Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Avobenzone

Avobenzone, chemically known as 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione, is a synthetic β-diketone compound (C₂₀H₂₂O₃) used as an oil-soluble in products to absorb primarily spanning 320–400 nm wavelengths. Its conjugated molecular , favoring the in solution, enables efficient capture followed by non-radiative energy dissipation as , thereby reducing skin penetration of damaging rays that contribute to and . Despite its broad absorption efficacy—often providing superior coverage compared to earlier filters like —avobenzone exhibits notable photolability, undergoing rapid degradation via keto-enol tautomerization and upon prolonged UV exposure, which diminishes its protective capacity unless formulated with stabilizers such as or antioxidants like . This instability arises from inherent excited-state dynamics in its diketone moiety, prompting ongoing research into encapsulation or derivative synthesis for enhanced durability in topical applications. Avobenzone's incorporation into over-the-counter sunscreens has been approved by regulatory bodies like the FDA at concentrations up to 3%, reflecting empirical evidence of its risk-benefit profile in preventing UV-induced DNA damage, though systemic absorption studies highlight the need for formulation-specific evaluations to minimize potential bioaccumulation. Its synthesis typically involves Claisen condensation of tert-butylbenzoyl chloride with acetylacetone derivatives, underscoring a cost-effective industrial route that supports widespread commercial viability despite stability challenges.

Chemical Structure and Properties

Molecular Formula and Structure

Avobenzone possesses the molecular formula C₂₀H₂₂O₃ and a molecular weight of 310.39 g/. Its systematic IUPAC name is 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione, reflecting a central propane-1,3-dione backbone substituted with a 4-tert-butylphenyl moiety at one carbonyl and a 4-methoxyphenyl group at the other. This arrangement forms a conjugated dibenzoylmethane , characterized by two aromatic rings linked via the β-diketone chain. The β-diketone functionality in avobenzone facilitates -keto , allowing equilibrium between the diketo form and the stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the enolic hydroxyl and the adjacent carbonyl oxygen. This structural feature distinguishes avobenzone from related UV filters such as (2-hydroxy-4-methoxy), which lacks the acyclic 1,3-diketone linker and instead features a direct core with ortho-hydroxy substitution.

Physical and Chemical Characteristics

Avobenzone is a pale yellow to off-white crystalline powder with a faint characteristic odor. Its molecular weight is 310.39 g/mol, corresponding to the formula C20H22O3. The compound melts in the range of 81–86 °C and demonstrates low water solubility, approximately 0.01 mg/L at 20 °C, reflecting its inherent lipophilicity. This lipophilicity is quantified by an octanol-water partition coefficient (logP) of about 4.5, which favors partitioning into non-polar phases over aqueous environments. Under non-irradiative conditions, avobenzone maintains , showing negligible degradation during dark storage at over periods of at least 7 days in aqueous media. Its oil supports direct dissolution in lipophilic solvents like isopropanol or capric/caprylic triglycerides, enabling seamless integration into oil-based systems without altering basic reactivity.

Solubility and Compatibility in Formulations

Avobenzone demonstrates negligible solubility in , with experimental measurements indicating values as low as 0.01 mg/L at 20°C and 27 μg/L at the same . In contrast, it exhibits high solubility in non-polar and polar organic solvents, including oils, alcohols such as , and emollients commonly used in cosmetic bases. This lipophilic character facilitates its incorporation into oil phases of emulsion-based formulations, where it disperses readily without requiring specialized solubilization techniques beyond standard mixing. In sunscreen formulations, avobenzone shows good compatibility with organic UV filters and excipients such as emollients, emulsifiers, and humectants, enabling stable oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsions typical of topical products. Unlike mineral UV blockers like zinc oxide or , which are inherently insoluble and necessitate suspension stabilizers, avobenzone's solubility in the vehicle phase reduces risks and supports during manufacturing. It integrates well with co-filters like or , which are often co-formulated to maintain homogeneity in the lipid matrix without altering significantly. Regulatory guidelines limit avobenzone concentrations to a maximum of 3% in U.S. over-the-counter products to ensure feasibility and product . At these levels—typically 2–3% in —avobenzone contributes to the sensory by enhancing spreadability and reducing greasiness, as its in oils promotes even formation on application without compromising integrity. Exceeding this range can lead to or instability in the matrix, necessitating higher solvent fractions that may affect overall product texture.

History and Development

Discovery and Early Research

Avobenzone, chemically known as 4-tert-butyl-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane, emerged from research in the aimed at expanding efficacy beyond the predominantly UVB-focused filters prevalent since the and , such as para-aminobenzoic acid derivatives. Earlier sunscreens, developed post-World War II, demonstrated empirical protection against UVB-induced through absorption spectra peaking below 320 nm, but clinical and spectroscopic data underscored gaps in UVA coverage (320–400 nm), which contributes to deeper dermal damage and . This empirical need drove investigation into dibenzoylmethane scaffolds, leveraging their conjugated systems for redshifted absorption into the range via enol-keto tautomerism. Initial synthesis and evaluation of substituted dibenzoylmethanes, including avobenzone, occurred as part of systematic screening for oil-soluble absorbers compatible with topical formulations. Laboratory assays in the early 1970s confirmed avobenzone's peak absorbance around 358 nm, providing broader I protection than prior agents, based on extinction coefficients exceeding 20,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ in solvents like . These studies built on foundational chemistry from the , prioritizing compounds with minimal irritation in preliminary tests while maximizing spectral overlap with solar irradiance. The compound was patented in 1973 by , marking a milestone in UVA-specific filter development prior to regulatory approvals. Early photophysical testing revealed inherent photolability, with UV irradiation causing keto-enol shifts and degradation products reducing absorbance by up to 50% within hours of exposure , necessitating formulation adjustments for persistence—issues documented in pre-commercial lab protocols before 1980 market considerations.

Patenting and Commercial Introduction

Avobenzone, chemically known as butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, was first patented in 1973 for its use as a UVA-absorbing compound in sunscreen formulations. The compound was commercialized under the trade name Parsol 1789 by Givaudan-Rouvray and received regulatory approval for inclusion in sunscreen products in the European Union in 1978, enabling its market debut in European formulations around that period. Initial adoption in Europe was limited, appearing in approximately 1% of sunscreens by 1980, reflecting early recognition of its broad-spectrum UVA protection capabilities. In the United States, avobenzone was not included in the FDA's over-the-counter until , at concentrations up to 3%, which facilitated wider commercial availability following petitions and safety reviews. Its integration into formulations accelerated during the and globally, supporting claims of broad-spectrum protection amid growing public awareness of UV-induced skin damage.

Synthesis and Production

Key Synthetic Routes

Avobenzone is synthesized primarily through a base-catalyzed between methyl 4-tert-butylbenzoate and , yielding the unsymmetrical 1,3-diketone characteristic of dibenzoylmethane derivatives. This reaction proceeds via deprotonation of the methyl group, followed by nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl, elimination of , and tautomerization to the form stabilized by hydrogen bonding. Optimal conditions employ potassium methoxide as the base in at 110°C for 2 hours, achieving yields of 95% after acidification and purification. Variations using in under at 100–108°C for 4 hours provide yields of 67–69%, with product isolation via extraction, distillation, and recrystallization from to attain purity exceeding 99.5%. Yield optimization in this route focuses on excess usage (molar ratio 1.25:1) to suppress self-condensation and precise catalyst loading (1.3–1.7 equivalents) to minimize over-alkylation side products. An alternative synthetic pathway involves initial of p-tert-butylbenzaldehyde with 4-methoxyacetophenone (acetanisole) under basic conditions, forming a intermediate, followed by oxidative transformation to the 1,3-diketone. The condensation step uses aqueous NaOH in at 20–50°C, with dropwise addition of the over 1–3 hours, yielding the enone after adjustment and cooling. Subsequent oxidation employs trifluoroacetate catalyst with 70% tert-butyl in at 20–55°C, delivering avobenzone in overall yields ranging from 59–90% after quenching and recrystallization. This method mitigates side reactions by staged addition and mild temperatures, though it introduces additional steps compared to the direct Claisen approach.

Industrial-Scale Preparation and Patents

Avobenzone is manufactured on an industrial scale through optimized variants of the , typically involving the reaction of methyl 4-tert-butylbenzoate with 4'-methoxyacetophenone in the presence of a strong base catalyst, followed by purification steps such as and to attain cosmetic-grade purity exceeding 99%. These processes are conducted in large stainless-steel batch reactors under controlled temperature and inert atmospheres to minimize side reactions and ensure consistent yield, with overall production efficiencies reported in excess of 80% in refined methods. Key patents have driven improvements in by addressing waste reduction and cost efficiency. For instance, Chinese CN104876814A, granted in 2017, details a sequential synthesis from phenetole and via , oxidation, esterification, , and , yielding avobenzone with purity above 99% and reduced raw material consumption, positioning it as viable for commercial volumes while lowering environmental discharge. Similarly, CN105085223A, published in , refines the aldol condensation-oxidation route using p-tert-butylbenzaldehyde and p-methoxyacetophenone, streamlining steps to boost throughput and simplify post-reaction for applicability. These post-2000 innovations reflect a progression from early batch protocols toward greener practices, incorporating recyclable solvents and byproduct minimization to align with regulatory standards for chemical manufacturing. The foundational for avobenzone originated with its initial in 1973, enabling subsequent commercial scaling after regulatory approval in 1978, though modern production emphasizes proprietary refinements for higher purity and over the original disclosures.

Photophysical Properties and Efficacy

UV Absorption Spectrum

Avobenzone exhibits a maximum of 357 , positioned within the UVA-I spectral region (340–400 ). Its profile extends with a tail into the UVA-II range (320–340 ), with measurable from approximately 310 to 400 . The specific UV value, determined as of a 1% solution in over a 1 path length at 358 , falls between 1100 and 1160. The molar extinction coefficient at the peak, reported near 361 , is 3.4 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ ⁻¹, indicating strong capacity in this band. Compared to octinoxate, which peaks around 310 in the UVB range, avobenzone demonstrates primary in UVA with limited overlap in the 310–320 transition zone.

Mechanism of Action

Avobenzone functions as a chemical absorber by capturing photons, primarily through its dominant chelated , which undergoes a π-π* electronic transition to populate the first excited (S1). This occurs in the range, with around 357 nm, corresponding to the extended conjugation between the β-diketone and aromatic moieties. From the S1 state, the molecule predominantly relaxes to the (S0) via ultrafast and vibrational relaxation processes, dissipating the absorbed as harmless thermal vibrations rather than re-emitting photons or generating reactive intermediates. The intramolecular in the form facilitates this non-radiative decay by stabilizing the twisted intramolecular charge-transfer (TICT) state, enhancing the efficiency of dissipation through conical intersections between excited and ground states. A competing pathway involves excited-state enol-to- tautomerization, where proton transfer along the leads to the form, which exhibits shifted and reduced absorption (peaking near 300 nm). This tautomerism, occurring on timescales, contributes to but represents a minor fraction under typical conditions, with the primary protective mechanism relying on the form's rapid return to S0 without tautomerization. to the (T1) is limited in the enol form due to the fast non-radiative decay, but when it occurs—particularly from keto excitations—the T1 state interacts with ground-state oxygen, yielding with a of approximately 0.1-0.2. This sensitization process highlights avobenzone's relative inefficiency as a singlet oxygen quencher compared to alternatives like certain derivatives, which actively deactivate such species without generating them.

Empirical Evidence of Protective Efficacy

In vitro assessments of sunscreen formulations demonstrate that 3% avobenzone, when photostabilized, yields significantly higher protection factors (PFA) compared to 5% , with superior attenuation of wavelengths exceeding 360 and comparable efficacy to 5% zinc oxide. These measurements, conducted via transmission on substrate films, indicate effective broad blockade in stable vehicles, often achieving PFA values that correspond to over 90% attenuation of incident radiation in optimized products. Such prioritize empirical UV over alone, confirming avobenzone's role in extending into the longer UVA-I range (340–400 ). Human skin model studies, including the persistent pigment darkening (PPD) method, validate avobenzone's dermal photoprotection by quantifying delayed pigmentation endpoints after controlled exposure. The PPD protocol, standardized in ISO 24442 and echoed in ISO 24443 for proxies, applies doses to buttock sites and measures protection via the minimal dose inducing persistent darkening, yielding protection factors aligned with PFA. Formulations incorporating avobenzone at typical concentrations (up to 3%) demonstrate dose-responsive PPD values, substantiating efficacy for preventing -mediated and markers without reliance on erythema-based UVB metrics. Epidemiological data from long-term randomized controlled trials link regular broad-spectrum application—featuring avobenzone as the primary UVA filter in many regimens—to decreased incidence. A 4.5-year community trial (n=1621) followed by 15-year surveillance reported 40% lower rates (rate ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.46–0.81) and halved invasive risk (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.97) among daily users versus discretionary applicators. These outcomes, derived from intention-to-treat analyses in high-UV environments, underscore causal associations between consistent blockade and reduced , independent of behaviors like shade-seeking.

Stability and Degradation

Photodegradation Processes

Avobenzone undergoes primarily through a Norrish Type I α-cleavage pathway upon absorption of radiation (320–400 nm). The molecule exists predominantly in its chelated , which upon photoexcitation relaxes mainly via ultrafast to the ; however, a minor fraction converts to the reactive keto via photo-ketonization. This keto form, characterized by a 1,3-dicarbonyl , then undergoes homolytic cleavage of the C-C bond adjacent to one of the carbonyl groups, generating acyl radicals such as 4-tert-butylbenzoyl and 4-methoxybenzoyl species. These radicals can recombine to form unsymmetrical derivatives, such as 4-tert-butyl-4'-methoxy, or propagate further reactions yielding phenyl-substituted fragments and carbonyl compounds like aldehydes or ketones (e.g., 4-methoxybenzaldehyde and 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)ethan-1-one analogs). The process is irreversible, leading to loss of the responsible for absorption and resulting in diminished photoprotective efficacy over time. The of exhibit a low , with only a small fraction (estimated as percentage) of photoexcited molecules proceeding to , reflecting efficient non-radiative pathways that compete with destructive channels. accelerates under sustained exposure due to the accumulation of reactive intermediates and secondary reactions, though the primary rate remains governed by the initial and tautomerization steps.

Influencing Factors and Measurements

The photodegradation rate of avobenzone is significantly influenced by solvent polarity, with greater observed in polar protic solvents such as and isopropanol, where UVA-induced remains low, compared to non-polar solvents that accelerate breakdown through enhanced sensitivity to . Temperature also plays a key role, as elevated thermal conditions increase the kinetics of by promoting excited-state transitions and formation alongside UV exposure. Formulation variables, including co-formulation with other UV filters like octinoxate, can exacerbate instability; avobenzone accelerates the photolysis of octinoxate while mutual interactions lead to heightened overall , particularly under prolonged exposure. Degradation extent is quantified primarily through (HPLC), which provides stability-indicating separation and detection of avobenzone and its by-products, often using reverse-phase columns with UV detection at wavelengths around 358–360 nm for precise concentration tracking post-irradiation. Complementary measures the loss of at the λ_max (typically 350–365 nm), revealing quantitative drops in protection efficacy; for example, studies report significant hypochromic shifts and peak height reductions at 360 nm following UVA1 exposure in solvent mixtures. These metrics, applied under standardized irradiation (e.g., xenon arc or simulators), enable assessment of up to 50% or more loss in unstable media after equivalent doses of 5–10 MED (minimal doses).

Strategies for Enhancing Stability

Co-formulation with photostabilizers such as significantly mitigates avobenzone's by acting as an energy acceptor, transferring excitation energy and preventing formation that leads to breakdown; studies report up to 80% reduction in degradation rates when avobenzone is paired with 5-10% in emulsions. Incorporation of antioxidants further enhances stability through radical scavenging; for instance, () at a 1:2 avobenzone-to- ratio, ascorbic acid () at 1:0.5, and ubiquinone at 1:0.5 have demonstrated increased photostability by neutralizing generated during irradiation, with showing the most pronounced effect in solvent-based assays. Encapsulation techniques provide physical and chemical shielding, enclosing avobenzone within carriers like β-cyclodextrin or polymeric nanoparticles to limit UV penetration and favor the less reactive over the form; β-cyclodextrin encapsulation, for example, induces the diketo conformation within its cavity, reducing UVA1 reactivity and preserving over 70% of avobenzone integrity after prolonged exposure compared to free forms. These methods also improve formulation compatibility, with polymer-encapsulated avobenzone-octocrylene combinations exhibiting superior persistence in emulsions under simulated sunlight. Stabilized avobenzone variants are empirically validated using photostability protocols involving controlled UV irradiation (e.g., lamps simulating ) followed by quantification of residual filter via (HPLC) or UV , ensuring less than 10-20% loss after standardized doses like 5-10 MED equivalents. Persistence of UVA protection is confirmed through assays such as ISO 24443, which measures the protection factor (UVA-PF) on PMMA plates pre- and post-exposure, verifying that stabilized products maintain critical above 370 and UVA-PF ratios indicative of broad-spectrum without significant attenuation.

Human Safety and Toxicology

Dermal Absorption and Systemic

Avobenzone exhibits low dermal penetration in studies, with clinical data indicating maximal of ≤0.59% of the applied dose following topical application of sunscreen formulations. permeation studies using skin similarly report absorbed fractions around 0.39%, aligning closely with in vivo findings and underscoring limited percutaneous bioavailability. These low penetration rates persist across various product types, including lotions and sprays at concentrations up to 3%, as evaluated in maximal use trials. Systemic exposure remains minimal, with concentrations reaching maximum observed values of 7.1 ng/mL in applications under exaggerated use conditions (e.g., 2 g applied to 75% over four days), corresponding to an absorbed fraction of approximately 0.23% of the dose. For realistic daily applications of 3.46 g containing 3% avobenzone, the systemic exposure dose is estimated at 0.010 mg/kg body weight, far below levels associated with pharmacological effects. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) assessments and U.S. FDA maximal use studies confirm negligible systemic doses even at approved concentrations, with dermal absorption not exceeding 0.59%. Excretion occurs primarily via , with biomonitoring studies detecting only 0.012–0.016% of the applied dermal dose in urinary output, indicating efficient clearance and limited retention. half-lives range from 33 to 112 hours, but no evidence of emerges from chronic use simulations or repeated application trials, as the compound shows restricted tissue distribution and no tendency for . reviews conclude that these pharmacokinetic profiles support safety margins exceeding 100 for systemic exposure at typical use levels.

Allergic and Irritant Potential

Avobenzone demonstrates low irritant potential in clinical assessments, with multiple human repeat insult patch tests (HRIPT) on formulations containing 3-5% avobenzone showing no induction of or across 50-200 participants per study. These tests, involving repeated occlusive applications followed by phases, consistently rated avobenzone as non-irritating at cosmetic concentrations, with primary indices near zero. Sensitization rates to avobenzone remain low in dermatological patch test populations, typically under 1% among patients evaluated for suspected contact dermatitis, as evidenced by multicenter studies analyzing over 1,000 cases. Pure avobenzone elicits rare true allergic contact dermatitis, with most reported reactions linked to impurities, oxidation products, or cross-reactivity rather than the compound itself. Photoallergic reactions, though infrequent, have been documented in case series, often involving exposure to sunlight after application and attributed to reactive photodegradation byproducts rather than intact avobenzone. Photopatch testing in sensitized individuals confirms this pattern, with positive responses in fewer than 2% of photosensitive patients tested specifically for UV filters. In contrast to mineral filters like titanium dioxide, which can induce irritant dermatitis via mechanical occlusion or particulate friction, avobenzone's irritancy profile emphasizes hypersensitivity over primary irritation. Retrospective analyses of organic sunscreen safety data reinforce minimal overall risk, with photoirritation scores negligible in controlled exposures.

Endocrine and Reproductive Effects

Empirical studies in models, including the uterotrophic , have demonstrated no estrogenic activity for avobenzone at doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day. Similarly, developmental assessments in rats (oral gavage, gestational days 7-16) and rabbits (gestational days 7-19) established no observed levels (NOAELs) of 1000 mg/kg/day and 500 mg/kg/day, respectively, with no evidence of reproductive malformations, embryotoxicity, or maternal reproductive impairments. In vitro assays have occasionally reported weak (ERα) activation at concentrations of 10-100 µM, but these findings do not translate to effects, as confirmed by null results in uterotrophic and models. Avobenzone shows no competitive binding in human assays and lacks activity in anti-estrogenic or ERβ endpoints. Human plasma concentrations following maximal use (approximately 0.023 µM) are over 1000-fold below the lowest bioactive thresholds observed in curated endocrine assays, rendering systemic endocrine disruption implausible under typical exposure scenarios. A 2025 comprehensive toxicological review of avobenzone data across , , and clinical studies found no disruption of , , or systems, nor any endpoints, attributing prior concerns—such as those from cellular assays highlighted by advocacy groups—to insufficient consideration of exposure margins and biological relevance. This aligns with weight-of-evidence assessments privileging mammalian data, which show avobenzone's potency far weaker than endogenous estrogens like , whose receptor binding affinities exceed those of the compound by orders of magnitude in relative terms. Such weak interactions pose negligible risk compared to ubiquitous natural exposures, including dietary phytoestrogens from soy and other , which elicit comparable or greater estrogenic responses at everyday intake levels without regulatory alarm.

Carcinogenicity and Long-Term Risk Assessments

Avobenzone has demonstrated negative results in standard genotoxicity assays, including the Ames bacterial mutagenicity test and in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assays, indicating no mutagenic potential. Similarly, it has not induced micronuclei formation in in vitro tests, further supporting a lack of clastogenic or aneugenic effects. These findings align with a mode-of-action analysis that concludes avobenzone lacks key mechanisms associated with carcinogenicity, such as DNA reactivity or sustained cellular proliferation. In animal models, no evidence of tumor promotion or initiation has been observed. A 90-day dietary exposure study in rats at doses up to the (NOAEL) showed no increases in , preneoplastic lesions, or tumor incidence in skin or systemic tissues. Although formal two-year carcinogenicity bioassays were not conducted specifically for avobenzone, the absence of genotoxic signals, combined with low systemic from dermal application, supports a low carcinogenic hazard profile. Epidemiological data from decades of widespread avobenzone use in sunscreens, particularly since its approval in the United States in 1996, reveal no associations with increased skin cancer incidence. Population-level studies tracking sunscreen users over extended periods have not identified links between avobenzone-containing formulations and elevated risks of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or basal cell carcinoma, consistent with its minimal dermal absorption and lack of genotoxic activity. A comprehensive review published in September 2025 synthesized nonclinical and clinical data, affirming avobenzone's low long-term risk when used at concentrations up to 3% in sunscreens, with margins of safety exceeding 100 for carcinogenic endpoints based on NOAELs from repeat-dose studies. This assessment, drawing on absorption kinetics and absence of adverse oncogenic signals, concludes that avobenzone is unlikely to contribute to human carcinogenicity under intended topical use.

Environmental Considerations

Interactions with Aquatic Ecosystems

Avobenzone enters aquatic ecosystems primarily through rinse-off from use during recreational activities in coastal and areas, where swimmers and bathers release the compound into surface waters via direct skin shedding and product application. Upon release, concentrations dilute rapidly due to mixing in and coastal environments, with measured levels in typically ranging from nanograms to low micrograms per liter (ng/L to μg/L). For instance, monitoring in recreational waters has detected avobenzone at concentrations up to 1 μg/L or occasionally exceeding this threshold near high-use beaches, though values often remain below 750 ng/L in broader samples. In aqueous environments, avobenzone undergoes under natural , with reported photolytic half-lives in spanning from minutes to hours depending on conditions such as , presence of dissolved , and intensity; extended exposure can extend effective persistence to days in shaded or turbid waters. This process involves keto-enol tautomerism and subsequent breakdown, reducing dissolved concentrations over time. Additionally, avobenzone's low solubility (approximately 0.007 mg/L) and high (log Kow ≈ 6.3) promote adsorption to suspended particles and sediments, partitioning it from the water column and thereby lowering its in the dissolved phase. further limits its mobility in coastal systems, as evidenced by studies on freshwater sediments showing strong binding affinities.

Toxicity to Coral Reefs and Marine Organisms

Laboratory studies have demonstrated sublethal effects of avobenzone on , including alterations in and metabolome shifts indicative of chloroplast degradation, at concentrations of 300 µg/L (0.3 mg/L), with no observed or overt bleaching up to 1 mg/L. Effective concentration for 50% response () values for avobenzone-related endpoints in aquatic organisms, such as growth inhibition in , range from 1.2 to 1.95 mg/L, suggesting thresholds well above typical environmental exposures. Environmental monitoring near coral reefs reports avobenzone seawater concentrations with medians below 100 ng/L (0.0001 mg/L) and maxima up to 6.143 µg/L (0.006 mg/L), orders of magnitude lower than laboratory effect levels, limiting ecological relevance. A 2023 study exposed corals to 5–1000 µg/L avobenzone for 7 days, confirming tissue uptake but rapid into 17 derivatives comprising up to 95% of absorbed material via reduction and esterification pathways, with no significant mortality observed even at the highest dose. These derivatives exhibited predicted toxicities 1000–900,000 times higher than the parent compound , yet outcomes showed only metabolic perturbations without acute harm, implying detoxification capacity in corals. In contrast to , which exhibits lower values (e.g., 0.06–1 µg/L for bleaching in sensitive assays) and bioaccumulation leading to reactive intermediates under sunlight, avobenzone demonstrates comparatively reduced potency and faster metabolism, reducing risks at ambient levels. High-dose laboratory protocols often exceed field dilutions, photodegradation rates, and co-stressor interactions, exaggerating hazards relative to realistic scenarios where inputs from swimmers represent a minor fraction compared to effluents. Causal analysis prioritizes empirical threats to reefs, such as from marine heatwaves, sedimentation from coastal development and , and , which drive widespread bleaching and mortality far beyond sporadic UV filter exposures; sunscreen-derived avobenzone contributes negligibly to these dynamics given low persistence and bioavailability in dilute . Field data from anthropized reefs show no direct correlation between avobenzone detections and acute decline, underscoring that lab-derived risks do not translate to population-level impacts under multifaceted environmental pressures.

Persistence, Bioaccumulation, and Comparative Analysis

Avobenzone exhibits moderate persistence in environmental compartments, primarily due to rapid under exposure, with studies reporting up to 96% degradation in aqueous solutions within hours to days of simulated . This photolability contrasts with more stable UV filters like , limiting long-term accumulation in surface waters, though indirect photolysis products may persist longer in shaded or sediment-bound forms. The compound's (log Kow) of 4.51 indicates moderate hydrophobicity, facilitating partitioning into but not extreme accumulation. Laboratory factors (BCF) in fish range from estimated values of 113 L/kg to measured values of 1,807 L/kg, below thresholds for high bioaccumulative potential (typically BCF >5,000 L/kg) seen in persistent organic pollutants. Trophic is minimal, with assessments of lipophilic UV filters showing low likelihood of across food webs, as evidenced by trophic magnification factors (TMF) approaching or below 1 in relevant ecosystems. In comparative terms, avobenzone's profile is less concerning than legacy pollutants like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which exhibit BCFs exceeding 10^5 L/kg and TMFs >1, or dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDDT), with BCFs around 10^6 L/kg; these differences arise from avobenzone's shorter environmental and lower volatility. Relative to other chemical UV filters, such as (log Kow ~3.5–4.0, BCF ~2,500–13,000 L/kg in some studies), avobenzone presents a comparable or reduced risk, particularly given its faster degradation, though both surpass non-bioaccumulative inorganic alternatives like zinc oxide. Risk-benefit analyses prioritize avobenzone's role in preventing UV-associated cancers, where gains from broad-spectrum empirically outweigh quantified marginal bioaccumulation risks in marine biota.

Regulatory Framework and Controversies

Global Approvals and Usage Limits

In the United States, the (FDA) includes avobenzone in its for over-the-counter drug products, permitting its use at concentrations up to 3% as a UVA-absorbing . This limit reflects the FDA's determination of general recognition as safe and effective (GRASE) status for this concentration, based on data submitted under the Tentative Final Monograph process finalized in 2021. In the , avobenzone (listed as butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) is authorized as a in cosmetic products under entry 13 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, with a maximum concentration of 5% in the finished product. This approval stems from safety evaluations by the Scientific on (SCCS), which established margins of safety supporting the higher limit compared to the U.S. standard. Canada aligns with the U.S. limit of 3% for avobenzone in sunscreens, as specified in Health 's natural and non-prescription health products regulations. Approvals in other regions, such as and , permit concentrations up to 5%, consistent with harmonized international assessments confirming low systemic exposure and toxicity risks at these levels when applied topically. These usage limits derive from empirical pharmacokinetic and toxicological data, including dermal studies showing concentrations below thresholds for adverse effects at approved maxima.

Restrictions, Bans, and Policy Debates

In 2021, the State Senate passed SB132, which proposed banning the sale and distribution of sunscreens containing avobenzone and effective January 1, 2023, in response to concerns over potential marine toxicity. The bill, supported by environmental groups like the Center for Biological Diversity, aimed to extend protections beyond the 2018 ban on and octinoxate but ultimately died in the in May 2022 without enactment, reflecting limited implementation amid competing priorities for effective sun protection. Policy debates surrounding avobenzone often pit environmental advocacy against human health imperatives, with proponents of restrictions emphasizing risks to coral reefs and aquatic organisms from chemical UV filters. Advocates argue for prioritizing mineral-based alternatives (zinc oxide or titanium dioxide) under "reef-safe" labels to minimize ecological discharge, citing lab studies on chemical persistence despite lower field concentrations for avobenzone compared to banned ingredients like oxybenzone. Counterarguments from industry bodies such as the Consumer Healthcare Products Association highlight that avobenzone delivers critical broad-spectrum UVA protection unmatched by many mineral formulations, which can leave gaps in UV defense and elevate skin cancer incidence if chemical options are curtailed. Critiques of "reef-safe" labeling underscore its empirical shortcomings, as mineral sunscreens often fail to replicate avobenzone's UVA efficacy in real-world use due to formulation challenges and cosmetic inelegance leading to non-compliance. A 2025 lawsuit in alleged deceptive practices in such labeling, arguing that even non-banned chemicals like avobenzone may contribute to stress, yet unsubstantiated claims overlook data showing mineral alternatives' variable UVA performance and potential for higher overall environmental runoff from reduced user adherence. These tensions persist without federal bans on avobenzone, as U.S. policy favors evidence of human safety over precautionary eco-restrictions where risks remain debated among scientists.

Recent Scientific and Regulatory Developments (2023–2025)

In September 2025, a comprehensive toxicology review published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology evaluated avobenzone's safety profile based on clinical and nonclinical data, including pharmacokinetics, acute and repeated-dose toxicity, genotoxicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity studies. The assessment concluded that avobenzone exhibits minimal acute toxicity, with no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) exceeding typical human exposure margins, and lacks clear endpoints of concern such as endocrine disruption or systemic risks at concentrations up to 3% in sunscreens. This review, drawing on over 100 studies, affirmed its suitability for topical use without evidence of significant human health risks, countering prior concerns amplified in media but not substantiated by empirical data. Research on photostability advanced in 2023–2025, addressing avobenzone's known degradation under UV exposure. A 2023 study synthesized novel composite sunscreens integrating avobenzone with motifs, demonstrating enhanced stability through covalent linkages that reduced photodegradation by up to 50% compared to standard formulations. Complementary work in 2025 explored beta-cyclodextrin encapsulation, which stabilized the diketo form, mitigating UVA1-induced reactivity and preserving efficacy over extended . These developments, while not yet regulatory mandates, support formulation innovations to maintain broad-spectrum protection without increased risks. Regulatory landscapes remained stable for avobenzone through 2025, with no new global bans or usage limit reductions enacted. The U.S. FDA's implementation of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA) of 2022 intensified safety data requirements for cosmetic ingredients, indirectly affecting oversight as over-the-counter drugs, but yielded no avobenzone-specific prohibitions or GRASE reclassifications. Australia's (TGA) July 2025 review of seven sunscreen actives similarly classified avobenzone-derived exposures as low-risk for systemic toxicity, aligning with prior approvals up to 4% without necessitating reformulation. updates focused on other filters like , leaving avobenzone's 5% maximum unchanged amid ongoing harmonization efforts.

References

  1. [1]
    Avobenzone | C20H22O3 | CID 51040 - PubChem - NIH
    Avobenzone has the ability to absorb ultraviolet light over wider range of wavelengths. It is included in many commercially available sunscreens which are used ...
  2. [2]
    Avobenzone: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action - DrugBank
    Avobenzone is dibenzoyl methane derivative. It is oil soluble ingredient. Avobenzone has the ability to absorb ultraviolet light over wider range of ...
  3. [3]
    Stability and Properties of Ultraviolet Filter Avobenzone under Its ...
    Jan 7, 2025 · AVB absorbed a unique UVA1 band, whereas OBZ was comparatively verified as an UV filter absorbing UVB (280–320 nm) and UVA2 (320–340 nm) light ...Missing: IUPAC name
  4. [4]
    Photodegradation of avobenzone: stabilization effect of antioxidants
    Vitamin E (1:2), vitamin C (1:0.5) and ubiquinone (1:0.5) were the more effective concentrations increasing the photostability of avobenzone.
  5. [5]
    Photodegradation of avobenzone: Stabilization effect of antioxidants
    Avobenzone is one of the most common UVA-filters in sunscreens, and is known to be photounstable. Some of the strategies used to stabilize this filter present ...
  6. [6]
    Drug Delivery Strategies for Avobenzone: A Case Study of ...
    Mar 21, 2023 · Quercetin helps to improve the stability of the added UV filters. The photodegradation of BMDBM and OMC was significantly reduced when quercetin ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 1. Background and Action Requested - Regulations.gov
    Jun 27, 2019 · Identifiers and General Characteristics of Avobenzone29. Chemical-IUPAC Name. 4-tert-Butyl-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane. INCI name. Butyl ...
  8. [8]
    CN104876814A - Synthetic method of avobenzone - Google Patents
    The avobenzone is prepared by subjecting phenetole and methylbenzene, as starting materials, to alkylation, oxidation, esterification, acylation and ...
  9. [9]
    Unravelling the Keto–Enol Tautomer Dependent Photochemistry ...
    Mar 25, 2020 · Avobenzone (4-tert-butyl-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane, AB) is one of the most widely used filters in sunscreens for skin photoprotection in the ...Introduction · Discussion · Concluding Remarks · Supporting Information
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Safety Data Sheet Avobenzone Revision 3, Date 16 Jul 2024 - Redox
    Sep 23, 2025 · Molecular Weight. 310.39 g/mol. Octanol Water Coefficient. No Data Available. Melting Point. 81 - 86 °C. Appearance. Powder. Evaporation Rate.
  12. [12]
    Avobenzone(70356-09-1)MSDS Melting Point Boiling Density ...
    Appearance Colorless to yellowish powder with a weak characterristic odor. ; Solubility in water 0.01 mg/l (20 C) ; Melting Point 83.5 ; Boiling Point 464 ; Vapor ...Missing: logP | Show results with:logP
  13. [13]
    [PDF] In Vitro Testing of Sunscreens for Dermal Absorption - m-cersi
    LogP, octanol-water partition coefficient; TPSA, topological polar surface area in Å2; ... Significantly higher permeation than avobenzone (logP 4.5) was ...
  14. [14]
    New stability data indicates the true fate of PARSOL® 1789 in the ...
    Jun 23, 2022 · The control, in which Avobenzone was kept in pure water in the dark for 2 days, showed a high recovery rate of 92.7%. Such high recovery needs ...
  15. [15]
    In Light of Exposure: Understanding Avobenzone Part I ...
    Sep 29, 2017 · While it is soluble in a variety of polar and non-polar solvents, it exhibits low solubility in water; i.e., 0.01 mg/L at 20°C. Within the ...
  16. [16]
    Avobenzone | 70356-09-1 - ChemicalBook
    Sep 23, 2025 · Chemical Name: Avobenzone ; CBNumber: CB5337318 ; Molecular Formula: C20H22O3 ; Molecular Weight: 310.39 ; MDL Number: MFCD00210252.
  17. [17]
    Avobenzone - Amaris Chemical Solutions
    In stockSolubility: Soluble in oils, alcohols, and organic solvents; insoluble in water; Vapor Pressure: Low; Flash Point: > 180 °C (closed cup); Stability ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Avobenzone | Mechanism | Concentration - Selleck Chemicals
    Rating 5.0 (1) Avobenzone (Butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, BF2AVB) is an oil soluble ingredient used in sunscreen products to absorb the full spectrum of UVA rays and a ...
  19. [19]
    Determining the photostability of avobenzone in sunscreen ...
    Oct 25, 2021 · Avobenzone is an ultraviolet (UV) filter that is often included in sunscreen formulations despite its lack of photostability.Missing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility
  20. [20]
    Sunscreen formulation with avobenzone and method for stabilizing ...
    Accordingly, a sunscreen formulation containing avobenzone as a UVA blocker requires a UVB blocker, such as octocrylene or octyl-methoxycinnamate in order to ...Missing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility
  21. [21]
    21 CFR Part 352 -- Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-the ... - eCFR
    Avobenzone up to 3 percent. (c) Cinoxate up ... Assay the standard homosalate sunscreen preparation by the following method to ensure proper concentration:.
  22. [22]
    Sunscreen: a brief walk through history - PMC - NIH
    Sep 1, 2021 · 1889: Erik Johan Widmark of Stockholm publishes a landmark study that experimentally proves UV radiation can cause skin erythema and burns. 1891 ...
  23. [23]
    Avobenzone - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Avobenzone is an FDA-approved UV filter, the only one approved for UVA protection, with peak absorbance in the UV-A-1 spectrum, and is used in sunscreens.
  24. [24]
    Avobenzone: A Globally Approved UVA Absorber - UL Prospector
    Mar 27, 2015 · Avobenzone can lose up to 36% of its potential for UV absorption after only 1 hour of exposure to sunlight, if not stabilized.
  25. [25]
    History of sunscreen: An updated view - Ma - Wiley Online Library
    Feb 14, 2021 · The first long UVA filters were dibenzoylmethane derivatives (avobenzone) that were only found in 1% of sunscreens in Europe in 1980 and up ...
  26. [26]
    Everyday IP: UV and IP – the history of sunscreen - Dennemeyer.com
    May 30, 2025 · Sunscreen patent milestones popped up throughout the next several decades, starting with the protection of avobenzone in 1973. This chemical ...
  27. [27]
    Cloudy outlook for sunscreen ingredients in the US - C&EN
    Nov 27, 2022 · ... FDA approval process. If the company is successful, bemotrizinol would be the first new UV filter to hit the US market since avobenzone in 1996.
  28. [28]
    Federal Register, Volume 61 Issue 180 (Monday, September 16 ...
    Sep 16, 1996 · Safety of Avobenzone 3. The petition (Ref. 2) requested that FDA include avobenzone as an active ingredient in the proposed monograph and ...
  29. [29]
    Avobenzone synthesis - ChemicalBook
    Synthesis of Avobenzone from Methyl 4-tert-butylbenzoate and 4'-Methoxyacetophenone.Chemicalbook can provide 12 synthetic routes.
  30. [30]
    Method for preparing tertiary butyl 4' methoxy dibenzoyl methane
    The method comprises: condensing 4-tert-butyl methyl benzoate and 4-methoxyl acetophenone in the presence of alkaline catalyst and corresponding solvent to ...
  31. [31]
    CN105085223B - A kind of method for preparing Avobenzone
    The invention provides a kind of method for preparing Avobenzone, the method p-t-Butylbenzaldehyde and acetanisole are used as raw material, condensation ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Method for preparing avobenzone - CN105085223A - Google Patents
    Step 1, adds p-t-Butylbenzaldehyde, basic catalyst and the first solvent, in system, adds p-methoxy-acetophenone, carry out condensation reaction in ...
  34. [34]
    Synthesis process method of avobenzone - Eureka | Patsnap
    The avobenzone synthesis uses p-methoxyacetophenone and p-tert-butyl benzoate, reacting step by step to improve yield and control side reactions.
  35. [35]
    AVOBENZONE - Ataman Kimya
    Melting point: 81-84 °C Boiling point: 463.6 ± 35.0 °C (Predicted) Density ... The chemical structure of avobenzone includes a benzoylmethane backbone ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] 1 Evaporation of sunscreen films: how the UV protection properties ...
    3 M and its peak molar extinction coefficient at 361 nm is 3.4 x 104 M-1 cm-1. Hence, if the molar extinction remains the same in solution and solid state, the ...
  37. [37]
    Determining the photostability of avobenzone in sunscreen ...
    Oct 25, 2021 · To better understand and predict the photostability of avobenzone, ultrafast transient electronic absorption spectroscopy (TEAS) has been used.Missing: stability | Show results with:stability
  38. [38]
    Conformers influence on UV-absorbance of avobenzone
    The results indicate that the conformers of enolic-form of avobenzone have broad range of absorbance from 273-389 nm and the keto-form has relatively narrow ...
  39. [39]
    A Blocked Diketo Form of Avobenzone: Photostability ...
    Jan 16, 2009 · Singlet oxygen formation. The quantum efficiency of singlet oxygen (1O2) formation was determined employing time-resolved near-IR emission ...
  40. [40]
    Characterization of the UVA protection provided by avobenzone ...
    Dec 1, 2010 · Avobenzone and zinc oxide provide superior UVA protection compared to titanium dioxide, which cannot be considered a substitute for high levels ...Missing: compatibility | Show results with:compatibility
  41. [41]
    Full article: Comprehensive review of avobenzone (butyl ...
    Avobenzone has a long history of safe use in sunscreen products in the United States (US) and elsewhere. Since publication of the U.S. Food and Drug ...
  42. [42]
    Comparison of UVA Protection Factor Measurement Protocols - PMC
    May 8, 2020 · This study aims to review and compare all outstanding protocols in the field of UVA-PF measurement and finally the introduction of the best method of measuring ...
  43. [43]
    UVA protection efficacy of sunscreens can be determined by the ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · This study was designed to determine whether PPD can be used to correctly evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of UVA filters such as oxybenzone, avobenzone, ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin ...
    Dec 14, 2020 · Use of sunscreen has been shown to reduce the incidence of both melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers.
  45. [45]
    Methoxy-Monobenzoylmethane Protects Human Skin against UV ...
    Photolysis experiments performed in hexanes have shown that the photodegradation of avobenzone occurs following a Norrish-type I mechanism [15,16,17]. The ...
  46. [46]
    A new insight into the photochemistry of avobenzone in gas phase ...
    Jul 12, 2016 · Its photochemistry is similar to that of the parent compound DBM, although AB is known to photodegrade via the Norrish type I mechanism in ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Sunscreens: photostability, formulation and skin penetration
    Feb 18, 2014 · butyl benzil, 37 = 4-t-butyl-4-methoxy benzil, 38 = 4,4 ... Degradation kinetics of butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone) in ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Synthesis and Characterisation of Novel Composite Sunscreens ...
    Avobenzone is thought to have synergistic effects with other sunscreen additives ... Synthesis of avobenzone/octocrylene AVOCTO compounds. One equivalent ...
  49. [49]
    Unexpected Photolysis of the Sunscreen Octinoxate In The ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · This study examines the correlation between photochemical degradation of sunscreen agents and changes in protection provided by sunscreen films.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    (PDF) Stability indicating HPLC method for the determination of ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · An accurate, simple, and reproducible liquid chromatographic method was developed and validated for the determination of benzophenone-3 and avobenzone in a ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Photostability Study of Avobenzone in Commercial Sunscreen SPF ...
    The method used in this study is the spectroscopic method which uses two UV-VIS and HPLC spectrophotometer analyser. Based on the research data obtained in the ...
  52. [52]
    EVALUATION OF THE AVOBENZONE PHOTOSTABILITY IN ...
    The high decrease % of the absorption capacity in all the analytical grade solvents evaluated, indicates that AVO is not photostable on them because it can ...
  53. [53]
    Identification of avobenzone by-products formed by various ...
    In our research we focused on aquatic halogenation of avobenzone (4-tert-butyl-4′-methoxy-dibenzoylmethane), the most common UVA filter (400–320 nm) of this ...Missing: IUPAC | Show results with:IUPAC
  54. [54]
    Stability Study of Sunscreens with Free and Encapsulated UV Filters ...
    In particular avobenzone undergoes rapid photodegradation, when used alone, and for this reason it is often stabilized by addition of the UV filter octocrylene ...
  55. [55]
    Comparative behavior between sunscreens based on free or ...
    Methods. Sunscreen formulation with a combination of Avobenzone and Octocrylene in “free form” and a formulation using the same UV filters but encapsulated in a ...
  56. [56]
    Sun protection, progress, myths, and inconsistencies (a proposal for ...
    Aug 28, 2025 · The gold standard for the determination of sunscreen UVA protection “in vitro” is ISO 24443:2021. ... ISO procedures and compared to a sunscreen ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  57. [57]
    Effect of Sunscreen Application on Plasma Concentration of ...
    Jan 21, 2020 · The systemic exposures of all tested ingredients remained above 0.5 ng/mL in more than 50% of participants up to 7 days for avobenzone, ...
  58. [58]
    Comprehensive review of avobenzone (butyl ... - PubMed
    Sep 5, 2025 · No harmonized dermal absorption value was available, but the clinical data indicate low percutaneous absorption of avobenzone in humans (≤0.59% ...
  59. [59]
    Allergy to avobenzone - DermNet
    It may also produce classic allergic contact dermatitis. Another ... Contact allergy to pure avobenzone is rare. Most allergic reactions arise from the ...Missing: incidence | Show results with:incidence
  60. [60]
    Photoallergic Contact Dermatitis to Sunscreens Containing ...
    PACD to sunscreens containing oxybenzone is common and is probably underdiagnosed due to a lack of confirmation by photopatch tests or other diagnostic tools.
  61. [61]
    Sunscreens: A Review of UV Filters and Their Allergic Potential
    May 17, 2023 · Oxybenzone (benzophenone-3) is the most frequently reported contact and photocontact allergen compared with all other UV filters, and it is ...
  62. [62]
    Retrospective Review of Dermal Safety Studies of Organic Sunscreens
    Aug 21, 2025 · Conclusion: The findings show no to minimal risks of dermal irritation, sensitization, photo-allergy, and photo-irritation, reinforcing the ...Missing: HRIPT | Show results with:HRIPT
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Safety review of seven active sunscreen ingredients
    Jul 1, 2025 · Ensulizole, homosalate, octinoxate, octisalate, octocrylene, oxybenzone, avobenzone are used in Australian products, as of 12February 2025.Missing: IUPAC | Show results with:IUPAC
  64. [64]
    Mode of action approach supports a lack of carcinogenic potential of ...
    There was no estrogenic activity for avobenzone in the rodent uterotrophic assay (Schlumpf et al. ... estrogenic activity in this model. Octinoxate was ...
  65. [65]
    Comparison between endocrine activity assessed using ToxCast ...
    Aug 10, 2023 · The results show these organic UV filters have low intrinsic biological activity and risk of toxicity including endocrine disruption in humans.
  66. [66]
    Consensus Modeling for Prediction of Estrogenic Activity of ... - NIH
    Sep 29, 2016 · We have developed an in silico model to prioritize single ingredient estrogen receptor activity for use when actual animal data are inadequate, equivocal, or ...
  67. [67]
    Fact Check: Key context missing from post suggesting sunscreen is ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · There is no evidence avobenzone and oxybenzone in sunscreens are harmful, nor that vitamin D from sun exposure protects against skin cancer. The ...
  68. [68]
    Fate, Transport, and Potential Exposure in the Environment
    Overall, pH emerges as one of the most critical factors controlling ... Factors influencing the fate and environmental distribution of organic UV filters.
  69. [69]
    Environmental impacts due to the use of sunscreen products - NIH
    Sep 29, 2022 · For example, avobenzone and octocrylene are proven to be toxic to Daphnia magna; the latter even in environmentally realistic concentrations.
  70. [70]
    Transformation of avobenzone in conditions of aquatic chlorination ...
    Sep 15, 2016 · The present study involves transformation of avobenzone under the combined influence of active chlorine and UV-irradiation. These conditions ( ...Missing: manufacturing | Show results with:manufacturing<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Review of Studies on the Effects of UV Filters in Aquatic Environments
    Avobenzone is relatively unique in that it is a diketone, models as highly toxic, and is under-studied (see below). Zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) ...
  72. [72]
    4 Fate, Transport, and Potential Exposure in the Environment
    As is clear from this compilation, there are a broad range of reported aquatic photochemical half-lives for UV filters, with some UV filters likely transforming ...Biodegradation And Microbial... · Uv Filter Exposure Modeling · Measuring Uv Filter...
  73. [73]
    On the Fate of Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone) in ...
    Apr 7, 2023 · The present results suggest that the potential role of BM in coral bleaching in anthropogenic areas should be investigated and that BM ...
  74. [74]
    Microplastics enhance the toxicity and phototoxicity of UV filter ...
    Mar 5, 2023 · Notably, UV filters used in sunscreens are ecotoxic to aquatic environments. For example, oxybenzone, a UV filter, causes coral bleaching [25], ...
  75. [75]
    A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and ...
    This review summarizes the current state of the science regarding the concentration of organic UV filters in seawater and sediment near coral reef ecosystems ...
  76. [76]
    The Truth About Corals and Sunscreen | Smithsonian Ocean
    A 2022 National Academies review of sunscreen in the environment found that between 1 and 10 μg/L of sunscreen chemicals can be found in a popular tourist site ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Review of the environmental fate and effects of two UV filter ...
    Feb 20, 2022 · The two UV filters have low water solubilities and a high sorption potential. The available data indicate that OCR is poorly biodegradable.Missing: sunlight | Show results with:sunlight
  78. [78]
    Bioaccumulation and Measured Concentrations of UV Filters in Biota
    Aug 9, 2022 · It is highly unlikely that these chemicals will bioaccumulate, even if they are found not to be biodegradable. Role of Metabolism in ...HOW BIOACCUMULATION... · BIOACCUMULATION OF UV...
  79. [79]
    Summary | Review of Fate, Exposure, and Effects of Sunscreens in ...
    BAF or BCF studies for the most lipophilic UV filters indicate a low likelihood of trophic magnification, although some have measurable BCFs. Additional ...
  80. [80]
    Hawai'i Senate Bill Bans Harmful Sunscreen Chemicals
    Mar 9, 2021 · Sunscreens containing two harmful petrochemicals, avobenzone and octocrylene, would be banned from sale in Hawai'i under a bill passed today by the Hawai'i ...
  81. [81]
    HI SB132 | 2022 | Regular Session - LegiScan
    Beginning January 1, 2023, bans the sale, offer for sale, or distribution in the State of any sunscreen that contains avobenzone or octocrylene, or both, ...
  82. [82]
    HI SB132 - BillTrack50
    Crossed Over 03/09/2021 ; Dead 05/05/2022 ; Bill Summary. Beginning January 1, 2023, bans the sale, offer of sale, or distribution in the State of any sunscreen ...
  83. [83]
    Sunscreen bans aimed at protecting coral reefs spark debate
    Mar 15, 2019 · Environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers increasingly are working to bar the sale of sunscreens that may damage coral reefs.Missing: restrictions | Show results with:restrictions
  84. [84]
    The trouble with sunscreen ingredients | EWG's Guide to Sunscreens
    The ingredients oxybenzone, octinoxate, octisalate, octocrylene, homosalate and avobenzone are all systemically absorbed into the body after typical sunscreen ...Missing: IUPAC | Show results with:IUPAC
  85. [85]
    Statement from the Consumer Healthcare Products Association ...
    Banning these ingredients will drastically – and unnecessarily – reduce the selection of safe and effective sunscreens and other products available to residents ...
  86. [86]
    Mineral vs. Chemical Sunscreen: Which Is Better?
    May 24, 2024 · Mineral sunscreens have a heavier texture to create a physical barrier, while chemical sunscreens are lighter and use a chemical reaction to prevent UV damage.
  87. [87]
    New Lawsuit Raises Concerns Over 'Reef-Safe' Sunscreen Labeling
    Jun 9, 2025 · Experts say labeling sunscreens “reef-friendly” is deceptive since even chemicals that aren't banned can do widespread damage to coral reefs.
  88. [88]
    Is the FDA going to ban all 'chemical' sunscreens? The Future of ...
    Feb 8, 2024 · This article explores the ongoing debate surrounding the potential ban of 'chemical' sunscreens by the FDA in the United States.
  89. [89]
    'Avobenzone is safe,' says toxicology assessment - Cosmetics Design
    Sep 18, 2025 · The authors concluded that “avobenzone has a suitable safety profile without any clear markers of toxicity or endpoints of concern.” They found ...Missing: reproductive 2023-2025
  90. [90]
    RSC Advances - PAPER
    Jun 7, 2023 · Experiments that probe the stability of avobenzone in binary mixtures with octocrylene are presented, together with the synthesis of a class of.
  91. [91]
    Synthesis and characterisation of novel composite sunscreens ...
    Avobenzone is one of the most widely used sunscreens in skin care formulations, but suffers from some drawbacks, including photo instability. To mitigate this ...
  92. [92]
    Global Cosmetics Regulatory Update – July 2025 - ADSL Laboratories
    Aug 5, 2025 · From 21 January 2026, cosmetic products in Great Britain may only contain oxybenzone up to the new prescribed limit. A six-month grace period ...