Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Banking as a service


Banking as a Service (BaaS) is a modular financial model in which federally insured banks license their —such as opening, payments , and lending capabilities—to non-bank firms via application programming (APIs), permitting these partners to originate and manage banking products for end customers without the partners needing to secure their own banking charters or comply fully with banking regulations.
This arrangement emerged from early retailer-bank collaborations in the and gained momentum in the with the proliferation of platforms and standards, fostering embedded finance where banking functions integrate seamlessly into non-financial applications like or mobility services. BaaS enables banks to monetize unused capacity and distribute services at scale while allowing s to innovate rapidly without the capital burdens of licensing, though empirical regulatory assessments reveal it often concentrates operational, compliance, and reputational risks on sponsor banks, who retain ultimate liability for failures in partner-managed activities. Key defining characteristics include the reliance on third-party program managers for customer acquisition and servicing, which has driven notable achievements like accelerated adoption of digital wallets and solutions but also sparked controversies over diluted oversight leading to lapses in anti-money laundering controls, error resolution, and fraud prevention. U.S. banking agencies have responded with heightened scrutiny, issuing guidance on third-party and conducting targeted examinations to address systemic vulnerabilities exposed in BaaS partnerships, underscoring the causal tension between innovation speed and prudent risk controls.

History

Origins in Fintech and Open Banking

The 2008 global financial crisis eroded public trust in traditional banks, prompting entrepreneurs to develop solutions that circumvented established banking silos by leveraging modular infrastructure for . This environment catalyzed the conceptual foundations of Banking as a Service (BaaS), where licensed banks provide backend capabilities—such as account issuance and payment processing—through to non-bank entities, enabling rapid deployment of banking-like features without requiring to obtain full banking charters. In , the Revised (PSD2), enforced from January 13, 2018, served as a key regulatory enabler by requiring banks to grant secure access to third-party providers (TPPs), thereby fostering competition and innovation in payment services. PSD2's mandates for open interfaces allowed fintechs to integrate directly with bank data and systems, laying the groundwork for BaaS models that emphasized and reduced barriers for new entrants in the payments ecosystem. Early European adopters capitalized on this framework to offer white-label banking services, aligning with broader initiatives aimed at consumer data control and market contestability. In the United States, absent a direct equivalent to PSD2, BaaS emerged in the mid-2010s through voluntary partnerships between platforms and insured banks, exemplified by Stripe's 2010 founding to simplify online payments and Plaid's 2013 launch to connect apps with bank accounts via APIs. These collaborations enabled non-banks to embed functions, such as fund transfers and account management, into their products, addressing the need for scalable infrastructure amid rising demand for digital financial tools post-crisis. By mid-decade, such integrations marked initial practical implementations of BaaS, prioritizing through bank sponsors while avoiding the regulatory hurdles of banking.

Expansion and Market Growth (2010s–2020s)

The expansion of Banking as a Service (BaaS) accelerated in the through the widespread adoption of standardized and infrastructures, which enabled modular integration of functions like account management and payments into third-party applications. These technologies reduced costs and time-to-market for non-bank entities by abstracting complex regulatory-compliant backend processes, causally linking to a proliferation of embedded finance offerings where were seamlessly incorporated into , mobility, and retail platforms. Market metrics underscore this scaling: the global BaaS sector grew to a valuation of USD 19.65 billion by 2021, building on momentum from the latter amid rising demand for API-driven solutions. This trajectory was fueled by post-2015 surges in fintech-bank collaborations, with traditional institutions partnering to provide licensed infrastructure while fintechs handled user-facing innovations, thereby dismantling historical that had favored incumbents with physical branches and proprietary systems. Pivotal providers emerged as enablers of this model, including , founded in March 2016 as one of Europe's first dedicated BaaS platforms, which offered scalable, cloud-native banking modules to enable non-banks to launch deposit, lending, and payment products without obtaining full banking licenses. In the U.S., launched in late 2019, providing for embedded banking that supported over 430,000 cards issued to more than 330,000 end-users by 2022, exemplifying how BaaS facilitated rapid customer acquisition for software firms entering finance. These milestones correlated with broader shifts, where BaaS intermediaries captured value by commoditizing banking primitives, driving a tenfold increase in deposit volumes for select platforms and fostering competition through lowered capital requirements for innovators.

Recent Developments and Regulatory Shifts (2023–2025)

The Banking as a Service (BaaS) market experienced robust expansion from 2023 to 2025, driven by the integration of embedded finance into platforms and mobile applications, which enabled non-banks to offer seamless financial products without developing proprietary infrastructure. Projections indicated the global BaaS market would reach approximately USD 24.58 billion in 2025, up from around USD 18.6 billion in 2024, reflecting a (CAGR) exceeding 15% amid rising demand for real-time payments and digital wallets. This growth was particularly pronounced in embedded finance models, where BaaS providers facilitated lending, payments, and account services within non-financial apps, enhancing user accessibility but also amplifying operational interdependencies between fintechs and sponsor banks. In the United States, regulatory scrutiny intensified due to risks in sponsor bank- partnerships, culminating in heightened oversight following the April 2024 bankruptcy of , a key BaaS intermediary whose collapse froze access to nearly USD 160 million in customer funds across partner s owing to ledgering discrepancies and reconciliation failures. The incident exposed vulnerabilities in fund segregation and third-party , prompting the and other agencies to enforce stricter through consent orders against several BaaS-involved banks in 2024, including requirements for enhanced risk assessments of partners. Building on the June 2023 interagency guidance on third-party relationships, which outlined principles for banking organizations engaging with vendors, regulators emphasized , ongoing monitoring, and contingency planning to mitigate operational and risks in BaaS ecosystems. Globally, BaaS adoption accelerated in , where digital wallets integrated BaaS backends to support rapid innovation despite varying regulatory frameworks, contributing to non-cash transactions projected to reach 1.5 trillion by 2028 with digital wallets comprising 66% of point-of-sale payments. In , embedded finance via BaaS powered market growth from USD 120 billion in digital payments in 2023 to an anticipated USD 306 billion by 2028, as providers like mobile wallet operators leveraged sponsor banks for scalable services amid lighter-touch regulations that prioritized innovation over stringent pre-approvals. This regional dynamism contrasted with U.S. caution, illustrating how regulatory environments causally influenced BaaS velocity: permissive policies in fostered quicker experimentation and user adoption, even as they risked similar pitfalls observed in Synapse's .

Definition and Core Principles

Fundamental Concept and Scope

Banking as a Service (BaaS) constitutes a modular infrastructure model wherein licensed banks furnish regulated backend capabilities—such as account opening, payments processing, and compliance verification—to non-financial entities via application programming interfaces (APIs), thereby permitting these third parties to integrate and deliver financial products under their own branding without procuring independent banking charters. This framework leverages the banks' established regulatory compliance and operational expertise, outsourcing customer-facing elements to partners like fintech firms or corporations, which focus on user acquisition and interface design. At its foundation, BaaS operates on a dynamic where the sponsoring retains ultimate for , , and adherence to financial regulations, while enabling scalable access to core primitives like know-your-customer (KYC) processes and ledgering. Non-banks thus embed these elements into non-traditional platforms, such as sites or , fostering service composability without the capital-intensive burdens of de novo licensing or proprietary infrastructure development. This delineation preserves the bank's role as the regulated intermediary, circumventing direct exposure to end-user relationships for the provider while modularizing financial delivery to align with specialized competencies. The scope of BaaS delineates discrete, embeddable services including payments orchestration, lending origination support, and virtual or physical card issuance, confined to infrastructural provisioning rather than encompassing holistic entities with physical branches, administration, or comprehensive advisory operations. It excludes autonomous full-service banking models, emphasizing instead facilitation that partitions regulatory-heavy functions from market-facing , thereby curtailing entry barriers imposed by incumbents' integrated vertical control. Banking as a Service (BaaS) is distinguished from Banking as a Platform (BaaP) primarily by the direction of service integration and the end-user focus. In BaaS, licensed s provide modular, API-accessible banking infrastructure—such as account issuance, payments, and lending—to non-bank companies, enabling these entities to embed and offer regulated financial products directly to their own s without obtaining banking licenses. In contrast, BaaP positions the as a central hub that integrates third-party applications and services into its ecosystem via , allowing the to customize and distribute enhanced offerings to its existing base, thereby leveraging external innovations for internal development. This inversion underscores BaaS's emphasis on white-label distribution to external brands, while BaaP prioritizes ecosystem orchestration within the 's controlled environment. Conflations between BaaS and BaaP often overlook BaaS's core reliance on the provider's for compliance-heavy operations, such as KYC verification and fund safeguarding, which non-s access indirectly; BaaP, however, assumes the retains direct regulatory accountability and customer relationships, using platforms for agility rather than license outsourcing. analyses highlight that BaaS democratizes access to banking primitives for fintechs and retailers, whereas BaaP serves incumbent banks seeking to accelerate product iteration without building all components in-house. BaaS further diverges from (SaaS) models prevalent in by incorporating the full spectrum of regulated banking execution, not merely software delivery. SaaS provides cloud-hosted applications for tasks like simulations or analytics, but lacks the licensed backend for actual deposit-taking, , or credit extension, requiring users to pair it with separate infrastructure. BaaS, by design, bundles these executable services under the provider's regulatory umbrella, mitigating risks like licensing barriers that SaaS alone cannot address. For instance, while a SaaS tool might enable payment UI customization, BaaS ensures the underlying rails comply with frameworks like PSD2 in or FDIC requirements in the U.S., a layer absent in pure SaaS offerings. This distinction prevents undervaluation of BaaS's compliance overhead, as evidenced by adoption patterns where BaaS accelerates market entry by 12-18 months compared to standalone SaaS builds.

Technical Architecture

API-Driven Stacks

API-driven stacks constitute the foundational technical layer in Banking as a Service (BaaS), utilizing to modularize and expose operations for third-party integration. These architectures enable non-bank entities to programmatically access functions such as account onboarding, balance retrieval, fund transfers, and transaction initiation without managing underlying infrastructure. For instance, endpoints support operations for creating bank accounts and processing transaction rules, ensuring standardized data exchange via HTTP methods like GET, , , and DELETE. Interoperability in these stacks often aligns with standards derived from frameworks, which mandate secure specifications for account information services (AIS) and payment initiation services (PIS), though BaaS broadens this to encompass full lifecycle management beyond mere data access. Protocols like OAuth 2.0 underpin authentication, mitigating risks from exposed endpoints by enforcing consent-based tokenization, while payloads facilitate machine-readable requests for scalability. This design inherently reduces integration friction for developers, as abstract heterogeneous bank systems into uniform interfaces, though it demands rigorous and to counter vulnerabilities like API abuse. Plaid exemplifies early API aggregation in BaaS ecosystems, launching in 2013 to bridge consumer apps with bank accounts via a unified that handles and data normalization across institutions lacking native developer portals. By 2020, 's platform supported connections to over 11,000 financial entities, enabling real-time transaction pulls and essential for embedded finance applications. Such aggregators lower by minimizing custom coding per bank, promoting modular stacks where fintechs layer services atop BaaS providers, provided endpoint versioning maintains amid evolving compliance needs.

Cloud-Based Infrastructure Layers

Cloud-based infrastructure layers in Banking as a Service (BaaS) adapt standard cloud models to support scalable, compliant financial operations. The foundational (IaaS) tier, provided by platforms like (AWS) and (GCP), offers on-demand compute, storage, and networking resources optimized for banking's variable workloads. These services enable automatic scaling to handle transaction surges, with AWS financial services workloads demonstrating elasticity that accommodates peak demands without over-provisioning physical servers. Building on IaaS, the (PaaS) layer supports application development and integration, particularly through Banking as a Platform (BaaP) components that act as compliance intermediaries. BaaP connects partners to bank cores via , embedding regulatory checks for functions like deposits and lending while outsourcing governance burdens. This adaptation ensures adherence to standards such as KYC and AML without exposing underlying infrastructure. Software as a Service (SaaS) integrations from providers layer specialized tools atop PaaS, including payment processors that enable seamless transaction handling within BaaS ecosystems. Examples include Stripe's API-driven services for embedding payments, allowing non-banks to offer processing without building proprietary systems. Emerging extensions incorporate Hardware as a Service (HaaS) for tangible banking assets, such as card issuance and point-of-sale devices, shifting from ownership to subscription models for physical infrastructure. Providers bundle hardware with maintenance, aligning with BaaS's service-oriented ethos. Empirical metrics from cloud providers highlight efficiency: IaaS uptimes often exceed 99.99% under service level agreements, supporting fintech scalability that reduces infrastructure costs by 30-50% via pay-as-you-go pricing over traditional setups. This causal shift from capex to opex enables BaaS operators to allocate resources dynamically, minimizing idle capacity during low-demand periods.

Hybrid and Emerging Stacks

Hybrid stacks in Banking as a Service (BaaS) integrate on-premises systems with modern infrastructures, enabling banks to mitigate lock-in from outdated platforms while leveraging scalable for third-party access. This approach contrasts with pure migrations by allowing selective —sensitive operations remain in private clouds or environments, reducing migration risks and costs associated with full overhauls, which can exceed $36.7 billion annually across global banks due to inefficiencies as of 2022 projections extending into 2025. Full-stack BaaS offerings, which bundle end-to-end services like account issuance, lending, and payments into integrated platforms, differ from modular stacks that permit selection of components such as KYC verification or payment processing via . Modular adoption has accelerated for its flexibility, with modules holding 55.46% in BaaS deployments by 2024, driven by faster time-to-market for partners embedding specific services without overhauling entire systems. In practice, combining full-stack cores with modular extensions address legacy constraints, as evidenced by banks using hybrid clouds to process 40-60% more transactions efficiently without full replacements. Emerging stacks incorporate for cross-border capabilities, hybridizing technology with traditional BaaS to enable 24/7 settlements and reduce intermediary costs in payments, which blockchain eliminates for faster, transparent transfers compared to legacy systems. JPMorgan's hybrid blockchain implementations, for instance, facilitate secure cross-border and checks, demonstrating practical in pilots. AI integration in these stacks enhances fraud detection, with 43% of financial institutions reporting 40-60% efficiency gains in operational workflows from AI-driven anomaly detection layered atop BaaS APIs as of 2024 benchmarks. Pilots in 2024-2025 have shown AI hybrids yielding 20-30% reductions in false positives for transaction monitoring, prioritizing real-time pattern recognition over rule-based legacy methods while maintaining compliance in modular environments. These advancements underscore hybrids' role in verifiable performance uplifts, though vendor benchmarks must be cross-verified against independent audits to avoid inflated claims.

Economic Benefits and Innovations

Enhanced Competition and Accessibility

Banking as a service (BaaS) has facilitated entry for fintech startups and non-bank entities by providing backend infrastructure without the need for obtaining full banking licenses or building proprietary systems from scratch, thereby reducing initial capital requirements and accelerating market entry. This model enables fintechs to launch financial products with modest investments and high speed, focusing resources on innovation rather than compliance-heavy operations. For instance, BaaS disintermediates traditional banking value chains, allowing startups to embed services into non-financial platforms, which lowers technical and regulatory hurdles that historically deterred smaller players. By enabling —where banking features are integrated into everyday apps and —BaaS contributes to greater , particularly for the estimated 1.4 billion adults worldwide as of , many in developing regions lacking physical branches. This approach leverages digital channels to extend services to underserved populations, with empirical data from global financial access surveys showing account ownership rising from 51% in 2011 to 76% in , partly driven by and offerings that BaaS supports. In markets like , where over half of adults remain , models via BaaS have bridged gaps by offering seamless, low-friction access without requiring standalone accounts. BaaS intensifies competition against incumbent banks by fragmenting provision, compelling larger institutions to innovate or risk erosion, as evidenced by analyses of disruption showing shifts in business models toward API-enabled partnerships. This rivalry has improved outcomes through enhanced and pressures, with providers achieving up to 95% reductions in acquisition costs, which can translate to lower fees and broader product availability. Such dynamics prioritize measurable —via transaction volumes and user adoption—over unsubstantiated equity claims, fostering a merit-based expansion of .

Monetization Opportunities for Banks and Fintechs

Banks leverage Banking as a Service (BaaS) to monetize underutilized infrastructure, regulatory licenses, and capabilities by providing backend services to firms and non-bank entities through integrations, generating revenue via tiered access fees, per-transaction charges, and revenue-sharing agreements on activities like payments and deposits. For instance, banks earn from interchange fees in debit and prepaid programs, where partners drive volume and share proceeds, often splitting 50-70% based on negotiated terms that align incentives for acquisition and retention. This model transforms fixed-cost assets into scalable income streams, with banks like those partnering with providers such as Marqeta reporting expanded non-interest income from embedded finance offerings. Fintechs, in turn, accelerate market entry by embedding banking functions without obtaining full charters, reducing launch timelines from 18-24 months for traditional setups to as little as 3-6 months via BaaS platforms, allowing focus on user interfaces and niche services for through subscriptions, premium features, or transaction-based pricing. Partnerships exemplify mutual gain: fintechs like neobanks (e.g., initially) access compliant services rapidly, while banks tap fintech-driven customer segments, yielding combined revenue potential estimated at $25 billion annually for incumbent providers by enabling efficient resource allocation over siloed operations. Empirical data underscores these dynamics, with the global BaaS market valued at $21.27 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $85.73 billion by 2032 at a of approximately 16.8%, driven primarily by partnership-enabled expansions in embedded finance rather than isolated bank or efforts. Such growth reflects free-market mechanisms where voluntary collaborations optimize deployment and velocity, countering claims that regulatory burdens inherently stifle progress by demonstrating how contractual alignments foster and without mandated interventions. 84% of financial executives in 2024 identified BaaS as a pivotal diversification avenue, prioritizing API-gated services for sustained profitability amid shifts.

Empirical Evidence of Market Impact

The proliferation of Banking as a Service (BaaS) has facilitated the expansion of embedded finance, with the global market valued at USD 104.8 billion in 2024 and projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.3% from 2025 to 2034, driven by API integrations enabling non-financial firms to offer banking products. This growth reflects BaaS's role in capturing transaction volumes, with embedded finance revenues estimated to surpass USD 148 billion in 2025 alone. Fintech firms leveraging BaaS platforms accounted for 5% of global banking revenues in 2022, equivalent to USD 150-205 billion, with projections indicating an increase to over USD 400 billion by 2028 amid annual revenue growth of 15% for fintechs compared to 6% for traditional banks. BaaS-enabled diversification has supported revenue stability for participating banks and fintechs by broadening income sources beyond core lending, as evidenced by positive abnormal returns following announcements of digital platform strategies incorporating BaaS elements, signaling recognition of reduced earnings volatility. Empirical studies on diversification indicate that geographic and segmental expansion, akin to BaaS partnerships, enhances lending resiliency by stabilizing earnings streams and mitigating idiosyncratic risks during downturns. In remittances, BaaS underpins fintech innovations that have lowered costs, with digital-first operators charging 2-5% for USD 200 transfers versus higher traditional wire fees, contributing to a global average remittance cost decline from 6.62% in 2011 to around 6% by 2024 per tracking. Specific corridors have seen reductions exceeding 50% through mobile and API-driven models, such as from traditional banks' 12% averages to near-zero fees in competitive offerings, enhancing transfer volumes sensitive to price elasticity.

Risks and Criticisms

Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities and Breaches

The distributed architecture of Banking as a Service (BaaS), characterized by extensive integrations and reliance on third-party partners, inherently broadens the cyber beyond that of siloed traditional banking systems, enabling adversaries to target weaker links across ecosystems. This fragmentation introduces multiple points of entry, including exposed endpoints and interdependent data flows, which can propagate compromises rapidly if one component fails. In the 2024 /IIF Global Bank Survey, 73% of chief risk officers at global banks identified cybersecurity as the foremost near-term risk, a threat intensified in BaaS by the orchestration of services among banks, providers, and non-bank entities, each with varying security postures. API exposures represent a core in BaaS platforms, where open interfaces designed for seamless partner access often lack robust , , or , facilitating unauthorized or injection attacks. Fraudsters have increasingly targeted these in BaaS-enabled s, exploiting misconfigurations to sensitive or credentials. For instance, in breaches during 2023-2024, API-related flaws contributed to incidents affecting millions, such as the Evolve & , which exposed personal information of 7.6 million individuals through compromised access points in its BaaS partnerships with firms. Similarly, LoanDepot's 2024 breach impacted 16.9 million people, tracing back to API-adjacent third-party exposures in service delivery chains akin to BaaS models. Third-party risks in BaaS stem from causal chains where inadequate or allows initial intrusions to into widespread leaks, as non-bank partners may prioritize speed over in integrating backends. Weak oversight of these intermediaries—often handling on behalf of BaaS providers—has enabled supply-chain style attacks, where a single compromises downstream entities. The FDIC's 2024 Risk Review notes that operational cyber incidents, including those via third parties, surged in banking, with groups like Cl0p exploiting software vulnerabilities to hit over 170 targets by mid-2023, many involving financial service providers with BaaS-like dependencies. This multi-vendor dynamic in BaaS thus multiplies probabilities, as evidenced by the propagation of risks from partners lacking bank-level controls.

Operational and Third-Party Risks

Operational risks in Banking as a Service (BaaS) encompass failures in internal , systems, and human oversight that can disrupt service delivery, distinct from cybersecurity threats. These include technology outages from inadequate , errors in handling, and human errors in or . In BaaS models, where banks provide backend to partners, such risks amplify due to fragmented accountability across entities, potentially leading to delayed fund access or erroneous account balances for end-users. For instance, discrepancies between banks and intermediaries have historically caused operational bottlenecks, as seen in provider breakdowns that halt syncing. Third-party risks arise from over-dependence on external vendors and for critical functions like customer onboarding and transaction monitoring, often resulting in compliance lapses such as inadequate (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) controls. Sponsor banks in BaaS arrangements bear ultimate liability, yet partners may underinvest in robust verification, exposing banks to fines for systemic deficiencies. Empirical data indicates that 64% of enforcement actions against BaaS sponsor banks target AML shortfalls, compared to 29% for non-BaaS banks, reflecting higher vulnerability in these partnerships due to diffused oversight. Vendor failures in detection have prompted regulatory scrutiny, with lapses in transaction monitoring directly contributing to penalties for institutions. Scalability challenges further compound these issues, as rapid growth in BaaS partnerships strains single-provider infrastructures, leading to outages from over-reliance on layers. The 2024 bankruptcy of , a key BaaS intermediary, exemplified this: operational struggles including internal and failures disrupted services for partners, freezing access to approximately $265 million in deposits for over 100,000 consumers and forcing manual interventions by affected banks. Such events underscore causal vulnerabilities in concentrated dependencies, where optimism overlooks empirical partnership instability, with many programs faltering not from market demand but from unresolved operational scoping gaps. Despite touted efficiencies, these risks reveal accountability gaps, as banks absorb fallout from vendor insufficiencies without .

Notable Failures and Systemic Concerns

The shutdown of Financial Technologies in 2024 highlighted vulnerabilities in Banking as a Service (BaaS) arrangements, particularly mismatches between intermediaries and sponsor banks. , a provider facilitating BaaS for , filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on April 22, 2024, after disputes with its primary sponsor bank, Evolve Bank & Trust, over ledger discrepancies. This led to frozen access for over 100,000 end-users across multiple platforms, with approximately $265 million in deposits affected and a reported shortfall of $60 million to $95 million between funds held at banks and amounts owed to customers. The (CFPB) subsequently filed a in August 2025, alleging failed to maintain accurate records as early as September 2023, violating laws and exposing users to unverified FDIC pass-through claims. While most funds were eventually reconciled or recovered through court processes, the incident resulted in direct losses for about 13,725 former customers and underscored operational fragilities in multi-party ledger reconciliation. Regulatory scrutiny has extended beyond to sponsor banks enabling BaaS, with multiple consent orders issued in 2024 for inadequate oversight of partners. For instance, the (FDIC) and other agencies imposed penalties on banks for failures in anti-money laundering (AML) monitoring, (BSA) compliance, and risk assessments of high-volume BaaS programs, often involving unchecked transaction surges from clients. These actions revealed patterns of insufficient , where banks delegated core to unregulated intermediaries without robust verification, leading to elevated risks and operational disruptions rather than outright failures. Unlike 's acute collapse, these cases have not triggered widespread user losses but have prompted s to renegotiate partnerships and enhance internal controls. Systemic concerns in BaaS center on parallels to shadow banking, where opaque intermediation could amplify mismatches or if scaled without safeguards, though empirical outcomes indicate contained rather than economy-wide threats. BaaS structures, reliant on sponsor banks for deposits and compliance, introduce non-bank layers that may obscure risk transmission, akin to pre-2008 shadow activities involving maturity transformation without capital buffers. However, data from incidents like show spillovers limited to affected ecosystems—totaling under $300 million in disruptions—far below the trillions in traditional banking crises, due to FDIC-insured pass-through protections and rapid regulatory intervention. Proponents of lighter argue that market-driven , including sponsor bank selectivity and user migration to vetted platforms, fosters resilience without stifling innovation, countering calls for blanket restrictions that could entrench incumbents. Overall, while BaaS amplifies third-party dependencies, no evidence links it to systemic on par with unregulated shadow sectors, as bank oversight mitigates run risks.

Regulatory Framework

United States: Compliance and Crackdowns

In the wake of the Financial Technologies bankruptcy filing in April 2024, which disrupted access to approximately $300 million in customer deposits across over 100 partners and exposed operational fragilities in BaaS middleware arrangements, U.S. regulators intensified oversight of bank- partnerships. The , FDIC, and OCC issued a joint statement on July 25, 2024, reaffirming that banks retain ultimate responsibility for compliance, , and in third-party arrangements delivering deposit products and services, including BaaS models. This guidance, building on prior OCC third-party bulletins from 2023, directed risk-focused examinations toward BaaS sponsor banks to address operational, compliance, and reputational vulnerabilities, such as inadequate on partners and poor recordkeeping. Regulatory crackdowns manifested in a series of orders and enforcement actions against BaaS sponsor banks throughout 2024, targeting deficiencies in , internal controls, and third-party oversight. For instance, the FDIC issued orders against multiple partner banks, including a Tennessee-based in February 2024 that subsequently divested several relationships, and similar actions against entities like Quaint Oak Bank in for unsafe practices in collaborations. The OCC and followed with measures, such as a cease-and-desist order against a Wyoming in late 2024 linked to BaaS activities. These actions, numbering over a dozen by mid-2024, emphasized remediation plans for heightened monitoring of volumes and risks, contributing to a temporary contraction in partnership formations as banks recalibrated exposures. Under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and its anti-money laundering (AML) provisions, BaaS arrangements extend banks' reporting and due diligence obligations to third-party fintechs, with violations drawing substantial penalties. Enforcement data from 2024 reveals that 64% of actions against BaaS sponsor banks centered on AML shortfalls—compared to 29% for non-BaaS peers—reflecting amplified risks from rapid transaction scaling and cross-border exposures in partnerships. Cumulative BSA/AML fines across U.S. banks have exceeded $10 billion since 2010, with recent examples including TD Bank's $450 million civil penalty in October 2024 for program weaknesses that indirectly heightened third-party risks. Regulators mandate periodic risk assessments and enhanced controls in BaaS contexts to prevent illicit finance flows, yet incomplete implementation has prompted these crackdowns. These compliance mandates and enforcement waves, while safeguarding against systemic threats like those in the Synapse failure, have empirically slowed BaaS deployment by elevating entry barriers for new sponsors and fintechs lacking robust compliance infrastructure. Post-Synapse, sponsor banks reported fewer but more vetted partnerships, with industry analyses attributing hesitation to fear of supervisory repercussions and resource-intensive exams, outcomes that favor incumbents with established compliance apparatuses over agile entrants. An OCC request for information in July 2024 sought input on refining these frameworks to balance innovation with stability, signaling ongoing tensions.

Europe: PSD2 and Open Banking Mandates

The Revised (PSD2), Directive (EU) 2015/2366, entered into force on January 12, 2016, with member states required to transpose it into national law by January 13, 2018. It mandates banks and other payment service providers to grant third-party providers (TPPs), including information service providers (AISPs) and initiation service providers (PISPs), secure application programming interface () access to customer data upon explicit consent. This framework underpins in the by enabling firms to develop banking-as-a-service (BaaS) offerings, such as aggregated insights and initiated transactions, without needing to hold licenses for infrastructure. PSD2 has empirically accelerated and in BaaS ecosystems, with the directive's in November 2015 triggering a rapid surge in PayTech startups across , though the growth proved temporary amid implementation challenges. By early 2023, over 550 TPPs were active in the and , facilitating services like real-time payment aggregation and personalized financial tools that leverage bank-held . This mandatory has democratized BaaS development, allowing non-bank entities to compete on services rather than , yet it imposes asymmetric obligations on banks, potentially eroding their data moats without reciprocal access to TPP datasets. However, PSD2's API mandates have expanded cybersecurity vulnerabilities by increasing third-party entry points, with third-party breaches at Europe's top 100 banks rising 25% in 2024, highlighting systemic risks in digital supply chains under rules. The directive requires (SCA) via multi-factor methods, yet persistent incidents underscore how mandated data flows amplify breach vectors, such as API exploits and unauthorized TPP consents. Compliance burdens further temper benefits, with large banks incurring costs exceeding €30 million for API development, security upgrades, and ongoing monitoring. PSD2 intersects with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective May 25, 2018, creating tensions between mandated for competition and GDPR's emphasis on minimization and withdrawal. While PSD2 enables for BaaS innovation via TPP consents, GDPR's portability rights (Article 20) impose stricter controls, raising risks of unauthorized aggregation or re-identification in shared financial datasets. This duality fosters consumer empowerment through choice but heightens exposures, as TPPs must reconcile PSD2's duties with GDPR's notification timelines and impact assessments.

Asia-Pacific and Emerging Markets

In Singapore, the (MAS) has employed a Regulatory Sandbox since 2016, updated in 2024 to facilitate testing of innovative , including Banking as a Service (BaaS) models that enable non-banks to integrate banking functionalities via under controlled conditions with relaxed licensing requirements. This approach has accelerated BaaS adoption by allowing to experiment with embedded finance solutions while maintaining safeguards against systemic risks, contributing to Singapore's position as a regional hub for such innovations. In , the (UPI), launched in 2016 and expanded through the Account Aggregator framework by 2021, supports BaaS-like integrations by enabling seamless API-based and payments across non-bank platforms, processing over 140 million consent requests by December 2024. This infrastructure, while not mandating full , has driven embedded finance growth, with UPI facilitating direct bank account interoperability for third-party providers, fostering in a where traditional banking penetration remains uneven. Across , lighter regulatory environments have propelled BaaS evolutions through mobile money platforms like , originally launched in in 2007, which by 2024 handled transaction volumes exceeding $100 billion amid Sub-Saharan Africa's mobile money sector expansion at rates outpacing global averages. These models enable non-banks to offer banking services via agent networks and APIs with minimal barriers, achieving high growth in populations—such as serving over 50 million users in alone—but relying on evolving oversight from bodies like the rather than comprehensive mandates. Regulatory fragmentation in and emerging markets hinders cross-border BaaS interoperability, as diverse national frameworks—ranging from Singapore's to India's consent-based systems—create opportunities for providers while complicating . This lack of harmonization correlates with elevated fraud risks, including identity-based scams comprising 80% of cases in markets and projected to lead global online payment fraud losses by 2025 due to rapid scaling outpacing controls. Empirical data from 2023-2024 incidents underscore how permissive regimes amplify vulnerabilities in third-party integrations, necessitating targeted enhancements in security and KYC without stifling inclusion gains.

Global Harmonization Challenges

The and IV accords, established by the , exert influence on BaaS operations by mandating higher capital reserves for banks providing embedded services, particularly when exposures involve cross-border partnerships that amplify risk weights under standardized approaches for credit and operational risks. These frameworks, implemented variably across jurisdictions since 2013 with Basel IV refinements phased in from 2023 to 2028, complicate global BaaS scalability as providers must reconcile divergent capital floors and output floors that can elevate requirements by up to 25% for certain internal models. Non-uniform adoption, such as the U.S. "Basel III Endgame" proposals versus European timelines, fosters opportunities but heightens systemic risks from mismatched prudential standards. G20-led efforts to foster regulatory convergence in fintech-enabled services, including those underpinning BaaS like cross-border payments, have encountered delays, with the 2021 roadmap for enhancing international transactions projected to miss its targets due to persistent barriers in legal, supervisory, and data-sharing alignment. The has highlighted incomplete reform implementation as leaving financial systems vulnerable, exacerbating tensions where BaaS models rely on seamless integrations across borders yet confront fragmented anti-money laundering and licensing regimes. Such fragmentation imposes substantial compliance burdens on multinational BaaS entities, with fintech participants facing 15-20% annual rises in regulatory spending since 2021 to address jurisdiction-specific mandates, indirectly raising operational costs by constraining scalable service delivery. While targeted could mitigate these inefficiencies, pursuing overly rigid global standards risks prompting capital and flight to less stringent regimes, as evidenced by fintech migrations to hubs like amid Europe's prescriptive rules. This dynamic underscores a causal tension: excessive uniformity may erode competitive edges in BaaS without proportionally enhancing stability, favoring pragmatic, jurisdictionally tailored convergence over utopian equivalence.

Case Studies

Successful BaaS Deployments

Treasury, launched in 2020, exemplifies successful BaaS by enabling non-financial platforms to embed banking services such as accounts, payments, and transfers through integrations with partner banks like Evolve Bank & Trust. This model has facilitated embedded finance for marketplaces and providers, contributing to 's overall processing of $1.4 trillion in total payment volume in 2024, a 38% increase from the prior year, with Treasury supporting scalable banking infrastructure for high-volume platforms. Chime, a digital banking provider utilizing BaaS partnerships with FDIC-insured banks like The Bancorp Bank and Stride Bank for core services, achieved rapid user expansion in the , reaching approximately 25 million total customers by 2024, including 8.7 million monthly active users. Chime's revenue grew to $1.6 billion in 2024, driven by interchange fees averaging around 0.73% per , demonstrating BaaS-enabled without requiring its own banking . For card issuing, Chime leverages modern platforms that align with BaaS ecosystems, mirroring successes like Marqeta's card programs, which processed $67 billion in total processing volume in Q1 2024 alone. BaaS deployments have delivered measurable ROI through accelerated market entry and enhanced engagement; for instance, providers report enabling product launches in as little as , bypassing traditional banking timelines of months or years. Among firms implementing embedded finance via BaaS, 88% observed increased , while 85% noted improvements in customer acquisition and retention, underscoring the model's viability for revenue diversification and .

High-Profile Challenges and Lessons

The collapse of , a prominent Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) middleware provider, exemplifies partnership vulnerabilities in the model. On April 8, 2024, Synapse filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy amid escalating disputes with its primary sponsor bank, Evolve Bank & Trust, which terminated their relationship over unresolved ledger discrepancies. These mismatches arose from Synapse's failure to accurately reconcile its internal virtual ledgers—tracking end-user balances for partner s—with actual funds in for-benefit-of (FBO) accounts at sponsor banks, leading to a confirmed shortfall of $65 million to $95 million and temporarily freezing access to approximately $200 million in customer deposits across dozens of fintech clients. Post-mortems revealed causal gaps in and operational controls: fintech partners often integrated 's without independently verifying integrity or implementing redundant protocols, while scaled aggressively—serving over 100 fintechs by 2023—without proportionally bolstering back-end safeguards against sub- errors or . Contributing factors included over-reliance on automated sweeps without manual audits and insufficient contractual clauses mandating real-time balance attestations from banks. Such breakdowns highlight how BaaS intermediaries can amplify risks if not priced for operational hazards, as evidenced by 's underestimation of costs amid 30% year-over-year growth in transaction volumes from 2021 to 2023. Key lessons emphasize empirical safeguards: robust service level agreements (SLAs) must explicitly assign duties, trigger automated alerts for variances exceeding 1%, and include exit clauses with to avert lock-in during disputes—measures absent in Synapse's arrangements that prolonged resolutions. Analyses post-collapse demonstrate preventability through enhanced risk pricing, such as tiered fees reflecting client volumes and middleware complexity, alongside third-party audits of ledger processes; for instance, diversified sponsor bank relationships could have isolated the Evolve fallout. These incidents function as corrective market signals, incentivizing matured practices like API-level balance verifications without undermining BaaS's core efficiency in enabling scalable financial embedding.

Future Outlook

Technological Advancements

and are increasingly integrated into Banking as a Service (BaaS) platforms to enable compliance monitoring and detection. These technologies analyze transaction patterns instantaneously, adapting to emerging threats without manual intervention, as demonstrated in prototypes where AI-driven frameworks leverage for regulatory adherence. For instance, models can reduce manual compliance processes by up to 85% through continuous surveillance. In BaaS ecosystems, this facilitates seamless integration for partners, ensuring regulatory checks occur at the point of service delivery without disrupting . Blockchain technology is advancing BaaS through interoperable shared ledgers, with 2025 pilots focusing on cross-border transaction efficiency and data immutability. Initiatives like Swift's integration of -based ledgers into its aim to digital benefits across over 200 countries, enabling BaaS providers to offer verifiable, tamper-proof audit trails for services. These developments build on current trajectories where interoperability protocols allow disparate systems to securely, projected to grow the from $0.83 billion in 2025 to $7.90 billion by the decade's end. In BaaS contexts, such ledgers support modular composition, reducing times from days to seconds. Edge computing hybrids are emerging to minimize in BaaS applications, processing data closer to the end-user for high-frequency financial operations like payments and . By distributing computation to edge nodes, these systems cut data travel time, enabling sub-millisecond responses critical for BaaS integrations in and IoT-enabled services. Financial institutions adopting edge architectures report savings and enhanced reliability, with prototypes showing reductions that support alerts and personalized offers without dependency delays. This hybrid model complements BaaS's API-driven , allowing service providers to handle peak loads in decentralized environments. Automation via these technologies promises significant cost efficiencies in BaaS operations, with projections indicating 25-50% reductions in labor expenses through and orchestration. In banking contexts, generative applications for and could accelerate processes while trimming operational overhead by 20-30%, as per analyses of scaled implementations. For BaaS platforms, this translates to lower per-transaction costs, enabling competitive pricing for third-party developers and fostering broader adoption of embedded financial products. These gains stem from prototypes automating routine tasks like and KYC , verifiable in enterprise deployments.

Policy and Innovation Tensions

Regulatory authorities have intensified oversight of Banking as a Service (BaaS) partnerships, exemplified by the U.S. 's heightened scrutiny in 2025, which targets risks in fintech-bank collaborations such as inadequate and operational vulnerabilities exposed in cases like the collapse. This crackdown, involving coordinated actions from the , FDIC, and OCC, has led to increased enforcement actions against BaaS-involved institutions, with such banks accounting for 13.5% of severe federal regulatory penalties in 2023, a trend persisting into 2025. These measures, while intended to safeguard , create tensions with imperatives by elevating burdens and discouraging non-bank entrants from pursuing BaaS models, thereby slowing market expansion. indicates that overly stringent inhibits vigor, as seen in studies showing strict rules correlate with reduced output in compared to more permissive environments. In the U.S., where BaaS faces rigorous third-party assessments, lags behind projections in less encumbered markets; global BaaS market growth is forecasted at 19.68% CAGR to USD 60.35 billion by 2030, yet U.S.-specific partnerships have contracted amid regulatory pressures, contrasting with faster uptake in regions with lighter oversight. Countering precautionary regulatory biases, favors lighter-touch approaches that prioritize competitive markets to maximize , as unregulated or minimally regulated sectors historically deliver superior consumer outcomes through efficiency gains and risk allocation. Self-regulation via industry-led consortia offers a viable , drawing from analogs where self-regulatory organizations (SROs) have empirically enhanced market efficiency and coordination without stifling growth, as demonstrated in emerging frameworks that balance with voluntary standards. Such mechanisms, effective in high-velocity industries, could mitigate BaaS tensions by internalizing risks through peer , fostering gains over top-down mandates that often amplify systemic caution at innovation's expense.

References

  1. [1]
    What does Banking as a Service (BaaS) mean for business? - PwC
    Jul 11, 2024 · Banking as a Service (BaaS) is an emerging business model, within which licensed banks and fintech companies provide banking infrastructure, ...
  2. [2]
    Banking as a Service: Understanding risks and regulatory landscape
    BaaS is made possible when a bank (“sponsor bank”) provides access to its banking infrastructure through APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) to a fintech.What is Banking as a Service... · Benefits of BaaS · Key risk areas for internal...
  3. [3]
    What is banking-as-a-service (BaaS)? What businesses need to know
    Oct 11, 2024 · BaaS is the practice of banking systems allowing nonbank third-party businesses to offer their banking or financial services to customers.
  4. [4]
    The Rise Of Banking As A Service - Oliver Wyman
    Banking-as-a-service, or BaaS, is a great opportunity for existing banks, insurers, and wealth managers to reach a greater number of customers at a lower cost.
  5. [5]
    The Evolution of Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) Business Models ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · The BaaS landscape has come a long way from its early days in the 1990s when big retailers like Tesco and Sainsbury's partnered with banks to ...
  6. [6]
    A Primer on Banking-as-a-Service
    Mar 27, 2025 · BaaS refers to a model in which licensed banks and Financial Technology (FinTech) firms provide services, including but not limited to: banking infrastructure, ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] MARKET INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS Banking Organizations and Their ...
    Apr 12, 2021 · Greater insight of financial supervisors over risks to individual institutions, as well as more broadly across regulated banking organizations ...
  8. [8]
    The ultimate guide to Banking as a service (BaaS)
    Jan 9, 2023 · Banking as a service is a way for tech companies to partner with banks in order to make the bank's financial products (eg, bank accounts, credit cards) ...What Is Banking As A Service... · What Are Some Common Use... · What Should I Look For In A...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Regulators Crank Up the Heat On BaaS Banking - Ncontracts
    May 7, 2024 · BaaS banks have come under increased regulatory scrutiny. How can your institution capitalize on banking-as-a-service while remaining compliant ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  10. [10]
    Request for Information on Bank-Fintech Arrangements Involving ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · The agencies have observed that bank-fintech arrangements vary significantly in structure and product and service offerings, but many commonly ...
  11. [11]
    Breaking down Banking as a Service - Frontier Fintech Newsletter
    Apr 18, 2021 · The origins of BaaS can be traced to the post-GFC western hemisphere. ... The financial crises gave impetus to entrepreneurs and innovators ...
  12. [12]
    The Evolving Relationship Between Banks and Fintech Companies
    Aug 19, 2024 · Fintech emerged from the ashes of the 2008 financial crisis when traditional banks were widely perceived as the culprits of economic turmoil.Missing: Service BaaS
  13. [13]
    The revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2)
    Mar 13, 2018 · The PSD2 supports innovation and competition in retail payments and enhances the security of payment transactions and the protection of consumer data.
  14. [14]
    PSD2 and Open Banking - Plaid
    PSD2 provides the legislative and regulatory foundation for Open Banking and other broader initiatives at a UK and European level relating to open access to ...
  15. [15]
    PSD2 | Central Bank of Ireland
    The revised Payment Services Directive (EU 2015/2366 PSD2) aims to reduce fraud while opening up payment markets to new entrants.
  16. [16]
    Stripe Business Breakdown & Founding Story - Contrary Research
    Stripe was founded in 2010 by two brothers from Ireland, Patrick Collison (CEO) and John Collison. The pair came to the US in 2006, at ages 18 and 16, ...
  17. [17]
    Deep Dive: The Great Bank Unbundling - Fintech Wrap Up
    Jan 19, 2025 · Act 3: Embedded Infrastructure​​ Platforms like Stripe, Plaid, and Lithic, founded in 2010, 2013, and 2014 respectively, were built to address ...
  18. [18]
    The Technology Behind Banking as a Service: APIs and Cloud ...
    Aug 12, 2024 · This article focuses on the foundational technologies of BaaS, APIs and cloud computing, their roles and benefits, and how they collectively ...Missing: growth 2010s
  19. [19]
    Banking as a Service 101: Complete Guide to BaaS APIs | SmartDev
    Nov 13, 2024 · BaaS is a financial technology model enabling non-banking businesses to offer banking services directly through their digital platforms.
  20. [20]
    Banking as a Service: Revolutionizing Financial Ecosystems in the ...
    Jan 15, 2025 · Banking as a Service (BaaS) is a comprehensive model that allows non-bank entities to offer banking services to their customers.
  21. [21]
    Banking-as-a-Service Market Size, Share, Trends Report, 2030
    The global BaaS market was valued at USD 19.65 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 74.55 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 16.2%.
  22. [22]
    Fintechs: A new paradigm of growth - McKinsey
    Oct 24, 2023 · In this report, we examine how fintechs can continue to grow in strength and relevance for customers, the overall financial ecosystem, and the world economy.
  23. [23]
    Banking as a Service: Banks' $25 Billion Revenue Opportunity in ...
    Feb 1, 2022 · Of those that haven't partnered or invested, 37% plan to partner in 2022, and 18% expect to make an investment in a fintech in 2022. These ...Missing: 2015 | Show results with:2015
  24. [24]
    Solarisbank is blazing a trail for a new breed of digital banks - Mambu
    Mar 3, 2021 · Founded in 2016, Solarisbank is making its mark on the financial ... Catering for the specific requirements of a BaaS model, Solarisbank ...
  25. [25]
    Solarisbank: Germany's First Bank in the Cloud - Celent
    Mar 15, 2022 · Solarisbank is Europe's leading Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) platform founded by a group of fintech experts from FinLeap.
  26. [26]
    BaaS startup Unit closes on $100M at $1.2B valuation - TechCrunch
    May 17, 2022 · Unit, a banking-as-a-service startup, has closed on a $100 million Series C round of funding led by Insight Partners.Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  27. [27]
    Banking-as-a-Service Platform Unit Announces $100 Million Series ...
    May 17, 2022 · Unit, the first banking-as-a-service platform to achieve unicorn status, announces its expansion into credit products.
  28. [28]
    Unit becomes first banking-as-a-service provider to reach unicorn ...
    May 18, 2022 · Other recent milestones include issuing over 430,000 cards to over 330,000 end-customers and a ten-times increase in deposit volumes. With the ...Missing: BaaS date<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Banking as a Service Market Size, Growth Drivers, Share Analysis ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · The Banking as a Service market is valued at USD 24.58 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 60.35 billion by 2030, expanding at a 19.68% CAGR.
  30. [30]
    Banking as a Service Market Size, Forecasts Report 2025-2034
    The market size of banking as a service was valued at USD 18.6 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach around USD 73.7 billion by 2034, growing at 15.1% CAGR ...
  31. [31]
    Banking as a Service Market Growth and Forecast, 2032
    The global banking as a service market size is likely to be valued at US$22.5 Bn in 2025 and is expected to reach US$70.8 Bn by 2032, growing at a CAGR of ...
  32. [32]
    Synapse's collapse has frozen nearly $160M from fintech users
    Aug 22, 2024 · Here is a timeline of Synapse's troubles and the ongoing impact it is having on banking consumers. 2024. Founder raises $11 million for a new ...
  33. [33]
    5 lessons learned from Synapse's collapse - Banking Dive
    Oct 30, 2024 · Ledgering issues, bank partner and regulatory lapses and gross mismanagement led to a shortfall of up to $95 million between bank-held funds and amounts owed ...
  34. [34]
    A running list of BaaS banks hit with consent orders in 2024
    Dec 18, 2024 · The order, dated May 21, 2024, and made public in July, also requires the bank to implement a documented risk assessment of fintech partners.
  35. [35]
    Interagency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management
    Jun 9, 2023 · The final guidance offers the agencies' views on sound risk management principles for banking organizations when developing and implementing risk management ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  36. [36]
    Federal banking agencies issue final interagency guidance on risk ...
    Jun 8, 2023 · The final guidance rescinds and replaces each agency's previously-issued guidance on risk management practices for third-party relationships. In ...
  37. [37]
    Asia-Pacific Digital Payment Methods, Trends, & Consumer
    Jul 30, 2025 · By 2028, non-cash transactions in Asia-Pacific are set to hit 1.5 trillion, with digital wallets making up 66% of POS payments by 2027, up from ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  38. [38]
    The Next Decade of Growth in Southeast Asia's Booming Digital ...
    Jun 18, 2025 · The digital payments market is set to experience remarkable expansion over the next five years, growing from US$120 billion in 2023 to US$306 billion by 2028 ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  39. [39]
    The Unstoppable Rise of Digital Wallets in Asia - HPS Worldwide
    Jun 27, 2025 · ... growth of embedded finance powered by Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS), a market expected to grow significantly in the coming years. While the ...
  40. [40]
    Synapse Failure Could Force Reset of Banking-as-a-Service Model
    Sep 6, 2024 · Losing sight of core financial fundamentals can have dramatic impacts on BaaS—as evidenced by the recent failure of Synapse.
  41. [41]
    Embedded finance vs. banking-as-a-service (BaaS) - Stripe
    Nov 29, 2023 · Banking-as-a-service (BaaS) is a model in which financial institutions provide access to their core banking functions through APIs. This ...
  42. [42]
    API Banking and Banking as a Service | Deloitte US
    The nonbank company can offer users features only available from a bank, such as holding a cash balance—without having to go through the lengthy licensing ...
  43. [43]
    Banking as a Service Explained - CSI
    BaaS involves a bank enabling another organization to offer financial services or offering a new and innovative product alongside a technology company.
  44. [44]
    Top BaaS Providers 2025 | Complete Guide to Banking-as ... - Velmie
    Aug 15, 2025 · Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) allows companies to deliver financial products, such as accounts, cards, and payments, by integrating with licensed ...Missing: exclusion | Show results with:exclusion
  45. [45]
    Top Banking as a Service (Baas) Companies in 2025 - SDK.finance
    Rating 4.8 (40) Sep 14, 2025 · Banking as a service providers allow non-banks, such as fintech companies, startups, and others, to leverage the infrastructure and capabilities of traditional ...
  46. [46]
    Banking as a service vs. banking as a platform: what's the difference?
    While BaaS lets non-bank businesses provide financial services to customers, BaaP lets non-bank businesses provide services to banking institutions. The banks ...Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
  47. [47]
    Banking as a Service, Banking as a Platform & Open Banking - Tuum
    Banking as a Platform is, essentially, the inverse of Banking as a Service, whereby the bank integrates third party services into its own system using APIs.Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
  48. [48]
    BaaS vs. BaaP: Navigating the Future of Financial Ecosystems ...
    May 2, 2024 · While both BaaS and BaaP can be used for businesses, a key difference is that the former serves the non-bank business' customer with integrated ...
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    BaaS vs. Platform Banking vs. Open Banking: What are the ...
    Jul 26, 2024 · Banking as a Service (BaaS) involves delivering banking infrastructure and services to third-party distributors. By integrating non-banking ...Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
  51. [51]
    Decoding Banking-as-a-Platform Models - SunTec Group
    BaaP is also the foundation for newer models like Banking-as-a-Service that can help banks explore the possibilities of newer revenue generating options as such ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    BaaS vs. SaaS: how to choose the right approach? | Skaleet
    May 15, 2024 · This article looks at how they work and puts their different characteristics into perspective to help fintechs make the best decisions.
  53. [53]
    Banking as a Service vs. Software as a Service - Strands
    Sep 28, 2022 · BaaS vs. SaaS, explained. Banking as a service (BaaS) tools, allow platforms to integrate financial services into their offering directly into ...
  54. [54]
    Banking as a Service vs Banking Software Licensing - SDK.finance
    Rating 4.9 (42) May 21, 2024 · BaaS applications are also more customizable than SaaS apps, giving you more control over your bank's look and feel.
  55. [55]
    Banking as a Service (Baas): Meaning, Examples and Benefits.
    Nov 15, 2024 · BaaS focuses much on financial transactions, compliance, and banking services, while SaaS sells more software solutions for a wide range of ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Banking as a Service (BaaS): What It Is + Examples - Wallarm
    Jul 8, 2025 · The BaaS API operates by exhibiting a set of RESTful points that third-party developers can utilize to interlock with the banking amenities.
  57. [57]
    REST API for Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials
    The REST API endpoints for bank account transaction creation rules include POST to create, DELETE to delete, GET to retrieve, and PATCH to update rules.
  58. [58]
    REST API for Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials - Create a bank account
    The bank account transaction creation rules resource is used to add one or more bank statement transaction creation rules to a bank account. The transaction ...
  59. [59]
    Open banking APIs explained | Stripe
    Sep 25, 2024 · Open banking APIs create a standardized, secure channel for data exchange between banks and third-party providers (TPPs).
  60. [60]
    Open Banking and Banking as a Service: What's the Difference? | CSI
    Open banking uses APIs to access financial data, whereas. BaaS uses APIs to access banking functionality. Financial Industry Outlook on Open Banking and BaaS.Missing: standards | Show results with:standards
  61. [61]
    Open Banking: Guide to APIs, Regulations and FinTech | Kong Inc.
    Mar 16, 2025 · Essentially, BaaS offers banking functions, while Open Banking offers data access. What security measures protect customer data in Open Banking?
  62. [62]
    API Banking, BaaS, and Open Banking - Core Processing ... - IBT Apps
    API Banking can be defined as any software that uses an API to share information between financial institutional systems and third-party applications. With API ...
  63. [63]
    Plaid Review: Building the Infrastructure for Open Finance
    Jun 5, 2025 · From Startup to Global Infrastructure ... Founded in 2013, Plaid set out to simplify the process of connecting bank accounts to financial apps. At ...
  64. [64]
    Plaid's strategy to facilitate an API-based ecosystem
    Nov 19, 2020 · When Plaid launched in 2013, few banks in the United States had external APIs that allowed people to permission their data to third party apps.Missing: aggregation founding BaaS
  65. [65]
    Plaid Business Breakdown & Founding Story - Contrary Research
    Fintech Plaid has built a widely-used abstraction layer that provides seamless integration between financial applications, banks, and other financial service ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  66. [66]
    How To Develop a Banking Cloud Strategy in 2025? - Netguru
    Feb 17, 2025 · IaaS allows banks to utilize outsourced software, data centers, and servers, providing scalable infrastructure solutions. Key IaaS providers ...
  67. [67]
    IaaS for Banks: Benefits, Challenges & Use Cases - Crassula.io
    May 2, 2025 · Unlike PaaS or SaaS , banks retain full control over the Operating System, middleware, runtime environments, and the applications themselves.
  68. [68]
    Middleware as the Enabler of Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) - PCES
    Aug 27, 2025 · Why Middleware Matters in BaaS · Opens the gates securely through APIs so partners can connect without breaking the bank's foundation.
  69. [69]
    BaaS, Compliance, and the Path Forward for Community Banks
    Aug 22, 2023 · For community banks, banking-as-a-service (BaaS) is shooting the moon. The Risks and Rewards of BaaS. Banking-as-a-service is a partnership ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) Explained - Ncontracts
    Oct 11, 2023 · These middleware providers build the APIs that connect to a financial institution's core systems, handling functions such as deposits and ...
  71. [71]
    Top 10: Banking-as-a-Service Providers - FinTech Magazine
    Apr 23, 2025 · Through API integration, businesses can embed banking capabilities—from payment processing to account management—directly into their platforms.
  72. [72]
    What is Hardware as a Service (HaaS)? - IBM
    Hardware as a service (HaaS) is a procurement model where a business rents or leases hardware it needs from a managed service provider (MSP) on a subscription ...
  73. [73]
    The State of Hardware-as-a-Service 2024 - Silicon Valley Bank
    Discover the latest investment trends and important key metrics for the emerging HaaS model with Silicon Valley Bank's state of hardware-as-a-service report ...
  74. [74]
    FinTech Companies Can Reduce Costs When Migrating to AWS ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · Instead of on-demand pricing, FinTech firms can pre-commit to AWS resources to lower costs: ✓ Reserved Instances (RIs) – Prepay for EC2 ...
  75. [75]
    Cloud Computing in Banking & Financial Services Industry
    Jul 26, 2024 · The main cloud service models used in banking are SaaS (for CRM and financial planning tools), PaaS (for developing in-house apps), and IaaS ( ...
  76. [76]
    The Core Banking Modernization Dilemma: Incremental vs. Full ...
    By 2028, outdated banking systems are projected to cost global banks over $57 billion annually, up from $36.7 billion in 2022. According to Thought Machine ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    A Guide to Hybrid Cloud in Banking | Intellectsoft
    Sep 18, 2025 · Hybrid cloud technology for banking allows for combining a private cloud for sensitive and vulnerable data with a public cloud for some business ...
  78. [78]
    How Banking Is Adapting Blockchain Technology - Investopedia
    By eliminating intermediaries, blockchain lowers the costs of cross-border payments, clearing and settlement, and trade finance. These savings could be passed ...
  79. [79]
    Blockchain in cross-border payments: a complete 2025 guide - BVNK
    Oct 17, 2025 · Always-on operations: Blockchain networks operate 24/7/365. That means payments can be sent over weekends, during bank holidays, and outside ...
  80. [80]
    Unpacking The Future: What Is Hybrid Blockchain? - Savvycom
    Hybrid blockchain provides a secure and efficient solution for cross-border payments, fraud detection, and transaction verification. Example: JPMorgan's ...
  81. [81]
    Feedzai Report: 90% of FIs use AI to Fight Fraud and Financial Crime
    Tangible Benefits of AI for Fraud Detection · 39% of FIs saw 40-60% reduction in fraud losses · 43% of FIs saw 40-60% improvement in efficiency · 34% of FIs saw 40 ...
  82. [82]
    Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) Industry Outlook 2025-2030, Featuring ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · The global market for Banking-as-a-Service was valued at US$29.5 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach US$74.8 Billion by 2030, growing at a ...
  83. [83]
    AI in Fraud Management Market Size and Forecast 2025 to 2034
    The global AI in fraud management market size was calculated at USD 12.42 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach around USD 65.35 billion by 2034, expanding ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] BANKING-AS-A-SERVICE How it can catalyze financial inclusion
    Jun 1, 2022 · There are examples of BaaS being offered through a partnership between licensed banks and fintech providers of banking technology. As long as ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Banking-as-a-Service: FinTechs Walking the Regulatory Perimeter
    May 15, 2023 · Furthermore, the modern regulatory infrastructure was designed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and focuses almost exclusively on the ...
  86. [86]
    Financial Inclusion Overview - World Bank
    Jan 27, 2025 · Half of the adults around the world – around 2.5 billion people – don't use formal financial services, and 75% of poor people are unbanked ...
  87. [87]
    Embedded Finance: Pioneering Pathways to Revenue, Relevance
    Apr 9, 2025 · With 54% of Mexico's adult population still unbanked, embedded finance aims to bridge the gap by offering accessible and flexible financial ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Digital Disruption in Banking and its Impact on Competition | OECD
    This paper, by Professor Xavier Vives (IESE Business School) surveys technological disruption in banking, examining its impact on competition and its ...
  89. [89]
    Banking-as-a-service Enables Up To 95 Percent Cost Saving In ...
    Mar 8, 2021 · With a new Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) model, financial services providers can save up to 95 percent of a typical customer acquisition cost.Missing: 10-15% | Show results with:10-15%
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Literature review on financial technology and competition for ...
    Jun 7, 2024 · The aim is to characterise this competition, its impact on banks' business models and on the accessibility and price of services for customers.
  91. [91]
    Banking as a Service: Banks' $25 Billion Revenue Opportunity
    There's a huge revenue opportunity for banks to provide BaaS with the help of third-party technology companies.Missing: monetization | Show results with:monetization
  92. [92]
    Weighing risk in implementing BaaS partnerships: A tactical guide
    Aug 8, 2025 · Interchange revenue sharing is the most common model, especially in debit and prepaid card programs. In these cases, fintech companies drive ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  93. [93]
    Banking as a Service (BaaS) Examples and FAQs - Tipalti
    Examples of top-rated BaaS providers include the non-banks, Railsbank, Finastra, and Marqueta, and the bank, BBVA. They offer BaaS embedded finance services in ...What is Banking as a Service... · Examples of Top-Rated BaaS...
  94. [94]
    The Evolution of BaaS: Redefining Risk and Responsibility in Banking
    Jun 6, 2024 · The fintech partners win by having time-to-market for financial products cut down significantly, while also enjoying reduced overhead costs and ...
  95. [95]
    Banking as a Service Market to Reach USD 85.73 Billion by 2032 ...
    “The SNS Insider report indicates that the Banking as a Service Market size was valued at USD 21.27 billion in 2023 and is expected to grow to USD 85.73 billion ...
  96. [96]
    Banking as a Service in 2025 - Softjourn
    Rating 5.0 (3) The technology behind open banking utilizes APIs, and through open banking, APIs have been used to connect banks with third-party providers, ...
  97. [97]
    Embedded Finance Market Size, Growth Analysis 2025-2034
    The global embedded finance market size was valued at USD 104.8 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 23.3% between 2025 and 2034. The rapid ...
  98. [98]
    Embedded Finance Market Size to Hit USD 1,732.53 Bn by 2034
    In terms of revenue, the embedded finance market is valued at $148.38 billion in 2025. It is projected to reach $1,732.53 billion by 2034. The embedded finance ...
  99. [99]
    The Effect of Digital Platform Strategies on Firm Value in the Banking ...
    First, we find that the announcement of a digital platform strategy is associated with significant positive abnormal stock returns. Second, we examined the ...
  100. [100]
    Bank Diversification and Lending Resiliency
    Jul 7, 2022 · Diversification reduces the bank's idiosyncratic risk and stabilizes its stream of earnings. Banks lend more in normal times and maintain credit ...
  101. [101]
    Innovation promises efficiencies in remittances, if regulation can ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · Research suggests remittance flows are sensitive to transaction costs; remitters tend to send less money when transaction fees are high. The ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Remittance Prices Worldwide - Issue 49, March 2024 - World Bank
    The average cost of sending $500 to the G20 countries that are included in RPW as receiving markets decreased from 3.71 percent in Q4 2024 to 3.66 percent in Q1 ...
  103. [103]
  104. [104]
    The Uneven Path Toward Cheaper Digital Remittances
    Jun 22, 2023 · Can Fintech Help Reduce Remittance Costs? Digital remitting may bring significant reductions in costs, which tend to be highest in the ...
  105. [105]
    APIs and Points of Vulnerability Spotlight BaaS Risks - PYMNTS.com
    but fraudsters are targeting APIs and other points of attack.Missing: exposures | Show results with:exposures
  106. [106]
    Cybersecurity remains number one risk for global banks, as financial ...
    Feb 6, 2024 · 13th EY and IIF survey finds 73% of global chief risk officers (CROs) view cybersecurity as the top year-ahead risk heightened by ...
  107. [107]
    The biggest data breaches of 2024 in financial services
    Dec 16, 2024 · The biggest data breaches of 2024 in financial services · LoanDepot breach affects 16.9 million people · Evolve Bank & Trust breach affects 7.6 ...
  108. [108]
    Spotlight on Third-Party Risk Management in Banking as a Service ...
    The authors provide a timeline of key enforcement actions against BaaS banks in 2023 and 2024 due to poor risk management, inadequate capital controls, and ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] 2024 Risk Review - SECTION 5 - Operational and Cyber Risks - FDIC
    By July 2023, Cl0p was responsible for more than 170 attacks. Geopolitical events continued to increase the likelihood of cyber-attacks on banks in 2023.
  110. [110]
    The Synapse Collapse: Reconciliations Can Mean Survival or Failure
    Aug 22, 2024 · The collapse of US Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) provider Synapse highlights the importance of accurate reconciliations based on standardised data.
  111. [111]
    BaaS is not in Crisis: Data from 2024 Enforcement Actions
    Sep 9, 2024 · 64% of all enforcement actions against BaaS sponsor banks have focused on AML shortfalls, compared to 29% for non-BaaS banks. This high ...
  112. [112]
    Examining the Top Lapses in BaaS Banks' Compliance - CCG Catalyst
    Apr 9, 2024 · Those failures, along with lapses in transaction monitoring and other fraud concerns, have come back to bite sponsor banks.
  113. [113]
    What the Synapse BaaS Bankruptcy Means for the Fintech Industry
    Jun 28, 2024 · As one of the key intermediaries in the BaaS ecosystem, Synapse's downfall has disrupted financial operations, leaving many users and businesses ...
  114. [114]
    Wake up regulators, the BaaS revolution threatens all
    Sep 16, 2024 · Synapse's failure, which hurt over 100,000 consumers with $265 million in deposits, is a salient example of the harms posed by lack of oversight ...
  115. [115]
    Synapse Financial Technologies, Inc.
    Aug 21, 2025 · On April 22, 2024, Synapse filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The Bureau alleged that Synapse violated the Consumer Financial ...
  116. [116]
    Synapse: Americans caught in fintech's false FDIC promise - CNBC
    Jul 2, 2024 · More than 100,000 Americans with $265 million in deposits have been locked out of their accounts. The implications of this disaster may be far- ...
  117. [117]
    Synapse Faces CFPB Over Fund Reconciliation Gaps - PYMNTS.com
    Aug 22, 2025 · Synapse's alleged failures in record-keeping led to an estimated $60 million to $90 million shortfall in consumer funds. · Thousands of consumers ...
  118. [118]
    CFPB files complaint against Synapse Financial Technologies
    Aug 29, 2025 · The complaint stated that as early as September 2023, Synapse's records did not match the records maintained by partner banks.
  119. [119]
    What Is Banking-as-a-Service and Why the Fed Crackdown on BaaS?
    Aug 6, 2025 · Lack of Risk Management: The bank failed to adequately assess and manage risks associated with its fintech partnerships. AML and BSA Violations: ...<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Andreas Dombret: Systemic risks of shadow banking
    Aug 20, 2013 · Shadow banking creates bank-like risk without regulation, lacks transparency, and can shift risky activities, posing risks to the financial  ...
  121. [121]
    Assessment of shadow banking activities: risks and the adequacy of ...
    Jul 3, 2017 · This report, responding to a request from the G20, provides an assessment of the evolution of shadow banking activities and risks since the global financial ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Written Statement Before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. ...
    Nov 20, 2024 · The bankruptcy of Synapse, a BaaS middleware firm, showed that the risks of these arrangements are not just theoretical. Over 100 nonbank ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Warren, Van Hollen Letter to Prudential Regulators on BaaS ...
    Nov 9, 2024 · As the Synapse collapse demonstrates, these consumer deposits are not protected when in transit to the bank or if any associated fintech or.
  124. [124]
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
    3 Takeaways as Enforcement Actions, Data Breaches Roil BaaS
    Jun 2, 2025 · In particular, regulators have been increasingly focusing on anti-money laundering (AML) and know your customer (KYC) lapses.
  127. [127]
    BaaS outlook brighter after period of growing pains | Banking Dive
    Jan 15, 2025 · The most recent regulatory cycle addressed many of the BaaS sector's weak programs and bad actors through enforcement actions the past two years ...
  128. [128]
    The Bank Secrecy Act | FinCEN.gov
    The BSA authorizes the Department of the Treasury to impose reporting and other requirements on financial institutions and other businesses to help detect and ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  129. [129]
    OCC Issues Cease and Desist Order, Assesses $450 Million Civil ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · OCC Issues Cease and Desist Order, Assesses $450 Million Civil Money Penalty, and Imposes Growth Restriction Upon TD Bank, N.A. for BSA/AML ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS<|separator|>
  130. [130]
    17 Biggest Compliance Fines ($1Billion and Above) - Enzuzo
    Sep 2, 2025 · The bank was required to fork over $8.833 billion to the U.S. government as well as pay $140 million in fines, which gets you the $8.973 billion ...
  131. [131]
    After Synapse Collapse and Evolve Bank Action, U.S. ... - FOX8 WGHP
    Jun 12, 2025 · “We're going to see fewer partnerships, but higher-quality ones,” Bishop said. “It's not about pulling back from innovation. It's about maturing ...<|separator|>
  132. [132]
  133. [133]
    Revised rules on payment services - European Commission
    PSD2 gave open banking a stable regulatory framework. It imposed an obligation on banks to facilitate access to payments data for AISPs and PISPs via a secure ...Missing: date BaaS
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2) - Temenos
    For banks acting as payment processors, PSD2 mandates enhanced transparency and information requirements; charges are shared for transactions within the EU/EEA ...
  135. [135]
    The impact of Payment Services Directive 2 on the PayTech sector ...
    The implementation of Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2) has radically changed the regulatory environment for providing payment services in the European ...
  136. [136]
    PSD2: what it is and why does it matter for Businesses - Fabrick
    At the beginning of 2023, there were 559 TPPs active in Europe (European Economic Area and United Kingdom), and the market was still ...
  137. [137]
    [PDF] The impact of data portability on user empowerment, innovation, and ...
    ... PSD2 enables non-banks to access. -party providers. However, banks are not given similar access to the comparable data sets, which could lead to unfair ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS<|control11|><|separator|>
  138. [138]
    Third-party cyber breaches surge 25% in Europe's top banks
    Jun 10, 2025 · Third-party cyber breaches at Europe's top 100 banks surged 25% last year, exposing systemic weaknesses in their digital supply chains under ...
  139. [139]
    Guidelines on major incidents reporting under PSD2
    ​​​​​​​The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today its final revised Guidelines on major incident reporting under the Payment Service Directive (PSD2).
  140. [140]
    Getting to Know PSD2: What Compliance Means for Your Business
    Rating 4.9 (117) Apr 2, 2024 · A single large EU bank could see costs of over 30 million Euros to get in compliance. As an alternative, some of these merchants have turned ...
  141. [141]
    Overlap Between the GDPR and PSD2 - Inside Privacy
    Mar 16, 2018 · The interaction between PSD2, aimed at increasing the seamless sharing of data, and the GDPR, aimed at regulating such sharing, raises complicated compliance ...Missing: portability | Show results with:portability
  142. [142]
    [PDF] EU: The interplay of PSD2 and GDPR - some select issues
    Feb 13, 2019 · PSD2 and GDPR have contrasting purposes, with PSD2 requiring data sharing and GDPR restricting it. This creates concerns about overlapping ...Missing: intersection privacy
  143. [143]
    PSD2 and GDPR: are they enough for open finance? - Plaid
    Sep 4, 2020 · GDPR provides consumers with the right to data portability, meaning they can share their data with another party.Missing: intersection | Show results with:intersection
  144. [144]
    Overview of Regulatory Sandbox - Monetary Authority of Singapore
    Apr 29, 2024 · The sandbox will include appropriate safeguards to contain the consequences of failure and maintain the overall safety and soundness of the ...
  145. [145]
    Fintech Laws and Regulations 2025 | Singapore
    In line with its regulatory principles, the MAS introduced a FinTech Regulatory Sandbox for financial institutions and new FinTech players to test innovative ...
  146. [146]
    Singapore's Fintech Regulatory Sandbox and Incentives
    Apr 10, 2025 · Singapore's Fintech Regulatory Sandbox provides a controlled environment for companies to test innovative financial products and services with ...
  147. [147]
    India's Journey in Open Banking: Consent, Control, and Connectivity
    Jun 3, 2025 · As of December 2024, over 140 million consent requests have been successfully processed through AAs, with an estimated 7–8 percent of India's ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  148. [148]
    Beyond UPI: How India is Redefining the Future of Fintech
    Feb 3, 2025 · Significance: India's Open Banking builds on the foundation of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and the Account Aggregator framework. It ...
  149. [149]
    UPI: India's Digital Revolution Goes Global - Press Information Bureau
    Sep 17, 2025 · Unlike closed wallets, UPI was designed to be interoperable. It allowed anyone, using any app, to send money directly from one bank account to ...
  150. [150]
    What is M-Pesa? A Revolutionary Change in Africa's Digital Economy
    Mar 4, 2025 · Since its launch, M-Pesa has experienced impressive growth. In 2024, M-Pesa's transaction volume exceeded $100 billion, marking a substantial ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  151. [151]
    Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia-Pacific Fuel the Growth of the Global ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · In 2024, the global mobile money industry continued its strong growth trajectory, fueled by robust expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), as well as East Asia ...Missing: BaaS evolutions
  152. [152]
    How M-PESA Is Leading a Financial Revolution Across Africa
    Sep 27, 2024 · M-PESA has been quietly leading a financial revolution across Africa for over a decade. M-PESA, which stands for “mobile money” in Swahili, launched in Kenya ...Missing: BaaS evolutions
  153. [153]
  154. [154]
    Triangular Insight on Open Banking in Indonesia, Singapore, and ...
    Nov 25, 2024 · The lack of harmonization of open banking regulation refers to the inconsistent regulations across different countries and regions, making ...
  155. [155]
    Emerging Markets: The New Frontier for Financial Fraud
    Nov 29, 2024 · Africa is one of the biggest emerging FinTech markets most prone to digital identity fraud. 80% of fraud cases in Africa involve identity cards.Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  156. [156]
    Fraud and Security in Global Online Payments Market 2024
    By 2025, Asia-Pacific is expected to lead in online payment fraud losses, followed by North America and Europe. Currently, North America holds the highest share ...Missing: risks | Show results with:risks
  157. [157]
    Navigating the Future: Banking Supervision and Risk Management ...
    Feb 10, 2025 · ... new vulnerabilities, while cyber fraud risks are also escalating due to advancements in AI. Fraudsters are increasingly using AI to refine ...Missing: BaaS emerging Africa<|separator|>
  158. [158]
    Basel III: international regulatory framework for banks
    Basel III is an internationally agreed set of measures developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in response to the financial crisis of 2007-09.Basel III: A global regulatory · Minimum capital requirements · Basel Framework
  159. [159]
    [PDF] High-level summary of Basel III reforms
    The new standardised approach for operational risk determines a bank's operational risk capital requirements based on two components: (i) a measure of a bank's ...
  160. [160]
    Basel IV and the butterfly effect: A lesson in unintended consequences
    Feb 2, 2023 · Finalized Basel III (also known as Basel IV) increases banks' regulatory capital and reduces free capital. At the same time, the banking ...
  161. [161]
    Basel III endgame: Complete regulatory capital overhaul - PwC
    Basel III endgame is a significant regulatory capital overhaul. Banks should be looking at this beyond simply a compliance exercise in calculating numbers.
  162. [162]
    G20's cross-border payments push set to miss 2027 target | Reuters
    Oct 9, 2025 · Global financial authorities are set to miss a 2027 target set by the G20 group of nations to make international cross-border payments ...
  163. [163]
    [PDF] G20 Roadmap for Enhancing Cross-border Payments
    Oct 9, 2025 · Over the coming year, the FSB will intensify efforts to drive implementation of the policy recommendations issued under the Roadmap and support.
  164. [164]
    Incomplete reform implementation leaves financial system ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · FSB Chair Andrew Bailey warns that without full, timely and consistent implementation of G20 reforms, the financial system remains ...
  165. [165]
    Global Regulatory Standards in a Fragmenting Financial System
    Nov 30, 2023 · The main conclusion is that although regulation is one source of fragmentation, international coordination in global standard-setting bodies is ...
  166. [166]
    cross-border regulatory harmonization for global digital financial ...
    Nov 19, 2024 · This paper examines the importance of cross-border regulatory harmonization for global digital financial services, analyzing current challenges ...
  167. [167]
  168. [168]
    Stripe Stats for 2025: The Most Accurate Stripe Statistics Online
    Feb 24, 2025 · Stripe generated $1.4 trillion in total payment volume in 2024, up 38% from the prior year. Merchants in 50 countries use Stripe to accept and ...
  169. [169]
    Chime Revenue and Usage Statistics (2025) - Business of Apps
    Chime generated $1.6 billion revenue in 2024, mostly through a process called interchange · Chime has about 25 million customers, 8.7 million of which are ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  170. [170]
    Chime Equity Research - fyva.ai
    Jul 22, 2025 · The average interchange fee that a card-issuing bank (or its partner like Chime) receives from a debit card transaction is approximately 0.73%.
  171. [171]
    [PDF] marqeta reports first quarter 2024 financial results
    May 7, 2024 · The global modern card issuer reported $67 billion in Total Processing Volume with Net Revenue of $118 million in the first quarter of 2024.Missing: Chime | Show results with:Chime
  172. [172]
    Banking as a Service: The future of Banking - Integrated Finance
    Jan 25, 2023 · Learn how Integrated Finance enables fast, compliant market entry. Read more. Launch your product Faster. You can get to market in 6 weeks, not ...Missing: ROI | Show results with:ROI
  173. [173]
    [PDF] How BaaS Can Help FIs Win More Customers
    Eighty-eight percent of companies that have deployed embedded finance reported increased customer engagement, and 85% said these embedded finance systems helped ...
  174. [174]
    Where the F(BO) Is the Money? Part 1 – Synapse's Clarion Call for ...
    Sep 10, 2024 · The Synapse collapse left a $65-95 million shortfall, and people are unable to access their accounts, raising the question of where the money ...
  175. [175]
    Lessons and Implications for the Fintech Industry by David Krause
    Aug 12, 2024 · This paper examines the rise and fall of Synapse, exploring the systemic risks, operational challenges, and regulatory gaps that contributed to its collapse.Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS<|control11|><|separator|>
  176. [176]
    Synapse's Downfall Provides Hard Lessons for Its B2B Partners
    May 30, 2024 · Synapse's chaotic collapse had a domino effect on its many partner firms, offering insights into B2B partner management.
  177. [177]
    Real-Time Compliance Monitoring in Banking Operations using AI
    Aug 12, 2025 · This paper proposes an AI-driven framework for real-time compliance monitoring that leverages machine learning, natural language processing ...<|separator|>
  178. [178]
    Real-time AI and Machine Learning for Transaction Monitoring
    Real-time AI Machine Learning based transaction monitoring can eliminate up to 85% of manual processes.
  179. [179]
    AI Solutions for Financial Services: A Smarter Approach to ... - Mesh-AI
    Dec 12, 2024 · For instance, AI-powered compliance monitors each transaction in real time, identifying unusual patterns or breaches instantly. By scanning ...1. Real-Time Monitoring · 2. Fraud Detection And Risk... · Robotic Process Automation...
  180. [180]
    Swift to Add Blockchain-Based Ledger to Its Infrastructure Stack in ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · Swift today announces that it will add a blockchain-based shared ledger to its technology infrastructure, a pivotal step for global finance ...Missing: BaaS | Show results with:BaaS
  181. [181]
    How Will Blockchain Interoperability Impact Enterprise Adoption in ...
    Rating 4.6 (599) In the next few years, the blockchain interoperability market is expected to grow at a rate of 28.30% per year, rising from USD 0.83 billion in 2025 to USD 7.90 ...
  182. [182]
  183. [183]
    The Role of Edge Computing in Reducing Latency for Financial ...
    Apr 5, 2025 · Edge computing is a promising solution that helps reduce latency and ensures faster, more accurate financial transactions.
  184. [184]
    Edge Use Cases for Financial Services - STL Partners
    Edge computing greatly reduces this “last mile” latency by processing data locally to reduce bottlenecks, allowing for quicker data distribution. This is ...
  185. [185]
    Edge to Cloud Computing in Finance | OTAVA
    May 23, 2025 · Edge Computing​​ This dramatically reduces latency, increases reliability, and avoids the risks of transmitting sensitive data across networks. ...
  186. [186]
    Labor Cost Savings from Automation: Stat Breakdown | PatentPC
    Oct 1, 2025 · Companies implementing robotic process automation (RPA) achieve an average of 25–50% labor cost savings. RPA isn't just for large ...
  187. [187]
    AI Cost Reduction Through Business Process Automation in 2025
    Mar 6, 2025 · According to a McKinsey report, companies that adopt AI and automation solutions reduce operational costs by 20–30% and improve efficiency by ...
  188. [188]
    How generative AI can help banks manage risk and compliance
    Mar 1, 2024 · Generative AI could fundamentally change financial institutions' risk management by automating, accelerating, and enhancing everything from compliance to ...
  189. [189]
    After Synapse Collapse and Evolve Bank Action, U.S. Banks ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · Federal crackdown on fintech partnerships prompts renewed focus on strategy, structure, and oversight.
  190. [190]
    Bankers Say BaaS Turmoil Primes Future Growth
    Mar 4, 2024 · With regulators upping their expectations for banking as a service this year, bankers are assessing what the future looks like for BaaS.
  191. [191]
    Enforcement numbers are telling: BaaS crackdown picked up ... - BAI
    Apr 18, 2024 · Supervisory scrutiny has also intensified in the wake of 2023's Silicon Valley Bank and other high-profile regional bank failures. The size ...
  192. [192]
    Fintech and Financial Regulation: Current State of Development and ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · Undoubtedly, overly strict financial regulation will have a certain inhibiting effect on the innovation vigor of fintech enterprises. Strict ...
  193. [193]
    Heightened Regulation Is Making BaaS a Risky Proposition - PCBB
    Dec 2, 2024 · Summary: As regulatory oversight of BaaS increases, CFIs need to be aware of the risks in their third-party relationships.Missing: heavily light
  194. [194]
    FINTECH and Light-Touch Regulation
    Aug 29, 2017 · Most economists agree that unregulated businesses generally serve consumers and the economy best if markets are competitive. But banking in most ...
  195. [195]
    [PDF] Decentralized Markets and Self-Regulation
    Building on market expertise, the proposed SROs would promote regulatory efficiency, improve digital asset trading, reduce the costs of coordination among ...
  196. [196]
    [PDF] Self-regulation in Emerging and Innovative Industries
    Our case studies show that a variety of innovative, emerging industries rely on self-regulation to provide an important balance of certainty and flexibility; ...<|separator|>
  197. [197]
    Digital Currency Industry Self-Regulation: Not All Consensus is ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · These studies suggest that too much market concentration and too much competition both diminish the possibility for self-regulation in the interest of ...