Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chagai-I

Chagai-I was the codename for Pakistan's first series of underground nuclear weapons tests, conducted on 28 May 1998 with five simultaneous detonations and followed by one additional test on 30 May 1998, in horizontal shafts within the Ras Koh Hills of Balochistan Province's Chagai District. These tests, overseen by the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, demonstrated the functionality of Pakistan's boosted fission devices and established it as the world's seventh confirmed nuclear-armed state. The detonations occurred in direct response to India's tests earlier that month, escalating the regional and prompting immediate international condemnation alongside from the and other nations. Pakistan officially claimed aggregate yields of up to 40 kilotons for the initial five devices and 18 kilotons for the subsequent one, but independent seismic analyses estimated far lower totals—approximately 8-12 kilotons and 4-6 kilotons, respectively—highlighting discrepancies possibly attributable to device designs, geological factors, or political exaggeration. The tests' precise number of successful yields remains debated, with some assessments suggesting fewer than five distinct explosions on 28 May due to simultaneous firing and material constraints at the time. These events marked a pivotal assertion of deterrence against perceived existential threats, particularly from , while underscoring 's indigenous nuclear development under programs initiated in the . Despite the sanctions' short-term economic strain, the tests bolstered posture and influenced subsequent emphasizing minimum credible deterrence. No further tests have been conducted by since, with reliance shifting to simulations and subcritical experiments for arsenal maintenance.

Historical Context

Origins of Pakistan's Nuclear Program

Pakistan's nuclear program originated in the context of longstanding rivalry with , exacerbated by the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War, which resulted in the secession of and the creation of , leaving militarily humiliated and strategically vulnerable. In the lead-up to this defeat, , then serving as president and later prime minister, had advocated for nuclear capabilities as a counterbalance to India's conventional superiority, viewing as essential for during his earlier tenure as minister for fuel, power, and natural resources under President . The program's explicit shift toward weapons development occurred on January 20, 1972, when Bhutto convened a secret meeting of top Pakistani scientists in , directing the (PAEC) under to pursue a nuclear explosive device, marking the formal inception of the effort despite initial emphasis on plutonium reprocessing for a putative "peaceful explosion." India's underground nuclear test on May 18, 1974—codenamed —served as a direct catalyst, confirming New Delhi's nuclear ambitions and prompting to publicly vow that would develop its own bomb "even if we have to eat grass." This led to the launch of in 1974, a dedicated weapons initiative under PAEC oversight, focused initially on acquiring reprocessing technology from for plutonium production while exploring uranium enrichment pathways. To bolster enrichment capabilities, recruited in 1974 after Khan, working at URENCO's centrifuge facility in the , offered his expertise in technology for highly (HEU) production; Khan returned to in December 1975, establishing the Engineering Research Laboratories (later ) in by mid-1976. These parallel tracks—plutonium via PAEC and HEU via Khan—reflected a hedging strategy amid and technical hurdles, with early milestones including the commissioning of a small in 1972 and initial centrifuge prototyping by the late 1970s. The program's origins were driven by deterrence imperatives rather than , rooted in 's assessment that nuclear parity was necessary to offset India's demographic and advantages post-1971, a calculus Bhutto articulated in private directives emphasizing survival against existential threats. Despite U.S. nonproliferation pressures, including the withdrawal of aid under the Symington Amendment in 1979 after evidence of reprocessing pursuits, persisted through clandestine procurement networks, laying the groundwork for eventual weaponization in the under subsequent regimes. This foundational phase underscored a realist prioritization of , with Bhutto's ouster in via coup not derailing the momentum, as General continued the effort amid escalating Indo-Pakistani tensions.

Escalation with India Leading to 1998

's decisive military victory in the 1971 war, which resulted in the dismemberment of and the creation of , profoundly shaped Pakistani strategic thinking, underscoring the asymmetry in conventional forces and prompting early considerations of nuclear deterrence. This defeat, involving the surrender of over 90,000 Pakistani troops, highlighted Pakistan's vulnerability to 's larger army and air force, estimated at more than twice Pakistan's strength in personnel and equipment by the . India's "" nuclear test on May 18, 1974, conducted under the guise of a peaceful explosion, further accelerated Pakistan's nuclear ambitions, as it demonstrated India's capability to produce weapons-grade and shifted the regional balance. Pakistani Zulfikar Ali responded by declaring the nation would develop a nuclear bomb "even if we have to eat grass," initiating for uranium enrichment and parallel plutonium efforts. By the late 1970s, Pakistan had acquired centrifuge technology through A.Q. Khan's network, achieving low-enriched production by 1978 and nearing weapons-grade levels by the mid-1980s. The 1980s and 1990s saw recurring crises that intensified nuclear competition. The 1986-1987 , India's largest-ever military exercise involving over 400,000 troops near the border, prompted Pakistani mobilization and raised fears of preemptive Indian strikes, only de-escalated through U.S. diplomatic intervention. Similarly, the 1990 crisis, fueled by rising insurgency in Indian-administered —where provided covert support to militants—led to heightened rhetoric, with Indian forces on high alert and U.S. intelligence warning of potential nuclear use by , which by then possessed an estimated 10-15 warheads. These events, amid ongoing border skirmishes like the 1984 conflict, reinforced Pakistan's view of nuclear weapons as essential to offset India's conventional superiority and deter aggression over disputed territories. Throughout the 1990s, missile developments exacerbated tensions: India's 1995 test of the 150-km range Prithvi missile and pursuits of longer-range Agni systems threatened deeper strikes into Pakistan, while Pakistan countered with Hatf-series missiles and acquired Nodong technology from North Korea, achieving 1,300-km range by 1998. The Kashmir insurgency, escalating from 1989 with thousands of militant incursions annually by the mid-1990s, strained bilateral relations further, as India accused Pakistan of state-sponsored terrorism, leading to increased military deployments along the Line of Control. Pakistan's program matured into a de facto arsenal by the early 1990s, with cold tests of devices, but untested status left deterrence ambiguous, heightening incentives for demonstration amid India's preparations for overt weaponization. This cumulative escalation, rooted in unresolved territorial disputes and asymmetric capabilities, positioned Pakistan to respond decisively to India's eventual tests.

Immediate Trigger: Pokhran-II

India conducted three underground nuclear tests on May 11, 1998, at the test range in , followed by two additional sub-kiloton detonations on May 13. These tests, codenamed Operation Shakti or , marked India's first nuclear explosions since the 1974 "" device and involved a mix of , low-yield, and claimed thermonuclear designs. Indian officials announced the tests publicly on May 11, declaring them successful in advancing weapon capabilities, though international seismic analyses later disputed the thermonuclear yield claims, estimating total yields below official figures of around 56 kilotons. The detonations shattered the de facto nuclear restraint in , where both and had pursued capabilities without full-spectrum testing since the , relying on a of to avoid . , which had accelerated its program in response to India's 1974 test and subsequent conventional superiority, viewed the 1998 explosions as a direct threat to regional deterrence, tilting the strategic equation decisively in India's favor. Nawaz Sharif's government faced intense domestic and military pressure to respond, as failing to match India's overt nuclear posture risked vulnerability amid ongoing tensions and India's larger forces. In the 17 days following , Pakistani leadership deliberated rapidly, weighing against the imperative of credible deterrence; on May 28, 1998, Pakistan executed Chagai-I, conducting five simultaneous underground tests at the Ras Koh Hills in . This sequence established as the proximate catalyst, compelling to abandon restraint and demonstrate parity, thereby institutionalizing mutual nuclear deterrence despite global condemnation and economic fallout.

Site and Preparations

Location in Chagai Hills

The Chagai-I nuclear tests occurred in the Ras Koh Hills, a granite mountain range situated within the of Province in southwestern . This remote area lies near the borders with to the southwest and to the northwest, spanning parts of both Chagai and adjacent Kharan districts. The site's elevation and rugged topography, part of the broader Chagai Hills formation, provided natural isolation, with coordinates approximately at 28°44′N 65°05′E for the primary test chambers. The region's arid desert climate features extreme temperatures, sparse vegetation, and minimal water sources, contributing to its low and suitability for secretive underground testing. Geologically, the predominant composition offered stability for tunnel excavations, essential for containing blast effects and seismic signals during implosion-type device detonations. Preparations for the site began in the late 1970s, with extensive tunneling—such as a 3,325-foot-long shaft—completed to house multiple devices simultaneously. Selection of the Ras Koh Hills prioritized factors including geological containment capacity, remoteness from populated areas (over 150 km southeast of the nearest major city, ), and logistical feasibility in a seismically stable zone with minimal risk of fallout dispersion due to . These attributes minimized detection risks and environmental exposure, aligning with requirements for sub-kiloton to low-kiloton yield underground tests conducted on May 28, 1998. The site's vast expanse, as 's largest district by area, further ensured operational security amid the program's clandestine development.

Engineering and Security Measures

The Chagai-I test site was situated in the remote Ras Koh Hills of Balochistan's , beneath the Koh Kambaran massif at coordinates approximately 28.7919°N, 64.9475°E, selected for its geological stability and isolation in an arid, mountainous region with elevations reaching 2,700 meters. Preparations leveraged pre-existing infrastructure developed by the (PAEC), including horizontal, L-shaped tunnels extending about 1 kilometer into the mountain to accommodate underground detonations and minimize seismic and radiological signatures. These tunnels featured separate "zero rooms" for device assembly to ensure electromagnetic isolation during diagnostics. Immediate engineering efforts for the May 28, 1998, tests commenced on , involving rapid device assembly, cable laying for firing systems, and emplacement of five nuclear devices within the tunnels, completed within five days. Sealing operations, executed by the Engineering Corps, Frontier Works Organisation, and Special Development Works, utilized approximately 6,000 bags of cement to plug entrances by May 26, preventing venting and containing the blasts at depths sufficient for containment. The PAEC oversaw technical integration, drawing on prior cold test experience at sites like Kirana Hills to validate designs without full-yield explosions until 1998. Security protocols emphasized operational secrecy and physical isolation in the sparsely populated , with the federal government overriding provincial authorities to centralize control over the Chagai area. Prior to , non-essential personnel were evacuated, leaving only the diagnostics group and firing team on site; communication links were severed nationwide to avert leaks, while the military maintained high alert status. The transport of devices via C-130 aircraft was secured by F-16 escorts with shoot-down authorization for any deviation, underscoring the high-stakes compartmentalization enforced by PAEC and . The site's natural remoteness, combined with restricted access enforced by units, deterred surveillance and sabotage, though U.S. satellites detected final preparations like cement pouring on May 27.

Decision and Execution

Political and Strategic Deliberations

Following India's nuclear tests on May 11 and 13, 1998, Pakistan's government convened the Defence Committee of the Cabinet (DCC), chaired by Prime Minister , on May 15, 1998, to deliberate on a response. The meeting included Foreign Minister and Finance Minister , but ended inconclusively amid concerns over potential . An exclusive DCC session on May 16-17, 1998, shifted toward authorization, tasking the (PAEC) with preparations despite rivalry with the . On May 18, 1998, Sharif issued the order to conduct the tests, directing PAEC Chairman Ishfaq Ahmed with the phrase "Dhamaka kar dein" (make the explosion), reflecting mounting pressure from military leaders, opposition figures like , and public sentiment demanding parity with . A further key meeting occurred on May 21, 1998, in , organized by the Minister of Industry and attended by Chief of Army Staff , solidifying consensus amid Sharif's consultations with advisors. Sharif had curtailed a to to return for these deliberations, prioritizing national security over diplomatic engagements. Strategically, the tests aimed to restore equilibrium in , where Pakistan's conventional forces were outnumbered by India's, establishing a credible deterrent against potential aggression. later articulated that the decision was "taken in the interest of national self-defence" to counter India's demonstrated nuclear capability and prevent strategic vulnerability. Internally, debates highlighted risks: warned of financial fallout from sanctions, while proponents emphasized long-term security gains over short-term economic costs. Internationally, U.S. President urged restraint in phone calls to on May 13 and 27, 1998, offering incentives like F-16 aircraft deliveries and repeal of the Pressler Amendment in exchange for forgoing tests. U.S. diplomats, including , intensified efforts post-Pokhran-II, warning of sanctions and escalation, but rejected these overtures, viewing non-proliferation pressures as asymmetrically targeted against it rather than . This calculus prioritized deterrence credibility over immediate diplomatic or economic concessions.

Test Conduct on May 28, 1998

The five devices were detonated simultaneously at 15:16 PKT (10:16 UTC) in a 1-kilometer tunnel excavated under Koh Kambaran mountain within the Ras Koh Hills of Balochistan's . The operation was executed by the (PAEC), with approximately 140 personnel arriving at the site on to assemble the devices in sealed "zero rooms" along the tunnel and lower them into position. Final preparations included sealing the tunnel entrance with 6,000 bags of by May 26, following Nawaz Sharif's authorization to proceed on May 18. Detonation produced immediate seismic signals registering 4.8 to 4.9 in , detected globally, alongside visible effects at the : dust clouds and smoke erupting from five distinct points on the mountainside, with the surrounding rock de-oxidizing to appear white. The underground configuration contained the blasts with no reported atmospheric release of radioactive material, consistent with the horizontal shaft design in the geologically stable formations of Ras Koh. Prime Minister publicly announced the success of the tests shortly after detonation in a televised , stating that had "successfully carried out five nuclear tests" in response to India's recent series, thereby establishing the country as the first Muslim-majority nuclear-armed state. The announcement emphasized national resolve amid external pressures, with Sharif invoking religious gratitude ("Al-Hamdolillah") and calling for public austerity measures to offset anticipated . Domestic celebrations ensued, including gunfire salutes and public gatherings, reflecting widespread support for the strategic assertion of .

Technical Specifications

Devices and Design

The Chagai-I tests detonated five -type fission devices, all utilizing highly enriched (HEU) as the fissile core material. These designs followed a solid-core configuration, where a subcritical of weapon-grade HEU—estimated at 15-20 kilograms per —is symmetrically compressed by a surrounding system of high-explosive charges to achieve supercriticality and initiate a . Pakistan's program prioritized HEU over or gun-type assemblies due to its centrifuge-based enrichment pathway, which yielded weapons-grade (over 90% U-235) via the facility. Official announcements described the devices as boosted fission weapons, incorporating deuterium-tritium gas injection into the fissile core to enhance and efficiency, potentially increasing yields by 2-3 times compared to unboosted designs. This boosting capability, if realized, would align with Pakistan's reported access to a Chinese-derived HEU prototype rated for 15-25 kilotons, adapted for and . Independent assessments confirm the system's reliance on precision-machined lenses and tampers, developed through testing at facilities like the since the 1980s. The test array comprised one primary device alongside four smaller assemblies, likely configured for tactical or experimental validation, with the ensemble emplaced in horizontal shafts to contain while allowing seismic monitoring. While exact tamper materials and neutron initiator details remain classified, the designs emphasized reliability for aerial delivery via aircraft or emerging ballistic missiles, reflecting 's deterrence-focused doctrine against conventional inferiority.

Yield Evaluations and Disputes

Pakistan conducted five underground nuclear detonations as part of Chagai-I on May 28, 1998, with the Pakistani government initially claiming a total yield of 40-45 kilotons (kt). The Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission specified that the tests included one boosted fission device with a yield of 25-36 kt and four sub-kiloton devices intended as tactical weapons. A.Q. Khan, a key figure in the program, described one primary device yielding 30-35 kt alongside the smaller tests. Seismic monitoring provided the primary empirical basis for independent yield assessments, registering a single body-wave magnitude (mb) of approximately 4.6-4.9 for the May 28 event, consistent with simultaneous or closely timed detonations in the Chagai Hills. Analyses using regional magnitude-yield relations, such as mb = 4.10 + 0.75 log Y calibrated for the local geology, yielded estimates of 8-12 kt (Wallace, 1998) or 9 kt with a 95% confidence interval of 6-13 kt (Barker et al., 1998). Other evaluations placed the total at 5-20 kt (Walter et al., 1998) or 9-12 kt based on Southern Arizona Seismic Observatory data. A Berkeley seismological study derived a lower bound of 1-6 kt from the mb 4.6-4.8 readings. Disputes arose primarily from the gap between official claims and seismic-derived yields, with independent analyses consistently indicating totals below 12 —far short of the announced 40 . This discrepancy fueled about the number of successful detonations, as the single seismic signal suggested possibly only two or three devices functioned as intended, potentially due to technical constraints like limited or premature shaft collapses. Pakistani assertions may have been inflated for strategic signaling against India's tests (claimed 45 total) to project deterrence equivalence, though seismic evidence from networks prioritizes empirical calibration over self-reported figures. No detections confirmed higher yields, further supporting conservative estimates from peer-reviewed seismic methods.

Strategic and Military Implications

Deterrence Credibility

The Chagai-I nuclear tests, conducted on May 28, 1998, provided empirical demonstration of Pakistan's ability to assemble and detonate devices, thereby transitioning from nuclear ambiguity to overt capability and enhancing the perceived credibility of its deterrent against . These five simultaneous underground explosions in the Ras Koh Hills served as a direct counter to India's tests earlier that month, signaling Pakistan's resolve to match regional nuclear asymmetries and deter conventional or nuclear aggression. Pakistan's post-test nuclear doctrine emphasized minimum credible deterrence, defined as maintaining a survivable second-strike force capable of inflicting unacceptable damage on an adversary, tailored to offset India's superior conventional forces and broader nuclear arsenal. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif articulated this policy prior to the tests, stating on May 20, 1998, that "nuclear restraint, stabilisation and minimum credible deterrence constitute the basic elements of Pakistan’s nuclear policy," a framework that the detonations validated by proving operational readiness. This posture rejected India's no-first-use pledge, prioritizing flexible response options given Pakistan's resource constraints and geographic vulnerabilities. The tests restored strategic parity in , as Pakistan's demonstrated capability compelled to recalibrate its military planning, reducing the likelihood of large-scale incursions under the shadow of . Empirical evidence of deterrence efficacy includes the containment of the 1999 conflict to limited engagements, where both sides avoided escalation to full conventional war despite territorial stakes, arguably due to the heightened risks posed by confirmed arsenals. While some analyses highlight ongoing subconventional tensions and crisis instability, the absence of existential conflict post-1998 supports the view that Chagai-I established a baseline credibility sufficient to deter state-on-state annihilation.

Shift in South Asian Power Dynamics

Pakistan's Chagai-I nuclear tests on May 28, 1998, responded directly to India's detonations on May 11 and 13, which had disrupted the longstanding strategic asymmetry in by overt nuclearization. Prior to these events, India held a on capabilities in the region following its 1974 "peaceful" explosion, while relied on asymmetric conventional strategies and implicit deterrence signals. The tests restored parity, positioning as the world's seventh acknowledged and establishing a framework that offset India's superior conventional forces—estimated at over 1.3 million active personnel compared to 's 500,000 at the time. This shift introduced as Pakistan's doctrinal cornerstone, enabling it to counter potential Indian incursions without risking total conventional defeat, particularly over contested territories like . Empirical evidence supports enhanced stability: despite border skirmishes, such as the 1999 Kargil conflict involving thousands of troops, neither side escalated to full-scale war, attributing restraint to nuclear thresholds that raised the costs of aggression. Analysts note that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, with initial yields from Chagai-I claimed at 5-12 kilotons across five devices, leveled the strategic playing field, compelling to recalibrate its "" offensive doctrines in subsequent years to avoid crossing red lines. However, this balance has not eliminated risks; seismic data disputes over actual yields—U.S. estimates as low as 9-12 kilotons total—highlight ongoing uncertainties in escalation ladders, potentially amplifying miscalculation hazards in crisis scenarios. Regionally, the tests catalyzed an dynamic, with increasing military spending by 14% post- and both nations expanding stockpiles— to approximately 170 warheads by 2023, per estimates—while fostering indirect through deterrence signaling. The dyad diminished 's ability to leverage demographic and economic advantages (GDP ratio roughly 8:1 in ) for coercive , as evidenced by 's sustained "poke and get away" in low-intensity conflicts without proportional retaliation. This reconfiguration prioritized survival over dominance, aligning with causal realities of where even modest arsenals enforce restraint, though it entrenched a hair-trigger vulnerable to accidents or proxy escalations.

Reactions

Domestic and National Response

Prime Minister announced the successful detonation of five nuclear devices at the Chagai test site on May 28, 1998, in a televised , declaring Pakistan had become a and invoking "Al-Hamdolillah" to emphasize the achievement as a matter of national dignity and honor in response to India's recent tests. stated that the tests restored strategic balance in , assuring that Pakistan's nuclear capability was solely for self-defense and deterrence against aggression, while committing the nation to sacrifices for sovereignty. The announcement triggered widespread public celebrations across major cities including , , and , with crowds distributing sweets, firing guns in the air, and expressing national pride and relief at achieving nuclear parity with . affirmed that the decision enjoyed full domestic support, reflecting unified political pressures from military leaders, opposition figures, and the public amid perceived threats to . In recognition of the event's significance, May 28 is observed annually as ("Day of Greatness"), a national commemorating the tests as a pivotal assertion of deterrence and . To mitigate anticipated , the government promptly introduced domestic relief measures, including a 10% increase for employees, enhanced allocations for and budgets, and subsidies for essential commodities like , , and , aiming to bolster public . These steps underscored a national consensus on prioritizing over external pressures. While the response nationwide was marked by and cross-party endorsement, communities in the test vicinity, such as Dalbandin, voiced long-term grievances over unfulfilled government promises of infrastructure and health support following reports of seismic effects and potential .

International Condemnation and Sanctions

Following Pakistan's Chagai-I nuclear tests on May 28, 1998, world leaders issued swift condemnations, with U.S. President describing the detonations as "deplorable and dangerous," echoing prior rebukes of 's earlier tests. Similar statements came from Britain, Russia, China, and other nations, expressing alarm over heightened regional tensions and proliferation risks. On June 6, 1998, the unanimously adopted Resolution 1172, condemning the tests by both and , demanding an immediate cessation of further testing, adherence to a moratorium, and signatures on the (CTBT). The foreign ministers, meeting in on June 12, 1998, issued a communiqué strongly deploring the tests, urging both nations to refrain from weaponization or deployment of nuclear devices, and establishing a to coordinate international responses including aid restrictions. The group agreed to withhold non-humanitarian loans from to and until they met conditions like signing the CTBT and resolving underlying disputes. The implemented mandatory sanctions on June 18, 1998, under the Arms Export Control Act's Glenn Amendment and other laws, terminating most foreign assistance (except humanitarian aid and agricultural commodities), halting military sales and licenses, blocking new U.S. government credits, and prohibiting U.S. bank loans to the Pakistani government. These measures, supported by consensus on delaying multilateral loans, aimed to pressure Pakistan economically, though prior U.S. aid restrictions from earlier proliferation concerns limited additional impact. Other nations, including , suspended bilateral and loans, contributing to short-term economic strain amid Pakistan's existing debt burdens.

Long-term Diplomatic Repercussions

The nuclear tests conducted under Chagai-I, alongside India's , prompted United Nations Security Council Resolution 1172 on June 6, 1998, which condemned the detonations and called for both nations to cease further testing, refrain from weapon deployment, and pursue non-proliferation measures, marking a formal international rebuke that persisted in diplomatic discourse.) Over the subsequent decades, this resolution underscored the challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) regime, as neither nor joined the NPT, and the tests fueled debates over exemptions for de facto nuclear states, complicating efforts toward a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT). In U.S.-Pakistan relations, the tests triggered immediate sanctions under the Glenn Amendment, suspending aid and military cooperation, which strained ties amid existing concerns over Pakistan's nuclear program dating to the 1970s; however, these were largely waived by September 22, 2001, following Pakistan's alignment with U.S. counterterrorism efforts post-9/11, restoring strategic partnership despite ongoing proliferation worries exemplified by the 2004 revelations of A.Q. Khan's network. This pragmatic shift highlighted how geopolitical imperatives overrode non-proliferation ideals, enabling resumed military aid exceeding $30 billion from 2002 to 2017, though periodic tensions arose over Pakistan's safeguards compliance. Bilateral dynamics with evolved into a nuclear dyad characterized by (MAD), deterring conventional escalation as evidenced by the absence of full-scale war since 1998 despite crises like (1999) and the 2001-2002 standoff; Pakistan's tests equalized perceived threats, prompting India's formal no-first-use in 2003 while Pakistan maintained ambiguous first-use options against existential threats. Long-term, this stability coexisted with an , including sub-strategic weapon development, which international observers noted increased escalation risks during border skirmishes but also incentivized channels like the 1988-established hotlines. Globally, Chagai-I solidified Pakistan's alignment with , which provided technical support pre- and post-tests, enhancing Beijing's leverage in while countering U.S.-India convergence under the 2008 civil deal; this contributed to perceptions of as a proliferator in Western assessments, influencing export controls like the (NSG) denial of full membership. Nonetheless, the tests affirmed 's sovereign deterrence posture, reducing reliance on alliances for security and fostering domestic consensus on nuclear minimalism, with no further tests conducted despite India's 1998 follow-ups.

Key Contributors

Scientific and Engineering Teams

The scientific and engineering teams responsible for Chagai-I were predominantly drawn from the (PAEC), which developed the devices tested on May 28, 1998. These teams focused on device assembly, diagnostics, and detonation sequencing, drawing on years of prior cold testing and theoretical modeling conducted under Project-706. Support came from the (KRL) for enrichment components, though the core weaponization and testing execution remained under PAEC purview. On May 19, 1998, two contingents totaling 140 PAEC scientists, engineers, and technicians were airlifted to the Ras Koh site in via Boeing 737 flights, accompanied by specialized equipment and nuclear cores transported separately by C-130 aircraft under military escort. The on-site team, numbering around 150 personnel, included members of the Wah Group (responsible for metallurgical fabrication of explosive lenses and plutonium components), the Theoretical Group (device physics and yield simulations), the Directorate of Development (overall weapon integration), and the Diagnostics Group (seismic, radiochemical, and measurements). Dr. Samar Mubarakmand, PAEC Member (), served as test director, personally supervising the final assembly of the five devices in horizontal tunnels and initiating the for detonation at 15:15 PKT. PAEC Chairman Dr. Ishfaq Ahmad provided strategic oversight for the operation, coordinating with military engineers from the who handled tunnel excavation and sealing since site preparation began in the . Key supporting figures included Dr. Tariq Salija and Dr. Irfan Burney from the diagnostics and firing teams, ensuring real-time data capture during the simultaneous explosions. KRL Director Dr. contributed to site readiness and verification of integrity, reflecting the parallel enrichment pathway that supplied the uranium cores, though PAEC led the plutonium-based designs tested. This multidisciplinary effort underscored PAEC's role in achieving functional implosion technology through indigenous R&D, bolstered by training and covert acquisitions, with no public disclosure of foreign specialists on-site for the tests. Post-detonation analysis by the teams confirmed seismic signals and cavity venting data, validating the operation's success despite international yield disputes.

Leadership Roles

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif held ultimate authority for authorizing Pakistan's Chagai-I nuclear tests on May 28, 1998, following India's Pokhran-II detonations earlier that month, as he convened key meetings and issued the final order despite international pressure and economic risks. Sharif's decision was informed by consultations with military and scientific advisors, marking the shift from nuclear ambiguity to overt capability. General , serving as Chief of Army Staff, played a pivotal advisory role in the lead-up to the tests, urging during a May 1998 meeting to proceed amid heightened tensions and troop assessments along the , while coordinating military logistics for the operation. 's endorsement helped bridge civilian-military consensus, favoring the (PAEC) team over rival proposals, though he later navigated post-test sanctions. Dr. Ishfaq Ahmad, Chairman of the PAEC, directed the scientific execution of Chagai-I's five underground detonations at the Ras Koh Hills site, overseeing device assembly, emplacement, and detonation sequencing using plutonium-based designs developed under PAEC's Group. Ahmad's leadership ensured technical readiness, drawing on decades of covert testing at sites like Kirana Hills, and he coordinated site selection in Chagai as early as the . Dr. , Director of Research Laboratories (KRL), advocated strongly for immediate testing and contributed enrichment expertise for uranium-based devices, though Chagai-I primarily utilized PAEC's plutonium path; his influence stemmed from pioneering technology that enabled production since the . 's public and internal pressure, including protests against PAEC primacy, shaped the broader program but highlighted institutional rivalries resolved in favor of PAEC for the initial blasts.

Controversies

Proliferation Allegations

Following Pakistan's Chagai-I nuclear tests on May 28, 1998, which involved five underground detonations yielding an estimated total of 40 kilotons, international concerns intensified regarding the potential for proliferation from Pakistan's program. These tests, conducted using highly produced via gas centrifuges developed under Abdul Qadeer Khan's leadership at the (KRL), highlighted Pakistan's operational nuclear arsenal but also drew scrutiny to Khan's parallel clandestine activities. Allegations centered on Khan's smuggling network, which predated the tests but raised fears that Pakistan's demonstrated capability could embolden exports of sensitive technologies, designs, and materials to rogue states. Khan, often credited as the architect of Pakistan's uranium enrichment pathway essential for the Chagai devices, confessed in 2004 to heading a proliferation network that supplied components, designs, and expertise to , , and . Transfers to began in the mid-1980s, including over 2,000 P-1 and P-2 components between 1989 and 1995, valued at millions of dollars, enabling Tehran's covert enrichment efforts. To , shipments escalated from 1997 onward, encompassing 20 operational P-1 s, components for hundreds more, and gas, culminating in Libya's 2003 renunciation of its program after disclosures revealed Pakistani-origin designs nearly identical to those tested at Chagai. received and possibly drawings starting around 1997, allegedly in exchange for missile , with activities persisting into the early 2000s despite the 1998 tests. Pakistan's government consistently denied state complicity, attributing the network to rogue actors under Khan's personal initiative and asserting that security measures post-Chagai prevented institutional involvement. Khan was placed under house arrest in 2004, pardoned by President Pervez Musharraf, and released in 2009, with Islamabad cooperating limitedly with international probes while blocking direct access to him. Skeptics, including U.S. intelligence assessments, questioned the "rogue network" narrative, citing Khan's stature—evidenced by his public role in announcing the Chagai tests' success—and procurement overlaps between Pakistan's program and exports, suggesting possible awareness or tolerance at high levels. No definitive evidence has emerged of post-1998 state-directed proliferation, but the revelations amplified global nonproliferation efforts, including UN Security Council Resolution 1540 in 2004 targeting such networks. Ongoing concerns persist about Pakistan's arsenal security amid domestic instability, though empirical data shows no verified leaks since the Khan exposures.

Environmental and Local Health Impacts

The Chagai-I nuclear tests, conducted on May 28, 1998, in horizontal tunnels approximately 500 meters deep within the Ras Koh Hills of Balochistan, were designed to contain radioactive materials underground, minimizing atmospheric release. Seismic monitoring registered the explosions as earthquakes with magnitudes of 4.8 to 5.4, causing localized ground fracturing and subsidence craters up to several meters in diameter, but no surface venting or immediate fallout was reported by Pakistani authorities or international observers. Long-term environmental effects remain disputed, with theoretical risks of radionuclide migration into groundwater via fractures, though the arid, low-permeability granite host rock and absence of nearby aquifers limit dispersion. The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) assessed post-1998 underground tests globally, concluding negligible environmental contamination due to depth, stemming, and the short half-lives of most fission products, with no specific evidence of significant release from Chagai-I. Baloch activist groups, often aligned with separatist movements, claim barrening of soil, livestock deaths, and water contamination, but these assertions lack independent radiological surveys or peer-reviewed data and appear amplified for political leverage against the Pakistani state. Local health impacts are similarly contested, with reports from Chagai residents of elevated cancers (e.g., , skin), birth defects, and respiratory illnesses post-1998, attributed by proponents to residual . However, no causal epidemiological studies confirm linkage; baseline health in the remote, impoverished was already compromised by poverty, limited medical access, and UV-related conditions like , misattributed in some imagery to . UNSCEAR evaluations indicate doses from contained tests fall below thresholds for acute or effects (under 20-100 rems), rendering such claims unsubstantiated without verified exposure metrics. Pakistani officials maintain no measurable beyond levels, supported by the tests' to prevent leakage.

Legacy

Commemorative Observance

Youm-e-Takbir, meaning "Day of Greatness," is observed annually on as a in to commemorate the Chagai-I nuclear tests conducted on that date in 1998. The observance honors the achievement of nuclear capability, viewed domestically as a cornerstone of and strategic in following India's tests. Celebrations typically include patriotic rallies, special prayers in mosques, seminars, and media broadcasts recounting the tests' scientific and political significance, with government leaders delivering speeches emphasizing and deterrence. On the 27th anniversary in 2025, Prime Minister and President reiterated commitments to and military readiness, framing the event as a symbol of national resolve. Physical commemorations feature the Chagai Monument in , a large-scale model of the Ras Koh Hills test site erected to symbolize the explosions and relocated to F-9 Park for public access. Similar replicas and exhibits appear in other cities, reinforcing the tests' role in public memory as a pivotal assertion of in defense policy.

Enduring Deterrent Role

The Chagai-I nuclear tests, conducted on May 28, 1998, at the Ras Koh Hills in , demonstrated Pakistan's operational nuclear capability through five simultaneous underground detonations with a reported total yield of approximately 40 kilotons of . These tests, codenamed Chagai-I, validated indigenous designs for devices and established the technical foundation for Pakistan's posture, which prioritizes a survivable arsenal sufficient to inflict unacceptable damage on adversaries. Pakistani Prime Minister later affirmed that the 1998 tests ensured this deterrence framework, enabling to counter India's conventional military superiority and nuclear advancements following the latter's series earlier that month. This deterrent role has endured as the bedrock of Pakistan's strategy, deterring large-scale aggression by introducing the risk of nuclear escalation in response to threats against or . Unlike India's no-first-use policy, Pakistan's reserves the option for early nuclear use if conventional defenses are overwhelmed, a posture rooted in the asymmetry of forces and historical conflicts such as the 1971 war. Over time, the capabilities proven in Chagai-I have evolved into a full-spectrum deterrence framework, incorporating tactical weapons to address sub-conventional threats like India's , thereby maintaining strategic equilibrium without necessitating force parity. The tests' legacy in fostering regional stability lies in establishing mutual nuclear deterrence between and , where both states possess arsenals capable of devastating retaliation, reducing incentives for all-out conventional war. Analyses from security think tanks indicate that this balance has constrained escalatory spirals, as evidenced by limited scopes in post-1998 crises like (1999) and the 2019 incident, where nuclear shadows influenced restraint. Pakistan's leadership has consistently credited the 1998 demonstrations with restoring deterrence parity disrupted by India's program, arguing that without them, vulnerabilities to preemptive or coercive actions would persist. While critics highlight escalation risks, empirical outcomes suggest the posture has upheld a tenuous stability, prioritizing minimalism over expansion to avoid arms races.

References

  1. [1]
    Chagai Hills - Pakistan Special Weapons Facilities - Nuke
    May 28, 1998 · It was widely reported that Pakistan's nuclear weapons test site was located in the Chagai Hills region of Pakistan's southwestern Baluchistan province.
  2. [2]
    Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program - 1998: The Year of Testing
    On 6 April 1998 Pakistan conducted its first test of the Ghauri. Pakistani media reports credited the missile with a 1100 km test flight and an apogee of 350 km ...
  3. [3]
    LOOKING BACK: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Nuclear Tests
    [3] Pakistan tested its nuclear devices on May 28. The exact number of tests conducted on the subcontinent in May 1998 remains in doubt because several devices ...Missing: Chagai- details
  4. [4]
    Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: Pakistan
    The country's nuclear program dates to the 1970s, spurred by its defeat in the 1971 Indo-Pakistan war and India's first nuclear test in 1974. The Pakistani ...
  5. [5]
    Pakistan Nuclear Weapons - Nuke
    Pakistan's nuclear weapons program was established in 1972 by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who founded the program while he was Minister for Fuel, Power and Natural ...
  6. [6]
    Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program - The Beginning
    Jan 2, 2002 · Khan initially worked under the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), headed by Munir Ahmad Khan. Friction quickly developed and in July ...
  7. [7]
    Chronology of major events in Pakistan's nuclear programme
    Feb 5, 2004 · 1972 - Pakistan sets up first nuclear power station with Canadian help. 1974 - Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto vows Pakistan will "eat grass" ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Chapter 1: The pre-history of nuclear development in Pakistan
    The political decision to pursue nuclear weapons had to wait until the end of military rule, and ultimately was taken in early 1972 by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, a ...
  9. [9]
    Pakistan's Nuclear Program Posed “Acute Dilemma” for U.S. Policy
    Aug 30, 2021 · During the early 1970s Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto made formative decisions on Pakistan's nuclear weapons program. ... ” Smith considered ...
  10. [10]
    History of Conflict in India and Pakistan
    Nov 26, 2019 · India became a nuclear power in 1974, and Pakistan became a nuclear power in 1998. Neither country has used nuclear weapons in conflict, but ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Fifteen Years, Four Crises - Brookings Institution
    These crises took place at very different stages of South Asia's nuclearization: Brasstacks (1987), before India and Pakistan had manufactured nuclear weapons; ...
  12. [12]
    Pakistan's Road To a Minimum Nuclear Deterrent
    Between 1974 and 1998, when India resumed nuclear testing, Pakistan's two-fold strategy was to develop a credible nuclear deterrent against India and to fight ...
  13. [13]
    Pakistan - The Nuclear Threat Initiative
    Pakistan first tested nuclear weapons in May 1998 in response to nuclear tests by its regional rival, India. The program owes its success in part to Abdul ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Nuclear programs in India and Pakistan
    India has militarized its nuclear program, with nuclear testing in 1974 and 1998, the accumulation of a stockpile of fissile material and the development of ...
  15. [15]
    U.S. Intelligence on South Asian Conflict Scenarios
    Apr 22, 2025 · During 1979 and 1980, U.S. intelligence was learning more about Pakistan's secret program to produce fissile material for nuclear weapons, in ...
  16. [16]
    Avoiding Another Close Call in South Asia | Arms Control Association
    India and Pakistan have come close to war three or four times since 1990 and edged toward nuclear war at least twice. The disputes have grown more intense and ...
  17. [17]
    India's Nuclear Policy: China, Pakistan, and Two ... - Wilson Center
    May 14, 2018 · As the Pakistani nuclear program matured into an existential threat, India prepared for 'catalytic' response. In 1988, India decided to acquire ...
  18. [18]
    Kashmir: Future Paths and Challenges - Brookings Institution
    Many Indian policy makers believe that Pakistan intends to use its new nuclear capability, which makes escalation to conventional war risky because that in turn ...
  19. [19]
    India conducted five nuclear tests of advanced weapon designs on ...
    India conducted five nuclear tests of advanced weapon designs on 11 and 13 May 1998 at the Pokhran range in Rajasthan Desert. The first three detonations ...
  20. [20]
    India's Nuclear Weapons Program - Operation Shakti: 1998
    Just two days later on 13 May, at 6:51 UCT (2:51 a.m. EST, 12.21 p.m. local Indian time) India detonated two more sub-kiloton nuclear devices underground ...
  21. [21]
    India Conducts Nuclear Tests | Research Starters - EBSCO
    On May 11, 1998, the nuclear testing operation in the desert region of Pokhran was conducted. The first of the two nuclear tests was code-named Shakti I.
  22. [22]
    India's Nuclear Tests - Seismic Data - Richard Allen
    According to Indian Scientists at their press conference on May 17 the blasts on May 11 had yields of 12, 43 and < 1 ktons.Missing: II details
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The shots heard 'round the world
    On May 11, India conducted three simultaneous nuclear tests at the Pokhran test range, a desert site located about 350 miles southwest of New Delhi. Each shot ...
  24. [24]
    India Conducts Nuclear Tests; Pakistan Follows Suit
    India announced two sets of nuclear tests May 11 and 13, prompting Pakistan to announce its own tests on May 28 and 30.
  25. [25]
    Anniversary Of Pakistan's First And Last Nuclear Tests - PIR Center
    May 30, 2022 · On May 28, 1998, five underground nuclear explosions were carried out at the Chagai test site, the total power of which, according to various ...
  26. [26]
    India and Pakistan on the Brink: The 1998 Nuclear Tests - ADST.org
    In May 1998, India conducted five nuclear tests, followed by Pakistan's six tests fifteen days later, which were met with international condemnation.
  27. [27]
    Impact of Nuclear Tests in Chaghai - Voice of Balochistan
    Jan 23, 2019 · The Hills fall into an arid climate zone, devoid of vegetation and water, with extreme temperatures. These characteristics made Ras Koh Mountain ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Testing May 1998 - IPRI
    a nuclear test could be conducted. Ultimately, a 3,325 feet long tunnel was bored in the Ras Koh Hills of Chagai (the place where Pakistan conducted its.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Environmental impacts Atomic Bomb Blast at Chaghai Hills
    The suitable location for an underground nuclear test preferable in the ... the Ras Koh Hills range in Chaghai division of Balochistan in the year 1978 ...
  30. [30]
    The Hidden Story Behind Pakistan's Nuclear Tests - Vocal Media
    Why Was Chagai Chosen for Nuclear Tests? Located in the northwest of Balochistan province, Chagai is the largest district of Pakistan in terms of area. It ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Pakistan's Nuclear Testing
    South Asia's security profile underwent a major trans- formation following India's nuclear tests on May 11 and 13, 1998, and Paki- stan's matching response ...
  32. [32]
    Ras Koh - Pakistan Special Weapons Facilities - Nuke
    Jul 6, 2000 · The test was actually conducted in a horizontal shaft in Ras Koh [literally, gate of the mountains, or foothill] mountain, some distance to the southwest of ...
  33. [33]
    Pakistani government statement on nuclear tests (May 28, 1998)
    May 28, 1998 · Pakistan has successfully carried out five nuclear tests. Al-Hamdolillah This was announced by the Prime Minister Mr. Mohammad Nawaz Sharif in his address to ...Missing: explosion Ras Koh Hills
  34. [34]
    Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program - The Beginning - ciar.org
    Aug 6, 2001 · Khan initially worked under the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), headed by Munir Ahmad Khan. Friction quickly developed and in July ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Pakistan - Program on Science and Global Security
    Pakistan has developed an extensive nuclear infrastructure that allows it to produce both HEU and plutonium for weapons. This includes capacity for uranium ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    6/5/98 India-Pakistan Tests FAQ - NCI.org
    Pakistan claims to have detonated five simultaneous nuclear tests on May 28 of boosted devices made with highly enriched uranium (HEU), which Samar Mobarik ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Full article: Chapter One: Pakistan's nuclear programme
    Mar 18, 2014 · Warheads. In addition to free-fall bomb models prepared by PAEC, Pakistan obtained a tested design from China of a 15–25kt HEU implosion-type ...
  38. [38]
    Nuclear Testing - Pakistan, May 1998 - Richard Allen
    In a half hour televised address at 13:00 GMT the Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif (left) announced that Pakistan had "settled the score" with India by conducting five ...
  39. [39]
    Pakistans Nuclear Tests - Seismic Data Location - Richard Allen
    The two magnitude estimates for the May 28 seismic event are very similar, using these estimates we can estimate the yield at somewhere between 1 and 6 kton.
  40. [40]
    Ten Years of Instability in a Nuclear South Asia - Belfer Center
    Some scholars claim that nuclear weapons had a beneficial effect during this period, helping to stabilize historically volatile Indo-Pakistani relations. Such ...
  41. [41]
    Nuclear Weapons and Conflict in South Asia - Brookings Institution
    The tests certainly made South Asia a more dangerous place, and possibly a less-stable one.
  42. [42]
    The day Pakistan got the power to poke India - The Economic Times
    May 5, 2025 · In 1998, Pakistan's nuclear tests, following India's, escalated regional tensions, enabling asymmetric warfare under a nuclear shield.<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    20 YEARS OF NUKES: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT? - Dawn
    May 27, 2018 · Two days later, Pakistan conducted another test, this time in Kharan, codenamed Chagai-II. With six tests done on May 28 and May 30, 1998 ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    May 1998 Nuclear Tests: “Pakistan's Finest Hour” - SVI
    Jun 4, 2024 · The May 1998 tests proved to be “Pakistan's finest hour”. The tests restored the strategic balance in the region and made Pakistan's defense impregnable.<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    The Twenty Years' Crisis of Nuclear South Asia, 1998–2018
    Oct 17, 2018 · The workshop addressed three broad themes central to understanding nuclear dangers in South Asia: how to understand South Asian nuclear dynamics since 1998.
  46. [46]
    The Evolved Security Dynamics of South Asia - Insight Turkey
    Sep 22, 2020 · Pakistan's nuclear deterrence played an important role throughout the crisis by preventing the conflict from going beyond a certain point.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Politics of South Asia's Nuclear Crisis
    The nuclear tests have not changed this dynamic; after its tests India announced a 14% increase in military spending, with possibly an addi- tional increase ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Monitoring | Nawaz Sharif's speech - BBC News
    May 28, 1998 · In his address to the nation, broadcast live on Pakistani television, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said the five nuclear tests marked a decisive ...Missing: Chagai- domestic
  49. [49]
    NUCLEAR ANXIETY; Pakistani's Words: 'To Restore the Strategic ...
    May 29, 1998 · I would like to again assure all countries that our nuclear weapons systems are meant only for self-defense, and there should be no apprehension ...Missing: Chagai- | Show results with:Chagai-
  50. [50]
    Youm-E-Takbeer: Pakistan's 1998 Nuclear Tests And Their National ...
    May 28, 2025 · When Pakistan conducted its nuclear tests on that day, the news was met with widespread public celebrations and expressions of relief and ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    BBC NEWS | Events | Archive | Pakistan carries out nuclear tests
    Jun 1, 1998 · The prime minister said Pakistan's response was fully supported by its people. He said it had been made necessary by the alleged weak response ...
  52. [52]
    NUCLEAR ANXIETY: THE OVERVIEW; PAKISTAN, ANSWERING ...
    May 29, 1998 · Pakistan responded to India's nuclear tests on Thursday with underground nuclear tests of its own. Within hours, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif declared his ...
  53. [53]
    The Fallout From Pakistan's Nuclear Tests - The Diplomat
    May 28, 2017 · Some Historical Background​​ Shortly before the 1998 tests, the Pakistani government announced that it had chosen a deserted area in Chagai ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    SECURITY COUNCIL CONDEMNS NUCLEAR TESTS BY INDIA ...
    Jun 6, 1998 · "1. Condemns the nuclear tests conducted by India on 11 and 13 May 1998 and by Pakistan on 28 and 30 May 1998;. "2. Endorses ...
  55. [55]
    UofT G8 Information Centre: G8 Foreign Ministers' Meetings.
    Jun 12, 1998 · G8 Foreign Ministers Communiqué on Indian and Pakistani Nuclear Tests. Lancaster House, London, Friday 12 June 1998.
  56. [56]
    6/18/98: Fact Sheet: India-Pakistan Sanctions - State Department
    June 18, 1998. Blue Bar. The United States imposed sanctions on India and Pakistan as a result of their nuclear tests in May. In imposing these sanctions, we ...
  57. [57]
    Why the United States Keeps Strong Ties with Pakistan ... - RAND
    Jun 2, 2025 · Although the United States was angered by Pakistan's nuclear tests in 1998 that responded to India's earlier tests, another key aspect of U.S. ...
  58. [58]
    Pakistan: Challenges for U.S. Interests
    Sep 8, 2016 · Following the nuclear tests in 1998, Pakistan announced that it would seek credible minimum deterrence. But then the Indian economy began to ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] After the Tests: US Policy Toward India and Pakistan
    India's precise motives and reasons for testing nuclear devices on May 11 and 13 remain unclear, but they apparently ranged from the political to the strategic.
  60. [60]
    https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780804784801-018/html
  61. [61]
    Dr. Samar Mubarakmand | Scientists | PrideOfPakistan.com
    Mubarakmand charged with the test teams, and was made responsible for the countdown for the detonation of the weapon. As scientist, Mubarakmand's team was ...
  62. [62]
    A.Q. Khan and Samar Mubarakmand - Arms Control Wonk
    Jul 2, 2009 · Beginning in 1983, He conducted the first and subsequent “cold tests” of Pakistan's bomb designs. He was also the man in charge at Chagai when ...
  63. [63]
    https://www.nytimes.com/library/world/asia/052998pakistan-nuke.html
  64. [64]
    Pakistan's Nuclear Journey: From Disparity to Deterrence
    May 28, 2025 · Nawaz Sharif, as Prime Minister, made the decisive choice to conduct Pakistan's nuclear tests on May 28, 1998 (Chagai-I) and May 30, 1998 ( ...
  65. [65]
    The Battle of the Khans - Arms Control Wonk
    Oct 27, 2012 · PAEC was tasked for mining, milling and refining the materials and converting them into yellow cake and uranium hexafluoride. It was also tasked ...
  66. [66]
    Dr. Ishfaq Ahmad | Pride of Pakistan | Scientists | PrideOfPakistan.com
    Ishfaq was the head of the Nuclear Physics Division at the secret Pinstech Institute which developed the first designs of atomic bombs. There, he played an ...
  67. [67]
    Dr. Ishfaq Ahmed: A love of Science for Pakistan - WordPress.com
    Apr 12, 2015 · He was instrumental in conducting the Pakistani Nuclear tests in 1998 as a reply to India's Pokhran-II tests. He also created the first centre ...
  68. [68]
    Pakistani Nuclear Program - Atomic Heritage Foundation
    Aug 23, 2018 · On May 28, 1998—less than three weeks after India's nuclear tests—Pakistan exploded its first devices at the Ras Koh test site. “Today, we have ...
  69. [69]
    A. Q. Khan Nuclear Chronology
    Sep 7, 2005 · Pre-1985: Khan's early exposure to European technology and supply chains allow him to establish and develop uranium enrichment technologies in ...
  70. [70]
    Abdul Qadeer Khan: Nuclear hero in Pakistan, villain to the West
    Oct 10, 2021 · Khan was placed under effective house arrest in Islamabad in 2004 after he admitted running a proliferation network to the three countries.
  71. [71]
    The AQ Khan Revelations and Subsequent Changes to Pakistani ...
    In February 2004, Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the former head of Khan Research Labs, confessed to the illicit transfer of nuclear weapons technology to Iran, ...
  72. [72]
    Pakistan Pardons Nuclear Scientist | Science | AAAS
    Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf today pardoned Abdul Qadeer Khan, the architect of the Pakistani nuclear bomb who confessed yesterday on national ...
  73. [73]
    "A.Q. Khan Nuclear Smuggling Network" by Molly MacCalman
    Abdul Qadeer Khan, widely viewed as the father of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, was arrested on January 31, 2004 for his key role in the black market ...
  74. [74]
    Pakistan Fires Back With Nuclear Tests | Science | AAAS
    28 May 1998 ... Pakistan has replied to India's recent round of nuclear tests with five underground explosions today in the desolate Chagai region in Baluchistan ...
  75. [75]
    The Chagai Radiation Myths - Voice of Balochistan
    May 27, 2019 · Groups in Balochistan have plagued social media with claims that the latent radiation from the Chagai tests at Ras Koh Hills has been detrimental to the locals.Missing: proliferation allegations
  76. [76]
    Misperceptions about Pakistan's nuclear tests - The Express Tribune
    Jun 17, 2017 · Factually, there is no radiation exposure in the area; neither in Chagai nor in nearby areas. Without representing the facts, he claimed that ...
  77. [77]
    Public holiday today to commemorate nuclear tests - Dawn
    May 28, 2024 · May 28 is observed as Youm-i-Takbeer to mark the day when Pakistan became an atomic power in 1998 after conducting six nuclear tests in Chagai, Balochistan.
  78. [78]
    Pakistan Marks 27 Years as a Nuclear Power With National ...
    May 29, 2025 · Pakistan on Wednesday marked the 27th anniversary of its entry into the world's nuclear club with a national holiday, commemorating the May 28, 1998 tests.
  79. [79]
    Youm-e-Takbir: How Pakistan became a nuclear power - WION
    May 28, 2025 · May 28, 1998, Pakistan conducted six underground nuclear tests in Chagai, Balochistan, that altered the strategic dynamics of South Asia forever.
  80. [80]
    'Youm-e-Takbeer' to be observed tomorrow - RADIO PAKISTAN
    May 27, 2025 · "Youm-e-Takbeer" will be fervently observed tomorrow (Wednesday) in remembrance of nuclear tests conducted by Pakistan on May 28, 1998.Missing: Takbir | Show results with:Takbir
  81. [81]
    Pakistan celebrates Youm-e-Takbeer with patriotic fervour
    May 29, 2025 · Pakistan had announced a public holiday on Youm-e-Takbeer to remember the May 28, 1998, nuclear tests at the Ras Koh Hills in the Chagai District of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    PM, President mark nuclear anniversary with pledges of resilience ...
    May 28, 2025 · The anniversary marks the nuclear tests carried out on May 28, 1998, in the Chaghi hills of Balochistan, which made Pakistan the seventh nuclear ...
  83. [83]
    On nuclear test anniversary, Pakistani leaders vow to safeguard ...
    May 28, 2025 · ISLAMABAD. Pakistan on Wednesday commemorated the 27th anniversary of its nuclear tests, which it had conducted in the remote Chaghi ...
  84. [84]
    From faizabad bridge: Chaghi Mountains model to be relocated to F ...
    Sep 22, 2016 · The model of Chaghi Mountains was installed to commemorate the nuclear tests conducted by Pakistan back in 1998. Islamabad Metropolitan ...
  85. [85]
    28 May: A Nation's Resolve Forged In The Hills Of Chagai
    May 28, 2025 · 28 May symbolises Pakistan's resolve and unity, marking its nuclear capability as a testament to self-defence, strategic balance, ...
  86. [86]
    http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Pakistan/PakTests.html
  87. [87]
    Pakistan's Evolving Nuclear Doctrine - Arms Control Association
    Oct 1, 2023 · Credible minimum deterrence is another early tenet of Pakistan's nuclear doctrine as laid out in various official statements. On May 20, 1999, a ...
  88. [88]
    Pakistan PM Sharif says 1998 nuclear tests ensured ... - The Hindu
    May 28, 2024 · Pakistan PM Sharif says 1998 nuclear tests ensured 'credible minimum deterrence' · Pakistan's six nuclear tests were conducted as a tit-for-tat ...
  89. [89]
    Pakistan's Nuclear Use Doctrine
    Jun 30, 2016 · Refraining from the use of nuclear weapons would put the credibility of Pakistan's full-spectrum deterrence at stake. India's limited war ...
  90. [90]
    Nuclear deterrence and stability in South Asia: perceptions and ...
    May 20, 2021 · India and Pakistan already possess sufficient nuclear weapons to ensure a robust, largely stable mutual nuclear deterrence. Nuclear expansion ...
  91. [91]
    Nuclear Stability in South Asia - Belfer Center
    Aug 21, 2025 · ... Pakistan suggests that nuclear deterrence is robust in South Asia. Even though the 1999 crisis erupted into a war, its scope and dimensions ...