Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Avi Loeb


Abraham "Avi" Loeb is an Israeli-American theoretical astrophysicist who serves as the Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science at Harvard University, where he has directed the Institute for Theory and Computation since 2007.
Born on February 26, 1962, in Israel, Loeb earned his PhD in physics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1986 and has produced over 1,000 peer-reviewed publications in astrophysics and cosmology, achieving an h-index of 131.
His research encompasses the formation of the first stars and galaxies, supermassive black holes, and the potential detection of extraterrestrial technology, including foundational work on the evolution of the universe's luminous matter.
Loeb founded Harvard's Black Hole Initiative in 2016 and chaired the Department of Astronomy from 2011 to 2020, earning fellowships in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, American Physical Society, and International Academy of Astronautics.
He directs the Galileo Project, which deploys scientific instruments to search for signs of extraterrestrial artifacts, such as unmanned probes, emphasizing data-driven inquiry into unidentified aerial phenomena and interstellar objects.
Loeb's hypothesis that the interstellar object ʻOumuamua exhibits properties consistent with artificial origin—particularly its anomalous acceleration unexplained by standard cometary outgassing—has provoked debate, as it prioritizes empirical anomalies over prevailing natural-origin assumptions in astronomy.
A bestselling author of books like Extraterrestrial and Interstellar, Loeb advocates for openness to unconventional interpretations supported by evidence, critiquing institutional resistance to paradigm shifts in science.

Early Life and Education

Childhood in Israel

Abraham Loeb was born in 1962 on his family's farm in the Beit Hanan, an village approximately 20 kilometers south of , . The , established as part of 's early post-independence rural settlement efforts, emphasized self-reliant farming communities where residents owned their land but shared services and marketing. Loeb's family operated a poultry farm, raising around 2,000 chickens, which involved daily chores such as egg collection and fieldwork. Loeb's childhood blended manual labor with intellectual pursuits, as he attended the local Zarkor school in Beit Hanan while assisting on the farm during mornings and afternoons. A precocious reader, he frequently transported stacks of books on a to remote fields, where he immersed himself in science, philosophy, and literature amid the rural . This independent study fostered an early fascination with and existential questions, contrasting the practical demands of farm life; Loeb later described tracing his "far-flung musings" to these formative experiences. By his teenage years, Loeb excelled academically and athletically in high school, though he felt somewhat out of place among peers shaped by Israel's militaristic culture, preferring nature observation and intellectual reflection over conventional norms. His mother's influence, whom he idolized for her nurturing amid the farm's rigors, reinforced about world. These years laid the groundwork for his transition to formal scientific training, culminating in participation in Israel's elite after mandatory military service at age 18.

Academic Training and Early Influences

Loeb was selected for Israel's , an elite initiative of the that identifies and trains exceptionally talented youth for advanced roles in and , due to his strong performance in physics during high school. As part of this program, he undertook accelerated studies in physics and mathematics at the for three years while fulfilling military obligations. He completed a PhD in physics there in 1986, at the age of 24, after enrolling around 1980. During his doctoral period and immediately after, Loeb participated in research funded by the U.S. (SDI), leading the inaugural international collaboration under this program from 1983 to 1988. He fulfilled an additional two years of mandatory post-PhD, applying his physics expertise to SDI-related projects. In 1988, he began a long-term membership at for Advanced Study in , marking his entry into postdoctoral research focused on . Prior to his pivot to science, Loeb harbored ambitions to become a philosophy professor, influenced by weekend readings of existential philosophers and joint philosophy classes with his mother during his teenage years on the family farm in Beit Hanan, . The Talpiot selection redirected him toward physics, leveraging his aptitude in the subject. His subsequent opportunity at Princeton further shaped his path, as he came to view as a rigorous, evidence-based means to explore philosophical questions about the universe's origins and nature.

Professional Career

Academic Appointments at Harvard

Abraham (Avi) Loeb joined in 1993 as an in the Department of Astronomy. He advanced to in 1995, serving until 1996, before being promoted to full of Astronomy in 1997, a position he continues to hold. Loeb also serves as the Frank B. Baird Jr. of Science. From 2011 to 2020, Loeb chaired the Department of Astronomy, marking the longest tenure in that role at Harvard. Since 2007, he has directed the Institute for Theory and Computation (ITC) within the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for . In 2016, he founded and directed the Initiative until 2021, fostering interdisciplinary research on black holes across Harvard's departments of astronomy, physics, and . These roles underscore Loeb's influence in theoretical and computational astronomy at the institution.

Leadership in Astronomy and Astrophysics

Loeb has directed the Institute for Theory and Computation () at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics since 2007, overseeing theoretical research in , cosmology, and related fields through interdisciplinary collaborations. Under his leadership, the has hosted postdoctoral fellows and facilitated computational simulations pivotal to advancing models of galaxy formation and black hole dynamics. From 2011 to 2020, Loeb chaired Harvard University's Department of Astronomy, the longest tenure in its history, during which he expanded faculty expertise in multimessenger astronomy and secured funding for observational initiatives aligned with emerging telescopes like the . His stewardship emphasized integrating theoretical predictions with empirical data from detections and surveys. Loeb founded and directed Harvard's Initiative from 2016 to 2021, the first center worldwide dedicated to interdisciplinary study of s, uniting physicists, mathematicians, philosophers, and lawyers to explore theoretical, observational, and legal implications of black hole research. The initiative fostered collaborations that contributed to analyses of mergers following the Event Horizon Telescope's imaging efforts. Beyond Harvard, Loeb has chaired the Advisory Committee for the Breakthrough Starshot Initiative since , guiding scientific strategy for developing light-sail nanocrafts to reach Alpha Centauri, with emphasis on feasibility and interstellar dust mitigation. He also served as Theory Director for the Breakthrough Initiatives, coordinating theoretical frameworks across projects aimed at probing and fundamental physics. These roles have positioned Loeb as an influencer in shaping international priorities for high-risk, high-reward astrophysical engineering.

Core Scientific Contributions

Research in Cosmology and the Early Universe

Loeb's research in emphasizes first-principles modeling of the , integrating , , and hydrodynamics to probe phenomena from the onward. His early work focused on the physics of cosmic phase transitions and the emergence of structure, including the role of baryonic acoustic oscillations in the (). These efforts contributed to refining inflationary models, where he explored how quantum fluctuations seed large-scale structure, drawing on empirical data from CMB anisotropies mapped by satellites like Planck. A key area involves primordial black holes (PBHs), hypothetical relics formed in the early from perturbations exceeding the cosmic horizon . Loeb has analyzed PBH formation mechanisms, noting that smaller black holes arise proportionally faster due to linear scaling of horizon radius with mass, potentially explaining observed events if PBHs constitute . In 2024, he derived constraints excluding PBHs as all in the 10^{18}-10^{22} g range based on solar system perturbations, such as anomalous orbits of trans-Neptunian objects, which would be disrupted by close PBH passages. He further demonstrated quantum-mechanical suppression of gas accretion onto asteroid-mass PBHs via Pauli exclusion principles in degenerate gases, reducing their below detectable thresholds and evading microlensing limits. Loeb has also examined the early universe's potential for , proposing a "habitable " around z ≈ 10^15-10^20, when matter density was a million times higher than today, allowing compact life forms resilient to cosmic expansion. This framework challenges anthropic fine-tuning arguments by suggesting life could precede galaxy formation, with implications for the timing of the first stars—evidenced by data indicating ignition roughly 100 million years post-Big Bang. His models incorporate radiative feedback from Population III stars, which reionize intergalactic medium and regulate subsequent structure growth, aligning with simulations of cosmic dawn. These contributions, spanning over 1,000 peer-reviewed papers with an of 131, underscore Loeb's emphasis on testable hypotheses over speculative paradigms.

Work on Black Holes and Supermassive Objects

Loeb has made significant theoretical contributions to understanding the formation and growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the early , proposing mechanisms that address the challenge of assembling billion-solar-mass objects within the first billion years after the . In a 1994 paper co-authored with Frederic A. Rasio, he explored the collapse of gas clouds, suggesting that instabilities in massive, metal-poor clouds could lead to the rapid formation of -scale black holes through hierarchical merging of smaller progenitors. This work laid groundwork for models reconciling observed quasar luminosities with limited for accretion. A pivotal advancement came in 2003, when Loeb collaborated with Volker Bromm on the (DCBH) scenario, positing that in primordial galaxies exposed to intense radiation, atomic cooling is suppressed, preventing fragmentation into and instead channeling the entire gas mass—up to $10^5 masses—into a single atomic cooling halo that collapses directly into a massive seed . This mechanism allows seed SMBHs to form efficiently at redshifts z > 10, enabling subsequent super-Eddington accretion to match the masses of high-redshift s observed before cosmic . The model predicts quasar activity in low-spin, metal-free halos, distinguishing it from stellar remnant seeding pathways that require longer growth timescales. In parallel, Loeb's work with J. Stuart B. Wyithe examined self-regulated SMBH growth in galactic nuclei, demonstrating how from accretion disks limits runaway expansion while sustaining luminosity functions across optical and bands. This framework integrates radiative and mechanical to explain the observed population without invoking unrealistically high initial seeds, aligning empirical luminosity distributions with first-principles accretion physics. Loeb has continued refining these ideas, noting in recent analyses that detections of over-massive black holes at z \approx 10—such as those exceeding $10^9 solar masses—bolster DCBH viability over slower hierarchical merger models, as they imply seeds formed via rapid, high-efficiency channels rather than prolonged stellar-mass accumulation. Beyond theoretical modeling, Loeb founded Harvard's Initiative in 2016, an interdisciplinary center uniting physicists, philosophers, and mathematicians to probe fundamentals, including paradoxes and cosmological implications of SMBHs. This effort has advanced multimessenger studies, such as signatures from early SMBH binaries and environmental impacts on habitable zones near galactic centers. His over 800 publications, including those on SMBH seeding and evolution, underscore a commitment to causal mechanisms grounded in hydrodynamical simulations and observational constraints, challenging paradigms reliant on undetected intermediate-mass populations.

Galaxy Formation and Feedback Mechanisms

Loeb's research on galaxy formation emphasizes the hierarchical assembly of structures from primordial density fluctuations in the early universe, where dark matter halos collapse to form the gravitational wells hosting the first stars and galaxies. In models developed by Loeb and collaborators, the first galaxies emerge around redshift z \sim 10-20, with masses on the order of $10^8-10^9 M_\odot, driven by atomic cooling in metal-poor gas rather than molecular hydrogen dissociation. This framework incorporates radiative transfer simulations showing how the ultraviolet background from early stars photodissociates H_2, suppressing fragmentation and favoring massive star formation. Stellar feedback mechanisms, including explosions and , play a pivotal role in regulating efficiency within these proto-galaxies. Loeb's analyses demonstrate that mechanical from supernovae expels low-metallicity gas, reducing the baryonic content available for further collapse and enforcing a self-limiting cycle in progenitors. from emission, produced by high-mass X-ray binaries in the first stellar populations, ionizes and heats surrounding intergalactic medium, facilitating further gas accretion onto halos and enhancing subsequent galaxy growth. These processes are quantified through semi-analytic models, predicting escape fractions of ionizing photons around 10-20% from early galaxies, crucial for . Supermassive black hole (SMBH) feedback emerges as a dominant regulator in more massive galaxies, where active galactic nuclei (AGN) inject energy via outflows and radiation, quenching star formation. Loeb co-developed theories positing that SMBHs grow self-regulated until their Eddington-limited accretion unbinds the host galaxy's gas reservoir, capping black hole masses at \sim 0.1\% of the spheroid's stellar mass, as observed in local ellipticals. In gas-rich dwarf galaxies, early AGN feedback from intermediate-mass black holes ($10^3-10^5 M_\odot) prevents excessive starbursts, aligning simulated luminosity functions with observations from surveys like SDSS. Hydrodynamic simulations incorporating these mechanisms reproduce the observed M-sigma relation, where SMBH mass correlates tightly with host velocity dispersion, underscoring causal links between black hole activity and galaxy morphology. Loeb's work integrates these feedback loops into cosmological contexts, highlighting tensions with observations of high-redshift quasars hosting $10^9 M_\odot SMBHs by z \sim 7, implying rapid seed growth or direct collapse mechanisms amplified by minimal feedback suppression in pristine environments. Empirical tests from JWST data on early galaxy sizes and metallicities support his predictions of feedback-limited assembly, challenging purely merger-driven models by emphasizing internal baryon cycling.

Perspectives on Extraterrestrial Intelligence

Philosophical and Methodological Approach

Avi Loeb's philosophical approach to emphasizes cosmic modesty, positing that humanity's position in the is unexceptional given the prevalence of Earth-like around approximately 25% of , thereby challenging anthropocentric assumptions that render intelligent life exceedingly rare. He argues that scientific inquiry into whether we are alone should prioritize foundational questions through rather than preconceived notions of rarity, drawing on first-principles reasoning to evaluate anomalies without a priori dismissal of technological origins. This stance critiques institutional in astronomy, where and misapplications of criteria like "" have historically sidelined innovative pursuits, as seen in past resistance to paradigm-shifting ideas such as . Methodologically, Loeb advocates expanding beyond traditional SETI's narrow emphasis on detecting radio signals from active civilizations, which overlooks the possibility of extinct societies whose artifacts could persist as detectable relics. He promotes astro-archaeology, a framework for systematically searching the solar system and for technosignatures such as lightsails, artificial illumination, or debris from advanced probes, exemplified by his that the 2017 'Oumuamua exhibited properties—elongated shape, high reflectivity, and non-gravitational acceleration—better explained by artificial origin than natural comet models. This approach insists on template-free searches and rigorous testing, allocating 10-20% of astronomical resources to high-risk, high-reward endeavors like intercepting future visitors with missions akin to . Loeb's methodology integrates modern observational tools, such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time commencing in 2023, to catalog anomalies for follow-up analysis, underscoring that even improbable hypotheses advance science if they yield testable predictions and foster technological innovation. He contends that funding disparities—billions directed toward microbial biosignatures via projects like the Habitable Worlds Observatory versus negligible support for hunts—reflect cultural biases rather than evidential merit, urging reintegration of intelligence-focused into mainstream decadal surveys with public accountability. This evidence-centric paradigm prioritizes causal explanations grounded in observed data over consensus-driven conservatism, positioning the search for as a driver of broader astrophysical progress.

Critique of Conventional SETI Paradigms

Loeb contends that conventional efforts are hampered by anthropocentric biases, which assume extraterrestrial intelligences (ETI) would employ communication technologies mirroring mid-20th-century human developments, such as deliberate radio transmissions. This presumes cosmic significance for , a notion Loeb deems pretentious given that billions of stars formed billions of years before , potentially hosting advanced civilizations long predating . He argues that such assumptions discourage scrutiny of the foundational validity of SETI's narrow methodological framework, favoring incremental refinements over paradigm reevaluation. A core limitation, according to Loeb, lies in the overreliance on passive radio searches for signals, which overlook diverse technosignatures including physical artifacts, industrial pollutants detectable in spectra, or artificial lights from exoplanetary systems. Conventional approaches neglect ""—the proactive hunt for relics of extinct technological societies—such as interstellar probes or that could outnumber active signals due to the longevity of material evidence over transient broadcasts. Loeb cites the 2017 1I/'Oumuamua as an exemplar, where its anomalous non-gravitational acceleration and shape prompted hypotheses of artificial origin, yet were dismissed in favor of natural explanations without sufficient empirical testing. Loeb further critiques the handling of the within discourse, viewing it not as evidence of rarity but as a call for empirical humility amid vast cosmic timescales that render human-era silence uninformative. He advocates shifting resources toward multifaceted searches, including missions like for flyby reconnaissance of nearby stars and comprehensive monitoring of interstellar objects for engineered features. This broader strategy, Loeb maintains, aligns with scientific first-principles by prioritizing observable evidence over preconceived models of ETI behavior.

Investigations of Interstellar Objects

The ‘Oumuamua Anomaly and Hypotheses

, formally designated 1I/2017 U1, was discovered on October 19, 2017, by the telescope in , marking the first confirmed to pass through the Solar System. Its indicated an origin beyond the Solar System, with an inbound velocity of approximately 26 km/s relative to the Sun, exceeding the . Observations revealed several anomalies: an elongated, cigar-like shape with an estimated aspect ratio of 10:1 or greater, extreme tumbling motion, absence of cometary such as dust or gas tails despite perihelion proximity to the Sun at 0.25 AU on September 9, 2017, and a non-gravitational equivalent to about 0.1% of solar gravity, which deviated from purely Keplerian motion. These properties distinguished it from typical Solar System asteroids or comets, prompting diverse explanatory hypotheses. Avi Loeb, in collaboration with Shmuel Bialy, proposed in a 2018 Astrophysical Journal Letters paper that the object's acceleration could result from solar radiation pressure acting on a thin, sheet-like structure, akin to a with low mass-to-area ratio. Loeb argued this scenario fits the observed lack of outgassing and the object's brightness variations, suggesting it might represent defunct technological debris from an extraterrestrial civilization, such as a probe fragmented by interstellar dust. In subsequent work, including a 2022 paper, Loeb enumerated six key anomalies—interstellar origin, without dynamical disturbance, elongated shape, outgassing-free acceleration, non-detection of radio signals despite targeted searches, and extreme —and contended that natural explanations, like fragments of nitrogen ice from exo-Plutos or molecular outgassing, require rare compositions unsupported by prior precedents and fail to fully account for all data without ad hoc assumptions. He emphasized that the artificial hypothesis parsimoniously explains the anomalies through radiation pressure on a manufactured thin , without invoking unobserved volatile ices. Critics, including proponents of natural models, counter that favors prosaic origins over extraterrestrial technology absent direct evidence like artificial signals or structured composition, with simulations showing hydrogen ice evaporation could produce the acceleration via thermal processes. Loeb has responded that such natural models emerged post-discovery as reactive fits to data, whereas the hypothesis was proposed early based on empirical observations, and he advocates for future missions or telescopes like the to test for metallic surfaces or artificial signatures in similar objects. No consensus exists, but Loeb's position underscores the need to consider technosignatures empirically rather than dismissing them due to paradigm constraints.

Interstellar Meteor IM1 Expedition and Spherules

The interstellar meteor IM1, cataloged as , was detected entering Earth's atmosphere on January 8, 2014, over the western near , with an estimated impact energy equivalent to 7.2 tons of . Trajectory reconstruction from declassified U.S. government sensor data, including seismic and recordings, yielded a excess of approximately 45 km/s relative to , exceeding the solar and indicating an extrasolar origin independent of Earth's gravitational influence. In response, Avi Loeb, in collaboration with , secured permission from the Government of and organized an expedition to search for surviving fragments along the predicted on the ocean floor. The expedition deployed in June 2023 aboard the research vessel Silver Star, employing a magnetic to dredge from depths of 1–2 km within a 100 km corridor centered on , guided by refined trajectory models incorporating local seismic data from a nearby station. Over 11 days of operations, the team collected 850 subsamples totaling 35 kg of seabed material, yielding approximately 700 spherules with diameters ranging from 0.05 to 1.3 mm, exhibiting a yield per background mass that was 10–100 times higher near the IM1 path compared to regions. Of these, 57 were subjected to initial scanning electron microscopy and , revealing morphologies consistent with rapid atmospheric ablation, including surface dendrites indicative of millisecond-scale heating events. Compositional analysis of the spherules, particularly a subset enriched in (Be), (La), and (U)—dubbed "BeLaU" spherules—showed elevated levels of these rare earth elements alongside high iron content (up to 84% by onboard ) and negligible , distinguishing them from typical fly ash or volcanic sources. Loeb and colleagues argued that the BeLaU enrichment, with and abundances 10–100 times ratios, points to an extrasolar , as no known terrestrial or processes produce such metal combinations without . A subsequent peer-reviewed study classified 78% of 745 analyzed spherules as primitive, unaffected by , with atomic Mg-Si-Fe ratios plotting outside standard meteoritic fields, further supporting an undepleted, origin potentially from a differentiated extrasolar . These findings were detailed in a 2023 preprint and corroborated by laboratory validations, estimating IM1's pre-entry radius at ~0.5 m based on ablation mass of ~5 × 10^5 g derived from fireball energetics. While Loeb posits the spherules as fragments of interstellar technological or natural origin, alternative interpretations attribute the seismic signals to terrestrial sources like truck vibrations and the compositions to anthropogenic pollution, though control samples from distant Pacific sites showed no such enrichments. Follow-up expeditions were planned for 2024 to collect larger fragments and refine classifications.

3I/ATLAS Object and Recent Claims

The interstellar object designated 3I/ATLAS, the third confirmed visitor from outside the Solar System following 1I/ʻOumuamua and 2I/Borisov, was detected by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) survey in early 2025. Its hyperbolic trajectory, with an eccentricity greater than 1, confirms its interstellar origin, originating from the direction of the constellation Cetus at an estimated speed of approximately 30 km/s relative to the Sun. Observations indicate a nucleus size on the order of hundreds of kilometers, unusually large for interstellar objects, and an orbit unusually aligned with the ecliptic plane of the inner Solar System planets, with a low probability (estimated at 1/500) of occurring by chance for a random interstellar trajectory. Hubble Space Telescope imaging revealed diffuse emission extending ahead of its direction of motion toward the Sun, rather than the typical trailing cometary tail, prompting questions about outgassing dynamics or non-gravitational forces. Avi Loeb has proposed that 3I/ATLAS exhibits multiple anomalies inconsistent with conventional models, including its size, orbital flatness, lack of expected tidal disruption near perihelion (reached on October 21, 2025), and persistence of structural integrity amid solar coronal mass ejections that would typically alter a comet's path. In a July 2025 , Loeb calculated a 0.005% probability for a origin matching all observed properties under standard astrophysical assumptions, advocating empirical testing of the artificial hypothesis through and to detect engineered materials or signatures. He described the object as a potential "" event, likening it to a "" that could introduce microbes or , urging preparation for non- explanations given the low of natural fits. Post-perihelion observations as of October , including changes in its apparent tail structure and trajectory stability despite solar activity, have led Loeb to speculate on possible deceleration maneuvers, such as "slamming on the brakes" to enter around Mars, with estimated probabilities for artificial origins ranging from 30-40% in public statements, though he acknowledges the hypothesis as simplest absent definitive evidence. Loeb has criticized institutional in release, suggesting on October 24, , that might withhold spectroscopic details post-October 29 to avoid paradigm-shifting implications, emphasizing the need for independent verification via projects like Galileo to prioritize over consensus. Mainstream analyses, including from , attribute features to cometary activity, such as anisotropic causing forward emission, and dismiss artificial claims as unsubstantiated given the absence of confirmed non-gravitational or anomalous in available spectra.

The Galileo Project

Project Launch and Technological Framework

The Galileo Project was publicly announced by Avi Loeb on July 26, 2021, in a Scientific American op-ed, prompted by the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence's preliminary assessment on unidentified aerial phenomena released earlier that year and the 2017 detection of the interstellar object 'Oumuamua. The initiative seeks to apply empirical astronomical methods to detect potential extraterrestrial technological artifacts in Earth's atmosphere, on the Moon, or within the solar system, emphasizing verifiable data over speculative paradigms. Loeb positioned the project as a response to the limitations of passive radio searches in SETI, advocating for active, multi-modal monitoring of nearby space. The technological framework centers on deploying a of low-cost, ground-based observatories to achieve continuous, all-sky surveillance. Each observatory class unit integrates wide-field optical telescopes for high-resolution imaging of fast-moving objects, supplemented by sensors, radio antennas for signal detection, magnetometers, microphones for acoustic signatures, and detectors for energetic particles. These instruments operate across multiple wavelengths and modalities to capture correlated data on unidentified phenomena, enabling differentiation between prosaic explanations like or balloons and anomalous signatures. The system's design prioritizes scalability, with initial prototypes installed at sites such as the roof of Harvard College Observatory in , in 2022. Data processing relies on and algorithms to filter vast datasets in real-time, flagging events for human review based on deviation from calibrated baselines of natural and activity. This framework supports three primary research tracks: high-resolution multi-detector imaging of atmospheric , searches for thin-sheet artifacts via gravitational lensing, and monitoring for transients like meteors or comets. By 2024, the project had collected data on over half a million objects, demonstrating the feasibility of systematic without relying on anecdotal reports.

Expeditions, Data Collection, and Preliminary Results

The Galileo Project initiated data collection through its first observatory deployed on the roof of the Harvard College Observatory in Cambridge, Massachusetts, featuring an all-sky monitoring system known as Dalek, comprising eight uncooled infrared cameras supplemented by optical, radio, magnetic, and audio sensors. Observations commenced in January 2024 and continued through May 2024, yielding trajectories for approximately 500,000 aerial objects. Data processing employed machine-learning , including for and SORT for trajectory reconstruction, calibrated against ADS-B aircraft signals, followed by an detection to identify deviations from expected patterns. Detection efficiency varied with factors such as weather conditions, object distance, and size, with sensitivity enabling nighttime monitoring but limiting precise ranging without multi-station . Preliminary analysis flagged 16% of trajectories (about 80,000) as outliers, with 144 remaining ambiguous after filtering; an upper bound of 18,271 outliers was estimated at 95% confidence. No objects were conclusively identified as unidentified aerial phenomena () exhibiting non-mundane characteristics, such as those defying known or ; Loeb noted that ambiguities persist due to distance measurement gaps but emphasized empirical sensor data over anecdotal reports. To expand coverage, the project secured a $575,000 grant from the Foundation in April 2024 for a third instrument station in , with plans for additional observatories to enable stereoscopic ranging and refined UAP classification within months. Ongoing efforts focus on integrating multi-modal and public data release for independent verification, prioritizing quantifiable anomalies over speculative interpretations.

Controversies and Responses

Criticisms from the Scientific Establishment

Astronomers have criticized Avi Loeb for advancing hypotheses of technology with insufficient empirical support, prioritizing speculative interpretations over established natural explanations. , an astronomer at , described Loeb's claims about objects as "terribly naive" and often "incorrect," arguing that they lack evidence and dismiss expert analyses of natural origins. Similarly, physicist characterized Loeb's arguments as "thin," relying on anomaly hunting—such as improbable orbital alignments—without accounting for selection biases or broader contextual probabilities, leading the to dismiss them as unconvincing. Regarding 'Oumuamua, critics contend that Loeb's hypothesis ignores viable natural mechanisms for its non-gravitational acceleration, such as hydrogen outgassing from irradiated water ice, which aligns with observations of its low and tumbling motion. Paul Sutter, a cosmologist, highlighted Loeb's refusal to engage with these alternatives, noting inconsistencies like the object's dynamics that contradict artificial artifact models, and criticized unsubstantiated probability claims (e.g., "one in a trillion" uniqueness) lacking methodological transparency. Wright further asserted there is "little to no " for artificiality, viewing Loeb's portrayals as misleading to the public and dismissive of expertise. Loeb's IM1 expedition drew rebukes for methodological shortcomings, including reliance on unverified U.S. seismic from a single station, later identified as truck vibrations rather than an impact signal. Astrophysicist detailed how the recovered spherules' compositions—matching terrestrial coal ash and ancient sandstone—fall on the System's line, indicating earthly origins from or industrial activity rather than , rendering claims of exotic alloys like BeLaU untenable. Critics, including , labeled the persistence in assertions despite these rebuttals as an embarrassment to rigorous science. The Galileo Project's focus on unidentified aerial phenomena has been faulted for veering into , with peers accusing Loeb of that elevates unverified anecdotes over controlled data collection. and others expressed frustration at Loeb's self-presentation as a paradigm-shifting outsider, which they see as undermining collaborative scientific norms and fueling public without advancing testable predictions. These critiques underscore a broader establishment view that Loeb's approach contravenes by favoring complex artificial scenarios absent compelling disproof of simpler, natural ones.

Defenses Based on Empirical Evidence and Paradigm Challenges

Loeb and his collaborators defend their interpretations of interstellar objects by emphasizing verifiable observational anomalies that deviate from expectations for natural solar system bodies. For 1I/'Oumuamua, discovered on October 19, 2017, and telescopic revealed a highly elongated shape with an exceeding 5:1, extreme tumbling, and non-gravitational acceleration equivalent to about $5 \times 10^{-6} m/s² without detectable or , as quantified in post-discovery analyses from and Spitzer observations. These features, Loeb argues, align quantitatively with on a thin, reflective sheet—potentially artificial—rather than requiring unobserved , which would demand an implausibly large subsurface reservoir given 'Oumuamua's estimated mass of $10^{11} kg. Independent modeling supports that natural explanations strain dynamical constraints, leaving room for engineered origins until refuted by further . In the case of interstellar meteor IM1 (CNEOS 2014-01-08), detected on January 8, 2014, with a of 45 km/s relative to the local standard of rest exceeding 90% of the escape speed from the solar system, empirical recovery efforts yielded over 700 spherules from the floor during a June 2023 expedition. Electron microscopy and analysis of these millimeter-sized objects, published in August 2023, identified compositions enriched in (Be), (La), and (U)—up to 30 times solar abundances in some samples—with atomic ratios defying known alloys or solar system meteorites like CI chondrites. A follow-up September 2024 study in Chemical Geology classified 22% of spherules as differentiated, with rare earth elements suggesting extrasolar provenance, countering claims of terrestrial by magnetic sifting and control samples from nearby ship tracks. Loeb maintains these metallic beads, formed at temperatures above 2000 K, provide direct physical artifacts for isotopic testing, prioritizing material evidence over dismissal as industrial debris. The bolsters these defenses through proactive instrumentation, deploying since July 2021 all-sky optical and infrared cameras, radio receivers, and radars at multiple sites to capture high-fidelity data on unidentified aerial phenomena () and potential interstellar visitors. Unlike passive reliant on targeted signals, this framework—outlined in a overview—enables empirical falsification by resolving trajectories to sub-arcsecond precision and distinguishing artificial from natural objects via multi-wavelength signatures, with initial Vermont observatory data collection starting in 2022. Loeb cites this as a response to evidentiary voids in government reports, such as the 2021 ODNI noting 143 unexplained cases, arguing systematic monitoring will quantify false positives and reveal patterns invisible to sporadic sightings. Challenging entrenched paradigms, Loeb contends that conventional SETI's electromagnetic bias—focusing on deliberate beacons—overlooks passive artifacts like probes or relics, akin to assuming ancient civilizations left only radio messages. He advocates "space archaeology" for solar system surveys, noting interstellar objects arrive at rates of one per decade within Neptune's orbit, per 'Oumuamua's hyperbolic trajectory parameters (v_\infty \approx 26 km/s), urging missions to intercept future candidates like 2I/Borisov or 3I/ATLAS for in-situ sampling. This paradigm shift, Loeb asserts, mirrors historical resistance to heliocentrism or plate tectonics, where anomalies preceded acceptance; he documents in analyses how 'Oumuamua debates exhibit similar sociological inertia, with empirical priors favoring natural origins despite fitting artificial models equally well. Critics' a priori rejection, he argues, violates falsifiability by weighting consensus over data, as evidenced by rejections of early meteorite validations in the 19th century. Proponents, including Loeb's co-authors, emphasize that extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, but anomalies like IM1's velocity and spherule geochemistry merit hypothesis-testing over exclusion, fostering interdisciplinary rigor.

Public Engagement and Broader Impact

Books, Media Appearances, and Advocacy

Loeb has authored popular science books that extend his scientific arguments on interstellar objects and extraterrestrial technology to broader audiences. In Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth, published on January 26, 2021, by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, he posits that the anomalous properties of 'Oumuamua—such as its non-gravitational acceleration and elongated shape—warrant consideration of artificial origins over natural explanations like a hydrogen iceberg, drawing on observational data from telescopes including Hubble and Spitzer. His follow-up, Interstellar: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life and Our Future in the Stars, released on August 29, 2023, by Mariner Books, advocates for humanity's expansion into interstellar space as a survival imperative, detailing strategies for detecting extraterrestrial artifacts and critiquing institutional barriers to such pursuits. These works, alongside his nine total books, emphasize empirical evidence over speculative dismissal in astrobiology. Loeb frequently appears in media to defend data-driven hypotheses on unidentified phenomena. On the Podcast episode released January 13, 2021, he discussed 'Oumuamua's potential as technology and broader implications for black holes and human readiness for contact. In a January 25, 2021, interview on Sean Carroll's Mindscape , he elaborated on taking artifact claims seriously, contrasting them with traditional SETI's focus on radio signals. More recently, on the aired September 1, 2023, he argued for evidence of technology based on visitors. In 2025 appearances, including a March 22 on hunting artifacts and an August 25 discussion on visitors, Loeb addressed ongoing expeditions and recent objects like 3I/ATLAS. He has also debated skeptics, such as in a September 4, 2025, exchange with on whether 3I/ATLAS indicates technology. Through advocacy, Loeb challenges scientific orthodoxy on searches, promoting inclusion of physical artifacts and unidentified aerial phenomena () in mainstream inquiry. He co-signed a , 2025, urging integration of and research to overcome stigma and foster interdisciplinary evidence collection. In a July 29, 2021, profile, he emphasized rigorous, stigma-free study of as essential for advancing knowledge, independent of cultural biases. Loeb's Medium essays, such as a November 6, 2024, piece critiquing 's exclusion of discussions, highlight how institutional reluctance—often rooted in aversion to non-natural explanations—hinders empirical progress. His efforts extend to calling for expanded funding and observational infrastructure beyond radio-based , as outlined in his writings on fresh perspectives for detecting technological signatures.

Influence on Public Discourse and Policy

Loeb's advocacy for rigorous scientific scrutiny of unidentified anomalous phenomena (s) has contributed to heightened congressional attention, including his prepared statement to the House Oversight and Accountability Committee in 2024, where he offered testimony emphasizing empirical data collection over dismissal of anomalous observations. His proposal for a "UAP-Manhattan Project"—a large-scale, coordinated government effort modeled on historical scientific initiatives to analyze UAP artifacts and signatures—aims to address perceived gaps in official investigations by prioritizing multidisciplinary analysis and transparency. In discussions surrounding U.S. government UAP reports, Loeb has urged policymakers to defer to independent scientific methodologies rather than military-centric approaches, arguing that the 2021 Office of the Director of National Intelligence preliminary assessment underscored the need for verifiable data over speculation. He has criticized the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) for insufficient progress in resolving cases despite access to classified data, as highlighted in congressional contexts where witnesses, including those aligned with Loeb's empirical framework, called for enhanced scientific integration. These positions have aligned with broader pushes for legislative measures, such as increased funding for UAP research and declassification protocols, evident in 2025 proposals for new hearings and bills amid ongoing drone and UAP incidents. The Galileo Project's deployment of all-sky observatories has modeled a policy-relevant alternative to government monopolies on data, influencing discourse by demonstrating how private academic initiatives can yield preliminary datasets—such as observations of over 500,000 objects by late 2024—potentially informing federal standards for . Loeb's emphasis on public access to has pressured policymakers toward greater openness, countering historical , though critics contend such efforts risk amplifying unverified claims without proportional institutional adoption. His interventions have thus elevated from fringe topics to elements of national security policy debates, as seen in repeated engagements since 2023.

Recognition and Legacy

Honors, Awards, and Professional Accolades

Loeb was awarded the in 2002 by the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, recognizing his contributions to theoretical . In 2011–2012, he received the Cattedra Galileiana lectureship from the Scuola Normale Superiore in , , where he delivered a series of lectures on cosmology and in the . The granted Loeb the 2013 Chambliss Astronomical Writing Award for his book How Did the First Stars and Galaxies Form?, honoring outstanding astronomical writing accessible to the broader community. In 2015, Loeb was appointed Science Theory Director for the of the Breakthrough Prize Foundation, overseeing theoretical aspects of projects aimed at interstellar exploration and fundamental physics. Loeb was elected a of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2019, joining distinguished scholars in recognition of his scholarly achievements in and . His 2021 book Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth received the 2023 Cosmos Prize from , acknowledging its role in advancing public understanding of potential . Loeb holds endowed positions including the Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science at and the Sackler Professorship by Special Appointment at , reflecting sustained institutional recognition of his leadership in theoretical science. He also served as chair of Harvard's Department of Astronomy from 2011 to 2020, the longest tenure in its history.

References

  1. [1]
    Avi Loeb | Department of Astronomy
    Abraham (Avi) Loeb is the Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science at Harvard University and a bestselling author (in lists of the New York Times,Wall ...
  2. [2]
    Professor Abraham (Avi) Loeb
    Abraham (Avi) Loeb is the Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science at Harvard University and a bestselling author (in lists of the New York Times,Wall ...
  3. [3]
    Staying Young at 62 Out of 13.8-Billion Years | by Avi Loeb | Medium
    Feb 26, 2024 · Because today I turned 62 years old. This age delivers a numerical coincidence with its digits `6' and `2' as I was born on 26/2/62. The ...
  4. [4]
    Avi Loeb - Black Hole Initiative - Harvard University
    Abraham (Avi) Loeb is the Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science at Harvard University and a New York Times bestselling author.
  5. [5]
    https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/galileo
  6. [6]
    [PDF] On the Possibility of an Artificial Origin for `Oumuamua
    Ridiculing the notion that `Oumuamua may have been artificial in origin will not get rid of our neighbors (Loeb 2021).
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Autobiographical sketch Parents
    Oct 2, 2017 · Abraham (Avi) Loeb is the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University. Loeb published 4 books and nearly 600 papers with.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  8. [8]
    Cosmic Generosity in Stippled Watercolors | by Avi Loeb | Oct, 2025
    Oct 14, 2025 · I grew up in Israel on our family's farm in Beit Hanan, a village about fifteen miles south of Tel Aviv. It is an agricultural community ...
  9. [9]
    If True, This Could Be One of the Greatest Discoveries in Human ...
    Jan 16, 2019 · Abraham Loeb, 56, was born in Beit Hanan, a moshav in central Israel, and studied physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem as part of ...
  10. [10]
    https://www.jewishjournal.org/2023/10/26/israeli-born-harvard-physicist-reaches-beyond-the-stars/
  11. [11]
    The Harvard prof who insists we are not alone - ISRAEL21c
    Mar 4, 2021 · Loeb's life trajectory began in an Israeli farming village, Moshav Hanan, south of Tel Aviv. His boyhood afternoons were spent collecting eggs ...Missing: self- | Show results with:self-
  12. [12]
    From Farm to High Table - Avi Loeb
    Dec 26, 2023 · From Farm to High Table As my ... Students and principals of the Zarkor school, Beit Hannan, Israel, with Avi Loeb (December 26, 2023).
  13. [13]
    The Galilei Project, Extraterrestrial and Oumuamua | David Rosenthal
    Nov 1, 2021 · Avi Loeb: I was born on a farm (moshav) Beit Hanan in Israel and I went to school every afternoon, when I was little I was passionate about ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Profile of Avi Loeb By Abigail Klein Leichman If aliens aboard a ...
    Growing up on a farm in a small Israeli village, Loeb would load up a tractor with books each weekend and go out to the fields to read. “I was always interested ...
  15. [15]
    Avi Loeb - American Friends of the Hebrew University
    Oct 24, 2018 · Born in 1962, Abraham (Avi) Loeb was raised on his family farm in Beit Hanan, located in central Israel. A precocious young man, Avi was ...
  16. [16]
    The Wonder of Avi Loeb - Smithsonian Magazine
    As a nature-loving farm boy who idolized his mother, Loeb felt like a misfit among Israeli men. He proudly notes that he was a high school athlete and excelled ...
  17. [17]
    Taking Aliens Seriously, with Avi Loeb - UChicago News
    May 6, 2021 · I'm your host, Paul Rand. Avi Loeb grew up in a small farming village, outside Tel Aviv. As a kid, he would work on the farm during the day and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Avi Loeb Prepared His Whole Life To Find What's Beyond Earth
    Feb 1, 2024 · But Loeb's early ambitions to become a philosophy professor were derailed during his mandatory military service. Because of his good grades ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] CURRICULUM VITAE Abraham Loeb Field of Research: Theoretical ...
    Oct 30, 2024 · Positions Held. 2012–. Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science, Harvard University. 2007–. Director, Institute for Theory and Computation ...
  20. [20]
    Avi Loeb | Institute for Theory and Computation - Harvard University
    Avi Loeb is the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University. He was Former Chair (2011-2020) of the Department of Astronomy.
  21. [21]
    Avi Loeb - Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
    Loeb wrote 8 books and over 800 papers on a wide range of topics, including black holes, the first stars, the search for extraterrestrial life and the future of ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Avi Loeb Ponders the Early Universe, Nature and Life - NYTim...
    Among astrophysicists, Abraham Loeb is known for his creative and prolific attempts to understand the early universe.
  23. [23]
    Did the Infant Universe Resemble a Needle or a Sphere? | by Avi Loeb
    Oct 22, 2023 · Over the past four decades, cosmologists collected vast amounts of data on the anisotropies of the relic radiation from the Big Bang, the cosmic ...
  24. [24]
    Death by a Primordial Black Hole - Avi Loeb - Medium
    Mar 7, 2025 · The cosmic formation time of smaller black holes is proportional to their mass, because the horizon radius scales linearly with black hole mass.
  25. [25]
    Excluding Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Based on Solar ...
    Aug 20, 2024 · Current cosmological constraints allow primordial black holes (PBHs) to constitute dark matter in the mass range of 10^{18}-10^{22}g.
  26. [26]
    [2409.09081] Quantum-Mechanical Suppression of Accretion ... - arXiv
    Sep 10, 2024 · Quantum-Mechanical Suppression of Accretion by Primordial Black Holes. Authors:Abraham Loeb (Harvard).
  27. [27]
    Quantum-mechanical Suppression of Accretion by Primordial Black ...
    1. Introduction. Current cosmological constraints allow for the possibility that dark matter is made of primordial black holes (PBHs) in the asteroid mass range ...
  28. [28]
    [1312.0613] The Habitable Epoch of the Early Universe - arXiv
    Dec 2, 2013 · The possibility of life starting when the average matter density was a million times bigger than it is today argues against the anthropic explanation.
  29. [29]
    When Did Life Start in the Universe? | by Avi Loeb - Medium
    Apr 15, 2024 · The latest data from the Webb telescope suggests that the first stars formed about a hundred million years after the Big Bang.
  30. [30]
    https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=CvQxOmwAAAAJ&citation_for_view=CvQxOmwAAAAJ:3fE2CSJIrl8C
  31. [31]
    Formation of the First Supermassive Black Holes - IOPscience
    Low-spin galaxies form a single black hole instead. These early black holes lead to quasar activity before the epoch of reionization. Primordial black hole ...
  32. [32]
    Why Are Early Black Holes Over-Massive? | by Avi Loeb - Medium
    Oct 20, 2024 · Why is this black hole over-massive at such an early cosmic time when compared to nearby black holes? Get Avi Loeb's stories in your inbox. Join ...Missing: publications | Show results with:publications
  33. [33]
    [astro-ph/0212400] Formation of the First Supermassive Black Holes
    Dec 18, 2002 · Abstract: We consider the physical conditions under which supermassive black holes could have formed inside the first galaxies.<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] The First Galaxies in the Universe
    Stellar Feedback and Galaxy Formation. 180. 6.1 The Ultraviolet Background and H2 Photodissociation. 180. 6.2 The X-Ray Background: Positive Feedback. 190. 6.3 ...Missing: Avi mechanisms
  35. [35]
    Stellar Feedback and Galaxy Formation - ResearchGate
    This chapter studies radiative, mechanical, and chemical feedback in the earliest gaseous clouds, taking up the thread of discussion in the previous chapter ...
  36. [36]
    radiative feedback from the first sources of light
    Wood & Loeb (2000) [387] used a three-dimensional radiation transfer code to calculate the steady-state escape fraction of ionizing photons from disk galaxies ...Missing: Avi mechanisms
  37. [37]
    Self-regulated Growth of Supermassive Black Holes in Galaxies as ...
    We postulate that supermassive black holes grow in the centers of galaxies until they unbind the galactic gas that feeds them.
  38. [38]
    Feedback by Massive Black Holes in Gas-rich Dwarf Galaxies
    I argue that current observations of active galactic nuclei in dwarfs allow such a radical hypothesis that provides early feedback during the epoch of galaxy ...
  39. [39]
    Supermassive Black Hole Feedback in Galaxies
    Provides new insights into the formation and evolution of galaxies and, in particular the way accretion onto their nuclear supermassive black holes provides ...
  40. [40]
    The Cosmic Race Between Stars and Black Holes - Avi Loeb - Medium
    Jan 6, 2024 · High-redshift galaxies are found to contain over-massive black holes relative to expectations from the local Universe. This confirms the ...Get Avi Loeb's Stories In... · Responses (8) · More From Avi Loeb
  41. [41]
    Avi Loeb: The Origins of Galaxies - Smithsonian Magazine
    Abraham (Avi) Loeb is a professor of astronomy at Harvard University. Born in Israel in 1962, he is one of the pioneers in the field of early star and ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] (SETI) - Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
    A fresh perspective is required in the Search for Extraterrestrial. Intelligence (SETI). This chapter explains the importance of this innovative SETI approach, ...
  43. [43]
    Astronomer Avi Loeb Says Aliens Have Visited, and He's Not Kidding
    Feb 1, 2021 · In conversation, the Harvard University professor explains his shocking hypothesis—and calls out what he sees as a crisis in science.
  44. [44]
    From Extraterrestrial Microbes to Alien Intelligence - Avi Loeb
    Jul 23, 2025 · Path dependence operates through multiple mechanisms. First, the absence of extraterrestrial intelligence technosignature experts in funding ...
  45. [45]
    Interstellar Archaeology - Avi Loeb
    Aug 4, 2022 · The Galileo Project will develop software that will identify interstellar objects that do not resemble familiar asteroids or comets from the ...
  46. [46]
    10 Things: Mysterious 'Oumuamua - NASA Science
    Jul 2, 2018 · The object known as 1I/2017 U1 (and nicknamed 'Oumuamua) was traveling too fast (196,000 mph, that's 54 miles per second or 87.3 kilometers per ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Six Strange Facts about our First Interstellar Guest, `Oumuamua
    Nov 30, 2018 · The six anomalies exhibited by this weird object since its discovery imply that it is nothing like the garden variety of asteroids or comets ...
  48. [48]
    [2110.15213] On the Possibility of an Artificial Origin for `Oumuamua
    Oct 20, 2021 · The first large interstellar object discovered near Earth, Oumuamua, showed half a dozen anomalies relative to comets or asteroids in the Solar system.
  49. [49]
    On the Possibility of an Artificial Origin for 'Oumuamua - PubMed
    'Oumuamua's anomalies suggest that it might have been a thin craft-with a large area per unit mass-pushed by the reflection of sunlight; sharing qualities with ...
  50. [50]
    A surprisingly simple explanation for interstellar visitor 'Oumuamua's ...
    Apr 3, 2023 · Because 'Oumuamua's brightness changed periodically and varied asymmetrically, it was assumed to be highly elongated and tumbling end over end.
  51. [51]
    Scientific Paradigm Resistance: Evidence from the 'Oumuamua ...
    Jul 9, 2025 · The 'Oumuamua case exemplifies this phenomenon, where the astronomical community's response revealed systematic bias favoring natural ...
  52. [52]
    [2308.15623] Discovery of Spherules of Likely Extrasolar ... - arXiv
    Aug 29, 2023 · Discovery of Spherules of Likely Extrasolar Composition in the Pacific Ocean Site of the CNEOS 2014-01-08 (IM1) Bolide. Authors:Abraham Loeb, ...
  53. [53]
    Spherule analysis finds evidence of extrasolar composition
    Aug 29, 2023 · The expedition retrieved spherules with a yield per background mass that increased the count of spherules near IM1's path significantly. Using a ...
  54. [54]
    Chemical classification of spherules recovered from the Pacific ...
    Dec 20, 2024 · We identified 78 % of the spherules as primitive, in that their compositions have not been affected by planetary differentiation. We divided ...
  55. [55]
    New paper on chemical classification of IM1 spherules published in ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · ... CNEOS 2014-01-08 (IM1) bolide, presents the first-ever analysis of spherules recovered from the impact site of an interstellar object on Earth.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?
    Jul 17, 2025 · Avi Loeb was supported in part by Harvard's Black Hole Initiative and the Galileo Project. REFERENCES. Acton, C., Bachman, N., Semenov, B., & ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    https://avi-loeb.medium.com/the-scientific-revolution-of-interstellar-objects-b8d9278bc05f
  58. [58]
    More Avi Loeb and 3I/ATLAS | AstroWright - Sites at Penn State
    Aug 6, 2025 · Surprisingly, the Hubble image of 3I/ATLAS shows diffuse emission ahead of its motion towards the Sun rather than a trailing tail as expected ...
  59. [59]
    https://nypost.com/2025/10/24/science/could-mysterious-3i-atlas-comet-be-a-black-swan-event/
  60. [60]
    https://futurism.com/future-society/atlas-interstellar-brakes-aliens
  61. [61]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uep2aQPB10I
  62. [62]
    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/take-vacations-before-october-29-harvard-astrophysicist-warns-as-3i/atlas-sparks-debate-over-possible-artificial-origin/articleshow/124732839.cms
  63. [63]
    Interstellar overhype: Nasa debunks claim about alien-made comet
    Sep 11, 2025 · Loeb, meanwhile, acknowledged in his blogpost that “the simplest hypothesis is that 3I/ATLAS is a comet”, and that he was raising alternative ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [2209.02479] Overview of the Galileo Project - arXiv
    Aug 2, 2022 · The Galileo Project is the first systematic scientific research program in search for potential astro8 archaeological artifacts or remnants of extraterrestrial ...
  65. [65]
    The Galileo Project | The Galileo Project
    Expedition team lead by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb uncovers unprecedented materials from impact site of 2014 interstellar object CAMBRIDGE, MA ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  66. [66]
    https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2251171723400032
  67. [67]
    Activities | The Galileo Project - Harvard University
    The Galileo Project follows three major avenues of research: · 1. Obtain High-resolution, Multi-detector UAP Images, Discover their Nature · 2. Search for and In- ...Missing: framework | Show results with:framework<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    (PDF) Galileo Project Observatory Class System Architecture
    Jun 24, 2025 · The OCICP system consists of two subsystems. The first is the Edge Computing Subsystem which is located within the observatory site. This ...
  69. [69]
    The Galileo Project's First Data on Half a Million Objects with Avi Loeb
    Nov 28, 2024 · In this new interview with Avi Loeb, the head of the Galileo Project at Harvard, which is dedicated to advancing the scientific study of ...
  70. [70]
    Commissioning Data on Half a Million Objects in the Sky ... - Avi Loeb
    Nov 12, 2024 · This data contains half a million objects, observed during these 5 months. The GP team is currently in the process of establishing two ...
  71. [71]
    Galileo Project Releases Commissioning Data on Half a Million ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · The detection efficiency depends on weather conditions, distance, and object size. UAP Galileo Project Left: Examples of reconstructed ...
  72. [72]
    https://galileo.hsites.harvard.edu/news/richard-king-mellon-foundation-awards-575000-galileo-project
  73. [73]
    Avi and Oumuamua: Setting the Record Straight | AstroWright
    Jul 18, 2023 · Loeb, you might know, recently rose to public prominence with his claims that the first discovered interstellar comet, 'Oumuamua, is actually a ...
  74. [74]
    Avi Loeb and the Alien Technology Hypothesis - NeuroLogica Blog
    Jul 22, 2025 · He is the Harvard astrophysicist who first gained notoriety when he hypothesized that Oumuamua, the first detected interstellar object, might be ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Interstellar Overdrive | Paul Sutter - Inference Review
    'Oumuamua's most important characteristic for the purposes of Loeb's hypothesis is its nongravitational acceleration. ... Loeb has published papers on ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    The humiliating truth behind Harvard astronomer's "alien" spherules
    Mar 13, 2024 · Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb claimed to track down and find alien spherules on the ocean bottom. The sober truth is an utter embarrassment.
  77. [77]
    Avi Loeb's search for alien life and the conflict it has sparked - NPR
    Mar 21, 2025 · Astrophysicist Avi Loeb is on a mission to prove aliens exist. His peers say he's chasing sensationalism. He reflects on his status as an academic pariah.Missing: mentors | Show results with:mentors
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Discovery of Spherules of Likely Extrasolar Composition in the ...
    Aug 29, 2023 · This evidence points towards an association of “BeLaU"-type spherules with IM1, supporting its interstellar origin independently of the high.
  79. [79]
    Starting the Analysis of Spherules from the Interstellar Expedition
    Jul 7, 2023 · One way to figure this out is by studying the spherules of meteors like IM1, where velocity measurements are available. Get Avi Loeb's stories ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Overview of the Galileo Project
    May 23, 2023 · The Galileo Project is the ¯rst systematic scienti¯c research program in the search for potential astro-.
  81. [81]
    Avi Loeb's Galileo Project Will Search for Evidence of Alien Visitation
    Jul 27, 2021 · With nearly $2 million in private funding, the controversial new initiative is targeting unidentified phenomena in Earth's skies and beyond.<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    A Global Framework for Comprehensive Study of Interstellar Objects
    Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute ...
  83. [83]
    Attacks on the Three Facets of My Identity | by Avi Loeb - Medium
    Jun 4, 2025 · First, I was born on a farm in Israel 63 years ago. Second, I ... interview yesterday, I was asked about my forecast for the immediate ...Get Avi Loeb's Stories In... · Written By Avi Loeb · More From Avi LoebMissing: childhood early
  84. [84]
    Avi Loeb on 'Oumuamua, Aliens, Space Archeology, Great Filters ...
    Jul 9, 2021 · In this FLI Podcast, Avi Loeb joins us to discuss interstellar visitors, if we've encountered alien technology yet, and if we're alone in ...
  85. [85]
    Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth
    Book details ; Print length. 240 pages ; Language. English ; Publisher. Mariner Books ; Publication date. January 26, 2021 ; Dimensions. 6.25 x 0.85 x 9.25 inches.
  86. [86]
    Interstellar: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life and Our Future in the ...
    256 pages. Language: English. Publisher: Mariner Books. Publication date: August 29, 2023. Dimensions: 6 x 0.83 x 9 inches.
  87. [87]
    Avi Loeb: Aliens, Black Holes, and the Mystery of the Oumuamua
    Jan 13, 2021 · ... Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 ... media is a threat to society 1:44:26 - Are humans ready for ...
  88. [88]
    131 | Avi Loeb on Taking Aliens Seriously – Sean Carroll
    Jan 25, 2021 · Avi's been a great, extremely respected and successful theoretical astrophysicist for a long time. He's also not afraid of poking the hornet's ...<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Do We Have Evidence of Alien Life? - Freakonomics
    Sep 1, 2023 · Avi Loeb is a Harvard astronomer who argues that we've already encountered extraterrestrial technology.
  90. [90]
    DOCTOR AVI LOEB- Hunting Alien Artifacts & Interstellar Visitors!
    Mar 22, 2025 · In this exclusive 1-on-1 interview, we dive deep into the biggest questions in astrophysics and the search for intelligent life.From the ...
  91. [91]
    Harvard Professor Avi Loeb Full Podcast on Interstellar ... - YouTube
    Aug 25, 2025 · Check out Professor Loeb's last podcast with Hannibal here: https://www.youtube.com/live/F50dytWW1Js?si=5XtHZdREpF2IuL6F The Hannibal TV UFO ...
  92. [92]
    Is 3I/ATLAS Alien Technolgy? Avi Loeb & MIchael Shermer DEBATE
    Sep 4, 2025 · Avi Loeb & MIchael Shermer DEBATE. Members only. Streamed 1 month ago Full-length episodes of Brian Keating's Into The Impossible Podcast ...
  93. [93]
    Declaration on SETI and UAP Research - Durham University
    Apr 24, 2025 · SETI AND UAP RESEARCH includes advocacy aimed at influencing the public ... Prof Avi Loeb, Director of Harvard's Institute for Theory ...
  94. [94]
    Harvard's Avi Loeb Thinks We Should Study UFOs--and He's Not ...
    Jul 29, 2021 · But an alternative SETI strategy is to search for artifacts that highly advanced societies may have constructed. That's certainly a legitimate ...
  95. [95]
    Could UAP Save Us from Ourselves? | by Avi Loeb - Medium
    Nov 6, 2024 · Paradoxically, the stigma is promoted by members of the SETI community who banned discussions about UAP in their conferences. I started in ...
  96. [96]
    Avi Loeb's Statement on UAPs to the House Oversight and ... - Medium
    Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for ...
  97. [97]
    A Vision for a UAP-Manhattan Project | by Avi Loeb | Medium
    Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for ...
  98. [98]
    Pentagon UFO Report: Harvard's Avi Loeb Says Leave It to Scientists
    Jun 29, 2021 · America's top scientists, including Neil deGrasse Tyson and Avi Loeb, weigh in on Pentagon's unclassified report on UFOs and the ...
  99. [99]
    UAP witnesses criticize Pentagon UFO office in ... - Space
    Sep 13, 2025 · Loeb's Galileo Project is an endeavor to bring the search for extraterrestrial technological signatures of other star folk from "accidental or ...
  100. [100]
    New UAP legislation in the works as Congress prepares for more ...
    May 1, 2025 · Avi Loeb, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Christopher Mellon and former oceanographer of the Navy retired Rear ...
  101. [101]
    A top Harvard astronomer is studying UFOs, thanks in part to the ...
    Aug 9, 2021 · A few days after the government released its report on UFOs, Avi Loeb got a call from the Harvard astronomy department that set off an unusual series of events.
  102. [102]
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?529642-5
  103. [103]
    Avi Loeb - Scholars - Institute for Advanced Study
    Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Ph.D. 1987. Hebrew University. M.Sc. 1985. Honors. 2003. Guggenheim Fellow. Appointments. Harvard University. 1995–1997.
  104. [104]
    "Cattedra Galileiana" for the 2011-12 Academic Year at the Scoule ...
    Feb 13, 2012 · Avi Loeb was awarded the "Cattedra Galileiana" for the 2011-12 Academic Year at the Scoule Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy.<|control11|><|separator|>
  105. [105]
    The “Cattedra Galileiana” for the academic year 2011/2012 to Avi ...
    The “Cattedra Galileiana” for the academic year 2011/2012 has been assigned to Avi Loeb, an eminent astrophysicist and cosmologist at the University of Harvard ...
  106. [106]
    Avi Loeb Receives 2013 Chambliss Astronomical Writing Award ...
    Dr. Avi Loeb is the recipient of the 2013 Chambliss Astronomical Writing Award from the American Astronomical Society for his book, "How Did the First Stars ...
  107. [107]
    Avi Loeb Elected Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
    ... Prizes; the Turing Award; MacArthur and Guggenheim fellowships; and Kennedy Center Honors, Grammy, Golden Globe, and Academy awards. Loeb currently serves ...
  108. [108]
    Abraham Loeb | American Academy of Arts and Sciences
    Mar 22, 2019 · Abraham Loeb. Harvard University. Astrophysicist; Cosmologist; Educator. Area. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Specialty. Astronomy ...Missing: Avi | Show results with:Avi
  109. [109]
    Avi Loeb's book 'Extraterrestrial' wins 2023 Cosmos Award
    May 22, 2023 · Professor Avi Loeb, who heads the Galileo Project and is the director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at Harvard University, was awarded the 2023 ...