of a corals day-to-day life due to tidal flows, waves and frequent storms, ...
[47]
Fragmentation in the branching coral Acropora palmata (Lamarck)
a preliminary report.
[48]
Long-term survival, growth, and reproduction of Acropora palmata ...
Aug 1, 2023 · Acropora palmata colonies have been reared from larvae, outplanted and shown to be reproductively active at four years of age (Chamberland et al ...
[49]
Reproduction by Fragmentation in Corals
Feb 15, 2025 · Conceivably, corals could achieve a given level of asexual reproductive success by either producing many small fragments, each with a low ...
[50]
2 The worldwide distribution of Acropora species is essentially ...
2021) . More than 100 Acropora species have been identified in the Indo-Pacific region, up to 76 of which are sympatrically distributed and at least 35 of ...
[51]
Depth & Distribution | 3D Digitization
While there are over four hundred species of Acropora, only two live in the Atlantic Ocean: A. cervicornis and A. palmata (plus A. prolifera, a hybrid of the ...
[52]
[PDF] Acropora cervicornis (Staghorn Coral) - UWI St. Augustine
DISTRIBUTION. Acropora cervicornis can be found on reefs in the Caribbean, southern Gulf of. Mexico, and the Bahamas (Fig. 2). The species has ...
[53]
[PDF] Biodiversity of the Indian Ocean from the perspective of staghorn ...
Indo-Pacific Acropora distribution patterns. Acropora occurs in all tropical oceans1, three species exclusively in the Atlantic Ocean. (A. cervicornis, A ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[54]
The origin and evolution of coral species richness in a marine ...
The Coral Triangle (CT) region of the Indo-Pacific realm harbors an extraordinary number of species, with richness decreasing away from this biodiversity ...
[55]
[PDF] <i>Acropora</i> Habitat Evaluation and Restoration Site Selection ...
Mar 28, 2016 · Depth is one of the most important habitat requirements for many species of coral, with. A. cervicornis restricted to depths less than 30 m ...
[56]
[PDF] Management Plan for Caribbean Acropora Population Enhancement
Light levels should be comparable to those found in natural habitat. Acropora cervicornis is most common in 5-20 meter (m) depth, and A. palmata is most common ...
[57]
[PDF] Acropora - Reef Resilience Network
Jan 2, 2011 · Coral reefs offer coastal protection, are centers of high biodiversity and provide essential habitat to a wide range of recreational and ...
[58]
Settlement patterns of the coral Acropora millepora on sediment ...
Dec 31, 2017 · ... temperatures between 27 and 29 °C (equivalent to the current temperatures at the collection sites), salinity at 36 ppt, pH at 8.16, and ...Missing: niche | Show results with:niche
[59]
Acropora millepora | INFORMATION - Animal Diversity Web
Asexual reproduction by fragmentation may be adaptive; evolved by natural selection to affect the shape and mechanical properties of branching colonies (Smith, ...
[60]
Acropora corals | Nausicaa
PTo grow, these corals need clear, unpolluted water, plenty of light, which means a shallow depth (less than 50 m), constant salinity and a temperature above 20 ...
[61]
Physiological and symbiotic flexibility of reef‐building corals to new ...
Dec 15, 2024 · After transfer to coral reef habitats, both coral species shifted in photopigmentation and host energy reserves. Acropora palmata also shifted ...
[62]
Adaptations by the coral Acropora tenuis confer resilience to future ...
Dec 14, 2022 · Recent findings indicate that corals potentially acclimate to the higher water temperature without bleaching and reduction of physiological ...
[63]
Natural selection could determine whether Acropora corals persist ...
Nov 28, 2024 · We found that, although corals have some adaptation capacity, they will suffer severe heatwave-induced declines over the coming decades.
[64]
Endangered and Threatened Species; Critical Habitat for the ...
Nov 27, 2020 · Acropora jacquelineae is found in numerous subtidal reef slope and back-reef habitats, including but not limited to, lower reef slopes, walls ...
[65]
U-Th dating reveals regional-scale decline of branching Acropora ...
Sep 11, 2017 · Species of the genus Acropora play a significant role in reef ecosystems as key framework builders and habitat providers for numerous organisms ...
[66]
Staghorn Coral | NOAA Fisheries
Due to their bush-like growth form, staghorn corals provide complex habitat for fish and other coral reef organisms. When staghorn corals are abundant, they ...
[67]
Ocean acidification and warming will lower coral reef resilience - PMC
Ocean warming and acidification from increasing levels of atmospheric CO2 ... Thermal anomaly threshold for Acropora bleaching, 0.9 ± 0.3, Maynard et al ...
[68]
Emergent increase in coral thermal tolerance reduces mass ... - Nature
Aug 22, 2023 · The 1998 marine heatwave caused severe bleaching and mortality in Acropora ... Changes in bleaching susceptibility among corals subject to ocean ...
[69]
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03466-x
[70]
Major Cellular and Physiological Impacts of Ocean Acidification on a ...
Apr 11, 2012 · These changes lead to compromised health in Acropora millepora (reduction in symbiont cells and decreased photosynthesis and respiration). The ...
[71]
Reduced Atlantic reef growth past 2 °C warming amplifies sea-level ...
Sep 17, 2025 · Sea-level rise (SLR) is projected to increase the frequency of coastal inundation globally, threatening coastal habitats, human coastal ...
[72]
how to optimize coral restoration to reduce impacts of sea-level rise
May 1, 2023 · If restoration efforts can increase coverage of Acropora palmata by ~30% cover at Buck Island Reef National Monument, resulting reef growth ...
[73]
White Band Disease transmission in the threatened coral, Acropora ...
Nov 13, 2012 · White Band Disease transmission in the threatened coral, Acropora cervicornis ... Few coral pathogens have been identified and little is ...Missing: threats | Show results with:threats
[74]
[PDF] Pathogen Transmission Techniques and Genotypic Resistance to ...
Apr 27, 2018 · Pathogen Transmission Techniques and Genotypic Resistance to Disease in the Threatened Coral, Acropora cervicornis. Master's thesis. Nova ...
[75]
Systematic Analysis of White Pox Disease in Acropora palmata of ...
In the Florida Keys and elsewhere, the iconic elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) has experienced precipitous declines due in part to white pox disease (WPD) (3, 4) ...
[76]
Human Pathogen Shown to Cause Disease in the Threatened ...
Infections by the human pathogen Serratia marcescens have contributed to precipitous losses in the common Caribbean elkhorn coral, Acropora palmata.
[77]
Widespread loss of Caribbean acroporid corals was underway ...
Apr 22, 2020 · Declines have been attributed to overfishing, pollution, sea urchin and coral disease, and climate change, but the mechanisms are unresolved due ...
[78]
Are infectious diseases really killing corals? Alternative ...
Daszak et al. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife-threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. (2000).
[79]
Crown-of-thorns starfish | AIMS
Adult starfish generally prefer to feast on fast-growing corals, such as branching corals and plate corals of the genus Acropora. Timelapse of a crown-of ...
[80]
Crown of thorns starfish: a threat to coral reefs
Dec 7, 2012 · The Crown-of Thorns sea star was most drawn to a branching species of coral, Acropora, followed by a sub branching species, Pocipora, and so on.
[81]
Crown-of-thorns seastar (Acanthaster spp.) feeding ecology across ...
Jun 20, 2024 · In outbreaking populations, COTS impacts reef systems by reducing live coral cover, eroding reef complexity and causing shifts in reef trophic ...
[82]
Why Acropora are important? - Ocean Gardener
Jun 10, 2025 · Acropora is susceptible to environmental changes. Despite their extraordinary growth rates, Acropora corals are highly specialized and adapted ...
[83]
Bleaching causes loss of disease resistance within the threatened ...
Sep 11, 2018 · We studied the interaction between two major stressors affecting colonies of the threatened coral, Acropora cervicornis: white-band disease and ...
[84]
Bacterial assemblages associated with Acropora palmata affected ...
This study contributes to the knowledge of bacterial assemblages associated with A. palmata in Mexican coral reefs and broadens the contributes to ...
[85]
Microbial and transcriptional response of Acropora valida and ...
Aug 2, 2024 · Pathogenic challenges elicit different microbial and transcriptional shifts across coral species. This study offers novel insights into ...
[86]
Disease prevalence and bacterial isolates associated with Acropora ...
Feb 28, 2024 · The decline in Acropora palmata populations in Colombian reefs has been mainly attributed to diseases outbreaks.
[87]
[PDF] Sediment source and dose influence the larval performance of the ...
Jun 26, 2024 · Even a thin layer of sediments not harmful to adult corals can be detrimental to coral larvae [23,25,30,33,37,38], both by physically ...
[88]
[PDF] Threats and Stressors to US Coral Reef Ecosystems
Human activity is commonly identified as a major contributor to the observed global deterioration of coral reef ecosystem health, with loss of live coral ...
[89]
How does land-based pollution threaten coral reefs?
Jun 16, 2024 · Many coastal and island communities depend on coral reef fisheries, but overfishing can deplete key reef species and damage coral habitat. coral ...
[90]
Threats to Coral Reefs | US EPA
Feb 9, 2025 · Overfishing can alter food-web structure and cause cascading effects, such as reducing the numbers of grazing fish that keep corals clean of ...
[91]
How does overfishing threaten coral reefs?
Jun 16, 2024 · The impacts from unsustainable fishing on coral reef areas can lead to the depletion of key reef species in many locations.
[92]
[PDF] Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation
Apr 5, 2025 · Decline of tropical fisheries is partially attributable to deterioration of coral reefs, seagrass beds, and mangroves from sedimentation.
[93]
[PDF] Priorities for Effective Management of Coral Diseases
The underlying causes of reef decline are diverse, and include pollution, sedimentation, fishing impacts, habitat destruction, invasive species, bleaching ...
[94]
A global map of human pressures on tropical coral reefs
Dec 28, 2021 · We map six human (nonclimatic) pressures on coral reefs using the latest quantitative data on fishing, water pollution (nitrogen and sediments), coastal ...
[95]
Pollution & Coastal Development — Coral Reef Education Institute
Like chronic diseases, excess sediments and turbidity reduce the fitness of individual corals, interfering with vital functions and potentially making corals ...
[96]
Co-occurring anthropogenic stressors reduce the timeframe of ...
Oct 11, 2022 · We show that the projected effects of marine heatwaves, ocean acidification, storms, land-based pollution, and local human stressors are being underestimated ...
[97]
Bleaching and post-bleaching mortality of Acropora corals on a heat ...
Dec 5, 2019 · We observed the bleaching and post-bleaching mortality status of individual colonies of Acropora spp. in 2016 in fixed plots on the reef flat.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[98]
(PDF) Mortality and recovery rates of Acropora fragments on in-situ ...
Aug 21, 2025 · The present study assesses the mortality or recovery of Acropora cervicornis and Acropora palmata coral fragments on in-situ ocean nurseries ...
[99]
High survival following bleaching underscores the resilience of a ...
Feb 13, 2023 · Severe bleaching followed by rapid recovery and the continuing dominance of Acropora populations in the Keppel Islands is indicative of high resilience.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[100]
Increased resilience and a regime shift reversal through repeat ... - NIH
Dec 31, 2024 · Rates and timing of coral cover increase between 2017 and 2022 suggest coral recovery was faster following the second mass bleaching event.
[101]
Emergent increase in coral thermal tolerance reduces mass ... - NIH
Aug 22, 2023 · Coral bleaching data. Coral bleaching is caused by a breakdown in the symbiosis between coral hosts and their photosynthetic algal symbionts ...
[102]
The potential listing of Acropora species under the US Endangered ...
A number of factors have been responsible for Acropora mortality, with white-band disease (WBD), temperature stress, predation, and hurricanes having been some ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
[103]
Coral reef degradation is not correlated with local human population ...
Jul 20, 2016 · The global decline of reef-building corals is understood to be due to a combination of local and global stressors.
[104]
Decline in Acropora in Okinotorishima - J-Stage
Jul 13, 2023 · factor between local and global environmental stressors causing the decline in coral reefs has been controversial, as many coral reefs are ...
[105]
[PDF] NON-DETRIMENT FINDING FOR CITES-LISTED CORALS IN ...
Corals in the genus Pocillopora and Acropora prefer an open area with high to moderate wave energy. Many of the corals in the genus Porites and Goniopora ...<|separator|>
[106]
[PDF] AC33 Doc. 24 - CITES
Jul 12, 2024 · 1. This document has been prepared by the Secretariat on behalf of the co-chairs of the Animals Committee working group on Trade in stony corals ...Missing: IUCN | Show results with:IUCN
[107]
Elkhorn Coral | FWC
Conservation. The elkhorn coral is protected as a Threatened species by the Federal Endangered Species Act and as a Federally-designated Threatened species by ...
[108]
Acropora pharaonis Coral: Conservation & Management
The Acropora pharaonis coral is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Additionally, the Acropora pharaonis coral is listed under:.Missing: legal IUCN
[109]
Acropora speciosa Coral: Conservation & Management
A Recovery Status Review is a stand-alone document that provides the most comprehensive and current information on the 15 species' biology, ecology, status and ...Missing: valid | Show results with:valid
[110]
Endangered and Threatened Species; Designation of Critical ...
Jul 15, 2025 · We, NMFS, designate critical habitat for five threatened Indo-Pacific coral species, Acropora globiceps, A. retusa, A. speciosa, Fimbriaphyllia ...
[111]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Adding 20 Coral ...
Nov 13, 2014 · On December 7, 2012, NMFS published a proposed rule (77 FR 73220) to list 66 petitioned coral species, 12 as endangered and 54 as threatened, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[112]
Coral restoration – A systematic review of current methods ... - NIH
Jan 30, 2020 · Overall, coral restoration projects focused primarily on fast-growing branching corals (59% of studies), and report survival between 60 and 70%.
[113]
[PDF] A REVIEW OF REEF RESTORATION AND CORAL PROPAGATION ...
Large-scale ecological coral restora- tion projects were first conducted in the Indo-Pacific and the Red Sea in the 1990s ... Atlantic Acropora status review ...
[114]
Reef site and habitat influence effectiveness of Acropora palmata ...
Nov 11, 2024 · Other factors contributing to the decline of A. palmata prevalence include overfishing, nutrient pollution, disease outbreaks, storm ...
[115]
Coral micro-fragmentation assays for optimizing active reef ...
Jul 18, 2022 · Micro-fragmentation can increase coral cover by orders of magnitude faster than natural growth, which now allows cultivation of slow growing ...
[116]
Mechanisms and potential immune tradeoffs of accelerated coral ...
Mar 29, 2022 · Microfragmentation is the act of cutting corals into small pieces (~1 cm2) to accelerate the growth rates of corals relative to growth rates ...
[117]
Differential Effects of Substrate Type and Genet on Growth of ...
Apr 12, 2021 · All corals survived the experimental period, and doubled their initial size in 45 days, with an average growth of 545% over the study duration.
[118]
Acropora spp. Coral Gardening Using Fragmentation and Direct ...
We introduce a cost-effective design for Acropora robusta and Acropora valenciennesi coral gardening through fragmentation and direct transplantation.
[119]
a large-scale method for rearing Acropora millepora larvae, inducing ...
Sep 6, 2017 · Here we describe an efficient and effective technique for rearing sexually-derived coral propagules from spawning through larval settlement ...
[120]
Evaluation of the performance and cost-effectiveness of coral ...
Microfragmentation, coral gardening, and larval enhancement were also compared using similar models. Acropora had the highest coral cover and mortality rates, ...
[121]
Biological controls to manage Acropora-eating flatworms in coral ...
Feb 13, 2020 · ABSTRACT: Coral aquaculture is expanding to supply the marine ornamental trade and active coral reef restoration. A common pest of Acropora ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
[122]
Population Genomics for Coral Reef Restoration-A Case Study of ...
Jun 23, 2025 · We conducted a comprehensive population genomic study of Acropora cf. pulchra, a major restoration target species in the Indo-West Pacific.
[123]
A roadmap to integrating resilience into the practice of coral reef ...
Branching coral species like acroporids are commonly used in restoration because they can be easily fragmented and grow rapidly, allowing practitioners to ...<|separator|>
[124]
Assisted sexual reproduction of Acropora cervicornis for active ...
The objective of this study was to optimize ASR of Acropora cervicornis by (1) evaluating broodstock compatibility for genets actively used within Mote's ...
[125]
Enhancing survival of ex-situ reared sexual recruits of Acropora ...
We conclude that feeding during and ex-situ culture period enhances ex-situ growth rates and in situ recruit survival of A. palmata juveniles.
[126]
Feasibility of early outplanting of sexually propagated Acropora ...
Oct 14, 2019 · Results suggest that A. verweyi reared in ex situ nurseries for only 4 months can survive reasonably well when outplanted onto coral reefs.
[127]
Coral restoration in a stressful environment: Disease, bleaching, and ...
Mar 19, 2025 · We report mortality from disease and bleaching in an introduced nursery-reared population of the staghorn coral Acropora aspera, in Guam, Micronesia.
[128]
A low-tech method for monitoring survival and growth of coral ...
May 24, 2023 · The overall survival rate of coral transplants at the end of the 11.5 months (345 days) experimental period ranged from 16.6% to 83.3% ( ...
[129]
Microfragmenting for the successful restoration of slow growing ...
Techniques to effectively propagate and outplant these species have proven challenging. However, advancement in methodology may increase rates of success.
[130]
Contribution of the threatened coral Acropora cervicornis to the ...
Coral reefs provide goods and services exceeding $375 billion. Such economic contribution to the global economy, however, is in jeopardy.
[131]
Summary Report: The Economic Value of U.S. Coral Reefs
Brander et al have estimated total economic value of coral reef services for all US coral reef jurisdictions at just over US$ 3.4 billion per year.
[132]
[PDF] Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2020
• Tourism: coral reef tourism contributes USD36 billion to the global tourism industry annually ... hard coral species including two Acroporid species: Acropora ...
[133]
Case study of the application of the blue economy in making coral ...
Jun 27, 2024 · Research shows that the high biodiversity around Pari Island is highly dependent on the presence of Acropora coral, which strengthens the ...
[134]
The economic value of coral reefs: Climate change impacts and ...
Our results show that the 2014–2015 coral bleaching event caused losses in the order of $25 M per year to Maui's residents.
[135]
Marine Aquarium Trade worth $2.15bn, Study Shows | Reef Builders
Dec 8, 2023 · According to a new paper published in Science Advances, every year 55 million organisms are sold with a combined value of $2.15bn at retail.
[136]
Cash for Corals: Exploiting Ecosystems on Their Way to Extinction
Feb 25, 2025 · Experts say the growing commercial trade in wild, threatened species like corals is unacceptable and irresponsible.
[137]
Got nerdy with coral market data analysis across ... - Reef2Reef
Jun 2, 2025 · Marketing/naming conventions heavily influence perceived value; The trade has some interesting supply/demand mismatches. Quick tech note for ...
[138]
Coral Conservation in The Bahamas
Restoring degraded coral reefs and protecting climate-resilient corals through innovation while supporting healthy marine ecosystems and livelihoods.
[139]
https://reefchasers.com/blogs/reef-chasers-coral-care-guide/acropora-corals
[140]
Acropora Coral Care - Tidal Gardens
Acropora are the crown jewel of the SPS world. No other genus has the sheer number of species as Acropora and when reef aquarists talk about the ...<|separator|>
[141]
Acropora Coral Care Guide - Saltwater Fish Tanks Made Simple
Jun 11, 2023 · Keeping the temperature within a 0.5 degrees F or so is very important to reducing coral stress. Ideal Temperature. When researching Acropora ...<|separator|>
[142]
How do you keep your acros? : r/ReefTank - Reddit
May 20, 2025 · The easiest path to keeping healthy Acropora is to keep pH in the 8.0+ range at all times, and to keep phosphate in the 0.1-0.2 ppm range.Missing: challenges maintaining
[143]
https://sunnysidecorals.com/blog/how-to-frag-acropora/
[144]
https://www.extremecorals.com/blog/care-requirements-of-acropora-in-home-reef-aquariums.html
[145]
Breeding Acropora Corals in your Reef Tank - YouTube
Oct 20, 2019 · ... aquariums, and anyone who can keep sps corals ... #scicomm. Breeding Acropora Corals in your Reef Tank - Captive Reproduction of SPS Coral.
[146]
[PDF] Investigating the impacts of heterotrophic nutrition on Acropora ...
Dec 23, 2022 · The study investigated the impact of different feeding regimes on Acropora microclados. One group fed Artemia salina nauplii experienced ...
[147]
The Life Cycle of the Acropora Coral-Eating Flatworm (AEFW ...
Sep 3, 2019 · Our findings show that warmer seawater shortened generation times; at 27°C it took, on average, 11 days for eggs to hatch, and 35 days for flatworms to reach ...
[148]
What do SPS need? This is what you need to read - Melev's Reef
Flow is critical with Acropora. They need lots of flow to keep their core clean of any detritus which often leads to dying tissue. Once this tissue or skin is ...
[149]
Reef tank maintenance tips - helping you succeed with Acropora
Jun 10, 2022 · Stick to the basics of high flow, high light, low nutrients, and consistently good, consistently stable water conditions first.<|separator|>
[150]
Acropora coral care and tips - YouTube
Jan 2, 2021 · ... acropora coral in a home reef aquarium. Not too long ago it was thought impossible to keep these corals alive in the home aquarium. With ...<|control11|><|separator|>