Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Asteroid capture

Asteroid capture refers to the engineering and orbital mechanics techniques proposed to rendezvous with a small near-Earth asteroid or extract a multi-ton boulder from a larger one's surface, then redirect the material into a stable cis-lunar orbit using propulsion systems such as solar electric thrusters.^[1] This concept aims to enable in-situ resource utilization for water, metals, and volatiles to support space exploration, while testing technologies for planetary defense against larger threats.^[2] No full-scale asteroid capture has been achieved to date, with efforts limited to conceptual designs and precursor missions demonstrating related capabilities like sample return and kinetic impact deflection.^[3] The most prominent initiative was NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), formulated in the early 2010s to deploy a robotic spacecraft for boulder collection via advanced grippers and low-thrust propulsion to achieve the necessary delta-v for orbital transfer, targeting a return to lunar vicinity by the mid-2020s for astronaut access.^[1] ARM's Option B focused on surface boulder retrieval to mitigate risks of handling a free-flying asteroid, emphasizing electromagnetic and mechanical anchoring systems refined through ground testing.^[3] However, the mission faced significant technical hurdles, including precise characterization of asteroid composition to avoid fragmentation during capture and the high energy demands of altering trajectories under microgravity conditions governed by Newtonian orbital dynamics.^[4] Budget constraints, debates over diverting funds from human Mars exploration, and skepticism regarding its scientific return led to cancellation in 2017, highlighting tensions between ambitious resource-acquisition goals and fiscal realism in space policy.^[5] Ongoing research explores alternative strategies, such as multi-vehicle swarms for gradual momentum transfer or aerobraking-assisted captures, but these remain theoretical amid challenges like international legal ambiguities over asteroid ownership under the Outer Space Treaty and the empirical uncertainties of regolith behavior in vacuum.^[6] Despite setbacks, foundational advancements in autonomous robotics and ion propulsion from ARM studies continue to inform broader asteroid prospecting efforts, underscoring the causal interplay between propulsion efficiency and feasible capture windows dictated by near-Earth object ephemerides.^[7]

Natural Asteroid Capture

Gravitational Mechanisms

Gravitational mechanisms for natural asteroid capture operate within multi-body dynamical systems, where an asteroid's trajectory is altered by the competing gravitational influences of a planet and the Sun, potentially leading to a temporary bound orbit around the planet. In the circular restricted three-body problem, capture becomes possible when the asteroid enters the planet's Hill sphere with a low hyperbolic excess velocity, allowing the Jacobi constant to permit librating or circulating orbits relative to the planet-Sun frame. Such conditions enable the asteroid's energy relative to the planet to drop below zero, forming a temporary planetocentric orbit without requiring physical interaction or dissipation. However, these orbits are unstable due to chaotic perturbations, with lifetimes typically ranging from weeks to a few years depending on the system's parameters.^[8] For permanent capture under purely gravitational conditions, the process relies on rare resonant encounters or successive close approaches that gradually dampen eccentricity through gravitational scattering, though the probability remains exceedingly low in isolated two- or three-body interactions owing to energy conservation constraints. Theoretical analyses indicate that in the current solar system, hyperbolic trajectories cannot transition to elliptic ones without external energy loss, limiting purely gravitational captures to transient events unless amplified by dense multi-body environments, such as during planetary formation. In the early solar system, gravitational instabilities during giant planet migration may have facilitated such captures by providing multiple perturbation opportunities, enabling irregular satellites to achieve long-term stability.^[9]^[10] Temporary captures exemplify these mechanisms effectively for near-Earth objects, where lunar gravitational assists or solar perturbations can extend binding durations. For example, small asteroids approaching Earth with relative velocities under 1 km/s can enter quasi-bound states, as analyzed in dynamical simulations of the Earth-Moon system. These events highlight the foundational role of gravity in initiating capture, even if subsequent stabilization often invokes non-gravitational effects like atmospheric drag for permanence in historical contexts.^[11]

Observed Examples

Phoebe, Saturn's outermost major moon discovered in 1898, exemplifies a permanently captured asteroid through its retrograde and highly inclined orbit, which deviates from prograde satellites formed in situ. Spectral analysis reveals a dark, primitive surface akin to C-type asteroids, with evidence of water ice beneath a thin regolith layer, supporting origins in the outer asteroid belt or Kuiper Belt before gravitational capture by Saturn. Cassini spacecraft flyby data from 2004 confirmed its composition, including carbon dioxide absent in typical asteroids but consistent with captured bodies from colder regions, reinforcing the capture hypothesis via orbital dynamics rather than co-formation.^[12]^[13] Jupiter's irregular satellites, numbering over 90, provide additional instances of inferred asteroid captures, characterized by distant, eccentric, and inclined orbits incompatible with formation in Jupiter's circumplanetary disk. Groups such as the Himalia (prograde) and Pasiphae (retrograde) clusters exhibit spectral similarities to outer Solar System asteroids or Trojans, suggesting multiple capture events possibly involving binary asteroid dissociation or three-body interactions. Recent JWST observations in 2025 of satellites like Himalia and Pasiphae indicate varied compositions, with some matching carbonaceous asteroids, though dynamical models debate exact mechanisms like temporary gas drag during planetary migration.^[14]^[15] Earth has observed several temporary captures of near-Earth asteroids into mini-moon orbits, lasting weeks to years before escape due to gravitational perturbations. The asteroid 2006 RH120, approximately 3-5 meters in diameter, entered Earth's Hill sphere in 2006 and remained in geocentric orbit for about a year, tracked via ground-based telescopes confirming its hyperbolic approach and parabolic departure. Similarly, 2020 CD3 orbited Earth from 2018 to 2020, while 2024 PT5 was captured in September 2024 for roughly two months, both identified through orbital computations as temporarily bound despite originating from heliocentric paths. These events demonstrate short-term gravitational capture without atmospheric or artificial aid, observable via modern surveys.^[16]

Historical Development of Artificial Capture Concepts

Early Theoretical Proposals

One of the earliest theoretical proposals for artificial asteroid capture involved using a small near-Earth object as a counterweight for an Earth-orbiting space elevator. In 1975, aerospace engineer Jerome Pearson outlined this concept in his analysis of orbital elevator systems, suggesting that a captured asteroid positioned beyond geostationary orbit could supply the required mass—equivalent to asteroids exceeding 3 meters in diameter—to generate centrifugal tension in the tether without relying on Earth-launched materials.^[17] This approach aimed to facilitate low-cost access to space by exploiting naturally occurring bodies amenable to low-delta-v trajectory adjustments into stable geosynchronous orbits.^[18] Pearson's proposal built on foundational space elevator ideas from earlier decades but introduced asteroid capture as a practical enabler, emphasizing the abundance of metallic near-Earth asteroids with sufficient density (around 2.6 g/cm³) for structural utility.^[18] The method envisioned impulsive maneuvers or gradual aerodynamic drags to alter the asteroid's heliocentric path, followed by stabilization via attached tethers or propulsion to counteract perturbations from lunar and solar gravity. Such concepts underscored causal challenges like precise velocity matching (typically under 1 km/s for viable targets) but prioritized empirical orbital mechanics over speculative engineering feats. By 1980, institutional interest emerged within NASA, where Administrator Robert A. Frosch testified before Congress on July 29, referencing "asteroid retrieval to Earth" as an advanced evolutionary objective beyond the Space Shuttle, potentially for resource extraction or propulsion fuel depots in cislunar space.^[19] This testimony highlighted preliminary feasibility assessments of capturing small bodies (under 10 meters) via robotic spacecraft, aligning with first-principles trajectory optimization to minimize energy costs through resonant orbits or gravitational assists.^[20] Unlike Pearson's infrastructure-focused rationale, NASA's framing emphasized broader exploratory synergies, though both shared a realist appraisal of delta-v budgets limited by chemical propulsion (around 5-7 km/s for Earth return). These pre-1980s ideas laid groundwork for later missions but lacked detailed risk modeling for rotational stabilization or collision avoidance.

Post-Apollo Era Advancements

In the years following the Apollo program's conclusion in 1972, conceptual advancements in artificial asteroid capture emphasized resource extraction for space industrialization, building on earlier theoretical work with more detailed engineering feasibility assessments. Physicist Gerard K. O'Neill's 1974 proposal outlined using near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) as primary material sources for constructing massive orbital habitats, arguing their lower delta-v requirements for access—often under 5 km/s from low Earth orbit—made them preferable to lunar mining for bulk volatiles and metals.^[21] This shifted focus from mere observation to active retrieval, positing that captured asteroid-derived materials could enable self-sustaining space economies without repeated Earth launches.^[22] A pivotal 1977 study by Brian O'Leary quantified the energetics of capturing Earth-approaching Apollo and Amor asteroids, calculating that velocity increments as low as 0.3–1 km/s suffice to redirect small bodies (diameters 10–200 m) into Earth or lunar orbits using electromagnetic mass drivers.^[23] O'Leary estimated that a 200-m carbonaceous asteroid could yield 10^7 tons of water, organics, and silicates—resources exceeding lunar equivalents in accessibility—with total mission costs around $1 billion (1976 dollars), competitive with Shuttle-era launches.^[23] His approach involved robotic tugs deploying mass drivers to accelerate the asteroid or its payload incrementally over multiple orbits, leveraging gravitational assists from Earth and Venus to minimize propulsion needs; he identified candidates like 1566 Arenda or 433 Eros analogs with favorable low-inclination orbits.^[21] NASA's concurrent 1970s explorations extended these ideas through ad hoc groups assessing sample-return precursors to full capture, confirming NEA delta-v budgets below 6 km/s for rendezvous using modified Apollo hardware.^[22] By 1979, O'Leary refined retrieval schemes in AIAA proceedings, advocating precursor prospecting missions to map asteroid composition and spin rates, essential for stable capture bags or nets to enclose tumbling bodies up to 100 m across.^[21] The 1980s saw incremental refinements within space settlement communities, such as L5 Society advocacy for lunar-manufactured mass drivers to relocate 10^8-kg asteroid fragments, though lacking dedicated funding amid post-Shuttle budget cuts.^[24] In the 1990s, enhanced NEA catalogs from surveys like Spacewatch enabled trajectory models for specific targets (e.g., 1989 ML, a 1–2 m boulder captured conceptually via solar sails), while planetary defense studies dual-purposed deflection techniques—like ion beam shepherds—for resource relocation, highlighting risks of orbital instability for bodies over 10 m.^[22] These advancements laid groundwork for propulsion innovations but stalled on unproven in-situ characterization, with no operational prototypes by 2000.^[25]

Technologies for Artificial Capture

Propulsion and Trajectory Control

Electric propulsion systems dominate concepts for asteroid capture due to their high specific impulse, which facilitates the low-acceleration, long-duration thrusting required to achieve the delta-v of several kilometers per second needed to transfer near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) from heliocentric orbits to geocentric or lunar orbits.^[26] Gridded electrostatic ion thrusters and Hall-effect thrusters, powered by solar arrays or nuclear reactors, offer exhaust velocities of 20-50 km/s, contrasting with chemical rockets' 3-5 km/s, thereby minimizing propellant mass for missions involving multi-tonne asteroids.^[27] Studies indicate that systems delivering kilowatts to megawatts of power are essential for feasible capture timelines, as thrust levels below 1 N per thruster necessitate years of operation to impart sufficient momentum without excessive energy loss to radiation pressure or gravitational perturbations.^[26] Solar electric propulsion (SEP) configurations, such as those employing xenon as propellant, have been central to proposed missions; for instance, analyses of scaled electric propulsion architectures project capture of 500-tonne asteroids using arrays generating 100-500 kW, achieving transfer times of 5-10 years via continuous low-thrust arcs.^[26] Nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) variants extend operational range beyond 2-3 AU by replacing solar panels with fission reactors, potentially halving transfer durations for outer solar system objects while maintaining thrust-to-power efficiencies around 50-60 mN/kW.^[27] Attachment of propulsion units to the asteroid—either via surface anchoring or boulder encapsulation—requires integration with attitude control systems to counter the body's rotation, typically 1-10 rpm for candidate NEAs, ensuring thrust alignment with the center of mass to avoid tumbling-induced instability.^[28] Trajectory control in capture operations involves optimizing low-thrust paths that balance fuel efficiency against mission constraints like Earth departure windows and arrival phasing. Low-thrust trajectory design employs techniques such as primer vector theory or direct collocation methods to solve the nonlinear dynamics of continuous acceleration under solar gravity and planetary perturbations, often incorporating lunar gravity assists to modulate orbital energy by 0.5-1 km²/s².^[29] For the NASA Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission (ARRM) Option B, interplanetary transfers to 100-500 m asteroids utilized SEP for outbound rendezvous, with inbound trajectories shaped to exploit multiple lunar flybys, reducing total delta-v by up to 20% compared to impulsive maneuvers.^[28] Real-time adjustments during the capture phase rely on onboard navigation using optical sensors and laser altimeters to refine ephemeris errors below 1 km, preventing escape from temporary capture orbits around the Lagrangian points.^[29] These methods prioritize deterministic control over stochastic perturbations from non-gravitational forces like Yarkovsky effects, which can drift asteroid positions by 10-100 m/year.^[29]

Physical Capture Methods

Physical capture methods for asteroids rely on direct mechanical contact to secure small near-Earth objects or surface regolith samples, enabling subsequent redirection via propulsion systems. These techniques target asteroids up to several meters in diameter or boulders weighing multi-tons from larger bodies, prioritizing low-mass, low-velocity encounters to minimize structural stress. NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), formulated between 2013 and 2016, evaluated such methods as part of feasibility studies for robotic retrieval.^[30]^[31] One approach involves enclosure systems, such as inflatable bags or rigid containers deployed around a free-flying asteroid. In ARM's Option A, a spacecraft would encapsulate an entire asteroid up to 8 meters in diameter within a containment structure, using mechanisms like padding and restraint bands to stabilize the irregular body during capture and transport. This method suits cohesive, monolithic asteroids with minimal rotation, allowing the enclosure to absorb kinetic energy from contact. Simulations indicate success requires precise trajectory matching, with closure actuated post-encirclement to prevent escape.^[30]^[32] Gripper-based systems employ robotic arms with articulated end-effectors to grasp boulders directly from a parent asteroid's surface. ARM's Option B, selected in 2015 for further development, featured two counter-rotating arms equipped with soft-capture mechanisms, including pneumatic or mechanical clamps to conform to rough terrains without penetration. These grippers, rigidly mounted to the spacecraft, secure holds via friction on the boulder's exterior, supporting masses up to 500 kilograms for solar electric propulsion towing. Ground tests and dynamic modeling confirm viability for low-gravity environments, though tumbling or regolith shedding poses risks to arm integrity.^[33]^[31]^[32] Harpoon systems offer an alternative for anchoring, deploying tethered projectiles to embed into the target and reel it in. Proposed within ARM boulder capture options, harpoons use pyrotechnic or electromagnetic launchers to achieve penetration velocities of 50-60 m/s into regolith or rocky surfaces, followed by tensioned tethers for stabilization. Peer-reviewed analyses highlight efficacy for non-cohesive materials but note challenges like tether entanglement or insufficient embedment depth in fractured regolith. Complementary net deployment methods, involving expandable meshes to envelop the object, have been modeled for asteroid-scale targets, drawing from space debris removal prototypes that achieve full enclosure at relative velocities under 1 m/s.^[33]^[34]

Orbital Stabilization Techniques

Orbital stabilization techniques for artificially captured asteroids emphasize orbit selection to leverage natural dynamical stability while employing propulsion for precise insertion and initial corrections. In NASA's Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission (ARRM), a captured boulder from a near-Earth asteroid is transported to a lunar distant retrograde orbit (DRO) at approximately 70,000 km altitude above the Moon's surface, chosen for its inherent stability exceeding 100 years due to balanced Earth-Moon gravitational perturbations in the circular restricted three-body problem.^[1]^[35] This passive stability minimizes long-term active intervention, with solar radiation pressure and third-body effects counteracted by the orbit's geometry rather than continuous thrusting.^[36] Propulsion systems, particularly solar electric propulsion (SEP) with 40 kW power and 3000 s specific impulse, deliver the required delta-v—around 60 m/s for transfer and 16 m/s for post-insertion trimming via 20 maneuvers over eight months—to position the asteroid mass (up to 500 kg boulder plus vehicle) into the DRO while avoiding unstable regions near the Earth-Moon L1 and L2 libration points.^[35] These maneuvers use up to 12 metric tons of xenon propellant to ensure the orbit's Lyapunov stability, preventing escape or decay over mission-relevant timescales.^[1] For alternative Earth-centric or less stable orbits in other concepts, active station-keeping via low-thrust ion engines attached to the capture vehicle or asteroid could counteract perturbations like solar radiation pressure or Yarkovsky thermal forces, though such methods increase propellant demands and operational complexity compared to DRO placement.^[37] Attitude control during transport, involving thruster pulses to despin tumbling asteroids, complements orbital techniques by maintaining spacecraft-asteroid alignment for accurate thrusting.^[38] Overall, proposals prioritize orbits with extended stability lifetimes to reduce reliance on ongoing propulsion, aligning with current technological constraints on in-situ asteroid thruster attachment.^[1]

Motivations and Potential Benefits

In-Situ Resource Utilization

Capturing asteroids and relocating them to stable cislunar orbits, such as lunar distant retrograde orbit (LDRO), enables in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) by providing proximate, low-delta-v access to extraterrestrial materials for extraction and processing. This approach leverages the compositional diversity of near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), particularly carbonaceous (C-type) varieties, which contain 10-20 weight percent water bound in hydrated minerals, alongside hydrocarbons, silicates, and trace metals.^[39] Water, the primary ISRU target, can be liberated through thermal or chemical processes and electrolyzed into hydrogen and oxygen for storable propellants, directly addressing the high cost of launching volatiles from Earth—estimated at over $10,000 per kilogram to low Earth orbit.^[40] Propellant production from such sources could fuel solar electric propulsion systems or chemical rockets, enabling efficient transfer of payloads to Mars or beyond while minimizing launch vehicle requirements.^[2] Metallic (M-type) asteroids offer additional ISRU potential through high concentrations of iron, nickel, and platinum-group metals (PGMs) like platinum and iridium, which exceed terrestrial ore grades in some cases and could be refined for spacecraft structural components or catalytic applications.^[39] Regolith from captured bodies also serves non-fuel roles, such as radiation shielding via compacted aggregates or habitat construction materials produced through sintering or 3D printing, reducing mission mass by repurposing asteroid mass directly in orbit.^[2] NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) concept, developed in the mid-2010s, proposed robotic retrieval of a 500-ton NEA or multi-ton boulder to LDRO by the mid-2020s, followed by crewed ISRU demonstrations including water extraction and volatile processing to validate scalability.^[2] This would establish proof-of-concept for commercial operations, where extracted resources could populate propellant depots or supply chains, potentially lowering deep-space mission costs by enabling iterative, on-site replenishment.^[39] ISRU from captured asteroids extends to life support, with oxygen derived from regolith oxides or electrolysis supporting crewed outposts, and carbon dioxide or organics convertible to methane via Sabatier reactions for fuel cells.^[40] Stony (S-type) asteroids contribute oxides and metals for similar ends, though with lower volatile yields than C-types. Overall, these capabilities foster self-sustaining space infrastructure, with captured asteroids acting as "gas stations" or foundries in cislunar space, though economic viability hinges on demonstrated extraction efficiencies in microgravity, projected to require advances in robotic prospecting and processing hardware.^[39]^[2]

Planetary Defense Applications

Asteroid capture concepts offer applications in planetary defense primarily through the demonstration and refinement of trajectory modification techniques applicable to hazardous near-Earth objects (NEOs). By retrieving small NEOs or surface boulders and relocating them to stable orbits, such as lunar retrograde orbits, missions can test deflection methods in a low-risk environment, avoiding direct engagement with larger threats that might require urgent intervention.^[41] A key proposed technique is the enhanced gravity tractor, where a spacecraft maintains a stationary position relative to the target asteroid, leveraging gravitational interaction to impart subtle velocity changes over time. NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) planned to augment this method by incorporating the mass of a captured boulder, thereby increasing the tractor's effective gravitational pull and demonstrating scalability for altering the paths of potentially impactful NEOs up to hundreds of meters in diameter.^[42] This approach provides continuous, non-contact deflection without the structural damage risks of kinetic impacts, suitable for long-lead-time threats detected years in advance.^[41] Advanced propulsion systems, such as high-power solar electric propulsion (SEP) integrated into capture vehicles, enable efficient delta-v maneuvers essential for both retrieval and deflection operations. ARM's SEP design targeted over 1 km/s of velocity change, a capability that could extend to nudging larger asteroids off collision courses by providing sustained thrust for orbital adjustments.^[42] Testing these systems on captured material yields empirical data on asteroid response, including outgassing, tumbling, and fragmentation risks, which refine predictive models for defense scenarios. Captured asteroids also serve as proxies for studying NEO compositions and behaviors under artificial perturbations, informing hybrid deflection strategies that combine capture-derived insights with methods like standoff nuclear disruption or ion beam shepherding. Despite these potentials, practical implementation faces hurdles including precise rendezvous with tumbling bodies and ensuring orbital stability post-capture, with no operational systems yet deployed as of 2025.^[42] Proponents argue that early investment in capture tech accelerates readiness for the estimated 25,000 NEOs larger than 140 meters capable of regional devastation, though critics highlight the focus on rare events over immediate detection priorities.^[43]

Scientific and Exploratory Value

Asteroid capture missions offer substantial scientific value by enabling the retrieval of multi-ton samples from near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), which serve as primordial remnants of the solar system's formation approximately 4.6 billion years ago. Unlike limited sample-return missions such as OSIRIS-REx, which returned mere grams of material from Bennu in 2023, capturing a boulder or small asteroid—potentially 500 tons of carbonaceous material rich in volatiles, metals, and silicates—facilitates extensive in-situ analysis of composition, internal structure, and mechanical properties.^[44] This approach addresses key planetary science gaps, including the chemical and physical history of asteroids through assays for organic constituents, cosmogenic nuclides, and regolith formation processes.^[44]^[45] Detailed characterization via remote sensing techniques, such as gamma-ray/neutron spectrometry, X-ray spectroscopy, and multi-wavelength imaging across phase angles, reveals volatile content, morphology, and ejection dynamics not fully achievable with flyby or small-sample missions. For instance, NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) concept targeted a 2-4 meter boulder from a larger NEA, allowing prolonged study in lunar distant retrograde orbit (DRO) to quantify resources like up to 200 tons of water ice, informing models of water delivery to early Earth and the origins of life-enabling chemistry.^[45]^[1] Such captures diversify access to asteroid types, enhancing understanding of NEA heterogeneity beyond the few visited bodies like Itokawa or Ryugu. Exploratory value stems from positioning captured asteroids in stable cislunar orbits, such as lunar DRO at ~70,000 km, as accessible testbeds for human spaceflight technologies and operations.^[1] Crewed missions, as envisioned in ARM with Orion and SLS vehicles, enable astronauts to conduct 24-25 day rendezvous for direct sampling, inspection, and technology validation, including proximity operations, anchoring, and radiation shielding using asteroid regolith—reducing risks for longer Mars voyages.^[45]^[44] This framework supports iterative robotic and human visits, pre-deploying payloads up to 3,100 kg via solar electric propulsion (SEP), and fosters operational experience in deep-space environments with lower radiation exposure than direct NEA trips.^[44] Ultimately, these capabilities bridge robotic precursors to sustained human presence beyond low Earth orbit, validating in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) for propellants and life support derived from asteroid volatiles.^[1]

Challenges, Risks, and Criticisms

Technical and Engineering Hurdles

Capturing asteroids presents formidable challenges in matching their rotational dynamics, as many near-Earth asteroids rotate at rates up to 0.5 revolutions per minute, necessitating precise despin maneuvers to enable stable contact without structural failure.^[46] Rubble-pile compositions, common among small asteroids, exacerbate this by risking fragmentation upon contact or torque application, as these bodies consist of loosely bound regolith and boulders held by microgravity and cohesion rather than monolithic rock.^[47] Physical capture mechanisms, such as deployable bags for whole-asteroid enclosure or robotic arms for boulder extraction, face engineering difficulties in deployment reliability and secure attachment. For instance, NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission Option A required a large inflatable container to envelop asteroids up to 8 meters in diameter, but scaling and material integrity under vacuum and radiation posed risks of premature failure or incomplete enclosure.^[48] Option B's approach of grappling 6-meter boulders with grippers demands advanced robotics capable of handling irregular, dusty surfaces in microgravity, where traditional grippers may slip or eject regolith, complicating stabilization.^[49] Soft robotics and gecko-like adhesives have been proposed to mitigate non-cooperative docking issues, yet their durability against abrasive asteroid particulates remains unproven at scale.^[50] Propulsion systems for post-capture orbital transfer require substantial delta-V budgets, often exceeding 3 km/s for retrograde capture of candidates like Apophis into Earth orbit, demanding efficient solar electric propulsion with kilowatt-level power inputs over months-long spirals.^[51] Scaling electric thrusters for asteroid mass—potentially hundreds of tons—introduces thermal management and propellant efficiency hurdles, as ion engines must operate continuously without interruption in the deep-space environment.^[26] Autonomous operations and navigation amplify risks, given communication delays of minutes to hours and the need for real-time adaptation to unforeseen asteroid properties, such as unexpected outgassing or shape irregularities, which could derail capture sequences.^[52] Mission requirements uncertainty, as experienced in the Asteroid Redirect Mission's cancellation, underscores integration challenges across subsystems like launch vehicles and rendezvous sensors.^[53] Overall, these hurdles demand iterative testing of prototypes, with ground-based simulations limited by the inability to replicate microgravity and vacuum fully.

Economic and Feasibility Assessments

The Keck Institute for Space Studies' 2012 Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study evaluated the capture and return of a small near-Earth asteroid (approximately 500,000 kg) to high lunar orbit, determining it technically feasible using solar electric propulsion and existing or near-term technologies, with a mission timeline of 6-10 years and a target completion by around 2025.^[44] The study's cost estimate for the inaugural mission totaled approximately $2.6 billion (in FY2012 dollars), including $1.36 billion for development, test, and evaluation, $0.34 billion for recurring hardware, $0.29 billion for launch on an Atlas V 551, and reserves at 30% of the total; subsequent missions could recur at about $1 billion.^[44] This analysis assumed discovery of suitable carbonaceous asteroids via enhanced surveys and highlighted a mass amplification factor of 28:1, enabling delivery of 500 tons to lunar orbit for roughly one-eighth the cost of Earth-launched equivalents (estimated at $20 billion).^[44] NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), inspired by the KISS study, faced escalating cost projections that contributed to its cancellation in 2017. Initial NASA estimates set a development cost cap at $1.25 billion, later raised to $1.4 billion excluding launch and operations, with total mission costs potentially reaching $1.72 billion including a placeholder $500 million for launch.^[54] Independent reviews, such as from NASA's Glenn Research Center, aligned with the KISS figure of $2.6 billion for a full robotic capture and return, underscoring challenges in achieving cost targets amid technical complexities like advanced robotics and propulsion.^[44] Critics within NASA and congressional oversight noted that these expenditures competed with higher-priority programs like the Space Launch System and Orion, rendering ARM economically unviable without clear near-term returns beyond technology demonstration.^[54] Broader techno-economic analyses of asteroid capture for resource utilization reveal persistent hurdles to profitability, including high initial capital outlays and market uncertainties. A 2021 U.S. Air Force thesis concluded that while capture technologies draw from proven sample-return missions like OSIRIS-REx ($1.16 billion total cost), full-scale operations remain economically unfeasible without refined in-situ water extraction yielding propellants or shielding materials at scales offsetting launch costs—estimated at $25,000 per gallon for water to low Earth orbit from the surface.^[55] Peer-reviewed modeling suggests that architectures involving fleets of small spacecraft for prospecting and capture could require $7 billion upfront, with break-even potentially after 10 missions only if volatile-rich near-Earth asteroids are abundant and extraction efficiencies exceed 90%; however, flooding terrestrial markets with platinum-group metals or volatiles risks price collapses, diminishing returns.^[55] These assessments prioritize space-based demand (e.g., for lunar or Mars outposts) over Earth return, as delta-v requirements for de-orbiting payloads amplify energy costs by factors of 10-100 compared to in-space use.^[56] Feasibility hinges on probabilistic factors like asteroid discoverability—requiring 5 suitable targets per year for viable operations—and risk mitigation for orbital stability post-capture, where unmodeled perturbations could necessitate additional propulsion reserves inflating costs by 20-30%.^[44] Private initiatives, such as those by AstroForge or TransAstra, emphasize lower-cost precursors like spectroscopic surveys over full capture, reflecting skepticism about billion-dollar government-led efforts yielding immediate economic gains amid stagnant launch economics pre-reusable rocketry advancements. Overall, studies concur that asteroid capture offers strategic value for planetary defense and exploration enablement but lacks compelling commercial economics without scaled reductions in launch costs below $100/kg to orbit and validated resource yields.^[55]^[56]

Safety and Environmental Concerns

One primary safety concern in asteroid capture missions is the potential for orbital perturbations or propulsion failures during redirect, which could inadvertently alter the target's trajectory toward Earth. Small near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), typically 7 meters in diameter and carbonaceous in composition, are selected for capture because they would largely disintegrate upon atmospheric entry, posing negligible impact risk even if deorbited uncontrolled.^[44] Trajectory designs prioritize stable cislunar orbits, such as high lunar orbits or Earth-Moon Lagrange points, ensuring that loss of control would result in lunar impact rather than Earth collision.^[44] Technical failure modes, including incomplete de-spinning of tumbling asteroids or insufficient characterization of mass and composition, could complicate secure capture and increase mission abort risks. Autonomous robotic systems must handle irregular shapes and low-gravity environments without human intervention, with studies indicating that oversized contact mechanisms, such as inflatable bags, reduce sinkage and fragmentation risks during boulder collection.^[31] Quantitative assessments show station-keeping requirements of approximately 10 m/s ΔV per year in lunar orbits to maintain stability over decades, with propulsion systems like solar electric propulsion (SEP) vulnerable to power or propellant depletion.^[44] Long-term simulations confirm orbital lifetimes exceeding 20 years without intervention, but missed-thrust scenarios necessitate rigorous fault-tree analyses to bound Earth-impact probabilities below natural meteoroid risks.^[44] Environmental concerns are limited, as operations occur in deep space or cislunar regions without direct terrestrial effects. Potential space environmental impacts include generation of micro-debris from capture interactions or propulsion exhaust, which could contribute to Kessler syndrome in congested orbits if scaled to multiple missions.^[57] Planetary protection protocols classify most target C-type asteroids as Category V unrestricted for return, given the absence of viable Martian or lunar contamination pathways in Earth-proximal orbits.^[44] Anthropogenic alteration of NEA orbits raises speculative long-term risks of destabilizing populations, potentially increasing collision hazards over centuries, though current proposals mitigate this through reversible, low-energy redirects.^[58]

Key Proposals and Current Developments

NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission

The Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) was a NASA initiative proposed in 2013 to develop and demonstrate technologies for asteroid capture and redirection, with the primary objective of robotically retrieving a multi-ton boulder from the surface of a large near-Earth asteroid and placing it into a distant retrograde lunar orbit for subsequent study and utilization.^[59] The mission aimed to advance capabilities in solar electric propulsion, autonomous rendezvous and capture, and in-situ resource utilization, while supporting broader goals such as planetary defense through kinetic impactor testing and human exploration precursors for Mars missions.^[1] NASA envisioned a two-phase approach: a robotic precursor to perform the capture and redirection by the mid-2020s, followed by a crewed Orion spacecraft mission to rendezvous with the asteroid in lunar orbit for sample collection and technology validation. Initially, NASA evaluated two capture concepts under ARM. Option A involved deploying an inflatable bag-like device to enclose and capture an entire small asteroid up to 8 meters in diameter, estimated at 500-1,000 tons in mass.^[33] Option B, deemed more feasible due to reduced mass requirements and compatibility with existing propulsion technologies, focused on using robotic arms with grippers to secure a 2-4 meter boulder from a larger asteroid (100-500 meters in diameter), targeting a mass of several tons.^[60] In March 2015, NASA selected Option B as the baseline, citing its lower technical risk, greater flexibility in target selection (e.g., asteroids like 2008 EV5), and potential for demonstrating boulder extraction relevant to resource prospecting.^[61] The spacecraft would employ high-power solar electric propulsion for efficient trajectory adjustments, with the capture vehicle designed to hover above the asteroid surface, deploy arms to grasp the boulder, and then ascend using low-thrust maneuvers.^[62] Development progressed through feasibility studies and preliminary design reviews, with key milestones including a 2013 NASA study recognizing solar electric propulsion advancements and a 2016 critical design review assessing maturity.^[63] However, the mission faced persistent budget constraints, with the robotic segment estimated at $1.25-1.4 billion and total costs potentially exceeding $2.6 billion including crewed elements.^[63] Critics, including MIT planetary scientist Richard Binzel, argued that ARM diverted resources from higher-priority deep-space human exploration, questioned the scientific value of a single boulder sample given existing meteorite data, and highlighted unproven capture reliability amid asteroid regolith uncertainties.^[64] Feasibility concerns centered on microgravity grappling, boulder stability during extraction, and propulsion efficiency for the 18-24 month journey to lunar orbit.^[62] In June 2017, NASA initiated an orderly closeout of ARM following the Trump administration's proposed budget elimination, prioritizing Mars human missions and commercial partnerships over asteroid redirection amid fiscal pressures and shifting agency goals.^[65] Although canceled, ARM's legacy influenced subsequent efforts, including advanced propulsion tests applied to missions like Psyche and contributions to planetary defense strategies via NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART).^[63] No revival has occurred as of 2025, with focus redirected to lunar Gateway and Artemis programs.^[65]

Private and International Initiatives

TransAstra, a U.S.-based aerospace company founded in 2017, has developed the Apis™ Capture Bag system, an inflatable enclosure derived from concepts originally proposed for NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission, designed to enclose and redirect asteroids or large orbital debris.^[66] The technology deploys via inflatable booms to form a rip-stop fabric bag capable of scaling from small debris capture to enclosing asteroids up to 10,000 tons in mass.^[67] On October 2, 2025, TransAstra successfully demonstrated a prototype on the International Space Station, validating deployment and capture mechanics for both debris removal and potential asteroid applications.^[68] In September 2025, the company secured $5 million in funding, including NASA support and private investment, to advance the system toward operational asteroid capture, with CEO Joel Sercel stating plans to capture an asteroid by 2028.^[69]^[70] Other private entities, such as AstroForge, are advancing asteroid prospecting and mining technologies, including spacecraft like Odin and Vestri targeted at 400-meter-diameter near-Earth asteroids for resource extraction, though these emphasize in-situ processing over full-body capture and redirection.^[71] TransAstra's approach prioritizes low-cost orbital transfer of captured bodies to Earth-Moon Lagrange points for subsequent mining or utilization, leveraging optical mining techniques to process volatiles and metals post-capture.^[72] These efforts reflect growing private investment in space resources, driven by potential economic returns from platinum-group metals and water-derived propellants, amid regulatory frameworks like the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 permitting asteroid resource ownership.^[73] Internationally, asteroid capture initiatives remain conceptual or absent in operational phases, with agencies focusing instead on sample-return missions and kinetic impact deflection. The European Space Agency's Hera mission, launched October 7, 2024, targets the Didymos-Dimorphos system to assess deflection outcomes from NASA's DART impact, emphasizing planetary defense over capture.^[74] ESA's proposed Ramses mission to asteroid Apophis in 2029 involves rendezvous and flyby observation during its Earth approach, studying gravitational and tidal effects without redirection intent.^[75] Japan's Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has executed Hayabusa2, a 2014-2020 sample-return from asteroid Ryugu yielding subsurface materials via impactor-generated ejecta, but no full-capture programs have advanced beyond Hayabusa-series touchdown-and-ascend techniques.^[76] Broader international coordination, such as the United Nations' 2029 International Year of Asteroid Awareness and Planetary Defence endorsed by ESA, promotes awareness and mitigation strategies through the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, but lacks dedicated capture missions or hardware development.^[77] Academic proposals, including multi-spacecraft strategies for near-Earth asteroid capture using ion propulsion for gradual orbit adjustment, highlight feasibility for bodies under 100 meters but remain unadopted by agencies due to high delta-v requirements and cost uncertainties.^[6] This contrasts with private sector momentum, where capture technologies enable scalable, commercially viable pathways absent in state-led international efforts.

References

[1]
[PDF] Asteroid Redirect Mission Reference Concept Description - NASA
Rendezvous with, capture, and redirect an entire near-Earth asteroid, with a mass of up to ~1,000 t, into a stable lunar orbit by the first half of the next ...
[2]
Asteroid Redirect Mission concept: A bold approach for utilizing ...
Asteroid Redirect Mission enables utilization of natural resources from asteroids. •. Robotic capture and return of small asteroid or multi-ton boulder from an ...
[3]
NASA builds asteroid capture mission definitions
Mar 31, 2014 · NASA has begun to define the approach towards capturing a space rock that will be investigated during the Exploration Mission -2 (EM-2).
[4]
Strategies to capture asteroids to distant retrograde orbits in the Sun ...
The second strategy of asteroid capture is defined as direct capture to increase opportunities of capturing asteroids with low cost.
[5]
What a controversial asteroid mission tells us about US space policy
Oct 14, 2016 · Binzel called the asteroid mission “a multibillion-dollar stunt.” NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, meanwhile, said that ARM wasn't necessary ...
[6]
A multiple-vehicle strategy for near-Earth asteroid capture
Asteroid capture missions aim to bring useful asteroids closer to Earth, such that they can be permanently accessed by future space missions. Near-Earth ...
[7]
NASA Funds 18 Asteroid Retrieval Concepts - SpaceNews
Jun 23, 2014 · The space agency has awarded a total of $4.9 million to 18 proposals that could advance and flesh out the asteroid retrieval plan.
[8]
[PDF] a look at the capture mechanisms of the “temporarily ... - ISSFD
These objects get naturally captured within the gravitational potential of the Earth, but due to the strongly perturbed environment the capture has a limited ...
[9]
On the capture origin of the satellites of the solar system. - NASA ADS
The purely gravitational capture of comets or asteroids by the planets is examined theoretically, reviewing the results of studies published during the ...<|separator|>
[10]
Gravitational Capture of Asteroids by Gas Drag - Vieira Neto - 2009
Mar 7, 2010 · An asteroid that was gravitationally captured by the planet got its velocity reduced and could been trapped as an irregular satellite. It is ...Missing: natural | Show results with:natural
[11]
Capturing near-Earth asteroids around Earth - ScienceDirect.com
▻ We model the orbit of near Earth asteroids. ▻ We introduce a thrust force to alter asteroid orbit. ▻ Accelerations and impulsive forces suggested for capture ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
[12]
Phoebe - NASA Science
Phoebe, discovered in 1898, is a dark, captured moon of Saturn with a retrograde orbit, likely from the outer solar system, and is named after a Greek goddess.
[13]
Saturn's moon mystery solved - Nature
Jun 25, 2004 · Although astronomers had suspected that Phoebe was a captured moon, Cassini's results provide compelling proof of its origins. Its chemical ...
[14]
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/ae04dd
[15]
Irregular satellites of Jupiter: capture configurations of binary-asteroids
By tracking the binary-asteroid trajectory, one sees that it becomes temporarily captured (light blue triangle) by Jupiter, disrupts (green square inside the ...
[16]
Earth's quasi-moons, minimoons, and ghost… - The Planetary Society
May 21, 2024 · Minimoon 2020 CD3 trajectory The path traveled by Earth's temporarily captured orbiter (or "minimoon") 2020 CD3 from January 2019 to May 2020.
[17]
Claimed moons of Earth - Wikipedia
469219 Kamoʻoalewa, an asteroid discovered on 27 April 2016, is possibly the most stable quasi-satellite of Earth. As it orbits the Sun, 469219 Kamoʻoalewa ...
[18]
[PDF] Space Elevators - High Frontier
Finally in 1975, Jerome Pearson, working at the. Air Force Research Laboratory, also independently invented the space elevator and published a technical paper ...
[19]
[PDF] Opportunities for Asteroid Retrieval Missions | Strathprints
Early proposals for the space elevator involved the capture of a small body in a close to GEO orbit to serve as counterweight. The size of the counterweight ...
[20]
The Long and Storied Path to Human Asteroid Exploration
Apr 26, 2013 · In a 1964 document that looked at “long range future mission planning,” NASA expressed an early aspiration to visit asteroids through unmanned ...
[21]
[PDF] Duck! Disaster! Destruction! Challenges in communicating about ...
Apr 16, 2013 · NASA administrator Robert A. Frosch mentioned this in testimony to Congress on July 29, 1980, when he explained that “a number of evolutionary ...
[22]
[PDF] Spacecraft Conceptual Design for Returning Entire Near-Earth ...
Jun 25, 2008 · Should the asteroid SEP transportation vehicle and the asteroid capture vehicle be one spacecraft or two? 3. What range of asteroid ...
[23]
NASA's Asteroid Initiative Benefits From Rich History
Apr 10, 2013 · As early as the 1970s, NASA examined potential ways to use existing hardware to visit an asteroid to understand better its characteristics. On ...
[24]
Mining the Apollo and Amor Asteroids | Science
Mining the Apollo and Amor Asteroids. Brian O'LearyAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 22 Jul 1977. Vol 197, Issue 4301. pp. 363-366. DOI: 10.1126/science ...
[25]
IV-2 Retrieval of Asteroidal Materials - Al Globus
Figure 14(a) is a schematic of the asteroid capture mission; it also includes a parametric cost equation expressing total program costs per kilogram of asteroid ...
[26]
[PDF] Origins and Chronology of the Asteroid Retrieval Mission (ARM ...
Apr 12, 2013 · NASA has been conducting studies related to asteroids and asteroid mining beginning with the 1970s. However, propulsion and transportation ...
[27]
[PDF] Electric propulsion system scaling for asteroid capture-and-return ...
It was determined by the KISS case study that “sufficiently powerful” electric propulsion systems are an enabling technology for asteroid capture and return ...
[28]
[PDF] Advanced Solar & Nuclear Electric Propulsion Systems for Asteroid ...
Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) pose an impact hazard to Earth. • Low probability, high consequences, similar to other natural hazards.<|separator|>
[29]
Interplanetary Trajectory Design for the Asteroid Robotic Redirect ...
This paper presents an analysis of mission performance for the ARRM Option B, detailing the optimization and design of low-thrust trajectories to asteroid ...
[30]
Trajectory Design for Asteroid Retrieval Missions: A Short Review
Oct 1, 2018 · In simple terms, an asteroid retrieval mission envisages a spacecraft that rendezvous with an asteroid, lassos it and hauls it back to the ...Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
[31]
[PDF] NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission Concept Development Summary
component and system options, and asteroid capture option trades and risk reduction efforts. This paper also provides a summary of concept development ...
[32]
[PDF] Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Formulation Assessment ... - NASA
Feb 1, 2016 · 2015, NASA announced the selection of the boulder capture option for the robotic segment of ARM. ... Identification Using the Hierarchical ...<|separator|>
[33]
[PDF] Modeling and Simulation of Asteroid Retrieval Using a Flexible ...
In this paper we describe the results of a simulation study into the dynamics of an asteroid capture event. This study has been conducted in parallel with an ...
[34]
[PDF] Boulder Capture System Design Options for the Asteroid Robotic ...
Gripper System: Rigidly mounted to the S/C; grips the boulder's surface without fully wrapping around it. Harpoon System: Deploys a tethered ...
[35]
Research on a novel multiple cable-nets swing capture mechanism ...
In contrast, space grippers based on launching devices exhibit distinctly different configurations, exemplified by the space-net capture and harpoon techniques ...
[36]
[PDF] Overview of Mission Design for NASA Asteroid Redirect Robotic ...
Oct 6, 2013 · The Orion could access this orbit (for 2009 BD) as early as March 2024 while the DRO is being trimmed for long-term stability. III. Identifying ...
[37]
Long Duration Stability of Distant Retrograde Orbits - AIAA ARC
This paper studies the stability of distant retrograde orbits (DROs) in the Earth-Moon system over periods of 100 years or greater.Missing: lunar | Show results with:lunar
[38]
[PDF] ORBIT MECHANICS ABOUT SMALL ASTEROIDS
Small asteroid orbits are affected by solar radiation pressure, mass distribution, and solar gravity. Solar radiation pressure is strong, and mass distribution ...
[39]
Attitude Control and Stabilization of Spacecraft with a Captured ...
We conclude this paper with specific design guidelines for the ARM spacecraft for efficiently stabilizing the tumbling NEO asteroid and spacecraft combination.Missing: active | Show results with:active
[40]
[PDF] Concepts of Operations for Asteroid Rendezvous Missions Focused ...
The presence of a captured asteroid with valuable resources in a stable lunar orbit may prove attractive for companies aiming to mine such objects. The ...
[41]
[PDF] SPACE RESOURCE UTILIZATION
Space resources include water, volatiles, metals, minerals, solar energy, and trash. ISRU can produce propellants, metal feedstock, and landing pads.<|separator|>
[42]
Asteroid Redirect Mission Planetary Defense Demonstration - NASA
Mar 25, 2015 · The gravity tractor method leverages the mass of the spacecraft to impart a gravitational force on the asteroid, slowly altering the asteroid's ...
[43]
Enhanced Gravity Tractor Derived from the Asteroid Redirect ...
May 15, 2017 · The Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) concept would robotically visit a hazardous-size near-Earth asteroid (NEA) with a rendezvous spacecraft.
[44]
Planetary Defense at NASA - NASA Science
NASA's Planetary Defenders is a gripping documentary that delves into the high-stakes world of asteroid detection and planetary defense by journeying alongside ...DART · Asteroid 2024 YR4 · Near-Earth Asteroids · Team
[45]
[PDF] Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study
Apr 2, 2012 · The proposed Asteroid Capture and Return mission would impact an impressive range of NASA interests including: the establishment of an ...
[46]
[PDF] Asteroid Redirect Mission Overview and Potential Science ...
NASA is developing the ARM, which includes the goal of robotically returning a multi-ton boulder. (typically 2-4 meters in size) from a large near-Earth.
[47]
[PDF] 1 IAC-14-D2.8-A5.4.1 TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR ... - NASA
4A). Key technical challenges are capturing an asteroid that may be rotating at up to 0.5 revolutions per minute, and that may consist of a loose agglomeration ...
[48]
[PDF] Asteroid Retrieval Technology Development From the Asteroid ...
This report documents the challenges and opportunities arising from capturing, characterizing, and mining a small (7-m diameter) NEA. The results of the initial ...
[49]
[PDF] Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission: Robotic Boulder Capture Option ...
This alternative mission approach, designated the Robotic Boulder Capture Option (Option B), has been investigated to determine the mission feasibility and ...Missing: difficulties | Show results with:difficulties
[50]
[PDF] Testbed for studying the capture of a small, free-flying asteroid in ...
A scaled deployable device has been built and tested for the purpose of evaluating the feasibility of capturing an entire small asteroid in free space.Missing: difficulties | Show results with:difficulties
[51]
Making Contact: A Review of Robotic Attachment Mechanisms for ...
Jul 28, 2021 · This article reviewed three main technologies for robotic attachment mechanisms in extraterrestrial applications: gecko-like adhesives, ...
[52]
orbital mechanics - How could 99942 Apophis, in 2029, be captured ...
May 16, 2022 · This means that 3246 m/s of delta-v must be applied in the retrograde direction to capture Apophis. ... How much delta-v required to hit specific ...Missing: propulsion challenges
[53]
The Science Behind NASA's First Attempt at Redirecting an Asteroid
Oct 14, 2024 · After the DART impact, scientists used a technique called the transit method to see how much the impact changed Dimorphos' orbit. As observed ...
[54]
[PDF] Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Lessons Learned Report
Some notable issues within the technical discussion included: Uncertainty in Key Mission Requirements: The launch vehicle uncertainty that arose due to not ...
[55]
NASA moves ahead with Asteroid Redirect Mission despite cost ...
Aug 16, 2016 · NASA said that, as a part of the review, it increased the mission's cost cap from $1.25 billion to $1.4 billion, an increase the agency said was ...
[56]
[PDF] The Technological and Economic Feasibility of Asteroid Mining - DTIC
Jun 1, 2021 · This thesis concludes that asteroid mining will be technologically feasible but will only be economically feasible upon further refinement of ...
[57]
A techno-economic analysis of asteroid mining - ScienceDirect.com
This paper develops a techno-economic analysis of asteroid mining with the objective of providing basic recommendations for future technology development and ...
[58]
An Environmental Impact Assessment Framework for Space ...
Resource extraction in space is likely to result in a number of environmental impacts, ranging from the generation of dust and changes to landscapes, through to ...
[59]
An Emerging x-risk: Anthropogenic Asteroid Alteration — EA Forum
Jul 13, 2025 · Asteroid impacts pose a range of hazards, including property damage, loss of human life, damage to infrastructure, ecological disruption, and ...
[60]
Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission - NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
It would then redirect the boulder into orbit around the moon, where astronauts would have explored it and returned to Earth with samples.
[61]
NASA Selects Boulder Option for Asteroid Redirect Mission
Mar 25, 2015 · Under Option B, a robotic spacecraft will travel to an asteroid several hundred meters in diameter and grab a boulder up to four meters across ...
[62]
For Asteroid-Capture Mission, NASA Picks 'Option B' for Boulder
Mar 25, 2015 · NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission aims to capture a boulder from a larger asteroid and park it in orbit around the moon by 2025.
[63]
NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission: The Boulder Capture Option
NASA is examining two options for the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), which will return asteroid material to a Lunar Distant Retrograde Orbit (LDRO) using ...
[64]
[PDF] Legacy of the Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission (ARRM)
Oct 12, 2017 · The resulting higher coupling force in an enhanced gravity tractor system requires high-power SEP in order to provide the necessary thrust ...
[65]
3 Questions: Richard Binzel on NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission
Oct 29, 2014 · MIT planetary scientist Robert Binzel argues that NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission is unnecessary and wasteful. In a Q&A with MIT News, ...Missing: budget feasibility
[66]
NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission - SpaceNews
Jun 14, 2017 · With administration plans to cancel it announced earlier this year, NASA is now in an “orderly closeout” phase of its Asteroid Redirect ...
[67]
Apis™ Capture Bags for Collection of Large Orbital Debris
The Apis Capture Bag is derived from technology originally envisioned for the Asteroid Redirect Mission. It utilizes inflatable booms to deploy a rip-stop bag ...
[68]
Bagging Space Junk: TransAstra's Inflatable Tech - ISS National Lab
Sep 10, 2025 · Capture Bag comes in a variety of sizes, from as small as a coffee mug to big enough to capture a 10,000-ton asteroid the size of a small ...
[69]
TransAstra Demonstrates Asteroid Capture and Orbital Debris ...
Oct 2, 2025 · California-based aerospace company TransAstra completed a successful demonstration of its Capture Bag technology on the ISS on Oct. 2, 2025. The ...
[70]
TransAstra Secures $5M to Scale Asteroid Capture Technology With ...
Sep 23, 2025 · TransAstra Secures $5M to Scale Asteroid Capture Technology With NASA and Private Investment. Oops, something went wrong. Skip to main content ...
[71]
Scott Manley on X: "RT @JoelSercel: Big news from TransAstra! I ...
Sep 23, 2025 · The Capture Bag system we will build under this program will allow for us to capture an asteroid by 2028! Thousands of pieces of space junk ...<|separator|>
[72]
Against all odds, an asteroid mining company appears to be making ...
Aug 20, 2024 · AstroForge is tracking several candidate asteroids as the target body for Odin and Vestri, Gialich said, each of which is about 400 meters across.
[73]
TransAstra
TransAstra is making asteroid mining a reality. To do this, we have developed four core capabilities: Detect, Capture, Move, and Process.Capture Bag · Featured · Sutter™ Telescope Technology · Move
[74]
AstroForge - Unlocking deep space resources through asteroid mining
AstroForge is a commercial space startup focused on asteroid mining and the extraction of platinum group metals and other critical minerals.Careers · About us · Explore Roid Rage<|control11|><|separator|>
[75]
Hera Mission
Hera is a planetary defence mission under development at the European Space Agency (ESA) - launching in October 2024.
[76]
Ramses: ESA's mission to asteroid Apophis - European Space Agency
ESA's Ramses spacecraft will rendezvous with Apophis before it passes Earth and accompany the asteroid during the flyby to observe how it is warped and changed ...
[77]
Asteroid Explorer Hayabusa2 | Spacecraft | ISAS
Asteroid Explorer “Hayabusa2” is a mission to clarify the origin and evolution of the Solar System, including the beginnings of life.
[78]
ESA endorses Year of Asteroid Awareness and Planetary Defence
Feb 7, 2025 · The European Space Agency (ESA) has endorsed the United Nations' (UN) designation of 2029 as the International Year of Asteroid Awareness and Planetary Defence.