Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

BL755

The BL755 is a cluster bomb developed in the early , comprising a 277-kilogram (609-pound) aerodynamic casing that functions as a submunition dispenser, releasing 147 parachute-retarded high-explosive dual-purpose bomblets optimized for penetrating armored vehicles while providing secondary fragmentation effects against personnel. Each submunition weighs 1.18 kilograms, features a capable of defeating up to 25 centimeters of armor, and generates approximately 2,500 fragments upon detonation. Designed by Hunting Engineering Ltd. for low-altitude delivery from NATO-standard tactical aircraft, the BL755 employs a free-fall mechanism where submunitions are ejected sequentially over a target area, with parachutes slowing descent to enhance accuracy and coverage against clustered armored formations. Entering service with the Royal Air Force in 1973, over 60,000 units were produced by 1996, with exports to more than a dozen nations including , , and the . The weapon saw combat employment by British forces in the 1991 and has been utilized by export recipients such as in the Yemen conflict starting in 2015, where its deployment against Houthi positions drew scrutiny for potential civilian risks due to unexploded submunitions. Although effective for area suppression of mobile armor, the BL755's submunitions exhibit failure rates that contribute to lingering explosive remnants, prompting international calls for restrictions despite non-adherence by producer and user states to the 2008 .

Development and History

Predecessor Systems and Initial Requirements

The Royal Air Force (RAF) initially relied on unitary general-purpose bombs, such as the 1,000 lb class, for ground attack roles during the , but these exhibited significant limitations against massed Soviet-style armored threats. These bombs demanded precise direct impacts to penetrate tank armor, rendering near misses ineffective, and required aircraft to conduct vulnerable low-level "pop-up" dives for release, increasing exposure to anti-aircraft defenses. Retarded tail units improved standoff slightly for static targets like ammunition depots or gun positions, yet failed to address the mobility and dispersion of armored columns advancing at speed across European battlefields. Doctrinal shifts in the emphasized the need for area-saturation weapons to counter anticipated offensives, involving up to 14,000 tanks and rapid reinforcement by thousands more from reserve divisions. RAF requirements specified a lightweight, free-fall deliverable at very low altitudes in a single pass by tactical strike , minimizing time over target amid dense ground-based air defenses. This design prioritized probabilistic kills over wide footprints—applying a "shotgun" dispersal principle to compensate for aiming inaccuracies and target movement—enabling one bomb to engage multiple vehicles simultaneously where unitary warheads could not. In response, the Ministry of Defence's Procurement Executive collaborated with Hunting Engineering Ltd. in the early 1970s to develop the BL755, a 600 lb bomb casing submunitions optimized for anti-tank effects via parachute-retarded high-explosive shaped charges. The system targeted armored concentrations by covering areas up to several hundred meters, leveraging empirical assessments of tank density in breakthrough scenarios to achieve higher overall kill probabilities than precision-dependent predecessors. Compatibility with platforms like the , , , and ensured integration into NATO's doctrines, doubling effective ordnance loads on light fighters compared to equivalent-weight conventional bombs.

Design and Production of BL755

The BL755 cluster bomb was developed in the early 1970s by Hunting Engineering Limited of , , , in collaboration with the Ministry of Defence to provide an air-dropped munition effective against armored vehicles. The design emphasized low-altitude delivery compatibility, with the bomb structured as a cylindrical aluminum casing approximately 2.45 meters long and weighing 267 kg when fully loaded, housing 147 submunitions divided into seven internal bays. Each submunition featured a (HEAT) shaped-charge derived from technologies similar to the BLU-26/B, engineered to generate an explosive-formed penetrator jet capable of defeating up to 250 mm of rolled homogeneous armor through focused chemical energy transfer rather than pure kinetic impact. Production commenced in 1972 at Hunting Engineering facilities, with a total of 60,598 units manufactured by January 1996, alongside over 8.9 million associated submunitions. The manufacturing process prioritized modular assembly of the submunitions, each equipped with a parachute-retardation system for aerodynamic stability during descent, ensuring consistent orientation for detonation upon ground impact. A pyrotechnic height-of-burst initiated submunition ejection via sidewall vents at altitudes optimized for target coverage, typically 30-90 meters above ground level in low-level release profiles, allowing radial dispersion patterns up to 100 meters in diameter dependent on release speed and height. This mechanism relied on timed delay post-release to achieve reliable dispersal without reliance on or proximity sensors, reflecting engineering trade-offs for simplicity and cost in 1970s-era aerial munitions. Core design decisions centered on maximizing submunition density and dispersion efficacy for area saturation against mechanized formations, with empirical ground testing validating shaped-charge penetration against armored plates under controlled impact conditions. The absence of or self-deactivation features in the original submunitions stemmed from production priorities favoring reliability over post-strike hazard mitigation, a choice common in pre-Convention on Cluster Munitions era weapons. Compatibility with standard bomb racks facilitated integration onto platforms like the and , underscoring the modular engineering approach.

Variants and Upgrades

The BL755 cluster bomb received targeted engineering modifications to enhance reliability and operational flexibility, primarily addressing submunition performance and delivery constraints identified in early deployments. The IBL755 variant incorporated upgraded bomblets with improved fuzing mechanisms and designs, increasing armor capability against hardened targets while reducing failure rates in submunition deployment and . These changes focused on empirical fixes to bomblet reliability, stemming from field data showing inconsistencies in explosive yield and stability during parachute-retarded descent. A more significant upgrade, the RBL755, integrated a —sourced from —to function as a , enabling release from medium altitudes rather than the original low-level toss-bombing profile limited to approximately 500 feet. This modification, introduced to mitigate risks from ground-based air defenses encountered in high-threat environments, allowed deployment from heights up to several thousand feet, with the altimeter triggering submunition dispersal at a preset altitude to optimize spread pattern and minimize deployment errors. The RBL755 was rapidly qualified for service ahead of the 1991 , where low-altitude tactics proved vulnerable, and subsequent testing confirmed reduced dud rates through consistent height-of-burst control. Both variants retained the core dispenser design but prioritized causal fixes to real-world failure modes, such as erratic dispersion from variable release speeds and heights, without altering the 147-submunition payload.

Withdrawal and Replacement Efforts

The United Kingdom Ministry of Defence announced the withdrawal of the BL755 from Royal Air Force service in March 2007, prior to the country's signature of the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM) in December 2008. This decision aligned with ongoing stockpile reviews and the impending introduction of the MBDA Brimstone missile, which offered superior precision-guided capabilities against armored targets, addressing the BL755's limitations in engaging modern tank armor protected by reactive plating and spaced layers. The BL755 had last seen operational use by British forces during the initial combat phase of the 2003 Iraq invasion, after which assessments highlighted its reduced effectiveness relative to evolving threats requiring standoff, low-collateral strikes over area saturation. Following ratification of the CCM in 2010, the committed to destroying its declared stockpiles within the treaty's five-year deadline, prioritizing military obsolescence and operational upgrades alongside compliance. The entered service in the mid-2000s, providing a direct replacement with and functionality, enabling selective targeting that minimized risks inherent in the BL755's submunition dispersal—though primary drivers stemmed from tactical requirements for accuracy in high-threat environments rather than humanitarian concerns alone. Destruction efforts culminated in the elimination of remaining UK-held munitions by late 2013, ensuring full transition to precision munitions like and Paveway-guided bombs for anti-armor roles. In contrast, non-CCM states such as continued employing BL755 munitions post-2008, including documented uses during the Yemen conflict starting in 2015, where Saudi-led coalitions assessed the weapon's area-denial effects as suitable for countering dispersed insurgent threats amid rugged terrain and mobile targets. These deployments reflected differing strategic evaluations, prioritizing volume of fire against asymmetric forces over CCM restrictions, with Saudi forces confirming BL755 employment in strikes before pledging cessation in December 2016 following international scrutiny. Such persistence underscored how military necessities—e.g., suppressing fortified positions without precision infrastructure—varied by operational context, even as CCM parties phased out similar systems.

Technical Specifications

Overall Design and Components

The BL755 is a free-fall cluster bomb designed to resemble a conventional 450-kilogram , but distinguished by a hardened along its spine to facilitate ejection release from pylons and crutching during carriage. Its cylindrical body houses an internal payload bay divided into compartments for submunitions, with the overall structure optimized for aerodynamic stability during unpowered descent. The measures 2.451 meters in length and 0.419 meters in diameter, with a total mass of 277 kilograms, including the inert casing estimated at around 100 kilograms and the explosive payload comprising 147 submunitions. The system employs an all-ways-acting impact mechanism or selectable time delay to trigger expulsion charges, which deploy the submunitions at a predetermined altitude or upon ground contact, with operational limits tied to release velocities not exceeding typical tactical dive-bombing profiles. Each submunition, designated BL755 Mk 1, weighs 1.18 kilograms and incorporates a high-explosive dual-purpose with a liner forming an (EFP) upon detonation, enabling armor penetration of up to 250 millimeters at oblique angles while producing secondary fragmentation for anti-personnel effects. The submunitions are arranged in seven internal bays, each holding 21 units, secured by pyrotechnic expulsion systems that ensure reliable release without reliance on external power sources. Variants such as the RBL755 integrate a for proximity-initiated dispersal, enhancing precision in low-level deliveries.

Submunitions and Dispersion Mechanism

The BL755 cluster bomb contains 147 high-explosive dual-purpose () submunitions arranged in seven internal bays of 21 each, divided by a central aluminum . Each submunition features a designed to generate an explosively formed capable of penetrating up to 250 mm of rolled homogeneous armor, optimized for top-attack against armored . Upon , the also produces approximately 2,000 fragmentation pieces for secondary effects against personnel and soft targets. Release is initiated by a fuze—originally mechanical and later upgraded with proximity sensing in 1992—triggered at low altitudes around 90 meters (300 feet) during high-speed overflights. Ejection occurs rearward and sideways via a central propellant cartridge combined with bay-specific inflatable bladders that expand like airbags, propelling submunitions up to 18 meters laterally at timed intervals for even distribution. Following expulsion, stabilizing coronets (on Mk 1 variants) or parachutes (on Mk 2) deploy to orient the submunitions nose-down and retard descent, ensuring impact at velocities suitable for shaped charge performance against explosive reactive armor through sustained jet velocity. The dispersion mechanism yields probabilistic area coverage of approximately 120 by 240 meters (400 by 800 feet) in an elliptical footprint, compensating for delivery inaccuracies in by statistically ensuring multiple submunition strikes on clustered targets. Submunitions arm post-ejection via safety and arming units (SAFU), with piezoelectric fuzes detonating on ground impact to maximize anti-armor lethality from optimal angles. This timed, ballistic spread relies on the physics of ejection momentum, aerodynamic stabilization, and gravity-driven scatter rather than active guidance.

Compatibility and Delivery Platforms

The BL755 was designed for integration with strike aircraft, principally the and , employing low-level toss or laydown release profiles to facilitate submunition dispersal over armored targets. These platforms utilized the bomb's spinal saddle for ejector release, with typical envelopes encompassing altitudes of 200–500 feet and speeds up to 450 knots to ensure safe separation and pattern coverage. A 1992 upgrade incorporating proximity fuzing expanded viable release altitudes to approximately 1,000 feet while maintaining speeds in the 300–600 knot range, based on empirical testing of dispersal dynamics and fragmentation risks. Subsequent adaptations certified the BL755 for the GR1, accommodating its higher operational speeds through modified dispensing patterns, though practical employment favored precision alternatives in low-threat environments. The retained compatibility as part of its legacy free-fall munitions suite, supporting up to six BL755 units alongside general-purpose bombs, prior to phase-out in favor of guided weapons by 2008. Export variants featured integrations for non-UK platforms, including the 5BA, where fixed-view trials confirmed release mechanics and submunition ejection up to 18 meters sideways from the dispenser. For Middle Eastern users, adaptations enabled carriage on the Northrop F-5E/F, aligning with regional F-5 fleets equipped for anti-armor roles via standard 1,000-pound bomb lugs. These configurations preserved core release parameters while accounting for aircraft-specific and limitations.

Operational History

British Deployments

The BL755 cluster bomb saw its first combat deployment by British forces during the in May 1982, when Sea Harriers of the and RAF Harrier GR.3s employed it against Argentine ground positions, primarily in an anti-infantry and anti-vehicle role from ultra-low altitudes. The munitions were released over targets such as troop concentrations and logistics sites near Stanley, with empirical accounts noting submunition impacts on Argentine vehicles amid challenging weather and low-level delivery constraints. In the of 1991, under , the Royal Air Force deployed the BL755 from Jaguar aircraft for area denial and missions, including drops totaling eight units aimed at disrupting Iraqi ground movements and highway retreats. These sorties contributed to broader RAF cluster bomb usage, which constituted over 50% of munitions expended, targeting armored concentrations and supply routes with the weapon's submunitions designed for anti-tank effects. The BL755 received limited subsequent employment in British operations, including RAF missions during the invasion (Operation Telic), marking its final combat use before withdrawal from service amid policy decisions to phase out cluster munitions. No verified UK combat deployments occurred after early , aligning with eventual stockpile destruction under international commitments by 2013.

Deployments by Other Operators

The Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force utilized BL755 cluster bombs extensively during the from 1980 to 1988, primarily against Iraqi armored vehicles and troop concentrations using F-4 Phantom II aircraft. One documented deployment occurred on 4 April 1981, when Iranian F-4s dropped BL755s on Al-Walid Air Base in western to suppress military infrastructure and forces. These operations targeted formations and logistics nodes, leveraging the bomb's dispersion of 147 submunitions for area suppression in mechanized warfare contexts. In the Saudi-led 's intervention in beginning March 2015, BL755 munitions were employed in against Houthi-controlled military positions through 2016. officials confirmed a limited number of BL755 drops, with remnants including submunition casings verified in strike sites near Houthi-held areas, aimed at disrupting insurgent armor and fortifications. The announced cessation of BL755 use in 2016 following international scrutiny, marking the first confirmed combat application of the weapon post-1999.

Notable Combat Incidents

During the , Sea Harriers of the Royal Navy's dropped BL755 cluster bombs on the runway at Port Stanley Airfield as part of coordinated strikes on 1 May 1982 aimed at denying Argentine air operations. The submunitions dispersed over the target area to achieve anti-personnel and area-denial effects against aircraft, fuel storage, and ground positions, with the weapon's low-altitude release enabling broad coverage despite challenging weather and defenses. In the 1990-1991 , RAF Jaguar GR1A aircraft from Nos. 6 and 41 Squadrons expended eight BL755 bombs primarily in roles against Iraqi armored and infantry concentrations, contributing to coalition efforts to disrupt ground forces though specific sortie outcomes emphasized integration with laser-guided alternatives for precision. In Yemen's , the Saudi-led coalition deployed BL755 from IDS aircraft, with a notable malfunction documented in Al-Khadhra village, district, Hajjah governorate, where a strike in late December 2015 left approximately 80 unexploded submunitions—over half of the bomb's 147 bomblets—scattered in an agricultural field, as evidenced by a 1-meter-deep and fresh remnants recovered by the Yemen Executive Mine Action Centre in 2016. The high dud rate highlighted reliability issues in operational dispersal, endangering civilians and requiring specialized clearance, with no immediate casualties reported from this specific failure but contributing to broader post-strike hazards.

Operators and Proliferation

Active Operators

and the , neither of which has joined the 2008 , maintain stockpiles of the BL755 cluster bomb, enabling potential operational use despite international restrictions on such weapons. The possesses UK-manufactured BL-755 bombs, as documented in defense assessments. 's inventory includes BL755 units, confirmed through their deployment in until at least December 2016, after which the kingdom pledged to cease employment of this specific munition but provided no verification of stockpile destruction. The Air Force of Zimbabwe holds BL755 cluster bombs, originally acquired in the late 1990s for arming BAE Hawk aircraft, with no public reports of divestment or destruction as of the 2020s; these have been retained amid the country's non-adherence to cluster munition bans. No open-source evidence indicates new BL755 acquisitions by any nation since the early 2010s, reflecting the weapon's obsolescence relative to precision-guided alternatives and global proliferation controls.

Former Operators and Transfers

The , the primary producer and initial operator of the BL755, divested its entire stockpile by destruction in 2007 as required under the , which it ratified following negotiations in . This action followed a March 2007 ban on operational use of the BL755 and similar cluster weapons by British forces, driven by international treaty obligations rather than unilateral policy shifts. Documented exports from the , handled through manufacturers like Hunting Engineering, occurred primarily between the 1970s and 1990s to allied and purchasing states seeking anti-armor capabilities compatible with Western aircraft platforms. Recipients included , the , (with final deliveries in 1989), and (later ). These transfers reflected standard defense trade dynamics, including government-to-government sales for regional security needs, with no verified evidence of illicit diversion channels. Other former operators, such as and the , similarly divested BL755 holdings through destruction after acceding to the , eliminating operational stocks by the early . Yugoslavia's underwent post-1999 amid regional conflicts and sanctions, reducing holdings to non-operational levels without formal destruction programs.

Military Effectiveness

Anti-Armor and Area Denial Capabilities

The BL755 cluster employs 147 (HEAT) submunitions, each equipped with a designed to penetrate armored vehicle plating, supplemented by fragmentation effects for secondary anti-personnel damage. Upon from low-altitude, high-speed delivery—typically at 450 knots and 300 feet—the disperses its over a footprint of approximately 100 by 200 meters, with parachutes on each submunition orienting them for near-vertical impact to optimize armor defeat angles. This dispersion pattern enhances the probability of engaging multiple targets within mechanized formations, outperforming unitary bombs in area coverage against dispersed or moving armor by distributing lethal effects across a broader zone. In area denial roles, the BL755's submunitions establish a hazard zone post-detonation, suppressing enemy by compelling armored and units to avoid or clear the contaminated footprint, thereby delaying advances and facilitating follow-on strikes. Variants like the Hunting Area Denial System adapt the design explicitly for prolonged suppression, leveraging the submunitions' deployment to create persistent barriers to vehicle traffic. Operational deployments, such as RAF strikes in the 1991 where eight BL755s were expended alongside other munitions, demonstrated utility in disrupting Iraqi mechanized elements, though overall cluster bomb efficacy against armor was assessed as limited amid evolving threats. During the 1982 Falklands conflict, forces utilized BL755 against Argentine positions, contributing to the interruption of ground operations in terrain favoring defensive armor employment.

Combat Performance Data

In the 1991 , the BL755 was deployed by Jaguar aircraft during for low-level attacks on , including armored targets. Declassified assessments from the Gulf War Air Power Survey record that UK Jaguars expended 8 BL755 units, each dispersing 147 parachute-retarded submunitions with (HEAT) warheads capable of penetrating at least 250 mm (9.84 inches) of rolled homogeneous armor plating. These submunitions also generate lethal fragmentation effective against accompanying soft-skinned vehicles and personnel within a dispersed footprint. The weapon's combat efficacy against armored formations stems from its area-saturation pattern, which compensates for low-level delivery vulnerabilities—such as exposure to anti-aircraft —by enabling engagement of clustered and vehicles across hundreds of square meters per dispenser. While specific kill attributions for the limited BL755 sorties are not isolated in CENTCOM or battle damage assessments, aggregate air campaign data credit fixed- and rotary-wing strikes with destroying over 1,400 Iraqi and 2,000+ other armored vehicles prior to the ground phase, with dispensers like the BL755 contributing to anti-armor saturation effects in tactical scenarios. A radar-altimeter variant was introduced mid-conflict to permit safer medium-altitude releases, maintaining dispersion reliability without compromising submunition impact velocity.
Combat Use Summary for BL755
Conflict: 1991
Platform: RAF
Expenditures: 8 units (1,176 total submunitions)
Primary Targets: Iraqi armored vehicles and supporting elements
Key Performance Factor: Area coverage offsets delivery risks, yielding high probabilistic kills per design trials against tactical armor concentrations.
Compared to broader incendiary options like , the BL755's targeted /fragmentation profile delivered more discriminate anti-armor outcomes in operational testing, prioritizing vehicle disablement over undifferentiated damage.

Comparative Advantages Over Alternatives

The BL755 offered superior compatibility for low-altitude, high-speed delivery profiles compared to the U.S. CBU-87, enabling deployment from like the at heights as low as 300 feet (91 meters) and speeds up to 450 knots (830 km/h), which was critical for tactical strikes in contested environments where higher-altitude releases risked dispersion inaccuracies or vulnerability. In contrast, the heavier CBU-87 (430 kg versus BL755's 275 kg) was optimized for medium-altitude dispenser release, limiting its effectiveness in the low-level toss-bombing tactics favored by doctrine for rapid, against armored columns. This lighter weight also allowed light strike-fighters to carry nearly twice as many BL755 units as equivalent conventional or heavier munitions, enhancing sortie flexibility for forces facing numerical disadvantages. Against precision-guided munitions like the GBU-12 or early laser-guided bombs, the BL755 provided cost-effective saturation coverage for massed, dispersed threats such as tank concentrations, with a unit cost of approximately $21,700 (1996 dollars) delivering 147 parachute-retarded HEAT submunitions over an elliptical footprint of up to 200 by 100 meters. Precision alternatives, often exceeding $20,000 per unit by the 1990s, prioritized single-target accuracy but proved uneconomical and logistically intensive for area-denial missions against numerically superior ground forces, where the BL755's volume-of-fire approach could neutralize dozens of vehicles per sortie. Non-signatory operators, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, retained BL755 stockpiles into the 2020s for such scenarios, valuing its scalability over the precision paradigm adopted by treaty-bound Western air forces. In doctrinal terms, the BL755 aligned with strategies for outnumbered air forces countering Pact-style armored blitzes, enabling a single or to disperse submunitions across advancing echelons, thereby amplifying without relying on air superiority. This causal edge in probabilistic kill rates against clustered targets—stemming from the submunitions' magnetic influence fuzing and bottom-attack geometry—outweighed the pinpoint focus of guided weapons in high-threat, high-volume engagements, as evidenced by its selection for export to operators confronting regional armor-heavy adversaries.

Reliability and Technical Challenges

Dud Rates and Failure Modes

The original BL755 exhibited elevated dud rates of 5-7% in Ministry of Defence surveillance trials, with failures primarily stemming from parachute non-deployment during low-altitude releases, where descent times shorter than the 2-3 seconds required for extraction, unfolding, and stabilization caused submunitions to strike the ground in unstable orientations, often bypassing initiation. This physics-based mode arises from the causal chain of rapid free-fall limiting mechanical sequencing reliability, compounded by impact angles that fail to generate sufficient deceleration for the crush-sensitive . The RBL755 variant, equipped with a radar altimeter for height-triggered dispersal, demonstrated failure rates below 5% in controlled tests by decoupling ejection from release altitude, yet combat deployments yielded approximately 10-11% duds due to variances in aircraft velocity increasing submunition descent speed and terrain irregularities distorting radar returns, resulting in mistimed ejections that either buried submunitions too deeply for fuze activation or caused high-velocity impacts exceeding design tolerances. Fuze insensitivity in soft or oblique terrain further contributed, as kinetic energy dissipation prevented consistent detonator compression, leaving persistent unexploded ordnance. Empirical data from post-1991 clearance operations, involving recovery of over 95,000 cluster submunitions including BL755 types, indicated long-term UXO persistence at 1-2%, reflecting secondary failure modes such as rendering fuzes inert or burial evading detection, distinct from initial deployment faults. These rates, while lower than acute combat failures, underscore causal factors like penetration depth exceeding sensitivity thresholds, perpetuating hazards independent of primary mechanical issues.

Improvements and Mitigation Attempts

In 1992, Hunting Engineering introduced a upgrade to the BL755, enabling safer release from higher altitudes by triggering dispersal at a preset height above ground, which reduced risks associated with low-level delivery profiles. This modification, incorporated into the RBL755 variant with a , supported medium-altitude drops as prepared for operations like the 1991 , where ground impact testing demonstrated improved dispersal consistency over earlier models. Submunition enhancements focused on aerodynamic stability rather than wholesale electronic overhauls, which were deemed cost-prohibitive for the legacy design. The BL755 Mk2 submunition replaced the original stabilizing coronet with a parachute-retarder system, optimizing the angle of attack for better against armored targets while mitigating erratic descent patterns observed in initial variants. Similarly, the IBL755 bomblet iteration incorporated refinements to boost overall reliability and armor defeat capability without altering core electronics. Operational adaptations included updated delivery guidelines in user manuals, emphasizing optimal release parameters such as speed, altitude, and to maximize submunition functionality, as derived from iterative field trials by manufacturers and adopting forces. These measures prioritized mechanical tweaks and procedural adjustments over radical redesigns, reflecting budgetary constraints and the weapon's established production run.

Long-Term Field Observations

In post-conflict , (UXO) surveys following the 1999 campaign identified BL755 remnants among other submunitions at approximately 30 sites where 83 bombs were deployed, with operations by (NPA) and local teams recovering and destroying thousands of submunitions through (EOD) techniques. Field assessments indicated dud rates for BL755 submunitions ranging from 5% to 7% as claimed by manufacturers and government reports, though operational factors such as soft soil penetration and variable drop altitudes from aircraft elevated actual failure incidences beyond factory-tested baselines. These duds functioned as inadvertent area-denial hazards, contaminating agricultural and civilian areas, yet systematic clearance reduced risks, with NPA documenting over 10 civilian accidents linked to various UXO types by the mid-2000s, mitigated through targeted EOD rather than widespread inaccessibility. In , Saudi-led coalition strikes employing BL755 from 2015 onward left submunition duds in northern provinces, with Amnesty International-verified remnants prompting recoveries amid broader cluster clearance efforts; by 2016, coalition spokespersons acknowledged use and pledged cessation, correlating with reported disposals of UK-origin UXO, though comprehensive metrics remain sparse due to ongoing conflict. Dud proportions aligned with 5-10% field estimates, influenced more by combat delivery variables like dust ingress and jamming in fuzes than inherent manufacturing flaws, as corroborated by defense analyses attributing reliability variances to environmental stressors over production defects. Clearance operations, including manual detection and controlled detonations, addressed these as persistent but containable threats, paralleling UXO management in other theaters. Comparatively, BL755 UXO persistence mirrors that of dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM) from , such as U.S. M483A1 projectiles with reported rates under 2.35% in controlled tests but higher in field conditions due to analogous factors like and impact angles, without evidence of uniquely elevated hazards from the aerial-dispensed design. Long-term monitoring in both and underscores that while duds endure for years, efficacy—evidenced by global destruction of over 96,000 submunitions annually in recent years—prioritizes verifiable remediation over exaggerated contamination narratives from advocacy sources.

Controversies and Debates

Humanitarian and Civilian Impact Claims

Claims of civilian harm from the BL755 cluster bomb primarily stem from its documented use by the Saudi-led coalition in during 2015–2016 airstrikes. reported evidence of a partially detonated BL-755 munition in Hajjah Governorate in May 2016, near populated areas including villages and displacement camps, following coalition strikes. The organization linked remnants, including BL-755 submunitions, to 16 civilian casualties in the region, comprising nine children among those killed or maimed by in minefields created post-strike. These incidents involved submunitions failing to detonate on impact, scattering over wide areas and posing ongoing risks to civilians scavenging or farming nearby, though verification relied on field investigations of remnants and witness accounts rather than direct attribution to BL-755 in every casualty. Broader NGO critiques, such as those from the Cluster Munition Coalition, emphasize the BL-755's potential for persistent duds—estimated at 5–10% failure rates for its PB-250 submunitions based on historical testing—contributing to long-term hazards akin to de facto landmines. However, BL-755-specific casualty data remains sparse compared to other cluster munitions like Russia's RBK series or U.S. CBU-87, with global reports documenting fewer than 20 verified deaths or injuries directly tied to BL-755 remnants across conflicts. Advocacy groups attribute this to limited deployment volumes rather than inherent safety, noting the bomb's wide dispersal pattern (up to 500 meters radius) inherently risks in non-precision strikes, even absent intentional civilian targeting. No evidence indicates systematic civilian targeting with BL-755 by operators like the or transferred users; reported impacts arise from area-denial effects in contested zones, where military objectives overlapped with civilian proximity. verifications, including UN panels, have corroborated use but highlighted challenges in isolating BL-755 contributions amid mixed , underscoring the need for incident-specific forensic over generalized NGO extrapolations.

Strategic Utility and Policy Defenses

Military doctrine from the and has emphasized the strategic value of cluster munitions like the BL755 in engaging dispersed or massed targets, such as armored columns and infantry concentrations, where single-precision strikes prove insufficient or logistically burdensome. These weapons deliver 147 submunitions designed for anti-tank penetration and fragmentation effects, enabling broad area denial that enhances firepower economy against numerically superior foes. Prior to the 2008 (CCM), joint analyses concluded that prohibitions would erode capabilities critical for high-intensity warfare, particularly against adversaries employing saturation tactics reminiscent of War-era threats. Non-signatory nations, including and , maintain stockpiles of munitions for operational necessities in asymmetric conflicts, where precision-guided alternatives remain cost-prohibitive or technologically inaccessible. These states argue that such systems provide essential deterrence and response options against irregular forces or proxy threats, sustaining proliferation despite international pressure. U.S. policy defenses, echoed in Department of Defense evaluations, underscore retention for scenarios like Ukraine's counteroffensives, where variants effectively neutralize positions, vehicle convoys, and troop assemblies over wide fronts. Counterarguments to CCM-driven bans highlight a disparity: while treaty adherents face self-imposed limitations, non-signatories retain advantages in projection, potentially tilting balances in peer or near-peer engagements. U.S. assessments post-2022 have validated this utility, noting cluster munitions' role in amplifying defensive depth without equivalent reliance on scarce unitary bombs. Though humanitarian data from CCM monitors documents post-strike risks, military rationales prioritize verifiable combat efficacy in denying enemy maneuver, as demonstrated in doctrinal applications against area-based threats.

International Treaties and Non-Signatory Rationales

The , adopted on 30 May 2008 in and entering into force on 1 August 2010, prohibits the development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, transfer, and use of cluster munitions, defined as munitions that release submunitions each weighing less than 20 kilograms. As of 2023, the treaty has 112 states parties, leaving approximately 83 non-states parties, including major powers such as the , , , , , and . These non-signatories represent over 80% of global population and include key producers and users of such weapons. The , producer of the BL755, ratified the CCM on 30 June 2010 and fulfilled its destruction obligations by completing the elimination of 195,000 cluster munitions, including all BL755 stockpiles, by December 2013. UK export controls post-ratification prohibited further transfers of cluster munitions, though pre-2010 deliveries to allies, such as Saudi Arabia's acquisition of BL755 units, permitted their retention and operational use by recipients unbound by the . No binding international mechanisms enforce phase-out or destruction mandates on non-signatories, allowing legacy systems like the BL755—designed in the with submunitions featuring retardation to reduce dispersion errors—to remain in active inventories without post-2016 compliance deadlines. Non-signatories prioritize state security imperatives, asserting cluster munitions' effectiveness for area denial against massed infantry, armored formations, or swarm attacks in peer or near-peer conflicts, where precision-guided alternatives prove insufficient for saturating large targets economically. For instance, , a non-party, deployed UK-supplied BL755 in 2015–2017 operations against Houthi forces in , targeting missile and launch sites to counter cross-border barrages exceeding 200 attacks on Saudi population centers, with coalition statements emphasizing their role in defending sovereign territory from asymmetric threats. Similarly, the maintains that cluster munitions address artillery shortages in prolonged engagements, as evidenced by Department of Defense assessments of their volume fire superiority over unitary munitions in scenarios like armored breakthroughs or swarms. Many non-signatories contend that submunition reliability enhancements—such as fuzes and spin-braking designs in post-1990s variants—have lowered dud rates to 1–5% in controlled tests, rendering blanket prohibitions unwarranted given the weapons' validated combat utility against time-sensitive, dispersed threats unattainable by other means. , for example, describes cluster munitions as "legitimate " integral to doctrinal needs for suppressing enemy air defenses and troop concentrations, rejecting CCM constraints absent universal adherence by adversaries. This position aligns with empirical evaluations from non-party militaries, which prioritize operational deterrence over humanitarian-driven restrictions, particularly in regions facing from non-state actors employing low-cost, high-volume tactics.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] BL755 Cluster Bomb and BL755 Submunition - Archived 12/97
    Dec 3, 1996 · Bomb diameter. 41.9 centimeters. 16.5 inches. Bomb length. 245.1 centimeters. 96.5 inches. Bomb weight. 277 kilograms. 609.4 pounds. Submunition ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    Bl 755 aircraft cluster bomb - CAT-UXO
    The 600lb BL-755 is a free-fall cluster-bomb comprising of a cluster-bomb body and a No 119 Mk 1 tail-unit. Inside the nose part of the cluster-bomb, is the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    BL755 British Cluster Bomb - ODIN - OE Data Integration Network
    Jun 14, 2024 · The weapon was developed in the early 1970s by Hunting Engineering, Ltd. of Ampthill, Bedfordshire but manufactured elsewhere at their ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Use of Cluster Bombs in Yugoslavia - TICKING TIME BOMBS
    The RBL755 is a modified version of the BL755, which the British Royal Air Force used in the Gulf war in 1991 (see below). 8 AWar Briefing, Days 31 & 32 ...Missing: usage | Show results with:usage
  5. [5]
    [PDF] UK-Manufactured BL-755 Cluster Munition in Yemen | Amnesty UK
    May 7, 2016 · The UK-manufactured cluster munition could not have been used in a previous conflict as previous conflicts did not target the area involved.<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    UK-made cluster bombs used in Yemen, Michael Fallon confirms
    Dec 19, 2016 · "This munition was used against legitimate military targets to defend Saudi towns and villages against continuous attacks by Houthi militia, ...
  7. [7]
    BL755 Cluster Munition - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Jul 19, 2006 · Information on the failure rate of the BL755 cluster bomb used by the RAF is collected during regular in-service surveillance trials. ... BL755 ...Missing: Gulf War credible sources
  8. [8]
    [PDF] A GUIDE TO CLUSTER MUNITIONS
    Ethiopian aircraft also dropped cluster munitions on civilians in Eritrea. On 9 May 2000, UK-manufactured BL755 cluster bombs were dropped on a camp ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The cluster bomb: Britain's new weapon against tactical targets
    The BL 755 cluster bomb weighs only 600 Ibs; it can be used with simple or ... The modest weight of the BL 755 weapon enables the average light strike ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  10. [10]
    BL755 - Military Wiki - Fandom
    The BL755 looks like a standard 450 kilograms (1,000 lb) general purpose bomb but with a hard "saddle" on the spine for ejector release and crutching pad ...
  11. [11]
    appendix a: descriptions of cluster bomb types - Human Rights Watch
    The BL755 is manufactured by Hunting Engineering. The BL755 cluster bomb was originally designed for low-altitude delivery only, and in the Gulf war ...
  12. [12]
    BL-755 Mk 1 Submunition - CAT-UXO
    This is the British BL-755 Mk 1, a High-Explosive Dual-Purpose (HEDP), Anti-Vehicle (AV) and Anti-Personnel (AP) submunition, dispensed from the 272kg (600lb) ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  13. [13]
    Wingman Models -F32006 BL.755 Cluster Bomb Units - Super-Hobby
    The BL755 bomb was developed in the 1960s and its production began in 1972 at the Hunting Engineering Limited facilities. The task of the bomb was to destroy ...
  14. [14]
    Submunitions - CAT-UXO
    The BL-755-Mk-1 submunitions are then ejected sideways, as much as 18m (60ft) from the dispenser at pre-set intervals. Each of the ejected submunitions is then ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  15. [15]
    RAF Tornados - Steadfast Strikers - Key Aero
    Jan 17, 2019 · An upgraded version also entered service known as the RBL755, which had a radar altimeter allowing it to be used from medium level. Both the ...
  16. [16]
    BL755 - Wikipedia
    BL755 is a cluster bomb developed by Hunting Aircraft that contains 147 parachute-retarded high explosive anti-tank (HEAT) submunitions.Missing: dispenser | Show results with:dispenser
  17. [17]
    Low level attack and GW1 - NavWeaps Forums - Tapatalk
    The modification involved the provision of a Motorola radar altimeter ... RBL755 – 'R' for radar." Post ... "The Gulf War along with other factors again ...
  18. [18]
    UK to retire air-launched cluster bomb stockpile | News | Flight Global
    Mar 26, 2007 · The British Army will be required to dispose of almost 28 million cluster weapon submunitions used by its Multiple-Launch Rocket System. Source: ...
  19. [19]
    Brimstone - GlobalSecurity.org
    Oct 25, 2021 · The Royal Air Force needs a replacement for BL755, a weapon that was becoming increasingly ineffective against modern armour. It was to be ...
  20. [20]
    Brimstone - Missile Threat - CSIS
    Dec 6, 2017 · The origin of the Brimstone can be traced to the United Kingdom's cancellation of the Royal Air Force's (RAF) steerable cluster bomb (VJ291) ...
  21. [21]
    Three years after global ban, UK to complete destruction of all ...
    The UK has already destroyed 95% of its stockpile of cluster munitions and is due to complete destruction of the remainder by the end of this year.Missing: 2010 | Show results with:2010
  22. [22]
    Saudi Arabia: Immediately abandon all use of cluster munitions
    Dec 19, 2016 · General Ahmed al-Asiri, the spokesperson for the Saudi Arabia-led military coalition, stated today that it would cease use of UK-made BL-755 ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] THE ROYAL AIR FORCE IN OPERATION GRANBY, THE FIRST ...
    Jan 20, 1991 · The RAF clearly understood the threat presented to low-flying aircraft by Iraqi GBAD, yet there was no co-ordinated action to develop different.
  24. [24]
    BL755 use on GR1 Tornadoes? - Aircraft Cold War - Britmodeller.com
    Nov 27, 2019 · Also the RAF Tornadoes used the RBL-755 during the Balkans War, just an addition of antennas forward of the fins is required to make them RBLs.
  25. [25]
    Eurofighter Typhoon - aircraft museum - Aerospaceweb.org
    Apr 6, 2011 · Eurofighter Typhoon (Eurofighter 2000) history, specifications ... 500-kg GP, 1,000-kg GP, GBU-24 LGB, Paveway II/III/IV, BL755 cluster.<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    DASSAULT MIRAGE FIXED VIEW BL755 CLUSTER BOMB TRIALS ...
    A compilation of fixed view footage of BL755 cluster bomb releases from Dassault Mirage 5BA serial BA15. Cameras mounted on the aircraft provide views ...Missing: integration F1 F- 5 export
  27. [27]
    Bomb, Cluster, 600lb, Type BL755 - Mobile Guide
    The BL755 in front of you was a type of Cluster Bomb Unit carried by RAF Hawker Siddeley Harrier GR.3s during the Falklands Conflict.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] UNITED KINGDOM - Mine Action Review
    Mar 29, 2018 · As part of its demining efforts, the United Kingdom destroys cluster munition remnants (CMR), as well as other explosive remnants of war (ERW), ...
  29. [29]
    Operation Desert Storm: RAF Jaguars over the Gulf - Key Aero
    Feb 4, 2024 · The detachment's 22 pilots dropped 750 1,000lb general purpose (GP) bombs, eight BL755 and 385 CBU-87 cluster bombs, and fired 32 x 19-round ...
  30. [30]
    House of Commons - Defence - Fourteenth Report - Parliament UK
    Over 50% of the bombs dropped by the RAF were cluster bombs. 148 The BL755 has been in-service with the RAF since 1972. Even in 1991, the MoD acknowledged that ...
  31. [31]
    Flying & fighting the F-4 Phantom II in the Iran-Iraq War - Hush-Kit
    Sep 11, 2020 · These are cluster bombs designed to destroy tanks and armoured troop carriers. That day I got to take my revenge and wage my own personal war. I ...
  32. [32]
    GBR - BL-755 : Cluster Bombs and Submunition - Armedconflicts.com
    Aug 26, 2007 · The BL-755 bombers also came into action on 4 April 1981 during a mission in which the Iranian Air Force bombed Al-Wallid Air Base. BL-755s were ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Regarding the BL755 Hunting cluster bomb - Britmodeller.com
    Sep 19, 2014 · The BL755 was used in combat by the Royal Navy during the Falklands War, and the RAF during the Gulf War and Bosnian War.
  34. [34]
    Saudi Arabia admits it used UK-made cluster bombs in Yemen
    Dec 19, 2016 · Saudi Arabia has finally admitted that it used UK-manufactured cluster bombs against Houthi rebels in Yemen, increasing pressure on the British government.
  35. [35]
    Yemen: Children among civilians killed and maimed in cluster bomb ...
    May 23, 2016 · 16 new civilian casualties, including nine children, documented in aftermath of Saudi Arabia-led coalition's cluster bomb use ...
  36. [36]
    Yemen: Arab coalition to stop using UK cluster bombs - Al Jazeera
    Dec 20, 2016 · The BL-755 bomb, manufactured in Britain in the 1970s, is known to be in the stockpiles of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, it said.
  37. [37]
    Saudi-led coalition ends use of UK-made cluster bombs in Yemen
    Dec 22, 2016 · ... cluster munitions used by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen since April 2015, besides the BL-755 and the sensor fuzed weapons. On the same ...
  38. [38]
    Saudi Arabia - Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor
    The Saudi Arabia-led coalition's use of BL-755 cluster munitions marked the first recorded use of UK-made cluster munitions since the Convention on Cluster ...
  39. [39]
    Manufacturer's plate from BL755 Cluster Bomb
    Taken from a Cluster Bomb that was dropped by a Sea Harrier from HMS Hermes during a raid on the runway at Stanley Airfield.
  40. [40]
    United Arab Emirates (UAE) - Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor
    Jul 29, 2025 · According to Jane's Information Group, the UAE Air Force possesses UK-made BL-755 bombs and has received Hydra-70 air-to-surface rockets.
  41. [41]
    Zimbabwe Govt. Orders Military Hardware - allAfrica.com
    Dec 18, 1998 · His number two, Air-Vice Marshal Henry Muchena, refused to comment. The sources said the same deal would include 65 BL 755 cluster bombs to be ...Missing: force | Show results with:force
  42. [42]
    British forces banned from using 'dumb' cluster bombs - The Guardian
    Mar 18, 2007 · The two bombs now banned are the RAF's BL755 weapon, which was used extensively in Iraq and in Kosovo in 1999, and the cluster weapon ...
  43. [43]
    Survey of Cluster Munitions Produced and Stockpiled
    Apr 10, 2007 · BL-755 cluster bombs are reported to be stockpiled by Belgium, Eritrea, Germany, India, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi ...
  44. [44]
    Saudi Arabia and UK-supplied cluster bombs: what do we know?
    Dec 19, 2016 · He added: “The United Kingdom last provided BL755 cluster munitions to Saudi Arabia nearly 30 years ago. The final delivery was in 1989. We ...
  45. [45]
    Cluster Munitions - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Apr 10, 2002 · There are no records of any Government-to-Government sales of surplus BL755 cluster munitions (or other surplus cluster munitions) by the ...
  46. [46]
    Cluster Munition Monitor 2024
    Cluster Munition Monitor 2024 covers cluster munition ban policy, use, production, transfers, and stockpiling globally; and contains information on developments ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Tactical Dispersal of Fighter Aircraft - DTIC
    BL 755 has been developed to meet a requirement for a weapon that will yield a high probability of kill against a range of small hard and soft targets ....
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Environmental Threat of Military Operations
    The BL-755 is a British-manufactured cluster bomb. Sources: U.S. Department of the Air Force, Gulf War Air Power Survey (GW APS),. Volume III, Part I, p ...Missing: usage | Show results with:usage
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Gulf War Air Power Survey. Volume 4. Weapons, Tactics, and ... - DTIC
    Gulf War Air Power Survey directed by Eliot A. C, %en. Includes an unnumbered summary report by Thomas A. Keaney and. Eliot A. Cohen. Includes bibliographical ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Humanitarian, military, technical and legal challenges of cluster ...
    BL-755 cluster bombs are reported to be stockpiled by Belgium, Eritrea ... submunitions, Mr Clark agreed that submunitions with self-destruct features are.
  51. [51]
    Cluster Munitions: 17 Mar 2006 - TheyWorkForYou
    Mar 17, 2006 · The original BL755 and the Radar BL755 (RBL755). Recent statistics for both variants show an overall failure rate of approximately 6 per cent.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster Munition
    Nov 6, 2006 · In 2001, failure rates of BLU-97 submuni- tions were estimated at some seven percent, and RBL755 submunitions at about 11 per- cent.151 The ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] The UK Government's efforts to understand cluster munitions and ...
    The BL 755 is described in Jane's Air Launched Weapons (1998) as for use against “a wide range of small hard and soft targets.” Notably, “in addition to its ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    BL-755 Mk 2 Submunition - CAT-UXO
    It is an armour-piercing submunition for use against hard-skinned targets with fragmentation against troops and soft-skinned targets.Missing: ejection mechanism pistons bladders
  55. [55]
    [PDF] CLUSTER MUNITION REMNANTS IN NORTHERN KOSOVO
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members conducted an aerial bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 24 March to 10 June 1999.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] EXPECTED CIVILIAN DAMAGE AND THE PROPORTIONALITY ...
    Nov 17, 2006 · Parliament the failure rate of BL755 was given at 6%. Failure rates for BLU97 and. BL755 submunitions have also been put at 20% in other ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Cluster Munitions Remnants in Kosovo - JMU Scholarly Commons
    Kosovo had consid- erable mine and explosive remnants of war (ERW) contamination, includ- ing cluster munition remnants (CMR) from armed conflict between forces ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Saudi Arabia-led coalition has used UK-manufactured cluster ...
    May 23, 2016 · Letter to David Cameron calls for urgent investigation into 'scandal' of UK-supplied BL-755 cluster bomb being used in village in northern ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Reliability of Cluster Munitions
    6 Factors that can have an effect on reliability include environmental conditions such as severe weather and soft ground, as well as human error. These will ...
  60. [60]
    Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress
    Dec 16, 2024 · First, the U.S.-supplied DPICM ammunition has an unexploded ordnance rate of less than 2.35%, Kahl stated on July 7, 2023. Cluster munitions ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] CLEARING CLUSTER MUNITION REMNANTS 2024
    Aug 1, 2024 · A total of 96,553 unexploded submunitions were destroyed worldwide during clearance, survey, and explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) ...
  62. [62]
    Yemen: Evidence counters UK claims about use of British-made ...
    Jun 6, 2016 · In May 2016, Amnesty International researchers investigated the remains of a partially detonated UK-manufactured BL-755 cluster munition in ...Missing: bomb | Show results with:bomb
  63. [63]
    Evidence counters UK claims denying use of British-made cluster ...
    Jun 6, 2016 · Spokespeople available for interview Amnesty International has published detailed information rebutting claims by the British government ...
  64. [64]
    Meeting the Challenge: Protecting Civilians through the Convention ...
    Nov 22, 2010 · This book is the culmination of a decade of research by Human Rights Watch. It details the humanitarian toll of cluster munitions, ...
  65. [65]
    Cluster Munitions and Rearming for Great Power Competition
    May 9, 2018 · Cluster munitions provide the Joint Force with an effective and necessary capability to engage area targets, including massed formations of ...
  66. [66]
    Why Biden Was Justified to Send Cluster Munitions to Ukraine | RAND
    Aug 14, 2023 · Cluster munitions are legitimate weapons with clear military utility, as they provide distinct advantages against a range of threats in the ...Missing: reports | Show results with:reports
  67. [67]
    Iran - Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor
    Cluster munitions were used in Iran during the 1980–1988 Iran–Iraq War. ... According to one source, during the war, Iraq used air-dropped cluster bombs in 1984 ...
  68. [68]
    Cluster Munitions: What Are They, and Why Is the United States ...
    Jul 10, 2023 · Dud rates vary from 2 percent to 40 percent, with U.S. submunitions on the lower end and Russian submunitions on the higher end. Duds act like ...Missing: environmental factors
  69. [69]
    Cluster Munitions and the Ukraine War - Lieber Institute - West Point
    Feb 28, 2022 · Cluster munitions have been regarded as militarily effective ways of engaging wide area or dispersed targets, such as soft-skinned vehicles, ...Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments
  70. [70]
    Convention on Cluster Munitions. Dublin, 30 May 2008 - UNTC
    Signatories : 107. Parties : 112. Text, : Certified true copy. United Nations ... “Until further notice, the Convention shall not apply to the Faroe Islands.”.Missing: list | Show results with:list
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    An examination of Saudi Arabia's airstrike rules of engagement and ...
    Mar 19, 2019 · ... BL-755 cluster munitions in Yemen. This munition was used ... strikes, have taken a staggering toll on lives in Yemen. According ...
  73. [73]